Next Article in Journal
Disturbance Observer-Based Terminal Sliding Mode Tracking Control for a Class of Nonlinear SISO Systems with Input Saturation
Previous Article in Journal
Adsorptive Removal of Dye (Methylene Blue) Organic Pollutant from Water by Pine Tree Leaf Biomass Adsorbent
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal Methane Cracking on Molten Metal: Kinetics Modeling for Pilot Reactor Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Industrial Chemistry Reactions: Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Industrial Reactor Design (II)

1
Eurochem Engineering Ltd., 20139 Milano, Italy
2
NICL—Department of Chemical Science, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(7), 1880; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071880
Submission received: 20 June 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 22 June 2023

1. Introduction

Due to the success of the first edition of the Special Issue “Industrial Chemistry Reactions: Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Industrial Reactor Design” in terms of both the quantity and quality of the published papers, we thought it would be prudent to announce a second edition.
Recently conceived, powerful calculation methods have enabled the development of more sophisticated approaches to catalysis, kinetics, reactor design, and simulation. It is well known that many chemical reactions of a large scale and of great interest for industrial processes require information related to topics ranging from thermodynamics and kinetics to transport phenomena related to mass, energy, and momentum. For reliable industrial-scale reactor design, all these pieces of information must be incorporated into appropriate equations and mathematical models that facilitate accurate and reliable simulations for scale-up purposes. One challenge in this regard is to collect, in a memorable volume, the main advances and trends in the field of industrial chemistry that have been brought about by the contributions of various champions of scientific and technological progress by reviewing their past activity in the field or providing, through original manuscripts, examples of modern approaches to the investigation of industrial chemical reactions.
Therefore, the aim of this Special Issue is to collect worldwide contributions from experts in the field of industrial reactor design pertaining to kinetic and mass-transfer studies. The call for reviews and original papers solicited research in the following areas:
  • Kinetic studies of complex reaction schemes (multiphase systems);
  • Kinetics and mass transfer in multifunctional reactors;
  • Reactions in mass-transfer-dominated regimes (e.g., fluid–solid and intraparticle diffusive limitations);
  • Kinetics and mass transfer modeling with alternative approaches (e.g., stochastic modeling);
  • Pilot plant and industrial-size reactor simulation and scale-ups based on kinetic studies (e.g., the lab-to-plant approach).
This Special Issue collected eleven papers that could be framed within different macro areas and whose distribution is depicted in Figure 1.
As depicted, the distribution is well-balanced among the five different macro areas, namely,
(i)
kinetics for complex reaction schemes;
(ii)
multifunctional reactors;
(iii)
reactions in mass-transfer-dominated regimes;
(iv)
modeling with alternative approaches;
(v)
scale-ups.
In the following sections, the main achievements published in this SI will be reviewed and summarized, highlighting the points of novelty with respect to each macro area.

2. Kinetics for Complex Reaction Schemes

Two articles were published in the field of kinetics for complex reaction schemes. Santacesaria et al. [1] reviewed and analyzed the possibility of using ethanol as a liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC), analyzing in detail both the main and side reactions (see Figure 2A for the latter), finding that the main rate expressions can be strongly dependent on the adsorption phenomena with regard to the surface reaction mechanisms.
Palo et al. proposed a kinetic model of thermal methane cracking on molten metal [2] that correctly described the experimental data collected using a pilot plant even when using simplified ideal packed bed reactor models (see Figure 2B).

3. Multifunctional Reactors

Three papers were published in the field of multifunctional reactor technologies. Alqahtani et al. [3] explored the possibility of using a membrane reactor for hydrogen production, specifically with respect to its modeling and simulation. Figure 3A shows the hydrogen concentration profiles along the residence time, illustrating that the model can also predict instability regions for the operation, making it a valuable tool in reactor design.
Liu et al. proposed a rotating zigzag bed reactor for a modeling and experimental study on CO2 absorption using NaOH solution [4], adopting the experimental apparatus sketched in Figure 3B. The authors managed to measure and simulate the gas–liquid mass transfer interfacial parameters with high precision.
Finally, Zhang et al. reviewed both the classical and the most recent technologies in relation to simulated moving bed reactors (see Figure 3C) [5], reviewing the possibility of using such technologies in specific applications.

4. Reactions in Mass-Transfer-Dominated Regimes

Two articles were published in the field of chemical reactions in the presence of mass-transfer limitations. Hua et al. published a paper on a Multiphysics numerical simulation model related to an argon-stirred ladle [6]. As revealed in Figure 4A, the model accounts for the mass transfer aspects involved in the overall reaction network, paying particular attention to the diffusion of the chemical components between the involved phases. The results were promising and in line with the collected experimental data.
Tao et al. explored the hydrodynamic performance of a countercurrent total spray tray under sloshing conditions [7]. The influence of the main experimental conditions, including gas velocity and rolling-induced sweeping, on pressure drops, entrainment, and plate fluctuations was determined, thereby retrieving information for a better physical understanding of the system under investigation (see scheme reported in Figure 4B).

5. Modeling Using Alternative Approaches

The research groups of Huang and Lan published two articles on the topic of modeling using alternative approaches. Huang et al. conducted a model-based analysis of ethylene carbonate hydrogenation in industrial tubular reactors [8], comparing the performances of different reactors operating in adiabatic or heat-exchanged modalities (see Figure 5A). They identified the optimal operation-condition-related windows within which to optimize both the conversion and selectivity of the process.
Lan et al. investigated the effects of S and mineral elements (Ca, Al, Si, and Fe) on the thermochemical behavior of Zn during the co-pyrolysis of coal and waste tires [9]. The authors conducted an in-depth experimental and thermodynamic analysis to model the mentioned system, allowing them to predict the chemical composition of the mixtures obtained at different temperatures after thermal treatment (Figure 5B). Undoubtedly, this study yielded information required for the further scale-up of the operation.

6. Scale-Up

Finally, two articles were devoted to the scale-up process. Wang et al. studied the scaling-up of the catalytic decomposition of chlorinated hydrocarbons [10]. A dedicated experiment (see device in Figure 6A) was conducted to prove the concept, analyzing the quality of the products obtained for the future scaling-up of the process.
Lacerda de Oliveira Campos et al. proposed a process and techno-economic analysis of methanol synthesis from hydrogen and carbon dioxide with intermediate condensation steps [11]. The authors proposed a detailed flowsheet (see Figure 6B) that was designed to optimize the operation conditions of the whole plant.

7. Conclusions

Due to the success of the first edition, the second edition of this Special Issue on Industrial Chemistry Reactions: Kinetics, Mass Transfer, and Industrial Reactor Design (II) was launched and received significant attention. Part of the success of this second edition was due to the great variety of options that can be obtained when chemical reactions, catalysis, kinetics, transport phenomena, and multiphase systems are considered. The high quality of the collected papers, together with the highly interdisciplinary approach, allowed for the production of relevant papers in this sector, which will surely serve as a reference for future research.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Santacesaria, E.; Tesser, R.; Fulignati, S.; Galletti, A.M.R. The Perspective of Using the System Ethanol-Ethyl Acetate in a Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC) Cycle. Processes 2023, 11, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Palo, E.; Cosentino, V.; Iaquaniello, G.; Piemonte, V.; Busillo, E. Thermal Methane Cracking on Molten Metal: Kinetics Modeling for Pilot Reactor Design. Processes 2023, 11, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alqahtani, R.T.; Ajbar, A.; Bhowmik, S.K.; Alghamdi, R.A. Study of Static and Dynamic Behavior of a Membrane Reactor for Hydrogen Production. Processes 2021, 9, 2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Z.; Esmaeili, A.; Zhang, H.; Wang, D.; Lu, Y.; Shao, L. Modeling and Experimental Studies on Carbon Dioxide Absorption with Sodium Hydroxide Solution in a Rotating Zigzag Bed. Processes 2022, 10, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Ray, A.K.; Li, Y.; Tesser, R.; Russo, V.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Ray, A.K.; Li, Y. Research Progress on the Typical Variants of Simulated Moving Bed: From the Established Processes to the Advanced Technologies. Processes 2023, 11, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hua, C.; Bao, Y.; Wang, M. Multiphysics Numerical Simulation Model and Hydraulic Model Experiments in the Argon-Stirred Ladle. Processes 2022, 10, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tao, J.; Zhang, G.; Yao, J.; Wang, L.; Wei, F.; Tesser, R.; Russo, V.; Tao, J.; Zhang, G.; Yao, J.; et al. Study on the Hydrodynamic Performance of a Countercurrent Total Spray Tray under Sloshing Conditions. Processes 2023, 11, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, H.; Cao, C.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Lv, J.; Xu, J. Model-Based Analysis for Ethylene Carbonate Hydrogenation Operation in Industrial-Type Tubular Reactors. Processes 2022, 10, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lan, Y.; Jin, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Ling, L.; Jin, M. Effects of S and Mineral Elements (Ca, Al, Si and Fe) on Thermochemical Behaviors of Zn during Co-Pyrolysis of Coal and Waste Tire: A Combined Experimental and Thermodynamic Simulation Study. Processes 2022, 10, 1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, C.; Bauman, Y.I.; Mishakov, I.V.; Stoyanovskii, V.O.; Shelepova, E.V.; Vedyagin, A.A. Scaling up the Process of Catalytic Decomposition of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons with the Formation of Carbon Nanostructures. Processes 2022, 10, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lacerda de Oliveira Campos, B.; John, K.; Beeskow, P.; Herrera Delgado, K.; Pitter, S.; Dahmen, N.; Sauer, J. A Detailed Process and Techno-Economic Analysis of Methanol Synthesis from H2 and CO2 with Intermediate Condensation Steps. Processes 2022, 10, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Statistical information related to the Special Issue, “Industrial Chemistry Reactions: Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Industrial Reactor Design (II)”: distribution of papers per macro area.
Figure 1. Statistical information related to the Special Issue, “Industrial Chemistry Reactions: Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Industrial Reactor Design (II)”: distribution of papers per macro area.
Processes 11 01880 g001
Figure 2. (A) Detailed reaction scheme of acetaldehyde condensation [1]. (B) CH4 conversion versus reactors’ axial coordinates for 6.0 cm ID reactor [2].
Figure 2. (A) Detailed reaction scheme of acetaldehyde condensation [1]. (B) CH4 conversion versus reactors’ axial coordinates for 6.0 cm ID reactor [2].
Processes 11 01880 g002
Figure 3. (A) Variations in hydrogen concentration with residence time in a membrane reactor [3]. (B) Diagram of a rotating zigzag bed [4]. (C) Simulated moving bed reactor [5].
Figure 3. (A) Variations in hydrogen concentration with residence time in a membrane reactor [3]. (B) Diagram of a rotating zigzag bed [4]. (C) Simulated moving bed reactor [5].
Processes 11 01880 g003
Figure 4. (A) Diagram of the simulation model applied to the argon-stirred ladle [6]. (B) Experimental setup used by Tao et al. to investigate the hydrodynamic performance of a countercurrent total spray tray under sloshing conditions [7].
Figure 4. (A) Diagram of the simulation model applied to the argon-stirred ladle [6]. (B) Experimental setup used by Tao et al. to investigate the hydrodynamic performance of a countercurrent total spray tray under sloshing conditions [7].
Processes 11 01880 g004
Figure 5. (A) Different industrial tubular reactors modeled in the work conducted by Huang et al. [8]. (B) Thermodynamic equilibrium distribution distributions of Zn when S and Zn coexist in the coal [9].
Figure 5. (A) Different industrial tubular reactors modeled in the work conducted by Huang et al. [8]. (B) Thermodynamic equilibrium distribution distributions of Zn when S and Zn coexist in the coal [9].
Processes 11 01880 g005
Figure 6. (A) Experimental setup of the catalytic decomposition of chlorinated hydrocarbons: (ac), reactors (b); 1 gas cylinders; 2 flow mass controllers; 3 saturator; 4 quartz reactor; 5 heating zone; 6 catalyst sample; 7 foamed quartz basket; 8 lab flowthrough quartz reactor; 9 scaled-up quartz reactor; 10 evaporator; 11 carbon collector; 12 vessel; 13 pump; 14 alkali trap. [10]. (B) One-step process flowsheet [11].
Figure 6. (A) Experimental setup of the catalytic decomposition of chlorinated hydrocarbons: (ac), reactors (b); 1 gas cylinders; 2 flow mass controllers; 3 saturator; 4 quartz reactor; 5 heating zone; 6 catalyst sample; 7 foamed quartz basket; 8 lab flowthrough quartz reactor; 9 scaled-up quartz reactor; 10 evaporator; 11 carbon collector; 12 vessel; 13 pump; 14 alkali trap. [10]. (B) One-step process flowsheet [11].
Processes 11 01880 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santacesaria, E.; Tesser, R.; Russo, V. Industrial Chemistry Reactions: Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Industrial Reactor Design (II). Processes 2023, 11, 1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071880

AMA Style

Santacesaria E, Tesser R, Russo V. Industrial Chemistry Reactions: Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Industrial Reactor Design (II). Processes. 2023; 11(7):1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071880

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santacesaria, Elio, Riccardo Tesser, and Vincenzo Russo. 2023. "Industrial Chemistry Reactions: Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Industrial Reactor Design (II)" Processes 11, no. 7: 1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071880

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop