Next Article in Journal
Adult Attachment and Fear of Missing Out: Does the Mindful Attitude Matter?
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Life in Penile Cancer Patients following Surgical Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 11
Issue 23
10.3390/healthcare11233092
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Task-Oriented Training with Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver in Sitting Position for Trunk Control, Balance, and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

by
Seunghoon Jeong
1 and
Yijung Chung
2,*
1
Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2023, 11(23), 3092; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11233092
Submission received: 15 October 2023 / Revised: 26 November 2023 / Accepted: 29 November 2023 / Published: 4 December 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In many patients with stroke, trunk stabilization and balance are decreased. Trunk stabilization and balance are important to perform posture control and functional movement. This study investigates the effects of task-orientated training with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in a sitting position on trunk control, balance, and activities of daily living in patients with chronic stroke. The study design is a randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight patients with chronic stroke participated in this study. The task-oriented training combined with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver group (n = 13), the task-oriented training group (n = 13), and the control group (n = 12) received traditional physical therapy. Three groups participated in a total of 20 sessions, four times a week for five weeks. After the five-week training period, trunk control, balance, and activities of daily living were assessed. The task-oriented training combined with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver group demonstrated significant improvements in trunk control, balance, and activities of daily living compared to the task-oriented training and control groups (p < 0.05). These results have implications for improving trunk control, balance, and activities of daily living for patients with stroke, and support the integration of this training method into standard clinical practice.

1. Introduction

Patients with stroke-induced hemiparesis experience difficulty in trunk control, balance instability, dysfunction in gait and activities of daily living (ADL) [1], and difficulty in postural control [2] because anticipatory stabilizing muscles of the trunk do not function appropriately owing to muscle weakness and sensory changes.
In patients with stroke, training in a sitting position is more unstable than that in a lying position owing to the narrow base of support. Nonetheless, it is more functional than that in a lying position and provides opportunities for greater muscle contraction to facilitate muscle activation [3]. Core stabilization exercises in the antigravity posture of sitting upright with the back straight are more effective than those in the lying position and are safe and easy to implement clinically [4,5,6,7,8]. Such exercises may improve sitting postural balance, including trunk control, and enable the manipulation of objects within arm’s reach, which is predictive of improved ADL [6,9]. Moreover, muscle activation in the paretic lower extremity is increased by facilitating weight shifting to the paretic side, and this effect is carried over with postural changes to the standing position [9,10].
Task-oriented training, one of the approaches for the rehabilitation of patients with stroke, can be used as a beneficial exercise method for those suffering from musculoskeletal and neurological disorders because it involves constructing interesting tasks to motivate patients and causes neural reorganization during the repetitive training process [11]. Task-oriented training is also a neurological therapeutic approach that improves walking ability and the quality of life by improving motor control and balance [9,12,13]. This training can improve performance of ADL based on the activation of functional movement via motor learning [14,15,16].
The purpose of trunk stabilization exercises is to strengthen the deep muscles, promote synergistic effects, and improve trunk stability [17]. Of the various trunk stabilization exercises, the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) has been proven to be more effective in increasing the thickness of the transverse abdominis than typical core exercises [17,18,19]. ADIM draws the lower abdomen in without spinal or pelvic movement to increase intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) via preferential contraction of the transverse abdominis and internal obliques, thus reducing excessive spinal anterior flexion and an anterior pelvic tilt [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. To accurately perform ADIM, a pressure biofeedback unit (PBU), a tool developed to help retrain muscle activities, is available. This tool can provide useful visual biofeedback during treatment [2,25,27,28,29,30]. Visual feedback-based training can be beneficial in improving balance and stimulating interest in stroke rehabilitation [8]. During visual feedback, as we observe our actions, mirror neurons are activated, leading to the formation of new neural pathways in the primary motor cortex when imitating movements [9]. Therefore, providing information through visual feedback while performing actions can be helpful for patients [8].
To date, some studies have reported positive results for trunk control, balance, and gait when applying a single exercise with ADIM to patients with stroke. However, most of these exercises were performed in the supine or prone position, and there is a lack of research on ADIM in the sitting position for functional activities. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of task-oriented training combined with ADIM in a sitting position on trunk control, balance, and ADL in patients with stroke, and to compare task-oriented training in a sitting position and its effectiveness.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Ethical Considerations

This study was a randomized controlled trial. The groups were categorized as the task-oriented training combined with ADIM group, the task-oriented training group without ADIM group, and the control group according to the treatment method. Pre-training and post-training surveys were conducted. Before the experiment, the participants signed a voluntary consent form for this study, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sahmyook University (approval number: 2-7001793-AB-N-012018053HR). Further, this trial has been registered on the clinical trials register (approval number: KCT0008750) and has been designed and reported in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Participants

Forty-five patients with stroke who were hospitalized at Bobath Memorial Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, were recruited for this study. The following patients were included in the study: (1) those who had been diagnosed with hemiparesis owing to stroke by a neurologist and rehabilitation specialist; (2) those who developed a brain injury > 6 months ago [27]; (3) those who had a Mini Mental State Examination-Korean (MMSE-K) score of ≥21, with the ability to communicate and follow instructions [31,32]; (4) those who had a Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) score of ≥10 [4]; (5) those who did not have any orthopedic problems that may affect their sitting balance [4]; and (6) those could perform reaching, grasping, and kicking tasks. Patients with difficulty in understanding the study and those with vestibular or cerebellar disease were excluded, and all participants were screened using the selection and exclusion criteria, resulting in 38 participants. Patients were enrolled between 6 August 2018 and 28 September 2018.
All participants received a detailed explanation of the experimental procedure and completed an informed consent form. Using G*Power Version 3.1.9.4 (Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, version 3.1.9.4, Düsseldorf, Germany) [33], and applying an effect size 0.25, 1-beta error 0.80, and alpha error 0.05, a sample size of 36 patients was required, and 45 patients were selected considering the dropout rate. A total of 38 patients participated. The selected participants were randomly www.randomizer.org (accessed on 30 May 2018) assigned to the task-oriented training combined with ADIM group (n = 13), the task-oriented training group (n = 13), and the control group (n = 12) via lottery (Table 1).

2.3. Equipment and Data Collection

Trunk control in all study participants was measured using the TIS and the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS) before and after the 5-week experiment. Balance ability was assessed using the Functional Reaching Test (FRT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the Messen–Trainieren–Dokumentieren (MTD) system. Additionally, ADLs were measured and evaluated using the Modified Barthel Index (MBI).
All participants performed the given exercises for 30 min a day, 4 days a week for 5 weeks, for a total of 20 sessions. All three groups also received conventional physical therapy for 30 min per session, twice a day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks according to the hospital inpatient rehabilitation program.

2.4. Procedures and Interventions

The task-oriented training combined with ADIM group performed task-oriented training while doing ADIM using a PBU in a sitting position. The task-oriented training group performed task-oriented training only in a sitting position, and the control group performed normal exercises. The task-oriented training comprised arm extension, ring stacking, and ball kicking, and each exercise was performed 15 times per set, with 3-set repetitions.

2.4.1. Task-Oriented Training Combined with ADIM

In task-oriented training combined with ADIM, a PBU (Chattanooga Stabilizer, Chattanooga Group Inc., Hamilton Country, Tennessee, USA) was used to provide visual feedback of exercise during ADIM. It was performed in a sitting position at a table with a straight back, both feet on the floor, and knee joint and hip joint angles maintained at 90 degrees. The participant was instructed by the researcher to slowly draw the lower abdomen toward the umbilicus, with no movement of the upper abdomen or spine between movements, and the pelvis maintained in a neutral position [27]. The participants were asked to perform the maximal ADIM in a sitting position, and a PBU calibrated to 70 mmHg was placed at the anterior part of the abdomen, secured with a strap (Figure 1a). The increased pressure reading when the contractile force of the ADIM was removed was measured and recorded, and the expansion to 80 mmHg is one example of an increase when ADIM contraction force is removed (Figure 2b). Values measured during ADIM with the pressure on the PBU placed at the anterior part of the abdomen being set to 70 mmHg were compared with the previously measured values. If a reading of ≥80% was maintained, ADIM was construed as successful and the training proceeded. (Figure 1c). Therefore, visual biofeedback was used while the patients were looking at the pressure gauge so that they could maintain the ADIM during the task-oriented training, and when the pressure reading dropped, a therapist provided auditory biofeedback [13,34,35] (Figure 1). Minimal assistance was provided by the therapist if the patient had difficulty performing the task independently. A 5 min warm-up was performed before and after the start of task-oriented training [36]. Additionally, to maintain consistency in the intensity of the ADIM, the maximum ADIM values were measured repeatedly while the patients performed the first exercise of each week and the changes in values were applied to the exercises (Figure 2).

2.4.2. Task-Oriented Training

Task-oriented training was performed in a sitting position with a straight back, both feet on the floor, and knee joint and hip joint angles at 90 degrees. Exercises of arm reaching the limit of stability, ring stacking, and ball kicking were performed 15 times in one set with 3-set repetitions for each exercise [13,34,35] without PBU, with a 5 min warm-up before and after the task-oriented training [36] (Figure 2).

2.4.3. General Physical Therapy

Of the neuro-facilitation approaches based on the conventional motor development theory and motor learning theory, rolling, sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit, and maintaining stable standing treatment were provided for general physical therapy. This approach facilitated movement and aided in performing various functions by re-educating patients with stroke on abnormal movements and postures, with treatment to help them in their daily life [37,38,39]. All participants received 30 min of general physical therapy twice a day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks, and additionally, the control group received the same amount of general physical therapy as the experimental group.

2.5. Measurement of the Results

In this study, the general characteristics of the participants were measured before the assessment. The results were measured using clinical tests, with high reliability, validity, and sensitivity as dependent variables. The TIS and PASS were used to assess trunk control; the FRT, BBS, and weight bearing were used to assess balance; and the MBI was used to measure ADL.
TIS is a 17-item instrument that assesses static and dynamic control and coordination of the trunk in a sitting position, comprising a total score of 23 points. The test–retest reliability in patients with stroke was high, with an ICC of 0.92 [1]. PASS is a 12-item scale with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 3 for each item, for a total score of 36 points. The Korean version of tmhe PASS used in this study has a high reliability of 0.97 [39].
FRT tests dynamic balance and uses the average of three measurements as the result. The test method is easy and convenient to apply in clinical settings, with an intra-rater reliability of r = 0.98 and inter-rater reliability of r = 0.99 [40]. BBS for measuring balance comprises 14 items and is a highly valid assessment tool with an internal consistency of 0.97 in patients with stroke [41].
To measure weight bearing, the Messen–Trainerieren–Dokumentieren (MTD, balance version 4.0) system was used, which can measure two-footed balance ability and left–right weight bearing in a standing position and when rising from a sitting position [42]. MBI comprises 10 items, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100, with higher scores indicating greater independence in daily living. The inter-rater reliability of the MBI is r = 0.95 and the intra-rater reliability is r = 0.89 [43]. The Korean version of the BBS used in this study has a very high reliability of 0.98 [44].

2.6. Statistics

This study used the SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) program for analysis. Normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Participants were tested for homogeneity in general characteristics and dependent variables before the experiment. Pre- and post-experimental changes within the groups were compared using paired sample t-test, differences in post-experimental changes between groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance, and post hoc tests were performed using Scheffe. The statistical significance level for all data was <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Trunk Control

The TIS and PASS scores were significantly improved in the task-oriented training combined with ADIM group compared with the task-oriented training group and the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, the task-oriented training group showed significant improvement in TIS and PASS scores compared with the control group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3a,b and Table 2).

3.2. Balance

The FRT, BBS, and weight bearing ratio values were significantly improved in the task-oriented training combined with ADIM group compared with the task-oriented training and control groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, the task-oriented training group showed significant improvement in FRT, BBS, and weight bearing ratio values compared with the control group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3c–e and Table 3).

3.3. ADL

The MBI scores used to measure ADL were significantly improved in the task-oriented training combined with ADIM group compared with the task-oriented training group and the control group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3f and Table 4).

4. Discussion

This study examined the effects of task-oriented training combined with ADIM in a sitting position on trunk control, balance, and ADL in patients with stroke. The results demonstrated that the training was effective in improving trunk control, balance, and ADL.
The improvement in trunk control with the task-oriented training combined with ADIM in the present study could be attributed to the following reasons. The trunk muscles were used as primary or cooperative muscles in voluntary trunk control, providing an automatic response to unexpected body shaking [2,45,46]. Vasseljen and Fladmark [47] reported that the thickness of the transverse abdominis increased by 3% in patients with low back pain when real-time ultrasound imaging was applied along with ADIM. In addition, Seo et al. [48] applied trunk stabilization exercises using a PBU and ADIM in patients with stroke, resulting in a significant increase in the thickness of transverse abdominis (p < 0.05). The ADIM, which was performed using a PBU for voluntary stabilization and control of the trunk, allowed for appropriate simultaneous contraction of the transverse abdominis, internal obliques, and erector spinae muscles [20,49,50]. In a study by Haruyama et al. [27], 32 patients with stroke underwent core stability training with ADIM, and there was a significant difference in TIS scores, from 15.50 ± 3.33 points before the experiment to 19.63 ± 2.45 points after the experiment (p < 0.05). Cabanas-Valdes et al. [4] divided 80 patients with stroke into two groups to improve trunk control, dynamic sitting balance, and standing balance by applying core stability exercises. The mean (±SD) differences between the groups’ total TIS, BBS, and Barthel Index scores were 3.40 ± 4.12 (p < 0.05), 14.54 ± 18.19 (p < 0.05), and 13.17 ± 25.27 (p < 0.05) points, respectively. Furthermore, providing visual and auditory biofeedback improved trunk control by sustaining the exact contractile force of the trunk muscle, allowing them to experience contractions in different environments. While maintaining this condition, task-oriented training, including arm extension movements, was performed, which is deemed to be the reason for improved trunk control [51]. Task-oriented training combined with ADIM could be an effective treatment method for patients with stroke.
In this study, the improvement in balance ability achieved with the task-oriented training combined with ADIM could be ascribed to the fact that improved trunk control provided a stable foundation for postural control, thus enabling upright posture to perform selective trunk movements and weight shifts [1,52]. Jung et al. [51] conducted a study involving training using ADIM along with visual biofeedback, and found that changes in static sitting balance ability, medial–lateral sway speed, anterior–posterior sway speed, and velocity of moment in both the experimental and control groups displayed significant improvement after the intervention, regardless of their vision. Additionally, the improvement was more significant in the experimental group than in the control group (p < 0.05). In Haruyama’s study [27], ADIM training enhanced the trunk control ability of patients with stroke (p < 0.05), and the Brief-BESTest balance test scale score was 5.43 ± 3.47 points in the experimental group before the experiment. The results showed a significant difference in the control group, with 8.22 ± 4.67 points after the experiment (p < 0.05).
Furthermore, trunk stabilization training in a sitting position improved seated dynamic postural balance, upright balance, gait, and ADL in patients with stroke [4]. Moreover, arm extension exercise during ADIM caused an increase in the thickness of transverse abdominis [53]. This muscle is the first to be activated among the abdominal muscles before limb movements occur and is responsible for generating and regulating IAP and increasing lumbar spine stability to allow for trunk control [53,54]. The increased thickness of the transverse abdominis muscle contributed to trunk stability and balance [11,55]. These elements provided a stable foundation for balance and ADL via the integrated coordination of fine postural control and motor performance of the patient’s trunk [52]. This promoted stability and facilitated movements, which might have aided in the recovery of balance ability.
The results of this study showed that ADLs were improved significantly based on the pre–post difference in the group of task-oriented training with ADIM in a sitting position compared with the task-oriented training and control groups. This is because the ADIM, commonly used clinically for trunk control, stabilizes the trunk via precise and selective contraction of the transverse abdominis, internal obliques, and external oblique abdominis, located deeper than the superficial abdominal muscles [22,56]. ADIM promotes neuromuscular re-education by inducing contraction of the transverse abdominis and internal obliques to enhance lumbar spine stability [22,25,56], resulting in improved trunk control and balance.
Additionally, more studies have reported a significant correlation in validity between the BBS and the MBI, which could be attributed to trunk control and balance. In a study by Cabanas-Valdes et al. [4], significant differences were observed in the scores of both the TIS and BBS in patients with chronic stroke (p < 0.05). Additionally, these findings had a significant impact on the ADL measurement tool, the Barthel index, with scores increasing from 32.00 ± 15.27 points before the intervention to 68.50 ± 22.37 points after the intervention (p < 0.05). In a study by Karaca et al. [1] involving 36 patients with chronic stroke investigating the effect of trunk, upper limb, and lower limb functions on ADL and balance, the multiple regression analysis revealed that the TIS scores had a positive influence on both the BBS and Barthel index scores (p < 0.05). Furthermore, improvements in lower limb function were found to have a significant impact on BBS scores (p < 0.05).
Trunk control and balance are highly correlated and mutually influential to ADL [52,57]. This study found that task-oriented training combined with ADIM improved ADL in patients with stroke by augmenting their trunk control and balance.
In general, the ultimate rehabilitation goal for patients with stroke is to perform ADL independently [58]. This study investigated the effects of task-oriented training combined with ADIM in a sitting position on trunk control, balance, and ADL in patients with stroke. This approach was found to be effective in restoring trunk control and balance, as well as facilitating the recovery of ADL in the patients.
The limitations of this study include the recruitment of inpatients from a specific region and the utilization of a small sample size, potentially limiting its generalizability. Further studies are needed with larger sample sizes to investigate the impact of interventions in more functional positions than sitting on the rehabilitation of patients with stroke.

5. Conclusions

These findings demonstrate that task-oriented training with the use of PBU for ADIM application in the TASK + ADIM group contributed to increased trunk control, balance, and improvements in ADL for patients with stroke. TASK + ADIM was especially superior to TASK for ADL. We advocate for subsequent longitudinal research encompassing broader and more varied cohorts of patients with stroke to both validate and enrich our findings on this critical subject.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J. and Y.C.; methodology, S.J. and Y.C.; software, S.J.; validation, S.J.; formal analysis, S.J.; investigation, S.J.; resources, S.J.; data curation, S.J.; writing—original draft preparation, S.J. and Y.C.; writing—review and editing, S.J. and Y.C.; visualization, S.J.; supervision, S.J. and Y.C.; project administration, S.J. and Y.C.; funding acquisition, S.J. and Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Sahmyook University (reference number: 2-7001793-AB-N-012018053HR). The trial was registered under trial registration (approval number: KCT0008750).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Sahmyook University for support in the research and selection for research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Karaca, O.; Sütçü, G.; Kılınç, M. The Effects of Trunk and Extremity Functions on Activities of Daily Living, Balance, and Gait in Stroke. Neurol. Res. 2023, 45, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, N.G.; You, J.S.; Chung, H.Y.; Jeon, H.S.; Choi, B.S.; Lee, D.R.; Park, J.M.; Lee, T.H.; Ryu, I.T.; Yoon, H.S. Best core stabilization for anticipatory postural adjustment and falls in hemiparetic stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018, 99, 2168–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nagai, H.; Akasaka, K.; Otsudo, T.; Sawada, Y.; Okubo, Y. Deep abdominal muscle thickness measured under sitting conditions during different stability tasks. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2016, 28, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cabanas-Valdés, R.; Bagur-Calafat, C.; Girabent-Farrés, M.; Caballero-Gómez, F.M.; Hernández-Valiño, M.; Urrutia Cuchi, G. The effect of additional core stability exercises on improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control for subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 2016, 30, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saeys, W.; Vereeck, L.; Truijen, S.; Lafosse, C.; Wuyts, F.P.; Van de Heyning, P. Randomized controlled trial of truncal exercises early after stroke to improve balance and mobility. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 2012, 26, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Verheyden, G.; Vereeck, L.; Truijen, S.; Troch, M.; LaFosse, C.; Saeys, W.; Leenaerts, E.; Palinckx, A.; De Weerdt, W. Additional exercises improve trunk performance after stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2009, 23, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McCook, D.T.; Vicenzino, B.; Hodges, P.W. Activity of deep abdominal muscles increases during submaximal flexion and extension efforts but antagonist co-contraction remains unchanged. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2009, 19, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reeve, A.; Dilley, A. Effects of posture on the thickness of transversus abdominis in pain-free subjects. Man Ther. 2009, 14, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mackie, P.; Eng, J.J. The influence of seated exercises on balance, mobility, and cardiometabolic health outcomes in individuals living with a stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Rehabil. 2023, 37, 927–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dean, C.M.; Channon, E.F.; Hall, J.M. Sitting training early after stroke improves sitting ability and quality and carries over to standing up but not to walking: A randomised controlled trial. Aust. J. Physiother. 2007, 53, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Atif, M.M.; Afzal, F. The effects of a task-oriented walking intervention on improving balance self-efficacy in post-stroke patients. Adv. Neurol. 2023, 2, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Park, J.; Gong, J.; Yim, J. Effects of a sitting boxing program on upper limb function, balance, gait, and quality of life in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation 2017, 40, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Traxler, K.; Baum, E.; Klotz, E.; Reindl, M.; Schinabeck, F.; Seebacher, B. Combining specific task-oriented training with manual therapy to improve balance and mobility in patients after stroke: A mixed methods pilot randomised controlled trial. Disabil. Rehabil. 2023, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rensink, M.; Schuurmans, M.; Lindeman, E.; Hafsteinsdottir, T. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2009, 65, 737–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shumway-Cook, A.; Woollacott, M.H. Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice, 3rd ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-605-9160-66-7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Thielman, G.T.; Dean, C.M.; Gentile, A.M. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: Task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004, 85, 1613–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van Criekinge, T.; Truijen, S.; Schröder, J.; Maebe, Z.; Blanckaert, K.; van der Waal, C.; Vink, M.; Saeys, W. The effectiveness of trunk training on trunk control, sitting and standing balance and mobility post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Rehabil. 2019, 33, 992–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Akuthota, V.; Nadler, S.F. Core strengthening. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004, 85, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hodges, P.W.; Richardson, C.A. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain: A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine 1996, 21, 2640–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, S.C.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, C.S. Effect of abdominal draw in maneuver in sitting position. J. Rehabil. Welf. Eng. Assist. Technol. 2017, 11, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kisner, C.; Colby, L.A.; Borstad, J. Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques; Fa Davis: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2017; ISBN 987-89-7224-233-8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Macedo, L.G.; Maher, C.G.; Latimer, J.; McAuley, J.H. Motor control exercise for persistent, nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review. Phys. Ther. 2009, 89, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hides, J.; Wilson, S.; Stanton, W.; McMahon, S.; Keto, H.; McMahon, K.; Bryant, M.; Richardson, C. An MRI investigation into the function of the transversus abdominis muscle during “drawing-in” of the abdominal wall. Spine 2006, 31, E175–E178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barnett, F.; Gilleard, W. The use of lumbar spinal stabilization techniques during the performance of abdominal strengthening exercise variations. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2005, 45, 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  25. Teyhen, D.S.; Miltenberger, C.E.; Deiters, H.M.; Del Toro, Y.M.; Pulliam, J.N.; Childs, J.D.; Boyles, R.E.; Flynn, T.W. The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2005, 35, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Drysdale, C.L.; Earl, J.E.; Hertel, J. Surface electromyographic activity of the abdominal muscles during pelvic-tilt and abdominal-hollowing exercises. J. Athl. Train. 2004, 39, 32. [Google Scholar]
  27. Haruyama, K.; Kawakami, M.; Otsuka, T. Effect of core stability training on trunk function, standing balance, and mobility in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2017, 31, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Choi, H.S.; Shima, Y.J.; Shin, W.S. Comparison on postural control between abdominal draw-in maneuver and abdominal expansion maneuver in persons with stroke. Phys. Ther. Rehabil. Sci. 2016, 5, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jeon, I.C.; Hwang, U.J.; Jung, S.H.; Kwon, O.Y. Comparison of gluteus maximus and hamstring electromyographic activity and lumbopelvic motion during three different prone hip extension exercises in healthy volunteers. Phys. Ther. Sport 2016, 22, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mirelman, A.; Patritti, B.L.; Bonato, P.; Deutsch, J.E. Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke. Gait Posture 2010, 31, 433–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rowland, J.T.; Basic, D.; Storey, J.E.; Conforti, D.A. The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) and the Folstein MMSE in a multicultural cohort of elderly persons. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2006, 18, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Troyer, A.K. DemTect effective in screening for mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. Evid. Based Ment. Health 2004, 7, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kang, T.W.; Kim, T.Y. Effects of task-oriented postural control training on the postural control, balance and ADL in patients with sub-acute stroke. J. Spec. Educ. Rehabil. Sci. 2016, 55, 135–148. Available online: https://scholar.google.co.kr/scholar?hl=ko&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=34.%09Kang%2C+T.+W.%3B+Kim%2C+T.+Y.+Effects+of+task-oriented+postural+control+training+on+the+postural+control%2C+balance+and+ADL+in+patients+with+sub-acute+stroke.+Journal+of+Special+Education+%26+Rehabilitation+Science.+2016%2C+55%282%29%2C+135-48.+&btnG= (accessed on 25 November 2023). [CrossRef]
  35. Carey, J.R.; Kimberley, T.J.; Lewis, S.M.; Auerbach, E.J.; Dorsey, L.; Rundquist, P.; Ugurbil, K. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain 2002, 125, 773–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Horsley, S.A.; Herbert, R.D.; Ada, L. Four weeks of daily stretch has little or no effect on wrist contracture after stroke: A randomised controlled trial. Aust. J. Physiother. 2007, 53, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Benito García, M.; Atín Arratibel, M.Á.; Terradillos Azpiroz, M.E. The Bobath Concept in walking activity in chronic Stroke measured through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Physiother. Res. Int. 2015, 20, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kılınç, M.; Avcu, F.; Onursal, O.; Ayvat, E.; Savcun Demirci, C.; Aksu Yildirim, S. The effects of Bobath-based trunk exercises on trunk control, functional capacity, balance, and gait: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2016, 23, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. An, S.H.; Lee, J.H. Reliability and validity of the postural assessment scale for stroke in chronic stroke patients. J. Korean Phys. Ther. 2009, 21, 9–17. Available online: https://scholar.google.co.kr/scholar?hl=ko&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%2C+S.+H.%3B+Lee%2C+J.+H.+Reliability+and+validity+of+the+postural+assessment+scale+for+stroke+in+chronic+stroke+patients (accessed on 25 March 2009).
  40. Merchán-Baeza, J.A.; González-Sánchez, M.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Reliability in the parameterization of the functional reach test in elderly stroke patients: A pilot study. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Downs, S.; Marquez, J.; Chiarelli, P. The Berg Balance Scale has high intra-and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: A systematic review. J. Physiother. 2013, 59, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, D.H.; Yang, J.H.; Kim, Y.G. The effect of strengthening exercise of core muscles and lower limb extensor muscles on postural control and walking of stroke patients. Neurotherapy 2012, 16, 9–16. Available online: https://scholar.google.co.kr/scholar?hl=ko&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=42.%09Kim%2C+D.+H.%3B+Yang%2C+J.+H.%3B+Kim%2C+Y.+G.+The+effect+of+strengthening+exercise+of+core+muscles+and+lower+limb+extensor+muscles+on+postural+control+and+walking+of+stroke+patients (accessed on 15 October 2012).
  43. Duffy, L.; Gajree, S.; Langhorne, P.; Stott, D.J.; Quinn, T.J. Reliability (inter-rater agreement) of the Barthel Index for assessment of stroke survivors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2013, 44, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jung, H.Y.; Park, B.K.; Shin, H.S.; Kang, Y.K.; Pyun, S.B.; Paik, N.J.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, T.H.; Han, T.R. Development of the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): Multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J. Korean Acad. Rehab. Med. 2007, 31, 283–297. Available online: https://scholar.google.co.kr/scholar?hl=ko&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=44.%09Jung%2C+H.+Y.%3B+Park%2C+B.+K.%3B+Shin%2C+H.+S.%3B+Kang%2C+Y.+K.%3B+Pyun%2C+S.+B.%3B+Paik%2C+N.+J.%3B+Han%2C+T.+R.%3B+et+al.+Development+of+the+Korean+version+of+Modified+Barthel+Index+%28K-MBI%29%3A+multi-center+study+for+subjects+with+stroke (accessed on 22 March 2007).
  45. Pereira, S.; Silva, C.C.; Ferreira, S.; Silva, C.; Oliveira, N.; Santos, R.; Vilas-Boas, J.P.; Correia, M.V. Anticipatory postural adjustments during sitting reach movement in post-stroke subjects. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2014, 24, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Curuk, E.; Lee, Y.; Aruin, A.S. Individuals with stroke improve anticipatory postural adjustments after a single session of targeted exercises. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2020, 69, 102559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vasseljen, O.; Fladmark, A.M. Abdominal muscle contraction thickness and function after specific and general exercises: A randomized controlled trial in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther. 2010, 15, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Seo, D.; Lee, S.; Kwon, O. Comparison of the changes in thickness of the abdominal wall muscles of stroke patients according to the duration of their illness as observed using ultrasonographic images. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2013, 25, 817–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lehman, G.J.; Hoda, W.; Oliver, S. Trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises on and off a swissball. Chiropr. Osteopat. 2005, 30, 13–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marshall, P.W.; Murphy, B.A. Core stability exercises on and off a Swiss ball. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005, 86, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jung, S.; Lee, K.; Kim, M.; Song, C. Audiovisual biofeedback-based trunk stabilization training using a pressure biofeedback system in stroke patients: A randomized, single-blinded study. Stroke Res. Treat. 2017, 2017, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ryerson, S.; Byl, N.N.; Brown, D.A.; Wong, R.A.; Hidler, J.M. Altered trunk position sense and its relation to balance functions in people post-stroke. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2008, 32, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McGalliard, M.K.; Dedrick, G.S.; Brismée, J.M.; Cook, C.E.; Apte, G.G.; Sizer, P.S., Jr. Changes in transversus abdominis thickness with use of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver during a functional task. PM&R 2010, 2, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Karthikbabu, S.; Chakrapani, M.; Ganesan, S.; Ellajosyla, R. Pelvic alignment in standing, and its relationship with trunk control and motor recovery of lower limb after stroke. Neurol. Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 5, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gong, W. Correlations between transversus abdominis thickness, lumbar stability, and balance of female university students. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2013, 25, 681–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yun, J.H.; Kim, T.S.; Lee, B.K. The effects of combined complex exercise with abdominal drawing-in maneuver on expiratory abdominal muscles activation and forced pulmonary function for post stroke patients. J. Korean Soc. Phys. Med. 2013, 8, 513–523. Available online: https://scholar.google.co.kr/scholar?hl=ko&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=56.%09Yun%2C+J.+H.%3B+Kim%2C+T.+S.%3B+Lee%2C+B.+K.+The+effects+of+combined+complex+exercise+with+abdominal+drawing-in+maneuver+on+expiratory+abdominal+muscles+activation+and+forced+pulmonary+function+for+post+stroke+patients.+J+Korean+Soc+Phys+Med.+2013%2C+8%284%29%2C+513-523.&btnG= (accessed on 25 November 2023). [CrossRef]
  57. Ishiwatari, M.; Honaga, K.; Tanuma, A.; Takakura, T.; Hatori, K.; Kurosu, A.; Fujiwara, T. Trunk impairment as a predictor of activities of daily living in acute stroke. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 665592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hsing, W.T.; Imamura, M.; Weaver, K.; Fregni, F.; Azevedo Neto, R.S. Clinical effects of scalp electrical acupuncture in stroke: A sham-controlled randomized clinical trial. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2012, 18, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Healthcare 11 03092 g001
Figure 1. Method of using PBU: (a) perform a maximal ADIM using a strap to set the PBU pressure to 70 mmHg; (b) check the increase in PBU pressure when maximal ADIM is reduced; (c) perform the task while maintaining ADIM at 80% of (a,b).
Figure 1. Method of using PBU: (a) perform a maximal ADIM using a strap to set the PBU pressure to 70 mmHg; (b) check the increase in PBU pressure when maximal ADIM is reduced; (c) perform the task while maintaining ADIM at 80% of (a,b).
Healthcare 11 03092 g001
Healthcare 11 03092 g002
Figure 2. Task-oriented training with ADIM: (a) reaching the limit of stability; (b) hooking with a ring; (c) ball kicking.
Figure 2. Task-oriented training with ADIM: (a) reaching the limit of stability; (b) hooking with a ring; (c) ball kicking.
Healthcare 11 03092 g002
Healthcare 11 03092 g003
Figure 3. Comparison of change values in trunk control, balance, and activities of daily living in each group: (a,b) trunk control; (c–e) balance; (f) activities of daily living. * Significant improvement from the control group; † Significant improvement from the TASK group.
Figure 3. Comparison of change values in trunk control, balance, and activities of daily living in each group: (a,b) trunk control; (c–e) balance; (f) activities of daily living. * Significant improvement from the control group; † Significant improvement from the TASK group.
Healthcare 11 03092 g003
Table 1. General and medical characteristics of the subjects (n = 38).
Table 1. General and medical characteristics of the subjects (n = 38).
VariableTASK + ADIM
(n = 13)		TASK
(n = 13)		Control
(n = 12)		F/X2 (p)
Age (years)51.08 ± 11.84 *51.08 ± 11.8448.33 ± 10.810.249 (0.781) a
Body mass index (kg/cm2)23.37 ± 2.9022.47 ± 2.3022.71 ± 2.830.390 (0.680) a
Gender (male/female)7/68/57/50.159 (0.924) b
Etiology (infarction/hemorrhage)6/76/77/51.000 (0.607) b
Paretic side (right/left)6/77/67/50.698 (0.709) b
Post-stroke duration (month)15.85 ± 5.7413.31 ± 4.9614.42 ± 5.430.726 (0.491) a
Korean-Mini Mental State Examination (score)26.54 ± 2.9625.69 ± 2.2925.50 ± 2.610.559 (0.577) a
Modified Ashworth Scale—elbow joint (score)1.04 ± 0.961.11 ± 0.820.79 ± 0.0622.901 (0.821) b
Note: TASK + ADIM: task-oriented training combined with ADIM; TASK: task-oriented training without ADIM. * Mean ± SD; a One-way ANOVA; b Chi-square test.
Table 2. Comparison of trunk control in each group (n = 38).
Table 2. Comparison of trunk control in each group (n = 38).
VariableTASK + ADIM
(n = 13)		TASK
(n = 13)		Control
(n = 12)		F (p)
Trunk impairment scale (score)
Before training13.77 ± 2.24 a13.46 ± 2.3713.75 ± 1.860.081 (0.923)
After training18.92 ± 1.5516.23 ± 1.6914.42 ± 2.07
Change values5.15 ± 1.46 *†2.77 ± 0.51 *0.67 ± 1.5024.338 (<0.001)
t (p)−12.700 (<0.05)−5.448 (<0.05)−1.542 (<0.05)
Posture assessment scale of stroke (score)
Before training29.92 ± 1.5029.77 ± 2.3529.67 ± 2.310.048 (0.953)
After training34.85 ± 1.2132.54 ± 1.9430.58 ± 2.43
Change values4.92 ± 1.04 *†2.77 ± 0.93 *0.92 ± 1.2443.858 (<0.001)
t (p)−17.105 (<0.05)−10.773 (<0.05)−2.561 (<0.05)
Note: TASK + ADIM: task-oriented training combined with ADIM; TASK: task-oriented training without ADIM. a Mean ± SD; * Significant improvement from the control group; † Significant improvement from the TASK group.
Table 3. Comparison of balance in each group (n = 38).
Table 3. Comparison of balance in each group (n = 38).
VariableTASK + ADIM
(n = 13)		TASK
(n = 13)		Control
(n = 12)		F (p)
Functional reaching test (cm)
Before training20.64 ± 5.63 a23.28 ± 5.3220.86 ± 4.790.994 (0.380)
After training30.28 ± 4.6726.21 ± 4.6221.64 ± 4.92
Change values9.64 ± 3.75 *†2.92 ± 1.47 *0.78 ± 0.9146.509 (<0.001)
t (p)−9.263 (<0.05)−7.186 (<0.05)−2.948 (<0.05)
Berg balance scale (score)
Before training39.23 ± 8.5739.15 ± 8.9637.75 ± 8.870.110 (0.896)
After training51.08 ± 3.4545.00 ± 7.8138.50 ± 7.85
Change values11.85 ± 5.94 *†5.85 ± 2.88 *0.75 ± 1.6024.497 (<0.001)
t (p)−7.188 (<0.05)−7.313 (<0.05)−1.621 (<0.05)
Weight bearing ratio (%)
Before training41.62 ± 1.5041.92 ± 2.2941.92 ± 2.310.093 (0.911)
After training50.23 ± 2.4246.54 ± 1.8043.58 ± 5.45
Change values8.62 ± 1.94 *†4.62 ± 1.12 *1.67 ± 4.4819.011 (<0.001)
t (p)−16.027 (<0.05)−14.846 (<0.05)−1.289 (<0.05)
Note: TASK + ADIM: task-oriented training combined with ADIM; TASK: task-oriented training without ADIM. a Mean ± SD; * Significant improvement from the control group; † Significant improvement from the TASK group.
Table 4. Comparison of activities of daily living in each group (n = 38).
Table 4. Comparison of activities of daily living in each group (n = 38).
VariableTASK + ADIM
(n = 13)		TASK
(n = 13)		Control
(n = 12)		F (p)
Modified Barthel Index (score)
Before training67.15 ± 6.72 a67.62 ± 7.0968.17 ± 8.000.061 (0.941)
After training73.00 ± 6.9370.62 ± 6.3871.25 ± 11.08
Change values5.85 ± 1.86 *†3.00 ± 1.352.42 ± 1.8814.617 (<0.001)
t (p)−11.308 (<0.05)−7.989 (<0.05)−4.451 (<0.05)
Note: TASK + ADIM: task-oriented training combined with ADIM; TASK: task-oriented training without ADIM. a Mean ± SD; * Significant improvement from the control group; † Significant improvement from the TASK group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeong, S.; Chung, Y. Task-Oriented Training with Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver in Sitting Position for Trunk Control, Balance, and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare 2023, 11, 3092. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11233092

AMA Style

Jeong S, Chung Y. Task-Oriented Training with Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver in Sitting Position for Trunk Control, Balance, and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare. 2023; 11(23):3092. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11233092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeong, Seunghoon, and Yijung Chung. 2023. "Task-Oriented Training with Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver in Sitting Position for Trunk Control, Balance, and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial" Healthcare 11, no. 23: 3092. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11233092

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop