Preliminary Study on Size Effect of Fractured Rock Mass with Sand Powder 3D Printing
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Preparation and Experimental Design of Sand Powder 3D Printing Fractured Specimens
2.1. Preparation of Sand Powder 3D Printing Specimen
2.2. Experimental Design
3. Analysis of the Size Effect of Fractured Specimens
3.1. Analysis of Influence of Fractured Specimen Size on Uniaxial Compression Strength (UCS)
3.2. Analysis of Influence of Fractured Specimen Size on Elasticity Modulus
3.3. Analysis of Crack Evolution Process of Fractured Specimen
3.4. Failure Mode Analysis of Fractured Specimen
- (1)
- When α is 0°, the maximum horizontal displacement field of each specimen is approximately symmetrically distributed on both sides of the prefabricated fracture. As is shown in Figure 12a, The maximum horizontal displacement at the fracture is −1.78 pixels and 1.60 pixels; the cracks start from the prefabricated fracture under tensile stress, and shear slip occurs in the specimen when the cracks propagate to the upper and lower ends, the tensile crack changes into a shear crack. Finally, the specimen presents a mixed failure mode of tensile and shear.
- (2)
- When α is 30° and 60°, the maximum horizontal displacement field gradually develops from the upper and lower sides of the prefabricated fracture to the two tips and is located on the left and right sides of the prefabricated fracture in an antisymmetric distribution [34]. When α is 30°, as is shown in Figure 13a, the maximum horizontal displacement on the upper and lower sides of the fracture is −3.35 pixels and 3.45 pixels, respectively. The crack initiates by tensile stress, and then the tensile crack becomes a shear crack during the process of propagating the upper and lower ends. Finally, the specimen presents a mixed failure mode of tensile and shear. When α is 60°, as is shown in Figure 14a,c, The crack propagation of L-50 and L-100 specimens is always affected by shear stress, and the specimens show shear failure mode. As is shown in Figure 14b, The crack of the L-75 specimen is initiated by the tensile stress and is controlled by the shear stress and the tensile stress in turn during the propagation process. Finally, the L-75 specimen shows a mixed failure mode of tension and shear.
- (3)
- When α is 90°, the maximum horizontal displacement field regularity of each specimen is not obvious. The maximum horizontal displacement field of L-50 and L-100 specimens is located near the prefabricated fracture. As is shown in Figure 15a, the L-50 specimen horizontal displacement field at the lower end of the fracture is larger, which is −0.17 pixels in the left direction and 1.1 pixels in the right direction. The crack is initiated by shear stress. Shear slip occurs when propagating up and down, resulting in the complete loss of bearing capacity of the specimen. The L-50 specimen presents a shear failure mode. As is shown in Figure 15b, the crack initiation of the L-75 specimen is also controlled by shear stress and finally presents shear failure mode. As is shown in Figure 15c, The L-100 specimen’s maximum horizontal displacement field does not appear near the prefabricated fracture but is located at the upper end of the specimen, which is −1.60 pixels and 1.35 pixels, respectively. The crack is initiated by tensile stress. The L-100 specimen finally shows tensile failure mode.
4. Mechanism Analysis of Size Effect
5. Results and Discussion
6. Conclusions
- (i)
- Under the condition of fracture with different inclination angles, the UCS and Elasticity Modulus of 3D printing specimens decreases with the increase of size. The influence of size effect on specimens with different fracture characteristics is different. The size effect of UCS is most obvious for the 0° fractured specimen, the 30° fractured specimen is the least obvious, and the size effect of Elasticity Modulus is most significant for the 30° and 60° fractured specimens in different size ranges.
- (ii)
- When α is 0°, with the increase of the specimen size, the crack initiation position shifts from fracture middle to fracture end; When α is 0° and 60°, each specimen crack initiates at the fracture tip and propagates to specimen upper and lower ends after initiation; When α is 90°, each specimen fracture initiates from the bottom near the prefabricated fracture and then propagates to the specimen upper end.
- (iii)
- When α is 0° and 30°, each specimen exhibits tensile and shear mixed failure; When α is 60°, each specimen exhibits shear failure; When α is 90°, with the increase of the specimen size, each specimen transitions from the failure of shear to the failure of tension.
- (iv)
- Combined with the Scanning Electron Microscopy of the 3D printing specimen, the degree of bonding between the particles inside the specimen was analyzed. The size effect of fractured rock mass is closely related to the defect level inside the rock mass. The size effect originates from the heterogeneity inside the material.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xie, H.P.; Chen, Z.H. Rock Mechanics; Beijing Science Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Weibull, W.; Rockey, K.C. Fatigue Testing and Analysis of Results. J. Appl. Mech. 1961, 29, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudson, J.A.; Crouch, S.L.; Fairhurst, C. Soft, stiff and servo-controlled testing machines: A review with reference to rock failure. Eng. Geol. 1972, 6, 155–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darbor, M.; Faramarzi, L.; Sharifzadeh, M. Size-dependent compressive strength properties of hard rocks and rock-like cementitious brittle materials. Geosystem Eng. 2018, 22, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weibull, W. A Statistical Theory of Strength of Materials. IVB-Handl 1939, 151, 1034. [Google Scholar]
- Bazant, Z.P. Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, Metal. J. Eng. Mech. 1984, 110, 518–535. [Google Scholar]
- Li, K.; Yin, Z.Y.; Han, D.; Fan, X.; Cao, R.; Lin, H. Size Effect and Anisotropy in a Transversely Isotropic Rock Under Compressive Conditions. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2021, 54, 4639–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, H.; Masoumi, H.; Zoorabadi, M.; Canbulat, I. Size-dependent Behaviour of Weak Intact Rocks. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2020, 53, 3563–3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faramarzi, L.; Rezaee, H. Testing the effects of sample and grain sizes on mechanical properties of concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuncay, E.; Özcan, N.T.; Kalender, A. An approach to predict the length-to-diameter ratio of a rock core specimen for uniaxial compression tests. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2019, 78, 5467–5482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pappalardo, G.; Mineo, S.; Marchese, G. Effects of cubical specimen sizing on the uniaxial compressive strength of etna volcanic rocks (Italy). Ital. J. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2013, 2, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, D.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.; Gao, L. On the excavation-induced stress drop in damaged coal considering a coupled yield and failure criterion. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2020, 7, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Wu, F.; Hu, T.; Faisal, S.A. Analysis of fracture mechanism for surrounding rock hole based on water-filled blasting. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2020, 7, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Chen, H.; Zhang, W.; Lou, J.; Shan, B. An analytical solution of equivalent elastic modulus considering confining stress and its variables sensitivity analysis for fractured rock masses. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2022, 14, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Hu, Y.; Tian, S.M.; Huang, H.L. Analysis of deformation control mechanism of prestressed anchor on jointed soft rock in large cross-section tunnel. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2021, 80, 9089–9103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darlington, W.J.; Ranjith, P.G.; Choi, S.K. The Effect of Specimen Size on Strength and Other Properties in Laboratory Testing of Rock and Rock-Like Cementitious Brittle Materials. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2011, 44, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahrani, N.; Kaiser, P.K. Numerical investigation of the influence of specimen size on the unconfined strength of defected rocks. Comput. Geotech. 2016, 77, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stavrou, A.; Murphy, W. Quantifying the effects of scale and heterogeneity on the confined strength of micro-defected rocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2018, 102, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju, Y.; Xie, H.; Zheng, Z.; Lu, J.; Mao, L.; Gao, F.; Peng, R. Visualization of the complex structure and stress field inside rock by means of 3D printing technology. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2014, 59, 5354–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Q.; Liu, X.; Yan, F.; Yang, Y.; Xu, D.; Feng, G. Failure Performance of 3DP Physical Twin-Tunnel Model and Corresponding Safety Factor Evaluation. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2020, 54, 109–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, L.; Ostadhassan, M.; Li, C.; Tamimi, N. Can 3D Printed Gypsum Samples Replicate Natural Rocks? An Experimental Study. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2018, 51, 3061–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, W.; Han, N.V. Mechanical properties of rock specimens containing prexisting flaws with 3d printed materials. Strain 2017, 53, e12240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez, J.S.; Chalaturnyk, R.J.; Zambrano-Narvaez, G. Experimental Investigation of the Mechanical Behavior and Permeability of 3D Printed Sandstone Analogues Under Triaxial Conditions. Transp. Porous Media 2019, 129, 541–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Q.; Jiang, L.S. Effect of layer thickness on the physical and mechanical properties of sand powder 3d printing specimens. Front. Earth Sci. 2021, 2021, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.S.; Wu, X.Y.; Wang, Q.W. Study on dynamic mechanical behaviors of sand-powder 3D printing rock-like specimens under coupled static and dynamic loads. J. China Coal Soc. 2022, 47, 1196–1207. [Google Scholar]
- He, M.C.; Jing, J.H.; Sun, X.M. Soft Rock Engineering Mechanics; Beijing Science Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, P.; Ju, Y.; Ranjith, P.G.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, L.; Wanniarachchi, A. Visual representation and characterization of three-dimensional hydrofracturing cracks within heterogeneous rock through 3D printing and transparent models. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2016, 3, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazhar, H.; Osswald, T.; Negrut, D. On the use of computational multi-body dynamics analysis in SLS-based 3D printing. Addit. Manuf. 2016, 12, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.T.; Wu, T.H.; Zhou, Y. Application and prospective of 3D printing in rock mechanics: A review. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2021, 28, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, Z.R. A Study on Mechanical Characteristics of Flawed Rock Mass Specimens Based on CT Scanning and 3D Printing Technology. Master’s Thesis, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, G.F.; Liu, L.Z.; Chen, L.W. Regulation for Testing the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Rock, 18th ed.; Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2015.
- Mei, Y.X.; Zhao, G.F.; Zeng, J. Regulation for Testing the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Rock, 19th ed.; Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2015.
- Wu, F.Q.; Qiao, L.; Guan, S.G.; Zhang, Q.T.; Wang, Z.Y.; Wu, J. Study on size effect of uniaxial compression tests of small size rock samples. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2021, 40, 865–873. [Google Scholar]
- Ai-Bing, J.; Shu-Liang, W.; Ben-Xin, W.; Hao, S.; Yi-Qing, Z. Study on the fracture mechanism of 3D-printed-joint specimens based on DIC technology. Rock Soil Mech. 2020, 41, 3214–3224. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, C.; Liu, F.; Tian, J. Study on single crack propagation and damage evolution mechanism of rock-like materials under uniaxial compression. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2016, 35 (Suppl. S2), 3626–3632. [Google Scholar]
- Quiñones, J.; Arzúa, J.; Alejano, L.R.; García-Bastante, F.; Mas Ivars, D.; Walton, G. Analysis of size effects on the geomechanical parameters of intact granite samples under unconfined conditions. Acta Geotech. 2017, 12, 1229–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mogi, K. Experimental Rock Mechanics; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2007; pp. 12–14, 36–37, 83–110. [Google Scholar]
- Wawersik, W.R. Detailed Analysis of Rock Failure in Laboratory Compression Tests; University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, Z.C.; Zhao, Y.S. Control effect of fissure scale on deformation and failure of rock mass. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2008, 27, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
- Gell, E.M.; Walley, S.M.; Braithwaite, C.H. Review of the Validity of the Use of Artificial Specimens for Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Rocks. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2019, 52, 2949–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Specimen ID | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Internal Friction Angle (°) | Cohesive Strength (MPa) | Elastic Modulus (GPa) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLS printed specimens | 3.45 | 0.53 | 47.19 | 0.49 | 1.38 |
BJT printed specimens | 8.46 | 0.53 | 30.79 | 1.15 | 0.96 |
natural coal specimens | 10.61 | 0.72 | 31.00 | 1.40 | 1.17 |
Specimen Number | Specimen Size (mm) | Fracture Length (mm) | Fracture Width (mm) | Fracture Angle (°) |
---|---|---|---|---|
L-50 | 50 × 50 × 100 mm | 15 | 1.5 | 0°, 30°, 60°, 90° |
L-75 | 75 × 75 × 150 mm | 22.5 | 2.25 | |
L-100 | 100 × 100 × 200 mm | 30 | 3.0 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zuo, J.; Liu, G.; Mitri, H.S. Preliminary Study on Size Effect of Fractured Rock Mass with Sand Powder 3D Printing. Processes 2022, 10, 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101974
Wang W, Zhao Y, Jiang L, Zuo J, Liu G, Mitri HS. Preliminary Study on Size Effect of Fractured Rock Mass with Sand Powder 3D Printing. Processes. 2022; 10(10):1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101974
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Wenhai, Yang Zhao, Lishuai Jiang, Jiacheng Zuo, Guangsheng Liu, and Hani S. Mitri. 2022. "Preliminary Study on Size Effect of Fractured Rock Mass with Sand Powder 3D Printing" Processes 10, no. 10: 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101974