Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Essential Oils and Combination of Copper and Lactic Acid on the Growth of E. coli O157:H7 in Laboratory Medium
Previous Article in Journal
Food Odours Direct Specific Appetite
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensory Profile and Consumers’ Liking of Functional Ovine Cheese
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biohydrogenation of Linoleic Acid by Lactic Acid Bacteria for the Production of Functional Cultured Dairy Products: A Review

by
Gabriela Christina Kuhl
and
Juliano De Dea Lindner
*
Food Science and Technology Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034-001, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2016, 5(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5010013
Submission received: 29 September 2015 / Revised: 1 February 2016 / Accepted: 15 February 2016 / Published: 23 February 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fermented Foods and Probiotics)

Abstract

:
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers have attracted significant attention due to their important physiological properties, which have been observed in humans. Many lactic acid bacteria (LAB) demonstrate the ability to produce CLA isomers (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 and C18:2 trans-10, cis-12) from the linoleic acid (LA) present in milk or in synthetic media. CLA isomers can be synthesized in vitro by LAB using vegetable oils rich in LA. The aim of this review is to present an update on the studies that have been conducted on the production of CLA isomers from LA mainly by LAB and of the factors that influence this conversion (source and concentration of LA and fermentation conditions). In addition, this review presents the relationship between the consumption of CLA isomers and their health benefits in humans such as anti-atherosclerosis and anti-carcinogenic effects. There is considerable variation between the studies concerning the beneficial effects of CLA in animal models, which have not been reflected in human studies. This can be attributed to the differences in the doses of CLA isomers used and to the different sources of CLA. Furthermore, the regulatory and scientific information classifying the physiological properties of CLA, which serve as support for the claims of its potential as a functional ingredient, are presented. More research is needed to determine whether CLA production by LAB can be enhanced and to determine the optimal requirements for these microbial cultures. Furthermore, safety and efficacy of CLA consumption have to be investigated in the future.

1. Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry offers a wide range of drugs to cure many illnesses, and the trend is shifting towards the use of some diets or food bioactive compounds that could potentially prevent some chronic diseases, if they are taken together with a healthy lifestyle, as an alternative or compliment to medicine.
The consumption of certain fruits, vegetables, herbs and dairy products, especially the fermented ones, has been recommended as part of a healthy diet to provide essential nutrients and ease or cure many chronic diseases [1]. In the 1980s, the term “functional foods” (FOSHU—foods for specified health use) was introduced in Japan to characterize a new understanding of foods that included their medicinal properties as a way to decrease the costs to the states with regard to the population’s healthcare. Functional foods are those that, besides contributing to nutrient intake, contain substances that may be considered biologically active (promote biomodulation) and, consequently, could produce health benefits [2].
In recent years, dairy products and certain milk-derived components (e.g., whey proteins) have been highlighted as a category of functional foods. Significant functional dairy foods include bioactive milk peptides, products of fermented lactic acid bacteria (LAB), probiotics and some fatty acids (FAs). Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers are the most important bioactive component in milk fat and have received particular attention in recent years [3,4].
According to Brazilian law, the functional property of a food is related to the metabolic or physiological role that the nutrient or non-nutrient components plays in the growth, development, maintenance and other normal functions of the human body [5]. The Ministry of Health, through the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), regulates functional foods through Resolutions 16, 17 and 19 [6,7,8]. Commercialization of CLA isomers are forbidden in Brazil by ANVISA through Technical Report No. 23, 2007, which claims that current scientific evidence does not demonstrate the safety and efficacy of their use [9].
According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CLA isomers have been deemed safe for human consumption since July 11, 2008 and have received the designation of Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) under the GRN 00232 code because of scientific claims of their capacity for inflammatory suppression in the bowel and the improvement of specific responses to antigens by T cells against viral and bacterial pathogens [10].
Following a request from the European Commission (EC), the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies from European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was asked to provide a scientific opinion on a list of health claims under the terms of article 13 of EC Regulation No. 1924/2006: “This opinion addressed the scientific basis of the health claims in relation to CLA isomers and their contribution to the maintenance or realization of a normal body weight, increased lean body mass, increased insulin sensitivity, and protection of DNA, proteins and lipids against oxidative damage, as well as their contribution to the immune system via the stimulation of the production of protective antibodies in response to vaccination. The scientific rationale for this opinion was based on the information provided by the Member States in the consolidated list of article 13 on the health claims and references that the EFSA has received from Member States or directly from stakeholders. The food constituent that is the object of these health claims is an equimolar mixture of isomers C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 and C18:2 trans-10, cis-12. The Panel considered the equimolar mixture of isomers to be sufficiently characterized” [11].
As for the Canadian Food and Drugs Act, based on its definition of food and medicine, it limits health claims related to food, food ingredients and natural health products (NHPs). In recent decades, scientific research has led to a large body of information demonstrating the health benefits of many foods and NHP ingredients. Canadian health authorities have recognized the limitations of the current regulation and have begun to develop regulations related to the support of the health claims made for functional foods and NHPs, including those containing CLA isomers. For nutritional labelling purposes, mixtures of the two most prominent CLA isomers (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 and C18:2 trans-10, cis-12) are not considered trans fats. Therefore, it is not required to declare the content of CLA isomers in the nutritional information about trans fats on the label [12].
CLA isomers attracted considerable attention after several in vivo experiments demonstrated the important physiological properties of these molecules. After discovering the CLA isomer content present in dairy products and their benefits to human health, including anti-cancer [13], anti-diabetic [14], anti-atherosclerotic [15], and anti-osteoporosis [16] properties, as well as the prevention of increases in body fat [17] and their function as a stimulator of the immune system [18], these molecules have become an object of study for applications in food production.
The daily intake of CLA isomers has been estimated in different countries through different techniques, such as the establishment of nationwide food surveys, food frequency questionnaires, dietary estimates and seven-day food records. Daily consumption is very low and ranges from 0 to 500 mg for people in most of the countries surveyed [19]. Dietary supplements of CLA isomers are mainly marketed in North America and European countries as gel capsules that provide cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 isomers in different proportions.
An alternative to dietary supplements, which are usually less preferred than the supply of nutrients in foods, is the direct increase of the CLA content of food. This is a practical approach because there are no changes in the diet or its components and no increase in the daily intake of cholesterol and saturated fat. The management of the CLA content of food, such as dairy products, provides an important way to increase their nutritional and functional value and may have a considerable marketing effect by adding value to traditional products. An increase in the concentration of CLA isomers in ruminant milk is an interesting option because of their important presence in this food matrix. The natural synthesis of these molecules is from the metabolism of ruminal microorganisms and they are present in ruminant tissues [20]. In addition to ruminal bacteria, many food-grade microorganisms are able to produce CLA isomers from the LA in milk [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Because the natural concentrations of CLA isomers in milk products are relatively low, to exert their health benefits, GRAS bacteria with linoleate isomerase (a strain-dependent enzyme responsible for CLA conversion) activity could be used as a microbial culture to develop functional, fermented dairy products with increased levels of CLA [27].
In this review, we summarize the most important contributions to the synthesis of CLA isomers by LAB and the factors that influence this production. In addition, we summarize the studies that have been conducted on the health benefits of CLA and present the regulatory and scientific information relating to the classification of the physiological properties of CLA, which provide support for its use in functional foods.

2. Methods

In this systematic review, we did not use statistical techniques (meta-analysis) to combine results of the eligible studies. We conducted an extensive bibliographical search using free search engines (PubMed and Web of Science) that access references and abstract databases on food science. The following key terms were used in our searches: conjugated linoleic acid, biohydrogenation of linoleic acid, conjugated linoleic acid conversion by lactic acid bacteria, and conjugated linoleic acid health benefits. The titles and abstracts of the articles found in the search were checked against the overall criteria for eligibility and relevance, which were as follows: the year of publication, the relevance of the research question, and the citation index.

3. Literature Review

3.1. CLA Isomers

Trans fatty acid (FA) isomers are rarely produced in nature. Thus, the major source of these trans FAs in the human diet is the industrial partial hydrogenation of vegetable oils. However, small quantities of these compounds are also formed in the rumen of polygastric animals via the bacterial biohydrogenation of unsaturated FA, which means they are mostly found in the milk and meat of ruminants [28,29,30].
The most abundant FAs, with a system of conjugated double bonds, are the isomers of LA known as CLA. The abbreviation CLA is used to describe the family of isomers of octadecadienoic acid (18:2) which have a pair of conjugated double bonds along the alkyl chain. Theoretically, the double bonds can exist at any location between carbons C2 to C18 to produce numerous structural isomers [31]. There are 28 possible isomers of CLA that differ in the position (7 and 9, 8 and 10, 9 and 11, 10 and 12, 11 and 13; based on the method used for counting the carboxyl group) and the configuration (cis or trans) of the double bonds [32].

3.2. Synthesis of CLA Isomers by Biohydrogenation

In recent decades, studies have demonstrated the biological significance of the CLA isomers. Meat and milk from ruminants and their products are the natural dietary sources of CLA. In the raw materials, the predominant isomer is C18:2 cis-9, trans-11, which accounts for over 75% of the total CLA. The C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer is produced from LA as an intermediate in biohydrogenation by ruminal bacteria [31,33,34].
The lipids inside the rumen undergo transformation by microbial lipases in a process called lipolysis, which is considered to be the prerequisite for biohydrogenation. Microbial lipases hydrolyze ester linkages in the lipid complex, thereby forming free FAs. With the oxidation of the triacylglycerols to glycerol and free FAs, the synthesis of CLA begins, specifically, with the isomerization of unsaturated FAs and further biohydrogenation by ruminal bacteria [35]. The degree of lipolysis and biohydrogenation depend on the type and amount of fat received by the rumen and the ruminal pH [36]. The biohydrogenation is actually considered to be detoxification mechanism [21]. To minimize the toxic effects of LA on ruminal fermentation, ruminal bacteria uses linoleate isomerase to convert it to CLA. This mechanism may be the key to finding methods to manipulate the biohydrogenation in a predictable manner [36,37].

3.3. Conversion of CLA Isomers by LAB

The discovery of the production of CLA isomers by ruminal bacteria led to the speculation that other microorganisms may also be able to synthesize these metabolites [38]. Several studies have reported the production of CLA isomers during lactic fermentation by LAB [21,22,39]. According to these studies, some strains of bacteria were found to be able to change the FA profile of milk in addition to producing functional FA during fermentation as a result of bacterial growth and metabolism. There are important factors that can increase the production of CLA isomers by LAB. Among them, the authors describe variables such as the fermentation time and temperature, the protein concentration and the oil substrate (LA supply) [40]. Some authors have invested in strategies to improve the conversion process (Table 1).
According to [22] an LA source must be added to the medium to enhance CLA isomer formation by LAB strains. However, [42] presented 20 LAB strains that are able to produce CLA in milk (0.43–1.12 g of FA) without any substrate addition. Thus, some authors have investigated the factors affecting the CLA content during milk fermentation instead of investing in strategies to improve the conversion process.
In the work of Jiang, et al. [21], the abilities of 19 different strains commonly used as dairy starter cultures to produce CLA (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer represented more than 70% of the total CLA formed) from free LA were determined. They observed that most strains were inhibited at an LA concentration of 25 µg/mL. Among the CLA-producing strains, a positive correlation between CLA formation and the ability to tolerate free LA was observed, which suggests that the conversion of free LA to CLA might function as a detoxification mechanism. Furthermore, the authors concluded that each strain requires different treatment when exposed to certain conditions, such as LA concentration, temperature and fermentation time.
Fourteen LAB strains were screened for their ability to produce CLA using sunflower oil as a substrate. Lc. lactis showed the highest production of CLA from sunflower oil (4 mg/g fat or more) and was selected for further studies to identify the factors and processes responsible for increasing CLA in fermented milk [23]. The highest CLA formation (8.5 mg/g fat) was detected with sunflower oil (0.2 g/L) in combination with dry milk powder (6%) and glucose (0.3%) and 12 h incubation. The results also demonstrated that CLA formation in fermented milk can be affected by several factors, including the microbial strain, number of cells, incubation time at neutral pH and substrate concentration.
LAB strains (Lactobacillus and Streptococcus) and Bifidobacteria were inoculated in MRS (Man Rogosa Sharpe) broth with added LA (200 µg/mL) to evaluate their CLA-producing capacity [24]. After initial screening, four strains that demonstrated the greatest ability to produce CLA from LA were selected to test the production of CLA in buffalo milk at different LA concentrations (200–1000 µg/mL). CLA production was shown to be strain dependent at different LA levels. Lb. casei showed the highest CLA production level (175.2 µg/mL) at 400 µg/mL LA, while Lb. rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium bifidum produced the most CLA (190.2 and 90 µg/mL, respectively) at 200 µg/mL LA and, finally, St. thermophilus showed the highest CLA production (198.6 µg/mL) at 800 µg/mL LA.
Different LAB strains (Lb. acidophilus, Lb. lactis, Lc. cremoris, Lc. lactis, Lb. bulgaricus and St. thermophilus) were inoculated in a growth medium containing 12% milk powder and LA concentrations of 1000 or 5000 μg/mL and were incubated for 0, 24 or 48 h. CLA (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer) production was significantly changed in Lb. bulgaricus (from 86 to 66 μg/mL) and St. thermophilus (from 82.5 to 57 μg/mL) cultures by prolonging the incubation time from 24 h to 48 h and with 5000 μg/mL LA [22]. However, another study on Lb. bulgaricus was not able to produce CLA in MRS broth supplemented with 100 or 200 µg/mL of LA at 37°C and incubation times of 12 or 24 h [23,24].
Recent studies have evaluated the independent variables for milk fermentation to determine the best conditions to increase the CLA content of dairy products [25,26]. Khosravi-Darani, et al. [25] used a Plackett-Burman design to study the effects of seven variables (whey powder‚ grape seed oil, temperature, pH, incubation time and inoculum age and size) on CLA production by different probiotic strains (Lb. acidophilus, B. bifidum and P. freudenreichii). The highest amount of CLA (11.03 mg/g fat) was obtained with the following combination of factors: 4% (w/v) whey powder, 4% (v/v) grape seed oil, pH 6.0, inoculum size of 0.8% (v/v), inoculum age of 36 h, a 35°C fermentation temperature, and an incubation time of 27 h. The ability of different Lactobacillus strains to produce CLA from LA was studied by A., et al. [26]. The experiments revealed that Lb. plantarum had the highest CLA producing (95.25 μg/mL) potential of the strains screened. A response surface methodology was applied to investigate the effects of three independent variables (LA, yeast extract concentration and inoculum size) on CLA formation. The optimum conditions to improve the CLA production (240.69 μg/mL) were obtained by using 3 mg/mL of LA, 4 g/L of yeast extract and an inoculum size of 4% (v/v).
Xu, et al. [41] assayed several lactic bacteria inoculums to obtain CLA, in a model system containing milk hydrolyzed soybean oil. Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii was the higher CLA (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11) producer (1.45 mg/g of fat) after fermentation time. Later, [43] evaluated the formation of CLA in fermented milk products from hydrolyzed soy oil. The authors tested probiotic strains individually or in co-culture with traditional yogurt cultures (1:1 ratio of Lb. bulgaricus and St. thermophilus). In the presence of yogurt cultures, a slightly higher content of CLA was found after 14 days of storage. Lb. rhamnosus in co-culture produced the highest levels of C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 (0.97 mg/g lipid) and C18:2 trans-10, cis-12 (0.71 mg/g lipid) among the probiotic bacteria assayed. In a similar study, cow and sheep milk yogurts were investigated for changes in CLA (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer) concentration during 14 days of storage. Refrigerated storage resulted in a significant decrease in the CLA in cow milk yogurts and in a significant increase in the CLA in sheep milk yogurts, suggesting that CLA content was influenced by the origin of milk [44].

3.4. CLA Isomers Health Benefits

Studies have been conducted to identify CLA consumption in many countries. Estimates range from 0.2 to 1.5 g/person/day and appear to depend on sex and food sources (from animal or vegetable origins) [31,45,46,47]. For example, the Brazilian population was found to have one of the lowest levels of dietary CLA intake reported (approximately 36 mg/day) [48].
Several experiments have been initiated to determine the physical, biochemical and physiological properties of CLA isomers. Research indicates that these isomeric conjugated FAs have potent biological activities that have been suggested to benefit human health [49] (Table 2).
According to Ip, et al. [50], supplementation of rat diets with 0.5% C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer was sufficient to produce a significant reduction in the development a mammary tumors. C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 may be more effective than any other FA in tumor modulation. However, Ip, et al. [52] observed a maximum antioxidant activity of CLA at a 0.25% daily dose in rat diets, suggesting a discrepancy between the doses needed for effective antioxidant and anti-carcinogenic activities.
Another study carried out by [51] suggested a daily intake of 3 g/day of CLA (a mixture of total isomers with the following composition: C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 and trans-9, cis-11, 43.3%; C18:2 trans-10, cis-12, 45.3%; C18:2 cis-9, cis-11, 1.9%; C18:2 cis-10, cis-12, 1.4%; C18:2 trans-9, trans-11 and trans-10, trans-12, 2.6%) to achieve the inhibitory effects on carcinogenesis in mammary gland rats. Animals weighing 350 g were fed a diet with 0.1% CLA (approximately 0.015 g of CLA/day), which is equivalent to a daily dose of 3 g of CLA for a 70 kg person. This is slightly higher than the estimated average consumption.
The molecular mechanisms of the bioactivity of CLA have been attributed to its ability to modulate eicosanoid formation and gene expression. Very few clinical studies in humans have been conducted. Nevertheless, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown antioxidant and anticancer effects for the C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer [28]. The inhibitory effects of CLA on different types of cancer, such as breast, skin, stomach, intestine and prostate cancer, have been consistently demonstrated in most studies, which have involved different animal models and human cell cultures [52,53].
Several studies reviewed by Belury, et al. [59] and Pariza, et al. [60] have demonstrated the ability of CLA (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 and C18:2 trans-10, cis-12 isomers) to modulate the inflammatory response and restore insulin sensitivity in animals with type-II diabetes. Recently, it has been shown that the modulation of inflammatory responses by CLA (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer) seems to have a positive influence on biochemical markers associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Barbosa, et al. [62] reported a reduction in the activity of different phospholipases (A2 (PLA2) subtypes) in the rat brain. PLA2is a family of hydrolytic enzymes that are important mediators in the transmission and processing of neuronal signals and in the regulation of other active products. Forty-eight animals were fed three different diets over a thirty-day period. The findings of the study suggest that a diet enriched with a 60% CLA supplement (30% of C18:2 trans-10, cis-12 and 30% of C18:2 cis-9, trans-11) may be a potential nutraceutic for the prevention and/or inhibition of the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Gama, et al. [63] analyzed 30 rats fed with three different diets over four weeks. Treatments consisted of a CLA-free diet and two diets containing butter enriched with the C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 isomer (0.72 and 1.98 g/100 g of total fat). Compared with the effects of the control diet, the hippocampal activity of the PLA2 enzyme group was increased by diets enriched with CLA. These results suggest that milk products enriched with CLA may be helpful in AD therapy.
An in vivo study evaluated the effects of industrial trans FAs and CLA on inflammation and oxidative stress markers in 61 healthy adult subjects. The authors observed a beneficial effect on inflammatory markers and on one oxidative stress marker in volunteers who consumed a mixture of CLA isomers (80% C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 and 20% C18:2 trans-10, cis-12) in their diet [64].
In a recent study, hypertriacylglycerolmic (HHTg) rats were fed for two months with a diet supplemented with a 2% mixture of CLA isomers (1:1, C18:2 cis-9, trans-11:C18:2 trans-10, cis-12) or with sunflower oil (control group). CLA-treated rats showed a decrease in body and visceral adipose weight and a reduction in triacylglycerol accumulation in the serum liver, heart, muscle and aorta. In addition, compared with the effects in the control rats, CLA treatment resulted in an increase in insulin sensitivity. In this study, the authors concluded that CLA supplementation may protect against HHTg-induced dyslipidaemia, ectopic lipid deposition and insulin resistance [14].
De Guire, et al. [16] demonstrated an association between the CLA content of erythrocyte membranes (RBC) and body composition and bone mineral density. Fifty-four men (age 19–53 years) were tested in a cross-sectional study to examine the association between the C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 content of RBC membranes and body composition. The study used a dose-response trial and randomized the subjects to 1 of 3 groups: placebo, 1.5 g/day or 3.0 g/day of CLA over a 16-week period. Bone mineral density was significantly higher in the group receiving 3.0 g of CLA compared with that of the group receiving 1.5 g, whereas the placebo group was not different from any other group.
Studies on obese individuals have proposed that a dose of 3.0 to 4.2 g/day of CLA may result in a loss of body fat in humans [54,55,56,57,58,61]. However, although the C18:2 trans-10, cis-12 isomer has been associated with anti-adipogenic effects in humans, the results are less significant and more ambiguous compared with those observed in other animals [65]. Nevertheless, scientists researching this topic believe, when the body of evidence is considered as a whole, that C18:2 trans-10, cis-12 does have a beneficial effect on human body composition if it is consumed over time and that it does not appear to result in any adverse effects [57,66].

4. Conclusions

Milk and its individual components in their intact or hydrolyzed forms may be considered to be a complete nutritional food, and its bioactive compounds may be considered to be functional ingredients. With the growing number of consumers aware of the importance of the consumption of functional foods in maintaining health, the importance of dairy products as a relevant source of bioactive compounds is clear. The use of LAB and Bifidobacteria in the production of CLA isomers contributes to the increased functional potential of milk because the incorporation of these strains, among its other benefits, allows for an increase in the CLA isomer content of fermented dairy products. More research is needed to assess if CLA production by LAB can be enhanced and to determine the optimal requirements for these microbial cultures. Fermented milk products can be naturally enriched with CLA isomers, providing synchronization between diet and health and promoting new opportunities for the dairy market. The current state of our knowledge is limited with regard to the effects of CLA isomers in humans. Adverse effects still were not described about CLA consumption, other questions related to the safety and efficacy have to be answered such as for example, oxidative stress, insulin resistance and irritation of intestinal tract. Furthermore, there are considerable variations between the studies concerning the beneficial effects of CLA in animal models, which have not been reflected in human studies. There is need to conduct more human studies with large number of participants with and without comorbitities and higher CLA intake intervals.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Capes for the scholarship.

Author Contributions

G.C.K. contributed to the acquisition of the data and wrote the manuscript. J.D.L. contributed to the design of the review and revised the manuscript. All authors provided input on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alhaj, O.A.; Kanekanian, A. Milk and Dairy Products as Functional Foods; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2014; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  2. De Dea Lindner, J.; Penna, A.L.B.; Demiate, I.M.; Yamaguishi, C.T.; Prado, M.R.M.; Parada, J.L. Fermented Foods and Human Health Benefits of Fermented Functional Foods. In Fermentation Processes Engineering in the Food Industry, 1st ed.; Soccol, C.R., Pandey, A., Larroche, C., Eds.; CRC Press: Bosa Roca, FL, USA, 2013; Volume 1, pp. 263–297. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alhaj, O.A.; Kanekanian, A. Milk and Dairy Products as Functional Foods; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2014; pp. 237–288. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernández, M.; Hudson, J.A.; Korpela, R.; de los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G. Impact on human health of microorganisms present in fermented dairy products: An overview. Bio. Med. Res. Int. 2015, 41, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Brazil. Resolução n. 18, de 30 de abril de 1999. Aprova o Regulamento Técnico que Estabelece as Diretrizes Básicas para Análise e Comprovação de Propriedades Funcionais e ou de Saúde Alegadas em Rotulagem de Alimentos; Diário Oficial da União, Poder Executivo: Brazil, 03 maio 1999. Available online: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/815ada0047458a7293e3d73fbc4c6735/RESOLUCAO_18_1999.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (accessed on 22 Februray 2016).
  6. Brazil. Resolução n. 16, de 30 de abril de 1999. Aprova o Regulamento Técnico de Procedimentos para Registro de Alimentos e ou Novos Ingredientes; Diário Oficial da União, Poder Executivo: Brazil, 03 maio 1999. Available online: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/96fa548047458ef597fdd73fbc4c6735/RESOLUCAO_16_1999.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (accessed on 22 Februray 2016).
  7. Brazil. Resolução n. 17, de 30 de abril de 1999. Aprova o Regulamento Técnico que Estabelece as Diretrizes Básicas para Avaliação de Risco e Segurança dos Alimentos; Diário Oficial da União, Poder Executivo: Brazil, 03 maio 1999. Available online: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/ea58f88047457ce3895cdd3fbc4c6735/RESOLUCAO_17_1999.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (accessed on 22 Februray 2016).
  8. Brazil. Resolução n. 19, de 30 de abril de 1999. Aprova o Regulamento Técnico de Procedimentos para Registro de Alimento com Alegação de Propriedades Funcionais e ou de Saúde em sua Rotulagem; Diário Oficial da União, Poder Executivo: Brazil, 3 de maio de 1999. Available online: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/727a7f004745792d8641d63fbc4c6735/RESOLUCAO_19_1999.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (accessed on 22 Februray 2016).
  9. Brazil. Informe Técnico n. 23, de 17 de abril de 2007. In Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Gerência Geral de Alimentos Gerência de Produtos Especiais; Esclarecimentos sobre as avaliações de segurança do ácido linoleico conjugado (CLA); ANVISA: Brasília, 28 Ministério da Saúde 2007. Available online: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/47c169804eb542de862b868a610f4177/Informe+T%C3%A9cnico+sobre+CLA.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (accessed on 22 Februray 2016).
  10. Bassaganya-Riera, J.; Hontecillas, R. Dietary CLA and n-3 PUFA in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2010, 13, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers and contribution to the maintenance or achievement of a normal body weight (ID 686, 726, 1516, 1518, 2892, 3165), increase in lean body mass (ID 498, 731), increase in insulin sensitivity (ID 1517), protection of DNA, proteins and lipids from oxidative damage (ID 564, 1937), and contribution to immune defences by stimulation of production of protective antibodies in response to vaccination (ID 687, 1519) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1794. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitzpatrick, K.C. Regulatory issues related to functional foods and natural health products in Canada: Possible implications for manufacturers of conjugated linoleic acid. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 1217–1220. [Google Scholar]
  13. Thuillier, P.; Pande, N.T.; Ghena, A.; Song, S.; Lawrence, Y.; Shridhar, V.; Akkari, Y.; Pejovic, T.; Olson, S. Dietary conjugated linoleic acids arrest cell cycle progression and prevent ovarian cancer xenografts growth suggesting a trans-10 cis-12 isoform specific activity. J. Cancer Ther. 2013, 4, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Malinska, H.; Hüttl, M.; Oliyarnyk, O.; Bratova, M.; Kazdova, L. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces visceral and ectopic lipid accumulation and insulin resistance in chronic severe hypertriglyceridemia. Nutrition 2015, 31, 1045–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stachowska, E.; Siennicka, A.; Baśkiewcz-Hałasa, M.; Bober, J.; Machalinski, B.; Chlubek, D. Conjugated linoleic acid isomers may diminish human macrophages adhesion to endothelial surface. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 63, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. DeGuire, J.R.; Makarem, N.; Vanstone, C.A.; Morin, S.; Duque, G.; Weiler, H.A. Conjugated linoleic acid is related to bone mineral density but does not affect parathyroid hormone in men. Nutr. Res. 2012, 32, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, S.C.; Lin, Y.H.; Huang, H.P.; Hsu, W.L.; Houng, J.Y.; Huang, C.K. Effect of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on weight loss and body fat composition in a Chinese population. Nutrition 2012, 28, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bassaganya-Riera, J.; Hontecillas, R.; Horne, W.T.; Sandridge, M.; Herfarth, H.H.; Bloomfeld, R.; Isaacs, K.L. Conjugated linoleic acid modulates immune responses in patients with mild to moderately active Crohn’s disease. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 31, 721–727. [Google Scholar]
  19. Block, J.M.; Barrera-Arellano, D. Temas Selectos en Aceites y Grasas: Procesamiento; Blucher: São Paulo, Brazil, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bomfim, M.A.D.; Queiroga, R.C.E.; Aguila, M.B.; Medeiros, M.D.C.; Fisberg, M.; Rodrigues, M.T.; Lanna, D.P.D. Abordagem multidisciplinar de P, D & I para o desenvolvimento de produto lácteo caprino com alto teor de CLA e alegação de propriedade funcional. R. Bras. Zootec. 2011, 40, 98–106. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang, J.; Björck, L.; Fonden, R. Production of conjugated linoleic acid by dairy starter cultures. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 85, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lin, T.Y.; Lin, C.W.; Lee, C.H. Conjugated linoleic acid concentration as affected by lactic cultures and added linoleic acid. Food Chem. 1999, 67, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, Y.J.; Liu, R.H. Increase of conjugated linoleic acid content in milk by fermentation with lactic acid bacteria. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1731–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Van Nieuwenhove, C.P.; Oliszewski, R.; González, S.N.; Perez Chaia, A.B. Conjugated linoleic acid conversion by dairy bacteria cultured in MRS broth and buffalo milk. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Khosravi-Darani, K.; Reihani, F.S.; Feili, R. Bioproduction of conjugated linoleic acid in yogurt by probiotic bacteria. Int. J. Biotechnol. Wellness Ind. 2014, 3, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khosravi, A.; Safari, M.; Khodaiyan, F.; Gharibzahedi, S.M.T. Bioconversion enhancement of conjugated linoleic acid by Lactobacillus plantarum using the culture media manipulation and numerical optimization. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 5781–5789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gorissen, L.; Leroy, F.; de Vuyst, L.; de Smet, S.; Raes, K. Bacterial production of conjugated linoleic and linolenic acid in foods: A technological challenge. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 1561–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Damodaran, S.; Parkin, K.; Fennema, O. R. Química de Alimentos de Fennema, 4th ed.; Artmed: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  29. Motard-Bélanger, A.; Charest, A.; Grenier, G.; Paquin, P.; Chouinard, Y.; Lemieux, S.; Couture, P.; Lamarche, B. Study of the effect of trans fatty acids from ruminants on blood lipids and other risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Pinho, D.M.M.; Suarez, P.A.Z. A hidrogenação de óleos e gorduras e suas aplicações industriais. Rev. Virtual Quim. 2013, 5, 47–62. [Google Scholar]
  31. Akoh, C.C.; Min, D.B. Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology, 3rd ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tvrzicka, E.; Kremmyda, L.S.; Stankova, B.; Zak, A. Fatty acids as biocompounds: Their role in human metabolism, health and disease—A review. Part 1: Classification, dietary sources and biological functions. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky. Olomouc Czech. Repub. 2011, 155, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lin, H.; Boylston, T.D.; Chang, M.J.; Luedecke, L.O.; Shultz, T.D. Survey of the conjugated linoleic acid contents of dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78, 2358–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kepler, C.R.; Hirons, K.P.; McNeill, J.J.; Tove, S.B. Intermediates and products of the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. J. Biol. Chem. 1966, 241, 1350–1354. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. De Holanda, M.A.C.; de Holanda, M.C.R.; Mendonça, A., Jr. Suplementação dietética de lipídios na concentração de ácido linoleico conjugado na gordura do leite. Acta Vet. Bras. 2012, 5, 221–229. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jenkins, T.C.; Wallace, R.J.; Moate, P.J.; Mosley, E.E. Board-invited review: Recent advances in biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids within the rumen microbial ecosystem. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Parodi, P.W. Conjugated linoleic acid and other anticarcinogenic agents of bovine milk fat. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82, 1339–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lucatto, J.N.; de Mendonça, S.N.T.G.; Drunkler, D.A. Ácido linoleico conjugado: estrutura química, efeitos sobre a saúde humana e análise em lácteos. Rev. Inst. Latic. Cândido Tostes 2014, 69, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kishino, S.; Ogawa, J.; Omura, Y.; Matsumura, K.; Shimizu, S. Conjugated linoleic acid production from linoleic acid by lactic acid bacteria. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2002, 79, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Terán, V.; Pizarro, P.L.; Zacarías, M.F.; Vinderola, G.; Medina, R.; van Nieuwenhove, C. Production of conjugated dienoic and trienoic fatty acids by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 19, 417–425. [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu, S.; Boylston, T.D.; Glatz, B.A. Effect of lipid source on probiotic bacteria and conjugated linoleic acid formation in milk model systems. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2004, 81, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pandit, A.; Anand, S.; Kalscheur, K.; Hassan, A. Production of conjugated linoleic acid by lactic acid bacteria in milk without any additional substrate. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2012, 65, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, S.; Boylston, T.D.; Glatz, B.A. Conjugated linoleic acid content and organoleptic attributes of fermented milk products produced with probiotic bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9064–9072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Serafeimidou, A.; Zlatanos, S.; Kritikos, G.; Tourianis, A. Change of fatty acid profile, including conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) content, during refrigerated storage of yogurt made of cow and sheep milk. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2013, 31, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ritzenthaler, K.L.; McGuire, M.K.; Falen, R.; Shultz, T.D.; Dasgupta, N.; McGuire, M.A. Estimation of conjugated linoleic acid intake by written dietary assessment methodologies underestimates actual intake evaluated by food duplicate methodology. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 1548–1554. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Herbel, B.K.; McGuire, M.K.; McGuire, M.A.; Shultz, T.D. Safflower oil consumption does not increase plasma conjugated linoleic acid concentrations in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 67, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Park, Y.; McGuire, M.K.; Behr, R.; McGuire, M.A.; Evans, M.A.; Shultz, T.D. High-fat dairy product consumption increases Δ9c’11t-18:2 (rumenic acid) and total lipid concentrations of human milk. Lipids 1999, 34, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nunes, J.C.; Torres, A.G. Fatty acid and CLA composition of Brazilian dairy products, and contribution to daily intake of CLA. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2010, 23, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Watkins, B.A.; Li, Y.; Sébédio, J.L.; Christie, W.W.; Adlof, R. CLA in functional food: Enrichment of animal products. Adv. Conjug. Linoleic Acid Res. 2003, 2, 174–188. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ip, C.; Chin, S.F.; Scimeca, J.A.; Pariza, M.W. Mammary cancer prevention by conjugated dienoic derivative of linoleic acid. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 6118–6124. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Ip, C.; Singh, M.; Thompson, H.J.; Scimeca, J.A. Conjugated linoleic acid suppresses mammary carcinogenesis and proliferative activity of the mammary gland in the rat. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 1212–1215. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ip, M.M.; Masso-Welch, P.A.; Shoemaker, S.F.; Shea-Eaton, W.K.; Ip, C. Conjugated linoleic acid inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of normal rat mammary cells in primary culture. Exp. Cell Res. 1999, 250, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ochoa, J.J.; Farquharson, A.J.; Grant, I.; Moffat, L.E.; Heys, S.D.; Wahle, W.J. Conjugated linoleics acids (CLAs) decrease prostate cancer cell proliferation: Different molecular mechanisms for cis-9, trans-11 and cis-10, trans-12 isomers. Carcinogenesis 2004, 25, 1185–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Blankson, H.; Stakkestad, J.A.; Fagertun, H.; Thom, E.; Wadstein, J.; Gudmundsen, O. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces body fat mass in overweight and obese humans. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 2943–2948. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Gaullier, J.M.; Halse, J.; Høye, K.; Kristiansen, K.; Fagertun, H.; Vik, H.; Gudmundsen, O. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation for 1 year reduces body fat mass in healthy overweight humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Laso, N.; Brugué, E.; Vidal, J.; Ros, E.; Arnaiz, J.A.; Carné, X.; Vidal, S.; Mas, S.; Deulofeu, R.; Lafuente, A. Effects of milk supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid (isomers cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12) on body composition and metabolic syndrome. Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 98, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Whigham, L.D.; Watras, A.C.; Schoeller, D.A. Efficacy of conjugated linoleic acid for reducing fat mass: A meta-analysis in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 1203–1211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Riserus, U.; Berglund, L.; Vessby, B. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) reduced abdominal adipose tissue in obese middle-aged men with signs of metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Obes. 2001, 25, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Belury, M.A. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid in health: physiological effects and mechanisms of action 1. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2002, 22, 505–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pariza, M.W.; Park, Y.; Cook, M.E. The biologically active isomers of conjugated linoleic acid. Prog. Lipid Res. 2001, 40, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gaullier, J.M.; Halse, J.; Høivik, H.O.; Høye, K.; Syvertsen, C.; Nurminiemi, M.; Hassfeld, C.; Einerhand, A.; O’Shea, M.; Gudmundsen, O. Six months supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid induces regional-specific fat mass decreases in overweight and obese. Br. J. Nutr. 2006, 97, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Barbosa, N.R.; Gama, M.A.S.; Lopes, F.C.F.; Defillipo, P.P.; Mury, F.B.; Trevisani, R.; Oliveira, D.E.; Gattaz, W.F. Activity of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) subtypes in rat brain is altered by feeding conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and linseed oil. Alzheimers Dement. 2009, 5, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gama, M.A.S.; Raposo, N.R.B.; Mury, F.B.; Lopes, F.C.F.; Dias-Neto, E.; Talib, L.L.; Gattaz, W.F. Conjugated linoleic acid-enriched butter improved memory and up-regulated phospholipase A2 encoding-genes in rat brain tissue. J. Neural Transm. 2015, 122, 1371–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Smit, L.A.; Katan, M.B.; Wanders, A.J.; Basu, S.; Brouwer, I.A. A high intake of trans fatty acids has little effect on markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in humans. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 1673–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, Y.W.; Jones, P.J.H. Conjugated linoleic acid and obesity control: Efficacy and mechanisms. Int. J. Obes. 2004, 28, 941–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bhattacharya, A.; Banu, J.; Rahman, M.; Causey, J.; Fernandes, G. Biological effects of conjugated linoleic acids in health and disease. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2006, 17, 789–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Summary of the strategies to increase conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) conversion by bacteria. Total CLA a; C18:2 cis-9 b, trans-11 isomer; Represented form was not specified c.
Table 1. Summary of the strategies to increase conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) conversion by bacteria. Total CLA a; C18:2 cis-9 b, trans-11 isomer; Represented form was not specified c.
MicroorganismLA SourceFermentation Time (h)CLA ConcentrationRef.
Oil Substrate(µg/mL)
Lc. lactisSunflower oil200128.5 mg/g fat a[23]
Lb. caseiLA40024175.2 µg/mL fat a[24]
Lb. rhamnosusLA20024190.2 µg/mL fat a
Bifidobacterium bifidumLA2002490 µg/mL fat a
St. thermophilusLA80024198. µg/mL fata
Lb. bulgaricusLA50004886 µg/mL medium b[22]
Lb. acidophilusLA100024106.5 µg/mL medium b
St. thermophilusLA50004882.5 µg/mL medium b
Lb. plantarumLA300024240.69 µg/mL b,c[26]
Lb. rhamnosusHydrolyzed soy oil1%24310 µg/g fat a[41]
Lb. acidophilusHydrolyzed soy oil1%24450 µg/g fat a
Lb. caseiHydrolyzed soy oil1%24480 µg/g fat a
Lb. plantarumHydrolyzed soy oil1%24510 µg/g fat a
Bifidobacterium bifidumHydrolyzed soy oil1%24460 µg/g fat a
Propionibacterium freudenerchii ssp. sherrmaniiHydrolyzed soy oil1%241450 µg/g fat a
Yogurt culture (St. thermophilus + Lb. bulgaricus, 1:1)Hydrolyzed soy oil1%24710 µg/g fat a
Yogurt starter culture + probiotic bacterias (Lb. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum and Propionibacterium freudenerchii)Grape seed oil4%2711.03 mg/g fat a[25]
Table 2. Biological activities of the CLA isomers.
Table 2. Biological activities of the CLA isomers.
CLA IsomerEffectsReference
C18:2 cis-9, trans-11; trans-10,cis-12 (1:1)Decrease in breast tumor development[50,51]
Increased antioxidant activity[50]
Inhibitory effects on various types of cancer, such as breast, skin, stomach, intestinal, and ovarian[52,53]
Immunoregulatory effects[18]
Decrease in body fat mass[17,54,55,56,57]
Decreased sagittal abdominal diameter (cm)[58]
Modulation of the inflammatory response[59,60]
Increased lean body mass[55,61]
Decreased glucose levels[14]
Decrease in body fat mass in specific region (legs)[61]
Decreased waist-hip ratio[61]
C18:2 cis-9, trans-11Positive influence on biochemical markers associated with Alzheimer’s disease[62,63]
Anti-osteoporotic effects[16]
Anti-atherosclerotic effects[15]
C18:2 trans-10, cis-12Inhibitory effects on the development of ovarian cancer[13]
Inhibitory effects on prostate cancer[53]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuhl, G.C.; De Dea Lindner, J. Biohydrogenation of Linoleic Acid by Lactic Acid Bacteria for the Production of Functional Cultured Dairy Products: A Review. Foods 2016, 5, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5010013

AMA Style

Kuhl GC, De Dea Lindner J. Biohydrogenation of Linoleic Acid by Lactic Acid Bacteria for the Production of Functional Cultured Dairy Products: A Review. Foods. 2016; 5(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5010013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuhl, Gabriela Christina, and Juliano De Dea Lindner. 2016. "Biohydrogenation of Linoleic Acid by Lactic Acid Bacteria for the Production of Functional Cultured Dairy Products: A Review" Foods 5, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5010013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop