Next Article in Journal
Mo–Bi Bimetallic Chalcogenide Nanoparticles Supported on CNTs for the Efficient Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to Methanol
Next Article in Special Issue
Peroxide Post-Treatment of Wood Impregnated with Micronized Basic Copper Carbonate
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue: “Optical Thin Films and Structures: Design and Advanced Applications”
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Fungicides, Plasma, UV-Additives and Weathering on the Adhesion Strength of Acrylic and Alkyd Coatings to the Norway Spruce Wood
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/coatings10121141
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Caffeine and TiO2 Nanoparticles Treatment of Spruce and Beech Wood for Increasing Transparent Coating Resistance against UV-Radiation and Mould Attacks

by
Miloš Pánek
1,*,
Kristýna Šimůnková
1,
David Novák
1,
Ondřej Dvořák
1,
Ondřej Schönfelder
1,
Přemysl Šedivka
1 and
Klára Kobetičová
2
1
Department of Wood Processing and Biomaterials, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Materials Engineering and Chemistry, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2020, 10(12), 1141; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10121141
Submission received: 10 November 2020 / Revised: 18 November 2020 / Accepted: 21 November 2020 / Published: 24 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Surface Modification and Treatment of Wood)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The effect of the initial modification of beech and spruce wood using a solution of caffeine and of a commercial product FN-NANO® FN-1 containing a water dispersion of TiO2 nanoparticles for increasing the service life of a transparent oil and acrylate coatings during 6 weeks of artificial accelerated weathering was tested. Changes in colour, gloss, and the contact angle of water were monitored. Degradation of the coating film was also evaluated visually and microscopically. The resistance of the coatings to mould growth was also subsequently tested. Based on the results, it is possible to recommend the initial treatment of spruce and beech wood with a 2% caffeine solution or 15% solution of FN-NANO® dispersion to increase the overall life of a transparent acrylic coating in exterior applications. No positive effect of the applied treatments was observed with the oil coating. In addition, lower concentrations of FN-NANO® did not have a sufficient effect, and the synergistic effect of using FN-NANO® in a mixture with a 1% caffeine solution was also not confirmed.

1. Introduction

Wood is a material of natural origin which is subject to a relatively rapid loss of its original appearance in exterior applications [1]. This is caused both by abiotic influences [2] and biotic infestation, in particular by moulds and wood-staining fungi [3,4]. The original appearance of wood in an exterior location can be further preserved using coating systems [5]. Transparent coatings can preserve not only the original design but also partly the colour of the base wood; however, their long-term stability is reduced compared to pigmented coatings by deeper and more intense penetration of sunlight into the coating film and base wood [6,7]. Another factor causing faster defoliation of coatings is the growth of fungal hyphae on their surface and in the zone between the coating and the wood surface [8,9]. In practice, penetrating base coatings containing fungicides and photo-stabilising components are most often used to suppress fungal growth, increase the bio-resistance of non-durable wood species, and increase photostability [5,10]. Ultraviolet (UV) stabilisers, hindered amine light stabilisers (HALS), and nanoparticles [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] are most often used as additives, and substances based on triazoles, carbamates, and others are most often used as fungicides [14,15].
An interesting possibility for increasing bio-resistance in parallel with photo-stabilisation of wood is the use of TiO2 nanoparticles in anatase form [2,13,16,17,18]. The use of various substances of natural origin extractable from renewable sources is a more ecologically acceptable form of wood protection against bio-attack [19]. One of the substances with a proven biocidal effect is caffeine [20,21,22], but it is also disadvantageous in terms of its washability from wood [23]. However, this disadvantage would be eliminated through use of the top barrier layer of the coating system, which protects the base caffeine-impregnated wood. Nevertheless, it is necessary to determine whether the initial pre-treatment with TiO2 nanoparticles and caffeine adversely affects the overall service life of the applied top coating, as described in some works [24,25]. Woods of the Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) were selected for research in this work. Spruce wood is widely used in exterior structures without a shelter—class 3 by EN 335 [26]. This is a type of wood with lower resistance to bio-attack [27] and its additional protection against bio-attack is often required. Transparent exterior coatings on this type of wood do not have optimal durability [28,29]. Beech wood is rarely used outdoors due to its low resistance to bio-attacks [27]. Its deep impregnation is necessary, and creosote oils are used, for example, for its use on railway sleepers [5]. Additionally, due to climate change, it is possible to anticipate an increase in its share in the total volume of wood processed—here, in Central Europe in particular [3,30,31]. The use of a suitable coating system and fungicidal components represents one of the simplest and cheapest variants of its possible use in class 3 by EN 335 [26]—outdoors without a shelter and without contact with the ground and water.
The aim of the experiment was to determine how the overall service life of the acrylate and oil coating system is affected by the initial surface modification of the underlying spruce and beech wood using caffeine solutions, dispersion of TiO2 nanoparticles, and their combinations. The method of artificial accelerated weathering in a UV-chamber and a subsequent test of mould growth on both ageless and weathered surfaces of treated wood were used for testing.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Wood Samples

Norway spruce (Picea abies, L. Karst) wood with an average density of 412 kg·m−3 and beech wood (Fagus sylvatica, L.) with an average density of 710 kg·m−3 were used for the experiments. Test specimens measuring 20 mm × 40 mm × 150 mm with a milled test area of 40 mm × 150 mm were prepared. Prior to treatment, the samples were conditioned in the laboratory at T = 20 °C and in air humidity of ϕ = 65% to an equilibrium humidity of 12%, and they were subsequently modified for further testing.

2.2. Treatments of Samples

In the first step, the test specimens were soaked in more concentrations of impregnation solutions containing an aqueous dispersion of commercial product FN-NANO© (FN-1) (FN-NANO® s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic). FN-NANO® dispersion containing about 7.5% TiO2 nanoparticles in anatase form with the addition of 2.4% ZnSO4 fulfilling the function of binder. Other sets were impregnated in 2% caffeine solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Prague, Czech Republic) and sets with different concentrations of FN-NANO® in solution combined with 1% of caffeine were also prepared (see Table 1). The intake of the solution and the soaking time were adjusted and controlled by continuous weighing of the samples so that the intake of impregnating substance into the wood was about 120 ± 20 kg·m−3 for both types of wood (beech is significantly more permeable compared to spruce). Subsequently, the samples were dried again in the laboratory at T = 20 °C and in air humidity of ϕ = 65% to an equilibrium humidity of 12%. After drying, in the second step, top coatings were applied by brush to the samples. Acrylic (AC) transparent exterior glaze (Impranal profi with UV-filter, Stachema a.s., Kolín, Czech Republic) and transparent coating based on vegetable oils (OL) for exterior OSMO UV 420 (Osmo, Münster, Germany). Both were applied in two layers by the producers’ recommendations with a deposit of approximately 100 g·m−2. A total of 4 test specimens were prepared for each type of treatment (see Table 1) and testing. After drying the coating systems, tests of artificial accelerated weathering were performed.

2.3. Artificial Accelerated Weathering

Artificial accelerated weathering (AW) was performed on the basis of EN 927-6 [32] in a UV chamber (Q-Lab, Cleveland, OH, USA) (radiation parameters 1.10 Wm−2; T on black panel = 65 °C were modified) as standard with 2.5 h radiation phases and 0.5 h spraying with distilled water in the dark, and air conditioning at 45 °C once a week for 24 h. In addition, once a week, 3 temperature cycles (1 h at 80 °C and one hour at −25 °C) were inserted in the Discovery My DM340 air conditioning chamber (ACS, Massa Martana, Italy). The tests lasted for 6 weeks and the selected properties of the tested samples were evaluated at the beginning and after the 3rd and 6th week of AW.

2.4. Tested Properties—Colour, Gloss, Surface Wetting, and Visual Evaluation

The evaluated properties were colour changes measured by a spectrophotometer (CM-600d, Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan) with an observation angle of 10°, d/8 geometry, D65 light source, and the SCI setting was used. The colour changes of the parameters L* (brightness), a* (+red; −green), b* (+yellow, −blue), and the total colour change ΔE* according to the known relationship ΔE* = (ΔL2 + Δa2 + Δb2)½ were evaluated [33]. Twelve measurements were made for each group of test samples and AW time.
The gloss was measured with an MG268-F2 glossmeter (KSJ, Quanzhou, China) at an angle of 60° according to EN ISO 2813 [34]. Twelve measurements were performed for each group of tested samples and AW time.
Surface wetting was evaluated using Goniometer DSA 30E (Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) and Krüss software (Krüss, Hamburg, Germany). The sessile drop method was used. The dosing volume of the distilled water drop was 5 μL and measurement time of the water contact angle on the surface after deposition was 5 s. A total of 20 measurements for each type of treatment and AW time were performed.
Visual evaluation was performed using 10× folder magnification and scans of samples (using a desktop scanner at a resolution of 300 dots per inch (DPI) (Canon 2520 MFP, Canon, Tokyo, Japan) before and during AW. Microscopic analyses of surfaces used a confocal laser scanning microscope (Lext Ols 4100, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with 108-fold magnification.

2.5. Mould Resistance Test

The test samples without weathering and after 6 weeks of artificial accelerated weathering were tested for the resistance of the surfaces to moulds. Petri dishes with Czapek–Dox agar were left in the open for 24 h to free up mould spores. This method provides more variable results compared to the laboratory methods using pure mould cultures, but it corresponds better to the real conditions of the exposed wood. The samples were then sealed and left at 30 °C and 90% relative humidity. After checking the growth of mould in the dish, moist test specimens measuring 15 mm × 40 mm × 10 mm were placed in the dishes with growing moulds, where their upper side measuring 40 mm × 15 mm was manipulated from the surfaces of the exposed test specimens, and not exposed to artificial accelerated weathering. The samples were placed on a low plastic pad to prevent the agar from seeping into the wood. Two test specimens were placed in each dish so that one dish did not contain samples from the same set of the tested types of treatments. Mould growth was evaluated after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of the mould test based on the ČSN 490604 [35] standard, where degree 0 corresponds to samples without growth, 0%–10% is evaluated by degree 1, 10%–30% by degree 2, 30%–50% by degree 3, and above 50% of the stand at degree 4.

2.6. Statistical Evaluation

The results of the obtained measurements were evaluated using Statistica software (version 13.4) (StatSoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and using mean values, standard deviations (SD), and whisker plots using means and 2 ± SD.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Visual and Microscopic Evaluation

Based on visual evaluation supplemented by a microscopic analysis of the surfaces of the tested samples after artificial accelerated aging, positive effect of certain types of pre-treatments improving the durability of the acrylate coating (Figure 1) were evident. Compared to untreated wood and two layers of acrylic coating (Figure 1b), these were mainly 2% caffeine solution treatments (Figure 1c), the surface treated with 15% FN-NANO® dispersion (Figure 1e), in beech wood also 10% FN-NANO® dispersions (Figure 1d), and in spruce, the combination of 1% caffeine solution and 10% FN-NANO® dispersion (Figure 1f) also had a relatively good effect. For other types of treatment, the result was better compared to the initially untreated surface, but the positive effect was not as expressive. As with other types of bio-treatments [36], the effect of caffeine treatment on wetting can be explained by waterborne acrylate coating by reducing the contact angle of water wetting and increasing surface free energy, which positively affect the adhesion of coatings to wood [37,38]. Based on our further research, it was found that the contact angle of water wetting in beech decreased after adjustment from the original 63.7° to 52.6° and from 105.6° to 83.4° in spruce, whilst surface free energy increased from 49.15 to 53.70 mN·m−2 in beech and from 30.5 to 43.9 mN·m−2 in spruce [39,40]. Regarding the positive effect of FN-NANO® containing TiO2 nanoparticles, it was documented that at certain concentrations—in particular, if TiO2 nanoparticles penetrate deeper into the wood—the effect on the service life of the top-coating system may not be negative, as evidenced by certain works [24,25]. In fact, they can even reduce the degradation of the under-laying wood surfaces by capturing part of the incident UV and visible radiation spectra. The potential synergistic effect of a mixture of TiO2 nanoparticles and caffeine on improving the service life of coating systems due to weathering was not demonstrated in this work. Only in the case of spruce was the overall appearance of the coatings slightly better after the combined treatment, whereas for beech it worsened (Figure 1d,e versus Figure 1f,g). Figure 1a shows the fully degraded surface of untreated native wood with a preserved layer of non-photodegradable cellulose [41], causing significant lightening of the test specimens during artificial accelerated weathering (Figure 1a).
Overall, the observed degradations of oil-based coating (Figure 2) were significantly higher compared to the degradations of acrylic coating (Figure 1). They were comparable for both beech and spruce wood without pre-treatment (Figure 2a,c), and the different types of treatments did not have a significant positive impact (Figure 2b,d). For this reason, colour changes, gloss changes, surface wetting, and mould growth were only subsequently evaluated for the acrylic coating system (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 and Table 2).

3.2. Colour, Gloss, and Water Contact Angle Changes during AW

During artificial accelerated weathering, there were significant colour changes in all of the tested surfaces (Figure 3). The changes were smaller for darker beech wood in cases where the coating film was preserved and there was no leaching of darker photodegraded lignin [42], and thus the overall colour change was lower than in comparable cases of overall lighter spruce wood (Figure 1). In contrast, for untreated wood, the ΔE* was greater for beech, as only light-coloured cellulose remained in the surface zones [4]. Overall, the coated surfaces of the primary treated wood often had a higher overall colour change compared to the untreated surfaces. However, this was due to the disruption of the coating film of the untreated surfaces (R-A) (see also Figure 1) and the leaching of darker photodegraded lignins [43] and subsequent lightening, thus returning the colour to the original lighter shade of wood that had not been weathered. Of the pre-treatments that increased the overall service life of the coating film, they also had a partial effect on reducing the colour changes of 2-A for spruce and 1-A and less 2-A for beech. This confirms the positive effect of TiO2 on the absorption and reflection of UV radiation, and thus reduces its impact on wood [13,44]. However, it was demonstrated that its effect and suitable concentrations vary for different types of wood (Figure 3). The decrease in gloss of the coatings sensitively predicts the degradation of its surface layers [45,46]. In terms of the tested treatments, a positive effect on the preservation of the original gloss was observed in caffeine-treated spruce wood (Figure 4) with an overall increased service life (Figure 1). The same was observed in beech treated with a higher concentration of TiO2 nanoparticles B-2-A (Figure 4) with an observed positive effect on colour fastness (Figure 3), as well as the overall service life of the top acrylate coating system (Figure 1). The contact angle of wetting and the reduction of hydrophobicity of the surfaces was observed mainly in untreated photodegraded wood, particularly in beech (Figure 5). Compared to other pre-treatments, a slight decrease in coated samples was only observed for S-1-A, which also confirmed the observed effect on reducing the overall life of the coating film (Figure 1). The hydrophobic effect was otherwise preserved in the samples where the top layer of the coating film was already disturbed (Figure 1), and there were only slight differences in the variability of the observed values (Figure 5). This also corresponds to the results of the work [46], where the preservation of hydrophobicity also did not correspond to the disruption of the overall appearance of the tested oak wood samples. Overall, a relatively high variability of the achieved values was observed (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). This is caused by several factors. The first factor is the variability of the measured values of individual samples in the set due to the inhomogeneity of wood as a material of natural origin. The second reason is the increase in inhomogeneity of some tested surfaces due to weathering, as was documented in Figure 1. It was confirmed that the quality of the coating after aging can be evaluated overall only by a complex of evaluated characteristics, where the overall visual evaluation of the coating film must not be neglected [7].

3.3. Mould Growth Tests

Moulds pose a significant risk of damage to surface-treated wood products outdoors, and moulds have a significant impact on their appearance [5]. There are various methods for testing mould growth on wood and treated wood [3,4,47]. The results can vary depending on the method used [3]. One of the possibilities is to use a free fall of mould spores into a prepared nutrient medium and subsequent insertion of test specimens [48]. This method provides more variable results similar to tests in natural conditions [4]. In this work, the highest rate of observed mould growth from the tested test samples of each series was evaluated (Table 2). This increases the likelihood that the level of risk will be more accurately verified in real exposures, where different species of mould may begin to grow under appropriate conditions [47], or a combination thereof.
In general, compared to spruce, higher mould growth was observed on the surface of the tested coated beech samples (Table 2). This can be explained by the higher natural bio-resistance of spruce wood [27] and also by the better durability of the coating system after AW on spruce wood (Figure 1). Before and after AW, treatment with a 2% caffeine solution (5-A) with a biocidal effect, which was also confirmed in other works, had a positive effect on beech and spruce wood [2,23]. In comparison with the work of Kwaśniewska-Sip et al. [49], a better biocidal effect was achieved due to barrier protection of treated wood with a coating that effectively prevented caffeine leaching during 6 weeks of artificial accelerated weathering. In several cases, a positive effect of treatment with TiO2 nanoparticles was visible [8]—in particular, at a concentration of 15% FN-NANO® (2-A and 4-A), more so in samples after AW (Table 2). This may be related to the greater exposure of the TiO2-treated layer connected with the degradation of the acrylate coating, which in itself did not show a significant anti-mould effect. A similar result was observed for spruce wood, but the growth of mould was generally lower than for beech wood. The result confirms that only higher concentrations of TiO2 nanoparticles have sufficient fungicidal activity, even if the specific amount required is affected by the co-modifying agent [18,50].
Research also confirms that the protection of beech wood against bio-attacks by moulds outdoors using coatings is more difficult. In addition to its lower bio-resistance, its greater permeability may also have an effect [51], and thereby increased demands on the amount of applied protective substance, which does not provide sufficient film-forming protection on the wood surface. However, it is encouraging that higher concentrations of the active ingredient TiO2 used in this research (sets 2-A and 4-A) represented a relatively effective alternative against mould growth (Table 2).

4. Conclusions

Transparent coatings on wood outdoors do not have sufficient service life and colourfastness due to more significant penetration of sunlight into the coating film and the base wood. Another significant factor causing degradation of coatings in humid environments are moulds. The possibility of increasing the durability and resistance to mould attacks in acrylic and oil coating on beech and spruce wood was investigated. Initial treatments of wood by dipping in a 2% solution of caffeine and various concentrations of commercial FN-NANO® containing TiO2 nanoparticles and their mixtures were used. A significant positive effect of caffeine treatment on the service life of the acrylate coating system during accelerated artificial weathering was observed in both types of tested woods. The 15% FN-NANO® dispersions treatment also showed good efficiency. The combined effect of a mixture of caffeine and FN-NANO® had no significant positive effect. No improved quality of the oil coating was observed using the initial wood treatments. Degradation by moulds was significantly reduced when the wood was initially treated with a 2% caffeine solution. Higher concentrations of FN-NANO® dispersion had a positive impact—in particular, on samples degraded for 6 weeks in a UV chamber. Based on the results, it is possible to recommend the initial treatment of spruce and beech wood with a 2% caffeine solution or 15% solution of FN-NANO® dispersion containing TiO2 nanoparticles in order to increase the overall service life of transparent acrylic coating in exterior applications.

Author Contributions

The work presented in this paper is a collaborative development by all of the authors. Conceptualisation: M.P. and K.K.; methodology: M.P.; investigation: K.Š., O.D., P.Š., and D.N.; resources: M.P. and K.K.; data curation: O.S., D.N., and K.Š.; writing—original draft preparation: M.P.; writing—review and editing: K.K.; visualisation, K.Š. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation, Project No. 19-02067S “The effects of methylxanthine-based biocides on the properties of constructional timber” and by Grant “EVA 4.0”, No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803 financed by OP RDE.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kržišnik, D.; Lesar, B.; Thaler, N.; Humar, M. Influence of natural and artificial weathering on the colour change of different wood and wood-based materials. Forests 2018, 9, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Feist, W.C. Weathering and Protection of Wood; American Wood-Preservers’ Association: Kansas City, KS, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  3. Imken, A.A.P.; Brischke, C.; Kögel, S.; Krause, K.C.; Mai, C. Resistance of different wood-based materials against mould fungi: A comparison of methods. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2020, 78, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gobakken, L.R.; Lebow, P.K. Modelling mould growth on coated modified and unmodified wood substrates exposed outdoors. Wood Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 315–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gaylarde, C.C.; Morton, L.H.G.; Loh, K.; Shirakawa, M.A. Biodeterioration of extrernal architectural paint films—A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2011, 65, 1189–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cogulet, A.; Blanchet, P.; Landry, V. The multifactorial aspect of wood weathering: A review based on a holistic approach of wood degradation protected by clear coating. BioResources 2018, 13, 2116–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Evans, P.D.; Vollmer, S.; Kim, J.D.W.; Chan, G.; Gibson, S.K. Improving the performance of clear coatings on wood through the aggregation of marginal gains. Coatings 2016, 6, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gobakken, L.R.; Westin, M. Surface mould growth on five modified wood substrates coated with three different coating systems when exposed outdoors. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2008, 62, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Evans, P.D.; Haase, J.G.; Shakri, A.; Seman, B.M.; Kiguchi, M. The search for durable exterior clear coatings for wood. Coatings 2015, 5, 830–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cristea, M.V.; Riedl, B.; Blanchet, P. Enhancing the performance of exterior waterborne coatings for wood by inorganic nanosized UV absorbers. Prog. Org. Coat. 2010, 69, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. George, B.; Suttie, E.; Merlin, A.; Deglise, X. Photodegradation and photostabilisation of wood—The state of the art. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 88, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Forsthuber, B.; Schaller, C.; Grüll, G. Evaluation of the photo stabilising efficiency of clear coatings comprising organic UV absorbers and mineral UV screeners on wood surfaces. Wood Sci. Technol. 2013, 2, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, X.; Liu, S.; Chang, H.; Liu, J. Sol-gel deposition of TiO2 nanocoatings on wood surfaces with enhanced hydrophobicity and photostability. Wood Fiber Sci. 2014, 46, 109–117. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandberg, D. Additives in Wood Products—Today and Future Development. In Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-Based Bioproducts, Environmental Footprints and Eco-Design of Products and Processes; Springer Science + Business Media Singapore: Singapore, 2016; pp. 105–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Reinprecht, L. Wood Deterioration, Protection and Maintenance, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; p. 376. [Google Scholar]
  16. Verdier, T.; Coutand, M.; Bertron, A.; Roques, C. Antibacterial Activity of TiO2 photocatalyst alone or in coatings on E. coli: The influence of methodological aspects. Coatings 2014, 4, 670–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, H.; Michen, B.; Burgert, I. Real test-bed studies at the ETH House of Natural Resources–wood surface protection for outdoor applications. Inf. Constr. 2017, 69, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Salem, M.Z.M.; Mansour, M.M.A.; Mohamed, W.S.; Ali, H.M.; Hatamleh, A.A. Evaluation of the antifungal activity of treated Acacia saligna wood with Paraloid B-72/TiO2 nanocomposites against the growth of Alternaria tenuissima, Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium culmorum. BioResources 2017, 12, 7615–7627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singh, T.; Singh, A.P. A review on natural products as wood protectant. Wood Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 851–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arora, D.S.; Ohlan, D. In vitro studies on antifungal activity of tea (Camellia sinensis) and coffee (Coffea arabica) against wood-rotting fungi. J. Basic Microbiol. 1997, 37, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kwaśniewska-Sip, P.; Cofta, G.; Nowak, P.B. Resistance of fungal growth on Scots pine treated with caffeine. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 132, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kobetičová, K.; Nábělková, J.; Ďurišová, K.; Šimůnková, K.; Černý, R. Antifungal activity of methylxanthines based on their properties. BioResources 2020, 15, 8110–8120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Broda, M.; Mazela, B.; Frankowski, M. Durability of wood treated with AATMOS and caffeine—Towards the long-term carbon storage. Maderas Cienc. Tecnol. 2018, 20, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moya, R.; Rodríguez-Zuniga, A.; Vega-Baudrit, J.; Puente-Urbina, A. Effects of adding TiO2 nanoparticles to a water-based varnish for wood applied to nine tropical woods of Costa Rica exposed to natural and accelerated weathering. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2016, 14, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pánek, M.; Hýsek, Š.; Dvořák, O.; Zeidler, A.; Oberhofnerová, E.; Šimůnková, K.; Šedivka, P. Durability of the exterior transparent coatings on nano-photostabilized English oak wood and possibility of its prediction before artificial accelerated weathering. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. EN 335:2013 Durability of Wood and Wood-Based Products—Use Classes: Definitions, Application to Solid Wood and Wood-Based Products; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
  27. EN 350:2016 Durability of Wood and Wood-Based Products—Testing and Classification of the Durability to Biological Agents of Wood and Wood-Based Materials; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
  28. Pánek, M.; Reinprecht, L. Colour stability and surface defects of naturally aged wood treated with transparent paints for exterior constructions. Wood Res. 2014, 59, 421–430. [Google Scholar]
  29. Reinprecht, L.; Pánek, M. Effects of wood roughness, light pigments, and water repellent on the color stability of painted spruce subjected to natural and accelerated weathering. BioResources 2015, 10, 7203–7219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gejdoš, M.; Lieskovský, M.; Potkány, M.; Nozdrovický, L. The future perspectives of spruce and fir wood use in selected countries of the Central Europe for wooden constructions. In Increasing the Use of Wood in the Global Bio-Economy 2018; Proceeding paper; University of Belgrade: Belgrade, Serbia; WoodEMA: Zagreb, Croatia, 2018; pp. 160–167. [Google Scholar]
  31. Burri, S.; Haeler, E.; Eugster, W.; Haeni, M.; Etzold, S.; Walthert, L.; Braun, S.; Zweifel, R. How did Swiss forest trees respond to the hot summer 2015? Erde 2019, 150, 214–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. EN 927-6:2008 Paints and Varnishes. Coating Materials and Coating Systems for Exterior Wood. Exposure of Wood Coatings to Artificial Weathering Using Fluorescent UV Lamps and Water; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
  33. Stearns, E.I. Colorimetry, 2nd ed.; Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage: Vienna, Austria, 1986; p. 74. [Google Scholar]
  34. EN ISO 2813:2015 Paints and Varnishes, Determination of Gloss Value at 20°, 60° and 85°; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.
  35. ČSN 49 0604:1982 Protection of Wood. In Methods for Determining the Biocidal Properties of Wood Preservatives; Office for Standardization and Measurement: Prague, Czech Republic, 1982.
  36. Ziglio, A.C.; Sardela, M.R.; Goncalves, D. Wettability, surface free energy and cellulose crystallinity for pine wood (Pinus sp.) modified with chili pepper extracts as natural preservatives. Cellulose 2018, 25, 6151–6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bulian, F.; Graystone, J. Wood Coatings—Theory and Practice; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; p. 320. ISBN 978-0444528407. [Google Scholar]
  38. de Meier, M. A Review of Interfacial Aspects in Wood Coatings: Wetting, Surface Energy, Substrate Penetration and Adhesion. COST E18 Final Seminar 2005 16pp. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260601859 (accessed on 9 March 2014).
  39. Šimůnková, K.; Reinprecht, L.; Nábělková, J.; Kindl, J.; Borůvka, V.; Šobotník, J.; Lišková, T.; Pánek, M. Caffeine—Perspective natural biocide for wood protection in interiors against decaying fungi and termites. 2020. Prepared for publication. [Google Scholar]
  40. Šimůnková, K.; Zeidler, A.; Schönfelder, O.; Pánek, M. Impact of modification by caffeine on some surface properties of beech wood. In Proceedings of the 9th Hardwood Conference, Sopron, Hungary, 21–22 October 2020. (moved due to pandemic to 2021). [Google Scholar]
  41. Volkmer, T.; Noël, M.; Arnold, M.; Strautmann, J. Analysis of lignin degradation on wood surfaces to create a UV-protecting cellulose rich layer. Int.. Wood Prod. J. 2016, 7, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Müller, U.; Ratzsch, M.; Schwanninger, M.; Steiner, M.; Zobl, H. Yellowing and IR-changes of spruce wood as result of UV-irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2003, 69, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sudiyani, Y. Chemical characteristics of surfaces of hardwood and softwood deteriorated by weathering. J. Wood Sci. 1999, 45, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pánek, M.; Oberhofnerová, E.; Hýsek, Š.; Šedivka, P.; Zeidler, A. Colour stabilization of oak, spruce, larch and Douglas fir heartwood treated with mixtures of nanoparticles dispersions and UV-stabilizers after exposure to UV and VIS-radiation. Materials 2018, 11, 1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ghosh, M.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, V.S.K. Studies on the loss of gloss of shellac and polyurethane finishes exposed to UV. Maderas Cienc. Technol. 2015, 17, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Pánek, M.; Oberhofnerová, E.; Zeidler, A.; Šedivka, P. Efficacy of hydrophobic coatings in protecting oak wood surfaces during accelerated weathering. Coatings 2017, 7, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lie, S.K.; Thiis, T.K.; Vestol, G.I.; Hoibo, O.; Gobakken, L.R. Can existing mould growth models be used to predict mould growth on wooden claddings exposed to transient wetting? Build. Environ. 2019, 152, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wasserbauer, R. Microbial biodeterioration of electrotechnical insulation materials. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2004, 53, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kwaśniewska-Sip, P.; Bartkowiak, M.; Cofta, G.; Nowak, P.B. Resistance of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) after treatment with caffeine and thermal modification against Aspergillus niger. BioResources 2019, 14, 1890–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fonseca, C.; Ochoa, A.; Ulloa, M.T.; Alvarez, E.; Canales, D.; Zapata, P.A. Poly(lactic acid)/TiO2 nanocomposites as alternative biocidal and antifungal materials. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Biomim. 2015, 57, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Požgaj, A.; Chovanec, D.; Kurjatko, S.; Babiak, M. Štruktúra a Vlastnosti Dreva. (Structure and Properties of Wood), 1st ed.; Príroda a.s.: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1993; p. 485. [Google Scholar]
Coatings 10 01141 g001a 550Coatings 10 01141 g001b 550
Figure 1. Beech (left) and spruce (right) wood samples before (0.w.) and after accelerated weathering (AW) (6.w.). (a) Reference native wood (R-R); (b) acrylic coating on untreated wood (R-A); (c) acrylic coating on caffeine treated wood (5-A); (d) acrylic coating on wood treated with 10% FN-NANO® (1-A); (e) acrylic coating on wood treated with 15% FN-NANO® (2-A); (f) acrylic coating on wood treated with a mixture of 10% FN-NANO® and 1% of caffeine (3-A); (g) acrylic coating on wood treated with a mixture of 15% FN-NANO® and 1% of caffeine (4-A). Note: The real observed area of microscopic picture was 2500 µm × 2500 µm using 108-folder magnification.
Figure 1. Beech (left) and spruce (right) wood samples before (0.w.) and after accelerated weathering (AW) (6.w.). (a) Reference native wood (R-R); (b) acrylic coating on untreated wood (R-A); (c) acrylic coating on caffeine treated wood (5-A); (d) acrylic coating on wood treated with 10% FN-NANO® (1-A); (e) acrylic coating on wood treated with 15% FN-NANO® (2-A); (f) acrylic coating on wood treated with a mixture of 10% FN-NANO® and 1% of caffeine (3-A); (g) acrylic coating on wood treated with a mixture of 15% FN-NANO® and 1% of caffeine (4-A). Note: The real observed area of microscopic picture was 2500 µm × 2500 µm using 108-folder magnification.
Coatings 10 01141 g001aCoatings 10 01141 g001b
Coatings 10 01141 g002 550
Figure 2. Oil-based coating after 6 weeks of AW. (a) Beech wood without pre-treatment (B-R-O); (b) beech wood with caffeine pre-treatment (B-5-O) achieved the best results from the tested oil-coated variants; (c) spruce wood without pre-treatment (S-R-O); (d) spruce wood with 10% FN-NANO® treatment achieved the best results from the tested oil-coated variants (S-1-O).
Figure 2. Oil-based coating after 6 weeks of AW. (a) Beech wood without pre-treatment (B-R-O); (b) beech wood with caffeine pre-treatment (B-5-O) achieved the best results from the tested oil-coated variants; (c) spruce wood without pre-treatment (S-R-O); (d) spruce wood with 10% FN-NANO® treatment achieved the best results from the tested oil-coated variants (S-1-O).
Coatings 10 01141 g002
Coatings 10 01141 g003 550
Figure 3. Colour changes in tested wooden surfaces during AW: (a) L* changes on spruce; (b) L* changes on beech; (c) a* changes on spruce; (d) a* changes on beech; (e) b* changes on spruce; (f) b* changes on beech; (g) ΔE* changes on spruce; (h) ΔE* changes on beech.
Figure 3. Colour changes in tested wooden surfaces during AW: (a) L* changes on spruce; (b) L* changes on beech; (c) a* changes on spruce; (d) a* changes on beech; (e) b* changes on spruce; (f) b* changes on beech; (g) ΔE* changes on spruce; (h) ΔE* changes on beech.
Coatings 10 01141 g003
Coatings 10 01141 g004 550
Figure 4. Gloss changes in tested wooden surfaces during AW: (a) Gloss changes on tested spruce samples; (b) Gloss changes on tested beech samples.
Figure 4. Gloss changes in tested wooden surfaces during AW: (a) Gloss changes on tested spruce samples; (b) Gloss changes on tested beech samples.
Coatings 10 01141 g004
Coatings 10 01141 g005 550
Figure 5. Water contact angle changes in tested wooden surfaces during AW: (a) Water contact angle (°) on tested spruce samples; (b) Water contact angle (°) on tested beech samples.
Figure 5. Water contact angle changes in tested wooden surfaces during AW: (a) Water contact angle (°) on tested spruce samples; (b) Water contact angle (°) on tested beech samples.
Coatings 10 01141 g005
Table
Table 1. Tested sets of specimens and their specification.
Table 1. Tested sets of specimens and their specification.
Types of SamplesSolution of FN-NANO® Dispersion (Concentration)Caffeine Solution
(Concentration)		Acrylic Coating
(AC)		Oil-Based Coating
(OL)
R-R––––
R-A––2 layers–
1-A10%–2 layers–
2-A15%–2 layers–
3-A10%1%2 layers–
4-A15%1%2 layers–
5-A–2%2 layers–
R-O–––2 layers
1-O10%––2 layers
2-O15%––2 layers
3-O10%1%–2 layers
4-O15%1%–2 layers
5-O–2%–2 layers
Note: The spruce samples were marked (S) and the beech samples (B). Solutions of FN-NANO® dispersion with concentrations 3.5% and 5%, as well as their combinations with a total 1% concentration of caffeine were also prepared, but the achieved results after artificial weathering were unsatisfactory, and they have therefore not been further evaluated in this article.
Table
Table 2. Maximum mould growth on tested samples before (R) and after weathering (W).
Table 2. Maximum mould growth on tested samples before (R) and after weathering (W).
BeechDegree of Moulds Growth
(% of Surface Covered by Moulds in Parenthesis)		SpruceDegree of Moulds Growth
(% of Surface Covered by Moulds in Parenthesis)
Time of Moulds ExposureTime of Moulds Exposure
1 week2 weeks3 weeks4 weeks1 week2 weeks3 weeks4 weeks
B-R-R-R0 (0)4 (80)4 (90)4 (90)S-R-R-R0 (0)3 (50)4 (65)4 (60)
B-R-R-W0 (0)3 (50)4 (60)4 (75)S-R-R-W0 (0)3 (50)4 (60)4 (90)
B-R-A-R0 (0)3 (50)3 (50)4 (75)S-R-A-R0 (0)3 (40)4 (55)4 (65)
B-R-A-W0 (0)4 (75)4 (75)4 (75)S-R-A-W0 (0)4 (75)4 (80)4 (95)
B-5-A-R0 (0)1 (5)1 (5)2 (10)S-5-A-R0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (5)
B-5-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (25)S-5-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
B-4-A-R0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (25)S-4-A-R0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (10)
B-4-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (5)S-4-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)
B-3-A-R0 (0)4 (75)4 (85)4 (100)S-3-A-R0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (10)
B-3-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (25)S-3-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)
B-2-A-R0 (0)4 (75)4 (75)4 (100)S-2-A-R0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (35)
B-2-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (5)S-2-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (1)
B-1-A-R0 (0)4 (75)4 (75)4 (100)S-1-A-R0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (5)
B-1-A-W0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (25)S-1-A-W0 (0)1 (5)1 (5)1 (5)
Note: degree 0 represents the best results; degree 4 represents the worst results.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pánek, M.; Šimůnková, K.; Novák, D.; Dvořák, O.; Schönfelder, O.; Šedivka, P.; Kobetičová, K. Caffeine and TiO2 Nanoparticles Treatment of Spruce and Beech Wood for Increasing Transparent Coating Resistance against UV-Radiation and Mould Attacks. Coatings 2020, 10, 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10121141

AMA Style

Pánek M, Šimůnková K, Novák D, Dvořák O, Schönfelder O, Šedivka P, Kobetičová K. Caffeine and TiO2 Nanoparticles Treatment of Spruce and Beech Wood for Increasing Transparent Coating Resistance against UV-Radiation and Mould Attacks. Coatings. 2020; 10(12):1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10121141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pánek, Miloš, Kristýna Šimůnková, David Novák, Ondřej Dvořák, Ondřej Schönfelder, Přemysl Šedivka, and Klára Kobetičová. 2020. "Caffeine and TiO2 Nanoparticles Treatment of Spruce and Beech Wood for Increasing Transparent Coating Resistance against UV-Radiation and Mould Attacks" Coatings 10, no. 12: 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10121141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop