Next Article in Journal
Machine Learning for DDoS Attack Detection in Industry 4.0 CPPSs
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Analysis of Soft Switching Techniques in Reducing the Energy Loss and Improving the Soft Switching Range in Power Converters
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Cooperative Transmission Scheme in UAV-Assisted Wireless Sensor Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analytical Expression for Line Voltage THD of Three-Phase Staircase Modulated Multilevel Inverters
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Overall Analysis of the Static Characteristics of the Single Active Bridge Converter

Electronics 2022, 11(4), 601; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11040601
by Alberto Rodriguez 1,*, Javier Sebastian 1, Diego G. Lamar 1, Marta M. Hernando 1, Iban Ayarzaguena 2, Igor Larrazabal 2, David Ortega 2, Jose M. Bermejo 2 and Francisco Vazquez 3
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Electronics 2022, 11(4), 601; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11040601
Submission received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 3 February 2022 / Accepted: 13 February 2022 / Published: 15 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Power Converter Design, Control and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors is attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on our work. We have studied the reviewers’ comments and we have carefully incorporated their suggestions in the reviewed paper. All the changes have been highlighted in red colour in the new version of the manuscript.

Our responses to all the comments of the reviewers can be found in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper presents a good study on the performance of the proposed Single Active Bridge 11 (SAB) converter and compared it with the typical converters such as Buck, Forward, and Phase Shifted Full-Bridge converters. It showed good analytical approach and even validated its performance on both simulation and measurement results.

My comment is the authors should provide a picture or image of the actual measurement and testing setup of the SAB used. Moreover, provide a table summarizing the comparison of SAB with other converters.

 

 

Author Response

We would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on our work. We have studied the reviewers’ comments and we have carefully incorporated their suggestions in the reviewed paper. All the changes have been highlighted in red colour in the new version of the manuscript.

Our responses to all the comments of the reviewers can be found in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

1- a comparison with the existing approaches in the literature should be added in more details.

2- abstract should including the advantages and the importance of this converter compared to the conventional ones.

3- please revise the English of the paper.

Author Response

We would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on our work. We have studied the reviewers’ comments and we have carefully incorporated their suggestions in the reviewed paper. All the changes have been highlighted in red colour in the new version of the manuscript.

Our responses to all the comments of the reviewers can be found in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept in present form

Back to TopTop