Next Article in Journal
Use of Inverse Method to Determine Thermophysical Properties of Minimally Processed Carrots during Chilling under Natural Convection
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Sensor Based on Laser-Induced Graphene for Carbendazim Detection in Water
Previous Article in Journal
Insoluble Dietary Fiber from Soybean Residue (Okara) Exerts Anti-Obesity Effects by Promoting Hepatic Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Oxidation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review of Pesticide Residues in Peppers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/foods12102082
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dissipation, Metabolism, Accumulation, Processing and Risk Assessment of Fluopyram and Trifloxystrobin in Cucumbers and Cowpeas from Cultivation to Consumption

by
Kai Cui
1,
Shuai Guan
1,
Jingyun Liang
1,
Liping Fang
1,
Ruiyan Ding
1,
Jian Wang
1,
Teng Li
1,
Zhan Dong
1,*,
Xiaohu Wu
2 and
Yongquan Zheng
2
1
Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan 250100, China
2
Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(10), 2082; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12102082
Submission received: 16 March 2023 / Revised: 25 April 2023 / Accepted: 19 May 2023 / Published: 22 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Pesticide Residues Monitoring and Health Risk Assessment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fluopyram and trifloxystrobin are widely used for controlling various plant diseases in cucumbers and cowpeas. However, data on residue behaviors in plant cultivation and food processing are currently lacking. Our results showed that cowpeas had higher fluopyram and trifloxystrobin residues (16.48–247.65 μg/kg) than cucumbers (877.37–3576.15 μg/kg). Moreover, fluopyram and trifloxystrobin dissipated faster in cucumbers (half-life range, 2.60–10.66 d) than in cowpeas (10.83–22.36 d). Fluopyram and trifloxystrobin were the main compounds found in field samples, and their metabolites, fluopyram benzamide and trifloxystrobin acid, fluctuated at low residue levels (≤76.17 μg/kg). Repeated spraying resulted in the accumulation of fluopyram, trifloxystrobin, fluopyram benzamide and trifloxystrobin acid in cucumbers and cowpeas. Peeling, washing, stir-frying, boiling and pickling were able to partially or substantially remove fluopyram and trifloxystrobin residues from raw cucumbers and cowpeas (processing factor range, 0.12–0.97); on the contrary, trifloxystrobin acid residues appeared to be concentrated in pickled cucumbers and cowpeas (processing factor range, 1.35–5.41). Chronic and acute risk assessments suggest that the levels of fluopyram and trifloxystrobin in cucumbers and cowpeas were within a safe range based on the field residue data of the present study. The potential hazards of fluopyram and trifloxystrobin should be continuously assessed for their high residue concentrations and potential accumulation effects.

1. Introduction

Greenhouse cultivation has gradually developed into the dominant production approach to achieve a year-round supply of various vegetables, including cucumbers and cowpeas. However, these vegetables suffer from serious plant diseases due to their semi-enclosed and comfortable environments [1], resulting in the frequent application of fungicides. Fluopyram, N-{2-[3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]ethyl}-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide, (FLU, Figure 1), a new pyridyl-benzamide fungicide, acts on the enzyme succinate dehydrogenase to inhibit spore germination, mycelium growth and sporulation. Trifloxystrobin, methyl (2E)-(methoxyimino)(2-{[({(1E)-1-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ethylidene}amino)oxy]methyl}phenyl)acetate, (TRI, Figure 1), a strobilurin fungicide, acts as a quinone outside inhibitor to inhibit the mitochondrial respiration of pathogens. FLU and TRI are often simultaneously or alternately used to control a variety of plant diseases, such as cucumber and cowpea anthracnose, cucumber powdery mildew and target spot, achieving a high control efficiency due to their strong synergistic effects [2]. However, increasing evidence confirms their potential toxic effects on mammals, such as the induction of thyroid and liver tumor formation by FLU [3,4] and the triggering of neurotoxicity and skin toxicity by TRI [5,6]. Considering the potential health hazards of FLU and TRI, the residue fate and dietary health risks associated with exposure to FLU and TRI should be studied in agricultural products following their application.
Some studies have reported on the residue levels, dissipation behavior and dietary risk assessment of FLU or TRI in different farm crops [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. However, no work to date has focused on the potential accumulation of pesticide residues in crops after repeated spraying. It is generally recommended that fungicides are sprayed two to three times during crops’ development periods; more alarmingly, farmers often increase their application according to disease severity and their farming experience. This may result in residue accumulation of pesticides in crops and may pose a high dietary risk to humans. Single and repeated applications of fungicides have been proven to generate different pesticide dissipation rates in crops [14]. Hence, understanding the residue dissipation and accumulation of FLU and TRI after repeated spraying is crucial to ensure food safety and protecting public health.
Agricultural products are generally processed before being eaten through operations such as peeling, washing, boiling, stir-frying and pickling. These processing operations play an important role in the reduction or increase in pesticide residues in processed agricultural products [15,16,17,18,19]. To date, only a few papers have been published on the changes in FLU and TRI residues during food processing. Słowik-Borowiec and Szpyrka found that washing, peeling, juicing, boiling and ultrasonic washing could remove large amounts (≥56%) of FLU from apples [20]. On the contrary, TRI residues increased 3.7–5.4 times in dried red peppers following hot-air and sunlight drying [21]. Studies have shown that parent pesticides may be metabolized into more toxic compounds during food processing [22,23,24,25]. Owing to the wide use of FLU and TRI on cucumbers and cowpeas, their main toxic metabolites, i.e., fluopyram benzamide (FLB) and trifloxystrobin acid (TRA) (Figure 1), should also be measured and assessed to achieve a comprehensive risk assessment.
Our study is the first to systematically study the dissipation, metabolism, accumulation, processing and risk assessment of FLU and TRI and their main metabolites (FLB and TRA) in cucumbers and cowpeas from cultivation to consumption. Firstly, greenhouse-field trials were conducted to investigate the dissipation behavior and accumulation potential of pesticides applied to cucumbers and cowpeas. Secondly, a preliminary study of changes in pesticide residues in cucumbers and cowpeas was conducted via several traditional household processing operations. Thirdly, the health risks associated with exposure to pesticides were assessed on the basis of our residue data. The findings of this study could help in understanding the fate of FLU and TRI residues in different scenarios and could provide a reference for the rational use of these pesticides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Standards of FLU, FLB, TRI and TRA (all 1000 mg/L) were supplied by the Alta Scientific Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Acetonitrile and formic acid used were of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade and were acquired from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and sodium chloride (NaCl) used were of analytical grade and were acquired from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent (Shanghai, China). The sorbents (primary, secondary amine, PSA; graphitized carbon black, GCB) and 0.22 μm nylon syringe filters were purchased from Agela Technologies (Beijing, China). All standard solutions were stored at −20 °C in the dark.

2.2. Greenhouse-Field Trials

The greenhouse-field trials were conducted at the experimental base of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Jiyang District, Shandong, China) at 36°98′ N and 116°98′ E. No FLU or TRI had been applied to any of the experimental plots for 2 years. Each vegetable variety underwent two treatments, i.e., each had an experiment plot (100 m2) and a control plot (50 m2). A 43% suspension concentrate of FLU (21.5%) and TRI (21.5%) was sprayed three times every 7 days on cucumbers and cowpeas at the recommended dosage of 375 mL/ha. Three independent fresh samples (~2.0 kg) were randomly collected from each plot at 2 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d and 7 d after each application to study the dissipation and accumulation of pesticides. To study the effect of processing on pesticide residues, ≥20.0 kg of samples were collected 1 day after the last application. All processed and unprocessed samples were chopped, homogenized and frozen at −20 °C before analysis.

2.3. Processing Operations

The household processing procedure mimicked traditional Chinese cooking. The processing steps were conducted as follows based on modified versions of Huan et al. and An et al. [26,27].
Peeling: 1.0 kg of cucumber samples were peeled. All skins and pulps were stored separately.
Washing: 1.5 kg of samples were immersed in 4.5 L of tap water (25 °C) and then manually washed. Five sampling time points were set: 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 7 min and 10 min.
Stir-frying: The samples were first chopped into 3–4 cm pieces. Then, 50 mL of peanut oil and 1.5 kg of chopped samples were sequentially added into an electric frying pan. The samples were stir-fried evenly at 1000 W. Five sampling time points were set: 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 7 min and 10 min.
Boiling: 1.5 kg of chopped samples were immersed in 4.5 L of boiling tap water. Five sampling time points were set: 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 7 min and 10 min.
Pickling: 1.5 kg of chopped samples were added to a 3.0 L sealed plastic jar, and 2.0 L of 7% NaCl aqueous solutions was then added. All jars were finally stored in an incubator at 25 °C. Six sampling time points were set: 2 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 7 d and 14 d.
After sampling, the filter papers were used to remove the excess liquids (water or oil). Finally, each sample was homogenized and frozen at −20 °C until analysis.

2.4. Analytical Procedure

The homogenized samples (10 ± 0.01 g) were weighed and added to 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes. A total of 10 mL of acetonitrile (acidified with 1% formic acid, v/v) was added into each tube and mixed thoroughly for 5 min using a multi-tube vortex mixer (2500 r/min). To all tubes, we added 1.5 g of NaCl and 4 g anhydrous MgSO4, and the tubes were shaken for an additional 1 min. After centrifuging for 5 min at 5000 r/min, the aliquot of the extract (1.5 mL) was transferred into a 2 mL cleanup tube with the addition of 20 mg GCB, 50 mg PSA and 150 mg anhydrous MgSO4. The mixture was then mixed thoroughly for 1 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 r/min. After filtration via a 0.22 µm nylon syringe, the resulting filtrates were prepared for subsequent HPLC-triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS/MS) analysis.
For quantitative analysis of FLU and TRI and their main metabolites (FLB and TRA), a 1290 Infinity II HPLC equipped with a 6495 MS/MS (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, i.d., 2.7 μm, Agilent, USA) was used. The HPLC–MS/MS was operated in electrospray-positive ionization (ESI+) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. The column temperature and injected volume were set to 40 °C and 2 μL, respectively. The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile (A) and 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution (B) (0.3 mL/min), with the following parameters: 0 min, 10% A; 0.5 min, 10% A; 2.5 min, 90% A; 3.5 min, 90% A; 3.6 min, 10% A; 5 min, 10% A. The ESI parameters were as follows: capillary voltage, 3.5 kV; nozzle voltage, 500 V; gas temperature, 200 °C; gas flow, 11 L/min; nebulizer, 25 psi; sheath gas temperature, 300 °C; sheath gas flow, 12 L/min. Details of the MRM conditions for the analysis of the four analytes are shown in Table S1.

2.5. Health Risk Assessment

The health risks to consumers associated with exposure to FLU and TRI were assessed based on the risk quotient (RQ) method. The national estimated daily intake (NEDI) and chronic risk quotient (RQc) were calculated to assess chronic dietary intake risk using Equations (1) and (2). Moreover, the international estimation of short-term intake (IESTI) and the acute risk quotient (RQa) were calculated to assess acute dietary intake risk using Equations (3)–(5) [28].
NEDI = STMR × F/bw/1000
RQc = NEDI/ADI
IESTI = LP × HR/bw/1000
IESTI = LP × HR × v/bw/1000
RQa = IESTI/ARfD
In the above equations, STMR and HR represent the supervised trial median residue and the highest residue in greenhouse cowpeas and cucumbers (μg/kg), respectively. F refers to the daily intake of cowpeas and cucumbers (g/d), and bw represents the average body weight of a Chinese child or adult (kg). ADI and ARfD represent the acceptable daily intake and acute reference dose for FLU and TRI (μg/kg bw/d), respectively. LP is the large portion for cowpeas and cucumbers (g/d), and v is the variability factor. When an RQ value is larger than 1, it is considered to pose an unacceptable health risk. A higher RQ value represents a greater health risk. Notably, Equation (3) is used to calculate the IESTI for cowpeas, and Equation (4) is used for cucumbers. All parameters used for the calculation are supplied in Table S2.

2.6. Analysis of Results

The dissipation kinetics for FLU and TRI in cucumbers and cowpeas were calculated using Equation (6), and the half-life (t1/2) was calculated using Equation (7) [29].
Ct = C0 × e−kt
t1/2 = (ln2)/k
In Equations (6) and (7), Ct represents the sample residue at time t (μg/kg), C0 represents the initial sample residue (μg/kg), and k refers to the dissipation rate constant.
FLU and TRI residue accumulation (RA) in cucumbers and cowpeas after repeated spraying was calculated using Equation (8) [14].
RA = 1: (C2/C1): (C3/C2): …… (Cn/Cn−1)
In Equation (8), Cn represents the mean residue for a pesticide at each same time point after n instances of repeated spraying (μg/kg).
The processing factor (PF) for FLU and TRI during household processing operations was calculated using Equation (9) [30].
PF = Cpp/Crap
In Equation (9), Cpp represents the pesticide residue concentrations in the processed products (μg/kg), and Crap represents the pesticide residue concentrations in the raw agricultural products (μg/kg). PF > 1 represents pesticide residue concentration and PF < 1 represents pesticide residue reduction.
The matrix effect (ME) reflects the effects of co-extractives on the signal increase/decrease in pesticides and was calculated using Equation (10) [31].
ME = slope (matrix)/slope (solvent) × 100%
In Equation (10), slope (matrix) represents the slope of the matrix calibration curve, and slope (solvent) represents the slope of the solvent calibration curve. In general, an |ME| ≤ 10% represents an acceptable matrix effect. An ME < −10% represents a signal suppression effect, and an ME > +10% represents a signal enhancement effect.
The residue definition of FLU was defined as the sum of FLU and its main metabolite, FLB; it is expressed as FLUsum and was calculated using Equation (11). The TRI residue was defined as the sum of TRI and its main metabolite, TRA (expressed as TRIsum) and calculated using Equation (12).
FLUsum = CFLU + 1.04 × CFLB
TRIsum = CTRI + 2.10 × CTRA
In Equations (11) and (12), CFLU, CFLB, CTRI and CTRA (μg/kg) represent the residue concentrations of FLU, FLB, TRI and TRA. In addition, a 1/2 limit of quantification (LOQ) value is assigned to the residue concentrations that are below the LOQs.

3. Results

3.1. Method Validation

In our study, the methods for the simultaneous analysis of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA, were validated in terms of linearity, LOQ, ME, precision and accuracy. Linearity was estimated based on the solvent and matrix standard calibration curves in the range of 1 μg/L to 5000 mg/L, with satisfactory correlation coefficients (R2) ranging from 0.9943 to 1. The LOQs, defined as the lowest spiked concentrations in the matrix samples, were 1 μg/kg for the four analytes in the raw and processed cucumbers and cowpeas (Table S3). The ME values ranged from −79.41% to 16.00% for different matrices (Table S3), and therefore, matrix standard matrix curves were used to determine the four analytes and eliminate the influence of matrix effects. The precision and accuracy of this method were estimated based on a recovery assay experiment, in which we assessed the terms of the recoveries and the relative standard deviation (RSD). The average recoveries of the four analytes at the four spiked concentrations ranged from 83.73% to 115.78% in different matrices, with RSDs of 0.48–14.38% (Figure 2) (validation criteria: recovery of 70–120%, RSD ≤ 20%). These results confirm that the proposed analytical method was suitable for the extraction and detection of FLU and TRI and their two metabolites in cucumber and cowpea matrices.

3.2. Residue Dissipation and Accumulation of FLU and TRI in Greenhouse Cucumbers and Cowpeas

In our study, cucumbers and cowpeas were sprayed with FLU and TRI three consecutive times every seven days; all the residue data and dissipation curves are listed in Table 1 and Figure 3. The FLU residues in cucumbers ranged from 21.44 μg/kg to 107.13 μg/kg following the first spraying event, 120.33 μg/kg to 225.89 μg/kg following the second spraying event and 152.00 μg/kg to 247.65 μg/kg following the third spraying event, and those in cowpeas were 877.37–1341.08 μg/kg, 1626.35–2341.41 μg/kg and 2103.66–3256.29 μg/kg, respectively. These results suggest that cowpeas had much higher levels of FLU residues than cucumbers. A similar residue pattern was found between TRI levels in cucumbers and cowpeas (Table 1). FLU and TRI residues were then used to fit the first-order kinetics models, which produced satisfactory correlation coefficients of 0.50–0.97. The calculated half-lives of FLU were 3.15, 8.89 and 10.66 days for cucumbers and 12.37, 16.91 and 15.40 days for cowpeas, and those for TRI were 2.60, 4.88 and 7.97 days for cucumbers and 17.33, 22.36 and 10.83 days for cowpeas. These results suggest that FLU dissipated faster in cucumbers than in cowpeas, whereas TRI showed a similar dissipation trend in cucumbers and cowpeas. In addition, we noted that residual FLU and TRI in cucumbers and cowpeas increased with increasing spraying times. The average RA values of FLU were 1:2.65:1.08 for cucumbers and 1:1.83:1.15 for cowpeas, while those for TRI were 1:2.04:1.25 for cucumbers and 1:1.69:1.17 for cowpeas.
The parent FLU and TRI were the main compounds present in the greenhouse-field cucumbers and cowpeas, and their metabolites (FLB and TRA) fluctuated at low residue levels. Residual FLB was only found in cowpeas, with detectable concentrations of 1.14–9.06 μg/kg. Residual TRA ranged from 1.69 μg/kg to 24.26 μg/kg in cucumbers and from 5.85 μg/kg to 76.17 μg/kg in cowpeas, indicating higher levels of TRA residues in cowpeas (Table 1). In general, the concentrations of TRA first increased and then gradually decreased 2 h–7 d after each spraying event, except for the first instance of spraying on cowpeas, whereby TRA concentrations underwent a sustained increase (Figure 3). Although the levels of FLB and TRA residues were low, both showed strong residue accumulation in cucumbers (average RA value of TRA, 1:2.71:1.53) and cowpeas (FLB, 1:4.01:1.99; TRA, 1:2.86:1.14). Together, these results verify the residue accumulation of parent FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA, in greenhouse cucumbers and cowpeas after repeated spraying.

3.3. Residue Fate and Processing Factors of FLU and TRI in Cucumbers and Cowpeas

Pesticide residue changes in cucumbers and cowpeas were studied during several traditional household processing operations, including peeling, washing, stir-frying, boiling and pickling; all the data are listed in Table S4. Pesticide residue reduction and concentration during processing were estimated using the PFs, which are shown in Figure 4. Peeling removed 70.06% of FLU, 76.40% of TRI and 86.80% of TRA from cucumbers (Table S4). Following washing, the PFs in cucumbers decreased from 0.77 (1 min) to 0.38 (10 min) for FLU and 0.90 (1 min) to 0.30 (10 min) for TRI. A similar stepped downward trend was found for PFs in cowpeas for both FLU and TRI following washing (Figure 4A). Following boiling, the PFs of FLU and TRI also presented a decreasing trend in cucumbers and cowpeas with increasing in processing time (Figure 4C). However, following stir-frying, the PFs of FLU increased from 0.29 to 0.58 for cucumbers and 0.61 to 0.74 for cowpeas in 10 min, and those for TRI increased from 0.12 to 0.47 for cucumbers and 0.55 to 0.77 for cowpeas (Figure 4B). Following pickling, the PFs of FLU and TRI first decreased and then gradually increased (Figure 4D), implying that overpickling may result in an increase in pesticide residues in pickled cucumbers and cowpeas. Although the pesticide residues fluctuated greatly during processing, all operations reduced FLU and TRI residues in cucumbers and cowpeas because their PFs were lower than 1.
In addition to the parent FLU and TRI, the residues of FLB and TRA changed greatly in the processed cucumbers and cowpeas (Table S4). Washing, stir-frying and boiling removed large amounts of TRA from cucumbers and cowpeas with PFs of 0.19–0.90, except for cucumbers washed for 1 min (1.11); on the contrary, pickling increased the concentration of TRA residues in cucumbers (PF range, 1.39–2.73) and cowpeas (PF range, 1.35–5.41). Residual FLB was low in the processed cowpeas at 1.41–6.91 μg/kg, and PF values of higher than 1 were found for stir-frying for 7 min (1.17) and 10 min (1.23) and boiling for 5 min (1.17) and 7 min (1.23). In total, more attention should be paid to pickling operations due to their obvious effects on TRA concentrations during processing.

3.4. Dietary Risk Assessment of FLU and TRI in Cucumbers and Cowpeas

The maximum residue limits (MRLs) were first used to estimate the residue risks of FLU and TRI in cucumbers and cowpeas. The total FLU and TRI residues (expressed as FLUsum and TRIsum, respectively) at different sampling intervals are listed in Table S5. A 3-day pre-harvest interval (PHI) for the 43% suspension concentrate of FLU and TRI was proposed for both cucumbers and cowpeas. In cucumbers, even the highest residues of FLUsum (253.21 μg/kg) and TRIsum (277.61 μg/kg) were less than the MRLs recommended by China, the CAC, the US, the EU, Japan and Korea (500–1000 μg/kg for FLU and 300–700 μg/kg for TRI). In cowpeas, the average FLUsum residues 3 days after each spraying event ranged from 1180.10 to 2214.06 μg/kg and were higher than the MRLs of China and CAC (1000 μg/kg) but lower than the MRLs of the US and the EU (3000–4000 μg/kg). Moreover, the average TRIsum residue 3 days after the first spraying event (1251.89 μg/kg) was lower than the MRLs of the US and the EU (1500 μg/kg), whereas those following the second and third spraying events (2245.24 μg/kg and 2479.15 μg/kg) were higher than these MRLs.
The chronic and acute risks associated with exposure to FLU and TRI from cucumbers and cowpeas were estimated based on FAO/WHO models; the risk values are listed in Table 2. For the chronic risk assessment, the HQc values of FLU for children and adults ranging from 0.0033 to 0.042 for cucumbers and 0.016 to 0.099 for cowpeas, and those for TRI were 0.0010–0.011 for cucumbers and 0.016–0.099 for cowpeas, which were all far below 1. For the acute risk assessment, the HQa values ranged from 0.0027 to 0.017 for cucumbers and 0.023 to 0.057 for cowpeas for both children and adults, i.e., <1. In addition, acute risk assessment for TRI was not considered as the ARfD value was reported to be unnecessary by JMPR and EFSA [32,33]. In conclusion, the human health risks of dietary exposure to FLU and TRI from cucumber and cowpea consumption were considered to be acceptable based on the results of the present study.

4. Discussion

Studying the dissipation, metabolism and accumulation of pesticides after repeated spraying is of vital importance to ensure food safety. In our study, FLU and TRI residues were higher in cowpeas than in cucumbers. The residue difference between cucumbers and cowpeas may be largely due to differences in the crops’ morphological characteristics, including crop height, foliar size and shape, fruit size, shape and surface [34]. Moreover, FLU and TRI residues dissipated faster in cucumbers (half-life range, 2.60–10.66 days) than in cowpeas (half-life range, 10.83–22.36 days). During the experimental period, cucumbers grew rapidly to contribute to the dilution of pesticide residues in fruits; however, cowpeas only showed a slight increase in fruit weight after pesticide spraying. This may be the main reason for the fast dissipation of FLU and TRI in cucumbers. Moreover, the half-lives of cowpeas and cucumbers in our study were larger than those in the chili (1.23–2.38 for FLU; 1.27–4.88 for TRI) and onion (1.74–1.83 for FLU; 4.73–4.78 for TRI) [9,12]. Our results suggest that both FLU and TRI showed potential residue accumulation in cucumbers (average RA value, 1:2.65:1.08 for FLU and 1:2.04:1.25 for TRI) and cowpeas (average RA value, 1:1.83:1.15 for FLU and 1:1.69:1.17 for TRI) after repeated spraying. Similarly, Wang et al. confirmed the residue accumulation of four common fungicides in strawberries in the order of procymidone > cyprodinil > pyrimethanil > pyraclostrobin after repeated spraying [14]. In addition to the parent compounds, their metabolites, FLB and TRA, also accumulated in cucumbers (average RA values of TRA, 1:2.71:1.53) and cowpeas (FLB, 1:4.01:1.99; TRA, 1:2.86:1.14). Other studies have also confirmed the prevalence of FLB and TRA in crops [12,13,35]. Therefore, due attention should be given to these metabolites to achieve a comprehensive risk assessment of FLU and TRI in cucumbers and cowpeas.
Food processing is typically accompanied by pesticide residue changes. In our study, peeling, washing, stir-frying, boiling and pickling partially or substantially removed FLU and TRI residues from raw agricultural products (PF range, 0.12–0.97). Unlike washing and boiling operations, residues of FLU and TRI presented an increasing trend with increasing stir-frying and pickling time. We inferred that the main reason for this residue increase was the water loss that occurs in cucumbers and cowpeas under high-temperature conditions (stir-frying) and in high-salt environments (pickling). Similarly, Lu et al. found that residues of organophosphorus pesticides, such as chlorpyrifos, isocarbophos, profenofos and triazophos, were also increased to some extent during the cabbage pickling process with different NaCl solutions [36]. Huan et al. found that residual procymidone, chlorothalonil and difenoconazole increased 1.03–1.11 times in stir-fried cowpeas [27]. More notably, residues of TRA appeared to be concentrated in pickled cucumbers and cowpeas (PF range, 1.35–5.41), and these concentration effects increased with increasing pickling time. TRI was easily hydrolyzed into TRA via cleavage of its methyl ester group in aquatic environments [37,38].
The health risks of chronic and acute exposure to total FLU and TRI from cucumbers and cowpeas were assessed for both children and adults. The HQc and HQa values of total FLU and TRI ranged from 0.0010 to 0.099 and 0.0027 to 0.057, respectively, although the highest value was still far smaller than 1, indicating low risks of adverse effects following exposure to FLU and TRI based on the results of the present study. Similarly, previous studies also revealed a low dietary risk of exposure to FLU or TRI from various agricultural products, such as onions, carrots, strawberries and mangoes [12,39,40,41]. The risks associated with exposure to FLU and TRI should not be ignored. On the one hand, FLU and TRI residue concentrations were high in cucumbers and cowpeas, and some residues at the PHI even exceeded the MRLs established by the Chinese government. On the other hand, long-term exposure to low doses of pesticides (even at permitted levels) could have harmful effects on mammals [42,43,44]. Moreover, numerous studies have confirmed the cumulative toxicity of different pesticides that were classified in both the same and different classes [31,45,46]. Therefore, individual or mixed processing operations should be used to reduce FLU and TRI residues in agricultural products, with the aim of protecting human health.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we comprehensively assessed the dissipation, metabolism, accumulation, processing and risk assessment of FLU and TRI in cucumbers and cowpeas from cultivation to consumption for the first time. Our results suggest that FLU and TRI residues were higher in cowpeas but dissipated faster in cucumbers. FLU and TRI were the main compounds found in field samples (≤3256.29 μg/kg), and their metabolites (FLB and TRA) fluctuated at low residue levels (≤76.17 μg/kg). Moreover, both FLU and TRI accumulated in cucumbers and cowpeas after repeated spraying. Our results show that peeling, washing, stir-frying, boiling and pickling could partially or substantially remove FLU and TRI residues from raw cucumbers and cowpeas; on the contrary, residues of the metabolite TRA were obviously concentrated following pickling. Chronic and acute risk assessments indicate that exposure to FLU and TRI through cucumber and cowpea consumption posed a low health risk to either children or adults based on the results of the present study. In the future, more experimental sites and crop categories across China should be chosen to study the fate of FLU and TRI residues to achieve a comprehensive understanding of their actual dietary risks; this would be a significant step in ensuring the safe use of FLU- and TRI-containing products and in protecting human health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12102082/s1, Table S1: Retention time and MRM parameters of FLU and TRI and their metabolites FLB and TRA for HPLC-MS/MS detection; Table S2: Detailed parameters/exposure factors for human health risk assessment; Table S3: The calibration regression equation, R2, ME, and LOQ for FLU and TRI and their metabolites FLB and TRA in different matrices; Table S4: Residue levels of FLU and TRI and their metabolites FLB and TRA in cucumbers and cowpeas for the different processing operations; Table S5. Total FLU and TRI residues (expressed as FLUsum and TRIsum) at different sampling intervals and MRLs for different countries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C. and Z.D.; methodology, S.G.; software, J.L. and L.F.; validation, J.L. and L.F.; formal analysis, K.C. and R.D.; investigation, J.W.; resources, T.L.; data curation, Z.D.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C.; writing—review and editing, X.W. and Y.Z.; visualization, K.C.; supervision, Z.D.; project administration, Z.D.; funding acquisition, K.C. and Z.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Agricultural Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No. CXGC2022E05 and CXGC2023044) and the Open Project Program of Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety (No. 2021KF01).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Cui, K.; Ning, M.; Liang, J.; Guan, S.; Fang, L.; Ding, R.; Wang, J.; Li, T.; Dong, Z. Pollution characteristics and non-dietary human cumulative risk assessment of neonicotinoids in vegetable greenhouse soils: A case study in Shandong Province, China. J. Soils Sediments 2023, 23, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ezrari, S.; Lazraq, A.; El Housni, Z.; Radouane, N.; Belabess, Z.; Mokrini, F.; Tahiri, A.; Amiri, S.; Lahlali, R. Evaluating the sensitivity and efficacy of fungicides with different modes of action against Neocosmospora solani and Fusarium species, causing agents of citrus dry root rot. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2022, 55, 1117–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rouquié, D.; Tinwell, H.; Blanck, O.; Schorsch, F.; Geter, D.; Wason, S.; Bars, R. Thyroid tumor formation in the male mouse induced by fluopyram is mediated by activation of hepatic CAR/PXR nuclear receptors. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 70, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tinwell, H.; Rouquié, D.; Schorsch, F.; Geter, D.; Wason, S.; Bars, R. Liver tumor formation in female rat induced by fluopyram is mediated by CAR/PXR nuclear receptor activation. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 70, 648–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jang, Y.; Lee, A.Y.; Chang, S.H.; Jeong, S.H.; Park, K.H.; Paik, M.K.; Cho, N.J.; Kim, J.E.; Cho, M.H. Trifloxystrobin induces tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-mediated apoptosis in HaCaT, human keratinocyte cells. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 40, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nguyen, K.; Sanchez, C.L.; Brammer-Robbins, E.; Pena-Delgado, C.; Kroyter, N.; El Ahmadie, N.; Watkins, J.M.; Aristizabal-Henao, J.J.; Bowden, J.A.; Souders, C.L., II. Neurotoxicity assessment of QoI strobilurin fungicides azoxystrobin and trifloxystrobin in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells: Insights from lipidomics and mitochondrial bioenergetics. Neurotoxicology 2022, 91, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cao, M.; Li, S.; Wang, Q.; Wei, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, G.; Wang, M. Track of fate and primary metabolism of trifloxystrobin in rice paddy ecosystem. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 518, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chawla, S.; Patel, D.J.; Patel, S.H.; Kalasariya, R.L.; Shah, P.G. Behaviour and risk assessment of fluopyram and its metabolite in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) fruit and in soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 11626–11634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mandal, K.; Singh, R.; Sharma, S.; Kataria, D. Dissipation and kinetic studies of fluopyram and trifloxystrobin in chilli. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2023, 115, 105008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matadha, N.Y.; Mohapatra, S.; Siddamallaiah, L. Distribution of fluopyram and tebuconazole in pomegranate tissues and their risk assessment. Food Chem. 2021, 358, 129909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mohapatra, S. Residue levels and dissipation behaviors for trifloxystrobin and tebuconazole in mango fruit and soil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sharma, N.; Mandal, K.; Sharma, S. Dissipation and risk assessment of fluopyram and trifloxystrobin on onion by GC–MS/MS. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 80612–80623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, L.; Li, W.; Li, P.; Li, M.; Chen, S.; Han, L. Residues and dissipation of trifloxystrobin and its metabolite in tomatoes and soil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 7793–7799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Z.; Di, S.; Qi, P.; Xu, H.; Zhao, H.; Wang, X. Dissipation, accumulation and risk assessment of fungicides after repeated spraying on greenhouse strawberry. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 758, 144067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Arisekar, U.; Shakila, R.J.; Shalini, R.; Jeyasekaran, G.; Padmavathy, P. Effect of household culinary processes on organochlorine pesticide residues (OCPs) in the seafood (Penaeus vannamei) and its associated human health risk assessment: Our vision and future scope. Chemosphere 2022, 297, 134075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhao, X.; He, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z. The dissipation behavior, household processing factor and risk assessment for cyenopyrafen residues in strawberry and mandarin fruits. Food Chem. 2021, 359, 129925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kim, S.W.; Abd El-Aty, A.; Rahman, M.M.; Choi, J.H.; Lee, Y.J.; Ko, A.Y.; Choi, O.J.; Jung, H.N.; Hacımüftüoğlu, A.; Shim, J.H. The effect of household processing on the decline pattern of dimethomorph in pepper fruits and leaves. Food Control 2015, 50, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, A.; Park, J.H.; Abd El-Aty, A.; Choi, J.H.; Oh, J.H.; Do, J.A.; Kwon, K.; Shim, K.H.; Choi, O.J.; Shim, J.H. Synergistic effect of washing and cooking on the removal of multi-classes of pesticides from various food samples. Food Control 2012, 28, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yigit, N.; Velioglu, Y.S. Effects of processing and storage on pesticide residues in foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3622–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Słowik-Borowiec, M.; Szpyrka, E. Selected food processing techniques as a factor for pesticide residue removal in apple fruit. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 2361–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Noh, H.H.; Kwon, H.; Lee, H.S.; Ro, J.; Kyung, K.S.; Moon, B. Determination of pyraclostrobin and trifloxystrobin residues in red pepper powder processed from raw red pepper. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kong, Z.; Quan, R.; Fan, B.; Liao, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, M.; Dai, X. Stereoselective behaviors of the fungicide triadimefon and its metabolite triadimenol during malt storage and beer brewing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 123238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, H.; Zhong, Q.; Wang, X.; Luo, F.; Zhou, L.; Sun, H.; Yang, M.; Lou, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, X. The degradation and metabolism of chlorfluazuron and flonicamid in tea: A risk assessment from tea garden to cup. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, C.; Zhu, H.; Li, C.; Qian, H.; Yao, W.; Guo, Y. The present situation of pesticide residues in China and their removal and transformation during food processing. Food Chem. 2021, 354, 129552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhao, L.; Liu, F.; Wu, L.; Xue, X.; Hou, F. Fate of triadimefon and its metabolite triadimenol in jujube samples during jujube wine and vinegar processing. Food Control 2017, 73, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. An, X.; Pan, X.; Li, R.; Jiang, D.; Dong, F.; Zhu, W.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Wu, X.; Zheng, Y. Enantioselective monitoring chiral fungicide mefentrifluconazole in tomato, cucumber, pepper and its pickled products by supercritical fluid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2022, 376, 131883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Huan, Z.; Xu, Z.; Jiang, W.; Chen, Z.; Luo, J. Effect of Chinese traditional cooking on eight pesticides residue during cowpea processing. Food Chem. 2015, 170, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. FAO/WHO. Global Environment Monitoring System (GEMS)/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/nutrition-and-food-safety/databases/global-environment-monitoring-system-food-contamination (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  29. Zhou, J.; Dong, C.; An, W.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Jiao, B. Dissipation of imidacloprid and its metabolites in Chinese prickly ash (Zanthoxylum) and their dietary risk assessment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 225, 112719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, L.; Luo, F.; Chen, Z. Dissipation behavior and risk assessment of tolfenpyrad from tea bushes to consuming. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cui, K.; Wu, X.; Wei, D.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, J.; Xu, J.; Dong, F.; Liu, X.; Zheng, Y. Health risks to dietary neonicotinoids are low for Chinese residents based on an analysis of 13 daily-consumed foods. Environ. Int. 2021, 149, 106385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); Arena, M.; Auteri, D.; Barmaz, S.; Bellisai, G.; Brancato, A.; Brocca, D.; Bura, L.; Byers, H.; Chiusolo, A.; et al. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifloxystrobin. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e04989. [Google Scholar]
  33. JMPR. Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues. Trifloxystrobin. JMPR Report. 2017. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Report2017/5.37_TRIFLOXYSTROBIN__213_.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  34. Noh, H.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, H.K.; Lee, J.W.; Jo, S.H.; Lim, J.B.; Shin, H.G.; Kwon, H.; Kyung, K.S. Dissipation, persistence, and risk assessment of fluxapyroxad and penthiopyrad residues in perilla leaf (Perilla frutescens var. japonica Hara). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vargas-Pérez, M.; Egea González, F.J.; Garrido Frenich, A. Dissipation and residue determination of fluopyram and its metabolites in greenhouse crops. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 4826–4833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Shen, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Diao, J. Dissipation behavior of organophosphorus pesticides during the cabbage pickling process: Residue changes with salt and vinegar content of pickling solution. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 2244–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, X.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Tao, Y.; Pan, X.; Zheng, Y.; Dong, F. Simultaneous determination of trifloxystrobin and trifloxystrobin acid residue in rice and soil by a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method using ultra high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2014, 37, 1640–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bian, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, A.; Qi, X.; Ma, X.; Pan, J.; Han, J.; Liang, L. Residue behaviors, processing factors and transfer rates of pesticides and metabolites in rose from cultivation to consumption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 442, 130104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mohapatra, S.; Siddamallaiah, L.; Buddidathi, R.; Yogendraiah Matadha, N. Dissipation kinetics and risk assessment of fluopyram and tebuconazole in mango (Mangifera indica). Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2018, 98, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, L.; Zhong, Z.; Han, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Qin, Y.; Wu, Q.; He, X.; Pan, C. Dissipation of sixteen pesticide residues from various applications of commercial formulations on strawberry and their risk assessment under greenhouse conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 188, 109842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Y.; Yang, M.; Zhao, T.; Pan, L.; Jia, L.; Zheng, L. Residue and Risk Assessment of Fluopyram in Carrot Tissues. Molecules 2022, 27, 5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Conley, J.M.; Lambright, C.S.; Evans, N.; Cardon, M.; Medlock-Kakaley, E.; Wilson, V.S.; Gray, L.E., Jr. A mixture of 15 phthalates and pesticides below individual chemical no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) produces reproductive tract malformations in the male rat. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ghasemnejad-Berenji, M.; Nemati, M.; Pourheydar, B.; Gholizadeh, S.; Karimipour, M.; Mohebbi, I.; Jafari, A. Neurological effects of long-term exposure to low doses of pesticides mixtures in male rats: Biochemical, histological, and neurobehavioral evaluations. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tsatsakis, A.; Docea, A.O.; Constantin, C.; Calina, D.; Zlatian, O.; Nikolouzakis, T.K.; Stivaktakis, P.D.; Kalogeraki, A.; Liesivuori, J.; Tzanakakis, G. Genotoxic, cytotoxic, and cytopathological effects in rats exposed for 18 months to a mixture of 13 chemicals in doses below NOAEL levels. Toxicol. Lett. 2019, 316, 154–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Alarcan, J.; Waizenegger, J.; Solano, M.; Lichtenstein, D.; Luckert, C.; Peijnenburg, A.; Stoopen, G.; Sharma, R.P.; Kumar, V.; Marx-Stoelting, P. Hepatotoxicity of the pesticides imazalil, thiacloprid and clothianidin–Individual and mixture effects in a 28-day study in female Wistar rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 140, 111306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abd-Elhakim, Y.M.; El Sharkawy, N.I.; El Bohy, K.M.; Hassan, M.A.; Gharib, H.S.; El-Metwally, A.E.; Arisha, A.H.; Imam, T.S. Iprodione and/or chlorpyrifos exposure induced testicular toxicity in adult rats by suppression of steroidogenic genes and SIRT1/TERT/PGC-1α pathway. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 56491–56506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Foods 12 02082 g001 550
Figure 1. The chemical structures of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA.
Figure 1. The chemical structures of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA.
Foods 12 02082 g001
Foods 12 02082 g002 550
Figure 2. Recoveries of FLU (A) and TRI (B) and their metabolites, FLB (C) and TRA (D), in different matrices. Note: The error bars represent standard deviations calculated from five duplicates.
Figure 2. Recoveries of FLU (A) and TRI (B) and their metabolites, FLB (C) and TRA (D), in different matrices. Note: The error bars represent standard deviations calculated from five duplicates.
Foods 12 02082 g002
Foods 12 02082 g003 550
Figure 3. Residue dissipation of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA, in cucumbers and cowpeas after repeated spraying. Note: The error bars represent standard deviations calculated from three duplicates.
Figure 3. Residue dissipation of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA, in cucumbers and cowpeas after repeated spraying. Note: The error bars represent standard deviations calculated from three duplicates.
Foods 12 02082 g003
Foods 12 02082 g004 550
Figure 4. Processing factors (PFs) of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA, in cucumbers and cowpeas following washing (A), stir-frying (B), boiling (C) and pickling (D). The red bars represent a PF value of >1.
Figure 4. Processing factors (PFs) of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA, in cucumbers and cowpeas following washing (A), stir-frying (B), boiling (C) and pickling (D). The red bars represent a PF value of >1.
Foods 12 02082 g004
Table
Table 1. Residues, dissipation kinetics and residue accumulation (RA) of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA, in cucumbers and cowpeas after repeated spraying. Note: SD denotes standard deviation, calculated from three duplicates.
Table 1. Residues, dissipation kinetics and residue accumulation (RA) of FLU and TRI and their metabolites, FLB and TRA, in cucumbers and cowpeas after repeated spraying. Note: SD denotes standard deviation, calculated from three duplicates.
Time1st Spraying2nd Spraying3rd SprayingRAAverage
RA
Mean Residue ± SD (μg/kg)Dissipation Rate (%)Mean Residue ± SD (μg/kg)Dissipation Rate (%)Mean Residue ± SD (μg/kg)Dissipation Rate (%)
FLU in cucumbers
2 h105.63 ± 2.14-225.89 ± 3.59-214.67 ± 2.73-1:2.14:0.951:2.65:1.08
1 d107.13 ± 2.68-195.11 ± 12.1113.63247.65 ± 6.16-1:1.82:1.27
3 d54.78 ± 2.0348.14197.11 ± 26.8512.74209.42 ± 4.042.441:3.60:1.06
5 d54.27 ± 1.1048.62172.08 ± 9.9323.82152.00 ± 2.2529.191:3.17:0.88
7 d21.44 ± 0.6279.70120.33 ± 1.0346.73157.22 ± 2.7726.761:5.61:1.31
Dynamic equationy = 120.05e−0.22xy = 228.98e−0.078xy = 237.76e−0.065x
R20.900.850.77
t1/2 (d)3.158.8910.66
FLU in cowpeas
2 h1341.08 ± 53.95-2341.41 ± 18.12-3256.29 ± 19.45-1:1.75:1.391:1.83:1.15
1 d1215.85 ± 27.279.342142.03 ± 38.708.522228.24 ± 79.5531.571:1.76:1.04
3 d1179.58 ± 39.4512.042131.32 ± 29.498.972207.41 ± 37.2632.211:1.81:1.04
5 d1049.90 ± 5.8521.712130.55 ± 41.469.012160.21 ± 30.5833.661:2.03:1.01
7 d877.37 ± 28.3634.581626.35 ± 7.5630.542103.66 ± 49.2535.401:1.85:1.29
Dynamic equationy = 1341.06e−0.056xy = 2351.11e−0.041xy = 2726.41e−0.045x
R20.950.720.50
t1/212.3716.9115.40
TRI in cucumbers
2 h110.14 ± 8.39-207.41 ± 13.18-202.85 ± 11.54-1:1.88:0.981:2.04:1.25
1 d109.14 ± 9.530.91148.30 ± 1.8628.50208.68 ± 17.17-1:1.36:1.41
3 d49.54 ± 2.9255.02162.21 ± 4.1321.79173.55 ± 24.8514.451:3.27:1.07
5 d44.04 ± 1.1360.0267.62 ± 0.1967.40135.30 ± 8.1833.301:1.54:2.00
7 d16.48 ± 0.9785.0385.18 ± 4.6858.93117.59 ± 10.5642.031:5.17:1.38
Dynamic equationy = 126.06e−0.28xy = 194.74e−0.14xy = 216.45e−0.087x
R20.940.740.97
t1/2 (d)2.604.887.97
TRI in cowpeas
2 h1586.16 ± 156.66-2627.72 ± 124.51-3576.15 ± 79.16-1:1.66:1.361:1.69:1.17
1 d1384.96 ± 24.7512.682200.96 ± 52.5316.242665.77 ± 80.4625.461:1.59:1.21
3 d1235.94 ± 29.1022.082187.77 ± 99.0816.742399.93 ± 48.4432.891:1.77:1.1
5 d1267.11 ± 60.8720.112194.10 ± 49.6516.502258.87 ± 33.3636.841:1.73:1.03
7 d1138.03 ± 131.0628.251964.60 ± 75.5425.242122.85 ± 79.5540.641:1.73:1.08
Dynamic equationy = 1495.90 e−0.040xy = 2455.67e−0.031xy = 3140.45e−0.064x
R20.820.690.78
t1/217.3322.3610.83
FLB in cowpeas
2 h<LOQ 1.58 ± 0.04 3.91 ± 0.19 -1:4.01:1.99
1 d<LOQ 2.03 ± 0.07 3.93 ± 0.30 -
3 d<LOQ 2.61 ± 0.14 6.40 ± 0.09 -
5 d<LOQ 2.27 ± 0.08 8.33 ± 0.18 -
7 d1.14 ± 0.14 4.57 ± 0.35 9.06 ± 0.31 1:4.01:1.99
TRA in cucumbers
2 h1.69 ± 0.11 5.57 ± 0.09 20.30± 0.57 1:3.29:3.641:2.71:1.53
1 d4.27 ± 0.01 9.53 ± 0.32 24.26 ± 0.57 1:2.23:2.55
3 d7.81 ± 0.27 15.27 ± 2.69 19.54 ± 0.54 1:1.96:1.28
5 d3.96 ± 0.07 11.64 ± 1.15 8.40 ± 0.17 1:2.94:0.72
7 d1.89 ± 0.15 11.16 ± 0.06 8.76 ± 0.11 1:5.92:0.79
TRA in cowpeas
2 h5.85 ± 0.33 49.52 ± 1.48 35.79 ± 1.22 1:8.47:0.721:2.86:1.14
1 d16.42 ± 1.78 54.21 ± 4.50 57.19 ± 6.12 1:3.30:1.05
3 d15.34 ± 0.28 55.26 ± 4.77 76.17 ± 0.68 1:4.97:0.73
5 d20.85 ± 0.30 55.05 ± 0.84 65.16 ± 3.18 1:2.64:1.18
7 d29.71 ± 8.50 37.98 ± 0.75 51.89 ± 4.48 1:1.28:1.37
Table
Table 2. Chronic and acute hazard quotients of FLU and TRI in cucumbers and cowpeas for children and adults.
Table 2. Chronic and acute hazard quotients of FLU and TRI in cucumbers and cowpeas for children and adults.
PesticidesVegetablesSpraying TimeNEDI (μg/kg bw/d)HQcIESTI (μg/kg bw/d)HQa
ChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdultsChildrenAdults
FLUCucumber10.110.0330.0110.00332.261.370.00450.0027
20.390.120.0390.0128.725.290.0170.011
30.420.130.0420.0138.465.140.0170.010
Cowpea10.520.160.0520.01615.5011.730.0310.023
20.950.290.0950.02927.4120.750.0550.041
30.990.300.0990.03028.3321.450.0570.043
TRICucumber10.130.0400.00330.00102.731.66--
20.380.120.0100.00298.064.90--
30.430.130.0110.00329.395.70--
Cowpea10.570.170.0140.004316.0212.13--
21.000.300.0250.007629.8122.56--
31.110.340.0280.008431.7724.05--
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cui, K.; Guan, S.; Liang, J.; Fang, L.; Ding, R.; Wang, J.; Li, T.; Dong, Z.; Wu, X.; Zheng, Y. Dissipation, Metabolism, Accumulation, Processing and Risk Assessment of Fluopyram and Trifloxystrobin in Cucumbers and Cowpeas from Cultivation to Consumption. Foods 2023, 12, 2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12102082

AMA Style

Cui K, Guan S, Liang J, Fang L, Ding R, Wang J, Li T, Dong Z, Wu X, Zheng Y. Dissipation, Metabolism, Accumulation, Processing and Risk Assessment of Fluopyram and Trifloxystrobin in Cucumbers and Cowpeas from Cultivation to Consumption. Foods. 2023; 12(10):2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12102082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cui, Kai, Shuai Guan, Jingyun Liang, Liping Fang, Ruiyan Ding, Jian Wang, Teng Li, Zhan Dong, Xiaohu Wu, and Yongquan Zheng. 2023. "Dissipation, Metabolism, Accumulation, Processing and Risk Assessment of Fluopyram and Trifloxystrobin in Cucumbers and Cowpeas from Cultivation to Consumption" Foods 12, no. 10: 2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12102082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop