Next Article in Journal
Mathematical Model to Understand the Dynamics of Cancer, Prevention Diagnosis and Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Convex Particle-in-Cell Model for the Mathematical Study of the Microscopic Blood Flow
Previous Article in Journal
Application of an Intensive Longitudinal Functional Model with Multiple Time Scales in Objectively Measured Children’s Physical Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Regulator Problem to the Convection–Diffusion Equation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Gravity Force Generated by a Non-Rotating Level Ellipsoid of Revolution with Low Eccentricity as a Series of Spherical Harmonics

by
Gerassimos Manoussakis
Department of Mathematics, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechneiou 9, 15780 Zografos, Greece
Mathematics 2023, 11(9), 1974; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11091974
Submission received: 16 March 2023 / Revised: 18 April 2023 / Accepted: 20 April 2023 / Published: 22 April 2023

Abstract

:
The gravity force of a gravity field generated by a non-rotating level ellipsoid of revolution enclosing mass M is given as a solution of a partial differential equation along with a boundary condition of Dirichlet type. The partial differential equation is formulated herein on the basis of the behavior of spherical gravity fields. A classical solution to this equation is represented on the basis of spherical harmonics. The series representation of the solution is exploited in order to conduct a rigorous asymptotic analysis with respect to eccentricity. Finally, the Dirichlet boundary problem is solved for the case of an ellipsoid of revolution (spheroid) with low eccentricity. This has been accomplished on the basis of asymptotic analysis, which resulted in the determination of the coefficients participating in the spherical harmonics expansion. The limiting case of this series expresses the gravity force of a non-rotating sphere.
MSC:
35A09; 35C10; 35J25; 33C05; 33C75

1. Introduction

The gravity field which is under consideration is generated by a non-rotating ellipsoid of revolution with semiaxes (a, b), (with a > b).In our case, it has an equipotential surface (level ellipsoid).According to [1], this gravity field was first given by Pizzetti in 1894 and was further elaborated upon by C. Somigliana in 1929.Descriptions of this field can be found in several books, for example, in [2,3,4].
According to Xiong Li [3], although the Earth is not an exact ellipsoid, the equipotential ellipsoid furnishes a simple, consistent, and uniform reference system for all purposes of geodesy, as well as geophysics.
The gravity field of an ellipsoid is of fundamental practical importance because it is easy to handle mathematically, and the deviations of the actual gravity field from the ellipsoidal “theoretical” or “normal” field are small. This splitting of the Earth’s gravity field into a “normal” and a remaining small “disturbing” or “anomalous” field considerably simplifies many problems, including the determination of the geoid (for geodesists) and the use of gravity anomalies to understand the Earth’s interior (for geophysicists). In addition [5], this kind of gravity field plays a significant role in planetary geodesy since the shape of large bodies in the solar system can be well approximated by ellipsoids of revolutions (case of planets) or [6,7] by triaxial ellipsoids (case of many natural satellites).
Various relations which were formulated for the description of this field gravity force are given for the surface of the ellipsoid in several coordinate systems (see, for example, [8]) and for the outer space of the ellipsoid. Although these formulae are widely used, they are not solutions to some partial differential equation (for example, in contrast to the gravity potential, which is a solution of the Laplace equation).
In this work, we prove the fact that the gravity force constitutes the solution toa suitable boundary value problem consisting of a partial differential equation and a boundary condition of the Dirichlet type. This is exploitable in the sense that the spectral analysis of the boundary value problem offers the possibility to express the solution in terms of adequate eigenfunctions involving the well-known Legendre functions.
Having introduced the appropriate basis inspired by the boundary value problem, the gravity force acquires a very efficient representation. Via this representation, the unknown character of the problem has been transferred from the gravity force to the coefficients of expansion in terms of the structural elements related to the aforementioned partial differential equation.
The eccentricity of the ellipsoid, which is a small parameter, plays an important role in defining the deviation from the spherical case. Its particular involvement in the problem via the implication of spherical functions is convenient for the application of asymptotic techniques, establishing, in a rigorous manner, a robust determination of the aforementioned expansion coefficients.

2. Formulation of a Partial Differential Equation Related to Spherical Gravity Force

Let S be a sphere of radius R and mass M. Let W be the gravity potential of this gravity field. The equipotential surfaces of this field are spheres which have the same center as the sphere S.
Let (X, Y, Z) be a Cartesian system, and the equation of the sphere is
X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 = R 2
The gravity field outside of the sphere in Cartesian coordinates is a function:
ξ : V 3 : ( X , Y , Z ) ξ ( X , Y , Z ) = ( W X ( X , Y , Z ) , W Y ( X , Y , Z ) , W Z ( X , Y , Z ) )
where WX, WY, and WZ are the first-order partial derivatives of the potential W, and V is the part of the three dimensional space which is outside of the sphere. The family of the equipotential surfaces of this gravity field is spheres and can be represented as
W ( X , Y , Z ) = w       ,       0 < w w 0
A point P with coordinates (XP,YP,ZP) is on an arbitrary equipotential surface with gravity potential WP. This equipotential surface is also referred to as W = WP.
In addition, let (x, y, z) be a Cartesian system with its center at point P. The x-axis is tangent to the meridian of the equipotential surface (pointing to the North Pole), the z-axis is vertical to the tangent plane of the equipotential surface at point P (pointing outwards), and y-axis makes the system right-handed. The rotation matrix between the axles X, Y, Z and x, y, z is as follows [9]:
[ X X P Y Y P Z Z P ] = [ cos θ cos λ sin λ sin θ cos λ cos θ sin λ cos λ sin θ sin λ sin θ 0 cos θ ] P [ x y z ]
The angles θ and λ are spherical angles, i.e.,
X = r sin θ cos λ Y = r sin θ sin λ Z = r cos θ
In this system, Wz(P) is not zero, and from the implicit function theorem, we knowthat the vector equation of the equipotential surface W = WP around point P is
s ¯ : ( ε 1 , ε 1 ) × ( ε 1 , ε 1 ) 3 : ( x , y ) s ¯ ( x , y ) = ( x , y , z ( x , y ) )
The first-order partial derivatives of the above vector equation are
s ¯ x ( x , y ) = ( 1 , 0 , W x W z )
s ¯ y ( x , y ) = ( 0 , 1 , W y W z )
The fundamental elements of the first kind [10] of the equipotential surface are defined to be
E ( x , y ) E = s ¯ x , s ¯ x = ( 1 , 0 , W x W z ) , ( 1 , 0 , W x W z ) = W x 2 + W z 2 W z 2
F ( x , y ) F = s ¯ x , s ¯ y = ( 1 , 0 , W x W z ) , ( 1 , 0 , W y W z ) = W x W y W z 2
G ( x , y ) G = s ¯ y , s ¯ y = ( 1 , 0 , W y W z ) , ( 1 , 0 , W y W z ) = W y 2 + W z 2 W z 2
The normal vector and the unit normal vector are
N ¯ C ( x , y ) = s ¯ x × s ¯ y = ( W x W z , W y W z , 1 )
N ¯ ( x , y ) = | W z | 1 W x 2 + W y 2 + W z 2 N ¯ C ( x , y ) = | W z | 1 g ( x , y ) N ¯ C ( x , y )
The gravity force g in the above relation is equal to
g ( x , y ) = W x 2 + W y 2 + W z 2
The fundamental quantities of the second kind L, M, and N of the equipotential surface describe the projections of the vectors
s ¯ x x       ,       s ¯ x y       ,       s ¯ y y
on the axis of the unit normal vector of the equipotential surface. The above vectors are the second-order partial derivatives of the vector equation of the equipotential surface. The fundamental quantities L, M, and N [10] are defined to be
L ( x , y ) = N ¯ , s ¯ x x = | W z | W x x W z 2 + 2 W x z W x W z W z z W x 2 W z 3 g
M ( x , y ) = N ¯ , s ¯ x y = | W z | W y W z W x z + W x W z W y z W x y W z 2 W z z W x W y W z 3 g
N ( x , y ) = N ¯ , s ¯ y y = | W z | W y y W z 2 + 2 W y z W y W z W z z W y 2 W z 3 g
The expressions of the fundamental elements and gravity force at point P in (x, y, z) coordinates are
E ( 0 , 0 ) E ( P ) = 1               ,             F ( P ) = 0           ,               G ( P ) = 1
L ( P ) = | W z | W z | P W x x g | P
M ( P ) = | W z | W z | P W x y g | P
N ( P ) = | W z | W z | P W y y g | P
g ( P ) = | W z ( P ) |
The gravity vector at point P has the opposite direction of the z-axis; therefore, Wz(P) < 0. Hence, the above three formulae become
L ( P ) = W x x g | P
M ( P ) = W x y g | P
N ( P ) = W y y g | P
Since F(P) = 0, the parametric lines x = 0 and y = 0 are vertical to one another. The equipotential surface is a spherical surface; therefore, all directions are principal directions, i.e.,
M ( P ) = 0 W x y ( P ) = 0
The curvatures along the x-direction and y-direction, respectively, are
k 1 ( P ) = W x x g | P
k 2 ( P ) = W y y g | P
The first-order partial derivatives of the gravity force g (see Equation (10a)) at point P in the (x, y, z) system are
g x ( P ) = 1 g ( P ) ( W x W x x + W y W x y + W z W x z ) P
g y ( P ) = 1 g ( P ) ( W x W x y + W y W y y + W z W y z ) P
g z ( P ) = 1 g ( P ) ( W x W x z + W y W y z + W z W z z ) P
The second-order partial derivatives of the gravity force g are defined as follows, if Equations (10) and (18) are taken into account:
g x x ( P ) = { [ W x x 2 + W x z 2 + W z W x x z ] 1 g W x z 2 g } P
g y y ( P ) = { [ W y y 2 + W y z 2 + W z W y y z ] 1 g W y z 2 g } P
g z z ( P ) = { [ W x z 2 + W y z 2 + W z z 2 + W z W z z z ] 1 g W z z 2 g } P
Adding the three above relations and taking into consideration that W is an harmonic function,
W x x + W y y + W z z = 0
W x x z + W y y z + W z z z = 0
we find that
g x x ( P ) + g y y ( P ) + g z z ( P ) = { [ W x x 2 + W x z 2 + W z W x x z ] 1 g W x z 2 g + + [ W y y 2 + W y z 2 + W z W y y z ] 1 g W y z 2 g + [ W x z 2 + W y z 2 + W z z 2 + W z W z z z ] 1 g W z z 2 g } P
or
g x x ( P ) + g y y ( P ) + g z z ( P ) = ( W x x 2 g + W y y 2 g + W x z 2 g + W y z 2 g ) P
Along the plumbline which passes at point P, it holds that
d x d t | P = W x ( P ) = 0
  d y d t | P = W y ( P ) = 0
d z d t | P = W z ( P )
d 2 x d t 2 | P = ( W x x W x + W x y W y + W x z W z ) P = W x z ( P ) W z ( P )
d 2 y d t 2 | P = ( W x y W x + W y y W y + W y z W z ) P = W y z ( P ) W z ( P )
d 2 z d t 2 | P = ( W x z W x + W y z W y + W z z W z ) P = W z z ( P ) W z ( P )
The curvature of the plumbline at point P is equal to
k p l ( P ) = d r ¯ d t | P × d 2 r ¯ d t 2 | P d r ¯ d t | P 3 = | W y z | W z | P
Since the plumblines of the gravity field ξ are straight lines, then kpl(P) = 0, and, consequently, Wxz(P) = Wyz(P) = 0. The relation (34) now becomes
( g x x + g y y + g z z ) P = ( k 1 2 + k 2 2 + k p l 2 ) P g ( P )
or
( 2 g ) ( P ) ( k 1 2 + k 2 2 ) P g ( P ) = 0
However, the value of the curvature along the x-direction and y-direction of the spherical equipotential surface is equal to 1/R. Hence, Equation (43) becomes
( 2 g ) ( P ) 2 R 2 g ( P ) = 0
The above relation holds for point P. This relation can be considered as an operator, i.e.,
2 2 r 2
The above operator is invariant under rotations; therefore, the following partial differential equation holds:
2 g 2 r 2 g = 0
where g is the gravity force.

3. Solution to the Partial Differential Equation

Expressing the above partial differential equation in spherical coordinates, (r, θ′, λ) becomes
g r r + 2 r g r + 1 r 2 g θ θ + tan θ r 2 g θ + 1 r 2 cos 2 θ g λ λ 2 r 2 g = 0
x = r cos θ cos λ y = r cos θ sin λ z = r sin θ
A classical solution to the above partial differential equation can be found with the method of separating variables [11], hence:
g ( r , θ , λ ) = F 1 ( r ) F 2 ( θ ) F 3 ( λ )
and substituting to the equation, we have the following system:
F 3 , λ λ + m 2 F 3 = 0
cos 2 θ F 2 , θ θ 2 sin θ F 2 , θ + ( n ( n + 1 ) m 2 cos 2 θ ) F 2 = 0
F 1 , r r + 2 r F 1 , r [ 2 r 2 + n ( n + 1 ) r 2 ] F 1 = 0
The first two differential equations have the following solutions:
F 3 ( λ ) = c 31 cos m λ + c 32 sin m λ
F 2 ( θ ) = c 21 P n m ( sin θ ) + c 22 Q n m ( sin θ )
The third differential equation is an Euler equation, and in order to find the general solution, we set F1 = ra and the equation becomes
a ( a 1 ) r a 2 + 2 a r a 2 2 [ n ( n + 1 ) 2 + 1 ] r a 2 = 0
Since r is not zero, the unknown a will be determined from the second-order algebraic equation
a 2 + a 2 [ n ( n + 1 ) 2 + 1 ] = 0
a 1 = 1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2
a 2 = 1 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2
Hence, the solution to this Euler equation is
F 1 ( r ) = c 1 r 1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 + c 2 r 1 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2
We combine Equations (53), (54) and (59) to construct the separate eigensolutions F1(r), F2(θ′),and F3(λ). The general solution to Equation (47) is expanded upon in terms of these eigensolutions as follows:
g ( r , θ , λ ) = n = 0 + r 1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 m = 0 n [ a n m P n m ( sin θ ) cos m λ + b n m P n m ( sin θ ) sin m λ ]
g ( r , θ , λ ) = n = 0 + r 1 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 m = 0 n [ a n m P n m ( sin θ ) cos m λ + b n m P n m ( sin θ ) sin m λ ]
The coefficients αnm and bnm are real numbers. Making all coefficients equal to zero except the term a00, we have two cases: In the first case, a00 = GM/a3, and Equation (60) becomes
g int ( r , θ , λ ) = G M a 3 r
which describes the gravity force inside of a sphere of radius a and mass M. In the second case, a00 = GM, and Equation (61) becomes
g e x t ( r , θ , λ ) = G M r 2
which describes the gravity force outside of a sphere of radius a and mass M. On the surface of the sphere, Equations (61b) and (61c) give the same result, and, therefore, are compatible:
g e x t ( a , θ , λ ) = g int ( a , θ , λ ) = G M a 2

4. The Gravity Force Generated by a Non-Rotating Ellipsoid of Revolution as a Solution of a Dirichlet Problem of the Suggested Partial Differential Equation

The level ellipsoid has constant gravity potential W0 on its surface. This surface is described in geodetic coordinates [12] as
( x ( ϕ , λ ) , y ( ϕ , λ ) , z ( ϕ , λ ) ) = 1 1 e 2 sin 2 ϕ ( a cos ϕ cos λ , a cos ϕ sin λ , a ( 1 e 2 ) sin ϕ )
where e is the ellipsoid’s first eccentricity. The gravity force on the surface of the ellipsoid is equal to [2]:
g ( ϕ ) = a g a cos 2 ϕ + b g b sin 2 ϕ a 2 cos 2 ϕ + b 2 sin 2 ϕ
The symbols “gα” and “gb” stand for the value of gravity force on the equator and at the poles, respectively. Their values are equal to
g a = G M a b
g b = G M a 2
From Equation (62), we know that
r = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 r = a 1 e 2 sin 2 ϕ cos 2 ϕ + ( 1 e 2 ) 2 sin 2 ϕ
From Equations (62) and (66), we derive the relationship between spherical latitude θ′ and geodetic latitude φ:
cos 2 ϕ = ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ sin 2 θ + ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ
sin 2 ϕ = sin 2 θ sin 2 θ + ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ
Hence, the gravity force on the surface S of the ellipsoid becomes
g ( θ ) = a ( 1 e 2 ) 2 g a cos 2 θ + b g b sin 2 θ sin 2 θ + ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ a 2 ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + b 2 sin 2 θ
The Dirichlet problem for the determination of the gravity force g is
2 g 2 r 2 g = 0
g | S ( θ ) = g ( θ ) = a ( 1 e 2 ) 2 g a cos 2 θ + b g b sin 2 θ sin 2 θ + ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ a 2 ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + b 2 sin 2 θ
x = r cos θ z = r sin θ
Replacing Equations (67) and (68) in Equation (66),we obtain the following relation:
r = a 1 e 2 1 e 2 cos 2 θ
Let D = (x0, z0) be an arbitrary point on the ellipse (see Figure 1). We consider point Z with coordinates (x0e2, 0), whose position is illustrated in Figure 1 (e is the first eccentricity of the ellipse).
From the triangle ZOD, it holds that φ = θ′+ ω, and
sin ϕ = sin ( θ + ω ) = sin θ cos ω + cos θ sin ω
Line segment OD is equal to r. Line segment DZ is equal to
D Z = x 0 2 ( 1 e 2 ) 2 + z 0 2 = r ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ
In addition,
O Z 2 = O D 2 + D Z 2 2 O D D Z cos ω cos ω = O D 2 + D Z 2 O Z 2 2 O D D Z
cos ω = r 2 + r 2 [ ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ ] e 4 r 2 cos 2 θ 2 r 2 ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ = = 1 + cos 2 θ + e 4 cos 2 θ 2 e 2 cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ e 4 cos 2 θ 2 ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ = ( 1 e 2 cos 2 θ ) ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ
Hence
cos ω = 1 e 2 cos 2 θ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) cos 2 θ
and
sin ω = e 2 sin θ cos θ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) cos 2 θ
Therefore,
P 2 n ( sin ϕ ) = P 2 n ( sin ( θ + ω ) ) = P 2 n ( sin θ cos ω + cos θ sin ω ) = P 2 n ( 1 e 2 cos 2 θ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) cos 2 θ sin θ + e 2 sin θ cos θ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) cos 2 θ cos θ ) = P 2 n ( sin θ e 2 cos 2 θ sin θ + e 2 sin θ cos 2 θ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) cos 2 θ ) = P 2 n ( sin θ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) cos 2 θ )
Equation (73) can also be written as
r = b 1 e 2 cos 2 θ
sin θ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) cos 2 θ = sin θ [ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) cos 2 θ ] 1 2 = sin θ [ 1 e 2 ( 2 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + 3 e 4 ( 2 e 2 ) 2 8 cos 4 θ 15 e 6 ( 2 e 2 ) 4 36 cos 6 θ + ]
b 1 e 2 cos 2 θ = b ( 1 e 2 cos 2 θ ) 1 2 = b ( 1 + e 2 2 cos 2 θ 3 e 4 8 cos 4 θ + 15 e 6 36 cos 6 θ 105 e 8 192 cos 8 θ )
We intend to find a solution to this Dirichlet problem, making a first-level approximation of gravity force g while keeping only terms of e2. The gravity field of the level ellipsoid has rotational symmetry and equatorial plane symmetry. Therefore, the solution contains only Legendre polynomials of even degrees. For small eccentricities, we knowthat (we set ε2 = e2(2 − e2))
P 2 n ( sin ϕ ) = P 2 n ( sin θ ε 2 2 sin θ cos 2 θ )
and
P 2 n ( sin θ ε 2 2 sin θ cos 2 θ ) = P 2 n ( sin θ ) + P 2 n ( sin θ ) ε 2 2 sin θ cos 2 θ
The prime on Legendre polynomials means derivation with respect to the argument θ′.
Equation (83) becomes
b 1 e 2 cos 2 θ = b ( 1 + e 2 2 cos 2 θ 3 e 4 8 cos 4 θ )
The crucial Equation (69) must be subjected to similar approximation with respect to eccentricity. We remark that
[ sin 2 θ + ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ ] 1 2 = ( sin 2 θ + cos 2 θ ε 2 cos 2 θ ) 1 2 = 1 ε 2 2 cos 2 θ
[ a 2 ( 1 e 2 ) 2 cos 2 θ + b 2 sin 2 θ ] 1 2 = b 1 [ ( 1 e 2 ) cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ ] 1 2 = b 1 ( 1 e 2 cos 2 θ ) 1 2 = 1 b ( 1 + e 2 2 cos 2 θ 3 e 4 8 cos 4 θ )
a ( 1 e 2 ) 2 g a cos 2 θ + b g b sin 2 θ = a g a cos 2 θ + b g b sin 2 θ ε 2 a g a cos 2 θ
The Dirichlet condition now becomes
g ( θ ) = ( 1 ε 2 2 cos 2 θ ) ( 1 + e 2 2 cos 2 θ 3 e 4 8 cos 4 θ )                           [ ( 1 ε 2 ) 1 1 e 2 g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ ] = ( 1 + e 2 2 cos 2 θ 3 e 4 8 cos 4 θ ε 2 2 cos 2 θ ) [ ( 1 ε 2 ) ( 1 + e 2 2 3 e 4 8 ) g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ ]
Replacing ε2 = −e4 + 2e2, we have that
( 1 + e 2 2 cos 2 θ 3 e 4 8 cos 4 θ ε 2 2 cos 2 θ ) [ ( 1 ε 2 ) ( 1 + e 2 2 3 e 4 8 ) g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ ] = ( 1 + e 2 2 cos 2 θ 3 e 4 8 cos 4 θ e 4 + 2 e 2 2 cos 2 θ ) [ ( 1 + e 4 2 e 2 ) ( 1 + e 2 2 3 e 4 8 ) g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ ] = = ( 1 e 2 2 cos 2 θ 3 e 4 8 cos 4 θ + e 4 2 cos 2 θ ) [ ( 1 + e 4 2 e 2 ) g a cos 2 θ e 2 ( e 2 + 2 ) g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ ]
Therefore,
g ( θ ) = ( 1 + e 4 2 e 2 ) g a cos 2 θ e 2 ( e 2 + 2 ) g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ e 2 2 ( 1 2 e 2 ) g a cos 4 θ + e 4 g a cos 4 θ e 2 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ 3 e 4 8 g a cos 6 θ 3 e 4 8 g b cos 4 θ sin 2 θ + e 4 2 g a cos 4 θ + e 4 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ
Keeping only the e2 terms, we transform the above relation as follows:
g ( θ ) = ( 1 2 e 2 ) g a cos 2 θ 2 e 2 g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ e 2 2 g a cos 4 θ e 2 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ = g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ 4 e 2 g a cos 2 θ e 2 2 g a cos 4 θ e 2 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ
The solution is a series expansion of the form
g ( r , θ ) = n = 0 + a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ε 2 2 sin θ cos 2 θ ) = n = 0 + a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) + ε 2 2 n = 0 + a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ
On the surface of the ellipsoid, it holds that (again, we keep only the e2 terms and replace ε2 = −e4 + 2e2 on the right-hand side of the equation)
g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ 4 e 2 g a cos 2 θ e 2 2 g a cos 4 θ e 2 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ = n = 0 + a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) + e 2 n = 0 + a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ
We intend to determine the coefficients a2n. Integrating both parts and substituting the radial distance from the e2 approximation of Equation (86), the above relation becomes
1 1 [ g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ 4 e 2 g a cos 2 θ e 2 2 g a cos 4 θ e 2 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ ]       P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = 1 1 n = 0 + a 2 n [ b ( 1 e 2 cos 2 θ ) 1 2 ]     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 [ P 2 n ( sin θ ) + e 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ ] P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
We first determine [13] the integrals involving the terms gacos2θ′ and gbsin2θ′on the left-hand side of Equation (96). This material is shown in Appendix A.
For a chosen truncation value n = n0, Equation (96) can be written in a matrix form:
( A + k 2 B ) X = C
The involved terms are those for which it holds that n = m − 1, n = m, and n = m + 1. Establishing
a ^ 2 n = a 2 n b 1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2
the matrix A is a diagonal matrix of the form
A = [ 1 0 0 0 0 0 A 22 0 0 0 0 0 A 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A n 0 n 0 ]
Along a column m = const. and along a line n = const., the Aii terms (i = 1,2,3,…, n0) are the fundamental terms of the expansions and constitute independent terms of the eccentricity (see Equations (A20), (A25) and (A28)). Matrix B is a matrix of the form
B = k 2 [ B 11 B 12 0 0 0 B 21 B 22 B 23 0 0 0 B 32 B 33 B 34 0 0 0 B 43 B 44 B 45 B n 0 n 0 1 0 0 0 B n 0 1 n 0 B n 0 n 0 ]
Matrix B, in its original form, has a very interesting structure. The principal diagonal is built again with terms which are eccentricity insensitive, while the adjacent diagonals have elements of order O(k2j) (see Equations (A24)–(A33)), where j refers to the diagonal numbering (enumeration away from the principal one).
Omitting all terms which offer O(k4) contribution, the final form of matrix B is a diagonal matrix. The matrix X is of the form
X = [ a ^ 0 a ^ 2 a ^ 4 a ^ 6 a ^ 2 n 0 ] T
The matrix C is of the form
C = [ c 0 c 1 c 2 c 3 c n 0 ] T
The term c0 involves the already-determined integral of Equation (96) for m = 0, i.e., for the integral
c 0 = 1 1 [ g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ 4 e 2 g a cos 2 θ e 2 2 g a cos 4 θ e 2 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ ]                           d ( sin θ )
Term c1 contains another family of calculated integrals:
c 1 = 1 1 [ g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ 4 e 2 g a cos 2 θ e 2 2 g a cos 4 θ e 2 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ ] P 2 ( sin θ ) + e 2 ( g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ ) P 2 ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ d ( sin θ )
which appear on the left-hand side of Equation(96) for m = 1, and so on for the rest of the coefficients ci. In conclusion, we have the following system:
( [ 1 0 0 0 0 0 A 22 0 0 0 0 0 A 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A n 0 n 0 ] + + k 2 [ B 11 B 12 0 0 0 B 12 B 22 B 23 0 0 0 B 23 B 33 B 34 0 0 0 B 43 B 44 B 45 B n 0 1   ,   n 0 0 0 0 B n 0   , n 0 1 B n 0   ,   n 0 ] ) [ a ^ 0 a ^ 2 a ^ 4 a ^ 6 a ^ 2 n 0 ] = [ c 0 c 1 c 2 c 3 c n 0 ]
We suppose that b > 1, k2 << 1 (since e2 << 1); therefore, the above system can be solved. It holds that
( A + k 2 B ) X = C [ A ( I + k 2 A 1 B ) ] X = C X = [ A ( I + k 2 A 1 B ) ] 1 C X = ( I k 2 A 1 B ) A 1 C X = ( A 1 k 2 A 1 B A 1 ) C
The above relation gives the coefficients in Equation (101) up to n = n0. It is worth mentioning that in the limiting case for which e2 = 0 (b = a), Equation (96) becomes
1 1 g a P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = n = 0 + a     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 a 2 n 1 1 P 2 n ( sin θ ) P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
For n = 0 and m = 0,
1 1 g a P 0 ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = 2 g a = 2 G M a 2
n = 0 + a     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 a 2 n 1 1 P 2 n ( sin θ ) P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = 1 a 2 a 0 1 1 d ( sin θ ) = 2 a 0 a 2
Therefore,
2 G M a 2 = 2 a 0 a 2 a 0 = G M
Making all other coefficients a2n (n = 1, 2, 3,…) equal to zero, we end up with the gravity force of a sphere with mass M and radius a.
g ( r , θ ) = G M a 2
From system (105), we have the degenerate case
[ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] [ a 0 a 2 0 0 0 0 ] = [ G M a 2 0 0 0 0 ]
Since the coefficients a2n (n = 1, 2, 3, …, n0) are known, the desired expression for the gravity force of the non-rotating level ellipsoid of revolution is (see Equations (61a), (86) and (94))
g ( r , θ ) = n = 0 n 0 a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 P 2 n ( sin θ )                           + e 2 n = 0 n 0 a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ
or [14]
g ( r , θ ) = n = 0 n 0 a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) + e 2 n = 0 n 0 a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) sin θ [ P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ P 2 n + 1 ( sin θ ) ]
or
g ( r , θ ) = n = 0 n 0 a 2 n r     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2                                                 { P 2 n ( sin θ ) + e 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) sin θ [ P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ P 2 n + 1 ( sin θ ) ] }
with (see Equation(81))
r b 1 e 2 cos 2 θ

5. Conclusions

In this work, we expressed the gravity force of a non-rotating level ellipsoid of revolution, containing mass M, as a series of spherical harmonics. In the second section (“Formulation of a partial differential equation which is related to the spherical gravity force”), we demonstrated that it is possible to formulate a partial differential equation which can be used in order to solve our problem.
In the third section, a classical solution to this partial differential equation was expressed as a series of spherical harmonics. A significant difference of this series (compared to other similar series) was that the powers of the radial distance were irrational numbers (except the first term).
In the fourth section, a Dirichlet problem was formulated in order to find an expression for the gravity force, which was generated by a non-rotating level ellipsoid of revolution. To solve this problem, we imposed a restriction, i.e., the eccentricity of the ellipsoid should be very small. This allowed us to make several approximations, which were for the radial distance of the ellipsoid’s points, the Dirichlet condition, and the Legendre polynomials.
The purpose of future works should be to better define the level of accuracy of the results by incorporating higher powers of eccentricity.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The relation under consideration is
1 1 [ g a cos 2 θ + g b sin 2 θ 4 e 2 g a cos 2 θ e 2 2 g a cos 4 θ e 2 2 g b cos 2 θ sin 2 θ ]       P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = 1 1 n = 0 + a 2 n [ b ( 1 e 2 cos 2 θ ) 1 2 ]     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 [ P 2 n ( sin θ ) + e 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ ] P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
It holds that [13]
1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) g a cos 2 θ d ( sin θ ) = g a 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) ( 1 sin 2 θ ) d ( sin θ ) = g a 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) g a 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) sin 2 θ d ( sin θ ) = g a 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) sin 2 θ d ( sin θ ) = { g a 2 2 m + 1 3 ( m + 1 2 m ) ( 2 m + 3 2 ) = 0         ,         m = 0 , 1 0               ,             m 2
1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) g b sin 2 θ d ( sin θ ) = g b 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) sin 2 θ d ( sin θ ) = { g b 2 2 m + 1 3 ( m + 1 2 m ) ( 2 m + 3 2 ) = 0         ,         m = 0 , 1 0               ,             m 2
The remaining terms on the left-hand side of Equation (A1) can be written as
e 2 1 1 ( 1 sin 2 θ ) [ 4 g a 1 2 g a ( 1 sin 2 θ ) 1 2 g b sin 2 θ ] P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
The above relation is split into two parts:
e 2 1 1 [ 4 g a 1 2 g a ( 1 sin 2 θ ) 1 2 g b sin 2 θ ] P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
and
e 2 1 1 ( sin 2 θ ) [ 4 g a 1 2 g a ( 1 sin 2 θ ) 1 2 g b sin 2 θ ] P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = 4 e 2 g a 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) sin 2 θ d ( sin θ ) e 2 2 g a 1 1 sin 2 θ P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) + e 2 2 g a 1 1 sin 4 θ P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) e 2 2 g b 1 1 sin 4 θ P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
For Equation (A5), we know that
1 1 ( 4 g a e 2 + e 2 2 g a ) P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = 0           ,           m 0
1 1 ( 4 g a e 2 + e 2 2 g a ) P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = 7 e 2 g a           ,           m = 0
e 2 2 g a 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) sin 2 θ d ( sin θ ) = { e 2 2 g a 2 2 m + 1 3 ( m + 1 2 m ) ( 2 m + 3 2 m ) = 0         ,         m = 0 , 1 0               ,             m 2
e 2 2 g b 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) sin 2 θ d ( sin θ ) = { e 2 2 g b 2 2 m + 1 3 ( m + 1 2 m ) ( 2 m + 3 2 ) = 0         ,         m = 0 , 1 0               ,             m 2
From Equation (A6), we know that
4 g a e 2 1 1 P 2 m ( sin θ ) sin 2 θ d ( sin θ ) = { 4 e 2 g a 2 2 m + 1 3 ( m + 1 2 m ) ( 2 m + 3 2 m ) = 0         ,         m = 0 , 1 0               ,             m 2
e 2 2 g a 1 1 sin 2 θ P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = { e 2 2 g a 2 2 m + 1 3 ( m + 1 2 m ) ( 2 m + 3 2 ) = 0         ,         m = 0 , 1 0               ,             m 2
e 2 2 g a 1 1 sin 4 θ P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = { e 2 2 g a 2 2 m + 1 5 ( m + 2 2 m ) ( 2 m + 5 4 ) 0           ,           m 3             ,           m = 0 , 1 , 2
e 2 2 g b 1 1 sin 4 θ P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ ) = { e 2 2 g b 2 2 m + 1 5 ( m + 2 2 m ) ( 2 m + 5 4 ) 0           ,           m 3             ,           m = 0 , 1 , 2
The following integral
1 1 n = 0 + a 2 n [ b ( 1 e 2 cos 2 θ ) 1 2 ]     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 [ P 2 n ( sin θ ) + e 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ ] P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
was determined with the program Mathematica. Making the transformation
( 1 e 2 cos 2 θ ) = ( 1 e 2 + e 2 sin 2 θ ) = ( 1 e 2 ) ( 1 + e 2 1 e 2 sin 2 θ ) = ( 1 e 2 ) ( 1 + k 2 sin 2 θ )
the integral in Equation (A15) is equal to
n = 0 + a 2 n ( 1 e 2 ) 1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 4 b     1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 2 1 1 ( 1 + k 2 sin 2 θ ) 1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 4 [ P 2 n ( sin θ ) + e 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ ] P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
In order to proceed to the integration procedure, we set
I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 4 , n , m ) = 1 1 ( 1 + k 2 sin 2 θ ) 1 + 9 + 4 n ( n + 1 ) 4 [ P 2 n ( sin θ ) + e 2 P 2 n ( sin θ ) sin θ cos 2 θ ]                       P 2 m ( sin θ ) d ( sin θ )
The determination of the above integral involved the hypergeometric function [15]
2 F 1 ( a , b , c , d ) = 1 + l = 1 + a ( a + 1 ) ( a + l 1 ) b ( b + 1 ) ( b + l 1 ) l ! c ( c + 1 ) ( c + l 1 ) d l
Integral (A18) can be determined for chosen indices m and n. We give some examples:
For n = m = 0,
I ( sin θ , k , 1 , 0 , 0 ) = 2 + 2 k 2 3
For n = 2 and m = 0,
I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 33 4 , 2 , 0 ) = 1 8 ( 1 + k 2 ) [ 6 ( 1 + k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 1 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 3 2 , k 2 ) 20 ( 1 + 3 k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 3 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 5 2 , k 2 ) + ( 14 + 94 k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 5 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 7 2 , k 2 ) + 40 k 2 2 F 1 ( 7 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 9 2 , k 2 ) ]
For n = m = 1,
I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 17 4 , 1 , 1 ) = 1 4 ( 1 + k 2 ) [ 2 ( 1 + k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 1 2 , 1 + 17 4 , 3 2 , k 2 ) + 2 ( 1 + 2 k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 3 2 , 1 + 17 4 , 5 2 , k 2 ) + ( 2 + 4 k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 3 2 , 1 + 17 4 , 5 2 , k 2 ) + 42 35 ( 3 + 11 k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 5 2 , 1 + 17 4 , 7 2 , k 2 ) 180 35 k 2 2 F 1 ( 7 2 , 1 + 17 4 , 9 2 , k 2 ) ]
For n = m = 2,
I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 33 4 , 2 , 2 ) = 1 64 ( 1 + k 2 ) [ 18 ( 1 + k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 1 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 3 2 , k 2 ) + 120 ( 1 + 2 k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 3 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 5 2 , k 2 ) ( 444 + 1404 k 2 ) 2 F 1 ( 5 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 7 2 , k 2 ) + ( 600 + 21240 7 k 2 )   2 F 1 ( 7 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 9 2 , k 2 ) ( 2450 + 24850 k 2 9 )   2 F 1 ( 9 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 11 2 , k 2 ) + 9800 11 k 2 2 F 1 ( 11 2 , 1 + 33 4 , 13 2 , k 2 ) ]
The integral I for n = m include a constant term; for m = n + 1, only O(k4) terms; for m = n + 2, only O(k6) terms; and so on. Since we do not have a general formula for the integral I, we provide some examples which were solved by Mathematica. These examples involve Taylor series (keeping the principal terms) of integral I for specific values of n and m.
For n = 1 and m = 0,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 17 4 , 1 , 0 ) ] = 454 + 110 17 375 + 90 17 k 2 146 + 34 17 875 + 90 17 k 4                                                                                               + 2682 + 626 17 7875 + 1890 17 k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 1 and m = 1,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 17 4 , 1 , 1 ) ] = 2 5 + ( 1 6 + 11 17 210 ) k 2 + ( 3 280 + 17 56 ) k 4                                                                                               + ( 1349 18480 1289 17 55440 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 1 and m = 2,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 17 4 , 1 , 2 ) ] = 2 105 ( 7 + 17 ) k 2 + ( 599 3465 13 17 693 ) k 4                                                                                                 + ( 53 308 + 3691 17 180180 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 1 and m = 3,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 17 4 , 1 , 3 ) ] = 1 + 9 17 1001 k 4 + ( 29 2310 + 1037 17 90090 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 2 and m = 2,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 33 4 , 2 , 2 ) ] = 2 9 + ( 17 198 + 14 13 33 ) k 2 + 12215 + 2151 33 360360 k 4                                                                                                 + ( 4567 144144 61 336 33 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 2 and m = 1,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 33 4 , 2 , 1 ) ] = 2 105 ( 21 + 33 ) k 2 + ( 25 99 + 173 105 33 ) k 4                                                                                                 + ( 107 252 2027 1092 33 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 2 and m = 0,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 33 4 , 2 , 0 ) ] = 2 315 ( 35 + 19 33 ) k 4 + ( 13 126 97 42 33 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 2 and m = 3,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 33 4 , 2 , 3 ) ] = 5 429 ( 15 + 33 ) k 2 + ( 541 2574 421 546 33 ) k 4                                                                                                   + ( 292517 1225224 + 34603 37128 33 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 2 and m = 4,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 33 4 , 2 , 4 ) ] = ( 14 21879 + 14 39 33 ) k 4                                                                                                       + ( 1397 37791 + 461 969 33 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )
For n = 2 and m = 5,
T [ I ( sin θ , k , 1 + 33 4 , 2 , 5 ) ] = ( 10 969 + 350 12597 33 ) k 6 + O ( k 8 )

References

  1. Moritz, H. Geodetic Reference System 1980. Bull. Géodésique 1980, 54, 395–405. Available online: https://geodesy.geology.ohio-state.edu/course/refpapers/00740128.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2023). [CrossRef]
  2. Heiskanen, W.; Moritz, H. Physical Geodesy; W. H. Freeman and Company: San Francisco, CA, USA; London, UK, 1967; pp. 23, 69, 70. Available online: https://archive.org/details/HeiskanenMoritz1967PhysicalGeodesy (accessed on 15 January 2023).
  3. Li, X.; Götze, H.J. Tutorial, Ellipsoid, geoid, gravity, geodesy and geophysics. Geophysics 2001, 66, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vermeer, M. Physical Geodesy; Aalto University Publication Series Science and Technology; Aalto University: Espoo, Finland, 2020; pp. 85–103. Available online: https://users.aalto.fi/~mvermeer/fys-en.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  5. Balmino, G. A note of ellipsoidal shape and gravitational potential, first order relationships in planetary geodesy. Artif. Satell. 2007, 42, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Torppa, J.; Hentunen, V.P.; Pääkkönen PKehusmaa, P.; Muinonen, K. Asteroid shape and spin statistics for convex models. Icarus 2008, 198, 91. Available online: https://hal.science/hal-00499092/document (accessed on 15 March 2023). [CrossRef]
  7. Lu, X.; Zhao, H.; You, Z. A Fast Elleipsoid Model for Asteroids Inverted from Lightcurves. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 13, 471–478. Available online: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-4527/13/4/008/pdf (accessed on 15 March 2023). [CrossRef]
  8. Lambert, W.D. The Gravity Field for an Ellipsoid of Revolution as a Level Surface. Ohio State University Research Foundation 1952, Photographic Reconnaissance Laboratory, Contract No. AF 18 (600)-90 RDO No. 683-44 RDO No. 683-58,Wright Air, Development Center Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, WADC Technical Report 52–151. pp. 1–39. Available online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA075988.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  9. Jekeli, C. Geometric Reference Systems in Geodesy; Division of Geodetic Science, School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University: Columbus, OH, USA, 2016; pp. 2-51–2-54. Available online: https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/77986/Geom_Ref_Sys_Geodesy_2016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 15 March 2023).
  10. Manoussakis, G.; Delikaraoglou, D.; Ferentinos, G. An alternative approach for the determination of orthometric heights using a circular arc approximation of the plumbline. In Proceedings of the Commission 2 “GS002 Symposium of the Gravity Field”, General Assembly of the International Association of Geodesy and Geophysics (IAG), Perugia, Italy, 2–13 July 2007; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 133, pp. 245–252. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-85426-5_29 (accessed on 3 February 2023).
  11. Morse, P.; Feshbach, H. Methods of Theoretical Physics; Mc Graw–Hill, Book Company, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1953; p. 1264. Available online: https://context4book.com/download/4739606-morse-and-feshbach-methods-in-theoretical-physics (accessed on 3 February 2023).
  12. Deakin, R.E.; Hunter, M.N. Geometric Geodesy, Part A; School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences, RMIT University: Melbourne, Australia, 2013; p. 52. Available online: http://www.mygeodesy.id.au/documents/Geometric%20Geodesy%20A(2013).pdf (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  13. López-Bonilla, J.; Vidal-Beltrán, S. Some Integrals Involving Legendre Polynomials. Stud. Nonlinear Sci. 2022, 7, 17–19. Available online: https://idosi.org/sns/7(2)22/2.pdf (accessed on 9 March 2023).
  14. Bell, W.W. Special Functions for Scientists and Engineers; D. Van Nostrand Company: London, UK, 1967; p. 58. Available online: https://www.kau.edu.sa (accessed on 10 March 2023).
  15. Olver, F.W.J. Asymptotics and Special Functions; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974; p. 159. Available online: https://archive.org/details/asymptoticsspeci0000olve/mode/2up (accessed on 9 March 2023).
Figure 1. Let γ be an ellipse with semimajor axis a and semiminor axis b.
Figure 1. Let γ be an ellipse with semimajor axis a and semiminor axis b.
Mathematics 11 01974 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Manoussakis, G. The Gravity Force Generated by a Non-Rotating Level Ellipsoid of Revolution with Low Eccentricity as a Series of Spherical Harmonics. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11091974

AMA Style

Manoussakis G. The Gravity Force Generated by a Non-Rotating Level Ellipsoid of Revolution with Low Eccentricity as a Series of Spherical Harmonics. Mathematics. 2023; 11(9):1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11091974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Manoussakis, Gerassimos. 2023. "The Gravity Force Generated by a Non-Rotating Level Ellipsoid of Revolution with Low Eccentricity as a Series of Spherical Harmonics" Mathematics 11, no. 9: 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11091974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop