Next Article in Journal
Modulation of Fabrication and Nutraceutical Delivery Performance of Ovalbumin-Stabilized Oleogel-Based Nanoemulsions via Complexation with Gum Arabic
Previous Article in Journal
Encapsulation of Caffeic Acid in Carob Bean Flour and Whey Protein-Based Nanofibers via Electrospinning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Method Validation, Residues and Dietary Risk Assessment for Procymidone in Green Onion and Garlic Plant

1
College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China
2
School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China
3
Institute for Pesticide Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(13), 1856; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11131856
Submission received: 21 May 2022 / Revised: 14 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Food Quality and Safety)

Abstract

:
Procymidone is used as a preventive and curative fungicide to control fungal growth on edible crops and ornamental plants. It is one of the most frequently used pesticides and has a high detection rate, but its residue behaviors remain unclear in green onion and garlic plants (including garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic). In this study, the dissipation and terminal residues of procymidone in four matrices were investigated, along with the validation of the method and risk assessment. The analytical method for the target compound was developed using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS), which was preceded by a Florisil cleanup. The linearities of this proposed method for investigating procymidone in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were satisfied in the range from 0.010 to 2.5 mg/L with R2 > 0.9985. At the same time, the limits of quantification in the four matrices were 0.020 mg/kg, and the fortified recoveries of procymidone ranged from 86% to 104%, with relative standard deviations of 0.92% to 13%. The dissipation of procymidone in green onion and garlic chive followed first-order kinetics, while the half-lives were less than 8.35 days and 5.73 days, respectively. The terminal residue levels in garlic chive were much higher than those in green onion and serpent garlic because of morphological characteristics. The risk quotients of different Chinese consumer groups to procymidone in green onion, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were in the range from 5.79% to 25.07%, which is comparably acceptable. These data could provide valuable information on safe and reasonable use of procymidone in its increasing applications.

1. Introduction

Green onion (Allium fistulosum L.) and garlic (Allium sativum L.) are popular spices and vegetables worldwide with long cultivation histories, and both of them possess a variety of biological activities [1,2,3]. Green onions have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antifungal, and antibacterial effects [4,5,6] and are grown in almost all provinces in China, with a planting area of 550,000 square kilometers [6], accounting for approximately 3% of the total vegetables [2]. Welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L. var. giganteum Makino) and chive (Allium schoenoprasum L.) are the main varieties of green onion cultivated in northern and southern areas in China, respectively (Figure 1). Garlic and its preparations possess many health benefits according to epidemiological, experimental, and clinical evidence, such as lowering blood lipids and blood pressure and inhibiting the growth of microorganisms (viral, fungal, and bacterial) [7,8]. There are three edible portions in the growth stages of the garlic plant, including garlic (Allium sativum L.), garlic chive (Allium sativum L. var. sativum), and serpent garlic (Allium sativum L. var. ophioscorodon (Link) Döll) [9] (Figure 1). These edible garlic parts have their unique functions and flavors; consequently, planting area and output have been increasing in recent years [10].
Procymidone is a systematic dicarboximide fungicide [11], and it is used as a postharvest fungicide and seed treatment to control fungal growth on various crops [11,12,13]. It is used in vegetables (tomato, cucumber, and leek) and fruits (grape and melon) for the control of grey mold (Botrytis cinerea). The dissipation of procymidone in strawberry [14], tomato [15], cucumber [16], grape juice [17], leek [18], rape plant [19], and soil [20] has been studied, and the results indicated that procymidone has much longer half-lives in those matrices. More recently, procymidone residues were found to be always detectable in various crops, while the detection rates in pepper, leafy vegetables, and eggplant in Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, were 26.7%, 26.2%, and 13.6%, respectively [21]. Furthermore, procymidone has been proved to have potential toxicity toward non-target organisms in the environment and it could inhibit the growth of Lemna minor and Scenedesmus Acutus in aquatic plants [22], while showing more significant toxicity toward rainbow trout [23].
Procymidone can effectively control the gray mold which is usually found in the growth and storage periods of green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic. The maximum residue limit (MRL) for procymidone in Welsh onion is 2 mg/kg in Japan and 5 mg/kg in Korea, while in garlic it is 0.1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg in Japan and Australia, respectively. MRLs for procymidone in garlic, green onion, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were established as 2 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, and 3 mg/kg in China, respectively [24]. However, the dissipation behavior and dietary risk of procymidone in green onion and garlic plants are not well-understood. Therefore, it is essential to obtain data on the dissipation and accumulation of procymidone in these vegetables and investigate the analytical method and risk assessment.
This study aimed to (1) optimize analytical methods using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS); (2) conduct field experiments in different areas across China to investigate procymidone’s dissipation rates and residue levels in four matrices; (3) assess the long-term dietary risks of procymidone based on the terminal residue results obtained. This study could provide a valuable reference for the safe and reasonable use of procymidone in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Reference standards of procymidone (purity 98.0%) were obtained from Dr. Ehrenstorfer Gmbh, and 50% procymidone wettable powder was purchased from Hebei Zhongtianbangzheng Biologic Science Co., Ltd. (Cangzhou, Hebei, China). HPLC-grade acetonitrile was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and n-hexane from Thermo Fisher Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Sodium chloride, acetone, and petroleum ether of analytical grade were purchased from Beijing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Petroleum ether was distilled before use and collected at 60 °C to 90 °C fractions. Florisil columns (1 g/6 mL) were purchased from ANPEL Laboratory Technologies, Inc. (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Stock Solution Preparation

Approximately 1000 mg/L of procymidone stock solution was prepared in acetone. The calibration and fortification standard solutions were freshly diluted with the stock solution using distilled petroleum ether/acetone (9:1, v/v). The matrix-matched standard solutions were prepared by diluting the stock solution with blank extracts of the matrices. The stock solution was stored at 4 °C in the dark.

2.3. Field Trials

The field trials were designed according to the Guideline on Pesticide Residue Trials (NY/T 788-2004) published previously by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P.R. China, in order to obtain more residue data and complete evaluation of the behaviors of procymidone in green onion and garlic plants. In terms of geology and climate difference, representative regions for garlic and green onion were selected across the whole country. Field trials for the green onion were conducted in Shunyi District, Beijing (40.13N, 116.65E), Suzhou, Anhui (33.63N, 116.98E), Wulanchabu, Inner Mongolia (41.03N, 113.11E), Nanning, Guangxi (22.84N, 108.30E), Jinan, Shandong (36.82N, 117.21E), and Pengzhou, Sichuan (30.99N, 103.94E). The garlic field trials were undertaken in Daxing District, Beijing (39.73N, 116.34E), Suzhou, Anhui (33.63N, 116.98E), Zhengzhou, Henan (34.35N, 113.57E), Liuyang, Hunan (28.14N, 113.63E), Jinan, Shandong (36.82N, 117.21E), and Xuanwei, Yunnan (26.23N, 104.09E), in the years 2017 and 2018. Green onions and garlic plants in sets of six plots were cultivated in fields without a history of procymidone or other analogical compounds in the past year.
The varieties of green onion cultivated were Gaojiaobai in Beijing, Xincong No. 2 in Anhui, Chuncong No. 1 in Inner Mongolia, Xiangcong in Guangxi, Zheyindacong in Shandong, and Xiaocong in Sichuan Province. The varieties of garlic were Jinyu No. 3 in Beijing, Jinxiangbaisuan in Anhui and Shandong, Hongpidasuan in Hunan, Hebeidaming in Henan, and Hongqixing in Yunnan.

2.3.1. Dissipation Trials

The dissipation trials were conducted for green onion and garlic chive at two sites each: Shunyi District, Beijing (40.13N, 116.65E), and Pengzhou, Sichuan (30.99N, 103.94E), for green onion; and Daxing District, Beijing (39.73N, 116.34E), and Suzhou, Anhui (33.63N, 116.98E), for garlic chive. In order to avoid random errors, the trials were conducted in triplicate, and one other plot was set as a control. Each plot was at least 15 m2 and separated using a buffer area of one meter from the following plot. A 50% procymidone wettable powder was used to obtain the dissipation trends in green onion and garlic chive. It was applied at a 675 g a.i./ha by spraying once during the early stage of the disease.

2.3.2. Terminal Residue Trials

The investigations of the terminal residues of procymidone and evaluation of their safe use in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were conducted in the experimental fields. The terminal residue study used two different 50% procymidone wettable powder dosages: one was the recommended dosage with a rate of 450 g a.i./ha and the other was 1.5 times the recommended dosage with a rate of 675 g a.i./ha. Two dosages were applied with a 7-day interval two or three times. The maturing stages of the garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were different. Consequently, three separate treatment areas were set. As in the dissipation trial, each treatment plot consisted of 15 m2 with three replicates. There were buffer areas to avoid cross-contamination between the different treatments.

2.3.3. Sample Collection and Preparation

For the dissipation study, green onion and garlic chive samples were randomly collected at 0 (2 h after application), 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 30 days after application.
For the terminal residue study, garlic chive and serpent garlic samples were randomly collected 5, 7, and 10 days, and garlic samples were collected 7, 14, and 21 days after the last application at harvest time. In contrast, green onion samples were collected 5, 7, 10, and 14 days after the last application.
The corresponding blank samples of the four matrices were collected. The blank and treated samples were cut into small pieces, crushed with a Foss HM294 homogenizer at a speed of 1500 rpm, and kept at −20 °C until analysis to avoid any degradation of residues.

2.4. Sample Extraction and Purification

The crushed samples (10.00 ± 0.01 g) of green onion, garlic, garlic chive, or serpent garlic were weighed into a 50 mL centrifuge tube and extracted with 20 mL of acetonitrile using ultrasonication for 15 min. Then, 6 g of sodium chloride was added, and the tube was shaken vigorously for 1 min and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min. An aliquot of 10 mL supernatant was evaporated to near dryness using a vacuum rotary evaporator at 35 °C. The Florisil SPE cartridge had been previously conditioned with 5 mL of petroleum ether, and the eluent was dropped. The concentrated extracts were washed with 5 mL of petroleum ether/acetone (9:1, v/v) and transferred to the cartridge twice. Subsequently, the eluent was collected and concentrated to dryness on a vacuum rotary evaporator at 35 °C and dissolved in 2.5 mL of petroleum ether/acetone (9:1, v/v) for GC-MS/MS analysis.

2.5. GC-MS/MS Analysis

Procymidone residue was detected using a 7890 GC equipped with a 7000 C Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The target compound was chromatographically separated with a DB-1701 column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 µm film thickness). The interface, ion source, and quadrupole temperatures were set at 280 °C, 300 °C, and 150 °C, respectively. The injection volume was 2 μL in splitless mode at 280 °C. Separation was performed using helium at a 1 mL/min constant flow rate. The oven temperature was programmed as follows: the initial temperature was 150 °C, which was raised to 255 °C at 6 °C/min, held for 1 min, then raised to 270 °C at 25 °C/min and held for 1 min. Under the conditions mentioned above, the quantitative and qualitative ions were m/z 282.7/95.9 and 282.7/254.8, and the retention time of procymidone was 15.53 min.

2.6. Storage Stability

To evaluate the concentration variation in frozen green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic samples, a storage stability study was further conducted with the sample collection. An aliquot of 0.1 mL of 10 mg/L working standard solutions was added to 10 g crushed blank samples, resulting in a final concentration of 0.1 mg/kg. Green onion samples were determined at intervals of 2, 4, and 9 months, while garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic samples were determined at intervals of 1, 3, and 11 months.

2.7. Data Analysis and Calculation

The matrix effect (ME) was assessed by comparing the slopes of the matrix-matched standard calibration with the slope in MeCN. A higher slope for the matrix standard indicated matrix-induced signal enhancement, whereas a lower slope indicated signal suppression [25]. The ME could be categorized as soft MEs (0 < |ME| ≤ 20%), medium MEs (20% < |ME| < 50%), and strong MEs (|ME| ≥ 50%). The soft MEs could be ignored. The following equation was used to evaluate the ME:
ME , % = the   slope   of   matrix   standard   the   slope   of   solvent   standard 1 × 100 %
The dissipation dynamics and half-lives of procymidone in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were determined using first-order kinetics equations:
C t = C 0 e kt
The half-lives (t1/2) were calculated using the equation:
t 1 / 2 = ln 2 k
where Ct (mg/kg) was the fungicide residue concentration at time t, C0 (mg/kg) was the initial concentration, and k was the first-order rate constant, which was the degradation rate (day−1) [14].
The dietary risk assessment was conducted based on the terminal residue data for the green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic obtained from field trials. National estimated daily intake (NEDI) and risk quotients (RQs) were used to evaluate the dietary risk of procymidone in four matrices. The following equations were used to evaluate the NEDI and RQs:
NEDI = STMRi × Fi bw
RQ = NEDI ADI × 100 %
where STMRi (mg/kg) was the supervised trial median residue, Fi (kg) was the dietary reference intake, bw (kg) was the body weight, and ADI (mg/kg BW) was the acceptable daily intake of pesticide [25]. Any RQ value higher than 100% indicates an unacceptable human risk from the pesticide [26].
The statistical software package SPSS 20.0 (IBM SPSS Software, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to conduct the statistical analysis. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analytical Methods

3.1.1. Selection of Purification Method

There is an existing and effective national standard in China to determine procymidone in various vegetables and fruits (NY761-2008) [27]. Procymidone residues in samples were extracted with acetonitrile, cleaned up with a Florisil column, and detected with a gas chromatography-electron capture detector (GC-ECD). In this study, an analytical method was also attempted based on an NH2 column for cleanup and toluene/acetonitrile (1:3, v/v) as the eluent for garlic samples. The chromatography of the garlic extracts using these two methods is shown in Figure 2, but it was impossible to quantify samples in this condition because of the increased interference.
Many sulfur-containing compounds exist in green onion and garlic [28], and 3, 4-dimethyl thiophene, dipropyl disulfide and methyl propyl disulfide have been identified in green onion [29]. These compounds would interfere with the quantitative and qualitative analysis under GC conditions. Treating samples from similar crops, such as onion, leek, and ginger, with microwaves resulted in effectively inactivated enzymes and matrix effects were eliminated [30,31]. Consequently, a microwave method using middle power for 30, 40, or 50 min was attempted; the impurities decreased with heating time, and the recovery of procymidone also decreased from 62% to 19%. Therefore, the analytical methods based on the Florisil column, NH2 column, and microwave could not meet the quantitation requirements for procymidone residue analysis. Finally, an analytical method based on MeCN extraction, Florisil cleanup, and GC-MS/MS detection was adopted to analyze the residues of procymidone in four matrices.

3.1.2. Method Validation

Method validation was performed by checking the calibration curve, matrix effect (ME), limit of quantification (LOQ), accuracy, and precision.
The linearity was constructed by plotting concentrations against the peak area, and appropriate linearity and coefficients over reasonable concentration ranges were achieved. All regression data for procymidone in the solvent, green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were obtained, as shown in Table 1. Procymidone exhibited good linearity over a concentration of 0.010–2.5 mg/L in the four matrices, and the correlation coefficients were higher than 0.9985. The MEs of procymidone in garlic chive and serpent garlic were −13.48% and −18.52%, which indicated soft matrix effects and could be ignored. Medium matrix effects in the green onion and garlic were observed with values of 38.00% and −21.30%. Therefore, matrix-matched calibration standards were used for quantification to ensure the method’s accuracy. The LOQ was defined as the minimum fortified level of the target compound, which was 0.02 mg/kg in the four matrices.
The precision and accuracy of the method were evaluated by calculating fortified recoveries at three or four different fortified levels with five replications (n = 5). As shown in Table 2, the mean recoveries of procymidone in green onion were 92% to 104% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 3.3% to 5.8% at fortified levels of 0.020, 0.050, 0.50, 5.0, and 10 mg/kg, respectively. The mean recoveries of procymidone in garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were 86% to 98%, 84% to 102%, and 85% to 97% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 0.92% to 13%, 2.8% to 4.5%, and 5.3% to 8.6% at spiked levels of 0.020, 0.50, 5.0, and 60 mg/kg (only for garlic chive), respectively. Typical GC-MS/MS chromatograms of procymidone are shown in Figure 3. The above findings demonstrated that the proposed method was suitable and adequate for procymidone residues in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic samples.

3.2. Storage Stability of Procymidone in Green Onion, Garlic, Garlic Chive, and Serpent Garlic

As shown in Table 3, the residues of procymidone changed within certain ranges during the storage period at −20 °C in the dark, ranging from 0.093 to 0.099 mg/kg in green onion, 0.081 to 0.087 mg/kg in garlic, 0.072 to 0.093 mg/kg in garlic chive, and 0.082 to 0.091 mg/kg in serpent garlic. The mean degradation rates for the green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic ranged from −1.0% to 5.1%, 2.8% to 7.0%, −1.6% to 22.1%, and −1.9% to 8.1%, respectively. The results showed that the degradation rates were lower than 30%, which indicated that procymidone remained comparably stable during the period from sample collection to testing [32].
Among the four matrices, the degradation rate in garlic chive was much higher than that in garlic and serpent garlic over the same period. According to Bian et al. [33] and Sun et al. [34], the storage temperature, moisture content, pH, and enzyme activity of the matrices should be the main influencing factors for the storage stability of compounds. The specific mechanisms explaining the variance in procymidone storage stability in the different matrices require further verification.

3.3. The Dissipation Pattern of Procymidone in Green Onion and Garlic Chive

Following the relevant literature, the initial residues were defined as the residue levels in the samples 2 h after pesticide application [35]. In this study, the dosages of 50% procymidone wettable powder in green onion and garlic chive were both 675 g a.i./ha. The initial concentrations in green onion were 2.65 mg/kg (Beijing) and 5.80 mg/kg (Sichuan), and they were 10.49 mg/kg (Beijing) and 9.85 mg/kg (Anhui) in garlic chive. The initial concentrations in garlic chive were significantly higher than those in green onion, which was perhaps caused by the crops’ morphological characteristics. The garlic chive was leafy with a fluffy surface and the whole leaf was flat, allowing it to carry more droplets, while the green onion was cylindrical. The initial concentration in the Sichuan samples was approximately twice that of the Beijing samples, which was perhaps caused by the different crop varieties. The species in Beijing was Welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L. var. giganteum Makino), and a part of the plant was under the soil. In Sichuan, chive (Allium fistulosum L. var. caespitosum Makino) was cultivated, and most of the plant was above the ground and contained many more sprayed droplets.
The main dissipation-related parameters—namely, the regression equations, correlation coefficients, half-lives, and degradation trends for procymidone in green onion and garlic chive—are shown in Table 4 and Figure 4. The residues of procymidone in green onion and garlic chive dissipated following first-order kinetics, with a regression coefficient of the degradation equation of 0.9282 to 0.9857. The half-lives of green onion in Beijing and Sichuan and garlic chive in Beijing and Anhui were 6.93, 8.35, 5.78, and 4.33 days, respectively. Although the garlic chive’s initial concentration was higher than that of the green onion, the half-life was shorter. In previous studies, the half-life of procymidone in strawberries has been reported to be 8.7 to 12.2 days [14], while that in green bean plantations was 10.9 ± 1.4 days [36] and that in ginseng plants was 18.28 days [37]. In general, the half-lives of procymidone residues in garlic chive were shorter than those in studies on various other crops. The variability in the dynamics kinetics can be affected by factors such as the physicochemical properties of pesticides, the application doses, the application method, the crop variety, the sampling tissues, the local environment, and crop growth characteristics [38,39], all of which can play comprehensive roles in the dissipation process in pesticides in crops. This study considered the crop variety, the local environment, and crop growth characteristics as the main factors affecting the green onion and garlic chive dynamics kinetics.

3.4. Terminal Residues of Procymidone in Green Onion, Garlic, Garlic Chive, and Serpent Garlic

Two doses (450 g a.i./ha and 675 g a.i./ha) of procymidone, sprayed twice or three times, were applied to evaluate the terminal residue levels in green onion garlic, chive, and serpent garlic. The terminal residues of procymidone for different spraying times and dosages in green onion at six sites are shown in Figure 5. Residues in Anhui, Beijing, Inner Mongolia, and Shandong were significantly lower than those in Guangxi and Sichuan. The different varieties of green onion may have been the cause of this phenomenon.
Terminal residues for low and high dosages sprayed twice and three times in serpent garlic and garlic chive are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7. In the results for garlic chive, residues in the Hunan plant were found to be significantly higher than residues at other locations. The climate, rainfall, and temperature may have been the main factors, and plant height and density also influenced the residues. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 8, in the three stages of garlic in Beijing, the terminal residues in garlic chive were the highest, while residues in garlic were below the LOQ. It is likely that the aboveground part contained higher procymidone residues than the underground part. The surface of the serpent garlic was smooth and not easy to cover with pesticides [40] compared to the serpent garlic due to morphological characteristics, and the results were consistent with Bian’s study [10].

3.5. Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment

Public attention to food safety has been increasingly significantly in recent times, and food consumption is the main route of human exposure to environmental pollutants [41]. In this part of the study, chronic dietary risk was evaluated based on dietary consumption and body weight (bw) in accordance with the Chinese National Nutrition and Health Survey program [42]. The survey was undertaken in a big city, medium and small cities, and rural areas, and the rural areas were classified as I~IV according to the regions and their overall economic strength. The STMRi values for the dietary risk assessment in green onion, garlic chive, and serpent garlic were 0.70 mg/kg, 3.98 mg/kg, and 0.64 mg/kg, respectively, and the ADI value for procymidone was 0.1 mg/kg bw [24]. As shown in Figure 9, the total risk quotient for the age 14–70 consumer group was relatively low. The age 2 to 13 group suffered the higher chronic exposure to procymidone. The risk for IV rural females aged 2 to 3 with greater vegetable consumption and lower weight was highest, and the maximum RQ reached 25.07%. These results indicate that procymidone’s total chronic dietary risk in the four matrices for Chinese residents in different consumer groups was acceptable. These results provide essential data for determining the risks associated with green onion, garlic chive, serpent garlic, and garlic consumption.

4. Conclusions

An analytical method based on GC-MS/MS was validated for procymidone in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic. Our dissipation study showed that the half-lives of procymidone were 6.86 days and 8.35 days in green onion in Beijing and Sichuan, and they were 5.73 days and 4.36 days in garlic chive in Beijing and Anhui. The residue levels of procymidone were significantly influenced by crop morphology, resulting in the terminal residue levels in garlic chive being much higher than those in the other three matrices. Based on the safety risk assessment using residue data, the RQs of different Chinese consumer groups were between 5.79% and 25.07%, indicating a low and acceptable dietary exposure risk for procymidone in green onion, garlic chive, and serpent garlic. This study can provide field data for the dietary risk assessment of procymidone in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic.

Author Contributions

Investigation, T.Z., K.S. and L.L.; Methodology, T.Z. and Y.L.; Supervision, H.L.; Writing—original draft, T.Z.; Writing—review & editing, L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (20210302124131) and China’s National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFD0200203-2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, L.Y.; Liu, Q.C.; Wang, Y.Q.; Liu, L.C. Identification and characterization of a glossy mutant in Welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L.). Sci. Hortic. 2017, 225, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, X.H.; Zhou, Q.X.; Sun, X.Y.; Ren, W.J. Effects of cadmium on uptake and translocation of nutrient elements in different welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L.) cultivars. Food Chem. 2016, 194, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Ruan, J.; Zhuang, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z. Phytochemicals of garlic: Promising candidates for cancer therapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 123, 109730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, C.; Ji, Y.; Li, M.L.; Li, X.A.; Jin, P.; Zheng, Y.H. Influence of wounding intensity and storage temperature on quality and antioxidant activity of fresh-cut Welsh onions. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 212, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, J.B.; Miyake, S.; Umetsu, R.; Hayashi, K.; Chijimatsu, T.; Hayashi, T. Anti-influenza A virus effects of fructan from Welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L.). Food Chem. 2012, 134, 2164–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, J.L.; Tan, Z.C.; Wen, Y.; Fan, S.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C.L. Residues, dissipation and risk assessment of triazole fungicide tebuconazole in green onion (Allium fistulosum L.). Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Myneni, A.A.; Chang, S.C.; Niu, R.; Liu, L.; Swanson, M.K.; Li, J.W.; Su, J.; Giovino, G.A.; Yu, S.Z.; Zhang, Z.F. Raw garlic consumption and lung cancer in a Chinese population. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2016, 25, 624–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Guercio, V.; Galeone, C.; Turati, F.; La Vecchia, C. Gastric cancer and allium vegetable intake: A critical review of the experimental and epidemiologic evidence. Nutrition 2014, 66, 757–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bian, Y.L.; Wang, J.; Liu, F.M.; Mao, B.M.; Huang, H.W.; Xu, J.Y.; Li, X.H.; Guo, Y.Y. Residue behavior and removal of iprodione in garlic, green garlic, and garlic shoot. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 4705–4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bian, Y.L.; Feng, Y.Z.; Zhang, A.J.; Qi, X.X.; Pan, J.J.; Han, J.F.; Ma, X.G.; Liang, L. Residue Distribution and Risk Assessment of Bifenazate and its Metabolite in Garlic Plant. Food Chem. 2022, 379, 132013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Radice, S.; Fumagalli, R.; Chiesara, E.; Ferraris, M.; Frigerio, S.; Marabini, L. Estrogenic activity of procymidone in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes: A possible mechanism of action. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2004, 147, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Özdoğan, N.; Kapukıran, F.; Mutluoğlu, G.; Chormey, D.S.; Bakırdere, S. Simultaneous determination of iprodione, procymidone, and chlorflurenol in lake water and wastewater matrices by GC-MS after multivariate optimization of binary dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Orth, A.B.; Sfarra, A.; Pell, E.J.; Tien, M. An investigation into the role of lipid peroxidation in the mode of action of aromatic hydrocarbon and dicarboximide fungicides. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 1992, 44, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Z.W.; Di, S.S.; Qi, P.P.; Xu, H.; Zhao, H.Y.; Wang, X.Q. Dissipation, accumulation and risk assessment of fungicides after repeated spraying on greenhouse strawberry. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 758, 144067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, S.M.; Che, Z.P.; Chen, G.Q. Multiple-fungicide resistance to carbendazim, diethofencarb, procymidone, and pyrimethanil in field isolates of Botrytis cinerea from tomato in Henan Province, China. Crop Prot. 2016, 84, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, J.Z.; Xu, C.X.; Shen, Y.; Gao, M.J.; Lu, L.N.; Lu, F.; Liu, X.J. Allied toxicity and residual level on combined application of procymidone and fludioxonil for gray mold on cucumber. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pose-Juan, E.; Cancho-Grande, B.; Rial-Otero, R.; Simal-Gándara, J. The dissipation rates of cyprodinil, fludioxonil, procymidone and vinclozoline during storage of grape juice. Food Control 2006, 17, 1012–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, Y.; Piao, X.Y.; Liao, X.J.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H.; Ma, H.H.; Zhou, X.M.; Li, F.G. Determination and chronic dietary exposure assessment of procymidone residue in Chinese chives. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2021, 23, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, X.J.; Li, L.S.; Meng, G.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.H.; Hua, X.D. Degradation of Procymidone on Rape and Its Metabolism in Hydroponic System. Asian J. Ecotoxicol. 2022, 2, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Querejeta, G.A.; Ramos, L.M.; Hughes, E.A.; Vullo, D.; Zalts, A.; Montserrat, J.M. Environmental fate of trifluralin, procymidone, and chlorpyrifos in small horticultural production units in Argentina. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, J.X.; Yang, D.Y.; Liu, L.; Yu, B.; Ma, J.Y.; Hu, G.X. Residues and diatery risk assessment of procymidone in vegetables and fruits in Jinhua, Zhejiang Province. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci. 2018, 59, 1399–1402. [Google Scholar]
  22. Verdisson, S.; Couderchet, M.; Vernet, G. Effects of procymidone, fludioxonil and pyrimethanil on two non-target aquatic plants. Chemosphere 2001, 44, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lai, Q.; Sun, X.; Li, L.; Li, D.; Wang, M.; Shi, H. Toxicity effects of procymidone, iprodione and their metabolite of 3, 5-dichloroaniline to zebrafish. Chemosphere 2021, 272, 129577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. GB 2763-2021; China, National Food Safety Standard-Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food. China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2021.
  25. Chen, X.X.; Fan, X.Q.; Ma, Y.C.; Hu, J.Y. Dissipation behaviour, residue distribution and dietary risk assessment of tetraconazole and kresoxim-methyl in greenhouse strawberry via RRLC-QqQ-MS/MS technique. Ecotox. Environ. Safe 2018, 148, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Affum, A.O.; Osae, S.D.; Nyarko, B.J.; Afful, S.; Fianko, J.R.; Akiti, T.T.; Adomako, D.; Acquaah, S.O.; Dorleku, M.; Antoh, E.; et al. Total coliforms, arsenic and cadmium exposure through drinking water in the Western Region of Ghana: Application of multivariate statistical technique to groundwater quality. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. NY/T 788-2018; China, Guideline for the Testing of Pesticide Residues in Crops. China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
  28. Nohara, T.; Fujiwara, Y. Antitumor sulfur compounds from Allium species (onion, welsh onion, and garlic). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2017, 12, 1235–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, S.Z.; Chen, Q.; Gao, L.M.; Tang, X.W.; Feng, G.; Chen, Y.Q.; He, H.J. Analysis of Aroma Components in Chinese Onion by SPME-GC-MS. J. Chin. Mass Spectrom. Soc. 2008, 29, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J.H.; Ye, Y.F.; Cheng, X.M.; Li, L.; Wu, C.M. Determination of pestiside multi-residues in onion, leek and ginger by dispersive solid-phase extraction and GC/MS. J. Chin. Mass Spectrom. Soc. 2011, 32, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.H.; Zhang, Y.B.; Tang, Z.X.; Liu, X.T. Determination of pesticide residues in sulfur-containing vegetables using a microwave–Assisted treatment and gas chromatographic method. J. Instrum. Anal. 2005, 24, 100–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. OECD/OCDE. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals; OECD Test No 506: Stability of Pesticide Residues in Stored Commodities; OECD: Paris, France, 2007; Volume 1, pp. 1–12.
  33. Bian, Y.L.; Liu, F.M.; Chen, F.; Sun, P. Storage stability of three organophosphorus pesticides on cucumber samples for analysis. Food Chem. 2018, 250, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, L.; Lee, H.K. Stability studies of propoxur herbicide in environmental water samples by liquid chromatography–atmospheric pressure chemical ionization ion-trap mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1014, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dong, M.F.; Wen, G.Y.; Tang, H.X.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Z.H.; Song, W.G.; Wang, W.M.; Zhao, L. Dissipation and safety evaluation of novaluron, pyriproxyfen, thiacloprid and tolfenpyrad residues in the citrus-field ecosystem. Food Chem. 2018, 269, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jose, C.S.; Ana, A.R.; Mariano, R.S.; Antonio, V.G. Residue levels, decline curves, and plantation distribution of procymidone in green beans grown in greenhouse. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2991–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, X.Y.; Xu, X.W.; Wang, Y.H.; Yang, D.; Zhu, Y.P.; Li, Y.R. Degradation Dynamics and Dietary Risk Assessment of Procymidone and Derivatives in Ginseng Root and Plant. Agrochemicals 2016, 55, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fantke, P.; Juraske, R. Variability of pesticide dissipation half-lives in plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 4, 3548–3562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karthika, C.; Muraleedharan, N.N. Residual deposits in green tea shoots and black tea after individual and combined application of propiconazole and copper oxychloride. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1851–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cabras, P.; Angioni, A.; Garau, V.L.; Melis, M.; Pirisi, F.M.; Cabitza, F.; Cubeddu, M.; Minelli, E. Pesticide residues in artichokes: Effect of different head shape. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 1996, 31, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fu, D.H.; Zhang, S.Y.; Wang, M.; Liang, X.Y.; Xie, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.H. Dissipation behavior, residue distribution and dietary risk assessment of cyromazine, acetamiprid and their mixture in cowpea and cowpea field soil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 4540–4548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jin, S. Survey Report on the Nutrition and Health of Chinese Residents: Data Set on the Status of Nutrition and Health in 2002; People’s Hygiene Press: Beijing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of different varieties of green onion and parts of the garlic plant. (A) Welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L. var. giganteum Makino); (B) chive (Allium schoenoprasum L.); (C) serpent garlic (Allium sativum L. var. ophioscorodon (Link) Döll); (D) garlic chive (Allium sativum L. var. sativum); (E) garlic (Allium sativum L.).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of different varieties of green onion and parts of the garlic plant. (A) Welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L. var. giganteum Makino); (B) chive (Allium schoenoprasum L.); (C) serpent garlic (Allium sativum L. var. ophioscorodon (Link) Döll); (D) garlic chive (Allium sativum L. var. sativum); (E) garlic (Allium sativum L.).
Foods 11 01856 g001
Figure 2. Chromatogram of different cleanup conditions. Black line: blank garlic sample; blue line: garlic sample purified with NH2 column; green line: garlic sample purified with Florisil column.
Figure 2. Chromatogram of different cleanup conditions. Black line: blank garlic sample; blue line: garlic sample purified with NH2 column; green line: garlic sample purified with Florisil column.
Foods 11 01856 g002
Figure 3. Typical chromatograms of procymidone in green onion (AD), garlic chive (EH), serpent garlic (IL), and garlic (MP). (A,E,I,M) are for the blank sample; (B,F,J,N) are for the solvent standard at 0.04 mg/kg; (C,G,K,O) are for the matrix standard at 0.04 mg/kg; and (D,H,L,P) are for the spiked sample at 0.02 mg/kg.
Figure 3. Typical chromatograms of procymidone in green onion (AD), garlic chive (EH), serpent garlic (IL), and garlic (MP). (A,E,I,M) are for the blank sample; (B,F,J,N) are for the solvent standard at 0.04 mg/kg; (C,G,K,O) are for the matrix standard at 0.04 mg/kg; and (D,H,L,P) are for the spiked sample at 0.02 mg/kg.
Foods 11 01856 g003
Figure 4. The dissipation of procymidone at different experiment sites. (A) Green onion; (B) garlic chive.
Figure 4. The dissipation of procymidone at different experiment sites. (A) Green onion; (B) garlic chive.
Foods 11 01856 g004
Figure 5. Terminal residues of procymidone for different spraying times in green onion. The asterisks represent statistically significant differences between two spraying times on the same interval day (p < 0.05). (A) low dosage; (B) high dosage.
Figure 5. Terminal residues of procymidone for different spraying times in green onion. The asterisks represent statistically significant differences between two spraying times on the same interval day (p < 0.05). (A) low dosage; (B) high dosage.
Foods 11 01856 g005
Figure 6. Terminal residues of procymidone for different spraying times in garlic chive. The asterisks represent statistically significant differences between two spraying times on the same interval day (p < 0.05). (A) low dosage; (B) high dosage.
Figure 6. Terminal residues of procymidone for different spraying times in garlic chive. The asterisks represent statistically significant differences between two spraying times on the same interval day (p < 0.05). (A) low dosage; (B) high dosage.
Foods 11 01856 g006
Figure 7. Terminal residues of procymidone for different spraying times in serpent garlic. The asterisks represent statistically significant differences between two spraying times on the same interval day (p < 0.05). (A) low dosage; (B) high dosage.
Figure 7. Terminal residues of procymidone for different spraying times in serpent garlic. The asterisks represent statistically significant differences between two spraying times on the same interval day (p < 0.05). (A) low dosage; (B) high dosage.
Foods 11 01856 g007
Figure 8. Terminal residues of procymidone in garlic chive, serpent garlic, and garlic in Beijing.
Figure 8. Terminal residues of procymidone in garlic chive, serpent garlic, and garlic in Beijing.
Foods 11 01856 g008
Figure 9. Chronic dietary risk for different consumer groups at different ages.
Figure 9. Chronic dietary risk for different consumer groups at different ages.
Foods 11 01856 g009
Table 1. Linearity ranges, regression equations, matrix effects, and limits of quantification for procymidone in a solvent, green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic.
Table 1. Linearity ranges, regression equations, matrix effects, and limits of quantification for procymidone in a solvent, green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic.
MatrixLinearity Range (mg·L−1)Regression EquationR2Matrix Effect (ME, %)Limit of Quantification (LOQ, mg·kg−1)
Solvent0.010–2.5y = 3582.5x − 74.2020.9985//
Green onion0.010–2.5y = 4944.1x + 92.2280.999838.000.020
Garlic0.010–2.5y = 2819.6x + 48.7450.9996−21.300.020
Garlic chive0.010–2.5y = 3099.6x + 213.5600.9998−13.480.020
Serpent garlic0.010–2.5y = 2919.2x + 64.9640.9998−18.520.020
Table 2. The mean recoveries and RSDs of procymidone in four matrices at different fortified levels (n = 5).
Table 2. The mean recoveries and RSDs of procymidone in four matrices at different fortified levels (n = 5).
MatrixFortified Levels (mg·kg−1)Mean Recoveries (%)RSDs (%)
Garlic chive0.020924.5
0.501003.3
5.01023.6
60842.8
Serpent garlic0.020978.6
0.50955.3
5.0857.2
Garlic0.0209513
0.50980.92
5.0863.1
Green onion0.0201045.8
0.050924.9
0.50925.1
5.0953.7
10933.3
Table 3. Residues and degradation rates of procymidone in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic matrices during laboratory storage.
Table 3. Residues and degradation rates of procymidone in green onion, garlic, garlic chive, and serpent garlic matrices during laboratory storage.
Time (Months)Green OnionTime (Months)GarlicGarlic ChiveSerpent Garlic
R a (mg·kg−1)DR b (%)R (mg·kg−1)DR (%)R (mg·kg−1)DR (%)R (mg·kg−1)DR (%)
00.098-00.087-0.092-0.089-
10.099−1.020.0834.20.093−1.60.091−1.9
30.0980.040.0852.80.0893.50.0836.8
110.0935.190.0817.00.07222.10.0828.1
a R: residue. b DR: degradation rate.
Table 4. The dosage, experiment sites, regression equations, correlation coefficients, and half-lives (t1/2) of procymidone in green onion and garlic chive.
Table 4. The dosage, experiment sites, regression equations, correlation coefficients, and half-lives (t1/2) of procymidone in green onion and garlic chive.
MatrixDosage
(g a.i·ha −1)
Experiment SitesRegression Equation (y=)Correlation Coefficient (r)Half-Life (Days)
Green onion675Beijing1.53e−0.10x0.92826.93
Sichuan5.00e−0.08x0.98578.35
Garlic chive675Beijing7.79e−0.12x0.96085.78
Anhui7.64e−0.16x0.92934.33
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, L.; Zhao, T.; Liu, Y.; Liang, H.; Shi, K. Method Validation, Residues and Dietary Risk Assessment for Procymidone in Green Onion and Garlic Plant. Foods 2022, 11, 1856. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11131856

AMA Style

Li L, Zhao T, Liu Y, Liang H, Shi K. Method Validation, Residues and Dietary Risk Assessment for Procymidone in Green Onion and Garlic Plant. Foods. 2022; 11(13):1856. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11131856

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Li, Tingting Zhao, Yu Liu, Hongwu Liang, and Kaiwei Shi. 2022. "Method Validation, Residues and Dietary Risk Assessment for Procymidone in Green Onion and Garlic Plant" Foods 11, no. 13: 1856. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11131856

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop