Next Article in Journal
Facile Preparation of Superhydrophobic Membrane Inspired by Chinese Traditional Hand-Stretched Noodles
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Protective Coatings for Accident Tolerant Zr-Based Fuel Claddings
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of the Technical Performance of Leather, Artificial Leather, and Trendy Alternatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Protection of Zr Alloy under High-Temperature Air Oxidation: A Multilayer Coating Approach

by
Dmitrii V. Sidelev
*,
Maxim S. Syrtanov
,
Sergey E. Ruchkin
,
Alexey V. Pirozhkov
and
Egor B. Kashkarov
School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(2), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11020227
Submission received: 31 January 2021 / Revised: 11 February 2021 / Accepted: 11 February 2021 / Published: 13 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Coatings for Accident Tolerant Fuel Claddings)

Abstract

:
Metallic Cr and multilayer CrN/Cr coatings with a thickness of 2.5 µm were deposited onto E110 alloy by magnetron sputtering. Oxidation tests in air were performed at 1100 °C for 10–40 min. The gravimetric measurements showed better protective properties of multilayer CrN/Cr coatings in comparison with metallic Cr coating. Multilayer coating prevented fast Cr–Zr inter-diffusion by the formation of a ZrN layer beneath the coating. The appearance of ZrN is caused by interaction with nitrogen formed from the decomposition of CrN to Cr2N phases. Optical microscopy revealed a residual Cr layer for the multilayer CrN (0.25 µm)/Cr (0.25 µm) coating for all the oxidation periods. Additional in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies of coated alloy during linear heating up to 1400 °C showed that the formation of the Cr2Zr phase in the case of multilayer coatings occurred at a higher (~150 °C) temperature compared to metallic Cr. Multilayer coatings can decrease the nitrogen effect for Zr alloy oxidation. Uniform and thinner oxide layers of Zr alloy were observed when the multilayer coatings were applied. The highest oxidation resistance belonged to the CrN/Cr coating with a multilayer step of 0.25 µm.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, a wide variety of materials have been studied as protective coatings on zirconium fuel claddings to improve its resistance under normal operation (~360 °C, 18.6 MPa) and design-based accident (DBA, up to 1200 °C) conditions. The majority of scientific groups and organizations suggest metallic chromium as the most suitable material for the development of accident tolerant fuel (ATF) claddings [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Growth of a chromia (Cr2O3) layer on surface of Cr-coated Zr alloy decelerates oxygen diffusion to the alloy and significantly increases its oxidation resistance (e.g., by an order of magnitude at 1200 °C for 10 min [7]). However, Cr–Zr inter-diffusion significantly increases at high temperatures especially for a β-Zr phase [8,9,10]. Thus, during oxidation, Cr coatings can be also consumed by diffusion into Zr alloys with subsequent formation of an eutectic Cr–Zr phase with low melting temperature (~1332 °C). Both processes—(1) surface oxidation of the Cr coating and (2) Cr–Zr inter-diffusion at the coating/alloy interface—are key factors determining the duration and temperature range of the protective scale of the Cr-coated Zr alloy in high temperature conditions.
To improve the oxidation resistance of coated Zr alloys, especially under beyond DBA conditions, a new coating preventing Cr–Zr inter-diffusion should be developed. The compound coatings (e.g., CrN, ZrSi2, etc.) can have better oxidation resistance than metallic Cr and act as a diffusion barrier [11,12,13,14,15]. However, high hardness and strong difference in thermal expansion coefficients of such materials in comparison with Zr alloys cause coating cracking and its spallation at high-temperature oxidation or under mechanical deformations [15]. Multilayer coatings can be more resistant to coating interruption if they are composed of alternating brittle and elastic layers [16,17]. Therefore, multilayers consisting of compound and metallic layers can be used as the barrier layer to prevent the Cr–Zr inter-diffusion, while a chromium coating deposited on top of the multilayers can act as the main protective layer that prevents inward diffusion of oxygen to Zr alloy similar to single layer metallic Cr coatings.
Several compound coatings (Ti2AlC, Cr2AlC, CrAlN, CrAlSiN, TiN, CrN, etc.) were already studied in normal operation and accident conditions [14,18,19,20,21,22]. The last results show that the chromium nitride coating has a good corrosion and oxidation resistance in both conditions. Moreover, the thermal expansion coefficient of CrN ((3.2–5.4) × 10−6 °C−1) is close to that for Zr alloys ((5.7–9.3) × 10−6 °C−1). Thus, the coating consisting of CrN/Cr multilayers and outer Cr film can be promising to protect Zr claddings.
This article focuses on investigation of the oxidation behavior of the E110 alloy with multilayer CrN/Cr coatings in air. The metallic Cr and multilayer CrN/Cr coatings were deposited by magnetron sputtering. Oxidation tests were performed in air at 1100 °C for 10–40 min. Finally, oxidation behavior of the coatings was discussed based on the analysis of the samples after oxidation, and additionally in situ XRD studies at high-temperature heating up to 1400 °C were performed.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Coating Deposition

The coatings were deposited on E110 alloy samples using the ion-plasma installation equipped with the multi-cathode magnetron sputtering systems and planetary substrate-holder. More details about the deposition system are presented in [23].
The E110 alloy (15 × 15 × 2 mm3) and polished Si (110) were used as substrates. Special holes with ∅2 mm were drilled in the samples to hold them during oxidation tests. The substrates were grinded and polished by SiC sandpapers (P600 → P2500), washed with technical soap → distilled water → 98% alcohol and dried by compressed air. Prior to coating deposition, the substrates were etched by Ar+ ions at the following parameters: voltage of 2.5 kV, ion current of 45 mA, and Ar pressure of 0.15 Pa.
Four series of the coatings were prepared in the present study. The parameters of the coatings and their deposition conditions are shown in Table 1.
The total operation pressure was 0.3 Pa. The target power density of the magnetron sputtering system for deposition of Cr and CrN layers was equal to 31.5 W/cm2. The infrared pyrometer Optris CTlaser 3MH1CF4 (Berlin, Germany) was used to measure the substrate temperature during coating deposition. The E110 samples were fixed in a stainless-steel holder; a small area (~5–10 mm2) remained uncoated.

2.2. Oxidation Tests

High-temperature oxidation of the samples was performed using an atmospheric furnace (ATS 3210, Applied Test Systems Inc., Butler, PA, USA). All tests were started from 500 °C, followed by a temperature ramp up to 1100 °C with a heating rate of ~20–25 °C/min. Next, the samples were isothermally oxidized at 1100 °C for 10, 20, 30 and 40 min. After oxidation, the furnace was opened, and the samples were naturally cooled to room temperature. The temperature profiles are shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Sample Characterization

The thickness and microstructure of the as-deposited coatings were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using Quanta 200 3D (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The weight gain of the samples was measured using an analytical balance machine CP124 S (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany) with an accuracy of 10−4 g. The weight gain was calculated only for coated area, so the next expression was used [6]:
W C r = Δ m C r S C r ,
where SCr—the area of coated part of the sample (in cm2); ΔmCr—the weight gain of the coated part of the sample (in mg).
Cross-sections of the samples after oxidation were analyzed by optical microscopy (OM) using AXIOVERT 200MAT (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The elemental distributions of the samples on depth were investigated by a glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (GDOES) using GD-Profiler 2 (HORIBA Scientific, Kyoto, Japan). Phase composition of the samples was studied by X-Ray diffraction XRD-7000S (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in a Bragg–Brentano configuration using CuKα radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA. The interpretation of the diffraction patterns and identification of reflections were carried out using PDF-4+ (ICDD, Newtown Township, PA, USA) software. The weight fractions of the crystalline phases were calculated by the reference intensity ratio using the formula [24]:
W k = I k m a x R I R k i I i m a x R I R i ,
where Wk—weight fraction of an analyzed phase; I k m a x —maximum intensity value of an analyzed phase; RIRk—reference intensity ratio of an analyzed phase.
In situ XRD was performed by synchrotron radiation source VEPP-3 (electron storage) at the station “Precision diffractometry II” in Siberian Synchrotron and Terahertz Radiation Center of the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science. Phase transitions were investigated using a high temperature chamber HTK 2000N (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) in vacuum. The experimental parameters were as follows: wavelength—1.0102 Å; temperature range—25–1400 °C; heating rate—50 °C/min; residual pressure—10−3 Pa.

3. Results

3.1. The As-Deposited Coatings

Figure 2 shows cross-sections of the as-deposited coatings on Si substrates.
All samples have a total thickness of ~2.5 µm. The microstructure of the coatings is dense and columnar. The Cr sample is a monolayer coating, while other coatings have a multilayer structure of CrN and Cr. Additionally, an elemental depth distribution in the CrN/Cr-250 sample (deposited on E110 alloy) was studied using GDOES (Figure 2). an outer Cr layer (~0.5 µm) and 8 alternating CrN and Cr layers are shown with a thickness of ~0.25 µm (four maximums and four minimums of N and Cr signals). The transition from the coating to Zr alloy is uniform and smooth without any peaks or fluctuations. According to the SEM images, the CrN/Cr-50 and CrN/Cr-500 samples have a multilayer step of ~0.05 and 0.5 µm, respectively.

3.2. Weight-Gain Measurements

To analyze macro structural changes, all samples (with/without coatings) are necessarily photographed before and after oxidation tests. Their outer view is shown in Table 2.
The samples have changed color after oxidation tests. The most pronounced effect is observed for the uncoated E110 alloy. This sample has a white surface, which indicated ZrO2 formation. Further spallation of ZrO2 films is found as oxidation time increases. All coated samples have a dark-green/blue–grey color corresponding to chromia. At the same time, these samples also have an uncoated area due to their fixation in the holder during coating deposition. Visual control of the CrN/Cr-50 sample shows swelling even after 10 min oxidation in air. The white-colored area in the right corner of this sample indicates coating spallation after 40 min oxidation test. Other samples also have swelling areas, but the coatings are still adherent to the alloy for all oxidation periods.
Figure 3 shows the weight gain of the samples depending on oxidation time.
The uncoated E110 alloy has the highest weight gain, which is equal to ~24 mg/cm2 (10 min) and increases up to ~80 mg/cm2 (40 min). The coated samples have significantly lower weight gain, but the coating type affects the oxidation kinetics. Among them, the Cr sample has the highest weight gain in each oxidation test, which strong rises to ~10–20 mg/cm2 for 30–40 min oxidation. The samples with multilayer coatings have a comparable weight gains up to 30 min oxidation. Only for the CrN/Cr-50 sample was an accelerated oxidation observed after 30 min oxidation. The lowest weight gain belongs to the CrN/Cr-250 sample (1–9 mg/cm2 depending on oxidation time).

3.3. The Samples after Oxidation in Air

3.3.1. Optical Microscopy

Two resolutions were used to observe the whole cross-section microstructure of the samples and their surface oxidation. Figure 4 shows OM images of cross-section microstructures of the samples after 40 min oxidation in air.
The microstructure of the Cr sample is represented by the highest depth of incursions of ZrO2 and ZrN in the alloy and their quantity, while an uneven layer of oxygen/nitrogen-stabilized α-Zr(O)/α-Zr(N) have a thickness of ~150–350 µm. The magnified OM image shows a ~30–45 µm-thick ZrO2 + ZrN layer beneath the Cr2O3 oxide layer.
The samples with the multilayer coatings have more uniform oxide layers at their surfaces with less quantity of cracks. In general, the thickness of the ZrO2 + ZrN layer is equal to ~2–10 µm depending on the coating type. However, the CrN/Cr-50 sample has an inhomogeneous area with a thicker oxide layer (up to 100 µm), which is highlighted by red arrows in Figure 4. In other parts of this sample, the thickness of ZrO2 + ZrN layer is less than 10 µm. The significant difference has the CrN/Cr-250 sample, where a residual Cr layer is still observed in the cross-section, while other coatings have only Cr2O3 oxide layers (fully consumed).
The optical images of cross-section microstructures after 40 min oxidation, outer view of the samples and their weight gains indicate less oxidation of the CrN/Cr-250 sample. Thus, the comparative study on the Cr and CrN/Cr-250 samples is further presented. Their cross-section microstructures after 20 min oxidation are shown in Figure 5.
Despite a small difference in weight gains after 20 min oxidation, the microstructures of the Cr and CrN/Cr-250 samples near the surface are different. The Cr sample has a less uniform, thinner and discontinuous layer of residual chromium, while the continuous Cr layer (~1 µm) is found for the CrN/Cr-250 sample.

3.3.2. Elemental Distributions over a Depth

Figure 6 shows the elemental distributions over a depth of the Cr and CrN/Cr-250 samples after 20, 30, and 40 min oxidation tests.
For the Cr sample (Figure 6a–c), the significant changes of elemental distributions are observed as oxidation time increases. Such behavior corresponds to transition from protective to non-protective scale of the coating [1,7], when the oxidation kinetics accelerates and the ZrO2 layer can be formed beneath the residual Cr layer. It is clearly seen by the change of the oxygen penetration depth from ~5 to 40 µm with increasing oxidation time from 20 to 40 min, respectively. Similar depth distributions of elements have been observed for E110 alloy with thin Cr coatings in the previous study [6].
The elemental distributions of the CrN/Cr-250 sample are less changed with oxidation time (Figure 6d–f). The depth of Cr slowly increases from ~3 to 4 µm as oxidation time changes from 20 to 40 min. According to Figure 6f, the oxygen distribution profile indicates the formation of ~2 µm-thick ZrO2 layer beneath the residual Cr, which is significantly lower compared to the Cr sample (~35 µm-thick ZrO2).

3.3.3. Phase Composition

Figure 7 shows diffraction patterns and phase content of E110 alloy with the Cr coating after air oxidation at 1100 °C for 10–40 min. The as-deposited sample (before oxidation) is composed by hexagonal close package (hcp) α-Zr (substrate) and body-centered cubic (bcc) α-Cr (coating) phases. The phase composition of the samples significantly changes after oxidation. The content of α-Cr decreases while Zr3O, Cr2O3, monoclinic m-ZrO2, and ZrN phases are formed after oxidation for 10 min. The Cr2N and tetragonal t-ZrO2 phases are found at higher oxidation time (after 30 min). The growth of CrN phase is observed after 40 min oxidation that can be caused by interacting of Cr with nitrogen from re-oxidation reaction [6]. The content of m-ZrO2 and t-ZrO2 phases is increased with the oxidation time. It should be noted that no α-Cr phase is found after 40 min oxidation, indicating full consumption of residual Cr.
In the case of the CrN/Cr-250 sample, the Cr2N phase forms after 10 min oxidation as a result of CrN decomposition in the as-received coating (Figure 8). However, the Cr2N phase disappears after oxidation during 20 min. When the oxidation time increases up to 30 min, the formation of the t-ZrO2 phase is observed. The increase in oxidation time is accompanied by the decrease in Zr3O and the growth of the monoclinic ZrO2 phase. An important feature of the multilayer CrN/Cr-250 sample is the presence of a high content of residual α-Cr (52.8 wt.%) even after 40 min oxidation.

3.3.4. In Situ XRD

In situ XRD measurements were performed on E110 alloy with the metallic Cr and multilayer CrN/Cr-250 coatings during linear heating in vacuum from room temperature to 1400 °C (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The results show the effect of the multilayer approach on the diffusion barrier properties and phase formation during HT treatment of the coated E110 alloy. It can be seen that the phase composition of the Cr coating does not change up to 900 °C (Figure 9a). In this range, the reflections of the α-Zr and α-Cr phases shift toward smaller angles, indicating an increase in crystal lattice parameters due to thermal expansion. An increase in temperature results in α→β phase transition of Zr at 900 °C that is consistent with Zr phase diagram. The intermetallic Cr2Zr phase appears when the temperature reaches 1200 °C. The formation of this phase is caused by fast Cr–Zr inter-diffusion under high temperature [25]. Meanwhile, the small amount of Cr2O3 phase is observed, which is related to the oxidation of surface layer of the coating. The temperature ramp from 1200 to 1400 °C is accompanied by an increase in the intensity of the Cr2Zr phase indicating growth of the Cr2Zr layer (Figure 9b).
No phase changes occur in the sample with the multilayer CrN/Cr-250 coating only up to 600 °C (Figure 10a). The growth of Cr2N phase begins at 650 °C, while the intensity of CrN phase decreases. The temperature rise up to 900 °C is accompanied by α → β phase transition of Zr. There is no complete α → β transformation with increasing temperature, which is due to the partial decomposition of CrN to Cr2N and the stabilization of the α-Zr phase by nitrogen (α-Zr(N) phase). The simultaneous decrease in the reflections of Cr2N phase and the appearance of the reflections of the ZrN phase are observed at 1000 °C. This fact indicates the formation of the ZrN phase caused by the reaction of zirconium with nitrogen formed during the decomposition of the Cr2N phase. The complete decomposition of the Cr2N phase occurs at 1200–1250 °C. It should be noted that the intermetallic Cr2Zr phase was observed only at the temperatures above 1350 °C (Figure 10b).

4. Discussion

The oxidation behavior of E110 alloy with the metallic Cr coating is well correlated with recently published data [1,9]. As oxidation time increases, the fast Cr–Zr inter-diffusion and penetration of O and N to the Zr alloy results in the transition to non-protective scale. In this case, oxidation kinetics of the coated alloy strongly accelerates (Figure 3). The analysis of the oxidized samples using OM, GDOES and XRD studies clearly shows such behavior (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 9).
The multilayer CrN/Cr coatings can protect E110 alloy from oxidation for a longer time, which was evident by gravimetry tests (Figure 3). The difference between the weight gains of the samples coated with single layer Cr and multilayer CrN/Cr coatings became greater as the oxidation time increased up to 30–40 min. Taking into account the same thickness of the as-deposited coatings (~2.5 µm), two possible mechanisms can cause different oxidation kinetics of E110 alloy with CrN/Cr coatings in comparison to the Cr coating. Firstly, the deposition of CrN instead of metallic chromium should enhance the oxidation resistance of coated alloy. Several comparative studies of oxidation behavior of CrN and Cr present questionable results due to the crucial role of CrN cracking in oxidation tests [12,14,22]. Thus, the oxidation kinetics of chromium nitride excluding cracking are still unclear. However, the Cr–Zr inter-diffusion at the coating/alloy interface should have a higher impact, considering the low thickness of the as-deposited coatings. According to the last data of Cr–Zr interaction at high temperatures [10], the thickness of the Cr–Zr interlayer can be equal to 0.5–0.9 µm at 1100 °C for 10–40 min. This Cr consumption results in a decrease in diffusion path for oxygen and nitrogen to the Zr alloy. Based on OM and XRD data, the residual Cr layer was observed even after 40 min oxidation, while for the samples with the metallic Cr coating there was no α-Cr phase. Calculations of phase composition show more than 50 wt.% content of α-Cr in the multilayer CrN/Cr-250 coating.
The partial decomposition of CrN to Cr2N resulted in inward nitrogen diffusion to the alloy and formation of α-Zr(N) phase at the coating/alloy interface (Figure 10). Further decomposition of the Cr2N phase at ~1000 °C led to the formation of a ZrN layer beneath the metallic (reduced) Cr layer. As indicated by Krejcí et al. [12], a thin ZrN layer can prevent chromium diffusion into the Zr-alloy and consequent embrittlement. The comparative in situ XRD studies confirm this statement. The shift of the Cr2Zr phase formation to higher temperatures (by 150 °C) for the multilayer CrN/Cr-250 coating is shown.
It is known that brittle CrN films can crack under high temperature oxidation or mechanical deformations [12,22]. No cracking was observed for the multilayer CrN/Cr-250 and CrN/Cr-500 coatings (Figure 4) in the present study. Uniform oxide layers without local areas of accelerated oxidation were shown in the cross-section microstructures. At the same time, the sample with metallic Cr coating had a lot of cracks at the coating/alloy interface which caused accelerated oxidation in these regions. This is typical behavior for Zr alloys in a nitrogen rich atmosphere [26,27]. These results indicate both effects: deceleration of Cr–Zr inter-diffusion kinetics and decreased nitrogen effect in the Zr alloy. This suggests a promising oxidation behavior of multilayer CrN/Cr coatings at high temperatures.
In the present work, the coating thickness was chosen for detailed X-ray diffraction studies of diffusion mechanisms and phase transformations in multilayer CrN/Cr coatings at high temperatures. Despite the good diffusion barrier properties of CrN/Cr multilayers, the total thickness of the coatings (or the top Cr layer) should be higher to increase diffusion path of O and N to the alloy and to provide a protective scale for a longer period. Therefore, the oxidation kinetics of the E110 alloy with thicker (10 µm or more) CrN/Cr coatings should be considered in future studies.
Another important point is related to the multilayer step (i.e., the thickness of CrN and Cr layers), which can influence the oxidation behavior of coated Zr alloys. This is clearly observed from the weight-gain measurements (Figure 3) and photographs of the samples (Table 2). For example, coating spallation/defects were found for the sample with the CrN/Cr-50 coating after 30–40 min oxidation, while other samples preserved their integrity. The coating with a multilayer step of 250 nm demonstrates better oxidation performance and cracking resistance compared to the CrN/Cr coatings with 50 and 500 nm steps. This aspect should be also taken into account in future studies.

5. Conclusions

The oxidation behavior of E110 alloy with multilayer CrN/Cr coatings was investigated in comparison to single layer metallic chromium. The multilayer step of CrN and Cr layers was 50, 250, or 500 nm, while the total thickness of the coatings was 2.5 µm. The comparative analysis of their cross-section microstructures, elemental distributions over a depth, phase compositions after oxidation in air, and in situ XRD studies under high-temperature heating revealed the following conclusions:
  • The multilayer CrN/Cr coatings have better protective properties in comparison to metallic Cr at 1100 °C in air. The results show higher weight gain for Cr-coated E110 alloy (~20 mg/cm2) compared to alloy with multilayer coatings (~9–13 mg/cm2). The highest oxidation resistance belongs to the sample with the CrN/Cr-250 coating.
  • CrN/Cr multilayers demonstrate barrier properties against Cr–Zr inter-diffusion. The formation of a ZrN layer beneath the multilayer coating due to decomposition of chromium nitrides can decelerate the kinetics of Cr–Zr inter-diffusion. For the considered total thickness (~2.5 µm) and multilayer step of 0.25 µm, the formation of the Cr2Zr phase occurs by ~150 °C higher in comparison to metallic Cr coating.
  • No coating cracking or local accelerated oxidation are observed for the multilayer coatings with a layer step of 0.25 and 0.5 µm after oxidation in air. Deposition of CrN/Cr multilayers can decrease nitrogen effect during Zr oxidation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.V.S.; methodology, D.V.S. and M.S.S.; formal analysis, D.V.S. and M.S.S.; investigation, S.E.R. and A.V.P.; resources, M.S.S. and E.B.K.; data curation, S.E.R. and A.V.P.; writing original draft preparation, D.V.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S.S. and E.B.K.; visualization, S.E.R. and A.V.P.; supervision, D.V.S. and M.S.S.; project administration, D.V.S.; funding acquisition, D.V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was funded by RFBR and ROSATOM, project number 20-21-00037.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Tomsk Polytechnic University Enhancement Program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brachet, J.C.; Rouesne, E.; Ribis, J.T.; Guilbert, S.; Urvoy, G. High temperature steam oxidation of chromium-coated zirconium-based alloys: Kinetics and process. Corros. Sci. 2020, 167, 108537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R. Application and development progress of Cr-based surface coatings in nuclear fuel element: I. selection, preparation, and characteristics of coating materials. Coatings 2020, 10, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R. Application and development progress of Cr-based surface coating in nuclear fuel elements: II. Current status and shortcomings of performance studies. Coatings 2020, 10, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sevecek, M.; Gurgen, A.; Seshadri, A.; Che, Y.; Wagih, M.; Phillips, B.; Champagne, V.; Shirvan, K. Development of Cr cold spray-coated fuel cladding with enhanced accident tolerance. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2018, 50, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yeom, H.; Maier, B.; Johnson, G.; Dabney, T.; Lenling, M.; Sridharan, K. High temperature oxidation and microstructural evolution of cold spray chromium coatings on Zircaloy-4 in steam environments. J. Nucl. Mater. 2019, 526, 151737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kashkarov, E.B.; Sidelev, D.V.; Rombaeva, M.; Syrtanov, M.S.; Bleykher, G.A. Chromium coatings deposited by cooled and hot target magnetron sputtering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 389, 125618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kashkarov, E.B.; Sidelev, D.V.; Syrtanov, M.S.; Tang, C.; Steinbrück, M. Oxidation kinetics of Cr-coated zirconium alloy: Effect of coating thickness and microstructure. Corros. Sci. 2020, 175, 108883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Wen, Q.; Ruan, X.; Luo, F.; Bai, G.; Qing, Y.; Zhu, D.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Behavior of plasma sprayed Cr coatings and FeCrAl coatings on Zr fuel cladding under loss-of-coolant accident conditions. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 344, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brachet, J.C.; Idarraga-Trujillo, I.; Le Flem, M.; Le Saux, M.; Vandenberghe, V. Early studies on Cr-coated zircaloy-4 as enhanced accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings for light water reactors. J. Nucl. Mater. 2019, 517, 268–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, J.; Stegmaier, U.; Tang, C.; Steinbruck, M.; Große, M.; Wang, S.; Seifert, H. High temperature Cr-Zr interaction of two types of Cr-coated Zr alloys in inert gas environment. J. Nucl. Mater. 2021, 547, 152806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, C.; Stueber, M.; Seifert, H.J.; Steinbrueck, M. Protective coatings on zirconium-based alloys as accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) claddings. Corros. Rev. 2017, 35, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Krejcí, J.; Kabátová, J.; Manoch, F.; Kočí, J.; Cvrček, L.; Málek, J. Development and testing of multicomponent fuel cladding with enhanced accidental performance. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2020, 52, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuprin, A.S.; Belous, V.A.; Voyevodin, V.N.; Bryk, V.V.; Vasilenko, R.L.; Ovcharenko, V.D.; Reshetnyak, E.N.; Tolmachova, G.N.; V’yugov, P.N. Vacuum-arc chromium-based coatings for protection of zirconium alloys from the high-temperature oxidation in air. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015, 465, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meng, C.; Yang, L.; Wu, Y.; Tan, J.; Dang, W.; He, X.; Ma, X. Study of the oxidation behavior of CrN coating on Zr alloy in air. J. Nucl. Mater. 2019, 515, 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, C.; Stüber, M.; Hans, J.; Steinbrück, M. Metallic and Ceramic Coatings for Enhanced Accident Tolerant Fuel Cladding. In Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, 2nd ed.; Konings, R.J.M., Stoller, R.E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 4, pp. 490–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Musil, J.; Sklenka, J.; Procházka, J. Protective over-layer coating preventing cracking of thin films deposited on flexible substrates. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 240, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Musil, J.; Sklenka, J.; Čerstvý, R. Protection of brittle film against cracking. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 370, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Daub, K.; Van Nieuwenhove, R.; Nordin, V. Investigation of the impact of coatings on corrosion and hydrogen uptake of Zircaloy-4. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015, 467, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tallman, D.; Anasori, B.; Barsoum, M.A. Critical review of the oxidation of Ti2AlC, Ti3AlC2 and Cr2AlC in air. Mater. Res. Lett. 2013, 1, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skarohlid, J.; Skoda, R. High temperature behaviour of CrAlSiN MAX phase coatings on zirconium alloy. In Proceedings of the 2017 Water Reactor Fuel Performance 2017, Jeju, Korea, 10–14 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ma, X.; Wu, Y.; Tan, J.; Meng, C.; Yang, L.; Dang, W.; He, X. Evaluation of corrosion and oxidation behaviors of TiAlCrN coatings for nuclear fuel cladding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 358, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Krejci, J.; Sevecek, M.; Cvrcek, L. Development of chromium and chromium nitride coated cladding for VVER reactors. In Proceedings of the 2017 Water Reactor Fuel Performance, Jeju, Korea, 10–14 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sidelev, D.V.; Kashkarov, E.B.; Syrtanov, M.S.; Krivobokov, V.P. Nickel-chromium (Ni–Cr) coatings deposited by magnetron sputtering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 369, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, X.; Liu, D.; Bu, H.; Deng, L.; Liu, H.; Yuan, P.; Du, P.; Song, H. XRD-based quantitative analysis of clay minerals using reference intensity ratios, mineral intensity factors, Rietveld, and full pattern summation methods: A critical review. Solid Earth Sci. 2018, 3, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perez, R.A.; Nakajima, H.; Dyment, F. Diffusion in -Ti and Zr. Mater. Trans. 2003, 44, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Steinbrueck, M.; Silva, F.O.; Grosse, M. Oxidation of Zircaloy-4 in steam-nitrogen mixtures at 600–1200 °C. J. Nucl. Mater. 2017, 490, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duriez, C.; Dupont, T.; Schmet, B.; Enoch, F. Zircaloy-4 and M5 high temperature oxidation and nitriding in air. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 380, 30–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Temperature profiles during oxidation tests.
Figure 1. Temperature profiles during oxidation tests.
Coatings 11 00227 g001
Figure 2. The cross-section SEM images of the as-deposited coatings on Si substrate: (a) Cr coating; (b) CrN/Cr-50 coating; (c) CrN/Cr-250 coating; (d) CrN/Cr-500 coating. Elemental depth distribution in the CrN/Cr-250 sample is shown.
Figure 2. The cross-section SEM images of the as-deposited coatings on Si substrate: (a) Cr coating; (b) CrN/Cr-50 coating; (c) CrN/Cr-250 coating; (d) CrN/Cr-500 coating. Elemental depth distribution in the CrN/Cr-250 sample is shown.
Coatings 11 00227 g002
Figure 3. The weight gain of the uncoated and coated E110 alloy samples after air oxidation.
Figure 3. The weight gain of the uncoated and coated E110 alloy samples after air oxidation.
Coatings 11 00227 g003
Figure 4. The optical images of the samples after 40 min oxidation.
Figure 4. The optical images of the samples after 40 min oxidation.
Coatings 11 00227 g004
Figure 5. The cross-section microstructures of the Cr and CrN/Cr-250 samples after 20 min oxidation.
Figure 5. The cross-section microstructures of the Cr and CrN/Cr-250 samples after 20 min oxidation.
Coatings 11 00227 g005
Figure 6. Depth distribution of elements in the Cr (ac) and CrN/Cr-250 (df) samples after 20, 30, and 40 min oxidation in air.
Figure 6. Depth distribution of elements in the Cr (ac) and CrN/Cr-250 (df) samples after 20, 30, and 40 min oxidation in air.
Coatings 11 00227 g006
Figure 7. Diffraction patterns of the E110 alloy with the Cr coating after air oxidation at 1100 °C (a) and phase content (b) depending on oxidation time: 1–10 min, 2–20 min, 3–30 min, 4–40 min.
Figure 7. Diffraction patterns of the E110 alloy with the Cr coating after air oxidation at 1100 °C (a) and phase content (b) depending on oxidation time: 1–10 min, 2–20 min, 3–30 min, 4–40 min.
Coatings 11 00227 g007
Figure 8. Diffraction patterns of the E110 alloy with the CrN/Cr-250 coating after air oxidation at 1100 °C (a) and phase content (b) depending on oxidation time: 1–10 min, 2–20 min, 3–30 min, 4–40 min.
Figure 8. Diffraction patterns of the E110 alloy with the CrN/Cr-250 coating after air oxidation at 1100 °C (a) and phase content (b) depending on oxidation time: 1–10 min, 2–20 min, 3–30 min, 4–40 min.
Coatings 11 00227 g008
Figure 9. Phase transitions in E110 alloy with the Cr coating under linear heating in the temperature range of 25–1400 °C: (a) 2θ range of 19°–47°; (b) zoom area of 20°–27°.
Figure 9. Phase transitions in E110 alloy with the Cr coating under linear heating in the temperature range of 25–1400 °C: (a) 2θ range of 19°–47°; (b) zoom area of 20°–27°.
Coatings 11 00227 g009
Figure 10. Phase transitions in E110 alloy with the CrN/Cr-250 coating under linear heating in the temperature range of 25–1400 °C: (a) 2θ range of 19°–47°; (b) zoom area of 20°–27°.
Figure 10. Phase transitions in E110 alloy with the CrN/Cr-250 coating under linear heating in the temperature range of 25–1400 °C: (a) 2θ range of 19°–47°; (b) zoom area of 20°–27°.
Coatings 11 00227 g010
Table 1. Deposition parameters of the coatings.
Table 1. Deposition parameters of the coatings.
#MultilayersOuter Cr Layert, minUb, Vjsub, mA/cm2Tsub, K
Nh, nmhCr, µm
Cr2.535−5067582
CrN/Cr-5040500.55072576
CrN/Cr-25082500.572578
CrN/Cr-50045000.573583
Note:N—number of multilayers; h—thickness; t—deposition time; Ub—substrate bias; jsub—averaged ion current density on the substrate; Tsub—substrate temperature. The total thickness of all coatings was equal to 2.45 ± 0.15 µm. The first coating type had a monolayer structure of metallic Cr. Other coatings had a multilayer structure with alternating CrN and Cr layers, where the first layer was CrN. Additionally, 0.5 µm-thick Cr was deposited as an outer layer.
Table 2. The samples before and after oxidation.
Table 2. The samples before and after oxidation.
Uncoated E110 AlloyCoated E110 Alloy
CrCrN/Cr-50CrN/Cr-250CrN/Cr-500
Before Oxidation
Coatings 11 00227 i001 Coatings 11 00227 i002 Coatings 11 00227 i003 Coatings 11 00227 i004 Coatings 11 00227 i005
After 10 min Oxidation
Coatings 11 00227 i006 Coatings 11 00227 i007 Coatings 11 00227 i008 Coatings 11 00227 i009 Coatings 11 00227 i010
After 20 min Oxidation
Coatings 11 00227 i011 Coatings 11 00227 i012 Coatings 11 00227 i013 Coatings 11 00227 i014 Coatings 11 00227 i015
After 30 min Oxidation
Coatings 11 00227 i016 Coatings 11 00227 i017 Coatings 11 00227 i018 Coatings 11 00227 i019 Coatings 11 00227 i020
After 40 min Oxidation
Coatings 11 00227 i021 Coatings 11 00227 i022 Coatings 11 00227 i023 Coatings 11 00227 i024 Coatings 11 00227 i025
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sidelev, D.V.; Syrtanov, M.S.; Ruchkin, S.E.; Pirozhkov, A.V.; Kashkarov, E.B. Protection of Zr Alloy under High-Temperature Air Oxidation: A Multilayer Coating Approach. Coatings 2021, 11, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11020227

AMA Style

Sidelev DV, Syrtanov MS, Ruchkin SE, Pirozhkov AV, Kashkarov EB. Protection of Zr Alloy under High-Temperature Air Oxidation: A Multilayer Coating Approach. Coatings. 2021; 11(2):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11020227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sidelev, Dmitrii V., Maxim S. Syrtanov, Sergey E. Ruchkin, Alexey V. Pirozhkov, and Egor B. Kashkarov. 2021. "Protection of Zr Alloy under High-Temperature Air Oxidation: A Multilayer Coating Approach" Coatings 11, no. 2: 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11020227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop