Next Article in Journal
Impact of Trade Openness on Food Security: Evidence from Panel Data for Central Asian Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Chufa Drink: Potential in Developing a New Plant-Based Fermented Dessert
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Rapid Detection Method for Tomato Gray Mold Spores in Greenhouse Based on Microfluidic Chip Enrichment and Lens-Less Diffraction Image Processing

1
School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment and Technology, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(12), 3011; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123011
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 30 November 2021 / Accepted: 3 December 2021 / Published: 5 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Food Analytical Methods)

Abstract

:
It is of great significance to find tomato gray mold in time and take corresponding control measures to ensure the production of tomato crops. This study proposed a rapid detection method for spores of Botrytis cinerea in green-house based on microfluidic chip enrichment and lens-free diffraction image processing. Microfluidic chip with a regular triangular inner rib structure was designed to achieve the enrichment of Botrytis cinerea spores. In order to obtain the diffraction image of the diseased spores, a lens-less diffraction imaging system was built. Furthermore, the collected spore diffraction images were processed and counted. The simulation results showed that the collection efficiency of 16 μm particles was 79%, 100%, and 89% at the inlet flow rate of 12, 14 and 16 mL/min, respectively. The experimental verification results were observed under a microscope. The results showed that when the flow rate of the microfluidic chip was 12, 14 and 16 mL/min, the collection efficiency of Botrytis cinerea spores was 70.65%, 87.52% and 77.96%, respectively. The Botrytis cinerea spores collected in the experiment were placed under a microscope for manual counting and compared with the automatic counting results based on diffraction image processing. A total of 10 sets of experiments were carried out, with an error range of the experiment was 5.13~8.57%, and the average error of the experiment was 6.42%. The Bland–Altman method was used to analyze two methods based on diffraction image processing and manual counting under a microscope. All points are within the 95% consistency interval. Therefore, this study can provide a basis for the research on the real-time monitoring technology of tomato gray mold spores in the greenhouse.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The area of various greenhouses has been increased up to 2.1 million hectares in China since 2017 [1,2]. Tomato is one of the important widely planted vegetables in the world as well as in China and has high economic and health benefits [3,4]. At present, China has become the world’s largest producer and consumer of tomatoes, with a planting area of 1.01 million hectares [1,5]. Tomato gray mold is caused by the asexual fungus Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea). It’s one of the common diseases in greenhouse tomato cultivation [6]. B. cinerea can spread through the air from disease spores [7]. B. cinerea occurs early and lasts for a long time, mainly at flowering and fruiting stages, flowers, fruits, leaves, and stems [6,8]. Suitable environment conditions in the greenhouse are favorable to the occurrence of B. cinerea, and it is not easy to control [9]. Generally, after B. cinerea disease occurs, the yield of tomatoes is decreased by 20–30%, and the severe plots can even be as high as about 50% [10,11,12]. Therefore, how to quickly and accurately discover B. cinereae and take corresponding control measures is of great significance to ensure the production of tomato crops [4,13].
Timely monitoring of B. cinerea spores is the key to effectively controlling its incidence [14]. At present, the diagnosis and prevention of greenhouse crop diseases are based on the experience of producers and the results of routine tests in the laboratory or on-site [5,7]. Laboratory testing techniques mainly include electron microscopy testing technology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and biological testing technology, etc. These testing technologies can accurately determine the type of disease, but laboratory testing technology is destructive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive [15,16,17]. Spectral detection technology and image processing technology are used to detect known or specific diseases. These technologies have good detection accuracy for the inversion of diseases through statistical modeling and provide accurate guidance for disease prevention and control [6,9,13]. However, these diagnostic techniques cannot detect crop diseases before they become prevalent but can only be detected when the diseases occur. At this time, the optimal window for prevention and control has been missed [18,19].
Relevant scholars use portable spore traps to catch airborne disease spores and combine them with image processing to detect airborne disease spores of crops in the early stage, e.g., Lei et al. [20], in order to realize the early detection of airborne diseases spores. Urediniospores were collected by using portable spore traps. The urediniospores were automatically detected and counted using a series of image processing approaches, including image segmentation using the K-means clustering algorithm, image pre-processing, the identification of touching urediniospores based on their shape factor and area. Wang et al. [7] achieved the identification and classification of three kinds of airborne disease spores of greenhouse crops. The spores of three airborne diseases were collected by portable spore traps. They proposed a method to identify the spores of greenhouse crop airborne diseases by digital image processing. Collected spore images were pre-processed. Then, the color, shape, and texture characteristics of spores were extracted, and the classification models of the spores were built based on logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM), respectively. Yang et al. [21] in order to achieve early detection of rice blast proposed a method to detect and identify rice blast based on crop disease spores’ diffraction fingerprint texture, which has certain advantages compared with the existing method of manual identification by microscope. Although the above methods can achieve early detection of crop airborne diseases, they still face many problems. First, the composition of air is complex. There is particulate matter in the air including spores, pollen, PM10, aerosols, etc. The spores of B. cinerea disease are challenging to directly separate. Secondly, the concentration of B. cinerea spores in the air before the disease outbreak was low, and it was difficult to detect it directly. Finally, the detection of diseased spores requires the help of a microscope, while the traditional optical microscope equipment has a small imaging area. In the early stage of airborne diseases, the spore concentration is low and the detection is difficult. In addition, the traditional optical microscope equipment is large in size and expensive, which cannot meet the needs of the large-area deployment.
In recent years, with the development of microfluidic technology, it is possible to separate and enrich small particles. For example, Yang et al. [22], in order to detect the diseased rice spores, designed a microfluidic chip to enrich and separate the diseased rice spores. Rice disease spores can be collected in the chip enrichment region. Wang et al. [23] designed a microfluidic chip that can directly enrich airborne fungal spores from airflow. The chip includes three parts: half-wave pretreatment channel, inertial impactor, and low-pressure collection chamber. Lee et al. [24] designed a microfluidic device to achieve high separation performance for continuous separation of nanoparticles by combining diffusiophoresis and electrophoresis to achieve the separation of nanoparticles having different sizes. In summary, microfluidic technology can be used to achieve separate and enrich B. cinerea spores in the greenhouse.
Hence, in this study, in order to achieve the enrichment of B. cinerea spores, a rapid detection method for B. cinerea spores in the greenhouse based on microfluidic enrichment and lens-less diffraction image processing designed a microfluidic chip with a regular triangular inner rib structure. Furthermore, built a lens-less diffraction imaging system which can separation-enrichment of greenhouse B. cinerea disease spore and achieve timely monitoring.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Spore Sample Preparation

B. cinerea spores were collected from tomato leaves. B. cinerea spores were maintained on potato dextrose agar medium and maintained on tomato plants by periodic transfer to the new plants when necessary [2,7]. Then, the sporangia or conidia suspension was prepared. Finally, the size parameters of spores were measured by the super depth of field microscope (VHX-900F, made by KEYENCE Co., Osaka, Japan). The measurement results are shown in Figure 1. Statistical analysis of the measured spores showed that B. cinerea spores are almost oval and have a size distribution of 19.3 (11.4–26.7) × 11.7 (8.3–14.5) μm2.

2.2. Design of Microfluidic Chip

In order to achieve efficient separation and enrichment of greenhouse B. cinerea spores, a microfluidic chip with a regular triangular inner rib structure for separation and enrichment of the greenhouse B. cinerea spores directly from gas flow was developed. The microfluidic chip was prepared according to the method mentioned in reference [22,25,26]. Figure 2 is the structure diagram of the microfluidic chip, which composed of plane structure, collection tank, internal rib structure, Channel 1, and Channel 2. The internal rib structure is a regular triangle, and the side length is A, the spacing of the internal rib structure is L, and the radius of the collection tank is R.

2.3. Numerical Method

In this study, the finite element analysis software COMSOL Multiphysics 5.1 was used for simulation analysis. Using the particle tracking module in COMSOL, the particle trajectories can be predicted. For numerical analysis, the model parameters were set at width of channel 1 = 1500 µm, length of channel 1 = 10,000 µm, width of channel 2 = 4000 µm, width of channel 2 = 33,750 µm. The internal rib structure is a regular triangle, and the side length is A (from 250 µm to 2500 µm, and the interval is set to 250 µm). The spacing of the internal rib structure is L (from 500 µm to 1500 µm, and the interval is set to 500 µm). The radius of the collection tank is R (from 2500 µm to 5000 µm, and the interval is set to 500 µm).
In a microfluidic system, laminar flow corresponds to the flow with small Re (Re < 1), the viscosity term of the Navier–Stokes equation dominates, and the inertia term can be ignored. At this point, the corresponding boundary conditions are: (1) the channel wall is a non-slip boundary. (2) The flow rates of inlet was set at 12, 14, and 16 mL/min, respectively. (3) The pressure at the outlet is P = 0. The flow was assumed to be steady, two-dimensional axisymmetric, and incompressible. The particle density was set at 1050 kg/m3 to express the aerodynamic size. Spore concentration in the air is deficient, so 100 particles were released from the particle entrance. Adjusting the convergence criterion to 10−6, iteratively solve the continuity, momentum, and energy equations. The Lagrange method is used to represent particle motion. The equation of motion of the particle is expressed as follows, Equation (1):
m P d 2 r P d t 2 = F f + F O
where r p is used to represent the particle motion position vector, m p is used to represent the particle mass, and t is used to represent the particle motion time. F f is used to represent the force of fluid on particles, and F O is used to represent the force exerted by the external potential field on particles.
The motion behavior of particles was investigated based on flow analysis. Using post-processing in COMSOL, select the global calculation in the derived value. The data set selects the particles to be released, and the expression is the total number of particles in the selection. Count the particles collected in the collection tank area. The enrichment efficiency of particles was obtained.

2.4. Diffraction Image Detection Platform Setup

Traditional micro-optical imaging technology refers to that visible light can be transmitted through or reflected from the sample, and after passing through one or more lenses, the magnified image of the tiny sample can be obtained. Diffraction is a phenomenon in which light waves deviate from the straight path and travel behind obstacles when they encounter obstacles or small holes during the propagation process. Observe the bright and dark areas that appear on the screen. The light intensity distribution can reflect the imaging information of the object. The diffraction imaging detection platform is shown in Figure 3.
The facility has two main parts—the microfluidic chip and the lens-less imaging module (includes the light source, stoma, and CMOS sensor) and the light source is LED light (520~525 nm). The diameter of the pores is 100 µm directly below LED light. and the CMOS sensor is located 45 mm below the micropore. The DYSMT805 image sensor chip (Changsha Daying Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Changsha, China) with 8 million pixels was selected. Imaging area is 4592 µm × 4339.6 µm. The pixel size is 1.4 µm ×1.4 µm. The sensitivity of CMOS sensor is 0.65 V/lux-sec@550 nm. The operating temperature range is 0 ~ 50 °C. The spectral response is 310 nm ~ 1070 nm. Due to the LED light source being monochromatic light, and the CMOS sensor collects color images. The image mode was set to gray in the image acquisition software (ToupView, Suzhou Jingtong Instrument Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). The facility realizes the independent operation of spore enrichment, sampling, photographing and detection.
The diffraction imaging system in this research is designed according to the Huygens–Fresnel principle. Diffraction images satisfy the relationship between Fourier transform and inverse transform. The complex amplitude of point P on the diffraction image can be expressed as Equation (2).
U ( P ) = k U 0 ( Q ) F ( θ 0 , θ ) r i k r r d x d y = | U ( P ) | · e i a p
where |U(P)|is used to represent amplitude information; eiaq is used to represent phase information. CMOS sensor is used to take diffraction images of airborne disease spores. The square of the light intensity information amplitude of the diffraction image is Equation (3):
I ( P ) = | U ( P ) | 2
Due to the inevitable phase loss phenomenon in the diffraction imaging process, it is necessary to perform phase recovery processing on the diffraction image of airborne spores. In this study, sampling theory and iterative algorithms are used to recover the phase of airborne disease spores diffraction images.

2.5. Diffraction Image Processing and Counting

The diffraction image processing process of airborne disease spores includes two parts: diffraction image pre-processing and feature information extraction. Diffraction image pre-processing reduces useless information, which is beneficial to obtain effective information. The flow chart of diffraction image processing and counting is shown in Figure 4.
Firstly, two-dimensional gamma function is used to correct the spore diffraction image of airborne diseases. The expression for the gamma function is, Equations (4) and (5).
O ( x , y ) = 255 ( F ( x , y ) 255 ) γ
γ = ( 1 2 ) m I ( x , y ) m
where O(x, y) is used to represent two-dimensional gamma functions, F(x, y) is used to represent the source image, I(x, y) is used to represent the light component, m is used to represent average brightness.
Secondly, in order to reduce the salt and pepper noise in the spore diffraction image of airborne disease, a median filter was used. Reconstruction of diffraction image of airborne disease spores by combined angular spectrum reconstruction algorithm. The formula of angular reconstruction is as follows, Equation (6):
U ( x i , y i , z i ) = F 1 { F [ C ( x , y ) · H ( x , y ) ] G A S ( f x , f y ) }
where U(xi, yi, zi) is used to represent the complex amplitude distribution of light, C(x, y) is used to represent reproduction lightwave, H(x, y) is used to represent the intensity distribution of hologram, GAS(fx, fy) is the free space transfer function.
Fourthly, the reconstructed image is finalized, and block threshold segmentation is used to filter out useless information. Fifthly, filling holes in the final image. Sixthly, after the holes are filled, smooth the image boundary. Seventhly, holes in large areas being filled. Eighthly, extract the two morphological features of airborne disease spore area and roundness, and identify and count them. The formula is as follows, Equations (7) and (8):
A = N
P = 2 N o + N e
where A is used to represent the area of the processed spore image, N is used to represent the number of pixels of the processed spore image, P is used to represent the perimeter of the processed spore image, No is used to represent the number of diagonal pixels of the processed spore image, Ne is used to represent the number of horizontal or vertical pixels in the processed spore image.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using the statistical analysis software program SPSS. The statistical differences between groups were analyzed by using ANOVA. The least significant difference (LSD) test was used to determine a significance level of p < 0.05. The Bland–Altman method was used to analyze two methods based on diffraction image processing counting and manual counting under a microscope.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Particle Motion Simulation

The spores in the air are mainly ungerminated [27]. In this study, 16 µm particles were used to represent B. cinerea spores during the simulations. In this section, the internal rib structure is a regular triangle, and the side length is A (from 250 µm to 2500 µm, and the interval is set to 250 µm). In order to find the optimal spacing of the internal rib structure, different values (from 500 µm to 1500 µm, and the interval was set to 500 µm) of the spacing of the internal rib structure were used to simulate. In order to seek the optimal radius of the collection tank, different values (from 2500 µm to 5000 µm, and the interval is set to 500 µm) of the collection tank’s radius were used to simulate. The enrichment results of particles are shown in Figure 5.
It can be seen from Figure 5a that when L = 500 μm, the collection efficiency of 16 μm particles decreases with the increase of the radius R of the collecting tank. However, the difference is that in Figure 5b,c, when L = 1000 μm and L = 1500 μm, the collection efficiency of particles increases first and then decreases with the increase of the radius R of the collecting tank reaches its maximum when the radius R of the collecting tank is 3000 μm. Combined with the influence of the inlet flow rate of the microfluidic chip on the collection efficiency of 16 μm particles, when R = 3000 μm, L = 1500 μm, the collection efficiency of 16 μm particles is relatively high. The maximum collection efficiency of 16 μm particles was 79%, 100% and 89% at the inlet flow rate of 12, 14 and 16 mL/min, respectively. Therefore, R = 3000 μm, L = 1500 μm, and flow rate of 14 mL/min were set as the next step of numerical simulation in this study. Figure 6a is the velocity distribution in the microchannel of the chip, Figure 6b is the intensity of pressure distribution in the microfluidics of the chip, and Figure 6c is the simulation results of 16 μm particles.
As shown in Figure 6, the airflow enters the microchannel from the particle’s entrance and obtains a horizontal to right initial velocity [28]. The particles move forward under the action of airflow, but in the process of the particles moving forward, due to the triangular inner rib structure, the direction of the particle movement will change. The particles suspended in the airflow are injected into the traditional inertial separation system, and some particles with sufficient momentum can pass through the streamline and be separated. However, other airflows with insufficient momentum will leave as the airflow deflected [29]. It can be seen from Figure 6a,b that the velocity of particles in the collecting tank is close to 0, and there is no pressure distribution in the collecting tank. It can be seen from Figure 6c that 16 μm particles can be well collected in the collecting tank. It is proved that the designed microfluidic chip can be used to collect 16 μm particles.

3.2. Spore Collection Experiment

3.2.1. Evaluation of B. cinerea Spores Collection Efficiency

The collection efficiency of B. cinerea spores can be defined as Equation (9) [30].
η = η i η i + η j × 100 %
where η i is the number of given particle size spores that pass through the chip and enter the collection tank; η j is the sum of the number of given particle size spores at the microchannel wall and outlet position of the chip.

3.2.2. Result of Spore Collection

The schematic diagram of the experimental platform is shown in Figure 7, including high-efficiency particulate air filter, mass flow controller, biological aerosol generator, diffusion dryer, rotameter, aerosol neutralizer, vacuum pump, microfluidic chip, diffraction device, and computer system.
B. cinerea spores suspension from greenhouse crops was placed in aerosol generators to maintain the integrity and biological activity of spores under low pressure. The compressed air was filtered with high-efficiency particulate air to produce a bioaerosol at 2 atmospheres. A diffusion dryer was placed behind the aerosol generator (24 Jet Collison, BGI Collison) to remove moisture from the aerosol stream. A 210Po aerosol neutralizer was installed after the diffusion dryer to remove the charge from the spores [5,23]. The flow rate of the rotameter (range of rotameter is 6–60 mL/min) was set to 12, 14 and 16 mL/min, respectively. Finally, the PDMS layer was removed to expose spores, so the collected greenhouse crops’ airborne disease spores can be observed by the inverted microscope.
Figure 8 is an experimental image taken by the inverted microscope. As can be seen from Figure 8, the spores of B. cinerea can be well collected in the enrichment area. In addition, the distribution of spores in the enrichment area is relatively scattered, and there is little overlap. This is conducive to the subsequent collection and processing of spore diffraction images. However, by analyzing the collected spore microscopic images, it can be known that there are still some other impurities in the collection tank of the microfluidic chip. This may be because the air has some impurities similar in volume and density to tomato gray mold spores. Therefore, the designed microfluidic chip can separate and collect tomato gray mold spores.
In this study, to verify the collection efficiency of B. cinerea spores, the designed microfluidic chip was tested. A total of three sets of experiments were performed, and the flow rates of the three sets of experiments were set to 12, 14 and 16 mL/min, respectively. To reduce the random error of the experiment, experiments were repeated five times, each experiment was conducted for 2 min, and the average value and standard deviation were calculated at last. Then, the experimental results were statistically analyzed. The result is shown in Table 1.
It can be seen from Table 1 that when the flow rate of the microfluidic chip was 12, 14, and 16 mL/min, the collection efficiency of B. cinerea spores was 70.65%, 87.52% and 77.96%, respectively. The standard deviation analysis of the five tests showed that when the flow rate of the microfluidic chip was 12, 14, and 16 mL/min, the standard deviation of the test results was 0.024, 0.012 and 0.025, respectively. The collection efficiency was the best when the flow rate of the microfluidic chip was 14 mL/min. The experimental results are consistent with the simulation results. It can be seen from Figure 5 that when R = 3000 μm, L = 1500 μm and the flow rates was 12, 14 and 16 mL/min, respectively, the maximum collection efficiency of the designed microfluidic chip for 16 μm particles was 79%, 100% and 89%, respectively. The actual collection efficiency of the microfluidic chip for B. cinerea spores was slightly lower than the simulation result. This may be because the model of B. cinerea spores was an equivalent model during the simulation, while the size of B. cinerea spores in the actual test was within a range (in Figure 1). In addition, it can be seen from Table 1 that the deviations of the three sets of tests are all within the range of ±5%, which can meet the actual engineering needs. Therefore, the microfluidic chip can realize the enrichment of B. cinerea spores in the greenhouse and provide a basis for the study of real-time monitoring technology of B. cinerea spores in the greenhouse.

3.3. Spore Count Results

3.3.1. Evaluation of B. cinerea Spores Count Results

The counting error of B. cinerea spores can be defined as, Equation (10).
e r r o r = | N N 0 | N 0 × 100 %
where N is the counting result of computer image processing. N0 is the result of manual counting under a microscope.

3.3.2. Analysis of B. cinerea Spores Count Results

The B. cinerea spores collected in the experiment were placed under a microscope for manual counting and compared with the automatic counting results based on diffraction image processing. The results are shown in Table 2.
It can be seen from Table 2 that a total of 10 sets of experiments were carried out, with an error range of the experiment was 5.13~8.57%, and the average error of the experiment was 6.42%. Although the automatic counting based on diffraction image processing has a certain error compared with manual counting under the microscope, the overall accuracy is still trustworthy and falls within the acceptable range. The source of error may be that some diffraction rings are weak and difficult to identify when using diffracted light. It is also possible that the suspension of B. cinerea spores used in the experiment contained spores at different germination stages, and the shapes and sizes of spores at different germination stages were different, resulting in different diffraction fingerprints. In actual conditions, the spores in the air are in the ungerminated stage [27]. Only when the B. cinerea spores invade tomato leaves and fruitscan germinate under a suitable temperature and humidity environment.
In order to further illustrate the feasibility of identifying and counting spores of B. cinerea based on diffraction image processing, the Bland–Altman method was used to analyze two methods based on diffraction image processing counting and manual counting under a microscope. The analysis results are shown in Figure 9. It can be seen from Figure 9 that all points are within the 95% consistency interval, and the consistency is good [31]. The results showed that the recognition and counting results of B. cinerea spores based on diffraction image processing had good consistency with the manual counting results, and it could be used for the identification and counting of B. cinerea spores.

4. Conclusions

Tomatoes are amongst the most important and widely planted vegetables in the world as well as in China and has high economic and health benefits. Generally, after tomato gray mold fungi occurs, the yield of tomato is decreased by 20–30%, and the serious plots can even be as high as about 50%. Therefore, how to quickly and accurately discover B. cinereae and take corresponding control measures is of great significance to ensure the production of tomato crops. In this study, in order to realize early monitoring of tomato gray mold, a rapid detection method for spores of B. cinerea in a greenhouse was proposed based on microfluidic chip enrichment and lens-free diffraction image processing and designed a microfluidic chip with a regular triangular inner rib structure. Built a lens-less diffraction imaging system. In order to verify the collection efficiency of B. cinerea spores, the designed microfluidic chip was tested. When R = 3000 μm, L = 1500 μm, and the flow rate was 14 mL/min and the collection efficiency of B. cinerea spores was 87.52%, the standard deviation of the test results was 0.012. Collection efficiency is the best.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W., and H.M.; methodology, Y.W., software, Y.W., X.Z. and Y.L.; validation, Y.W., and X.D.; data curation, Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W., Y.L. and X.D.; writing—review and editing, Y.W., X.D. and Y.L.; project administration, H.M.; funding acquisition, H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the national natural science foundation of china (32071905 and 61771224).

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Jiangsu University for supporting the experimental conditions of the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, C.; Li, X.Y.; Yan, H.F.; Ullah, I.; Zuo, Z.Y.; Li, L.L.; Yu, J.J. Effects of irrigation quantity and biochar on soil physical properties, growth characteristics, yield, and quality of greenhouse tomato. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 241, 106263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.F.; Ma, G.X.; Du, X.X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, B.; Xu, G.L.; Mao, H.P. Effects of Nutrient Solution Irrigation Quantity and Downy Mildew Infection on Growth and Physiological Traits of Greenhouse Cucumber. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, F.Y.; Lv, R.; Cheng, M.Z.; Mo, F.L.; Zhang, N.; Qi, H.N.; Liu, J.Y.; Chen, X.L.; Liu, X.L.; Liu, Y.X.; et al. Insights into the molecular basis of biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea by Clonostachys rosea in tomato. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 291, 110547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, X.; Zhou, G.X.; Chen, A.; Yi, J.Z.; Zhang, W.Z.; Hu, Y.H. Identification of tomato leaf diseases based on combination of ABCK-BWTR and B-ARNet. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 178, 105730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.F.; Zhang, X.D.; Yang, N.; Ma, G.X.; Du, X.X.; Mao, H.P. Separation-enrichment method for airborne disease spores based on a microfluidic chip. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2021, 14, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xie, C.Q.; Yang, C.; He, Y. Hyperspectral imaging for classification of healthy and gray mold diseased tomato leaves with different infection severities. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 135, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Y.F.; Du, X.X.; Ma, G.X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, B.; Mao, H.P. Classification Methods for Airborne Disease Spores from Greenhouse Crops Based on Multifeature Fusion. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Malolepsza, U. Induction of disease resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and o-hydroxyethylorutin against botrytis cinerea in tomato plants. Crop. Prot. 2006, 25, 956–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xie, C.Q.; Wang, H.L.; Shao, Y.N.; He, Y. Different Algorithms for Detection of Malondialdehyde Content in Eggplant Leaves Stressed by Grey Mold Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technique. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2015, 21, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hafez, Y.M.; Attia, K.A.; Kanel, S.; Alamery, S.; El-Gendy, S.; Al-Doss, A.A.; Mehiar, F.; Ghazy, A.; Ibrahim, E.I.; Abdelaal, K.A.A. Bacillus subtilis as a bio-agent combined with nano molecules can control powdery mildew disease through histochemical and physiobiochemical changes in cucumber plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 111, 101489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tanaka, K.; Fukuda, M.; Amaki, Y.; Sakaguchi, T.; Inai, K.; Ishihara, A.; Nakajima, H. Importance of prumycin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SD-32 in biocontrol against cucumber powdery mildew disease. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 2419–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wallace, E.C.; D’Arcangelo, K.N.; Quesada-Ocampo, L.M. Population Analyses Reveal Two Host-Adapted Clades of Pseudoperonospora cubensis, the Causal Agent of Cucurbit Downy Mildew, on Commercial and Wild Cucurbits. Phytopathology 2020, 110, 1578–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abbas, A.; Jain, S.; Gour, M.; Vankudthu, S. Tomato plant disease detection using transfer learning with C-GAN synthetic images. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 187, 106279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gu, Q.; Sheng, L.; Zhang, T.H.; Lu, Y.W.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zheng, K.F.; Hu, H.; Zhou, H.K. Early detection of tomato spotted wilt virus infection in tobacco using the hyperspectral imaging technique and machine learning algorithms. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 169, 105066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sireesha, Y.; Velazhahan, R. Rapid and specific detection of Peronosclerospora sorghi in maize seeds by conventional and real-time PCR. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 150, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bandamaravuri, K.B.; Nayak, A.K.; Bandamaravuri, A.S.; Samad, A. Simultaneous detection of downy mildew and powdery mildew pathogens on Cucumis sativus and other cucurbits using duplex-qPCR and HRM analysis. AMB Express 2020, 10, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, J.J.; Li, K.T. Analysis of PCR Kinetics inside a Microfluidic DNA Amplification System. Micromachines 2018, 9, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Akhmadeev, A.A.; Salakhov, M.K. A new approach of recognition of ellipsoidal micro- and nanoparticles on AFM images and determination of their sizes. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2016, 27, 105402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdulridha, J.; Ampatzidis, Y.; Kakarla, S.C.; Roberts, P. Detection of target spot and bacterial spot diseases in tomato using UAV-based and benchtop-based hyperspectral imaging techniques. Precis. Agric. 2019, 21, 955–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lei, Y.; Yao, Z.F.; He, D.J. Automatic detection and counting of urediniospores of Puccinia striiformis f.sp tritici using spore traps and image processing. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Yang, N.; Yu, J.J.; Wang, A.Y.; Tang, J.; Zhang, R.B.; Xie, L.L.; Shu, F.Y.; Kwabena, O.P. A rapid rice blast detection and identification method based on crop disease spores’ diffraction fingerprint texture. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 3608–3621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, N.; Chen, C.Y.; Li, T.; Li, Z.; Zou, L.R.; Zhang, R.B.; Mao, H.P. Portable Rice Disease Spores Capture and Detection Method Using Diffraction Fingerprints on Microfluidic Chip. Micromachines 2019, 10, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wang, P.; Yuan, S.Q.; Yang, N.; Wang, A.Y.; Fordjour, A.; Chen, S.B. The Collection Method for Crop Fungal Spores Based on an Efficient Microfluidic Device. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2020, 20, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, K.; Lee, J.W.; Ha, D.; Kim, M.; Kim, T. Low-electric-potential-assisted diffusiophoresis for continuous separation of nanoparticles on a chip. Lab Chip 2020, 20, 2735–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chung, A.J.; Gossett, D.R.; Di, C.D. Three Dimensional, Sheathless, and High-Throughput Microparticle Inertial Focusing Through Geometry-Induced Secondary Flows. Small 2013, 9, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Seo, J.; Lean, M.H.; Kole, A. Membrane-free microfiltration by asymmetric inertial migration. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 033901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhu, Y.D.; Zhang, J.Y.; Li, M.Y.; Zhao, L.J.; Ren, H.R.; Yan, L.G.; Zhao, G.M.; Zhu, C.Z. Rapid determination of spore germinability of Clostridium perfringens based on microscopic hyperspectral imaging technology and chemometrics. J. Food Eng. 2020, 280, 109896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, P.; Yuan, S.Q.; Yang, N.; Wang, A.Y. Performance Evaluation of a Virtual Impactor with an Additional Pretreatment Structure for Particle Separation. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2021, 21, 200269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ho, M.T.; Li, J.; Su, W.; Wu, L.; Borg, M.K.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.H. Rarefied flow separation in microchannel with bends. J. Fluid Mech. 2020, 901, A26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, P.F.; Zhang, R.B.; Yang, N.; Oppong, P.K.; Sun, J.; Wang, P. High-precision extraction and concentration detection of airborne disease microorganisms based on a microfluidic chip. Biomicrofluidics 2019, 13, 023110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ashley-Martin, J.; Guadreau, E.; Dumas, P.; Liang, C.L.; Logvin, A.; Belanger, P.; Provencher, G.; Gagne, S.; Foster, W.; Lanphear, B.; et al. Direct LC-MS/MS, and indirect GC-MS/MS methods for measuring urinary bisphenol A concentrations are comparable. Environ. Int. 2021, 157, 106874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The measurement results for B. cinerea spores.
Figure 1. The measurement results for B. cinerea spores.
Foods 10 03011 g001
Figure 2. Structure diagram of microfluidic chip: (a) Two-dimensional structure,1. Plane structure, 2. Collection tank, 3. Channel 1, 4. Internal rib structure, 5. Channel 2; (b) Physical picture of the microfluidic chip, A and L represent the side length of internal rib structure and the internal rib structure spacing, respectively.
Figure 2. Structure diagram of microfluidic chip: (a) Two-dimensional structure,1. Plane structure, 2. Collection tank, 3. Channel 1, 4. Internal rib structure, 5. Channel 2; (b) Physical picture of the microfluidic chip, A and L represent the side length of internal rib structure and the internal rib structure spacing, respectively.
Foods 10 03011 g002aFoods 10 03011 g002b
Figure 3. Diffraction imaging detection platform.
Figure 3. Diffraction imaging detection platform.
Foods 10 03011 g003
Figure 4. Spore diffraction image processing and counting.
Figure 4. Spore diffraction image processing and counting.
Foods 10 03011 g004
Figure 5. Collection efficiency of 16 μm particles. (a) Spacing of the internal rib structure L = 500 μm, (b) Spacing of the internal rib structure L = 1000 μm, (c) Spacing of the internal rib structure L = 1500 μm, a–m are used to represent significance levels.
Figure 5. Collection efficiency of 16 μm particles. (a) Spacing of the internal rib structure L = 500 μm, (b) Spacing of the internal rib structure L = 1000 μm, (c) Spacing of the internal rib structure L = 1500 μm, a–m are used to represent significance levels.
Foods 10 03011 g005aFoods 10 03011 g005b
Figure 6. Simulation results of the microfluidic chip. (a) Velocity distribution, (b) Pressure distribution, (c) 16 μm particle trajectory.
Figure 6. Simulation results of the microfluidic chip. (a) Velocity distribution, (b) Pressure distribution, (c) 16 μm particle trajectory.
Foods 10 03011 g006
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the experimental platform.
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the experimental platform.
Foods 10 03011 g007
Figure 8. Experimental results of spores enrichment. (a) Example 1, (b) Example 2, (c) Example 3.
Figure 8. Experimental results of spores enrichment. (a) Example 1, (b) Example 2, (c) Example 3.
Foods 10 03011 g008
Figure 9. Analysis by Bland–Altman method, the triangles in the figure represent data for counting errors.
Figure 9. Analysis by Bland–Altman method, the triangles in the figure represent data for counting errors.
Foods 10 03011 g009
Table 1. Statistics results of spore enrichment.
Table 1. Statistics results of spore enrichment.
VelocityCount TypeExperimental Groups
G 1G 2G 3G 4G 5AverageStandard Deviation
12 mL/minCollection Tank828991879488.64.03
Other areas283540384336.85.11
Sum110124131125137125.49.00
Collection Efficiency74.55%71.77%67.91%69.6%68.61%70.65%0.024
14 mL/minCollection Tank94981038710998.27.52
Other areas1216141117142.28
Sum10611411798126112.29.55
Collection Efficiency88.68%85.96%88.03%88.78%86.51%87.52%0.012
16 mL/minCollection Tank869282788484.44.63
Other areas253220182323.64.84
Sum111124102961071089.44
Collection Efficiency77.48%74.19%80.39%81.25%78.5%77.96%0.025
Note: G 1–G 5 are the experimental groups.
Table 2. Results of manual counting and diffraction image reconstruction recognition counting in the microscope field.
Table 2. Results of manual counting and diffraction image reconstruction recognition counting in the microscope field.
Number Computer Image Processing CountingManual Microscope CountingCounting Error (%)Average Counting Error (%)
136385.266.42
239368.33
337407.5
435375.41
537355.71
629316.45
738358.57
837395.13
930326.25
1038365.56
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Mao, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Du, X. A Rapid Detection Method for Tomato Gray Mold Spores in Greenhouse Based on Microfluidic Chip Enrichment and Lens-Less Diffraction Image Processing. Foods 2021, 10, 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123011

AMA Style

Wang Y, Mao H, Zhang X, Liu Y, Du X. A Rapid Detection Method for Tomato Gray Mold Spores in Greenhouse Based on Microfluidic Chip Enrichment and Lens-Less Diffraction Image Processing. Foods. 2021; 10(12):3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yafei, Hanping Mao, Xiaodong Zhang, Yong Liu, and Xiaoxue Du. 2021. "A Rapid Detection Method for Tomato Gray Mold Spores in Greenhouse Based on Microfluidic Chip Enrichment and Lens-Less Diffraction Image Processing" Foods 10, no. 12: 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop