Next Article in Journal
Linear and Nonlinear Intersubband Optical Properties of Direct Band Gap GeSn Quantum Dots
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Characterization of Microsphere ZnO ALD Coating Dedicated for the Fiber-Optic Refractive Index Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Impaired Liver Size and Compromised Neurobehavioral Activity are Elicited by Chitosan Nanoparticles in the Zebrafish Embryo Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fracture Mechanics and Oxygen Gas Barrier Properties of Al2O3/ZnO Nanolaminates on PET Deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/nano9010123
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Titania Nanotubes/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites Produced with the Use of the Atomic Layer Deposition Technique: Estimation of Bioactivity and Nanomechanical Properties

by
Aleksandra Radtke
1,2,*,
Michalina Ehlert
1,2,
Tomasz Jędrzejewski
3,
Beata Sadowska
4,
Marzena Więckowska-Szakiel
4,
Jani Holopainen
5,†,
Mikko Ritala
5,
Markku Leskelä
5,
Michał Bartmański
6,
Marek Szkodo
6 and
Piotr Piszczek
1,2
1
Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Gagarina 7, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
2
Nano-implant Ltd. Gagarina 5, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
3
Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
4
Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland
5
Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, A.I. Virtasen aukio 1, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
6
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Beneq, PO Box 4, 02201 Espoo, Finland.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(1), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010123
Submission received: 21 December 2018 / Revised: 14 January 2019 / Accepted: 15 January 2019 / Published: 19 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design of Nanostructured Materials by Atomic Layer Deposition and Its Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Titanium dioxide nanotubes/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites were produced on a titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA) and studied as a biocompatible coating for an implant surface modification. As a novel approach for this type of nanocomposite fabrication, the atomic layer deposition (ALD) method with an extremely low number of cycles was used to enrich titania nanotubes (TNT) with a very thin hydroxyapatite coating. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used for determination of the structure and the surface morphology of the fabricated nanocoatings. The biointegration activity of the layers was estimated based on fibroblasts’ proliferation on the TNT/HA surface. The antibacterial activity was determined by analyzing the ability of the layers to inhibit bacterial colonization and biofilm formation. Mechanical properties of the Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA samples were estimated by measuring the hardness, Young’s module, and susceptibility to scratching. The results revealed that the nanoporous titanium alloy coatings enriched with a very thin hydroxyapatite layer may be a promising way to achieve the desired balance between biofunctional and biomechanical properties of modern implants.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The growing demand for bone implants, which could replace worn bone elements or support their regeneration, is closely related to the active lifestyle of contemporary people, as well as the aging of societies. Numerous groups in the world have carried out intensive studies on the development of new implant technologies and have been searching for novel biomaterials for implant production, with great progress [1]. The aim of these studies is the fabrication of biocompatible materials, which are characterized by non-toxicity, antimicrobial activity, and minimal impact on the immune system.
Titanium and its alloys are biomaterials widely used in the implants intended for orthopaedics, dentistry, maxillofacial surgery, as well as in laryngology and cardiology [2,3]. This is due to the low toxicity of these materials, their excellent corrosion resistance, high specific surface area, as well as very good mechanical properties. Despite the unique properties of titanium and its alloys, to meet the above-mentioned requirement, associated with high biocompatibility, the implant surfaces must be modified by appropriate mechanical or chemical treatments or by forming composite coatings on them [4,5,6,7]. Moreover, the modified surface of the implant must be resistant to mechanical damage, abrasion, and infections, and it must show biocompatibility [8]. The results of previous works indicate that the formation of titania nanotube (TNT) layers on the implant surface improves its osseointegration while maintaining appropriate mechanical properties [4,5,9,10].
Deposition of hydroxyapatite film (HA-Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) on the implant surface seems to be highly beneficial from a biological point of view because HA is the most stable form of calcium phosphate [11,12], which is the natural bone component (bones consist of c.a. 70% hydroxyapatite (HA), 20% type I collagen fibrils, and about 10% water [13,14,15]. Unfortunately, HA coating often negatively affects the mechanical properties of the complete system (metal substrate + HA layer) [16,17]. Studies on the HA nanolayers revealed their tendency to form nano-sized crystals of a high surface area, and thereby result in faster dissolution in body fluids. However, it should be noted that the osteoclastic resorption and the solubility of hydroxyapatite are also sensitive to factors, such as: crystallinity of hydroxyapatite, incorporation of carbonates, and content of other ions [12,18]. A biological HA is usually a calcium deficient and it is always substituted with a carbonate. This decreases the value of the Ca/P atomic ratio, which is equal to 1.67 in the stoichiometric HA [19,20]. HA coatings, in the form of dense films, have shown success in implant fixation (in-vivo), which increases the implant life by increasing the strength and rate of implant integration [21,22,23]. In addition to their bioactive role, hydroxyapatite films deposited on metallic implants can minimize metal ions’ release in the physiological environment of the body [24]. However, HA coatings are brittle and have low strength under wear conditions [25,26]. HA coated implants may also suffer from fatigue damage under cyclic loading in the body [27]. Lynn et al. investigated the effect of HA coating thickness on the fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V [28]. They found that coatings up to 100 um have no effect on the fatigue life of the alloy as compared to the uncoated alloy, but coatings of a thickness of 150 µm considerably reduces the fatigue resistance of Ti-6Al-4V [28].
The idea of TNT coating covered with a very thin hydroxyapatite layer seems to be especially promising in improving bone-implant osteointegration processes without affecting the fatigue resistance of Ti6Al4V. An analysis of literature reports indicates that the production of the titanium dioxide layer on the implant surface improves the adhesion and affects the anti-corrosion behavior of the oxide contact layer [2,3,5,6,7,29,30]. However, the increase in thickness of the HA layer leads to a weakening of the mechanical properties of the overall system, which can result in smoothening of the earlier made micro- or nanoscale modifications. Therefore, the deposition rate and coverage, coating morphology, and especially interfacial quality, are of great importance when choosing the right deposition technology for medical applications [19,31,32,33,34]. Hydroxyapatite coatings can be produced by many different techniques, e.g., the hydrothermal method, sol-gel, micro-arc oxidation, electrodeposition, biomimetic deposition, and plasma spraying [31,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) has also been used to synthesize bio-ceramic coatings. ALD is a chemical method, which allows the production of highly conformal and uniform thin films. Due to the alternating precursor pulses with self-limiting reactions, ALD is capable of producing films with atomic layer thickness control and to coat uniformly and conformally complex 3D structures [17,33,42,43,44].
The aim of our work was the estimation of the bioactivity and nano-mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA systems, which may be applied as a potential material for the construction of new generation implants. Nanocomposite TNT/HA coating on the surface of a titanium alloy implant is intended to initiate and accelerate regeneration of the bone tissue and to stimulate osteogenic cells. In our work, we combined three synthetic techniques: (1) Electrochemical oxidation of a Ti6Al4V surface to create a nanotubular titania surface, (2) ALD of a very thin calcium carbonate nanolayer on the titania nanotubes, and (3) wet thermal conversion of CaCO3 film to nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite [17,33] to optimize the coating in terms of high biocompatibility and proper mechanical properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabrication of Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA Composite Coatings

2.1.1. Anodic Oxidation of Ti6Al4V Substrates and Structural and Morphological Studies of the Ti6Al4V/TNT System

The electrochemical anodic oxidation method was used to fabricate the TNT system on the surface of Ti6Al4V substrates, applying previously described conditions (Ti6Al4V, grade 5 foil, 99.7% purity, 0.20 mm thick, Strem Chemicals, Inc. (Bischheim, France), 7 mm × 70 mm pieces) [6,7]. The anodization time was 20 min, and the process was carried out at potentials: 5 V (TNT5), 10 V (TNT10), 12 V (TNT10), 15 V (TNT15), 18 V (TNT18), and 30 V (TNT30). The structure of the produced TiO2 nanotube layers was studied using Raman spectroscopy (RamanMicro 200 PerkinElmer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) (λ = 785 nm)) and diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFT, Spectrum2000, PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The morphology of the coatings was examined using a Quanta scanning electron microscope with field emission (SEM, Quanta 3D FEG, Huston, TX, USA).

2.1.2. Preparation of Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA Coatings and Their Structural Characterization

Hydroxyapatite was fabricated on the surface of Ti6Al4V/TNT substrates by the two-stage procedure: (1) Deposition of CaCO3 thin film using the ALD method and (2) conversion of the CaCO3 film into crystalline hydroxyapatite by a reaction with aqueous (NH4)2HPO4 [17,33]. In the first step, the Ti6Al4V/TNT samples were attached onto 5 × 5 cm2 silicon with Kapton tape and placed into an F-120 ALD reactor (ASM Microchemistry Ltd., Helsinki, Finland). The CaCO3 films were deposited using Ca(thd)2 and O3 as the precursors at 250 °C; the growth rate for CaCO3 was around 0.47–0.48 Å/cycle. Unless otherwise noted, 100 cycles were applied that resulted in an approximately 5 nm CaCO3 film thickness. In the next step, the Ti6Al4V/TNT/CaCO3 composites were immersed in 0.2 M (NH4)2HPO4 and 1 M NH3 aqueous solution, which had been heated to 95 °C. The produced Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA systems were rinsed with deionized water and blown dry. Scheme 1 illustrates the overall Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA synthesis procedure.
The morphology of the fabricated coatings (both stages) was studied using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscopy, FE-SEM (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Prior to imaging the samples were sputter coated with 2 nm Au/Pd to enhance image quality. Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) studies were performed with an X-ray diffractometer PANalytical X’Pert Pro MPD (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, Netherlands) using CuKα radiation and an incident angle of 1°.

2.2. Wettability and the Surface Free Energy Measurements

The wettability determination was carried out, by the contact angle measurements, using a goniometer with drop shape analysis software (DSA 10 Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). The volume of the distilled water drop in the contact angle measurement was 3 μL. To estimate the value of the surface free energy based on mathematical calculations, which were performed using the Owens-Wendt method, the contact angle of diiodomethane (CH2I2) was measured. The volume of the diiodomethane drop in the contact angle measurement was 4 μL. Each measurement was carried out three times, immediately after deposition of the drop.

2.3. Topography and the Mechanical Properties of Studied Systems

2.3.1. Atomic Force Microscopy

To study the surface topography of Ti6Al4V (reference), and the Ti6Al4V/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA specimens, an atomic force microscope (AFM, NaniteAFM, Nanosurf AG, Liestal, Switzerland) was used. The examinations were performed in the non-contact mode at 55 mN force. The roughness index, Sa, was estimated in the area of 50 × 50 μm.

2.3.2. Mechanical Studies—Nanoindentation and Nano Scratch—Test

Nanoindentation tests were performed with the NanoTest™ Vantage (Micro Materials Ltd., Wrexham, UK) using a Berkovich three-sided pyramidal diamond. Ten independent measurements of indentation were carried out for each sample. The maximum applied force was equal to 10 mN, the loading time was 15 s, the dwell period at maximum load was 10 s, and unloading time was 10 s. The distances between the subsequent indents were 20 μm. Based on the load–penetration curves and the Oliver and Pharr method, the surface hardness (H) and Young’s modulus (E) were calculated using the integrated software. For the estimation of the Young’s modulus, the Poisson’s ratio 0.25 was assumed. The mechanical properties of the nanocomposites, such as the elastic strain to failure of the coating (H/E) and the factor used to describe the resistance of a material to plastic deformation (H3/E2), were also studied using the nanoindention technique [45,46].
Nano-scratch tests were performed with the NanoTest™ Vantage (Micro Materials Ltd., Wrexham, UK) using a Berkovich three-sided pyramidal diamond. Five independent measurements were made for the Ti6Al4V/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA specimens. The scratch tests were made by increasing the load from 0 mN to 200 mN at a loading rate of 1.3 mN/s over a distance 500 µm. The adhesion failure of the coating was assessed based on the observation of an abrupt change in frictional force during the test.

2.4. Biocompatibility Assays

2.4.1. Cell Culture

Murine fibroblast cell line L929 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in a complete RPMI 1640 medium containing 2 mM L-glutamine, heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 100 IU/mL penicillin (all compounds from Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). Cultured cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity, after which sub-confluent cells (70–80% of surface of flask, covered by cell monolayer, were expanded by cell scraping.

2.4.2. Biointegration Studies of Studied Systems

L929 murine fibroblasts in a volume of 1 mL of culture medium were seeded onto the autoclaved test specimens placed in a 24-well culture plate (Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well for 72 h or 120 h days. The cells incubated with the test plates were analyzed for the level of cell proliferation as well as the observation of cell morphology.
The effect of TiO2 nanocoatings enriched with hydroxyapatite on the L929 cells proliferation (measured after 72 h and 120 h) were studied by the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide; Sigma Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) assay using the same method as was reported in [5,6,7]. Briefly, after the respective incubation time, the plates were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and then the MTT (5 mg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) solution in an RPMI 1640 culture medium without phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each well. After 3 h of incubation, the samples were transferred to new 24-well culture plates and 500 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; 100% v/v; Sigma Aldrich) was added to each well. The plates were shaken for 10 min and the absorbance was measured at the wavelength of 570 nm with the subtraction of the 630 nm background, using a microplate reader (Synergy HT; BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). All measurements were done in duplicate in five independent experiments.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Quanta 3D FEG; Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) analyses were performed to study the morphology changes of L929 fibroblasts growing on the surface of the studied samples, using the same method as in [5,6,7]. Briefly, after the selected incubation time, the specimens were washed with PBS to remove the non-adherent cells and were fixed in 2.5% v/v glutaraldehyde (Sigma Aldrich). Then, the plates were rinsed again with PBS and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (50%, 75%, 90%, and 100%). Finally, the samples were dried in vacuum-assisted desiccators overnight and stored at room temperature until the SEM analysis was performed.

2.4.3. Statistical Analysis in the MTT Assay

All values are reported as means ± standard error of the means (SEM) and were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Bonferroni multiple comparisons test with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 7.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA).

2.5. Antibacterial Test

2.5.1. Bacterial Strains and Biofilm Formation on Studied Systems

Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 reference strain (MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus) and S. aureus H9 clinical strain (MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus) were grown for 24 h at 37 °C on Tryptic Soy Agar—TSA (BTL, Poland) and for the next 18 h on Tryptic Soy Broth—TSB (BTL, Poland) containing 0.25% glucose (TSB/Glu). Finally, microbial suspension at the optical density OD535 = 0.6 (nephelometer type Densilameter II, Czech Republic) was prepared. Biomaterial samples were added to 1 mL of bacterial suspensions into the wells of 24-well tissue culture polystyrene plates (Nunc, Denmark) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in stable conditions to form a microbial biofilm. Staphylococcal suspensions alone (without biomaterial) and TSB/Glu only were used as a positive and negative control, respectively. Two independent experiments with four replicates in each were performed.

2.5.2. The Assessment of S. aureus Biofilm on the Studied Systems

A LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability kit (L/D; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) was used to assess biofilm formation on the tested biomaterials. First, the biomaterials were dipped in fresh TSB to gently remove bacteria weakly bound with their surface. Then, the pieces of titanium foil were vortexed (3 min) in TSB to reclaim the cells forming the biofilm. The obtained S. aureus suspensions or medium (negative control) were added (100 μL) to the wells of 96-well black microplates (Greiner, Germany) in quadruplicate. Bacterial staining was performed as recommended by the manufacturer of the L/D test and finally the fluorescence at ex. 485 nm/em. 530 nm (green fluorescence) and ex. 485 nm/em. 620 nm (red fluorescence) was measured. Based on the relative fluorescence units (RFU), for green fluorescence, a percentage of live bacteria in the biofilm formed on the modified titanium foils tested in comparison to microbial biofilm on a control unmodified biomaterial, considered as 100%, was calculated.

2.5.3. Statistical Analysis

The nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA was used to compare differences among the samples from different populations. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. The Structure and Morphology of Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA

The anodic oxidation of Ti6Al4V samples in 0.3wt% aqueous HF solution led to uniform nanotubular coatings (TNT), with a tube length of approximately 150–200 nm. The nanotube diameters increased from 18 to 140 nm with increasing potential applied. Surface morphology changes of the produced Ti6Al4V/TNT systems are presented in Figure 1.
The amorphous structure of the produced TNT coatings was confirmed by the Raman and IR DRIFT spectroscopy methods. In the next step of our work, the Ti6Al4V/TNT samples were covered by a CaCO3 nanolayer using the ALD technique (100 cycles of Ca(thd)2 and O3 at 250 °C). Analysis of the grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) patterns of the Ti6Al4V/TNT/CaCO3 systems confirmed the amorphous form of the calcium carbonate nanocoatings (Figure 2(1)). In addition, it could be noted that the TNT layer was not crystallized during the ALD process. The CaCO3 thin films were converted to hydroxyapatite nanocrystals by immersion into an aqueous (NH4)2HPO4-NH3 solution. The structure of the produced HA coatings was confirmed by GIXRD (Figure 2(2)). The HA reflections are clear, but weak, because of the small thickness of the HA layer. The energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) of Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA, measured in SEM, is shown in Figure 3, revealing the presence of Ca and P on the surface of the sample Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA. Calculated Ca/P ratios for Ti6Al4V/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA samples are presented in Table 1.
SEM images (Figure 4) revealed morphology differences of HA coatings deposited on the Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al4V/TNT substrates. The morphology of the hydroxyapatite layer significantly depends on the substrate type. Dispersed HA nanocrystals were formed on the surface of Ti6Al4V (Figure 4a), while on the TNT layers, the HA layers consisted of much more densely packed nanoplatelets. It should be noted that the HA nanoplatelet density significantly increases with the increase of the titania nanotube diameters (Figure 4b–d).
Figure 5 shows the diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transformation spectra (DRIFT) of Ti6Al4V/TNT, Ti6Al4V/HA, and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA samples. Absorption bands detected at ca. 1044, 1114 cm−1, and 566, 608 cm−1 were attributed to the vibrations of the phosphate groups of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals, while the bands at 807 and 1405 cm−1 were due to vibrations of CO32− groups [47]. Analysis of the HA and TNT/HA spectra draws attention to the lack of bands at 875–880 cm−1, which proves the absence of HPO42− groups. The wide band, which appears between 600 and 1000 cm−1, in the spectra of the Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA samples can be assigned to ν(Ti-O) modes of titania nanotubes.
The hydrophilicity of the HA layers was estimated based on contact angle measurements of water droplets deposited on the sample surface (Table 2). The formation of dispersed HA nanocrystals on the surface of the Ti6Al4V sample increased the hydrophilicity so that the contact angle decreased from 108° to 57°. With the TNT/HA composites, the hydrophilicity increased further so that the values of the contact angles were in the range 32–16°, depending on the diameter of the titanium dioxide nanotubes. Analysis of changes in the surface free energy, estimated based on the Owens-Wendt method, which uses the values of contact angles for polar and dispersive liquid (water and diiodomethane, respectively), revealed only slight changes of its value for Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al4V/HA, and a clear increase for Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA systems from 65.8 mJ/m2 (TNT5/HA) up to 71.8 mJ/m2 (TNT30/HA).

3.2. The Mechanical Properties of the Studied Systems

Deposition of hydroxyapatite on the surface of the titanium alloy practically does not change its surface roughness. By contrast, hydroxyapatite deposited on the nanotube layers caused a several-fold increase in roughness. However, there is no specific correlation between the Sa parameter and the diameter of the nanotubes (Table 3 and Figure 6). Similar relations occur for the hardness of the titanium alloy, Ti6Al4V alloy with the hydroxyapatite layer, and the anodized titanium alloy surface enriched with hydroxyapatite nanocrystals. The deposition of hydroxyapatite on the surface of the titanium alloy does not change its hardness, whereas the presence of TNT/HA composite reduces the hardness of the studied systems Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA Also, in this case, there is no correlation between the hardness and size of the nanotubes (Table 4). Scratch tests showed a decrease in the critical force that caused the loss of adhesion of the hydroxyapatite - TiO2 nanotube coatings deposited on the surface of the Ti6Al4V alloy (Table 5).

3.3. The Evaluation of Biointegration Properties of Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA

The biointegration of the TiO2 nanocoatings enriched with a hydroxyapatite was evaluated based on the results of the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay and SEM images. The level of L929 murine fibroblasts’ proliferation measured after 72 h and 120 h is presented in Figure 7. It is worth noticing that with an increase of the incubation time, more L929 fibroblasts proliferated on all the tested materials (P < 0.001). Analysis of these data also revealed that the TNT/HA samples as well as the Ti6Al4V alloy foils covered with the hydroxyapatite (Ti6Al4V/HA) showed a higher level of cell proliferation than the Ti6Al4V reference sample after the both incubation times of 72 h and 120 h. This effect was the most noticeable for the Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT10/HA samples (P < 0.001).
Comparative SEM images of L929 murine fibroblasts cultured on the selected nanocoatings covered with the hydroxyapatite are presented in Figure 8. Based on the results from the MTT assay, we have selected to show in Figure 8 those samples that induced the greatest and the least changes in cell proliferation compared to the Ti6Al4V reference samples (Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA and Ti6Al4V/HA, respectively). SEM images confirm the results from the MTT assay and clearly indicate the high level of biointegration of the tested materials. As can be seen, the cells cultivated on the TNT5/HA nanocoatings effectively attached to the specimen surface and the number of L929 fibroblasts growing on the surface significantly increases over time. This observation is more noticeable for the Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA specimens than for the Ti6Al4V/HA sample and the Ti6Al4V reference (compare micrographs a–c, d–f, and g–i in Figure 8). Importantly, the fibroblasts cultured for 120 h on the Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA sample were crowded and formed networks due to the overgrowth of cells (Figure 8f), which clearly indicates that the tested nanocoatings stimulate cell proliferation. This observation was also confirmed by the elongated shape of the cells (e.g., see Figure 8c,k) and numerous filopodia, which attached the fibroblasts to the nanocoating surface by penetrating deep into the nanolayers (arrows in Figure 8l) or formed filopodia between the cells (arrows in Figure 8j,k).

3.4. The Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties of Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA

The samples of Ti6Al4V foil (unmodified control), titanium alloy foil coated with the hydroxyapatite (Ti6Al4V/HA), and titanium foil modified by both nanotubes and hydroxyapatite (Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA) were exposed for 24 h to staphylococci to assess their ability to inhibit bacterial colonization and biofilm formation. The presence of S. aureus ATCC 29213 reference strain and S. aureus H9 clinical strain biofilm on the surface of the samples was tested using a Live/Dead BacLight Bacterial Viability kit (L/D) and the results are presented in Figure 9 as a percentage of the live bacteria recovered from the biofilms on the tested coated samples in comparison to the biofilms formed on the unmodified Ti6Al4V control, considered as 100%.
All the tested modified titanium samples caused significant inhibition of staphylococcal colonization and biofilm formation in comparison to the reference Ti6Al4V sample, independently of the S. aureus strain used. The average percentage of biofilm inhibition, compared to the control biofilm developed on the unmodified titanium alloy considered as 100%, achieved the range from 32.1 ± 5.1% (P = 0.0008) to 51.3 ± 8.7% (P = 0.0008) and from 25.7 ± 33.0% (P = 0.0023) to 60.5 ± 6.2% (P = 0.0008) for S. aureus ATCC 29213 and S. aureus H9, respectively. The least potent in this respect was titanium alloy coated by the hydroxyapatite only (Ti6Al4V/HA) and additional nanostructural modification of the Ti6Al4V surface in the form of the nanotubes enriched with the hydroxyapatite (Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA) intensified their anti-biofilm activity. Among all the surfaces modified by both nanotubes and hydroxyapatite, the effect of Ti6Al4V/TNT18/HA against S. aureus ATCC 29213 was the weakest, reaching 39.9 ± 13.3% of biofilm inhibition. Both Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA showed higher antibacterial activity against this strain reaching, respectively, 47.0 ± 15.3 and 51.3 ± 8.7% of biofilm inhibition. Somewhat different, but even more clear, is the tendency visible for the S. aureus H9 strain. The effectivity of biofilm inhibition increased in the order of Ti6Al4V (0% of inhibition) < Ti6Al4V/HA (25.7% ± 33.0 of inhibition) < Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA (48.1% ± 5.0 of inhibition <Ti6Al4V/TNT18/HA (55.8 ± 2.1 of inhibition) < Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA (60.5 ± 5.2% of inhibition).

4. Discussion

Modification of the Ti6Al4V surface by biologically active coating materials, such as HA nanocrystals, TNT layers, and TNT/HA nanocomposites, is one of the most promising ways to improve the osseointegration processes [2,3,4,5,6,7,40]. Moreover, bioactive coatings can be also used for counteracting the formation of inflammation as well as for preventing the release of metal ions to the patient’s body during long-term use, e.g., in the construction of modern implants. According to the literature, TNT/HA coatings with good bioactivity have been produced by cathodic deposition [48] and pulse electrodeposition [2,3] of HA on the surface of TNT/Ti or TNT/Ti6Al4V substrates. In the both above-mentioned methods, the surface of the TNT coating was covered by densely packed nano- and micro-crystals of different shapes and sizes.
In our work, we focused on the fabrication of HA coatings consisting of nanocrystals with a similar shape and size and good adhesion to the surface of titania nanotube coatings. Moreover, special attention was paid to the fact that the formed TNT/HA composite should exhibit beneficial properties of both TiO2 nanotubes and hydroxyapatite. Preservation of both constituents’ properties would not be possible if the hydroxyapatite layer completely covered the nanotubes layer as was in the case of both the above-mentioned methods. Therefore, we decided to exploit and modify the already reported method, which was applied to the production of HA coatings on the surface of unpolished Grade 2 titanium sheet [17,33]. This two-step method first deposits CaCO3 films on the titanium substrate by ALD, and then converts them to continuous hydroxyapatite coatings by wet treatment in a dilute phosphate solution [17]. Post-conversion annealing at 700 °C for 30 min, which was applied in that study, improved the adhesion test results by 0.8 MPa compared to non-annealed samples, but the difference was not statistically significant. In our work on the preparation of the TNT/HA composites, we had to consider that the TNT coatings cannot be heated to temperatures higher than 300 °C because that would cause the destruction of the nanotubular architecture [5]. To not cover the TiO2 nanotubes fully by the HA nanocrystals and simultaneously make them adhere well to the surface of the TNT layer, we decided to deposit significantly thinner HA films than in the previous studies. Based on our earlier experience, the number of CaCO3 ALD cycles was 100 in all our experiments. The results showed that the use of greater number of ALD cycles (i.e., 500 and 1000, which gave CaCO3 film of a thickness of 25 nm and 50 nm, respectively) resulted, after the conversion of CaCO3 into HA, in HA layers that were only weakly adherent to the TNT substrates. The HA layers deposited by 500 cycles on the surface of the Ti6Al4V/TNT substrates were delaminated and did not allow even for the proper performance of the biointegration MTT assay (Figure S1).
GIXRD and EDS confirmed that the HA films consisted of hydroxyapatite crystals, although the Ca/P ratios determined from the EDS spectra were lower than 1.67 (Table 1) [33,47]. The existence of bands characterized for CO32− in the IR spectra indicates the formation of carbonate substituted calcium deficient hydroxyapatite, with an overall formula Ca10−x(CO3)x(PO4)6−x(OH)2−x (0 ≤ x ≤ 1), in which two types of carbonate substitutions are possible: (1) Direct substitution of OH− with CO32− (a-type substitution CO32− ↔ 2OH−), and (2) CO32− substituting a tetrahedral PO43- group and charge compensation by calcium deficiency (B-type substitution) [47]. The lack of bands at 875–880 cm−1 in the DRIFT spectra proved that octacalcium phosphate (Ca8(HPO4)2(PO4)4·5H2O) or other species containing HPO42− ions of Ca/P = 1.3 or 1.5 were not formed (Figure 5). The fabrication of the Ti6l4V/TNT/HA structures without the calcination procedure led to the lack of calcium phosphate, Ca3(PO4)2, Ca/P = 1.5 [33,47].
SEM images of the surfaces of the Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA–Ti6Al4V/TNT30/HA samples proved that the packing density of the HA nanocrystals on the surface of the TNT layers increases as the diameter of the nanotubes increases. Also, nanoindentation results highlight clear differences between the nanocrystalline HA coatings deposited on the surface of the TNT layers produced at different potentials. The HA coatings present heterogeneous morphology with discontinuities, which is a result of the distinct nanotubular architecture of the TNT layer on which the HA coating is formed (Figure 10a). Fabrication of TNT layers at 5 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT5) results in a significant decrease in the elastic modulus and nanohardness compared to the unmodified Ti6Al4V substrate. This effect is positive in the case of materials for long-term implants because it decreases the otherwise significant difference in mechanical properties between the implant and the bone and, consequently, a risk of the stress shielding effect [49]. The deposition of the HA coating on the surfaces of Ti6Al4V/TNT5 increased the H/E and H3/E2 ratios (H/E = wear resistance coefficient; H = hardness, E = Young’s modulus) compared to the uncoated Ti6Al4V/TNT system. For the Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA system, the situation is reversed, i.e., the deposition of the hydroxyapatite reduced these ratios by 7% and 33%, respectively. The H/E and H3/E2 ratios influence the wear resistance of a material, either in bulk or in coating form. The first ratio characterizes the resistance of the material to elastic deformation, and the second ratio allows estimation of the ability of the material to dissipate energy upon plastic deformation during loading. The HA coating deposited on the Ti6Al4V/TNT5 improved the elasticity index and the resistance to plastic deformation, which suggests a better tribological performance of the HA coated surface in medical applications. The scratch test of the nanocomposites based on the HA-coated TNT surface did not give information about the adhesion of HA nanocrystals to TNT. The calculated critical forces were rather related to the loss of adhesion of the entire TNT/HA nanocoating to the Ti6Al4V substrate rather than to the loss of adhesion of HA to the nanotubes. Figure 10b presents the initial scratch trace, which shows the point of loss of adhesion of the TNT/HA coating for the Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA sample.
The mechanical properties of biomaterials used in the construction of implants should go hand in hand with their bioactivity. Therefore, studies on the ability of proliferation of fibroblast cells on the surface of the produced nanocomposites and on their potential antibacterial activity were carried out. Since mouse connective tissue fibroblasts, including L929 cells, are recommended as the standard model for biocompatibility testing [50], we chose this cell line to study the biointegration of the TiO2 nanocoatings enriched with the hydroxyapatite. Additionally, fibroblasts are considered to be the most common cells in connective tissue, one of the main components of peri-implant soft tissue, which is key to the formation of the peri-implant mucosal seal and helps to prevent epithelial ingrowth [51]. The results of the MTT assay indicated on the cell proliferation measured after 72 h and 120 h revealed the promising biocompatible properties of all the TNT coatings covered with the hydroxyapatite, with the highest level of proliferation observed for the TNT5/HA and TNT10/HA samples (Figure 7). Moreover, the results of the MTT assay correspond to the comparative SEM micrographs presented in Figure 8, which clearly showed the increase in the number of cells growing on the TNT5/HA coatings over time. This coating is characterized by the low surface energy (SFE = 65.84 mJ/m2) and the highest roughness (Sa = 0.135 µm) among the studied Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA samples. The surface roughness of biomaterials has a significant impact on the possibility of creating a proper connection between the implant and the bone. The influence of the implant surface roughness on the adhesion of cells and their proliferation has also been proven. A surface with a high roughness improves the adhesion of cells and tissues to the implant and provides improved primary stabilization between the implant and bone [52,53]. Analysis of SEM micrographs presented in Figure 8 also indicated that the L929 fibroblasts growing on the TNT5/HA coatings formed filopodia, which attached the cells to the nanotube arrays by penetrating deep into the nanolayers (white arrows in Figure 8l) and fibroblasts formed filopodia also among themselves (see white arrows in, e.g., Figure 8j,k). The ability of the cells to sense nanometer scale topographical features in their environment manifests itself, among others, in the formation of filopodia at the cell boundary, which enables the cells to spread over the nanocoatings [54]. Filopodia are cell protrusions consisting of a network of long parallel actin filaments, and therefore they play a fundamental role in cell attachment, migration, proliferation, and cell-cell interactions [55,56]. Our results correspond to the findings of other authors. Soares et al. demonstrated that the L929 fibroblasts’ adhesion and propagation is improved on the TiO2 nanotubes covered with a hydroxyapatite compared to an untreated titanium surface [57]. Similarly, hydroxyapatite deposited on TiO2 nanotubes showed higher cell density, more live cells, and better spreading of the mouse osteoblastic cell line, MC3T3-E1, as compared with an untreated titanium plate surface [58]. Taken together, these findings clearly demonstrate the biocompatible properties of the studied TNT/HA coatings, which are associated with the statement that a favorable cellular interaction with the biomaterials surface is critical for the long-term success of the implants [59].
Biofilm-associated infections of inserted and implanted biomaterials, such as intravascular catheters, prosthetic valves, orthopedic implants, vascular grafts, etc., remain a serious medical problem, which threaten the lives of patients. Therefore, the estimation of the antibacterial activity of the produced TNT/HA coatings, which could be applied in modifications of Ti6Al4V implant surfaces to limit potential infection development, was important for us. Earlier works revealed that the nanoarchitecture of the surface (e.g., TiO2 nanotubes, nanowires, nanofibers), metal ions/nanoparticles (mainly silver and copper), graphene oxide thin film, or covalently bounded antibiotics enhanced antimicrobial activity of titanium implants [5,7,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. In our previous study, it was shown that TiO2 nanotubes formed on the Ti6Al4V alloy possessed in vitro anti-biofilm properties as tested on the S. aureus model [6]. The coatings obtained using low-potential anodic oxidation (3–5 V) were found to be the most effective, with the highest activity against staphylococci expressed by TNT5. Shen et al. demonstrated that carboxylated chitosan/silver-hydroxyapatite (CMCS/Ag-HA) hybrid microspheres exhibited in vitro good antimicrobial activity against S. aureus tested by the agar diffusion method. Although the choice of the method used was not the best one due to the lack of standardization in the reading of growth inhibition zones, the antimicrobial effect of the hybrid microspheres was noticeable and it was shown that CMCS/Ag-HA was more efficient than HA [67]. Similarly, in our research, double modified biomaterials exhibited stronger antimicrobial activity than the surface covered by the hydroxyapatite only, indicating a synergistic effect of both modifications. Herein, it should be remembered that the modifications of the biomaterials themselves are only one of the many elements influencing implant colonization by microorganisms in vivo. This has been well illustrated by Spengler et al., who used polished high-density pellets of hydroxyapatite as a model material for teeth to test Streptococcus mutans and nonpathogenic Staphylococcus carnosus adhesion in a human cavity, indicating the presence of saliva as a factor strongly determining the adhesion of S. mutans, but not S. carnosus, to HA [68]. Colonization of the implants by the microorganisms depends, inter alia, on the surface properties, microbial virulence factors, such as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs), capsule and other adhesins, as well as the ambient conditions in the tissues, including the local immune response [64,69].

5. Conclusions

ALD was exploited to add hydroxyapatite on top of TiO2 nanotubes on a titanium alloy in an attempt to produce novel nanocomposites with optimized biocompatible, antibacterial, and mechanical properties for applications in medical implants. The results of our work revealed that the use of TiO2 nanotubes as a link system between the titanium alloy and a thin layer of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals seems to be an excellent solution to inhibit the delamination of the hydroxyapatite layer. Their nanoporous architecture led to a much stronger connection with hydroxyapatite than if the hydroxyapatite was deposited directly on the surface of the titanium alloy. However, one condition had to be fulfilled - the hydroxyapatite layer must be extremely thin. Such a thin layer can be provided by the method used in our experiment, i.e., the atomic layer deposition of CaCO3 films on the Ti6Al4V substrate followed by their conversion to hydroxyapatite nanocrystals by wet treatment in dilute phosphate solution.
The results of our work indicate the promising properties of the Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA as a bio-active nanocomposite. This system showed the best adhesion and proliferation of fibroblast cells, in comparison to the other studied nanocomposites, and simultaneously good antibacterial activity. Moreover, this system was characterized by high surface roughness, an appropriate elasticity index, and resistance to plastic deformation, which suggests optimal tribological performance of the surface for medical applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/1/123/s1, Figure S1: The formazan crystals in the culture medium (white arrows) formed during carrying out the MTT assay. Released formazan crystals indicate on the detachment of L929 cells from the surface of TiO2 nanotubes covered with a hydroxyapatite, obtained during ALD process applying 500 cycles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R. and P.P.; methodology, A.R.; formal analysis, A.R.; T.J., B.S., M.S., investigation, A.R., M.E., T.J., M.W.-S., M.B., J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.; writing—review and editing, A.R.; supervision, A.R., P.P., M.L., M.R.

Funding

This research was funded by the Regional Operational Programme of the Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship (1.3.1. Support for research and development processes in academic enterprises), within the grant obtained by Nano-implant Ltd. and by the Finnish Centre of Excellence in ALD. The scientific cooperation between Polish and Finnish research groups were established within HERALD Cost Action (MP1402).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mohseni, E.; Zalnezhad, E.; Bushroa, A.R. Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: A review paper. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2014, 48, 238–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahmadi, S.; Riahi, Z.; Eslami, A.; Sadrnezhaad, S.K. Fabrication mechanism of nanostructured HA/TNTs biomedical coatings: An improvement in nanomechanical and in vitro biological responses. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2016, 27, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ahmadi, S.; Mohammadi, I.; Sadrnezhaad, S.K. Hydroxyapatite based and anodic Titania nanotube biocomposite coatings: Fabrication, characterization and electrochemical behavior. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 287, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, H.; Shi, X.; Tian, A.; Wang, L.; Liu, C. Electrochemical properties of Ti3+ doped Ag-Ti nanotube arrays coated with hydroxyapatite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 436, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Piszczek, P.; Lewandowska, Ż.; Radtke, A.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Kozak, W.; Sadowska, B.; Szubka, M.; Talik, E.; Fiori, F. Biocompatibility of Titania Nanotube Coatings Enriched with Silver Nanograins by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Radtke, A.; Topolski, A.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Kozak, W.; Sadowska, B.; Więckowska-Szakiel, M.; Szubka, M.; Talik, E.; Nielsen, L.P.; Piszczek, P. The bioactivity and photocatalytic properties of titania nanotube coatings produced with the use of the low-potential anodization of Ti6Al4V alloy surface. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Radtke, A.; Topolski, A.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Kozak, W.; Sadowska, B.; Więckowska-Szakiel, M.; Piszczek, P. Bioactivity Studies on Titania Coatings and the Estimation of Their Usefulness in the Modification of Implant Surfaces. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cotruta, C.M.; Vladescub, A.; Dinuc, M.; Vranceanua, D.M. Influence of deposition temperature on the properties of hydroxyapatite obtained by electrochemical assisted deposition. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, S.H.; Ho, S.C.; Chang, C.H.; Chen, C.C.; Say, W.C. Influence of roughness on invivo properties of titanium implant surface and their electrochemical behawior. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 302, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khodaei, M.; Valanezhad, A.; Watanabe, I.; Yousefi, R. Surface and mechanical properties of modified porous titanium scaffold. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 313, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Domínguez-Trujillo, C.; Peón, E.; Chicardi, E.; Pérez, H.; Rodríguez-Ortiz, J.A.; Pavón, J.J.; García-Couce, J.; Galván, J.C.; García-Moreno, F.; Torresa, Y. Sol-gel deposition of hydroxyapatite coatings on porous titanium for biomedical applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 333, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dai-Hua, H.; Wang, P.; Liu, P.; Liu, X.K.; Ma, F.C.; Zhao, J. HA coating fabricated by electrochemical deposition on modified Ti6Al4V alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 301, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, K.; Chang, J. Structure and properties of hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. In Hydroxyapatite (Hap) for Biomedical Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Szcześ, A.; Hołysz, L.; Chibowski, E. Synthesis of hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 249, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dorozhkin, S.V.; Epple, M. Biological and medical significance of calcium phosphates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3130–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumari, R.; Majumdar, J.D. Microstructure and surface mechanical properties of plasma spray deposited and post spray heat treated hydroxyapatite (HA) based composite coating on titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) substrate. Mater. Charact. 2017, 131, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Avila, I.; Pantchev, K.; Holopainen, J.; Ritala, M.; Tuukkanen, J. Adhesion and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite coating obtained by conversion of atomic layer deposited calcium carbonate on titanium substrate. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2018, 29, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gómez-Morales, J.; Iafisco, M.; Delgado-López, J.M.; Sarda, S.; Drouet, C. Progress on the preparation of nanocrystalline apatites and surface characterization: Overview of fundamental and applied aspects. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 2013, 59, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Koutsopoulos, S. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite crystals: A review study on the analytical methods. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 62, 600–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, G.; Liu, X. Hydroxyapatite: Hexagonal or monoclinic. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 2991–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Holmes, R.; Bucholz, R.W.; Mooney, V. Porous hydroxyapatite as a bone-graft substitute in metaphyseal defects. A histometric study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol. 1986, 68, 904–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cook, S.D.; Kay, J.F.; Thomas, K.A.; Jarcho, M. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1987, 2, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Ozawa, S.; Kasugai, S. Evaluation of implant materials (hydroxyapatite, glass-ceramics, titanium) in rat bone marrow stromal cell culture. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Faig-Martí, J.; Gil-Mur, F.J. Hydroxyapatite coatings in prosthetic joints. Rev. Esp. Cir. Ortop. Traumatol. Engl. Ed. 2008, 52, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Morks, M.F.; Kobayashi, A.; Fahim, N.F. Abrasive wear behavior of sprayed hydroxyapitite coatings by gas tunnel type plasma spraying. Wear 2007, 262, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Metikoš-Huković, M.; Tkalčec, E.; Kwokal, A.; Piljac, J. An in vitro study of Ti and Ti-alloys coated with sol–gel derived hydroxyapatite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 165, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Oskouei, R.H.; Fallahnezhad, K.; Kuppusami, S. An Investigation on the Wear Resistance and Fatigue Behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V Notched Members Coated with Hydroxyapatite Coatings. Materials 2016, 9, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lynn, A.K.; DuQuesnay, D.L. Hydroxyapatite-coated Ti-6Al-4V: Part 1: The effect of coating thickness on mechanical fatigue behaviour. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 1937–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Byeon, I.S.; Hwang, I.J.; Choe, H.C.; Brantley, W.A. Electrochemically-coated hydroxyapatite films on nanotubular TiNb alloys prepared in solutions containing Ca, P, and Zn ions. Thin Solid Films 2016, 620, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hao, J.; Kuroda, S.; Ohya, K.; Bartakova, S.; Aoki, H.; Kasugai, S. Enhanced osteoblast and osteoclast responses to a thin film sputtered hydroxyapatite coating. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011, 22, 1489–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, L.; Bhatia, R.; Webster, T.J. Atomic layer deposition of nano-TiO2 thin films with enhanced biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity for orthopedic implants. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 8711–8723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lugovskoy, S.; Weiss, D.; Tsadok, U.; Lugovskoy, A. Morphology and antimicrobial properties of hydroxyapatite–titanium oxide layers on the surface of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 301, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Holopainen, J.; Kauppinen, K.; Mizohata, K.; Santala, E.; Mikkola, E.; Heikkilä, M.; Kokkonen, H.; Leskelä, M.; Lehenkari, P.; Tuukkanen, J.; et al. Preparation and bioactive properties of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite thin films obtained by conversion of atomic layer deposited calcium carbonate. Biointerphases 2014, 9, 031008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kolmas, J.; Krukowski, S.; Laskus, A.; Jurkitewicz, M. Synthetic hydroxyapatite in pharmaceutical applications. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 2472–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Drevet, R.; Jaber, N.B.; Fauré, J.; Tara, A.; Larbi, A.B.; Benhayoune, H. Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) of nano-hydroxyapatite coatings with improved mechanical properties on prosthetic Ti6Al4V substrates. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 301, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lin, D.Y.; Zhao, Y.T. Preparation of Novel Hydroxyapatite/Yttria-Stabilized-Zirconia Gradient Coatings by Magnetron Sputtering. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2011, 13, B18–B24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Heimann, R.B. On the Self-Affine Fractal Geometry of Plasma-Sprayed Surfaces. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2011, 20, 898–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Corni, I.; Ryan, M.P.; Boccaccini, A.R. Electrophoretic deposition: From traditional ceramics to nanotechnology. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 1353–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pan, Y.K.; Chen, C.Z.; Wang, D.G.; Lin, Z.Q. Preparation and bioactivity of micro-arc oxidized calcium phosphate coatings. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 141, 842–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shirdar, M.R.; Taheri, M.; Sudin, I.; Shafaght, A.; Keyvanfar, A.; Majid, M.Z.A. In situ synthesis of hydroxyapatite-grafted titanium nanotube composite. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2016, 11, 816–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zheng, X.B.; Ding, C.X. Characterization of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite/TiO2 composite coatings. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2000, 9, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. George, S.M. Atomic layer Deposition: An Overview. Chem. Rev. 2009, 110, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Abbass, M.K.; Ajeel, S.A.; Wadullah, H.M. Biocompatibility, Bioactivity and Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel 316L Nanocoated with TiO2 and Al2O3 by Atomic Layer Deposition Method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1032, 012017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Miikkulainen, V.; Leskelä, M.; Ritala, M.; Puurunen, R.L. Crystallinity of inorganic films grown by atomic layer deposition: Overview and general trends. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 021301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Golovin, Y.I.; Tyurin, A.I.; Aslanyan, E.G.; Pirozhkova, T.S.; Vorob’ev, M.O. Local Physicomechanical Properties of Materials for Use in Calibration of Nanoindentation Instruments. Meas. Tech. 2016, 59, 911–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Surmeneva, M.A.; Mukhametkaliyev, T.M.; Tyurin, A.I.; Teresov, A.D.; Koval, N.N.; Pirozhkova, T.S.; Shuvarin, I.A.; Shuklinov, A.V.; Zhigachev, A.O.; Oehr, C.; et al. Effect of silicate doping on the structure and mechanical properties of thin nanostructured RF magnetron sputter-deposited hydroxyapatite films. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 275, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Berzina-Cimdina, L.; Borodajenko, N. Research of Calcium Phosphates Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. In Infrared Spectroscopy—Materials Science, Engineering and Technology; Theophile, T., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 123–148. ISBN 978-953-51-0537-4. [Google Scholar]
  48. Swain, S.; Rautray, T.R. Cu and Zn substituted hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium oxie anotubes formed by electrochemical methods. Innovare J. Eng. Technol. 2016, 4, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kaabi Falahieh Asl, S.; Nemeth, S.; Tan, M.J. Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite coatings on AZ31 magnesium substrate for biodegradable implant applications. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 2014, 60, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Biological Evaluation for Medical Devices, Part 5, Tests for Cytotoxicity: In Vitro Methods; ISO 10 993-5, EN 30 993-5; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.
  51. Furuhashi, A.; Ayukawa, Y.; Atsuta, I.; Okawachi, H.; Koyano, K. The difference of fibroblast behavior on titanium substrata with different surface characteristics. Odontology 2012, 100, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Barbour, M.E.; O’Sullivan, D.J.; Jenkinson, H.F.; Jagger, D.C. The effects of polishing methods on surface morphology, roughness and bacterial colonisation of titanium abutments. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2007, 18, 1439–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, W.; Zhong, X.; Wu, X.; Yuan, L.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, H.; Xia, Y.; Feng, Y.; He, J.; Chen, W. The effect of surface roughness and wettability of nanostructured TiO2 film on TCA-8113 epithelial-like cells. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 200, 6155–6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Teixeira, A.I.; Abrams, G.A.; Bertics, P.J.; Murphy, C.J.; Nealey, P.F. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 1881–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cicco, S.R.; Vona, D.; Gristina, R.; Sardella, E.; Ragni, R.; Lo Presti, M.; Farinola, G.M. Biosilica from Living Diatoms: Investigations on Biocompatibility of Bare and Chemically Modified Thalassiosira weissflogii Silica Shells. Bioengineering 2016, 3, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lee, J.W.; Lee, K.B.; Jeon, H.S.; Park, H.K. Effects of surface nano-topography on human osteoblast filopodia. Anal. Sci. 2011, 27, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Soares, P.; Trujillo, N.A.; Popat, K.C. Comparative cell behavior on titania nanotubes filled with HAP. In Proceedings of the Society for Biomaterials 2014 Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, 16–19 April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  58. Parcharoen, Y.; Kajitvichyanukul, P.; Sirivisoot, S.; Termsuksawad, P. Hydroxyapatite electrodeposition on anodized titanium nanotubes for orthopedic applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 311, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cevc, G.; Vierl, U. Nanotechnology and the transdermal route: A state of the art review and critical appraisal. J. Control. Release 2010, 141, 277–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jin, J.; Zhang, L.; Shi, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q. Ti-GO-Ag nanocomposite: The effect of content level on the antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 4209–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kucharíková, S.; Gerits, E.; De Brucker, K.; Braem, A.; Ceh, K.; Majdič, G.; Španič, T.; Pogorevc, E.; Verstraeten, N.; Tournu, H.; et al. Covalent immobilization of antimicrobial agents on titanium prevents Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans colonization and biofilm formation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 71, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lan, M.-Y.; Liu, C.-P.; Huang, H.-H.; Lee, S.-W. Both enhanced biocompatibility and antibacterial activity in Ag-decorated TiO2 nanotubes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, R.; Memarzadeh, K.; Chang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Allaker, R.P.; Ren, L.; Yang, K. Antibacterial effect of copper-bearing titanium alloy (Ti-Cu) against Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Martinez-Perez, M.; Perez-Jorge, C.; Lozano, D. Evaluation of bacterial adherence of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus sp. using a competitive model. Bone Jt. Res. 2017, 6, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  65. Radtke, A.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Kozak, W.; Sadowska, B.; Więckowska-Szakiel, M.; Talik, E.; Mäkelä, M.; Leskelä, M.; Piszczek, P. Optimization of the silver nanoparticles PEALD process on the surface of 1-D titania coatings. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lewandowska, Ż.; Piszczek, P.; Radtke, A.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Kozak, W.; Sadowska, B. The evaluation of the impact of titania nanotube covers morphology and crystal phase on their biological properties. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 26, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Shen, J.; Jin, B.; Qi, Y.-C.; Jiang, Q.-Y.; Gao, X.-F. Carboxylated chitosan/silver-hydroxyapatite hybrid microspheres with improved antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 78, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Spengler, C.; Thewes, N.; Nolle, F.; Faidt, T.; Umanskaya, N.; Hannig, M.; Bischoff, M.; Jacobs, K. Enhanced adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to hydroxyapatite after exposure to saliva. J. Mol. Recognit. 2017, 30, e2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Valotteau, C.; Prystopiuk, V.; Pietrocola, G.; Rindi, S.; Peterle, D.; De Filippis, V.; Foster, T.J.; Speziale, P.; Dufrêne, Y.F. Single-cell and single-molecule analysis unravels the multifunctionality of the Staphylococcus aureus collagen-binding protein Cna. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 2160–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 09 00123 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the overall Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA synthesis procedure.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the overall Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA synthesis procedure.
Nanomaterials 09 00123 sch001
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM images of TNTs coatings produced on the surface of Ti6Al4V substrates using potentials 5-30V ((a) 5 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT5), (b) 10 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT10), (c) 12 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT12), (d) 15 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT15), (e) 18 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT18), and (f) 30 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT30)).
Figure 1. SEM images of TNTs coatings produced on the surface of Ti6Al4V substrates using potentials 5-30V ((a) 5 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT5), (b) 10 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT10), (c) 12 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT12), (d) 15 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT15), (e) 18 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT18), and (f) 30 V (Ti6Al4V/TNT30)).
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g001
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g002 550
Figure 2. GIXRD of (1): (a) Ti6Al4V/TNT18, (b)Ti6Al4V/TNT18/CaCO3, (c)Ti6Al4V/TNT18/HA, and (2) Ti6Al4V/TNT18/HA. The reflections assigned to HA are marked separately whereas all unmarked peaks were assigned to the substrate.
Figure 2. GIXRD of (1): (a) Ti6Al4V/TNT18, (b)Ti6Al4V/TNT18/CaCO3, (c)Ti6Al4V/TNT18/HA, and (2) Ti6Al4V/TNT18/HA. The reflections assigned to HA are marked separately whereas all unmarked peaks were assigned to the substrate.
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g002
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g003 550
Figure 3. EDS spectrum of Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA.
Figure 3. EDS spectrum of Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA.
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g003
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images of (a1,a2)—Ti6Al4V/HA; (b1,b2)—Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA, and (c1,c2)—Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA, (d1,d2)—Ti6Al4V/TNT30/HA.
Figure 4. SEM images of (a1,a2)—Ti6Al4V/HA; (b1,b2)—Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA, and (c1,c2)—Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA, (d1,d2)—Ti6Al4V/TNT30/HA.
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g004
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g005 550
Figure 5. DRIFT spectra of studied Ti6Al4V/TNT, Ti6Al4V/HA, and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA systems.
Figure 5. DRIFT spectra of studied Ti6Al4V/TNT, Ti6Al4V/HA, and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA systems.
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g005
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g006 550
Figure 6. AFM surface topography and Sa parameters of the studied samples.
Figure 6. AFM surface topography and Sa parameters of the studied samples.
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g006
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g007 550
Figure 7. L929 murine fibroblasts proliferation (measured after 72 h and 120 h) on the surface of Ti6Al4V, Ti6Al4V/HA, and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA, detected by the MTT assay. The absorbance values are expressed as means ± S.E.M of five independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences in the level of cell proliferation observed after 72 h between the cells incubated with titanium alloy reference samples (Ti6Al4V) in comparison with the fibroblasts incubated on the surface of the tested samples (*** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Hash marks denote significant differences in cell proliferation between Ti6Al4V reference samples and the tested specimens after 120 h (# # # P < 0.001, # # P < 0.01, # P < 0.05).
Figure 7. L929 murine fibroblasts proliferation (measured after 72 h and 120 h) on the surface of Ti6Al4V, Ti6Al4V/HA, and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA, detected by the MTT assay. The absorbance values are expressed as means ± S.E.M of five independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences in the level of cell proliferation observed after 72 h between the cells incubated with titanium alloy reference samples (Ti6Al4V) in comparison with the fibroblasts incubated on the surface of the tested samples (*** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05). Hash marks denote significant differences in cell proliferation between Ti6Al4V reference samples and the tested specimens after 120 h (# # # P < 0.001, # # P < 0.01, # P < 0.05).
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g007
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM micrographs showing the murine L929 fibroblasts proliferation (after 72 h and 120 h incubation times) on the surfaces of the Ti6Al4V reference alloy (a,d,g), Ti6Al4V alloy surface covered with the hydroxyapatite (Ti6Al4V/HA; b,e,h), and Ti6Al4V alloy covered with TiO2 and the hydroxyapatite (Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA; c,f,i). Arrows indicate filopodia spread between the cells (j,k) or penetrating deep into the TNT5/HA nanocoatings after 120 h incubation time (l).
Figure 8. SEM micrographs showing the murine L929 fibroblasts proliferation (after 72 h and 120 h incubation times) on the surfaces of the Ti6Al4V reference alloy (a,d,g), Ti6Al4V alloy surface covered with the hydroxyapatite (Ti6Al4V/HA; b,e,h), and Ti6Al4V alloy covered with TiO2 and the hydroxyapatite (Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA; c,f,i). Arrows indicate filopodia spread between the cells (j,k) or penetrating deep into the TNT5/HA nanocoatings after 120 h incubation time (l).
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g008
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g009 550
Figure 9. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and S. aureus H9 biofilms (24 h old) on the surfaces of Ti6Al4V/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA. The results are provided as the mean percentage ± standard deviation (SD) of staphylococcal biofilm compared to a control biofilm formed on the reference sample (Ti6Al4V), considered as 100%. Biofilm inhibition by all the tested samples in comparison to the reference Ti alloy was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Figure 9. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and S. aureus H9 biofilms (24 h old) on the surfaces of Ti6Al4V/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA. The results are provided as the mean percentage ± standard deviation (SD) of staphylococcal biofilm compared to a control biofilm formed on the reference sample (Ti6Al4V), considered as 100%. Biofilm inhibition by all the tested samples in comparison to the reference Ti alloy was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g009
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) HA nanocrystals on the surface of the nanotubes showing heterogeneous morphology with discontinuities. (b) The initial scratch trace after the scratch test for the sample Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA.
Figure 10. (a) HA nanocrystals on the surface of the nanotubes showing heterogeneous morphology with discontinuities. (b) The initial scratch trace after the scratch test for the sample Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA.
Nanomaterials 09 00123 g010
Table
Table 1. Ca/P ratios obtained from EDS measurements for the Ti6Al4V/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA samples.
Table 1. Ca/P ratios obtained from EDS measurements for the Ti6Al4V/HA and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA samples.
Biomaterial SampleCa/P Ratio
Ti6Al4V/HA1.65 ± 0.06
Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA1.62 ± 0.01
Ti6Al4V/TNT10/HA1.59 ± 0.04
Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA1.47 ± 0.04
Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA1.54 ± 0.02
Ti6Al4V/TNT18/HA1.45 ± 0.06
Ti6Al4V/TNT30/HA1.54 ± 0.04
Table
Table 2. Results of the contact angle and surface free energy (SFE) measurements; contact angles were measured three times using distilled water and diiodomethane and the SFE was determined using the Owens-Wendt method.
Table 2. Results of the contact angle and surface free energy (SFE) measurements; contact angles were measured three times using distilled water and diiodomethane and the SFE was determined using the Owens-Wendt method.
SampleAverage Contact Angle [°] ± Standard DeviationSFE [mJ/m2]
Measuring Liquid
WaterDiiodomethane
Ti6Al4V108.3 ± 0.137 ± 0.245.4 ± 0.1
Ti6Al4V/HA57.4 ± 1.854.5 ± 2.644.6 ± 0.9
Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA32.2 ± 1.0<1065.8 ± 0.2
Ti6Al4V/TNT10/HA23.3 ± 1.8<1069.6 ± 0.3
Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA22.2 ± 0.5<1070.5 ± 0.7
Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA18.9 ± 1.9<1071.6 ± 0.4
Ti6Al4V/TNT18/HA18.2 ± 1.1<1071.3 ± 0.2
Ti6Al4V/TNT30/HA16.5 ± 1.3<1071.8 ± 0.2
Table
Table 3. Roughness of Ti6Al4V, Ti6Al4V/HA, and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA composites.
Table 3. Roughness of Ti6Al4V, Ti6Al4V/HA, and Ti6Al4V/TNT/HA composites.
SampleSa Parameter [µm]
Ti6Al4V0.027
Ti6Al4V/HA0.021
Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA0.135
Ti6Al4V/TNT10/HA0.113
Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA0.066
Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA0.075
Ti6Al4V/TNT20/HA0.090
Ti6Al4V/TNT30/HA0.078
Table
Table 4. Mechanical and nanoindentation properties of the studied samples.
Table 4. Mechanical and nanoindentation properties of the studied samples.
SampleHardness [GPa]Young’s Modulus [GPa]Maximum Depth of Indentation [nm]
Ti6Al4V16.29 ± 3.07283.1 ± 30.9161.1 ± 15.3
Ti6Al4V/HA16.47 ± 2.38293.5 ± 30.8158.4 ± 9.7
Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA10.26 ± 4.08256.3 ± 82.0205.4 ± 46.5
Ti6Al4V/TNT10/HA7.51 ± 1.40126.1 ± 14.5246.3 ± 20.1
Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA7.66 ± 1.70248.3 ± 53.0226.5 ± 32.6
Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA12.53 ± 3.30 291.6 ± 47.1179.3 ± 23.5
Ti6Al4V/TNT20/HA10.53 ± 2.59160.8 ± 33.2210.6 ± 31.5
Ti6Al4V/TNT30/HA7.51 ± 1.48239.9 ± 38.4226.2 ± 22.4
Table
Table 5. Results of nano scratch tests.
Table 5. Results of nano scratch tests.
Nano Scratch Test Properties
SampleCritical Friction [mN]Critical Load [mN]
Ti6Al4V/HA282.1 ± 52.8229.0 ± 37.9
Ti6Al4V/TNT5/HA165.6 ± 28.2166.9 ± 21.7
Ti6Al4V/TNT10/HA153.6 ± 39.6139.2 ± 26.3
Ti6Al4V/TNT12/HA124.0 ± 13.0128.9 ± 13.0
Ti6Al4V/TNT15/HA202.6 ± 45.0175.5 ± 31.9
Ti6Al4V/TNT20/HA149.3 ± 6.5160.4 ± 13.4
Ti6Al4V/TNT30/HA228.1 ± 54.7204.1 ± 32.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radtke, A.; Ehlert, M.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Sadowska, B.; Więckowska-Szakiel, M.; Holopainen, J.; Ritala, M.; Leskelä, M.; Bartmański, M.; Szkodo, M.; et al. Titania Nanotubes/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites Produced with the Use of the Atomic Layer Deposition Technique: Estimation of Bioactivity and Nanomechanical Properties. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010123

AMA Style

Radtke A, Ehlert M, Jędrzejewski T, Sadowska B, Więckowska-Szakiel M, Holopainen J, Ritala M, Leskelä M, Bartmański M, Szkodo M, et al. Titania Nanotubes/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites Produced with the Use of the Atomic Layer Deposition Technique: Estimation of Bioactivity and Nanomechanical Properties. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(1):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radtke, Aleksandra, Michalina Ehlert, Tomasz Jędrzejewski, Beata Sadowska, Marzena Więckowska-Szakiel, Jani Holopainen, Mikko Ritala, Markku Leskelä, Michał Bartmański, Marek Szkodo, and et al. 2019. "Titania Nanotubes/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites Produced with the Use of the Atomic Layer Deposition Technique: Estimation of Bioactivity and Nanomechanical Properties" Nanomaterials 9, no. 1: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop