Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Visible-Light-Responsive Photocatalytic Degradation of Ciprofloxacin by the CuxO/Metal-Organic Framework Hybrid Nanocomposite
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetic Studies of Superconductivity in the Ga-Sn Alloy Regular Nanostructures
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/nano13020281
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Forced Mineral Carbonation of MgO Nanoparticles Synthesized by Aerosol Methods at Room Temperature

by
Kyungil Cho
1,
Yeryeong Kang
1,
Sukbyung Chae
2,* and
Changhyuk Kim
1,*
1
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University of Technology and Education, Cheonan 31253, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(2), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020281
Submission received: 25 December 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 7 January 2023 / Published: 9 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Materials and Catalysts for Pollutants and CO2 Capture and Transformation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Magnesium oxide (MgO) has been investigated as a wet mineral carbonation adsorbent due to its relatively low adsorption and regeneration temperatures. The carbon dioxide (CO2) capture efficiency can be enhanced by applying external force on the MgO slurry during wet carbonation. In this study, two aerosol-processed MgO nanoparticles were tested with a commercial MgO one to investigate the external force effect on the wet carbonation performance at room temperature. The MgO nano-adsorbents were carbonated and sampled every 2 h up to 12 h through forced and non-forced wet carbonations. Hydrated magnesium carbonates (nesquehonite, artinite and hydromagnesite) were formed with magnesite through both wet carbonations. The analyzed results for the time-dependent chemical compositions and physical shapes of the carbonation products consistently showed the enhancement of wet carbonation by the external force, which was at least 4 h faster than the non-forced carbonation. In addition, the CO2 adsorption was enhanced by the forced carbonation, resulting in a higher amount of CO2 being adsorbed by MgO nanoparticles than the non-forced carbonation, unless the carbonation processes were completed. The adsorbed amount of CO2 was between the maximum theoretical amounts of CO2 adsorbed by nesquehonite and hydromagnesite.

1. Introduction

Climate change caused by global warming is currently a severe global environmental issue, which brings out extreme weather events such as heat waves and large storms and threatens human lives on the earth [1]. Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have been known to accelerate global warming and climate change. Carbon dioxide (CO2) produced by fossil fuel combustion is a well-known greenhouse gas with the largest share of radiative forcing since 1990 [2]. Therefore, many countries have struggled to achieve carbon neutral status for a sustainable environment and survival. Replacing the fossil fuel with hydrogen (H2) is a promising way to accomplish a carbon neutral status. Ideally, H2 should be synthesized using renewable energy (green H2) [3]. However, most H2 is currently produced by the reforming of methane (gray H2) with a huge amount of CO2 (10 kg CO2/1 kg H2) [4]. This requires carbon capture and utilization/storage (CCUS) technology to prohibit CO2 emission to the atmosphere after the gas reforming (blue H2) [5,6]. Mineral carbonation using alkaline earth metal oxides, such as magnesium and calcium oxides (MgO and CaO), is a promising CCUS technology for achieving carbon neutrality and net zero emissions [7]. In particular, MgO has been spotlighted and investigated as a CO2 adsorbent because it requires less energy consumption for regeneration than calcium oxide (CaO) [8]. It can also enhance the lifetime of the CO2 adsorbent by reducing the thermal fatigues during the regeneration. In addition, controlling indoor CO2 concentration is important for human health because people spend more than 80% of a day in an indoor environment [9]. In particular, multi-purpose facilities including kindergartens and schools are required to limit the indoor CO2 concentration for the sake of maintaining children’s health, as they cannot easily figure out if the quality of the air is bad and ventilate the indoor air effectively. However, no instruments are currently available that can reduce the indoor CO2 concentration below the indoor air quality standard. Therefore, carbon capture technologies should also be developed to improve the indoor air quality. Mineral carbonation at room temperature can be a solution to control the CO2 concentration for sustainable indoor air quality.
Many researchers have investigated basic metal oxides (e.g., CaO and Li2O) as CO2 absorbents at >500 °C [10,11]. MgO-based materials were investigated in a temperature range of 200~350 °C [10,12]. These temperature ranges were related to CO2 post-capture in fossil fuel power plants. If the CO2 adsorption of adsorbents can be facilitated even at room temperature, the materials can be applied to an indoor air environment where high CO2 concentration (>1000 ppm) may cause health problems.
Doping MgO-based adsorbents with transition and alkaline metals is one of the promising approaches to enhance the performance of CO2 capture [10,13]. Decreasing particle size and forming porous structures to obtain higher surface areas are also effective methods to enhance CO2 absorption since they lead to there being more reaction sites in MgO particles [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Nanostructured MgO/Al2O3 aerogel [20] and synthesizing MgO via hydrothermal methods with urea [21] optimized the basicity of particle surfaces to increasing CO2 adsorption. Vacancy defects in an MgO crystal’s structure have the possibility of increasing CO2 uptake by lowering the bonding energy of CO2 and the surfaces of MgO crystals [22]. The sizes and molecular structures of MgO nanoparticles can be controlled by the synthesis methods and conditions. Aerosol synthesis methods such as spray pyrolysis, self-combustion and flame metal combustion have high productivity and size controllability, releasing less pollution than that of wet-based chemistry [23]. In addition, cubic or terrace-shaped MgO nanoparticles can be generated via two different combustion methods, such as self-combustion and flame metal combustion methods, respectively [24,25]. External forces such as the mechanical agitation of solutions can also promote the CO2 adsorption reaction [26]. By applying the external forces on the mineral carbonation of the MgO nanoparticles, we can optimize and enhance CO2 adsorption in a lower temperature range with the same materials.
In this study, three MgO nanoparticles (two kinds of nanoparticles synthesized by two aerosol methods and one commercial nanoparticle) were investigated to figure out the effects of the forced wet carbonation on the carbonation performance of the MgO nanoparticle adsorbents at room temperature. Pairs of each MgO adsorbent prepared as slurry were exposed to a CO2 environment in a closed chamber with and without stirring to compare the forced and non-forced wet carbonations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation and Wet Carbonation Experiments of MgO Nanoparticles

Three kinds of MgO nanoparticles (A-, C- and T-MgO) were prepared by different aerosol methods as adsorbents for wet mineral carbonation. A-MgO represents commercial MgO nanoparticles (<50 nm, Sigma Aldrich Co., Ltd, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and it might be synthesized by an aerosol method based on the morphology. C-MgO means cubic-shaped ones synthesized by the self-combustion method with magnesium chips (99/98% purity, 6–35 mesh, Sigma Aldrich Co., Ltd., Saint Louis, MO, USA) [8,27]. T-MgO is a terrace-shaped nanoparticle, which was produced by the flame metal combustion (FMC) method using a hydrogen/oxygen diffusion flame burner and micro-sized magnesium powders (<45 μm, 98.5% purity, Daejung Chemical and Metals Co., Ltd, Sihueng, Republic of Korea) [23,24,25].
Scheme 1 shows the experimental setup for the wet carbonation of the 3 MgO nanoparticle-based adsorbents. The nano-adsorbents were prepared as slurries by mixing 500 mg MgO nanoparticles with 5 mL D.I. water in a glass petri dish. The 3 MgO nano-adsorbents were simultaneously exposed to CO2 in the wet carbonation chamber. The wet carbonation was conducted at the normal indoor air condition (~25 °C and 1 atm) [8]. One of each nano-adsorbent was placed in the chamber without stirring (non-forced sample, N) and the other was agitated by a magnetic stirrer at 100 rpm (forced sample, F). Pure CO2 gas (99.99% purity) was conditioned at ~100%RH at 25 °C by passing through a bubbler filled with D.I. water at 4 lpm using a mass flow controller (Alicat Co., Ltd, Tucson, AZ, USA). Then, the humidified CO2 was continuously introduced into the wet carbonation chamber. Farajzadeh et al. reported the characteristic time of dissolving of gas phase of CO2 (~99.9%) (CO2 + H2O → H2CO3) into water through the CO2-water interface at ~100%RH, room temperature (25 °C) was <25 s [28], which is much shorter than our experimental time scale (every 2 h sampling, up to 12 h). In addition, H2CO3 in the MgO nano-adsorbent slurries could be fully developed during the wet carbonation because the thicknesses of MgO slurries in the petri dishes were negligible compared to the height of carbonation chamber. The evaporation of waters in the slurries was also prohibited by controlling the relative humidity of gas environment in the chamber as ~100%RH through the wet carbonation processes. The intermediate carbonate samples for each MgO nano-adsorbent were taken every 2 h, up to 12 h. After the sampling, 1 mL D.I. water was added to maintain the volume of slurry. All carbonate samples were immediately dried in the oven at 80 °C for 24 h.

2.2. Analyses of MgO Nanoparticles and the Carbonate Products

The chemical composition and crystallinity of pristine and carbonate samples (N and F) for each MgO nano-adsorbent were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Xpert3 Powder X-ray diffractometer, Malvern Panalytical Instrument, Ltd, Malvern, UK) with Cu Kα radiation from 2θ = 5 to 90°. The morphological changes in the MgO nano-adsorbents during the wet carbonations were investigated by a field emission electron scanning microscopic (FE-SEM, JSM-7900F, JEOL, Ltd, Akishima, Japan). The formation of functional groups on the carbonate samples during the wet carbonation was investigated by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, FT/IR-4100, JASCO, Inc, Hachiojo, Japan) in attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode. The crystallite sizes of the MgO nano-adsorbents were calculated by the Scherrer formula ( τ = K λ β cos θ ) [8]. For the calculation of crystallite sizes, the shape factor (K) was selected as 0.9 for all samples. The X-ray wavelength for X-ray diffraction measurement was 1.54 Å . The surface areas, total pore volumes and average pore diameters of the MgO nano-adsorbents were determined by a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method (BELSORP-max II, Microtac MRB) and are summarized in Table 1. The surface area of all three nanoparticles were smaller than the previous studies with porous MgO. However, A-MgO showed relatively large value of surface area (13.125 m2/g−1) among the 3 kinds of MgO nanoparticles.

2.3. Calculation of Adsorbed CO2 Mass per Unit Mass of Carbonation Samples

The mass of adsorbed CO2 per unit mass of magnesium carbonate samples (MCO2) was quantitatively analyzed by a gas chromatography–thermal conductivity detector (GC-TCD, 7890A, Agilent, Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) after the carbonation processes. To compare the adsorption amounts of samples, four types of magnesium carbonate minerals (artinite, nesquehonite, hydromagnesite, magnesite anhydrous) were also calculated theoretically based on their molar weights and chemical structures (artinite = 0.2238, nesquehonite = 0.3181, hydromagnesite = 0.3764 and magnesite anhydrous = 0.522 mg CO2 per unit mass of each mineral). The calibration curve of each MgO nano-adsorbent was obtained for 5 points of MgO and hydromagnesite (Sigma Aldrich Co., Ltd., St. Louis, MO, USA) mixture with different ratios; 0:10, 3:7, 6:4, 8:2, 10:0 (hydromagnesite: MgO, respectively), and one crosscheck point (5:5) was also analyzed to evaluate the calibration curve. Calibration curve and crosscheck value are described in Supplementary Materials (Figure S6). For quantifying MCO2, 10 mg of each carbonate sample was placed in a headspace vial and mixed with 4 mL of hydrochloric acid (HCl, 0.1 N) to fully dissolve CO2 in gas phase from the carbonate particles. After vibrating the vial by a vortex mixer and keeping it to obtain gas phase CO2 for 2 h, 250 μL overhead gas was extracted from the vial using a gastight syringe (Hamilton®, gastight®, 1005TLL 5mL, Reno, NV, USA), and then injected to the GC-TCD inlet. The GC-TCD analysis was repeated three times for each carbonate sample, and the GC-TCD data were averaged. The adsorbed amount of CO2 was calculated by interpolating the averaged GC-TCD data for the carbonate samples based on the calibration curve made by reference materials. Then, MCO2 was calculated by dividing the mass of CO2 by the mass of carbonated samples (10 mg).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Result and Crystallinity of Carbonated Samples

Figure 1 shows XRD patterns of the N- and F-carbonate samples of the three MgO nano-adsorbents. In the cases of N-carbonation as shown in the upper side of Figure 2, all the MgO nano-adsorbents (A-, C- and T-MgO) started to show the carbonate products after 8 h of wet carbonation. Magnesite (MgCO3) and hydrated magnesium carbonates (nesquehonite (MgCO3·3H2O) and artinite (MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·3H2O)) [29] were formed until 12 h; however, the formation of carbonate products did not finish until after 12 h. Compared to the C- and T-MgO, A-MgO showed hydromagnesite (Mg5(CO3)4(OH)2·4H2O) in the 6 h carbonate sample as an intermediate product. At the same time, the intensity of the MgO peak at 2θ = 42° for A-MgO reduced quickly after 6 h, while C- and T-MgO showed clear and sharp pristine MgO peaks. Compared to the N-carbonation samples, the formation of nesquehonite, artinite and magnesite was facilitated by the F-carbonation and was observed in the samples after 4 h as shown in the bottom side of Figure 1, regardless of the kind of MgO nano-adsorbents. The F-carbonation processes for the three MgO nano-adsorbents were almost finished after 8 h, which can be seen in the XRD patterns between 8 and 12 h. Interestingly, the MgO peak was reduced for the 12 h F-carbonation samples of C- and T-MgO and relatively lower than the magnesite peak. This phenomenon would be observed if the N-carbonation proceeded further. A-MgO had a different carbonation pathway than other nano-adsorbents; in particular, the hydromagnesite formation with nesquehonite shown in the 6 h N- and F-carbonation samples. Figures S1 and S4 show a mixture of pillar-shaped nesquehonite and flake-shaped hydromagnesite particles [30,31,32]. The number of pillar-shaped nesquehonite particles increased with the carbonation time, as depicted in Figure S4. However, the hydromagnesite particles were not able to be seen very well from the XRD and SEM images for C- and T-MgO.
Table 2 summarizes the crystallite sizes of nesquehonite (2θ = 34°) produced by the carbonation of the MgO nano-adsorbents, which were calculated from the XRD data. The peaks for nesquehonite were not observed in the XRD data at the beginning of the N-carbonation, and the first observation of the peaks depended on the MgO nano-adsorbents. The nesquehonite crystalline sizes of A-MgO, C-MgO and T-MgO increased from 0 to 21.1 nm, 0 to 20 nm and 0 to 18.6 nm, over 8 h, respectively. In the case of forced wet carbonation, the crystalline growth of the nesquehonite began after 4 h for all three kinds of MgO absorbents, the size of which increased from 0 to 17.6~18.6 nm. However, the crystalline growth started after 8 h in the non-forced wet carbonation. Such a starting point of growth means the forced wet carbonation promoted the CO2 absorbing reaction of all MgO nanoparticles.

3.2. Morphological Changes in MgO Nano-Adsorbents

Figure 2 shows the morphological changes from pristine particles to the carbonate products after 4 h of the N- and F-carbonation processes. Pristine A-, C- and T-MgO nano-adsorbents originally had octahedral, cubic and spherical shapes, respectively. After the 4 h wet carbonation, the carbonate products showed significant differences between the N- and F-carbonation processes, which implies that the processes were accelerated by the F-carbonation. F-carbonation samples showed more pillar-shaped nesquehonite [30,32,33], while N-carbonation ones showed more agglomerates of primary particles. This means that F-carbonation accelerated carbonate formation, which is also shown in Figure 1. The F-carbonation processes also produced some agglomerate particles (several tenth~hundredth μm) for the MgO nano-adsorbents, which were made by the collision of primary particles due to the stirring. For N-carbonation, shape changes in the carbonate products caused by incomplete carbonation were observed until the 12 h samples. However, the F-carbonation samples showed almost completed carbonate particles after 8 h samples for all three of the MgO nano-adsorbents (Figures S1–S3). These results also support the findings in the XRD results in Figure 2 and the crystallite size changes in Table 2.

3.3. FT-IR Result with Different Functional Groups

Figure 3 shows FT-IR spectra of the three MgO nano-adsorbents during the N- and F-carbonation processes. The inserts in each FT-IR spectrum between 1000 and 2000 cm−1 were plotted together to investigate the formation of bicarbonate (HCO3−) during both N- and F-carbonation. First, the pristine A-MgO nano-adsorbent showed a hydroxyl (OH−) peak at 3700 cm−1, which was not found in the FT-IR spectra for C- and T-MgO. The hydroxyl peak disappeared during the wet carbonation processes. This means that the A-MgO nano-adsorbent partially contained Mg(OH)2 and was transformed into carbonates during the wet carbonation [8]. However, C- and T-MgO synthesized through the aerosol methods in this study maintained their original MgO statuses well.
On the other hand, C- and T-MgO showed similar FT-IR results to the XRD results in Figure 1. During the of wet carbonation, two main peaks at 1390 cm−1 (CO32− group) and 1505 cm−1 (MgCO3 from unidentate) increased with the carbonation time [34]. However, different carbonation times were needed to fully develop these two peaks depending on the carbonation processes (N- vs. F-carbonation). While F-carbonation showed these peaks after 2 h of carbonation and only the transmittance was changed, 6 h of N-carbonation time was needed for these two main peaks to appear in the carbonate products of C- and T-MgO nano-adsorbents.
Once the wet carbonation was started, hydrated magnesium carbonates were produced, showing H2O and CO32− bands in the FT-IR spectra, as discussed on the XRD data. For instance, the intensity of the CO32− band at 845 cm−1 [35,36,37] was increased for all three of the MgO nano-adsorbents as the wet carbonation was conducted. In addition, the A-MgO nano-adsorbent showed the shape change in the 800–880 cm−1 band until 6 h of carbonation, which matched well with the change in the XRD patterns for A-MgO. As shown in the inserts in Figure 3a,b, the FT-IR spectrum bands at 1420 and 1480 cm−1 between 2 and 6 h of N- and F- carbonation were increased and approached the highest intensity after 6 h of carbonation. The bands were reported to indicate both CO32− and HCO3− on the hydromagnesite surfaces [35]. However, the bands were broadened to 1395 and 1505 cm−1 for the 8 h to 12 h carbonation samples of both N- and F-carbonation. Furthermore, N-carbonation showed different results in that the transmittances of the main peaks (1390 and 1505 cm−1) decreased at 12 h carbonation. While the F-carbonation was saturated after 8 h of carbonation, N-carbonation kept increasing the transmittance until 10 h, and the peak dropped at 12 h.
When comparing the peaks at 800–880 cm−1 in Figure S5, the forced carbonation processes of all three MgO nano-adsorbents were saturated at around 6 h. The left side of Figure S5 shows with details that the carbonated peak in 845 cm−1 overlapped from 6 h to 12 h, while the H2O peaks at around 1650 cm−1 [35,38,39] on the right side of Figure S5 also overlapped at the same time.

3.4. Quantitative Comparison of MCO2

Figure 4 shows the amounts of adsorbed CO2 (MCO2) in the unit mass of carbonated samples analyzed by GC-TCD. The differences in the MCO2 between F- and N-carbonation samples are also summarized in Table 3 according to the carbonation time. Overall, the F-carbonation samples showed larger amounts of MCO2 in the sample compared to the N-carbonation ones in the early stage of the carbonation processes. F-carbonation increased the magnitude of MCO2 for all three of the MgO nano-adsorbents until the 6 h samples, compared to N-carbonation samples, as shown in Figure 4a–c. The F-carbonation of the three MgO nano-adsorbents showed almost similar magnitudes of MCO2 from 6 h, as also described in FT-IR, and the averages and standard deviations of MCO2 of F-carbonation between 6, 8, 10 and 12 h were as follows: A-MgO: 0.360 ± 0.026, C-MgO: 0.331 ± 0.015 and T-MgO: 0.329 ± 0.025. However, N-carbonation needed relatively more carbonation time to show these flat saturations and the three MgO nano-adsorbents showed different times for this saturation. As also mentioned in a previous study [8], C-MgO needed the longest carbonation time of 10 h, while A-MgO required a time almost similar with F-carbonation (6 h). The MCO2 for the three F-carbonation samples with the theoretical maximum amounts of MCO2 by different kinds of hydrated magnesium carbonates (artinite = 0.2238, nesquehonite = 0.3181, hydromagnesite = 0.3764 and magnesite anhydrous = 0.522 mg-CO2/mg of each standard carbonate) are described in Figure 4d. The MCO2 amounts of the three MgO nano-adsorbents placed between hydromagnesite and nesquehonite after 6 h of wet carbonation, and the F-carbonation processes were finished as shown by the FT-IR and XRD data. This implies that most of the nano-adsorbent particles were transformed into hydrated magnesium carbonates, rather than anhydrous MgCO3, due to the reaction temperature and moderate pressure of CO2 gases [33].
After 8 h, the MCO2 amounts of the N-carbonation samples were closer to the values of F-carbonation for the A- and C-MgO nano-adsorbents. However, T-MgO showed higher CO2 adsorption for the N-carbonation samples than the F-carbonation ones. The T-MgO nano-adsorbent showed an average MCO2 value of 0.395 ± 0.004 between 8~12 h of N-carbonation. This magnitude was much larger than the F-carbonation of T-MgO between 6~12 h (0.344 ± 0.006) even after eliminating the odd value (8 h). One of the possible reasons for this distinct characteristic is that T-MgO nanoparticles have more structural defects than C-MgO nanoparticles as previous studies mentioned [24,25,27]. From the previous research, the defects of the MgO nanoparticles were shown to be the active basic sites that reacted with acidic CO2 gas and had lower adsorption and regeneration temperatures [14,40,41]. At the same time, similar to previous studies [30,31,32], SEM of the N-carbonation of the T-MgO nano-adsorbent only showed hydromagnesite, which has a larger MCO2 value than nesquehonite (Figure S3). Furthermore, in Figure 1, the XRD peaks of the F-carbonation of T-MgO showed less nesquehonite than for N-carbonation. This could be evidence that even though F-carbonation could accelerate the mineral carbonation, F-carbonation also became a barrier for the crystallite growth of hydromagnesite and other more carbonate-containing products from artinite to nesquehonite and hydromagnesite [34].

4. Conclusions

In this study, three kinds of MgO nano-adsorbents synthesized by aerosol methods were investigated to figure out the effects of the external force on the carbonation performance at room temperature by comparing the characteristics of forced (F) and non-forced (N) carbonation samples. Due to the external force, F-carbonation processes showed carbonation products (artinite or nesquehonite) 4 h earlier than N-carbonation ones for all MgO nano-adsorbents. In addition, F-carbonation processes for the MgO nano-adsorbents were finished after 8 h, although N-carbonation processes were not finished until after 12 h. Even though the pristine morphologies of the MgO nano-adsorbents were different depending on the synthesis methods, they had similar wet carbonation capacities based on the GC-TCD analysis. The GC-TCD results for the MgO nano-adsorbents imply that the MgO nanoparticles were transformed into hydrated magnesium carbonates, such as hydromagnesite and nesquehonite, because F- and N-carbonation were conducted as wet carbonation processes. In other words, the F-carbonation after stirring the MgO adsorbent slurry has faster adsorption kinetics compared to N-carbonation. However, F-carbonation limited the crystalline growth of hydrated magnesium carbonates effectively as shown by the GC-TCD and XRD results described above.
This wet carbonation technology could be applied to capture CO2 in the flue gas, atmosphere and indoor air as a direct air capture technology. Applying the external force on the wet carbonation can enhance the CO2 capture efficiency of the direct air capture using slurry-type MgO nano-adsorbents. In addition, the aerosol-processed MgO nano-adsorbents do not produce wastewater for post-treatments and harmful gaseous pollutants during the synthesis processes. The lower regeneration temperature of MgO compared with CaO can also save energy and costs as well as extend the lifetime of the adsorbents.
For direct air capture applications, the carbon capture characteristics at CO2 concentrations lower than the test gas in this study (for example, <1000 ppm CO2 in the indoor air) need to be investigated further. Moreover, the dry carbonation characteristics of the aerosol-processed MgO nano-adsorbents at elevated temperatures can increase the CO2 capture efficiency and prevent fungi formation in the indoor air caused by the water used in the wet carbonation during the direct air capture in the indoor air environment. This study on the dry carbonation characteristics also makes it easier to understand the mechanism of the carbonation process. Understanding the carbonation mechanism can be fundamental for manipulating the MgO-based CO2 adsorbents depending on their future applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13020281/s1, Figure S1: Morphological changes in the A-MgO nano-adsorbents during the forced (F) or non-forced (N) wet carbonation at different carbonation times (scale bars: 100 nm, 200 nm and 10 μm depending on the images); Figure S2: Morphological changes in the C-MgO nano-adsorbents during the forced (F) or non-forced (N) wet carbonation at different carbonation times (scale bars: 100 nm, 200 nm and 10 μm depending on the images); Figure S3: Morphological changes in the T-MgO nano-adsorbents during the forced (F) or non-forced (N) wet carbonation at different carbonation times (scale bars: 100 nm, 200 nm and 10 μm depending on the images); Figure S4: Morphological changes in the A-MgO nanoparticles during the non-forced wet carbonation. (scale bars: 100 μm from larger image and 10 (N-A-6) and 1 μm (N-A-4 and N-A-8) from smaller image); Figure S5: Detailed FT-IR spectra for the 3 forced carbonation samples in the ranges of 800–1000 cm−1 (left, HCO3−) and 1550–1750 cm−1 (right, H2O); Figure S6: Calibration curve of each MgO nano-adsorbent with different hydromagnesite ratio in 10 mg powder and crosscheck value, which was 5 mg of hydromagnesite.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C. and C.K.; methodology, K.C., Y.K. and C.K.; software, K.C., Y.K. and S.C.; validation, S.C. and C.K.; formal analysis, K.C. and Y.K.; investigation, K.C., Y.K. and C.K.; resources, C.K.; data curation, K.C., Y.K., S.C. and C.K.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C., S.C. and C.K.; writing—review and editing, S.C. and C.K.; visualization, K.C., Y.K. and S.C.; supervision, C.K.; project administration, C.K.; funding acquisition, S.C. and C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (NRF-2022R1C1C1008367, NRF-2022R1F1A1076537) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Intramural Research Program for the New Faculty of KOREATECH (202102610001) and 2021 BK21 FOUR Program of Pusan National University.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lesk, C.; Rowhani, P.; Ramankutty, N. Influence of Extreme Weather Disasters on Global Crop Production. Nature 2016, 529, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Schleussner, C.F.; Rogelj, J.; Schaeffer, M.; Lissner, T.; Licker, R.; Fischer, E.M.; Knutti, R.; Levermann, A.; Frieler, K.; Hare, W. Science and Policy Characteristics of the Paris Agreement Temperature Goal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Velazquez Abad, A.; Dodds, P.E. Green Hydrogen Characterisation Initiatives: Definitions, Standards, Guarantees of Origin, and Challenges. Energy Policy 2020, 138, 111300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Terlouw, T.; Bauer, C.; McKenna, R.; Mazzotti, M. Large-Scale Hydrogen Production via Water Electrolysis: A Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 3583–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ajanovic, A.; Sayer, M.; Haas, R. The Economics and the Environmental Benignity of Different Colors of Hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 24136–24154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cichosz, M.; Kiełkowska, U.; Skowron, K.; Kiedzik, Ł.; Łazarski, S.; Szkudlarek, M.; Kowalska, B.; Żurawski, D. Changes in Synthetic Soda Ash Production and Its Consequences for the Environment. Materials 2022, 15, 4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pedraza, J.; Zimmermann, A.; Tobon, J.; Schomäcker, R.; Rojas, N. On the Road to Net Zero-Emission Cement: Integrated Assessment of Mineral Carbonation of Cement Kiln Dust. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 408, 127346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cho, K.; Kim, C. Enhanced Mineral Carbonation at Room Temperature through MgO Nanocubes Synthesized by Self-Combustion. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du, B.; Tandoc, M.C.; Mack, M.L.; Siegel, J.A. Indoor CO2 Concentrations and Cognitive Function: A Critical Review. Indoor Air 2020, 30, 1067–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Harada, T.; Simeon, F.; Hamad, E.Z.; Hatton, T.A. Alkali Metal Nitrate-Promoted High-Capacity MgO Adsorbents for Regenerable CO2 Capture at Moderate Temperatures. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1943–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mosqueda, H.A.; Vazquez, C.; Bosch, P.; Pfeiffer, H. Chemical Sorption of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) on Lithium Oxide (Li2O). Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 2307–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Donat, F.; Müller, C.R. Prospects of MgO-Based Sorbents for CO2 Capture Applications at High Temperatures. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 36, 100645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qiao, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, W.; Harada, T.; Huang, L.; Hatton, T.A.; Wang, Q. Alkali Nitrates Molten Salt Modified Commercial MgO for Intermediate-Temperature CO2 Capture: Optimization of the Li/Na/K Ratio. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ruminski, A.M.; Jeon, K.J.; Urban, J.J. Size-Dependent CO2 Capture in Chemically Synthesized Magnesium Oxide Nanocrystals. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 11486–11491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Elvira, G.B.; Francisco, G.C.; Víctor, S.M.; Alberto, M.L.R. MgO-Based Adsorbents for CO2 Adsorption: Influence of Structural and Textural Properties on the CO2 Adsorption Performance. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 57, 418–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Harada, T.; Brown, P.; Hatton, T.A. Nonvolatile Colloidal Dispersion of MgO Nanoparticles in Molten Salts for Continuous CO2 Capture at Intermediate Temperatures. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 7979–7986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hiremath, V.; Hwang, S.; Seo, J.G. Enhanced Cyclic Stability and CO2 Capture Performance of MgO-Al2O3 Sorbent Decorated with Eutectic Mixture. Energy Procedia 2017, 114, 2421–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pang, H.; Sun, A.; Xu, H.; Xiao, G. Regenerable MgO-Based Sorbents for CO2 Capture at Elevated Temperature and Pressure: Experimental and DFT Study. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 425, 130675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, G.; Zhu, X.; Chen, R.; Liao, Q.; Ding, Y.D.; Chen, L. An Investigation of CO2 Adsorption Kinetics on Porous Magnesium Oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, S.J.; Bang, Y.; Kwon, H.J.; Lee, H.C.; Hiremath, V.; Song, I.K.; Seo, J.G. Elevated Temperature CO2 Capture on Nano-Structured MgO-Al2O3 Aerogel: Effect of Mg/Al Molar Ratio. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 242, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, W.; Zhou, T.; Wang, Q. Controlled Synthesis of MgO with Diverse Basic Sites and Its CO2 Capture Mechanism under Different Adsorption Conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lv, G.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, H.; Su, Y.; Qian, P. Mechanism of CO2 Adsorption on Point-Defective MgO Surfaces: First-Principles Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 604, 154647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, S.; Jang, Y.H.; Kim, C.H.; Hwang, C.; Lee, J.; Chae, S.; Jung, S.; Choi, M. A Flame Metal Combustion Method for Production of Nanoparticles. Powder Technol. 2010, 197, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pikhitsa, P.V.; Kim, C.; Chae, S.; Shin, S.; Jung, S.; Kitaura, M.; Kimura, S.I.; Fukui, K.; Choi, M. Two-Band Luminescence from an Intrinsic Defect in Spherical and Terraced MgO Nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 183106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chae, S.; Lee, H.; Pikhitsa, P.V.; Kim, C.; Shin, S.; Kim, D.H.; Choi, M. Synthesis of Terraced and Spherical MgO Nanoparticles Using Flame Metal Combustion. Powder Technol. 2017, 305, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Linga, P.; Kumar, R.; Lee, J.D.; Ripmeester, J.; Englezos, P. A New Apparatus to Enhance the Rate of Gas Hydrate Formation: Application to Capture of Carbon Dioxide. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2010, 4, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kim, C.; Pikhitsa, P.V.; Chae, S.; Cho, K.; Choi, M. Light Emission Induced by Electric Current at Room Temperature through the Defect Networks of MgO Nanocubes. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 125305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Farajzadeh, R.; Zitha, P.L.J.; Bruining, H. Enhanced Mass Transfer of CO2 into Water: Experiment and Modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 6423–6431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Veelen, A.; Copping, R.; Law, G.T.W.; Smith, A.J.; Bargar, J.R.; Rogers, J.; Shuh, D.K.; Wogelius, R.A. Uranium Uptake onto Magnox Sludge Minerals Studied Using EXAFS. Mineral. Mag. 2012, 76, 3095–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ferrini, V.; De Vito, C.; Mignardi, S. Synthesis of Nesquehonite by Reaction of Gaseous CO2 with Mg Chloride Solution: Its Potential Role in the Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 168, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prigiobbe, V.; Mazzotti, M. Precipitation of Mg-Carbonates at Elevated Temperature and Partial Pressure of CO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 223, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dung, N.T.; Unluer, C. Development of MgO Concrete with Enhanced Hydration and Carbonation Mechanisms. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 103, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hänchen, M.; Prigiobbe, V.; Baciocchi, R.; Mazzotti, M. Precipitation in the Mg-Carbonate System-Effects of Temperature and CO2 Pressure. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 1012–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yoo, Y.; Kang, D.; Park, J. Advanced Pseudopolymorph Control of Magnesium Carbonates Using Structural Properties of Amines for CO2 Utilization Based on Post-Treatment of Desalinated Brine. Desalination 2021, 505, 114904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kuenzel, C.; Zhang, F.; Ferrándiz-Mas, V.; Cheeseman, C.R.; Gartner, E.M. The Mechanism of Hydration of MgO-Hydromagnesite Blends. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 103, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Choudhari, B.P.; Vaidya, M.C.; Datar, D.S. Physico-chemical studies on basic magnesium carbonates. Indian J. Chem. 1972, 10, 731–733. [Google Scholar]
  37. Han, H.; Hu, S.; Feng, J.; Gao, H. Effect of Stearic Acid, Zinc Stearate Coating on the Properties of Synthetic Hydromagnesite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2677–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Raade, G. Dypingite, a New Hydrous Basic Carbonate of Magnesium, from Norway. Am. Mineral. 1970, 55, 1457–1465. [Google Scholar]
  39. White, B.W. Infrared Characterization of Water and Hydroxyl Ion in the Basic Magnesium Carbonate Minerals. Am. Mineral. 1971, 56, 46–53. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim, T.K.; Lee, K.J.; Yuh, J.; Kwak, S.K.; Moon, H.R. Multi-Core MgO NPs@C Core-Shell Nanospheres for Selective CO2 Capture under Mild Conditions. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 1606–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, T.K.; Lee, K.J.; Cheon, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Joo, S.H.; Moon, H.R. Nanoporous Metal Oxides with Tunable and Nanocrystalline Frameworks via Conversion of Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8940–8946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 13 00281 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Experimental setup for the forced or non-forced wet carbonations of 3 MgO nanoparticle adsorbents.
Scheme 1. Experimental setup for the forced or non-forced wet carbonations of 3 MgO nanoparticle adsorbents.
Nanomaterials 13 00281 sch001
Nanomaterials 13 00281 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD results of the samples for the non-forced (N) wet carbonations of (a) A-MgO, (b) C-MgO and (c) T-MgO as well as forced (F) wet carbonations of (d) A-MgO, (e) C-MgO and (f) T-MgO.
Figure 1. XRD results of the samples for the non-forced (N) wet carbonations of (a) A-MgO, (b) C-MgO and (c) T-MgO as well as forced (F) wet carbonations of (d) A-MgO, (e) C-MgO and (f) T-MgO.
Nanomaterials 13 00281 g001
Nanomaterials 13 00281 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphological changes in the 3 MgO nano-adsorbents between pristine and 4 h carbonation products through the forced (F) or non-forced (N) wet carbonations for (a) A-MgO, (b) C-MgO and (c) T-MgO analyzed by FE-SEM (scale bars: 100 nm for pristine particles and 10 μm for carbonated samples) (SEM images at full carbonation time conditions are in the Supplementary Materials) SI).
Figure 2. Morphological changes in the 3 MgO nano-adsorbents between pristine and 4 h carbonation products through the forced (F) or non-forced (N) wet carbonations for (a) A-MgO, (b) C-MgO and (c) T-MgO analyzed by FE-SEM (scale bars: 100 nm for pristine particles and 10 μm for carbonated samples) (SEM images at full carbonation time conditions are in the Supplementary Materials) SI).
Nanomaterials 13 00281 g002
Nanomaterials 13 00281 g003 550
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra results of the pristine MgO nanoparticles and the products after non-forced wet carbonations of (a) A-MgO, (b) C-MgO and (c) T-MgO as well as forced wet carbonations of (d) A-MgO, (e) C-MgO and (f) T-MgO.
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra results of the pristine MgO nanoparticles and the products after non-forced wet carbonations of (a) A-MgO, (b) C-MgO and (c) T-MgO as well as forced wet carbonations of (d) A-MgO, (e) C-MgO and (f) T-MgO.
Nanomaterials 13 00281 g003
Nanomaterials 13 00281 g004 550
Figure 4. Adsorbed CO2 masses per unit mass (MCO2) of the forced (F) or non-forced (N) wet carbonation products analyzed by GC-TCD for (a) A-MgO, (b) C-MgO and (c) T-MgO. (d) MCO2 of the F-carbonation products of the 3 MgO nano-adsorbents were compared with theoretical maximum CO2 adsorption masses of the possible MgO carbonates such as magnesite, hydromagnesite, nesquehonite and artinite.
Figure 4. Adsorbed CO2 masses per unit mass (MCO2) of the forced (F) or non-forced (N) wet carbonation products analyzed by GC-TCD for (a) A-MgO, (b) C-MgO and (c) T-MgO. (d) MCO2 of the F-carbonation products of the 3 MgO nano-adsorbents were compared with theoretical maximum CO2 adsorption masses of the possible MgO carbonates such as magnesite, hydromagnesite, nesquehonite and artinite.
Nanomaterials 13 00281 g004
Table
Table 1. Physical characteristics of three pristine MgO nano-adsorbents measured by BET method (Four significant digits).
Table 1. Physical characteristics of three pristine MgO nano-adsorbents measured by BET method (Four significant digits).
A-MgO
(Commercial
Nanopowder)		C-MgO
(Self-Combustion)		T-MgO
(Flame Metal
Combustion)
Surface Area
(m2/g−1)		13.1310.944.059
Total Pore Volume
(cm3/g−1)		0.11190.028780.02716
Average Pore Diameter
(nm)		34.1010.5226.76
Table
Table 2. Crystallite sizes of nesquehonite of three MgO nano-adsorbents at different carbonation times (unit: nm).
Table 2. Crystallite sizes of nesquehonite of three MgO nano-adsorbents at different carbonation times (unit: nm).
(Unit: nm)A-MgO
(Commercial
Nanopowder)		C-MgO
(Self-Combustion)		T-MgO
(Flame Metal
Combustion)
Carbonation Hour (h)NFNFNF
0 (Pristine)000000
2000000
4017.6018.6017.6
6010.00-017.6
821.114.520.013.918.618.6
107.212.721.320.015.116.7
1216.721.316.817.817.616.7
Table
Table 3. Adsorbed CO2 mass per unit mass of carbonated MgO samples (MCO2) (mg/mg) through GC-TCD analysis and the differences of MCO2 (ΔMCO2) between non-forced (N) and forced (F) wet carbonation samples.
Table 3. Adsorbed CO2 mass per unit mass of carbonated MgO samples (MCO2) (mg/mg) through GC-TCD analysis and the differences of MCO2 (ΔMCO2) between non-forced (N) and forced (F) wet carbonation samples.
(Unit: mg/mg)A-MgO
(Commercial
Nanopowder)		C-MgO
(Self-Combustion)		T-MgO
(Flame Metal
Combustion)
Carbonation Hour (h)NFNFNF
20.161 ± 0.0020.227 ± 0.0020.102 ± 0.0060.195 ± 0.0060.121 ± 0.0030.168 ± 0.010
ΔMCO2 = 0.067ΔMCO2 = 0.093ΔMCO2 = 0.047
40.243 ± 0.0040.307 ± 0.0070.156 ± 0.0040.212 ± 0.0080.182 ± 0.0030.312 ± 0.013
ΔMCO2 = 0.064ΔMCO2 = 0.056ΔMCO2 = 0.129
60.328 ± 0.0040.390 ± 0.0060.227 ± 0.0130.329 ± 0.0050.325 ± 0.0210.287 ± 0.006
ΔMCO2 = 0.062ΔMCO2 = 0.102ΔMCO2 = 0.011
80.353 ± 0.0020.337 ± 0.0130.257 ± 0.0140.307 ± 0.0060.389 ± 0.0210.287 ± 0.006
ΔMCO2 = −0.016ΔMCO2 = 0.050ΔMCO2 = −0.103
100.348 ± 0.0060.381 ± 0.0050.342 ± 0.0040.345 ± 0.0210.399 ± 0.0060.349 ± 0.004
ΔMCO2 = 0.034ΔMCO2 = 0.003ΔMCO2 = −0.050
120.345 ± 0.0040.332 ± 0.0050.333 ± 0.0050.339 ± 0.0270.397 ± 0.0110.346 ± 0.006
ΔMCO2 = −0.012ΔMCO2 = 0.006ΔMCO2 = −0.051
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, K.; Kang, Y.; Chae, S.; Kim, C. Forced Mineral Carbonation of MgO Nanoparticles Synthesized by Aerosol Methods at Room Temperature. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020281

AMA Style

Cho K, Kang Y, Chae S, Kim C. Forced Mineral Carbonation of MgO Nanoparticles Synthesized by Aerosol Methods at Room Temperature. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(2):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, Kyungil, Yeryeong Kang, Sukbyung Chae, and Changhyuk Kim. 2023. "Forced Mineral Carbonation of MgO Nanoparticles Synthesized by Aerosol Methods at Room Temperature" Nanomaterials 13, no. 2: 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop