Next Article in Journal
Optimizing the Estimation of a Histogram-Bin Width—Application to the Multivariate Mixture-Model Estimation
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Quartic Residues and Their New Distribution Properties
Previous Article in Journal
On the Periodic Structure of Parallel Dynamical Systems on Generalized Independent Boolean Functions
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Study of the Second-Kind Multivariate Pseudo-Chebyshev Functions of Fractional Degree
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On the Generalized Riesz Derivative

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Brandon University, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2020, 8(7), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/math8071089
Submission received: 3 June 2020 / Revised: 28 June 2020 / Accepted: 1 July 2020 / Published: 3 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Analysis and Analytic Number Theory 2020)

Abstract

:
The goal of this paper is to construct an integral representation for the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) for k < s < k + 1 with k = 0 , 1 , , which is proved to be a one-to-one and linearly continuous mapping from the normed space W k + 1 ( R ) to the Banach space C ( R ) . In addition, we show that R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) is continuous at the end points and well defined for s = 1 2 + k . Furthermore, we extend the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) to the space C k ( R n ) , where k is an n-tuple of nonnegative integers, based on the normalization of distribution and surface integrals over the unit sphere. Finally, several examples are presented to demonstrate computations for obtaining the generalized Riesz derivatives.

1. Introduction

During the past few decades, fractional calculus [1,2,3,4] has been an emergent tool which uses fractional differential and integral equations to develop more sophisticated mathematical models that can accurately describe complex systems. Fractional powers of the Laplacian operator arise naturally in the study of partial differential equations related to anomalous diffusion, where the fractional operator plays a similar role to that of the integer-order Laplacian for ordinary diffusion [5,6]. By replacing Brownian motion of particles with Lévy flights [7], one obtains a fractional diffusion equation in terms of the fractional Laplacian operator [8] of order s ( 0 , 1 ) via the Cauchy principal value (P.V. for short) integral [9], given as
( ) s u ( x ) = C n , s P . V . R n u ( x ) u ( ζ ) | x ζ | n + 2 s d ζ ,
where = 2 / x 1 2 + + 2 / x n 2 , and the constant C n , s is given by
C n , s = R n 1 cos y 1 | y | n + 2 s d y 1 = π n / 2 2 2 s Γ ( n + 2 s 2 ) Γ ( 1 s ) s .
Let x = ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) R n . For a given n-tuple α = ( α 1 , α 2 , , α n ) of nonnegative integers (or called a multi-index), we define
| α | = α 1 + α 2 + + α n , α ! = α 1 ! α 2 ! α n ! x α = x 1 α 1 x 2 α 2 x n α n , α u = 1 α 1 2 α 2 n α n u = | α | u x 1 α 1 x 2 α 2 x n α n .
The Schwartz space S ( R n ) (space of rapidly decreasing functions on R n ) is the function space [10] defined as
S ( R n ) = u ( x ) C ( R n ) : u ( x ) α , k C α , k ( const ) α , k N 0 n ,
where N 0 = { 0 } N is the set of nonnegative integers and
u ( x ) α , k = sup x R n x α k u ( x ) .
Let r 2 = x 1 2 + x 2 2 + + x n 2 . The function space C k ( R n ) is defined in Reference [11] as follows.
C k ( R n )   = u ( x )   is   bounded   and   2 k u ( x )   is   continuous   on   R n : M k ( const ) > 0 , such   that 2 k u ( x ) M k r 2 as r
where k = ( k 1 , k 2 , , k n ) is an n-tuple of nonnegative integers.
Applying the normalization in distribution theory, Pizzetti’s formula, and surface integrals on R n , Li [11] very recently extended the fractional Laplacian ( ) s u ( x ) over the space C k ( R n ) (which contains S ( R n ) as a proper subspace) for all s > 0 and s 1 , 2 , , and obtained Theorem 1 below.
Theorem 1.
Let i = 0 , 1 , and i < s < i + 1 . Then the generalized fractional Laplacian ( ) s is normalized over the space C k ( R n ) as
( ) s u ( x ) = 1 2 C n , s 0 r 1 2 s · S ( r ) r 2 Ω n u ( x ) n 2 r 2 i Ω n i u ( x ) 2 i i ! n ( n + 2 ) ( n + 2 i 2 ) d r ,
where Ω n = 2 π n / 2 / Γ ( n 2 ) is the area of the unit sphere Ω R n , k = ( k 1 , k 2 , , k n ) with k 1 + + k n = i + 1 , and
S ( r ) = Ω [ u ( x + r σ ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x r σ ) ] d σ .
In particular for n = 1 , we have the following.
Theorem 2.
Let k < s < k + 1 and k = 0 , 1 , 2 , . Then the fractional Laplacian operator ( ) s is normalized over C k + 1 ( R ) as
( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 0 y 1 2 s S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y ,
where
S ( y ) = u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) .
Definition 1.
For a sufficiently nice function u ( x ) defined on R the left- and right- sided Riemann-Liouville derivatives of order α, with m 1 < α < m N , given by
R L D , x α u ( x ) = 1 Γ ( m α ) d m d x m x u ( t ) ( t x ) α m + 1 d t ,
and
R L D x , α u ( x ) = ( 1 ) m Γ ( m α ) d m d x m x u ( t ) ( t x ) α m + 1 d t
respectively.
From integration by parts we have
lim α m R L D , x α u ( x ) = u ( m ) ( x ) , and lim α ( m 1 ) + R L D , x α u ( x ) = u ( m 1 ) ( x ) .
Definition 2.
The α-order Riesz derivative of a function u ( x ) ( x R ) is defined as
R Z D x α u ( x ) = Ψ α R L D , x α + R L D x , α u ( x )
where
Ψ α = 1 2 cos α π 2
for α 1 , 3 , .
In general, the following definition regarding the Riesz derivative on R n can be given.
Definition 3.
The Riesz fractional derivative is defined for suitably smooth function u ( x ) ( x R n ) in arbitrary dimensions by [1,12]
R Z D x α u ( x ) = 1 d n , l ( α ) R n ( y l u ) ( x ) | y | n + α d y , 0 < α < l
where l is an arbitrary integer bigger than α, and ( y l u ) ( x ) denotes either the centred difference
( y l u ) ( x ) = k = 0 l ( 1 ) k l k u ( x + ( l / 2 k ) y ) ,
or non-centred differences
( y l u ) ( x ) = k = 0 l ( 1 ) k l k u ( x k y ) .
The d n , l ( α ) are normalizing constants which are independent of the choice of l > α , and are analytic functions with respect to the parameter α by
d n , l ( α ) = 2 α π 1 + n / 2 Γ 1 + α 2 Γ n + α 2 A l ( α ) sin π α 2 ,
and
A l ( α ) = k = 0 l ( 1 ) k 1 l k k α , i n   t h e   c a s e   o f   n o n c e n t r e d   d i f f e r e n c e , 2 k = 0 l 2 ( 1 ) k 1 l k l 2 k α , i n   t h e   c a s e   o f   c e n t r e d   d i f f e r e n c e ,
for an even number l > α .
It is well known that the Riesz derivative plays an important role in anomalous diffusion [13,14,15] and space of fractional quantum mechanics. For example, the Riesz derivative satisfies the fractional diffusion equation, which has lots of physical applications [13]:
P L ( x , t ; α ) t σ α R Z D x α P L ( x , t ; α ) = 0 ,
where P L ( x , t ; α ) is the α -stable Lévy distribution and α , 0 < α 2 , is called the Lévy index. There are also many studies, including numerical analysis [16,17,18,19], scientific computing and Fourier transform methods [20,21], on differential equations involving the Riesz derivative with applications in several fields, including mathematical physics and engineering.
It is widely considered that the Riesz derivative is equivalent to the fractional Laplacian in arbitrary dimensions [22,23,24]. Cai and Li [25] showed that for s ( 0 , 1 )
( ) s u ( x ) = R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) , u ( x ) S ( R )   and   s 1 / 2 , ( ) s u ( x ) = R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) , u ( x ) S ( R n )   with   n > 1 .
Furthermore, on page 205 and 206 in the same reference they stated
(i)
for the case with α = 3 , 5 , , the Riesz derivative of the given function u ( x ) ( x R ) can be defined in the form
R Z D x α u ( x ) = 2 α 1 α Γ 1 + α 2 π 1 2 Γ ( 1 α 2 ) 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 1 + α d y ,
which is suitable for positive values of α 2 , 4 , 6 , .
(ii)
For k = 1 , 2 , . Then,
lim α 4 k + 1 R Z D x α u ( x ) = 2 4 k ( 4 k + 1 ) Γ ( 2 k + 1 ) π 1 / 2 Γ 1 4 k 2 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 4 k + 2 d y ,
and for k = 0 , 1 , 2 , ,
lim α 4 k + 3 R Z D x α u ( x ) = 2 4 k + 2 ( 4 k + 3 ) Γ ( 2 k + 2 ) π 1 / 2 Γ 1 + 4 k 2 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 4 k + 4 d y .
We would like to reconsider cases (i) and (ii) in this paper as the integrals on the right-hand side do not exist even for a sufficiently good function u ( x ) S ( R ) . Indeed, by Taylor’s expansion
u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) = u ( x + θ y ) + u ( x θ y ) 2 ! y 2 u ( x ) y 2 as y 0 +
where θ ( 0 , 1 ) . This clearly makes all the integrals on the right-hand side divergent near the origin.
As outlined in the abstract, we establish an integral representation for the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) for k < s < k + 1 with k = 0 , 1 , , as a linearly continuous mapping from the normed space W k + 1 ( R ) to the Banach space C ( R ) . Then we study the generalized Riesz derivative in arbitrary dimensions and further show that R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) is continuous at the end points based on the normalization of distribution and the surface integrals. In particular, the derivative R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) is well defined for all s = k + 1 2 , which extends Definition 2.

2. The Generalized Riesz Derivative on R

Let C ( R ) be the space of continuous functions on R given as
C ( R ) = u ( x ) : u ( x )   is   continuous   on   R   and   u <
where
u = sup x R | u ( x ) | .
Clearly, C ( R ) is a Banach space. The following space will play an important role in defining the generalized Riesz derivative on R.
Let k = 1 , 2 , . We define the normed space W k ( R ) as
W k ( R ) = u ( x ) : u ( 2 k ) ( x )   is   continuous   on   R   and   u k <
where
u k = max sup x R | x u ( x ) | , sup x R | x u ( x ) | , sup x R ( x 2 + 1 ) u ( 2 k ) ( x ) .
Clearly, u ( x ) = x x 2 + 1 W k ( R ) but u ( x ) = x x 2 + 1 S ( R ) , and
S ( R ) W k ( R ) C k ( R ) C ( R )
for all k = 1 , 2 , .
We are ready to prove the following theorem which establishes an initial equivalence between the Riesz derivative and the fractional Laplacian on the space W 1 ( R ) .
Theorem 3.
Let u W 1 ( R ) . Then both R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) and ( ) s u ( x ) exist and
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 1 + 2 s d y
for 0 < s < 1 .
Proof of Theorem 3.
Making the variable change z = x ζ , we derive from Equation (1) that (for n = 1 )
( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s P . V . R u ( x ) u ( x z ) | z | 1 + 2 s d z .
Setting w = z on the right-hand side of the above equality, we come to
P . V . R u ( x ) u ( x z ) | z | 1 + 2 s d z = P . V . R u ( x ) u ( x + w ) | w | 1 + 2 s d w .
Therefore,
2 P . V . R u ( x ) u ( x z ) | z | 1 + 2 s d z = P . V . R u ( x ) u ( x z ) | z | 1 + 2 s d z + P . V . R u ( x ) u ( x + w ) | w | 1 + 2 s d w = P . V . R u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) | y | 1 + 2 s d y
after relabeling y = z and y = w . This implies that
( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 2 P . V . R u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) | y | 1 + 2 s d y .
Note that the above integral is well defined for u ( x ) W 1 ( R ) . Indeed, a second order Taylor expansion infers
| u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) | | y | 1 + 2 s sup y R | u ( y ) | | y | 2 s 1 .
Hence, it is absolutely integrable near the origin. Furthermore, u ( x ) W 1 ( R ) implies that there exists a constant C > 0 such that
( y 2 + 1 ) u ( y ) C as   | y | .
This indicates that the integral is absolutely integrable at infinity. In summary,
( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 2 R u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) | y | 1 + 2 s d y = C 1 , s 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 1 + 2 s d y ,
as
u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) | y | 1 + 2 s
is an even function with respect to y.
Assume 0 < s < 1 / 2 . Integration by parts yields
0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 1 + 2 s d y = 1 2 s u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 2 s y = 0 + 1 2 s 0 u ( x + y ) u ( x y ) y 2 s d y = 1 2 s d d x 0 u ( x + y ) y 2 s d y 1 2 s d d x 0 u ( x y ) y 2 s d y
by applying the facts that all four integrals
0 u ( x + y ) y 2 s d y , 0 u ( x + y ) y 2 s d y 0 u ( x y ) y 2 s d y , and 0 u ( x y ) y 2 s d y
are uniformly convergent with respect to x using the conditions
sup x R | x u ( x ) | and sup x R | x u ( x ) |
are bounded. Since
d d x 0 u ( x + y ) y 2 s d y = Γ ( 1 2 s ) R L D x , 2 s u ( x ) , and d d x 0 u ( x y ) y 2 s d y = Γ ( 1 2 s ) R L D , x 2 s u ( x )
we come to
( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s Γ ( 1 2 s ) 2 s R L D x , 2 s u ( x ) + R L D , x 2 s u ( x ) .
From the formula [26]
C 1 , s 1 = 1 cos y | y | 1 + 2 s d y = 1 s Γ ( 1 2 s ) cos ( π s ) ,
we have
( ) s u ( x ) = Ψ 2 s R L D , x 2 s + R L D x , 2 s u ( x ) = R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) .
Finally we assume 1 / 2 < s < 1 . Applying
d 2 d x 2 0 u ( x + y ) y 2 s 1 d y = Γ ( 2 2 s ) R L D x , 2 s u ( x ) and d 2 d x 2 0 u ( x y ) y 2 s 1 d y = Γ ( 2 2 s ) R L D , x 2 s u ( x ) ,
we deduce that
( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 2 s ( 2 s 1 ) 0 u ( x + y ) + u ( x y ) y 2 s 1 d y = C 1 , s 2 s ( 2 s 1 ) d 2 d x 2 0 u ( x + y ) y 2 s 1 d y + d 2 d x 2 0 u ( x y ) y 2 s 1 d y = C 1 , s 2 s ( 2 s 1 ) Γ ( 2 2 s ) R L D , x 2 s + R L D x , 2 s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 2 s Γ ( 1 2 s ) R L D , x 2 s + R L D x , 2 s u ( x ) = R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) .
In particular for s = 1 / 2 , we have
R Z D x 1 u ( x ) = ( ) 1 / 2 u ( x ) = C 1 , 1 / 2 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 2 d y = 1 π 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 2 d y ,
which is well defined and extends Definition 2 to the value α = 1 . □
Remark 1.
(a)
Using the formula
Γ ( z ) Γ z + 1 2 = π 2 1 2 z Γ ( 2 z )
for 2 z 0 , 1 , 2 , , we have for u W 1 ( R ) that
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( ) s u ( x ) = Γ ( 1 + 2 s ) sin π s π 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 1 + 2 s d y
for 0 < s < 1 . This expression has symbolically appeared in several existing literatures, such as References [13,21,24], for a suitable smooth function u ( x ) .
(b)
Cai and Li presented Theorem 3 in Reference [25] under the conditions that u ( x ) S ( R ) which is a proper subspace of W 1 ( R ) , and s ( 0 , 1 ) with s 1 / 2 .
In order to study the generalized Riesz derivative, we briefly introduce the following basic concepts in distribution and the normalization of x + λ . Let D ( R ) be the Schwartz space [27] of infinitely differentiable functions (or so-called the Schwartz space of testing functions) with compact support in R, and D ( R ) be the space of distributions (linearly continuous functionals) defined on D ( R ) . Furthermore, we shall define a sequence ϕ 1 ( x ) , ϕ 2 ( x ) , ⋯, ϕ m ( x ) , ⋯ which converges to zero in D ( R ) if all these functions vanish outside a certain fixed and bounded smooth set in R n and converge uniformly to zero (in the usual sense) together with their derivatives of any order. We further assume that D ( R + ) is the subspace of D ( R ) with support contained in R + . The functional δ is defined as
( δ , ϕ ) = ϕ ( 0 ) ,
where ϕ D ( R ) . Clearly, δ is a linear and continuous functional on D ( R ) , and hence δ D ( R ) .
Let f D ( R ) . Then the distributional derivative f on D ( R ) is defined as:
( f , ϕ ) = ( f , ϕ )
for ϕ D ( R ) . In particular,
( δ ( m ) ( x ) , ϕ ( x ) ) = ( 1 ) m ϕ ( m ) ( 0 ) ,
where m is a nonnegative integer.
The distribution x + λ on D ( R ) is normalized in Reference [27] as:
( x + λ , ϕ ( x ) ) = 0 x λ ϕ ( x ) ϕ ( 0 ) x ϕ ( 0 ) x m 1 ( m 1 ) ! ϕ ( m 1 ) ( 0 ) d x ,
where m 1 < λ < m ( m N ) and ϕ D ( R ) .
Let τ ( x ) be an infinitely differentiable function on [ 0 , + ) R satisfying the following conditions:
(i)
0 τ ( x ) 1 ,
(ii)
τ ( x ) = 1 if 0 x 1 / 2 ,
(iii)
τ ( x ) = 0 if x 1 .
Let r = x 1 2 + x 2 2 + + x n 2 . We construct the sequence I m ( r ) for m = 1 , 2 , as:
I m ( r ) = 1 if   r m , τ m 2 m 1 + 2 m 1 + m r 2 m 2 m + 2 1 + 2 m 1 + m if   r > m .
Clearly, I m ( r ) is infinitely differentiable with respect to x 1 , x 2 , , x n and r, and I m ( r ) = 0 if r m + m m , as
m 2 m 1 + 2 m 1 + m ( m + m m ) 2 m 2 m + 2 1 + 2 m 1 + m = 1 .
Furthermore,
0 I m ( r ) 1 .
Applying Equation (5) and the identity sequence I m ( r ) for m = 1 , 2 , , Li [11] established Theorems 1 and 2 outlined in the introduction. Based on Theorems 2 and 3, the generalized Riesz derivative on R is well defined, for k < s < k + 1 with k = 0 , 1 , 2 , , as
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 0 y 1 2 s S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y ,
where u ( x ) W k + 1 ( R ) , and
S ( y ) = u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) .
The following theorem is to construct a relationship between the normed space W k + 1 ( R ) and the Banach space C ( R ) by the generalized Riesz derivative.
Theorem 4.
Let k < s < k + 1 with k = 0 , 1 , 2 , . Then the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s given by
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 0 y 1 2 s S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y
is a one-to-one and linearly continuous mapping from W k + 1 ( R ) to C ( R ) .
Proof of Theorem 4.
From the above integral expression, the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s is a linear mapping on the space W k + 1 ( R ) . Let u m ( x ) W k + 1 ( R ) and u m ( x ) 0 in W k + 1 ( R ) . It follows from Taylor’s expansion that
S m ( y ) = u m ( x + y ) 2 u m ( x ) + u m ( x y ) = u m ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 + + 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u m ( 2 k ) ( x ) + y 2 k + 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x + θ y ) + u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x θ y ) ,
where θ ( 0 , 1 ) . Clearly,
R Z D x 2 s u m ( x ) = C 1 , s ( 2 k + 2 ) ! 0 1 y 1 2 s + 2 k + 2 u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x + θ y ) + u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x θ y ) d y = C 1 , s ( 2 k + 2 ) ! 1 y 1 2 s + 2 k y 2 u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x + θ y ) + y 2 u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x θ y ) d y .
Therefore,
R Z D x 2 s u m ( x ) 2 | C 1 , s | ( 2 k + 2 ) ! ( 2 k + 2 2 s ) sup y R u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) + 2 | C 1 , s | ( 2 k + 2 ) ! ( 2 s 2 k ) sup y R y 2 u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) ,
which converges to zero, as u m ( x ) k + 1 0 implies that both sup y R u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) and sup y R y 2 u m ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) go to zero as m .
It remains to show that R Z D x 2 s is one-to-one from W k + 1 ( R ) to C ( R ) . Assume u 1 ( x ) , u 2 ( x ) W k + 1 ( R ) such that
R Z D x 2 s u 1 ( x ) = R Z D x 2 s u 2 ( x ) .
This infers that
0 y 1 2 s S 1 ( y ) u 1 ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u 1 ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y = 0 y 1 2 s S 2 ( y ) u 2 ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u 2 ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y .
Using the formula [28]
lim s ( k + 1 ) y 1 2 s Γ ( 2 s ) = δ ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) ,
we arrive at
0 δ ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) S 1 ( y ) u 1 ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u 1 ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y = 0 δ ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) S 2 ( y ) u 2 ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u 2 ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y .
Hence,
S 1 ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 0 ) = S 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 0 ) ,
by noting that
0 δ ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) S 1 ( y ) u 1 ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u 1 ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y = S 1 ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 0 ) .
Evidently,
S 1 ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 0 ) = 2 u 1 ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x ) = 2 u 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x ) = S 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 0 ) ,
which further claims that
u 1 ( x ) = u 2 ( x ) + P 2 k + 1 ( x ) ,
where P k + 1 ( x ) is a polynomial of degree 2 k + 1 in the space W k + 1 ( R ) , which must be zero due to the condition
sup x R | x P k + 1 ( x ) | < .
 □
Remark 2.
At this moment, we are unable to describe a subspace (say C s ( R ) ) of C ( R ) such that the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s is bijective and linearly continuous mapping from W k + 1 ( R ) to C s ( R ) . This further study is of interest since we can define an inverse operation of the Riesz derivative on C s ( R ) if it exists.
In addition, we have the following theorem regarding the limits at the end points for the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) over the space W k + 1 ( R ) .
Theorem 5.
Let u ( x ) W k + 1 ( R ) and k < s < k + 1 with k = 0 , 1 , 2 , . Then,
lim s ( k + 1 ) R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) k u ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x ) , a n d lim s k + R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) k + 1 u ( 2 k ) ( x )
in the space C ( R ) .
In particular,
lim s k R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) k + 1 u ( 2 k ) ( x )
for all k = 1 , 2 , .
Proof of Theorem 5.
Let k < s < k + 1 with k = 0 , 1 , 2 , . Then,
lim s ( k + 1 ) R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) ( 1 ) k u ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x ) = lim s ( k + 1 ) sup x R C 1 , s 0 y 1 2 s S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y ( 1 ) k u ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x ) .
Using
lim s ( k + 1 ) Γ ( 2 s ) Γ ( 1 s ) = k ! ( 2 k + 2 ) ! ( 1 ) k + 1 2 , and Γ 1 2 + k + 1 = ( 2 k + 2 ) ! 2 2 k + 2 ( k + 1 ) ! π ,
we derive that
lim s ( k + 1 ) C 1 , s Γ ( 2 s ) = π 1 / 2 2 2 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 1 ) Γ 1 2 + k + 1 k ! ( 2 k + 2 ) ! ( 1 ) k + 1 2 = ( 1 ) k 2 .
Furthermore, the integral
0 y 1 2 s Γ ( 2 s ) S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y
converges uniformly with respect to s. Hence,
lim s ( k + 1 ) 0 y 1 2 s Γ ( 2 s ) S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y = 0 δ ( 2 k + 2 ) ( y ) S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y = S ( 2 k + 2 ) ( 0 ) = 2 u ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x ) .
In summary, we get
lim s ( k + 1 ) R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) ( 1 ) k u ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x ) = 0 ,
which implies that
lim s ( k + 1 ) R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) k u ( 2 k + 2 ) ( x )
in the space C ( R ) .
On the other hand,
lim s k + R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) ( 1 ) k + 1 u ( 2 k ) ( x ) = lim s k + sup x R C 1 , s 0 y 1 2 s S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y ( 1 ) k + 1 u ( 2 k ) ( x ) .
Using
lim s k + Γ ( 2 s ) Γ ( 1 s ) = ( k 1 ) ! ( 2 k ) ! ( 1 ) k 2 , and Γ 1 2 + k = ( 2 k ) ! 2 2 k k ! π
we derive that
lim s k + C 1 , s Γ ( 2 s ) = π 1 / 2 2 2 k k Γ 1 2 + k ( k 1 ) ! ( 2 k ) ! ( 1 ) k 2 = ( 1 ) k + 1 2 .
Thus, from
y + 1 2 s Γ ( 2 s ) = δ ( 2 s ) ( y ) , 2 s y 2 s u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 + + 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y = 0 for   s > k ,   and lim s k + 0 δ ( 2 s ) ( y ) S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 + + 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y = lim s k + S ( 2 s ) ( 0 ) = S ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = 2 u ( 2 k ) ( x )
it follows that
lim s k + R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) ( 1 ) k + 1 u ( 2 k ) ( x ) = 0 .
Therefore,
lim s k + R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) k + 1 u ( 2 k ) ( x )
in the space C ( R ) . □
Remark 3.
(a)
From Theorem 5, we have
lim s 2 k + 1 R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = lim s ( 2 k + 1 ) + R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = lim s ( 2 k + 1 ) R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = u ( 4 k + 2 ) ( x )
for all k = 0 , 1 , 2 , , and
lim s 2 k R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = lim s ( 2 k ) + R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = lim s ( 2 k ) R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = u ( 4 k ) ( x )
for all k = 1 , 2 , .
(b)
Clearly for k = 0 , 1 , ,
R Z D x 2 k + 1 u ( x ) = 2 2 k + 1 ( k + 1 / 2 ) ( 2 k ) ! ( 4 ) k π 0 y 2 2 k u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 2 k ( 2 k ) ! u ( 2 k ) ( x ) d y
using the identity
Γ k + 1 2 = ( 4 ) k k ! ( 2 k ) ! π .
In particular,
R Z D x 1 u ( x ) = 1 π 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 2 d y , a n d R Z D x 3 u ( x ) = 6 π 0 y 4 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 d y .
To end off this section, we use the following example to demonstrate computations of the generalized Riesz derivative.
Theorem 6.
Let s > 0 and s 1 , 2 , . Then,
R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = 2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s Γ ( 1 s ) s e x 2 j = 0 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! Γ ( j s ) .
Furthermore,
lim s 0 + R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = e x 2 a n d lim s k R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = ( 1 ) k + 1 d 2 k d x 2 k e x 2 ,
where k = 1 , 2 , .
Proof of Theorem 6.
We first assume 2 < s < 3 . Letting u ( x ) = e x 2 we come to
u ( 2 ) ( x ) = e x 2 4 x 2 2 e x 2 , and u ( 4 ) ( x ) = 12 e x 2 48 x 2 e x 2 + 16 x 4 e x 2 .
By Theorem 4 (as e x 2 W 3 ( R ) ),
R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = C 1 , s 0 y 1 2 s S ( y ) u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 4 4 ! u ( 4 ) ( x ) d y = C 1 , s 0 y 1 2 s e ( x + y ) 2 2 e x 2 + e ( x y ) 2 u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 4 4 ! u ( 4 ) ( x ) d y .
Clearly,
e ( x + y ) 2 2 e x 2 + e ( x y ) 2 u ( 2 ) ( x ) y 2 2 y 4 4 ! u ( 4 ) ( x ) = e ( x + y ) 2 2 e x 2 + e ( x y ) 2 e x 2 4 x 2 y 2 + 2 e x 2 y 2 y 4 e x 2 + 4 y 4 x 2 e x 2 4 3 y 4 x 4 e x 2 = 2 e x 2 ( e y 2 1 + y 2 1 2 y 4 ) + 4 x 2 y 2 e x 2 ( e y 2 1 + y 2 ) + 4 3 x 4 y 4 e x 2 ( e y 2 1 ) + e x 2 e y 2 j = 3 2 ( 2 x y ) 2 j ( 2 j ) !
using
e 2 x y + e 2 x y = j = 0 2 ( 2 x y ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! = 2 + 4 x 2 y 2 + 4 3 x 4 y 4 + j = 3 2 ( 2 x y ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! .
Making the variable change u = y 2 ,
0 y 1 2 s e y 2 1 + y 2 1 2 y 4 d y = 1 2 0 u 1 s e u 1 + u 1 2 u 2 d u .
Using integration by parts, we get
1 2 0 u 1 s e u 1 + u 1 2 u 2 d u = 1 2 s e u 1 + u 1 2 u 2 u s u = 0 + 1 2 s 0 u s [ e u + 1 u ] d u = 1 2 s 0 u s [ e u 1 + u ] d u = 1 2 s ( s + 1 ) e u 1 + u u s 1 0 + 1 2 s ( s + 1 ) 0 u s + 1 [ 1 e u ] d u = 1 2 s ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) 1 e u u s + 2 0 + 1 2 s ( s 1 ) ( s + 2 ) 0 u s + 3 e u d u = 1 2 s ( s 1 ) ( s + 2 ) Γ ( s + 3 ) = Γ ( 2 s ) 2 s ( s 1 ) ,
by noting that
lim u e u 1 + u 1 2 u 2 u s = lim u 0 + e u 1 + u 1 2 u 2 u s = 0 , lim u e u 1 + u u s 1 = lim u 0 + e u 1 + u u s 1 = 0 , and lim u 1 e u u s + 2 = lim u 0 + 1 e u u s + 2 = 0
if 2 < s < 3 . Similarly, we obtain
0 y 1 2 s e y 2 1 + y 2 d y = Γ ( 2 s ) 2 ( s 1 ) , 0 y 3 2 s e y 2 1 d y = Γ ( 2 s ) 2 , 0 y 2 j 1 2 s e y 2 d y = Γ ( j s ) 2 , for   j = 3 , 4 , .
Hence,
R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = 2 C 1 , s e x 2 0 y 1 2 s e y 2 1 + y 2 1 2 y 4 d y + 4 C 1 , s x 2 e x 2 0 y 1 2 s e y 2 1 + y 2 d y + 4 3 C 1 , s x 4 e x 2 0 y 3 2 s ( e y 2 1 ) d y + 2 C 1 , s e x 2 j = 3 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! 0 y 2 j 1 2 s e y 2 d y = 2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s e x 2 + 2 2 s + 1 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s x 2 e x 2 + 2 2 s + 1 3 π 1 2 s Γ ( 2 s ) Γ ( 1 s ) Γ 1 2 + s x 4 e x 2 + 2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s Γ ( 1 s ) s e x 2 j = 3 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! Γ ( j s ) = 2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s Γ ( 1 s ) s e x 2 j = 0 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! Γ ( j s ) .
Clearly, the series
2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s Γ ( 1 s ) s e x 2 j = 0 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! Γ ( j s )
can be extended to all values of s > 0 and s 1 , 2 , . For example, a similar calculation leads to
R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = 2 2 s Γ ( s + 1 2 ) e x 2 π + 2 2 s + 1 s Γ ( s + 1 2 ) π x 2 e x 2 + 2 2 s s Γ ( s + 1 2 ) Γ ( 1 s ) π e x 2 j = 2 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! Γ ( j s ) = 2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s Γ ( 1 s ) s e x 2 j = 0 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! Γ ( j s )
if 1 < s < 2 . In addition,
lim s 0 + R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = lim s 0 + 2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s Γ ( 1 s ) s e x 2 Γ ( s ) + j = 1 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! Γ ( j s ) = lim s 0 + 2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s Γ ( 1 s ) s e x 2 Γ ( s ) + lim s 0 + 2 2 s π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + s Γ ( 1 s ) s e x 2 j = 1 ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! Γ ( j s ) = e x 2 ,
by applying the formula
s Γ ( s ) = Γ ( 1 s ) .
Clearly for j = 2 , 3 , , k ,
lim s k Γ ( j s ) Γ ( 1 s ) = lim s k ( j 1 s ) ( j 2 s ) ( 1 s ) Γ ( 1 s ) Γ ( 1 s ) = ( 1 ) j 1 ( k 1 ) ( k 2 ) ( k j + 1 ) .
Hence for k = 1 , 2 , ,
lim s k R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = 2 2 k π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + k e x 2 + 2 2 k + 1 k π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + k x 2 e x 2 2 2 k π 1 2 Γ 1 2 + k e x 2 j = 2 k ( 2 x ) 2 j ( 2 j ) ! ( 1 ) j k ( k 1 ) ( k j + 1 ) = ( 1 ) k + 1 d 2 k d x 2 k e x 2
by Theorem 5, which can be verified directly by mathematical induction. □
Remark 4.
From the physicists’ Hermite polynomials given by
H n ( x ) = ( 1 ) n e x 2 d n d x n e x 2 ,
we derive
lim s k R Z D x 2 s e x 2 = ( 1 ) k + 1 e x 2 H 2 k ( x ) .

3. The Generalized Riesz Derivative on R n with n 2

In this section, we begin to study the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) for s > 0 on R n , and obtain its integral representation using Theorem 1 mentioned in the introduction. In particular, we derive explicit integral expressions for R Z D x 2 k + 1 u ( x ) when k = 0 , 1 , 2 , .
Theorem 7.
Let 0 < s < 1 and k = ( k 1 , k 2 , , k n ) be an n-tuple of nonnegative integers with k 1 + + k n = 1 . Then for u ( x ) C k ( R n ) (defined in the introduction),
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( ) s u ( x ) = 1 2 C n , s 0 r 1 2 s S ( r ) d r
where S ( r ) is the surface integral on the unit sphere Ω R n , given by
S ( r ) = Ω [ u ( x + r σ ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x r σ ) ] d σ .
Proof of Theorem 7.
We let l = 2 in the case of centred difference from Definition 3 and derive that
( y 2 u ) ( x ) = k = 0 2 ( 1 ) k 2 k u ( x + ( 1 k ) y ) = u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y )
and direct computation implies that
1 d n , l ( 2 s ) = 2 2 s 1 s Γ n 2 + s π n 2 Γ ( 1 s ) = C n , s 2
by making use of the identity
Γ ( 1 z ) Γ ( z ) = π sin π z
for any non-integer z. Hence,
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = C n , s 2 R u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) | y | n + 2 s d y ,
which is well defined for u ( x ) C k ( R n ) . Indeed, a second order Taylor expansion derives
| [ u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) ] | | y | n + 2 s D 2 u L | y | n + 2 s 2 , 0 < s < 1 ,
which is integrable near zero. Furthermore, u ( x ) C k ( R n ) implies that
sup y R n | | y | 2 D 2 u ( y ) |
is bounded as | y | . This deduces that the integral converges at infinity.
Using the spherical coordinates below
y 1 = r cos θ 1 y 2 = r sin θ 1 cos θ 2 y 3 = r sin θ 1 sin θ 2 cos θ 3 y n 1 = r sin θ 1 sin θ n 2 cos θ n 1 y n = r sin θ 1 sin θ n 2 sin θ n 1 ,
where the angles θ 1 , θ 2 , , θ n 2 range over [ 0 , π ] and θ n 1 ranges over [ 0 , 2 π ] . Then Equation (7) turns out to be
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = 1 2 C n , s 0 r n 1 S ( r ) r n + 2 s d r = 1 2 C n , s 0 S ( r ) r 1 + 2 s d r ,
where
S ( r ) = Ω [ u ( x + r σ ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x r σ ) ] d σ .
Clearly, the integral
0 S ( r ) r 1 + 2 s d r = 0 S ( r ) S ( 0 ) r 1 + 2 s d r
converges as S ( 0 ) = 0 and S ( r ) is an even function with respect to r. It follows from Theorem 1 for 0 < s < 1 that
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( ) s u ( x ) = 1 2 C n , s 0 r 1 2 s S ( r ) d r .
 □
Remark 5.
There is a sign difference between Definition 2 and Definition 3 for n = 1 . Indeed for u W 1 ( R ) and 0 < s < 1 ,
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 1 + 2 s d y
from Definition 2, and
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( ) s u ( x ) = C 1 , s 0 u ( x + y ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x y ) y 1 + 2 s d y
by Equation (7), which is directly from Definition 3.
Let i = 0 , 1 , and i < s < i + 1 . Applying Theorem 7 and Theorem 1, we can extend the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s over the space C k ( R n ) as
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( ) s u ( x ) = 1 2 C n , s 0 r 1 2 s S ( r ) r 2 Ω n u ( x ) n 2 r 2 i Ω n i u ( x ) 2 i i ! n ( n + 2 ) ( n + 2 i 2 ) d r ,
where k = ( k 1 , k 2 , , k n ) is an n-tuple of nonnegative integers with k 1 + + k n = i + 1 .
In particular,
R Z D x 1 u ( x ) = Γ n + 1 2 2 π n + 1 2 0 S ( r ) r 2 d r , R Z D x 3 u ( x ) = 3 Γ n + 3 2 π n + 1 2 0 r 4 S ( r ) r 2 Ω n u ( x ) n d r , R Z D x 2 k + 1 u ( x ) = 2 2 k ( k + 1 2 ) ( 2 k ) ! Γ n + 1 2 + k π n + 1 2 ( 4 ) k k ! 0 r 1 2 s S ( r ) r 2 Ω n u ( x ) n 2 r 2 k Ω n k u ( x ) 2 k k ! n ( n + 2 ) ( n + 2 k 2 ) d r .
The following theorem can be found in Reference [11].
Theorem 8.
Let u ( x ) C k ( R n ) with n > 1 and i < s < i + 1 for i = 0 , 1 , . Then,
lim s ( i + 1 ) ( ) s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) i + 1 i + 1 u ( x ) , a n d lim s i + ( ) s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) i i u ( x )
where k = ( k 1 , k 2 , , k n ) is an n-tuple of nonnegative integers and k 1 + k 2 + + k n = i + 1 .
From Theorem 8 we have
lim s ( i + 1 ) R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) i + 1 i + 1 u ( x ) , and lim s i + R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) i i u ( x ) .
Hence,
lim s i R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( 1 ) i i u ( x ) .
for i = 1 , 2 , .
An an example, we are going to compute R Z D x 1 u ( x ) , where u ( x ) = e x 1 2 x 2 2 . It follows from Reference [11] that
S ( r ) = Ω [ u ( x + r σ ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x r σ ) ] d σ = 4 π e x 1 2 x 2 2 e r 2 k = 0 r 2 k ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) k ( k ! ) 2 1 .
Then,
R Z D x 1 u ( x ) = 1 4 π 0 S ( r ) r 2 d r = e x 1 2 x 2 2 0 1 r 2 e r 2 1 + e r 2 k = 1 r 2 k ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) k ( k ! ) 2 = e x 1 2 x 2 2 0 e r 2 1 r 2 d r e x 1 2 x 2 2 k = 1 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) k ( k ! ) 2 0 e r 2 r 2 k 2 d r = π e x 1 2 x 2 2 1 2 e x 1 2 x 2 2 k = 1 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) k ( k ! ) 2 Γ k 1 2 = π e x 1 2 x 2 2 π 2 e x 1 2 x 2 2 k = 1 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) k ( k ! ) 2 ( 2 k 2 ) ! 4 k 1 ( k 1 ) !
using
0 e r 2 1 r 2 d r = Γ ( 1 / 2 ) 2 = π , 0 e r 2 r 2 k 2 d r = Γ k 1 2 2 , Γ k 1 2 = ( 2 k 2 ) ! 4 k 1 ( k 1 ) ! π .
Let u ( x ) C ( R n ) . Then u ( x ) I m ( r ) has a compact support and belongs to the space C k ( R n ) for all n-tuple of nonnegative integers k where the identity sequence I m ( r ) is given in Section 2.
Let i < s < i + 1 with i = 0 , 1 , , and set
S m ( r ) = S ( r ) I m ( r ) .
Applying Equation (8) we can define the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s over the space C ( R n ) as
R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) = ( ) s u ( x ) = 1 2 C n , s lim m 0 m + m m r 1 2 s S m ( r ) r 2 Ω n u ( x ) n 2 r 2 i Ω n i u ( x ) 2 i i ! n ( n + 2 ) ( n + 2 i 2 ) d r ,
if the limit exists.
To complete this section, we present the following theorem.
Theorem 9.
Let s > 1 and n > 1 . Then R Z D x 2 s ( x 1 2 x 2 ) = 0 on R n .
Proof of Theorem 9.
We first note that the function x 1 2 x 2 C ( R n ) , but not bounded. Clearly,
( x 1 2 x 2 ) = ( 2 / x 1 2 + + 2 / x n 2 ) ( x 1 2 x 2 ) = 2 x 2 , ( ) 2 ( x 1 2 x 2 ) = 0 .
Assume 1 < s < 2 first. Then from Equation (9),
R Z D x 2 s ( x 1 2 x 2 ) = 1 2 C n , s lim m 0 m + m m r 1 2 s S m ( r ) r 2 Ω n u ( x ) n d r = 1 2 C n , s lim m 0 m + m m r 1 2 s S m ( r ) 2 x 2 r 2 Ω n n d r .
To compute S m ( r ) we come to
S m ( r ) = I m ( r ) Ω [ u ( x + r σ ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x r σ ) ] d σ
and
u ( x + r σ ) 2 u ( x ) + u ( x r σ ) = ( x 1 + r σ 1 ) 2 ( x 2 + r σ 2 ) 2 x 1 2 x 2 + ( x 1 r σ 1 ) 2 ( x 2 r σ 2 ) = 4 x 1 r 2 σ 1 σ 2 + 2 x 2 r 2 σ 1 2 .
Clearly,
Ω 2 x 2 r 2 σ 1 2 d σ = 2 x 2 r 2 Ω σ 1 2 d σ = 2 x 2 r 2 V n = 2 x 2 r 2 Ω n n ,
where V n is the volume of the unit ball in R n . Furthermore,
Ω σ 1 σ 2 d σ = Ω σ 1 σ 2 d σ 1 d σ n = 0
due to the integral cancellation over the unit sphere. Hence,
S ( r ) = 2 x 2 r 2 Ω n n ,
and
R Z D x 2 s ( x 1 2 x 2 ) = 1 2 C n , s lim m 0 m r 1 2 s S ( r ) 2 x 2 r 2 Ω n n d r 1 2 C n , s lim m m m + m m r 1 2 s I m ( r ) S ( r ) 2 x 2 r 2 Ω n n d r = x 2 Ω n n C n , s lim m m m + m m r 1 2 s [ 1 I m ( r ) ] d r = 0 .
It follows from
( ) 2 ( x 1 2 x 2 ) = ( ) 3 ( x 1 2 x 2 ) = = 0
that the result still holds for s > 2 . □

4. Conclusions

An integral representation is constructed for the generalized Riesz derivative R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) for k < s < k + 1 with k = 0 , 1 , in arbitrary dimensions by applying the normalization of distribution and the surface integrals. We further show that R Z D x 2 s u ( x ) is continuous at the end points and well defined for s = 1 2 + k . In addition, several examples are presented to demonstrate computations for obtaining the generalized Riesz derivatives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L. and J.B.; methodology, C.L.; software, C.L.; validation, C.L. and J.B.; formal analysis, C.L.; resources, C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; writing—review and editing, C.L.; visualization, C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by NSERC (Canada 2019-03907) and BURC.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the academic editor and reviewers for the careful reading of the paper with productive suggestions and corrections.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; Elsevier: North-Holland, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gorenflo, R.; Mainardi, F. Fractional Calculus: Integral and Differential Equations of Fractional Order. In Fractals and Fractional Calculus in Continuum Mechanics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 223–276. [Google Scholar]
  3. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  4. Srivastava, H.M.; Buschman, R.G. Theory and Applications of Convolution Integral Equations; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA; London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  5. Metzler, R.; Klafter, J. The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: A fractional dynamics approach. Phys. Rep. 2000, 339, 1–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Metzler, R.; Klafter, J. The restaurant at the end of the random walk: Recent developments in the description of anomalous transport by fractional dynamics. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 2004, 37, R161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mandelbrot, B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature; Henry Holt and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kwaśnicki, M. The equivalent definitions for the fractional Laplacian operator. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2017, 20, 7–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Saichev, A.I.; Zaslavsky, G.M. Fractional kinetic equations: Solutions and applications. Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 1997, 7, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Barros-Neto, J. An Introduction to the Theory of Distributions; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, C. On the generalized fractional Laplacian. Submitted.
  12. Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications; Gordon and Breach: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bayın, S.Ş. Definition of the Riesz derivative and its application to space fractional quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 2016, 57, 123501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Cushman, J.H. Dynamics of Fluids in Hierarchical Porous Media; Academic Press: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  15. Benson, D.A. The Fractional Advection-Dispersion Equation: Development and Application. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ding, H.F.; Li, C.P.; Chen, Y.Q. High-order algorithms for Riesz derivaive and their applications (I). Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 653797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ding, H.F.; Li, C.P. High-order algorithms for Riesz derivative and their applications (V). Numer. Meth. Part. Differ. Equ. 2017, 33, 1754–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, Q.; Liu, F.; Turner, I. Numerical methods for fractional partial differential equations with Riesz space fractional derivatives. Appl. Math. Model. 2010, 34, 200–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huang, Y.; Oberman, A. Numerical methods for the fractional Laplacian: A finite difference-quadrature approach. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2014, 52, 3056–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Muslih, S.I.; Agrawal, O.P. Riesz fractional derivatives and fractional dimensional space. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2010, 49, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mainardi, F.; Luchko, Y.; Pagnini, G. The fundamental solution of the space-time fractional diffusion equation. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2001, 4, 153–192. [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller, K.S.; Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pozrikidis, C. The Fractional Laplacian; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, C.; Li, C.P.; Humphries, T.; Plowman, H. Remarks on the generalized fractional Laplacian operator. Mathematics 2019, 7, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Cai, M.; Li, C.P. On Riesz derivative. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2019, 22, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gel’fand, I.M.; Shilov, G.E. Generalized Functions; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1964; Volume I. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, C. Several results of fractional derivatives in D ( R + ) . Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2015, 18, 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Beaudin, J. On the Generalized Riesz Derivative. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8071089

AMA Style

Li C, Beaudin J. On the Generalized Riesz Derivative. Mathematics. 2020; 8(7):1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8071089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Chenkuan, and Joshua Beaudin. 2020. "On the Generalized Riesz Derivative" Mathematics 8, no. 7: 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8071089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop