Next Article in Journal
Methylation of the Suppressor Gene p16INK4a: Mechanism and Consequences
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of 3-Mercaptopyruvate Sulfurtransferase in the Regulation of Proliferation, Migration, and Bioenergetics in Murine Colon Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Pro-Resolving Effect of Ginsenosides as an Anti-Inflammatory Mechanism of Panax ginseng
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrogen Sulfide in Pharmacotherapy, Beyond the Hydrogen Sulfide-Donors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/biom10030445
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Synergisms, Discrepancies and Interactions between Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Monoxide in the Gastrointestinal and Digestive System Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology

by
Urszula Głowacka
,
Tomasz Brzozowski
and
Marcin Magierowski
*
Department of Physiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 16 Grzegórzecka Street, 31-531 Cracow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(3), 445; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030445
Submission received: 5 February 2020 / Revised: 7 March 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2020 / Published: 13 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue H2S, Polysulfides, and Enzymes: Physiological and Pathological Aspects)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Endogenous gas transmitters, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO) are important signaling molecules known to exert multiple biological functions. In recent years, the role of H2S, CO and NO in regulation of cardiovascular, neuronal and digestive systems physiology and pathophysiology has been emphasized. Possible link between these gaseous mediators and multiple diseases as well as potential therapeutic applications has attracted great attention from biomedical scientists working in many fields of biomedicine. Thus, various pharmacological tools with ability to release CO or H2S were developed and implemented in experimental animal in vivo and in vitro models of many disorders and preliminary human studies. This review was designed to review signaling functions, similarities, dissimilarities and a possible cross-talk between H2S and CO produced endogenously or released from chemical donors, with special emphasis on gastrointestinal digestive system pathologies prevention and treatment.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon monoxide (CO), next to nitric oxide (NO) are the most recently studied endogenous gaseous mediators. Chemically, exogenous CO is a colorless and odorless gas lighter than air, while colorless H2S has characteristic smell of rotten eggs. Both gaseous molecules were assumed for many years to be toxic for human body and when generated in the mammalian tissues, they were considered only as a by-product of metabolic processes or, as in case of H2S, as the end product of anaerobic respiration due to bacteria capable of utilizing inorganic sulfur substrates [1,2]. However, based on scientific evidence, the second beneficial face of CO and H2S has been reported recently. It has been shown that these gaseous mediators, similarly to NO, play an important beneficial functions in the body among others including the regulation of homeostasis, vasorelaxation, the regulation of various enzymes activity and the modulation of the particular genes expression [1,2,3,4]. These small gaseous molecules have become the main target of many investigations in the context of various diseases including gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies. However, due to toxicity of inhaled CO or H2S, novel compounds were designed and developed with ability to release small amounts of these gaseous molecules and are widely used as pharmacological tools under experimental conditions [5]. Interestingly, it seems that together with NO, all three mediators form a kind of endogenous triad interacting with each other [6]. However, these aspects have not been investigated deeply so far. Thus, within this article we aimed to explain and highlight possible mechanisms of interaction and the cross-talk between CO and H2S biosynthesis pathways, with special emphasis on the development, prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) and digestive system pathologies.

2. Overview on CO and H2S Physiology and Pharmacology in Digestive System

2.1. H2S Physiology and Pharmacology

H2S is known to modulate various biological functions on molecular, biochemical and even functional level under physiological and pathological conditions. This molecule can be formed in both, enzymatic and non-enzymatic processes. Three enzymes are involved in the enzymatic production of H2S in the body: cystathionine-γ-lyase (CTH), cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MPST) [7]. CTH and CBS are located in cytosol and their activity requires pyridoxal-5’-phosphate (P5P; vitamin B6) as a cofactor. MPST is present within cytosol and mitochondria and is P5P-independent but works in co-activity with cysteine aminotransferase (CAT), which is necessary to convert cysteine to 3-mercaptopyruvate, a substrate for MPST [7]. As mentioned before, the colonic sulfate-reducing bacteria could be also the source of H2S in the GI tract [8]. The molecular targets of endogenous H2S include many physiologically important proteins, signaling targets including kinases, phosphatases, thiols, polysulfide’s, thiosulfate/sulfite, iron-sulfur cluster proteins, the anti-oxidant compounds and transcriptional factors affecting multiple cellular and molecular responses. Thus, this mediator is involved in the regulation of signaling pathways and genes expression [9].
Numerous studies have shown that H2S has anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective properties [5,10]. The anti-inflammatory effect of H2S is assumed to result in inhibition of endothelial leukocyte adhesion, modulation of inflammatory markers expression, prostaglandins biosynthesis and by interacting with transcription factors such as nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) [10,11]. NF-κB regulates the expression of genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines, some growth factors, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and apoptotic pathways components [12]. Its activation has been noted in various inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, atherosclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, type I diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, and especially in digestive system pathologies, including e.g., inflammatory bowel disease (IBD mainly consisting of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) and drugs-induced gastrotoxicity [13,14,15]. NF-κB inhibition by H2S can occur in two possible ways, by sulfhydration of the free thiol group on 38 cysteine in the subunit 65 or due to phosphorylation suppression and degradation of IkBα [16,17]. As it has been mentioned above, H2S can also interact with another transcription factor, Nrf-2, which regulates cellular defensive response to inflammation and oxidation [11,18]. Physiologically, Nfr-2 is present in the cytoplasm as a molecular complex with the cytoskeleton protein, Keap1. When cellular redox homeostasis is imbalanced, Nrf-2 is released from its repressor (Keap1), translocated to the nucleus and bound to promoter of antioxidant responsive element (ARE). This translocation leads to increased transcription for anti-oxidative genes, such as catalase (CAT) or superoxide dismutase (SOD) [19,20], glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) [11,18]. H2S most likely activates Nrf-2 pathway by sulfuration the Keap1 protein (at the cysteine-151, 226 and 613), leading to this nuclear factor release, its nuclear translocation and enhancement of antioxidant genes expression [18]. H2S is also supposed to exert its anti-inflammatory activity due to the modulation of annexin A1 (AnxA1) pathway. H2S triggers AnxA1 mobilization and modulates vascular inflammatory processes by the enhancement in the detachment rate of leukocytes from the vessel wall resulting in reduction of inflammation [21]. This gaseous molecule can interact with the endogenous NO in vasomotor responses of the arterial vessels involved in the blood pressure control. Previous study concerning the systolic blood pressure (sBP), vasoreactivity, NO-synthase (NOS) expression and activity, CTH expression and geometry of the isolated thoracic aorta revealed that this vasomotor interaction between H2S released from Na2S with NO in thoracic aorta of normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) seems to be age- and blood pressure-dependent [4].
It has been reported that H2S biosynthesis pathway activity could be crucial for gastric mucosal barrier physiology and alterations in this gaseous molecule signaling were observed in pathology of upper GI-tract and other parts of the digestive system [5]. Moreover, H2S-releasing NaHS has been shown to accelerate ulcer healing and to attenuate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-induced gastrotoxicity [22,23]. Interestingly, H2S-releasing derivative of naproxen (ATB-346) which successfully completed phase 2 clinical trial, offers a promising safer alternative for conventional native form of this NSAID not only in improvement of pain relief but also in GI-safety manifested by the reduction of upper GI tract damage formation in subjects treated with equimolar effective doses of ATB-346 versus naproxen [24]. Similarly GYY4137, slow H2S-releasing compound has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory activity [25] and to decrease the area of ischemia/reperfusion-induced gastric damage in rats [23]. GYY4137 also attenuated intestinal barrier injury in mouse model as well as in human colon cancer cells model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or TNF-α/IFN-γ-induced endotoxemia [26].
It is also worth mentioning that natural sources of sulfur compounds, such as garlic-derived compounds including diallyl sulfide (DAS) disulfide, diallyl disulfide (DADS), diallyl trisulfide (DATS) and allicin were described as H2S releasing molecules [27]. Numerous studies have shown beneficial therapeutic and protective effects of these compounds in cancer development [24,25,26]. Cell cultures and animal models, as well as epidemiology data have revealed the chemopreventive activity of these H2S donors, especially in gastric and colorectal cancers [28,29,30]. On the other hand, somehow related to H2S and sulfide physiology, sulfiredoxin (Srx) is multifunction enzyme involved in antioxidant metabolism by reduction of cysteine sulfinic acid to sulfenic acid in proteins exposed to oxidative stress [31]. Some studies suggested that increased Srx expression could be linked with carcinogenesis and tumor progression [29,31]. Indeed, in gastric tumors cells, expression of Srx was significantly elevated as compared with normal tissue [29]. Interestingly, it has been reported that treatment with DATS decreased expression of Srx in gastric tumor cell line BGC823 [29]. Similarly, Srx is highly expressed in poorly differentiated, aggressive HCT116 human colorectal cancer cells, while in normal colon epithelium (NCM460) or cells derived from well-differentiated colorectal carcinomas (SW640 and HT29) this protein was not detected [32]. It has been also observed that inhibition of Srx resulted in selective death of cancer cells by disturbance in redox homeostasis [33]. Taken together, we assume that inhibition of Srx could be considered as a novel approach and target for anticancer treatment. On the other hand, some studies showed pro-cancer effects of H2S [34,35,36]. This phenomenon may be associated with induction of angiogenesis, regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetics, acceleration of cell cycle progression, and anti-apoptotic actions [34]. It has been reported that in adenocarcinoma-derived cell lines (HCT-116, HT-29, LoVo) CBS expression was upregulated as compared to control-non-malignant colonic epithelial cells [35]. Moreover, anti-apoptotic effect of H2S and its involvement in the enhancement of cell proliferation linked with alterations in CTH expression was demonstrated on  human gastric adenocarcinoma (AGS) [36]. Taken together, H2S has been shown to exert both pro- and anti-cancer effects and we assume that this could be dependent on the dose of this gaseous mediator and possibly on the differences in sensitivity of various cell types to the impact of this molecule.
Garlic-derived H2S-releasing compounds were also shown to exhibit hepatoprotective effect in experimental animal models [37,38]. Pretreatment with DAS decreased NF-κB and TNF-α in serum and reversed the decreased level of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activity in liver as observed in a well described model of liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) [38]. Therefore, garlic-derived H2S donors might affect cell signaling networks in a similar way as synthetic H2S donors.

2.2. CO Physiology and Pharmacology

CO is produced in mammalian tissues by heme degradation involving enzymatic activity of heme oxygenases (HMOXs) [2]. This protein has two main isoforms, HMOX-1 and HMOX-2 translated by the expression of two separate genes. HMOX-1 is inducible and this isoform is active under imbalanced homeostasis conditions, while HMOX-2 is constitutively expressed with relatively low yield. Interestingly, rats also encode third isoform, HMOX-3, probably from a pseudogene that does not produce a functional form of this protein [39]. It has been indicated that in majority of biological systems, CO has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative, anti-apoptotic and cytoprotective effects, similarly to H2S [39,40]. CO may regulate the activity and functionality of various proteins by binding to heme domains. This includes e.g., hemoglobin, myoglobin, cytochrome c, cytochrome P450, nitric oxide synthase (NOS), catalase, prostaglandin H synthase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (Nox) and transcription factors NPAS2, Bach-1 and Bach-2 [41].
Recently, endogenous CO or that released from the synthetic CO donor, tricarbonyldichlororuthenium (II) dimer (CORM-2) has been implicated in the mechanism of gastric mucosal integrity, gastroprotection and the healing of chronic gastric ulcers [42,43]. These gastroprotective and therapeutic effects of CO are mediated by the activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC), which is regulating cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) generation. Elevated intracellular concentration of this second messenger leads to enhancement in the gastric microcirculation as documented by the direct measurement of gastric blood flow (GBF) [40,42,43]. Moreover, the potential mediators of this CO-induced beneficial action such as Ca2+-activated K+ channels [44] and the arachidonic acid derivative (20-HETE) production, have been proposed to mediate vasoactive, gastroprotective and ulcer healing properties of CO [45].
In addition, the anti-apoptotic and anti-hypoxic effects of this gaseous molecule have been demonstrated [37]. In animal in vivo and cell culture in vitro models, CO has been shown to inhibit LPS-induced overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1β and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [44]. It has been assumed that the anti-inflammatory activity of CO is related to the possible modulation by this gaseous molecule of the multiple members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family [44]. Fukuda et al. has reported that water-soluble CORM-3 attenuated inflammatory response in animal model of trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis by targeting CD4+ T cells releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-8, INF-γ, IL-17A) [46]. Interestingly, CO may affect ERK MAPK pathway in T cells inhibiting their proliferation followed by the reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines release, as it has been documented in experimental mice model of colitis [47]. Moreover, recent evidence has indicated that pretreatment with CORM-3 alleviated the postoperative ileus (POI) in mice [48]. Similarly to above mentioned observations, CORM-3 significantly reduced intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress in postoperative ileus due to activation of p38 MAPK and downregulation of ERK1/2 [48]. Taken together, it can be assumed that CO has immunomodulatory properties and affects the activity of various cell types including T cells, B cells, epithelial cells, neutrophils, mast cells, dendritic cells and macrophages stimulated in the course of gastrointestinal digestive disorders [49]. Takagi et al. investigated the effects of CO-releasing CORM-A1 on Th17 differentiation using T-cell transfer-induced colitis in mice [50]. They revealed that CORM-A1 ameliorated intestinal inflammation through reduction of retinoid related orphan receptor (ROR)γ-receptor expression, inhibition of Th17 differentiation and by the decrease of IL-17A level [50]. HMOX-1/CO pathway can also regulate intestinal inflammation in acute and chronic experimental models by cross-talk of this pathway proteins with enteric microbiota in mucosal immune compartment [49]. Undoubtedly, CO could be considered as potential therapeutic agent in various GI disorders due to the wide range of molecular inflammatory and anti-inflammatory targets affected by this small gaseous molecule.

3. Similarities and Dissimilarities in H2S and CO Activity and their Interaction within Digestive System

3.1. Parallelisms and Discrepancies in CO and H2S Effects and Targets

CO and H2S, likewise NO have similar activity and regulate parallel molecular pathways, also due to mutual interaction and the cross-talk between these molecules [51,52]. H2S and CO were shown to prevent gastric mucosa against NSAIDs- or alendronate-induced damage and to accelerate ulcer healing due to an improvement of gastric microcirculation [15,53,54,55]. Both molecules attenuated hypoxia and inflammation decreasing gastric mucosal expression of HIF-1α and NF-κB [15]. Recent evidence indicates that H2S- and CO-gastroprotection was abolished or at least reduced by the inhibition of sGC or NOS activity [54,56]. Interestingly, in contrast with H2S, CO was shown to maintain its gastroprotective effects independently on afferent sensory nerves activity [56]. On the other hand, H2S-releasing NaHS accelerated gastric ulcer healing but in contrast with CO-releasing CORM-2, this effect of H2S donor was accompanied by the upregulation of gastric mucosal protein expression for Nrf-2, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) at the ulcer margin [42,53].
Interestingly, it has been reported that CO donors could exert antibacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) [57]. Nowadays, the gastric colonization with H. pylori constitutes the major risk of gastric and duodenal ulcer diseases, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and even gastric adenocarcinoma [58]. Antimicrobial action of stimulated murine macrophages was enhanced by CORM-2 against H. pylori [57]. Moreover, CORM-2 impaired H. pylori respiration and inhibited H. pylori related urease activity [57], however, the role of H2S in H. pylori infection has not been fully recognized. On the one hand, H. pylori produces H2S [8], but on the other hand, as mentioned above, natural sulfur compounds like garlic have antibacterial activity [59]. Moreover, microbiological studies revealed anti-H. pylori potential of DADS derived from garlic powder or garlic oil [59]. Antibacterial activity of garlic-derived compounds were shown to be effective in patients infected with H. pylori [60]. Furthermore, allicin as an adjuvant to conventional anti-H.pylori therapy increased efficiency of H. pylori eradication [61]. However, further studies are required to fully explain these bactericidal aspects of H2S donating agents.
Both H2S and CO donors were shown to increase HCO3- secretion in rat duodenum protecting the duodenal mucosa against the damage induced by acidic content [62]. Additionally, H2S was observed to modulate gastric secretion possibly via activation of TRPV1 channel and the consequent release of substance P and in a NF-κB -dependent manner [63]. H2S released from NaHS stimulated the secretion of HCO3- in part mediated by the activity of capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons as well as endogenous NO and PGs [64]. Similarly, CORM-2 dose-dependently elevated HCO3- secretion acting as the stimulant of endogenous PGs biosynthesis [62].
In another study, de Araujo et al. proposed that adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) plays an important role as a regulator of cellular energy and metabolism, and could be the common target for all above mentioned gaseous mediators [65]. Indeed, AMPK inducers can actually exert a beneficial effects within the GI tract, e.g., metformin has been shown to suppress esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) [66]. Interestingly, the γ-subunit of AMPK contains four CBS domains located close to the N-terminus of this subunit, operating in pairs known as Bateman’s domain [67]. The administration of H2S, CO and NO donors increased p-AMPK expression and protected gastric mucosa of mice against ethanol-induced lesions [65]. On the other hand, it has been also indicated that AMPK stimulates HMOX-1 gene expression within human vascular cells and rat arteries via modulation of Nrf2/ARE pathway [6].
Interestingly, H2S donor, DADS has been demonstrated to stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor α (HIF-1α) and to prevent colonic mucosa in experimental model of colitis [68]. H2S also is produced by intestinal bacteria forming a biofilm lining the mucus surface [69]. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota and “leaky” mucus layer is associated with the pathogenesis of IBD, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), colorectal cancer and extra-intestinal disorders like obesity or metabolic syndrome [70,71]. It has been reported that H2S derived from DADS can have additional protective effect on gut affecting intestinal microbiota and biofilm formation because treatment with this compound not only alleviated intestinal damage but has also effectively reconstituted microbiota biofilm structure in rat model of colitis [69,72]. As mentioned before, CO due to its anti-inflammatory activity ameliorated intestinal injury in experimental models of colitis by the modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression [49]. Experiments carried out in mice showed that enteric microbiota have the ability to regulate the activity of intestinal macrophages essential in killing pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella enterica. This bactericidal effect was associated with an induction of HMOX-1/CO pathway by microbiota [49,73]. Moreover, the gut microbiota can produce CO due to the presence of enzymes with similar functions as HMOX-1. In addition, CO can directly interact with heme-containing groups in some intestinal bacteria [73]. Importantly, in patients with ulcerative colitis, increased intestinal expression of HMOX-1 has been demonstrated [74]. Thus, the interplay between gasotransmitters and gut microbiome may play an important role in maintenance of intestinal homeostasis (Figure 1).

3.2. Cross-talk between CO and H2S Biosynthesis Pathways

3.2.1. Effects of CO on H2S Biosynthesis Pathway

CO has the chemical ability to bind to metal-centered prosthetic groups of many proteins including enzymes [75]. Therefore, heme containing proteins could be considered as the main target of molecular events associated with CO activity. CBS, similarly to CTH and MPST takes part in endogenous H2S production but belongs to the above mentioned type of enzymes. Indeed, it has been reported that CO can bind to the prosthetic heme domain of CBS, stabilizing CO-Fe(II)-histidine complex and in turn, resulting in this enzyme inhibition [75,76]. CO regulates H2S production, but on the other hand, CBS acts in parallel as a CO sensor [75], however, the indirect effect of CO on CTH and MPST activity could not be excluded.
With the implementation of metabolomic methods, the decreased activity of CBS, which affected remethylation and transsulfuration has been observed (Figure 2). In detail, the CBS inhibition by CO has been shown to elevate methionine and S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) levels resulting in modulation of proteins methylation leading to increased generation of anti-oxidants [77,78]. Therefore, CO-mediated CBS inhibition is supposed to switch the transsulfuration pathway into the remethylation pathway, leading to the wide range of proteins and histones methylation. Indeed, based on in vitro model, it has been demonstrated that CO released from CORM-2 enhanced histone H3 protein methylation in human monoblastic leukemia U937 cells [79].
Histone modification and DNA methylation work together in mechanism of chromatin condensation process which is a morphological hallmark of apoptosis, and its regulatory availability for transcription factors. For instance, alterations in DNA methylation have been reported in development of both precancerous Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), despite its noticeable role in gastric carcinogenesis [80]. Histological alterations that occur in BE include the transformation of normal squamous epithelium into intestinal metaplasia with a further progression into dysplasia and finally into adenocarcinoma. Thus, there were also epigenetic alterations observed, especially within DNA methylation. Genomic analysis revealed the presence of global hypomethylation during the course of metaplasia development [81]. However, the possible involvement of CO and H2S in the development of chronic esophageal disorders has not been fully elucidated. Taken together, this aspect should be further investigated with the emphasis on possible impact of these gaseous mediators in the mechanism of DNA methylation process of these upper GI pathologies.
Interestingly, the interaction of CO with CBS/H2S pathway could be involved in regulation of bile secretion since CO attenuated H2S levels, stimulated biliary HCO3- and therefore protected the liver, accelerating its detoxification [82]. In fact, H2S may play an essential role in these processes because heterozygous knockout (CBS+/-) reversed these effects of CO [82]. However, the inhibition of CTH activity by propargylglycine (PAG) induced choleresis in the rat liver suggesting that the increased CO and decreased H2S content are responsible for an elevation of bile secretion [83]. Since bile secretion strictly depends on the blood flow in mesenteric circulation, the blood vessel vasomotor activity can be directly mediated by these endogenous gaseous molecules. Indeed, the anti-contractile effect of H2S in both, the rat vascular wall and perivascular tissue has recently been demonstrated using normal and SH rats [3,4]. It has been found that pretreatment with PAG elevated the noradrenaline-induced contraction in normal but not in spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats [3]. However, perivascular adipose tissue presence increased vasoactive effect of exogenously derived H2S in SH rats [3].
On the other hand, an opposite final effect of CBS inhibition by CO, such as increased H2S concentration has been proposed [77]. This could be explained by accumulation of homocysteine that compensatively raised CTH activity in endoplasmic reticulum stress model in HEK293 cells, an effect also confirmed in CBS deficient mice [84]. This hypothesis could be corroborative with our previous finding that pretreatment with CO-donor, CORM-2 not only prevented gastric lesions induced by aspirin but also downregulated gastric mucosal protein expression of CBS and subsequent H2S production [54]. However, in chronic experimental gastric ulcer study, the daily treatment with CO donor throughout 9 days period, accelerated ulcer healing and upregulated mRNA expression for CTH and CBS increasing H2S production at the gastric mucosa of ulcer margin [53]. These observations strongly suggest that the effect of CO on CBS and possible activation of compensative mechanisms regulating H2S biosynthesis could be time-dependent.

3.2.2. Effects of H2S on CO Biosynthesis Pathway

As mentioned above, the endogenous synthesis of CO depends upon the activity of HMOX-1 and HMOX-2. As reported previously, H2S can affect the expression of HMOX-1 and endogenous CO content indirectly, by modulation of Keap1-Nrf2 pathway [58] (Figure 3). For instance, the pretreatment with H2S-releasing derivative of naproxen, ATB-346 increased the expression of Nrf-2 and HMOX-1 proteins in gastric mucosa compromised by acute stress [32].
As reported by our group previously, daily treatment with H2S-releasing NaHS accelerated gastric ulcer healing and decreased mRNA expression of HMOX-1 at ulcer margin supporting the notion that this beneficial effect of H2S donor is mediated by anti-inflammatory activity of this gaseous molecule [53]. However, pharmacological inhibition of HMOXs by administration of zinc protoporphyrin IX (ZnPP) reversed gastroprotective, ulcer healing and vasodilatory effects of H2S donor [53,54]. Interestingly, beneficial outcomes of CORM-2 administration in gastric mucosa and gastric microcirculation were still observed despite the H2S biosynthesis pathway has been pharmacologically inhibited [43].Taken together, these results suggest that, at least within gastric mucosa, H2S activity including modulation of gastric microcirculation is dependent on endogenous CO biosynthesis while beneficial effects of CO are independent on the activity of endogenous H2S biosynthesis pathway.

4. Conclusions, Possible Implementation into Therapy of GI Disorders and Future Perspectives

CO and H2S donors were shown to exert preventive and therapeutic effects in various digestive system disorders and pathologies, such as drugs-induced gastrotoxicity, ulcer healing or prevention and treatment of colitis (Figure 4). It has been reported that these gaseous molecules have similar molecular targets and could influence each other (Table 1). Nevertheless, the emerging cross-talk and interactions between these two molecules remain to be studied. Especially, possible effects of both gaseous molecules and novel class of drugs releasing H2S and CO in the therapy of the short-term and long-term esophageal pathologies such as GERD, BE or EAC should be further determined. Additionally, influence of CO and H2S on the H. pylori infection consequences requires further investigations. Lastly, but not limited to, precise mechanisms and effects of CO and H2S on the methylation process and regulation of mitochondrial activity, especially in the context of upper GI pathologies could significantly expand the current knowledge related to the possible molecular targets of these gaseous transmitters and pharmacological agents releasing these gaseous molecules.
Even though the experimental evidence on protective efficacy of CO-donating agents are promising, clinical implementation of these compounds into therapy in humans might be questionable since many CO-releasing pharmacological tools contain heavy metals in their structure [85]. However, novel CO-releasing prodrugs were developed recently and further studies will hopefully reveal their clinical potential [86]. It is worth to highlight, that H2S-releasing derivative of naproxen, ATB-346 with its reduced gastrotoxicity passed successfully the Phase 2 of clinical trial [24]. Taken together, there are still many missing aspects to be answered and extensively investigated in the context of CO and H2S-related physiology and pharmacology of GI digestive system.

Author Contributions

U.G. and M.M. wrote the manuscript. U.G. prepared the table and Figures and screened the scientific literature related to the topic. T.B. revised the manuscript. M.M. designed the concept of this manuscript and is leading research projects related to this article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.M. received financial support from National Science Centre Poland (UMO-2016/23/D/NZ4/01913) and from the National Centre for Research and Development, Poland (LIDER/9/0055/L-8/16/NCBR/2017).

Conflicts of Interest

Nothing to declare.

References

  1. Wallace, J.L.; Ianaro, A.; Denucci, G. Gaseous Mediators in Gastrointestinal Mucosal Defense and Injury. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017, 62, 2223–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Magierowska, K.; Brzozowski, T.; Magierowski, M. Emerging role of carbon monoxide in regulation of cellular pathways and in the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 129, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cacanyiova, S.; Majzunova, M.; Golas, S.; Berenyiova, A. The role of perivascular adipose tissue and endogenous hydrogen sulfide in vasoactive responses of isolated mesenteric arteries in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2019, 70, 295–306. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berenyiova, A.; Drobna, M.; Cebova, M.; Kristek, F.; Cacanyiova, S. Changes in the vasoactive effects of nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide and the structure of the rat thoracic aorta: The role of age and essential hypertension. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2018, 69. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shen, F.; Zhao, C.-S.; Shen, M.; Wang, Z.; Chen, G. The role of hydrogen sulfide in gastric mucosal damage. Med. Gas. Res. 2019, 9, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, L.; Hsu, A.; Moore, P.K. Actions and interactions of nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide in the cardiovascular system and in inflammation—A tale of three gases! Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 123, 386–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kimura, H. Production and Physiological Effects of Hydrogen Sulfide. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Singh, S.B.; Lin, H.C. Hydrogen Sulfide in Physiology and Diseases of the Digestive Tract. Microorganisms 2015, 3, 866–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Olas, B. Hydrogen sulfide in signaling pathways. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 439, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Flannigan, K.L.; Wallace, J.L. Hydrogen sulfide-based anti-inflammatory and chemopreventive therapies: an experimental approach. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 3012–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Benedetti, F.; Curreli, S.; Krishnan, S.; Davinelli, S.; Cocchi, F.; Scapagnini, G.; Gallo, R.; Zella, D. Anti-inflammatory effects of H2S during acute bacterial infection: a review. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Karin, M. NF-κB as a Critical Link Between Inflammation and Cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, a000141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.-C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Atreya, I.; Atreya, R.; Neurath, M.F. NF-κB in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Intern. Med. 2008, 263, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Magierowski, M.; Magierowska, K.; Szmyd, J.; Surmiak, M.; Sliwowski, Z.; Kwiecien, S.; Brzozowski, T. Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Monoxide Protect Gastric Mucosa Compromised by Mild Stress Against Alendronate Injury. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2016, 61, 3176–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Sen, N.; Paul, B.D.; Gadalla, M.M.; Mustafa, A.K.; Sen, T.; Xu, R.; Kim, S.; Snyder, S.H. Hydrogen Sulfide-Linked Sulfhydration of NF-κB Mediates Its Antiapoptotic Actions. Mol. Cell 2012, 45, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, D.; Du, J.; Tang, C.; Huang, Y.; Jin, H. H2S-Induced Sulfhydration: Biological Function and Detection Methodology. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Corsello, T.; Komaravelli, N.; Casola, A. Role of Hydrogen Sulfide in NRF2- and Sirtuin-Dependent Maintenance of Cellular Redox Balance. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xie, Z.-Z.; Liu, Y.; Bian, J. Hydrogen Sulfide and Cellular Redox Homeostasis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dreger, H.; Westphal, K.; Weller, A.; Baumann, G.; Stangl, K.; Meiners, S.; Stangl, K. Nrf2-dependent upregulation of antioxidative enzymes: a novel pathway for proteasome inhibitor-mediated cardioprotection. Cardiovasc. Res. 2009, 83, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Brancaleone, V.; Mitidieri, E.; Flower, R.J.; Cirino, G.; Perretti, M. Annexin A1 mediates hydrogen sulfide properties in the control of inflammation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014, 351, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Magierowski, M.; Magierowska, K.; Surmiak, M.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Kwiecien, S.; Wallace, J.L.; Brzozowski, T. The effect of hydrogen sulfide-releasing naproxen (ATB-346) versus naproxen on formation of stress-induced gastric lesions, the regulation of systemic inflammation, hypoxia and alterations in gastric microcirculation. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2017, 68, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Magierowski, M.; Magierowska, K.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Sliwowski, Z.; Pajdo, R.; Ginter, G.; Kwiecien, S.; Brzozowski, T. Exogenous and Endogenous Hydrogen Sulfide Protects Gastric Mucosa against the Formation and Time-Dependent Development of Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Acute Lesions Progressing into Deeper Ulcerations. Molecules 2017, 22, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wallace, J.L.; Nagy, P.; Feener, T.D.; Allain, T.; Ditrói, T.; Vaughan, D.J.; Muscara, M.N.; De Nucci, G.; Buret, A.G. A proof-of-concept, Phase 2 clinical trial of the gastrointestinal safety of a hydrogen sulfide-releasing anti-inflammatory drug. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 177, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Whiteman, M.; Li, L.; Rose, P.; Tan, C.-H.; Parkinson, D.B.; Moore, P.K. The effect of hydrogen sulfide donors on lipopolysaccharide-induced formation of inflammatory mediators in macrophages. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, S.; Bu, D.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, J.; Sun, L.; Zuo, S.; Ma, J.; Li, T.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, Y.; et al. GYY4137 ameliorates intestinal barrier injury in a mouse model of endotoxemia. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016, 118, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rose, P.; Moore, P.K.; Zhu, Y.Z. Garlic and Gaseous Mediators. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 39, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.-S.; Wang, X.; Jiao, F.; Wang, Q.-W.; Wang, J.; Yang, K.; Hu, R.-R.; Liu, H.-C.; Wang, H.-Y. Aged black garlic extract induces inhibition of gastric cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Med. Rep. 2011, 5, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J.; Si, L.; Wang, G.; Bai, Z.; Li, W. Increased Sulfiredoxin Expression in Gastric Cancer Cells May Be a Molecular Target of the Anticancer Component Diallyl Trisulfide. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hosono, T.; Fukao, T.; Ogihara, J.; Ito, Y.; Shiba, H.; Seki, T.; Ariga, T. Diallyl Trisulfide Suppresses the Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis of Human Colon Cancer Cells through Oxidative Modification of β-Tubulin. J. Boil. Chem. 2005, 280, 41487–41493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lei, K.; Townsend, D.M.; Tew, K.D. Protein cysteine sulfinic acid reductase (sulfiredoxin) as a regulator of cell proliferation and drug response. Oncogene 2008, 27, 4877–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Jiang, H.; Wu, L.; Chen, J.; Mishra, M.; Chawsheen, H.A.; Zhu, H.; Wei, Q. Sulfiredoxin Promotes Colorectal Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis through a Novel Mechanism of Enhancing EGFR Signaling. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015, 13, 1554–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kim, H.; Lee, G.-R.; Kim, J.; Baek, J.Y.; Jo, Y.-J.; Hong, S.-E.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, J.; Lee, H.I.; Park, S.-K.; et al. Sulfiredoxin inhibitor induces preferential death of cancer cells through reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial damage. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 91, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, D.; Si, W.; Wang, M.; Lv, S.; Ji, A.; Li, Y. Hydrogen sulfide in cancer: Friend or foe? Nitric Oxide 2015, 50, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hellmich, M.R.; Szabo, C. Hydrogen Sulfide and Cancer. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2015, 230, 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sekiguchi, F.; Sekimoto, T.; Ogura, A.; Kawabata, A. Endogenous Hydrogen Sulfide Enhances Cell Proliferation of Human Gastric Cancer AGS Cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 39, 887–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Guan, M.-J.; Zhao, N.; Xie, K.; Zeng, T. Hepatoprotective effects of garlic against ethanol-induced liver injury: A mini-review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 111, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, M.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Kou, R.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhao, N.; Zeng, T.; Xie, K. Diallyl sulfide treatment protects against acetaminophen-/carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury by inhibiting oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis in mice. Toxicol. Res. 2019, 8, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gibbons, S.; Farrugia, G. The role of carbon monoxide in the gastrointestinal tract. J. Physiol. 2004, 556, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bauer, I.; Pannen, B. Bench-to-bedside review: Carbon monoxide – from mitochondrial poisoning to therapeutic use. Crit. Care 2009, 13, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gibbons, S.; Verhulst, P.-J.; Bharucha, A.; Farrugia, G. Review article: carbon monoxide in gastrointestinal physiology and its potential in therapeutics. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 38, 689–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Magierowski, M.; Magierowska, K.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Sliwowski, Z.; Ginter, G.; Pajdo, R.; Chmura, A.; Kwiecien, S.; Brzozowski, T. Carbon monoxide released from its pharmacological donor, tricarbonyldichlororuthenium (II) dimer, accelerates the healing of pre-existing gastric ulcers. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 3654–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Motterlini, R.; Foresti, R. Biological signaling by carbon monoxide and carbon monoxide-releasing molecules. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2017, 312, C302–C313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Otterbein, L.E.; Bach, F.H.; Alam, J.; Soares, M.P.; Lu, H.T.; Wysk, M.; Davis, R.J.; Flavell, R.A.; Choi, A.M. Carbon monoxide has anti-inflammatory effects involving the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, F.; Kaide, J.-I.; Rodriguez-Mulero, F.; Abraham, N.G.; Nasjletti, A. Vasoregulatory function of the heme-heme oxygenase-carbon monoxide system. Am. J. Hypertens. 2001, 14, S62–S67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Fukuda, W.; Takagi, T.; Katada, K.; Mizushima, K.; Okayama, T.; Yoshida, N.; Kamada, K.; Uchiyama, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Handa, O.; et al. Anti-inflammatory Effects of Carbon Monoxide-Releasing Molecule on Trinitrobenzene Sulfonic Acid-Induced Colitis in Mice. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2014, 59, 1142–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, H.; Yao, S.; Dann, S.; Qin, H.; Elson, C.O.; Cong, Y. ERK differentially regulates Th17- and Treg-cell development and contributes to the pathogenesis of colitis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 1716–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Backer, O.; Elinck, E.; Blanckaert, B.; Leybaert, L.; Motterlini, R.; Lefebvre, R.A. Water-soluble CO-releasing molecules reduce the development of postoperative ileus via modulation of MAPK/HO-1 signalling and reduction of oxidative stress. Gut 2008, 58, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Onyiah, J.C.; Sheikh, S.Z.; Maharshak, N.; Otterbein, L.E.; Plevy, S.E. Heme oxygenase-1 and carbon monoxide regulate intestinal homeostasis and mucosal immune responses to the enteric microbiota. Gut Microbes 2013, 5, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Takagi, T.; Naito, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Mizushima, K.; Ushiroda, C.; Toyokawa, Y.; Uchiyama, K.; Hamaguchi, M.; Handa, O.; Itoh, Y. Carbon monoxide ameliorates murine T-cell-dependent colitis through the inhibition of Th17 differentiation. Free. Radic. Res. 2018, 52, 1328–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giuffrè, A.; Vicente, J.B. Hydrogen Sulfide Biochemistry and Interplay with Other Gaseous Mediators in Mammalian Physiology. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 6290931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Farrugia, G.; Szurszewski, J.H. Carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, and nitric oxide as signaling molecules in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterol. 2014, 147, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Magierowski, M.; Magierowska, K.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Surmiak, M.; Sliwowski, Z.; Wierdak, M.; Kwiecien, S.; Chmura, A.; Brzozowski, T. Cross-talk between hydrogen sulfide and carbon monoxide in the mechanism of experimental gastric ulcers healing, regulation of gastric blood flow and accompanying inflammation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 149, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Magierowski, M.; Magierowska, K.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Adamski, J.; Bakalarz, D.; Sliwowski, Z.; Pajdo, R.; Kwiecien, S.; Brzozowski, T. Interaction between endogenous carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide in the mechanism of gastroprotection against acute aspirin-induced gastric damage. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 114, 235–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wallace, J.L.; Dicay, M.; McKnight, W.; Martin, G.R. Hydrogen sulfide enhances ulcer healing in rats. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 4070–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Magierowski, M.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Magierowska, K.; Wojcik, D.; Sliwowski, Z.; Kwiecien, S.; Brzozowski, T. Nitric oxide, afferent sensory nerves, and antioxidative enzymes in the mechanism of protection mediated by tricarbonyldichlororuthenium(II) dimer and sodium hydrosulfide against aspirin-induced gastric damage. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 53, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Tavares, A.F.; Parente, M.R.; Justino, M.; Oleastro, M.; Nobre, L.; Saraiva, L. The Bactericidal Activity of Carbon Monoxide–Releasing Molecules against Helicobacter pylori. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e83157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Burkitt, M.; Duckworth, C.A.; Williams, J.; Pritchard, D. Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric pathology: insights from in vivo and ex vivo models. Dis. Model. Mech. 2017, 10, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. O’Gara, E.A.; Hill, D.J.; Maslin, D.J. Activities of Garlic Oil, Garlic Powder, and Their Diallyl Constituents against Helicobacter pylori. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2269–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zardast, M.; Namakin, K.; Kaho, J.E.; Hashemi, S.S. Assessment of antibacterial effect of garlic in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori using urease breath test. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2016, 6, 495–501. [Google Scholar]
  61. Si, X.-B.; Zhang, X.-M.; Wang, S.; Lan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Huo, L.-Y. Allicin as add-on therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 6025–6040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Takasuka, H.; Hayashi, S.; Koyama, M.; Yasuda, M.; Aihara, E.; Amagase, K.; Takeuchi, K. Carbon Monoxide Involved in Modulating HCO3− Secretion in Rat Duodenum. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 337, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sun, H.Z.; Gong, X.Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, X.X.; Nie, Y.N.; Shang, R.; Wang, Y.C.; Li, Q.F.; Sun, P.F.; Gao, P.F.; et al. Hydrogen sulfide modulates gastric acid secretion in rats via involvement of substance P and nuclear factor-κB signaling. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018, 69, 419–422. [Google Scholar]
  64. Takeuchi, K.; Aihara, E.; Kimura, M.; Dogishi, K.; Hara, T.; Hayashi, S. Gas mediators involved in modulating duodenal HCO3(-) secretion. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. De Araújo, S.; Oliveira, A.P.; Sousa, F.B.; Souza, L.K.; Pacheco, G.; Filgueiras, M.C.; Nicolau, L.; Brito, G.; Cerqueira, G.S.; Silva, R.O.; et al. AMPK activation promotes gastroprotection through mutual interaction with the gaseous mediators H 2 S, NO, and CO. Nitric Oxide 2018, 78, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fan, H.; Yu, X.; Zou, Z.; Zheng, W.; Deng, X.; Guo, L.; Jiang, W.; Zhan, Q.; Lu, S.-H. Metformin suppresses the esophageal carcinogenesis in rats treated with NMBzA through inhibiting AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway. Carcinogenesis 2018, 40, 669–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gu, X.; Bridges, M.; Yan, Y.; De Waal, P.W.; Zhou, X.E.; Suino-Powell, K.M.; Xu, H.E.; Hubbell, W.L.; Melcher, K. Conformational heterogeneity of the allosteric drug and metabolite (ADaM) site in AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 16994–17007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Flannigan, K.L.; Agbor, T.A.; Motta, J.-P.; Ferraz, J.G.P.; Wang, R.; Buret, A.G.; Wallace, J.L. Proresolution effects of hydrogen sulfide during colitis are mediated through hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. FASEB J. 2014, 29, 1591–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Motta, J.-P.; Flannigan, K.L.; Agbor, T.A.; Beatty, J.K.; Blackler, R.W.; Workentine, M.; Wallace, J.L.; Da Silva, G.J.; Wang, R.; Buret, A.G. Hydrogen Sulfide Protects from Colitis and Restores Intestinal Microbiota Biofilm and Mucus Production. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 1006–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yu, L.C.-H. Microbiota dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancers: exploring a common ground hypothesis. J. Biomed. Sci. 2018, 25, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Carding, S.R.; Verbeke, K.; Vipond, D.T.; Corfe, B.M.; Owen, L. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb. Ecol. Heal. Dis. 2015, 26, 3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wallace, J.L.; Motta, J.-P.; Buret, A.G. Hydrogen sulfide: an agent of stability at the microbiome-mucosa interface. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2017, 314, G143–G149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Sebastián, V.P.; Salazar, G.A.; Coronado-Arrázola, I.; Schultz, B.M.; Vallejos, O.P.; Berkowitz, L.; Álvarez-Lobos, M.M.; Riedel, C.A.; Kalergis, A.M.; Bueno, S.M. Heme Oxygenase-1 as a Modulator of Intestinal Inflammation Development and Progression. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Takagi, T.; Naito, Y.; Mizushima, K.; Nukigi, Y.; Okada, H.; Suzuki, T.; Hirata, I.; Omatsu, T.; Okayama, T.; Handa, O.; et al. Increased intestinal expression of heme oxygenase-1 and its localization in patients with ulcerative colitis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 23, S229–S233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Suematsu, M.; Nakamura, T.; Tokumoto, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Kajimura, M.; Kabe, Y. CO-CBS-H2S Axis: From Vascular Mediator to Cancer Regulator. Microcircirculation 2016, 23, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Puranik, I.; Weeks, C.L.; Lahaye, D.; Kabil, Ö.; Taoka, S.; Nielsen, S.B.; Groves, J.T.; Banerjee, R.; Spiro, T.G. Dynamics of carbon monoxide binding to cystathionine beta-synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 13433–13438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Hishiki, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Morikawa, T.; Kubo, A.; Kajimura, M.; Suematsu, M. Carbon monoxide: impact on remethylation/transsulfuration metabolism and its pathophysiologic implications. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 90, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Murray, B.; Barbier-Torres, L.; Fan, W.; Mato, J.M.; Lu, S.C. Methionine adenosyltransferases in liver cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 4300–4319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yamamoto, T.; Takano, N.; Ishiwata, K.; Suematsu, M. Carbon monoxide stimulates global protein methylation via its inhibitory action on cystathionine β-synthase. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2010, 48, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Tahara, T.; Arisawa, T. DNA methylation as a molecular biomarker in gastric cancer. Epigenomics 2015, 7, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Agarwal, A.; Polineni, R.; Hussein, Z.; Vigoda, I.; Bhagat, T.D.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Maitra, A.; Verma, A. Role of epigenetic alterations in the pathogenesis of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2012, 5, 382–396. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Shintani, T.; Iwabuchi, T.; Soga, T.; Kato, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Takano, N.; Hishiki, T.; Ueno, Y.; Ikeda, S.; Sakuragawa, T.; et al. Cystathionine β-synthase as a carbon monoxide-sensitive regulator of bile excretion. Hepatology 2008, 49, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Fujii, K.; Sakuragawa, T.; Kashiba, M.; Sugiura, Y.; Kondo, M.; Maruyama, K.; Goda, N.; Nimura, Y.; Suematsu, M. Hydrogen Sulfide as an Endogenous Modulator of Biliary Bicarbonate Excretion in the Rat Liver. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2005, 7, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kabil, O.; Yadav, V.; Banerjee, R. Heme-dependent Metabolite Switching Regulates H2S Synthesis in Response to Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 16418–16423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Vummaleti, S.V.C.; Branduardi, D.; Masetti, M.; De Vivo, M.; Motterlini, R.; Cavalli, A. Theoretical Insights into the Mechanism of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Release from CO-Releasing Molecules. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 9267–9275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ji, X.; Zhou, C.; Ji, K.; Aghoghovbia, R.E.; Pan, Z.; Chittavong, V.; Ke, B.; Wang, B. Click and Release: A Chemical Strategy toward Developing Gasotransmitter Prodrugs by Using an Intramolecular Diels-Alder Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15846–15851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lee, T.-S.; Chau, L.-Y. Heme oxygenase-1 mediates the anti-inflammatory effect of interleukin-10 in mice. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pae, H.-O.; Oh, G.-S.; Choi, B.-M.; Chae, S.-C.; Kim, Y.-M.; Chung, K.-R.; Chung, H.-T. Carbon monoxide produced by heme oxygenase-1 suppresses T cell proliferation via inhibition of IL-2 production. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 4744–4751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Kwiecien, S.; Magierowska, K.; Magierowski, M.; Surmiak, M.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Pajdo, R.; Sliwowsky, Z.; Chmura, A.; Wojcik, D.; Brzozowski, T. Role of sensory afferent nerves, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzymes in the carbon monoxide-induced gastroprotection against stress ulcerogensis. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2016, 67, 717–729. [Google Scholar]
  90. Shaidullov, I.F.; Shafigullin, M.U.; Gabitova, L.M.; Sitdikov, F.G.; Zefirov, A.L.; Sitdikova, G.F. Role of Potassium Channels in the Effects of Hydrogen Sulfide on Contractility of Gastric Smooth Muscle Cells in Rats. J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol. 2018, 54, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Magierowska, K.; Korbut, E.; Hubalewska-Mazgaj, M.; Surmiak, M.; Chmura, A.; Bakalarz, D.; Buszewicz, G.; Wójcik, D.; Śliwowski, Z.; Ginter, G.; et al. Oxidative gastric mucosal damage induced by ischemia/reperfusion and the mechanisms of its prevention by carbon monoxide-releasing tricarbonyldichlororuthenium (II) dimer. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 145, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 10 00445 g001 550
Figure 1. Possible involvement of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon monoxide (CO) in physiology of intestinal microbiota.
Figure 1. Possible involvement of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon monoxide (CO) in physiology of intestinal microbiota.
Biomolecules 10 00445 g001
Biomolecules 10 00445 g002 550
Figure 2. Possible impact of carbon monoxide (CO) on cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) activity resulting in transsulfuration/remethylation switch. Abbreviations: Met: methionine; SAMe: S-adenosyl-methionine; SAH: S-adenosyl-homocysteine; Hcy: homocysteine; CSE: cystathionine-γ-lyase
Figure 2. Possible impact of carbon monoxide (CO) on cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) activity resulting in transsulfuration/remethylation switch. Abbreviations: Met: methionine; SAMe: S-adenosyl-methionine; SAH: S-adenosyl-homocysteine; Hcy: homocysteine; CSE: cystathionine-γ-lyase
Biomolecules 10 00445 g002
Biomolecules 10 00445 g003 550
Figure 3. Nuclear factor erythroid2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) mediated modulation of carbon monoxide (CO) production by hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Abbreviations: Keap1: Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; ARE: antioxidant response element
Figure 3. Nuclear factor erythroid2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) mediated modulation of carbon monoxide (CO) production by hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Abbreviations: Keap1: Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; ARE: antioxidant response element
Biomolecules 10 00445 g003
Biomolecules 10 00445 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic overview of beneficial actions of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or carbon monoxide (CO) releasing pharmacological tools in physiology and pathophysiology of digestive system pathologies.
Figure 4. Schematic overview of beneficial actions of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or carbon monoxide (CO) releasing pharmacological tools in physiology and pathophysiology of digestive system pathologies.
Biomolecules 10 00445 g004
Table
Table 1. Summary of exemplary beneficial effects of H2S and CO.
Table 1. Summary of exemplary beneficial effects of H2S and CO.
H2S
Biomolecules 10 00445 i001		ReferenceCO
Biomolecules 10 00445 i002		Reference
Beneficial effects of H2S and CO
Anti-inflammatorydecreased serum level of TNF-α and IL-1β and expression of mRNA in gastric mucosa[5,15]inhibited production of TNF-α, IL-1β in LPS-stimulated macrophages in vivo and in vitro[44]
reduced mRNA and protein expression of HIF-1α in gastric mucosa [5,15]increased IL-10 expression in macrophages via activation p38MAPK[87]
supressed NF-κB pathway in gastric mucosa [21]decreased ERK1/2 kinase activity in T cells [88]
induced activation of AnxA1 pathway[21]re reduced mRNA and protein expression of HIF-1α in gastric mucosa and supressed NF-κB pathway in gastric mucosa[15]
involved in regulation of Th1, Th2, and Th17 lymphocyte differentiation, decrease of IL-17A content[50]
Anti-oxidativecaused Nrf-2 /HMOX-1pathway upregulation[11,18]inhibited the lipid peroxidation[2]
decreased level of MDA and increased production of glutathione (GSH)[7,56]decreased level of MDA and modulated SOD activity[56,89]
Vasodilatationincreased gastric microcirculation via sGC on endogenous NO and CO biosynthesis-dependent manner[53,54,56] Increased gastric microcirculation via sGC with contribution of NO biosynthesis pathway and independently on endogenous H2S activity[40,42,43,54,56]
dependent on activation of KATP channels[90]dependent on activation of KATP channels[91]
HCO3- secretion in duodenumincreased [64]increased[62,64]
Impact on gut microbiotacaused the reconstitution of microbiota biofilm dysbiosis[69,72]found to be involved in CO/HMOX-1 pathway in cross-talk between the microbiota and the mucosal immune compartment[49]
Cross-talk between H2S and CO
DirectionMechanism of actionPossible biological effectReferences
CO→ ↓ H2S CO can bind to CBS and inhibits its activityswitch of transsulfuration pathway into the remethylation pathway→ methylation of proteins→ epigenetic changes[76,77]
H2S → ↑CO H2S activates Nrf-2 which and modulates of HMOX-1 expression and CO productionmodulation of oxidative homeostasis and Nrf-2-dependent molecular pathways[18]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Głowacka, U.; Brzozowski, T.; Magierowski, M. Synergisms, Discrepancies and Interactions between Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Monoxide in the Gastrointestinal and Digestive System Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030445

AMA Style

Głowacka U, Brzozowski T, Magierowski M. Synergisms, Discrepancies and Interactions between Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Monoxide in the Gastrointestinal and Digestive System Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(3):445. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Głowacka, Urszula, Tomasz Brzozowski, and Marcin Magierowski. 2020. "Synergisms, Discrepancies and Interactions between Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Monoxide in the Gastrointestinal and Digestive System Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology" Biomolecules 10, no. 3: 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop