Next Article in Journal
Activity Changes of the Peptic Lactoferrin Hydrolysate in Human Gastric Cancer AGS Cells in Response to Cu(II) or Mn(II) Addition
Next Article in Special Issue
Quality of Commercially Available Manuka Honey Expressed by Pollen Composition, Diastase Activity, and Hydroxymethylfurfural Content
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Characteristics and Thermal Oxidative Stability of Novel Cold-Pressed Oil Blends: GC, LF NMR, and DSC Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sunflower Honey—Evaluation of Quality and Stability during Storage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 12
Issue 14
10.3390/foods12142661
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Metabolomics Reveals Distinctive Metabolic Profiles and Marker Compounds of Camellia (Camellia sinensis L.) Bee Pollen

by
Dandan Qi
1,2,
Meiling Lu
3,
Jianke Li
1 and
Chuan Ma
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects, Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
2
Tea Research Institute, Shangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250000, China
3
Agilent Technologies (China) Co., Ltd., Beijing 100102, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(14), 2661; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142661
Submission received: 13 June 2023 / Revised: 5 July 2023 / Accepted: 6 July 2023 / Published: 11 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Evaluation of Bee Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Camellia bee pollen (CBP) is a major kind of bee product which is collected by honeybees from tea tree (Camellia sinensis L.) flowers and agglutinated into pellets via oral secretion. Due to its special healthcare value, the authenticity of its botanical origin is of great interest. This study aimed at distinguishing CBP from other bee pollen, including rose, apricot, lotus, rape, and wuweizi bee pollen, based on a non-targeted metabolomics approach using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Among the bee pollen groups, 54 differential compounds were identified, including flavonol glycosides and flavone glycosides, catechins, amino acids, and organic acids. A clear separation between CBP and all other samples was observed in the score plots of the principal component analysis, indicating distinctive metabolic profiles of CBP. Notably, L-theanine (864.83–2204.26 mg/kg) and epicatechin gallate (94.08–401.82 mg/kg) were identified exclusively in all CBP and were proposed as marker compounds of CBP. Our study unravels the distinctive metabolic profiles of CBP and provides specific and quantified metabolite indicators for the assessment of authentic CBP.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bee pollen is collected from plant flowers and agglutinated into pellets by honeybees via oral secretion. As an indispensable nutrient source for honeybee development, bee pollen is rich in carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, polyphenols, lipids, minerals, and vitamins [1]. Its chemical composition varies considerably according to its botanical origins [1,2]. The large amounts of bioactive constituents endow bee pollen with health beneficial properties, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergen, anti-aging, and anti-cancer effects [3,4,5]. Owing to its nutritional and therapeutic properties, bee pollen has gained increasing attention worldwide and is commercially consumed as a natural dietary supplement for human health promotion [6,7].
Camellia bee pollen (CBP) is among the most important bee pollen products that are extensively consumed in China. It is gathered by honeybees from the flowers of tea plants (Camellia sinensis L.), the leaves of which can be made into tea, a popular beverage worldwide with various health benefits. It has been reported that the chemical constituents of tea flowers are similar to those of tea leaves [8]. A share of some common bioactive constituents and functional properties between CBP and tea can thus be expected. Indeed, CBP has a special fragrance, similar to the aroma of tea. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that CBP possesses higher anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-tyrosinase activities relative to other types of bee pollen [9,10,11]. In recent years, the identification of bioactive constituents responsible for the observed functional properties has been attracting growing interest. Among them, caffeine, kaempferol, levulinic acid, and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural are reported to contribute partly to the anti-tyrosinase activities of CBP [12,13,14]. However, the metabolic basis for its functional properties is still far from being fully understood, thereby impeding the use of CBP in the cosmetics, food, and pharmaceutical industries.
The aforementioned superior functional properties promote increasing demand for CBP, which leads to fraudulent practices in the market [15]. To identify bee pollen of different botanical origins, sensory testing (e.g., color, aroma, and taste characteristics) and microscopic examination (e.g., size, form, and color of pollen grains) are widely used [16]. However, such subjective judgments based on sensory evaluation are easily biased by personal preference. Moreover, even with a microscope, it is still difficult to distinguish between different types of bee pollen with similar morphological and structural attributes [17,18]. The situation is even worse for CBP, which shows substantial morphological variation between tea cultivars [19]. The lack of accurate identification methods represents a loophole for the current adulteration chaos of bee pollen. A more sensitive method is, thus, urgently needed to ensure accurate identification for the long-term development of the bee product industry.
Non-targeted metabolomics based on high-resolution mass spectrometry provides a convenient method for the simultaneous analysis of hundreds or thousands of small molecules in food products, including various bee products [20,21,22,23]. This approach, combined with targeted metabolomics, plays a key role in screening and quantifying marker compounds for food authenticity [24,25,26]. For bee pollen authenticity, however, such research is currently limited [27].
Our study aimed to uncover distinctive metabolic components of CBP and to explore efficient metabolite indicators to identify authentic CBP. To this end, non-targeted metabolic profiling of CBP and other types of bee pollen was performed. We proposed epicatechin gallate (ECG) and L-theanine as marker compounds of CBP, and measured their content based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadruple-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Standards

Ultrapure water was produced using a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, St. Louis, MA, USA). Methanol of LC-MS grade was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Acetonitrile, formic acid, and ammonium formate of LC–MS grade were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). All of the authentic standards used for qualification are listed in Table S1.

2.2. Bee Pollen Sample Collection

Fifteen CBP samples were collected from Anhui, Fujian, Jiangsu, Sichuan, and Zhejiang Provinces in China (n = 3 for each), while fifteen non-CBP samples were obtained from five botanical plants (n = 3 for each; Table S1), i.e., rose (Rosa rugosa Thunb.), apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.), rape (Brassica campestris L.), and wuweizi (Frucus Schisandra chinensis). To guarantee their authenticity, these samples were collected by professional beekeepers from their apiaries of Apis mellifera L. colonies using pollen traps, and were then identified using a scanning electron microscope (S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Dead bee parts and other hive debris were removed manually. All samples were freeze-dried and stored at −80 °C until analysis.

2.3. Preparation of Bee Pollen Extracts

In brief, 25 mL of 80% methanol was added to accurately weighed 0.5 g samples of powdered bee pollen in a 50 mL vial. After supersonic extraction for 1.5 h at 4 °C, the mixture was kept still for 30 min, followed by 0.22 μm membrane filtration (Shimadzu, Shanghai, China). Tolbutamide and sulfacetamide, at final concentrations of 2 μg/mL and 4 μg/mL, respectively, were added as internal standards for retention time correction.

2.4. UHPLC-QTOF/MS-Based Non-Targeted Metabolomics Analysis

Non-targeted metabolomics analysis was performed on an Infinity 1290 UHPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to an Agilent 6545 QTOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (3.0 × 150 mm, 1.8 µm, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 40 °C. Water with 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate and methanol with 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate were used for mobile phases A and B, respectively, which were kept at a flow rate of 0.40 mL/min with a gradient elution profile. The proportion of solvent B was linearly applied as follows: 0–5 min, 0–12%; 5–15 min, 12–35%; 15–18 min, 35–45%; 18–26 min, 45–75%; 26–33 min, 75–95%; and 33–35 min, 95–5%. The injection volume was 3 μL. The post-time between each two consecutive injections was 3 min. Dual jet stream electrospray ionization (ESI) was performed under negative ionization mode. The parameters were as follows: nebulizer pressure: 35 psi; capillary voltage: 3.5 kV; gas flow rate: 8 L/min; fragmentator voltage: 130 V; sheath gas temperature: 350 °C; and sheath gas flow rate: 8 L/min. The TOF scan was set at an m/z of 100–1100 with an acquisition rate of 2 spectra per second. The auto MS/MS model was applied for compound identification with fixed collision energies (10 V, 20 V and 40 V). Reference ions with m/z 112.9856 and 1033.9881 were utilized for real-time mass calibration during both the TOF scan and the auto MS/MS scan.
The obtained raw data were imported into Masshunter Qualitative Analysis software (B.07.00 SP1, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to extract all feature ions, then exported as .cef documents. These .cef documents were imported into MPP (Mass Profiler Professional software package, version B.14.5, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for retention time correction using internal standards and subsequent peak alignment within the specified retention time window (±2.5%). The entities with an occurrence frequency >60% and a coefficient of variability (CV) < 25% were retained. After Pareto scaling and logarithmic transformation of the quantitative data, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using SIMCA 14.1 (Umetrics AB, Umeå, Sweden) to provide an intuitionistic demonstration of an overall clustering pattern of the bee pollen samples.
Differential entities (p < 0.05 in analysis of variance, ANOVA) among the bee pollen samples from different botanical origins were identified using SPSS 20.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) for further analysis. Metabolite identification was performed by searching for exact mass and MS/MS spectra in the Metlin database (http://metlin.scripps.edu, accessed on 10 January 2021) and Human Metabolome Database (HMDB, https://hmdb.ca/, accessed on 10 January, 2021). The retention time and MS/MS spectra of putatively identified compounds were validated by authentic standards analyzed under the same conditions. To show the abundance differences in identified compounds among these bee pollen samples, heatmap visualization was carried out using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 [28] with Pareto scaling and logarithmic transformation. To improve the classification of CBP and non-CBP samples, orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was conducted in SIMCA 14.1. The OPLS-DA model was cross-validated by permutation tests with 200 iterations. The values of variable importance in projection (VIP) were used to rank the overall contribution of each compound to the OPLS-DA model. Compounds with VIP > 1.0, p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test and fold change (FC) > 1.5 were regarded as discriminating compounds driving the observed group separation.

2.5. Targeted Quantification of ECG and L-Theanine in CBP

The contents of ECG and L-theanine in CBP were determined using the UHPLC system (Dionex Ultimate 3000, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, CA, USA) coupled with Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, CA, USA) in parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) mode. Compound separation was performed using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) with an ACQUITY BEH Amide column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at 50 °C. Mobile phase A and B were 30% and 95% acetonitrile, respectively, both containing 10 mmol/L ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid. A gradient elution profile at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min was set as follows: 1 min, 100% B; 11 min, 30% B; 11.5 min, 100% B; and 15 min, 100% B. The injection volume was 2 μL. The Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS with a heated HESI source was operated in negative mode with stepped normalized collision energies (NCE 10, 20, and 30). The mass resolution was 70,000 full width at half maximum (FWHM) for the full MS mode and 17,500 FWHM for the MS/MS scan. Calibration curves were established with standard solutions (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 μg/mL for ECG and 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 μg/mL for L-theanine) and used to calculate the ECG and L-theanine content in Xcalibur (v4.0.27.19, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Overall Metabolic Profiles of the Bee Pollen

To obtain an overview of grouping patterns of the bee pollen samples of different botanical origins, 670 valid entities were submitted with which to perform unsupervised PCA. The first two principal components of PCA explained 74.46% of the total variance (PC1 = 65.70% and PC2 = 8.76%). In the PCA score plots (Figure 1A), a tight clustering of the pollen samples from the same botanical origins was observed, and their distribution patterns were found to be affected by their botanical origins. Remarkably, a clear separation between the CBP and non-CBP samples was observed. Specifically, the CBP samples were all distributed in the negative part of the PC1 axis, while the non-CBP samples were located in the positive part of the PC1 axis and separated along the PC2 axis.

3.2. Metabolite Identification

To screen the compounds explaining the overall grouping patterns observed in the PCA score plots, differential entities among the bee pollen samples (p < 0.05 in ANOVA) were subjected to compound identification. Finally, 54 compounds were identified, including 15 flavonol glycosides and flavone glycosides, 3 catechins, 11 amino acids, 8 organic acids, 4 fatty acids, 4 nucleotides and their derivatives, 2 aldehydes, and 7 other compounds (Table S1). Among them, four compounds were detected exclusively in all CBP samples, including ECG, L-theanine, gallic acid (GA), and kaempferol. The CBP samples were all clustered into a single clade, whereas the non-CBP samples formed a different clade in the clustering heatmap of the identified compounds (Figure 2).

3.3. Marker Compound Selection of CBP

To pick out the most discriminating compounds between the CBP and non-CBP samples, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted based on the relative abundance levels of the 54 identified compounds (Table S2). In total, 16 compounds with FC > 1.5 showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the CBP and non-CBP samples (Table S1). A reliable OPLS-DA model was established (R2Y = 0.873, Q2 = 0.845, R2 intercepts = 0.0902, and Q2 intercepts = −0.4112 in a 200-time permutation test), and the resulting score plots supported a clear separation between the CBP and non-CBP samples (Figure 1B), as is consistent with the grouping patterns in the PCA score plots (Figure 1A). Further filtering with VIP values > 1.0 in the OPLS-DA resulted in a final selection of two compounds, i.e., ECG and L-theanine, which had the highest VIP values (Figure 1D). Moreover, ECG and L-theanine exhibited the greatest distance from the origin in the loading plots (Figure 1C) and, hence, had the highest discriminatory power. Taken together, ECG and L-theanine could be used as marker compounds to distinguish CBP from non-CBP samples.

3.4. ECG and L-Theanine Quantification

A targeted quantification method based on a PRM assay was carried out to measure the ECG and L-theanine content in the CBP samples. The established calibration curve showed good linearity for ECG (r2 = 0.9965) and L-theanine (r2 = 0.9932). A significant difference was observed in the ECG (94.08–401.82 mg/kg) and L-theanine (864.83–2204.26 mg/kg) content among the CBP samples (Figure 3). The highest ECG content was found in the CBP samples from Anhui Province (387.04–430.70 mg/kg), followed by Sichuan Province (272.52–280.56 mg/kg), and the lowest content was found in the samples from Zhejiang Province (90.95–98.33 mg/kg). The CBP samples from Sichuan Province had the highest L-theanine content (2138.56–2314.01 mg/kg), while those from Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces had the lowest content (819.45–964.43 mg/kg).

4. Discussion

4.1. Distinctive Metabolic Profiles of CBP

As a mixture of flower pollen and honeybee saliva, bee pollen from different botanical origins shows differing chemical composition and functional properties [2,29]. Our metabolomics analysis confirmed the presence of different metabolic profiles of bee pollen samples according to botanical origins. Remarkably, one of our key findings was the distinctive metabolic profile of CBP samples compared with others. It has been reported that tea plants synthesize unique metabolites and transport quality-related components to their organs, including tea flowers [30], which could account for our observed special metabolic profile of CBP. Indeed, our study revealed four characteristic compounds (L-theanine, ECG, kaempferol, and GA) which were found to be specific to the CBP samples and 12 other differential compounds between CBP and non-CBP samples.
A wide diversity of bioactive functions has been reported for our identified differential compounds. Among them, L-theanine, a non-protein amino acid, is reported to naturally occur mainly in tea plants and shows a wide range of beneficial effects, such as antioxidant, anti-cancer, and immune-modulating activities [31,32]. ECG, a highly abundant catechin in green tea, has been demonstrated to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumor effects [33]. Other polyphenolic compounds, such as kaempferol, GA, and rutin, show similar biological activities [34,35]. Collectively, these bioactive compounds account for at least some of the superior functional activities of CBP which have been reported in previous studies [9,10,11].

4.2. ECG and L-Theanine as Maker Compounds of CBP

Metabolomics approaches have been widely adopted for the global evaluation of marker compounds for food authenticity [24]. If some compounds are detected exclusively in certain bee products, or are significantly more abundant or profile-defining, they could be considered as markers of these products [36]. Typically, compounds with VIP scores greater than 1.0 in the OPLS-DA are generally considered to have the highest discrimination potential [37]. With these methods, marker compounds of bee products of different origins, such as honey [38] and propolis [23], have been proposed. In our study, ECG and L-theanine satisfied the conditions mentioned above (FC > 1.5, p < 0.05, and VIP score > 1.0), and could, thus, be regarded as the best potential candidates for CBP marker compounds. In addition, flavonoid glycosides, which are present in lower quantities in CBP, have been proposed to distinguish CBP from several kinds of bee pollen [17]. Unlike these flavonoid glycosides, ECG and L-theanine were found exclusively in CBP in our study. Based on the measured content in our study, a minimum content of 90.95 mg/kg for ECG and 819.45 mg/kg for L-theanine are required for the authentication of CBP. The combination of the two special components specific to CBP could, thus, assist in distinguishing CBP from adulterated CBP or other bee pollen.
It should be noted that significant variation in the content of both ECG (90.95–430.70 mg/kg) and L-theanine (819.45–2314.01 mg/kg) was observed in our CBP samples from different geographical locations. This finding could be explained by diverse tea germplasm resources and environmental conditions, which have been reported to affect L-theanine content in the young shoots of tea trees [39,40]. It is, thus, likely that the geographical origins of CBP could be predicted by means of ECG and L-theanine content after extensive sampling of CBP in future studies.

5. Conclusions

Our comparative metabolomics analysis revealed distinctive metabolic profiles of the CBP relative to other bee pollen, including rose, apricot, lotus, rape, and wuweizi bee pollen. Among the differential compounds, L-Theanine and ECG were detected exclusively in all the CBP samples, and showed the highest discriminatory power. Further quantification based on targeted metabolomics demonstrated the content of L-theanine (819.45–2314.01 mg/kg) and ECG (90.95–430.70 mg/kg) in the CBP samples. The feasibility of easy detection and quantification of ECG and L-theanine in bee pollen demonstrates their possible practical application as marker compounds for CBP authentication.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12142661/s1, Table S1: Compounds identified in bee pollen samples. Table S2: Relative abundance of the identified compounds in bee pollen samples.

Author Contributions

D.Q.: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—original draft. M.L.: formal analysis, writing—review and editing. J.L.: resources, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing. C.M.: project administration, formal analysis, writing—original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program in China (CAAS-ASTIP-2021-IAR) and the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System in China (CARS-44).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author M.L. was employed by the company Agilent Technologies (China) Co. Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thakur, M.; Nanda, V. Composition and functionality of bee pollen: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 98, 82–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barbieri, D.; Gabriele, M.; Summa, M.; Colosimo, R.; Leonardi, D.; Domenici, V.; Pucci, L. Antioxidant, nutraceutical properties, and fluorescence spectral profiles of bee pollen samples from different botanical origins. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Algethami, J.S.; Abd El-Wahed, A.A.; Elashal, M.H.; Ahmed, H.R.; Elshafiey, E.H.; Omar, E.M.; Al Naggar, Y.; Algethami, A.F.; Shou, Q.Y.; Alsharif, S.M.; et al. Bee pollen: Clinical trials and patent applications. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Khalifa, S.A.M.; Elashal, M.H.; Yosri, N.; Du, M.; Musharraf, S.G.; Nahar, L.; Sarker, S.D.; Guo, Z.M.; Cao, W.; Zou, X.B.; et al. Bee pollen: Current status and therapeutic potential. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Margaoan, R.; Strant, M.; Varadi, A.; Topal, E.; Yucel, B.; Cornea-Cipcigan, M.; Campos, M.G.; Vodnar, D.C. Bee collected pollen and bee bread: Bioactive constituents and health benefits. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kostic, A.Z.; Milincic, D.D.; Barac, M.B.; Ali Shariati, M.; Tesic, Z.L.; Pesic, M.B. The application of pollen as a functional food and feed ingredient-The present and perspectives. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Baky, M.H.; Abouelela, M.B.; Wang, K.; Farag, M.A. Bee pollen and bread as a super-food: A comparative review of their metabolome composition and quality assessment in the context of best recovery conditions. Molecules 2023, 28, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, D.; Chen, G.J.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, X.X.; Ye, H. Physiological genetics, chemical composition, health benefits and toxicology of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) flower: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, e109584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Q.Q.; Sun, M.H.; Wan, Z.R.; Liang, J.S.; Betti, M.; Hrynets, Y.; Xue, X.F.; Wu, L.M.; Wang, K. Bee pollen extracts modulate serum metabolism in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury mice with anti-inflammatory effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7855–7868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Su, J.; Yang, X.Y.; Lu, Q.; Liu, R. Antioxidant and anti-tyrosinase activities of bee pollen and identification of active components. J. Apic. Res. 2021, 60, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, H.C.; Wang, X.; Wang, K.; Li, C.Y. Antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibitory properties of aqueous ethanol extracts from monofloral bee pollen. J. Apic. Sci. 2015, 59, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Yang, Y.F.; Sun, X.; Ni, H.; Du, X.P.; Chen, F.; Jiang, Z.D.; Li, Q.B. Identification and characterization of the tyrosinase inhibitory activity of caffeine from Camellia pollen. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12741–12751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, Y.F.; Lai, X.Y.; Huang, G.L.; Chen, Y.H.; Du, X.P.; Jiang, Z.D.; Chen, F.; Ni, H. Isolation and purification of two tyrosinase inhibitors from camellia pollen by high-speed counter-current chromatography. Acta Chromatogr. 2017, 29, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, Y.F.; Lai, X.Y.; Lai, G.Y.; Jiang, Z.D.; Ni, H.; Chen, F. Purification and characterization of a tyrosinase inhibitor from Camellia pollen. J. Funct. Food. 2016, 27, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.Y.; Ren, P.P.; Wu, Y.N.; He, Q.H. Recent advances in analytical techniques for the detection of adulteration and authenticity of bee products—A review. Food Addit. Contam. Part A-Chem. 2021, 38, 533–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barth, O.M.; Freitas, A.S.; Oliveira, E.S.; Silva, R.A.; Maester, F.M.; Andrella, R.R.S.; Cardozo, G.M.B.Q. Evaluation of the botanical origin of commercial dry bee pollen load batches using pollen analysis: A proposal for technical standardization. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2010, 82, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhou, J.H.; Qi, Y.T.; Ritho, J.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zheng, X.W.; Wu, L.M.; Li, Y.; Sun, L.P. Flavonoid glycosides as floral origin markers to discriminate of unifloral bee pollen by LC-MS/MS. Food Control. 2015, 57, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khansari, E.; Zarre, S.; Alizadeh, K.; Attar, F.; Aghabeigi, F.; Salmaki, Y. Pollen morphology of Campanula (Campanulaceae) and allied genera in Iran with special focus on its systematic implication. Flora 2012, 207, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xie, W.; Yu, W.; Yang, G.; Chen, J.; Pan, Y.; Ye, N. Micromorphological observation on pollen of 14 cultivars of tea tree (Camellia sinensis). J. South. Agric. 2018, 49, 1698–1704. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, H.F.; Zhu, X.L.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liu, X.H.; Liu, R.; Lu, Q. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of rape bee pollen after fermentation and their correlation with chemical components by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry-based untargeted metabolomics. Food Chem. 2023, 409, e135342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, C.; Ma, B.; Li, J.; Fang, Y. Changes in chemical composition and antioxidant activity of royal jelly produced at different floral periods during migratory beekeeping. Food Res. Int. 2022, 155, e111091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, T.; Qiao, N.; Ning, F.J.; Huang, X.Y.; Luo, L.P. Identification and characterization of plant-derived biomarkers and physicochemical variations in the maturation process of Triadica cochinchinensis honey based on UPLC-QTOF-MS metabolomics analysis. Food Chem. 2023, 408, e135197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stavropoulou, M.I.; Termentzi, A.; Kasiotis, K.M.; Cheilari, A.; Stathopoulou, K.; Machera, K.; Aligiannis, N. Untargeted ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) metabolomics reveals propolis markers of Greek and Chinese origin. Molecules 2021, 26, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Selamat, J.; Rozani, N.A.A.; Murugesu, S. Application of the metabolomics approach in food authentication. Molecules 2021, 26, 7565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, S.B.; Tian, Y.F.; Jiang, P.Y.Z.; Lin, Y.; Liu, X.L.; Yang, H.S. Recent advances in the application of metabolomics for food safety control and food quality analyses. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 1448–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yan, S.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y.C.; Wang, K.; Shan, J.H.; Xue, X.F. A metabolomics approach revealed an Amadori compound distinguishes artificially heated and naturally matured acacia honey. Food Chem. 2022, 385, e132631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rocchetti, G.; Castiglioni, S.; Maldarizzi, G.; Carloni, P.; Lucini, L. UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS phenolic profiling and antioxidant capacity of bee pollen from different botanical origin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chong, J.; Wishart, D.S.; Xia, J. Using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for comprehensive and integrative metabolomics data analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2019, 68, e86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, X.X.; Yu, M.H.; Zhu, X.L.; Liu, R.; Lu, Q. Metabolomics reveals that phenolamides are the main chemical components contributing to the anti-tyrosinase activity of bee pollen. Food Chem. 2022, 389, e133071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Y.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, L.T.; Dong, F.; Tu, Y.Y.; Yang, Z.Y. Occurrence of functional molecules in the flowers of tea (Camellia sinensis) plants: Evidence for a second resource. Molecules 2018, 23, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sharma, E.; Joshi, R.; Gulati, A. L-Theanine: An astounding sui generis integrant in tea. Food Chem. 2018, 242, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, M.Y.; Liu, H.Y.; Wu, D.T.; Kenaan, A.; Geng, F.; Li, H.B.; Gunaratne, A.; Li, H.; Gan, R.Y. L-theanine: A unique functional amino acid in tea (Camellia sinensis L.) with multiple health benefits and food applications. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, e853846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yu, J.J.; Li, W.F.; Xiao, X.; Huang, Q.X.; Yu, J.B.; Yang, Y.J.; Han, T.F.; Zhang, D.Z.; Niu, X.F. (-)-Epicatechin gallate blocks the development of atherosclerosis by regulating oxidative stress in vivo and in vitro. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 8715–8727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gullon, B.; Lu-Chau, T.A.; Moreira, M.T.; Lema, J.M.; Eibes, G. Rutin: A review on extraction, identification and purification methods, biological activities and approaches to enhance its bioavailability. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 67, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kahkeshani, N.; Farzaei, F.; Fotouhi, M.; Alavi, S.S.; Bahramsoltani, R.; Naseri, R.; Momtaz, S.; Abbasabadi, Z.; Rahimi, R.; Farzaei, M.H.; et al. Pharmacological effects of gallic acid in health and diseases: A mechanistic review. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2019, 22, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Oelschlaegel, S.; Gruner, M.; Wang, P.N.; Boettcher, A.; Koelling-Speer, I.; Speer, K. Classification and characterization of manuka honeys based on phenolic compounds and methylglyoxal. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7229–7237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ivanisevic, J.; Want, E.J. From samples to insights into metabolism: Uncovering biologically relevant information in LC-HRMS metabolomics data. Metabolites 2019, 9, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, X.R.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.Z.; Zhou, J.H. Analytical strategies for LC-MS-based untargeted and targeted metabolomics approaches reveal the entomological origins of honey. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 1358–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fang, K.X.; Xia, Z.Q.; Li, H.J.; Jiang, X.H.; Qin, D.D.; Wang, Q.S.; Wang, Q.; Pan, C.D.; Li, B.; Wu, H.L. Genome-wide association analysis identified molecular markers associated with important tea flavor-related metabolites. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gong, A.D.; Lian, S.B.; Wu, N.N.; Zhou, Y.J.; Zhao, S.Q.; Zhang, L.M.; Cheng, L.; Yuan, H.Y. Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis of catechins, caffeine and theanine biosynthesis in tea plant (Camellia sinensis) over the course of seasons. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, e294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 12 02661 g001 550
Figure 1. Multivariate and univariate analysis of CBP and non-CBP (rose, apricot, lotus, rape, and wuweizi bee pollen) metabolomics data. PCA score plots were generated from all valid entities (A); score plots (B) and loading plots (C) of OPLS-DA for the 54 identified compounds. The ellipses indicate 95% confidence limits according to Hotelling’s T2 statistics. VIP score and log fold change (CBP/non-CBP) of the identified compounds are shown (D).
Figure 1. Multivariate and univariate analysis of CBP and non-CBP (rose, apricot, lotus, rape, and wuweizi bee pollen) metabolomics data. PCA score plots were generated from all valid entities (A); score plots (B) and loading plots (C) of OPLS-DA for the 54 identified compounds. The ellipses indicate 95% confidence limits according to Hotelling’s T2 statistics. VIP score and log fold change (CBP/non-CBP) of the identified compounds are shown (D).
Foods 12 02661 g001
Foods 12 02661 g002 550
Figure 2. Clustering heatmap of the 54 identified compounds in the 30 bee pollen samples.
Figure 2. Clustering heatmap of the 54 identified compounds in the 30 bee pollen samples.
Foods 12 02661 g002
Foods 12 02661 g003 550
Figure 3. ECG and L-theanine content (mean ± standard error) in the CBP samples from different locations. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05 in ANOVA).
Figure 3. ECG and L-theanine content (mean ± standard error) in the CBP samples from different locations. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05 in ANOVA).
Foods 12 02661 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, D.; Lu, M.; Li, J.; Ma, C. Metabolomics Reveals Distinctive Metabolic Profiles and Marker Compounds of Camellia (Camellia sinensis L.) Bee Pollen. Foods 2023, 12, 2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142661

AMA Style

Qi D, Lu M, Li J, Ma C. Metabolomics Reveals Distinctive Metabolic Profiles and Marker Compounds of Camellia (Camellia sinensis L.) Bee Pollen. Foods. 2023; 12(14):2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142661

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Dandan, Meiling Lu, Jianke Li, and Chuan Ma. 2023. "Metabolomics Reveals Distinctive Metabolic Profiles and Marker Compounds of Camellia (Camellia sinensis L.) Bee Pollen" Foods 12, no. 14: 2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142661

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop