Next Article in Journal
Trusted and Secure Blockchain-Based Architecture for Internet-of-Medical-Things
Next Article in Special Issue
Graphene and Two-Dimensional Materials-Based Flexible Electronics for Wearable Biomedical Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Prioritization and Processor Selection Schemes for HEFT Algorithm: A Makespan Optimizer for Task Scheduling in Cloud Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Bio-Optoelectronics Enabled by Flexible Micro Light-Emitting Diodes
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

From Transparent Cranial Windows to Multifunctional Smart Cranial Platforms

Electronics 2022, 11(16), 2559; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11162559
by Nana Yang 1,2, Qing Li 1,3,*, Xinyue Zhang 1,3, Jingjing Xu 4, Shengyong Xu 2 and Fengyu Liu 5,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2022, 11(16), 2559; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11162559
Submission received: 9 July 2022 / Revised: 7 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Fabrication and Applications of Flexible/Wearable Electronics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments on electronics-1833471

In this manuscript, the authors reviewed the development of cranial windows and their functions for applications in neuroscience and reported their progress with a large-area honeycomb structured Ti-PDMS cranial device. The manuscript was written logically. The reviewed papers were up to date. However, the authors need to make some minor changes before publication.

1.    The authors should calculate some mechanical parameters from the data as presented in Figure 2c, for example, Young’s modulus.

2.    The Ti-PDMS cranial window as shown in Figures 5a-5c does not look like a honeycomb structure as presented in Figure 2a. The authors need to provide more experimental details for these images.

 

3.    It would be more informative if some keywords can be added in Figure 6.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is well written but the paper does not have results or any comparison we can check the results. After the author provides some results I recommend this paper for publication pending minor revision.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop