Next Article in Journal
Application of Nanotechnology in Immunity against Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Curcumin: Modern Applications for a Versatile Additive
Previous Article in Journal
The Geometric Surface Structure of EN X153CrMoV12 Tool Steel after Finish Turning Using PCBN Cutting Tools
Previous Article in Special Issue
Smart Food Packaging Designed by Nanotechnological and Drug Delivery Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Natural Ingredients in Functional Coatings—Recent Advances and Future Challenges

by
Radu Claudiu Fierascu
1,2,
Irina Fierascu
1,3,* and
Irina Elena Chican
1,*
1
National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry—ICECHIM, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
3
University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(4), 429; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040429
Submission received: 18 March 2021 / Revised: 30 March 2021 / Accepted: 5 April 2021 / Published: 7 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Materials in Functional Coatings)

Abstract

:
In recent decades, coating materials have gained researchers’ interest, finding applications in different areas such as antimicrobial coatings for biomedical applications, coatings for increasing the shelf-life of commercial products, or coatings for the conservation of cultural heritage artifacts. The use of new types of coating materials based on natural ingredients can lead to the removal of harmful chemicals and contribute to the development of materials having different and promising properties. New challenges can appear both in the production process, as well as in the case of final application, when coating materials must be applied on various supports. The present review paper aims to be a critical discussion regarding the possibility of using natural ingredients as functional coatings, and to prove that the same material can be used in different fields, from the biomedical to environmental, or from cultural heritage protection to the food and cosmetic industries. The paper is based on the newest published studies, and its main goal is to be an inspiration source for researchers, in order to create more functional and applicable composite coatings in specific fields.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent decades, coating materials have gained researchers’ interest, and the registered progress has led to the evaluation of their potential use in different applications, including some of great importance, such as the development of antimicrobial coatings for biomedical applications, coatings applied for increasing the shelf-life of commercial products, or coatings used for the conservation of cultural heritage artifacts. In its widest sense, a coating represents a thin layer of material that, when deposited or applied on the surface of a support material, improves the surface properties of the substrates and creates a protective barrier against detrimental external factors [1]. Considering their envisaged properties and final applications, different types of coatings were developed, from monolayer to nanostructured and/or nanometric-scale multilayer coatings [2].
The permanent search for new types of coating materials, accompanied by the shift in consumer’s habits towards “bio-products” led to an increasing interest regarding the application of functional coatings based on natural products, especially in industries such as food or cosmetic. In the food industry, as an example regarding the potential of natural alternatives, the use of wax coatings on citrus (as a method to protect them against microbial spoilage) was known and applied in ancient China [3]; nowadays, the development of new materials and production technologies has new valences—to obtain enhanced biodegradability and eco-friendly properties [4].
For other applications, such as development of antifouling coatings, the interest is to replace classical used materials (such as tributyltin or zinc pyrithione), which can have negative effects on non-target organisms, with some natural-based alternatives [5].
Widely applied, natural and synthetic polymers are commonly used as coating layers, and their enrichment with nanoparticles, inorganic and organic materials increases the variety of available coatings, with the developed hybrid materials overcoming deficiencies by combining the advantages of each component [6,7].
The present review paper aims to represent a critical discussion regarding the possibility of applying natural ingredients (compounds obtained from natural sources) for the development of functional coatings, and to explore their possible applications in different areas which affects our daily life, from biomedical uses to environmental protection, or from cultural heritage conservation and restoration to food or cosmetic industries (Figure 1).
The present work is based on the most recently published literature data, and its main goal is to be an inspiration source for researchers, in order to create more functional and applicable composite coatings in specific fields, based on natural ingredients.

2. Coating Materials for Biomedical Applications

Coating materials for biomedical applications are one of the most studied class of materials in the last decades. Various biomedical engineering applications emerged with the development of new materials: drug delivery systems, tissue engineering, or wound dressing composites. Various types of coatings, such as inorganic ceramics, polymers, or composite materials can be successfully applied for titanium or magnesium alloys, or 316 L stainless steel implants, possessing superior biocompatibility and biodegradation properties [8]. Surface modification via coating can remove implant-associated bacterial infections caused by bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli; the materials used for implants undergo permanent improvements, including the search for new alternative coating materials, and, in the same time, development of methods for support material treatment, i.e., droplet elimination for the removal of any potential bacteria or dirt particles, thus offering a good adhesion and a proper behavior of the coating material [2].
Hydroxyapatite (HAP) is one of the most used inorganic materials in biomedical applications that has gained attention as a coating material on metallic implants, and not only due to its enhanced adhesion properties [9], but also for its biocompatibility and osteoconductivity [10]. The use of HAP is limited by the available deposition techniques, which can influence the properties of the material in relation with the support. Physical vapor deposition, dip coating, chemical vapor deposition, micro-arc oxidation, sol-gel, or thermal spraying are all suitable deposition methods, but for each of these methods, different aspects must be considered before the final decision regarding the deposition method selection is made: apparition of thermal effects (e.g., distortion, crack, phase changing, etc.), destructive effects of loose atmospheric protection (e.g., penetration of inclusions and contaminations into the substrate) and, of particular importance, the properties of the coating materials [11].
The most important parameter in the selection of the coating method is represented by the biomaterial’s envisaged application [12]. For example, among the disadvantages of dip coating, of particular importance is the low mechanical properties such as adhesion strength when compared to plasma spray coating, which is cost effective and protects the metal surface from corrosion [13]. Through plasma electrolytic oxidation (PAE), there can be obtained better mechanical properties than those produced by anodic oxidation and superior adhesion strengths, compared with plasma spraying [14]. Moreover, the morphology and the stability of HAP can limit its utilization in biomedical applications. The drawbacks of deposition techniques based on high temperature are related to the thermal behavior of HAP, which can lead to the degradation of the coating material [15]; this drawback can be overcome by the alteration of the classical HAP structure, usually by the substitution of calcium with other metals [16,17]. Moreover, modifying the HAP classical structure, the materials can achieve enhanced antimicrobial properties. As the field of materials for biomedical applications is shifted towards the use of modified scaffolds, in this area materials can be obtained with the mechanical advantages of the bio-ceramic materials properties [18,19]. Besides the previous presented advantages of modification of the classical structure of HAP used for medical implants, a disadvantage can be the long-term cytotoxicity, thus infecting red blood cells, a negative aspect that can be removed by producing composite coatings with a combination of polymer and ceramic materials [20]. Instead of using a structurally modified HAP for its antimicrobial properties, the possible cytotoxicity of the classical material can be removed by using natural products, especially secondary metabolites from plants [21].
For bone implants, an application for which metallic alloys are usually used due to the lack of adsorption sites, a challenge in the deposition of coating materials such as hydroxyapatite (in its classical or modified structure) without any special technique, is the use of different chelating agents or adhesive materials, with no alteration of the coating properties [22,23,24].
As potential coating material for biomedical applications, hydroxyapatite from natural sources with improved mechanical properties was studied by different authors. Utomo et al. studied hydroxyapatite synthesis, from the calcite rock from Jember, Indonesia, increasing its Vickers hardness up to 78.50 HVN, by adding polyethylene glycol [25]. A larger amount of magnesium in the coating materials was proven to stimulate an activity of new bone tissue in the study of Bootchanont et al. regarding the development of coatings based on HAP synthesized from fish bones [26]. By re-sintering pigeon bones wastes at 850, 950, 1050, and 1150 °C, a natural HAP was obtained with particle sizes in the range of 50–250 nm and a Ca/P ratio of 1.7, the compressive strength enhanced from 23.18 to 47.57 MPa, and with enhanced activity and proliferation of osteoblast cells in comparison with synthetic HAP [27]. Some recent advancements in the area of natural coatings applied in the biomedical area are presented in Table 1.
Hydroxyapatite’s properties and applicability can be enhanced by developing different composite materials, in order to achieve superior behavior in biomedical applications. Nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide, as a potential composite material for medical implant coating applications, gained Kaviya and coworkers’ attention due to graphene oxide chemical and mechanical stability, magnetic behavior, thermal and electrical conductivity [28]. The synthesis of the composite material, using water as a mixture media, presented better morphological characteristics for the targeted application than those obtained in alcoholic media (flaky texture reflecting its layered microstructure), thus proposing water as a proper solvent, instead of toxic organic solvents. Silver ions proved to enhance nano-sized hydroxyapatite (nHAp) properties. Synthesized by the precipitation method, HAP-Ag composite can be used as a coating material, with superior properties compared with HAP, for the remineralization of dentine samples, contributing to the viability of L929 fibroblast cells (percentage cell viability for HAP-Ag—139.04, for HAP—137.85) and providing an antibacterial effect against bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, and Escherichia coli, in a reduced time of action [29]. By modifying the HAP–Ag scaffold with polyvinyl alcohol, Lett et al. obtained an enhanced material with better antimicrobial properties and 0.8% hemolytic activity, less than pure HAP (2%), which recommends it as a proper candidate, compatible with human blood [30]. PLA scaffolds influence the crystallinity and porosity of HAP-Ag, offering more protein adsorption, which is beneficial for an implant material, and, moreover, a bending strength (125 MPa) comparable to the strength of cortical bone.
Changing the P/Ca ratio from the synthesis process by adding other metallic ions than silver or metallic oxides, the morphology of HAP can be tailored; thus, the bioactive properties can be enhanced by releasing active ions in the media [31,32,33].
Other materials, which are usually used for enhancing mechanical properties, can be used to protect HAP degradation in thermal depositing processes and increase its healing properties. Singh et al. used calcium silicate to improve microhardness (238 HV for calcium silicate—HAP, respectively 194 HV for HAP) and porosity of pure HAP (19% calcium silicate—HAP, respectively 16% for HAP), a higher porosity conducting to improvement in the bond strength, avoiding interfacial failure and reducing the healing time and a high success rates of implantation [34]. Moreover, addition of calcium silicate improves the coating crystallinity, which indicates that the amount of the secondary phases such as α-tricalcium phosphate, β-tricalcium phosphate, tetracalcium phosphate, and calcium oxide decreased in the coating material by thermal degradation. Tangestani and Hadianfard used polycaprolactone as a binder for production of the electrolyte suspensions in the electrophoretic process of applying a HAP-TiO2 composite to nickel-free austenitic stainless steel, improving the adhesion strength and creating a smoother surface with minimal or no cracks or pores at a certain amount of binder (2 g/L), because increasing the polymer concentration leads to an increase in viscosity and a decrease in zeta potential [35]. As another modality to enhance the adhesion of HAP as coating material on titanium substrate, Khanmohammadi et al. presented titania nanotube (TNT) arrays as an intermediate layer between ceramic coating and base surface, thus boosting the antibacterial effect [36].
Other compounds from the class of ceramics used as coating materials with enhanced properties were highlighted in different studies. Poly-L-lactic acid-akermanite-doxycycline coating on Ca-Mg-Zn alloy increased MG-63 cell attachment [38], hardystonite increased the attachment and spread of MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells [39], strontium-hardystonite-gahnite, a potential coating material for implants, revealed higher results of microhardness, nano-hardness and elastic moduli than those shown for the HAP coating [40], while diopside-coated AZ91 Mg alloy provided suitable protein adsorption sites [41].
Another important biomedical application of coatings is represented by the development of new wound healing dressings. Coatings with applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine must possess enhanced physicochemical and mechanical properties, biocompatibility, biodegradability and a bio-mimicking ability at the anatomical site. Instead of traditional materials (i.e., gauze), the advantages of modern wound healing dressing are tremendous: fast recovery caused by proliferation of unaffected cells, preservation of proper moisturizing, diffusion of active molecules, that can occur freely in any direction, an easier air penetration, all accompanied by the transparency of the material which offers the possibility to control the healing process without unnecessarily exposing the wound [42].
Choosing a proper coating material in which an active substance can be incorporated conduct to a successful wound management, thus facilitating and accelerating the healing process (Figure 2). An ideal material must be safe, non-irritant, easy to apply, pain-free, cost-effective and highly absorbent [43].
Most often, wound healing dressings are used in hemostatic strategy, so the main properties of the material are to rapidly absorb blood and to concentrate red blood cells, in order to achieve an efficient hemostasis [44]. When active substances (synthetic pharmaceutics or natural compounds) cannot be used alone, composite materials based on different polymers can be developed for enhancing their properties. Due to their effective biocompatibility and biodegradability, natural polymers used for coatings in medical devices, such as chitosan, starch, alginate, collagen, gelatin, or silk, were reported by different authors [45,46,47]. Moreover, different studies revealed that the construction of such medical devices in the form of a layer-by-layer coating can generate multi-component coatings with an increased ability to regulate the release of active substances [48,49,50]. Additionally, these devices are used to create a physical barrier against exterior infections, by covering the wound surface and ensuring the diffusion of various nutrients and metabolites exchange between cells and scaffolds [51].
A promising approach to wound treatment is represented by the development of a composite material which could combine all desirable properties, the coating and the active substances contributing synergistically to the wound healing process. In some cases, coating materials are based on a single component, however the most encountered are the multiple-components coatings (Table 2). These coating materials can be in form of hydrogels, films or delivery systems deposited on support materials, their main characteristic being a good compatibility between the components and the active substances [52]. For the development of a proper coating material, various aspects need to be considered: (i) when the coating is obtained only from polymers (natural or synthetic), the advantage is the flexibility of the material, but the drawback is the lack of mechanical strength and chemical stability [53]; (ii) for coatings obtained only from inorganic materials, there is a poor adhesive strength on surfaces, film-forming ability, or the tendency to aggregate [54]; (iii) lack of stability and reduced activity under infection conditions and variable pH of different active substances can be removed by the proper use of the coating material [55]; (iv) the additives used to enhance the beneficial properties must not affect the main properties and the functionality of the primary coating material (i.e., antimicrobial) [56].
For single component coating materials, Aubert-Viard et al. controlled the cationic charge density of an antibacterial textile by the reaction time and the concentration of the reagents, and further coated it by a first layer consisting of a natural polymer (chitosan), immobilized by crosslinking with genipin, a polycarboxylic acid, and by thermal treatment, thus influencing the cytocompatibility and degradation of the material [57]. Blending inorganic compounds into a polymer coating can lead to the enhancement of the tensile strength between the layers, omitting the crosslinking process between them, without blocking their pores [58]. The polymer coating modification can be performed through chemical, radiation, or enzymatic methods [59,60]. Multiple-layer coatings have the advantage of the properties specific to each layer, thus accelerating the wound healing process [61]. Additionally, the lipopeptide incorporated membranes are potential candidates in wound healing dressing, due to their hemocompatibility along with a pH similar to the skin and the antibacterial properties, conferred by their electrostatic interaction onto the bacterial membrane with the subsequent disruption of cell membrane [62].
Table 2. Coating materials based on single and multiple support materials.
Table 2. Coating materials based on single and multiple support materials.
Coating MaterialActive SubstancesPropertiesRef.
Single components
ChitosanChlorhexidineAntibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus[57]
Polyvinyl alcoholLipopeptides and zinc oxide nanoparticlesAntibacterial against S. aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa[62]
AlginateAmniotic fluidSuperior cellular proliferation and enhanced collagen secretion[63]
Two components
Chitin/poly (lactic-coglycolic acid)Fibroblast growth factor 2-hyaluronic acidAntibacterial against S. aureus and Escherichia coli[64]
Cellulose/chitosanSelf-antimicrobialAntibacterial against S. aureus and E. coli[58]
Alginate/gum acaciaAmpicillin and norfloxacinAntibacterial against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria[65]
Chitosan/collagenArginine, alanine and phenylalaninePro-angiogenic ability[66]
Chitosan/l-glutamic acid Ag nanoparticlesAntibacterial against E. coli and S. aureus[67]
Polyvinyl alcohol/chitosanChlorhexidine and polyhexanideAntibacterial against S. aureus and S. epidermidis[68]
Alginate/carboxymethyl chitosanKangfuxinAccelerate blood coagulation[69]
Chitosan/alginateGentamicinAntibacterial against E. coli and S. aureus[70]
Multiple components
Chitosan/poly-γ-glutamic acid/pluronicCurcuminNeocollagen regeneration and tissue reconstruction[71]
Gelatine/poly-dopamine/chitosanCarbon nanotubesAntibacterial against E. coli and S. aureus[72]
Polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate/chitosanAg nanoparticles loaded chitosanAntibacterial against E. coli and S. aureus[61]
Gelatin/sodium alginate/hyaluronic acid/reduced graphene oxideIbuprofenAnti-inflammatory[73]
Alginate/gelatin/carboxymethyl celluloseAg nanoparticlesAntibacterial against E. coli and S. aureus[74]
Composite coatings can combine the advantages of multiple components, overcoming the drawbacks of the single components, transforming the biomedical devices into better tools, in order to satisfy the clinical requirements. Different dual systems are presented in the literature, each of them having their own advantages [64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. Chitin/poly (lactic-coglycolic acid) coating system can facilitate wound healing within 15 days in basic medium, achieving a FGF2 (fibroblast growth factor) able to promote the proliferation and migration of fibroblasts, being also a broad-spectrum antibacterial material with activity against drug-resistant bacteria [64]. Alginate/gum acacia represents a cheap coating material for synthetic drugs, presenting a rapid and high absorption capability in the range of 1022–2419% at pH 5.5 simulating wound exudates, and 2268–5042% at a pH 7.4 simulating blood within a period of 1–3 h [65]. In addition to chitosan/collagen-based hydrogels, amino acids (such as arginine, alanine and phenylalanine) are a source of building proteins, support endothelial cells proliferation and trigger angiogenesis [66]. The spongy composite chitosan-l-glutamic acid, due to its structure, can immobilize metallic nanoparticles with antimicrobial properties and release them to the damaged area [67]. Additionally, a cheap solution is offered by the polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan system, but it can be used especially on wounds with low level of exudate production, being hydrophilic and presenting high swelling and water retention capacity [68]. Properties such as suitable water vapor transmittance, cytocompatibility, rapid hemostasis and elastic properties are present for alginate/carboxymethyl chitosan coatings and transform them into better wound healing dressing than commercial products [69].
Multiple components coatings can offer more advantages than the ones described above; more components into the matrix can offer superior properties to the final material [61,71,72,73,74].
A special interest gained the use of natural ingredients for different wound therapies, especially in order to prevent the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics, natural compounds being a viable alternative treatment for multidrug resilient microorganisms [75]. Coatings containing nanoparticles synthesized by chemical routes were developed for traditional cotton fabrics and deposited on the surface via numerous techniques, such as the sol-gel method, sonochemical method, or pad dry cure method [76]. Phytosynthesized nanoparticles (nanoparticles obtained using natural extracts, for which the phytocomponents acts as both reducing and capping agents) proved to be more effective as antibacterial agents, being an alternative to the chemical compounds, providing long term durability against the microbial growth in an exterior of traditional cotton fabrics, by harnessing the antimicrobial properties of the nanoparticles and of the phytocomponents involved [77]. Moreover, plants extracts can be loaded into various polymers, enhancing hemostasis and speeding up tissue regeneration [78,79], or coated on the polymer support, thus being a simple, reproducible and cost-effective approach [80]. For wound healing dressings in the form of hydrogels, natural extracts can modify the morphology of the bio-composite by suppressing the crystallinity behavior [81] an important aspect being represented by the condition for the pores of the support material to have proper dimensions, to achieve the release of the encapsulated drugs and molecules, as well as to prevent the bacterial invasion [82].

3. Coating Materials for Different Industries

3.1. Food Industry

Recently, different materials were developed, in order to be used in the food industry to prolong the shelf-life of food products, presented as packings or even coatings used as layers on commercialized merchandise. The interest in using natural compounds started in controlling the postharvest disease of fruits and vegetables [83]. Usually, these coatings are based on natural materials, classified, according to their origin, as of animal origin (casein, gelatin, collagen, etc.), and of vegetable origin (proteins, polysaccharides, waxes, etc.) [84]. In contrast to the harmful chemicals, natural functional coatings represent a non-toxic, biocompatible and biodegradable alternative. This type of coatings can decrease the respiration level and migration of water for perishable products [85], and, serve as good delivery vectors for antimicrobial substances, nutraceuticals and flavors [86].
For obtaining coatings as edible films for the food industry, the methods are based on two different routes, wet and dry processes, each of them having advantages and drawbacks, related not only to the raw materials, but also the envisaged application. They are based on solvent casting and extrusion processes, solubility of the materials being a main parameter for the first method and gelatinization for the second one [87].
The solvent casting method involves a three steps process: solubilization of raw materials in a suitable solvent, casting of the obtained solution, respectively drying of casted solution under proper conditions; each step parameter influences the intermediate and final products, the main advantage being low-cost film manufacturing without a specialized equipment. However, due to multiple operation conditions, this method present several bottlenecks: the proper choice of the solvent—solvents must be non-toxic, as there it remains a possibility that the solvent can impurify the polymer and to negatively affect the active substances characteristics; the proper choice of the molds—for food industry, the mechanical characteristics of the obtained films must permit molding on different types of products; extra time for drying into the molds—slows down and makes the process more expensive; proper temperatures for drying—the process must be optimized for proper temperatures in order not to damage the films and final products, which often degrades at higher temperatures [88,89].
Extrusion methods are in use at industrial scales for obtaining polymeric coating films, but they involve the use of specialized equipment and supplementary materials, such as plasticizers and stabilizers. Through thermomechanical processes such as extrusion, injection, kneading, and casting, different films can be obtained [90], a proper choice of the added plasticizer influencing the physicochemical properties of the final material, decreasing hydrogen bonding between polymers, and increasing intermolecular spacing. For example, hydrophilic plasticizers such as protein hydrolysates can enhance water vapor permeability levels of the vegetal based films, having a double role: plasticizer and active ingredient [91].
Moreover, for extrusion methods, a major challenge is maintaining a balance in choosing the suitable equipment operation parameters and proper plasticizers and stabilizers, this balance being a key point for obtaining coating materials with specific physico-chemical characteristics (homogeneity, shear rate, shear stress, and residence time control). An example of choosing proper conditions is the study of Sun et al. [92]. The authors developed starch/polyhydroxyalkanoate films through extrusion method using as cross-linking agent, citric acid, adipic acid, boric acid, and borax, at a blending and compounding screw speed of 60 rpm, and film blowing screw speed of 30 rpm. The obtained films proved to have the best properties (high tensile strength (9 MPa) and elongation at break over than 60%) for the above presented operations conditions, only when the citric acid and adipic acid were applied.
The extrusion method for obtaining coating materials is used at industrial levels with high performance and low costs [93]. The disadvantage of this method is mainly related to the processing temperature when the raw material is based on more than two components, as all the components must have similar melting points.
The nature of food products considered, surface properties, and final targeted application (such as protective packing, antibacterial, enhancing nutritional value, etc.) leads to the selection of the deposition method (Table 3).
The enhancement of the final properties can be obtained by the addition of different ingredients into the coating material. Glycerol, for example, can increase the elasticity and the hydrophobic character of chitosan-based films used as protective layer for strawberries, maintaining the bactericidal character after the plasticization [94]; by the addition of procyanidins, it can be modified the antiradical activity and decreased the microbial growth, thus prolonging the shelf life [95]. Before immersing the products into the coating material, disinfectant solutions (sodium hypochlorite) are used. Due to the hydrophilic nature of pea starch and guar gum, Saberi et al. used as a coating material a mixture with hydrophobic compounds (shellac and oleic acid), obtaining lower levels of respiration rates in coated fruits (approximately 8 μg/(Kg × s)) [96]. This represents the capability of the coating to modify the internal atmosphere of the fruit as a protective gas barrier, the materials being better candidates than the commercial products, where levels of respiration are higher (12 8 μg/(Kg × s)). For coating the blueberries, the properties of the chitosan films were enhanced through the addition of nisin and silicon dioxide nanoparticles, by Eldib et al., thus obtaining a good control of shrinking (38.52%) and decay rates (8.61%), as well as the maintaining of main nutritional parameters (Vitamin C—7.34 mg/100 g and polyphenoloxidase—558.03 U/(min × g)) [97]. Additionally, the irradiation treatment can enhance the mechanical properties of the coating material. This is the case of calcium caseinate γ-irradiated with a dose of 32 kGy and a low-dose of γ-irradiation post-treatment of 0.5 kGy [98]. In the experiment was observed an improvement of the mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of the materials for prolonging shelf life of carrots during storage. The total mesophilic flora (Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, and Staphylococcus aureus) decreased after only one treatment cycle (3.2 log CFU/g compared to 5.4 log CFU/g in control) and the bioactive cross-linked coating proved to be a good alternative to be used as a natural treatment.
The properties of the coating materials can be also improved by using natural polymers in nanostructured forms. Due to the particle size, nanostructured chitosan (with particle size of 5 and 8 nm) and chitosan functionalized with cinnamon essential oil (particle size 4.34 nm) have the ability to increase total chlorophyll content at the end of storage time (from 6 mg/L for control sample to 14 mg/L for treated sample) and successfully inhibit fungal growth (from 600 CFU/10g tissue for the control sample to less than 100 CFU/10 g tissue for the treated sample—tests applied for F. solani) [100]. Dimensions of particles and antibacterial effect of cinnamon essential oil are responsible for the obtained results on cucumber samples. Additionally, metallic oxides nanoparticles having a higher surface area to volume ratio are able to damage the cell membrane through penetration into the bacterial cells [104].
Besides nanotechnology products, coating materials can be used for the residues generated from the agro-industrial sector, which nowadays produce increased amounts of residues [106]. Serrano-León et al. developed and characterized active packaging based on peanut skin and pink pepper residue extracts incorporated in chitosan, in order to evaluate their effects on lipid oxidation and antimicrobial effect on chicken products [106]. The antimicrobial activity of chitosan, conferred by the presence of amino groups, was potentiated by the extracts’ antimicrobial properties, leading to an enhanced effect. Moreover, the antimicrobial effect of polymeric coatings enriched with natural products can be enhanced through its casting procedure. Lamination can improve the performance of polymeric films by combining the properties of different films into one sheet, its different layers having specific properties, such as moisture resistance and mechanical stability, or gas barrier [107]. Additionally, by adding natural extracts from fresh vegetables into polymeric coatings, due to changing a variety of factors, such as molecular weight, concentration, viscosity, deacetylation grade, it can be prolonged the shelf life of meat products [109].
Coating materials are an interesting domain and the concept of active packaging gained new valences, offering the possibility of interaction among the food product, the packaging, and the environment, new smart packaging systems based on natural products being developed in order to improve the quality of food products, thus prolonging their shelf-life [110,111,112,113,114].
The deposition methods are dependent on the nature of food that should be coated, the support surface being a main parameter for a successful coating [4]. Additionally, surface tension, density, and viscosity of the coating material influence the selection of applying methods and equipment used. Dipping and spraying technologies are usually used as application methods of coating materials for the fresh products, ensuring uniformity across a rough and complex shape. In the case of spraying method, several shortcomings are mainly related to the working parameters of the equipment, which must be corroborated with the coating’s physico-chemical properties [115]. For a low-density coating material, fluidized-bed processing is the method of choice, and in confectionery sector, panning method is used to apply thick layers to hard materials.

3.2. Cosmetic Industry

For coating systems used in cosmetic formulations and pharmaceutic industry, the approach is different than in the above discussed sections dedicated to medical devices or food industry. The subject is very vast, and itself can be a topic for a review paper, but some interesting examples of coating materials and active substances will be discussed. The development of new coating delivery systems in cosmetic formulations and pharmaceutic industry, nowadays follow concerns regarding the use of green technologies and non-toxic environmental materials. Developing cosmetic formulations is a significant challenge as there can appear diverse bottlenecks, the final target efficacy (sun screen protection, antiaging, antiwrinkle, etc.) being dependent on the vehicle formulation, choice of emulsifiers, solvents and emollients.
Different types of nanoengineered coating systems (e.g., liposomes, niosomes, transferosomes, lipid nanoparticles, core-shell materials), polymeric microparticles, nanoparticles, inorganic materials, etc., have been successfully used in cosmetic formulations, improving the penetration of active substances into the skin (Figure 3).
For cosmetic formulations, the requirements are different than for a topical pharmaceutical preparation, many factors influencing the properties of the final products. The coating material of the active substance must be compatible with the oil-water emulsion, water-oil emulsion or double emulsion in the case of cosmetic formulations [116].

3.2.1. Lipid Nanoparticles

Cosmetic formulations can present some limitations due to their requirements such as higher absorption, low washability and good stability, so different nanocarriers were proposed. Liposomes can entrap hydrophobic molecules, have low toxicity, can be easy prepared and have the ability to extend products shelf life, having the main disadvantage of rapidly releasing water-soluble active substances [117]. Niosomes, transferosomes, and ethosomes are used both in cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry, overcoming the liposomes limitations, due to producing costs and manufacturing procedures [118]. These particles must possess high encapsulation efficiency and long-term stability. Enhancing the adhesion of carrier particles to the skin and control the release of active agents over a period of time can be achieved using different polymers, such as poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) [119]. To overcome the drawbacks related to the lipid composition or the rigidity of the liposome’s membrane, polysaccharides can be used as a coating layer, being more resistant in the presence of surfactants and electrolytes, compared to the non-coated materials [120].
Lipid nanoparticles are widely applied in cosmetic formulation as core-shell materials, in order to protect the active ingredients. The advantages of using these systems are based on their ability to incorporate both lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds, allow released control, as well as their preparation process, which do not involve organic solvents; among this category, the nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) present an increased loading efficiency of actives compounds, compared with solid-lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) [121]. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) loaded with azelaic acid, white willow bark extract and panthenol were used for improving the reconstruction of epidermal cells, antioxidant NLCs inhibiting 97% of short-life radicals and 15% of ABTS long-life radical cations [122]. A hydration effect (up to 74%) and a skin elasticity reaching 90% were obtained after the topic application of carrot and marigold extract encapsulated in NLCs based on rosehip oil or black cumin oils [123]. Hybrid nanoparticles, composed of lipids and silica, were developed by Andreani et al., in order to be loaded with UVB filter, octyl methoxycinnamate [124]. Encapsulation efficiency of 98.3% and a SPF (sun protection factor) value of 10.62 was obtained for particle dimensions of 210.0 ± 3.341 nm, while no irritation effects on the HET-CAM test (Hen’s egg-chorioallantoic membrane test) were observed for the developed materials. The main drawback of using SLNs and NLCs as coating for active substances in water based cosmetic formulations is aggregation and gelation of particles, which causes instability of the developed systems; however, between the two solutions, NLCs are preferred for use in cosmetics, due to adhesiveness, skin penetration enhancement, occlusion, lubrication and skin hydration [125]. Similar to liposomes, the modification of NLCs’ surface with natural polymers (non-toxic, biodegradable and biocompatible) will prevent their aggregation through the repulsion of positive charges [126].

3.2.2. Hydroxides and Oxides

Layered double hydroxides (LDH) are clays based on a hydrotalcite structure, of natural origin, for which the Van der Waals forces (hydrogen bonding) hold the stacked layers together [127]. They possess a host-guest type structure, having the ability of coating different active molecules, as a result of the possibility to tune their crystallinity, texture and structural properties [128,129,130].
Additionally, from the category of inorganic coating, TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles are reported due to their stability and non-toxicity as platforms for active substances delivery and theranostics at certain dimensions. TiO2-SiO2 core-shell nanoparticles with TiO2 dimensions of 100 nm proved to have efficiency towards the development of cosmetic products (UVA protection factor 39 and sun protection factor 42), in the study of Swain et al. [131], while at smaller dimensions (10 nm) they do not exhibit such properties [132]. Metallic oxides can be used as coating material for other metallic oxides, or for organic active substances. The cytotoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles, which are usually used for their photocatalytic properties (being an efficient absorber of UVA and UVB), can be reduced by the use of an adequate inorganic coating, such as nanocomposites based on Fe2O3/CeO2 or Y2O3, which can promote cell viability and proliferation [133,134]. Hydrophilic fumed SiO2 nanoparticles can cover α-leucine using ultrasonic irradiation in high-pressure liquid carbon dioxide, thus obtaining a potential cosmetic formulation, acting as modifier for low water soluble active compounds [135]. As a future trend, silica nanoparticles modified to achieve different hydrophobicity can be used in formulation of Pickering emulsions, in order to obtain novel cosmetic products at industrial level [136].

3.2.3. Natural Polymers

Due to the ability of natural polymers to enhance the physicochemical properties of the cosmetic products, these are successfully used as rheological modifier, water-soluble binders, thickeners, film-forming agents, conditioners or texturing and hydrating agents [137]. Moreover, comparing to food industry where natural polymers are usually used as coating materials, providing a controlled release of active ingredients, for cosmetics applications these polymers can act themselves as active compounds [138] or can protect active ingredients of chemical self-degradation/oxidation, as in the case of β-cyclodextrin [139].

3.2.4. Phytosynthesized Metallic Nanoparticles

In the last decades, nanotechnology has offered a series of valuable tools for improving our daily life, important aspects being related to the cosmetic industry [83]. The ability of plants extracts to mediate chemical reduction of metallic salts, leading to the formation of phytosynthesized metallic nanoparticles, proposed as potential agents in multiple applications, offering a viable alternative to the use of environmentally hazardous reagents [140]. Phytoconstituents act as reducing agents in the obtaining reaction, and moreover they continue their role, as coating agents for the nanoparticles. Thus, it is offered a synergism between the compounds towards enhanced properties and against agglomeration and aggregation [141]. Silver and gold phytosynthesized nanoparticles can be used in cosmetic formulations, due to their free radical scavenging activity, reductive and anti-lipid peroxidation properties, as well as to their anti-aging properties, which some authors assigned to the presence of phytoconstituents coating [142,143,144]. Phyto-mediated Zn and ZnO nanoparticles can be used as protective agents against UV rays, also possessing antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [145,146].
Combined with the advantages of using natural phytoconstituents, the use of this type of nanoparticles represents a valuable raw material in the cosmetic field, but still needs future research regarding obtaining methods and toxicological aspects.

3.3. Coatings for Miscellaneous Applications

Different types of pollutants are produced nowadays in large amounts due to a rapid increase in the world population and widespread industrialization, so the development of new materials for environmental remediation represents a goal of outmost importance [147]. Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) are by far the most applied methods for removing hazardous compounds from water. Catalytic ozonation represents an AOP process with high efficiency in the application on effluents with a low and average flow rate and pollutants concentration [148]. The optimization of this process, in order to achieve better performances is very difficult and requires multiparametric monitoring of oxidation reaction, the catalyst playing a main role. In the last decade, numerous materials and technologies were proposed for a better and complete oxidation processes. In porous structures, nanoparticles are formed inside pores as a result of a multistep, costly and difficult process without having a very good control over their chemical composition, dimensions, and shape [149].
An interesting alternative is represented by the immobilization of catalyst in the form of thin-films coatings using different substrates (glass, quartz, polymers, textile materials, etc.), according to their uses, having the advantage of being cost effective and easily recycled after washing [150,151]. Thin film morphology containing phytosynthesized metallic or metal oxides nanoparticles gained more attention in the last decades, being suitable for catalytic processes, since this approach includes advantages of using nanoparticles and avoid the diffusivity problems (in fixed bed systems) or daunting separation step (in slurry approach). Another innovative and eco-friendly aspect of this type of materials consists in the preparation of novel thin-film catalysts using plant extracts, without harmful substances [152,153]. Additionally, phyto-mediated metallic or metal oxide nanoparticles can act as catalysts themselves (being coated by the phytoconstituents), or be included in nanocomposite materials for the catalytic reduction of organic dyes [151,154,155], or can be coated by natural minerals, such as perlite [156].
For other environmental applications, coating materials based on natural product can be successfully applied. This is the case of sensors developed using silver nanoparticles coated with natural polymers, such as xylan, which are able to detect Hg2+ at a 4nM detection limit [157] or natural minerals such as Cs2SnI6 perovskite used for coating ZnO nanorods for solar cells [158]. Coatings based on rhamnolipid biosurfactant, gum karaya and xanthan gum are able to inhibit the agglomeration of nanoparticles, such as zero valent iron nanoparticles, in order to be used for organic and inorganic bioremediation [159,160,161,162]. For soil remediation applications, coating layer has a double role: protect the inorganic core against agglomeration and percolate into the spaces between soil particles in order to travel longer distances before being trapped by the soil matrix [163].
Environmental factors affect not only the human health, being able to damage important cultural heritage objects which are kept in outdoor conditions. The use of protective coatings gained importance in heritage conservation, and coatings based on natural products replace successfully chemical hazardous substances [164]. From the category of inorganic compounds, calcium hydroxide can be used as a coating material, due to its property to be transformed under natural atmospheric conditions into a hard coating of insoluble CaCO3. Moreover, when Ca(OH)2 is applied in its nanoparticle state, the deposition and penetration of prepared suspensions through external porous of the surface are enhanced. Daniele and Taglieri reported the efficiency of consolidation with this type of coating more than 75% for stone samples [165], while Lanzón et al. reported that nanoparticles with dimensions in the range 200 to 600 nm can penetrate through conventional pores of mechanically weak materials (lime mortars), this type of coating being used for the consolidation of deteriorated walls of the Roman Theatre of Cartagena [166]. Despite the disadvantages (160 repetitions) presented by Slízková et al. [167], the use of alcohols as dispersion media can overcome the drawbacks of a large number of applications of the coating material [166].
As a very interesting aspect regarding the potential use of natural resources for the development of next-generation materials for highly specialized scientific, medical or precision equipment, the biomachining process can be mentioned. It represents the metal processing using lithotrophic (usually extremophile) bacteria, as an intermediate step, before applying the final functional coatings. An example on this topic is the work of Díaz-Tena et al., presenting the application of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans for biomachining oxygen-free copper, resulting in a finished and/or engraved material surface, without the shortcomings of traditional processing methods [168].
For wooden cultural heritage objects, the appropriate materials for coating layers are natural products, such as proteins, lipids, polysaccharides, or terpenoids, having a waterproofing role and, occasionally, as ingredients of binding media [169], while for iron artefacts, adding natural compounds (tannins) into commercial resins can inhibit their corrosion [170]. For conservation studies, natural polymer coatings are preferred instead of resins, for indoor objects, due to their water-solubility, thus avoiding the use of harmful solvents, necessary for the application and removal of commonly used commercial protective coatings. Giuliani et al. used a coating based on chitosan, which acted as a reservoir for the inhibitors benzotriazole and mercaptobenzothiazole, for bronze artefacts, contributing to the formation of a barrier layer, thus improving the protective properties of the treatment [171].
Conservation methods based on the chemical strategies of using natural coatings can be adapted for paper artefacts, too. Jia et al. obtained an antibacterial and antifungal composite material based on ZnO/cellulose nanocrystals, and the chemical and mechanical properties of coated papers after dry heat and UV accelerated aging were measured, in order to demonstrate the efficiency of the treatment [172], the cellulose layer having a good compatibility and affinity with paper cellulose fibers. The treated papers had higher thermal and UV stability and exhibited an inferior loss of strength. For papers coated with chitosan nanoparticles, the protection is due to the formation of chitosan protective layer when the nanoparticles combined with H2O and H+, the deacidification of the paper being produced (a pH increase from 5 to 7 being recorded), also increasing tensile strength and folding endurance [173].

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The rapid technological developments from recent decades has led to an exponential increase of theoretical findings and practical development of new materials used as coatings for different applications, mainly based on their refined properties; however, all these materials have their own shortcomings and restrictions in application: for medical application, the development of controlled release strategies for active substances is necessary, in order to optimize the therapeutic effects of the treatment; for food industry, edible coatings have great potential to extend the shelf life of products, recent advancements in the field proposing new plant-based materials or nanotechnology products, future research being necessary for their industrial application and maintaining the laboratory characteristics of the materials; for cosmetic industry, materials’ limitations due to their specific requirements, such as higher absorption, low washability, and good stability, must be overcome.
Regardless of application, future studies are also needed, in order to obtain optimized layer-by-layer or smart coatings from natural products, with a fine tuning of their properties to a phase transition triggered by temperature changes or by presence of selected chemical species, especially in the case of multiple components, which can be used and tailored to adapt to any kind of protection In all cases, special attention must be attributed to mechanical properties of the coating material, which require an equilibrium between resistance and elasticity.
The application of coating technologies to develop new approaches is limited and correlated with their application, as a result of the complexity of the coating process, physical and chemical issues, the difficulty of achieving uniform coatings based on natural compounds, the diverse properties of different support materials, as well as due to the production cost, which sometimes does not meet the requirements for large-scale production. Further developments may facilitate an optimal use of natural compounds as coating materials using modern techniques with a lower consumption of solvents, time, and energy.
This review paper summarized different aspects of the use of natural products as functional coatings for various applications, highlighting their importance in the production of coatings as they have the advantage of enhancing the physical and chemical properties of the products. In the context of green chemistry, in which the use of substances with less negative effects is mandatory, natural functionalized coatings are potential candidates, not only for the above-described applications, but for others, such as agriculture or for advanced sensors, smart materials and nanotechnology.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support obtained by grants of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS/CCCDI—UEFISCDI, project No. PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-4018, contract 524PED/2020 and project No. PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-3495, contract 259PED/2020 within PNCDI III, and by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project No. PN-III-P3-3.5-EUK-2019-0226, within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ong, G.; Kasi, R.; Subramaniam, R. A review on plant extracts as natural additives in coating applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 151, 106091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rodríguez-Barrero, S.; Fernández-Larrinoa, J.; Azkona, I.; De Lacalle, L.N.L.; Polvorosa, R. Enhanced performance of nanostructured coatings for drilling by droplet elimination. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kumar, N. Polysaccharide-based component and their relevance in edible film/coating: A review. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 49, 793–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suhag, R.; Kumar, N.; Petkoska, A.T.; Upadhyay, A. Film formation and deposition methods of edible coating on food products: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, L.; Duan, Y.; Cui, M.; Huang, R.; Su, R.; Qi, W.; He, Z. Biomimetic surface coatings for marine antifouling: Natural antifoulants, synthetic polymers and surface microtopography. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 766, 144469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zentel, R. Polymer coated semiconducting nanoparticles for hybrid materials. Inorganics 2020, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hussain, A.K.; Sudin, I.; Basheer, U.M.; Yusop, M.Z.M. A review on graphene-based polymer composite coatings for the corrosion protection of metals. Corros. Rev. 2019, 37, 343–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oriňaková, R.; Gorejová, R.; Orságová Králová, Z.; Oriňak, A. Surface modifications of biodegradable metallic foams for medical applications. Coatings 2020, 10, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ratha, I.; Datta, P.; Balla, V.K.; Nandi, S.K.; Kundu, B. Effect of doping in hydroxyapatite as coating material on biomedical implants by plasma spraying method: A review. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 4426–4445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nayar, S.; Sinha, M.K.; Basu, D.; Sinha, A. Synthesis and sintering of biomimetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2006, 17, 1063–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fotovvati, B.; Namdari, N.; Dehghanghadikolaei, A. On coating techniques for surface protection: A review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2019, 3, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Avci, M.; Yilmaz, B.; Tezcaner, A.; Evis, Z. Strontium doped hydroxyapatite biomimetic coatings on Ti6Al4V plates. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 9431–9436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ke, D.; Vu, A.A.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S. Compositionally graded doped hydroxyapatite coating on titanium using laser and plasma spray deposition for bone implants. Acta Biomater. 2019, 84, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Durdu, S.; Deniz, Ö.F.; Kutbay, I.; Usta, M. Characterization and formation of hydroxyapatite on Ti6Al4V coated by plasma electrolytic oxidation. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 551, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Demnati, I.; Grossin, D.; Combes, C.; Rey, C. Plasma-sprayed apatite coatings: Review of physical-chemical characteristics and their biological consequences. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2014, 34, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Candidato, R.T., Jr.; Sergi, R.; Jouin, J.; Noguera, O.; Pawlowski, L. Advanced microstructural study of solution precursor plasma sprayed Zn doped hydroxyapatite coatings. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 2134–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Mao, H.; Li, T.; Zhao, R.; Yan, Y.; Pang, X. Osteoblastic cell responses and antibacterial efficacy of Cu/Zn co-substituted hydroxyapatite coatings on pure titanium using electrodeposition method. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 17076–17086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fielding, G.A.; Roy, M.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S. Antibacterial and biological characteristics of silver containing and strontium doped plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3144–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Roy, M.; Fielding, G.A.; Beyenal, H.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S. Mechanical, in vitro antimicrobial, and biological properties of plasma-sprayed silver-doped hydroxyapatite coating. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ansar, E.B.; Ajeesh, M.; Yokogawa, Y.; Wunderlich, W.; Varma, H. Synthesis and characterization of iron oxide embedded hydroxyapatite bioceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95, 2695–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Palierse, E.; Hélary, C.; Krafft, J.-M.; Génois, I.; Masse, S.; Laurent, G.; Echazu, M.I.A.; Selmane, M.; Casale, S.; Valentin, L.; et al. Baicalein-modified hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and coatings with antibacterial and antioxidant properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 118, 111537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gao, F.; Xu, C.; Hu, H.; Wang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Chen, H.; Guo, Q.; Chen, D.; Eder, D. Biomimetic synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide hybrid coating on Mg alloy with enhanced corrosion resistance. Mater. Lett. 2015, 138, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, Z.; Zheng, B.; Gu, Y.; Shen, C.; Wen, J.; Meng, Z.; Chen, S.; Ou, J.; Qin, A. New approach for improving anticorrosion and biocompatibility of magnesium alloys via polydopamine intermediate layer-induced hydroxyapatite coating. Surf. Interfaces 2020, 19, 100501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nevarez-Rascón, A.; Hurtado-Macías, A.; Esparza-Ponce, H.E.; Nevarez-Rascón, M.M.; González-Hernández, J.; Yacamán, M.J. Nano-structured hydroxyapatite and titanium dioxide enriching PENTA/UDMA adhesive as aesthetic coating for tooth enamel. Dent. Mater. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Utomo, H.J.; Noerjannah, L.I.; Yudyanto, N.Z.R. Yudyanto Physical and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite/polyethylene glycol nanocomposites. Mater. Today Proc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bootchanont, A.; Wechprasit, T.; Areesamarn, N.; Pholprom, R.; Hwangphon, T.; Temprom, L.; Amonpattaratkit, P.; Klysubun, W.; Yimnirun, R. Comparison of local structure between Mg/Mn-doped natural and synthetic hydroxyapatites by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020, 177, 109075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sharifianjazi, F.; Esmaeilkhanian, A.; Moradi, M.; Pakseresht, A.; Asl, M.S.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Jang, H.W.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Varma, R.S. Biocompatibility and mechanical properties of pigeon bone waste extracted natural nano-hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 264, 114950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaviya, M.; Ramakrishnan, P.; Mohamed, S.; Gimbun, J.; Veerabadran, K.; Kuppusamy, M.; Kaviyarasu, K.; Sridhar, T. Synthesis and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide composite materials for medical implant coating applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 36, 204–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Erdem, U.; Dogan, M.; Metin, A.U.; Baglar, S.; Turkoz, M.B.; Turk, M.; Nezir, S. Hydroxyapatite-based nanoparticles as a coating material for the dentine surface: An antibacterial and toxicological effect. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lett, J.A.; Sagadevan, S.; Paiman, S.; Mohammad, F.; Schirhagl, R.; Léonard, E.; Alshahateet, S.F.; Oh, W.-C. Exploring the thumbprints of Ag-hydroxyapatite composite as a surface coating bone material for the implants. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 12824–12833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, J.-M.; Choe, H.-C. Mg-containing hydroxyapatite coatings on Ti-6Al-4V alloy for dental materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 432, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, S.; Singh, G.; Bala, N. Synthesis and characterization of iron oxide-hydroxyapatite-chitosan composite coating and its biological assessment for biomedical applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 150, 106011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sivaraj, D.; Vijayalakshmi, K.; Ganeshkumar, A.; Rajaram, R. Tailoring Cu substituted hydroxyapatite/functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube composite coating on 316L SS implant for enhanced corrosion resistance, antibacterial and bioactive properties. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 590, 119946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Singh, J.; Chatha, S.S.; Singh, H. Characterization and corrosion behavior of plasma sprayed calcium silicate reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings for medical implant applications. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 782–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tangestani, A.; Hadianfard, M. Hydroxyapatite/titania nanocomposite coating on nickel-free austenitic stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 409, 126849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khanmohammadi, S.; Ojaghi-Ilkhchi, M.; Farrokhi-Rad, M. Development of bioglass coating reinforced with hydroxyapatite whiskers on TiO2 nanotubes via electrophoretic deposition. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 1333–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Duta, L.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Popescu-Pelin, G.; Bleotu, C.; Gradisteanu, G.; Anastasescu, M.; Achim, A.; Popescu, A. Pulsed laser deposited biocompatible lithium-doped hydroxyapatite coatings with antimicrobial activity. Coatings 2019, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Akbari, M.; Ismail, A.F.; Aziz, M.; Hadisi, Z.; Pagan, E.; Daroonparvar, M.; Chen, X. Coating biodegradable magnesium alloys with electrospun poly-l-lactic acid-åkermanite-doxycycline nanofibers for enhanced biocompatibility, antibacterial activity, and corrosion resistance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 377, 124898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, J.; Xu, L.; Xie, N.; Li, K.; Xi, Y.; Liu, X.; Zheng, X.; Chen, X.; Ye, X.; Wei, D. Optimal Zn-modified Ca–Si-based ceramic nano-coating with Zn ion release for osteoblast promotion and osteoclast inhibition in bone tissue engineering. J. Nanomater. 2017, 2017, 7374510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pham, D.Q.; Berndt, C.C.; Sadeghpour, A.; Zreiqat, H.; Wang, P.-Y.; Ang, A.S.M. Mechanical properties of strontium–hardystonite–gahnite coating formed by atmospheric plasma spray. Coatings 2019, 9, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Razavi, M.; Fathi, M.; Savabi, O.; Vashaee, D.; Tayebi, L. In vitro study of nanostructured diopside coating on Mg alloy orthopedic implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 41, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kaniewska, K.; Karbarz, M.; Katz, E. Nanocomposite hydrogel films and coatings—Features and applications. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20, 100776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Okur, M.E.; Karantas, I.D.; Şenyiğit, Z.; Okur, N.U.; Siafaka, P.I. Recent trends on wound management: New therapeutic choices based on polymeric carriers. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 15, 661–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zheng, W.; Chen, C.; Zhang, X.; Wen, X.; Xiao, Y.; Li, L.; Xu, Q.; Fu, F.; Diao, H.; Liu, X. Layer-by-layer coating of carboxymethyl chitosan-gelatin-alginate on cotton gauze for hemostasis and wound healing. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 406, 126644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rezwan, K.; Chen, Q.; Blaker, J.; Boccaccini, A.R. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 3413–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wöltje, M.; Brünler, R.; Böbel, M.; Ernst, S.; Neuss, S.; Aibibu, D.; Cherif, C. Functionalization of silk fibers by PDGF and bioceramics for bone tissue regeneration. Coatings 2019, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Khan, A.U.R.; Huang, K.; Jinzhong, Z.; Zhu, T.; Morsi, Y.; Aldalbahi, A.; El-Newehy, M.; Yan, X.; Mo, X. PLCL/Silk fibroin based antibacterial nano wound dressing encapsulating oregano essential oil: Fabrication, characterization and biological evaluation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 196, 111352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chiono, V.; Carmagnola, I.; Gentile, P.; Boccafoschi, F.; Tonda-Turo, C.; Ballarini, M.; Georgieva, V.; Georgiev, G.; Ciardelli, G. Layer-by-layer coating of photoactive polymers for biomedical applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012, 206, 2446–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fang, F.; Zhang, X.; Meng, Y.; Gu, Z.; Bao, C.; Ding, X.; Li, S.; Chen, X.; Tian, X. Intumescent flame retardant coatings on cotton fabric of chitosan and ammonium polyphosphate via layer-by-layer assembly. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 262, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Polomska, A.; Leroux, J.-C.; Brambilla, D. Layer-by-layer coating of solid drug cores: A versatile method to improve stability, control release and tune surface properties. Macromol. Biosci. 2017, 17, 1600228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yadav, C.; Chhajed, M.; Choudhury, P.; Sahu, R.P.; Patel, A.; Chawla, S.; Goswami, L.; Goswami, C.; Li, X.; Agrawal, A.K.; et al. Bio-extract amalgamated sodium alginate-cellulose nanofibres based 3D-sponges with interpenetrating BioPU coating as potential wound care scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 118, 111348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Okur, N.U.; Hökenek, N.; Okur, M.E.; Ayla, S.; Yoltaş, A.; Siafaka, P.I.; Cevher, E. An alternative approach to wound healing field; new composite films from natural polymers for mupirocin dermal delivery. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 738–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Chong, E.W.N.; Owolabi, F.A.T.; Asniza, M.; Tye, Y.Y.; Rizal, S.; Fazita, M.R.N.; Haafiz, M.K.M.; Nurmiati, Z.; Paridah, M.T. Enhancement of basic properties of polysaccharide-based composites with organic and inorganic fillers: A review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Alizadeh-Osgouei, M.; Li, Y.; Wen, C. A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications. Bioact. Mater. 2019, 4, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Neff, J.A.; Bayramov, D.F.; Patel, E.A.; Miao, J. Novel antimicrobial peptides formulated in chitosan matrices are effective against biofilms of multidrug-resistant wound pathogens. Mil. Med. 2020, 185, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Cunha, C.S.; Castro, P.J.; Sousa, S.C.; Pullar, R.C.; Tobaldi, D.M.; Piccirillo, C.; Pintado, M.M. Films of chitosan and natural modified hydroxyapatite as effective UV-protecting, biocompatible and antibacterial wound dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aubert-Viard, F.; Mogrovejo-Valdivia, A.; Tabary, N.; Maton, M.; Chai, F.; Neut, C.; Martel, B.; Blanchemain, N. Evaluation of antibacterial textile covered by layer-by-layer coating and loaded with chlorhexidine for wound dressing application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 100, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cao, Z.; Shen, Z.; Luo, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Cai, N.; Xue, Y.; Yu, F. Citrate-modified maghemite enhanced binding of chitosan coating on cellulose porous membranes for potential application as wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 166, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mittal, H.; Ray, S.S.; Kaith, B.S.; Bhatia, J.K.; Sukriti; Sharma, J.; Alhassan, S.M. Recent progress in the structural modification of chitosan for applications in diversified biomedical fields. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 109, 402–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Negm, N.A.; Hefni, H.H.; Abd-Elaal, A.A.; Badr, E.A.; Kana, M.T.A. Advancement on modification of chitosan biopolymer and its potential applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 681–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, M.; Wang, G.; Wang, D.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Meng, W.; Zhang, X.; Du, F.; Lee, S. Ag@MOF-loaded chitosan nanoparticle and polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate/chitosan bilayer dressing for wound healing applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 175, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jayakumar, A.; Radoor, S.; Nair, I.C.; Siengchin, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Radhakrishnan, E. Lipopeptide and zinc oxide nanoparticles blended polyvinyl alcohol-based nanocomposite films as antimicrobial coating for biomedical applications. Process. Biochem. 2021, 102, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ghalei, S.; Nourmohammadi, J.; Solouk, A.; Mirzadeh, H. Enhanced cellular response elicited by addition of amniotic fluid to alginate hydrogel-electrospun silk fibroin fibers for potential wound dressing application. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 172, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, Z.; Hu, W.; You, W.; Huang, G.; Tian, W.; Huselstein, C.; Wu, C.-L.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X. Antibacterial and angiogenic wound dressings for chronic persistent skin injury. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 126525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ngece, K.; Aderibigbe, B.; Ndinteh, D.; Fonkui, Y.; Kumar, P. Alginate-gum acacia based sponges as potential wound dressings for exuding and bleeding wounds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 172, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Aleem, A.R.; Shahzadi, L.; Tehseen, S.; Alvi, F.; Chaudhry, A.A.; Rehman, I.U.; Yar, M. Amino acids loaded chitosan/collagen based new membranes stimulate angiogenesis in chorioallantoic membrane assay. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 140, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lu, B.; Lu, F.; Zou, Y.; Liu, J.; Rong, B.; Li, Z.; Dai, F.; Wu, D.; Lan, G. In situ reduction of silver nanoparticles by chitosan-L-glutamic acid/hyaluronic acid: Enhancing antimicrobial and wound-healing activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 173, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Massarelli, E.; Silva, D.; Pimenta, A.; Fernandes, A.; Mata, J.; Armês, H.; Salema-Oom, M.; Saramago, B.; Serro, A. Polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan wound dressings loaded with antiseptics. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 593, 120110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. He, Y.; Zhao, W.; Dong, Z.; Ji, Y.; Li, M.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yuan, C.; Deng, J.; Zhao, P.; et al. A biodegradable antibacterial alginate/carboxymethyl chitosan/Kangfuxin sponges for promoting blood coagulation and full-thickness wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.; Hadisi, Z.; Ismail, A.; Aziz, M.; Akbari, M.; Berto, F.; Chen, X. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of chitosan-alginate/gentamicin wound dressing nanofibrous with high antibacterial performance. Polym. Test. 2020, 82, 106298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lin, Y.-H.; Lin, J.-H.; Hong, Y.-S. Development of chitosan/poly-γ-glutamic acid/pluronic/curcumin nanoparticles in chitosan dressings for wound regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2015, 105, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Hu, T.; Han, Y.; Guo, B. Mussel-inspired, antibacterial, conductive, antioxidant, injectable composite hydrogel wound dressing to promote the regeneration of infected skin. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 556, 514–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Aycan, D.; Selmi, B.; Kelel, E.; Yildirim, T.; Alemdar, N. Conductive polymeric film loaded with ibuprofen as a wound dressing material. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 121, 109308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Montaser, A.S.; Jlassi, K.; Ramadan, M.A.; Sleem, A.A.; Attia, M.F. Alginate, gelatin, and carboxymethyl cellulose coated nonwoven fabrics containing antimicrobial AgNPs for skin wound healing in rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 173, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mihai, M.M.; Dima, M.B.; Dima, B.; Holban, A.M. Nanomaterials for wound healing and infection control. Materials 2019, 12, 2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Morais, D.S.; Guedes, R.M.; Lopes, M.A. Antimicrobial approaches for textiles: From research to market. Materials 2016, 9, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Maghimaa, M.; Alharbi, S.A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Curcuma longa L. and coating on the cotton fabrics for antimicrobial applications and wound healing activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020, 204, 111806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Manne, A.A.; Arigela, B.; Giduturi, A.K.; Komaravolu, R.K.; Mangamuri, U.; Poda, S. Pterocarpus marsupium Roxburgh heartwood extract/chitosan nanoparticles loaded hydrogel as an innovative wound healing agent in the diabetic rat model. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 26, 101916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pires, J.; Cargnin, S.T.; Costa, S.A.; Sinhorin, V.D.G.; Damazo, A.S.; Sinhorin, A.P.; Bicudo, R.D.C.; Cavalheiro, L.; Valladão, D.M.D.S.; Pohlmann, A.R.; et al. Healing of dermal wounds property of Caryocar brasiliense oil loaded polymeric lipid-core nanocapsules: Formulation and in vivo evaluation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 150, 105356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sutar, T.; Bangde, P.; Dandekar, P.; Adivarekar, R. Herbal hemostatic biopolymeric dressings of alginate/pectin coated with Croton oblongifolius extract. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sakthiguru, N.; Manimohan, M.; Jaganathan, G.; Manivannan, K.; Sithique, M.A. Biologically active chitosan/ZnO/Acalypha indica leaf extract biocomposite: An investigation of antibacterial, cell proliferation and cell migration aptitude for wound healing application. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2021, 19, 100357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ilhan, E.; Cesura, S.; Gulera, E.; Topala, F.; Albayrak, D.; Guncu, M.M.; Camad, M.E.; Taskin, T.; Sasmazel, H.T.; Aksu, B.; et al. Development of Satureja cuneifolia-loaded sodium alginate/polyethylene glycol scaffolds produced by 3D-printing technology as a diabetic wound dressing material. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 161, 1040–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fierascu, R.; Fierascu, I.; Baroi, A.; Ortan, A. Selected aspects related to medicinal and aromatic plants as alternative sources of bioactive compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mokrejs, P.; Langmaier, F.; Janacova, D.; Mladek, M.; Kolomaznik, K.; Vasek, V. Thermal study and solubility tests of films based on amaranth flour starch–protein hydrolysate. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2009, 98, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Beikzadeh, S.; Khezerlou, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Pilevar, Z.; Mortazavian, A.M. Seed mucilages as the functional ingredients for biodegradable films and edible coatings in the food industry. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 280, 102164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wongphan, P.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Characterization of starch, agar and maltodextrin blends for controlled dissolution of edible films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sharma, R.; Ghoshal, G. Emerging trends in food packaging. Nutr. Food Sci. 2018, 48, 764–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Velaga, S.P.; Nikjoo, D.; Vuddanda, P.R. Experimental studies and modeling of the drying kinetics of multicomponent polymer films. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Rodríguez, G.M.; Sibaja, J.C.; Espitia, P.J.P.; Otoni, C.G. Antioxidant active packaging based on papaya edible films incorporated with Moringa oleifera and ascorbic acid for food preservation. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 103, 105630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Avramescu, S.M.; Butean, C.; Popa, C.V.; Ortan, A.; Moraru, I.; Temocico, G. Edible and functionalized films/coatings—Performances and perspectives. Coatings 2020, 10, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ju, X.; He, R. The preparation and physiochemical characterization of rapeseed protein hydrolysate-chitosan composite films. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sun, S.; Liu, P.; Ji, N.; Hou, H.; Dong, H. Effects of various cross-linking agents on the physicochemical properties of starch/PHA composite films produced by extrusion blowing. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 77, 964–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Anukiruthika, T.; Sethupathy, P.; Wilson, A.; Kashampur, K.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Multilayer packaging: Advances in preparation techniques and emerging food applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 1156–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Pavinatto, A.; de Almeida Mattos, A.V.; Malpass, A.C.G.; Okura, M.H.; Balogh, D.T.; Sanfelice, R.C. Coating with chitosan-based edible films for mechanical/biological protection of strawberries. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mannozzi, C.; Tylewicz, U.; Chinnici, F.; Siroli, L.; Rocculi, P.; Dalla, R.M.; Romani, S. Effects of chitosan based coatings enriched with procyanidin by-product on quality of fresh blueberries during storage. Food Chem. 2018, 251, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Saberi, B.; Golding, J.B.; Marques, J.R.; Pristijono, P.; Chockchaisawasdee, S.; Scarlett, C.J.; Stathopoulos, C.E. Application of biocomposite edible coatings based on pea starch and guar gum on quality, storability and shelf life of ‘Valencia’ oranges. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 137, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Eldib, R.; Khojah, E.; Elhakem, A.; Benajiba, N.; Helal, M. Chitosan, nisin, silicon dioxide nanoparticles coating films effects on blueberry (vaccinium myrtillus) quality. Coatings 2020, 10, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ben-Fadhel, Y.; Cingolani, M.C.; Li, L.; Chazot, G.; Salmieri, S.; Horak, C.; Lacroix, M. Effect of γ-irradiation and the use of combined treatments with edible bioactive coating on carrot preservation. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 28, 100635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Salam, H.E.; Abdel Aziz, M.S. Optimized alginate and Aloe vera gel edible coating reinforced with nTiO2 for the shelf-life extension of tomatoes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 2693–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Istúriz-Zapata, M.; Hernández-López, M.; Correa-Pacheco, Z.; Barrera-Necha, L. Quality of cold-stored cucumber as affected by nanostructured coatings of chitosan with cinnamon essential oil and cinnamaldehyde. LWT 2020, 123, 109089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhao, H.; Wang, L.; Belwal, T.; Jiang, Y.; Li, D.; Xu, Y.; Luo, Z.; Li, L. Chitosan-based melatonin bilayer coating for maintaining quality of fresh-cut products. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 235, 115973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ordoñez, R.; Contreras, C.; González-Martínez, C.; Chiralt, A. Edible coatings controlling mass loss and Penicillium roqueforti growth during cheese ripening. J. Food Eng. 2021, 290, 110174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Berti, S.; Resa, C.P.O.; Basanta, F.; Gerschenson, L.N.; Jagus, R.J. Edible coatings on Gouda cheese as a barrier against external contamination during ripening. Food Biosci. 2019, 31, 100447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Al-Nabulsi, A.; Osaili, T.; Sawalha, A.; Olaimat, A.N.; Albiss, B.A.; Mehyar, G.; Ayyash, M.; Holley, R. Antimicrobial activity of chitosan coating containing ZnO nanoparticles against E. coli O157:H7 on the surface of white brined cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 334, 108838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Hilbig, J.; Hartlieb, K.; Herrmann, K.; Weiss, J.; Gibis, M. Influence of calcium on white efflorescence formation on dry fermented sausages with co-extruded alginate casings. Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 109012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Serrano-León, J.S.; Bergamaschi, K.B.; Yoshida, C.M.; Saldaña, E.; Selani, M.M.; Rios-Mera, J.D.; Alencar, S.M.; Contreras-Castillo, C.J. Chitosan active films containing agro-industrial residue extracts for shelf life extension of chicken restructured product. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Nilsuwan, K.; Guerrero, P.; De La Caba, K.; Benjakul, S.; Prodpran, T. Fish gelatin films laminated with emulsified gelatin film or poly(lactic) acid film: Properties and their use as bags for storage of fried salmon skin. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 111, 106199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Umaraw, P.; Munekata, P.E.; Verma, A.K.; Barba, F.J.; Singh, V.; Kumar, P.; Lorenzo, J.M. Edible films/coating with tailored properties for active packaging of meat, fish and derived products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 98, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chaparro-Hernández, S.; Ruiz-Cruz, S.; Márquez-Ríos, E.; Ornelas-Paz, J.D.J.; Del-Toro-Sánchez, C.L.; Gassos-Ortega, L.E.; Ocaño-Higuera, V.M.; López-Mata, M.A.; Devora-Isiordia, G.E. Effect of chitosan-tomato plant extract edible coating on the quality, shelf life, and antioxidant capacity of pork during refrigerated storage. Coatings 2019, 9, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Aragüez, L.; Colombo, A.; Borneo, R.; Aguirre, A. Active packaging from triticale flour films for prolonging storage life of cherry tomato. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 25, 100520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ceballos, R.L.; Ochoa-Yepes, O.; Goyanes, S.; Bernal, C.; Famá, L. Effect of yerba mate extract on the performance of starch films obtained by extrusion and compression molding as active and smart packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 244, 116495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Cheng, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, R.; Zhai, X.; Hou, H. Effect of gelatin bloom values on the physicochemical properties of starch/gelatin–beeswax composite films fabricated by extrusion blowing. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. El-Sayed, S.M.; El-Sayed, H.S.; Ibrahim, O.A.; Youssef, A.M. Rational design of chitosan/guar gum/zinc oxide bionanocomposites based on Roselle calyx extract for Ras cheese coating. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 239, 116234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Vedove, T.M.; Maniglia, B.C.; Tadini, C.C. Production of sustainable smart packaging based on cassava starch and anthocyanin by an extrusion process. J. Food Eng. 2021, 289, 110274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Peretto, G.; Du, W.-X.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Berrios, J.D.J.; Sambo, P.; McHugh, T.H. Electrostatic and conventional spraying of alginate-based edible coating with natural antimicrobials for preserving fresh strawberry quality. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Costa, R.; Santos, L. Delivery systems for cosmetics—From manufacturing to the skin of natural antioxidants. Powder Technol. 2017, 322, 402–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sebaaly, C.; Charcosset, C.; Stainmesse, S.; Fessi, H.; Greige-Gerges, H. Clove essential oil-in-cyclodextrin-in-liposomes in the aqueous and lyophilized states: From laboratory to large scale using a membrane contactor. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 138, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kumar, A.; Pathak, K.; Bali, V. Ultra-adaptable nanovesicular systems: A carrier for systemic delivery of therapeutic agents. Drug Discov. Today 2012, 17, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Pavelkova, R.; Matouskova, P.; Hoova, J.; Porizka, J.; Marova, I. Preparation and characterisation of organic UV filters based on combined PHB/liposomes with natural phenolic compounds. J. Biotechnol. X 2020, 7, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Belhaj, N.; Arab-Tehrany, E.; Loing, E.; Bézivin, C. Skin delivery of hydrophilic molecules from liposomes and polysaccharide-coated liposomes. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2017, 39, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Van Tran, V.; Nguyen, T.L.; Moon, J.-Y.; Lee, Y.-C. Core-shell materials, lipid particles and nanoemulsions, for delivery of active anti-oxidants in cosmetics applications: Challenges and development strategies. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 368, 88–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Arsenie, L.V.; Lacatusu, I.; Oprea, O.; Bordei, N.; Bacalum, M.; Badea, N. Azelaic acid-willow bark extract-panthenol—Loaded lipid nanocarriers improve the hydration effect and antioxidant action of cosmetic formulations. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 154, 112658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lacatusu, I.; Istrati, D.; Bordei, N.; Popescu, M.; Seciu, A.; Panteli, L.; Badea, N. Synergism of plant extract and vegetable oils-based lipid nanocarriers: Emerging trends in development of advanced cosmetic prototype products. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 108, 110412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Andreani, T.; Dias-Ferreira, J.; Fangueiro, J.; Souza, A.; Kiill, C.; Gremião, M.; García, M.; Silva, A.; Souto, E. Formulating octyl methoxycinnamate in hybrid lipid-silica nanoparticles: An innovative approach for UV skin protection. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. López-García, R.; Ganem-Rondero, A. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC): Occlusive effect and penetration enhancement ability. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. Sci. Appl. 2015, 5, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Rabelo, R.S.; Oliveira, I.F.; da Silva, V.M.; Prata, A.S.; Hubinger, M.D. Chitosan coated nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) for loading Vitamin D: A physical stability study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 902–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Pillai, S.K.; Marindade, P.K.; Mudaly, B.P. Layered double hydroxides: An advanced encapsulation and delivery system for cosmetic ingredients-an overview. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 199, 105868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Mohsin, S.M.N.; Hussein, M.Z.; Sarijo, S.H.; Fakurazi, S.; Arulselvan, P.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Characterisation and cytotoxicity assessment of UV absorbers-intercalated zinc/aluminium-layered double hydroxides on dermal fibroblast cells. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2014, 6, 648–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pagano, C.; Perioli, L.; Latterini, L.; Nocchetti, M.; Ceccarini, M.R.; Marani, M.; Ramella, D.; Ricci, M. Folic acid-layered double hydroxides hybrids in skin formulations: Technological, photochemical and in vitro cytotoxicity on human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 168, 382–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Saito, G.P.; Romero, J.H.S.; Cebim, M.A.; Davolos, M.R. Eu(III) doped LDH intercalated with cinnamate anion as multifunctional sunscreens. J. Lumin. 2018, 203, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Swain, B.; Park, J.R.; Park, K.-S.; Lee, C.G. Synthesis of cosmetic grade TiO2-SiO2 core-shell powder from mechanically milled TiO2 nanopowder for commercial mass production. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 95, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Jaroenworaluck, A.; Sunsaneeyametha, W.; Kosachan, N.; Stevens, R. Characteristics of silica-coated TiO2 and its UV absorption for sunscreen cosmetic applications. Surf. Interface Anal. 2006, 38, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Cardillo, D.; Tehei, M.; Weiss, M.; Devers, T.; Rosenfeld, A.; Konstantinov, K. Multifunctional Fe2O3/CeO2 nanocomposites for free radical scavenging ultraviolet protection. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 65397–65402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Borrás, M.C.; Sluyter, R.; Barker, P.J.; Konstantinov, K.; Bakand, S. Y2O3 decorated TiO2 nanoparticles: Enhanced UV attenuation and suppressed photocatalytic activity with promise for cosmetic and sunscreen applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020, 207, 111883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Matsuyama, K.; Tsuruoka, A.; Nemoto, Y.; Nishinomiya, T. Powder coating and dissolution rate modification of L-leucine supplements with hydrophilic fumed SiO2 nanoparticles by ultrasonic irradiation in high-pressure liquid CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2021, 169, 105104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wu, F.; Deng, J.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, H.; Li, Y.; Yi, Z.; Ngai, T. Investigation of the stability in Pickering emulsions preparation with commercial cosmetic ingredients. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 602, 125082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Krstonošić, V.; Dokić, L.; Nikolić, I.; Milanović, M. Influence of xanthan gum on oil-in-water emulsion characteristics stabilized by OSA starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 45, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kouhi, M.; Prabhakaran, M.P.; Ramakrishna, S. Edible polymers: An insight into its application in food, biomedicine and cosmetics. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Vilanova, N.; Solans, C. Vitamin A Palmitate–β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: Characterization, protection and emulsification properties. Food Chem. 2015, 175, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Fierascu, I.; Fierascu, I.C.; Brazdis, R.I.; Baroi, A.M.; Fistos, T.; Fierascu, R.C. Phytosynthesized metallic nanoparticles—Between nanomedicine and toxicology. A Brief Review of 2019’s Findings. Materials 2020, 13, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Selvan, D.A.; Mahendiran, D.; Kumar, R.S.; Rahiman, A.K. Garlic, green tea and turmeric extracts-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Phytochemical, antioxidant and in vitro cytotoxicity studies. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 180, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Mostafa, E.; Fayed, M.A.; Radwan, R.A.; Bakr, R.O. Centaurea pumilio L. extract and nanoparticles: A candidate for healthy skin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 182, 110350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Dhayalan, M.; Denison, M.I.J.; Ayyar, M.; Gandhi, N.; Krishnan, K.; Abdulhadi, B. Biogenic synthesis, characterization of gold and silver nanoparticles from Coleus forskohlii and their clinical importance. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 183, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Pérez, Z.E.J.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Markus, J.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kang, H.M.; Abbai, R.; Seo, K.H.; Wang, D.; Soshnikova, V.; Yang, D.C. Ginseng-berry-mediated gold and silver nanoparticle synthesis and evaluation of their in vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxicity effects on human dermal fibroblast and murine melanoma skin cell lines. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Sonia, S.; Linda, J.K.H.; Ruckmani, K.; Sivakumar, M. Antimicrobial and antioxidant potentials of biosynthesized colloidal zinc oxide nanoparticles for a fortified cold cream formulation: A potent nanocosmeceutical application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2017, 79, 581–589. [Google Scholar]
  146. Matinise, N.; Fuku, X.; Kaviyarasu, K.; Mayedwa, N.; Maaza, M. ZnO nanoparticles via Moringa oleifera green synthesis: Physical properties & mechanism of formation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 406, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Pedanekar, R.; Shaikh, S.; Rajpure, K. Thin film photocatalysis for environmental remediation: A status review. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2020, 20, 931–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Rekhate, C.V.; Srivastava, J. Recent advances in ozone-based advanced oxidation processes for treatment of wastewater- A review. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2020, 3, 100031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Vebber, M.C.; Aguzzoli, C.; Beltrami, L.V.R.; Fetter, G.; Crespo, J.D.S.; Giovanela, M. Self-assembled thin films of PAA/PAH/TiO2 for the photooxidation of ibuprofen. Part II: Characterization, sensitization, kinetics and reutilization. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 361, 1487–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chang, C.; Wei, Y.; Kuo, W. Free-standing CuS-ZnS decorated carbon nanotube films as immobilized photocatalysts for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 44, 30553–30562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Sajjadi, M.; Dasmeh, H.R.; Sajadi, S.M. Green synthesis of the Cu/sodium borosilicate nanocomposite and investigation of its catalytic activity. J. Alloys. Compd. 2018, 763, 1024–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Baruah, R.; Yadav, A.; Das, A.M. Livistona jekinsiana fabricated ZnO nanoparticles and their detrimental effect towards anthropogenic organic pollutants and human pathogenic bacteria. Spectrochim. Acta Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 251, 119459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Diaz-Uribe, C.; Vallejo, W.; Romero, E.; Villareal, M.; Padilla, M.; Hazbun, N.; Muñoz-Acevedo, A.; Schott, E.; Zarate, X. TiO2 thin films sensitization with natural dyes extracted from Bactris guineensis for photocatalytic applications: Experimental and DFT study. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2020, 24, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Bordbar, M.; Negahdar, N.; Nasrollahzadeh, M. Melissa Officinalis L. leaf extract assisted green synthesis of CuO/ZnO nanocomposite for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol and Rhodamine B. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 191, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Maham, M.; Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Sajadi, S.M.; Nekoei, M. Biosynthesis of Ag/reduced graphene oxide/Fe3O4 using Lotus garcinii leaf extract and its application as a recyclable nanocatalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol and organic dyes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 497, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Maryami, M.; Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Mehdipour, E.; Sajadi, S.M. Green synthesis of the Pd/perlite nanocomposite using Euphorbia neriifolia L. leaf extract and evaluation of its catalytic activity. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 184, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Luo, Y.; Shen, S.; Luo, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, R. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles in xylan solution via Tollens reaction and their detection for Hg2+. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Qiu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Qiu, Z.; Yuan, S.; Wang, P.; Cao, B. Lead-free mesoscopic Cs2SnI6 perovskite solar cells using different nanostructured ZnO nanorods as electron transport layers. Phys. Status Solidi RRL Rapid Res. Lett. 2016, 10, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Zhan, J.; Zheng, T.; Piringer, G.; Day, C.; McPherson, G.L.; Lu, Y.; Papadopoulos, K.; John, V.T. Transport characteristics of nanoscale functional zerovalent iron/silica composites for in situ remediation of trichloroethylene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 8871–8876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Comba, S.; Sethi, R. Stabilization of highly concentrated suspensions of iron nanoparticles using shear-thinning gels of xanthan gum. Water Res. 2009, 43, 3717–3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Basnet, M.; Ghoshal, S.; Tufenkji, N. Rhamnolipid biosurfactant and soy protein act as effective stabilizers in the aggregation and transport of palladium-doped zerovalent iron nanoparticles in saturated porous media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 13355–13364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Vinod, V.T.P.; Wacławek, S.; Senan, C.; Kupčík, J.; Pešková, K.; Černík, M.; Somashekarappa, H.M. Gum karaya (Sterculia urens) stabilized zero-valent iron nanoparticles: Characterization and applications for the removal of chromium and volatile organic pollutants from water. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 13997–14009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Li, Y.; Zhao, H.-P.; Zhu, L. Remediation of soil contaminated with organic compounds by nanoscale zero-valent iron: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 760, 143413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. García-Vera, V.E.; Tenza-Abril, A.J.; Solak, A.M.; Lanzón, M. Calcium hydroxide nanoparticles coatings applied on cultural heritage materials: Their influence on physical characteristics of earthen plasters. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 504, 144195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Daniele, V.; Taglieri, G. Nanolime suspensions applied on natural lithotypes: The influence of concentration and residual water on carbonation process and on treatment effectiveness. J. Cult. Herit. 2010, 11, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lanzón, M.; Madrid, J.A.; Martínez-Arredondo, A.; Mónaco, S. Use of diluted Ca(OH)2 suspensions and their transformation into nanostructured CaCO3 coatings: A case study in strengthening heritage materials (stucco, adobe and stone). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 424, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Slízková, Z.; Drdácký, M.; Viani, A. Consolidation of weak lime mortars by means of saturated solution of calcium hydroxide or barium hydroxide. J. Cult. Herit. 2015, 16, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Díaz-Tena, E.; Rodríguez-Ezquerro, A.; Marcaide, L.L.D.L.; Bustinduy, L.G.; Sáenz, A.E. A sustainable process for material removal on pure copper by use of extremophile bacteria. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 84, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Invernizzi, C.; Fiocco, G.; Iwanicka, M.; Targowski, P.; Piccirillo, A.; Vagnini, M.; Licchelli, M.; Malagodi, M.; Bersani, D. Surface and interface treatments on wooden artefacts: Potentialities and limits of a non-invasive multi-technique study. Coatings 2020, 11, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Jaén, J.A.; De Obaldía, J.; Rodriguez, M.V. Application of Mössbauer spectroscopy to the study of tannins inhibition of iron and steel corrosion. Hyperfine Interact. 2011, 202, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Giuliani, C.; Pascucci, M.; Riccucci, C.; Messina, E.; de Luna, M.S.; Lavorgna, M.; Ingo, G.M.; Di Carlo, G. Chitosan-based coatings for corrosion protection of copper-based alloys: A promising more sustainable approach for cultural heritage applications. Progr. Org. Coat. 2018, 122, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Jia, M.; Zhang, X.; Weng, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, M. Protective coating of paper works: ZnO/cellulose nanocrystal composites and analytical characterization. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 38, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Jia, Z.; Yang, C.; Zhao, F.; Chao, X.; Li, Y.; Xing, H. One-step reinforcement and deacidification of paper documents: Application of Lewis base—Chitosan nanoparticle coatings and analytical characterization. Coatings 2020, 10, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the manuscript content.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the manuscript content.
Coatings 11 00429 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of a wound management process.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of a wound management process.
Coatings 11 00429 g002
Figure 3. Potential coating materials for cosmetic formulation.
Figure 3. Potential coating materials for cosmetic formulation.
Coatings 11 00429 g003
Table 1. Recent advances regarding coating materials for implants.
Table 1. Recent advances regarding coating materials for implants.
Coating MaterialMedical ApplicationMethod of Obtaining Coating Material/Deposition TechniqueProperties of the MaterialRef.
Nano-HAP/Graphene oxideCoating for bone implantsPrecipitation method/-HAP—Rod shaped morphology; Graphene oxide—plates[28]
Ag(I) doped HAPCoating on dentinePrecipitation method/--[29]
Ag doped HAP/PLA compositeBone coating materialFused deposition technique-/Dip coatingElongated rod-shaped morphology, 50 nm[30]
Mg-HAPCoating for Ti6Al4V alloy—dental application-/Plasma electrolytic oxidationPore size—99.30–28.55 μm[31]
Fe3O4 doped HA/chitosanBiomedical implants Co-precipitation technique/electrophoretic depositionThickness of coatings—10  ±  0.2 μm[32]
Cu-HAP/functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubeCoating for 316L stainless steelPrecipitation method/spray pyrolysisCrystallite size—22 nm[33]
Calcium silicate reinforced HAPTi6Al4V medical implant-/atmospheric plasma spraySpherical particles—1–10 μm[34]
Hydroxyapatite and TiO2 suspensionNickel-free austenitic stainless steel-/Electrophoretic coating processCoating thickness—71.2–104.1 μm[35]
Bio-glass reinforced with HAPTiO2 nanotubesChemical method/electrophoretic depositionCoating thickness of 10–12 μm[36]
Lithium-doped HAPBiomedical applicationsPulsed laser deposition processDiameter 25–50 nm[37]
Table 3. Coating materials for food industry.
Table 3. Coating materials for food industry.
Coating MaterialFood ProductObtaining Method for the Coating MaterialCoating MethodCoating PropertiesRef.
Coating materials for fruits
Papaya -Moringa oleifera leaf powderPearSolvent castingFood packaging filmsControlling physicochemical properties; antioxidant activity[89]
ChitosanStrawberriesSolvent castingDrop-casting, films for packagingControlling physicochemical properties; antimicrobial activity[94]
ChitosanBlueberriesSolvent castingDippingControlling physicochemical properties; antimicrobial and antioxidant activity[95]
Pea starch/Guar gumOrangesSolvent castingSprayingControlling physicochemical properties and fruit quality assessments[96]
Chitosan/Nisin/SiO2 nanoparticlesBlueberrySolvent castingDippingMaintaining nutritional values of the fruits during storage[97]
Coating materials for vegetables
Calcium caseinateCarrotsSolvent castingCastingProlonged shelf-life and antimicrobial activity[98]
Alginate/Aloe vera gel/TiO2 nanoparticlesTomatoesSolvent castingDippingProlonged shelf-life and antimicrobial activity[99]
Chitosan/cinnamon essential oilCucumberSolvent castingDippingControlling Fusarium solani fungal growth[100]
Chitosan/melatoninCucumber, broccoliSolvent castingDippingAntioxidant and antimicrobial properties[101]
Coating materials for dairy products
Gellan/xanthan/k-carrageenan/Aloe vera gelCheeseSolvent castingDippingInhibition of Penicillium roqueforti fungal growth[102]
Starch/glycerol/natamycin/nisinGouda cheeseSolvent castingDippingBarrier against external contamination (L. innocua and S. cerevisiae)[103]
Chitosan/ZnO nanoparticlesWhite brined cheeseSolvent castingDippingControlling E. coli fungal growth[104]
Coating materials for meat products
AlginateSausagesExtrusionDippingProlonged shelf-life up to 8 weeks[105]
ChitosanChicken meatSolvent casting (enhanced with plants extract)Active films for packaging (wrapping)Films for lipid oxidation and decrease microbial count[106]
Gelatin/poly (lactic acid) epigallocatechinFried fishSolvent casting, compression, molding, laminationLayer-by-layer films, bagsProlonged antioxidant activity during storage (30 days)[107]
Gelatin/chitosan/gallic acid/clove oilSalmonSolvent castingDippingPreserve fresh salmon fillet during cold storage extending shelf-life and antimicrobial properties[108]
Chitosan/tomato extractPork loinSolvent castingDippingEnhanced physicochemical antimicrobial and antioxidant properties[109]
Coating materials for other foods packaging
Triticale flour filmsCherry tomatoesSolvent castingActive packaging boxesControlling physicochemical properties[110]
Starch/Ilex paraguariensis extractMarket potential packingExtrusion, compression moldingActive packagingActive and smart materials to replace the use of conventional plastic[111]
Starch/gelatin-beeswaxPotential packingExtrusionActive packagingActive materials to replace the use of conventional plastic[112]
Chitosan/guar gum/ZnOPotential packing for cheeseSolvent casting-Controlling antimicrobial and organoleptic properties[113]
Cassava starch/anthocyaninPotential packingExtrusionSmart packagingpH change indicator for meat stored at 6 °C[114]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fierascu, R.C.; Fierascu, I.; Chican, I.E. Natural Ingredients in Functional Coatings—Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Coatings 2021, 11, 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040429

AMA Style

Fierascu RC, Fierascu I, Chican IE. Natural Ingredients in Functional Coatings—Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Coatings. 2021; 11(4):429. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040429

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fierascu, Radu Claudiu, Irina Fierascu, and Irina Elena Chican. 2021. "Natural Ingredients in Functional Coatings—Recent Advances and Future Challenges" Coatings 11, no. 4: 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040429

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop