Next Article in Journal
Sub-Nanosecond Passively Q-Switched Yellow and Orange Raman Lasers
Next Article in Special Issue
Stray Light Analysis and Suppression for an Infrared Fourier Imaging Spectrometer
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Identification of Crude Oil via Combined Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy and Machine Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Ground Object Echo Simulation of Avian Lidar
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design of Backstepping Control Based on a Softsign Linear–Nonlinear Tracking Differentiator for an Electro-Optical Tracking System

Photonics 2024, 11(2), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11020156
by Jiachen Li 1,2,3,4, Shanlin Zhuang 1,2,3,4, Haolin Wang 1,2,3,4, Jiuqiang Deng 1,2,3,4,* and Yao Mao 1,2,3,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Photonics 2024, 11(2), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11020156
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 23 January 2024 / Accepted: 31 January 2024 / Published: 6 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Photoelectric Tracking Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

An application of the Softsign function on Backstepping Control is presented in this paper for an electro-optical tracking system. The paper presents mathematical models and theoretical frameworks for their proposed work. Overall the paper is well-written with experimental validations. However, it is not apparent that the significance of the research does not compare their method to some of the traditional methods.

Figure 12 (a), and Figure 15, need to be modified as they hide the time axis title.

Figure 11 (a), there is no need for multiple magnifications.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The written quality is satisfactory.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article describes an important scientific issue.

The topic of the article is relevant.

I recommend accept this document after minor revision. 

My decision is supported by the following comments:

1. Fig. 5 shows a photograph of the constructed test stand. Including a diagram of the test stand would be more legible.

2. The job description is very general. No parameters of the elements used are provided.

3. CCD is not the same as a camera. The detection matrix is one of the camera elements.

4. What camera was used (CCD or maybe CMOS)?

5. The Conclusion chapter is too short and too general and requires expansion.

 

Editorial page needs corrections:

- the legend in Fig. 1 should be in English

- no axis markings on the charts (fig. 1, 2)

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have addressed the issues/concerns that I raised, and have added relevant literature to improve the availability of references and also updated figures that needed to be updated.

 

The article can be accepted

Back to TopTop