Next Article in Journal
Prototypical Network with Residual Attention for Modulation Classification of Wireless Communication Signals
Previous Article in Journal
Oversea Cross-Lingual Summarization Service in Multilanguage Pre-Trained Model through Knowledge Distillation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Energy-Efficient Inverter-Based Voltage Reference Scheme with Wide Output Range Using Correlated Level Shifting Technique

School of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2023, 12(24), 5002; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12245002
Submission received: 2 November 2023 / Revised: 3 December 2023 / Accepted: 12 December 2023 / Published: 14 December 2023

Abstract

:
A voltage reference is indispensable in Integrated Circuits. To improve the limited linear output voltage range and energy efficiency of a voltage reference, we innovatively propose a switched-capacitor-based programmable voltage reference scheme employing inverter-based OTAs to reduce the power consumption, simultaneously using a novel Correlated Level Shifting (CLS) technique (without active overhead) to enhance the OTA’s DC gain and integral gain. Experimented with SMIC 180 nm CMOS technology, a scheme-based voltage reference realizes a programable output voltage range from 266 to 995 mV at −30 to 120 °C, and the corresponding temperature coefficient (TC) ranges from 82.4 to 99.5 ppm/°C. The power consumption is 976 nW. Furthermore, comparative experiments and evaluations with other schemes have unequivocally verified the superiority of our proposed scheme, characterized by its high energy efficiency and wide output voltage range. The scheme can be suitably deployed in a multitude of novel edge-data processing systems.

1. Introduction

Following the advancement of the Internet of Things, research on low-voltage and low-power signal-conditioning circuits has increasingly become popular because sensing devices are generally powered by batteries. When voltage reference is used as a signal-conditioning circuit supply module, its power consumption is generally required to be at the nanowatt level. A conventional voltage reference generally consists of an Operational Amplifier (Op-Amp) and a Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Such designs generally consume large amounts of energy. A voltage reference based on subthreshold Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor (CMOS) combined with BJT was proposed [16], which effectively reduced power consumption but had a poor temperature coefficient (TC). A voltage reference based on switched-capacitor amplifiers was proposed [17], but its power consumption could not be further reduced because of the addition of traditional Operational Transconductance Amplifiers (OTAs). Passive switched-capacitor technology used to achieve ultra-low power benchmarks has been reported [18], but it was only suitable for a small range of temperature difference calculations.
Therefore, in order to further enhance the energy efficiency of a switched-capacitor voltage reference, we first used inverter-based OTAs in place of conventional OTAs in switched-capacitor networks. However, inverter-based OTAs have programable linear output range limitations, so we propose a novel Correlated Level Shifting (CLS) technique [19,20,21,22,23,24] based on a switched-capacitor voltage reference scheme, which further reduces the power consumption (because it does not require additional active overhead). Consequently, the proposed scheme includes the following: (1) a switched-capacitor voltage reference with inverter-based OTAs and (2) a switched-capacitor voltage reference with inverter-based OTAs using the CLS technique.
Compared with conventional schemes [17,18], the experiments show that the proposed scheme is output-programable, energy-efficient and has a wide voltage reference linear output range. As far as the knowledge of the authors, this is the first scheme to systematically combine inverter-based OTAs with CLS and voltage reference.

2. Proposed Voltage Reference Scheme

As depicted in Figure 1, the proposed scheme comprises the following components: a core circuit, a switched-capacitor network and an auxiliary circuit (IDC and clock generation). The IDC generation circuit supplies current to the core circuit, which generates two Complementary-To-Absolute Temperature (CTAT) voltages, i.e., VGS1 and VGS2. The switched-capacitor network employs these CTAT voltages to output the zero-temperature voltage reference. The scheme incorporates improvements to the OTAs in the switched-capacitor network, enhancing the overall energy efficiency and broadening the range of the output voltage reference. The clock generation circuit supplies the necessary clock signal for the switch-capacitor network.

2.1. Core Circuit

2.1.1. CTAT Voltage Generation Principle

Subthreshold MOS Field-Effect Transistors (MOSFETs) [25,26,27,28,29] have negative temperature characteristics; however, the voltage varies with the process. Therefore, the use of a voltage reference circuit designed using MOSFETs only is more sensitive to the process, voltage, and temperature (PVT). The circuit that generates voltage reference based on diode-cascaded MOSFETs is shown in Figure 2a. However, due to the poor PVT robustness of this structure, the TC is poor.
A more suitable CTAT voltage generation circuit is shown in Figure 2b. The addition of a current source bias improves the PVT characteristics of the CTAT voltage generation circuit. This is because the current source fixes the bias current of the inverter so that the current is unchanged when PVT is perturbed. We need to mention that, driven by fixed bias current IDC, the source-level potential of transistor M3 is suppressed, and the output node voltage (V2) exhibits a negative temperature characteristic, which is dominated by diode-connected transistor M4.

2.1.2. Core Circuit with CTAT and Inverter-Based OTAs

As shown in Figure 3, M1, M2, M5, M8 and M11 constitute a current mirror, and the current in each branch is 100 nA. Transistors M3, M4, M6 and M7 are connected in diode-connected forms to generate CTAT voltages. All MOS transistors operate in the subthreshold region.
The more complex subthreshold-region current Equation (1) is expressed as follows:
I DS = n μ C OX W L k T q 2 exp q n k T V GS V TH 1 exp V DS k T / q
where μ is the carrier mobility, COX is the oxide capacitance per unit area, kT/q = VT is the thermal voltage, VTH is the threshold voltage and n is the subthreshold slope correction factor typically taken as 1.5.
Assuming that voltage VDS of MOSFET is much larger than three times kT/q, Equation (1) can be simplified as Equation (2):
I DS = n μ C OX W L k T q 2 exp q n k T V GS V TH
The calculation Equation (3) for VGS1 and VGS2 is expressed as follows:
V GS 1 , 2 = V TH + n V T ln L W 1 V T 2 I DS n μ C OX
In Figure 3, by changing the width-length ratio of M3, M4, M6, and M7, different negative TCs can be obtained. The voltage of the two can be subtracted to obtain the voltage that is positively correlated with temperature. Equation (4) is expressed as follows:
Δ V GS = V GS 1 V GS 2 = n V T ln m 7 m 4
The m4, m7 is the width-length ratio of M4, M7, respectively.

2.2. Auxiliary Circuit

2.2.1. The IDC Generation Circuit

The IDC generation circuit in the proposed scheme is shown in Figure 4. In Figure 4, transistors M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7 and M8 form the current source start-up circuit. The gate-source voltage of transistor M22, operating in the subthreshold region, exhibits negative temperature characteristics. By utilizing the positive temperature characteristics of the gate-source voltage difference of transistors M18 and M19, a bias is provided to transistor M15, which operates in the deep linear region, to generate the zero-temperature current IDC and supply power to the subsequent circuits.
The circuit for the generation of IDC is highly sensitive to variations in device parameters (mismatches). We will discuss this in terms of device parameter design. According to [30,31,32], the mismatch impacts in MOSFETs are expressed as mismatches among several parameters, including μ, COX, W, L and VTH.
Within our scheme, to meet high energy efficiency demands, IDC is required to provide current at the nanoampere level. To enhance matching and minimize the impact of device mismatches, thereby obtaining more precise current values, our scheme primarily adopts the following measures:
  • MOS transistor dimensions are designed based on the principle of unit matching, i.e., all devices are formed by the series and parallel connection of unit devices. In the IDC circuit, the W and L of the unit device (multiplier = 1) are uniformly set at 3 μm/3 μm;
  • As the MOS transistor mismatch is inversely proportional to the square root of the product of the device size (W and L), larger device sizes will average out the random mismatches of various MOS transistor parameters to a greater extent, thereby resulting in a relatively smaller expected mismatch value. In the IDC circuit, the area is maximized as much as possible under the premise of the MOS transistor operating in the correct region to achieve better matching performance.
The total current of the IDC generation circuit used is 280 nA, and the temperature characteristic of IDC is shown in Figure 5. It is worth noting that the proposed switched-capacitor voltage reference is insensitive to the generation of IDC current.

2.2.2. Clock Generation Circuit

The clock generation circuit of the proposed voltage reference scheme is shown in Figure 6, which utilizes D flip-flops [33] with appropriate delays to generate the required clock control signals through division. Unlike the conventional D flip-flop, the DFF_DELAY module has an additional port called DFF non-overlapping (DNOL).
The introduction of the DNOL port is for the purpose of generating non-overlapping clocks. Overlapping clocks can introduce switch switching chaos, preventing capacitors from transferring charge at the correct phase, leading to voltage errors at both plates of the capacitor. Therefore, the non-overlapping of clocks is crucial for generating the correct voltage reference.
Figure 7 displays the circuit diagram of the DFF_DELAY module. As illustrated in Figure 7, the delay unit Time Delay (Td) is inserted between DNOL and M8 gates. Composed of a straightforward inverter, Td provides flexible control of specific delay durations, substantially lessening the difficulty in designing multiple non-overlapping sequences. Therefore, this non-overlapping clock design technique maintains low circuit complexity and minimal additional power consumption, adhering to the high energy efficiency objective of the scheme.
As discussed in the previous paragraph, the DNOL port is the core part of generating non-overlapping clocks. Taking a single DFF_DELAY module as an example, the signal Q can only rise after DNOL has fallen to a low level after a duration of Td, thereby inducing a signal delay. The sequential interplay of four DFF_DELAY modules ultimately ensures that all clocks are non-overlapping, guaranteeing the accurate transition of all switches.
The clock input frequency is 100 kHz, and the overall power consumption of the clock circuit is 40 nW.

2.3. Scheme 1: Switched-Capacitor Voltage Reference with Inverter-Based OTAs

The proposed voltage reference switched-capacitor network is shown in Figure 8. OTA1 and OTA2 are shown in Figure 3, and the sizes of OTA1 and OTA2 are obtained using a circuit image generated by VGS2, which improves the matching of the overall circuit layout. Contrasted with conventional OTAs, the output transconductance of inverter-based OTAs is observed to be nearly twice as much, which implies the inverter-based OTA with a constant current–source bias demonstrates higher energy efficiency than traditional OTAs [17]. Compared with conventional inverter-based OTAs [34], this circuit demonstrates better PVT robustness. We must mention that because the switched-capacitor divider only needs to provide a charge-transfer function in the scheme, the common-mode feedback circuit of the switched-capacitor in the literature [34] is not necessary, which further reduces the area and power of the circuit.
The reset function is executed in phase Ф1, where the inverter-based OTAs are switched to a unity gain configuration. Offset voltage VOFF1 (VOFF2) is sampled on capacitor CC1 (CC2) while capacitor CI1 (CI2) is reset. At the same time, the input voltage is sampled on capacitor CS1 (CS2). The sampling function is executed in phase Ф2. Because the right plate of capacitor CC1 (CC2) is not connected to the ground, the left side of capacitor CC1 (CC2) forms an equivalent virtual ground node VG1 (VG2), and the collected signal charge is transferred to capacitors C1 and C2. Finally, in phase Ф3, C1 is imposed on top of C2, and the two voltages are added to obtain the output reference voltage that is independent of temperature and is stored in capacitor C3.
To simplify the analysis, only a finite gain is considered without considering the non-ideal effects on the circuit. Thus, the following expression can be obtained, as shown in Equation (5):
V REF n = C 1 C 2 C 1 C 2 + C 1 C 3 + C 2 C 3 A C S 1 C S 1 + A C I 1 V GS 2 + V OFF 1 C I 1 + C S 1 1 + A C I 1 + C S 1 + A C S 2 C S 2 + A C I 2 V GS 1 V GS 2 + V OFF 2 C I 2 + C S 2 1 + A C I 2 + C S 2 + C 1 C 3 + C 2 C 3 C 1 C 2 + C 1 C 3 + C 2 C 3 V R E F n 1
Because the coefficient of VREF (n − 1) must be less than one, we can observe that the output reference quickly stabilizes after the switched capacitor operates. In the case of infinite inverter-based OTA gain, the scale of the input voltage is completely determined by the ratio of the CS1 (CS2) and CI1 (CI2) capacitors. As long as the proportional relationship between capacitors CS1 (CS2) and CI1 (CI2) is reasonably controlled, the size of the output reference voltage can be programed. However, because the integral DC gain based on the inverter-based OTAs is generally approximately 30 dB [34], the coefficient term of VOFF1 (VOFF2) and the zero temperature-coefficient term must be considered. Although a current-source bias has been used to counter the PVT characteristics, the environment for both the VOFF1 (VOFF2) and zero temperature coefficient terms will deteriorate because of the smaller gain of A. In particular, when CS1 (CS2) and CI1 (CI2) are programable items, the TC substantially increases. In a transistor-level experiment, the results are consistent with the foregoing analysis. To make matters worse, the low integral gain makes the programable reference voltage linear output range obtained by this scheme limited. In addition, the influence of non-ideal factors in the design process must be considered, especially the parasitic capacitance introduced by the inverter-based OTAs input/output switch docking, which can make the scheme unattractive.

2.4. Scheme 2: Switched-Capacitor Voltage Reference with Inverter-Based OTAs Using Correlated Level Shifting (CLS) Technique

To overcome the output range limitation of the voltage reference caused by the low gain of inverter-based OTAs, as shown in Figure 3, we observed that a CLS technique based on inverter-based OTAs was proposed [24], which could significantly improve the DC and the integral gain of inverter-based OTAs.
However, the CLS technique in [24] requires the additional input/output short-circuit inverter to provide the VCLS reference, which introduces additional active power consumption that is not allowed in low-power designs. Figure 9 shows that the reference core circuit based on our proposed scheme is highly compatible with the CLS technique because the required VCLS reference can be supplied by negative reference voltage VGS2, which further avoids additional active power consumption. Thus, the designed architecture can realize a wide reference voltage linear output range in a low-power consumption manner.
To simplify the analysis, Figure 10 shows an example of the equivalent working model of the CLS technique in relation to the voltage reference. By incorporating the CCLS capacitor and modifying switch timing utilization, this technique can suppress the swing of OTA output to enhance DC gain, bringing the virtual ground node closer to the signal ground node, thereby achieving superior charging precision and a higher DC gain.
Contrasted with the switched-capacitor network in Figure 8, timing utilization has been updated with the addition of new phases, Ф21 and Ф22, and the details of the switching process are as follows: During the Ф1 phase, the inverter auto-zeroes, CI resets, and CS samples the input voltage. When the Ф21 phase (coarse charging stage) arrives, the right plate of CCLS is connected to the inverter output, and the left plate is linked to a voltage (VGS2) equal to the inverter’s critical point. The inverter charges CCLS to make a rough estimate of the output. Then, during the Ф22 phase (fine charging stage), the level shift capacitor CCLS is inserted, and the output swing is suppressed at the inverter output, shifting VG towards the ground. As a result, charge redistribution reduces the residual charge on CS, leading to a complete charge transfer, thereby enhancing effective DC gain.
The complete switched-capacitor voltage reference with inverter-based OTAs using the CLS technique and its timing utilization are shown in Figure 11. Assuming 1 + C S / C I = s i g m a 1 and considering the situation with limited gains, its single-ended output expression is expressed as shown in Equation (6):
V REF = C S V IN C I A A + s i g m a 1 s i g m a 1 + A + 1 + C S C I + C S C CLS C S A + 1 + C S C I + C S C CLS C S + V OFF C I + C S 1 + A C I + C S 1 A A + 1 + C S C I + C S C CLS
Compared with Equation (5), VOFF has an additional coefficient term of 1 A / 1 + A + C S / C I + C S / C CLS , which is a value approaching zero. With the addition of the CLS technique, the offset can be approximately eliminated. In Equation (6), A / A + s i g m a 1 < 1 , and the ratio of s i g m a 1 + A + 1 + C S / C I + C S / C CLS C S to A + 1 + C S / C I + C S / C CLS C S is greater than 1. Thus, their product is obviously almost close to one and less than one. Therefore, the zero TC is almost exclusively related to the capacitor ratio C S / C I . As we can observe, the characteristics of this switched-capacitor amplifier are insensitive to the gain of the inverter-based OTAs with the introduction of the CLS technique, which also makes the circuit’s programable scaling voltage–output reference better.
Compared with the simple inverter-based OTA’s voltage reference, obvious advantages can be observed. Compared with that in the literature [24], the bias voltage used for CCLS is inherent in the proposed scheme. Thus, using one capacitive CCLS is cost effective because it only uses one passive capacitor overhead.

3. Experiment Result

The proposed scheme was verified through the use of a voltage reference experiment using SMIC 180 nm CMOS technology. The core device parameters shown in Figure 3 and Figure 9 were used as follows: M6 = M9 = M12 = 24 μm/4 μm, M7 = M10 = M13 = 8 μm/4 μm. To reduce the effect of parasitic capacitance on the gain linearity, CCLS was chosen to have a value of 0.5 pF.
Its layout is presented in Figure 12. The voltage reference occupies an area of 843 μm × 832 μm (including the IDC generation circuit, clock generation circuit and I/O ports).
Layout matching is a crucial factor in minimizing device mismatch [35]. In this scheme, the performance characteristics of the switched-capacitor voltage reference are contingent on the matching of the proportional devices, thereby imposing stringent requirements for layout matching. To mitigate the impact of device mismatch on the overall circuit, we utilized various matching principles in the layout of this scheme, striving to optimize the layout as much as possible. The specific measures are as follows:
  • In the overall layout, devices requiring matching are placed as close as possible, and the orientation is kept consistent;
  • In the IDC circuit, proportional diodes adopt a common centroid layout, and virtual devices are added to the bias circuit devices;
  • In the OTA circuit, all current mirrors are arranged in a row, with virtual devices placed on both sides, and current mirrors that need to be replicated are positioned in the middle;
  • In the switched-capacitor network, all switches are placed together, and the switch control signal routing is minimized as much as possible. Strictly proportional capacitors are matched with a common centroid layout by choosing a reasonable unit capacitance value, and virtual capacitors are placed around the capacitor array to mitigate process influences.
As shown in Figure 13, the equivalent DC gain increased from 33 to 48 dB with the introduction of CLS, and the linear interval of the integral gain obviously widened. The implementation of the CLS technique in the proposed scheme has facilitated the inverter-based OTA in matching the gain of a conventional OTA with lower power consumption, simultaneously enlarging the linearity of the output range, thereby demonstrating the high energy efficiency of this scheme.
The proposed voltage reference scheme could realize a programable voltage reference voltage output. By changing the sizes of CS1 (CS2) and CI1 (CI2), the reference output–voltage curve is shown in Figure 14, which shows that the linear output reference voltage could achieve a wide linear output range from 266 to 995 mV within the temperature range of −30 to 120 °C. The worst TC value was 99.5 ppm/°C at 603 mV, and the best TC value was 82.4 ppm/°C at 995 mV.
Figure 15a shows the temperature characteristic curves for five different process corners (TT, SS, FS, SF, and FF) under a temperature range of −30 °C to 120 °C for a specific programming configuration. At 1.2 V power supply voltage, VREF at the TT process corner was 430 mV, the TC value was 92.6 ppm/°C, and the power consumption was 936 nW. Figure 15b shows the output reference voltage curve as the supply voltage varied. The supply voltage varied from 0.9 to 1.8 V, and the linearity was less than 2%/V.

4. Discussion

Table 1 lists a summary of the comparison between the proposed voltage reference and other reported schemes. Compared with these schemes, the proposed voltage reference achieved a low TC value of 82.4 ppm/°C. The proposed scheme supports a wide programable voltage reference output range, which is an approximate 20% enhancement compared to the scheme in [17].
To facilitate a more effective energy efficiency comparison between our scheme and others [17,18,28,29], an energy FoM is specifically introduced. This involves a comprehensive analysis of the voltage reference’s temperature range, TC, and power consumption. The derived FoM is presented in Table 1, demonstrating the superiority of our scheme in terms of energy efficiency.
In addition, our scheme has other advantages as follows:
  • It can be implemented by a mature 180 nm process, which is economically advantageous compared to advanced processes in [17,18];
  • It can be implemented by full MOSFETs, eliminating BJT devices typically used in traditional bandgap references and thus reducing area;
  • The scheme-based reference operates within a voltage range of 0.9–1.8 V, exhibiting high resilience to variations in external voltage values.
Of course, there are some limitations and further optimizations to this scheme:
  • Consideration should be given to the reuse of the IDC generation circuit (Figure 4) and clock generation circuit (Figure 6) to reduce overall power consumption, thereby further improving energy efficiency;
  • The scheme biases the inverter with a current source (Figure 3), limiting the output range. It can be optimized by using a floating current source;
  • The scheme employs the CLS technique, which is limited by the large capacitance area. Future work will employ capacitors with larger capacitance/(unit area) to optimize the layout;
  • The scheme does not adopt a high-order calibration. It is not easy to integrate this calibration within switched-capacitor networks in the discrete-time domain. Future work will focus on this to reduce the TC.

5. Conclusions

To achieve higher energy efficiency and a wide programable output range, a novel scheme implementing a switched-capacitor voltage reference with inverter-based CLS OTAs is proposed for the first time.
Compared with the conventional switched-capacitor voltage reference, this scheme represents the first innovative use of inverter-based OTAs in place of conventional OTAs. In contrast with the conventional voltage reference based on subthreshold MOSFETs, the proposed scheme achieves a lower TC. Furthermore, compared with the conventional inverter-based CLS technique, it shows that the proposed novel CLS does not require additional active overhead. The proposed scheme is verified by implementing a voltage reference with SMIC 180 nm CMOS technology, and its linearity is 2%/V under a 0.9–1.8 V power supply. At a supply voltage of 1.2 V, a programable output voltage range of 266 to 995 mV can be achieved in the range from −30 to 120 °C with corresponding TCs that range from 82.4 to 99.5 ppm/°C, and the corresponding power consumption is 976 nW.
The proposed scheme exhibits a high level of energy efficiency and a wide output range (60.8% of the supply voltage), thus making it suitable for low-voltage and low-power supply applications. The scheme has been utilized in high-precision analog-to-digital converters, digital-to-analog converters, and instrument amplifiers. It holds significant potential for future applications in memory processing units and artificial intelligence chips.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.W. (Rongshan Wei) and W.H.; methodology, R.W. (Rongshan Wei); software, R.W. (Rongshan Wei); validation, C.W. and C.C.; formal analysis, C.C.; investigation, Q.Z.; resources, L.H. and R.W. (Renping Wang); data curation, C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C. and C.W.; writing—review and editing, Q.Z.; visualization, L.H.; supervision, W.H.; project administration, W.H.; funding acquisition, W.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62274036), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (Grant No. 2022J01079, Grant No. 2023J01398).

Data Availability Statement

All the data are reported/cited in the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shahghasemi, M.; Odame, K.M. A Constant gₘ Current Reference Generator With Pseudo Resistor-Based Compensation. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2022, 69, 1115–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ria, A.; Catania, A.; Bruschi, P.; Piotto, M. A Low-Power CMOS Bandgap Voltage Reference for Supply Voltages Down to 0.5 V. Electronics 2021, 10, 1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, C.; Xin, M.; Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Liu, D.; Jiang, X. A Low-power Bandgap Reference Voltage Source for Smart Grid Sensor System on Chip. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Consumer Electronics and Computer Engineering (ICCECE), Guangzhou, China, 6–8 January 2023; pp. 411–415. [Google Scholar]
  4. He, F.Y.; Yuan, G.H.; Lei, L.; Yu, H.J.; Kong, D.W. A 3.95 ppm/°C 7.5 μW Second-Order Curvature Compensated Bandgap Reference in 0.11 μm CMOS. Electronics 2022, 11, 2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feldman, A.; Shor, J. A 0.0106 mm2 8 nW Resistor-Less BJT Bandgap Reference in 65nm. In Proceedings of the ESSCIRC 2023—IEEE 49th European Solid State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC), Lisbon, Portugal, 11–14 September 2023; pp. 85–88. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, H.W.; Luo, J.Y.; Yen, W.C. A 1 V power supply operation CMOS subbandgap reference using switched capacitors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Seattle, WA, USA, 18–21 May 2008; pp. 2234–2237. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sanborn, K.; Ma, D.; Ivanov, V. A Sub-1-V Low-Noise Bandgap Voltage Reference. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2007, 42, 2466–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ge, G.; Zhang, C.; Hoogzaad, G.; Makinwa, K. A single-trim CMOS bandgap reference with a 3σ inaccuracy of ±0.15% from −40 °C to 125 °C. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 18 March 2010; pp. 78–79. [Google Scholar]
  9. Buck, A.; McDonald, C.; Lewis, S.; Viswanathan, T.R. A CMOS bandgap reference without resistors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 9 February 2000; pp. 442–443. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ming, X.; Ma, Y.Q.; Zhou, Z.K.; Zhang, B. A High-Precision Compensated CMOS Bandgap Voltage Reference Without Resistors. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2010, 57, 767–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, C.; Siek, L. An Area-Efficient Current-Mode Bandgap Reference With Intrinsic Robust Start-Up Behavior. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2015, 62, 937–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yue, M. A 46.468 µW low-power bandgap voltage reference. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT), Chengdu, China, 9–11 July 2010; pp. 256–258. [Google Scholar]
  13. Koudounas, S.; Andreou, C.M.; Georgiou, J. A novel CMOS Bandgap reference circuit with improved high-order temperature compensation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Paris, France, 30 May–2 June 2010; pp. 4073–4076. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhu, W.R.; Yang, H.G.; Gao, T.G. A novel low voltage Subtracting BandGap Reference with temperature coefficient of 2.2 ppm/°C. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium of Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 15–18 May 2011; pp. 2281–2284. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, J.; Peng, X.H.; Hou, L.G.; Zhang, Y.H.; Sun, G.Q. A 12.42 μA 0.192 ppm/°C high PSRR curvature-compensated CMOS bandgap voltage reference. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuits and Microsystems (ICICM), Nanjing, China, 8–11 November 2017; pp. 191–194. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chowdary, G.; Kota, K.; Chatterjee, S. A 1-nW 95-ppm/°C 260-mV Startup-Less Bandgap-Based Voltage Reference. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Seville, Spain, 12–14 October 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chun, H.; Skafidas, S. A low-power, small-area and programmable bandgap reference. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 55th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), Boise, ID, USA, 5–8 August 2012; pp. 510–513. [Google Scholar]
  18. Biederman, W.; Yeager, D.; Alon, E.; Rabaey, J. A CMOS switched-capacitor fractional bandgap reference. In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), San Jose, CA, USA, 9–12 September 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gregoire, B.R.; Moon, U.K. An Over-60 dB True Rail-to-Rail Performance Using Correlated Level Shifting and an Opamp with 30 dB Loop Gain. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 3–7 February 2008; pp. 540–634. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Qu, W.; Ye, L.; Zhao, M.; Tan, Z. A 2.87 μW 1kHz-BW 94.0dB-SNDR 2-0 MASH ADC Using FIA with Dynamic-Body-Biasing Assisted CLS Technique. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 20–26 February 2022; pp. 410–412. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hung, T.C.; Kuo, T.H. A 75.3-dB SNDR 24-MS/s Ring Amplifier-Based Pipelined ADC Using Averaging Correlated Level Shifting and Reference Swapping for Reducing Errors From Finite Opamp Gain and Capacitor Mismatch. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2019, 54, 1425–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meng, L.X.; Hu, Y.P.; Zhao, Y.B.; Qu, W.Y.; Ye, L.; Zhao, M.L.; Tan, Z.C. A 1.2-V 2.87-μW 94.0-dB SNDR Discrete-Time 2–0 MASH Delta-Sigma ADC. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2022, 58, 1636–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, T.; Tan, Z.; Xie, N.; Zhang, H.; Ye, L. Ping-Pong Operated Inverter-based OTA using Correlated Level Shifting Technique. In Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Solid-State & Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT), Kunming, China, 3–6 November 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, H.; Tan, Z.; Nguyen, K. Inverter-based low-power delta–sigma modulator using correlated level shifting technique. Electron. Lett. 2017, 53, 1663–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vita, G.D.; Iannaccone, G. A Sub-1 V, 10 ppm/°C, Nanopower Voltage Reference Generator. In Proceedings of the 32nd European Solid-State Circuits Conference (ESSCIR), Montreaux, Switzerland, 19–21 September 2006; pp. 307–310. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ueno, K.; Hirose, T.; Asai, T.; Amemiya, Y. A 300 nW, 15 ppm/°C, 20 ppm/V CMOS Voltage Reference Circuit Consisting of Subthreshold MOSFETs. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2009, 44, 2047–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seok, M.; Kim, G.; Blaauw, D.; Sylvester, D. A PorTable 2-Transistor Picowatt Temperature-Compensated Voltage Reference Operating at 0.5 V. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2012, 47, 2534–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hirose, T.; Ueno, K.; Kuroki, N.; Numa, M. A CMOS bandgap and sub-bandgap voltage reference circuits for nanowatt power LSIs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (ASSCC), Beijing, China, 8–10 November 2010; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  29. Osaki, Y.; Hirose, T.; Kuroki, N.; Numa, M. 1.2-V Supply, 100-nW, 1.09-V Bandgap and 0.7-V Supply, 52.5-nW, 0.55-V Subbandgap Reference Circuits for Nanowatt CMOS LSIs. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2013, 48, 1530–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pelgrom, M.J.M.; Duinmaijer, A.C.J.; Welbers, A.P.G. Matching properties of MOS transistors. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 1989, 24, 1433–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gupta, V.; Rincon-Mora, G.A. Predicting and designing for the impact of process variations and mismatch on the trim range and yield of bandgap references. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED’05), San Jose, CA, USA, 21–23 March 2005; pp. 503–508. [Google Scholar]
  32. Conti, M.; Crippa, P.; Orcioni, S.; Turchetti, C. Parametric yield formulation of MOS IC’s affected by mismatch effect. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1999, 18, 582–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhuang, H.Y.; Guo, W.J.; Liu, J.X.; Tang, H.; Zhu, Z.M.; Chen, L.; Sun, N. A Second-Order Noise-Shaping SAR ADC With Passive Integrator and Tri-Level Voting. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2019, 54, 1636–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chae, Y.; Han, G. Low Voltage, Low Power, Inverter-Based Switched-Capacitor Delta-Sigma Modulator. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2009, 44, 458–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Conti, M.; Crippa, P.; Orcioni, S.; Turchetti, C. Layout-based statistical modeling for the prediction of the matching properties of MOS transistors. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Fundam. Theory Appl. 2002, 49, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of the voltage reference scheme.
Figure 1. Structure of the voltage reference scheme.
Electronics 12 05002 g001
Figure 2. CTAT voltage generated by the circuit. (a) CTAT voltage generation circuit based on di ode-cascaded MOSFETs. (b) CTAT voltage generation circuit based on current source biased.
Figure 2. CTAT voltage generated by the circuit. (a) CTAT voltage generation circuit based on di ode-cascaded MOSFETs. (b) CTAT voltage generation circuit based on current source biased.
Electronics 12 05002 g002
Figure 3. Core circuit of voltage reference.
Figure 3. Core circuit of voltage reference.
Electronics 12 05002 g003
Figure 4. IDC generation circuit.
Figure 4. IDC generation circuit.
Electronics 12 05002 g004
Figure 5. Temperature characteristics curve of IDC.
Figure 5. Temperature characteristics curve of IDC.
Electronics 12 05002 g005
Figure 6. Clock generation circuit for switched-capacitor voltage reference.
Figure 6. Clock generation circuit for switched-capacitor voltage reference.
Electronics 12 05002 g006
Figure 7. DFF_DELAY circuit diagram.
Figure 7. DFF_DELAY circuit diagram.
Electronics 12 05002 g007
Figure 8. Switched-capacitor voltage reference with inverter-based OTAs and its timing utilization.
Figure 8. Switched-capacitor voltage reference with inverter-based OTAs and its timing utilization.
Electronics 12 05002 g008
Figure 9. Voltage reference core based on CLS technique.
Figure 9. Voltage reference core based on CLS technique.
Electronics 12 05002 g009
Figure 10. Equivalent working model of the CLS technique and its timing utilization.
Figure 10. Equivalent working model of the CLS technique and its timing utilization.
Electronics 12 05002 g010
Figure 11. Switched-capacitor voltage reference with inverter-based OTAs using the CLS technique and its timing utilization.
Figure 11. Switched-capacitor voltage reference with inverter-based OTAs using the CLS technique and its timing utilization.
Electronics 12 05002 g011
Figure 12. Layout of the scheme-based voltage reference.
Figure 12. Layout of the scheme-based voltage reference.
Electronics 12 05002 g012
Figure 13. Gain−output sweep curves. (a) Comparison between INV (inverter-based OTAs without CLS technique) and CLSINV (inverter-based OTAs with CLS technique); (b) Comparison between INT (the inverter-based OTAs without CLS technique) and CLSINT (inverter-based OTAs with CLS technique).
Figure 13. Gain−output sweep curves. (a) Comparison between INV (inverter-based OTAs without CLS technique) and CLSINV (inverter-based OTAs with CLS technique); (b) Comparison between INT (the inverter-based OTAs without CLS technique) and CLSINT (inverter-based OTAs with CLS technique).
Electronics 12 05002 g013
Figure 14. Programmable voltage reference voltage output and TC curve.
Figure 14. Programmable voltage reference voltage output and TC curve.
Electronics 12 05002 g014
Figure 15. (a) Temperature characteristic curve; (b) power–supply voltage characteristic curve.
Figure 15. (a) Temperature characteristic curve; (b) power–supply voltage characteristic curve.
Electronics 12 05002 g015
Table 1. Performance Comparison.
Table 1. Performance Comparison.
This Work[17][29][28][18]
CMOS Process180 nm65 nm180 nm350 nm65 nm
DevicesMOSBJT + MOSMOSBJT + MOSBJT
Switched-CapacitorYes
(active)
Yes
(active)
NoNoYes
(passive)
Supply (V)0.9–1.80.9–1.81.2–1.81.2–3.30.75
Min VDD (V)0.90.91.21.2N/A
Temp Range (°C)−30–120−40–100−40–120−20–80−35–80
Reference
Voltage (V)
0.266–0.9950.591
0.872
1.189
1.090.5530.423
Normalized Output Range * (%)60.849.8N/AN/AN/A
TC (ppm/°C)82.4–99.543 (for 0.591)
28 (for 0.872)
33 (for 1.189)
147394160
Power (μW)0.97640 (for 0.591)
60 (for 0.872)
110 (for 1.189)
0.10.110.1035
Energy FoM **14.9 (min TC)
10.1 (max TC)
11.5
23.1
13.1
12.317.4
* Normalized   Output   Range = Reference   Voltage Supply   Voltage × 100 % , Supply Voltage is 1.2 V. ** Energy Figure of Merit FoM = Temp   Range TC 2   ×   Power 0.4 . Note that, normalization is applied to the FoM with the baseline FoM calculated from [28]. Higher FoM indicate higher energy efficiency of the reference.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, R.; Chen, C.; Wei, C.; Wang, R.; Huang, L.; Zhou, Q.; Hu, W. An Energy-Efficient Inverter-Based Voltage Reference Scheme with Wide Output Range Using Correlated Level Shifting Technique. Electronics 2023, 12, 5002. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12245002

AMA Style

Wei R, Chen C, Wei C, Wang R, Huang L, Zhou Q, Hu W. An Energy-Efficient Inverter-Based Voltage Reference Scheme with Wide Output Range Using Correlated Level Shifting Technique. Electronics. 2023; 12(24):5002. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12245002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Rongshan, Chu Chen, Cong Wei, Renping Wang, Lijie Huang, Qikun Zhou, and Wei Hu. 2023. "An Energy-Efficient Inverter-Based Voltage Reference Scheme with Wide Output Range Using Correlated Level Shifting Technique" Electronics 12, no. 24: 5002. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12245002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop