Publications

19 pages, 315 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Incentive Policies for Scientific Publications in the State Universities of Chile

by Elizabeth Troncoso, Francisco Ganga-Contreras and Margarita Briceño

Publications 2022, 10(2), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020020 - 16 Jun 2022

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3744 | Correction

Most state universities in Chile (15 out of 18) have monetary incentive policies for scientific publications, but they are based on criteria that do not necessarily aim to improve institutional performance in all disciplines. This work compares affinities and differences of these policies [...] Read more.

Most state universities in Chile (15 out of 18) have monetary incentive policies for scientific publications, but they are based on criteria that do not necessarily aim to improve institutional performance in all disciplines. This work compares affinities and differences of these policies in three areas: (i) type of publications encouraged, (ii) beneficiaries, and (iii) monetary amounts per type of publication. It was found that the 15 universities encourage publications with WoS indexing, 13 do so for Scopus and SciELO, and 6 are open to other databases. Only seven institutions encourage the production of books and book chapters. As expected, the 15 universities direct the incentives to their academic staff, although with different requirements, six accept non-academic staff, and only one university considers its student body. In general, the highest monetary amounts are received by WoS publications, with differentiation by quartile or impact factor of the journal. All in all, there is a clear need to design incentive policies in universities that are more homogeneous and take into account the “quality” and “impact” of the research they publish based on different metrics that tend to provide robust analyses in the different areas of knowledge. Full article

7 pages, 209 KiB

Open AccessSystematic Review

What Proportion of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in the Annals of Surgery Provide Definitive Conclusions—A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

by Matthew G. Davey, Martin S. Davey, Aoife J. Lowery and Michael J. Kerin

Publications 2022, 10(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020019 - 28 Apr 2022

Viewed by 2435

Abstract

Objective: To perform a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in the Annals of Surgery during a 10-year eligibility period and determine the unambiguity of concluding statements of these reviews published in the journal. Background: Systematic reviews and [...] Read more.

Objective: To perform a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in the Annals of Surgery during a 10-year eligibility period and determine the unambiguity of concluding statements of these reviews published in the journal. Background: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses integrate clinically pertinent results from several studies to replicate large-volume, ‘real world’ scenarios. While the assimilation of results from multiple high-quality trials are at the summit of the evidence-base, the increasing prevalence of reviews using low-to-moderate levels of evidence (LOE) limit the ability to make evidence-based conclusions. In surgery, increasing LOE are typically associated with publication in the highest impact surgical journals (e.g., Annals of Surgery). Methods: A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search of the Annals of Surgery for articles published between 2011 and 2020 was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: In total, 186 systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) were published in the Annals of Surgery between 2011 and 2020 (131 systematic reviews with meta-analyses (70.4%) and 55 without meta-analyses (29.6%)). Study data were from 22,656,192 subjects. In total, 94 studies were from European research institutes (50.5%) and 58 were from North American institutes (31.2%). Overall, 75.3% of studies provided conclusive statements (140/186). Year of publication (P = 0.969), country of publication (P = 0.971), region of publication (P = 0.416), LOE (P = 0.342), surgery performed (P = 0.736), and two-year impact factor (IF) (P = 0.251) failed to correlate with conclusive statements. Of note, 80.9% (106/131) of meta-analyses and 61.8% of systematic reviews (34/55) provided conclusive statements (P = 0.009, †). Conclusions: Over 75% of systematic reviews published in the Annals of Surgery culminated in conclusive statements. Interestingly, meta-analyses were more likely to provide conclusive statements than systematic reviews, while LOE and IF failed to do so. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity)

25 pages, 2399 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Correction of the Scientific Production: Publisher Performance Evaluation Using a Dataset of 4844 PubMed Retractions

by Catalin Toma, Liliana Padureanu and Bogdan Toma

Publications 2022, 10(2), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020018 - 21 Apr 2022

Viewed by 3304

Abstract

Background. Retraction of problematic scientific articles after publication is one of the mechanisms for correcting the literature available to publishers. The market volume and the busi-ness model justify publishers’ ethical involvement in the post-publication quality control (PPQC) of human-health-related articles. The limited information [...] Read more.

Background. Retraction of problematic scientific articles after publication is one of the mechanisms for correcting the literature available to publishers. The market volume and the busi-ness model justify publishers’ ethical involvement in the post-publication quality control (PPQC) of human-health-related articles. The limited information about this subject led us to analyze Pub-Med-retracted articles and the main retraction reasons grouped by publisher. We propose a score to appraise publisher’s PPQC results. The dataset used for this article consists of 4844 Pub-Med-retracted papers published between 1.01.2009 and 31.12.2020. Methods. An SDTP score was constructed from the dataset. The calculation formula includes several parameters: speed (article exposure time (ET)), detection rate (percentage of articles whose retraction is initiated by the edi-tor/publisher/institution without the authors’ participation), transparency (percentage of retracted articles available online and the clarity of the retraction notes), and precision (mention of authors’ responsibility and percentage of retractions for reasons other than editorial errors). Results. The 4844 retracted articles were published in 1767 journals by 366 publishers, the average number of retracted articles/journal being 2.74. Forty-five publishers have more than 10 retracted articles, holding 88% of all papers and 79% of journals. Combining our data with data from another study shows that less than 7% of PubMed dataset journals retracted at least one article. Only 10.5% of the retraction notes included the individual responsibility of the authors. Nine of the top 11 publishers had the largest number of retracted articles in 2020. Retraction-reason analysis shows considerable differences between publishers concerning the articles’ ET: median values between 9 and 43 months (mistakes), 9 and 73 months (images), and 10 and 42 months (plagiarism and overlap). The SDTP score shows, from 2018 to 2020, an improvement in PPQC of four publishers in the top 11 and a decrease in the gap between 1st and 11th place. The group of the other 355 publishers also has a positive evolution of the SDTP score. Conclusions. Publishers have to get involved actively and measurably in the post-publication evaluation of scientific products. The introduction of reporting standards for retraction notes and replicable indicators for quantifying publishing QC can help increase the overall quality of scientific literature. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Publication Ethics and Research Integrity)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4354 KiB

Open AccessArticle

RecSys Pertaining to Research Information with Collaborative Filtering Methods: Characteristics and Challenges

by Otmane Azeroual and Tibor Koltay

Publications 2022, 10(2), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020017 - 02 Apr 2022

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3017

Abstract

Recommendation (recommender) systems have played an increasingly important role in both research and industry in recent years. In the area of publication data, for example, there is a strong need to help people find the right research information through recommendations and scientific reports. [...] Read more.

Recommendation (recommender) systems have played an increasingly important role in both research and industry in recent years. In the area of publication data, for example, there is a strong need to help people find the right research information through recommendations and scientific reports. The difference between search engines and recommendation systems is that search engines help us find something we already know, while recommendation systems are more likely to help us find new items. An essential function of recommendation systems is to support users in their decision making. Recommendation systems are information systems that can be categorized into decision support systems, as long as they are used for decision making and are intended to support people instead of replacing them. This paper deals with recommendation systems for research information, especially publication data. We discuss and analyze the challenges and peculiarities of implementing recommender systems for the scientific exchange of research information. For this purpose, data mining techniques are examined and a concept for a recommendation system for research information is developed. Our aim is to investigate to what extent a recommendation system based on a collaborative filtering approach with cookies is possible. The data source is publication data extracted from cookies in the Web of Science database. The results of our investigation show that a collaborative filtering process is suitable for publication data and that recommendations can be generated with user information. In addition, we have seen that collaborative filtering is an important element that can solve a practical problem by sifting through large amounts of dynamically generated information to provide users with personalized content and services. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Data and Data Papers)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 272 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Was This Supposed to Be on the Test? Academic Leadership, Gender and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Denmark, Hungary, Romania, and United Kingdom

by Sorana-Alexandra Constantinescu and Maria-Henriete Pozsar

Publications 2022, 10(2), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020016 - 01 Apr 2022

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3219

Abstract

Recent developments in workplace dynamics have made us even more aware of the importance of gender representation in all work-related decisions. Working from home during the pandemic, a decision that was generally the norm for European universities, forced us to rethink what are [...] Read more.

Recent developments in workplace dynamics have made us even more aware of the importance of gender representation in all work-related decisions. Working from home during the pandemic, a decision that was generally the norm for European universities, forced us to rethink what are the main priorities when addressing the different needs of academic workers. The present paper tackles this overall issue from the perspective of gender representation, looking at the gender composition of the leadership structures of universities and their policy responses to employee needs. All the state-accredited universities in the following countries were included in the analysis: Romania, Denmark, Hungary and UK. These countries were chosen for the diversity in the state of their gender politics and in their overall quality of higher education. Primary results show not only that gender equality within academic leadership lags behind, but also that this lag may be associated with a poorer policy response to challenges typically faced by women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender Research at the Nexus of the Social Sciences and Humanities)

14 pages, 303 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Disinformation at a Local Level: An Emerging Discussion

by Pedro Jerónimo and Marta Sanchez Esparza

Publications 2022, 10(2), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020015 - 25 Mar 2022

Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5687

Abstract

Fake news and disinformation are not a new phenomenon. However, in recent years, they have acquired great prominence on the public agenda, conditioning electoral results and generating episodes of political destabilization. Academic interest runs in parallel with the consideration of disinformation as a [...] Read more.

Fake news and disinformation are not a new phenomenon. However, in recent years, they have acquired great prominence on the public agenda, conditioning electoral results and generating episodes of political destabilization. Academic interest runs in parallel with the consideration of disinformation as a growing priority for governments and international organizations, due to its geostrategic relevance and its importance for national sovereignty and security. The interference of countries such as Russia or China in other nations’ electoral processes, using new tools and methods to manipulate public opinion and proliferate cyberattacks have led to the creation of agencies or regulations aimed at curbing disinformation in some states. The UN, the EU and other countries’ governments have tried to develop strategies to respond to this growing threat. The pandemic has accelerated the decline of local media, which leaves communities in a state of serious vulnerability. Reliable resources and sources around local information are scarce assets, information is increasingly consumed through social media, and in them disinformation easily proliferates. With this proposal, we intend to start a discussion around disinformation at a local level, something that has been absent in disinformation studies. Full article

3 pages, 199 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

When Science Communication Becomes Parascience: Blurred Boundaries, Diffuse Roles

by Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Rosa Lorés

Publications 2022, 10(2), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10020014 - 24 Mar 2022

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2698

Abstract

The communication of science goes hand in hand with technological development and, in general, with the need to apply scientific advancements to the improvement of human wellbeing [...] Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Scientific and Parascientific Communication)

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Publications, Volume 10, Issue 2 (June 2022) – 7 articles

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI