Next Article in Journal
Developing an Open-Source Lightweight Game Engine with DNN Support
Previous Article in Journal
Dehazing with Offset Correction and a Weighted Residual Map
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gaze-Based Vehicle Driving Evaluation of System with an Actual Vehicle at an Intersection with a Traffic Light
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Emotional Variability Analysis Based I-Vector for Speaker Verification in Under-Stress Conditions

Electronics 2020, 9(9), 1420; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091420
by Barlian Henryranu Prasetio 1,*, Hiroki Tamura 2 and Koichi Tanno 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2020, 9(9), 1420; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091420
Submission received: 22 July 2020 / Revised: 28 August 2020 / Accepted: 30 August 2020 / Published: 1 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Bioinspired Neural Network)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper proposes a speaker modelling that accommodates the presence of emotions on the speech segments by extracting a speaker representation compactly. The paper is well written and organise, however there are some typos and minor grammatical mistakes.

The authors consider other baseline methods to compare the results along with other publicly available datasets. What is the main objective of this study? What are the contributions? The authors should also consider other loss functions. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper present a speaker modeling that accommodates the presence of emotions on the speech segments by extracting a speaker representation.  The proposed model was built based on i-vector and used deep discriminant analysis as compensation.  Compared with standard i-vector/DDA, the proposed method shows a reduction of error rate from ~6% to ~4%.   

 

Although there is concern about influence of this paper over the readers of Electronics, the methods and results in this manuscript is well described and presented.  The overall proposed organization and section structure are consistent with the proposed objectives.  To further improve the integrity of this work, it would be good to discuss the limitation of this current work and how to overcome these barriers in future development.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop