Next Article in Journal
Mn-Doped Glass–Ceramic Bioactive (Mn-BG) Thin Film to Selectively Enhance the Bioactivity of Electrospun Fibrous Polymeric Scaffolds
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation on Physical Properties of IGZO Thin Films under the Conditions of Mixing Oxygen and Argon
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preharvest Application of Hexanal as a Surface Treatment Improved the Storage Life and Quality of Mango Fruits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Why Natural-Based Bioactive Coatings?

by
Arantzazu Santamaria-Echart
1,2,* and
Filomena Barreiro
1,2
1
Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
2
Laboratório Associado para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha (SusTEC), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(10), 1426; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101426
Submission received: 23 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Based Bioactive Coatings)
The design of bioactive coatings through combining green strategies and natural formulations prevails over conventional synthetic systems. These approaches address the need to provide biofunctional properties through alternative solutions. Green strategies include methodologies that involve lower environmental impact, namely by using green solvents and reagents, or low-cost and low-toxic processes, promoting an optimized life assessment of the product, among other features. It is important to note that most recent methodologies (e.g., 3D printing, electrospinning, layer-by-layer deposition, or dip coating) enable the design of novel and tailor-made structures, whose assemblies/morphology can be essential to guarantee the formulation’s functionality [1].
Natural formulations imply using natural polymers to replace total or partial use of petrochemical polymers. Chitin, chitosan, collagen, silk fibroin, gelatin, cellulose and cellulose-derivatives, alginate, starch, pectin, xanthan gum, pullulan, or proteins are some highlightable natural polymers used as bioactive coating matrices [2,3]. Concurrently, formulations with added natural-derived functionalities are increasingly positioned as an attractive pathway to functionalize coatings. The intrinsic properties of these natural compounds, e.g., antioxidant, antibacterial, or anti-inflammatory capacities, can be transferred to the coatings, providing functionalities to the entire system [4].
In this context, bioactives of a diverse nature can be incorporated, attending to the final application. For example, natural extracts, even obtained from agro-industrial residues, have been reported to be attractive candidates in the food industry to produce edible coatings, which are aimed at extending the lifespan of foods. De Carli et al. [5] produced chitosan films from chitin extracted from waste crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) shells. These bioactive films were added with propolis bioactive extract, aiming at acting as edible protective coatings in fruits. Aloui et al. [6] developed locust bean gum-based coatings with added cutin monomers and/or cuticular wax from tomatoes to be applied as a postharvest preservation strategy for cherry tomatoes. The results showed the potential of the coatings to delay the respiration rate and fungal decay of tomatoes, while controlling the weight loss and retaining their firmness and antioxidant capacity in cold storage.
Similarly, pectin, hydroxylpropylmethylcellulose, and methylcellulose were employed by Settier-Ramírez et al. [7] to prepare coatings with yeast extract and apple pomace. Apples were coated with the most promising formulations, and the antifungal activity was analyzed during storage against Penicillium expansum, particularly the prevention from patulin, the mycotoxin produced by the fungi. Concurrently, the production of bioactive coatings has also been reported for the preservation of other types of foods, including cheese preservation with coatings based on alginate that incorporates bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria [8] and fish products with guar gum-based coatings that contain thyme oil [9] or chitosan coatings with pomegranate peel extract [10].
In the field of biomedicine, the incorporation of growth factors or bioactive compounds can mimic the composition of specific parts of the body. This is the case of hydroxyapatite, the principal mineral in the body’s hard tissues, which is reportedly used in the preparation of bioactive coatings to promote cell proliferation, especially in bone and dental applications [11,12]. Other compounds have been reported to hold diverse roles in the preparation of biomedical coatings, as is the case of polydopamine. Some works reported the potential of polydopamine-based bioinspired coatings to control the release of bioactive compounds (e.g., silver ions and bovine serum albumin) in titanium-based implants [13]. Alternatively, Sharma et al. [14] reported the potential of polydopamine to functionalize polyvinylidene fluoride coatings as piezo-active biomaterials. They demonstrated the potential of coating deposition to tailor the biomineralization and bioactive properties, promoting the regeneration of musculoskeletal damaged areas.
The family of growth factors is also considered as essential compounds in tissue engineering. For example, several works have demonstrated the potential of adding growth factors into bioactive coatings to promote bone healing. Different growth factors, including morphogenic proteins, fibroblast growth factors, and vascular endothelial growth factors, were reported to show promising results for osteoconduction and osteoinduction, favoring bone healing processes [15].
In agriculture, microorganisms or biocatalysts are added to the coatings to promote soil fertilization. Weiß et al. [16] developed soil improver bio-based and biocompatible coatings based on lignosulfonates biocatalyzed by laccase and plasticized with glycerol, xylitol, or sorbitol. The spray-coated formulations were added with plant growth promoter microorganisms (Bacillus species) and tested in diverse model plants, including corn, wheat, tomato, and salad and demonstrated no toxic effects on their germination and growth process. Majaron et al. [17] designed a novel approach to improve the availability of unprocessed (raw) nutrient sources (e.g., elemental sulfur and mineral oxides) to plants, aiming at promoting sustainable agriculture as an alternative to conventional fertilizers. The coatings were prepared with maize starch and the unprocessed nutrient sources with a microbial source (Aspergillus niger or Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans), which is responsible for ensuring that the nutrients are accessible to the plants. The acidification effect of the microorganisms improved the oxide and elemental sulfur oxidation, validating the potential of these biocoatings as nutrient suppliers’ co-adjutants.
It is worth noting that in the aforementioned application fields, the activity of the coating solution does not only depend on the polymer and bioactive compounds, but it is also influenced by the coating preparation strategy and its final structure. The surface activation of hydrophobic coatings through the high-frequency plasma at low pressure in a nitrogen atmosphere was presented as a strategy to improve the adhesion and reactivity of the side chains of poly (lactic acid)-based coatings [18]. Other tailoring strategies comprise the selection of specific and advanced coating preparation techniques to modulate the bioactive profile of the coatings. Coatings produced by electrospinning can tailor the biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity. In contrast, dip coatings can promote mechanical and adhesion properties, and layer-by-layer deposition enables the design of specific drug release profiles [1].
Overall, when asked the question “Why natural-based bioactive coatings?”, one must consider the broad possibilities (in terms of formulation and preparation strategies) offered by the bioactive coatings to improve and modulate the bioactivity of various products and their environmental compatible fabrication strategies.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support through national funds FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) to CIMO ((UIDB/00690/2020 and UIDP/00690/2020)) and SusTEC (LA/P/0007/2021). National funding by FCT, through the institutional scientific employment program-contract with Arantzazu Santamaria-Echart.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kravanja, K.A.; Finšgar, M. A review of techniques for the application of bioactive coatings on metal-based implants to achieve controlled release of active ingredients. Mater. Des. 2022, 217, 110653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Iñiguez-Moreno, M.; Ragazzo-Sánchez, J.A.; Calderón-Santoyo, M. An extensive review of natural polymers used as coatings for postharvest shelf-life extension: Trends and challenges. Polymers 2021, 13, 3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guo, L.; Liang, Z.; Yang, L.; Du, W.; Yu, T.; Tang, H.; Li, C.; Qiu, H. The role of natural polymers in bone tissue engineering. J. Control. Release 2021, 338, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kravanja, K.A.; Finšgar, M.; Knez, Z.; Knez Marevci, M. Evaluation of natural extracts as promising components of bioactive coatings for orthopedic implants. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 878176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Carli, C.; Aylanc, V.; Mouffok, K.M.; Santamaria-Echart, A.; Barreiro, F.; Tomás, A.; Pereira, C.; Rodrigues, P.; Vilas-Boas, M.; Falcão, S.I. Production of chitosan-based biodegradable active films using bio-waste enriched with polyphenol propolis extract envisaging food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 213, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aloui, H.; Ghazouani, Z.; Khwaldia, K. Bioactive coatings enriched with cuticle components from tomato wastes for cherry tomatoes preservation. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 6155–6163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Settier-Ramírez, L.; López-Carballo, G.; Hernández-Muñoz, P.; Fontana-Tachon, A.; Strub, C.; Schorr-Galindo, S. Apple-based coatings incorporated with wild apple isolated yeast to reduce Penicillium expansum postharvest decay of apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 185, 111805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silva, S.P.M.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Teixeira, J.A.; Silva, C.C.G. Application of an alginate-based edible coating with bacteriocin-producing Lactococcus strains in fresh cheese preservation. LWT 2022, 153, 112486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ruelas-Chacon, X.; Aguilar-González, A.; de la Luz Reyes-Vega, M.; Peralta-Rodríguez, R.D.; Corona-Flores, J.; Rebolloso-Padilla, O.N.; Aguilera-Carbo, A.F. Bioactive protecting coating of guar gum with thyme oil to extend shelf life of tilapia (Oreoschromis niloticus) fillets. Polymers 2020, 12, 3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yu, D.; Zhao, W.; Dong, J.; Zang, J.; Regenstein, J.M.; Jiang, Q.; Xia, W. Multifunctional bioactive coatings based on water-soluble chitosan with pomegranate peel extract for fish flesh preservation. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Liu, Z.; Kataoka, T.; Samitsu, S.; Kawagoe, D.; Tagaya, M. Nanostructural control of transparent hydroxyapatite nanoparticle films using a citric acid coordination technique. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Singh, J.; Chatha, S.S.; Singh, H. Microstructural and in-vitro characteristics of functional calcium silicate topcoat on hydroxyapatite coating for bio-implant applications. Prog. Biomater. 2022, 11, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, K.; Zhou, M.; Chen, W.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q. Bioinspired polydopamine/graphene oxide/collagen nanofilms as a controlled release carrier of bioactive substances. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sharma, V.; Chowdhury, S.; Bose, S.; Basu, B. Polydopamine codoped BaTiO3-functionalized polyvinylidene fluoride coating as a piezo-biomaterial platform for an enhanced cellular response and bioactivity. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 170–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bjelić, D.; Finšgar, M. The role of growth factors in bioactive coatings. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Weiß, R.; Gritsch, S.; Brader, G.; Nikolic, B.; Spiller, M.; Santolin, J.; Weber, H.K.; Schwaiger, N.; Pluchon, S.; Dietel, K.; et al. A biobased, bioactive, low CO2 impact coating for soil improvers. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 6501–6514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Majaron, V.F.; da Silva, M.G.; Bortoletto-Santos, R.; Klaic, R.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Polito, W.L.; Bevilaqua, D.; Farinas, C.S.; Ribeiro, C. Bioactive material with microorganisms can enhance the micronutrients solubilization and sulfate availability from low reactive sources: Insight for application as coating fertilizer granules. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 2602–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stoleru, E.; Vasile, C.; Irimia, A.; Brebu, M. Towards a bioactive food packaging: Poly (lactic acid) surface functionalized by chitosan coating embedding clove and argan oils. Molecules 2021, 26, 4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santamaria-Echart, A.; Barreiro, F. Why Natural-Based Bioactive Coatings? Coatings 2022, 12, 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101426

AMA Style

Santamaria-Echart A, Barreiro F. Why Natural-Based Bioactive Coatings? Coatings. 2022; 12(10):1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santamaria-Echart, Arantzazu, and Filomena Barreiro. 2022. "Why Natural-Based Bioactive Coatings?" Coatings 12, no. 10: 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop