Next Article in Journal
A Novel Fermented Rapeseed Meal, Inoculated with Selected Protease-Assisting Screened B. subtilis YY-4 and L. plantarum 6026, Showed High Availability and Strong Antioxidant and Immunomodulation Potential Capacity
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptional Profiling Reveals Adaptive Response and Tolerance to Lactic Acid Stress in Pichia kudriavzevii
Previous Article in Journal
Antioxidant Activities of Co-Encapsulated Natal Plum (Carissa macrocarpa) Juice Inoculated with Ltp. plantarum 75 in Different Biopolymeric Matrices after In Vitro Digestion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spoilage Potential of Contaminating Yeast Species Kluyveromyces marxianus, Pichia kudriavzevii and Torulaspora delbrueckii during Cold Storage of Skyr
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production of Indigo by Recombinant Escherichia coli with Expression of Monooxygenase, Tryptophanase, and Molecular Chaperone

1
School of Food and Health, Beijing Technology & Business University, Beijing 100048, China
2
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology & Business University, Beijing 100048, China
3
Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Food Additives, Beijing Technology & Business University, Beijing 100048, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(14), 2117; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142117
Submission received: 10 June 2022 / Revised: 4 July 2022 / Accepted: 14 July 2022 / Published: 16 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiological Safety and Quality of Fermented Products)

Abstract

:
Indigo is an important pigment widely used in industries of food, cosmetics, and textile. In this work, the styrene monooxygenase StyAB from Pseudomonas putida was co-expressed with the tryptophanase TnaA and the chaperone groES-groEL in Escherichia coli for indigo production. Over-expression of the gene styAB endowed the recombinant E. coli AB with the capacity of indigo biosynthesis from indole and tryptophan. Tryptophan fermentation in E. coli AB generated about five times more indigo than that from indole, and the maximum 530 mg/L of indigo was obtained from 1.2 mg/mL of tryptophan. The gene TnaA was then co-expressed with styAB, and the tryptophanase activity significantly increased in the recombinant E. coli ABT. However, TnaA expression led to a decrease in the activity of StyAB and indigo yield in E. coli ABT. Furthermore, the plasmid pGro7 harboring groES-groEL was introduced into E. coli AB, which obviously promoted the activity of StyAB and accelerated indigo biosynthesis in the recombinant E. coli ABP. In addition, the maximum yield of indigo was further increased to 550 mg/L from 1.2 mg/mL of tryptophan in E. coli ABP. The genetic manipulation strategy proposed in this work could provide new insights into construction of indigo biosynthesis cell factory for industrial production.

1. Introduction

Indigo is one of the oldest pigments used by human beings with a history of thousands of years, and it is still widely used in food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and textile industries [1,2]. Indigo production is mainly achieved by extraction from plants and chemical synthesis [3]. However, indigo preparation from plants has obvious disadvantages in cost and yield, and chemical synthesis inevitably brings about harmfulness to human health and the environment due to toxic compounds from the reaction systems [4]. Previous studies reported indigo could be produced by various microorganisms such as Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter [5,6,7,8,9,10], which provides economic, effective, and eco-friendly approaches for indigo production. Various indigo biosynthesis pathways were found in different microbial species. Generally, indigo is generated via oxidation of the substrate by catalysis of oxygenase. In Pseudomonas species, multiple oxygenases, including xylene oxygenase, toluene-4-monooxygenase, toluene dioxygenase, 2-naphthoic acid oxygenase, naphthalene dioxygenase, and styrene monooxygenase, were proved to express the catalytic activities of indigo biosynthesis [8,11]. O’Connor et al. (1997) proposed the pathway of indigo biosynthesis from indole in Pseudomonas. Briefly, indole is oxidized into indole oxide by monooxygenase; indole oxide is then transformed to indoxyl by isomerase; and two indoxyl molecules form indigo by dimerization [12]. However, not only indigo but also the structurally similar by-product indirubin could be generated via the alternative branch pathway by catalysis of dioxygenase [13,14]. Therefore, indole conversion by catalysis of monooxygenase is a shortcut to obtain pure indigo.
In our previous work, over-expression of the styrene monooxygenase gene styAB was conducted in Pseudomonas putida, and it significantly enhanced indigo production from indole, revealing that the monooxygenase StyAB acted as the key rate-limiting enzyme for indigo biosynthesis [15]. In this work, the styrene monooxygenase gene styAB from P. putida was heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli for highly efficient indigo production, and co-expression of styAB with the tryptophanase gene TnaA and the molecular chaperone groES-groEL was further performed in E. coli to construct an indigo production system from tryptophan. The genetic manipulation strategy proposed in this work provided new insights into construction of indigo biosynthesis cell factory for industrial application.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains, Plasmids and Culture Conditions

Strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. E. coli strains were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium at 37 °C with vigorous shaking. P. putida strain was cultured at 30 °C in LB medium with vigorous shaking. When needed, kanamycin (50 μg/mL) and chloramphenicol (35 μg/mL) were added into LB medium for E. coli strain screening.

2.2. DNA Manipulation Techniques

Standard DNA manipulation techniques were performed as described by Green and Sambrook [16]. Bacterial genomic DNA was prepared using the TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid DNA from E. coli was prepared using the High-purity Plasmid Miniprep Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA amplification was performed using the TakaRa Primer SRTAR MAX DNA Polymerase following the manufacturer’s protocol (Takara, Beijing, China). Restriction endonuclease digestion and DNA ligation were conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Takara, Beijing, China). Standard heat-shock transformation method was used to introduce plasmid DNA to E. coli [16]. Total mRNA from E. coli was prepared using the Trizol Extraction Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioTeke, Beijing, China). RNA was subject to reverse transcription to generate cDNA using FastKing RT Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (q RT-PCR) was performed using the SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green) Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) in Light Cycler Nano System (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) with the following cycling conditions: 95 °C for 10 s, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s. The 16S rRNA gene was used for transcript normalization. All reactions were performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method corrected for primer efficiencies using the untreated group mean as the reference condition [17]. Primers used in this work were listed in Table 2.

2.3. Vectors Construction for Gene Expression in E. coli

The styAB gene was amplified by PCR from the genomic DNA of P. putida B4 using the specific primers styAB-F and styAB-R designed according to the sequence of styrene monooxygenase gene (GenBank accession no. DQ177365.1) from P. putida. The amplicon of styAB was inserted into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of the E. coli expression vector pBK-CMV to construct the recombinant vector pBK-AB (Figure S1), which was transformed into E. coli DH5α, and the recombinant strain E. coli AB was screened on LB agar plates containing kanamycin.
The TnaA gene was amplified by PCR from the genomic DNA of E. coli DH5α using the specific primers TnaA-F and TnaA-R designed according to the sequence of tryptophanase gene (GenBank accession no. NC_000913.3) from E. coli. The amplicon of TnaA was inserted into the upstream site of styAB in MCS of pBK-AB to construct the recombinant vector pBK-ABT (Figure S1). pBK-ABT was transformed into E. coli DH5α to construct the recombinant strain E. coli ABT.
The chaperone plasmid pGro7 was transformed into E. coli AB and E. coli ABT, respectively, and the recombinant strains E. coli ABP and E. coli ABTP were screened on LB agar plates containing kanamycin and chloramphenicol. The recombinant vectors were verified by sequencing and alignment analysis using DNAMAN software package and BLAST Program at NCBI against the GenBank database, and the recombinant strains were verified by plasmid profile and sequencing.

2.4. Indigo Production by E. coli Fermentation

For indigo production, fresh overnight culture of E. coli was inoculated (1%) in the fermentation medium (17 g/L Na2HPO4 • 12 H2O, 3 g/L KH2PO4, 1 g/L NH4Cl, 0.5 g/L NaCl, 0.1 g/L MgSO4, and 3 g/L yeast extract) containing indole or tryptophan as the substrates, and fermentation was conducted at 30 °C with vigorous shaking at 200 rpm for 24~48 h. For fermentation of the E. coli strain harboring the chaperone plasmid pGro7, fresh overnight culture of E. coli was inoculated (1%) in LB medium and cultured at 37 °C with vigorous shaking at 200 rpm. When cells density reached 0.2 (OD 600 nm), 150 μg/mL of arabinose was added in LB medium, and cells were cultured at 30 °C with vigorous shaking at 200 rpm until OD 600 nm reached 0.8. The fresh culture was then inoculated (1%) in the fermentation medium, and fermentation was conducted as described above. The fermentation data were representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

2.5. Enzymatic Activity Assay

Monooxygenase activity was measured by indole consumption as described previously [15]. Cells were harvested from cultures by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min, washed with potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0), and resuspended in the same buffer containing 5 mM indole. Cell suspension was incubated in shaking water bath at 30 °C at 150 rpm for 30 min. Indole depletion was determined by HPLC, and 1 unit (U) of monooxygenase activity was defined as 1 μM indole depletion in 30 min.
Tryptophanase activity was assayed by indole production from tryptophan. Cells were harvested from cultures by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min, washed with phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0), and resuspended in the same buffer. Cell resuspension solution was subject to sonication in ice-bath, and the supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 5 min. Cell supernatant was mixed with glutathione (5 mM) and tryptophan (5.0 mg/mL) and incubated in shaking water bath at 37 °C at 150 rpm for 10 min. Indole production was determined by HPLC, and 1 unit (U) of tryptophanase activity was defined as 0.01 μm indole production in 10 min. The results were representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Significant differences between different strains were identified by the unpaired Student’s t-test or ANOVA analysis.

2.6. Measurement of Indole, Indigo, and Tryptophan

For indigo determination, fermentation culture was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min to collect blue indigo pellets, which were washed with water and resuspended in dimethyl formamide (DMF). The indigo suspension was subject to sonication for 5 min repeatedly and filtrated with 0.22 μm millipore for HPLC analysis. Indigo and indole were measured by a HPLC system (Agilent 1290, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an Agilent Eclipse plus C18 RRHD column (1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 50 mm) and diode array detector [15]. The mobile phase was water/methanol (10: 90, v/v), and the operating conditions were as follows: detection at 610 nm and flow rate of 0.2 mL/min.
For tryptophan determination, fermentation culture was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min to collect supernatant. The supernatant was filtrated with 0.22 μm millipore and used for tryptophan determination by a HPLC system (Agilent 1200, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an Agilent C18 column (5.0 µm, 150 mm × 4.6 mm) and diode array detector. The mobile phase was 0.03% KH2PO4 solution/methanol (90:10, v/v), and the operating conditions were as follows: detection at 278 nm and flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The results were representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Significant differences between different strains were identified by the unpaired Student’s t-test.

3. Results

3.1. Expression of Styrene Monooxygenase Gene StyAB Generated Indigo Biosynthesis in E. coli

The 1815 bp styAB gene was cloned from P. putida B4, and sequencing analysis showed that the DNA fragment shared a 100% homology with the styrene monooxygenase gene (GenBank accession no. DQ177365.1). The 6.3 kb recombinant expression vector pBK-AB was then constructed by inserting the styAB gene into pBK-CMV and transformed into E. coli DH5α, generating the recombinant strain E. coli AB. The fermentation results indicated that E. coli AB obtained the ability of indigo biosynthesis from indole, and its indigo production yield was quite higher than that of P. putida B4 (Figure 1). It was observed that indigo production in E. coli AB was indole dose-dependent. The highest yield of indigo (70 mg/L) in E. coli AB was produced from indole at 160 μg/mL, but higher concentrations of indole generated cytotoxicity and consequently led to a sharp decrease in indigo production (Figure 1).
In order to avoid the cytotoxicity of indole, tryptophan was used as the substrate of indigo biosynthesis. As shown in Figure 2, much more indigo was produced from tryptophan than that from indole in E. coli AB. The maximum yield of indigo from 1.0 mg/mL of tryptophan in E. coli AB was determined to be about 380 mg/L after 24 h of fermentation (Figure 3), which was about 5.4-fold higher than the highest yield (70 mg/L) from 160 μg/mL of indole, revealing that tryptophan was more suitable than indole as the substrate for indigo production by E. coli fermentation.
Furthermore, the influence of different concentrations of tryptophan on indigo production was investigated in E. coli AB fermentation. The results (Figure 4) indicated that low concentrations of tryptophan (<0.8 mg/mL) could be almost completely transformed to indigo, but indigo yield was limited to some extent due to low substrate concentration. When the concentration of tryptophan increased to 0.8–1.2 mg/mL, though the conversion rate of tryptophan decreased to 75%, the maximum indigo yield was 530 mg/L from 1.2 mg/mL of tryptophan (Figure 4). However, as the concentration of tryptophan rose (>1.2 mg/mL), the conversion rate of tryptophan and indigo yield both fell rapidly. It suggested that excessive tryptophan possibly led to the inadequate catalytic capacity of tryptophanase for subsequent indigo biosynthesis.

3.2. Co-Expression of Monooxygenase Gene StyAB and Tryptophanase Gene TnaA for Indigo Biosynthesis in E. coli

In order to enhance the utilization rate of tryptophan and improve indigo biosynthesis, the tryptophanase gene TnaA was over-expressed in E. coli AB. The 1416 bp TnaA gene was cloned from E. coli DH5α, which shared a 100% homology with the E. coli tryptophanase gene (GenBank accession no. K00032.1). The 7.7 kb recombinant expression vector pBK-ABT was constructed by inserting the TnaA gene into pBK-AB and transformed into E. coli DH5α, generating the recombinant strain E. coli ABT. Tryptophanase activity assay indicated that the recombinant strain E. coli ABT with expression of TnaA exhibited much higher tryptophanase activity than E. coli AB in response to high concentrations (0.8–2.0 mg/mL) of tryptophan added in fermentation (Figure 5), demonstrating that the TnaA gene was successfully expressed in E. coli ABT.
E. coli ABT was then used in fermentation with addition of different concentrations of tryptophan for indigo biosynthesis. Surprisingly, the fermentation results indicated that both the indigo yield and the conversion rate of tryptophan in E. coli ABT were significantly lower than that in E. coli AB at each concentration of tryptophan (Figure 6), revealing that expression of the TnaA gene hardly contributed to more indigo biosynthesis. Besides, more indole accumulated in E. coli ABT than that in E. coli AB, which was in accordance with the lower production yield of indigo (Figure 6). Though the tryptophanase activity was substantially enhanced, and tryptophan could be efficiently utilized, the monooxygenase activity must be strong enough for transformation of indole derived from tryptophan into indigo in E. coli ABT. It suggested that co-expression of the genes TnaA and styAB led to the deficiency in the catalytic activity of the monooxygenase StyAB because of some specific reasons, and it revealed that a delicate balance between the activities of tryptophanase and monooxygenase was essential for highly effective indigo biosynthesis from tryptophan in E. coli.

3.3. Introduction of Molecular Chaperone Enhanced the Activity of Monooxygenase StyAB and Indigo Biosynthesis in E. coli

In order to further enhance the activity of the monooxygenase StyAB, the molecular chaperone plasmid pGro7 was introduced into E. coli AB and E. coli ABT, respectively, generating the recombinant strain E. coli ABP and E. coli ABTP. Monooxygenase activity assay indicated that activities of the monooxygenase StyAB were significantly higher in the strain harboring pGro7 (E. coli ABP or E. coli ABTP) than in its corresponding strain without pGro7 (E. coli AB or E. coli ABT) during fermentation (Figure 7), which demonstrated that the presence of the molecular chaperone plasmid pGro7 contributed to improving the enzymatic activity in E. coli.
Moreover, it was observed that the strain with over-expression of TnaA (E. coli ABT or E. coli ABTP) expressed a significantly lower monooxygenase activity than its corresponding strain without TnaA expression (E. coli AB or E. coli ABP) when indigo was produced in quantity during fermentation (6 h and 18 h) (Figure 7), suggesting that expression of the styAB gene was reduced when it was co-expressed with the TnaA gene in the same vector.
Fermentation results showed that indigo accumulated faster in the first 24 h of fermentation in strains E. coli ABP and E. coli ABTP than in E. coli AB and E. coli ABT (Figure 8). Though a significant difference in the maximum yield of indigo was hardly detected between strains with and without pGro7, the introduction of the molecular chaperone benefited the catalytic activity of StyAB and consequently led to more indigo production (Figure 8). Besides, in comparison with E. coli ABT and E. coli ABTP, about 2-fold higher maximum yield of indigo was achieved in E. coli AB and E. coli ABP after 20 h of fermentation (Figure 8), which demonstrated that co-expression of TnaA with styAB exerted a negative effect on indigo biosynthesis due to a great reduction in the monooxygenase StyAB activity.
Furthermore, the fermentation with different concentrations of tryptophan showed that the conversion rate of tryptophan declined as the concentration of tryptophan rose, and the maximum yield of indigo was detected to be 550 mg/L from 1.2 mg/mL of tryptophan in fermentation of E. coli ABP (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

Different strategies of genetic manipulations were conducted to enhance indigo biosynthesis in E. coli in this study. The styrene monooxygenase gene styAB from P. putida was successfully expressed in E. coli, and it fulfilled a large number of indigo biosynthesis, demonstrating that the monooxygenase StyAB was the key enzyme for indigo biosynthesis. In P. putida, both styrene monooxygenase and styrene oxide isomerase are indispensable for transformation of indole to indigo [9]. The conversion of indole to indigo in P. putida is the result of a two-step biotransformation including formation of indole oxide from indole by styrene monooxygenase and generation of 3-oxindole from indole oxide by styrene oxide isomerase, and indigo is finally synthesized by dimerization of 3-oxindole [18]. This study verified that indigo production from indole could be simply achieved by expression of solo styrene monooxygenase in E. coli, which is an economic pathway for industrial production. Further, it suggested that there was a possible alternative isoenzyme of styrene oxide isomerase that could catalyze indole oxide to 3-oxindole in E. coli.
The monooxygenase StyAB directly catalyzes indole into indigo, but a high concentration of indole was toxic to E. coli cells [19,20], so there are inevitable limitations for indigo production using indole as the substrate. As E. coli could transform tryptophan to indole by catalysis of tryptophanase [21], tryptophan was used as the alternative substrate in fermentation for indigo production. The tryptophanase gene TnaA was successfully co-expressed with the monooxygenase gene styAB in E. coli, which obviously enhanced the tryptophanase activity. However, expression of TnaA unexpectedly resulted in a decrease in the monooxygenase activity, and consequently, co-expression of TnaA with styAB failed to promote indigo biosynthesis from tryptophan. In order to figure out the reason for StyAB activity decrease, the transcriptional level assay of the genes styA and styB was performed in E. coli AB and E. coli ABT in fermentation with different concentrations of tryptophan. As shown in Figure 10, the relative expression levels of both styA and styB in E. coli AB were significantly higher than that in E. coli ABT, which demonstrated that the StyAB activity decrease resulted from the low expression of styAB in E. coli ABT. For construction of the co-expression vector pBK-ABT, the gene TnaA was inserted into the upstream region of styAB. TnaA was adjacent to the promoter and consequently kept styAB distant from the promoter region. As the two genes were under the control of the same promoter, the transcription of styAB was probably attenuated due to the longer distance from the promoter [22]. Royo et al. [23] reported that co-expression of tryptophanase from E. coli and dioxygenase from Sphingomonas macrogolitabida did not improve the rate of indigo production from tryptophan in E. coli, and the reason probably was that tryptophanase production is not a limiting factor. Indigo biosynthesis from tryptophan in E. coli is a cascade reaction involved with sequential catalysis of tryptophanase and monooxygenase, so it is reasonable to assume that an appropriate balance in activities of the two key enzymes is likely essential for achievement of highly efficient indigo production. Though the genes TnaA and styAB were co-expressed in E. coli, their expressions were not under a tightly regulatory control. Hence, it was possible that the irrational ratio of expression levels of TnaA and StyAB led to indole accumulation and indigo biosynthesis decline.
The plasmid pGro7 harboring the chaperone protein groES-groEL could help the recombinant protein fold correctly in E. coli [24]. Therefore, introduction of pGro7 significantly enhanced the activity of StyAB and consequently sped up the rate of indigo biosynthesis from tryptophan. However, the effect of the molecular chaperone on the production yield of indigo was very finite. It suggested that other limiting factors might exit in the indigo biosynthesis system. Efficient cofactor regeneration is critical to oxidation-reduction reactions. Since the epoxidation of indole requires the activity of the flavin-dependent monooxygenase StyAB, enough supply of NADH or FAD is essential for the reaction system and productivity of indigo biosynthesis [25]. It is expectable that introduction of a NADH or FAD regeneration system will further promote indigo production by catalysis of the monooxygenase StyAB in E. coli.

5. Conclusions

The styrene monooxygenase gene styAB from P. putida was heterologously over-expressed in E. coli, and it fulfilled an economic pathway for indigo production from indole and tryptophan. Introduction of the chaperone protein groES-groEL significantly enhanced the catalytic activity of StyAB and consequently sped up the rate of indigo biosynthesis from tryptophan.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods11142117/s1, Figure S1: Construction of the expression vector pBK-AB harboring styAB and pBK-ABT harboring TnaA and styAB.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y.; data curation, L.D.; formal analysis, L.D.; funding acquisition, S.Y.; investigation, L.D., J.Y. and Y.Z.; methodology, L.D., J.Y. and Y.Z.; project administration, S.Y.; resources, S.Y.; software, L.D.; supervision, S.Y.; validation, L.D., J.Y. and Y.Z.; visualization, L.D. and S.Y.; writing—original draft, L.D. and S.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401669), Joint Program of Beijing Natural Science Foundation and Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KZ201910011014), Support Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities (IDHT20180506), and Talent Training Quality Construction-First Class Professional Construction (PXM2019-014213-000010).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Erkan, G.; Şengül, K.; Kaya, S. Dyeing of white and indigo dyed cotton fabrics with Mimosa tenuiflora extract. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2014, 18, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Han, G.H.; Bang, S.E.; Babu, B.K.; Chang, M.; Shin, H.-J.; Kim, S.W. Bio-indigo production in two different fermentation systems using recombinant Escherichia coli cells harboring a flavin-containing monooxygenase gene (fmo). Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 788–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bechtold, T.; Turcanu, A.; Geissler, S.; Ganglberger, E. Process balance and product quality in the production of natural indigo from Polygonum tinctorium Ait. applying low-technology methods. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 81, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pathak, H.; Madamwar, D. Biosynthesis of indigo dye by newly isolated naphthalene-degrading strain Pseudomonas sp. HOB1 and its application in dyeing cotton fabric. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 1616–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bhushan, B.; Samanta, S.K.; Jain, R.K. Indigo production by naphthalene-degrading bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 31, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Doukyu, N.; Nakano, T.; Okuyama, Y.; Aono, R. Isolation of an Acinetobacter sp. ST-550 which produces a high level of indigo in a water-organic solvent two-phase system containing high levels of indole. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gillam, E.M.; Aguinaldo, A.M.; Notley, L.M.; Kim, D.; Mundkowski, R.G.; Volkov, A.A.; Arnold, F.H.; Soucek, P.; DeVoss, J.J.; Guengerich, F.P. Formation of indigo by recombinant mammalian cytochrome P450. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 265, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mercadal, J.P.; Isaac, P.; Sineriz, F.; Ferrero, M.A. Indigo production by Pseudomonas sp. J26, a marine naphthalene-degrading strain. J. Basic Microbiol. 2010, 50, 290–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. O’Connor, K.E.; Dobson, A.D.; Hartmans, S. Indigo formation by microorganisms expressing styrene monooxygenase activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 4287–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lin, G.H.; Chen, H.P.; Huang, J.H.; Liu, T.T.; Lin, T.K.; Wang, S.J.; Tseng, C.H.; Shu, H.Y. Identification and characterization of an indigo-producing oxygenase involved in indole 3-acetic acid utilization by Acinetobacter baumannii. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 101, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qu, Y.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Li, X.; Zhou, J. Optimization of indigo production by a newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. QM. J. Basic Microbiol. 2012, 52, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mermod, N.; Harayama, S.; Timmis, K.N. New route to bacterial production of indigo. Nat. Biotechnol. 1986, 4, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Furuya, T.; Takahashi, S.; Ishii, Y.; Kino, K.; Kirimura, K. Cloning of a gene encoding flavin reductase coupling with dibenzothiophene monooxygenase through coexpression screening using indigo production as selective indication. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 313, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Qu, Y.; Shi, S.; Zhou, H.; Ma, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, J. Characterization of a novel phenol hydroxylase in indoles biotransformation from a strain Arthrobacter sp. W1. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, L.; Yin, S.; Chen, M.; Sun, B.; Hao, S.; Wang, C. Enhancing indigo production by over-expression of the styrene monooxygenase in Pseudomonas putida. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 73, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Green, M.; Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 4th ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. O’Leary, N.D.; O’Connor, K.E.; Dobson, A.D. Biochemistry, genetics and physiology of microbial styrene degradation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Garbe, T.R.; Kobayashi, M.; Yukawa, H. Indole-inducible proteins in bacteria suggest membrane and oxidant toxicity. Arch. Microbiol. 2000, 173, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, D.; Ding, X.; Rather, P.N. Indole can act as an extracellular signal in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 4210–4216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Snell, E.E. Tryptophanase: Structure, catalytic activities, and mechanism of action. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1975, 42, 287–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rydenfelt, M.; Garcia, H.G.; Cox, R.S.; Phillips, R. The influence of promoter architectures and regulatory motifs on gene expression in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Royo, J.L.; Moreno-Ruiz, E.; Cebolla, A.; Santero, E. Stable long-term indigo production by overexpression of dioxygenase genes using a chromosomal integrated cascade expression circuit. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 116, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nishihara, K.; Kanemori, M.; Kitagawa, M.; Yanagi, H.; Yura, T. Chaperone coexpression plasmids: Differential and synergistic roles of DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE and GroEL-GroES in assisting folding of an allergen of Japanese cedar pollen, Cryj2, in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 1694–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Otto, K.; Hofstetter, K.; Röthlisberger, M.; Witholt, B.; Schmid, A. Biochemical characterization of StyAB from Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120 as a two-component flavin-diffusible monooxygenase. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 5292–5302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Indigo biosynthesis from different concentrations of indole in fermentation of P. putida B4 and E. coli AB. Bars with asterisk (*) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Indigo biosynthesis from different concentrations of indole in fermentation of P. putida B4 and E. coli AB. Bars with asterisk (*) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Foods 11 02117 g001
Figure 2. Indigo production from indole and tryptophan in E. coli AB fermentation. CK, E. coli DH5α; 1, E. coli AB fermentation with 160 μg/mL of indole; 2, E. coli AB fermentation with 1.0 mg/mL of tryptophan.
Figure 2. Indigo production from indole and tryptophan in E. coli AB fermentation. CK, E. coli DH5α; 1, E. coli AB fermentation with 160 μg/mL of indole; 2, E. coli AB fermentation with 1.0 mg/mL of tryptophan.
Foods 11 02117 g002
Figure 3. Indigo production from 1.0 mg/mL of tryptophan in E. coli AB fermentation.
Figure 3. Indigo production from 1.0 mg/mL of tryptophan in E. coli AB fermentation.
Foods 11 02117 g003
Figure 4. Indigo biosynthesis from different concentrations of tryptophan in E. coli AB fermentation.
Figure 4. Indigo biosynthesis from different concentrations of tryptophan in E. coli AB fermentation.
Foods 11 02117 g004
Figure 5. Tryptophanase activity in E. coli AB and E. coli ABT in fermentation with different concentrations of tryptophan. Bars with asterisk (*) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Tryptophanase activity in E. coli AB and E. coli ABT in fermentation with different concentrations of tryptophan. Bars with asterisk (*) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Foods 11 02117 g005
Figure 6. Indigo biosynthesis from different concentrations of tryptophan in E. coli ABT fermentation.
Figure 6. Indigo biosynthesis from different concentrations of tryptophan in E. coli ABT fermentation.
Foods 11 02117 g006
Figure 7. StyAB activity in E. coli AB, E. coli ABP, E. coli ABT, and E. coli ABTP in fermentation with 1.2 mg/mL of tryptophan. Bars with different letters (a, b, and c) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. StyAB activity in E. coli AB, E. coli ABP, E. coli ABT, and E. coli ABTP in fermentation with 1.2 mg/mL of tryptophan. Bars with different letters (a, b, and c) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Foods 11 02117 g007
Figure 8. Indigo production from 1.2 mg/mL of tryptophan in fermentation of E. coli AB, E. coli ABP, E. coli ABT, and E. coli ABTP.
Figure 8. Indigo production from 1.2 mg/mL of tryptophan in fermentation of E. coli AB, E. coli ABP, E. coli ABT, and E. coli ABTP.
Foods 11 02117 g008
Figure 9. Indigo biosynthesis from different concentrations of tryptophan in E. coli ABP fermentation.
Figure 9. Indigo biosynthesis from different concentrations of tryptophan in E. coli ABP fermentation.
Foods 11 02117 g009
Figure 10. Transcriptional level assay of the genes styA and styB in E. coli AB and E. coli ABT in fermentation with different concentrations of tryptophan. Bars with asterisk (*) or pound sign (#) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 10. Transcriptional level assay of the genes styA and styB in E. coli AB and E. coli ABT in fermentation with different concentrations of tryptophan. Bars with asterisk (*) or pound sign (#) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Foods 11 02117 g010
Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in this work.
Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in this work.
Strains or PlasmidsRelevant FeaturesSource
Plasmids
pBK-CMVVector for gene expression in E. coli, KanRLaboratory collection
pBK-ABstyAB gene cloned in pBK-CMV, KanRThis work
pBK-ABTTnaA gene cloned in pBK-AB, KanRThis work
pGro7Chaperone plasmid harboring groES-groEL, CmRTakara, Beijing, China
Strains
E. coli DH5αHost for gene expressionTIANGEN, Beijing, China
E. coli ABE. coli DH5α harboring pBK-ABThis work
E. coli ABTE. coli DH5α harboring pBK-ABTThis work
E. coli ABTPE. coli DH5α harboring pBK-ABT and pGro7This work
P. putida B4Donor of styAB geneLaboratory collection
Table 2. Primers used in this work.
Table 2. Primers used in this work.
GenePrimerSequence (5′–3′)
q RT PCR
styAstyA-FGGCGAGCTGATTGAGATTC
styA-RTTTTGCCGTTATTGAGGGT
styBstyB-FAAAAGATGTGGTGGTGGAT
styB-RTGCTGAAGAATGCCGATAA
16S rRNA16S-FCCACCTGGACTGATACT
16S-RGCACCTGTCTCAATGTT
PCR
styABstyAB-FAACTGCAGATGAAAAAGCGTATCGGTATTG
styAB-RCCCAAGCTTTCAATTCAGTGGCAACGGGTT
TnaATnaA-FCCCAAGCTTATGGAAAACTTTAAACATCTCCC
TnaA-RCTAGTCTAGATTAAACTTCTTTAAGTTTTGCGG
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, L.; Yue, J.; Zhu, Y.; Yin, S. Production of Indigo by Recombinant Escherichia coli with Expression of Monooxygenase, Tryptophanase, and Molecular Chaperone. Foods 2022, 11, 2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142117

AMA Style

Du L, Yue J, Zhu Y, Yin S. Production of Indigo by Recombinant Escherichia coli with Expression of Monooxygenase, Tryptophanase, and Molecular Chaperone. Foods. 2022; 11(14):2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Lingyan, Jianming Yue, Yiying Zhu, and Sheng Yin. 2022. "Production of Indigo by Recombinant Escherichia coli with Expression of Monooxygenase, Tryptophanase, and Molecular Chaperone" Foods 11, no. 14: 2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop