Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of TiO2/Al2O3 Double-Layer Inverse Opal by Thermal and Plasma-Assisted Atomic Layer Deposition for Photocatalytic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances on Electrospun Nanofibers for Periodontal Regeneration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Performance P- and N-Type SiGe/Si Strained Super-Lattice FinFET and CMOS Inverter: Comparison of Si and SiGe FinFET

1
College of Semiconductor Research, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
2
Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
3
Taiwan Semiconductor Research Institute, Hsinchu 30078, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(8), 1310; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13081310
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 6 April 2023 / Accepted: 6 April 2023 / Published: 8 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Nanoelectronics, Nanosensors and Devices)

Abstract

:
This research presents the optimization and proposal of P- and N-type 3-stacked Si0.8Ge0.2/Si strained super-lattice FinFETs (SL FinFET) using Low-Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition (LPCVD) epitaxy. Three device structures, Si FinFET, Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET, and Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, were comprehensively compared with HfO2 = 4 nm/TiN = 80 nm. The strained effect was analyzed using Raman spectrum and X-ray diffraction reciprocal space mapping (RSM). The results show that Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET exhibited the lowest average subthreshold slope (SSavg) of 88 mV/dec, the highest maximum transconductance (Gm, max) of 375.2 μS/μm, and the highest ON–OFF current ratio (ION/IOFF), approximately 106 at VOV = 0.5 V due to the strained effect. Furthermore, with the super-lattice FinFETs as complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) inverters, a maximum gain of 91 v/v was achieved by varying the supply voltage from 0.6 V to 1.2 V. The simulation of a Si0.8Ge0.2/Si super-lattice FinFET with the state of the art was also investigated. The proposed Si0.8Ge0.2/Si strained SL FinFET is fully compatible with the CMOS technology platform, showing promising flexibility for extending CMOS scaling.

1. Introduction

As CMOS technology scales down, Si-based FinFET technology will eventually reach its physical and electrical limits. To scale transistors, it is necessary to enhance the mobility of the channel. One approach to achieving this is through the use of high-mobility channel materials, such as SiGe [1,2], Ge [3,4], and GeSn [5,6], as well as strain engineering [7,8]. By applying mechanical stress to the channel region of the transistor, carrier mobility can be increased by modifying the band structure. Compressive strained SiGe is a promising alternative to Si in pFETs due to its superior hole mobility, which can enhance device drive current and transconductance (Gm) [9,10,11]. On the other hand, tensile strained Si is proposed for enhancing effective electron mobility in nFETs [12,13,14]. Previous research has demonstrated that SiGe super-lattice-like heterostructures with a buried channel within bulk FinFETs can improve channel mobility and drive current, while also inhibiting short channel effects (SCEs) that are typically observed in conventional Si FinFET and SiGe FinFET devices [15]. The SiGe/Si super-lattice-like heterostructure induces an intrinsic strain effect on the high-mobility SiGe layer, resulting in even higher carrier mobility than traditional Si channels. Moreover, the heterostructure can be seamlessly integrated into existing FinFET technology, as it is compatible with current fabrication processes.
This paper presents the fabrication of a super-lattice channel FinFET using a Si0.8Ge0.2/Si heterostructure. The epitaxy mono-crystallinity and full strain of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si super-lattice structure were confirmed through various material analyses. Conventional Si FinFET and Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET were also prepared as references for device characteristic comparison. The results showed that the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si super-lattice FinFETs exhibit superior electrical characteristics in both N- and P-type devices. The potential use of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si super-lattice FinFETs in CMOS inverters and the voltage transfer characteristics (VTCs) were also investigated. In addition, the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si super-lattice FinFET was simulated using the Sentaurus technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulator with the state of the art. Overall, these results demonstrate that these devices are promising candidates for CMOS scaling.

2. Device Fabrication

Figure 1a depicts the fabrication process flow of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET device. The structural and A–A’ cross-sectional schemes of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET are illustrated in Figure 1b,c, respectively. First, the monocrystalline Si layer of an 8” SOI wafer was thinned down to the thickness of 25 nm, serving as the bottom layer. Then, a 5 nm thick Si0.8Ge0.2 layer was grown epitaxially, followed by two cycles of epitaxy consisting of a 5 nm thick Si layer/5 nm thick Si0.8Ge0.2 by LPCVD. The final total height of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL stack was approximately 48 nm. For a fair comparison, conventional Si and Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFETs were also fabricated.
The active layer of the device was defined using e-beam lithography (EBL), and the pattern was transferred through reactive ion etching (RIE). After chemical cleaning, a 4 nm thick HfO2 layer was deposited as the gate dielectric layer using atomic layer deposition (ALD). Subsequently, the gate electrode was formed by depositing an 80 nm thick TiN metal using physical vapor deposition (PVD), and the pattern was transferred through EBL and RIE. For the N-type devices, the source/drain (S/D) regions were implanted with phosphorus at a dose of 1 × 1015 cm−2 and energy of 15 keV, and for P-type devices, the S/D regions were implanted with boron at a dose of 1 × 1015 cm−2 and energy of 12 keV. Rapid thermal annealing (RTA) was performed at 550 °C for 30 s in a nitrogen atmosphere to activate the dopants. Finally, the device fabrication was completed by performing oxide passivation, contact holes, and metallization processes.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a depicts the transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET with high-quality epitaxy and an enlarged view of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL structure. The thicknesses of each epitaxy layer are shown in Figure 2b, where the a three-stacked epi-layer SL structure has a total fin height (FH) of 48 nm. Figure 2c displays an enlarged view of the 1 nm thick SiO2 interfacial layer and 4.1 nm thick HfO2 gate insulator. The corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping is presented in Figure 3a. Clear separation of the Si0.8Ge0.2 and Si epi-layers can be observed in the EDX mapping in Figure 3b–g, which also show the distributions of the elements including Si, Ge, Hf, O, Ti, and N.
To verify the crystallinity of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL heterostructure, nanobeam diffraction (NBD) analysis was performed, with a focus on each layer. The NBD patterns according to the focusing point from the top to the bottom layer of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET are presented in Figure 4a–f. The sharp diffraction patterns reveal that the six Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL layers are single-crystalline and epitaxially grown. Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra of Si, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL samples to analyze the strain effect. Both Si0.8Ge0.2 and Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL samples exhibit the Si-Si vibration mode, attributed to tensile strained Si, with lower wavenumbers than the c-Si peak (Figure 5a) [16], with the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL sample exhibiting more tensile strain. Furthermore, the Ge-Ge and Si-Ge vibration modes of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL samples were observed to shift to higher wavenumbers compared to the Si0.8Ge0.2 sample, indicating that the Si0.8Ge0.2 layers in the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL sample are more compressively strained (Figure 5b).
XRD reciprocal space mapping (RSM) was used to analyze the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL sample at the (004) and (224) planes. The X-ray reflection from Si0.8Ge0.2/Si and Si appeared at the same in-plane wave vector, indicating that they have the same in-plane lattice constant (Figure 6a,b) [17]. This indicated that the Si0.8Ge0.2 in the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL sample is fully compressively strained since the lattice constant of single crystal Si and Ge are 5.43 Å and 5.66 Å, respectively. The mole fraction of Ge in SiGe layers, which is approximately 20%, was determined by XRD through Vegard’s law [18].
Figure 7 and Figure 8 compare the characteristics of drain current (ID) versus gate voltage (VG) curves for Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET devices with HfO2 = 4 nm/TiN = 80 nm, Fin width (Fw) = 30 nm, and gate length (LG) = 200 nm for both P-type (Figure 7a–c) and N-type (Figure 8a–c). The Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFETs exhibit the lowest SSavg,P = 93.3 mV/dec, SSavg,N = 88.0 mV/dec atc, where SS was extracted from every adjacent measured point. Due to the strain effect of the super-lattice structure, the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET has the highest ION and reflects on the high ION/IOFF of approximately 106. The ID is normalized by the footprint width, and VTH is extracted at a constant ID of 10−7 A/µm. ION is extracted at VOV = VD = ±0.5 V. All electrical characteristics were determined using Keithley 4200A at room temperature.
Figure 9a shows that the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET has a drive current (VOV = VD = ±0.5 V) of 124.6 µA/µm, which is 141.8% and 55.6% higher than that of the Si FinFET and Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET, respectively, for the P-type. In Figure 9b, the drive current for the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET is 92.5 µA/µm, which is 52.7% and 61.1% higher than that of the Si FinFET and Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET, respectively, for the N-type. Figure 10a,b show that the Si0.8Ge0.2 SL FinFETs exhibit the highest maximum transconductance (Gm,P) of 375.2 µS/µm and Gm,N 235.1 µS/µm at VD = ±0.5V.
Figure 11a displays the ID-VG characteristics of the CMOS inverter operation using the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFETs, with FW = 35 nm and LG = 125 nm for the P-type and FW = 30 nm and LG = 200 nm for the N-type. The Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET CMOS inverter exhibits SSavg,P = 87.6 mV/dec, SSavg,N = 96.4 mV/dec, the drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL) values of DIBLP = 15.6 mV/V, DIBLN = 49.9 mV/V, and high ION/IOFF greater than 106 at VD = ±0.5V. In Figure 11b, the drive current (VOV = VD = ±0.7 V) of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET CMOS inverter is 245.9 µA/µm and 176.8 µA/µm for the P- and N-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, respectively. Figure 11c depicts the voltage transfer characteristic (VTC) of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET CMOS inverter, with a maximum gain of 91 v/v by varying the supply voltage from 0.6 V to 1.2 V, as shown in Figure 11d.
To confirm the potential of the proposed approach in contributing to the development of future technology nodes, the Sentaurus TCAD simulator was applied for simulation. The simulation parameters of the devices, including LG = 15 nm and FW = 5 nm, were selected based on the current state of the art [19]. The gate insulator utilized was HfO2 with a thickness of 4 nm, and the total fin height was set to 48 nm to match the experimental conditions of this study. Figure 12a displays the calibrated ID-VG characteristic of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET with LG = 60 nm and FW = 30 nm for both the P- and N-type, between experimental data and the TCAD simulation results. In Figure 12b, the ID-VG characteristics of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET devices are compared. The results indicate that compared to the Si FinFET and Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET, the saturation current of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET exhibits the highest value of 7.26 × 10−5 for the P-type and 3.8 × 10−5 for the N-type. Figure 12c presents the simulated Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, which exhibits SSavg,P = 66.1 mV/dec and SSavg,N = 66.5 mV/dec, with values of DIBLP = 31.8 mV/V and DIBLN = 65.4 mV/V. In Figure 12d, the drive current (VOV = VD = ±0.7 V) of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET is 87.4 µA/µm for the P-type and 52.8 µA/µm for the N-type. While GAAFET has the advantage of better scaling, its complex fabrication and low yield make it less practical for certain applications. As an alternative, the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET can extend FinFET technology to more particle applications.

4. Conclusions

The Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET and CMOS inverter were both fabricated and characterized to evaluate their high-mobility channel achieved through the strain effect. The crystallinity and strain effect were confirmed through the implementation of NBD, Raman scattering, and XRD RSM. Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFETs exhibit remarkable electrical characteristics, including SSavg = 88 mV/dec, Gm, max = 375.2 μS/μm, and the highest ION/IOFF, approximately 106, when compared to conventional Si and Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFETs. The Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET CMOS inverter exhibits SSavg,P = 87.6 mV/dec, SSavg,N = 96.4 mV/dec, the DIBL values of DIBLP = 15.6 mV/V and DIBLN = 49.9 mV/V, and high ION/IOFF greater than 106 at VD = ±0.5V, with a maximum gain of 91 v/v by varying the supply voltage from 0.6 V to 1.2 V. The simulation of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET with the state of the art demonstrates the potential for extending FinFET technology. The purposed Si0.8Ge0.2/Si strained SL FinFET is fully compatible with the CMOS technology platform, making it a promising alternative for extending future nanoelectronics applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and writing—original draft, Y.-J.Y.; investigation, and data curation, C.-R.Y., T.-Y.T., H.-J.C., and T.-J.L.; validation and writing—review and editing, G.-L.L. and F.-J.H.; supervision and project administration, Y.-C.W. and K.-S.C.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, grant number MOST 111-2119-M-007-010-MBK, MOST 111-2218-E-A49-015-MBK, MOST 109-2221-E-007-031-MY3, and in part by the Taiwan Semiconductor Research Institute, Taiwan.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of the Taiwan Semiconductor Research Institute (TSRI) and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Nano Facility Center (NFC).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, C.H.; Mochizuki, S.; Southwick, R.G.; Li, J.; Miao, X.; Bao, R.; Ando, T.; Galatage, R.; Siddiqui, S.; Labelle, C.; et al. Jagannathan. A comparative study of strain and Ge content in Si1−xGex channel using planar FETs, FinFETs, and strained relaxed buffer layer FinFETs. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–6 December 2017; pp. 37.2.1–37.2.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yeap, G.; Lin, S.S.; Chen, Y.M.; Shang, H.L.; Wang, P.W.; Lin, H.C.; Peng, Y.C.; Sheu, J.Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, X.; et al. 5 nm CMOS Production Technology Platform featuring full-fledged EUV, and High Mobility Channel FinFETs with densest 0.021 µm2 SRAM cells for Mobile SoC and High Performance Computing Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–11 December 2019; pp. 36.7.1–36.7.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. van Dal, M.J.H.; Vellianitis, G.; Doornbos, G.; Duriez, B.; Holland, M.C.; Vasen, T.; Afzalian, A.; Su, S.K.; Chen, T.K.; Shen, T.M.; et al. Ge CMOS gate stack and contact development for Vertically Stacked Lateral Nanowire FETs. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 1–5 December 2018; pp. 21.1.1–21.1.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arimura, H.; Eneman, G.; Capogreco, E.; Witters, L.; De Keersgieter, A.; Favia, P.; Porret, C.; Hikavyy, A.; Loo, R.; Bender, H.; et al. Advantage of NW structure in preservation of SRB-induced strain and investigation of off-state leakage in strained stacked Ge NW pFET. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 1–5 December 2018; pp. 21.2.1–21.2.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, Y.-S.; Tsai, C.-E.; Tu, C.-T.; Chen, J.-Y.; Ye, H.-Y.; Lu, F.-L.; Liu, C.W. First Demonstration of Uniform 4-Stacked Ge0.9Sn0.1 Nanosheets with Record ION = 73 μA at VOV = VDS = −0.5 V and Low Noise Using Double Ge0.95Sn0.05 Caps, Dry Etch, Low Channel Doping, and High S/D Doping. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 12–18 December 2020; pp. 2.4.1–2.4.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tsai, C.-E.; Liu, Y.-C.; Tu, C.-T.; Huang, B.-W.; Jan, S.-R.; Chen, Y.-R.; Chen, J.-Y.; Chueh, S.-J.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Tsen, C.-J.; et al. Highly Stacked 8 Ge0.9Sn0.1 Nanosheet pFETs with Ultrathin Bodies (~3 nm) and Thick Bodies (~30 nm) Featuring the Respective Record ION/IOFF of 1.4x107 and Record ION of 92uA at Vov = VDS = −0.5 V by CVD Epitaxy and Dry Etching. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 11–16 December 2021; pp. 26.4.1–26.4.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agrawal, A.; Chouksey, S.; Rachmady, W.; Vishwanath, S.; Ghose, S.; Mehta, M.; Torres, J.; Oni, A.A.; Weng, X.; Li, H.; et al. Gate-All-Around Strained Si0.4Ge0.6 Nanosheet PMOS on Strain Relaxed Buffer for High Performance Low Power Logic Application. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 12–18 December 2020; pp. 2.2.1–2.2.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mochizuki, S.; Bhuiyan, M.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, J.; Stuckert, E.; Li, J.; Zhao; Wang; Basker, V.; Loubet, N.; et al. Stacked Gate-All-Around Nanosheet pFET with Highly Compressive Strained Si1-xGex Channel. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 12–18 December 2020; pp. 2.3.1–2.3.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rim, K.; Koester, S.; Hargrove, M.; Chu, J.; Mooney, P.M.; Ott, J.; Kanarsky, T.; Ronsheim, P.; Ieong, M.; Grill, H.-S.; et al. Strained Si NMOSFETs for high performance CMOS technology. In Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on VLSI Technology, Kyoto, Japan, 12–14 June 2001; pp. 59–60, Digest of Technical Papers (IEEE Cat. No.01 CH37184). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Welser, J.; Hoyt, J.L.; Takagi, S.; Gibbons, J.F. Strain dependence of the performance enhancement in strained-Si n-MOSFETs. In Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 11–14 December 1994; pp. 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goo, J.S.; Xiang, Q.; Takamura, Y.; Wang, H.; Pan, J.; Arasnia, F.; Paton, E.N.; Besser, P.; Sidorov, M.V.; Adem, E.; et al. Scalability of strained-Si nMOSFETs down to 25 nm gate length. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2003, 24, 351–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hashemi, P.; Ando, T.; Cartier, E.A.; Lee, K.L.; Bruley, J.; Lee, C.H.; Narayanan, V. High performance and reliable strained SiGe PMOS FinFETs enabled by advanced gate stack engineering. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–6 December 2017; pp. 37.3.1–37.3.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ok, I.; Akarvardar, K.; Lin, S.; Baykan, M.; Young, C.D.; Hung, P.Y.; Rodgers, M.P.; Bennett, S.; Stamper, H.O.; Franca, D.L.; et al. Strained SiGe and Si FinFETs for high performance logic with SiGe/Si stack on SOI. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–8 December 2010; pp. 34.2.1–34.2.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gomez, L.; Hashemi, P.; Hoyt, J.L. Enhanced Hole Transport in Short-Channel Strained-SiGe p-MOSFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2009, 56, 2644–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.L.; Chang-Liao, K.S.; Li, C.C.; Feng, H.T.; Kao, C.H.; Chen, C.Y.; Ruan, D.B.; Chen, Y.J.; Li, K.S.; Luo, G.L. Improved Electrical Characteristics of Bulk FinFETs With SiGe Super-Lattice-Like Buried Channel. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2009, 40, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mala, S.A.; Tsybeskov, L.; Lockwood, D.J.; Wu, X.; Baribeau, J.-M. Raman scattering in Si/SiGe nanostructures: Revealing chemical composition, strain, intermixing, and heat dissipation. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 014305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paskiewicz, D.M.; Savage, D.E.; Holt, M.V.; Evans, P.G.; Lagally, M.G. Nanomembrane-based materials for Group IV semiconductor quantum electronics. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kasper, E.; Schuh, A.; Bauer, G.; Holländer, B.; Kibbel, H. Test of Vegard’s law in thin epitaxial SiGe layers. J. Cryst. Growth 1995, 157, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS™), IRDS. 2022. Available online: https://irds.ieee.org/editions/2022 (accessed on 27 September 2022).
Figure 1. (a) Process flow for fabricating the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET. (b) Three-dimensional schematic and (c) A–A’ cross-sectional view of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET.
Figure 1. (a) Process flow for fabricating the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET. (b) Three-dimensional schematic and (c) A–A’ cross-sectional view of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g001
Figure 2. (a) TEM image of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET with high uniform epitaxy, enlarged view of (b) the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL structure with each thickness, and (c) interfacial layer of SiO2 and HfO2.
Figure 2. (a) TEM image of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET with high uniform epitaxy, enlarged view of (b) the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL structure with each thickness, and (c) interfacial layer of SiO2 and HfO2.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g002
Figure 3. (a) EDX mapping of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET and (bg) the element distribution with clear separation between the Si0.8Ge0.2 and Si epitaxial layers.
Figure 3. (a) EDX mapping of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET and (bg) the element distribution with clear separation between the Si0.8Ge0.2 and Si epitaxial layers.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g003
Figure 4. (af) NBD patterns of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET from top to bottom layer reveals well epitaxial and single-crystal structure.
Figure 4. (af) NBD patterns of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET from top to bottom layer reveals well epitaxial and single-crystal structure.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g004
Figure 5. Raman spectra of Si, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL samples of (a) the Si substrate and strain Si components and (b) Si-Ge and Ge-Ge vibration mode.
Figure 5. Raman spectra of Si, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL samples of (a) the Si substrate and strain Si components and (b) Si-Ge and Ge-Ge vibration mode.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g005
Figure 6. XRD RSM of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL sample in the direction (a) (004) and (b) (224), showing they are fully strained.
Figure 6. XRD RSM of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL sample in the direction (a) (004) and (b) (224), showing they are fully strained.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g006
Figure 7. ID-VG characteristics of P-type (a) Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, (b) Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET, and (c) Si FinFET. The ID is normalized by the footprint width, and VTH is extracted at a constant ID of 10−7 A/µm. ION is extracted at VOV = VD = −0.5 V.
Figure 7. ID-VG characteristics of P-type (a) Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, (b) Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET, and (c) Si FinFET. The ID is normalized by the footprint width, and VTH is extracted at a constant ID of 10−7 A/µm. ION is extracted at VOV = VD = −0.5 V.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g007
Figure 8. ID-VG characteristics of N-type (a) Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, (b) Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET, and (c) Si FinFET. The ID is normalized by the footprint width, and VTH is extracted at a constant ID of 10−7 A/µm. ION is extracted at VOV = VD = 0.5 V.
Figure 8. ID-VG characteristics of N-type (a) Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, (b) Si0.8Ge0.2 FinFET, and (c) Si FinFET. The ID is normalized by the footprint width, and VTH is extracted at a constant ID of 10−7 A/µm. ION is extracted at VOV = VD = 0.5 V.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g008
Figure 9. ID-VD characteristics of (a) P-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET and (b) N-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET with LG = 200 nm and FW = 30 nm.
Figure 9. ID-VD characteristics of (a) P-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET and (b) N-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET with LG = 200 nm and FW = 30 nm.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g009
Figure 10. Gm characteristics of (a) P-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET and (b) N-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET with LG = 200 nm and FW = 30 nm.
Figure 10. Gm characteristics of (a) P-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET and (b) N-type Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET with LG = 200 nm and FW = 30 nm.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g010
Figure 11. (a) ID-VG and (b) ID-VD characteristics of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET CMOS inverter. (c) VTC and (d) gain of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET CMOS inverters with the VDD ranging from 0.6 to 1.2 V.
Figure 11. (a) ID-VG and (b) ID-VD characteristics of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET CMOS inverter. (c) VTC and (d) gain of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET CMOS inverters with the VDD ranging from 0.6 to 1.2 V.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g011
Figure 12. (a) The calibrated ID-VG characteristic of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET between experimental data and TCAD simulation. (b) The simulated ID-VG characteristics of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET for comparison, (c) the simulated ID-VG and (d) ID-VD characteristics of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, both with LG = 15 nm and FW = 5 nm according to state of the art and a total fin height of 48 nm and HfO2 = 4nm, as used in the experiment of this work.
Figure 12. (a) The calibrated ID-VG characteristic of the Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET between experimental data and TCAD simulation. (b) The simulated ID-VG characteristics of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL, Si0.8Ge0.2, and Si FinFET for comparison, (c) the simulated ID-VG and (d) ID-VD characteristics of Si0.8Ge0.2/Si SL FinFET, both with LG = 15 nm and FW = 5 nm according to state of the art and a total fin height of 48 nm and HfO2 = 4nm, as used in the experiment of this work.
Nanomaterials 13 01310 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, Y.-J.; Yang, C.-R.; Tseng, T.-Y.; Chang, H.-J.; Lin, T.-J.; Luo, G.-L.; Hou, F.-J.; Wu, Y.-C.; Chang-Liao, K.-S. High-Performance P- and N-Type SiGe/Si Strained Super-Lattice FinFET and CMOS Inverter: Comparison of Si and SiGe FinFET. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13081310

AMA Style

Yao Y-J, Yang C-R, Tseng T-Y, Chang H-J, Lin T-J, Luo G-L, Hou F-J, Wu Y-C, Chang-Liao K-S. High-Performance P- and N-Type SiGe/Si Strained Super-Lattice FinFET and CMOS Inverter: Comparison of Si and SiGe FinFET. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(8):1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13081310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Yi-Ju, Ching-Ru Yang, Ting-Yu Tseng, Heng-Jia Chang, Tsai-Jung Lin, Guang-Li Luo, Fu-Ju Hou, Yung-Chun Wu, and Kuei-Shu Chang-Liao. 2023. "High-Performance P- and N-Type SiGe/Si Strained Super-Lattice FinFET and CMOS Inverter: Comparison of Si and SiGe FinFET" Nanomaterials 13, no. 8: 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13081310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop