Next Article in Journal
Calcium Phosphate Layers Deposited on Thermal Sensitive Polymer Substrates in Radio Frequency Magnetron Plasma Discharge
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancement of Polyvinyl Acetate (PVAc) Adhesion Performance by SiO2 and TiO2 Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Safety of Furniture Products

1
Mytischi Branch of Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Mytischi, Moscow Region 141005, Russia
2
Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan 420015, Russia
3
Center of Monitoring Science and Education, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2019, 9(11), 708; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9110708
Submission received: 17 September 2019 / Revised: 25 October 2019 / Accepted: 29 October 2019 / Published: 30 October 2019

Abstract

:
At present, technical regulations are adopted for furniture products of various types, establishing the protection of human health from the influence of harmful substances in the parts and assemblies of wood products and wood materials. The technical regulation adopted the requirements for ensuring chemical safety in the design and manufacture of furniture. The technical regulation is based on the condition of furniture products, eliminating the risk of harm to human health due to exceeding the maximum permissible concentration of harmful chemicals in indoor air. Such substances include free formaldehyde, migrating from the volume of chipboard and glue interlayers when gluing and veneering furniture parts and assemblies. Harmful chemicals are vapor-gas mixtures of solvents, the migration of which is observed from solid lacquer membrane of protective and decorative coatings of parts and components of furniture into the indoor air environment. These chemicals are present in the construction and auxiliary materials in the development of furniture. It is desirable that manufacturers of furniture products determine in advance, at the stage of its design, the level of safety when using certain raw materials. For this purpose, a technique is proposed that allows us to determine the concentration of harmful substances in the air of the premises with the selected materials, design and manufacturing technology of furniture products. Preliminary calculations based on the proposed method, allows us to determine the life of the furniture, in which the harmful substances migrating into the air environment of the premises will be within the permissible concentrations. This allows certifying the manufactured furniture products for chemical safety with the assignment of certain quality parameters. The proposed technique may be useful for enterprises focused on the production of furniture products.

1. Introduction

It is known that natural wood contains harmful substances belonging to various hazard classes, such as furfural, formaldehyde, phenol. When environmental temperature increases, these substances exhale, which is very dangerous for human beings.
Wood-based plate constructional materials, such as chipboards and wood laminated plastic are very popular in the interior design and furniture industry. As resin is used as binding material, which exhales harmful substances, this is an active area of research all over the world. The aim is to develop regulations and standards to minimize harm caused to human health.
One of the indicators of the technical regulation of furniture products is chemical safety. It is based on such a state of furniture products, in which there is no risk associated with causing harm to the health of the user due to an increase in the level of harmful chemicals in the air.
Harmful chemicals are present in the structural materials of products and in the auxiliary ones. The main structural material for various types of furniture is chipboard. It is made by gluing wood chips in the pressing process using adhesive compositions based on carbamide, melamine and other resins, one of the components of which is formaldehyde. At present, according to the conditions for obtaining, storing and applying these resins, a standard has been established on the level of migration of free formaldehyde into the air [1].
Its penetration into the human body through the respiratory tract is mainly due to the presence in the air of the premises. During the operation of furniture, migration of free formaldehyde, enclosed in the volume of chipboard, which is the main structural material of the furniture, to the air environment of residential and administrative premises occurs [2,3].
As auxiliary materials in furniture designs glues for gluing and facing of details and knots, and protective and decorative coverings on the basis of liquid paints and varnishes are used.
In the processes of bonding and veneering carbamide resins are usually used. In the adhesive layer of adhesive resins, there is also a separate amount of free formaldehyde, which, together with its content in the chipboard, creates an additional migration to the air environment of the room.
Finishing of various surfaces of details of furniture products is carried out by drawing-curing of liquid paints and varnishes. All of them contain solvents in their composition, partially evaporating during the curing of coatings. The remaining part of them for a long time migrates from the solid lacquer film in the air environment of the room, creating a certain concentration. For the human body, they are harmful substances, hence their concentration should not exceed the level of maximum permissible norms.
Scientific research in the field of emission of volatile organic substances from plate-based construction materials based on wood into the air of rooms affecting human health is of current importance. For example, Jan-Olof Fechter, Finn Englund Anders Lundin [4] noted the effect of temperature on the rate of emission of organic compounds. It is established that this ratio has an exponential character. An increase in room temperature leads to a more than proportional increase in the concentration of volatile organic substances. In this study, four relatively non-polar target compounds were not affected by changes in relative humidity, while the more polar aldehyde showed a sharply increased emission at higher relative humidity.
Studies of Meihong Yan, Yunbo Zhai, Pengtu Shi, Yanjun Hu [5] are aimed at studying the emissions of volatile organic compounds from new furniture products and its impact on human health. The influence of the loading rate (the ratio of the surface area of the furniture to the chamber volume) on emissions of volatile organic compounds was investigated. The result showed that the concentrations of the target compounds varied greatly depending on the type of furniture products. The most dominant components were n-undecane and styrene. Concentrations of volatile organic compounds increased rapidly and reached a maximum after about 1–2 h, and then decreased as emission rates slowed down.
In the article, Duy Xuan Ho, Ki-Hyun Kim, Jong Ryeul Sohn, Youn Hee, Oh, and Ji-Won Ahn [6], emissions of volatile organic compounds from ordinary furniture used in households and buildings were measured using 5 furniture samples (writing chair, bedside table, dining table, sofa and wardrobe) through the time parameter (up to 14 days) in two weeks of their production. The results showed that toluene and α-pinene were the most dominant emission components, and most volatile organic compounds showed similar decreasing trends over time. It is assumed that the relative prevalence of toluene and α-pinene among all the individual components emitted from various test samples is caused by polyurethane skin and foam, while those produced by others (MDF, HDF, PP and covering substances (PVC and LPM)) were not distinctive enough to affect overall emission levels.
Regarding laminated wood, the work of Safin R.R. [7,8] and others on the technology of creating decorative plywood with low formaldehyde emissions is worth mentioning. In these works, the results of studies of the basic properties of plywood, made on the basis of heat-treated veneer, are presented. Studies have shown that thermal effects in the manufacture of plywood provide an improvement in its water-repellent properties while reducing the emission of volatile organic substances.
Because of the health risks due to indoor volatile organic matter pollution, a more in-depth study of the emissions of different types of furniture is needed to properly maintain a healthy indoor environment.
In this regard, the purpose of this work is the development of methods and determination of concentrations of harmful substances in the air environment of premises that meet the requirements of chemical safety during the operation of furniture products.

2. Materials and Methods

Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has accumulated a lot of experimental materials [1], presented by a group of experts studying the harmful effects of a number of chemicals on public health. Poor indoor air quality is regarded as a serious health risk factor in countries with low, medium and high-income levels. The importance of this issue is due to the fact that people spend in the room much of the time.
It is known that the optimal level of free formaldehyde in resins prepared for use may be in the range of 0.1% to 1.5% [4,5,6,7,8]. A smaller amount of free formaldehyde leads to deterioration of the properties of the resin during storage and use. A larger amount increases the migration of free formaldehyde into the air and increases its concentration level.
It is established that currently used resins for chipboard and other materials have a level of migration of free formaldehyde into the air environment equal to 0.1 mg/m3. This is the maximum attainable rate, due to the current level of technology and production technology, complies with the standard (0.124 mg/m3) in force in Europe and other technologically developed countries and recommended by WHO. Long-term practice (over 50 years) of using materials containing free formaldehyde within the limits of this norm has not accumulated examples of a strongly negative impact on humans. According to reports, the minimum concentration that causes eye irritation in humans is 0.36 mg/m3 for 4 h. At a concentration of 0.1 mg/m3 and below, some individuals experience subjective complaints of sensory irritation, which cannot be considered as an adverse effect on human health. In addition, there are no statistics on occupational diseases of furniture and woodworking workers who directly use such resins and materials based on them for the production of products. There is also no information about diseases of the population in residential and administrative premises of which products of furniture and other enterprises are used based on materials containing free formaldehyde.
Currently, the Russian Federation has adopted the level of migration of free formaldehyde into the air to a value of 0.01 mg/m3. The adoption of this norm makes it difficult to use carbamide, melamine and other resins containing free formaldehyde for the production of chipboard and other materials, and products from them.
Liquid coating materials are used as auxiliary materials for finishing parts and components of furniture products. On their basis, protective and decorative coatings are formed. Paints and varnishes contain various solvents. They improve the wetting and spreading of the liquid finishing composition and partially evaporate during the curing of the coatings. The remaining part for a long time migrates to the air in the room as a vapor-gas mixture [9].
Currently, nitrocellulose, polyurethane, polyester and other varnishes are used as liquid finishing materials for the transparent finishing of parts and furniture assemblies from wood and wood materials. Lacquers contain various solvents: butyl and ethyl alcohols, toluene, acetone, butyl, and ethyl acetate, ethyl cellosolve, xylene, styrene, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl glycol acetate, and others. Polyurethane varnish as a hardener contains toluene diisocyanate. These chemicals partially volatilize during curing of coatings. Some of them up to about 10% remains in the coating and migrate from it as a vapor-gas mixture into the air environment of the premises during the operation of furniture. Being in the air of residential or administrative premises, they have various harmful effects on the human body. Some of them can cause headaches, dizziness, nausea if inhaled. Others provoke heart palpitations, ringing in the ears, dry mouth. Almost all of them can irritate the respiratory tract, skin and mucous membranes of the eyes, cause sore throat, cough, and general malaise [10,11].
For all these substances, the maximum permissible concentration has been established, at which their harmful effects on the human body is limited to safe. Constant air exchange in the room of natural or forced appearance allows reducing the number of harmful substances in the air environment.
To do this, the original method of calculating the period of reducing the initial concentration of harmful substances, to the level of the maximum permissible values, during the operation of furniture in a room of a certain volume was considered in the [12,13,14].
To select the volume of a room and a set of furniture, the main provisions of GOST 30255 “Furniture, wood and polymeric materials. Methods for determining the release of formaldehyde and other harmful volatile chemicals in climate chambers” are taken [15]. For cabinet furniture, tables, beds per 1 m2 of sample surface area, 1 m3 of the volume of the climate chamber should be accounted for. In our case, when choosing a residential or administrative space of medium size 52 m3 (area 20 m3 with a ceiling height of 2.6 m) should account for the surfaces of furniture products 50 m2. On such an area of surfaces of parts and components of furniture should be used chipboard approximately 1 m3 (16 mm thick).
Given the amount of binder (carbamide resin) and 1 m3 of wood chipboard per manufacturing of GOST 30255 [15], it is calculated the amount of free formaldehyde migrating into the air environment of the room and establish the initial concentration during the operation of furniture [16].
With a known area of furniture products and assemblies, it is calculated the number of adhesive materials, knowing their consumption per 1 m2 of surface. Since, as a rule, carbamide resins are used for gluing and cladding parts and components, it becomes calculated the amount of free formaldehyde found in adhesive layers. It will also migrate to the air environment of the residential or administrative premises over time.
With a known area of finishing parts and components of furniture (50 m2), by asking various paints and varnishes, as well as technological processes of applying and drying coatings, it is calculated the amount of harmful substances (solvents and others) migrating into the air environment of the premises where the furniture is used. Considering the air exchange in the room, recommended by the Building Norms and Rules 2.08.01, it is calculated the period of reduction of the initial concentration of harmful substances to the level of the maximum permissible norms (months) for all considered options.

3. Results

We calculate the concentration of free formaldehyde based on the volume of chipboard used in the manufacture of a set of furniture for a dwelling of 52 m3. As shown, a set of furniture for the premises of this volume includes 1 m3 chipboard. With an average plate density of 700 kg/m3, this material will weigh 700 kg. If we assume that, on average, in the manufacture of chipboard for cabinet furniture, 10% of adhesive substances are used, then their mass per 1 m3 of the plate is 70 kg. It is known that the content of free formaldehyde in adhesives (urea resins) of the plate is 0.1%. With 70 kg of adhesive substances, the content of free formaldehyde will be 70 g. [7].
Considering that chipboards are faced by layers with natural veneer or other types of linings, where glue urea resins are also used for gluing, it is possible to calculate the additional content of free formaldehyde in the adhesive layer migrating into the air in the room.
The total surface area for the chipboard (16 mm thick) with a volume of 1 m3 is approximately 50 m2. When the layers of the wall shield carbamide glue with the consumption of 170/180 g/m2 the weight of the furniture set will be 8.5 kg. The dry residue of such adhesives is 60%. The ratio of the base (urea) formaldehyde is 1/2. If the amount of free formaldehyde in the adhesive layers for such resins is 1%, then the number of premises migrating into the air will be 34 g. It can be seen that the total number of free formaldehyde, migrating from the volume of chipboard and glue interlayers when veneering plastic panels, for a furniture set will be 104 g.
When using air exchange in residential premises (SNiP 2.08.01) with a multiplicity of 1 (1/h) and assuming a uniform migration of free formaldehyde into the air from the volume of the particleboard and from the adhesive layers of the lined panels, its concentration of 0.124 mg/m3 (the norm recommended by WHO) will be observed for (22 months), and the concentration of 0.01 mg/m3 (the norm recommended for the Russian Federation). We will observe changes in the formaldehyde concentration in furniture for 21 years. Figure 1 shows the kinetics of formaldehyde concentration in the indoor air environment during the operation of furniture, confirming the results of the calculations performed.
If to focus on the same set, made of 1 m3 chipboard, it is possible to calculate the emission of harmful substances when finishing products with liquid paints. Such a furniture set for a living space with a total area of 20 m2 may consist of the following separate products: a three-door wardrobe and linen cabinet, a bookcase, a combined cabinet for storing dishes and other materials, and objects, as well as chairs, a table and upholstered furniture. The total surface area of the parts and assemblies of the listed furniture items is on average 50 m2.
According to the data of the calculation carried out (the results are not given in the article), the presented furniture products contain front, front and internal surfaces, from them, 12.3% will be on front surfaces, 32.1% on facial surfaces and 55.6% on internal surfaces, which corresponds to 6, 16 and 28 m2. Practice shows that facade, facial and internal surfaces, in many respects, better to finish with various paints and varnishes. This is due to a set of requirements for these surfaces. Some of them must meet high decorative qualities, others must meet operational requirements, including the effects of various chemicals, food products, and other substances according to GOST 33095 [17]. Considering all these requirements, Table 1 lists the most common options for finishing with paints and varnishes for facade, front and interior surfaces of the parts and components of furniture products for a general-purpose residential area.
As can be seen from the data of Table 1, almost all finishing options provide for the application of priming compositions. So the nitrocellulose primer, dyeing performs two functions, it is the coloring composition and at the same time priming. In this case, the combination of finishing operations and saving more expensive paint and varnish materials of the upper layers of protective and decorative coatings is carried out. For the polyurethane lacquer according to the presented finishing option, a special polyvinyl butyral primer has been selected, which allows to improve the adhesion properties of the resulting coating to wood and reduce the consumption of lacquer.
In the presented finishing options, it is possible to get covers with various decorative properties by the types of paints and varnishes. Mirror reflective coatings are obtained by finishing with cold curing, hot curing, and ultraviolet drying polyester varnishes. Matte coatings with diffuse light reflection are obtained by finishing with polyurethane varnish and matt nitrocellulose. Glossy coatings, which are formed in the presented variants by a nitrocellulose primer coating, are usually used on the internal surfaces of products.
Table 2 summarizes the characteristics and content of various solvents and substances in paints and varnishes.
The specified consumption of paintwork material sometimes should be used for second and third times application during the formation of the coating. It depends on the category of quality of coverage. The first category, which characterizes the facade and front surfaces of a product, as a rule, requires a coating thickness of at least 60 microns to GOST 33290 “Paint materials used in building. General specifications” [18]. For the second category of quality of the coating, which characterizes the inner surfaces of the products, the thickness of the obtained varnish film should be at least 40 microns.
In all paints with the exception of polyester varnishes, the percentage of dry residue does not exceed an average of 30%. This means that a significant part of the finishing materials are solvents that evaporate during the drying of the lacquer film. The individual composition of solvents is represented for each type of paint. All of them are harmful chemicals for humans: butyl and ethyl alcohols, toluene, acetone, butyl, and ethyl acetate, ethyl cellosolve, xylene, oxyterpene solvent, styrene, methyl ethyl ketone, and ethyl glycol acetate. When curing coatings under production conditions, the listed solvents evaporate partially. The finished product with a long period of operation, in the coating remains about 10%. This is the part that migrates over time from the coating into the air environment of the room, creating a certain concentration.
The two substances, indicated in the table by (*) and (**), were not taken into further consideration as volatile components in the air environment of the room. This is styrene for polyester UV varnish and itoluene diisocyanate for polyurethane varnish. Although styrene is partly solvent base of PE-varnish UV-drying, at the same time serves as a copolymer. There is no information on its volatility from a varnish solid film. Toluene diisocyanate is a curing agent for UR varnish and similar information is also missing from it.
Table 3 shows the data obtained by calculation, the duration of operation of furniture, in which the concentration of solvent in the air environment of residential premises is reduced to the level of maximum permissible norms. With the exception of ethyl cellosolve, oxyterpene solvent and methyl glycol acetate, the maximum allowable concentration of it in the air environment of the room are given for each considered solvent representative. For some of them (ethyl alcohol, acetone, xylene, methyl ethyl ketone) the concentration in the air environment of the room for the first year of furniture operation is less than the MPC value. That is, the level of concentration in the air environment of the room does not represent a danger to human health.
For the other four (alcohol-butyl, toluene, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate), Figure 2 shows graphs of the kinetics of solvent concentration in the air environment of a room when operating furniture. For each solvent, there is a graph for the finishing option, where the solvent concentration for the first year of furniture operation was the highest. The results of calculations show that for ethyl alcohol and toluene the concentration decreases to the level of the MPC after five years, the use of furniture for butyl acetate after four years and ethyl acetate after three years.

4. Conclusions

The proposed method for determining the concentration of harmful volatile substances in the air environment of residential and administrative premises can be used by the furniture manufacturer to certify the environmental safety of wood products and wood materials during their operation.
The value of the technique lies in the fact that at the development stage of furniture products a manufacturer can apply a set of measures for selecting structural and auxiliary materials that meet the requirements of ensuring maximum allowable standards for harmful substances migrating into the air environment from various surfaces and from the volume of parts and components.
In order to improve the proposed methodology, it is necessary to conduct a series of studies devoted to determining the speed of migration of various substances harmful to a person from structural and auxiliary materials of furniture into the indoor air environment.
Calculations performed in the work showed that some of the norms of permissible concentration of harmful substances have overestimated numerical values. This refers to the level of migration of free formaldehyde. The standard of 0.01 mg/m3, adopted in the Russian Federation, is currently an unattainable value. As can be seen from the above calculation for a set of furniture made of chipboard, such a concentration of free formaldehyde in the air environment of a room can be achieved in a very long period of furniture operation (21 years).
Whereas the established WHO norm of 0.124 mg/m3 can be achieved in 1.84 years of operation of the furniture. The norm adopted in the Russian Federation contradicts not only international recommendations on air quality but also common sense. In 2005, the results of a study of human respiration were published [19], according to which the human exhaled air contains formaldehyde in amounts of 0.0893 mg/m3. Moreover, in 97.5% of the subjects, the content of formaldehyde in respiration was observed at the level of 0.0495 mg/m3, which is 5 times more than the limit in the Russian Federation.
For paints and varnishes, calculations have shown that some solvents migrating into the indoor air environment are within acceptable concentrations already in the first year of furniture operation. These include ethyl alcohol, acetone, xylene, methylethyl ketone. For butyl alcohol and toluene, concentration is reduced to the level of ultimate concentration after five years of operation of furniture, for ethyl acetate after three years.
The proposed method and the calculations performed on its basis are submitted for discussion by interested employees of woodworking, furniture and paint companies. All additional information and comments will be accepted by the authors with gratitude.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.R. and R.S.; Methodology, B.R. and R.S.; Validation, I.Z. and S.M.; Formal analysis, I.Z.; Investigation, D.R.; Resources, S.M. and A.G.; Writing—original draft preparation, B.R., R.S., I.Z., S.M., D.R. and A.G.; Writing—review and editing, B.R., R.S., I.Z., S.M., D.R. and A.G.; Visualization, I.Z. and S.M.; Project Administration, B.R., Funding acquisition, A.G.

Funding

The research carried out with the financial support of the grant from the Program Competitiveness Enhancement of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Project 5-100-2020.

Acknowledgments

Standardization studies were carried out as part of project No. MK-3229.2018.8 “Improving the standardization management method”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest to declare for this publication.

References

  1. WHO. Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ziniakov, V.Y.; Gorodetskiy, A.E.; Tarasova, I.L. Control of vitality and reliability analysis. Stud. Syst. Decis. Control 2016, 49, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ziniakov, V.Y.; Gorodetskiy, A.E.; Tarasova, I.L. System failure probability modelling. Stud. Syst. Decis. Control 2016, 49, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fechter, J.; Englund, F.; Lundin, A. Association between temperature, relative humidity and concentration of volatile organic compounds from wooden furniture in a model room. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2006, 1, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yan, M.; Zhai, Y.; Shi, P.; Hu, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhao, H. Emission of volatile organic compounds from new furniture products and its impact on human health. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2019, 25, 1886–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ho, D.X.; Kim, K.H.; Sohn, J.R.; Oh, Y.H.; Ahn, J.W. Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds Released from Newly Produced Household Furniture Products Using a Large-Scale Chamber Testing Method. Sci. World J. 2011, 11, 650624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Safin, R.R.; Khasanshin, R.R.; Shaikhutdinova, A.R.; Ziatdinov, R.R. The technology for creating of decorative plywood with low formaldehyde emission. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 93, 012077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khasanshin, R.R.; Safin, R.R.; Razumov, E.Y. High temperature treatment of birch plywood in the sparse environment for the creation of a waterproof construction veneer. Procedia Eng. 2016, 150, 1541–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Klochkov, Y. Conflicts between quality management methods. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Infocom Technologies and Unmanned Systems: Trends and Future Directions, ICTUS, Dubai, UAE, 18–20 December 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gravit, M.; Simonenko, Y.; Larionov, A. Method single burning item (SBI) for fire hazard of wood constructions. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 91, 02049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rassokhin, A.S.; Ponomarev, A.N.; Figovsky, O.L. Ultra-light hybrid composite wood-polymer structural materials in construction. Mag. Civil Eng. 2018, 79, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Safin, R.R.; Khasanshin, R.R.; Mukhametzyanov, S.R. Influence of technical parameters of disk-shaped reactor on productivity of heat treatment of crushed wood. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 327, 042095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shaikhutdinova, A.R.; Safin, R.R.; Nazipova, F.V.; Mukhametzyanov, S.R. Use of thermo-modified wood massif in making parametric exterior furniture. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 1112–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Galyavetdinov, N.R.; Safin, R.R.; Khasanshina, R.T. Wood heat treatment in construction materials production. Solid State Phenom. 2017, 265, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. GOST 30255. The method for determination of formaldehyde and other volatile chemicals in the air of climatic chambers. In Furniture, Timber and Polymers; Standardinform: Moscow, Russia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Halachan, P.; Babiak, M.; Spišiak, D.; Chubinsky, A.N.; Tambi, A.A.; Chauzov, K.V. Physico-acoustic characteristics of spruce and larche wood. Wood Res. 2017, 62, 235–242. [Google Scholar]
  17. GOST 33095. Protective decorative coatings for wood furniture. In Classification and Designations; Standardinform: Moscow, Russia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. GOST 33290. Paint materials used in building. In General Specifications; Standardinform: Moscow, Russia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moser, B. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 145, pp. 295–300. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Kinetics of formaldehyde concentration in the indoor air environment during the operation of furniture.
Figure 1. Kinetics of formaldehyde concentration in the indoor air environment during the operation of furniture.
Coatings 09 00708 g001
Figure 2. Kinetics of solvent concentration in the air environment of a room when operating furniture.
Figure 2. Kinetics of solvent concentration in the air environment of a room when operating furniture.
Coatings 09 00708 g002
Table 1. Finishing options for the facade, the front and inner surfaces of the parts and components of furniture products with various paints and varnishes.
Table 1. Finishing options for the facade, the front and inner surfaces of the parts and components of furniture products with various paints and varnishes.
Paint Materials TypeFinishing Variant with Various Paint Materials for Façade (Fa), Front (Fr) and Interior (In) Surfaces of Furniture Products
IIIIIIIVV
FaFrInFaFrInFaFrInFaFrInFaFrIn
Painting base coat (CN)+++ ++++++++ ++
Gloss lacquer (CN) + + +
Gloss-base coat lacquer (CN) + + +
Matt lacquer (CN)+ + ++
Cold-setting lacquer (PE) +
Hot-setting lacquer (PE) +
UV-setting lacquer (PE) +
Basecoat (PB) +
Matt lacquer (PY) +
“+”—Availability of paint and varnish materials on finishing technology.
Table 2. Brief description and content of various solvents and substances in paints and varnishes.
Table 2. Brief description and content of various solvents and substances in paints and varnishes.
Main Film Forming SubstanceType of Paint MaterialExpense When FinishingFilm-Forming Substances Content, %Solvents Content and Other Substances in Paint Material, %
Butyl AlcoholEthyl AlcoholTolueneAcetoneButyl AcetateEthyl CellosolveEthyl AcetateXyleleOxyterpeneToluene DiisocyanateStyroleneMetyl Etyl KeytoneEthyl Glycol Acetate
Cellulose nitrate (CN)Painting base coat252111.857.939.55.537.96.32-------
Gloss lacquer2502510.7232.64--10.72-910.272.55----
Gloss-base coat lacquer295227.0212.4836.66-7.022.3412.48------
Matt lacquer4442611.17.4375.187.45.92-------
Polyether (PE)Cold-setting lacquer55092---25--------
Hot-setting lacquer80065--529---1-----
UV-setting lacquer44065----------35 *--
PolyvinylBase coat350101813.522.5--9-27-----
PolyuretanMatt lacquer11033---------16.6 **-33.533.5
*—lacquer base copolymer, **—lacquer base hardener.
Table 3. The duration of the furniture operation, in which the concentration of solvent in the air environment of residential premises is reduced to the level of maximum permissible norms.
Table 3. The duration of the furniture operation, in which the concentration of solvent in the air environment of residential premises is reduced to the level of maximum permissible norms.
Solvent NameMAC, mg/m3Solvent Concentration in the Room Air Environment for the First Year of Furniture Operation (mg/m3) and the Period of Reducing it to the Maximum Allowable Norms Level (Months) According to the Finishing Options
IIIIIIIVV
Butyl alcohol0.10.31/350.41/480.5/600.25/360.246/36
Ethyl alcohol5.00.57/*0.42/*0.33/*0.53/*0.53/*
Toluene0.30.98/361.33/481.69/600.82/360.76/36
Acetone0.350.04/*0.09/*0.25/*0.32/*0.013/*
Butyl acetate0.10.28/360.26/360.37/480.23/240.23/24
Ethyl cellosolve-0.094/**0.19/**0.27/**0.05/**0.05/**
Ethyl acetate0.10.30/360.22/24--0.30/360.30/36
Xylele0.20.09/*0.12/*--0.10/*0.09/*
Oxyterpene-0.02/**----0.02/**0.02/**
Styrolene0.002----0.007/48----
Metyl etyl keytone0.1--0.048/*------
Ethyl glycol acetate---0.582/**------
* The concentration of solvent is below maximum permissible concentration, ** The value of maximum permissible concentration is missing, -- The use of solvent is not provided in the finishing option.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rybin, B.; Safin, R.; Zavrazhnova, I.; Mukhametzyanov, S.; Rybin, D.; Gazizulina, A. Chemical Safety of Furniture Products. Coatings 2019, 9, 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9110708

AMA Style

Rybin B, Safin R, Zavrazhnova I, Mukhametzyanov S, Rybin D, Gazizulina A. Chemical Safety of Furniture Products. Coatings. 2019; 9(11):708. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9110708

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rybin, Boris, Ruslan Safin, Irina Zavrazhnova, Shamil Mukhametzyanov, Dmitry Rybin, and Albina Gazizulina. 2019. "Chemical Safety of Furniture Products" Coatings 9, no. 11: 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9110708

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop