Next Article in Journal
Progesterone Suppresses Uterine Contraction by Reducing Odontogenic Porphyromonas gingivalis Induced Chronic Inflammation in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Lipid Readjustment in Yarrowia lipolytica Odd-Chain Fatty Acids Producing Strains
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/biom12081027
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Silicon as a Smart Fertilizer for Sustainability and Crop Improvement

by
Rupesh Tayade
,
Amit Ghimire
,
Waleed Khan
,
Liny Lay
,
John Quarshie Attipoe
and
Yoonha Kim
*
Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(8), 1027; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12081027
Submission received: 30 June 2022 / Revised: 22 July 2022 / Accepted: 23 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metalloids and Organo-Metalloids in Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Silicon (Si), despite being abundant in nature, is still not considered a necessary element for plants. Si supplementation in plants has been extensively studied over the last two decades, and the role of Si in alleviating biotic and abiotic stress has been well documented. Owing to the noncorrosive nature and sustainability of elemental Si, Si fertilization in agricultural practices has gained more attention. In this review, we provide an overview of different smart fertilizer types, application of Si fertilizers in agriculture, availability of Si fertilizers, and experiments conducted in greenhouses, growth chambers, and open fields. We also discuss the prospects of promoting Si as a smart fertilizer among farmers and the research community for sustainable agriculture and yield improvement. Literature review and empirical studies have suggested that the application of Si-based fertilizers is expected to increase in the future. With the potential of nanotechnology, new nanoSi (NSi) fertilizer applications may further increase the use and efficiency of Si fertilizers. However, the general awareness and scientific investigation of NSi need to be thoughtfully considered. Thus, we believe this review can provide insight for further research into Si fertilizers as well as promote Si as a smart fertilizer for sustainability and crop improvement.

1. Introduction

Silicon (Si) is a metalloid element and is the most commonly found element in the earth’s crust after oxygen [1]. Orthosilicic acid is the plant available form of silicon present in a small amount in the soil, which is absorbed by plant roots at pH < 9, and its concentration ranges between 0.1 to 0.6 nM [2]. The effect of Si application on several plant species has been proven for several decades, and research has shown numerous advantageous effects of Si on different plant attributes including vegetative growth, development, production, and reduction of biotic and abiotic stress [3,4,5,6]. Other Si-driven benefits include increase in photosynthetic rate, lower transpiration rate, and resistance to UV-B radiation [7].
Plants face several biotic and abiotic challenges, such as pathogenic infections, insect pest damage, drought, flooding, salinity, and metal toxicity. The availability of Si in plants is inadequate in most agricultural soils [2,8,9]. Hence, Si is commonly supplied as a fertilizer to assess the impact on plants. Vegetable and fruit crops, some dicotyledonous plants, and monocotyledonous plants can actively absorb and accumulate Si at high levels in their plant tissues [1,10]. Application of Si fertilizer takes into account soil fertility, crop needs, soil moisture patterns, and crop uptake of nutrients from the soil, also help in maintaining the ratio of nutrients withdrawn by crops in check [4]. The utilization of Si fertilizers has resulted in increased plant growth rate, higher productivity, protection against a wide range of pathogen invasions, and adaptation to unfavorable environmental conditions [2,5,6]. For example, in rice (Oryza sativa), application of Si fertilization resulted in increases in the culm wall thickness, vascular bundle size, and peroxidase activity, thereby increasing stress tolerance, stem strength, and preventing lodging [11,12]. Similarly, Si supplementation as a fertilizer tends to alter level of proline in upland rice cultivars during water stress in the vegetative and reproductive stages; this effect could be indicative of stress tolerance [13]. In addition, supplementation with Si is thought to increase the water flow rate in the xylem vessels and improve water use efficiency by reducing water loss through transpiration in plants under drought stress in maize (Zea mays) [14,15,16]. Murillo-Amador et al. (2007) [17] reported that sodium chloride (NaCl) stress in cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) and kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) caused significant reductions in plant growth; however, Si supplementation greatly improved their growth by increasing net photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, and intercellular carbon dioxide [14]. Si supplementation improved the oxidative defense system of waterlogged crops, thereby enhancing their tolerance to flooding). Moreover, Si induces a defense against different insects and pests, including sugarcane stalk borers, leaf spiders, stem borers, green leafhoppers, brown planthoppers, and mites [18,19,20]. Conclusively, Si-based compounds have multiple and diverse uses in crop production in the agricultural sector.
Globally, crop species face challenges from climate change, and abiotic and biotic stresses lead to significant crop yield reductions. The current crop production trend is not sufficient to meet the growing demand driven by the population rise by 2050 [21]. Therefore, numerous management technologies are required to boost crop productivity. It should be noted that sustainability is vital for the future of agriculture as well as the planet. In this context, the improvement of fertilizers, such as Si fertilizer application, can greatly influence plant attributes and aid in improving plant health and yield. The impact of Si fertilizer on crop growth, yield, and quality is well recognized. Si fertilizers (organic and inorganic) are high-quality fertilizers considered eco-friendly and sustainable for agriculture because of their noncorrosive and pollution-free nature; they can also be inexpensive and thus be considered “smart fertilizers.” In addition, silicate fertilizers are used for soil pH correction and in macro- and micronutrient acquisition, particularly when slag or Si-containing mineral ores are utilized as silicate fertilizer sources [22].
In this review, we present an overview of the different smart fertilizers; application of Si fertilizer in agriculture (monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants); availability of Si fertilizers; experiments conducted in greenhouses, growth chambers, and open fields; and prospects to promote Si as a smart fertilizer among farmers and the research community for sustainable agriculture and yield improvement.

2. Smart Fertilizer Types

In general, smart fertilizers are fertilizers applied in soil that allow for managing the rate, timing, nutrient release duration, and active absorption by the plant roots [23]. Recently, Raimodi et al. (2021) [24] defined a smart fertilizer as “any single or composed nanomaterial, multicomponent, and/or bioformulation containing one or more nutrients that can adapt the timing of nutrient release to the plant nutrient demand via physical, chemical, and/or biological processes, thereby improving crop growth and development and reducing environmental impact when compared to conventional fertilizers.” Smart fertilizers are classified as (i) nano fertilizers, (ii) composite fertilizers, and (iii) bioformulations [24].
Nano fertilizers, which are based on nanoparticles, as their name suggests, are available as powder or liquid formulations, including manufacturing, design, and application [24]. These fertilizers can help improve nutrient release kinetics and plant uptake efficiency [25], resulting in benefits including increased crop productivity [26,27,28,29], decreased nutrient loss to the environment [30] and enhanced nutritional quality and shelf life [31].
Composite fertilizers are composed of various materials containing one or more nutrients that have been developed to take advantage of material synergy and improve essential plant nutrition [24,32]. Based on material properties, organic and inorganic coating materials (including granules and hydrophobic or hydrophilic materials [matrix or gel]) and inorganic compounds with low solubility are commonly used for coating or mixing fertilizers [24,33,34,35,36,37].
Bioformulations are fertilizers containing active or dormant microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi capable of influencing physiological growth responses, nutrition, and protection improvement in plants [38].
The precision of fertilizer usage has become a vital point in the agricultural sector worldwide because of the need for increased productivity and reduced over-fertilization with negative impacts on the agricultural ecosystem [39]. From these viewpoints, smart fertilizers have been utilized to boost agronomic fertilizer efficiency while lowering environmental impact and fertilizer costs. Consequently, several novel fertilizers have been developed.

3. Effects of Si Fertilizers on Crops under Controlled Environmental Conditions

Si uptake and translocation in plants are influenced by the type of plant, the type of root system, and the chemical composition of the soil [40]. In the soil-plant system, Si fertilizer has a bifurcated impact. First, it strengthens the plant’s protective properties against biotic and abiotic stress. Second, the addition of biogeochemically active Si compounds to soil improves the soil’s physical, chemical, and water content, as well as the availability of nutrients in plant-available forms [41]. Si fertilizer application has a positive impact on plant growth, mineral nutrient balance, and lodging. Foliar application of potassium silicate and magnesium silicate fertilizers improved the nutrient content and yield in flax [42]. Si supplemented plants were also observed to have improved root characteristics, such as total root length, root surface area, and lateral root length, thus inducing plant resistance to drought [43] and element deficiency conditions [44]. Despite the large differences in Si uptake among rice, tomato, cotton, onion, and chili, amorphous Si fertilizer showed improved productivity in all crops [45].
Globally, 50% of crop loss occurrence is due to abiotic stress [4,46]. Si fertilizers have a substantial impact on abiotic and biotic stress tolerance, including drought stress, temperature tolerance, UV tolerance and disease/pest resistance respectively. Reportedly, Si fertilization in grapevines elicited an induced chemical response to pest attack and induced defenses against pests [47]. According to Lemes et al. (2011), the utilization of Si fertilizer decreased the quantity and rate of fungicide application, lowered production cost, and optimized control practices in areas where Si was naturally low.
Studies on monocotyledonous and various dicotyledonous plant species in greenhouses/growth chambers have demonstrated that Si fertilizer increases resistance level against biotic stress, including lepidoptera, hemiptera, homoptera, diptera, thysanoptera, oleoptera, and non-insect pest attacks [19,48,49,50]. Si fertilizer also reduces the susceptibility of many monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant species to fungal diseases [51]. However, there have been some contradictory reports suggesting no significant differences in the control of gray leaf spots. For example, Nanayakkara et al. [52] conducted experiments in a controlled environment using two sources of Si supplement: calcium silicate and wollastonite (calcium inosilicate). The authors found that Si sources had no significant differences in the control of gray leaf spot of perennial ryegrass turf compared with control rice plants that absorbed an ample amount of Si (up to 10% of shoot dry weight) in the form of monosilicic acid, which further accumulated in the form of a cuticle-Si double layer [53]. Monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants have a large number of Si transporters (influx and efflux). The Si uptake mechanism differs across monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants because of the differences in their root architecture [54]. Monocots can accumulate Si up to 10% of the plant mass, whereas most dicots can accumulate less Si [42,55,56,57]. The following families increase Si uptake and utilization: among the monocotyledonous plants, Poaceae (Gramineae) and Cyperaceae [58], and among the dicotyledonous plants, Fabaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Rosales, and Asteraceae. However, the shoots of dicotyledonous plants are unable to gather high levels of Si. In a perennial dicotyledonous strawberry plant study, the greenhouse experiment showed an increase in vegetative growth and fruit dry weight after Si fertilization [59].
Studies on numerous monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous crop plants have shown that Si has beneficial effects; these effects of Si are more obvious when the plants are under stress (Table 1). Overall, the effect of Si-based fertilizers on different plant species is well established, but the mechanisms underlying their beneficial effects are still elusive. In Figure 1, we illustrate the mechanism of Si uptake and transport from the roots to the different plant parts. The ways by which Si uptake and transport influence the other general mechanisms of plants, which result in altered plant attributes, including abiotic, biotic stress tolerance and yield enhancement, are also presented in this figure.

4. Application of Si under Field Condition

Generally, intense weathering, leaching, and intense agricultural practices promote desilication and Si removal from soil. Fertilizers are critical to the global food supply. Farmers typically utilize individual commercial chemical fertilizers to meet the nutrient needs of plants. As they are cost-effective and provide quick results, such fertilizers are widely used by farmers [94]. A positive effect of Si fertilization on some essential plant nutrients has also been reported. Silicon fertilization has a dual effect on the soil-plant system. First, it improves plant Si nutrition and increases plant resistance against diseases, insect attacks, and unfavorable environmental conditions, such as drought, salt, heavy metals, and hydrocarbon toxicity. Second, soil treatment with biogeochemically active Si substances optimizes soil fertility through improved water, physical, and chemical soil properties and maintenance of nutrients in plant-available forms. On average, Si fertilization increases the yield by 10–25% [41]. When Si was applied to barley grown under flooding conditions, it reduced the intensity of oxidative damage without any significant change in the antioxidant activity; a reduction of nitrous oxide production in the flooded soil was also observed [95]. Likewise, another source of Si—potassium silicate (K2SiO3)—when sprayed on the leaves of maize plants, increased water use efficiency and yield under low irrigation conditions as well as enhanced protein and oil contents of the grain [96]. In one study, the application of Si fertilizer increased N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn concentrations. Sugarcane parameters showed a positive relationship with Si in plants; the height and stalk diameter and the dry leaf biomass were 50, 58, and 71% higher compared with those of the control plants. In addition, damage caused by the stalk borer was significantly reduced because of the accumulation of Si [97]. Different sources of Si fertilizers are available for application in the field, as shown in Figure 2.

5. Various Si Sources for Si Fertilizer Application

Industrial wastes such as blast furnace slag, steel slag, fly ash, and bottom ash are known to be potential silica fertilizers [100,101]. Particularly, steel slag is a by-product material formed during the process of manufacturing steel from iron, whose volume accounts for 15–20% of the total steel produced [102]. The basic properties of slag vary according to the manufacturing, cooling, and valorization processes [103]. The nutrient constituents of steel slag are calcium oxide CaO (40–50%), silicon dioxide SiO2 (10–28%), iron Fe (17–28%), traces of magnesium oxide MgO (2.5–10%), and manganese oxide MnO (1.5–6%) [104]. These slags, produced as byproducts, have been used in agricultural fields as Si supplements. However, only a few studies have been conducted to distinguish the effects of different slag-based fertilizers on plant growth and disease incidence. For example, steel slag- and iron slag-based Si fertilizers were used to determine their effects on yield parameters and disease incidence in rice [105]. The authors reported that steel slag showed a stronger effect than iron slag in increasing the yield and lowering the incidence of brown-spot disease in rice.
Approximately 80 million tons of rice husk/hulls is produced worldwide, which comprises nearly 3.2 million tons of Si, mainly in the form of ‘opaline silica’ [106]. When converted into biochar under partial oxygen, this nutrient-rich rice husk is used as an effective soil ameliorant [107]. Rice husk biochar (RHB) decreased the level of insect infestation, while simultaneously increasing the level of Si in leaves of brinjal plants [108]. Similarly, when used together, Si-rich rice husk ash (RHA) and RHB lowered the amount of inorganic arsenic buildup in rice grains [109]. The studies also concluded that Si obtained from sources such as RHB and RHA would be available in a more soluble form than Si from silicate minerals. Previously, it was reported that K2SiO3 also developed resistance to disease incidence, and its application suppressed powdery mildew in strawberries [110] and mildew in tomato plants [111]. In addition, foliar application of another source of Si, sodium silicate (Na2SiO3), on maize increased the chlorophyll and carotenoid contents and the uptake of potassium and calcium by plants under drought stress conditions [112]. Another study evaluating the effects of Na2SiO3 in response to disease occurrence showed that the use of Na2SiO3 lowered Fusarium wilt in cucumbers by changing the soil microbial properties and increasing the seedling growth of the plant [113]. Application of monosilicic acid when the concentration of heavy metals was high in barley plantation soil showed that with an increase in the acid concentration from 5–20 mg kg−1 to ≥50 mg kg−1, there was a reduction in the mobility of heavy metals in plants and an increase in plant resistance against these heavy metals [114]. Likewise, when monosilicic acid was used in rice against cadmium toxicity, toxicity levels were reduced in roots, leaves, and stems by 50–90% through the apoplast pathway of cadmium transportation [115].

5.1. Application of Different Commercially Available Silicon Fertilizers

Hydrophilic fumed silica (SiO2), produced by Evonik Industries under the commercial name “Aerosil 200” (average particle size = 12 nm), improved the seed germination, increased chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate, and improved the growth parameters of squash (Cucurbita pepo) under salt stress condition [116]. Diatomaceous earth, produced by Agripower Australia Private Limited, when applied at a rate of 600 kg per hectare along with standard fertilizer practice, resulted in a significant increase in the yield and nutrient uptake in rice [117]. Soluble Si, in the commercial name AgriboosterTM, significantly increased the chlorophyll content in onion plants, proportionately increasing the photosynthesis rate under environmental stress conditions [118]. The same soluble Si fertilizer used in soybean increased water availability, thereby increasing the peroxidase enzyme, which has scavenging roles against stress conditions [119]. Similarly, a commercial silicon fertilizer produced by Pungnong Co., Ltd. (Seoul, South Korea) consisting of SiO2, MgO, and CaO (25%, 2%, and 40%, respectively), when applied to soil along with a foliar application of sodium metasilicate, enhanced the root morphological traits of soybean plants. Its application also increased the nodule number, nodule size, and photosynthetic parameters, which ultimately increased the yield by 21% and 19% in two (2018 and 2019) different years [120]. In the field or greenhouse numerous Si sources (solid and liquid) have been used as fertilizers for agronomic and horticultural crops which are produced and marketed by commercial enterprises (Table 2).

5.2. Application of NanoSi in the Field

Nanotechnology is a revolutionary field with considerable potential in the agricultural sector, particularly in the context of yield enhancement and plant disease management [121]. Nanotechnology is a new platform for increasing global food production, which has become a hot research topic for every sector involved in agri-food production, and its applications have opened a new research field in biotechnological and agricultural science [122]. NanoSi (NSi) has been reported to contribute to the growth and yield of plants under different biotic and abiotic stress conditions and in the effective utilization of the fertilizers applied [123].
A significant increase in harvested and milled dry grains was observed in a field experiment of black rice when 1 N of NSi was used along with N, P, and K [124]. A similar result was observed in two Iranian rice varieties, where the maximum harvest index was obtained using a combination of NSi and nitroxin [125]. Consistently, the application of NSi (with 2% chelated Si) increased the yield of wheat by 28% and 32% in two different years of field experiments under deficit irrigation conditions [126]. The same experiment showed that water use efficiency was maximum in both years under full irrigation and deficit irrigation conditions upon foliar application of NSi. In cucumber, an increase in the growth parameters and yield was observed in a field experiment using NSi fertilizer at a rate of 60 mg/L under salt stress conditions [127]. Several NSi fertilizers have been used to assess their effects on diverse plant species (Table 3).
In summary, the role of Si under stress conditions is prevalent indeed, either through direct or indirect mechanisms (not proven at the molecular level); thus, Si fertilizer can play an important role in improving production and maintaining sustainability in the agriculture sector. However, several questions remain regarding the effective use of Si fertilizers.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

A comprehensive review of the literature revealed that Si and its fertilizer form can stimulate plant growth and alleviate various abiotic and biotic stresses in several crops. However, there is much scope for further research on developing new Si-based fertilizers using advanced nanotechnology approaches. Our literature survey revealed that the molecular mechanism of Si under control and stress conditions is critical for improving our understanding. Thus, we suggest the following points for this prospect.
Fertilizers are vital for global food production, and the use of Si-based fertilizers in agriculture is expected to increase in the future. This is because intense cultivation of crops over the years has depleted Si and the soil nutrient status of many agricultural soils. In addition, the increased use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides causes environmental and ecosystem degradation, biodiversity loss, and public health risks, which ultimately lead to huge economic losses and sustainability crises. Si accumulator plants account for seven of the top ten most important crops worldwide, implying that crops other than Si accumulators will almost certainly require Si applications in the future to maintain optimal yields. That Si is eco-friendly, prophylactic, and plays an important role to improve soil health and plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses through diverse mechanisms is now well established. Several reviews have been published on pure Si but not on Si fertilizers, and most of them suggest that the mechanism of Si in plants is still unclear. Recently, Coskun et al. (2019) [138] found that many of the molecular assumptions regarding Si activity contradict most of the scientific evidences, particularly those acquired from current functional genomics. Thus, future research should focus on the following:
(i) Understanding the precise molecular basis of pure Si in the biological activity of diverse plant species.
(ii) Demonstrating the beneficial role of pure Si as well as Si fertilizers under stress conditions. Very few studies have been conducted under normal conditions; thus, efforts should be invested to determine the effect of Si or Si fertilizer without inorganic ions, such as Mg and Ca, under normal conditions.
(iii) Ensuring beneficial outcomes. Determining the precise application dose/rate of Si fertilizers is crucial; hence, further research should be consistently conducted for crop-specific Si accumulators and pH of the soil.
(iv) Nanotechnology has the potential to greatly influence the future of agriculture. Despite this, very little work has been conducted to utilize nanotechnology in agriculture; thus, novel nanoparticle approaches should be explored further to develop new NSi, which can enhance the catalytic performance of Si fertilizers. Focus should also be given to investigating particle integrity, efficiency, movement, toxicity, and sustainability of newly developed materials.
(v) After utilizing the new NSi at preliminary studies (to determine feasibility, time of release, cost, scaling factors, unpredicted results), its consistency and performance should be evaluated in large or actual fields.
As a consequence of climate change, major and minor crops globally are likely to face new constraints and yield penalties as well as prospects for sustaining productivity. Si fertilizer application is a common agricultural practice in several regions; however, global awareness is important for promoting the potential use of Si fertilizers and minimizing the gap between researchers/developers and farmers. We consider that this review may provide insights into Si fertilizers and their applicability in agriculture as a long-term strategy for mitigating biotic and abiotic stresses in the future.

Author Contributions

R.T. wrote the manuscript; A.G., W.K., L.L. and J.Q.A. prepared the illustrations, figures, tables, and references; Y.K. and R.T. conceptualized the overall structure; Y.K. and R.T. edited the manuscript; Y.K. critically contributed to the draft and approved the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1I1A3040280).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luyckx, M.; Hausman, J.-F.; Lutts, S.; Guerriero, G. Silicon and Plants: Current Knowledge and Technological Perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Thakral, V.; Bhat, J.A.; Kumar, N.; Myaka, B.; Sudhakaran, S.; Patil, G.; Sonah, H.; Shivaraj, S.M.; Deshmukh, R. Role of silicon under contrasting biotic and abiotic stress conditions provides benefits for climate smart cropping. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 189, 104545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mir, R.A.; Bhat, B.A.; Yousuf, H.; Islam, S.T.; Raza, A.; Rizvi, M.A.; Charagh, S.; Albaqami, M.; Sofi, P.A.; Zargar, S.M. Multidimensional Role of Silicon to Activate Resilient Plant Growth and to Mitigate Abiotic Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 819658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zargar, S.M.; Mahajan, R.; Bhat, J.A.; Nazir, M.; Deshmukh, R. Role of silicon in plant stress tolerance: Opportunities to achieve a sustainable cropping system. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Borawska-Jarmułowicz, B.; Mastalerczuk, G.; Janicka, M.; Wróbel, B. Effect of Silicon-Containing Fertilizers on the Nutritional Value of Grass–Legume Mixtures on Temporary Grasslands. Agriculture 2022, 12, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rao, B.; Gao, L.; Dai, H.; Hong, Z.; Xie, H. An efficient and sustainable approach for preparing silicon fertilizer by using crystalline silica from ore. JOM 2019, 71, 3915–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mavrič Čermelj, A.; Golob, A.; Vogel-Mikuš, K.; Germ, M. Silicon Mitigates Negative Impacts of Drought and UV-B Radiation in Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tubana, B.S.; Babu, T.; Datnoff, L.E. A Review of Silicon in Soils and Plants and Its Role in US Agriculture: History and Future Perspectives. Soil Sci. 2016, 181, 393–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tubaña, B.S.; Heckman, J.R. Silicon in Soils and Plants. In Silicon and Plant Diseases; Rodrigues, F.A., Datnoff, L.E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 7–51. [Google Scholar]
  10. Devanna, B.N.; Mandlik, R.; Raturi, G.; Sudhakaran, S.S.; Sharma, Y.; Sharma, S.; Rana, N.; Bansal, R.; Barvkar, V.; Tripathi, D.K.; et al. Versatile role of silicon in cereals: Health benefits, uptake mechanism, and evolution. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 165, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dorairaj, D.; Ismail, M.R. Distribution of silicified microstructures, regulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase and lodging resistance in silicon and paclobutrazol mediated Oryza sativa. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ma, J.F.; Takahashi, E. Chapter 4—Effect of silicate fertilizer application on paddy rice. In Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan; Ma, J.F., Takahashi, E., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 49–61. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mauad, M.; Crusciol, C.A.C.; Nascente, A.S.; Grassi Filho, H.; Lima, G.P.P. Effects of silicon and drought stress on biochemical characteristics of leaves of upland rice cultivars. Rev. Ciência Agronômica 2016, 47, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Maghsoudi, K.; Emam, Y.; Pessarakli, M. Effect of silicon on photosynthetic gas exchange, photosynthetic pigments, cell membrane stability and relative water content of different wheat cultivars under drought stress conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 39, 1001–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, X.; Zou, C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F. Silicon decreases transpiration rate and conductance from stomata of maize plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2006, 29, 1637–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, X.; Zou, C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F. Silicon improves water use efficiency in maize plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 27, 1457–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Murillo-Amador, B.; Yamada, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Rueda-Puente, E.; Ávila-Serrano, N.; García-Hernández, J.; López-Aguilar, R.; Troyo-Diéguez, E.; Nieto-Garibay, A. Influence of calcium silicate on growth, physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in two legume species under salt stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2007, 193, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reynolds, O.L.; Padula, M.P.; Zeng, R.; Gurr, G.M. Silicon: Potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Han, Y.; Lei, W.; Wen, L.; Hou, M. Silicon-mediated resistance in a susceptible rice variety to the rice leaf folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Keeping, M.G.; Kvedaras, O.L.; Bruton, A.G. Epidermal silicon in sugarcane: Cultivar differences and role in resistance to sugarcane borer Eldana saccharina. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 66, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ray, D.K.; Mueller, N.D.; West, P.C.; Foley, J.A. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Liang, Y.; Nikolic, M.; Bélanger, R.; Gong, H.; Song, A. Effect of Silicon on Crop Growth, Yield and Quality. In Silicon in Agriculture: From Theory to Practice; Liang, Y., Nikolic, M., Bélanger, R., Gong, H., Song, A., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 209–223. [Google Scholar]
  23. Calabi-Floody, M.; Medina, J.; Rumpel, C.; Condron, L.M.; Hernandez, M.; Dumont, M.; de La Luz Mora, M. Smart fertilizers as a strategy for sustainable agriculture. In Advances in Agronomy; Academic Press—Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 147, p. 302. [Google Scholar]
  24. Raimondi, G.; Maucieri, C.; Toffanin, A.; Renella, G.; Borin, M. Smart fertilizers: What should we mean and where should we go? Ital. J. Agron. 2021, 16, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. DeRosa, M.C.; Monreal, C.; Schnitzer, M.; Walsh, R.; Sultan, Y. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, R.; Lal, R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 514, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dewdar, M.; Abbas, M.S.; El-Hassanin, A.S.; Abd El-Aleem, H.A. Effect of nano micronutrients and nitrogen foliar applications on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) of quantity and quality traits in marginal soils in Egypt. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. 2018, 7, 4490–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abdelsalam, N.R.; Fouda, M.M.; Abdel-Megeed, A.; Ajarem, J.; Allam, A.A.; El-Naggar, M.E. Assessment of silver nanoparticles decorated starch and commercial zinc nanoparticles with respect to their genotoxicity on onion. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 1008–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kandil, E.E.; Abdelsalam, N.R.; EL Aziz, A.A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Siddiqui, M.H. Efficacy of nanofertilizer, fulvic acid and boron fertilizer on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield and quality. Sugar Tech. 2020, 22, 782–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bley, H.; Gianello, C.; Santos, L.D.S.; Selau, L.P.R. Nutrient release, plant nutrition, and potassium leaching from polymer-coated fertilizer. Rev. Bras. Ciência Solo 2017, 41, e0160142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kalia, A.; Sharma, S.P.; Kaur, H. Nanoscale fertilizers: Harnessing boons for enhanced nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity. In Nanobiotechnology Applications in Plant Protection; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 191–208. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guimaraes, G.G.; Klaic, R.; Giroto, A.S.; Majaron, V.F.; Avansi, W., Jr.; Farinas, C.S.; Ribeiro, C. Smart fertilization based on sulfur–phosphate composites: Synergy among materials in a structure with multiple fertilization roles. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 12187–12196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, M.; Zou, H.; Zhang, Y. Inorganic matter modified water-based copolymer prepared by chitosan-starch-CMC-Na-PVAL as an environment-friendly coating material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 234, 115925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ramli, R.A. Slow release fertilizer hydrogels: A review. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 6073–6090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, T.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhao, Y. Synthesis composite hydrogels from inorganic-organic hybrids based on leftover rice for environment-friendly controlled-release urea fertilizers. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Treinyte, J.; Grazuleviciene, V.; Paleckiene, R.; Ostrauskaite, J.; Cesoniene, L. Biodegradable polymer composites as coating materials for granular fertilizers. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, J.; Lü, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Ning, P.; Liu, M. Environmentally friendly fertilizers: A review of materials used and their effects on the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 613, 829–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khan, M.S.; Zaidi, A.; Wani, P.A. Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture—A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2007, 27, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agrahari, R.K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Tanaka, T.S.T.; Panda, S.K.; Koyama, H. Smart fertilizer management: The progress of imaging technologies and possible implementation of plant biomarkers in agriculture. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 67, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mandlik, R.; Thakral, V.; Raturi, G.; Shinde, S.; Nikolić, M.; Tripathi, D.K.; Sonah, H.; Deshmukh, R. Significance of silicon uptake, transport, and deposition in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 6703–6718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bocharnikova, E.; Matichenkov, V. Silicon fertilizers: Agricultural and environmental impacts. In Fertilizers: Components, Uses in Agriculture and Environmental Impacts; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New YOrk, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 183–198. [Google Scholar]
  42. Shedeed, S.I.; Bakry, B.A.; Nofal, O.A. Response of Flax (Linum usitatissimun L.) nutrients content to foliar application by two different sources of silicon fertilizers. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 373–398. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ma, J.F. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Soltani, M.; Kafi, M.; Nezami, A.; Taghiyari, H. Effects of silicon application at nano and micro scales on the growth and nutrient uptake of potato minitubers (Solanum tuberosum var. Agria) in greenhouse conditions. BioNanoScience 2018, 8, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Crooks, R.; Prentice, P. Extensive Investigation Into Field Based Responses to a Silica Fertiliser. Silicon 2017, 9, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Singh, T.; Singh, P.; Singh, A. Silicon significance in crop production: Special consideration to rice: An overview. Pharma Innov. 2021, 10, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Connick, V.J. The Impact of Silicon Fertilisation on the Chemical Ecology of Grapevine, Vitis Vinifera; Constitutive and Induced Chemical Defences Against Arthropod Pests and their Natural Enemies; Charles Sturt University: Albury-Wodonga, NSW, Australia, 2011; p. 219. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kvedaras, O.L.; Keeping, M.G. Silicon impedes stalk penetration by the borer Eldana saccharina in sugarcane. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2007, 125, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hou, M.; Han, Y. Silicon-mediated rice plant resistance to the Asiatic rice borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae): Effects of silicon amendment and rice varietal resistance. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 1412–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dias, P.; Sampaio, M.; Rodrigues, M.; Korndörfer, A.; Oliveira, R.; Ferreira, S.; Korndörfer, G. Induction of resistance by silicon in wheat plants to alate and apterous morphs of Sitobion avenae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 2014, 43, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lemes, E.; Mackowiak, C.; Blount, A.; Marois, J.; Wright, D.; Coelho, L.; Datnoff, L. Effects of silicon applications on soybean rust development under greenhouse and field conditions. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Nanayakkara, U.; Uddin, W.; Datnoff, L.J.P.D. Effects of soil type, source of silicon, and rate of silicon source on development of gray leaf spot of perennial ryegrass turf. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Savant, N.K.; Snyder, G.H.; Datnoff, L.E. Silicon management and sustainable rice production. Adv. Agron 1996, 58, 151–199. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaur, H.; Greger, M. A Review on Si Uptake and Transport System. Plants 2019, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hodson, M.; White, P.; Mead, A.; Broadley, M. Phylogenetic variation in the silicon composition of plants. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 1027–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Epstein, E. Silicon. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1999, 50, 641–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Richmond, K.E.; Sussman, M. Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sangster, A.; Hodson, M.; Tubb, H. Silicon deposition in higher plants. In Studies in Plant Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; Volume 8, pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hajiboland, R.; Moradtalab, N.; Eshaghi, Z.; Feizy, J. Effect of silicon supplementation on growth and metabolism of strawberry plants at three developmental stages. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2018, 46, 144–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhu, Z.; Wei, G.; Li, J.; Qian, Q.; Yu, J. Silicon alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant enzymes activity in leaves of salt-stressed cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Eneji, A.E.; Inanaga, S.; Muranaka, S.; Li, J.; Hattori, T.; An, P.; Tsuji, W. Growth and nutrient use in four grasses under drought stress as mediated by silicon fertilizers. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hashemi, A.; Abdolzadeh, A.; Sadeghipour, H.R. Beneficial effects of silicon nutrition in alleviating salinity stress in hydroponically grown canola, Brassica napus L., plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2010, 56, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Assis, F.; Moraes, J.; Assis, G.; Parolin, F. Induction of caterpillar resistance in sunflower using silicon and acibenzolar-S-methyl. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015, 17, 543–550. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yu, T.-H.; Peng, Y.-Y.; Lin, C.-X.; Qin, J.-H.; Li, H.-S. Application of iron and silicon fertilizers reduces arsenic accumulation by two Ipomoea aquatica varities. J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2613–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Dehghanipoodeh, S.; Ghobadi, C.; Baninasab, B.; Gheysari, M.; Shiranibidabadi, S. Effect of silicon on growth and development of strawberry under water deficit conditions. Hortic. Plant J. 2018, 4, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Huang, H.; Rizwan, M.; Li, M.; Song, F.; Zhou, S.; He, X.; Ding, R.; Dai, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Cao, M. Comparative efficacy of organic and inorganic silicon fertilizers on antioxidant response, Cd/Pb accumulation and health risk assessment in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ. Pollut. 2019, 255, 113146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cao, B.-L.; Ma, Q.; Xu, K. Silicon restrains drought-induced ROS accumulation by promoting energy dissipation in leaves of tomato. Protoplasma 2020, 257, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Semenova, N.A.; Smirnov, A.A.; Grishin, A.A.; Pishchalnikov, R.Y.; Chesalin, D.D.; Gudkov, S.V.; Chilingaryan, N.O.; Skorokhodova, A.N.; Dorokhov, A.S.; Izmailov, A.Y. The Effect of Plant Growth Compensation by Adding Silicon-Containing Fertilizer under Light Stress Conditions. Plants 2021, 10, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chakma, R.; Saekong, P.; Biswas, A.; Ullah, H.; Datta, A. Growth, fruit yield, quality, and water productivity of grape tomato as affected by seed priming and soil application of silicon under drought stress. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 256, 107055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alam, A.; Hariyanto, B.; Ullah, H.; Salin, K.R.; Datta, A. Effects of silicon on growth, yield and fruit quality of cantaloupe under drought stress. Silicon 2021, 13, 3153–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, W.; Yao, X.; Cai, K.; Chen, J. Silicon alleviates drought stress of rice plants by improving plant water status, photosynthesis and mineral nutrient absorption. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 142, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sidhu, J.; Stout, M.; Blouin, D.; Datnoff, L. Effect of silicon soil amendment on performance of sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on rice. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2013, 103, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Han, L.; Haleem, M.S.; Taylor, M. A novel computer vision-based approach to automatic detection and severity assessment of crop diseases. In Proceedings of the 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI), London, UK, 28–30 July 2015; pp. 638–644. [Google Scholar]
  74. Xiao, Z.; Peng, M.; Mei, Y.; Tan, L.; Liang, Y. Effect of organosilicone and mineral silicon fertilizers on chemical forms of cadmium and lead in soil and their accumulation in rice. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 283, 117107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, J.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, P.; Han, L.; Reynolds, O.L.; Zeng, R.; Wu, J.; Shao, Y.; You, M.; Gurr, G.M. Silicon supplementation alters the composition of herbivore induced plant volatiles and enhances attraction of parasitoids to infested rice plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Fleck, A.T.; Schulze, S.; Hinrichs, M.; Specht, A.; Waßmann, F.; Schreiber, L.; Schenk, M.K. Silicon promotes exodermal Casparian band formation in Si-accumulating and Si-excluding species by forming phenol complexes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gong, H.; Randall, D.; Flowers, T. Silicon deposition in the root reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by reducing bypass flow. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1970–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rasoolizadeh, A.; Labbé, C.; Sonah, H.; Deshmukh, R.; Belzile, F.; Bélanger, R. RNA-seq analysis of the role of silicon in the soybean–Phytophthora sojae interaction reveals interference with effector-receptor expression. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Adrees, M.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Abbas, F.; Farid, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Irshad, M.K. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 119, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chanchal Malhotra, C.; Kapoor, R.; Ganjewala, D. Alleviation of abiotic and biotic stresses in plants by silicon supplementation. Scientia 2016, 13, 59–73. [Google Scholar]
  81. Cooke, J.; Leishman, M.R. Consistent alleviation of abiotic stress with silicon addition: A meta-analysis. Funct. Ecol. 2016, 30, 1340–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Coskun, D.; Britto, D.T.; Huynh, W.Q.; Kronzucker, H.J. The role of silicon in higher plants under salinity and drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Hernandez-Apaolaza, L. Can silicon partially alleviate micronutrient deficiency in plants? A review. Planta 2014, 240, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Imtiaz, M.; Rizwan, M.S.; Mushtaq, M.A.; Ashraf, M.; Shahzad, S.M.; Yousaf, B.; Saeed, D.A.; Rizwan, M.; Nawaz, M.A.; Mehmood, S. Silicon occurrence, uptake, transport and mechanisms of heavy metals, minerals and salinity enhanced tolerance in plants with future prospects: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 183, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Kim, Y.-H.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Lee, I.-J. Silicon regulates antioxidant activities of crop plants under abiotic-induced oxidative stress: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Liang, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Christie, P. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of abiotic stresses in higher plants: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 147, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Kim, Y.-H.; Khan, A.L.; Lee, I.-J. Silicon: A duo synergy for regulating crop growth and hormonal signaling under abiotic stress conditions. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 1099–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Meena, V.; Dotaniya, M.; Coumar, V.; Rajendiran, S.; Kundu, S.; Subba Rao, A. A case for silicon fertilization to improve crop yields in tropical soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 84, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Pozza, E.A.; Pozza, A.A.A.; Botelho, D.M.D.S. Silicon in plant disease control. Rev. Ceres 2015, 62, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Ibrahim, M.; Farid, M.; Adrees, M.; Bharwana, S.A.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Abbas, F. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 15416–15431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wang, M.; Gao, L.; Dong, S.; Sun, Y.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. Role of silicon on plant–pathogen interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Zhang, W.; Xie, Z.; Lang, D.; Cui, J.; Zhang, X. Beneficial effects of silicon on abiotic stress tolerance in legumes. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 2224–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhu, Y.; Gong, H. Beneficial effects of silicon on salt and drought tolerance in plants. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 34, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Purbajanti, E.D.; Slamet, W.; Fuskhah, E.; Rosyida. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, activity of nitrate reductase and chlorophyll contents of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 250, 012048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Włodarczyk, T.; Balakhnina, T.; Matichenkov, V.; Brzezińska, M.; Nosalewicz, M.; Szarlip, P.; Fomina, I. Effect of silicon on barley growth and N2O emission under flooding. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 685, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Gomaa, M.A.; Kandil, E.E.; El-Dein, A.A.M.; Abou-Donia, M.E.M.; Ali, H.M.; Abdelsalam, N.R. Increase maize productivity and water use efficiency through application of potassium silicate under water stress. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Oliva, K.M.E.; da Silva, F.B.V.; Araújo, P.R.M.; de Oliveira, E.C.A.; do Nascimento, C.W.A. Amorphous Silica-Based Fertilizer Increases Stalks and Sugar Yield and Resistance to Stalk Borer in Sugarcane Grown Under Field Conditions. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 2518–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gascho, G.J. Chapter 12 Silicon sources for agriculture. In Studies in Plant Science; Datnoff, L.E., Snyder, G.H., Korndörfer, G.H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; Volume 8, pp. 197–207. [Google Scholar]
  99. Sandhya, K.; Prakash, N.B.; Meunier, J.D. Diatomaceous earth as source of silicon on the growth and yield of rice in contrasted soils of Southern India. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 18, 344–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Anggria, L.; Masunaga, T. Anggria, L.; Masunaga, T. A method for production of pure silica as fertilizer from industrial waste material. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; p. 012213. [Google Scholar]
  101. Haynes, R.J.; Belyaeva, O.N.; Kingston, G. Evaluation of industrial wastes as sources of fertilizer silicon using chemical extractions and plant uptake. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2013, 176, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Dong, B.S. Treatment and Utilization of Solid Wastes; Metallurgical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  103. de Brito, J.; Agrela, F. New Trends in Eco-Efficient and Recycled Concrete; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  104. Tsakiridis, P.E.; Papadimitriou, G.D.; Tsivilis, S.; Koroneos, C. Utilization of steel slag for Portland cement clinker production. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ning, D.; Song, A.; Fan, F.; Li, Z.; Liang, Y. Effects of slag-based silicon fertilizer on rice growth and brown-spot resistance. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Chaudhary, D.S.; Jollands, M.C.; Cser, F. Understanding rice hull ash as fillers in polymers: A review. Silicon Chem. 2002, 1, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ebe, S.; Ohike, T.; Okanami, M.; Ano, T. Components of rice husk biochar in promoting the growth, sporulation and iturin A production of Bacillus sp. strain IA. Z. Nat. C 2019, 74, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bakhat, H.F.; Bibi, N.; Fahad, S.; Hammad, H.M.; Abbas, S.; Shah, G.M.; Zakir, A.; Murtaza, B.; Ashraf, M.R. Rice Husk Bio-Char Improves Brinjal Growth, Decreases Insect Infestation by Enhancing Silicon Uptake. Silicon 2021, 13, 3351–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Leksungnoen, P.; Wisawapipat, W.; Ketrot, D.; Aramrak, S.; Nookabkaew, S.; Rangkadilok, N.; Satayavivad, J. Biochar and ash derived from silicon-rich rice husk decrease inorganic arsenic species in rice grain. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 684, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kanto, T.; Miyoshi, A.; Ogawa, T.; Maekawa, K.; Aino, M. Suppressive effect of potassium silicate on powdery mildew of strawberry in hydroponics. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2004, 70, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yanar, Y.; Yanar, D.; Gebologlu, N. Control of powdery mildew (Leveillula taurica) on tomato by foliar sprays of liquid potassium silicate (K2SiO3). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 3121–3123. [Google Scholar]
  112. Bijanzadeh, E.; Barati, V.; Egan, T.P. Foliar application of sodium silicate mitigates drought stressed leaf structure in corn (Zea mays L.). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 147, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhou, X.; Shen, Y.; Fu, X.; Wu, F. Application of sodium silicate enhances cucumber resistance to Fusarium wilt and alters soil microbial communities. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Ji, X.; Liu, S.; Huang, J.; Bocharnikova, E.; Matichenkov, V. Monosilicic acid potential in phytoremediation of the contaminated areas. Chemosphere 2016, 157, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wei, W.; Ji, X.; Saihua, L.; Bocharnikova, E.; Matichenkov, V. Effect of Monosilicic and Polysilicic Acids on Cd Transport in Rice, a Laboratory Test. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 818–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Siddiqui, M.H.; Al-Whaibi, M.H.; Faisal, M.; Al Sahli, A.A. Nano-silicon dioxide mitigates the adverse effects of salt stress on Cucurbita pepo L. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 2429–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Pati, S.; Pal, B.; Badole, S.; Hazra, G.C.; Mandal, B. Effect of silicon fertilization on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of rice. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2016, 47, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rangwala, T.; Bafna, A.; Vyas, N.; Gupta, R. Beneficial role of soluble silica in enhancing chlorophyll content in onion leaves. Curr. Agric. Res. J. 2019, 7, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Tasneem, R.; Bafna, D.A.; Vyas, N.; Gupta, R. Role of soluble silica in alleviating oxidative stress in soybean crop. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2018, 52, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Tripathi, P.; Na, C.-I.; Kim, Y. Effect of silicon fertilizer treatment on nodule formation and yield in soybean (Glycine max L.). Eur. J. Agron. 2021, 122, 126172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. de Moraes, A.C.P.; Lacava, P.T. Chapter 5—Use of silicon and nano-silicon in agro-biotechnologies. In Silicon and Nano-Silicon in Environmental Stress Management and Crop Quality Improvement; Etesami, H., Al Saeedi, A.H., El-Ramady, H., Fujita, M., Pessarakli, M., Anwar Hossain, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 55–65. [Google Scholar]
  122. Scrinis, G.; Lyons, K. The emerging nano-corporate paradigm: Nanotechnology and the transformation of nature, food and agri-food systems. Int. J. Sociol. Agric. Food 2007, 15, 22–44. [Google Scholar]
  123. Parveen, A.; Mumtaz, S.; Saleem, M.H.; Hussain, I.; Perveen, S.; Thind, S. Silicon and nanosilicon mediated heat stress tolerance in plants. In Silicon and Nano-Silicon in Environmental Stress Management and Crop Quality Improvement; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 153–159. [Google Scholar]
  124. Amalya, N.; Yuniarti, A.; Setiawan, A.; Machfud, Y. The effect of N, P, K fertilizer and Nano Silica fertilizer to total N content, N uptake, and black rice yield (Oryza sativa L. Indica) on inceptisols from jatinangor. J. Plant Sci. 2020, 8, 185–188. [Google Scholar]
  125. Lemraski, M.G.; Normohamadi, G.; Madani, H.; Abad, H.H.S.; Mobasser, H.R. Two Iranian rice cultivars’ response to nitrogen and nano-fertilizer. Open J.Ecol. 2017, 7, 591–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Ahmadian, K.; Jalilian, J.; Pirzad, A. Nano-fertilizers improved drought tolerance in wheat under deficit irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 244, 106544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Yassen, A.; Abdallah, E.; Gaballah, M.; Zaghloul, S. Role of silicon dioxide nano fertilizer in mitigating salt stress on growth, yield and chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Int. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 22, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Ayman, M.; Metwally, S.; Mancy, M.; Abd Alhafez, A. Influence of nano–silica on wheat plants grown in salt–affected soil. J. Product. Dev. 2020, 25, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. El-Saadony, M.T.; Desoky, E.-S.M.; Saad, A.M.; Eid, R.S.M.; Selem, E.; Elrys, A.S. Biological silicon nanoparticles improve Phaseolus vulgaris L. yield and minimize its contaminant contents on a heavy metals-contaminated saline soil. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 106, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Suriyaprabha, R.; Karunakaran, G.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Prabu, P.; Rajendran, V.; Kannan, N. Growth and physiological responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to porous silica nanoparticles in soil. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Qados, A.M.S.A.; Moftah, A.E. Influence of silicon and nano-silicon on germination, growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under salt stress conditions. Am. J. Exp. Agric. 2015, 5, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hellala, F.; Amerb, A.K.; El-Sayeda, S.; El-Azab, K. Mitigation The negative effect of water stress on barley by nano silica application. Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 3224–3231. [Google Scholar]
  133. Fatemi, H.; Esmaiel Pour, B.; Rizwan, M. Foliar application of silicon nanoparticles affected the growth, vitamin C, flavonoid, and antioxidant enzyme activities of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) plants grown in lead (Pb)-spiked soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 1417–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Haghighi, M.; Pessarakli, M. Influence of silicon and nano-silicon on salinity tolerance of cherry tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at early growth stage. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 161, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ismail, L.M.; Soliman, M.I.; Abd El-Aziz, M.H.; Abdel-Aziz, H.M.M. Impact of silica ions and nano silica on growth and productivity of pea plants under salinity stress. Plants 2022, 11, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Al-juthery, H.; Al-taee, R.; Al-Obaidi, Z.; Ali, E.; NAl-Shami, Q. Influence of foliar application of some nano-fertilizers in growth and yield of potato under drip irrigation. In Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Medan, Indonesia, 19–20 July 2019; p. 092024. [Google Scholar]
  137. Janmohammadi, M.; Sabaghnia, N.; Ahadnezhad, A. Impact of silicon dioxide nanoparticles on seedling early growth of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) genotypes with various origins. Poljopr. Sumar. 2015, 61, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Coskun, D.; Deshmukh, R.; Sonah, H.; Menzies, J.G.; Reynolds, O.; Ma, J.F.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Bélanger, R.R. The controversies of silicon’s role in plant biology. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 12 01027 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanism of Si-induced apoplastic obstruction and its beneficial effect on the applied plants. (a) Conditions before (−Si) and after (+Si) Si application; Si blocks the apoplastic entry route of toxicants, which is the common pathway in addition to the symplastic route to reach the xylem. Casparian bands (CBs) are present, stopping the entry of toxicants, although breaks may occur allowing for bypassing routes, particularly under low or −Si conditions. High or +Si improves CB development [76], as well as apoplastic Si deposition (as silica, SiO2 [77], effectively blocks bypass routes resulting to root-to-shoot translocation of toxicants). (b) In +Si plants, when Si translocates to the plant shoot cells, it deposits in the form of SiO2, forming a thick layer in the apoplastic region or a mechanical barrier blocking the pathogenic entry, and protects from other abiotic stresses. Furthermore, it modulates reactive oxygen species (ROS) level leading to detoxification and reduction of stress effect and increased plant growth. However, in the case of −Si plants, toxicant levels in shoots accumulate to a greater extent causing adverse effect on plants. (c) In +Si plants, the formation of an SiO2 barrier layer in the apoplastic region disrupts the process of establishing specificity between a plant and insect by altering the flow of molecules (e.g., effectors). This also helps the plant to prevent piercing by insects, resulting in the limited translocation and release of effectors in +Si plants compared with that in −Si plants [78]. (d) The overall effect of Si application influences the other general mechanisms of plants, altering plant attributes, including abiotic and biotic stress resistance, which leads to yield enhancement. For further details about the general mechanisms, see the references in [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93].
Figure 1. Mechanism of Si-induced apoplastic obstruction and its beneficial effect on the applied plants. (a) Conditions before (−Si) and after (+Si) Si application; Si blocks the apoplastic entry route of toxicants, which is the common pathway in addition to the symplastic route to reach the xylem. Casparian bands (CBs) are present, stopping the entry of toxicants, although breaks may occur allowing for bypassing routes, particularly under low or −Si conditions. High or +Si improves CB development [76], as well as apoplastic Si deposition (as silica, SiO2 [77], effectively blocks bypass routes resulting to root-to-shoot translocation of toxicants). (b) In +Si plants, when Si translocates to the plant shoot cells, it deposits in the form of SiO2, forming a thick layer in the apoplastic region or a mechanical barrier blocking the pathogenic entry, and protects from other abiotic stresses. Furthermore, it modulates reactive oxygen species (ROS) level leading to detoxification and reduction of stress effect and increased plant growth. However, in the case of −Si plants, toxicant levels in shoots accumulate to a greater extent causing adverse effect on plants. (c) In +Si plants, the formation of an SiO2 barrier layer in the apoplastic region disrupts the process of establishing specificity between a plant and insect by altering the flow of molecules (e.g., effectors). This also helps the plant to prevent piercing by insects, resulting in the limited translocation and release of effectors in +Si plants compared with that in −Si plants [78]. (d) The overall effect of Si application influences the other general mechanisms of plants, altering plant attributes, including abiotic and biotic stress resistance, which leads to yield enhancement. For further details about the general mechanisms, see the references in [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93].
Biomolecules 12 01027 g001
Biomolecules 12 01027 g002 550
Figure 2. Different sources of Si fertilizer used in agricultural applications. (a) Crop raw rice hull, (b) silicate slag, (c) diatomite, (d) wollastonite, (e) rice hull ash, (f) biochar carbonized straw or husk, (g) sodium silicate, (h) potassium silicate, and (i) foliar Si soluble silicic acid forms, right from monosilicic to subcolloidal silicic acid [98,99].
Figure 2. Different sources of Si fertilizer used in agricultural applications. (a) Crop raw rice hull, (b) silicate slag, (c) diatomite, (d) wollastonite, (e) rice hull ash, (f) biochar carbonized straw or husk, (g) sodium silicate, (h) potassium silicate, and (i) foliar Si soluble silicic acid forms, right from monosilicic to subcolloidal silicic acid [98,99].
Biomolecules 12 01027 g002
Table
Table 1. Effects of silicon fertilizers on monocotyledon and dicotyledon crops.
Table 1. Effects of silicon fertilizers on monocotyledon and dicotyledon crops.
CropGrowing ConditionStressType of Si Fertilizer UsedEffect on PlantReferences
CucumberGreenhouseSalt stressPotassium silicate (K2SiO3)Decreases oxidative damage of plant tissue under salt stress conditions; enhances physiological and metabolic activities[60]
SugarcaneShade houseStem borderCalcium silicate (CaSiO3)Less stalk damage by reducing the growth of stem borer larva and delaying its penetration to the stalk[48]
Grasses (Timothy, Sudan, Rhodes, and Tall fescue grass)GreenhouseWater stressK2SiO3, CaSiO3Increase in biomass yield and enhance nutrient uptake[61]
CanolaGreenhouseSalinity stressSodium silicate (Na2SiO3)Improves plant growth and saline tolerance[62]
SoybeanGreenhouse and fieldsFungal diseaseCaSiO3 and K2SiO3Suppress disease development; delay disease impact during the growth cycle[51]
SunflowerGreenhouseCaterpillarSi + acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM)Increase the lignin and Si content in plants, thus inhibiting caterpillar development[63]
Water spinachControl chamberArsenicIron and silicon fertilizerEnhance plant growth and reduce the arsenic taken up by the plant, thereby reducing human health risks from consumption[64]
PotatoGreenhouseSalinity stressHydrophilic bentonite (H2Al2O6Si)Improves root characteristics to cope with drought and nutrient deficiency; increases tubers[43]
StrawberryShade houseWater deficitK2SiO3Improves plant growth and development[65]
WheatGreenhouseHeavy metal toxicityOrganosilicon fertilizer (OSiF)Promotes wheat growth and increase biomass; enhances photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll content; reduces oxidative damage and content of cadmium in roots and lead in shoots, branches, and flowers[66]
TomatoGreenhouseDrought-induced reactive oxygen speciesNa2SiO3Promotes energy consumption in mitochondria, thus increasing photosynthesis[67]
Red-lettuceChamber, HydroponicLight stressLiquid silicon-containing fertilizerIncrease in yield biomass for red-leaved lettuce under LED lighting[68]
Grape tomatoGreenhouse (Polyhouse)DroughtMonosilicic acid (H4SiO4)Increases fruit number and yield; enhances irrigation water productivity[69]
Cantaloupe (Rock melon)PolyhouseDroughtH4SiO4Improves fruit quality and flesh thickness under moderate drought and well-watered conditions[70]
RiceGreenhouseDrought stressK2SiO3Improves photosynthesis, photochemical efficiency, and mineral nutrient level[71]
GreenhouseSugarcane borerSoil Si amendmentsDecrease in feeding injury; attracts natural enemies[72]
GreenhouseLeaf folderSi-mediatedResistance to leaf folders for the susceptible varieties[73]
GreenhouseCadmium and leadOrganosiliconeand mineral silicon fertilizerReduces rice uptake of cadmium and lead contamination; increases grain yield for brown rice; improves the antioxidant capacity of rice; alleviates stress from heavy metals[74]
ChamberHerbivoresNa2SiO3Enhances the attractiveness of herbivore-induced plant volatile blends[75]
Table
Table 2. List of commercial sources of Si products and relevant organizations.
Table 2. List of commercial sources of Si products and relevant organizations.
Company/InstituteProduct NameProduct DescriptionWebsite
AgripowerAgripower Silica/Agrisilica/Agrisilica Chip Silicon Fertilizer Silicon Based Natural Plant NutrientDiatomaceous earthhttps://agripower.com.au/ (access on 26 May 2022)
Agriculture Envision US Inc.Blue SilicateFertilizers and soil amendments, blendedhttps://www.omri.org/mfg/aeu/ (access on 26 May 2022)
CalSil Corp.Sili-CalCalcium silicatehttp://www.calsilcorp.com/ (access on 26 May 2022)
Canadian WollastoniteCanadian WollastoniteCalcium silicate soil amendmentwww.canadianwollastonite.com/ (access on 26 May 2022)
Dyna-GroPro-TektPotassium silicate solutionhttps://dyna-gro.com/ (access on 26 May 2022)
Eden SolutionsBlue Gold SilicaSiO2https://edenbluegold.com/product/blue-gold-silica-omri-listed/ (access on 26 May 2022)
Haitor Silicon Fertilizer Research InstituteNanosilicon fertilizer, Seaweed Silicon, Water Soluble Silicon, Potassium Silicate Foliar Fertilizer, Silicon Calcium Magnesium Fertilizer, Soil conditioner SiO2, CaO, MgOhttps://www.haitoragro.com/silicon-fertilizer/silicon-solid-fertilizer/nano-silicon-fertilizer.html/ (access on 30 May 2022)
HarscoCrossOverCalcium and magnesium silicateshttps://www.crossover-soil.com/ (access on 30 May 2022)
Montana GrowNatural Si FertilizerDiatomaceous earthhttps://montanagrow.com/ (access on 30 May 2022)
Plant Tuff Inc.Plant TuffCalcium and magnesium silicateshttp://planttuff.com/ (access on 30 May 2022)
Pilares OperationsIMERYS WOLLASTONITE Calcium SilicateNYAD® MD200 Diatomaceous earth, wollastonitehttps://www.imerys.com/minerals/ (access on 30 May 2022)
Privi Life Sciences Ltd.SilixolOrthosilicic acidhttp://privilifesciences.com/ (access on 30 May 2022)
PQ Corp.Sil-MATRIXPotassium silicatehttps://www.pqcorp.com/ (access on 30 May 2022)
Rexil AgroOSAB3Hydrated silicon dioxide, potassium chloride, polyethylene glycol, and boric acidhttp://rexil-agro.com/ (access on 30 May 2022)
TEAA Tecnología Agrícola Avanzada SA de CVSIK Silicato de PotasioPotassium silicate, aqueoushttps://teaa.mx/portafolio/ (access on 30 May 2022)
UNITEKBIO PRODUCTS INC.Blue CureCopper sulfate, potassium bicarbonate, potassium silicate, aqueoushttps://kr03828467.en.ec21.com/ (access on 30 May 2022)
Vanderbilt Minerals, LLCVansil W-10Calcium metasilicatehttps://www.vanderbiltminerals.com/ (access on 30 May 2022)
YaraActiSilCholine chloride and orthosilicic acidhttps://www.yara.co.uk/ (access on 30 May 2022)
Organic AgroNutritionals LLCMegaSilica Amorphous diatomaceous earthhttps://megasilica.com/product/megasilica-organic-soil-conditioner%E2%80%8B-5lbs/ (access on 30 May 2022)
Note: We do not recommend or endorse any of these listed products, product description not available.
Table
Table 3. Nano silica (Silicon dioxide nanoparticles), nSiO2 application for growth and yield attributes in different crops.
Table 3. Nano silica (Silicon dioxide nanoparticles), nSiO2 application for growth and yield attributes in different crops.
NanoparticleConcentration (Dose) AppliedApplicationCropEffect on PlantReference
nSiO260 mg L−1FoliarCucumber (Cucumis sativus)Increase in plant height, number of leaves, fruits per plant, fruit length, weight, and yield per plant[127]
nSiO2600 mg L−1, 80 mg Kg−1Foliar, rootWheat (Triticum aestivum)Enhances the nutrient absorption of N, P, and K and increases the test weight under salinity stress conditions[128]
nSiO2900 mg L−1Foliar French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)Increase in shoot length, number of leaves, leaf area, number of pods, green pod yield, chlorophyll, and carotenoid content[129]
nSiO215 kg ha−1Soil Maize (Zea mays) Enlarges leaf area thus promoting more photosynthetic activity; growth characteristics increase up to 20 days after sowing [130]
nSiO22 mMFoliar Broad bean (Vicia faba) Increase in pod weight, seed dry weight, and pods per plant under salinity stress conditions[131]
nSiO2100 ppmFoliarBarley (Hordeum vulgare)Improves protein content; enhances yield parameters, such as the number of tillers, plant height, and spike numbers, under water stress conditions[132]
nSiO21.5 mMFoliarCoriander (Coriandrum sativum)Increase in growth attributes decreased by lead stress; adjusts antioxidant enzyme activities[133]
nSiO22 mMFoliar Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicon)Enhances fresh and dry weight of root; increase in root volume and chlorophyll along with photosynthetic rate under salinity stress [134]
nSiO23 mMSoilPea (Pisum sativum)Increase in seed weight per pod and total seed yield; enhances potassium ions in roots and shoots; decreases sodium ion concentration; increase in the relative water content[135]
nSiO2, Nano chelated potato specific fertilizer (NPS), Nano chelated complete micron (NCM)200 gm/100 LFoliarPotato (Solanum tuberosum)Increase in tuber yield, dry matter of tubers, starch content, and water use efficiency[136]
nSiO21 mMFoliarLentil (Lens culinaris)Increase in seed germination; alleviation of the effect of salinity stress; maintains germination percentage[137]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tayade, R.; Ghimire, A.; Khan, W.; Lay, L.; Attipoe, J.Q.; Kim, Y. Silicon as a Smart Fertilizer for Sustainability and Crop Improvement. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12081027

AMA Style

Tayade R, Ghimire A, Khan W, Lay L, Attipoe JQ, Kim Y. Silicon as a Smart Fertilizer for Sustainability and Crop Improvement. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(8):1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12081027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tayade, Rupesh, Amit Ghimire, Waleed Khan, Liny Lay, John Quarshie Attipoe, and Yoonha Kim. 2022. "Silicon as a Smart Fertilizer for Sustainability and Crop Improvement" Biomolecules 12, no. 8: 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12081027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop