Next Article in Journal
Epipregnanolone as a Positive Modulator of GABAA Receptor in Rat Cerebellar and Hippocampus Neurons
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Connection between Porphyromonas gingivalis and Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Pilot Quantitative Study on the Bacterium Abundance in Oral Cavity and the Amount of Antibodies in Serum
Previous Article in Journal
The Roles of Various Prostaglandins in Fibrosis: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Tea Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) Targeting Protein Misfolding in Drug Discovery for Neurodegenerative Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mediterranean Diet and Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Neglected Role of Nutrition in the Modulation of the Endocannabinoid System

1
Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica, 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
2
Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Federica Armeli and Alessio Bonucci contributed equally.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(6), 790; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060790
Submission received: 23 April 2021 / Revised: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021 / Published: 24 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Natural and Synthetic Compounds in Neurodegenerative Disorders)

Abstract

:
Neurodegenerative disorders are a widespread cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, characterized by neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and neuronal depletion. The broad-spectrum neuroprotective activity of the Mediterranean diet is widely documented, but it is not yet known whether its nutritional and caloric balance can induce a modulation of the endocannabinoid system. In recent decades, many studies have shown how endocannabinoid tone enhancement may be a promising new therapeutic strategy to counteract the main hallmarks of neurodegeneration. From a phylogenetic point of view, the human co-evolution between the endocannabinoid system and dietary habits could play a key role in the pro-homeostatic activity of the Mediterranean lifestyle: this adaptive balance among our ancestors has been compromised by the modern Western diet, resulting in a “clinical endocannabinoid deficiency syndrome”. This review aims to evaluate the evidence accumulated in the literature on the neuroprotective, immunomodulatory and antioxidant properties of the Mediterranean diet related to the modulation of the endocannabinoid system, suggesting new prospects for research and clinical interventions against neurodegenerative diseases in light of a nutraceutical paradigm.

1. Endocannabinoid System: Physiology and Pathophysiology No

Initially analyzed for its ability to modulate pain, the endocannabinoid system is now considered a powerful system, capable of regulating several physiological and pathological processes. Interest in endocannabinoid activities has increased considerably in recent years, since their involvement in the fine-tuning of numerous metabolic processes, to maintain cell and tissue homeostasis, has been clearly established [1]. Endocannabinoids (ECs) exhibit pleiotropic activities impacting cognition, pain, appetite and inflammatory processes. They are involved in glucose and lipid metabolism, and they stimulate food uptake, so their chronic overactivation leads to the development of obesity, insulin and leptin resistance, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes [2].
Initially, interest in this class of compounds was aroused by the observation that the endogenous substances under study were able to bind to the specific receptors for some psychoactive molecules obtained from Cannabis sativa, and for this reason, one of the first endocannabinoids to be identified was named anandamide from a Sanskrit term that means happiness. Since then, the role of endocannabinoids in the control of different metabolic pathways to maintain homeostasis has emerged.
The EC system constitutes a complex endogenous system of communication between cells. As detailed below, the system of ECs is made up of three groups of elements that work in synergy and are stimulated as needed, depending on the contingent onset of an imbalance. Therefore, the levels of ECs vary on demand, according to homeostatic needs, making it difficult to quantify a normal range of the single components of the system [3]. Moreover, given the complexity of the system, the heterogeneity of the molecules that are part of it, and the variety of biological mechanisms underlying their action, research in this area has to overcome many problems. Results obtained so far have established that several molecules are involved in this system: receptors, ligands and enzymes responsible for EC synthesis and degradation [4]. The biological activity of endocannabinoids (ECs) is primarily mediated by two receptors: cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R), belonging to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. CB1Rs, the most abundant in the central nervous system (CNS), are located mostly on the neuronal terminals of brain regions responsible for motor coordination, such as the cerebellum, striatum and substantia nigra, and within the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala and hypothalamus where they control memory and cognitive functions, fertility, sexual behavior and food intake [5,6]. ECs regulate appetite and food intake via activation of CB1R localized within brain regions controlling feeding, energy expenditure and reward, such as the hypothalamus and limbic forebrain, suggesting their involvement in both the homeostatic and hedonic control of eating [7,8].
CB1Rs are also expressed, in lower amounts, in cells of peripheral organs and tissues, including hepatocytes, adipocytes, gastrointestinal tract and muscle tissue, where CB1Rs modulate metabolism [6]. On the other hand, CB2Rs play a crucial role in the CNS immune response: indeed, their modulation impacts the migration and release of inflammatory mediators by activated microglia and astrocytes. They are also expressed in immunocompetent cells such as monocytes, T lymphocytes and mast cells, influencing their activity [9,10,11].
CB2Rs are additionally expressed on enteric neurons and epithelial cells of the digestive tract [12].
CBR-related Gi/O proteins inhibit adenylate cyclase (AC) activity, decreasing intracellular levels of second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), modulating excitatory or inhibitory neurotransmission through inhibition of Ca2+ entry. CB1Rs activate various kinases too, particularly mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) [10,13]. They affect excitotoxicity and cellular survival and counteract inflammatory processes [9]. There are other receptors engaged in endocannabinoid signaling: transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1), relevant to synaptic plasticity; and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ), involved in neuroprotection and energy balance modulation, lipid metabolism and adipogenesis [14,15]. A 2018 clinical trial revealed that PPAR-α was implicated in appetite control in overweight patients [16].
Our knowledge about the mechanisms underlying CBR function derives from studies dealing with natural and synthetic cannabinoid compounds, including Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), the major components of the Cannabis sativa plant [14]. The most characterized ECs are anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), lipid molecules that originate from arachidonic acid. AEA is synthesized by N-acetyl phosphatidylethanolamine phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD), while 2-AG secretion depends mostly on the activity of phospholipase C, diacylglycerol lipase α (DAGLα) and diacylglycerol lipase β (DAGLβ) [17]. The ECs are hydrolyzed by two main enzymes: fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), targeting AEA and 2-AG, respectively [18]. A bulk of studies have examined the role of ECs in neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and multiple sclerosis (MS), where inflammation plays a critical role and the endocannabinoid system has been shown to be altered both in experimental models and in patients [14,19,20,21]. Modulation of the endocannabinoid system was detected during AD progression, characterized by the accumulation of amyloid β peptide (Aβ), which induces persisting glial activation and neuroinflammation [22]. In AD transgenic mice, which overexpress a mutant form of the amyloid precursor protein, a depletion of AEA was detected within the hippocampal area [23]. Preclinical studies in murine models have demonstrated AD-like symptom improvement after FAAH and MAGL inhibition [24,25]. In AD patients, an increased FAAH expression was detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [26]. APP/PS1 mice, expressing the mutant form of amyloid precursor protein and presenilin, treated with CB2R agonists, showed improved cognitive performance, paralleled by a lower microglial activity, suggesting that the neuroprotective role of CB2R receptors was dependent on reductions in both neurotoxicity and neuroinflammation, as well as on increased Aβ clearance, leading to improved memory and cognition [23,27]. In support of this result, a follow-up study, performed in knockout CB2R mouse models of AD, showed increased levels of Aβ [28]. Dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system has also been evidenced in animal models of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [20]. CB2R activation, in mice treated with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), reduces depletion of dopamine and neuroinflammation [29,30,31]. In rodents treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at the level of the nigrostriatal area to simulate parkinsonian inflammation, CB2R activation was able to downregulate the expression of inflammatory mediators [32]. In MPTP-treated mice, MAGL inhibition combined with CB2R activity has a neuroprotective effect, while FAAH inhibition by URB597 showed antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects accompanied by improved motor behavior [33,34,35]. Dysregulation of EC levels has been demonstrated both in PD rat models, at the level of the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, and in cerebrospinal fluid of PD patients [36,37]. Neuroimaging demonstrated a different expression of CBRs in PD patients’ substantia nigra compared with dopaminergic projection regions [38]. Changes in the endocannabinoid system have also been highlighted in multiple sclerosis (MS). Different studies in MS mouse models have shown positive effects following the activation of CBRs [14]. In murine Theiler’s encephalitis virus-induced demyelinating disease (TMEV-IDD) and chronic relapsing autoimmune encephalomyelitis (CREAE), treatment with CBR agonists revealed a beneficial impact on inflammation, improving tremor and spasticity [39,40]. Immunohistochemical analysis in post-mortem brains of MS patients showed an upregulation of microglia CB2Rs and increased amounts of FAAH metabolites [41]. In both in vitro and in vivo investigations, phytocannabinoids (THC and CBD) exhibited immunoregulatory properties in chronic neuroinflammation, improving symptoms and quality of life for NDD patients [14]. Furthermore, lipid compound members of the same family of canonical ECs, such as palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and oleoylethanolamide (OEA), N-acetylanolamines hydrolyzed by N-acylethanolamine acid amidase (NAAA), show anti-inflammatory properties [42,43,44,45]. PEA and OEA are endogenous PPAR agonists; they regulate the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, food intake, weight loss, lipolysis, and also indirectly activate CB1Rs and CB2Rs [42,46]. In a recent study on different cell lines (SH-SY5Y, C6, BV2), increased PEA levels, subsequent to downregulation of NAAA, counteracted LPS- and interferon-γ (INF-γ)-induced inflammation [47].
Taking together these observations, modulation of the endocannabinoid system could be a potential wide-ranging therapeutic target in reducing the main hallmarks of neurodegeneration, including neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity and oxidative stress (OxS) [44]. There are well-established neuroprotective properties of the Mediterranean lifestyle, but it is not yet known whether its nutritional and caloric balance can induce a modulation of the endocannabinoid system. This review aims to reconsider some neuroprotective properties of a typical Mediterranean diet (MedD) as being linked to a rebalancing between the components of the endocannabinoid system.

2. Mediterranean Diet

It is estimated that the prevalence of NDDs in elderly people, including AD and PD, will increase in the next few decades [48]. Beyond the development of new specific drugs to restrain the neurological symptomatology, it is necessary to individuate new prevention potential strategies. In this scenario, a healthy lifestyle, which includes an adequate dietary pattern and physical activity, seems to have a pivotal role [48,49]. A chronic low-grade inflammatory status, which induces microglial chronic activation leading to pro-inflammatory cytokine production and neuronal apoptosis, is recognized as a key factor in the pathogenesis of AD and other NDDs [50]. The Whitehall II prospective cohort study (2017) showed how a pro-inflammatory Western diet, which increases serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, may accelerate cognitive dysfunction [51]. Evidence supports the role of the Mediterranean diet (MedD) in the primary and secondary prevention of non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular disease, AD and dementia [52,53,54,55]. The high intake of different types of fruit, seasonal green leafy vegetables, extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO) (cold pressed), fresh blue fish, whole grains, legumes, nuts, spices and a low intake of alcohol such as red wine, with small quantities of red meat, eggs and dairy products, defines the Mediterranean dietary pattern [48,56,57]. The most recent revision of the Mediterranean Diet Pyramid (MDP), in addition to graphically summarizing all the nutritional aspects, also emphasizes sociocultural, environmental and sustainability issues, which are essential components of the concept of well-being >(Figure 1) [58].
Daily intake of whole grains, fruits and vegetables containing phenolic compounds such as flavonoids and polyphenols, and sources of vitamins, fiber, potassium, magnesium and folic acid, has been shown to reduce human body fatness and the risk of death from stroke, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer [56]. Phytosterols, dietary fiber, and flavones from legumes, following microbiota metabolic transformation and intestinal absorption, produce beneficial effects on cholesterol metabolism and regulate blood pressure and insulin sensitivity, leading to a decrease in mortality risk [56,57,59]. The intake of fish and nuts, which are rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA n-3, n-6), such as alpha-linolenic acid, EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid), DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) and linoleic acid, provides lipoprotein metabolism benefits [56,60]. EVOO is the main or exclusive fatty seasoning in the MedD, a valuable source of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and phytosterols which modulate the lipid metabolism, as well as of polyphenols with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity [56].
Some scientific studies have raised the issue of the lectins present in some foods of the Mediterranean diet (especially whole grains and beans) with respect to the alteration of intestinal permeability and the consequent pro-inflammatory response [61,62]. Petroski W. and Minich D.M. (2020), more recently, published a narrative review, which concluded that the available human trials do not provide strong evidence to claim that lectin-rich cooked foods increasing intestinal permeability cause inflammation in the general population, and which highlighted the limitations of the studies conducted in animal models and cell cultures using isolated lectins. This scenario is quite far from the reality, in which the lectin intake is relatively small and is combined with other bioactive components [63,64]. However, several studies support the role of the Mediterranean diet in reducing the risk of non-communicable disease through various mechanisms, including modulation of the inflammatory response [65,66,67,68], which has also been related to the effects of the Mediterranean diet on intestinal permeability and microbiota, although further studies are required to reach definitive conclusions in relation to the latter hypothesis [69].
The MedD, through molecules such as β-carotene, phenolic components, vitamin C and vitamin E, enhances the activity of the biological antioxidant systems. In two randomized and controlled trials including overweight and healthy subjects, the intake of a diet rich in EVOO and polyphenols was associated with a significant reduction in 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine and 8-isoprostane in urinary samples [70,71]. Antioxidant compounds and/or compounds modulating the human antioxidant system activity introduced with a MedD, such as flavonoids and polyphenols, lower neuro-inflammatory events by blocking the activity of transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB), and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Several biological activities of these foods’ compounds are mediated by the activation of PPAR-γ, which promotes the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines and inhibits NF-κB [56]. The intake of a diet enriched with EVOO decreased the expression of some genes linked to pro-inflammatory pathways, including C-C motif chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1/2/3 (CXCL1/CXCL2/CXCL3), C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6 and oncostatin M (OSM), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of individuals with metabolic syndrome, if compared with diets with low phenolic compound content [72]. In vitro, inhibition of NF-kB by resveratrol (RSV), a polyphenol found in red wine, grapes and peanuts, supported its anti-inflammatory activity [73,74]. Moreover, the PUFA n-3, found in fish oil, suppresses systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation, whereas saturated fatty acid (SFA) promotes inflammation. In addition, diet impacts the intestinal microbiota composition: a healthy diet favors the growth of beneficial symbiotic bacteria and counteracts the growth of pathogens. Microbiota metabolic products may affect gut permeability and stimulate both peripheral and CNS inflammation [50]. A very recent study dealing with a cohort of Southern Italian patients with MS demonstrated that adherence to the MedD positively affected several neurodegenerative parameters, due to modulation of the gut microbiota and systemic inflammation [75]. The brain inflammation is significantly reduced in relationship to a healthy lifestyle with nutritional habits based on antioxidant and anti-inflammatory components, balancing the intestinal microbiome, which affects the brain innate immune cells through the systemic circulation [50]. A diet enriched with EVOO supplemented to TgSwDI mice induced a significant decrease in brain Aβ and neurofibrillary tangles and an improvement in cognitive performance. Consumption of a diet with EVOO following AD onset had minor effects, but still increased Aβ clearance through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [76]. In AD, Aβ modifies glucose metabolism in neural cells and thus insulin resistance has a relevant impact on the progression of this pathology: indeed, diabetes mellitus is often accompanied by the development of NDDs. In an in vitro study, hydroxytyrosol, a polyphenol present in EVOO, added to an astrocytic cellular line in the presence of Aβ, reduced its cytotoxic effect, by the activation of protein kinase B (Akt) and inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), reverting the insulin signaling pathway, showing that olive oil consumption prevents cognitive decline by improving insulin metabolism [77]. In vitro studies on PC12 cells supported the beneficial effect of RSV on Aβ-induced neurotoxicity [78].
Several clinical trials support the hypothesis that the MedD exerts its neuroprotective action against cognitive decline by its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [79]. In a long-term primary prevention clinical trial, Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED), a comparison was made between groups of older adults with elevated vascular risk: one group was consuming a low-fat diet, enriched with nuts and olive oil, and a second group was consuming a low-fat diet; a higher score in cognitive performance was obtained by the first group [80]. A further randomized clinical trial conducted in elderly subjects at high vascular risk, cognitively healthy, showed that the MedD, rich in antioxidants and supplemented with EVOO or nuts, had a beneficial effect on cognitive functions compared with a Western diet [81]. In a recent randomized clinical trial, PD patients, who adhered to a Mediterranean personalized diet for 10 weeks, obtained higher scores on the cognitive evaluation compared with control groups [82]. Another clinical study revealed that a vegetable-based nutritional protocol, with a moderate consumption of meat and alcohol, can prevent PD [82]. Two trials in Japan showed that a healthy diet, rich in fruits and vegetables, confers protection against development of PD and ALS [83,84]. MedD reduced motor impairment and improved quality of life when supplemented to Huntington’s disease (HD) patients [85].
Limited and conflicting evidence on the MedD’s influence on NDDs, such as PD, ALS and HD, necessitates further investigations, especially on the synergistic effect of multiple foods [48]. Finally, the main feature of the MedD is the high plant/animal food ratio resulting in a particular richness of biological compounds that interact with the endocannabinoid system. Few human studies have systematically explored this therapeutic possibility. Furthermore, personalized dietary protocols aiming at improving all NDDs by balancing endocannabinoid tone have not yet been set up. As described below, the evidence obtained so far from both in vitro and in vivo studies suggests treating NDDs by nutritional protocols based on a Mediterranean dietary pattern, affecting the endocannabinoid system (Figure 2).

3. CB2R Ligands: β-Caryophyllene and 3,3′-Diindolylmethane

β-Caryophyllene (BCP) is a bicyclic sesquiterpene widely distributed in the plant kingdom and the most extracted terpenoid from C. sativa [86,87]. BCP is present in numerous spices and foods, including black pepper (Piper nigrum) (7.29%), hops (Humulus lupulus) (5.1–14.5%), oregano (Origanum vulgare) (4.9–15.7%), cloves (Syzygium aromaticum) (1.7–19.5%), valerian (Valeriana officinalis), wild sage (Salvia verbenaca), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) (0.1–8.3%) and basil (Ocimum basilicum), as an essential oil [88]. Depending on the forage quality, BCP can also accumulate in cow’s milk in higher or lower concentrations [89]. The safety of the molecule has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Food Safety Authority, who have approved its use as an additive in cosmetics and foodstuff production [90]. Previous works established its antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, acetylcholinesterase-inhibitory, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, which made it a promising candidate for the treatment of many acute and chronic diseases [91]. At 100 nM, BCP acts as a selective full agonist of CB2Rs [92]. Thanks to its high liposolubility, BCP can cross the BBB, exerting broad-spectrum neuroprotective activity against many NDDs, such as PD, MS and AD [93] (Figure 3).
Neuroinflammation, perpetrated by M1 microglial cell chronic activation, is an important driver mechanism in neuropathology [94]. In an amyloid β1-42 (Aβ1-42)-induced neuroinflammation model, BCP (10, 25 and 50 μM) treatment attenuated the release of nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and pro-inflammatory cytokines in BV2 microglial cells, controlling toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) overexpression and IκBα/NF-κB downstream activity [95]. Likewise, in transgenic APP/PS1 mice, oral administration of BCP (16, 48 and 144 mg/kg) improved neurobehavioral hallmarks of an Alzheimer-like phenotype, reducing Aβ burden, astrogliosis and levels of the pro-inflammatory mediators (cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα)) in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus [96]. In a Wistar rat model of PD, previous administration for 4 weeks of BCP (50 mg/kg) attenuated rotenone-induced toxicity in brainstem dopaminergic neurons and controlled neuroinflammation, decreasing inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), COX-2, TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β expression [97]. BCP treatment has been shown to improve autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), in a mouse model of MS, preventing axonal demyelination through the modulation of Th1/Treg immune balance and the mitigation of microglial cells, and CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte activity [98]. Although the exact mechanism by which BCP exerts its anti-inflammatory activity (already reached at 4 mg/kg/day) is still not known, there is a common agreement that CB2R represents a key player in these processes [99,100]. Misfolding proteins, OxS and many pro-inflammatory cytokines trigger the TLR4/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) pathway, which in turn leads to nuclear translocation of nucleus of activator protein 1 (AP-1) and NF-κB transcription factors [101]. AP-1 and NF-κB upregulate pro-inflammatory mediators, promoting M1 microglial shift [102]. CB2R-dependent inhibition of p38 MAPK/NF-κB signaling has been suggested as a possible mechanism involved in BCP anti-inflammatory effects [103]. Although CBRs are Gi-coupled receptors, CB2Rs enhance cAMP synthesis and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)/cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB) downstream pathway. CREB promotes TGF β, IL-4, IL-10 and CD206 expression, typical markers of an M2 anti-inflammatory microglial phenotype [104]. In a similar fashion, BCP may induce M2 microglial shift via PPAR-γ [105]. In a randomized pilot clinical trial lasting 18 months, pioglitazone (a PPAR-γ agonist) in nondiabetic patients with AD significantly improved memory and cognitive performances [106]. It is well-established that PPAR-γ’s functions are regulated by its main coactivator, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) [107]. Additionally, the expression of PGC-1α can be increased by Sirtuin-1 (Sirt1), a type 3 histone deacetylase, which is assisted by CREB phosphorylation. Taking together these observations, BCP could lead to a M1/M2 microglial shift via CB2R/cAMP/PKA/CREB/Sirt1 signaling, upregulating PGC-1α and the further activation of PPAR-γ [108,109]. OxS is typically involved in neuronal damage and NDD progression [110]. In an in vitro study on the C6 glioma cell line, BCP at a concentration of 0.5 or 1 μM counteracted glutamate-induced OxS cytotoxicity, restoring the glutathione (GSH) antioxidant system and mitochondrial membrane potential [111]. In a similar fashion, BCP (10, 25 and 50 μM) inhibited NO production in BV2 microglial cells [95]. In animal models of NDDs, BCP at doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg/day has been found to control NO and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production in EAE mice [112]. The administration for 4 weeks of BCP (50 mg/kg) proved effective in reducing lipid peroxidation, implementing the reserves of GSH and antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), in PD-like Wistar rats [97,113]. Although part of BCP scavenger activity is directly due to its cyclic structure, CB2R downstream signaling also seems to be important against neuronal OxS [111,114]. Interestingly, Assis et al. (2014) found that BCP’s cytoprotective effects on the C6 glioma cell line were mediated by nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in a CB2R-mediated manner [111]. Nrf2, a member of the cap “n” collar (Cnc) family of transcription factors, is the main cellular sensor of oxidoreductive homeostasis [108,115]. Under OxS conditions, the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and peroxidized lipids, such as 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), trigger Nrf2 nuclear translocation. Nrf2 binding to antioxidant responsive element (ARE) promotes the transcription of detoxifying enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), CAT, glutamate cysteine ligase (CGL), glutathione reductase (GR), peroxiredoxin (Prx) and thioredoxin (Trx), and/or proteins with thiol (-SH) group such as GSH, implicated in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial antioxidant endogenous defense restoration [108,116]. Several works have demonstrated the presence of CB2Rs at the level of the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, basal ganglia and cerebellum, whose modulation may be a promising therapeutic target in AD, PD, HD and hereditary spinocerebellar ataxias in order to counteract the pathologic accumulation of free radicals [97,117,118,119].
The question of which molecular cascade links CB2R to Nrf2 still remains elusive; however, Sirt1 has been found to upregulate Nrf2 expression [120]. It is possible that the cAMP/PKA/CREB/Sirt1 pathway may play an important role, but more studies will be needed to confirm this hypothesis. Moreover, Sirt1 itself: (i) implements the efficiency of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC), stimulating the expression of uncoupling proteins (UCPs) 2, 4 and 5 [121]; (ii) synergistically with Nrf2, upregulates PCG-1α expression which represents a key step in counteracting neuronal mitochondrial dysfunction, promoting mitochondrial biogenesis [122,123]; and (iii) Nrf2, like Sirt1, promotes M2 microglial shift, reducing OxS as well as related neuroinflammation [124]. On the other hand, a recent study demonstrated that in microglia cells, the CNR2 gene (CB2R gene) owns an ARE sequence in the promoter, harnessing a positive feedback loop between Nrf2 activation and upregulation of CB2R transcription which may counter the pathological positive feedback loop between TNFα and NF-κB activation [125,126]. A third neuroprotective activity of BCP is the induction of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) synthesis in a CB2R-dependent manner [127]. BDNF is a neurotrophin, which plays a prominent role in neuronal survival, plasticity and repair as well as in mood and cognitive function regulation [128]. In many NDDs and chronic inflammatory disorders, BDNF levels are reduced [129]. BCP, triggering the CB2R/cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway, enhances PCG-1α levels, which in turn stimulates neuronal synthesis of FNDC5, a myokine secreted by muscle and brain, which finally leads to BDNF expression [128]. Furthermore, high levels of BDNF increase CREB phosphorylation and PCG-1α expression, amplifying BDNF transcription in a positive feedback loop [130]. In microglial cells, BCP upregulates downstream M2-associated mediators, including BDNF, through a CB2R/Nrf2 signaling cascade [124]. It has also been reported that neural progenitor cells express CB2R, which seems to be important for their proliferation and differentiation, opening a promising line of research [131,132] (Figure 3).
The maintenance of neurovascular coupling, resulting from a complex interaction between brain microvascular endothelial cells, astrocytes and neurons, is under the precise control of CB2Rs [133]. Maintenance of BBB integrity is mandatory for brain homeostasis, as it inhibits leukocyte infiltration and promotes Aβ clearance [9]. Tian et al. (2016) performed an in vitro study on co-cultures of brain microvascular endothelial cells, neurons and astrocytes to investigate the effects of BCP on oxygen-glucose deprivation and re-oxygenation-induced injury: BCP (10 μM/L) downregulated Bax and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) expression, and upregulated claudin-5 (CLDN-5), zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), occludin, Bcl-2, and growth associated protein 43 (GAP-43) expression, reducing BBB permeability [134]. It has been suggested that this pro-homeostatic effect of BCP on BBB also involves both the AMPK/cAMP and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways in a CB2R-dependent [127,135] (Figure 3).
Glucosinolates (GLs) belong to a structurally homogeneous class of thiosaccharidic metabolites, mainly contained in roots, seeds and leaves of cruciferous vegetables (Brassicaceae family) such as broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica), cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata f. alba), cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis) and horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) [136,137]. The anticarcinogenic action of GLs has been known for decades, as well as their antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties: regular consumption of cruciferous vegetables is associated with a reduced incidence of cancer [138,139]. Brassicaceae vegetables contain 206–3895 mg/kg of GLs; however, most of these are affected by the cooking processes, so the greatest health benefits seem to be related to their raw intake [140]. A regular dietary consumption of cruciferous vegetables has also been linked to several benefits in NDDs [141]. A specific GL, 3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM), might partly mediate its neuroprotective actions by enhancing endocannabinoid tone. Specifically, DIM is an indole-3-carbinol dimer, noted for its hepatoprotective, antioxidant and anticancer properties [142,143,144]. It is a selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulator, which acts as an agonist or antagonist in a tissue-specific manner, both in the CNS and in peripheral tissues [145]. Investigating DIM pharmacokinetics, Anderton et al. (2004) observed that it reaches a concentration of 5–36.5 μM in the brain within 6 h after oral administration to mice (250 mg/kg) [146]. Indirectly, this work also demonstrated that the molecule can cross the BBB. A clinical trial on healthy subjects reported that up to a single dose of 300 mg, DIM does not induce relevant side effects, although no difference in Cmax emerged between the 200 mg dose when compared with that of 300 mg [147]. The tolerability of the molecule was also confirmed in a pilot study on postmenopausal women with a history of early-stage breast cancer who received an administration of 108 mg DIM/day for 30 days [148]. Based on body surface area, DIM at a dose of 0.8–1.6 mg/kg could be effective in exerting biological activity in humans [149,150]. In vitro, DIM reduces inflammatory mediator release by macrophages and microglial cells after an inflammatory LPS stimulus. Kim et al. (2013) found that both in vitro, on BV-2 microglia, and in vivo, on C57BL/6 mice, DIM respectively downregulated iNOS and COX-2 expression, and attenuated hippocampal inflammation after LPS stimulus, inhibiting NF-κB [151,152]. The p38 MAPK signaling pathway plays an important role in triggering both inflammatory cascade and intrinsic pathway of neuronal apoptosis [153]. In a recent study on mouse hippocampal cell cultures treated with DIM (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 μM), the latter was shown to exert neuroprotective effects against ischemia-induced cell damage, decreasing the levels of pro-apoptotic factors such as caspase-3, ischemia-induced lactate dehydrogenase and p38 MAPK [154]. In a similar fashion, DIM and its analog (DIM-CpPhtBu) were found to be effective in inhibiting apoptosis in vitro and to exert a cytoprotective effect in in vivo models of PD [155,156]. Interestingly, DIM-C-pPhtBu seems to induce neuroprotection, acting as a PPAR-γ agonist [157]. DIM, both in vitro and in vivo, increases the expression of BDNF and antioxidant enzymes (HO-1, CGL and NAD(P)H quinine oxidoreductase-1), significantly reducing hippocampal neuronal depletion [150]. It is possible that DIM exerts neuroprotection through two molecular cascades: the tropomyosin-related kinase receptor B (TrkB)/Akt/CREB/BDNF pathway [158], and the Nrf2/ARE or TrkB/Akt/Nrf2/ARE pathway [159]. In addition, TrkB and BDNF establish a positive feedback loop, reversing scopolamine-induced memory impairment (DIM 10–20 mg/kg) [150]. Taking together these overlaps with BCP downstream biological mediators (e.g., p38MAPK, Nrf2, PPAR-γ, CREB, etc.), a possible role for CB2Rs in the neuroprotective activity of DIM has been proposed [160]. To our knowledge, only one study found that DIM can act as a CB2R partial agonist, with a binding affinity of around 1 μM [161]. If this finding were to be confirmed by further studies, it would provide a new insight into the biological activity of DIM (Figure 3).

4. FAAH Inhibitors: Flavonoids

There is robust evidence that, by promoting endocannabinoid tone through FAAH inhibitors, an overall improvement in many hallmarks of neurodegeneration will take place, with promising results in terms of efficacy and tolerability [25]. Current developments of FAAH inhibitors are aimed at synthesizing compounds that, at the same time, activate receptors, such as the PPAR family, and/or inhibit COX-2 [162,163]. The discovery that AEA and 2-AG are not only substrates of FAAH but also of PPAR-γ and COX-2 suggested that there may be an overlap of structural requirements for the same molecule to act simultaneously on three targets. In support of this theory, indomethacin and ibuprofen, two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), are COX inhibitors and modulators of PPAR-γ and FAAH [164,165]. On the other hand, several compounds, such as flavonoids, acting as PPAR-γ agonists are also FAAH inhibitors [166,167]. Flavonoids are a subclass of polyphenolic compounds with a 15-carbon common structure, arranged in two phenyl rings and a six-membered heterocyclic ring [168]. Based on the mutual connection between B and C rings, and the degree of hydroxylation, oxidation and saturation of the heterocyclic ring, flavonoids are classically divided into six classes: flavonols, flavones, flavan-3-ols (or catechins), flavanones, isoflavones and anthocyanidins [169]. They are ubiquitously distributed in MedD foodstuffs, especially in legumes, fruits and vegetables, noted for their remarkable anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and cytoprotective properties against several chronic diseases [169,170]. Only a few studies have evaluated the FAAH-inhibiting property of flavonoids; however, it could represent a new therapeutic prospect against NDDs. Considering that metabolism and bioavailability of flavonoids in mammals is affected by a complex network of variables including genetic polymorphisms, intestinal transit time and gut microbiota, their intake should be included in appropriate dietary protocols [171]. Biochanin A (4′-methoxy-5, 7-dihydroxy isoflavone) (BCA) is an isoflavone, mainly contained in legumes of the Fabaceae family (soy and red clover), but peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) are nevertheless other sources [172,173]. Of the overall total, BCA is the most represented flavonoid in chickpea, approximately yielding 15.7 mg/150 mg [174]. Its possible use within a nutraceutical approach to various diseases for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, neuroprotective, hepatoprotective and antimicrobial properties has been considered [175]. To our knowledge, only Thors et al. (2010) reported an FAAH-inhibitory activity of BCA [176]. According to this study, BCA in vitro inhibits rat, mouse and human FAAH (IC50 respectively 1.4, 1.8 and 2.4 μM), preventing 0.5 μM AEA hydrolysis. On the other hand, in an in vivo model of persistent pain, 100 μM BCA locally injected prevented extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation induced by intraplantar formalin injection in C57BL/6 mice. Interestingly, the latter effect was suppressed by AM251 (30 μM i.p. administration), a CB1R antagonist/inverse agonist, suggesting that this BCA activity is dependent on AEA accumulation [176]. These preliminary results suggest that BCA exerts a peripheral antinociceptive effect driven by FAAH inhibition; however, its activity in the CNS remains uncertain. Secondly, implementing its dietary intake might be insufficient to achieve a therapeutic concentration: in a group of fourteen volunteers, 80 mg of isoflavone extract from red clover was administered for two weeks but the maximum plasma concentration of BCA averaged 48 ng/mL (170 nM) [177]. However, BCA in vivo undergoes a conjugation process that finally converts it to genistein, another compound belonging to the isoflavone class, with FAAH-inhibitory activity [178,179]. In addition, BCA may exert a weak synergy with other substances, enhancing EC tone [176]. Genistein is a phytoestrogen isoflavone, produced by the metabolism of its precursors, biochanin A or formononetin, or taken up as such through diet. At micromolar concentrations, it acts as a PPAR-γ agonist and as a competitive inhibitor of FAAH (Ki value 2.8 μM) [180,181,182]. In a similar way, daidzein, a related isoflavone, activates PPAR-γ [183] and competitively inhibits FAAH (Ki value 1.7 μM) [182]. The major dietary source of genistein and daidzein in humans is soy and its derivatives. The MedD can also allow their intake, mainly through the consumption of whole grain bread and legumes such as beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), lentils (Lens culinaris), chickpeas (Ciser arietinum), split chicklings (Lathyrus sativus) and fava beans (Vicia fava) [184]. Despite the minor amount of genistein and daidzein in MedD foodstuffs, their potential cumulative long-term effect cannot be excluded if regularly consumed from a range of sources [185]. In a Mediterranean menu, 92% and 96% of the daily intake of genistein and daidzein, respectively, comes from brown bread (3.55 and 4.71 mg/week) [184]. The therapeutic potential of these two phytoestrogens’ supplementation in the treatment of several pathological conditions, including NDDs, is well-established because of the complex interactions between microbiota and their second metabolites; however, the exact dietary amount necessary to achieve a therapeutic effect is still not known (0.05–0.7 mg/kg for menopausal symptom treatment) [180,186,187]. Two studies on different cell cultures have demonstrated an FAAH-inhibitory property of genistein and daidzein, which was not additive for genistein to URB597 [179,182]. Whether this FAAH-inhibitory activity also takes place in vivo is still uncertain; however, it is known that the high soy dietary intake in Asian countries increases serum levels of genistein and daidzein to 2–4 μM, compatible with their Ki values [188,189].
Apigenin (4’,5,7-trihydroxyflavone) (APi) is one of the most represented flavons in the plant kingdom [190]. In recent decades, its prominent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties have been investigated in AD and PD, both in vitro and in vivo [191]. APi interacts at micromolar concentrations with PPAR-γ, inhibits COX-2, and is a potent competitive inhibitor of FAAH [166]. Furthermore, it can also cross the BBB [192,193]. Many MedD foodstuffs contain Api, including vegetables (parsley, onions, celery), herbs (chamomile, oregano, thyme, basil), fruits (oranges) and plant-based beverages (tea, beer and wine) [194]. In a typical Mediterranean menu, Api accounts for 77% of flavone intake (6.7 mg/day), in which parsley is the primary source (96%) [184]. Based on studies in animal models, the dose required to observe a therapeutic benefit is approximately 7.5–50 mg/kg [195]. In homogenates and intact cells, Api showed a significant FAAH-inhibitory activity, making it even more attractive for NDD treatment [166]. The most well-known FAAH inhibitor/PPAR-γ activator flavonoid is kaempferol (Kmp) [196,197]. Kmp is a flavonol, widely distributed in leafy vegetables, apples, onions, broccoli, berries, tea, cabbage, broccoli, endive, kale, beans, tomato, strawberries, leek and grapes of Mediterranean countries [198]. Several molecular mechanisms have been recognized as important mediators of its neuroprotective properties, in both in vitro and in vivo models of AD and PD [198,199]. Of the twenty flavonoids tested by Thors et al. (2008), Kmp was the most potent competitive FAAH inhibitor with a Ki value of 5 μM [166]. The amount of Kmp usually consumed with a Mediterranean menu is about 7.94 mg/week, which may not be sufficient to achieve the necessary tissue concentration in vivo [184,200]. For the first time, in a contextual fear-conditioning animal model, it was demonstrated that Kmp facilitates the extinction of aversive memories, along with a reduction in anxiety in rats. The maximum therapeutic response was achieved with a 40 mg/kg dose (IC50 1 μM), while it was completely abolished by the co-administration of rimonabant, a CB1R antagonist [201].

5. Dietary ω-3 and ω-6 Fatty Acids Balance and Endocannabinoid System Coupling

PUFAs are key components of phospholipid membranes, as well as precursors of a large repertoire of bioactive lipid mediators. Traditionally, PUFAs are classified according to the position of the first desaturation from the methyl, n or ω terminal. The lack of expression of Δ12- and Δ15-desaturases in mammals, capable of inserting a double bond on the ω-3 and ω-6 carbons, makes α-linolenic (ALA, ω-3) and linoleic (LA, ω-6) essential fatty acids [202]. ALA and LA represent the precursors of the two most represented PUFAs in the brain, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, ω-3 PUFA) and arachidonic acid (ARA, ω-6 PUFA), respectively [203]. Because of the low efficiency of endogenous hepatic and brain biosynthesis of DHA and ARA [204], the most efficient way to enrich tissues of these PUFAs is their direct intake from the diet [205]. In addition, N-docosahexaenoylethanolamine (DHEA) and N-eicosapentaenoyl-ethanolamine (EPEA) are two pro-homeostatic lipid mediators, obtained from subsequent conversion of DHA and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, ω-3 PUFA), respectively [206]. On the other hand, ARA is the precursor of endogenous ligands of CBRs, including AEA and 2-AG [207]. Previous studies found that the main source of precursors for EC synthesis in mammals derives from dietary fatty acids and PUFAs. Changes in dietary style modulate their tissue levels [208]. In this regard, the maintenance of a correct balance between ω-3 and ω-6 PUFAs plays a crucial role: for example, the usual Western diet has a ω-6:ω-3 PUFA ratio of 15:1, far from the ideal ratio of 4:1 [209]. It is well-established that high consumption of LA (ω-6)-enriched foods drives an abnormal eicosanoid biosynthesis, involved in the etiology of many chronic diseases, while a diet rich in ω-3 PUFAs has a protective role against cardiovascular and NDDs [210,211,212]. Interestingly, the adherence to MedD permits a congruous intake of ω-3 PUFAs, widely distributed in plant-derived foods including walnuts, purslane, legumes, green leafy vegetables, and plant oils such as olive oil [213,214]. Animal-derived ω-3 is also important: in the ecosystem, algae are the primary producers of DHA and EPA, which, once they have entered the food chain through marine phytoplankton, accumulate in fish, especially in fish oil (salmon, trout, mackerel, herring and sardines) [215]. ECs seem to be involved in the neuroprotective properties of dietary ω-6:ω-3 ratio [205]. For example, a chronic consumption of ARA (ω-6)-enriched foods is associated with an increase in EC levels, causing desensitization and downregulation of CBRs [5]. On the other hand, a dietary supplementation of ω-3 PUFAs enhances plasma and tissue concentrations of EPA and DHA, balancing AEA and 2-AG amounts [216]. In light of these observations, one of the main problems related to chronic exposure to a typical Western diet may be a marked uncoupling between the expression and localization of CBRs and the uncoordinated synthesis of endogenous ligands. Diets with high amount of ω-3 PUFAs have been shown to increase the expression of CBRs and biosynthetic enzymes, such as NAPE-PLD, DAGLα and DAGβ, in mice [217]. ECs are key players in synaptic plasticity regulation [218]. In mice, dietary deprivation of ω-3 PUFAs leads to anxiety-like behavior and disrupts the CB1R signaling pathway (ERK1/2) in the prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus and hippocampus [219]. In addition, chronic ω-3 deficiency interferes with endocannabinoid-mediated long-term synaptic depression (LTD) in the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens, and inhibits hippocampal endocannabinoid-mediated inhibitory LTD [220,221]. DHA (ω-3) treatment, in cultured hippocampal neurons, promotes TRPV1 and CB1R expression, while in vivo it improves spatial memory in rats (150 or 300 mg DHA/kg/day) [222]. Taken together, these findings could explain some of the benefits observed in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who implemented ω-3 PUFA consumption [223].
Furthermore, the endocannabinoid system could undergo a progressive age-related deficit, accelerating cognitive decline [224]. These hallmarks of brain aging could be attenuated by ω-3 PUFA supplementation [222,225]. The stimulation of neurogenesis is an important therapeutic target in NDD treatment: EPA seems to stimulate neural stem cell proliferation via the CBRs/p38 MAPK signaling cascade, while DHA could be involved in neural stem cell differentiation [226]. Recent studies have focused on a series of ω-3 endocannabinoids (ω-3ECs), such as DHEA and EPEA [159], produced by DHA and EPA conversion through the same AEA biosynthetic pathways [227]. DHEA and EPEA act as partial agonists of CBRs and PPAR-γ [228]. These ω-3ECs properties could induce the “entourage effect”, boosting AEA and 2-AG biological activity through their partial affinity for the same receptors and enzymes [205]. DHEA, named “synaptamide”, can also bind G protein-coupled orphan receptor (GPR110), promoting neurogenesis, neuronal differentiation and synaptogenesis via cAMP-dependent pathways [229]. Moreover, DHEA has been shown to reduce neuroinflammation, both in vitro and in vivo, enhancing cAMP/PKA signaling and inhibiting NF-κB activation [230].

6. Between “Entourage” Effect and Noncanonical CBRs: N-Acylethanolamines (NAEs) and Resveratrol

N-acylethanolamines (NAEs) are a series of lipid mediators, belonging to the same class as AEA, derived from the common precursor N-acylated phosphatidylethanolamine (NAPE) [45]. NAEs are pleiotropic compounds produced on demand both in the CNS, in which their levels greatly exceed those of AEA, and in peripheral tissues [231,232]. This “extended” EC family, including PEA, OEA and stearoylethanolamide (SEA), shares with AEA the same biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes. Specifically, NAEs can be the substrate of FAAH-1 and FAAH-2 isoforms [233,234]: FAAH-deficient mice have increased tissue levels of both AEA and NAEs [235]. NAAA is a second enzyme located in lysosomes, deputed to NAE degradation at low pH, although a preference for PEA was demonstrated [236,237]. In addition to canonical CBRs, other receptors have been proposed as targets of ECs, and for some of them, NAEs would represent potential ligands. For example, OEA and PEA activate TRPV1, while PEA could act as an orphan GPCR 55 (GPR55) agonist [238,239]. Despite these similarities with AEA, these endocannabinoid-related mediators lack affinity for CBRs [240]. The concentrations of NAEs, as well as NAPEs, are typically increased during brain injury, suggesting a possible neuroprotective role [241]. Two possible mechanisms are the “entourage effect” and the direct receptor activation. The first one is mediated by AEA accumulation following FAAH-competitive inhibition and/or FAAH downregulation [242,243]. The second one involves NAEs binding to specific receptors: PEA acts as a GPR55 agonist, which has been linked to several downstream signaling events, including CREB, NF-κB and ERK1/2 phosphorylation [244]; TRPV1, activated by both PEA and OEA, modulates neuroinflammatory processes [245]; and NAEs enhance PPAR-α signaling, promoting anti-inflammatory response and neuroprotection [246,247]. According to in vitro and in vivo studies, increasing NAE levels may represent a viable therapeutic option for NND treatment [240]. For example, OEA and PEA have been shown to reduce ROS production, preventing mitochondrial OxS [248,249]. Since its discovery, PEA has been considered an anti-inflammatory agent: it promotes microglia motility, probably in a PPAR-α-mediated manner [250]. Moreover, its analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties seem to require CBRs and TRPV1, through the “entourage effect” [232]. In both in vitro and in vivo models of PD, OEA exerts neuroprotection against 6-OHDA-induced degeneration of substantia nigra [251]. OEA and PEA prevent LPS-induced NF-κB activation, iNOS and COX-2 expression, and OxS in rats’ frontal cortex [252]. NAEs can also lead to pro-resolving signal synthesis, such as IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonists [253]. Despite NAE levels being elevated during brain injuries, they may not be enough for an adequate response [254]. Growing evidence suggests that an exogenous administration of NAPEs and NEAs may have a clinical relevance for many NDDs [255]. In EAE mice, exogenous administration of PEA reduces inflammation, demyelination and neuronal damage with a general improvement in clinical phenotype [256]. In both AD and PD in vivo models, PEA supplementation mitigates inflammatory response, OxS and neuronal apoptosis, ameliorating behavioral impairment [257,258]. In a similar fashion, OEA supplementation showed efficacy in counteracting neurobehavioral changes in stress-related disorders as well as in chronic neuroinflammatory diseases [259,260]. In light of these observations, encouraging intake of NAEs and/or their precursor NAPEs can boost their tissue levels, which in turn can affect the progression of many NDDs through modulation of the endocannabinoid system and PPAR-α [255]. It is known that high-fat diets (e.g., Western dietary style) reduce intestinal and hippocampal concentrations of ECs and NAEs [261,262]. On the other hand, strict adherence to MedD induces EC and NAE synthesis. Artmann et al. (2008) investigated five different types of dietary fats, evaluating their short-term effects on the endocannabinoid system: the diet rich in olive oil (MedD-like) increased brain levels of OEA, LEA and AEA in rats [208]. In a recent study, dealing with a cross-sectional sample of 195 healthy men and women, the levels of several lipid mediators belonging to the endocannabinoid system were assessed before and after two days of MedD. A short-term change in eating style and fatty acid intake was found to increase circulating levels of NAEs [263]. Moreover, the EC, NAE and NAPE contents of 43 food products were evaluated in order to simulate their daily intake in three different diets: MedD had the highest amount of NAPEs and NAEs compared with a Western diet (263 vs. 163 mg/day and 0.25 vs. 0.08 mg/day, respectively), with the same EC content (0.17 mg/day), which was higher than a vegetarian diet (0.01 mg/day) [264]. Plant-food products are rich in NAPEs and NAEs, especially refined wheat flour, which seems to be the main source of NEAs, followed by legumes (beans, lentils and chickpeas). Extra-virgin olive oil contains approximately 53.9 ng/g dw of LEAs and 85.7 ng/g dw of OEAs. On the other hand, animal food products are the primary source of dietary ECs [264]. RSV (3,4’,5 trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) is a natural polyphenol, contained in several plant-derived foodstuffs of MedD, such as grapes, peanuts and berries (blackberries, blackcurrants, blueberries, cranberries) [265]. Since red grape skin contains the highest concentration of RSV, red wine represents its most concentrated dietary source (mean RSV content of 6 mg/L) [266]. In recent decades, it has proved to be a promising therapeutic strategy against cardiovascular diseases and NDDs [267,268]. However, the protective effects of red wine follow a U-curve: the greatest benefits seem to be associated with a low-to-moderate consumption (10–50 g/day for men, 5–25 g/day for women), within a Mediterranean pattern [269]. A critical therapeutic limitation is RSV’s poor bioavailability, due to its rapid conversion into glucuronated and sulfonated conjugated forms [266]. On the other hand, it has some attractive characteristics that make it particularly interesting for NDD treatment: RSV can cross the BBB and, binding Sirt1, enhance its activity by about two times [270,271]. As previously reported, Sirt1 plays important roles in neuropathology, improving neuronal antioxidant reserves as well as promoting an M2 microglial shift [108]. According to epidemiologic evidence, modest wine consumption protects against AD onset [272]. Likewise, works on animal models of HD, PD and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have confirmed the neuroprotective properties of RSV [273]. Beyond classic immunomodulatory and antioxidant action, part of RSV’s neurotrophic effects may be mediated by the endocannabinoid system.
The finding that arachidin-1, arachidin-3 and piceatannol (RSV analogs) bind human and mice CBRs was the first evidence to suggest the abovementioned hypothesis [274]. Hassanzadeh et al. (2016) investigated RSV’s antidepressant activity in male Wistar rats, comparing its neurotrophic effects with amitriptyline and clonazepam: after four weeks of treatment, RSV enhanced nerve growth factor (NGF), 2-AG and AEA release at the level of the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala and olfactory system. Interestingly, pre-treatment with a CB1R antagonist (AM251) prevented an increase in NGF levels [275]. NGF is a neurotrophin, produced in the cortex and hippocampus and involved in cholinergic–hippocampal interactions, as well as in the synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis of the hippocampus [276,277]. Low NGF levels are associated with AD progression, while their elevation has been shown to improve cognitive performance [278]. In a murine model of neuropathic pain, RSV exerted antinociceptive activity through AEA and 2-AG, in a CB1R- and μ-opioid receptor-mediated manner [279]. In another study, the neuroprotective properties of a single acute dose of RSV were tested against bilateral common carotid artery occlusion, followed by reperfusion challenge. In the frontal cortex, RSV pre-treatment (i) controls lipoperoxide levels induced by hypoperfusion/reperfusion stress; (ii) increases DHA and PEA levels; (iii) triggers CBR and PPAR-α expression; and (iv) drives the synthesis of syntaxin-3 and post-synaptic density protein-95 (PSD-95), two proteins involved in synaptic plasticity [280] (Table 1).

7. EC Activity and Diseases

Recently, much interest has been focused on the role of endocannabinoids in peripheral tissues, beyond the central and peripheral nervous system, as an increasing number of functions have been attributed to this class of compounds, and they are now considered a potential candidate for the treatment of several diseases.

8. EC Induction of Obesity Counteracted by MedD-Related Compounds

One important issue has been the establishment of ECs’ orexigenic function, mediated by binding to CB1Rs distributed within the hypothalamus, as evidenced by an increase in food intake following AEA administration [287]. EC levels raise during starvation while, when satiety is reached, their concentration in the hypothalamus and the mesolimbic areas slowly decreases [287]. High-calorie dietary intake induces endocannabinoid hypertone and CB1R hyperactivation. In previous in vivo studies with obese mice and clinical trials in overweight individuals, treatments with CB1R antagonists or reverse agonists exerted an antiobesity effect, improving metabolism-related risk factors [6,288]. In obese mice treated with a CB1R antagonist, a significant reduction in food intake and a broad improvement in metabolic parameters were found [289,290]. Increased levels of AEA in the plasma of women with binge eating syndrome confirmed the endocannabinoid system hyperactivity related to an excessive food intake [291]. In the past, this endocannabinoid action conferred an evolutionary benefit because hyperphagia ensured an accumulation of energy within adipose tissue, which was essential for survival during periods of famine. High-sugar diets, promoted by the advancement of agricultural practices, have disrupted the homeostatic role of CB1Rs [160,292,293], but CB2Rs may have a protective role, counteracting the metabolic impact of CB1R dysregulation [160]. In modern societies where the Western diet is widespread, an increased food intake results in the accumulation of visceral fat, leading to the development of obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, the main risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases [6,160,287,294].
In obesity, the imbalance of endocannabinoid peripheral signaling also depends on a reduction in FAAH metabolites, which impacts visceral fat, leading to CB1R overstimulation and subsequent adiponectin inhibition, resulting in the exacerbation of insulin resistance and low-grade inflammation [288,295]. CB1R overactivity associated with hyperphagia was found in obese patients with Prader–Willi syndrome and in obese mouse models, and peripheral CB1R antagonist treatment promoted weight loss [296]. A good balance of omega-6 (ω-6) and ω-3, needed for a healthy diet, is not found in Western diets [5]. Important PUFAs, such as LA, which are then converted to arachidonic acid, increase levels of ECs chronically, inducing a subsequent downregulation and desensitization of their receptor system, contributing to obesity, as shown in mouse models [297]. In obese mice supplied with a diet rich in arachidonic acid, the introduction of ω-3 fatty acids lowered endocannabinoid tone in adipose tissues and liver. Thus, it appears that dietary intake of ω-3 restores endocannabinoid signaling and also “entourage” compounds such as PEA and OEA [5]. In a 2012 study, mice on an LA diet showed adipogenesis and EC overactivity; supplementation with EPA and DHA restored the physiological levels of AEA and 2-AG [297].
Common probiotics, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium, which are found in foods including yogurt, increase CB2R expression [298] and downregulate CB1R expression by reducing their mRNA levels, as shown in obese mice [299].

9. ECs and Gut Microbiome

A correlation between ECs and microbiome has recently been identified. Changes in eating habits can induce the development of metabolic disorders by influencing the crosstalk between ECs and the gut microbiota [300].
Obesity promotes changes in the gut microbiota, with a reduction in the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio followed by enteric mucus degradation, thinning of the intestinal barrier, and increased gut permeability, ending with the development of low-grade chronic inflammation of the intestinal mucosa. LPS released by bacteria increases AEA levels, targeting FAAH expression [301].
A CB1 receptor blockade restored the gut barrier in obese mice by improving the expression of tight junction proteins [299]. A cannabinoid hypertonus would therefore lead to an impairment of gut permeability with an increased circulation of bacterial endotoxins, and a consequent stimulus in the synthesis and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. A further consequence may consist in the increased transfer of these cytokines to the brain, by an increase in BBB permeability or even by transport through the afferent fibers of the vagus nerve (gut–brain axis) [302,303]. In fact, rimonabant, which antagonizes CB1R, reduces LPS levels and inflammation [304].

10. ECs and Inflammation

One of the main roles of ECs concerns the modulation of inflammatory processes and cells belonging to the immune system, therefore affecting all diseases based on chronic inflammation including cancer, diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis, as well as cardiovascular, chronic airway, inflammatory bowel, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases [305].
Increasing the levels of AEA and 2-AG in the brain with the use of inhibitors of the main degrading enzymes, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), has been documented as an effective strategy to control the immune response in different models of MS, Huntington’s disease (HD) and AD.

11. ECs and Cancer

Anandamide and 2-AG exert a pro-apoptotic effect in cultured tumor cells and inhibit their migration, holding the potential to modulate tumor growth [306]. Several studies have shown that ECs as well as phytocannabinoids and synthetic cannabinoids exert an inhibitory effect on cancer growth by inducing apoptosis or cell cycle arrest, or by inducing autophagic cell death by inhibition of mTORC1. Furthermore, several inhibitors of EC cathabolic enzymes suppressed cancer aggressiveness [307]

12. Endocannabinoid Tone Modulation by Plant Flavonoids

Plant flavonoids, including BCA and Kmp, modulate endocannabinoid tone through FAAH inhibition; show antioxidant, antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory activity; and have been suggested to decrease risk factors for cardiovascular disease, although this role is still under debate [176,195]. RSV interacts with both CB1Rs and CB2Rs [171]. RSV activates SIRT1 and was shown to have an antiobesity effect in mice and rats through inhibition of PPAR-γ in adipocytes [308,309,310,311,312]. RSV modulates glucose uptake in T2DM via AMPK activation [309,313]. Even though in vitro and in vivo studies seem to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of RSV, clinical studies do not always confirm these results in both obese and diabetic subjects [308,314]. Many studies have shown the anti-inflammatory properties of RSV [315]: in rats with an inflamed colon, RSV suppressed production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines COX-1 and COX-2 [316], and in murine and human inflamed adipose tissue, RSV was found to lower the expression of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 [317,318]. In addition, RSV obtained from a grape extract decreased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after the intake of a high-calorie meal in healthy subjects as well as in diabetic and hypertensive subjects [319,320]. In a rat model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis induced by a high-fat diet, RSV intake inhibited CB1Rs in the colon and diminished intestinal inflammation through activation of CB2Rs, suggesting its role in preserving intestinal barrier integrity by modulation of ECs [321].
Interestingly, there are relatively few plant-based secondary metabolites that trigger CB1Rs compared with those that activate CB2Rs [283]. Overall, CB2R activation by cannabimimetics in plant-based diets has a salutary effect against obesity-induced risks, as they counteract the CB1R effects. [160,322].
ECs, via PPAR-γ, physiologically control adipocyte maturation and lipid storage, exerting a positive effect against lipotoxicity, which induces insulin resistance, risk of diabetes, and cardiovascular and hepatic pathologies related to metabolic syndrome [323]. Vegetable-based diets seem to have a protective role, triggering PPAR-γ activation [324].
BCP induced PPAR-γ-mediated anti-inflammatory effects in mice with colitis triggered by sodium dextran sulfate (DSS) [325]. In LPS-stimulated human monocytes, BCP caused a significant reduction in ERK1/2 and JNK1/2 and a reduction in the serum levels of TNF-α and IL-1β. In CB2R knockout mice, BCP treatment did not decrease inflammation caused by carrageenan, indicating the importance of CB2R signaling [92]. In rats with diabetes mellitus, high doses of BCP decreased inflammation and OxS induced by hyperglycemia [326,327]. BCP selectively binds peripheral CB2Rs with a cannabimimetic activity, with a positive activity on inflammatory processes [328,329].
In animal models of colorectal carcinogenesis, a diet based on olive oil, ω-3-/ω-6 fatty acids, showed antiobesity and anti-inflammatory activity through the interaction with CB2Rs, helping adipogenic homeostasis and decreasing endocannabinoid activation [330,331].
Further insights into the molecular processes described above (see Table 1) may result in new therapeutic strategies. In light of these observations, a healthy lifestyle associated with the MedD seems to be a key factor in the modulation of the endocannabinoid system, which counteracts inflammation and impacts CNS functions [12,332].

13. Conclusions

The endocannabinoid system is a pleiotropic complex of endogenous pro-homeostatic mediators [333], and its suboptimal functioning is associated with many diseases, including NDDs [5]. “Clinical endocannabinoid deficiency syndrome” was the definition that was used to describe these pathological conditions [334]. From a phylogenetic perspective, the co-evolution of dietary habits and human physiology could explain how many phytochemicals and MedD foodstuffs modulate the endocannabinoid system: McPartland et al. (2007) suggest that diet represents a key player in the shaping of certain endocannabinoid genes [335]. The mismatch between a high-calorie diet, such as the Western diet, and ancient genes, adaptive among our ancestors during food restriction and hunting, leads to chronic metabolic disorders and NDDs [160]. CB1R overstimulation, abnormal activation of the endocannabinoid system and its subsequent downregulation may be also consequences of an excessive consumption of foods rich in refined carbohydrates and fats [5,264]. On the other hand, a high consumption of vegetable foodstuffs and spices, typical of the MedD, contains the appropriate amounts of CB2R agonists and cannabimimetic components necessary to counter CB1R-mediated metabolic stress [160]. Additionally, it may restore the uncoupling between the expression and localization of CBRs as well as reducing neuroinflammation, OxS and neuroapoptosis, via multiple downstream cascades in the CNS (Table 2). Despite the small number of studies and the few human trials conducted to evaluate the in vivo endocannabinoid-mediated neuroprotection provided by some cannabimimetic compounds of the MedD, preclinical studies have shown that they may represent a promising therapeutic strategy to slow down the progression of many NDDs. Their metabolism and bioavailability are also critical aspects to consider in any dietary intervention.
To our knowledge, this is the first review that aims to evaluate the evidence accumulated in the literature on the neuroprotective, immunomodulatory and antioxidant properties of the Mediterranean lifestyle related to the modulation of the endocannabinoid system. In light of this nutraceutical paradigm, a new prospect for research and clinical interventions against neurodegenerative diseases based on a specific dietary protocol is suggested.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A., A.B., R.B.; Formal analysis, E.M., A.P., R.B.; Resources: R.B.; Writing-original daft preparation F.A., A.B.; Writing review and editing, A.P., R.B.; Supervision, R.B.; Funding acquisition, R.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Sapienza Ateneo RM120172B745088B to R.B.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moreno, E.; Cavic, M.; Canela, E.I. Functional Fine-Tuning of Metabolic Pathways by the Endocannabinoid System—Implications for Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Simon, V.; Cota, D. Mechanisms in Endocrinology: Endocannabinoids and Metabolism: Past, Present and Future. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2017, 176, R309–R324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wu, J. Cannabis, Cannabinoid Receptors, and Endocannabinoid System: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2019, 40, 297–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gowran, A.; Noonan, J.; Campbell, V.A. The Multiplicity of Action of Cannabinoids: Implications for Treating Neurodegeneration. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2011, 17, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McPartland, J.M.; Guy, G.W.; Di Marzo, V. Care and Feeding of the Endocannabinoid System: A Systematic Review of Potential Clinical Interventions That Upregulate the Endocannabinoid System. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pagotto, U.; Marsicano, G.; Cota, D.; Lutz, B.; Pasquali, R. The Emerging Role of the Endocannabinoid System in Endocrine Regulation and Energy Balance. Endocr. Rev. 2006, 27, 73–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Silvestri, C.; Di Marzo, V. The Endocannabinoid System in Energy Homeostasis and the Etiopathology of Metabolic Disorders. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Harrold, J.A.; Williams, G. The Cannabinoid System: A Role in Both the Homeostatic and Hedonic Control of Eating? Br. J. Nutr. 2003, 90, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vendel, E.; de Lange, E.C.M. Functions of the CB1 and CB2 Receptors in Neuroprotection at the Level of the Blood–Brain Barrier. Neuromol. Med. 2014, 16, 620–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Svizenska, I.; Dubovy, P.; Sulcova, A. Cannabinoid Receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2), Their Distribution, Ligands and Functional Involvement in Nervous System Structures—A Short Review. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 2008, 90, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berdyshev, E.V. Cannabinoid Receptors and the Regulation of Immune Response. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2000, 108, 169–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sharkey, K.A.; Wiley, J.W. The Role of the Endocannabinoid System in the Brain–Gut Axis. Gastroenterology 2016, 151, 252–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Fagan, S.G.; Campbell, V.A. The Influence of Cannabinoids on Generic Traits of Neurodegeneration: Cannabinoids and Neurodegeneration. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2014, 171, 1347–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cristino, L.; Bisogno, T.; Di Marzo, V. Cannabinoids and the Expanded Endocannabinoid System in Neurological Disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 16, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Grygiel-Górniak, B. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Their Ligands: Nutritional and Clinical Implications—A Review. Nutr. J. 2014, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Laleh, P.; Yaser, K.; Abolfazl, B.; Shahriar, A.; Mohammad, A.J.; Nazila, F.; Alireza, O. Oleoylethanolamide Increases the Expression of PPAR-A and Reduces Appetite and Body Weight in Obese People: A Clinical Trial. Appetite 2018, 128, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luchicchi, A.; Pistis, M. Anandamide and 2-Arachidonoylglycerol: Pharmacological Properties, Functional Features, and Emerging Specificities of the Two Major Endocannabinoids. Mol. Neurobiol. 2012, 46, 374–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fezza, F.; Bari, M.; Florio, R.; Talamonti, E.; Feole, M.; Maccarrone, M. Endocannabinoids, Related Compounds and Their Metabolic Routes. Molecules 2014, 19, 17078–17106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fernández-Ruiz, J.; Romero, J.; Ramos, J.A. Endocannabinoids and Neurodegenerative Disorders: Parkinson’s Disease, Huntington’s Chorea, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Others. In Endocannabinoids; Pertwee, R.G., Ed.; Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 231, pp. 233–259. ISBN 978-3-319-20824-4. [Google Scholar]
  20. Basavarajappa, B.S.; Shivakumar, M.; Joshi, V.; Subbanna, S. Endocannabinoid System in Neurodegenerative Disorders. J. Neurochem. 2017, 142, 624–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chitnis, T.; Weiner, H.L. CNS Inflammation and Neurodegeneration. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3577–3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Scuderi, C.; Steardo, L. Neuroglial Roots of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Therapeutic Potential of Palmitoylethanolamide in Models of Alzheimer’s Disease. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2013, 12, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Köfalvi, A.; Lemos, C.; Martín-Moreno, A.M.; Pinheiro, B.S.; García-García, L.; Pozo, M.A.; Valério-Fernandes, Â.; Beleza, R.O.; Agostinho, P.; Rodrigues, R.J.; et al. Stimulation of Brain Glucose Uptake by Cannabinoid CB2 Receptors and Its Therapeutic Potential in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuropharmacology 2016, 110, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Chen, R.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, D.; Feng, G.; Tang, Y.-P.; Teng, Z.; Chen, C. Monoacylglycerol Lipase Is a Therapeutic Target for Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Rep. 2012, 2, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ren, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, N. Potential Application of Endocannabinoid System Agents in Neuropsychiatric and Neurodegenerative Diseases—Focusing on FAAH/MAGL Inhibitors. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2020, 41, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. D’Addario, C.; Di Francesco, A.; Arosio, B.; Gussago, C.; Dell’Osso, B.; Bari, M.; Galimberti, D.; Scarpini, E.; Altamura, A.C.; Mari, D.; et al. Epigenetic Regulation of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase in Alzheimer Disease. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Aso, E.; Juvés, S.; Maldonado, R.; Ferrer, I. CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist Ameliorates Alzheimer-Like Phenotype in AβPP/PS1 Mice. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2013, 35, 847–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Koppel, J.; Vingtdeux, V.; Marambaud, P.; d’Abramo, C.; Jimenez, H.; Stauber, M.; Friedman, R.; Davies, P. CB2 Receptor Deficiency Increases Amyloid Pathology and Alters Tau Processing in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. García-Arencibia, M.; González, S.; de Lago, E.; Ramos, J.A.; Mechoulam, R.; Fernández-Ruiz, J. Evaluation of the Neuroprotective Effect of Cannabinoids in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease: Importance of Antioxidant and Cannabinoid Receptor-Independent Properties. Brain Res. 2007, 1134, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shi, J.; Cai, Q.; Zhang, J.; He, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, R.; Jin, L. AM1241 Alleviates MPTP-Induced Parkinson’s Disease and Promotes the Regeneration of DA Neurons in PD Mice. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 67837–67850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chung, Y.C.; Shin, W.-H.; Baek, J.Y.; Cho, E.J.; Baik, H.H.; Kim, S.R.; Won, S.-Y.; Jin, B.K. CB2 Receptor Activation Prevents Glial-Derived Neurotoxic Mediator Production, BBB Leakage and Peripheral Immune Cell Infiltration and Rescues Dopamine Neurons in the MPTP Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 2016, 48, e205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gómez-Gálvez, Y.; Palomo-Garo, C.; Fernández-Ruiz, J.; García, C. Potential of the Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor as a Pharmacological Target against Inflammation in Parkinson’s Disease. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 64, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fernández-Suárez, D.; Celorrio, M.; Riezu-Boj, J.I.; Ugarte, A.; Pacheco, R.; González, H.; Oyarzabal, J.; Hillard, C.J.; Franco, R.; Aymerich, M.S. The Monoacylglycerol Lipase Inhibitor JZL184 Is Neuroprotective and Alters Glial Cell Phenotype in the Chronic MPTP Mouse Model. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 2603–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Celorrio, M.; Fernández-Suárez, D.; Rojo-Bustamante, E.; Echeverry-Alzate, V.; Ramírez, M.J.; Hillard, C.J.; López-Moreno, J.A.; Maldonado, R.; Oyarzábal, J.; Franco, R.; et al. Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibition for the Symptomatic Relief of Parkinson’s Disease. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 57, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Viveros-Paredes, J.M.; Gonzalez-Castañeda, R.E.; Escalante-Castañeda, A.; Tejeda-Martínez, A.R.; Castañeda-Achutiguí, F.; Flores-Soto, M.E. Effect of inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase on MPTP-induced dopaminergic neuronal damage. Neurología 2019, 34, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Di Marzo, V.; Hill, M.P.; Crossman, V.; Brotchie, M. Enhanced Levels of Endogenous Cannabinoids in the Globus Pallidus Are Associated with a Reduction in Movement in an Animal Model of Parkinson’s Disease. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 1432–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pisani, A.; Fezza, F.; Galati, S.; Battista, N.; Napolitano, S.; Finazzi-Agrò, A.; Bernardi, G.; Brusa, L.; Pierantozzi, M.; Stanzione, P.; et al. High Endogenous Cannabinoid Levels in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Untreated Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Ann. Neurol. 2005, 57, 777–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Van Laere, K.; Casteels, C.; Lunskens, S.; Goffin, K.; Grachev, I.D.; Bormans, G.; Vandenberghe, W. Regional Changes in Type 1 Cannabinoid Receptor Availability in Parkinson’s Disease in Vivo. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 620.e1–620.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arevalo-Martin, A.; Molina-Holgado, E.; Guaza, C. A CB1/CB2 Receptor Agonist, WIN 55,212–2, Exerts Its Therapeutic Effect in a Viral Autoimmune Model of Multiple Sclerosis by Restoring Self-Tolerance to Myelin. Neuropharmacology 2012, 63, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Baker, D.; Pryce, G.; Croxford, J.L.; Brown, P.; Pertwee, R.G.; Huffman, J.W.; Layward, L. Cannabinoids Control Spasticity and Tremor in a Multiple Sclerosis Model. Nature 2000, 404, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Benito, C.; Romero, J.P.; Tolon, R.M.; Clemente, D.; Docagne, F.; Hillard, C.J.; Guaza, C.; Romero, J. Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 Receptors and Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Are Specific Markers of Plaque Cell Subtypes in Human Multiple Sclerosis. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 2396–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. O’Sullivan, S.E. Cannabinoids Go Nuclear: Evidence for Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors: Cannabinoids and PPARs. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2007, 152, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Malamas, M.S.; Farah, S.I.; Lamani, M.; Pelekoudas, D.N.; Perry, N.T.; Rajarshi, G.; Miyabe, C.Y.; Chandrashekhar, H.; West, J.; Pavlopoulos, S.; et al. Design and Synthesis of Cyanamides as Potent and Selective N-Acylethanolamine Acid Amidase Inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Alhouayek, M.; Muccioli, G.G. Harnessing the Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Palmitoylethanolamide. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 1632–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hansen, H.S.; Diep, T.A. N-Acylethanolamines, Anandamide and Food Intake. Biochem. Pharm. 2009, 78, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Petrosino, S.; Di Marzo, V. The Pharmacology of Palmitoylethanolamide and First Data on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Some of Its New Formulations: Palmitoylethanolamide and Its New Formulations. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2017, 174, 1349–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Casili, G.; Lanza, M.; Campolo, M.; Siracusa, R.; Paterniti, I.; Ardizzone, A.; Scuderi, S.A.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Esposito, E. Synergic Therapeutic Potential of PEA-Um Treatment and NAAA Enzyme Silencing In the Management of Neuroinflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gardener, H.; Caunca, M.R. Mediterranean Diet in Preventing Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2018, 7, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gardener, H.; Wright, C.B.; Rundek, T.; Sacco, R.L. Brain Health and Shared Risk Factors for Dementia and Stroke. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2015, 11, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McGrattan, A.M.; McGuinness, B.; McKinley, M.C.; Kee, F.; Passmore, P.; Woodside, J.V.; McEvoy, C.T. Diet and Inflammation in Cognitive Ageing and Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2019, 8, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ozawa, M.; Shipley, M.; Kivimaki, M.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Brunner, E.J. Dietary Pattern, Inflammation and Cognitive Decline: The Whitehall II Prospective Cohort Study. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 36, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Tsivgoulis, G.; Judd, S.; Letter, A.J.; Alexandrov, A.V.; Howard, G.; Nahab, F.; Unverzagt, F.W.; Moy, C.; Howard, V.J.; Kissela, B.; et al. Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet and Risk of Incident Cognitive Impairment. Neurology 2013, 80, 1684–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Scarmeas, N.; Stern, Y.; Tang, M.-X.; Mayeux, R.; Luchsinger, J.A. Mediterranean Diet and Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease. Ann. Neurol. 2006, 59, 912–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Féart, C.; Samieri,, C.; Rondeau, V.; Portet, F.; Dartigues, J.-F.; Scarmeas, N.; Barberger-Gateau, P. Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet, Cognitive Decline, and Risk of Dementia. JAMA 2009, 302, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Tangney, C.C.; Kwasny, M.J.; Li, H.; Wilson, R.S.; Evans, D.A.; Morris, M.C. Adherence to a Mediterranean-Type Dietary Pattern and Cognitive Decline in a Community Population. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Schwingshackl, L.; Morze, J.; Hoffmann, G. Mediterranean Diet and Health Status: Active Ingredients and Pharmacological Mechanisms. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2020, 177, 1241–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Davis, C.; Bryan, J.; Hodgson, J.; Murphy, K. Definition of the Mediterranean Diet; A Literature Review. Nutrients 2015, 7, 9139–9153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Serra-Majem, L.; Tomaino, L.; Dernini, S.; Berry, E.M.; Lairon, D.; Ngo de la Cruz, J.; Bach-Faig, A.; Donini, L.M.; Medina, F.-X.; Belahsen, R.; et al. Updating the Mediterranean Diet Pyramid towards Sustainability: Focus on Environmental Concerns. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abumweis, S.S.; Barake, R.; Jones, P. Plant Sterols/Stanols as Cholesterol Lowering Agents A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Food Nutr. Res. 2008, 52, 1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Salas-Salvadó, J.; Fernández-Ballart, J.; Ros, E.; Martínez-González, M.-A.; Fitó, M.; Estruch, R.; Corella, D.; Fiol, M.; Gómez-Gracia, E.; Arós, F.; et al. Effect of a Mediterranean Diet Supplemented With Nuts on Metabolic Syndrome Status: One-Year Results of the PREDIMED Randomized Trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008, 168, 2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pusztai, A.; Grant, G. Assessment of Lectin Inactivation by Heat and Digestion. Methods Mol. Med. 1998, 9, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. De Punder, K.; Pruimboom, L. The Dietary Intake of Wheat and Other Cereal Grains and Their Role in Inflammation. Nutrients 2013, 5, 771–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Petroski, W.; Minich, D.M. Is There Such a Thing as “Anti-Nutrients”? A Narrative Review of Perceived Problematic Plant Compounds. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Van Buul, V.J.; Brouns, F.J.P.H. Health Effects of Wheat Lectins: A Review. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 59, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Razquin, C.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A. A Traditional Mediterranean Diet Effectively Reduces Inflammation and Improves Cardiovascular Health. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Tsigalou, C.; Konstantinidis, T.; Paraschaki, A.; Stavropoulou, E.; Voidarou, C.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Mediterranean Diet as a Tool to Combat Inflammation and Chronic Diseases. An Overview. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bonaccio, M.; Pounis, G.; Cerletti, C.; Donati, M.B.; Iacoviello, L.; de Gaetano, G. MOLI-SANI Study Investigators Mediterranean Diet, Dietary Polyphenols and Low Grade Inflammation: Results from the MOLI-SANI Study. Br. J. Clin. Pharm. 2017, 83, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Schwingshackl, L.; Hoffmann, G. Mediterranean Dietary Pattern, Inflammation and Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Trials. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014, 24, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bailey, M.A.; Holscher, H.D. Microbiome-Mediated Effects of the Mediterranean Diet on Inflammation. Adv. Nutr. 2018, 9, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Machowetz, A.; Poulsen, H.E.; Gruendel, S.; Weimann, A.; Fitó, M.; Marrugat, J.; Torre, R.; Salonen, J.T.; Nyyssönen, K.; Mursu, J.; et al. Effect of Olive Oils on Biomarkers of Oxidative DNA Stress in Northern and Southern Europeans. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Annuzzi, G.; Bozzetto, L.; Costabile, G.; Giacco, R.; Mangione, A.; Anniballi, G.; Vitale, M.; Vetrani, C.; Cipriano, P.; Corte, G.D.; et al. Diets Naturally Rich in Polyphenols Improve Fasting and Postprandial Dyslipidemia and Reduce Oxidative Stress: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Camargo, A.; Ruano, J.; Fernandez, J.M.; Parnell, L.D.; Jimenez, A.; Santos-Gonzalez, M.; Marin, C.; Perez-Martinez, P.; Uceda, M.; Lopez-Miranda, J.; et al. Gene Expression Changes in Mononuclear Cells in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome after Acute Intake of Phenol-Rich Virgin Olive Oil. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Zern, T.L.; Fernandez, M.L. Cardioprotective Effects of Dietary Polyphenols. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 2291–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Malaguarnera Influence of Resveratrol on the Immune Response. Nutrients 2019, 11, 946. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Esposito, S.; Sparaco, M.; Maniscalco, G.T.; Signoriello, E.; Lanzillo, R.; Russo, C.; Carmisciano, L.; Cepparulo, S.; Lavorgna, L.; Gallo, A.; et al. Lifestyle and Mediterranean Diet Adherence in a Cohort of Southern Italian Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2021, 47, 102636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Qosa, H.; Mohamed, L.A.; Batarseh, Y.S.; Alqahtani, S.; Ibrahim, B.; LeVine, H.; Keller, J.N.; Kaddoumi, A. Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Attenuates Amyloid-β and Tau Pathologies in the Brains of TgSwDI Mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2015, 26, 1479–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Crespo, M.C.; Tomé-Carneiro, J.; Pintado, C.; Dávalos, A.; Visioli, F.; Burgos-Ramos, E. Hydroxytyrosol Restores Proper Insulin Signaling in an Astrocytic Model of Alzheimer’s Disease: Astrocytic Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. BioFactors 2017, 43, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Feng, X.; Liang, N.; Zhu, D.; Gao, Q.; Peng, L.; Dong, H.; Yue, Q.; Liu, H.; Bao, L.; Zhang, J.; et al. Resveratrol Inhibits β-Amyloid-Induced Neuronal Apoptosis through Regulation of SIRT1-ROCK1 Signaling Pathway. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Baumgart, M.; Snyder, H.M.; Carrillo, M.C.; Fazio, S.; Kim, H.; Johns, H. Summary of the Evidence on Modifiable Risk Factors for Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Population-Based Perspective. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2015, 11, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Martínez-Lapiscina, E.H.; Clavero, P.; Toledo, E.; Estruch, R.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; San Julián, B.; Sanchez-Tainta, A.; Ros, E.; Valls-Pedret, C.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.Á. Mediterranean Diet Improves Cognition: The PREDIMED-NAVARRA Randomised Trial. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2013, 84, 1318–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Valls-Pedret, C.; Sala-Vila, A.; Serra-Mir, M.; Corella, D.; de la Torre, R.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Martínez-Lapiscina, E.H.; Fitó, M.; Pérez-Heras, A.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; et al. Mediterranean Diet and Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015, 175, 1094–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Paknahad, Z.; Sheklabadi, E.; Derakhshan, Y.; Bagherniya, M.; Chitsaz, A. The Effect of the Mediterranean Diet on Cognitive Function in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial. Complement. Ther. Med. 2020, 50, 102366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Okubo, H.; Miyake, Y.; Sasaki, S.; Murakami, K.; Tanaka, K.; Fukushima, W.; Kiyohara, C.; Tsuboi, Y.; Yamada, T.; Oeda, T.; et al. Dietary Patterns and Risk of Parkinson’s Disease: A Case-Control Study in Japan: Dietary Patterns and Parkinson’s Disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2012, 19, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Okamoto, K.; Kihira, T.; Kobashi, G.; Washio, M.; Sasaki, S.; Yokoyama, T.; Miyake, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Inaba, Y.; Nagai, M. Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Japan. Neuroepidemiology 2009, 32, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rivadeneyra, J.; Cubo, E.; Gil, C.; Calvo, S.; Mariscal, N.; Martínez, A. Factors Associated with Mediterranean Diet Adherence in Huntington’s Disease. Clin. Nutr. Espen 2016, 12, e7–e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fidyt, K.; Fiedorowicz, A.; Strządała, L.; Szumny, A. β-Caryophyllene and β-Caryophyllene Oxide-Natural Compounds of Anticancer and Analgesic Properties. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 3007–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Russo, E.B. Taming THC: Potential Cannabis Synergy and Phytocannabinoid-Terpenoid Entourage Effects: Phytocannabinoid-Terpenoid Entourage Effects. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2011, 163, 1344–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Machado, K.d.C.; Islam, M.T.; Ali, E.S.; Rouf, R.; Uddin, S.J.; Dev, S.; Shilpi, J.A.; Shill, M.C.; Reza, H.M.; Das, A.K.; et al. A Systematic Review on the Neuroprotective Perspectives of Beta-Caryophyllene: Neurobiological Effects of β-Caryophyllene. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 2376–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Borge, G.I.A.; Sandberg, E.; Øyaas, J.; Abrahamsen, R.K. Variation of Terpenes in Milk and Cultured Cream from Norwegian Alpine Rangeland-Fed and in-Door Fed Cows. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Chicca, A.; Caprioglio, D.; Minassi, A.; Petrucci, V.; Appendino, G.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; Gertsch, J. Functionalization of β-Caryophyllene Generates Novel Polypharmacology in the Endocannabinoid System. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gonçalves, E.C.D.; Baldasso, G.M.; Bicca, M.A.; Paes, R.S.; Capasso, R.; Dutra, R.C. Terpenoids, Cannabimimetic Ligands, beyond the Cannabis Plant. Molecules 2020, 25, 1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Gertsch, J.; Leonti, M.; Raduner, S.; Racz, I.; Chen, J.-Z.; Xie, X.-Q.; Altmann, K.-H.; Karsak, M.; Zimmer, A. Beta-Caryophyllene Is a Dietary Cannabinoid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9099–9104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Sharma, C.M.; Al Kaabi, J.M.; Nurulain, S.N.; Goyal, S.; Amjad Kamal, M.; Ojha, S. Polypharmacological Properties and Therapeutic Potential of β-Caryophyllene: A Dietary Phytocannabinoid of Pharmaceutical Promise. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 3237–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Glass, C.K.; Saijo, K.; Winner, B.; Marchetto, M.C.; Gage, F.H. Mechanisms Underlying Inflammation in Neurodegeneration. Cell 2010, 140, 918–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Hu, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, B.; Guo, S. Trans-Caryophyllene Inhibits Amyloid β (Aβ) Oligomer-Induced Neuroinflammation in BV-2 Microglial Cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 51, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cheng, Y.; Dong, Z.; Liu, S. β-Caryophyllene Ameliorates the Alzheimer-like Phenotype in APP/PS1 Mice through CB2 Receptor Activation and the PPARγ Pathway. Pharmacology 2014, 94, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ojha, S.; Javed, H.; Azimullah, S.; Haque, M.E. β-Caryophyllene, a Phytocannabinoid Attenuates Oxidative Stress, Neuroinflammation, Glial Activation, and Salvages Dopaminergic Neurons in a Rat Model of Parkinson Disease. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2016, 418, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Alberti, T.; Barbosa, W.; Vieira, J.; Raposo, N.; Dutra, R. (−)-β-Caryophyllene, a CB2 Receptor-Selective Phytocannabinoid, Suppresses Motor Paralysis and Neuroinflammation in a Murine Model of Multiple Sclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gertsch, J. Antiinflammatory Cannabinoids in Diet—Towards a Better Understanding of CB2 Receptor Action?: Towards a Better Understanding of CB2 Receptor Action? Commun. Integr. Biol. 2008, 1, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Navarro, G.; Morales, P.; Rodríguez-Cueto, C.; Fernández-Ruiz, J.; Jagerovic, N.; Franco, R. Targeting Cannabinoid CB2 Receptors in the Central Nervous System. Medicinal Chemistry Approaches with Focus on Neurodegenerative Disorders. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Saha, R.N.; Pahan, K. Regulation of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene in Glial Cells. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 929–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kim, H.-Y.; Hwang, K.W.; Park, S.-Y. Extracts of Actinidia Arguta Stems Inhibited LPS-Induced Inflammatory Responses through Nuclear Factor–ΚB Pathway in Raw 264.7 Cells. Nutr. Res. 2014, 34, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Segat, G.C.; Manjavachi, M.N.; Matias, D.O.; Passos, G.F.; Freitas, C.S.; Costa, R.; Calixto, J.B. Antiallodynic Effect of β-Caryophyllene on Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Mice. Neuropharmacology 2017, 125, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhao, Q.; Wu, X.; Yan, S.; Xie, X.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Peng, C.; You, Z. The Antidepressant-like Effects of Pioglitazone in a Chronic Mild Stress Mouse Model Are Associated with PPARγ-Mediated Alteration of Microglial Activation Phenotypes. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. O’Sullivan, S.E.; Kendall, D.A.; Randall, M.D. Time-Dependent Vascular Effects of Endocannabinoids Mediated by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARγ). PPAR Res. 2009, 2009, 425289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Geldmacher, D.S.; Fritsch, T.; McClendon, M.J.; Landreth, G. A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial of the Safety of Pioglitazone in Treatment of Patients With Alzheimer Disease. Arch. Neurol. 2011, 68, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Yu, S.; Xu, H.E. Couple Dynamics: PPARγ and Its Ligand Partners. Structure 2012, 20, 2–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Pinto, A.; Bonucci, A.; Maggi, E.; Corsi, M.; Businaro, R. Anti-Oxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Ketogenic Diet: New Perspectives for Neuroprotection in Alzheimer’s Disease. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Zheng, X.; Sun, T.; Wang, X. Activation of Type 2 Cannabinoid Receptors (CB2R) Promotes Fatty Acid Oxidation through the SIRT1/PGC-1α Pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 436, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Niedzielska, E.; Smaga, I.; Gawlik, M.; Moniczewski, A.; Stankowicz, P.; Pera, J.; Filip, M. Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 4094–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Assis, L.C.; Straliotto, M.R.; Engel, D.; Hort, M.A.; Dutra, R.C.; de Bem, A.F. β-Caryophyllene Protects the C6 Glioma Cells against Glutamate-Induced Excitotoxicity through the Nrf2 Pathway. Neuroscience 2014, 279, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Fontes, L.B.A.; Dias, D.d.S.; Aarestrup, B.J.V.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Da Silva Filho, A.A.; Corrêa, J.O.d.A. β-Caryophyllene Ameliorates the Development of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in C57BL/6 Mice. Biomed. Pharm. 2017, 91, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Javed, H.; Azimullah, S.; Haque, M.E.; Ojha, S.K. Cannabinoid Type 2 (CB2) Receptors Activation Protects against Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation Associated Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in Rotenone Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Calleja, M.A.; Vieites, J.M.; Montero-Meterdez, T.; Torres, M.I.; Faus, M.J.; Gil, A.; Suárez, A. The Antioxidant Effect of β-Caryophyllene Protects Rat Liver from Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Fibrosis by Inhibiting Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Baird, L.; Swift, S.; Llères, D.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T. Monitoring Keap1–Nrf2 Interactions in Single Live Cells. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Tebay, L.E.; Robertson, H.; Durant, S.T.; Vitale, S.R.; Penning, T.M.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Hayes, J.D. Mechanisms of Activation of the Transcription Factor Nrf2 by Redox Stressors, Nutrient Cues, and Energy Status and the Pathways through Which It Attenuates Degenerative Disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 88, 108–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. García-Cabrerizo, R.; García-Fuster, M.J. Opposite Regulation of Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 Receptors in the Prefrontal Cortex of Rats Treated with Cocaine during Adolescence. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 615, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sierra, S.; Luquin, N.; Rico, A.J.; Gómez-Bautista, V.; Roda, E.; Dopeso-Reyes, I.G.; Vázquez, A.; Martínez-Pinilla, E.; Labandeira-García, J.L.; Franco, R.; et al. Detection of Cannabinoid Receptors CB1 and CB2 within Basal Ganglia Output Neurons in Macaques: Changes Following Experimental Parkinsonism. Brain Struct. Funct. 2015, 220, 2721–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Callén, L.; Moreno, E.; Barroso-Chinea, P.; Moreno-Delgado, D.; Cortés, A.; Mallol, J.; Casadó, V.; Lanciego, J.L.; Franco, R.; Lluis, C.; et al. Cannabinoid Receptors CB1 and CB2 Form Functional Heteromers in Brain. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 20851–20865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kawai, Y.; Garduño, L.; Theodore, M.; Yang, J.; Arinze, I.J. Acetylation-Deacetylation of the Transcription Factor Nrf2 (Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2) Regulates Its Transcriptional Activity and Nucleocytoplasmic Localization. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 7629–7640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Wang, S.-J.; Zhao, X.-H.; Chen, W.; Bo, N.; Wang, X.-J.; Chi, Z.-F.; Wu, W. Sirtuin 1 Activation Enhances the PGC-1α/Mitochondrial Antioxidant System Pathway in Status Epilepticus. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Puigserver, P.; Spiegelman, B.M. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Coactivator 1α (PGC-1α): Transcriptional Coactivator and Metabolic Regulator. Endocr. Rev. 2003, 24, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Olmos, Y.; Sánchez-Gómez, F.J.; Wild, B.; García-Quintans, N.; Cabezudo, S.; Lamas, S.; Monsalve, M. SirT1 Regulation of Antioxidant Genes Is Dependent on the Formation of a FoxO3a/PGC-1α Complex. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 1507–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Freitas, A.E.; Egea, J.; Buendia, I.; Gómez-Rangel, V.; Parada, E.; Navarro, E.; Casas, A.I.; Wojnicz, A.; Ortiz, J.A.; Cuadrado, A.; et al. Agmatine, by Improving Neuroplasticity Markers and Inducing Nrf2, Prevents Corticosterone-Induced Depressive-Like Behavior in Mice. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 3030–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Galán-Ganga, M.; del Río, R.; Jiménez-Moreno, N.; Díaz-Guerra, M.; Lastres-Becker, I. Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor Modulation by the Transcription Factor NRF2 Is Specific in Microglial Cells. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2020, 40, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Kagoya, Y.; Yoshimi, A.; Kataoka, K.; Nakagawa, M.; Kumano, K.; Arai, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Saito, T.; Iwakura, Y.; Kurokawa, M. Positive Feedback between NF-ΚB and TNF-α Promotes Leukemia-Initiating Cell Capacity. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 528–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Choi, I.-Y.; Ju, C.; Anthony Jalin, A.M.A.; Lee, D.I.; Prather, P.L.; Kim, W.-K. Activation of Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor–Mediated AMPK/CREB Pathway Reduces Cerebral Ischemic Injury. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 182, 928–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Wrann, C.D.; White, J.P.; Salogiannnis, J.; Laznik-Bogoslavski, D.; Wu, J.; Ma, D.; Lin, J.D.; Greenberg, M.E.; Spiegelman, B.M. Exercise Induces Hippocampal BDNF through a PGC-1α/FNDC5 Pathway. Cell Metab. 2013, 18, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Eyileten, C.; Kaplon-Cieslicka, A.; Mirowska-Guzel, D.; Malek, L.; Postula, M. Antidiabetic Effect of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Its Association with Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Diabetes Res. 2017, 2017, 2823671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Giampà, C.; Montagna, E.; Dato, C.; Melone, M.A.B.; Bernardi, G.; Fusco, F.R. Systemic Delivery of Recombinant Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in the R6/2 Mouse Model of Huntington’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Avraham, H.K.; Jiang, S.; Fu, Y.; Rockenstein, E.; Makriyannis, A.; Zvonok, A.; Masliah, E.; Avraham, S. The Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor Agonist AM1241 Enhances Neurogenesis in GFAP/Gp120 Transgenic Mice Displaying Deficits in Neurogenesis: Effects of CB2 Agonist on Neurogenesis. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2014, 171, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Palazuelos, J.; Aguado, T.; Egia, A.; Mechoulam, R.; Guzmán, M.; Galve-Roperh, I.; Palazuelos, J.; Aguado, T.; Egia, A.; Mechoulam, R.; et al. Non-psychoactive CB2 Cannabinoid Agonists Stimulate Neural Progenitor Proliferation. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2405–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Fujii, M.; Sherchan, P.; Krafft, P.R.; Rolland, W.B.; Soejima, Y.; Zhang, J.H. Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor Stimulation Attenuates Brain Edema by Reducing Cerebral Leukocyte Infiltration Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Rats. J. Neurol. Sci. 2014, 342, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Tian, X.; Peng, J.; Zhong, J.; Yang, M.; Pang, J.; Lou, J.; Li, M.; An, R.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, L.; et al. β-Caryophyllene Protects in Vitro Neurovascular Unit against Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation and Re-Oxygenation-Induced Injury. J. Neurochem. 2016, 139, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Lou, J.; Cao, G.; Li, R.; Liu, J.; Dong, Z.; Xu, L. β-Caryophyllene Attenuates Focal Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway in Rats. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 1291–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ibrahim, N.; Allart-Simon, I.; De Nicola, G.R.; Iori, R.; Renault, J.-H.; Rollin, P.; Nuzillard, J.-M. Advanced NMR-Based Structural Investigation of Glucosinolates and Desulfoglucosinolates. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Fuentes, F.; Paredes-Gonzalez, X.; Kong, A.-N.T. Dietary Glucosinolates Sulforaphane, Phenethyl Isothiocyanate, Indole-3-Carbinol/3,3′-Diindolylmethane: Antioxidative Stress/Inflammation, Nrf2, Epigenetics/Epigenomics and In Vivo Cancer Chemopreventive Efficacy. Curr. Pharm. Rep. 2015, 1, 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. McNaughton, S.A.; Marks, G.C. Development of a Food Composition Database for the Estimation of Dietary Intakes of Glucosinolates, the Biologically Active Constituents of Cruciferous Vegetables. Br. J. Nutr. 2003, 90, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Hayes, J.D.; Kelleher, M.O.; Eggleston, I.M. The Cancer Chemopreventive Actions of Phytochemicals Derived from Glucosinolates. Eur. J. Nutr. 2008, 47, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Link, L.B.; Potter, J.D. Raw versus Cooked Vegetables and Cancer Risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2004, 13, 1422–1435. [Google Scholar]
  141. Calabrese, V.; Cornelius, C.; Trovato-Salinaro, A.; Cambria, M.; Locascio, M.; Rienzo, L.; Condorelli, D.; Mancuso, C.; De Lorenzo, A.; Calabrese, E. The Hormetic Role of Dietary Antioxidants in Free Radical-Related Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhang, W.W.; Feng, Z.; Narod, S.A. Multiple Therapeutic and Preventive Effects of 3,39-Diindolylmethane on Cancers Including Prostate Cancer and High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. J. Biomed. Res. 2014, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Wang, S.; Cheng, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Jiang, W. Indole-3-Carbinol (I3C) and Its Major Derivatives: Their Pharmacokinetics and Important Roles in Hepatic Protection. Curr. Drug Metab. 2016, 17, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Li, Y.; Kong, D.; Ahmad, A.; Bao, B.; Sarkar, F.H. Antioxidant Function of Isoflavone and 3,3′-Diindolylmethane: Are They Important for Cancer Prevention and Therapy? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Rzemieniec, J.; Bratek, E.; Wnuk, A.; Przepiórska, K.; Salińska, E.; Kajta, M. Neuroprotective Effect of 3,3’-Diindolylmethane against Perinatal Asphyxia Involves Inhibition of the AhR and NMDA Signaling and Hypermethylation of Specific Genes. Apoptosis 2020, 25, 747–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Anderton, M.J.; Manson, M.M.; Verschoyle, R.; Gescher, A.; Steward, W.P.; Williams, M.L.; Mager, D.E. Physiological Modeling of Formulated and Crystalline 3,3’-Diindolylmethane Pharmacokinetics Following Oral Administration in Mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2004, 32, 632–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Reed, G.A.; Sunega, J.M.; Sullivan, D.K.; Gray, J.C.; Mayo, M.S.; Crowell, J.A.; Hurwitz, A. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Absorption-Enhanced 3,3’-Diindolylmethane in Healthy Subjects. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2008, 17, 2619–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Dalessandri, K.M.; Firestone, G.L.; Fitch, M.D.; Bradlow, H.L.; Bjeldanes, L.F. Pilot Study: Effect of 3,3′-Diindolylmethane Supplements on Urinary Hormone Metabolites in Postmenopausal Women With a History of Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Nutr. Cancer 2004, 50, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Nair, A.; Jacob, S. A Simple Practice Guide for Dose Conversion between Animals and Human. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2016, 7, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Lee, B.D.; Yoo, J.-M.; Baek, S.Y.; Li, F.Y.; Sok, D.-E.; Kim, M.R. 3,3′-Diindolylmethane Promotes BDNF and Antioxidant Enzyme Formation via TrkB/Akt Pathway Activation for Neuroprotection against Oxidative Stress-Induced Apoptosis in Hippocampal Neuronal Cells. Antioxidants 2019, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Cho, H.J.; Seon, M.R.; Lee, Y.M.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.-K.; Kim, S.G.; Park, J.H.Y. 3,3′-Diindolylmethane Suppresses the Inflammatory Response to Lipopolysaccharide in Murine Macrophages. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Kim, H.W.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.; Choi, B.-R.; Han, J.-S.; Lee, K.W.; Lee, H.J. 3,3’-Diindolylmethane Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Microglial Hyperactivation and Attenuates Brain Inflammation. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 137, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Kim, E.K.; Choi, E.-J. Pathological Roles of MAPK Signaling Pathways in Human Diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2010, 1802, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Rzemieniec, J.; Wnuk, A.; Lasoń, W.; Bilecki, W.; Kajta, M. The Neuroprotective Action of 3,3′-Diindolylmethane against Ischemia Involves an Inhibition of Apoptosis and Autophagy That Depends on HDAC and AhR/CYP1A1 but Not ERα/CYP19A1 Signaling. Apoptosis 2019, 24, 435–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Ito, K.; Eguchi, Y.; Imagawa, Y.; Akai, S.; Mochizuki, H.; Tsujimoto, Y. MPP+ Induces Necrostatin-1- and Ferrostatin-1-Sensitive Necrotic Death of Neuronal SH-SY5Y Cells. Cell Death Discov. 2017, 3, 17013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. De Miranda, B.R.; Miller, J.A.; Hansen, R.J.; Lunghofer, P.J.; Safe, S.; Gustafson, D.L.; Colagiovanni, D.; Tjalkens, R.B. Neuroprotective Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic Behavior of Novel Anti-Inflammatory Para-Phenyl Substituted Diindolylmethanes in a Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2013, 345, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Qin, C.; Morrow, D.; Stewart, J.; Spencer, K.; Porter, W.; Smith, R.; Phillips, T.; Abdelrahim, M.; Samudio, I.; Safe, S. A New Class of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARgamma) Agonists That Inhibit Growth of Breast Cancer Cells: 1,1-Bis(3’-Indolyl)-1-(p-Substituted Phenyl)Methanes. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2004, 3, 247–260. [Google Scholar]
  158. Almeida, R.D.; Manadas, B.J.; Melo, C.V.; Gomes, J.R.; Mendes, C.S.; Grãos, M.M.; Carvalho, R.F.; Carvalho, A.P.; Duarte, C.B. Neuroprotection by BDNF against Glutamate-Induced Apoptotic Cell Death Is Mediated by ERK and PI3-Kinase Pathways. Cell Death Differ. 2005, 12, 1329–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Saw, C.L.-L.; Cintrón, M.; Wu, T.-Y.; Guo, Y.; Huang, Y.; Jeong, W.-S.; Kong, A.-N.T. Pharmacodynamics of Dietary Phytochemical Indoles I3C and DIM: Induction of Nrf2-Mediated Phase II Drug Metabolizing and Antioxidant Genes and Synergism with Isothiocyanates. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 2011, 32, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Gertsch, J. Cannabimimetic Phytochemicals in the Diet—An Evolutionary Link to Food Selection and Metabolic Stress Adaptation?: Cannabimimetic Phytochemicals in the Diet. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2017, 174, 1464–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Yin, H.; Chu, A.; Li, W.; Wang, B.; Shelton, F.; Otero, F.; Nguyen, D.G.; Caldwell, J.S.; Chen, Y.A. Lipid G Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligand Identification Using β-Arrestin PathHunterTM Assay. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 12328–12338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Brunetti, L.; Loiodice, F.; Piemontese, L.; Tortorella, P.; Laghezza, A. New Approaches to Cancer Therapy: Combining Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) Inhibition with Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) Activation: Miniperspective. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 10995–11003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Toczek, M.; Malinowska, B. Enhanced Endocannabinoid Tone as a Potential Target of Pharmacotherapy. Life Sci. 2018, 204, 20–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Fowler, C.J.; Stenström, A.; Tiger, G. Ibuprofen Inhibits the Metabolism of the Endogenous Cannabimimetic Agent Anandamide. Pharm. Toxicol. 1997, 80, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Lehmann, J.M.; Lenhard, J.M.; Oliver, B.B.; Ringold, G.M.; Kliewer, S.A. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors α and γ Are Activated by Indomethacin and Other Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 3406–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Thors, L.; Belghiti, M.; Fowler, C.J. Inhibition of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase by Kaempferol and Related Naturally Occurring Flavonoids: Inhibition of FAAH by Flavonoids. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2008, 155, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Lenman, A.; Fowler, C.J. Interaction of Ligands for the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ with the Endocannabinoid System: Ciglitazone Inhibits FAAH Activity. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2007, 151, 1343–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid Biosynthesis. A Colorful Model for Genetics, Biochemistry, Cell Biology, and Biotechnology. Plant. Physiol. 2001, 126, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Graf, B.A.; Milbury, P.E.; Blumberg, J.B. Flavonols, Flavones, Flavanones, and Human Health: Epidemiological Evidence. J. Med. Food 2005, 8, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Mozaffarian, D.; Wu, J.H.Y. Flavonoids, Dairy Foods, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health: A Review of Emerging Biologic Pathways. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cassidy, A.; Minihane, A.-M. The Role of Metabolism (and the Microbiome) in Defining the Clinical Efficacy of Dietary Flavonoids. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Reiter, E.; Beck, V.; Medjakovic, S.; Mueller, M.; Jungbauer, A. Comparison of Hormonal Activity of Isoflavone-Containing Supplements Used to Treat Menopausal Complaints. Menopause 2009, 16, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Kaczmarczyk-Sedlak, I.; Zych, M.; Wojnar, W.; Ozimina-Kamińska, E.; Dudek, S.; Chadała, N.; Kachel, A. Biochanin a Shows No Effect on Skeletal System in Ovariectomized Rats, When Administered in Moderate Dose. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2015, 72, 587–596. [Google Scholar]
  174. Lv, Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Gu, D.; He, D.; Yili, A.; Ma, Q.; Cheng, Z.; Gao, Y.; Aisa, H.A.; et al. Comparative Study on Separation and Purification of Isoflavones from the Seeds and Sprouts of Chickpea by High-Speed Countercurrent Chromatography. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2009, 32, 2879–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Sarfraz, A.; Javeed, M.; Shah, M.A.; Hussain, G.; Shafiq, N.; Sarfraz, I.; Riaz, A.; Sadiqa, A.; Zara, R.; Zafar, S.; et al. Biochanin A: A Novel Bioactive Multifunctional Compound from Nature. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 722, 137907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Thors, L.; Burston, J.; Alter, B.; McKinney, M.; Cravatt, B.; Ross, R.; Pertwee, R.; Gereau, R.; Wiley, J.; Fowler, C. Biochanin A, a Naturally Occurring Inhibitor of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase: Inhibition of FAAH by Isoflavones. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2010, 160, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Howes, J.; Waring, M.; Huang, L.; Howes, L.G. Long-Term Pharmacokinetics of an Extract of Isoflavones from Red Clover (Trifolium Pratense). J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2002, 8, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Moon, Y.J.; Sagawa, K.; Frederick, K.; Zhang, S.; Morris, M.E. Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of the Isoflavone Biochanin A in Rats. AAPS J. 2006, 8, E433–E442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Thors, L.; Alajakku, K.; Fowler, C.J. The ‘Specific’ Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Genistein Inhibits the Enzymic Hydrolysis of Anandamide: Implications for Anandamide Uptake: Genistein Inhibits FAAH Activity. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2007, 150, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Miadoková, E. Isoflavonoids—An Overview of Their Biological Activities and Potential Health Benefits. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2009, 2, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Dang, Z.-C.; Audinot, V.; Papapoulos, S.E.; Boutin, J.A.; Löwik, C.W.G.M. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) as a Molecular Target for the Soy Phytoestrogen Genistein. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 962–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Thors, L.; Eriksson, J.; Fowler, C.J. Inhibition of the Cellular Uptake of Anandamide by Genistein and Its Analogue Daidzein in Cells with Different Levels of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase-Driven Uptake: Genistein, Daidzein and Anandamide Uptake. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2007, 152, 744–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Chacko, B.K.; Chandler, R.T.; D’Alessandro, T.L.; Mundhekar, A.; Khoo, N.K.H.; Botting, N.; Barnes, S.; Patel, R.P. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Isoflavones Are Dependent on Flow and Human Endothelial Cell PPARγ. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Vasilopoulou, E.; Georga, K.; Joergensen, M.; Naska, A.; Trichopoulou, A. The Antioxidant Properties of Greek Foods and the Flavonoid Content of the Mediterranean Menu. CMCIEMA 2005, 5, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Sureda, A.; Sanches Silva, A.; Sánchez-Machado, D.I.; López-Cervantes, J.; Daglia, M.; Nabavi, S.F.; Nabavi, S.M. Hypotensive Effects of Genistein: From Chemistry to Medicine. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2017, 268, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Subedi, L.; Ji, E.; Shin, D.; Jin, J.; Yeo, J.; Kim, S. Equol, a Dietary Daidzein Gut Metabolite Attenuates Microglial Activation and Potentiates Neuroprotection In Vitro. Nutrients 2017, 9, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. López, P.; Sánchez, M.; Perez-Cruz, C.; Velázquez-Villegas, L.A.; Syeda, T.; Aguilar-López, M.; Rocha-Viggiano, A.K.; del Carmen Silva-Lucero, M.; Torre-Villalvazo, I.; Noriega, L.G.; et al. Long-Term Genistein Consumption Modifies Gut Microbiota, Improving Glucose Metabolism, Metabolic Endotoxemia, and Cognitive Function in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 1800313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Morton, M.S.; Arisaka, O.; Miyake, N.; Morgan, L.D.; Evans, B.A.J. Phytoestrogen Concentrations in Serum from Japanese Men and Women over Forty Years of Age. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 3168–3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Woo, H.W.; Kim, M.K.; Lee, Y.-H.; Shin, D.H.; Shin, M.-H.; Choi, B.Y. Sex-Specific Associations of Habitual Intake of Soy Protein and Isoflavones with Risk of Type 2 Diabetes. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Plumb, J.; Pigat, S.; Bompola, F.; Cushen, M.; Pinchen, H.; Nørby, E.; Astley, S.; Lyons, J.; Kiely, M.; Finglas, P. EBASIS (Bioactive Substances in Food Information Systems) and Bioactive Intakes: Major Updates of the Bioactive Compound Composition and Beneficial Bioeffects Database and the Development of a Probabilistic Model to Assess Intakes in Europe. Nutrients 2017, 9, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  191. Salehi, B.; Venditti, A.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Kręgiel, D.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Santini, A.; Souto, E.; Novellino, E.; et al. The Therapeutic Potential of Apigenin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Liang, Y.-C.; Tsai, S.-H.; Tsai, D.-C.; Lin-Shiau, S.-Y.; Lin, J.-K. Suppression of Inducible Cyclooxygenase and Nitric Oxide Synthase through Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ by Flavonoids in Mouse Macrophages. Febs Lett. 2001, 496, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Venigalla, M.; Gyengesi, E.; Münch, G. Curcumin and Apigenin—Novel and Promising Therapeutics against Chronic Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer′s Disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Hostetler, G.L.; Ralston, R.A.; Schwartz, S.J. Flavones: Food Sources, Bioavailability, Metabolism, and Bioactivity. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Tauchen, J.; Huml, L.; Rimpelova, S.; Jurášek, M. Flavonoids and Related Members of the Aromatic Polyketide Group in Human Health and Disease: Do They Really Work? Molecules 2020, 25, 3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Russo, E.B. Beyond Cannabis: Plants and the Endocannabinoid System. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2016, 37, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Fang, X.-K.; Gao, J.; Zhu, D.-N. Kaempferol and Quercetin Isolated from Euonymus Alatus Improve Glucose Uptake of 3T3-L1 Cells without Adipogenesis Activity. Life Sci. 2008, 82, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Imran, M.; Rauf, A.; Shah, Z.A.; Saeed, F.; Imran, A.; Arshad, M.U.; Ahmad, B.; Bawazeer, S.; Atif, M.; Peters, D.G.; et al. Chemo-Preventive and Therapeutic Effect of the Dietary Flavonoid Kaempferol: A Comprehensive Review: Chemo-Preventive and Therapeutic Effect of Kaempferol: A Comprehensive. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Yang, Y.-L.; Cheng, X.; Li, W.-H.; Liu, M.; Wang, Y.-H.; Du, G.-H. Kaempferol Attenuates LPS-Induced Striatum Injury in Mice Involving Anti-Neuroinflammation, Maintaining BBB Integrity, and Down-Regulating the HMGB1/TLR4 Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  200. DuPont, M.S.; Day, A.J.; Bennett, R.N.; Mellon, F.A.; Kroon, P.A. Absorption of Kaempferol from Endive, a Source of Kaempferol-3-Glucuronide, in Humans. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 58, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Ahmad, H.; Rauf, K.; Zada, W.; McCarthy, M.; Abbas, G.; Anwar, F.; Shah, A.J. Kaempferol Facilitated Extinction Learning in Contextual Fear Conditioned Rats via Inhibition of Fatty-Acid Amide Hydrolase. Molecules 2020, 25, 4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Catalá, A. Five Decades with Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids: Chemical Synthesis, Enzymatic Formation, Lipid Peroxidation and Its Biological Effects. J. Lipids 2013, 2013, 710290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Dyall, S.C. Long-Chain Omega-3 Fatty Acids and the Brain: A Review of the Independent and Shared Effects of EPA, DPA and DHA. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  204. Domenichiello, A.F.; Kitson, A.P.; Bazinet, R.P. Is Docosahexaenoic Acid Synthesis from α-Linolenic Acid Sufficient to Supply the Adult Brain? Prog. Lipid Res. 2015, 59, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Dyall, S.C. Interplay Between N-3 and n-6 Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and the Endocannabinoid System in Brain Protection and Repair. Lipids 2017, 52, 885–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Bisogno, T.; Maccarrone, M. Endocannabinoid Signaling and Its Regulation by Nutrients: Endocannabinoid Signaling and Nutrients. BioFactors 2014, 40, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Kim, J.; Li, Y.; Watkins, B.A. Endocannabinoid Signaling and Energy Metabolism: A Target for Dietary Intervention. Nutrition 2011, 27, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Artmann, A.; Petersen, G.; Hellgren, L.I.; Boberg, J.; Skonberg, C.; Nellemann, C.; Hansen, S.H.; Hansen, H.S. Influence of Dietary Fatty Acids on Endocannabinoid and N-Acylethanolamine Levels in Rat Brain, Liver and Small Intestine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2008, 1781, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Simopoulos, A.P. The Importance of the Ratio of Omega-6/Omega-3 Essential Fatty Acids. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2002, 56, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Casas, R.; Sacanella, E.; Estruch, R. The Immune Protective Effect of the Mediterranean Diet against Chronic Low-Grade Inflammatory Diseases. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2014, 14, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Bosma-den Boer, M.M.; van Wetten, M.-L.; Pruimboom, L. Chronic Inflammatory Diseases Are Stimulated by Current Lifestyle: How Diet, Stress Levels and Medication Prevent Our Body from Recovering. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Bigford, G.E.; Del Rossi, G. Supplemental Substances Derived from Foods as Adjunctive Therapeutic Agents for Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Disorders. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  213. Panagiotakos, D.B.; Kastorini, C.-M.; Pitsavos, C.; Stefanadis, C. The Current Greek Diet and the Omega-6/Omega-3 Balance: The Mediterranean Diet Score Is Inversely Associated with the Omega-6/Omega-3 Ratio. In World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics; Simopoulos, A.P., Ed.; KARGER: Basel, Switzerland, 2011; Volume 102, pp. 53–56. ISBN 978-3-8055-9780-7. [Google Scholar]
  214. Scoditti, E.; Capurso, C.; Capurso, A.; Massaro, M. Vascular Effects of the Mediterranean Diet—Part II: Role of Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Olive Oil Polyphenols. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2014, 63, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Massaro, M.; Scoditti, E.; Carluccio, M.A.; De Caterina, R. Basic Mechanisms behind the Effects of N-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Disease. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2008, 79, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  216. Wood, J.T.; Williams, J.S.; Pandarinathan, L.; Janero, D.R.; Lammi-Keefe, C.J.; Makriyannis, A. Dietary Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation Alters Select Physiological Endocannabinoid-System Metabolites in Brain and Plasma. J. Lipid Res. 2010, 51, 1416–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. Hutchins-Wiese, H.L.; Li, Y.; Hannon, K.; Watkins, B.A. Hind Limb Suspension and Long-Chain Omega-3 PUFA Increase MRNA Endocannabinoid System Levels in Skeletal Muscle. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012, 23, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Campos, A.C.; Fogaça, M.V.; Sonego, A.B.; Guimarães, F.S. Cannabidiol, Neuroprotection and Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 112, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Larrieu, T.; Madore, C.; Joffre, C.; Layé, S. Nutritional N-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Deficiency Alters Cannabinoid Receptor Signaling Pathway in the Brain and Associated Anxiety-like Behavior in Mice. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 68, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Lafourcade, M.; Larrieu, T.; Mato, S.; Duffaud, A.; Sepers, M.; Matias, I.; De Smedt-Peyrusse, V.; Labrousse, V.F.; Bretillon, L.; Matute, C.; et al. Nutritional Omega-3 Deficiency Abolishes Endocannabinoid-Mediated Neuronal Functions. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  221. Thomazeau, A.; Bosch-Bouju, C.; Manzoni, O.; Layé, S. Nutritional N-3 PUFA Deficiency Abolishes Endocannabinoid Gating of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation. Cereb. Cortex 2016, 27, bhw052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Pan, J.-P.; Zhang, H.-Q.; Wang, W.; Guo, Y.-F.; Xiao, N.; Cao, X.-H.; Liu, L.-J. Some Subtypes of Endocannabinoid/Endovanilloid Receptors Mediate Docosahexaenoic Acid-Induced Enhanced Spatial Memory in Rats. Brain Res. 2011, 1412, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Yurko-Mauro, K. Cognitive and Cardiovascular Benefits of Docosahexaenoic Acid in Aging and Cognitive Decline. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2010, 7, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Di Marzo, V.; Stella, N.; Zimmer, A. Endocannabinoid Signalling and the Deteriorating Brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 16, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Dyall, S.C.; Michael, G.J.; Michael-Titus, A.T. Omega-3 Fatty Acids Reverse Age-Related Decreases in Nuclear Receptors and Increase Neurogenesis in Old Rats. J. Neurosci. Res. 2010, 88, 2091–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Dyall, S.C.; Mandhair, H.K.; Fincham, R.E.A.; Kerr, D.M.; Roche, M.; Molina-Holgado, F. Distinctive Effects of Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acids in Regulating Neural Stem Cell Fate Are Mediated via Endocannabinoid Signalling Pathways. Neuropharmacology 2016, 107, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Yang, R.; Fredman, G.; Krishnamoorthy, S.; Agrawal, N.; Irimia, D.; Piomelli, D.; Serhan, C.N. Decoding Functional Metabolomics with Docosahexaenoyl Ethanolamide (DHEA) Identifies Novel Bioactive Signals. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 31532–31541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  228. Rovito, D.; Giordano, C.; Vizza, D.; Plastina, P.; Barone, I.; Casaburi, I.; Lanzino, M.; De Amicis, F.; Sisci, D.; Mauro, L.; et al. Omega-3 PUFA Ethanolamides DHEA and EPEA Induce Autophagy through PPARγ Activation in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013, 228, 1314–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. De Bus, I.; Witkamp, R.; Zuilhof, H.; Albada, B.; Balvers, M. The Role of N-3 PUFA-Derived Fatty Acid Derivatives and Their Oxygenated Metabolites in the Modulation of Inflammation. Prostaglandins Lipid Mediat. 2019, 144, 106351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Park, T.; Chen, H.; Kevala, K.; Lee, J.-W.; Kim, H.-Y. N-Docosahexaenoylethanolamine Ameliorates LPS-Induced Neuroinflammation via CAMP/PKA-Dependent Signaling. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Hansen, H.S.; Moesgaard, B.; Hansen, H.H.; Petersen, G. N-Acylethanolamines and Precursor Phospholipids—Relation to Cell Injury. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2000, 108, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Iannotti, F.A.; Di Marzo, V.; Petrosino, S. Endocannabinoids and Endocannabinoid-Related Mediators: Targets, Metabolism and Role in Neurological Disorders. Prog. Lipid Res. 2016, 62, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Wang, J.; Ueda, N. Biology of Endocannabinoid Synthesis System. Prostaglandins Lipid Mediat. 2009, 89, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Wei, B.Q.; Mikkelsen, T.S.; McKinney, M.K.; Lander, E.S.; Cravatt, B.F. A Second Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase with Variable Distribution among Placental Mammals. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 36569–36578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  235. Cravatt, B.F.; Demarest, K.; Patricelli, M.P.; Bracey, M.H.; Giang, D.K.; Martin, B.R.; Lichtman, A.H. Supersensitivity to Anandamide and Enhanced Endogenous Cannabinoid Signaling in Mice Lacking Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9371–9376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  236. Tsuboi, K.; Takezaki, N.; Ueda, N. TheN-Acylethanolamine-Hydrolyzing Acid Amidase (NAAA). Chem. Biodivers. 2007, 4, 1914–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Ueda, N.; Tsuboi, K.; Uyama, T. N-Acylethanolamine Metabolism with Special Reference to N-Acylethanolamine-Hydrolyzing Acid Amidase (NAAA). Prog. Lipid Res. 2010, 49, 299–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Costa, B.; Comelli, F.; Bettoni, I.; Colleoni, M.; Giagnoni, G. The Endogenous Fatty Acid Amide, Palmitoylethanolamide, Has Anti-Allodynic and Anti-Hyperalgesic Effects in a Murine Model of Neuropathic Pain: Involvement of CB1, TRPV1 and PPARγ Receptors and Neurotrophic Factors. Pain 2008, 139, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Godlewski, G.; Offertáler, L.; Wagner, J.A.; Kunos, G. Receptors for Acylethanolamides—GPR55 and GPR119. Prostaglandins Lipid Mediat. 2009, 89, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Tsuboi, K.; Uyama, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Ueda, N. Endocannabinoids and Related N-Acylethanolamines: Biological Activities and Metabolism. Inflamm. Regen. 2018, 38, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Hansen, H.S.; Moesgaard, B.; Petersen, G.; Hansen, H.H. Putative Neuroprotective Actions of N-Acyl-Ethanolamines. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002, 95, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Di Marzo, V.; Melck, D.; Orlando, P.; Bisogno, T.; Zagoory, O.; Bifulco, M.; Vogel, Z.; de Petrocellis, L. Palmitoylethanolamide Inhibits the Expression of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase and Enhances the Anti-Proliferative Effect of Anandamide in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Biochem. J. 2001, 358, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Jonsson, K.O.; Vandevoorde, S.; Lambert, D.M.; Tiger, G.; Fowler, C.J. Effects of Homologues and Analogues of Palmitoylethanolamide upon the Inactivation of the Endocannabinoid Anandamide. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2001, 133, 1263–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  244. Pertwee, R.G. GPR55: A New Member of the Cannabinoid Receptor Clan?: Commentary. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2007, 152, 984–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  245. Kong, W.-L.; Peng, Y.-Y.; Peng, B.-W. Modulation of Neuroinflammation: Role and Therapeutic Potential of TRPV1 in the Neuro-Immune Axis. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 64, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Lo Verme, J.; Fu, J.; Astarita, G.; La Rana, G.; Russo, R.; Calignano, A.; Piomelli, D. The Nuclear Receptor Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α Mediates the Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Palmitoylethanolamide. Mol. Pharm. 2005, 67, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Bento-Abreu, A.; Tabernero, A.; Medina, J.M. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Alpha Is Required for the Neurotrophic Effect of Oleic Acid in Neurons. J. Neurochem. 2007, 103, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Wasilewski, M.; Więckowski, M.R.; Dymkowska, D.; Wojtczak, L. Effects of N-Acylethanolamines on Mitochondrial Energetics and Permeability Transition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2004, 1657, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  249. Zolese, G.; Bacchetti, T.; Masciangelo, S.; Ragni, L.; Ambrosi, S.; Ambrosini, A.; Marini, M.; Ferretti, G. Effect of Acylethanolamides on Lipid Peroxidation and Paraoxonase Activity. Biofactors 2008, 33, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Franklin, A.; Parmentier-Batteur, S.; Walter, L.; Greenberg, D.A.; Stella, N. Palmitoylethanolamide Increases after Focal Cerebral Ischemia and Potentiates Microglial Cell Motility. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 7767–7775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  251. Galan-Rodriguez, B.; Suarez, J.; Gonzalez-Aparicio, R.; Bermudez-Silva, F.J.; Maldonado, R.; Robledo, P.; Rodriguez de Fonseca, F.; Fernandez-Espejo, E. Oleoylethanolamide Exerts Partial and Dose-Dependent Neuroprotection of Substantia Nigra Dopamine Neurons. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Sayd, A.; Anton, M.; Alen, F.; Caso, J.R.; Pavon, J.; Leza, J.C.; Rodriguez de Fonseca, F.; Garcia-Bueno, B.; Orio, L. Systemic Administration of Oleoylethanolamide Protects from Neuroinflammation and Anhedonia Induced by LPS in Rats. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015, 18, pyu111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  253. McCoy, K.L. Interaction between Cannabinoid System and Toll-Like Receptors Controls Inflammation. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 5831315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  254. Fidaleo, M.; Fanelli, F.; Ceru, M.; Moreno, S. Neuroprotective Properties of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha (PPARα) and Its Lipid Ligands. Curr. Med. Chem. 2014, 21, 2803–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Skaper, S.D.; Facci, L.; Barbierato, M.; Zusso, M.; Bruschetta, G.; Impellizzeri, D.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Giusti, P. N-Palmitoylethanolamine and Neuroinflammation: A Novel Therapeutic Strategy of Resolution. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 52, 1034–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Rahimi, A.; Faizi, M.; Talebi, F.; Noorbakhsh, F.; Kahrizi, F.; Naderi, N. Interaction between the Protective Effects of Cannabidiol and Palmitoylethanolamide in Experimental Model of Multiple Sclerosis in C57BL/6 Mice. Neuroscience 2015, 290, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. D’Agostino, G.; Russo, R.; Avagliano, C.; Cristiano, C.; Meli, R.; Calignano, A. Palmitoylethanolamide Protects Against the Amyloid-Β25-35-Induced Learning and Memory Impairment in Mice, an Experimental Model of Alzheimer Disease. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37, 1784–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  258. Esposito, E.; Impellizzeri, D.; Mazzon, E.; Paterniti, I.; Cuzzocrea, S. Neuroprotective Activities of Palmitoylethanolamide in an Animal Model of Parkinson’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  259. Joshi, U.; Evans, J.E.; Joseph, R.; Emmerich, T.; Saltiel, N.; Lungmus, C.; Oberlin, S.; Langlois, H.; Ojo, J.; Mouzon, B.; et al. Oleoylethanolamide Treatment Reduces Neurobehavioral Deficits and Brain Pathology in a Mouse Model of Gulf War Illness. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Orio, L.; Alen, F.; Pavón, F.J.; Serrano, A.; García-Bueno, B. Oleoylethanolamide, Neuroinflammation, and Alcohol Abuse. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 11, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Diep, T.A.; Madsen, A.N.; Holst, B.; Kristiansen, M.M.; Wellner, N.; Hansen, S.H.; Hansen, H.S. Dietary Fat Decreases Intestinal Levels of the Anorectic Lipids through a Fat Sensor. FASEB J. 2011, 25, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Hansen, S.L.; Nielsen, A.H.; Knudsen, K.E.; Artmann, A.; Petersen, G.; Kristiansen, U.; Hansen, S.H.; Hansen, H.S. Ketogenic Diet Is Antiepileptogenic in Pentylenetetrazole Kindled Mice and Decrease Levels of N-Acylethanolamines in Hippocampus. Neurochem. Int. 2009, 54, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Castonguay-Paradis, S.; Lacroix, S.; Rochefort, G.; Parent, L.; Perron, J.; Martin, C.; Lamarche, B.; Raymond, F.; Flamand, N.; Di Marzo, V.; et al. Dietary Fatty Acid Intake and Gut Microbiota Determine Circulating Endocannabinoidome Signaling beyond the Effect of Body Fat. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. De Luca, L.; Ferracane, R.; Vitaglione, P. Food Database of N-Acyl-Phosphatidylethanolamines, N-Acylethanolamines and Endocannabinoids and Daily Intake from a Western, a Mediterranean and a Vegetarian Diet. Food Chem. 2019, 300, 125218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Silva, P.; Sureda, A.; Tur, J.A.; Andreoletti, P.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M.; Latruffe, N. How Efficient Is Resveratrol as an Antioxidant of the Mediterranean Diet, towards Alterations during the Aging Process? Free Radic. Res. 2019, 53, 1101–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Walle, T.; Hsieh, F.; DeLegge, M.H.; Oatis, J.E.; Walle, U.K. High Absorption but Very Low Bioavailability of Oral Resveratrol in Humans. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2004, 32, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  267. Ditano-Vázquez, P.; Torres-Peña, J.D.; Galeano-Valle, F.; Pérez-Caballero, A.I.; Demelo-Rodríguez, P.; Lopez-Miranda, J.; Katsiki, N.; Delgado-Lista, J.; Alvarez-Sala-Walther, L.A. The Fluid Aspect of the Mediterranean Diet in the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: The Role of Polyphenol Content in Moderate Consumption of Wine and Olive Oil. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Sun, A.Y.; Wang, Q.; Simonyi, A.; Sun, G.Y. Resveratrol as a Therapeutic Agent for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2010, 41, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  269. Gea, A.; Bes-Rastrollo, M.; Toledo, E.; Garcia-Lopez, M.; Beunza, J.J.; Estruch, R.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A. Mediterranean Alcohol-Drinking Pattern and Mortality in the SUN (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra) Project: A Prospective Cohort Study. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 111, 1871–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  270. Wang, Q.; Xu, J.; Rottinghaus, G.E.; Simonyi, A.; Lubahn, D.; Sun, G.Y.; Sun, A.Y. Resveratrol Protects against Global Cerebral Ischemic Injury in Gerbils. Brain Res. 2002, 958, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Milne, J.C.; Denu, J.M. The Sirtuin Family: Therapeutic Targets to Treat Diseases of Aging. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Lindsay, J.; Laurin, D.; Verreault, R.; Hébert, R.; Helliwell, B.; Hill, G.B.; McDowell, I. Risk Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Prospective Analysis from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 156, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  273. Albani, D.; Polito, L.; Signorini, A.; Forloni, G. Neuroprotective Properties of Resveratrol in Different Neurodegenerative Disorders. BioFactors 2010, 36, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Brents, L.K.; Medina-Bolivar, F.; Seely, K.A.; Nair, V.; Bratton, S.M.; Ñopo-Olazabal, L.; Patel, R.Y.; Liu, H.; Doerksen, R.J.; Prather, P.L.; et al. Natural Prenylated Resveratrol Analogs Arachidin-1 and -3 Demonstrate Improved Glucuronidation Profiles and Have Affinity for Cannabinoid Receptors. Xenobiotica 2012, 42, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  275. Hassanzadeh, P.; Arbabi, E.; Atyabi, F.; Dinarvand, R. The Endocannabinoid System and NGF Are Involved in the Mechanism of Action of Resveratrol: A Multi-Target Nutraceutical with Therapeutic Potential in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Psychopharmacology 2016, 233, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Allen, S.J.; Watson, J.J.; Shoemark, D.K.; Barua, N.U.; Patel, N.K. GDNF, NGF and BDNF as Therapeutic Options for Neurodegeneration. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 138, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Conner, J.M.; Franks, K.M.; Titterness, A.K.; Russell, K.; Merrill, D.A.; Christie, B.R.; Sejnowski, T.J.; Tuszynski, M.H. NGF Is Essential for Hippocampal Plasticity and Learning. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 10883–10889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Faustino, C.; Rijo, P.; Reis, C.P. Nanotechnological Strategies for Nerve Growth Factor Delivery: Therapeutic Implications in Alzheimer’s Disease. Pharm. Res. 2017, 120, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Oliveira, C.D.C.; e Castor, M.G.M.; e Castor, C.G.M.; Costa, Á.D.F.; Ferreira, R.C.M.; da Silva, J.F.; Pelaez, J.M.N.; Capettini, L.D.S.A.; Lemos, V.S.; Duarte, I.D.G.; et al. Evidence for the Involvement of Opioid and Cannabinoid Systems in the Peripheral Antinociception Mediated by Resveratrol. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2019, 369, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Carta, G.; Poddighe, L.; Serra, M.; Boi, M.; Melis, T.; Lisai, S.; Murru, E.; Muredda, L.; Collu, M.; Banni, S.; et al. Preventive Effects of Resveratrol on Endocannabinoid System and Synaptic Protein Modifications in Rat Cerebral Cortex Challenged by Bilateral Common Carotid Artery Occlusion and Reperfusion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  281. Sundaresan, A.; Radhiga, T.; Deivasigamani, B. Biological Activity of Biochanin A: A Review. Asian J. Pharm. Pharm. 2018, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. McDougle, D.R.; Watson, J.E.; Abdeen, A.A.; Adili, R.; Caputo, M.P.; Krapf, J.E.; Johnson, R.W.; Kilian, K.A.; Holinstat, M.; Das, A. Anti-Inflammatory ω-3 Endocannabinoid Epoxides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E6034–E6043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  283. Yurko-Mauro, K.; Alexander, D.D.; Van Elswyk, M.E. Docosahexaenoic Acid and Adult Memory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  284. Van der Wurff, I.S.M.; Meyer, B.J.; de Groot, R.H.M. Effect of Omega-3 Long Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (n-3 LCPUFA) Supplementation on Cognition in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Literature Review with a Focus on n-3 LCPUFA Blood Values and Dose of DHA and EPA. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Davis, M.P.; Behm, B.; Mehta, Z.; Fernandez, C. The Potential Benefits of Palmitoylethanolamide in Palliation: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 2019, 36, 1134–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Payahoo, L.; Kahjebishak, Y.; Asghari Jafarabadi, M.; Ostadrahimi, A. Oleoylethanolamide Supplementation Reduces Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Obese People: A Clinical Trial. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 8, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Pagotto, U.; Vicennati, V.; Pasquali, R. Endocannabinoid system and energy metabolism: Physiology and pathophysiology. G Ital. Cardiol. 2008, 9, 74S–82S. [Google Scholar]
  288. He, M.; Shi, B. Gut Microbiota as a Potential Target of Metabolic Syndrome: The Role of Probiotics and Prebiotics. Cell Biosci. 2017, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  289. Bensaid, M.; Gary-Bobo, M.; Esclangon, A.; Maffrand, J.P.; Le Fur, G.; Oury-Donat, F.; Soubrié, P. The Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Antagonist SR141716 Increases Acrp30 MRNA Expression in Adipose Tissue of Obese Fa/Fa Rats and in Cultured Adipocyte Cells. Mol. Pharm. 2003, 63, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  290. Ravinet Trillou, C.; Arnone, M.; Delgorge, C.; Gonalons, N.; Keane, P.; Maffrand, J.-P.; Soubrié, P. Anti-Obesity Effect of SR141716, a CB1 Receptor Antagonist, in Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2003, 284, R345–R353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  291. Monteleone, P.; Matias, I.; Martiadis, V.; De Petrocellis, L.; Maj, M.; Di Marzo, V. Blood Levels of the Endocannabinoid Anandamide Are Increased in Anorexia Nervosa and in Binge-Eating Disorder, but Not in Bulimia Nervosa. Neuropsychopharmacology 2005, 30, 1216–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  292. Ströhle, A.; Hahn, A. Diets of Modern Hunter-Gatherers Vary Substantially in Their Carbohydrate Content Depending on Ecoenvironments: Results from an Ethnographic Analysis. Nutr. Res. 2011, 31, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Mazier, W.; Saucisse, N.; Gatta-Cherifi, B.; Cota, D. The Endocannabinoid System: Pivotal Orchestrator of Obesity and Metabolic Disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 26, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Di Marzo, V.; Goparaju, S.K.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Bátkai, S.; Járai, Z.; Fezza, F.; Miura, G.I.; Palmiter, R.D.; Sugiura, T.; et al. Leptin-Regulated Endocannabinoids Are Involved in Maintaining Food Intake. Nature 2001, 410, 822–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Burhans, M.S.; Hagman, D.K.; Kuzma, J.N.; Schmidt, K.A.; Kratz, M. Contribution of Adipose Tissue Inflammation to the Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Compr. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Knani, I.; Earley, B.J.; Udi, S.; Nemirovski, A.; Hadar, R.; Gammal, A.; Cinar, R.; Hirsch, H.J.; Pollak, Y.; Gross, I.; et al. Targeting the Endocannabinoid/CB1 Receptor System for Treating Obesity in Prader–Willi Syndrome. Mol. Metab. 2016, 5, 1187–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Alvheim, A.R.; Malde, M.K.; Osei-Hyiaman, D.; Hong, Y.H.; Pawlosky, R.J.; Madsen, L.; Kristiansen, K.; Frøyland, L.; Hibbeln, J.R. Dietary Linoleic Acid Elevates Endogenous 2-AG and Anandamide and Induces Obesity. Obesity 2012, 20, 1984–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  298. Rousseaux, C.; Thuru, X.; Gelot, A.; Barnich, N.; Neut, C.; Dubuquoy, L.; Dubuquoy, C.; Merour, E.; Geboes, K.; Chamaillard, M.; et al. Lactobacillus Acidophilus Modulates Intestinal Pain and Induces Opioid and Cannabinoid Receptors. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 35–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Muccioli, G.G.; Naslain, D.; Bäckhed, F.; Reigstad, C.S.; Lambert, D.M.; Delzenne, N.M.; Cani, P.D. The Endocannabinoid System Links Gut Microbiota to Adipogenesis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Di Marzo, V.; Silvestri, C. Lifestyle and Metabolic Syndrome: Contribution of the Endocannabinoidome. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  301. Liu, J.; Bátkai, S.; Pacher, P.; Harvey-White, J.; Wagner, J.A.; Cravatt, B.F.; Gao, B.; Kunos, G. Lipopolysaccharide Induces Anandamide Synthesis in Macrophages via CD14/MAPK/Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/NF-ΚB Independently of Platelet-Activating Factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 45034–45039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  302. Forte, N.; Fernández-Rilo, A.C.; Palomba, L.; Di Marzo, V.; Cristino, L. Obesity Affects the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis and the Regulation Thereof by Endocannabinoids and Related Mediators. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  303. Iannotti, F.A.; Di Marzo, V. The Gut Microbiome, Endocannabinoids and Metabolic Disorders. J. Endocrinol. 2021, 248, R83–R97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Mehrpouya-Bahrami, P.; Chitrala, K.N.; Ganewatta, M.S.; Tang, C.; Murphy, E.A.; Enos, R.T.; Velazquez, K.T.; McCellan, J.; Nagarkatti, M.; Nagarkatti, P. Blockade of CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Alters Gut Microbiota and Attenuates Inflammation and Diet-Induced Obesity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Leuti, A.; Fazio, D.; Fava, M.; Piccoli, A.; Oddi, S.; Maccarrone, M. Bioactive Lipids, Inflammation and Chronic Diseases. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 159, 133–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Pacher, P.; Bátkai, S.; Kunos, G. The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy. Pharm. Rev. 2006, 58, 389–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  307. Hinz, B.; Ramer, R. Anti-Tumour Actions of Cannabinoids. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2019, 176, 1384–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Chaplin, A.; Carpéné, C.; Mercader, J. Resveratrol, Metabolic Syndrome, and Gut Microbiota. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  309. Baur, J.A.; Pearson, K.J.; Price, N.L.; Jamieson, H.A.; Lerin, C.; Kalra, A.; Prabhu, V.V.; Allard, J.S.; Lopez-Lluch, G.; Lewis, K.; et al. Resveratrol Improves Health and Survival of Mice on a High-Calorie Diet. Nature 2006, 444, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Macarulla, M.T.; Alberdi, G.; Gómez, S.; Tueros, I.; Bald, C.; Rodríguez, V.M.; Martínez, J.A.; Portillo, M.P. Effects of Different Doses of Resveratrol on Body Fat and Serum Parameters in Rats Fed a Hypercaloric Diet. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 65, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Kim, S.; Jin, Y.; Choi, Y.; Park, T. Resveratrol Exerts Anti-Obesity Effects via Mechanisms Involving down-Regulation of Adipogenic and Inflammatory Processes in Mice. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 81, 1343–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Picard, F.; Kurtev, M.; Chung, N.; Topark-Ngarm, A.; Senawong, T.; Machado de Oliveira, R.; Leid, M.; McBurney, M.W.; Guarente, L. Sirt1 Promotes Fat Mobilization in White Adipocytes by Repressing PPAR-γ. Nature 2004, 429, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  313. Kang, W.; Hong, H.J.; Guan, J.; Kim, D.G.; Yang, E.-J.; Koh, G.; Park, D.; Han, C.H.; Lee, Y.-J.; Lee, D.-H. Resveratrol Improves Insulin Signaling in a Tissue-Specific Manner under Insulin-Resistant Conditions Only: In Vitro and in Vivo Experiments in Rodents. Metabolism 2012, 61, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Springer, M.; Moco, S. Resveratrol and Its Human Metabolites—Effects on Metabolic Health and Obesity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  315. Dvorakova, M.; Landa, P. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Natural Stilbenoids: A Review. Pharm. Res. 2017, 124, 126–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Martín, A.R.; Villegas, I.; La Casa, C.; de la Lastra, C.A. Resveratrol, a Polyphenol Found in Grapes, Suppresses Oxidative Damage and Stimulates Apoptosis during Early Colonic Inflammation in Rats. Biochem. Pharm. 2004, 67, 1399–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Ølholm, J.; Paulsen, S.K.; Cullberg, K.B.; Richelsen, B.; Pedersen, S.B. Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Resveratrol on Adipokine Expression and Secretion in Human Adipose Tissue Explants. Int. J. Obes. 2010, 34, 1546–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  318. Yen, G.-C.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chang, W.-T.; Hsu, C.-L. Effects of Polyphenolic Compounds on Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α)-Induced Changes of Adipokines and Oxidative Stress in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Ghanim, H.; Sia, C.L.; Korzeniewski, K.; Lohano, T.; Abuaysheh, S.; Marumganti, A.; Chaudhuri, A.; Dandona, P. A Resveratrol and Polyphenol Preparation Suppresses Oxidative and Inflammatory Stress Response to a High-Fat, High-Carbohydrate Meal. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1409–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  320. Tomé-Carneiro, J.; Gonzálvez, M.; Larrosa, M.; Yáñez-Gascón, M.J.; García-Almagro, F.J.; Ruiz-Ros, J.A.; García-Conesa, M.T.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Espín, J.C. One-Year Consumption of a Grape Nutraceutical Containing Resveratrol Improves the Inflammatory and Fibrinolytic Status of Patients in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012, 110, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Chen, M.; Hou, P.; Zhou, M.; Ren, Q.; Wang, X.; Huang, L.; Hui, S.; Yi, L.; Mi, M. Resveratrol Attenuates High-Fat Diet-Induced Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis by Maintaining Gut Barrier Integrity and Inhibiting Gut Inflammation through Regulation of the Endocannabinoid System. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 1264–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Sikand, G.; Kris-Etherton, P.; Boulos, N.M. Impact of Functional Foods on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2015, 17, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Medina-Gomez, G.; Gray, S.; Vidal-Puig, A. Adipogenesis and Lipotoxicity: Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) and PPARγcoactivator-1 (PGC1). Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10, 1132–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Wang, L.; Waltenberger, B.; Pferschy-Wenzig, E.-M.; Blunder, M.; Liu, X.; Malainer, C.; Blazevic, T.; Schwaiger, S.; Rollinger, J.M.; Heiss, E.H.; et al. Natural Product Agonists of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARγ): A Review. Biochem. Pharm. 2014, 92, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  325. Bento, A.F.; Marcon, R.; Dutra, R.C.; Claudino, R.F.; Cola, M.; Pereira Leite, D.F.; Calixto, J.B. β-Caryophyllene Inhibits Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis in Mice through CB2 Receptor Activation and PPARγ Pathway. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 1153–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Basha, R.H.; Sankaranarayanan, C. β-Caryophyllene, a Natural Sesquiterpene Lactone Attenuates Hyperglycemia Mediated Oxidative and Inflammatory Stress in Experimental Diabetic Rats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2016, 245, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Basha, R.H.; Sankaranarayanan, C. β-Caryophyllene, a Natural Sesquiterpene, Modulates Carbohydrate Metabolism in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Acta Histochem. 2014, 116, 1469–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  328. Leonti, M. The Co-Evolutionary Perspective of the Food-Medicine Continuum and Wild Gathered and Cultivated Vegetables. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2012, 59, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Klauke, A.-L.; Racz, I.; Pradier, B.; Markert, A.; Zimmer, A.M.; Gertsch, J.; Zimmer, A. The Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor-Selective Phytocannabinoid Beta-Caryophyllene Exerts Analgesic Effects in Mouse Models of Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014, 24, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  330. Notarnicola, M.; Tutino, V.; Tafaro, A.; Bianco, G.; Guglielmi, E.; Caruso, M.G. Dietary Olive Oil Induces Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor Expression in Adipose Tissue of ApcMin/+ Transgenic Mice. Nutr. Health Aging 2016, 4, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  331. Simopoulos, A. An Increase in the Omega-6/Omega-3 Fatty Acid Ratio Increases the Risk for Obesity. Nutrients 2016, 8, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  332. Caracciolo, B.; Xu, W.; Collins, S.; Fratiglioni, L. Cognitive Decline, Dietary Factors and Gut–Brain Interactions. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2014, 136–137, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Di Marzo, V. ‘Endocannabinoids’ and Other Fatty Acid Derivatives with Cannabimimetic Properties: Biochemistry and Possible Physiopathological Relevance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Lipids Lipid. Metab. 1998, 1392, 153–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Russo, E.B. Clinical Endocannabinoid Deficiency Reconsidered: Current Research Supports the Theory in Migraine, Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel, and Other Treatment-Resistant Syndromes. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2016, 1, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  335. McPartland, J.M.; Glass, M.; Pertwee, R.G. Meta-Analysis of Cannabinoid Ligand Binding Affinity and Receptor Distribution: Interspecies Differences: Ligand Affinity and Receptor Distribution of CB1. Br. J. Pharmcol. 2007, 152, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. New Pyramid for a Sustainable Mediterranean Diet.
Figure 1. New Pyramid for a Sustainable Mediterranean Diet.
Biomolecules 11 00790 g001
Figure 2. Mediterranean diet activity on EC receptors (CB1R, CB2R, GPR55/TRPV1) and on FAAH inhibition.
Figure 2. Mediterranean diet activity on EC receptors (CB1R, CB2R, GPR55/TRPV1) and on FAAH inhibition.
Biomolecules 11 00790 g002
Figure 3. Activity of Mediterranean diet components on the endocannabinoid system at the level of CNS cells.
Figure 3. Activity of Mediterranean diet components on the endocannabinoid system at the level of CNS cells.
Biomolecules 11 00790 g003
Table 1. The potential role of Mediterranean diet components in the modulation of the endocannabinoid system.
Table 1. The potential role of Mediterranean diet components in the modulation of the endocannabinoid system.
Class of MoleculesCompoundDietary OriginEndocannabinoid Target/EffectsPotencyProposed Oral Dose in
Humans
Bicyclic sesquiterpeneβ-caryophyllene (BCP)Black pepper, hops, oregano, cloves,
valerian, wild sage, rosemary, basil and
cow’s milk
CB2R full agonist100 nM [196]4 mg/kg/day [196]
Glucosinolates (GLs)3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM)Broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower and
horseradish
CB2R partial agonist1 μM (binding affinity) [161]0.8–1.6 mg/K [149,150]
FlavonoidsBiochanin A (isoflavone)Peanuts and chickpeasFAAH inhibitor2.4 μM (IC50) [176]50 mg/kg (rats) [281]
Genistein (isoflavone)Whole grain bread, beans, lentils, chickpeas, split chicklings and fava beansFAAH competitive
inhibitor/PPAR-γ agonist
2.8 μM (Ki value) [182]9.0 mg/day
[189](
based on an Asian population)
Daidzein (isoflavone)FAAH competitive
inhibitor/PPAR-γ agonist
1.7 μM (Ki value) [182]7.4 mg/day [189]
(based on an Asian population)
Apigenin (flavons)Parsley, onions, celery, chamomile,
oregano, thyme, basil, oranges, tea, beer
and wine
FAAH competitive
inhibitor/PPAR-γ agonist/COX-2
inhibitor
15 μM (IC50) [166]0.7 mg/kg [191]
Kaempferol (flavonol)Leafy vegetables, apples, onions,
broccoli, berries, tea, cabbage, broccoli,
endive, kale, beans, tomato,
strawberries, leek and grapes
Competitive FAAH
inhibitor/PPAR-γ agonist
5 μM (Ki value) [166]1.4–5.7 mg/kg/day [195]
ω-3 PUFAsDHA/EPAWalnuts, purslane, legumes, green leafy
vegetables, olive oil, salmon, trout,
mackerel, herring and sardines
↑ CBRs NAPE-PLD, DAGLα
and DAGβ expression
(DHA/EPA);
CBRs/PPAR-γ partial agonists
(DHEA/EPEA); GPR110 agonist
(DHEA)
DHEA → CB1 1044 nM (EC50),
CB2 305 nM (EC50);
EPEA → CB1 0.1 nM (EC50),
CB2 2.1 nM (EC50) [282]
>1 g/day DHA/EPA [283,284]
N-acylethanolamines
(NAEs)
Palmitoylethanolamine (PEA)Refined wheat flour, beans, lentils,
chickpeas and extra-virgin olive oil
Competitive FAAH/NAAA
inhibitor, TRPV1/PPAR-
α/GPR55 agonist
/600–1200 mg/day [285]
Oleoylethanolamide (OEA)Competitive FAAH/NAAA inhibitor, TRPV1/PPAR-α
agonist
/125 mg/day [286]
PolyphenolsResveratrol (stilbene)Red grapes, red wine, peanuts,
blackberries, blackcurrants, blueberries
and cranberries
↑ DHA and PEA levels; ↑
CBRs and PPAR-α expression;
CB1R-mediated neuroprotection
/1.4–4.2 mg/kg/day [195]
Table 2. A synoptic overview of neuroprotective actions, mediated by endocannabinoid system modulation, by the Mediterranean diet in in vivo models of neurodegenerative disorders.
Table 2. A synoptic overview of neuroprotective actions, mediated by endocannabinoid system modulation, by the Mediterranean diet in in vivo models of neurodegenerative disorders.
DisordersDisease ModelsCompoundEffects
ADTransgenic APP/PS1 miceBCP↑ Cognitive performance
↓ Aβ accumulation
↓ Astrogliosis
↓Pro-inflammatory mediators
[96]
ADICR mice
(scopolamine)
DIM↑ BDNF
↑ Antioxidant enzyme expression
↑ Cognitive performance
↓ Neuroapoptosis
[150]
ADTransgenic APP/PS1 miceApigenin↑ Neuroprotection [191]
ADTg 2576 miceRSV↑ Cognitive performance
↓ Amyloid brain pathology
[273]
ADMouse model p25RSV↓ Hippocampal neurodegeneration
↑ Cognitive performance,
↑ SIRT1 overexpression
[273]
ADTgSwDI mice EVOO
(OEA)
↓ Aβ and neurofibrillary tangles
↑ Cognitive performance
BBB Aβ clearance
[76]
ADC57BL6 mice (Aβ 25–35
intracerebroventricular injection)
PEA↓ Neuroapoptosis
↓ Neuroinflammation
↓ Memory dysfunction
↓ OxS
[257]
PDWistar rats
(rotenone-induced toxicity)
BCP↓ Neuroapoptosis
↓ iNOS), COX-2, TNFα, IL-6 and IL-
1β expression
↑ Antioxidant defenses
[97]
PDC57BL/6J mice
(MPTP)
DIM↓ Neuroapoptosis
↑ Cytoprotection
[156]
PDWistar rats
(6-OHDA)
OEA↑ Neuroprotection[251]
PDPPAR-αKO and PPAR-αWT mice
(MPTP)
PEA↓ Microglial activation
↓ Microtube alteration
↓ Neuroapoptosis
↑ Motor behavior
[258]
MSEAE mouse modelBCP↓ Axonal demyelination
↓ Microglial cells, CD4+ and CD8+ activity
↑ Th1/Treg immune balance
[98]
MSEAE mouse PEA↓ Demyelination
↓ Neuronal damage
↑ Clinical phenotype
[256]
MSEAE mouse modelBCP↓ NO and H2O2 production[112]
ALSMouse model of ALSRSV↑ Neuroprotection[273]
Neuropsychiatric
diseases
C57BL6/J
mice (ω-3 deficiency)
ω-3↑ Anxiolytic effect[219]
Obesityω-3 deficiency ω-3↑ CBR-Gi/o coupling↑ Mood modulation[220]
ObesityObese mice ω-3↑ AEA/2-AG balance[5]
Memory impairmentP18–P24 CD1
mice (ω-3 deficiency)
ω-3↑ Hippocampal LTP
↑ Synaptic plasticity
↓ Hippocampal LTP
[221]
Brain agingOld Wistar rats
(EPA/DHA supplementation)
EPA/DHA↓ Neuroapoptosis
↑ Neuroprotection
↑ PPAR-γ expression
[225]
LPS-induced
neuroinflammation
C57BL/6J mice DHEA↑ cAMP/PKA signaling
↑ Inhibition of NF-κB activation
↓ Pro-inflammatory mediators
[230]
LPS-induced
neuroinflammation
Wistar Hannover rats OEA/PEA↓ Oxs
↑ NF-κB inhibition
↓ Pro-inflammatory mediators
[252]
LPS-induced
neuroinflammation
C57BL/6 miceDIM↓ iNOS and COX-2 expression
↑ NF-κB inhibition
[152]
Neuropathic painC57BL/6 mice (formalin)BCA↓ ERK phosphorylation
↓ Pain
[176]
Neuropathic painSwiss miceRSV↓ Pain
↑ Neuroprotection
[279]
Brain atrophyWistar ratsRSV↑ NGF[275]
Occlusion-reperfusion
stress
Wistar ratsRSV↓ OxS
↓ Neuroapoptosis
↑ DHA and PEA levels
↑ CBR and PPAR-α expression
↑ Synaptic plasticity
[280]
Stress-related disordersWistar rats (contextual fear
conditioning)
Kmp↑ Anxiolytic effect[201]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Armeli, F.; Bonucci, A.; Maggi, E.; Pinto, A.; Businaro, R. Mediterranean Diet and Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Neglected Role of Nutrition in the Modulation of the Endocannabinoid System. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060790

AMA Style

Armeli F, Bonucci A, Maggi E, Pinto A, Businaro R. Mediterranean Diet and Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Neglected Role of Nutrition in the Modulation of the Endocannabinoid System. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(6):790. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060790

Chicago/Turabian Style

Armeli, Federica, Alessio Bonucci, Elisa Maggi, Alessandro Pinto, and Rita Businaro. 2021. "Mediterranean Diet and Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Neglected Role of Nutrition in the Modulation of the Endocannabinoid System" Biomolecules 11, no. 6: 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060790

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop