# Possible Origins and Properties of an Expanding, Dark Energy Providing Dark Multiverse

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Summary of Previous Work on the DM-Concept

**Annotation:**We consider the case ${x}_{i}\ne 1$ only in Section 4.1, everywhere else we assume ${x}_{i}=1$.

## 3. Two Scenarios for the Origin of the Dark Multiverse

#### 3.1. Quasiclassical Approximation of the Quantum Regime

- Creation from nothing through tunneling. It is interesting to look into the question of whether a tunneling solution of Equation (8) is also possible when $x(u)$, as in the HH-approach, forms a semicircle (page 86 of Ref. [7]) so that no point is distinguished. Accordingly, we demand the validity of the equation$$x(u)=-\sqrt{1-{u}^{2}}$$$$\rho (x)=\frac{2{x}^{2}-1}{{x}^{4}}\phantom{\rule{0.277778em}{0ex}}\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}=0\hfill & \mathrm{for}& x=1/\sqrt{2},\\ <0\hfill & \mathrm{for}& x<1/\sqrt{2},\\ \to -\infty \hfill & \mathrm{for}& x\to 0\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}.\end{array}\right.$$This treatment of the QR is an approximation which is getting worse the deeper one gets into it. In that sense, the negative values of the density $\rho $ may perhaps not be taken seriously. However, for $x\to 0$, a singularity appears that is just what should be avoided in a quantum treatment.There are two ways to get out of this situation with a viable solution.1. the solution (13), yielding $\rho (x)\ge 0$ in the range $1/\sqrt{2}\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}\le \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}x\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}\le \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}1$, is continued into the range $1/\sqrt{2}\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}\ge \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}x\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}\ge \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}0$ by a straight line with the slope $\dot{x}(u)=\pm 1$ following from Equation (8) for $\rho \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}0$.2. The solution (13) is cut off at $x=1/\sqrt{2}$.Both possibilities are shown in Figure 1. The truncated HH-like solution, supplemented by two straight lines, has a peak which constitutes a distinguished point and must therefore be regarded as a tunneling solution of the VL-type. It represents an alternative to the solution (45) of Ref. [2], $x(u)=cosu$ or $u=arccosx$, but does not comply with the HH-concept.
- HH-like primordial state. In the case of the solution cut off at $x\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}1/\sqrt{2}$ with $\rho \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}0$, the situation changes. If the two end points are connected by a horizontal straight line and the resulting corners rounded, one arrives at a solution, whose boundary, although not having a constant curvature, does not contain any point which could be interpreted as a temporal beginning. Although this solution results from the effort to construct a VL-like tunneling solution, it makes sense to accept it as a solution compatible with the HH-intention, so that the fourth spatial coordinate (which resulted from time by a Wick Rotation) is on equal footing to the others. It is obvious that the treatment of this model with the WdW-equation in the context of QG is much more appropriate because of its time independence.

#### 3.2. Employing Quantum Gravity with Use of a Wheeler-De Witt Equation

#### 3.2.1. Creation from Nothing

- Solution in the QR. In finding the right solution for a creation from nothing, we restrict ourselves to the option $\rho \equiv 1$2, for which we must solve Equation (A9) (with ${v}_{i}=1$),$${\psi}^{\u2033}(v)+{\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)}^{2}\left(1-{v}^{-2/3}\right)\psi =0\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}.$$According to pages 203–206 of Ref. [11], a solution is considered the best, for which ${\psi}^{2}(x)$ is largest at $x=0$ and decreases fast with increasing x because it roughly corresponds to the tunneling through the potential barrier given by the factor ∼${x}^{4}-{x}^{2}$ near $\psi $ in Equation (A8). We take the position that probability statements make sense only within an already existing multiverse, while conclusions based on such statements about the start of the tunneling are external, that is, they come from nowhere and must be regarded as meaningless. In the selection of a solution for an equivalent process, being suggested as a viable alternative on page 204 of Ref. [11] with reference to Ref. [10], we rely entirely on the probability interpretation of ${\psi}^{2}$ and choose $\psi (v)$ so that with increasing v its square permanently increases. The solution shown in Figure 2 has this property; in the place where it is linked with the wave function for the CR, it satisfies the further constraint ${\psi}^{\prime}(v)=0$, which is explained further down. In the next paragraph, another argument is developed which supports our selection. Although derived with the goal of a tunneling process, this solution has nothing in common with the latter and therefore should be named differently, e.g., “soft entry”. Equation (14) has, of course, also a genuine tunneling solution, which can be treated in exactly the same way as our “soft entry” solution.
- Interpretation. Contributions to the literature on QG such as [14,15,16] give the impression that too little information is available for the assignment and interpretation of the WdW-equation. In Ref. [16], the interesting suggestion is made to use the de Broglie–Bohm interpretation for this purpose. According to this, from the representation $\mathsf{\Psi}(\overrightarrow{x},t)\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{e}}^{\mathrm{i}S(\overrightarrow{x},t)/\hslash}$ of the wave function, particle trajectories satisfying $\dot{\overrightarrow{x}}(t)\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}\nabla S$ are derived. Unfortunately, this is not possible in our case because the solutions of Equation (14) are real whence $S\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}\equiv \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}0$. Therefore, we develop an alternative, which, like the de Broglie–Bohm approach, leaves quantum mechanics completely unchanged and concerns only its interpretation. Under application to the solutions of Equation (14), it consists essentially in reversing the step ${p}_{V}\to (\hslash /i)\partial /\partial V$ that leads from the classical to the quantum-mechanical description. Specifically, for the spatial density $\mathsf{\Psi}{\widehat{p}}_{V}\mathsf{\Psi}$ of the quantum mechanical momentum, we make the ansatz$$\mathrm{i}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\Psi}{\widehat{p}}_{V}\mathsf{\Psi}=\frac{{p}_{V}}{V}\phantom{\rule{2.em}{0ex}}\mathrm{or}\phantom{\rule{2.em}{0ex}}\hslash \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\Psi}{\mathsf{\Psi}}^{\prime}(V)=\frac{{c}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\dot{V}(t)}{12\pi G\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{V}^{2}}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}$$$$\dot{v}(\tau )=12\pi \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{v}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\psi \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{\psi}^{\prime}(v)=6\pi \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{v}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}d{\psi}^{2}\phantom{\rule{-0.166667em}{0ex}}/dv\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}.$$This means that the DM moves to larger values of ${\psi}^{2}$ until it terminates the entry process, if everywhere ${\psi}^{\prime}(v)\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}\ge \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}0$. The velocity $\dot{v}(\tau )$ and ${\psi}^{2}(v)$, up to a normalization factor the probability density of our “soft entry” solution, are depicted in Figure 2. From that, it becomes particularly clear that our solution is suitable for describing a creation from nothing. Regarding the dynamics, one could even say, at least for this solution that in the QR the role of time is taken over by the probability density $dP/dv\sim {\psi}^{2}(v)$.
- Wave function of the the CR. We want to connect the wave function of the QR with that of the CR and have to determine the latter. For this, it is advantageous to use the interpretation of the classical solution based on Equations (5) and (6) with a friction term because then the minisuperspace contains only the one variable v. Furthermore, we can use the fact that we already know the classical solution (9), which satisfies the equation$${\dot{x}}^{2}(\tau )-{\gamma}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{x}^{2}=0\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}.$$We first consider the quantisation of the latter in the minisuperspace spanned by a or x resp. This can be done in the same way as in the derivation of Equation (A7). With $x=a/{l}_{P}$, Equation (17) becomes ${\dot{a}}^{2}(t)-{(\gamma c/{l}_{P})}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{a}^{2}=0$. The equation corresponding to Equation (A2) is obtained by setting $\dot{\mathsf{\Phi}}(t)=0$, ${U}_{a}=0$ and ${U}_{\mathsf{\Phi}}=3{\gamma}^{2}{c}^{4}/(8\pi G\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{l}_{P}^{2})$. With this, one can go directly to Equation (A6) and from there to dimensionless quantities, ending up at the WdW-equation$${\psi}^{\u2033}(x)+{\left(\frac{3\pi \gamma}{2}\right)}^{2}\phantom{\rule{-0.166667em}{0ex}}{x}^{4}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\psi =0\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}.$$Its general solution is$${\psi}_{c}(x)=\sqrt{u}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\left[a\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\Gamma}(5/6)\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{J}_{-\frac{1}{6}}({u}^{3}/3)+b\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\Gamma}(7/6)\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{J}_{\frac{1}{6}}({u}^{3}/3)\right]\phantom{\rule{2.em}{0ex}}\mathrm{with}\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}u={\left(\frac{3\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\pi \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\gamma}{2}\right)}^{\phantom{\rule{-0.166667em}{0ex}}1/3}\phantom{\rule{-0.166667em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{-0.166667em}{0ex}}x,\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}$$The situation turns for the better, if we employ the minisuperspace spanned by v. The corresponding WdW-equation can be easily deduced from Equation (18) by replacing in it $d{x}^{2}$ by $(d{v}^{2}/9{x}^{4})$ according to Equation (A10). The resulting equation is$${\psi}^{\u2033}(v)+{\left(\frac{\pi \gamma}{2}\right)}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\psi =0$$$${\psi}_{c}(v)=sin[\omega (v-\delta )]\phantom{\rule{2.em}{0ex}}\mathrm{with}\phantom{\rule{2.em}{0ex}}\omega =\frac{\pi \gamma}{2},\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}$$Figure 3 shows the solutions thus obtained. The joining point is ${v}_{i}=2.103$ or ${x}_{i}={v}_{i}^{1/3}=1.28$ and not ${x}_{i}=1$ as in Section 3.1. This is due to the requirement ${\psi}^{\prime}({v}_{i})=0$ and the fact that Equation (14) does not allow a solution with $\psi (0)=0$ and ${\psi}^{\prime}(1)=0$. The classical solution (21) is entered twice in the figure, once over $\omega (v-\delta )$ (horizontal straight line), and once over $(4/\omega )\omega (v-\delta )$ (dashed curve).
- Normalization of $\psi (v)$ and corresponding probabilities. The freely selectable factor C in the solutions $C\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\psi (x)$ of Equations (14) and (20) allows a particularly simple fulfillment of the normalization condition (A11), for which only$$C={\left(2{\pi}^{2}{\int}_{r}{\psi}^{2}dv\right)}^{-1/2}$$For interpreting the dynamics of the system described by the wave function (21), the probability density ${\psi}_{c}^{2}(v)$ can not be used as in the case of the “soft entry” solution. The reason is that it has many local maxima, and the system would remain with one of them, once it has reached it. This problem can be solved by considering the set of ${\psi}_{c}$ values between two successive zeros as a single quantum state of the classical system. This range has the size $\Delta v$ following from $\gamma \pi \Delta v/2=\pi $ or $\Delta v=2/\gamma $ and corresponds to the x-range $\Delta x={(\Delta v)}^{1/3}$ or$$\Delta a=2.71\xb7{10}^{20}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{l}_{p}=3.14\xb7{10}^{-15}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\mathrm{m}=5.94\xb7{10}^{-5}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{r}_{B},\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}$$$$\u2329\frac{dP}{dv}\u232a\sim \u2329{\psi}_{c}^{2}(v)\u232a=\u2329{sin}^{2}\left[\gamma \pi (v-\delta )/2\right]\u232a=\frac{1}{2}.$$With our solution, the probability of the different states does not decrease as with the solution (19) based on the usual minisuperspace. However, it does not increase as desired either. This can, however, be improved by taking advantage of the fact that the classical dynamic is an evolution in time, and by relating the probability density not to volume but to time (using $dP/d\tau $ instead of $dP/dv$). Setting$$\u2329\frac{dP}{d\tau}\u232a=\u2329\frac{dP}{dv}\u232a\dot{v}(\tau )\sim \dot{v}(\tau )/2\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}$$$$\u2329\frac{dP}{d\tau}\u232a\sim \frac{3\gamma}{2}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}v,$$

#### 3.2.2. Modified HH-Approach

- Depictive model. In this section, we investigate an alternative to the HH-approach which differs comparatively more from the latter than the approach in Section 3.1. We now assume that the timeless primordial state is a 4D-sphere of radius $R\approx {l}_{P}$ in a 4D-space (coordinates $x,y,z,u$) of constant positive curvature, uniformly filled with DE of the 3D-density $\varrho ={\varrho}_{\mathsf{\Lambda}}$. It can be represented by the surface$${x}^{2}+{y}^{2}+{z}^{2}+{u}^{2}+{v}^{2}={R}^{2}$$$$d{s}^{2}=-{a}^{2}\left({\chi}^{2}+{sin}^{2}\phantom{\rule{-0.166667em}{0ex}}\chi \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}d\mathsf{\Omega}\right)\phantom{\rule{2.em}{0ex}}\mathrm{with}\phantom{\rule{2.em}{0ex}}d\mathsf{\Omega}=d{\vartheta}^{2}+{sin}^{2}\vartheta \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}d{\phi}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}\mathrm{and}\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}sin\chi =\frac{r}{R},$$$$\overline{a}={(8/3)}^{1/4}R\approx 1.28\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}R\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}.$$The surface of the Euclidean 5D-sphere is invariant under rotations $x,y,z,u,v\to {x}^{\prime},{y}^{\prime},{z}^{\prime},{u}^{\prime},{v}^{\prime}$, each of which leads to another set of homogeneous and isotropic 3D-sub-spaces, which for given $a\le \overline{a}$ all have the same metric and shape. All in all, we get a number3 of similar 3D-sub-spaces, which, based on their abundance, are equally probable. We assume that each of them can serve as a timeless primordial state of the DM. (An important difference to the HH-model is that the latter has only one coordinate which can turn from space-like to time-like; furthermore, the initial state is represented only by the lower part of the 4D-sphere, while the upper part is reserved for the evolution in time, see pages 80–83 of Ref. [7].)
- Treatment in the framework of quantum gravity. For the above model, which is partly based on classical ideas, a suitable solution of the WdW-equation for the QR is to be found. Because we again want to have a continuous connection between the solutions for the QR and the CR, once again we impose the boundary conditions $\psi ({v}_{i})={\psi}_{c}({v}_{i})$ and ${\psi}^{\prime}({v}_{i})={\psi}_{c}^{\prime}({v}_{i})$. In order to implement our concept from above as accurately as possible, we look for a solution in the QR whose probability density $dP/dv\sim {\psi}^{2}(v)$ is as constant as possible. This condition can only roughly be satisfied (see Figure 4). Furthermore, it appears reasonable to require for this timeless state that its total momentum disappears, i.e.,$${\int}_{QR}\psi (v)\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{\widehat{p}}_{V}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\psi (v)\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}dv=\frac{\hslash}{i}{\int}_{QR}\psi (v)\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{\psi}^{\prime}(v)\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}dv=\frac{\hslash}{i}\left({\psi}^{2}({v}_{i})-{\psi}^{2}(0)\right)=0\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}.$$Both in the HH-concept, used as a model, and in the present concept, the transition from the time-independent primordial state in four spatial dimensions to a time-dependent evolution in three spatial dimensions represents a critical point. (In the original version of the HH-concept [6], it appears somewhat non-transparent [17] by being accomplished via transition probabilities. In a later contribution—see pages 85–86 of Ref. [7]—the transition is explicitly performed by linking the purely spatial solution for the QR with the time-dependent solution for the CR, the same as done by us in this and in Section 3.2.1.)A look at the averaged probability density in the CR does not reveal why the DM should make this transition. In our case, it could slightly be favored by the fact that each of the four spatial coordinates and, in addition, coordinates resulting from them by a rotation (if allowed by LQG) are eligible for the transition to a time coordinate. However, another means can help: because a transition from space to time is concerned, it offers itself to relate the probability density in the CR to the time interval $d\tau $ as in Section 3.2.1. According to Equation (23), due to the prefactor $\gamma $, $dP/d\tau $ starts with an extremely small value which is smaller than $dP/dx$ by many orders of magnitude. However, since it is a probability assessment of the same state, it must be considered as equivalent. In this way, the transition from space to time is associated with a corresponding change in relating the probability densities. Thus, the transition from purely spatial to time-dependent states finally leads to an evolution with increasing probabilities.

## 4. Critical Comments on the Quantum Results

#### 4.1. Notes on the Storage and Transmission of Information

#### 4.2. Notes on the Primordial States

#### 4.3. Primordial State with Large Volume

## 5. Properties of the CR-Solution

#### 5.1. Initial Equilibrium between DE and Matter

#### 5.2. Minimum Age of the Dark Multiverse

#### 5.3. Irreversibility of the Friction-Involving Interpretation

#### 5.4. Behavior of the DE in Our Universe

## 6. Discussion

## Funding

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

M | multiverse |

U | our universe |

DE | dark energy |

DM | dark multiverse |

QR | quantum regime |

CR | classical regime |

VL | Vilenkin–Linde |

HH | Hartle–Hawking |

QG | quantum gravity |

LQG | loop quantum gravity |

WdW | Wheeler–de Witt |

FL | Friedmann–Lemaître |

## Appendix A

## References

- Rebhan, E. Model of a multiverse providing the dark energy of our universe. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A
**2017**, 32, 1750149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Rebhan, E. Acceleration of cosmic expansion through huge cosmological constant progressively reduced by submicroscopic information transfer. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A
**2018**, 33, 1850137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vilenkin, A. Creation of universes from nothing. Phys. Lett. B
**1982**, 117, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vilenkin, A. Quantum origin of the universe. Nucl. Phys. B
**1985**, 252, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Linde, A.D. Quantum creation of the inflationary universe. Lett. Nuovo Cim.
**1984**, 39, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hartle, J.B.; Hawking, S.W. Wave function of the universe. Phys. Rev. B
**1983**, 28, 2960–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hawking, S.; Penrose, R. The Nature of Space and Time; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- DeWitt, C.M.; Wheeler, J.A. (Eds.) Lectures in Mathematics and Physics. In Batelle Rencontres; Benjamin: New York, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- DeWitt, B.S. Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory. Phys. Rev.
**1967**, 160, 1113–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Coleman, S. Why there is nothing rather than something: A theory of the cosmological constant. Nucl. Phys. B
**1988**, 310, 643–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Linde, A. Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology; Contemporary Concepts Physics 5; Harwood Academic Publishers: Reading, UK, 1990; pp. 1–362. [Google Scholar]
- Rovelli, C. Reality Is Not What It Seems: The Journey to Quantum Gravity; Penguin Publishing Group: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Vilenkin, A.; Yamada, M. Tunneling wave function of the universe. arXiv
**2018**, arXiv:1808.02032v2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Peres, A. Critique of the Wheeler-DeWitt Equation. In On Einstein’s Path. Essays in Honor of Engelbert Schucking; Harvey, A., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 367–379. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
- Patrick, P. Using Trajectories in Quantum Cosmology. arXiv
**2018**, arXiv:1902.00796v1. [Google Scholar] - Pinto-Neto, N.; Fabris, J.C. Quantum cosmology from the de Broglie–Bohm perspective. Class. Quantum Gravity
**2013**, 30, 143001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vilenkin, A. Many Worlds in One; Hill and Wang: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 190–191. [Google Scholar]
- Rovelli, C.; Vidotto, F. Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Spinfoam Theory; Cambridge University Press: Camebridge, UK, 2014; Available online: http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/IntroductionLQG.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2019).
- Bekenstein, J.D. Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Phys. Rev. D
**1981**, 23, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bekenstein, J.D. Energy cost of information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1981**, 46, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bremermann, H.J. Optimization through evolution and recombination. In Self-Organizing Systems 1962; Yovits, M.C., Jacobi, G.T., Goldstein, G.D., Eds.; Spartan Books: Washington, DC, USA, 1962; pp. 93–106. [Google Scholar]

1 | For later purposes (Section 4.1), we consider here a slightly more general case. Unfortunately, when Ref. [2] was written down for printing, in the derivation of Equation (26) there (Equation (7) here), two different types of calculation were mixed up, which resulted in two sign errors. For correction, the following substitutions must be made there: ${\mathrm{e}}^{{\gamma}_{2}}\to {\mathrm{e}}^{-{\gamma}_{2}}$ in Equation (22), and $\alpha {\gamma}_{1}+\beta {\gamma}_{2}\to \alpha {\gamma}_{1}-\beta {\gamma}_{2}$ in the unnumbered equation immediately thereafter. The resulting Equation (26) is, however, correct. |

2 | Note that by this assumption or $\varrho \equiv {\varrho}_{\mathsf{\Lambda}}$ resp. the term ${\varrho}_{f}$ in Equation (2) drops out, i.e., the friction term plays a role only in the CR. |

3 | Due to space-related quantum effects, this number could be quite small. |

**Figure 1.**Approximate solutions for the QR, discussed from the bottom up. 1. dashed curve: $u=arccosx$, 2. full curve: solution (13) continued by straight lines, 3. dotted curve: semicircle, 4. curve with gray filling: HH-like solution.

**Figure 3.**The full curve is a joint representation of the “soft entry” solution $\psi (v)$ for the QR (gray filling) and ${\psi}_{c}(v)$ for the CR. The dashed curve shows ${\psi}_{c}(v)$ once again, but highly compressed in the horizontal direction in order to visualize the oscillations.

**Figure 4.**Joint representation of the HH-like QR-solution $\psi (v)$ and the CR-solution ${\psi}_{c}(v)$, the latter being shown a second time in dashed style and with strong horizontal compression.

**Figure 5.**QR-solution of Equation (30) with ${\int}_{QR}\psi \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{\widehat{p}}_{v}\psi \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}dv=0$ and substructures obtained by choosing ${v}_{i}\gg 1$. For the reason of presentability, only a small value, ${v}_{i}={10}^{-4.5}$, was used. The short horizontal line at the top right is the beginning of ${\psi}_{c}^{2}(v)$.

**Figure 6.**Square of our “soft entry” solution, extending from $v=0$ to the dashed line, and at constant $\rho =1$ continued over a larger v-interval. The upper boundary value $\approx 50$, selected for visualization, should in reality be much larger.

**Figure 7.**Age ${\mathcal{T}}_{0}$ of the DM as a function of $\zeta $. Due to inadmissible curvature values, the shaded area $\zeta <8.4$ must be excluded. The dashed curve represents the approximation $170.4+1.21\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}ln\zeta $.

Generally | n = 3 | n = 4 | |
---|---|---|---|

${\rho}_{mi}$ | 2/n | 2/3 | 1/2 |

${\rho}_{i}$ | (n−2)/n | 1/3 | 1/2 |

© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Rebhan, E.
Possible Origins and Properties of an Expanding, Dark Energy Providing *Dark Multiverse*. *Universe* **2019**, *5*, 178.
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5080178

**AMA Style**

Rebhan E.
Possible Origins and Properties of an Expanding, Dark Energy Providing *Dark Multiverse*. *Universe*. 2019; 5(8):178.
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5080178

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Rebhan, Eckhard.
2019. "Possible Origins and Properties of an Expanding, Dark Energy Providing *Dark Multiverse*" *Universe* 5, no. 8: 178.
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5080178