1. Introduction
Sugeno investigated the theory of fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals as a tool for modeling non-deterministic issues. The fuzzy integral (also known as the Sugeno integral) has profoundly amazing mathematical characteristics that have been noted by several authors. Sugeno pioneered the study of the theory of nonadditive measures and integrals, frequently referred to as fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals [
1]. Ralescu and Adams [
2] investigated numerous equivalent definitions of fuzzy integral, whereas Wang and Klir [
3,
4,
5] offered an outline of fuzzy measure theory and generalized fuzzy measure theory, respectively. Fuzzy measures and the Sugeno integral have also been successfully employed in a variety of domains, including decision-making [
6] and artificial intelligence [
7]. Integral inequalities are useful tools in a variety of theoretical and practical applications. The investigation of inequalities for the Sugeno integral was started by Román-Flores et al. in [
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13], and was subsequently expanded upon by Ouyang et al. in [
14,
15,
16].
Many researchers studied celebrated inequalities using the Sugeno integral; for example, Hu [
17] proved the following Chebyshev-type inequalities for a Sugeno-like integral by using a binary operation called
g-seminorm.
Theorem 1 ([
17]).
Let be a left continuous and non-decreasing n-place function. Let be any strictly monotone increasing bijection, and suppose that is any comonotone system. If the g-seminorm G satisfiesfor all , then for any we have Caballero and Sadarangani [
18] developed a Cauchy–Schwarz-type inequality for the Sugeno integral.
Theorem 2 ([
18]).
Let be a fuzzy measure space, , ( is the set of all non-negative measurable functions with respect to Σ) and f and g comonotone functions, with . Then, Agahi et al. [
19] shown a generalization of the Stolarsky inequality for a Sugeno integral as follows:
Theorem 3 ([
19]).
Let be a nonincreasing function, a fuzzy measure space, and define by for . Let be automorphisms on (i.e., are increasing bijections) and is a continuous aggregation function that is jointly strictly increasing and bounded from above by min, and which is dominated by h, i.e., for all from , it holdsthenwhere means the composite function defined on and given by . We also refer the reader to Ouyang et al. [
16], which contains the study of the Minkowski type for the Sugeno integral on abstract spaces.
Theorem 4 ([
16]).
Let μ be an arbitrary fuzzy measure on and be two real-valued measurable functions such that and . If are both non-decreasing, then the inequalityholds. Caballero and Sadarangani [
20] have shown that the classical Hermite–Hadamard inequalities [
21,
22] do not hold true for fuzzy integrals in general and established some Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for the Sugeno integral with peculiar examples to validate their results.
The main results from [
20] are stated in the following theorems.
Theorem 5 ([
20]).
Let be a convex function and μ the Lebesgue measure on . Recently, the integral inequalities for Sugeno integrals using different kinds of convexities and other results on several other types of inequalities based on Sugeno integrals are a thought-provoking topic to many authors in the field of fuzzy integrals, see for instance [
20,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37] and the references cited therein.
The integral inequalities for coordinated convex functions in the context of Sugeno integrals have not been investigated in any study so far. Hence, motivated by the ongoing research about the integral inequalities for the Sugeno integrals involving the different kinds of convex functions, it is the main objective of this paper to obtain Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for Sugeno double integrals by using coordinated convex functions.
2. Main Results
In order to proceed to our results, we first give some basic notations and properties of Sugeno integral.
Definition 1 ([
20]).
Suppose that Σ
is σ-algebra of subsets of and that is non-negative extended real valued set function, then μ is said to be fuzzy measure if and only if:- 1.
,
- 2.
E, and imply that (monotonicity),
- 3.
, , imply (continuity from below),
- 4.
, , , imply (continuity from above).
If f is a non-negative real-valued function defined on , we will denote by the -level of f, for and =supp the support of f. It may be noted that if , then . If is fuzzy measure on , by , we mean all -measurable functions from to .
Definition 2 ([
20]).
Suppose that μ is a fuzzy measure on . If and then the Sugeno integral (or fuzzy integral) of f on A with respect to the fuzzy measure μ is defined as: where ∨ and ∧ denote the supremum and infimum on , respectively. In particular, if , then The following properties of the Sugeno integral are well known and can be found in [
5].
Proposition 1 ([
5]).
If μ is a fuzzy measure on , and f, then- 1.
.
- 2.
.
- 3.
If on A, then .
- 4.
.
- 5.
.
- 6.
if and only if there exists such that .
- 7.
if and only if there exists such that .
Definition 3 ([
20]).
If μ is a fuzzy measure on , and then the survival function F associated to f on A is defined by where . Remark 1 ([
20]).
Consider the survival function F associated to f on A, that is, . If and , from (4) and (5) of Proposition 1, we obtain The above equation implies that any fuzzy integral can be calculated by solving the equation . Theorem 6 ([
38]).
Let and be two fuzzy measure spaces and f be a -measurable function. Then, there exists a fuzzy measure m on such that Considering the characteristic function of , we have . Remark 2 ([
13]).
In the sequel, μ will denote the Lebesgue measure on and will denote the Lebesgue measure on . We recall that if are two μ-measurable subsets of , then For more details on Sugeno integral we refer the interested readers to [
1,
5].
The classical Hermite–Hadamard inequalities provide estimates of the mean value of a convex function
The inequalities (
1) were first discovered by C. Hermite [
22] in 1893 and J. Hadamard proved it independently again in [
21]. The inequalities (
1) have numerous generalizations and extensions, we the refer the reader to [
20,
35,
37,
39,
40,
41,
42,
43,
44,
45,
46,
47] and the references cited therein.
We recall some definitions and Hermite–Hadamard-type integral inequalities for coordinated convex functions on in .
Definition 4 ([
39]).
Let in with and be a bidimensional interval. A mapping is said to be convex on Δ
if the inequality holds for all and . Dragomir [
39] modified Definition 4 of convex functions on
, known as coordinated convex functions as follows.
Definition 5 ([
39]).
A function is said to be convex on the coordinates on Δ
if the partial mappings , and , are convex where defined for all , . Remark 3 ([
41]).
It is clear that if a function is convex on the coordinates on Δ
, then holds for all and . The following Hermite–Hadamard-type for coordinated convex functions on the rectangle from the plane
were proved in ([
39], Theorem 1, page 778):
Theorem 7 ([
39]).
If is coordinated convex on Δ
, then The above inequalities are sharp. We will see that this inequality does not hold true for fuzzy integrals in general.
Example 1. Take and let μ be the Lebesgue measure on X and Y. Then, will denote the Lebesgue measure on . Let be defined as , then the function is convex on the coordinates on . Now, we calculate the Sugeno integral . By using the Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals, we observe thatLet F be the survival function associated to on , thenThus,According to Remark 1, we obtainHenceFinally,We can see that the third and the fourth inequalities in (2) are not satisfied in the fuzzy context. Example 2. Take and let μ be the Lebesgue measure on X and Y. Then, will denote the Lebesgue measure on . Let be defined as , then the function is convex on the coordinates on . Now, we calculate the Sugeno integral . By using the Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals and Remark 1, we observe that andSuppose that F is the survival function associated to on . Then,Thus,According to Remark 1, we obtainHence,Lastly,which shows that the first and the second inequalities in (2) are also not satisfied in the fuzzy framework. Now we prove estimates for the third and the fourth inequalities in (
2) but for the Sugeno integral. In order to obtain our main results, we will use a non-additivity assumption of integrals together with the Lebesgue measure, that is, we use the fuzzy context to prove the results.
Our first result gives estimates of the integrals involved in the fourth inequality in (
2) for fuzzy integrals over the interval
.
Theorem 8. Let be a convex function on the coordinates on . Let be the Lebesgue measure on .
- 1.
If , then - 2.
If , then
Proof. By the coordinated convexity of
g on
that
and hence by 3. of Proposition 1, we obtain
If we consider the survival function
F together with the assumption
. Then, according to Remark 1, we obtain
The solution of the Equation (
5) is
.
Applying 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
The solution
of the Equation (
5) together with (
6) prove the inequality (
3).
Since
g is convex on the coordinates on
, we find that
and hence by 3. of Proposition 1, we obtain
Suppose
F is the survival function and
, then according to Remark 1, we obtain
The solution of the Equation (
7) is
.
Applying 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
The solution
of the Equation (
7) together with (
8) prove the inequality (
4). □
Remark 4. If , thenIf , then The second result provides an estimate of the first integral of the third inequality in (
2) for fuzzy integrals over the interval
.
Theorem 9. Let be a convex function on the coordinates on such that and . Let be the Lebesgue measure on , thenwhere α is a positive solution of the equation Proof. Since
g is a convex function on the coordinates on
. Therefore, for
, we obtain
Suppose
F is the survival function with respect to the variable
x together with
and
. By 3. of Proposition 1 and by using the Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals and Remark 1, we have
where
is a positive solution of the equation
However, according to 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
A positive solution of (
14) and (
15), we obtain (
11). □
Remark 5. If , and in Theorem 9, then from (13) we obtain Another estimate of the first integral of the third inequality in (
2) for fuzzy integrals over the interval
can be determined as given in the following remark.
Remark 6. Since g is a convex function on the coordinates on , we obtainandHence, by 1., 3. of Proposition 1 and Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals, we obtainandThus, from (3), (4), (17) and (18), we find thatIt is clear that from (11) and (19) that the inequalityholds, where α is a positive solution of the Equation (12). The following example illustrates how to obtain an estimate for the first integral of the third inequality in (
2) using fuzzy integrals.
Example 3. Take , and let μ be the Lebesgue measure on X and Y. Suppose that is defined as and is the Lebesgue measure on .
Since , hence by 1. of Theorem 8, we haveWe observe that , hence by 2. of Theorem 8, we obtainFinally, (20) giveswhere α is a positive root of the equationThe solution of this equation isandThus, The next result gives different estimates of the integral involved in the fourth inequality in (
2) for fuzzy integrals over the interval
.
Theorem 10. Let be a convex function on the coordinates on . Let be the Lebesgue measure on .
- 1.
If , then - 2.
If , then
Proof. By the coordinated convexity of
g on
, we find that
and hence by 3. of Proposition 1, we obtain
If we consider the survival function
F together with the condition
, then according to Remark 1, we obtain
The solution of the Equation (
23) is
.
Applying 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
The solution of Equation (
23) together with (
24) give us the required inequality (
21).
Since
g is convex on the coordinates on
, we find that
and hence by 3. of Proposition 1, we obtain
Suppose
F is the survival function and
, then according to Remark 1, we obtain
The solution of Equation (
25) is
.
Applying 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
The solutions of Equation (
25) and inequality (
26) give us inequality (
22). □
Remark 7. If in Theorem 8, then and if , then We can obtain some different estimates of the integral involved in the fourth inequality in (
2) for fuzzy integrals over the interval
if we replace “>” with “<” in the assumptions of Theorem 10.
Theorem 11. Let be a convex function on the coordinates on such that and . Let be the Lebesgue measure on , thenwhere α is a positive solution of the equation Proof. Since
g is a convex function on the coordinates on
. Hence, for
, we have the inequality
Suppose
F is the survival function with respect to the variable
x together with
and
G is the survival function with respect to the variable
y together with
. By 3. of Proposition 1 and by using the Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals and Remark 1, we have
where
is a positive solution of the equation
However, according to 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
A positive solution of (
32) and inequality (
33) give us the desired inequality (
29). □
Remark 8. If , and in Theorem 11, then from (31) we obtain A complementary estimate of the first integral of the third inequality in (
2) for fuzzy integrals over the interval
is given in the remark below.
Remark 9. Since is a convex function on the coordinates on , we obtainandHence by 1., 3. of Proposition 1 and Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals, we obtainandThus, from (21), (22), (35) and (36), we obtainIt is clear from (29) and (37) that the inequalityholds, where α is a positive solution of the Equation (30). The following example illustrates the method for the calculation of the estimates of the first integral of the third inequality in (
2).
Example 4. Take , and let μ be the Lebesgue measure on X and Y. Suppose that is defined as and be the Lebesgue measure on .
Since , hence by 1. of Theorem 9, we haveWe observe that , hence by 2. of Theorem 9, we obtainFinally, (30) givesThe solutions of this equation areandThus, In the sequel, we will prove the general case of Theorems 8–11 and examples related to these theorems.
Theorem 12. Let be a convex function on the coordinates on . Let be the Lebesgue measure on .
- 1.
If , then - 2.
If , then
Proof. By the coordinated convexity of
g on
, we find that
and hence by 3. of Proposition 1, we obtain
If we consider the survival function
F and
, then according to Remark 1, we obtain
The solution of Equation (
41) is
.
Applying 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
The solutions of Equations (
41) and (
42) give us (
39).
Since
g is convex on the coordinates on
, we find that
and hence by 3. of Proposition 1, we obtain
Suppose
F is the survival function and
, then according to Remark 1, we obtain
The solution of Equation (
43) is
.
Applying 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
The solution of Equation (
43) and the inequality (
44) give us the inequality (
40). □
Remark 10. If in Theorem 12, thenand if , then Theorem 13. Let be a convex function on the coordinates on such that and . Let be the Lebesgue measure on , thenwhere α is a positive solution of the equation Proof. Since
g is a convex function on the coordinates on
. Therefore, for
, we obtain
Suppose
F is the survival function with respect to the variable
x together with
and
. By 3. of Proposition 1 and by using the Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals and Remark 1, we have
where
is a positive solution of the equation
However, according to 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
A positive solution of (
50) and the inequality (
51) give us the desired inequality (
47). □
Remark 11. If in Theorem 13 the conditions , and hold, then Remark 12. Since g is a convex function on the coordinates on , we obtainandHence, by 1., and 3. of Proposition 1 and the Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals, we obtainandThus, from (39), (40), (53) and (54), we observe that the inequalityholds. It is clear from (54) and (55) that the inequalityholds, where α is a positive solution of the Equation (48). Theorem 14. Let be a convex function on the coordinates on . Let be the Lebesgue measure on .
- 1.
If , then - 2.
If , then
Proof. By the coordinated convexity of
g on
that
and hence by 3. of Proposition 1, we obtain
If we consider the survival function
F and
, then according to Remark 1, we obtain that
The solution of Equation (
59) is
.
Applying 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
The solution of Equation (
59) and the inequality (
60) give the inequality (
57).
Since
g is convex on the coordinates on
, we find that
and hence by 3. of Proposition 1, we obtain
Suppose
F is the survival function and if
, then according to Remark 1, we obtain
The solution of Equation (
61) is
.
Applying 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
The solution of Equation (
61) and inequality (
62) yield the inequality (
58). □
Remark 13. If in Theorem 14, thenand if , then Theorem 15. Let be a convex function on the coordinates on such that and . Let be the Lebesgue measure on , thenwhere α is a positive solution of the equation Proof. Since
g is a convex function on the coordinates on
. Therefore, for
, we obtain
Suppose
F is the survival function with respect to the variable
x together with the assumptions
and
. By 3. of Proposition 1 and by using the Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals and Remark 1, we have
where
is a positive solution of the equation
However, according to 1. of Proposition 1, we obtain
A positive solution of (
68) and the inequality (
69) prove the desired inequality (
66). □
Remark 14. Suppose that , and in Theorem 15, then Remark 15. Since is a convex function on the coordinates on , we obtainandHence, by 1. and 3. of Proposition 1 and the Fubini theorem for fuzzy integrals, we obtainandThus, from (57), (58), (71) and (72), we find thatIt is clear from (72) and (73), that the inequalityholds, where α is a positive solution of the Equation (66). Example 5. Take , and let μ be the Lebesgue measure on X and Y. Suppose that is defined as and be the Lebesgue measure on .
Since , hence by 1. of Theorem 12, we haveWe observe that , hence by 2. of Theorem 12, we obtainFinally, (56) giveswhere α is a positive root of the equationThe solution of this equation isandThus, Example 6. Take , and let μ be the Lebesgue measure on X and Y. Suppose that is defined as and be the Lebesgue measure on .
Since , hence by 1. of Theorem 14, we have, thenWe observe that , hence by 2. of Theorem 14, we obtainFinally, (74) giveswhere α is a positive root of the equationThe solution of this equation isandThus,