Next Article in Journal
The Relationship of Dioxin Levels in Serum of 9-Year-Old Vietnamese Children and Their Mothers’ Breast Milk
Next Article in Special Issue
Discharge Patterns of Potentially Harmful Elements (PHEs) from Coking Plants and Its Relationship with Soil PHE Contents in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Longer-Term Exposure to AuNPs on Two Soil Ecotoxicological Model Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vulnerability to Nitrate Occurrence in the Spring Waters of the Sila Massif (Calabria, Southern Italy)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potentially Toxic Elements in Urban Soils from Public-Access Areas in the Rapidly Growing Megacity of Lagos, Nigeria

by
Abimbola O. Famuyiwa
1,2,
Christine M. Davidson
1,*,
Sesugh Ande
1,3 and
Aderonke O. Oyeyiola
4
1
Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G1 1XL, UK
2
Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Moshood Abiola Polytechnic, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria
4
Department of Chemistry, University of Lagos, Akoka-Yaba, Lagos State, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2022, 10(4), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10040154
Submission received: 31 January 2022 / Revised: 18 March 2022 / Accepted: 21 March 2022 / Published: 23 March 2022

Abstract

:
Rapid urbanization can lead to significant environmental contamination with potentially toxic elements (PTEs). This is of concern because PTEs are accumulative, persistent, and can have detrimental effects on human health. Urban soil samples were obtained from parks, ornamental gardens, roadsides, railway terminals and locations close to industrial estates and dumpsites within the Lagos metropolis. Chromium, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn concentrations were determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry following sample digestion with aqua regia and application of the BCR sequential extraction procedure. A wide range of analyte concentrations was found—Cr, 19–1830 mg/kg; Cu, 8–11,700 mg/kg; Fe, 7460–166,000 mg/kg; Mn, 135–6100 mg/kg; Ni, 4–1050 mg/kg; Pb, 10–4340 mg/kg; and Zn, 61–5620 mg/kg—with high levels in areas close to industrial plants and dumpsites. The proportions of analytes released in the first three steps of the sequential extraction were Fe (16%) < Cr (30%) < Ni (46%) < Mn (63%) < Cu (78%) < Zn (80%) < Pb (84%), indicating that there is considerable scope for PTE (re)mobilization. Human health risk assessment indicated non-carcinogenic risk for children and carcinogenic risk for both children and adults. Further monitoring of PTE in the Lagos urban environment is therefore recommended.

1. Introduction

Urban soil pollution has become a major environmental concern in recent decades. Increased migration from rural to urban areas, in particular in the developing world, has resulted in high population density and rapid increase in anthropogenic activities [1]. Over half of the world’s population now lives in urban areas [2], and this puts substantial pressure on environmental resources, such as soil and water.
With a population of at least 20 million people and an estimated population growth rate of about 600,000 persons per annum, Lagos is one of the most densely populated cities in the world [3]. Within the metropolis, there is rapid industrialization, continuous infrastructural development, and a high prevalence of vehicular traffic congestion. Incessant demand for land means that recreational open spaces can be found in proximity to dumpsites, and schools and housing are often co-located with industrial estates. Therefore, Lagos residents are subjected to an array of potential pollution sources that may have adverse effects on their health.
Numerous studies have reported evidence of anthropogenic inputs of potentially toxic elements (PTE) to urban soils. Extensive work has been carried out in developed countries [4,5,6,7]. Less attention has been paid to urban soils of developing nations, although their importance is increasingly being recognized [8,9,10,11,12]. Potentially toxic elements are one of the most studied soil contaminants because they are ubiquitous and persistent. Metals are non-biodegradable and accumulative in nature; emission and deposition over a long period of time can lead to enrichment in surface environments. The prolonged presence of PTEs in urban soils, together with their proximity to human populations, can lead to exposure via inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact [13,14]. Because these contaminants become hazardous when present in soil above certain concentrations, this can have significant health implications.
Measurement of total or pseudo-total (aqua-regia soluble) PTE concentrations in soil can provide important information about distribution and enrichment, but it is likely to overestimate human health risk because only a fraction of the total content is usually bioavailable [15]. The mobility and availability of PTEs in soil depends on complex interactions between multiple factors, including solubility, the availability of binding sites, complexation, pH and redox processes [16]. Sequential extraction involves the treatment of solid environmental samples with a series of reagents to partition PTE content into various fractions, nominally corresponding to major soil mineral phases but more accurately representing operationally defined reservoirs with the potential to become mobile under changes in environmental conditions, such as pH and redox potential. Several sequential extraction schemes have been developed and applied [17,18,19,20]. Amongst the most popular is the harmonized Community Bureau of Reference of the European Commission (BCR) sequential extraction procedure [21], summarised in Table 1. Advantages of this protocol are that it incorporates an internal quality check—comparison of the sum of the steps, Σ(step 1–4), with results of a separate pseudo-total digestion—and that dedicated certified reference material (CRM)—BCR 701—is available.
Previous studies have investigated PTE in urban soils of Lagos State. However, their scope has either been limited to a particular land use—for example, roadside soils [22,23] or soils from school playgrounds [8,24]—or featured assessment of contamination in proximity to specific industrial plants [25], dumpsites [26] or electronic waste (e-waste) processing sites [27,28,29]. Much of the work is at least a decade old [22,23,24,25] and therefore may not accurately reflect the current status of the rapidly growing metropolis. Few works have considered PTE mobility. Adeyi et al. [30] applied Tessier sequential extraction [17] to residential soils from Lagos and Ibadan as part of their study of the potential health impacts of Cd and Pb associated with the use of metal-rich paints. Oyeyiola et al. [31] employed the BCR procedure [21] in their investigation of partitioning, mobility and ecotoxicology of Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in sediment from the Lagos Lagoon and three trans-urban rivers. However, there is a need for more comprehensive evaluation of both levels and potential mobility of PTE in Lagos urban soils, in particular soils that local citizens are most likely to interact with.
The aims of the current study were therefore to determine the concentrations and potential mobilities of Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in soils from public-access areas across the Lagos metropolis and to evaluate the risks associated with human exposure to PTE in Lagos urban soils.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Lagos lies in the Nigerian sector of the Dahomey (or Benin) basin. The area is characterized by sediments of Cretaceous to recent origin underlain by Precambrian basement rocks of granitic composition [32]. The Cretaceous and Tertiary sediments include sands, marine shales and limestone. Quaternary sediments consist of coastal plain sands (>100 m in thickness) with alluvial deposits in the river valleys. Lagos is Nigeria’s most populous city and the seventh fastest-growing city in the world. Lagos State Government estimated the population of Lagos as 17.5 million during a parallel census conducted in 2006, with more than 12 million people living in the urban areas. A more recent report [3] estimated its population as 21 million, making Lagos the largest city in Africa. Lagos experiences rainy and dry seasons, with the latter accompanied by hot, dry and dusty winds. It represents the most industrialized area in Nigeria, with over 60% of total industrial activities.

2.2. Sampling and Sample Preparation

We selected 20 urban from a larger set of 92 samples collected as part of a previous study [33]. Sampling locations are shown in Figure 1. These included examples of different types of public-access areas (parks and open spaces, ornamental gardens, roadsides, industrial estates, railway terminals and locations in the vicinity of dumpsites). At each sampling location, a composite soil sample was collected to a depth of 10 cm. This consisted of 4–8 sub-samples taken 2 m apart in a square grid (the number of sub-samples depending on the shape of the area). Grass, leaves, paper and plastic debris present in the samples were discarded. Wet soil samples were air-dried for 3 days in the laboratory of the Lagos Ministry of Environment. Then, approximately 500 g of each soil was placed in a sealed, labelled polythene bag and transported from Lagos, Nigeria to the University of Strathclyde, Scotland, UK under a Scottish Government soil import license (IMP/SOIL/24/2014) for further processing and analysis.
On arrival, the soil samples were air-dried for 14 days, and then sieved through a 2 mm nylon mesh sieve before grinding and homogenization with mortar and pestle. Test portions for digestion or extraction were obtained by coning and quartering. All glass and plasticware was soaked in 5% (v/v) nitric acid overnight (general-purpose-grade reagent, Sigma Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) and then washed thoroughly with distilled water before use.

2.3. Microwave-Assisted Pseudo-total Digestion

Samples were digested with aqua regia prepared by mixing extra-pure hydrochloric (HCl) and nitric (HNO3) acids (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) in the ratio 3:1 (v/v). Each soil sample (1 g) was weighed into a high-pressure vessel, and 20 mL of freshly prepared aqua regia was added. This was left to stand overnight in a fume cupboard to allow any vigorous reaction to subside. Then, the vessels were placed in a MarsXpressTM (CEM Microwave Technology, Ltd., Middle Slade, Buckingham, UK) microwave digestion system and heated to 160 °C using 1600 W power for 40 min (comprising 20 min ramp to temperature and 20 min hold at temperature). Digests were then allowed to cool and were filtered. Filtrates were made up to 100 mL with deionised water and stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator prior to analysis. Replicate samples (n = 3) were digested, along with procedural blanks.

2.4. Sequential Extraction

The BCR sequential extraction procedure was carried out as described by Rauret et al. [21]. The experimental protocol is summarised below. Samples were analysed in triplicate, along with procedural blanks.
  • Step 1: Exchangeable phase
Approximately 1 g of soil was weighed into a 100 mL centrifuge tube, and 40 mL of 0.11 M acetic acid added. The mixture was shaken for 16 h (overnight) using a GFL 3040 mechanical end-over-end shaker (GFL, Burgwedel, Germany). The extract was separated from the residue by centrifuging at 3000× g for 20 min in an Allegra 21 centrifuge (Beckman Coulter Ltd., High Wycombe, UK). The supernatant was decanted and stored in a polyethylene bottle at 4 °C in a refrigerator prior to analysis. The residue was washed by adding 20 mL of distilled water and shaking for 15 min. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was decanted and discarded.
  • Step 2: Reducible phase
A volume of 40 mL of freshly prepared 0.5 M hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution was added to the washed residue from step 1 in the same centrifuge tube. The mixture was shaken and centrifuged, the supernatant was recovered, and the residue was washed, as described in step 1.
  • Step 3: Oxidisable phase
A volume of 10 mL of 8.8 M hydrogen peroxide solution was added slowly, in small aliquots to avoid losses due to possible violent reaction, to the washed residue from step 2. The centrifuge tube was loosely covered with its cap, and the contents were digested at room temperature for 1 h with occasional manual shaking. The digestion was continued for another 1 h at 85 ± 2 °C in a water bath, with occasional manual shaking for the first 30 min. Then, the sample mixture was reduced in volume to about 3 mL by further heating the uncovered tube. Another 10 mL of hydrogen peroxide solution (8.8 M) was added, and the covered sample was heated for a further 1 h at 85 ± 2 °C. Subsequently, the cap of the centrifuge tube was removed, and the volume was reduced to about 1 mL, with care not to take to complete dryness. A volume of 50 mL of 1.0 M ammonium acetate solution was added to the cool, moist residue, and the mixture was shaken for 16 h (overnight). The sample was centrifuged, and the supernatant was recovered as described in step 1.
  • Step 4: Residual phase
A volume of 20 mL of aqua regia was used to wash the residue from step 3 into a pressure vessel, where it was digested as described in Section 2.3.

2.5. Analysis of Sample Digests and Extracts

Analyte concentrations were measured in soil digests and extracts using a Model 7700x inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry system (Agilent Technologies, Cheadle, UK). Commercially available stock solutions (from Qmx Laboratories, Thaxted, UK) were used to prepare reagent-matched multielement standard solutions for instrument calibration in the range of 0–1600 µg/L for Cr, Cu, Mn, Pb, Ni and Zn and 0–100,000 µg/L for Fe. The internal standard was 115In. Before each batch of analyses, the instrument was tuned to verify mass resolution and maximise sensitivity. Collision cell technology mode was used for the determination of 52Cr, 63Cu, 56Fe, 55Mn, 60Ni, 208Pb and 64Zn. During analysis, a mid-range calibration standard (800 µg/L) was checked after every tenth sample measured. The calibration curves for the determined PTEs gave a linear fit with regression coefficient of at least 0.999.

2.6. Determination of Soil pH and Organic Matter

pH was determined in a suspension of 5 g soil in 25 mL of deionised water using a pH meter (SG2-ELK-SevenGOTM pH, Mettler Toledo, Leicester, UK) according to the British standard method [34]. Soil organic matter was estimated by loss on ignition of dry matter [35]. A muffle furnace (Elite Thermal Systems Box Furnace, model number BSF12/6-2416CG, Market Harborough, UK) ramped at 10 °C per min and held at 550 °C for 8 h was used for this purpose.

2.7. Quality Control

Analytical quality was assessed using CRMs BCR 143R (sewage sludge amended soil) for pseudo-total digestion and BCR 701 (lake sediment) for sequential extraction (Table 2).
Agreement between found and certified values for BCR 143R was excellent (100 ± 5%). For BCR 701, the recoveries of PTEs in exchangeable and reducible phases were 100 ± 15%, whereas recoveries in the oxidisable and residual phases were generally 100 ± 30%, except for Pb in step 3 (32%). In his review of results reported for BCR 701 over a 10-year period, Sutherland [36] highlighted other instances of low Pb recovery (<50% of the certified value) in step 3, together with the high degree of imprecision associated with the measurement of Pb in this step during the BCR 701 certification process. Overall, recoveries tended to be low in step 3, relative to certified or indicative values, but high in step 4. However, summations of the amounts of analyte released in steps 1 to 4 of the sequential extraction agreed (within ±20%) with results of pseudo-total measurement in BCR 701. This suggests that the quality of the extraction was adequate.

2.8. Potential Health Risk of PTE

Potential non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks were determined using United States Environmental Protection Agency [37,38,39,40] methods and exposure parameters recommended for management of contaminated land in South Africa [41]. Exposure assessment was carried out by calculating the average daily intake (ADI) of each PTE through ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact for adults and children (Equations (1)–(3)). Adults and children are considered separately because of their behavioural and physiological differences [42].
A D I i n g = C × I R × E F × E D B W × A T × 10 6  
A D I i n h = C × I n h × E F × E D P E F × B W × A T  
A D I d e r m a l = C × S A × A F × A B S × E F × E D B W × A T × 10 6
where ADIing is the average daily intake of a PTE from soil via ingestion in mg per kg per day (mg/kg/day), C is the concentration of PTE in the soil in mg/kg, IR is the ingestion rate, EF is the exposure frequency, ED is the exposure duration, BW is the body weight of the exposed individual and AT is the time period over which the dose is averaged. ADIinh is the average daily intake of PTE from soil via inhalation in mg/kg/day, Inh is the inhalation rate and PEF is the particulate emission factor. ADIdermal is the average daily intake of PTE from soil via dermal contact in mg/kg/day, SA is the skin surface area, AF is the soil-to-skin adherence factor and ABS is the fraction of the applied dose absorbed across the skin.
Hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) were used to estimate the non-carcinogenic risk of PTEs in soil [40]. HQ characterizes the health risk of non-carcinogenic adverse effects due to exposure to toxicants and is defined as the quotient of ADI or dose divided by the toxicity threshold value, which is referred to as the chronic reference dose (RfD) in mg/kg/day for a specific PTE, as shown in Equation (4).
HQ = ADI/RfD
To assess the overall potential of non-carcinogenic effects posed by a PTE, the calculated values of HQ are summed to give HI (Equation (5)).
HI = HQing + HQinh + HQdermal
For carcinogens, the risks are estimated as the incremental probability of an individual developing cancer over a lifetime (assumed to be 70 years) because of exposure to the potential carcinogen, CR, calculated using Equation (6).
CR = ADI × CSF
where CSF (mg/kg/day) is the cancer slope factor, which converts the estimated daily intake of a PTE to an incremental risk of an individual developing cancer [39]. The total excess lifetime cancer risk for an individual is ultimately calculated from the average contribution of the individual PTE across all exposure pathways using Equation (7).
CRtotal = CRing + CRinh + CRdermal
where CRing, CRinh, and CRdermal are risk contributions through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal pathways, respectively.
Values for all of the parameters used in the risk calculations are presented in Table 3.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Soil Characterstics and Pseudo-total PTE Concentrations

The pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.8 to 10, with an average of 7.5 (Table 4). Loss on ignition (LOI) values were low (0.07–5.0, with an average of 1.5). This is consistent with the hot and humid climatic conditions in Lagos, which typically deplete soil organic matter [43]. Findings were in agreement with previous work on Lagos residential soils [30] and playgrounds [24], which generally reported organic matter content <2% and slightly alkaline pH values.
Pseudo-total PTE concentrations (Table 4) reflected varying degrees of soil contamination, as expected, given the various types of land use represented. Samples A1 to A7, obtained from gardens and open spaces, were less contaminated than samples A8 to A20, (soil from industrial estates; A8 to A10), railway terminals (A11 to A13) and dumpsites (A14 to A20). Soil guideline values have not yet been defined specifically for use in Nigeria. However, compared with the frequently cited Dutch soil quality standards [44], more than half of the samples contained Cu, Pb and Zn (the ’urban metals’) [45,46] at concentrations greater than target values [44], whereas three soils—A10, A16 and A19—contained all three elements at concentrations sometimes considerably in excess of the intervention values [44]. The first of these, soil A10, was from an industrial estate where high PTE levels may be attributed to emissions from zinc smelting, steel production and metal foundry plants. Soils A16 and A19 were from the vicinity of dumpsites. Typical dumpsites in Lagos receive large volumes of domestic, industrial and e-waste daily, and there are also a number of auto repair workshops in proximity to these specific locations, all of which are likely to have contributed to the enhanced soil PTE contents observed.
As mentioned above, literature data on Lagos soils is limited to values for a few elements measured at a few sites. However, average concentrations found in the current study were higher than those reported in previous studies [22,23,24,25,26,30], which likely represents PTE accumulation over time as urbanization and industrialization have progressed. Exceptions were some high Cu, Pb and Zn concentrations reported recently at e-waste recycling locations in Owutu, Ikorodu [28] and Alaba International Market [29], which were of a similar magnitude to results for sites A16 and A19. Levels of PTE in the current study were generally substantially higher than PTE measured in urban soils of cities in other developing countries, such as Kampala, Uganda [47]; Karachi, Pakistan [48]; and Sunyani, Ghana [49].

3.2. Sequential Extraction and PTE Mobility

Sequential extraction was performed on the soil samples to assess the potential for PTE (re)mobilization. Results are presented in Supplementary Tables S1–S7. To check the quality of the data obtained, the amounts of analyte recovered—Σ(step 1–4)—were compared with those released by aqua regia digestion. A total of 57 (of 140) of the sequential extraction results fell within 10% of corresponding pseudo-total values. A further 63 were either 70–90% or 110–130% of pseudo-total concentrations, i.e., overall, in 86% of cases, the sum of the steps of the sequential extractions was 100 ± 30% of the aqua regia-soluble content. Only three recoveries were either <50% or >150% of the aqua regia-soluble content: Ni at site A20 (39%) and Pb at sites A1 (48%) and A11 (169%). Site A20 is close to a foundry, and it is possible that there are metal-rich particles heterogeneously distributed within it. This may also be the case for Pb at A11. As well as a railway, this site is close to a major bus depot where mechanical work is undertaken (including removal and servicing of vehicle batteries). Site A1 is an open space in a wealthier part of Lagos metropolis and not highly contaminated with PTEs. There is a relatively large uncertainty in the Pb pseudo-total concentration (17%, n = 3) and hence in the recovery calculated.
The fractionation patterns obtained using the BCR procedure are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Chromium was predominantly associated with step 4, the residual phase, in most of the samples (Figure 2a). Three-quarters of the soils studied contained more than 70% of their Cr content in the residual phase. This is in agreement with other urban soil studies [50,51,52]. Wu et al. [53] found 92% of Cr in the residual phase of urban soils of Guiyang City, China. The presence of Cr in residual forms suggests that the element is strongly bound to soil minerals; therefore, mobilization is unlikely to occur under typical environmental conditions. However, where Cr concentrations were highest, a larger proportion was associated with the reducible phase (step 2). This is worrisome because it indicates that were the soil to become waterlogged and anoxic, there is potential for Cr remobilization due to reduction and dissolution of iron and manganese oxyhydroxides.
Copper was released at various steps in the sequential extraction (Figure 2b), with the highest proportion associated with the reducible phase in most samples. The association of Cu with iron and manganese oxides and hydroxides—the target phase of step 2 of the BCR protocol—has been well documented in polluted urban soils, dusts and sediments [50,54,55,56,57,58,59]. For some samples, an appreciable amount of Cu was also released in step 2 which, again, has been reported in previous studies; for example, Szolnoki et al. [55] found 24% of Cu in the oxidisable fraction of urban vegetable garden soils from Szeged, Hungary. Because the majority of the overall Cu content was in non-residual forms, there is considerable potential for Cu mobilization under changing environmental conditions. Of particular concern is the most contaminated dumpsite, A16, where >3000 mg/kg of Cu was found in the easily mobilized exchangeable phase.
Almost all the Fe in Lagos urban soils was associated with the reducible and residual phases (Figure 2c), which was expected because step 2 of the BCR protocol targets iron and manganese oxyhydroxides, and ferrous minerals constitute a major structural component of soil. Similar findings have been reported for urban soils from public-access areas of five European cities [52], as well as urban vegetable garden soil [60]. The predominance of Fe in the residual phase indicates low mobility and bioavailability.
Manganese was found in all four phases (Figure 2d), with residual and reducible forms generally dominating for similar reasons to Fe. Manganese is one of the most abundant elements in the earth crust [57], and the hydroxylamine–hydrochloride reagent employed in step 2 principally targets Fe-Mn oxyhydroxides. Previous work on urban soils from five European cities reported [52] a similar manganese distribution between the fractions defined by sequential extraction. Significant amounts of Mn were also located in the most labile, exchangeable phase. This suggests that Mn is relatively mobile in Lagos soils.
Nickel was mainly associated with the reducible and residual phases (Figure 3a). This is in agreement with sequential extraction results of other studies, which found the largest proportions of Ni in the residual phase of urban vegetable garden soils [55], urban soils [52] and urban street dusts [51]. Similarly to Cr, the amounts of Ni found in the reducible phase were generally larger where pseudo-total concentrations were highest, and similarly to Cu, some of the dumpsite soils contained more exchangeable Ni than soils from other locations.
The reducible fraction was most important for Pb at all sites (Figure 3b), likely reflecting the element’s ability to form stable complexes with Fe-Mn oxides [50,61]. Umoren et al. [54] also found the largest percentage of extractable Pb (75%) associated with the reducible fraction in their study of refuse dump soils in Uyo, southern Nigeria. Similar observations have been reported in other urban areas [52,53]. However, Adeyi et al. [30] found lead fractionation varied between residential soils from different parts of Lagos. In high-income areas, Pb concentration was low (6–17 mg/kg), and the Fe-Mn oxide-bound fraction was dominant; in low-income areas, Pb concentration was higher (90 mg/kg), with higher proportions of Pb found in both more refractory and more labile phases. Particularly large amounts of Pb in the current study were associated with the reducible phase in dumpsite soils A16 (2460 mg/kg) and A19 (688 mg/kg), which is of concern because of the health risk this might pose if the element were mobilized under reducing conditions. Lead associated with the reducible phase can also be liberated by erosion processes of top soils and transported to a new environment, such as road surfaces [62].
Zinc was mainly associated with the exchangeable phase, followed by the reducible phase (Figure 3c). A previous study on sediment from three urban rivers and Lagos Lagoon [31] also found that a high proportion (40 to 87%) of Zn content was released in step 1 of the BCR sequential extraction. This is relevant to the current work because trans-urban water bodies are likely to contain considerable amounts of soil-derived material; therefore, trace elements may have similar speciation. A fractionation pattern similar to that reported in the current study were reported for soils and dusts collected in other urban areas [51,52,54,60]. Like Cu, the majority of Zn was present in non-residual forms, which is of concern from the point of view of potential mobilization and transport.
The relative availability of the analytes based on the average proportion found in the exchangeable phase was Fe (1.1%) < Cr (1.3%) < Ni (9.2%) < Pb (12%) < Cu (15%) < Mn (23%) < Zn (48%). Based on the proportion found in the three most labile phases (step 1 + step 2 + step 3), the relative availability was Fe (16%) < Cr (30%) < Ni (46%) < Mn (63%) < Cu (78%) < Zn (80%) < Pb (84%). Elements found to be mainly of lithogenic origin in previous urban soil studies (Fe [50,52] and Cr [4,51]) were similarly less available for mobilization in the Lagos samples; therefore, it might be expected that they would have lesser environmental or human health impact than elements likely of mainly anthropogenic origin (Cu, Pb, Zn). Where concentrations of the urban metals were highest—site A16 for Cu and Pb and site A19 for Zn—they were also more labile, which is clearly of concern.

3.3. Human Health Impact

Results obtained for human health risk assessment are presented in Table 5 and Figure 4. For non-carcinogenic risk, comparison of HQ values indicates that ingestion was the most significant exposure route for both children and adults, followed by dermal contact and inhalation. The HI (summation of HQ across the three exposure pathways) values were less than 1 for Cr, Ni and Zn, indicating that there is no significant non-carcinogenic risk associated with exposure to the average concentrations of the above PTEs in Lagos urban soils. In contrast, the HI for Cu, Mn and Pb were greater than 1 in children, which suggests that there is a risk of non-carcinogenic health effects. Among the PTEs studied, Pb was the largest contributor to non-carcinogenic risks. This is of particular concern, given the impact that this element can have on children’s development, even at low concentrations. Risk from the other metals followed the order Cu > Mn > Ni > Zn > Cr for children and Mn > Cu > Ni > Zn > Cr for adults (Figure 3). Although similar trends were observed in both groups, non-carcinogenic risk was greater in children than in adults. This is expected, given their lower body mass and immature physiology, as has been reported in many previous studies [63,64].
Carcinogenic risk was calculated for Cr, Ni and Pb based on their respective cancer slope factors (the other analytes are not considered a cancer risk, so slope factor data are not available). For Cr, a slope factor of 0.5 (the lower of the values commonly cited in literature [41]) was used because results of the sequential extraction suggested that the element was not readily available. Risks greater than 1 × 10−4 are considered unacceptable, those between 10−4 and 10−6 acceptable and those less than 1 × 10−6 unlikely to lead to any detrimental health outcomes. In the current study, total carcinogenic risk levels for children were greater than those for adults, and values for both Cr and Ni exceeded the threshold for unacceptable risk in both age groups. In contrast, values were in the range of 10−4 to 10−6 for Pb; therefore, the additional probability of developing cancer over a 70-year lifespan due to exposure to this element at the average concentration found in Lagos soils is considered acceptable.
However, it is important to emphasize that these risk calculations are based on average PTE concentrations. Given the remarkably wide range of analyte concentrations found and the fact that a few values markedly exceeded the mean for each element, it is probable that results overestimate risk for the majority of Lagos residents.

4. Conclusions

Concentrations of Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn varied markedly in soils obtained from public-access areas across the megacity of Lagos. The highest values were found in proximity to known pollution sources, such as dumpsites, but there is evidence that general ambient PTE levels are increasing as rapid urbanization and industrialization occurs. The urban metals—Cu, Pb and Zn—were generally found in more labile forms than elements such as Cr, Fe and Ni and are therefore more susceptible to (re)mobilization and transport under changing environmental conditions. Calculations indicated the presence of non-carcinogenic risk for children, as well as carcinogenic risk for both children and adults, although this is likely associated mainly with sites where PTE concentrations were highest. Nevertheless, further monitoring and assessment of the status of Lagos urban soils is recommended, together with the development and implementation of an appropriate regulatory framework to protect soil quality and public health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics10040154/s1, Table S1: Results for sequential extraction of chromium (mg/kg); Table S2: Results for sequential extraction of copper (mg/kg); Table S3: Results for sequential extraction of iron (mg/kg); Table S4: Results for sequential extraction of manganese (mg/kg); Table S5: Results for sequential extraction of nickel (mg/kg); Table S6: Results for sequential extraction of lead (mg/kg); Table S7: Results for sequential extraction of zinc (mg/kg).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.F., C.M.D. and A.O.O.; methodology, A.O.F., S.A. and C.M.D.; formal analysis, A.O.F.; investigation, A.O.F.; resources, C.M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.O.F.; writing—review and editing, C.M.D., S.A. and A.O.O.; supervision, C.M.D. and A.O.O.; funding acquisition, A.O.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.O.F. and S.A. wish to thank the Tertiary Education Trust Fund of Nigeria for awards of Ph.D. scholarships to study at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from abimbola.famuyiwa@gmail.com.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Alexander Clunie for assistance with ICP-MS and Michael Davidson for preparation of figures in Excel. We are grateful to the Lagos Ministry of Environment for logistical assistance during the soil sampling campaign.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations, 2015, Revision. Available online: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2021).
  2. Wong, C.S.; Li, X.; Thornton, I. Urban environmental geochemistry of trace metals. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 142, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Available online: https://lagosstate.gov.ng/ (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  4. Ajmone-Marsan, F.; Biasioli, M.; Kralj, T.; Grčman, H.; Davidson, C.; Hursthouse, A.; Madrid, L.; Rodrigues, S. Metals in particle-size fractions of the soils of five European cities. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 152, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Elom, N.I.; Entwistle, J.; Dean, J.R. Human health risk from Pb in urban street dust in northern UK cities. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2014, 12, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Filippelli, G.M.; Adamic, J.; Nichols, D.; Shukle, J.; Frix, E. Mapping the urban lead exposome: A detailed analysis of soil metal concentrations at the household scale using citizen science. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Imperato, M.; Adamo, P.; Naimo, D.; Arienzo, M.; Stanzione, D.; Violante, P. Spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban soils of Naples city (Italy). Environ. Pollut. 2003, 124, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Famuyiwa, A.O.; Davidson, C.M.; Oyeyiola, A.O.; Ande, S.; Lanre-Iyanda, Y.; Babajide, S.O. Pollution characteristics and health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in school playground soils: A case study of Lagos, Nigeria. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2018, 25, 1729–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Panghal, V.; Singh, A.; Kumar, R.; Kumari, G.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, S. Soil heavy metals contamination and ecological risk assessment in Rohtak urban area, Haryana (India). Environ. Earth Sci. 2021, 80, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Defo, C.; Yerima, B.P.K.; Noumsi, I.M.K.; Bemmo, N. Assessment of heavy metals in soils and groundwater in an urban watershed of Yaoundé (Cameroon-West Africa). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ogunbanjo, O.; Onawumi, O.; Gbadamosi, M.; Ogunlana, A.; Anselm, O. Chemical speciation of some heavy metals and human health risk assessment in soil around two municipal dumpsites in Sagamu, Ogun state, Nigeria. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 2016, 28, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Banat, K.M.; Howari, F.M.; Al-Hamad, A.A. Heavy metals in urban soils of central Jordan: Should we worry about their environmental risks? Environ. Res. 2005, 97, 258–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mielke, H.W.; Reagan, P.L. Soil is an important pathway of human lead exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 106, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Boyd, H.B.; Pedersen, F.; Cohr, K.-H.; Damborg, A.; Jakobsen, B.M.; Kristensen, P.; Samsøe-Petersen, L. Exposure Scenarios and Guidance Values for Urban Soil Pollutants. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1999, 30, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Poggio, L.; Vrščaj, B.; Schulin, R.; Hepperle, E.; Marsan, F.A. Metals pollution and human bioaccessibility of topsoils in Grugliasco (Italy). Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 680–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kabata-Pendias, H.A.; Mukherjee, A.B. Trace Elements from Soil to Human; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; ISBN 978-3-540-32714-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tessier, A.; Campbell, P.G.C.; Bisson, M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ure, A.M. Trace elements in soil: Their determination and speciation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 1990, 337, 577–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Filgueiras, A.V.; Lavilla, I.; Bendicho, C. Chemical sequential extraction for metal partitioning in environmental solid samples. J. Environ. Monit. 2002, 4, 823–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bacon, J.R.; Davidson, C.M. Is there a future for sequential chemical extraction? Analyst 2008, 133, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rauret, G.; López-Sánchez, J.F.; Sahuquillo, A.; Rubio, R.; Davidson, C.; Ure, A.; Quevauviller, P. Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J. Environ. Monit. 1999, 1, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Olukanni, D.O.; Adeoye, D.O. Heavy metal concentrations in road side soils from selected locations in the Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2012, 2, 1743–1752. [Google Scholar]
  23. Awofolu, O.R. A survey of trace metals in vegetation, soil and lower animal along some selected major roads in metropolitan city of Lagos. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2005, 105, 431–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Popoola, O.E.; Bamgbose, O.; Okonkwo, O.J.; Arowolo, T.A.; Odukoya, A.; Popoola, A.O. Heavy metals content in play-ground topsoil of some public primary schools in metropolitan Lagos, Nigeria. Res. J. Env. Earth Sci. 2012, 4, 434–439. [Google Scholar]
  25. Njoku, K.L.; Akinola, M.O.; Zighadina, T.M. A study on the spatial distribution of heavy metal in industrial area of Ikorodu, Lagos State, Nigeria. J. Res. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. 2012, 2, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  26. Olorunfemi, A.O.; Alao-Daniel, A.B.; Adesiyan, T.A.; Onah, C.E. Geochemical assessment of heavy metal impact on soil around Ewu-Elepe Dumpsite, Lagos State, Nigeria. Ife J. Sci. 2021, 22, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Adeyi, A.A.; Oyeleke, P. Heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil from e-waste dumpsites in Lagos and Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Health Pollut. 2017, 7, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sawyerr, H.O.; Oladeji, F.O. Evaluation of the distribution of heavy metals in soil around electronic dumpsite in Owutu, Ikorodu, Lagos State, Nigeria. Asian J. Chem. Sci. 2020, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anselm, O.H.; Cavoura, O.; Davidson, C.M.; Oluseyi, T.O.; Oyeyiola, A.O.; Togias, K. Mobility, spatial variation and human health risk assessment of mercury in soil from an informal e-waste recycling site, Lagos, Nigeria. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Adeyi, A.A.; Babalola, B.A. Lead and cadmium levels in residential soils of Lagos and Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Health Pollut. 2017, 7, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Oyeyiola, A.O.; Davidson, C.M.; Olayinka, K.O.; Alo, B.I. Fractionation and ecotoxicological implication of potentially toxic metals in sediments of three urban rivers and the Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria, West Africa. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 7321–7333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Falufosi, M.O.; Osinowo, O.O. Geology and hydrocarbon potential of the Nigerian sector of Dahomey Basin. J. Sediment. Environ. 2021, 6, 335–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Famuyiwa, A.O.; Lanre-Iyanda, Y.A.; Osifeso, O. Impact of Land Use on Concentrations of Potentially Toxic Elements in Urban Soils of Lagos, Nigeria. J. Health Pollut. 2018, 8, 180904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. BS ISO 10390:2005; Soil Quality. Determination of pH. British Standard International: London, UK, 2005; pp. 1–7.
  35. Soil, Waste, Treated Biowaste and Sludge. Determination of Loss on Ignition. Available online: https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-15935-2021-soil-waste-treated-biowaste-and-sludge-determination-of-loss-on-ignition/ (accessed on 25 January 2022).
  36. Sutherland, R.A. BCR®-701: A review of 10-years of sequential extraction analyses. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 680, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Soil Screening Guidance Technical Background Document; EPA/540 95; Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
  38. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook; EPA/600/P-95/002Fa-c U.S.; EPA National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  39. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites; OSWER 9355.4e24; Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  40. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance for superfund. In Part A: Human Health Evaluation Manual; Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment; Part F, Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  41. DEA. Framework for the Management of Contaminated Land (Part 1 of 3). Department of Environmental Affairs, Republic of South Africa. 2010. Available online: https://sawic.environment.gov.za/documents/562.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2022).
  42. Kamunda, C.; Mathuthu, M.; Madhuku, M. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils from witwatersrand gold mining Basin, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Karmakar, R.; Das, I.; Dutta, D.; Rakshit, A. Potential effects of climate change on soil properties: A review. Sci. Int. 2016, 4, 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment. Circular on Target and Intervention Values for Soil Remediation; Netherlands Government Gazette: Hague, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 1–51.
  45. Marsan, F.A.; Biasioli, M. Trace elements in soils of urban areas. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2010, 213, 121–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McIlwaine, R.; Doherty, R.; Cox, S.F.; Cave, M. The relationship between historical development and potentially toxic element concentrations in urban soils. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 220, 1036–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Nabulo, G.; Oryem-Origa, H.; Diamond, M. Assessment of lead, cadmium, and zinc contamination of roadside soils, surface films, and vegetables in Kampala City, Uganda. Environ. Res. 2006, 101, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Karim, Z.; Qureshi, B.A. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in urban soil of Karachi, Pakistan. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2014, 20, 658–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Asamoah, B.D.; Asare, A.; Okpati, S.W.; Aidoo, P. Heavy metal levels and their ecological risks in surface soils at Sunyani magazine in the bono region of Ghana. Sci. Afr. 2021, 13, e00937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lu, Y.; Zhu, F.; Chen, J.; Gan, H.; Guo, Y. Chemical fractionation of heavy metals in urban soils of Guangzhou, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 134, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, X.; Feng, L. Geostatistical analyses and fractionation of heavy metals in urban soil from industrial district in Weinan, NW China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 67, 2129–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Davidson, C.M.; Urquhart, G.J.; Ajmone-Marsan, F.; Biasioli, M.; Duarte, A.D.C.; Díaz-Barrientos, E.; Grčman, H.; Hossack, I.; Hursthouse, A.S.; Madrid, L.; et al. Fractionation of potentially toxic elements in urban soils from five European cities by means of a harmonised sequential extraction procedure. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 565, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Wu, Y.; Liu, C.; Tu, C. Distribution and sequential extraction of some heavy metals in urban soils of Guiyang City, China. Chin. J. Geochem. 2008, 27, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Umoren, I.U.; Udoh, A.P.; Udousoro, I.I. Concentration and chemical speciation for the determination of Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb and Cd from refuse dump soils using the optimized BCR sequential extraction procedure. Environmentalist 2007, 27, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Szolnoki, Z.; Farsang, A. Evaluation of metal mobility and bioaccessibility in soils of urban vegetable gardens using sequential extraction. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sayadi, M.H.; Rezaei, M.R.; Rezaei, A. Fraction distribution and bioavailability of sediment heavy metals in the environment surrounding MSW landfill: A case study. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 187, 4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yu, R.L.; Hu, G.R.; Wang, L.J. Speciation and ecological risk of heavy metals in intertidal sediments of Quanzhou Bay, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 163, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nemati, K.; Abu Bakar, N.K.; Abas, M.R.; Sobhanzadeh, E. Speciation of heavy metals by modified BCR sequential extraction procedure in different depths of sediments from Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, X.-S.; Qin, Y.; Chen, Y.-K. Leaching characteristics of arsenic and heavy metals in urban roadside soils using a simple bioavailability extraction test. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 129, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tokalıoğlu, Ş.; Kartal, Ş.; Gültekın, A. Investigation of heavy-metal uptake by vegetables growing in contaminated soils using the modified BCR sequential extraction method. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2006, 86, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gleyzes, C.; Tellier, S.; Astruc, M. Fractionation studies of trace elements in contaminated soils and sediments: A review of sequential extraction procedures. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2002, 21, 451–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sutherland, R.A.; Tolosa, C.A. Multi-element analysis of road-deposited sediment in an urban drainage basin, Honolulu, Hawaii. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 110, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Doyi, I.N.Y.; Isley, C.F.; Soltani, S.N.; Taylor, P.M. Human exposure and risk associated with trace element concentrations in indoor dust from Australian homes. Environ. Int. 2019, 133, 105125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Famuyiwa, A.O.; Entwistle, J.A. Characterising and communicating the potential hazard posed by potentially toxic elements in indoor dusts from schools across Lagos, Nigeria. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2021, 23, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of the Lagos area showing sampling points (prepared using Google Maps).
Figure 1. Map of the Lagos area showing sampling points (prepared using Google Maps).
Toxics 10 00154 g001
Figure 2. Fractionation of (a) Cr, (b) Cu, (c) Fe and (d) Mn according to BCR sequential extraction. Note that Cr and Cu are plotted against a secondary axis for site A16.
Figure 2. Fractionation of (a) Cr, (b) Cu, (c) Fe and (d) Mn according to BCR sequential extraction. Note that Cr and Cu are plotted against a secondary axis for site A16.
Toxics 10 00154 g002
Figure 3. Fractionation of (a) Ni, (b) Pb and (c) Zn according to BCR sequential extraction. Note that Ni and Pb are plotted against a secondary axis for site A16.
Figure 3. Fractionation of (a) Ni, (b) Pb and (c) Zn according to BCR sequential extraction. Note that Ni and Pb are plotted against a secondary axis for site A16.
Toxics 10 00154 g003aToxics 10 00154 g003b
Figure 4. Contribution of PTE to risk: (a) non-carcinogenic risks in children, (b) non-carcinogenic risks in adults, (c) carcinogenic risks in children and (d) carcinogenic risks in adults.
Figure 4. Contribution of PTE to risk: (a) non-carcinogenic risks in children, (b) non-carcinogenic risks in adults, (c) carcinogenic risks in children and (d) carcinogenic risks in adults.
Toxics 10 00154 g004
Table 1. BCR sequential extraction [21].
Table 1. BCR sequential extraction [21].
StepLabelReagentsNominal Target Phase(s)
1Exchangeable0.11 mol L−1 CH3COOHExchangeable, water- and acid-soluble PTE
2Reducible0.5 mol L−1 NH2OH.HCl at pH 1.5PTE bound to iron and manganese oxyhydroxides
3OxidisableH2O2 (85 °C) then 1.0 mol L−1 CH3COONH4 at pH 2PTE bound to organic matter and sulphides
4Residualaqua regiaRemaining PTE not bound within refractory/primary silicates
Table 2. Analysis of certified reference materials BCR 143R and BCR 701 (mg/kg dry weight).
Table 2. Analysis of certified reference materials BCR 143R and BCR 701 (mg/kg dry weight).
StepParameterCrCuFeMnNiPbZn
BCR 143R
Found422 ± 27137 ± 329,700 ± 12863 ± 7297 ± 4178 ± 31110 ± 10
Certified 426 ± 12131 ± 2 858 ± 11296 ± 4174 ± 51063 ± 16
Recovery (%)99105 101100102104
BCR 701
Step 1Found2.0 ± 142 ± 966 ± 8186 ± 2514 ± 93 ± 1187± 25
ExchangeableCertified2.26 ± 0.1649.3 ± 1.7 15.4 ± 0.93.18 ± 0.21205 ± 6
Recovery (%)8885 919491
Step 2Found45 ± 4124 ± 15370 ± 35 ± 125 ± 1125 ± 8104 ± 4
ReducibleCertified45.7 ± 2.0124 ± 3 26.6 ± 1.3126 ± 3114 ± 5
Recovery (%)98100 949991
Step 3Found109 ± 939 ± 7246 ± 4321 ± 0.114 ± 0.23 ± 0.333 ± 1
OxidisableCertified143 ± 755 ± 4 15.3 ± 0.99.3 ± 2046 ± 4
Recovery (%)7671 893271
Step 4Found80 ± 0.344 ± 321,400 ± 81261 ± 2040 ± 113 ± 2118 ± 9
ResidualIndicative63 ± 839 ± 12 41 ± 411 ± 695 ± 13
Recovery (%)128114 96122124
Σ(steps 1–4)Found23624922,00047493144442
Indicative253267 98.7149461
Recovery (%)9393 949796
CRM 143R certified vales are for aqua regia-soluble PTE content, except for Cu, for which only the total content is available.
Table 3. Parameters used in risk calculations.
Table 3. Parameters used in risk calculations.
ParameterUnitChildAdult
Ingestion rate (IR)mg/day200100
Exposure frequency (EF)days/year350350
Exposure duration (ED)years624
Body weight (BW)kg1570
Average time (AT)days
Inhalation rate (Inh)m3/day1020
Particulate emission factor (PEF)m3/kg1.3 × 1091.3 × 109
Skin surface area (SA)cm221005800
Soil–skin adherence factor (AF)mg/cm20.20.07
Dermal absorption factor (ABS)none11
For carcinogens 365 × 70365 × 70
For non-carcinogens 365 × ED365 × ED
Table 4. Pseudo-total PTE concentrations in Lagos urban soils (mg/kg dry weight).
Table 4. Pseudo-total PTE concentrations in Lagos urban soils (mg/kg dry weight).
Sampling SiteLand UsepH% LOICrCuFeMnNiPbZn
A1PO7.23.622 ± 125 ± 412,600 ± 485233 ± 228 ± 187 ± 15239 ± 36
A2PO105.025 ± 227 ± 812,000 ± 1310179 ± 266 ± 0.126 ± 5175 ± 4
A3PO8.11.430 ± 210 ± 210,000 ± 178212 ± 598 ± 424 ± 499 ± 45
A4PO7.00.3619 ± 18.0 ± 17460 ± 284135 ± 384 ± 0.210 ± 161 ± 3
A5PO7.00.9234 ± 1229 ± 1214,100 ± 2110199 ± 498 ± 1841 ± 12165 ± 25
A6PO6.50.1151 ± 118 ± 122,300 ± 480359 ± 1916 ± 0.257 ± 3165 ± 3
A7PO8.32.238 ± 620 ± 111,100 ± 1680159 ± 178 ± 129 ± 5132 ± 17
A8IE7.01.449 ± 471 ± 628,600 ± 4280375 ± 3217 ± 5400 ± 1541080 ± 123
A9IE8.10.17111 ± 1871 ± 860,200 ± 1060437 ± 7339 ± 5144 ± 14433 ± 37
A10IE5.84.3175 ± 12759 ± 406146,000 ± 15,6002570 ± 311109 ± 9536 ± 623240 ± 475
A11RT5.91.671 ± 16218 ± 746,300 ± 1780413 ± 1429 ± 3182 ± 10241 ± 37
A12RT7.42.094 ± 4168 ± 269,100 ± 7871220 ± 3944 ± 3321 ± 141200 ± 35
A13RT6.90.6746 ± 3243 ± 1736,100 ± 8370401 ± 7021 ± 2212 ± 531220 ± 283
A14DS7.02.6290 ± 42182 ± 6447,600 ± 3810899 ± 34139 ± 2476 ± 4880 ± 202
A15DS7.10.8579 ± 32133 ± 1941,100 ± 2730566 ± 5929 ± 8153 ± 29546 ± 6
A16DS8.01.21830 ± 7611,700 ± 1780166,000 ± 25301540 ± 621050 ± 2404340 ± 9742810 ± 70
A17DS8.30.07202 ± 3082 ± 2099,900 ± 42501600 ± 10738 ± 3102 ± 26353 ± 12
A18DS8.60.7747 ± 19108 ± 1414,700 ± 1020261 ± 7512 ± 1315 ± 45511 ± 222
A19DS8.00.16108 ± 13611 ± 15357,600 ± 5230753 ± 8250 ± 68802 ± 3055620 ± 362
A20DS8.20.08602 ± 53108 ± 2152,600 ± 53406100 ± 1750306 ± 3122 ± 7520 ± 20
Mean 7.51.519675549,60093097394985
Dutch target [44] 10036 3585140
Dutch intervention [44] 380190 210530720
PO = parks, gardens and open spaces; IE = industrial estates; RT = railway terminals; DS = dumpsites. The lowest concentration for each metal is indicated in italics, and the highest concentration is indicated in bold.
Table 5. Human health risk assessment for children and adults.
Table 5. Human health risk assessment for children and adults.
ElementHQingHQinhHQdermalHI
Children
HQingHQinhHQdermalHI
Adult
CRtotal ChildrenCRtotal Adult
Cr1.67 × 10−23.23 × 10−53.51 × 10−35.21 × 10−31.79 × 10−41.23 × 10−56.49 × 10−48.40 × 10−43.33 × 10−42.33 × 10−4
Cu2.60 × 1002.96 × 10−55.47 × 10−13.15 × 1002.79 × 10−21.32 × 10−51.18 × 10−11.46 × 10−1
Mn4.95 × 10−13.05 × 10−61.04 × 1001.53 × 1005.30 × 10−29.26 × 10−71.52 × 10−12.05 × 10−1
Ni6.19 × 10−27.70 × 10−61.30 × 10−11.92 × 10−16.63 × 10−32.92 × 10−62.38 × 10−23.05 × 10−22.76 × 10−41.93 × 10−4
Pb1.39 × 1003.56 × 10−62.93 × 1004.33 × 1001.49 × 10−11.60 × 10−66.38 × 10−17.88 × 10−11.13 × 10−57.96 × 10−6
Zn4.19 × 10−21.28 × 10−58.81 × 10−21.30 × 10−14.49 × 10−35.64 × 10−61.87 × 10−22.32 × 10−2
Values in bold indicate an HI value > 1 or a CR value > 1 × 10−4.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Famuyiwa, A.O.; Davidson, C.M.; Ande, S.; Oyeyiola, A.O. Potentially Toxic Elements in Urban Soils from Public-Access Areas in the Rapidly Growing Megacity of Lagos, Nigeria. Toxics 2022, 10, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10040154

AMA Style

Famuyiwa AO, Davidson CM, Ande S, Oyeyiola AO. Potentially Toxic Elements in Urban Soils from Public-Access Areas in the Rapidly Growing Megacity of Lagos, Nigeria. Toxics. 2022; 10(4):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10040154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Famuyiwa, Abimbola O., Christine M. Davidson, Sesugh Ande, and Aderonke O. Oyeyiola. 2022. "Potentially Toxic Elements in Urban Soils from Public-Access Areas in the Rapidly Growing Megacity of Lagos, Nigeria" Toxics 10, no. 4: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10040154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop