Next Article in Journal
FDTD Simulations for Rhodium and Platinum Nanoparticles for UV Plasmonics
Previous Article in Journal
Novel LiAlO2 Material for Scalable and Facile Lithium Recovery Using Electrochemical Ion Pumping
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/nano13050898
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanisms of the Device Property Alteration Generated by the Proton Irradiation in GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs Using Extremely Thin Gate Insulator

by
Sung-Jae Chang
1,*,
Dong-Seok Kim
2,*,
Tae-Woo Kim
3,
Youngho Bae
4,
Hyun-Wook Jung
1,
Il-Gyu Choi
1,
Youn-Sub Noh
1,
Sang-Heung Lee
1,
Seong-Il Kim
1,
Ho-Kyun Ahn
1,
Dong-Min Kang
1 and
Jong-Won Lim
1
1
ICT Components & Material Research Laboratory, Photonic/Wireless Convergence Research Department, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea
2
Korea Multi-Purpose Accelerator Complex, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Gyungju 38180, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Electrical/Electronic, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 44610, Republic of Korea
4
Department of IT Convergence, Uiduk University, Gyeongju 38004, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(5), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050898
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 20 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Nanoelectronics, Nanosensors and Devices)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recently, we reported that device performance degradation mechanisms, which are generated by the γ-ray irradiation in GaN-based metal-insulator-semiconductor high electron mobility transistors (MIS-HEMTs), use extremely thin gate insulators. When the γ-ray was radiated, the total ionizing dose (TID) effects were generated and the device performance deteriorated. In this work, we investigated the device property alteration and its mechanisms, which were caused by the proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator. The device property, such as threshold voltage, drain current, and transconductance varied by the proton irradiation. When the 5 nm-thick HfO2 layer was employed for the gate insulator, the threshold voltage shift was larger than that of the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 gate insulator, despite the HfO2 gate insulator exhibiting better radiation resistance compared to the Si3N4 gate insulator. On the other hand, the drain current and transconductance degradation were less for the 5 nm-thick HfO2 gate insulator. Unlike the γ-ray irradiation, our systematic research included pulse-mode stress measurements and carrier mobility extraction and revealed that the TID and displacement damage (DD) effects were simultaneously generated by the proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs. The degree of the device property alteration was determined by the competition or superposition of the TID and DD effects for the threshold voltage shift and drain current and transconductance deterioration, respectively. The device property alteration was diminished due to the reduction of the linear energy transfer with increasing irradiated proton energy. We also studied the frequency performance degradation that corresponded to the irradiated proton energy in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs using an extremely thin gate insulator.

1. Introduction

Gallium nitride (GaN)-based high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) have been studied for high-power radio frequency (RF), low noise, and aerospace applications, since GaN shows a high breakdown electric field, high carrier density and mobility at the hetero-interface, and a wide bandgap [1,2,3]. In GaN-based HEMTs, many dangling bonds exist at the AlGaN barrier surface, which traps negative charges [4,5]. The negative trapped charges reduce the 2-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) density and degrade the RF performance, which is so-called because of current collapse effects [4,5]. Furthermore, the Schottky contact, which is applied to the gate electrode, limits the drain current driving capacity and output power characteristics, as the gate leakage current is high [6,7,8,9].
In order to overcome these issues, the dielectric layer deposition, which is located on top of the AlGaN barrier and acts as a passivation layer, is essentially required in GaN-based HEMTs. The dielectric layer screens the dangling bonds and reduces the current collapse [4,5], which improves the RF performance in GaN-based HEMTs. In addition, a GaN-based metal–insulator–semiconductor (MIS)-HEMTs structure has been proposed. In GaN-based MIS-HEMTs, the dielectric layer that plays as a gate insulator is inserted between the AlGaN barrier and the gate electrode. The GaN-based MIS-HEMTs show lower gate leakage current, improved drain current driving capacity, and output power performance, which can be compared to the GaN-based HEMTs [10,11]. From this perspective, various gate layers and multi-layered gate insulator structures have been investigated in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
However, the usage of the dielectric layer results in a few side effects in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs. The device performance and reliability deteriorate during the device operation since the dielectric layer quality is degraded by the hot-electron-related trapping [19]. In addition, the employment of the dielectric layer should be more cautious, especially for aerospace applications. The radiation resistance of the dielectric layer is weaker than that of semiconductors such as AlGaN and GaN [20,21]. Therefore, various gate dielectric layers, such as SiO2 [22], Si3N4 [23], Al2O3 [24], Gd2O3 [25], MgCaO [26], and SiN/Al2O3 multi-layered gate insulator structure [27], have been studied for aerospace applications.
When GaN-based HEMTs and MIS-HEMTs are exposed to proton irradiation, two different radiation effects are induced. One is the total ionizing dose (TID) effect and another is the displacement damage (DD) effect. The TID effects are mostly induced inside the dielectric layer. The dielectric layer quality is degraded and charges are trapped in the interior of the dielectric layer by the radiation, which deteriorates device performance [20,22,26]. Whereas the DD effects, which are related to the point defects generation, occur in semiconductors [28,29,30], which results in the reduction of the 2DEG density and device performance degradation [23,24,25,27]. When the radiation is irradiated in a GaN-based device, Ga and N vacancies and interstitials are generated and added to the existing point defects. To reveal the device property alteration mechanisms, which are caused by the DD effects, various studies have been conducted [19,21,22,23,24,25,27,31,32,33,34]. However, the device performance alternation mechanisms are not clear in many cases; so far, the TID and DD effects are simultaneously generated and the impact of the two different radiation effects on the GaN-based HEMTs and MIS-HEMTs characteristics are not the same.
In this study, the device property alteration and its mechanisms, which were generated by proton irradiation, were investigated in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs using an extremely thin gate insulator. Our optimized dielectric layer deposition process made it possible for the employment of the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 layer, which showed sufficient quality as the gate insulator. The device properties were electrically characterized and compared before and after proton irradiation. After proton irradiation, the direct current (DC) and RF performance were changed. The degree of the device performance alteration reduced when the irradiated proton energy increased. At low irradiated proton energy, the threshold voltage shift was larger in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick HfO2 gate insulator than in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 gate insulator, even though the HfO2 gate insulator exhibited stronger radiation resistance than the Si3N4 gate insulator. By contrast, the drain current and transconductance alteration were less when the HfO2 was applied for the gate insulator. Based on our previous study [20], using pulse-mode stress measurement and carrier mobility extraction, we revealed the device property alternation mechanisms, which were generated by proton irradiation. For the determination of the threshold voltage shift, the TID and DD effects were in competition, whereas the TID and DD effects were superposed for the drain current and transconductance reduction. The impact of proton irradiation on RF performance was also investigated.

2. Structure and Fabrication

We processed GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator on a 4-inch sapphire substrate. The epitaxial layers were grown by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition, which was composed of a 2 µm-thick GaN buffer, 50 nm-thick GaN channel, and 20 nm-thick AlGaN barrier layers. The Al content of the AlGaN barrier was 0.25. For the formation of Ohmic contact, Ti/Al/Ni/Au (30/100/30/100 nm) was deposited by an e-beam evaporation system followed by rapid thermal annealing at 850 °C for 40 sec. The phosphorus was implanted except for the active region of the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs, for the device isolation. To compare the radiation resistance and reveal the device property alternation mechanisms, two different gate dielectric layers (Sample-Si3N4: Si3N4 = 5 nm, Sample-HfO2: HfO2 = 5 nm) were prepared, which played as a surface passivation layer as well as the gate insulator. A Si3N4 layer was deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD), whereas a HfO2 layer was deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD), respectively. The top of the Ohmic contact region and the source and drain contact pad areas were opened using a buffered oxide etch. For the gate electrode and contact pad formation, Ni/Au (30/370 nm) was deposited. The gate width (WG), gate length (LG), the distance between the source and gate (LSG), and the gate and drain (LGD) of the fabricated MIS-HEMTs were 100.0, 0.5, 1.0, and 3.5 µm, respectively. The radiated proton fluences were 1015 cm−2 at an energy of 5, 15, and 25 MeV, which were implemented at ARTI (Advanced Radiation Technology Institute). The flux of the irradiated proton was 1 × 1012 p/cm2·sec. The proton was irradiated at room temperature. The schematic cross-section of the processed GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 gate insulator was shown in Figure 1.

3. Results and Discussion

As shown in Figure 2, we measured the typical device transfer characteristics before and after proton irradiation in Sample-Si3N4 and Sample-HfO2. The drain current (ID) and gate leakage current (IG) were measured at drain bias (i.e., applied voltage at drain electrode, VD = 4.5 V), while the gate bias (i.e., applied gate voltage at gate electrode, VG) was swept. The transconductance (gm) curves were achieved by the derivation of the ID. In the fresh device (i.e., before proton irradiation), there was a device property difference in threshold voltage (VTH), ID, and gm for Sample-Si3N4 and Sample-HfO2, which resulted from the difference of the dielectric constant between Si3N4 and HfO2 [17].
The typical device transfer characteristics were changed by proton irradiation. For the two samples, the VTH was positively shifted after proton irradiation at 5 MeV. The degree of the positive VTH shift was larger in Sample-HfO2 than in Sample-Si3N4, despite the radiation resistance of HfO2 being better than that of Si3N4 [20]. Unlike the VTH shift after proton irradiation at 5 MeV, the VTH was negatively shifted after proton irradiation at 25 MeV. The superior radiation resistance of the HfO2 dielectric layer, which was compared to the Si3N4 dielectric layer, was confirmed by the lower IG increase in Sample-HfO2 than in Sample-Si3N4. In contrast with the VTH shift, the gm and ID reductions were less in Sample-HfO2 than in Sample-Si3N4.
For the quantization of the device property alteration and comparison of the immunity to the proton irradiation, several device parameters in terms of the threshold voltage shift (ΔVTH), drain current reduction (ΔID), and transconductance maximum reduction (Δgm,max) were extracted according to the irradiated proton energy in Sample-Si3N4 and Sample-HfO2, as shown in Figure 3. After proton irradiation at 5 MeV, the threshold voltage was positively shifted. The ΔVTH was reduced after proton irradiation energy at 15 MeV. When the irradiated proton energy was increased to 25 MeV, the VTH was negatively shifted. In addition, the ΔVTH was larger at 5 and 15 MeV in Sample-HfO2 than in Sample-Si3N4. However, the ΔID and Δgm,max alteration tendency was different from the ΔVTH tendency. The largest ΔID and Δgm,max were obtained after proton irradiation at 5 MeV. The ΔID and Δgm,max were gradually reduced when the irradiated proton energy became stronger. When we compared the Sample-Si3N4 and Sample-HfO2, the ΔID and Δgm,max were less in Sample-HfO2. These results reflected that the device property alteration mechanism was not the same for ΔID and Δgm,max and ΔVTH.
The diminishment of the device property alteration with increases in the irradiated proton energy was due to the reduction of the linear energy transfer (LET), and/or non-ionizing energy loss (NIEL) [35,36], which was the energy loss rate through ionization and/or displacements. When the irradiated proton energy was increased, the irradiated proton speed increased and the LET and/or NIEL decreased. As a result, fewer ionized charges and defects in the dielectrics and semiconductors, respectively, were induced and the device property alteration was reduced.
To determine the 2DEG density variation, which was caused by proton irradiation, the capacitance-voltage C(V) measurements were carried out for the two samples before and after proton irradiation, as shown in Figure 4. The C(V) measurement frequency was fixed at 1 MHz while the gate bias was swept. After proton irradiation, the capacitance curves were positively and negatively shifted at low (5 MeV) and high (25 MeV) proton irradiation energy, respectively. The direction and degree of the capacitance curve shift corresponded to the ΔVTH. Therefore, the 2DEG density was varied by the proton irradiation, which resulted in the ΔVTH.
In Figure 5, the pulse-mode stress measurements were performed to achieve the key clue of the ΔVTH mechanisms. When the pulses were applied to the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs, the electrical stress was induced and the charges were trapped inside the dielectric layer and/or semiconductor layers [17,20]. Therefore, the ID was degraded by the reduction of the 2DEG density. When we conducted the pulse-mode stress measurements, the pulses applied at the drain electrode were increased from 0 V to 10 V, while the pulses at the gate electrode were fixed at VTH + 2 V for the ID measurements. The quiescent biases were set as (VG = 0 V, VD = 0 V), (VG = VTH − 2 V, 0 V), and (VG = VTH − 2 V, 10 V) for the without-stress, gate-stress, and gate-and-drain stress conditions, respectively. A 2 ms stress pulse and 0.2 µs measurement pulse were applied for inducing stress and measuring ID, respectively. Compared to the without-stress condition, the drain current was reduced under the gate-stress condition due to the trapped charges, which were mainly inside the gate insulator and AlGaN barrier [17,20,37]. Under the gate-and-drain stress condition, the ID was lower than that of the gate-stress condition, since the impact of the traps existed in the GaN channel, and the GaN buffer was added to the gate-stress condition [17,20,37].
When the semiconductor was exposed to radiation, two different radiation effects (TID and DD effects) were generated. The TID effects mostly occurred in the interior of the dielectric layer [20,22,26] and were related to the LET. However, the TID effects generation mechanism was not the same for the dielectric layers. When the Si3N4 dielectric layer was deposited by the CVD system, there were many dangling bonds (so-called as K centers) [38,39,40]. When the Si3N4 was exposed to the radiation, the neutral K0 centers were converted to positively charged defects (K+ defects) [41]. On the other hand, the radiation exposure generated bond-breaking and oxygen vacancies in the HfO2 dielectric layer, which traps positive charges [42]. Despite the TID effects generation mechanism being different for the Si3N4 and HfO2 dielectric layers, the 2DEG density was increased and the VTH was negatively shifted by the radiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs [20,27]. By contrast, inside the semiconductor, the DD effects, which were related to the NIEL, were introduced. The atomic displacement in the semiconductor was generated by the impinging energetic radiation, which resulted in lattice defects [43] in the AlGaN barrier, GaN channel, and GaN buffer layer. The electrons located at the hetero-interface were trapped at the lattice defects and the 2DEG density was reduced. As a result, the threshold voltage of the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs was positively shifted [44,45].
In Figure 5c, before proton irradiation, the ΔID,pulse, which was the ID reduction under gate-stress and gate-and-drain stress conduction, was slightly larger in Sample-Si3N4 than in Sample-HfO2. The reason for this was that more dangling bonds were included in the Si3N4 dielectric layer, which was in contrast to the HfO2 dielectric layer [20]. The ΔID,pulse gap, which was the ΔID difference between gate-stress and gate-and-drain stress conditions, was identical for the two samples, as the epitaxial layer was the same.
Through the pulse-mode stress measurements, the VTH shift mechanism, which was generated by the proton irradiation, was explained. After proton irradiation the ΔID,pulse and ΔID,pulse gap was larger, which compared to the fresh devices due to the degradation of the dielectric layer and semiconductor quality. When we compared the two samples, the ΔID,pulse especially, under the gate-stress condition, was lower in Sample-HfO2 than in Sample-Si3N4. The HfO2 dielectric layer exhibited better immunity to proton irradiation, which compared to the Si3N4 dielectric layer. Therefore, in Sample-HfO2, the generation of the TID effects was less than in Sample-Si3N4. However, the ΔID,pulse gap stayed the same for the two samples at each proton irradiation energy. This phenomenon reflected the fact that the semiconductor quality degradation by the DD effects was the same for the two samples.
For the two samples, the same degree of positive VTH shift was observed by the DD effects and the positive VTH shift was compensated by the TID effects. In Sample-HfO2, less compensation occurred, which compared to the Sample-Si3N4, since the HfO2 dielectric layer showed superior radiation resistance to TID effects. Therefore, the ΔVTH was rather larger in Sample-HfO2 than in Sample-Si3N4 even though the immunity to proton irradiation was stronger in the HfO2 dielectric layer than in the Si3N4 dielectric layer.
In Figure 6, the carrier mobility μ was extracted before and after the proton irradiation to determine the mechanisms of the Δgm,max and ΔID, since the Δgm,max and ΔID depended on the μ. In the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs, there were parasitic resistance components, which resulted from the contact resistance and access region (between source and gate and gate and drain), and should be considered for the achievement of the precise μ behavior under the gated region. The μ behavior under the gated region, which took into account the parasitic components, was extracted, as is shown in Equation (1) [46]:
μ = [(ID/VD_Converted)/LG]/(qWGNS)
where VD_Converted is the drain voltage across the gated region, q is the electron charge, and NS is the electron concentration observed by the integration of the C(V) curve. The VD_Converted was calculated as the following equation:
VD_Converted = VD − ID(RACC − 2RC)
where RC and RACC are contact resistance and access region resistance, respectively, which are achieved using the transmission line method (TLM).
After the proton irradiation, the μ was degraded for the two samples. Consistent with the Δgm,max and ΔID, the largest μ degradation was observed at 5 MeV. When the irradiated proton energy was increased, the μ degradation was diminished for the two samples due to the reduced LET.
As shown in the inset in Figure 6a, the μ deterioration was observed from the low carrier density region after proton irradiation. The Coulomb scattering between the trapped charges and carriers located at the AlGaN/GaN hetero-interface was enhanced by the TID effects, since the amount of the trapped charges inside of the gate insulator was increased by the proton irradiation. The μ deterioration was also achieved at the high carrier density regime. The defects, which were induced by the proton irradiation and located near the AlGaN/GaN hetero-interface, were other μ degradation components. In addition, the overall tendency of the μ maximum reduction was the same as for the Δgm,max and ΔID, as shown in Figure 6b. Taken together, the origin of the Δgm,max and ΔID was due to the μ degradation, which was determined by the superposition of the TID and DD effects in the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs.
Before and after proton irradiation, the sheet resistance of Sample-HfO2 and Sample-Si3N4 were extracted by transmission line method (TLM), as seen in Table 1. The sheet resistance increased after proton irradiation because of the TID and DD effects. With increasing irradiated proton irradiation energy, the increase of the sheet resistance was reduced. In Sample-HfO2, the sheet resistance increase was less, which compared to Sample-Si3N4.
Note that the contact resistance was also extracted through the TLM before and after proton irradiation for the two samples. As shown in Table 2, it was difficult to observe the contact resistance alteration resulting from the proton irradiation. Therefore, the source and drain electrodes were unaffected by the proton irradiation for the two samples.
In Figure 7, the RF characteristics were investigated before and after proton irradiation in Sample-HfO2 and Sample-Si3N4. For the extraction of the cut-off frequency fT and maximum oscillation frequency fMAX, we measured the S-parameter using the network analyzer. First, the measured S-parameter was converted to the H-parameter. We fitted a linear line with a −20 dB slope on the H21 curve for achieving the fT. The fT was determined by a point, which was the extrapolated point of the linear line to the 0 dB. For the extraction of fMAX, we converted the measured S-parameter to the maximum stable gain MSG/maximum available gain MAG. A linear line with a −20 dB slope was then fitted at stability factor K = 1. The extrapolated point of the linear line to the 0 dB was defined as the fMAX.
The RF performance in terms of fT and fMAX was also deteriorated by the proton irradiation for the two samples. When the proton was irradiated at 5 MeV, fT and fMAX were degraded by 30% and 45%, respectively, in Sample-Si3N4. Compared to Sample-Si3N4, the RF performance degradation was less in Sample-HfO2. Like with the DC parameters, the RF performance deterioration was diminished when the irradiated proton energy was stronger. When we compared the RF performance degradation to the DC performance degradation, the RF performance degradation was much larger, as the defects and traps generated by the radiation were more sensitive to the frequency response [47].

4. Conclusions

The mechanisms of the device property alteration, which were generated by proton irradiation, were studied through the electrical device characterization in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs. The device properties in terms of the threshold voltage, drain current, and transconductance varied by the proton irradiation due to the generation of the total ionizing dose (TID) and displacement damage (DD) effects. We conducted the capacitance measurements, pulse-mode stress measurements, and carrier mobility extraction, and revealed the origin of the device property alteration. The threshold voltage shift was determined by the competition between the TID and DD effects. However, drain current and transconductance degradation resulted from the superposition of the two different radiation effects. The device property alteration was diminished when the irradiated proton energy became stronger due to the reduction of the energy loss rate. The deterioration of the RF performance, such as cut-off and maximum oscillation frequency, was large, since the defects and traps generated by proton irradiation were sensitive to the frequency response.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-J.C. and D.-S.K.; Investigation, S.-J.C., I.-G.C., H.-W.J., and D.-S.K.; Data analysis, S.-J.C., D.-S.K., T.-W.K., Y.B., D.-M.K., Y.-S.N., S.-H.L., S.-I.K., H.-K.A. and J.-W.L.; Writing, S.-J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (No. NRF-2021M3C1C3097672).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tang, Y.; Shinohara, K.; Regan, D.; Corrion, A.; Brown, D.; Wong, J.; Schmitz, A.; Fung, H.; Kim, S.; Micovic, M. Ultrahigh-speed GaN high-electron mobility transistors with fT/fmax of 454/444 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2015, 36, 549–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Palacios, T.; Chakraborty, A.; Rajan, S.; Poblenz, C.; Keller, S.; DenBaars, S.; Speck, J.; Mishra, U. High-power AlGaN/GaN HEMTs for Ka-band applications. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2005, 26, 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shinohara, K.; Regan, D.C.; Tang, Y.; Corrion, A.L.; Brown, D.F.; Wong, J.C.; Robinson, J.F.; Fung, H.H.; Schmitz, A.; Oh, T.C.; et al. Scaling of GaN HEMTs and Schottky Diodes for Submillimeter-Wave MMIC Applications. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 2982–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Green, B.; Chu, K.; Chumbes, E.; Smart, J.; Shealy, J.; Eastman, L. The effect of surface passivation on the microwave characteristics of undoped AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2000, 21, 268–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vetury, R.; Zhang, N.Q.; Keller, S.; Mishra, U.K. The impact of surface states on the DC and RF characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2001, 48, 560–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eastman, L.F.; Tilak, V.; Smart, J.; Green, B.M.; Chumbes, E.M.; Dimitrov, R.; Kim, H.; Ambacher, O.S.; Weimann, N.; Prunty, T.; et al. Undoped GaN/GaN HEMTs for microwave power amplification. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2001, 48, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hashizume, T.; Kotani, J.; Hasegawa, H. Leakage mechanism in GaN and AlGaN Schottky interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, Z.H.; Ng, G.I.; Arulkumaran, S.; Maung YK, T.; Teo, K.L.; Foo, S.C.; Sahmuganathan, V. Improved tow-dimensional electron gas transport characteristics in AlGaN/GaN metal-insulator-semiconductor high electron mobility transistor with atomic layer-deposited Al2O3 as gate insulator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 223501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ye, P.D.; Yang, B.; Ng, K.K.; Bude, J.; Wilk, G.D.; Halder, S.; Hwang, J.C.M. GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor high-electron-mobility-transistor with atomic layer deposited Al2O3 as gate dielectric. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 063501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Khan, M.; Hu, X.; Sumin, G.; Lunev, A.; Yang, J.; Gaska, R.; Shur, M. AlGaN/GaN metal oxide semiconductor heterostructure field effect transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2000, 21, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chumbes, E.M.; Smart, J.A.; Prunty, T.; Shealy, J.R. Microwave performance of AlGaN/GaN metal insulator semiconductor field effect transistors on sapphire substrates. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2001, 48, 416–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hashizume, T.; Anantathanasarn, S.; Negoro, N.; Sano, E.; Hasegawa, H.; Kumakura, K.; Makimoto, T. Al2O3 Insulated-Gate Structure for AlGaN/GaN Heterostructure Field Effect Transistors Having Thin AlGaN Barrier Layers. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 43, L777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lee, C.T.; Chen, H.; Lee, H.Y. Metal-oxide-semiconductor using Ga2O3 dielectrics on n-type GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, C.; Chor, E.; Tan, L.S. Investigations of HfO2/AlGaN/GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor high electron mobility transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 173504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mehandru, R.; Luo, B.; Kim, J.; Ren, F.; Gila, B.P.; Onstine, A.H.; Pearton, S.J.; Birkhahn, R.; Peres, B.; Gillespie, F.J.; et al. AlGaN/GaN metal-oxide-semoconductor high electron mobility transistors using Sc2O3 as the gate oxide and surface passivation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Balachander, K.; Arulkumaran, S.; Ishikawa, H.; Baskar, K.; Egawa, T. Studies on electron beam evaporated ZrO2/AlGaN/GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor high-electron-mobility transistors. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 2005, 202, R16–R18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, S.J.; Jung, H.W.; Do, J.W.; Cho, K.J.; Kim, J.J.; Jang, Y.J.; Yoon, H.S.; Ahn, H.-K.; Min, B.-G.; Kim, H.; et al. Enhanced carrier transport properties in GaN-based metal-insulator-semiconductor high electron mobility transistor with SiN/Al2O3 bi-layer passivation. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2018, 7, N86–N90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Anand, M.J.; Ng, G.I.; Vicknesh, S.; Arulkumaran, S.; Ranjan, K. Reduction of current collapse in AlGaN/GaN MISHEMT with bilayer SiN/Al2O3 dielectric gate stack. Phys. Status Solidi (C) 2013, 10, 1421–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Downey, B.P.; Meyer, D.J.; Roussos, J.A.; Katzer, D.S.; Ancona, M.G.; Pan, M.; Gao, X. Effect of Gate Insulator Thickness on RF Power Gain Degradation of Vertically Scaled GaN MIS-HEMTs at 40 GHz. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 2015, 15, 474–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chang, S.J.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.W.; Lee, J.H.; Bae, Y.; Jung, H.W.; Kang, S.C.; Kim, H.; Noh, Y.-S.; Lee, S.-H.; et al. Comprehensive research of total ionizing dose effects in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs using extremely thin gate dielectric layer. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kaya, S.; Yıldız, I.; Lok, R.; Yılmaz, E. Co-60 gamma irradiation influences on physical, chemical and electrical characteristics of HfO2/Si thin films. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 150, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, X.; Saadat, O.I.; Chen, J.; Zhang, E.X.; Cui, S.; Palacios, T.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Ma, T.P. Total-ionizing-dose effects in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs and MOS-HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2013, 60, 4074–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Keum, D.; Kim, H. Energy-dependent degradation characteristics of AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with 1, 1.5, and 2 MeV proton irradiation. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2018, 7, Q159–Q163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahn, S.; Kim, B.-J.; Lin, Y.-H.; Ren, F.; Pearton, S.J.; Yang, G.; Kim, J.; Kravchenko, I.I. Effect of proton irradiation dose on InAlN/GaN metal-oxide semiconductor high electron mobility transistors with Al2O3 gate oxide. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2016, 34, 051202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gao, Z.; Romero, M.F.; Redondo-Cubero, A.; Pampillon, M.A.; San Andres, E.; Calle, F. Effect of Gd2O3 gate dielectric on proton-irradiated AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhuiyan, M.A.; Zhou, H.; Chang, S.J.; Lou, X.; Gong, X.; Jiang, R.; Gong, H.; Zhang, E.; Won, C.-H.; Lim, J.-W.; et al. Total-ionizing-dose responses of GaN-based HEMTs with different channel thickness and MOSHEMTs with epitaxial MgCaO as gate dielectric. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2018, 65, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chang, S.J.; Cho, K.J.; Jung, H.W.; Kim, J.J.; Jang, Y.J.; Bae, S.B.; Yoon, H.S.; Ahn, H.-K.; Min, B.G. Improvement of proton radiation hardness using ALD-deposited Al2O3 gate insulator in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2019, 8, Q245–Q248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ananchenko, D.V.; Nikiforov, S.V.; Kuzovkov, V.N.; Popov, A.I.; Ramazanova, G.R.; Batalov, R.I.; Bayazitov, R.M.; Novikov, H.A. Radiation-induced defects in sapphire single crystals irradiated by a pulse ion beam. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2020, 466, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Feldbach, E.; Museur, L.; Krasnenko, V.; Zerr, A.; Kitaura, M.; Kanaev, A. Defects induced by He+ irradiation in γ-Si3N4. J. Lumin. 2021, 237, 118132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Patrick, E.; Law, M.E.; Liu, L.; Cuervo, C.V.; Xi, Y.; Ren, F.; Pearton, S.J. Modeling Proton Irradiation in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs: Understanding the Increase of Critical Voltage. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2013, 60, 4103–4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Greenlee, J.D.; Specht, P.; Anderson, T.J.; Koehler, A.D.; Weaver, B.D.; Luysberg, M.; Dubon, O.D.; Kub, F.J.; Weatherford, T.R.; Hobart, K.D. Degradation mechanisms of 2 MeV proton irradiated AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 083504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, D.-S.; Kim, J.-G.; Ahn, W.-H.; Bae, Y.; Lee, J.-H. Effect of gate dielectrics on characteristics of high-energy proton-irradiated AlGaN/GaN MISHEMTs. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 184, 109473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kalavagunta, A.; Touboul, A.; Shen, L.; Schrimpf, R.D.; Reed, R.A.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Jain, R.K.; Mishra, U.K. Electrostatic mechanisms responsible for device degradation in proton irradiated AlGaN/AlN/GeN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2008, 55, 2106–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rossetto, I.; Rampazzo, F.; Gerardin, S.; Meneghini, M.; Bagatin, M.; Zanandrea, A.; Dua, C.; di Forte-Poisson, M.-A.; Aubry, R.; Oualli, M.; et al. Impact of proton fluence on DC and trapping characteristics in InAlN/GaN HEMTs. Solid-State Electron. 2015, 113, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hiemstra, D.; Blackmore, E. LET spectra of proton energy levels from 50 to 500 MeV and their effectiveness for single event effects characterization of microelectronics. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2003, 50, 2245–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, D.-S.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, J.-G.; Yoon, Y.J.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J.-H. Anomalous DC Characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs Depending on Proton Irradiation Energies. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 065005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chang, S.-J.; Bhuiyan, M.A.; Won, C.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Jung, H.W.; Shin, M.J.; Lim, J.-W.; Ma, T. Dependence of GaN Channel Thickness on the Transistor Characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs Grown on Sapphire. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2016, 5, N102–N107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krick, D.T.; Lenahan, P.M.; Kanicki, J. Nature of the dominant deep trap in amorphous silicon nitride. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 38, 8226–8229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hezel, R.; Schorner, R. Plasma Si nitride—A promising dielectric to achieve high-quality silicon MIS-IL solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 1981, 52, 3076–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, V.; Tracy, C.; Schroder, D.; Herasimenka, S.; Dauksher, W.; Bowden, S. Manipulation of K center charge states in silicon nitride films to achieve excellent surface passivation for silicon solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 053503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dong, P.; Yu, X.; Ma, Y.; Xie, M.; Li, Y.; Huang, C.; Li, M.; Dai, G.; Zhang, J. A deep-level transit spectroscopy study of gamma-ray irradiation on the passivation properties of silicon nitride layer on silicon. AIP Adv. 2017, 7, 085112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Suria, A.J.; Chiamori, H.C.; Shankar, A.; Senesky, D.G. Capacitance-voltage characteristics of gamma irradiated Al2O3, HfO2, and SiO2 thin film grown by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition. Sens. Extrem. Harsh Environ. II 2015, 9491, 949105. [Google Scholar]
  43. Srour, J.R.; Palko, J.W. Displacement Damage Effects in Irradiated Semiconductor Devices. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2013, 60, 1740–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ives, N.E.; Chen, J.; Witulski, A.F.; Schrimpf, R.D.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Bruce, R.W.; McCurdy, M.W.; Zhang, E.X.; Massengill, L.W. Effects of Proton-Induced Displacement Damage on Gallium Nitride HEMTs in RF Power Amplifier Applications. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2015, 62, 2417–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yue, S.; Lei, Z.; Peng, C.; Zhong, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; En, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, L. High-Fluence Proton-Induced Degradation on AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2020, 67, 1339–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chang, S.-J.; Kang, H.-S.; Lee, J.-H.; Yang, J.; Bhuiyan, M.; Jo, Y.-W.; Cui, S.; Lee, J.-H.; Ma, T.-P. Investigation of channel mobility in AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 55, 44104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aktas, O.; Kuliev, A.; Kumar, V.; Schwindt, R.; Toshkov, S.; Costescu, D.; Stubbins, J.; Adesida, I. 60Co gamma radiation effects on DC, RF, and pulsed I-V characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Solid-State Electron. 2004, 48, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic cross-section of the processed GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator. The 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 layer were employed for Sample-Si3N4 and Sample-HfO2, respectively, which acted as the gate insulator and surface passivation.
Figure 1. Schematic cross-section of the processed GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator. The 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 layer were employed for Sample-Si3N4 and Sample-HfO2, respectively, which acted as the gate insulator and surface passivation.
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g001
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g002 550
Figure 2. Typical transfer characteristics comparison of GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator before and after proton irradiation at 5 and 25 MeV. (a) Drain current; (b) transconductance; (c) gate leakage current versus gate bias.
Figure 2. Typical transfer characteristics comparison of GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator before and after proton irradiation at 5 and 25 MeV. (a) Drain current; (b) transconductance; (c) gate leakage current versus gate bias.
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g002
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g003 550
Figure 3. Device parameter extraction before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator. (a) Threshold voltage shift; (b) transconductance maximum reduction; (c) drain current reduction as a function of the proton irradiation energy.
Figure 3. Device parameter extraction before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator. (a) Threshold voltage shift; (b) transconductance maximum reduction; (c) drain current reduction as a function of the proton irradiation energy.
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g003
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g004 550
Figure 4. Capacitance-voltage measurement results before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 gate insulator.
Figure 4. Capacitance-voltage measurement results before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 gate insulator.
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g004
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g005 550
Figure 5. Pulse-mode stress measurement results in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 gate insulator. Drain current versus drain bias with the quiescent bias of: (a) (0 V, 0 V) and (VTH − 2 V, 0 V); (b) (0 V, 0 V) and (VTH − 2 V, 10 V) before and after proton irradiation at the energy at 15 MeV; (c) drain current reduction from the quiescent bias of (0 V, 0 V) induced by the pulse-mode stress with the quiescent bias of (VTH − 2 V, 0 V) and (VTH − 2 V, 0 V) as a function of irradiated proton energy.
Figure 5. Pulse-mode stress measurement results in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 gate insulator. Drain current versus drain bias with the quiescent bias of: (a) (0 V, 0 V) and (VTH − 2 V, 0 V); (b) (0 V, 0 V) and (VTH − 2 V, 10 V) before and after proton irradiation at the energy at 15 MeV; (c) drain current reduction from the quiescent bias of (0 V, 0 V) induced by the pulse-mode stress with the quiescent bias of (VTH − 2 V, 0 V) and (VTH − 2 V, 0 V) as a function of irradiated proton energy.
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g005
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g006 550
Figure 6. Carrier mobility extraction before and after proton irradiation in the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 gate insulator. (a) Carrier mobility vs 2DEG density before and after proton irradiation at 5 MeV and 25 MeV; (b) Carrier mobility maximum reduction vs. the irradiated proton energy. Inset in (a) shows the zoomed-in carrier mobility behavior at a low 2DEG density regime in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 gate insulator before and after proton irradiation at 5 MeV and 25 MeV.
Figure 6. Carrier mobility extraction before and after proton irradiation in the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and the HfO2 gate insulator. (a) Carrier mobility vs 2DEG density before and after proton irradiation at 5 MeV and 25 MeV; (b) Carrier mobility maximum reduction vs. the irradiated proton energy. Inset in (a) shows the zoomed-in carrier mobility behavior at a low 2DEG density regime in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 gate insulator before and after proton irradiation at 5 MeV and 25 MeV.
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g006
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g007 550
Figure 7. Radio-frequency performance investigation, such as cut-off and maximum oscillation frequency before and after proton irradiation in the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator. Cut-off frequency characteristics before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for a 5 nm-thick (a) Si3N4 and (b) HfO2 gate insulator. (c) Extracted cut-off frequency and maximum oscillation frequency as a function of the irradiated proton energy.
Figure 7. Radio-frequency performance investigation, such as cut-off and maximum oscillation frequency before and after proton irradiation in the GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick Si3N4 and HfO2 gate insulator. Cut-off frequency characteristics before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for a 5 nm-thick (a) Si3N4 and (b) HfO2 gate insulator. (c) Extracted cut-off frequency and maximum oscillation frequency as a function of the irradiated proton energy.
Nanomaterials 13 00898 g007
Table
Table 1. Extracted sheet resistance before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick HfO2 and the Si3N4 gate insulator.
Table 1. Extracted sheet resistance before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick HfO2 and the Si3N4 gate insulator.
Before Proton Irradiation (Ω/χ)Proton Irradiation at 5 MeV (Ω/χ)Proton Irradiation at 15 MeV (Ω/χ)Proton Irradiation at 25 MeV (Ω/χ)
Sample-HfO2453562518491
Sample-Si3N4451522499482
Table
Table 2. Extracted contact resistance before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick HfO2 and the Si3N4 gate insulator.
Table 2. Extracted contact resistance before and after proton irradiation in GaN-based MIS-HEMTs for the 5 nm-thick HfO2 and the Si3N4 gate insulator.
Before Proton Irradiation (Ω/mm)Proton Irradiation at 5 MeV (Ω/mm)Proton Irradiation at 15 MeV (Ω/mm)Proton Irradiation at 25 MeV (Ω/mm)
Sample-HfO21.241.261.231.25
Sample-Si3N41.251.241.241.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, S.-J.; Kim, D.-S.; Kim, T.-W.; Bae, Y.; Jung, H.-W.; Choi, I.-G.; Noh, Y.-S.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, S.-I.; Ahn, H.-K.; et al. Mechanisms of the Device Property Alteration Generated by the Proton Irradiation in GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs Using Extremely Thin Gate Insulator. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050898

AMA Style

Chang S-J, Kim D-S, Kim T-W, Bae Y, Jung H-W, Choi I-G, Noh Y-S, Lee S-H, Kim S-I, Ahn H-K, et al. Mechanisms of the Device Property Alteration Generated by the Proton Irradiation in GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs Using Extremely Thin Gate Insulator. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(5):898. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050898

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Sung-Jae, Dong-Seok Kim, Tae-Woo Kim, Youngho Bae, Hyun-Wook Jung, Il-Gyu Choi, Youn-Sub Noh, Sang-Heung Lee, Seong-Il Kim, Ho-Kyun Ahn, and et al. 2023. "Mechanisms of the Device Property Alteration Generated by the Proton Irradiation in GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs Using Extremely Thin Gate Insulator" Nanomaterials 13, no. 5: 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050898

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop