Next Article in Journal
On q-Quasi-Newton’s Method for Unconstrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems
Previous Article in Journal
Two New Strategies for Pricing Freight Options by Means of a Valuation PDE and by Functional Bounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Almost Sure Convergence for the Maximum and Minimum of Normal Vector Sequences

1
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Institute of Nano Science and Department of Mathematics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
2
Department of Mathematics, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2020, 8(4), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/math8040618
Submission received: 15 February 2020 / Revised: 10 April 2020 / Accepted: 14 April 2020 / Published: 17 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Probability and Statistics)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we prove the almost sure convergences for the maximum and minimum of nonstationary and stationary standardized normal vector sequences under some suitable conditions.

1. Introduction

The extreme phenomena in nature and human society can be explored by the classical extreme value theory [1,2,3]. Almost sure convergence shows a nice behavior of the various ways of convergences [4,5,6]. Brosamler and Schatte firstly put forward the almost sure central limit theorem (ASCLT) on partial sums for independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables [7,8]. Let X 1 , X 2 , be i.i.d. random variables with E ( X n ) = 0 , V a r ( X n ) = 1 and T n = k = 1 n X k . Under some regularity conditions, we have
lim n 1 log n k = 1 n 1 k I T k k x = Φ ( x ) a . s . ,
for any x, where I denote the indicator function and Φ ( x ) stands for the standard normal distribution function. Later, Ibragimov and Lifshits extend Equation (1) to the functional form [9]. Cheng et al. [10], Fahrnar and Stadtmüller [6] and Berkes and Csáki [11] respectively consider the ASCLT on maximum of i.i.d random variables. Csáki and Gondigdanzan investigate the ASCLT for the maximum of a stationary weakly dependent Gaussian sequences [12]. Chen and Lin extend the ASCLT to nonstationary Gaussian sequences [13]. Chen et al. provide an ASCLT for the maxima of multivariate stationary Gaussian sequences under some mild conditions [14]. Zhao et al. explore the ASCLT for the maxima and sum of a nonstationary Gaussian vector sequence [15]. Weng et al. put forward an ASCLT for the maxima and minima of a strongly dependent stationary Gaussian vector sequence [16].
The purpose of this paper is to extend the result of the ASCLT for the maximum and minimum to multivariate general normal vector sequences, which include the two cases of nonstationary and stationary, under some suitable conditions. Throughout this paper, { X 1 , X 2 , } is a standardized nonstationary Gaussian sequence of d-dimensional random vectors (i.e., each component of the random vectors has a zero mean and a unit standard deviation). The covariance matrix is denoted by
r i j ( p ) = C o v X i ( p ) , X j ( p ) , r i j ( p , q ) = C o v X i ( p ) , X j ( q )
such that | r i j ( p ) | ρ | i j | ( p ) and | r i j ( p , q ) | ρ | i j | ( p , q ) where
sup 1 p d ρ n ( p ) < 1 , sup 1 p q d ρ n ( p , q ) < 1
for n 1 .
We set
M k , n = M k , n ( 1 ) , , M k , n ( d ) , M k , n ( p ) = max k + 1 i n X i ( p ) ,
especially
M n = M 0 , n , M n ( p ) = M 0 , n ( p )
for p = 1 , , d . The level u n = u n ( 1 ) , , u n ( d ) and v n = v n ( 1 ) , , v n ( d ) are two real vectors. The expression u n > v n implies u n ( p ) > v n ( p ) for all p = 1 , , d and a b stands for a = O ( b ) . Finally, we write a n = ( 2 log n ) 1 2 and b n = a n 1 2 a n 1 log ( 4 π log n ) .

2. Results

Theorem 1.
Let { X n } n = 1 be a standardized nonstationary normal d-dimensional vector sequence satisfying
(a) 
δ = max p q sup n 1 | r n ( p ) | , | r n ( p , q ) | < 1 ;
(b) 
there exists γ 2 ( 1 + δ ) 1 δ , such that
1 n 2 p = 1 d 1 i < j n | r i j ( p ) | exp γ | r i j ( p ) | log ( j i ) ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) ,
1 n 2 1 p q n d 1 i < j n | r i j ( p , q ) | exp γ | r i j ( p , q ) | log ( j i ) ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε )
where ε > 0 .
Suppose that the levels u n ( p ) and v n ( p ) satisfy n 1 Φ ( u n ( p ) ) τ p , n Φ ( v n ( p ) ) η p for 0 τ p , η p < and p = 1 , 2 , , d , then
lim n 1 log n k = 1 n 1 k I ( v k < m k M k u k ) = p = 1 d exp ( ( τ p + η p ) ) a . s .
Especially, let u n ( p ) = a n 1 x p + b n and v n ( p ) = a n 1 y p b n , where x p and y p are real numbers for p = 1 , 2 , , d , then
lim n 1 log n k = 1 n 1 k I ( v k < m k M k u k ) = p = 1 d exp ( e x p + e y p ) a . s .
Corollary 1.
Under the conditions of Theorem 1, if the levels u n ( p ) satisfies n 1 Φ ( u n ( p ) ) τ p as n , then
lim n 1 log n k = 1 n 1 k I M k u k = p = 1 d exp ( 2 τ p ) .
Especially, the level u n ( p ) satisfies u n ( p ) = a n 1 x p + b n for p = 1 , 2 , , d , then
lim n 1 log n k = 1 n 1 k I M k u k = p = 1 d exp ( 2 e x p ) .
Theorem 2.
Let { X n } n = 1 be a standardized nonstationary normal d-dimensional vector sequence satisfying
ρ n ( p ) log n ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) = O ( 1 ) , ρ n ( p , q ) log n ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) = O ( 1 ) .
If n 1 Φ ( u n ( p ) ) τ p and n Φ v n ( p ) η p as n for 0 τ p , η p < and ε > 0 , then (4) holds.
Especially, set u n ( p ) = a n 1 x p + b n and v n ( p ) = a n 1 y p b n , where x p and y p are real numbers for p = 1 , 2 , , d , then (5) holds.
Theorem 3.
Let Z 1 , Z 2 , be a standardized stationary normal sequence of d-dimensional random vectors satisfying
(a) 
r n ( p , q ) 0 and r n ( p ) 0 for 1 p q d as n ,
(b) 
there exists γ 2 ( 1 + δ ) 1 δ with δ = max p q sup n 1 | r n ( p ) | , | r n ( p , q ) | < 1 , such that
1 n p = 1 d k = 1 n r k ( p ) log k exp γ | r k ( p ) | log k ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) ,
1 n 1 p q d k = 1 n r k ( p , q ) log k exp γ | r k ( p , q ) | log k ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
If n 1 Φ ( u n ( p ) ) τ p and n Φ ( v n ( p ) ) η p as n for 0 τ p , η p < and ε > 0 , then (4) holds.
Especially, set u n ( p ) = a n 1 x p + b n and v n ( p ) = a n 1 y p b n , where x p and y p are real numbers for p = 1 , , d , then (5) holds.
Theorem 4.
Let Z 1 , Z 2 , be a standardized stationary normal sequence d-dimensional random vectors satisfying
r n ( p ) log n ( log log n ) 1 + ε = O ( 1 ) , r n ( p , q ) log n ( log log n ) 1 + ε = O ( 1 ) , 1 p q d .
If n 1 Φ ( u n ( p ) ) τ p and n Φ v n ( p ) η p as n for 0 τ p , η p < and ε > 0 , then (4) holds.
Especially, set u n ( p ) = a n 1 x p + b n and v n ( p ) = a n 1 y p b n , where x p and y p are real numbers for p = 1 , , d , then (5) holds.
Notice: We replace the nonstationary sequence { X n } n = 1 with the stationary sequence { Z n } n = 1 in Theorem 3 and 4. The symbols of { X n } n = 1 are used to denote the random vector sequence { Z n } n = 1 in the two theorems without ambiguities.

3. Proofs of the Main Results

In the section, we present and prove some lemmas which are useful in the proofs of the main results.
Lemma 1.
Let { ξ n } n = 1 and { η n } n = 1 be standardized nonstationary normal sequences of d-dimensional random vectors with r i j 0 ( p ) = C o v ξ i ( p ) , ξ j ( p ) , r i j 0 ( p , q ) = C o v ξ i ( p ) , ξ j ( q ) and r i j * ( p ) = C o v η i ( p ) , η j ( p ) , r i j * ( p , q ) = C o v η i ( p ) , η j ( q ) . Denote ρ i j ( p ) = max | r i j 0 ( p ) | , | r i j * ( p ) | , ρ i j ( p , q ) = max | r i j 0 ( p , q ) | , | r i j * ( p , q ) | and let { u n } , { v n } be real vectors. If max p q sup n 1 | r n ( p ) | , | r n ( p , q ) | = δ < 1 and ω n i ( p ) = min ( | u n i ( p ) | , | v n i ( p ) | ) , then
P j = 1 n ( v n j < ξ j u n j ) P j = 1 n ( v n j < η j u n j ) K 1 p = 1 d 1 i < j n r i j 0 ( p ) r i j * ( p ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( p ) 2 1 + ρ i j ( p ) + K 2 1 p q d 1 i < j n r i j 0 ( p , q ) r i j * ( p , q ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 1 + ρ i j ( p , q )
with the positive constants K 1 , K 2 which depend on δ.
Proof. 
It follows from Theorem 11.1.2 in Leadbetter et al. [17]. □
Lemma 2.
Let { X n } n = 1 be a standardized nonstationary normal d-dimensional vector sequence satisfying the conditions (a) and (b) of Theorem 1, then
1 p q d 1 i < j n r i j ( p , q ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + r i j ( p , q ) ) ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) ,
p = 1 d 1 i < j n r i j ( p ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( p ) 2 ( 1 + r i j ( p ) ) ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
Proof. 
Firstly, we peove Equation (12). This sum can be divided into two terms T 1 and T 2 ,
1 p q d 1 i < j n r i j ( p , q ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + | r i j ( p , q ) | ) = 1 p q d 1 i < j n j i n 2 γ r i j ( p , q ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + | r i j ( p , q ) | ) + 1 p q d 1 i < j n j i > n 2 γ r i j ( p , q ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + | r i j ( p , q ) | ) T 1 + T 2 .
Since exp u n 2 ( p ) 2 log n n , we have ω n i ( p ) = min ( | u n i ( p ) | , | v n i ( p ) | ) log n n . Let β = 2 γ , that is
0 < β < 1 δ 1 + δ , then the first term T 1
T 1 1 p q d 1 i < j n j i n β r i j ( p , q ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + δ ) n 1 + β n 2 log n 1 1 + δ = n 1 + β 2 1 + δ ( log n ) 1 1 + δ .
As 1 + β 2 1 + δ < 0 , we get
T 1 ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
Note that j i > n β , we have log n < log ( j i ) / β . Then, we consider the second part T 2 ,
T 2 1 p q d 1 i < j n j i > n β r i j ( p , q ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + | r i j ( p , q ) | ) 1 p q d 1 i < j n j i > n β r i j ( p , q ) n 2 log n 1 1 + | r i j ( p , q ) | = n 2 1 p q d 1 i < j n j i > n β r i j ( p , q ) n 2 | r i j ( p , q ) | 1 + | r i j ( p , q ) | log n 1 1 + | r i j ( p , q ) | n 2 1 p q d 1 i < j n j i > n β r i j ( p , q ) ( j i ) 2 | r i j ( p , q ) | β log ( j i ) n 2 1 p q d 1 i < j n j i > n β r i j ( p , q ) exp γ | r i j ( p , q ) | log ( j i ) log ( j i ) .
By the condition (a) of Theorem 1, we get
T 2 ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
Combining Equation (14) and Equation (15) induces that Equation (12) holds. Equation (13) can be proved in the similar way. □
Lemma 3.
Let { X n } n = 1 be a standardized nonstationary normal sequence of d-dimensional random vectors satisfying (a) of Theorem 1 and
(c) there exists γ 2 ( 1 + δ ) 1 δ , as n
1 n 2 p = 1 d 1 i < j n | r i j ( p ) | exp γ | r i j ( p ) | log ( j i ) 0 ,
1 n 2 1 p q n d 1 i < j n | r i j ( p , q ) | exp γ | r i j ( p , q ) | log ( j i ) 0 .
We have
p = 1 d 1 i < j n | r i j ( p ) | exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( p ) 2 ( 1 + | r i j ( p ) | ) n 0 ,
1 p q n d 1 i < j n | r i j ( p , q ) | exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + | r i j ( p , q ) ) | n 0 .
Proof. 
The proof of Lemma 3 is similar to Lemma 2. □
Lemma 4.
Suppose that { X n } n = 1 is a standardized nonstationary normal sequence of d-dimensional random vectors satisfying the conditions (a) and (b) of Theorem 1.
Let u n ( p ) and v n ( p ) be such that n 1 Φ ( u n ( p ) ) τ p and n Φ ( v n ( p ) ) η p as n for all p = 1 , 2 , , d , then
P ( v k < m k M k u k ) p = 1 d exp ( ( τ p + η p ) ) .
Especially, let u n ( p ) = 1 a n x p + b n and v n ( p ) = 1 a n y p b n with x p , y p R for all p = 1 , 2 , , d , then
P ( v k < m k M k u k ) p = 1 d exp ( ( e x p + e y p ) ) .
Proof. 
We consider the joint distribution of the maximum M n and the minimum m n of { X n } n = 1
P v n < m n M n u n p = 1 d exp ( τ p + η p ) P v n < m n M n u n p = 1 d Φ ( u p ) Φ ( v p ) n + p = 1 d Φ ( u p ) Φ ( v p ) n p = 1 d exp ( τ p + η p ) = Δ L 1 + L 2 .
By Lemmas 1 and 3, we have
L 1 = P v n < m n M n u n p = 1 d Φ ( u p ) Φ ( v p ) n K 1 p = 1 d 1 i < j n r i j 0 ( p ) r i j * ( p ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( p ) 2 ( 1 + ρ i j ( p ) ) + K 2 1 p q d 1 i < j n r i j 0 ( p , q ) r i j * ( p , q ) exp ω n i 2 ( p ) + ω n j 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + ρ i j ( p , q ) ) n 0 .
Based on the definition of u n and v n , we get
L 2 = p = 1 d Φ ( u p ) Φ ( v p ) n p = 1 d exp ( τ p + η p ) = p = 1 d 1 1 Φ ( u p ) Φ ( v p ) n p = 1 d exp ( ( τ p + η p ) ) = p = 1 d 1 η p n τ p n + o ( 1 n ) n p = 1 d exp ( τ p + η p ) n p = 1 d exp ( τ p + η p ) p = 1 d exp ( τ p + η p ) = 0 .
Combining Equation (22) and Equation (23) induces that Equation (20) hold. Equation (21) is a special case of Equation (20). Then Lemma 4 holds. □
Lemma 5.
Let { X n } n = 1 be a standardized nonstationary normal d-dimensional vector sequence satisfying the conditions (a) and (b) of Theorem 1, then
E I { M n u n } I { M k , n u n } k n + ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) ,
E I { m n > v n } I { m k , n > v n } k n + ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
Proof. 
We firstly consider Equation (24),
E I { M n u n } I { M k , n u n } = E I ( X 1 u n 1 , , X n u n n ) I ( X k + 1 u n ( k + 1 ) , , X n u n n ) = P ( X k + 1 u n ( k + 1 ) , , X n u n n ) P ( X 1 u n 1 , , X n u n n ) P ( X k + 1 u n ( k + 1 ) , , X n u n n ) p = 1 d j = k + 1 n Φ u n j ( p ) + P ( X 1 u n 1 , , X n u n n ) p = 1 d j = 1 n Φ u n j ( p ) + p = 1 d j = k + 1 n Φ u n j ( p ) p = 1 d j = 1 n Φ u n j ( p ) A + B + C .
By Theorem 4.2.1 in Leadbetter et al. [17] and Lemma 2, we obtain
A ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) ,
B ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
As λ n ( p ) = min 1 i n u n i ( p ) c ( log n ) 1 2 , then u n i ( p ) c ( log n ) 1 2 for p = 1 , 2 , , d . Define u n by 1 Φ ( u n ) = 1 n , then we have u n i ( p ) u n for some c as p = 1 , 2 , , d . The third part C can be controled as below,
C = j = k + 1 n p = 1 d Φ u n j ( p ) j = 1 n p = 1 d Φ u n j ( p ) 1 j = 1 k p = 1 d Φ u n j ( p ) p = 1 d 1 j = 1 k Φ u n j ( p ) p = 1 d 1 Φ k ( u n ) p = 1 d 1 1 1 n k k n .
Using Equations (26)–(28), Equation (24) can be proved.
Next, we prove Equation (25). As m k , n = min k + 1 i n X i , then m k , n = max k + 1 i n ( X i ) .
E I { m n > v n } I { m k , n > v n } = P ( m k , n > v n ) P ( m n > v n ) = P ( m k , n < v n ) P ( m n < v n ) P ( m k , n < v n ) p = 1 d Φ n k v n ( p ) ) + P ( m n < v n ) p = 1 d Φ n ( v n ( p ) ) ) + p = 1 d Φ n k v n ( p ) ) p = 1 d Φ n v n ( p ) ) A 1 + A 2 + A 3 .
Since
x n k x n k n , 0 x 1 ,
we have
A 3 k n .
By Theorem 4.2.1 in Leadbetter et al. [17] and Lemma 2, we get
A k ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) , k = 1 , 2 .
Using Equations (29) and (30), Equation (25) can be obtained. Then Lemma 5 holds. □
Lemma 6.
Let { X n } n = 1 be a standardized nonstationary normal d-dimensional vector sequence satisfying the conditions (a) and (b) of Theorem 1, then
C o v I { M k u k , m k > v k } , I { M k , n u n , m k , n > v n } ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
Proof. 
By Lemmas 1 and 2, we have
C o v I ( M k u k , m k > v k ) , I ( M k , n u n , m k , n > v n ) = P v k < m k M k u k , v n < m k , n M k , n u n P v k < m k M k u k P v n < m k , n M k , n u n p = 1 d i = 1 k j = k + 1 n r i j ( p ) exp w ´ 2 ( p ) 1 + r i j ( p ) + 1 p q d i = 1 k j = k + 1 n r i j ( p , q ) exp w ´ 2 ( p ) + w ´ 2 ( q ) 2 ( 1 + r i j ( p , q ) ) ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) ,
where w ´ ( p ) = m i n | v k ( p ) | , | v n ( p ) | , | u k ( p ) | , | u n ( p ) | , p = 1 , 2 , , d .  □
Lemma 7.
Let Υ 1 , Υ 2 be a sequence of bounded random variables. If
V a r k = 1 n 1 k Υ k ( log n ) 2 ( log log n ) ( 1 + ϵ ) ,
for some ε > 0 , then
lim n 1 log n k = 1 n 1 k ( Υ k E Υ k ) = 0 a . s .
Proof. 
The proof can be found in Lemma 3.1 [18]. □
Proof Theorem 1 .
Let χ k = I ( v k < m k M k u k ) , then
V a r k = 1 n 1 k χ k = k = 1 n 1 k 2 V a r ( χ k ) + 2 1 k < l n c o v ( χ k , χ l ) k l k = 1 n 1 k 2 + 2 1 k < l n c o v ( χ k , χ l ) k l A + B .
Note that for k < l , the absolute value of the numerator of the second term B can be expressed as below,
c o v ( χ k , χ l ) = c o v I ( v k < m k M k u k ) , I ( v l < m l M l u l ) | c o v ( I ( v k < m k M k u k ) , I ( v l < m l M l u l ) I ( v l < m l M k , l u l ) ) | + | c o v ( I ( v k < m k M k u k ) , I ( v l < m l M k , l u l ) I ( v l < m k , l M k , l u l ) ) | + c o v I ( v l < m l M k , l u l ) , I ( v l < m k , l M k , l u l ) B 1 + B 2 + B 3 .
By Lemma 5, we get
B 1 2 E I ( v l < m l M l u l ) I ( v l < m l M k , l u l ) 2 E I ( M l u l ) I ( M k , l u l ) k l + ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) ,
and
B 2 2 E I ( v l < m l M k , l u l ) I ( v l < m k , l M k , l u l ) 2 E I ( m l > v l ) I ( m k , l > v l ) k l + ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
By Lemma 6, we obtain
B 3 ( log log l ) ( 1 + ε ) .
Combining Equations (34)–(36), we can estimate B,
B 1 k < l n 1 k l k l + ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) 1 k < l n 1 l 2 + 1 k < l n 1 k l ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) log n + ( log n ) 2 ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
Lastly, we can draw the conclusion
V a r k = 1 n 1 k χ k ( log n ) 2 ( log log n ) ( 1 + ε ) .
By Lemma 7, Theorem 1 is proved. □
Proof Theorem 2. 
If we use Equation (8) instead of the conditions (a) and (b) of Theorem 1, Lemma 2, Lemma 3, Lemma 5 and Lemma 6 still hold. Theorem 2 can be proved. □
Proof Theorem 3. 
Replace (a) and (b) of Theorem 1 with (a) and (b) of Theorem 3, then Equations (4) and (5) still hold. □
Proof Theorem 4. 
If we use Equation (11) instead of Equation (8), Theorem 4 can be completed. □

4. Conclusions

The almost sure central limit theorems for the maxima and minimum of general normal vector sequences under suitable conditions are put forward. We note that lim n 1 log n k = 1 n 1 k is greater than 1 and converges to 1 as N . The convergence rate is mainly decided by the log n and the rate is not so fast. The extreme value theory deals with extreme phenomena which are less likely to occur, but more harmful [1,2,3]. The maximum and minimum can be used to depict the extreme risk in the economy and natural disaster (such as floods, hurricane, stock market crash, megaseism and so on), and then their joint limiting distribution computes the probability of the controllable risk in an interval.

Author Contributions

Project administration, Z.C. and X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.C.; Writing—review and editing, Z.C. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61374183, 51535005), the Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures (MCMS-I-0418K01, MCMS-I-0418Y01), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NC2018001, NP2019301, NJ2019002), the Higher Education Institution Key Research Project Plan of Henan Province, China (20B110005), and Innovation and entrepreneurship training program (2019CX095).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief, the Assistant Editor, and the two referees for careful reading and for their comments which greatly improved the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

  1. Galambos, J. Asymptotic Theory of Extreme Order Statistics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beirlant, J.; Goegebeur, Y.; Segers, J.; Teugels, J.L. Statistics of Extremes: Theory and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Resnick, S.I. Extreme Values, Regular Variation, and Point Processes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989; Volume 84. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bremaud, P. Discrete Probability Models and Methods; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. Oliveira, P.E. Almost Sure Convergence; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, S.; Peng, L.; Qi, Y. Almost Sure Convergence in Extreme Value Theory. Math. Nachrichten 2006, 190, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brosamler, G.A. An almost everywhere central limit theorem. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1998, 104, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hüsler, J.; Schüpbach, M. Limit results for maxima in non-stationary multivariate Gaussian sequences. Stoch. Process. Their Appl. 1988, 28, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ibragimov, I.; Lifshits, M. On the convergence of generalized moments in almost sure central limit theorem. Stat. Probab. Lett. 1998, 40, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fahrner, I.; Stadtmüller, U. On almost sure max-limit theorems. Stat. Probab. Lett. 1998, 37, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berkes, I.; Csáki, E. A universal result in almost sure central limit theory. Stoch. Process. Their Appl. 2001, 94, 105–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Csáki, E.; Gonchigdanzan, K. Almost sure limit theorems for the maximum of stationary Gaussian sequences. Stat. Probab. Lett. 2002, 58, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, S.; Lin, Z. Almost sure max-limits for nonstationary Gaussian sequence. Stat. Probab. Lett. 2006, 76, 1175–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, Z.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, H. An almost sure limit theorem for the maxima of multivariate stationary gaussian sequences. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 2009, 86, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, S.; Peng, Z.; Wu, S. Almost Sure Convergence for the Maximum and the Sum of Nonstationary Guassian Sequences. J. Inequalities Appl. 2010, 2010, 856495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Weng, Z.; Peng, Z.; Nadarajah, S. The almost sure limit theorem for the maxima and minima of strongly dependent Gaussian vector sequences. Extremes 2012, 15, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Leadbetter, M.R.; Lindgren, G.; Rootzén, H. Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gonchigdanzan, K. An almost sure limit theorem for the product of partial sums with stable distribution. Stat. Probab. Lett. 2008, 78, 3170–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X. Almost Sure Convergence for the Maximum and Minimum of Normal Vector Sequences. Mathematics 2020, 8, 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8040618

AMA Style

Chen Z, Zhang H, Liu X. Almost Sure Convergence for the Maximum and Minimum of Normal Vector Sequences. Mathematics. 2020; 8(4):618. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8040618

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Zhicheng, Hongyun Zhang, and Xinsheng Liu. 2020. "Almost Sure Convergence for the Maximum and Minimum of Normal Vector Sequences" Mathematics 8, no. 4: 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8040618

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop