Next Article in Journal
Ball-Mill-Inspired Durable Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Wind Energy Collecting and Speed Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Review of Nanofluid Heat Transfer in Porous Media
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/nano13050938
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Situ Polycondensation Synthesis of NiS-g-C3N4 Nanocomposites for Catalytic Hydrogen Generation from NaBH4

by
Alhulw H. Alshammari
*,
Khulaif Alshammari
,
Turki Alotaibi
,
Majed Alshammari
,
Sultan Alhassan
and
Taha Abdel Mohaymen Taha
Physics Department, College of Science, Jouf University, Sakaka P.O. Box 2014, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(5), 938; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050938
Submission received: 9 February 2023 / Revised: 27 February 2023 / Accepted: 2 March 2023 / Published: 5 March 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The nanocomposites of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 were synthesized for catalytic hydrogen production from the methanolysis of sodium borohydride (NaBH4). Several experimental methods were applied to characterize these nanocomposites such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). The calculation of NiS crystallites revealed an average size of 8.0 nm. The ESEM and TEM images of S@g-C3N4 showed a 2D sheet structure and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites showed the sheet materials that were broken up during the growth process, revealing more edge sites. The surface areas were 40, 50, 62, and 90 m2/g for S@g-C3N4, 0.5 wt.% NiS, 1.0 wt.% NiS, and 1.5 wt.% NiS, respectively. The pore volume of S@g-C3N4 was 0.18 cm3, which was reduced to 0.11 cm3 in 1.5 wt.% NiS owing to the incorporation of NiS particles into the nanosheet. We found that the in situ polycondensation preparation of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites increased the porosity of the composites. The average values of the optical energy gap for S@g-C3N4 were 2.60 eV and decreased to 2.50, 2.40, and 2.30 eV as the NiS concentration increased from 0.5 to 1.5 wt.%. All NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite catalysts had an emission band that was visible in the 410–540 nm range and the intensity of this peak decreased as the NiS concentration increased from 0.5 to 1.5 wt.%. The hydrogen generation rates increased with increasing content of NiS nanosheet. Moreover, the sample 1.5 wt.% NiS showed the highest production rate of 8654 mL/g·min due to the homogeneous surface organization.

1. Introduction

Research on graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has received a lot of attention due to its structure and substantial chemical and physical characteristics, such as superior electrical conductivity and high mechanical strength [1,2,3]. Moreover, the use of g-C3N4 in photocatalysis, electrocatalysis, photovoltaic devices, and bioimaging applications has a lot of potential [4,5,6]. It is composed of several abundant elements and is the most stable allotrope of carbon nitrides under ambient conditions. Graphite and g-C3N4 have a similar structure, however one by one, nitrogen and carbon atoms make up the hexatomic ring. A significant planer network structure is developed by the covalent connections that are formed by each carbon atom with three nitrogen atoms. The sp2 hybridized C and N atoms are organized in a six-member stalked ring; providing the semiconductor properties of g-C3N4. In the optical range of 260–320 nm, g-C3N4 has a significant UV–Vis absorption peak. The π-π* electron transfer for g-C3N4 with s-triazine rings is responsible for the absorption peak, which is located at about 250 nm. Moreover, the n-π* electron transfer involving a lone pair of electrons on nitrogen atoms in the g-C3N4 produced the absorption peak at 320 nm [7,8]. The electrical features and surface chemical properties of g-C3N4 doped with heteroatoms (such as oxygen, sulfur, phosphorous, and boron) can be tuned, which is advantageous for expanding their applications in bioimaging and biosensing. For catalytic usage, g-C3N4 has enhanced thermal stability because of higher durability and non-volatility up to 600 °C even in the air, according to the thermogravimetric analysis [8,9,10]. However, the limited solubility of g-C3N4 in organic solvents resists the processing of this material.
There is a potential use for metal sulfides in a variety of industries, including supercapacitors, catalysis, energy conversion, and biomedicine [11,12]. Due to their many structural forms, several metal sulfides have been investigated and widely used. Metal sulfide nanoparticle applications are influenced by characteristics including size, shape, surface area, and morphology. A well-known metal sulfide called nickel sulfide has been suggested as a promising material because of its nontoxicity, abundant mineral resources, and high stability for various energy storage and energy conversion applications [13,14]. The metallic structure of NiS provides high electrical conductivity, and this high conductivity enhances interfacial charge transfer and carrier separation. In order to facilitate interfacial charge transfer and separation, the NiS catalyst can serve as an electron-trapping agent and a site for the generation of H2. Nanoscale nickel sulfide with a specified surface charge and functionality may be of interest for catalytic applications [15]. As a result, it is crucial to develop a precise preparation approach to couple nickel sulfides with the g-C3N4 nanosheet. Accordingly, the nanocomposite of NiS/g-C3N4 is expected to have a large surface area and more active sites for hydrogen catalytic performance.
Over the past few years, numerous efforts have focused on the synthesis of g-C3N4. Heating the carbon- and nitrogen-containing precursors was the primary method of producing graphite carbon nitride [16]. Cyanamide, cyanuric chloride, ethylenediamine with carbon tetrachloride, and melamine are among the most frequently utilized substances in synthesis [17]. Additionally, the usage of templates allows for the synthesis of materials with regular structures [18]. The ability to electrostatically self-assemble composite structures with negatively surface-charged materials to function because cocatalysts are one of the main benefits of the positively charged g-C3N4 material [19]. The surface of g-C3N4-TiO2 was modified with phosphorous for hydrogen generation from NaBH4 methanolysis [20]. The data showed a hydrogen evolution rate of 14,750 mL/g·min. Furthermore, the activation energy for hydrolysis was estimated to be 36.17 kJ mol−1. Kottaikalai Ganesan et al. [21] reported utilizing phosphorylated silica (SP-PA) particles for the catalytic hydrolysis of sodium borohydride to produce hydrogen. In comparison to silica particles (133 mL min−1g−1 of catalyst), SP-PA particles generate hydrogen at a rate of 762.4 mL min−1g−1. The remarkable catalytic activity of SP-PA particles is indicated by the computed activation energy of 29.92 kJ mol−1 for NaBH4 hydrolysis. Fanghui Wang et al. [22] synthesized Co-P/CNTs-Ni foam for catalytic hydrogen generation at methanolysis of NaBH4. The dandelion-like structure of the Co-P/CNTs-Ni foam catalysts was maintained and produced a maximum amount of hydrogen (2430 mL min−1g−1) at a temperature of 298 K. The data showed that NaBH4 hydrolysis has an activation energy of 49.94 kJ mol−1. Another study used calcination and hydrothermal techniques to generate a hybrid g-C3N4-SiO2-N composite [23]. The experiments conducted using an NaBH4 content of 0.25 g revealed a maximal hydrogen evolution rate of 11,400 mL min−1g−1. According to calculations, the hydrolysis of NaBH4 has an activation energy of 33.2 kJ mol−1. Cafer Saka [24] prepared catalysts of sulfur and nitrogen-doped metal-free microalgal carbon that are very active for the dehydrogenation of sodium borohydride in methanol. Their study achieved a maximal hydrogen generation rate of 26,000 mL min−1g−1. Meanwhile, the activation energy for hydrolysis was 10.59 kJ mol−1. Highly dispersed CoB alloys implanted on MOF-74-derived graphene nanosheets were synthesized using the chemical reduction technique [25]. The catalytic hydrogen evolution measurements showed a value of 7937 mL min−1g−1 for the hydrolysis of NaBH4. Furthermore, the investigation of activation energy for hydrolysis was evaluated as 38.8 kJ mol−1.
Graphitic carbon nitride suffers from low conductivity and a small electroactive surface area. Low carrier mobility and excessive bulk recombination are the main reasons limiting the efficiency of g-C3N4. Therefore, researchers proposed many techniques to improve conductivity and surface area by elemental doping, converting into nanosheets, and combining with metal nanoparticles and other carbon nanomaterials. This in turn will suppress the electron–hole recombination. The in situ polycondensation process can produce metal/g-C3N4 nanocomposites. Meanwhile, this synthesis procedure enables the direct formation of nanocomposites as well as microstructure control. Moreover, this technique has excellent aggregate elimination/reduction along with ideal and reproducible properties.
The current study aims to find an appropriate precursor, morphology, exfoliation condition, and fabrication processes for g-C3N4 in order to improve the catalytic activity. Furthermore, NiS nanostructures can be integrated in situ into the g-C3N4 nanosheet to increase the electroactive surface area and electrical conductivity. The in situ polycondensation process using different ratios of nickel chloride and thiourea at 550 °C for 120 min synthesized the NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite samples. The structural measurements for these nanocomposites was conducted using XRD, FTIR, and ESEM techniques. Moreover, an extensive study of the methanol hydrolysis of sodium borohydride was completed. Finally, the hydrogen catalytic efficiency of prepared materials was examined at methanolysis of NaBH4. The hydrogen generation rates increased with increasing NiS nanosheet content. Moreover, the sample 1.5 wt.% NiS showed the highest production rate of 8654 mL/g·min.

2. Experimental

Loba Chemi, Mumbai, India supplied the chemicals (nickel chloride hexahydrate, thiourea, and sodium borohydride). The absolute methanol was provided by Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany. All provided chemicals were directly used without extra purification.
The bulk S@g-C3N4 was synthesized by heating 10.0 g of thiourea powder in a porcelain crucible covered with a lid in the muffle furnace at 550 °C (ramping rate = 3.0 °/min) and maintaining the temperature for 2 h. The yellow solid mass in a crucible was then allowed to cool to room temperature. Using an agate mortar, the resultant bulk S@g-C3N4 was crushed into a fine powder. The in situ polycondensation process using different ratios of nickel chloride and thiourea at 550 °C for 120 min synthesized NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite samples. In a typical synthesis, 10 g of thiourea powder and 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 wt.% of nickel chloride were ground in an agate mortar for 30 min. After that, the powder was transferred to porcelain crucibles covered with a lid inserted inside a muffle furnace. The furnace operated at 550 °C for 120 min at a heating rate of 3.0 °C/min. The obtained nanocomposite samples were allowed to cool and then ground.
X-ray diffraction studies can analyze structural factors such as crystallinity, grain size, strain, phase composition, and structural defects. The XRD spectra were recorded from a Shimadzu XRD 700 instrument utilizing a Cukα wavelength of 1.54056 Å. Cukα radiation was created by using a Cu source as an X-ray source. The data scans were collected at the 2Theta range 5.0–80° with a count rate of 0.2°/min. The crystal structure was identified by comparing the diffraction pattern of the synthesized nanocomposite with the JCPDS files in the database. FTIR data were collected using a Shimadzu FTIR spectrometer—100 Tracer. The frequency ranges that can be examined are generally in the 4,000,399 cm−1 range. The sensitive characterization instrument ESEM exposes surface morphology and when coupled with an EDX (energy dispersive X-ray analysis) accessory, determines the elemental composition of materials. High-resolution 3D micrographs of the morphology were provided utilizing the ESEM technique. ESEM images and EDX data were acquired using a Thermo Fisher Quattro environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has become an essential tool in medical, biological, and materials’ research because of its high magnifications. An investigation of TEM microscopy was carried out using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Talos F200i TEM/STEM electron microscope. The most generally used technique for calculating the specific surface area of produced material is the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The BET technique involves the multi-layer adsorption of chemically inert N2 gas with relative pressure and gas volume adsorbed in cm3/gm. The samples were degassed at 100 °C overnight to remove trapped moisture molecules. The samples were subjected to N2 gas at 77 K to record the adsorption–desorption isotherm on NOVA 4200e surface area analyzer. As a significant characterization tool in the field of photocatalysis, UV–Vis spectroscopy is a non-destructive method for analyzing optical characteristics such as absorbance, reflectance, transmittance, and bandgap energy that are related to the chemical composition of the material. In order to move electrons from their ground state to their excited state for electronic spectroscopy, it is necessary to absorb photons in the UV–visible region of the spectrum. The UV–Vis spectra were recorded on Agilent Cary 60 Spectrophotometer. The photoluminescence (PL) approach has been widely applied in the field of photocatalysis to study surface processes. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra at room temperature were obtained using a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer with a 350 nm excitation wavelength.
The hydrogen catalytic efficiency of prepared materials was evaluated as follows. Typically, 20 mg of the nanocomposite sample was mixed with 0.25 g of NaBH4 and 10 mL of methanol was added without stirring. The hydrogen gas volume was recorded via the water displacement method. The measurements were completed at a temperature of 30 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

XRD is a non-destructive analytical method that provides details of the physical characteristics and crystalline structure of materials. The results of XRD data for the synthesized S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite catalysts are presented in Figure 1. The catalyst included a variety of compounds which were discovered using XRD analysis. The presence of two major peaks at 13.08° and 27.20° were observed in the spectrum of S@g-C3N4. The small diffraction peak at 13.08° matched a (100) plane with a distance of 0.676 nm [26,27]. The highest diffraction peak with reflection (002) was a typical interlayer stacking peak for graphitic C3N4 material and located at 2θ = 27.20°, which occurs because the atomic radius of sulfur is larger than carbon and nitrogen. Further, small diffraction peaks of sulfur were observed in the XRD spectrum of S@g-C3N4 [28]. For NiS-g-C3N4 at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt.%, the peak (002) moved to 27.55°, 27.66° and 27.64°, respectively. The positions of these reflections shifted to higher angles and thus lowered d-values with increase in NiS content. This indicates a structural contraction along the layer-stacking direction, presumably because of a more extended condensation of the carbon nitride chains [29]. Moreover, this shift occurs because of the reduced size (layer thickness) in carbon nitride sheets [30].
The reflections of NiS are located at 30.24°, 34.54°, 45.65°, 53.34°, 60.71°, and 62.94° that corresponds to (100), (101), (102), (110), (103), and (200) of hexagonal crystal structure (ICDD No. 50-1791). The synthesis of the NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites is confirmed by the existence of the two phases. Meanwhile, the crystallite size (D) is inversely proportional to the diffraction peak broadening (β) as proposed by the Scherer equation [31,32]:
D = 0.9 λ β cos θ
Accordingly, the calculations of b at the diffraction peak with reflection (002) for S@g-C3N4 decreased as the NiS concentration increased from 0.5 to 1.5 wt.%. This reveals the small crystallite domains of S@g-C3N4. The calculation of NiS crystallites reveals an average size of 8.0 nm for 0.5 wt.% NiS, 1.0 wt.% NiS, and 1.5 wt.% NiS. Moreover, the shift of peak position for the (002) plane after the growth of NiS at different content (0.0–1.5 wt.%) confirms the successful formation of nanocomposites.
Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite samples. The vibrations of C-O stretching and C-OH stretching for the S@g-C3N4 sample located at 1010 and 1132 cm−1 [33]. This result indicates the existence of both hydroxyl (C-OH), carbonyl (C=O), and carboxylic (COOH). The vibrations of N-H stretching or the H2O adsorption showed two peaks at 3100–3300 cm−1 [34]. The absorption bands between 1229 and 1628 cm−1 observed in the spectrum of S@g-C3N4 correspond to the typical stretching modes of CN heterocycles [35]. It was determined that the physically adsorptive CO2 from the environment was responsible for a weak band at 2336 cm−1 [30]. Moreover, another weak peak connected to the C=N bond was seen at 2170 cm−1 [36].
The medium intense sharp band at around 804 cm−1 suggests the samples consist of triazine or heptazine building blocks [37]. The bands at 1205 and 1311 cm−1 indicate the presence of C–N (sp3) and C-N(-C)-C bonds [38]. Moreover, the positions of these peaks slightly shift to a higher wavenumber after the growth of NiS at 1.5 wt.%. These outcomes provide evidence of the successful preparation of NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites and agree with the XRD investigations.
The morphology and structure of the synthesized S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite samples were investigated by ESEM images. In Figure 3, S@g-C3N4 shows that a 2D sheet structure was achieved for g-C3N4 materials. NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites showed the sheet materials were broken up during the growth process in Figure 3, revealing more edge sites. This aligns with the XRD result showing that NiS-g-C3N4 is less ordered and crystalline by virtue of the broader spectral peaks.
The EDX spectra displayed in Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials) of the NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite samples confirm the presence of all the elements supposed. Table 1 also displays the weight percent of the elements found on the samples’ surfaces. Moreover, Figure S1 shows no identifiable peaks for any other elements besides Ni, S, C, and N, demonstrating that the NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite samples are of high purity.
TEM images of S@g-C3N4 and 1.5 wt.% NiS nanocomposite samples are shown in Figure 4. The lamellar structure with sheet morphology is seen in the images. The image of S@g-C3N4 reveals stack layers that are connected with XRD and ESEM measurements. Moreover, the sheet materials in 1.5 wt.% NiS nanocomposite sample were broken up throughout the growing process.
An adsorbent surface area, which is directly related to the number of active sites for adsorption, has a significant impact on its catalytic activity. We measured surface area using the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm at 77 K for the S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite samples (Figure 5). All the samples exhibited type IV isotherm with no saturation implying mesoporous nature. BET plots give specific surface areas of 40, 65, 66, and 83 m2/g for S@g-C3N4, 0.5 wt.% NiS, 1.0 wt.% NiS, and 1.5 wt.% NiS, respectively. The surface area represents the effect of the in situ polycondensation preparation of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites. The BJH pore volume of S@g-C3N4 is 0.18 cm3, which increases to 0.20 cm3 in 1.5 wt.% NiS owing to the incorporation of NiS into the nanosheet. We found that the in situ polycondensation preparation of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites increased the porosity of the composites, which allowed for more interaction with ions and faster electron transport for catalytic activity [39].
The absorbance properties of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite samples were measured with the help of UV–visible spectroscopy as shown in Figure 6a. The absorbance curve displays a significant absorption band centered around 322 nm that corresponds to n→π* electronic transitions. Heterocyclic aromatics showed the band gap absorption around 400 nm that corresponds to the characteristic π-π* transitions [8]. It is also expected that the disorder in nanocomposites will result in separated electron and hole states with energies in the band gap, causing the Urbach tail in the optical absorption spectrum, which broadens the absorption even more. Moreover, a shoulder appeared at 400 nm that showed a red shift when NiS content varies from 0.0–1.5 wt.%. The red shift in adsorption revealed the ease of production of photo-induced electrons and holes.
The optical energy gap (Eopt) is an important parameter to estimate the electronic structure of the S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites. Eopt is calculated by evaluation of the straight lines intercept at zero photon absorption from the plots of (αhν)2 vs. photon energy (hν) shown in Figure 6b as follows [40,41,42]:
α h υ = k ( h v − E g ) 0.5
The average values of the optical energy gap for S@g-C3N4 were 2.60 eV that decreased to 2.50, 2.40, and 2.30 eV as the NiS concentration increased from 0.5 to 1.5 wt.%. This decrease in the energy gap is explained by the development of additional energy levels or changes in the g-C3N4 electronic structure [43,44].
Physical and chemical characteristics of materials are measured in photoluminescence by employing photons to produce excited electronic states in the material system and evaluating the optical emission when these states relax. This in turn induces electron-hole pairs that recombine after a lifetime in excited states. The key factors influencing a catalyst’s capacity to catalyze a reaction are the electrical and structural defects as well as the recombination of electron-hole pairs [45]. Figure 7 shows the emission spectra of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites. All NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite catalysts have an emission band that is visible in the 410–540 nm range and is composed of n-π* transitions [46]. The intensity of this peak decreased as the NiS concentration increased from 0.5 to 1.5 wt.%. This could be because electron–hole pairs are produced quickly while the pair recombination process is delayed. Further, the photo-induced electron–hole pair can transfer easily at the interface of NiS/g-C3N4 nanocomposite. As a result, we expect that the nanocomposite sample 1.5 wt.% NiS will show high catalytic performance concerning the other samples.
In self-hydrolysis, sodium borohydride solutions become chemically stable and do not produce substantial quantities of H2 at ambient conditions. In pure water, sodium borohydride undergoes self-hydrolysis, consuming H3O+ ions, and causing a pH rise that lowers the rate at which hydrogen is produced [47]. Methanol is one of the highest reactivity reagents toward sodium borohydride and is the lightest alcohol, which makes it a suitable alternative for water in the reaction that produces hydrogen. Another benefit of employing methanol is that it lowers the reactant mixture’s freezing point, making it feasible to generate hydrogen at temperatures lower than 273 K with rapid hydrogen synthesis and quick reaction initiation—impossible when using pure water. Moreover, methanol regeneration may be employed as a possible high gravimetric density hydrogen storage device, and sodium borohydride methanolysis has been presented as a practical process for hydrogen production at low temperatures [48].
According to the Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism, catalysts whose surfaces are linked with the amino group effectively contribute to the hydrolysis or methanolysis of NaBH4 and for hydrogen generation. Meanwhile, methanol and NaBH4 molecules adsorb on the catalyst’s surface [49,50]. On the other hand, Michaelis–Menten stated that the active sites of the catalyst adsorb NaBH4 without methanol [51,52]. The aforementioned information leads to the conclusion that catalyst surface characteristics are crucial for the evolution of hydrogen gas.
Nanocomposite catalysts are employed to accelerate the kinetics of sodium borohydride hydrolysis in stable solutions, resulting in a significant increase in hydrogen production. The particle size and degree of dispersion are other factors that affect a catalyst’s activity. In order to speed up the reaction and lower the catalyst loading, small particle size and excellent dispersion encourage extensive catalyst interaction with the NaBH4 solution. A methanolysis experiment was performed in order to check the role of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites in the hydrogen evolution from NaBH4. The data were recorded at 30 °C and plotted in Figure 8. S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites were added and led to an increase in the maximum quantity of hydrogen. The sample 1.5 wt.% NiS showed the fastest hydrogen generation performance. In methanol, the NaBH4 material broke down into Na+ and BH 4 − ions. Moreover, the surface of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites adsorbed BH 4 − ions. The efficient catalyst adsorbs more BH 4 − ions in a short time and thus produces more hydrogen.
The rate of hydrogen production greatly determines the efficiency of the catalyst to speed up the reaction. Hydrogen evolution rates (r) of the S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites are calculated with help of the following equations using the H2 volume (V), the mass of catalyst (mcat), and time of reaction (t) [20,53]:
r = V t · m c a t
The hydrogen evolution curves displayed in Figure 8 were used to calculate the hydrogen generation rate. The calculated production rates are plotted in Figure 9 for the S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 samples. The hydrogen generation rates increased with the increase in the NiS nanosheet content. Moreover, the sample 1.5 wt.% NiS showed the highest production rate of 8654 mL/g·min. The nanocomposite 1.5 wt.% NiS had the highest generation rate among others due to the promising surface design [54]. In this context, NaBH4 decomposes in methanol into Na+ and BH 4 − ions. The large surface area of the nanocomposite sample 1.5 wt.% NiS helps the adsorption of more BH 4 − ions. As a result, the production of hydrogen from methanolysis of NaBH4 will be accelerated. Additionally, this rate of hydrogen evolution (8654 mL/g·min) exceeds the rates for R–TiO2-NH2 (3525 mL/g·min) [50], SiO2@PAA (5120 mL/g·min) [55], ZIF-67@GO (3200 mL/g·min) [56], and Ru/NiO-Ni foam (6000 mL/g·min) [57].

4. Conclusions

The in situ polycondensation method was implemented for the preparation of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 and was employed for catalytic hydrogen production from the methanolysis of sodium borohydride. The incorporation of NiS during the growth process played a major role in the enhancement of the surface area and porosity of the S@g-C3N4 composites. The 1.5 wt.% NiS sample had the highest surface area of 90 m2/g compared with the 0.5 wt.% NiS and 1.0 wt.% NiS samples. The pore volume of S@g-C3N4 was 0.18 cm3, which was reduced to 0.11 cm3 in 1.5 wt.% NiS owing to the incorporation of NiS particles into the nanosheet. We found that during the in situ polycondensation preparation of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites increased the porosity of the composites. The average value of the optical energy gap for S@g-C3N4 was 2.60 eV and decreased to 2.30 eV because of the 1.5 wt.% NiS incorporation. The NiS-g-C3N4 catalysts showed an emission band in the 410–540 nm range and the intensity of this peak decreased as the NiS concentration increased from 0.5 to 1.5 wt.%. The hydrogen generation rates increased with the increase in the NiS nanosheet content. The sample 1.5 wt.% NiS showed the highest production rate of 8654 mL/g·min compared with others due to the promising surface design. The large surface area of the nanocomposite sample 1.5 wt.% NiS helps for adsorption of more BH 4 − ions. As a result, the production of hydrogen from methanolysis of NaBH4 will be accelerated. All of these results enhance the possibility of using 1.5 wt.% NiS as a promising catalyst for the production of hydrogen from NaBH4 methanolysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13050938/s1, Figure S1: EDX data for NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H.A. and T.A.M.T.; validation, T.A.M.T., S.A., T.A.; formal analysis, M.A. and K.A.; resources, A.H.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A, K.A., S.A. and T.A.; writing—review and editing, A.H.A. and T.A.M.T.; supervision and funding acquisition, A.H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, the Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number 223202.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding author will make the data available on request.

Acknowledgments

The Authors thanks the central lab. At Jouf University for the advance techniques which have been used in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.; Wang, S. A critical review on graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based materials: Preparation, modification and environmental application. Co-Ord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 453, 214338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bharagav, U.; Reddy, N.R.; Rao, V.N.K.; Ravi, P.; Sathish, M.; Rangappa, D.; Prathap, K.; Chakra, C.S.; Shankar, M.V.; Appels, L.; et al. Bifunctional g-C3N4/carbon nanotubes/WO3 ternary nanohybrids for photocatalytic energy and environmental applications. Chemosphere 2023, 311, 137030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rono, N.; Kibet, J.K.; Martincigh, B.S.; Nyamori, V.O. A review of the current status of graphitic carbon nitride. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2021, 46, 189–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hayat, A.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; El-Nasser, K.S.; Taha, T.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Syed, J.A.S.; Amin, M.A.; Ali, T.; Bashir, T.; Palamanit, A.; et al. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)–based semiconductor as a beneficial candidate in photocatalysis diversity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 47, 5142–5191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hayat, A.; Sohail, M.; Anwar, U.; Taha, T.A.; Qazi, H.I.A.; Ajmal, Z.; Abdullah, G.A.S.; Hamed, A.; Ahmed, A.A.G.; Mohammed, A.A.; et al. A Targeted Review of Current Progress, Challenges and Future Perspective of g-C3N4 based Hybrid Photocatalyst Toward Multidimensional Applications. Chem. Rec. 2022, 23, e202200143. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hao, Q.; Jia, G.; Wei, W.; Vinu, A.; Wang, Y.; Arandiyan, H.; Ni, B.-J. Graphitic carbon nitride with different dimensionalities for energy and environmental applications. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 18–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Antonietti, M. Graphitic carbon nitride “reloaded”: Emerging applications beyond (photo) catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2308–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, A.-J.; Li, H.; Huang, H.; Qian, Z.-S.; Feng, J.-J. Fluorescent graphene-like carbon nitrides: Synthesis, properties and applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 8146–8160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harun, N.A.M.; Shaari, N.; Ramli, Z.A.C. Progress of g-C3N4 and carbon-based material composite in fuel cell application. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 16281–16315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Sayed, S.A. Review of thermal decomposition, kinetics parameters and evolved gases during pyrolysis of energetic materials using different techniques. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 161, 105364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muniyappa, M.; Kalegowda, S.N.; Shetty, M.; Sriramoju, J.B.; Shastri, M.; Nabakoteswara Rap, S.V.; Debasis, D.; Shankar, M.V.; Rangappa, D. Cocatalyst free nickel sulphide nanostructure for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 5307–5318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. NavakoteswaraRao, V.; Shankar, M.V.; Yang, B.L.; Ahn, C.W.; Yang, J.M. Effective excitons separation in starfish Bi2S3/TiO2 nanostructures for enhanced hydrogen production. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 26, 101096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, K.; Xie, J.; Li, M.; Li, X. In situ one-pot fabrication of g-C3N4 nanosheets/NiS cocatalyst heterojunction with intimate interfaces for efficient visible light photocatalytic H 2 generation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 430, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wen, J.; Xie, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, A.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, X. Constructing Multifunctional Metallic Ni Interface Layers in the g-C3N4 Nanosheets/Amorphous NiS Heterojunctions for Efficient Photocatalytic H2 Generation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 14031–14042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, M.; Cheng, J.; Wang, X.; Hong, X.; Fan, J.; Yu, H. Sulfur-mediated photodeposition synthesis of NiS cocatalyst for boosting H2-evolution performance of g-C3N4 photocatalyst. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, J.; Fu, W.; Liao, Y.; Fan, J.; Xiang, Q. Recent advances in crystalline carbon nitride for photocatalysis. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 91, 224–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fronczak, M. Adsorption performance of graphitic carbon nitride-based materials: Current state of the art. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shcherban, N.; Shvalagin, V.; Korzhak, G.; Yaremov, P.; Skoryk, M.; Sergiienko, S.; Kuchmiy, S.Y. Hard template synthesis and photocatalytic activity of graphitic carbon nitride in the hydrogen evolution reaction using organic acids as electron donors. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1250, 131741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guru, S.; Kumar, S.; Bellamkonda, S.; Gangavarapu, R.R. Synthesis of CuTi-LDH supported on g-C3N4 for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical oxygen evolution reactions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 16414–16430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saka, C. Phosphorus decorated g-C3N4-TiO2 particles as efficient metal-free catalysts for hydrogen release by NaBH4 methanolysis. Fuel 2022, 322, 124196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ganesan, K.; Hayagreevan, C.; Rahul, R.; Jeevagan, A.J.; Adinaveen, T.; Bhuvaneshwari, D.S.; Muthukumar, P.; Amalraj, M. Catalytic hydrolysis of sodium borohydride for hydrogen production using phosphorylated silica particles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 30, 21199–21212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, H. Preparation of dandelion-like Co–Mo–P/CNTs-Ni foam catalyst and its performance in hydrogen production by alcoholysis of sodium borohydride. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 30443–30454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saka, C. Efficient and durable H2 production from NaBH4 methanolysis using N doped hybrid g-C3N4-SiO2 composites with ammonia as a nitrogen source. Fuel 2022, 324, 124594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saka, C. Sulphur and nitrogen-doped metal-free microalgal carbon catalysts for very active dehydrogenation of sodium borohydride in methanol. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 18326–18337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Wei, Q.; Wu, G.; Qiu, S.; Zou, Y.; Xia, Y.; Xu, F.; Sun, L.; Chu, H. Zn-MOF-74-derived graphene nanosheets supporting CoB alloys for promoting hydrolytic dehydrogenation of sodium borohydride. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 930, 167486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xue, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Ao, C.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Lu, C. Facile fabrication of three-dimensional nanofibrous foams of cellulose@g-C3N4@Cu2O with superior visible-light photocatalytic performance. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 303, 120455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Z.; Huo, Y.; Fan, Y.; Wu, R.; Wu, H.; Wang, F.; Xu, X. Facile synthesis of carbon-rich g-C3N4 by copolymerization of urea and tetracyanoethylene for photocatalytic degradation of Orange II. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 358, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chang, F.; Yan, W.; Cheng, W.; Wu, F.; Deng, B.; Hu, X. The construction and enhanced photocatalytic performance of binary composite S/g-C3N4. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018, 87, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thomas, A.; Fischer, A.; Goettmann, F.; Antonietti, M.; Müller, J.-O.; Schlögl, R.; Carlsson, J.M. Graphitic carbon nitride materials: Variation of structure and morphology and their use as metal-free catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 4893–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Vu, M.H.; Sakar, M.; Nguyen, C.C.; Do, T.O. Chemically bonded Ni cocatalyst onto the S doped g-C3N4 nanosheets and their synergistic enhancement in H2 production under sunlight irradiation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 4194–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Taha, T.A.; Saad, R.; Zayed, M.; Shaban, M.; Ahmed, A.M. Tuning the surface morphologies of ZnO nanofilms for enhanced sensitivity and selectivity of CO2 gas sensor. Appl. Phys. A 2023, 129, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Manzoor, S.; Abid, A.G.; Aman, S.; Abdullah, M.; Rashid, A.R.; Ali, H.M.; Ali, T.E.; Assiri, M.A.; Ashiq, M.N.; Taha, T. Facile synthesis of CoFePO4 on eggshell membrane for oxygen evolution reaction and supercapacitor applications. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 36975–36982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fan, C.; Miao, J.; Xu, G.; Liu, J.; Lv, J.; Wu, Y. Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets obtained by liquid stripping as efficient photocatalysts under visible light. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 37185–37193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lu, Q.; Deng, J.; Hou, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y. One-step electrochemical synthesis of ultrathin graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets and their application to the detection of uric acid. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 12251–12253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gao, J.; Wang, J.; Qian, X.; Dong, Y.; Xu, H.; Song, R.; Yan, C.; Zhu, H.; Zhong, Q.; Qian, G.; et al. One-pot synthesis of copper-doped graphitic carbon nitride nanosheet by heating Cu–melamine supramolecular network and its enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalysis. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 228, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Z.-T.; Xu, J.-L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, X. Facile synthesis of Zn(II)-doped g-C3N4 and their enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Rare Met. 2019, 38, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bojdys, M.J.; Müller, J.-O.; Antonietti, M.; Thomas, A. Ionothermal Synthesis of Crystalline, Condensed, Graphitic Carbon Nitride. Chem A Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8177–8182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xia, P.; Zhu, B.; Yu, J.; Cao, S.; Jaroniec, M. Ultra-thin nanosheet assemblies of graphitic carbon nitride for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 3230–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vijayakumar, E.; Preetha, R.; Narendran, M.G.; Jennifer, G.A.; Varathan, E.; Neppolian, B.; Ganesh, V.K.; Bosco, A.J. Experimental investigation into the π-conjugated HT-g-C3N4/MoS2 (X) evokes the electron transport in type-II heterojunction to achieve high photocatalytic antibiotic removal under visible-light irradiation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 292, 121028. [Google Scholar]
  40. Alshammari, A.H.; Alshammari, M.; Alshammari, K.; Allam, N.K.; Taha, T. PVC/PVP/SrTiO3 polymer blend nanocomposites as potential materials for optoelectronic applications. Results Phys. 2023, 44, 106173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hosseini, A.; Faghihian, H. Application of FSM-16 impregnated by TiO2 as an efficient photocatalyst for elimination of benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene, adsorptive removal of degradation products by MCM-41. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 76, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zarringhadam, P.; Farhadi, S. Novel sheet-like bismuth subcarbonate-zinc ferrite (Bi2O2CO3/ZnFe2O4) magnetically recyclable nanocomposites: Synthesis, characterization and enhanced catalytic performance for the reduction of nitrophenols and nitroanilines. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 32, e4518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cao, S.; Yu, J. g-C3N4-based photocatalysts for hydrogen generation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2101–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, X.; Gong, J.; Dong, Y.; An, S.; Zhang, X.; Tian, J. Energy band engineering of hydroxyethyl group grafted on the edge of 3D g-C3N4 nanotubes for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production. Mater. Today Phys. 2022, 27, 100806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, X.; Mao, W.; Wu, Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, X.; Zhou, W.; Huo, P. Fabricating carbon nitride-based 3D/0D intramolecular donor–acceptor catalysts for efficient photoreduction of CO2. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 20225–20234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rong, X.; Qiu, F.; Rong, J.; Zhu, X.; Yan, J.; Yang, D. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity of W-doped porous g-C3N4 and effect of H2O2. Mater. Lett. 2016, 164, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Metin, Ö.; Özkar, S. Hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride by using water dispersible, hydrogenphosphate-stabilized nickel (0) nanoclusters as catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 32, 1707–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saka, C.; Balbay, A. Influence of process parameters on enhanced hydrogen generation via semi-methanolysis and semi-ethanolysis reactions of sodium borohydride using phosphoric acid. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 30119–30126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Q. Research progress on catalysts for hydrogen generation through sodium borohydride alcoholysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 47, 5929–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Demirci, S.; Sunol, A.K.; Sahiner, N. Catalytic activity of amine functionalized titanium dioxide nanoparticles in methanolysis of sodium borohydride for hydrogen generation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 261, 118242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hannauer, J.; Demirci, U.B.; Pastor, G.; Geantet, C.; Herrmann, J.M.; Miele, P. Hydrogen release through catalyzed methanolysis of solid sodium borohydride. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1796–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kassem, A.A.; Abdelhamid, H.N.; Fouad, D.M.; Ibrahim, S.A. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and MOFs-derived CuO@ C for hydrogen generation from sodium borohydride. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 31230–31238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saka, C. g-C3N4 particles with boron and oxygen dopants/carbon vacancies for efficient dehydrogenation in sodium borohydride methanolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 19016–19026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cline, E.D.; Adamson, S.E.; Bernhard, S. Homogeneous Catalytic System for Photoinduced Hydrogen Production Utilizing Iridium and Rhodium Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 10378–10388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, L.; Fan, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Li, R.; Yi, S.; Sun, Y.; Dong, H. Poly(acrylic acid)-modified silica nanoparticles as a nonmetal catalyst for NaBH4 methanolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 23236–23244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dai, P.; Yao, Y.; Hu, E.; Xu, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, C. Self-assembled ZIF-67@graphene oxide as a cobalt-based catalyst precursor with enhanced catalytic activity toward methanolysis of sodium borohydride. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 546, 149128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, F.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, H. Preparation of bush-like Ru/NiO-Ni foam catalyst and its performance in hydrogen production from sodium borohydride alcoholysis. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 11365–11372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD data of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Figure 1. XRD data of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g001
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g002 550
Figure 2. FTIR data of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Figure 2. FTIR data of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g002
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g003 550
Figure 3. ESEM micrographs of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Figure 3. ESEM micrographs of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g003
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g004 550
Figure 4. TEM micrographs of S@g-C3N4 and 1.5 wt.% NiS nanocomposites.
Figure 4. TEM micrographs of S@g-C3N4 and 1.5 wt.% NiS nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g004
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g005 550
Figure 5. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Figure 5. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g005
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g006 550
Figure 6. Graphs of (a) absorbance vs. wavelength and (b) (ahn)2 vs. photon energy for S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Figure 6. Graphs of (a) absorbance vs. wavelength and (b) (ahn)2 vs. photon energy for S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g006
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g007 550
Figure 7. PL spectra for S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Figure 7. PL spectra for S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g007
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g008 550
Figure 8. Hydrogen production from methanolysis of NaBH4 of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Figure 8. Hydrogen production from methanolysis of NaBH4 of S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g008
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g009 550
Figure 9. H2 production rates for S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Figure 9. H2 production rates for S@g-C3N4 and NiS-g-C3N4 nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 13 00938 g009
Table
Table 1. Weight % of elements present at the surface of the NiS-g-C3N4 samples analyzed from EDX analysis.
Table 1. Weight % of elements present at the surface of the NiS-g-C3N4 samples analyzed from EDX analysis.
SampleC (wt.%)N (wt.%)S (wt.%)Ni (wt.%)
0.5 wt.% NiS37.7561.140.170.94
1.0 wt.% NiS46.1152.130.301.47
1.5 wt.% NiS35.6457.271.086.01
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alshammari, A.H.; Alshammari, K.; Alotaibi, T.; Alshammari, M.; Alhassan, S.; Taha, T.A.M. In Situ Polycondensation Synthesis of NiS-g-C3N4 Nanocomposites for Catalytic Hydrogen Generation from NaBH4. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050938

AMA Style

Alshammari AH, Alshammari K, Alotaibi T, Alshammari M, Alhassan S, Taha TAM. In Situ Polycondensation Synthesis of NiS-g-C3N4 Nanocomposites for Catalytic Hydrogen Generation from NaBH4. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(5):938. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050938

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alshammari, Alhulw H., Khulaif Alshammari, Turki Alotaibi, Majed Alshammari, Sultan Alhassan, and Taha Abdel Mohaymen Taha. 2023. "In Situ Polycondensation Synthesis of NiS-g-C3N4 Nanocomposites for Catalytic Hydrogen Generation from NaBH4" Nanomaterials 13, no. 5: 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050938

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop