Next Article in Journal
Construction of Quasi-Ordered Metal-Organic Frameworks Superstructures via Colloidal Assembly of Anisotropic Particles for Selective Organic Vapor Sensing
Next Article in Special Issue
Post-Synthetic Modification of an Amino-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework for Highly In Situ Luminescent Detection of Mercury (II)
Previous Article in Journal
Crystalline Mesoporous F-Doped Tin Dioxide Nanomaterial Successfully Prepared via a One Pot Synthesis at Room Temperature and Ambient Pressure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Aluminum-Based Metal–Organic Framework (MOF)-Derived Carbon Nanomaterials and Their Water Adsorption Isotherm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Specific Recognition and Adsorption of Volatile Organic Compounds by Using MIL-125-Based Porous Fluorescence Probe Material

Key Laboratory of Organic Compound Pollution Control Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(19), 2732; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192732
Submission received: 20 June 2023 / Revised: 26 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 9 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Organic Framework (MOF)-Based Micro/Nanoscale Materials)

Abstract

:
The severity of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) issue calls for effective detection and management of VOC materials. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are organic-inorganic hybrid crystals with promising prospects in luminescent sensing for VOC detection and identification. However, MOFs have limitations, including weak response signals and poor sensitivity towards VOCs, limiting their application to specific types of VOC gases. To address the issue of limited recognition and single luminosity for specific VOCs, we have introduced fluorescent guest molecules into MOFs as reference emission centers to enhance sensitivity. This composite material combines the gas adsorption ability of MOFs to effectively adsorb VOCs. We utilized (MIL-125/NH2-MIL-125) as the parent material for adsorbing fluorescent molecules and selected suitable solid fluorescent probes (FGFL-B1) through fluorescence enhancement using thioflavin T and MIL-125. FGFL-B1 exhibited a heightened fluorescence response to various VOCs through charge transfer between fluorescent guest molecules and ligands. The fluorescence enhancement effect of FGFL-B1 on tetrahydrofuran (THF) was particularly pronounced, accompanied by a color change from yellow to yellowish green in the presence of CCl4. FGFL-B1 demonstrated excellent adsorption properties for THF and CCl4, with saturated adsorption capacities of 655.4 mg g−1 and 811.2 mg g−1, respectively. Furthermore, FGFL-B1 displayed strong luminescence stability and reusability, making it an excellent sensing candidate. This study addresses the limitations of MOFs in VOC detection, opening avenues for industrial and environmental applications.

1. Introduction

Environmental pollution has become a pressing global issue with the release of hazardous chemical pollutants into the atmosphere through industrial emissions, steam leakage, and fossil fuel combustion [1,2]. Among these pollutants, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) pose a significant threat to human health [3]. There is an urgent need to develop VOC detection sensors with high sensitivity capable of detecting a variety of gases. The selection of sensor materials plays a crucial role in achieving efficient VOC detection [4]. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are highly effective porous materials for the removal of harmful gases [5,6,7]. They offer numerous advantages over traditional materials such as zeolite-type materials [8], mesoporous silica [9], resins [10], and activated carbons with additives [11,12]. Unlike zeolite-related inorganic hybrid materials that require a template for formation, MOFs rely primarily on a solvent as the main templating molecule [13,14]. To ensure efficient capture of harmful gases through interaction with MOFs, it is crucial to employ MOFs with appropriate pore size and shape [15]. MOFs are functional materials known for their tailorable porosity, making them attractive candidates for VOC capture and sensing [16].
MOFs are a class of crystalline micro-mesoporous hybrid materials with diverse potential applications [17,18,19,20]. They possess designable structures, adjustable chemical functions, a low-density skeleton, an ultra-high specific surface area, and functional permanent pore space [21,22,23]. Due to their porous structure and broad luminescence behavior, MOFs are commonly used as gas adsorbents and luminescent sensors [24,25,26,27]. These MOF sensors exhibit rapid response, high sensitivity, and non-invasive operation [28,29,30]. Luminescent MOF sensors often utilize lanthanide elements as metal centers or specific organic ligands [31,32,33,34]. The selection of materials for such sensors still has limitations [35]. The disadvantage of MOFs is that excitation and emission energy transfer primarily occur within a single component, making fluorescence advantageous only for specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that closely interact with the luminescent groups [35,36,37].
Introducing luminescent groups in MOFs as reference emission centers is a simple and effective strategy to enhance the luminescence sensitivity of MOF sensors, allowing for widespread applications. Yao et al. used a porous supramolecular framework to adsorb guest dye molecules, creating solid materials with high fluorescence. This provides a simple, low-cost, and efficient way to create luminescent solid materials [38]. Similarly, Tian created solid luminous materials by adsorbing guest dye molecules into a symmetrical urea-based polypore supramolecular assembly of tetramethyl calabinus [6] for the detection of VOCs [39]. By adopting this method, luminescent groups can be introduced into MOFs as reference emission centers, effectively addressing the issue of limited luminescence and specific VOC recognition in traditional MOFs. Furthermore, taking advantage of the excellent gas adsorption performance of MOFs, there is potential to utilize them as parent materials for simultaneous VOC detection and adsorption. MIL-125, a popular Ti-based MOF, stands out due to its high thermal stability, solid framework, large specific surface area, and two types of pore cages (effective reachable diameters of 12.55 Å and 6.13 Å, respectively, are octahedral and tetrahedral cages, connected by triangular windows of 5–7 Å). These properties make MIL-125 an exceptional material for gas adsorption [40]. In 2014, Kim et al. reported the adsorption and catalytic properties of MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125 [41]. Recently, Kim et al. found that the formaldehyde adsorption ability of NH2-MIL-125 was significantly better than that of other MOF materials [42]. However, MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125 have not been widely utilized for VOC detection. Our objective is to employ MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125 as parent materials for developing fluorescent materials capable of detecting and adsorbing VOCs.
The fluorescence probe FGFL-B1 (composed of MIL-125 and thioflavin T dye molecules) showed the strongest fluorescence enhancement effect on tetrahydrofuran (THF), and it exhibited distinct fluorescence discoloration when specifically recognizing CCl4. This method not only has a simple material fabrication step and strong operability but also expands the application range of MIL-125 and other MOF materials as fluorescent probes. The study aimed to address practical challenges in VOC detection and treatment, offering potential applications in industrial and living environments.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

All reagent-grade chemicals were used without further purification: NH2-terephthalate acid (H2ATA, RG, Adamas-beta, Titan, Shanghai, China), terephthalate acid (H2BDC, RG, Adamas-beta, Titan, Shanghai, China), tetrabutyl titanate (TBT, AR, Greagent, Titan, Shanghai, China), anhydrous methanol (AR, Greagent, Titan, Shanghai, China), N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF, AR, Greagent, Titan, Shanghai, China), dansyl chloride (Leyan, Shanghai, China), pyren-1-amine (bidepharm, Shanghai, China), 8-hydroxyquinoline (Adamas-beta, Titan, Shanghai, China), umbelliferone (Adamas-beta, Titan, Shanghai, China), thioflavin T (ThT, bidepharm, Shanghai, China) benzene (C6H6, AR, General-Reagent, Titan, Shanghai, China), toluene (C6H5CH3, AR, General-Reagent, Titan, Shanghai, China), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2, AR, General-Reagent, Titan, Shanghai, China), carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, AR, General-Reagent, Titan, Shanghai, China), formaldehyde (HCHO, AR, General-Reagent, Titan, Shanghai, China), and tetrahydrofuran (C4H8O, THF, Safe Dry, Adamas-beta, Titan, Shanghai, China).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Precursor Synthesis

The MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125 were prepared by a solvothermal method, which was modified from a previous report [43].
Terephthalate acid (H2BDC, 3 mmol) was completely dissolved in N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 9 mL), and anhydrous methanol (3 mL). Then, 0.75 mmol of tetrabutyl titanate (TBT) was added to the solution under an N2 atmosphere to form a suspension. After vigorous stirring for 30 min, the suspension was reacted in a 50 mL Teflon-sealed autoclave at 423 K for 24 h. Finally, the material was cooled down to room temperature. The white MIL-125 powders were obtained after being washed with DMF and anhydrous methanol, dried at 333 K, and then vacuum dried at 423 K for 3 h (In order to remove water and DMF). Yellow NH2-MIL-125 powders were prepared in the same way, except that H2BDC was replaced with NH2-terephthalate acid (H2ATA).

2.2.2. Porous Fluorescence Probe Synthesis

15 mg of each of the five dyes (thioflavin T (ThT), 8-hydroxyquinoline, dansyl chloride, pyren-1-amine, umbelliferone) were placed in five small bottles containing 20 mL acetonitrile. Ultrasonic treatment was carried out for 15 min to form a uniformly dispersed dye solution. Then 50 mg of NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 was added to this uniformly dispersed dye solution and let stand for 3.5 h. After centrifugation, the lower layer was precipitated and dried at 333 K for 12 h to obtain (FGFL-A1–5 and FGFL-B1–5) materials. In this study, MIL-125/NH2-MIL-125 was used as the parent material to adsorb five fluorescent dye molecules (thioflavin T, 8-hydroxyquinoline, dansyl chloride, pyrene-1 amine, and cymflorone), labeled as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the paper. Different composites were prepared, with the complex formed by MIL-125 named FGFL-B1-5 and the composites formed by NH2-MIL-125 named FGFL-A1–5. By calculating the mass of dye before and after adsorption, the amounts of fluorophores 1–5 in 50 mg MIL-125 were 6.7 mg, 4.8 mg, 1.4 mg, 1.1 mg, and 5.4 mg, respectively, and 5.3 mg, 2.9 mg, 1 mg, 0.9 mg, and 2.3 mg in 50 mg of NH2-MIL-125, respectively.

2.3. Adsorption and Fluorescence Response of FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5 for VOCs

A glass bottle (10 mL) containing 50 mg of FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5 was placed into the sealable glass container (100 mL) and vacuumed with a vacuum pump until the weight of the FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5 remained the same. Then, another glass bottle (10 mL) containing a small amount of volatile organic compounds (C6H6, C6H5CH3, THF, CCl4, C2Cl2, HCHO) was placed in the vacuum-sealed glass container and sealed for 3.5 h. After the adsorption of different VOCs, the fluorescence of FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5 was detected successively. The weight variation was measured, and corresponding solid-state fluorescence spectra were determined at intervals of approximately 20–240 min over several hours in order to obtain the vapor adsorption profile.

2.4. Measurement of Fluorescence Spectra of Solid FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5

Fluorescence spectra of solid FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5 before and after adsorbing VOCs were recorded at room temperature by using a fluorescence spectrometer (F-320 PL, Guangdong Technology, Guangzhou, China), respectively.

2.5. Characterization

A powder X-ray diffractometer (PXRD, Bruker D8 Advance) was used to characterize the crystal structure of the synthesized catalysts by Cu Kα radiation operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. Patterns were collected using a scan speed of 2 s/step and a step size of 0.02° at a 2θ range from 5° to 50°. The morphologies and microstructures of the prepared materials were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Gemini SEM300, ZEISS, Germany). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of the samples were measured using a nitrogen adsorption instrument (Micromeritics ASAP 2460 analyzer, Beishide, Beijing, China) at liquid-nitrogen temperature. The IR experiments were carried out on a Nicolet 380 FT-IR spectrometer. The IR spectra of pure samples were collected without diluting with KBr. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded using a Guangdong Technology F-320 PL spectrophotometer with an excitation wavelength of 385 nm. All the liquid-state 1H NMR spectra in this work were obtained on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer in dimethyl sulfoxide solution. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of the prepared samples were recorded using a UV-vis spectrometer (UV-2600, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a background of BaSO4.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Property of FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5

We successfully synthesized MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125 by the solvothermal method [40]. The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns are shown in Figure 1. The main diffraction peaks of NH2-MIL-125 (Figure 1a) and MIL-125 (Figure 1b) were consistent with the simulated spectra, indicating that both MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125 have been successfully prepared [40]. Different fluorescent probe materials were prepared by introducing dye molecules into MIL-125/NH2-MIL-125 by the impregnation method. The PXRD pattern of NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 (FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5) remained unchanged after the adsorption of fluorescent dye molecules, indicating that the crystal structure of NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 was not affected by the adsorption process.
To investigate the impact of dye molecules on the morphology of NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125, we examined both the pristine materials and composites using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Figure 2 shows that MIL-125 and FGFL-B1–5 exhibit similar disc-like shapes with a diameter of approximately 300 nm and a thickness of around 100 nm. Similarly, the morphology and size of NH2-MIL-125 and FGFL-A1–5, as shown in Figure S1, remained unchanged. The surface morphology and structure, as observed from the PXRD and SEM patterns, also did not show significant alterations, and no dye was detected.
Nitrogen sorption experiments demonstrated the highly porous nature of NH2-MIL-125 and MIL-125, characterized by a type I isotherm typical of micro-porous solids (Figure 3), which exhibited a BET surface area of 1031.60 m2 g™1 and 1252.45 m2 g−1, and a micro-pore volume of 0.4806 cm3 g−1 and 0.6015 cm3 g−1, respectively (Figure S2, Table S1). Compared to NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125, the specific BET surface area and micro-pore volume of FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5 were significantly reduced, indicating successful adsorption of fluorescent dye molecules onto NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 (Table S1). Notably, the thioflavin T (ThT) composite exhibited the minimum BET surface area and micro-pore volume. In the case of FGFL-A1, formed using NH2-MIL-125 as a template, the BET surface area decreased from 1031.60 m2 g−1 to 271.45 m2 g−1, and the micropore volume decreased from 0.4806 cm3 g−1 to 0.1000 cm3 g−1. The BET surface area of MIL-125 composite (FGFL-B1) decreased from 1252.25 m2 g−1 to 356.05 m2 g−1, and the micro-pore volume decreased from 0.6015 cm3 g−1 to 0.1615 cm3 g−1. Therefore, NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 exhibited the highest ThT adsorption capacity.

3.2. Fluorescence of FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5

The fluorescence spectra of FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5 were tested to identify the optimal fluorescent probe materials. The results revealed that ThT exhibited a strong fluorescence enhancement effect when adsorbed onto NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 (Figure 4, Figure S3 and Figure S10), while other dye molecules showed minimal fluorescence response. Therefore, ThT was deemed the most suitable fluorescent guest molecule for NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125. Additionally, FGFL-B1 demonstrated significantly better fluorescence enhancement than FGFL-A1 (Figure 4b). The electrophotographs captured under sunlight and UV (365 nm) illumination (Figure S4) demonstrated that FGFL-B1, a fluorescent material formed after ThT adsorption by MIL-125, emitted vibrant yellow light under UV (365 nm) illumination.
To analyze whether ThT undergoes simple physical adsorption or chemical coupling with MIL-125/NH2-MIL-125, we conducted IR spectroscopy on ThT, NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125, and FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5. As shown in Figure 5, the carboxyl group characteristic peak of NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 showed at 3.140–3.204 (log1380–log1600 cm−1) [40]. An evident larger wavenumber shift at 3.23 (log1700 cm−1) was observed in the infrared spectra of FGFL-A1–5/FGFL-B1–5, indicating the adsorption and coupling of ThT molecules with NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125. The larger wavenumber shift was more pronounced in the FGFL-B1 infrared spectra. Figure S5 displays the Raman spectra of NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125, ThT, and FGFL-A1/FGFL-B1, with FGFL-A1/FGFL-B1 revealing peaks from both NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 and the fluorescent dye ThT. Additionally, Figure S6a,b illustrates the liquid nuclear magnetic hydrogen spectra of ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1. The peak at 8.14 ppm of ThT belongs to the H peak on the benzene ring on the benzylamine ring; the H peak (8.06 ppm) on the benzene ring of the organic ligand terephthalic acid of MIL-125 was significantly offset in FGFL-B1, indicating that ThT forms H···O conjugations with MIL-125 [44]. The ThT molecule consists of a benzylamine ring and a phenyl sulfide ring. When the benzylamine ring and phenyl sulfide ring rotate freely around the C-C bond in the natural state, the ThT fluorescence signal is weak. Once this rotation is limited by some structures, the ThT fluorescence is enhanced [45,46,47]. When ThT fluorescent guest molecules were introduced into NH2-MIL-125/MIL-125 as light sources and coupled with them via H···O interaction, the restriction of intramolecular rotation (RIR) of ThT fluorescence was caused to some extent. Charge transfer from fluorescent guest molecules to organic ligands was formed, resulting in a strong fluorescence response [48,49,50]. In order to confirm this phenomenon, we tested the solid UV-vis absorption spectra of ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1, respectively. As can be seen from Figure S7a, the absorption peak of FGFL-B1 formed by the combination of ThT and MIL-125 had a significant red shift compared with MIL-125. As a chromophore, ThT is prone to electron transition. The FGFL-B1 material formed by the combination of MIL-125 and ThT had a significant red shift relative to the absorption wavelength of MIL-125 and a significant blue shift relative to the absorption wavelength of ThT, which corresponded to the above phenomenon [51,52]. The band gaps of ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1 can be calculated from the solid UV-vis absorption spectra using the Kubelka–Munk function [53]. It can be seen from Figure S7b that by combining with ThT, the band gap of MIL-125 was reduced from 3.4 eV to 2.4 eV.

3.3. Fluorescence Sensors and Storage Performance of VOCs over FGFL-B1

Environmental pollution is a pressing global issue caused by the discharge of harmful chemical pollutants into the atmosphere. Volatile organic compounds (benzene, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, carbon tetrachloride, dichloromethane, methylene chloride, formaldehyde) are the main cause of environmental air pollution and pose risks to human health [54,55,56]. For instance, THF exhibits stimulatory and anesthetic effects. Inhalation causes upper respiratory irritation, nausea, dizziness, headache, and central nervous system depression [57,58]. CCl4 and its decomposition products can be absorbed through the respiratory tract, and skin contact can result in rapid absorption. CCl4 is particularly damaging to peripheral nerves, especially the liver [59]. Therefore, the development of fluorescent probes and porous materials for the detection and adsorption of VOC gases is crucial to addressing this issue.
In this paper, fluorescent molecules were selected through fluorescence spectra testing to determine the most suitable candidates. FGFL-A1 and FGFL-B1 were chosen as fluorescent probes for investigating the detection and adsorption properties of six common volatile organic compounds (VOCs): dichloromethane (CH2Cl2), carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), tetrahydrofuran (THF), formaldehyde (HCHO), benzene (C6H6), and toluene (C6H5CH3). As shown in Figure 6a,b, FGFL-B1, and FGFL-A1 demonstrated varying degrees of fluorescence response towards the VOCs. However, the fluorescence enhancement effect of FGFL-A1 was very low, which was negligible compared with that of FGFL-B1 (Figure 6c,d). Therefore, FGFL-B1 is considered the most suitable fluorescent probe material. After FGFL-B1 and FGFL-B1 adsorbed with different VOCs were formed into a suspension in acetonitrile solvent, different fluorescence responses could be clearly observed under UV light (Figure 6e). Notably, FGFL-B1 showed the most significant fluorescence enhancement effect towards THF gas, with fluorescence intensity 36 times higher than FGFL-B1 (Figure 6b). Additionally, the adsorption of CCl4 gas induced a noticeable red shift in FGFL-B1 (Figure 6b). This red shift resulted in a distinct transformation in fluorescence color from yellow to yellowish green (After the adsorption of CCl4, the maximum emission peak of FGFL-B1 undergoes a red shift from 530 nm to 560 nm, while it remained unchanged at 530 nm after the adsorption of other VOCs). To demonstrate the color transformation more effectively, test strips of FGFL-B1 were fabricated, which visibly turned yellowish green upon adsorption of CCl4 (Figure 6f). This test strip method offers the potential for faster and easier detection of simulated factory or indoor gas leaks.
FGFL-B1 was formed by the recombination of ThT (4 Å) within the MIL-125 channel [60,61]. Upon the entry of VOC gas into the FGFL-B1 channel, collisions with ThT molecules generate an effect [62]. The interaction between ThT and MIL-125 restricts the rotation of the benzene ring, thereby limiting non-radiative energy consumption pathways and reinforcing radiative transitions. As a result, fluorescence is substantially enhanced [63,64,65]. To illustrate this effect, we present the example of THF adsorption (Figure S8). Following the adsorption of THF, the fluorescence intensity of FGFL-B1 was significantly enhanced, accompanied by a change in the full width at half maximum (FWHM) from 73.63 nm to 85.04 nm [66]. Electronegative molecules induce a pronounced red shift in the spectra of the material. CCl4, known for its strong electronegativity, triggers intramolecular charge transfer of ThT, resulting in a red shift effect and fluorescence color transformation [67,68]. Therefore, FGFL-B1 can selectively recognize CCl4. These findings demonstrate that the incorporation of fluorescent guest molecules (ThT) as luminescent clusters significantly improves the fluorescence detection performance of materials and overcomes the limitations of conventional MOFs, which only exhibit a fluorescence response to specific gases (Figure 7).
The titrated fluorescence spectra of FGFL-B1 were analyzed in detail to monitor the real-time adsorption of THF and CCl4 (Figure 8a,b). The fluorescence intensity of solid FGFL-B1 at 530 nm and 560 nm increased with the increase in the adsorption time of THF and CCl4. As shown in Figure 8e,f, it took approximately 2 h for FGFL-B1 to reach its maximum fluorescence intensity with THF and CCl4, while only about 20 min were needed to shift the peak position to 560 nm. Although the fluorescence intensity and peak position of FGFL-B1 remained unchanged, the absorption rates of THF and CCl4 continued to increase within 3 h (Figure 8c,d). Comparing Figure 8c–f, it can be observed that the adsorption amount and time of THF and CCl4 required to achieve the maximum equilibrium value of FGFL-B1 fluorescence intensity are much lower than those required by saturated adsorption. The size of ThT (4 Å) is large, and the barrier entering porous MIL-125 is much larger than that of VOCs molecules. Therefore, the amount of ThT that can interact with MIL-125 is significantly lower than that of VOC molecules. Therefore, the time required for fluorescence to reach maximum equilibrium and the amount of gas is far less than the time of saturation adsorption and gas volume. By comparing the mass of FGFL-B1 before and after the saturated adsorption of THF and CCl4, we calculated that the adsorption properties of FGFL-B1 for THF and CCl4 were 655 mg g−1 and 812 mg g−1, respectively (Table S2). The adsorption performance of other VOC gases is shown in Table S1. Additionally, the ΔI curves representing the adsorption capacity of THF and CCl4 on FGFL-B1 (Figure 8g,h) were plotted using the adsorption-time curve data (Figure 8c,d) and intensity (ΔI) versus time curve data (Figure 8e,f) obtained from the interpolation method. The detection limits (DL) [39] of FGFL-B1 for THF and CCl4 were determined to be 1.41 × 10−4 mol g−1 and 4.66 × 10−5 mol g−1, respectively.
The detection of VOCs by FGFL-B1 is based on a fluorescence reaction triggered by the interaction of gases after entering the material. VOCs can be detached from FGFL-B1, allowing the material to be recycled [39]. To validate this, we conducted adsorption and desorption experiments using THF and CCl4 as examples. Lifetime tests demonstrated that the adsorption and desorption of THF and CCl4 on FGFL-B1 were not only reversible but also highly stable. Numerous adsorption and desorption experiments consistently indicated that the detection properties of FGFL-B1 for THF and CCl4, such as fluorescence intensity, remained unchanged (Figure S9c,d). Furthermore, a comparison of the PXRD patterns of FGFL-B1 before and after the adsorption and desorption of THF and CCl4 revealed no significant changes, suggesting that the adsorption or desorption of THF and CCl4 had minimal impact on FGFL-B1 (Figure S9a,b). These results provided strong evidence for the excellent stability of FGFL-B1.

4. Conclusions

We investigated the fluorescence enhancement effect of FGFL-B1, a composite of the ThT dye molecules and MIL-125 H···O conjugation, on VOCs by introducing various fluorescent dye molecules into MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125 synthesized via the solvothermal method. The presence of steric hindrance in ThT molecules both hampers and enhances their intramolecular rotation, resulting in a remarkable fluorescence enhancement effect on THF. The fluorescence intensity increases by a factor of 36 upon THF adsorption. Moreover, due to the strong electronegativity of CCl4, FGFL-B1 exhibits selective recognition of CCl4, leading to a distinct yellow-to-yellowish-green fluorescence color change. Remarkably, FGFL-B1 demonstrates excellent adsorption capacities for THF and CCl4, with values of 655.4 mg g−1 and 811.2 mg g−1, respectively. As a result, the prepared porous fluorescence probe material, FGFL-B1, holds great potential for detecting and adsorbing mixed gases in both industrial and domestic environments. This method opens up new possibilities for fluorescence detection of adsorption properties in Ti-based MOF materials and other MOF materials.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13192732/s1, Figure S1. (a–f) SEM images of NH2-MIL-125, FGFL-A1, FGFL-A2, FGFL-A3, FGFL-A4 and FGFL-A5, respectively; Figure S2. The corresponding BJH pore size distribution of the as-prepared samples of (a) NH2-MIL-125, FGFL-A1, FGFL-A2, FGFL-A3, FGFL-A4 and FGFL-A5 (b) MIL-125, FGFL-B1, FGFL-B2, FGFL-B3, FGFL-B4 and FGFL-B5. Table S1: BET surface area and T-Plot micro-pore volume of NH2-MIL-125, FGFL-A1–5, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1–5; Figure S3. Fluorescence spectra of (a) FGFL-A1, (b) FGFL-A2, (c) FGFL-A3, (d) FGFL-A4 and (e) FGFL-A5; Figure S4. Electronic photos of ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1 (a–c) under sunlight and (d–f) under UV (365 nm); Figure S5. Raman spectra of (a) ThT, NH2-MIL-125, and FGFL-A1, (b) ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1; Figure S6. (a) The liquid-state 1H NMR spectra in dimethyl sulfoxide of ThT, FGFL-B1, and MIL-125; (b) The liquid-state 1H NMR spectra in dimethyl sulfoxide of ThT, FGFL-B1, MIL-125 (7.87–8.25 ppm); (c) The solid-state 1H NMR spectra of MIL-125, FGFL-B1 and ThT; Figure S7. (a) The UV-vis absorption spectra of ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1; (b) The plot of (ahv)1/2 versus hv of ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1; Figure S8. The fluorescence spectra of FGFL-B1 and FGFL-B1 loaded with THF. Table S2: Adsorption properties of FGFL-B1 for the six selected VOCs; Figure S9. After FGFL-B1 adsorbed VOCs, the VOCs were removed by vacuum drying at 333 K. PXRD patterns and fluorescence intensity were measured before and after the cycle stability experiment. The numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 represent the number of adsorption and desorption cycles. A general survey of the PXRD patterns of (a) FGFL-B1 before and after loading with CCl4, and (b) FGFL-B1 before and after loading with THF. A general survey of the fluorescence spectra of (c) FGFL-B1 before and after loading with CCl4, (d) FGFL-B1 before and after loading with THF; Figure S10. Fluorescence spectra of (a) FGFL-B1, (b) FGFL-B2, (c) FGFL-B3, (d) FGFL-B4, and (e) FGFL-B5.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.C.; methodology, Q.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.W. and F.T.; writing—review and editing, W.C., J.W. and B.L.; supervision, W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12104286), Program for Professor of Special Appointment in Shanghai (QD2019005).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pawelec, B.; Navarro, R.M.; Campos-Martin, J.M.; Fierro, J.L.G. Retracted Article: Towards near Zero-Sulfur Liquid Fuels: A Perspective Review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 23–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Colvile, R.N.; Hutchinson, E.J.; Mindell, J.S.; Warren, R.F. The Transport Sector as a Source of Air Pollution. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 1537–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, Y.; Wen, M.; Li, G.; An, T. Recent Advances in VOC Elimination by Catalytic Oxidation Technology onto Various Nanoparticles Catalysts: A Critical Review. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 281, 119447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zheng, J.-P.; Ou, S.; Zhao, M.; Wu, C.-D. A Highly Sensitive Luminescent Dye@MOF Composite for Probing Different Volatile Organic Compounds. ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 758–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hamon, L.; Serre, C.; Devic, T.; Loiseau, T.; Millange, F.; Férey, G.; Weireld, G.D. Comparative Study of Hydrogen Sulfide Adsorption in the MIL-53(Al, Cr, Fe), MIL-47(V), MIL-100(Cr), and MIL-101(Cr) Metal−Organic Frameworks at Room Temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8775–8777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shi, J.; Zhao, Z.; Xia, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, Z. Adsorption and Diffusion of Ethyl Acetate on the Chromium-Based Metal–Organic Framework MIL-101. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56, 3419–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, Z.; Li, X.; Li, Z. Adsorption Equilibrium and Kinetics of P-Xylene on Chromium-Based Metal Organic Framework MIL-101. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pires, J.; Carvalho, A.; de Carvalho, M.B. Adsorption of Volatile Organic Compounds in Y Zeolites and Pillared Clays. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2001, 43, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chu, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Song, K.-Y.; Shul, Y.-G.; Jung, K.-T.; Lee, K.; Han, M.-H. Preparation of Mesoporous Silica Fiber Matrix for VOC Removal. Catal. Today 2002, 74, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, P.; Long, C.; Li, Q.; Qian, H.; Li, A.; Zhang, Q. Adsorption of Trichloroethylene and Benzene Vapors onto Hypercrosslinked Polymeric Resin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, X.; Yang, L.; Wu, H. Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds from the Coal-Fired Flue Gas by Adsorption on Activated Carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 302, 126925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, K.J.; Miyawaki, J.; Shiratori, N.; Yoon, S.-H.; Jang, J. Toward an Effective Adsorbent for Polar Pollutants: Formaldehyde Adsorption by Activated Carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 260, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lin, Y.; Massa, W.; Dehnen, S. “Zeoball” [Sn36Ge24Se132]24–: A Molecular Anion with Zeolite-Related Composition and Spherical Shape. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4497–4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Férey, G. Hybrid Porous Solids: Past, Present, Future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 191–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xiao, B.; Wheatley, P.S.; Zhao, X.; Fletcher, A.J.; Fox, S.; Rossi, A.G.; Megson, I.L.; Bordiga, S.; Regli, L.; Thomas, K.M.; et al. High-Capacity Hydrogen and Nitric Oxide Adsorption and Storage in a Metal−Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1203–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shen, Y.; Tissot, A.; Serre, C. Recent Progress on MOF-Based Optical Sensors for VOC Sensing. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 13978–14007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, H.-C.; Kitagawa, S. (Eds.) Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5415–5418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Long, J.R.; Yaghi, O.M. The Pervasive Chemistry of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1213–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, H.-C.; Long, J.R.; Yaghi, O.M. Introduction to Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 673–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, J.; Farha, O.K.; Roberts, J.; Scheidt, K.A.; Nguyen, S.T.; Hupp, J.T. Metal-Organic Framework Materials as Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1450–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tannert, N.; Sun, Y.; Hastürk, E.; Nießing, S.; Janiak, C. A Series of New Urea-MOFs Obtained via Post-Synthetic Modification of NH2-MIL-101(Cr): SO2, CO2 and H2O Sorption. Z. Für Anorg. Und Allg. Chem. 2021, 647, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Suh, M.P.; Park, H.J.; Prasad, T.K.; Lim, D.-W. Hydrogen Storage in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 782–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ingleson, M.J.; Barrio, J.P.; Bacsa, J.; Dickinson, C.; Park, H.; Rosseinsky, M.J. Generation of a Solid Brønsted Acid Site in a Chiral Framework. Chem. Commun. 2008, 11, 1287–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kitagawa, S.; Kitaura, R.; Noro, S. Functional Porous Coordination Polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2004, 43, 2334–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mueller, U.; Schubert, M.; Teich, F.; Puetter, H.; Schierle-Arndt, K.; Pastré, J. Metal-Organic Frameworks-Prospective Industrial Applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 626–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, M.; Guo, L.; Cao, D. Amino-Functionalized Luminescent Metal-Organic Framework Test Paper for Rapid and Selective Sensing of SO2 Gas and Its Derivatives by Luminescence Turn-On Effect. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 3608–3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gan, L.; Andres-Garcia, E.; Mínguez Espallargas, G.; Planas, J.G. Adsorptive Separation of CO2 by a Hydrophobic Carborane-Based Metal-Organic Framework under Humid Conditions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 5309–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.-A.; Zhao, C.-W.; Zhu, N.-X.; Liu, Q.-K.; Chen, G.-J.; Liu, J.-B.; Zhao, X.-D.; Ma, J.-P.; Zhang, S.; Dong, Y.-B. Nanoscale UiO-MOF-Based Luminescent Sensors for Highly Selective Detection of Cysteine and Glutathione and Their Application in Bioimaging. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 17672–17675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ke, F.; Yuan, Y.-P.; Qiu, L.-G.; Shen, Y.-H.; Xie, A.-J.; Zhu, J.-F.; Tian, X.-Y.; Zhang, L.-D. Facile Fabrication of Magnetic Metal-Organic Framework Nanocomposites for Potential Targeted Drug Delivery. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3843–3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, Z.; Deibert, B.J.; Li, J. Luminescent Metal-Organic Frameworks for Chemical Sensing and Explosive Detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5815–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Song, L.; Du, S.-W.; Lin, J.-D.; Zhou, H.; Li, T. A 3D Metal-Organic Framework with Rare 3-Fold Interpenetrating Dia-g Nets Based on Silver(I) and Novel Tetradentate Imidazolate Ligand: Synthesis, Structure, and Possible Ferroelectric Property. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 7, 2268–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Du, J.-L.; Hu, T.-L.; Li, J.-R.; Zhang, S.-M.; Bu, X.-H. Metal Coordination Architectures of 2,3-Bis(Triazol-1-Ylmethyl)Quinoxaline: Effect of Metal Ion and Counterion on Complex Structures. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008, 1059–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, M.-M.; Wang, J.-Y.; Sun, R.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, J.-P.; Che, G.-B.; Liu, F.-C. The Design of Dual-Emissive Composite Material [Zn2(HL)3]+@MOF-5 as Self-Calibrating Luminescent Sensors of Al3+ Ions and Monoethanolamine. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 9555–9562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Geranmayeh, S.; Mohammadnejad, M.; Abbasi, A. Ln Based Metal-Organic Framework for Fluorescence “Turn Off-On” Sensing of Hg2+. J. Fluoresc. 2023, 33, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Allendorf, M.D.; Bauer, C.A.; Bhakta, R.K.; Houk, R.J.T. Luminescent Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1330–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dong, M.-J.; Zhao, M.; Ou, S.; Zou, C.; Wu, C.-D. A Luminescent Dye@MOF Platform: Emission Fingerprint Relationships of Volatile Organic Molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1575–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. An, J.; Shade, C.M.; Chengelis-Czegan, D.A.; Petoud, S.; Rosi, N.L. Zinc-Adeninate Metal-Organic Framework for Aqueous Encapsulation and Sensitization of Near-Infrared and Visible Emitting Lanthanide Cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yao, Y.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Tao, Z.; Ni, X.-L.; Wei, G. Multiple Efficient Fluorescence Emission from Cucurbit[10]Uril-[Cd4Cl16]8−-Based Pillared Diamond Porous Supramolecular Frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40760–40765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tian, F.Y.; Cheng, R.X.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Tao, Z.; Zhu, Q.J. Specific Recognition of Methanol Using a Symmetric Tetramethylcucurbit[6]Uril-Based Porous Supramolecular Assembly Incorporating Adsorbed Dyes. Aust. J. Chem. 2020, 73, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dan-Hardi, M.; Serre, C.; Frot, T.; Rozes, L.; Maurin, G.; Sanchez, C.; Férey, G. A New Photoactive Crystalline Highly Porous Titanium(IV) Dicarboxylate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10857–10859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, S.-N.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.-Y.; Cho, H.-Y.; Ahn, W.-S. Adsorption/Catalytic Properties of MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125. Catal. Today 2013, 204, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, B.; Lee, Y.-R.; Kim, H.-Y.; Ahn, W.-S. Adsorption of Volatile Organic Compounds over MIL-125-NH2. Polyhedron 2018, 154, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fu, Y.; Sun, D.; Chen, Y.; Huang, R.; Ding, Z.; Fu, X.; Li, Z. An Amine-Functionalized Titanium Meta-Organic Framework Photocatalyst with Visible-Light-Induced Activity for CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3364–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cui, Y.; Yue, Y.; Qian, G.; Chen, B. Luminescent Functional Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1126–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sjekloća, L.; Ferré-D’Amaré, A.R. Binding between G Quadruplexes at the Homodimer Interface of the Corn RNA Aptamer Strongly Activates Thioflavin T Fluorescence. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019, 26, 1159–1168.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mohanty, J.; Choudhury, S.D.; Pal, H.; Bhasikuttan, A.C. Early Detection of Insulin Fibrillation: A Fluorescence Lifetime Assay to Probe the Pre-Fibrillar Regime. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 2403–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nielsen, L.; Khurana, R.; Coats, A.; Frokjaer, S.; Brange, J.; Vyas, S.; Uversky, V.N.; Fink, A.L. Effect of Environmental Factors on the Kinetics of Insulin Fibril Formation: Elucidation of the Molecular Mechanism. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 6036–6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mei, J.; Leung, N.L.C.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Aggregation-Induced Emission: Together We Shine, United We Soar! Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11718–11940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, J.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, X.; Lu, X.; He, P.; Jiang, L.; Dong, H.; Hu, W. Aggregation-Induced Emission Enhancement Based on 11,11,12,12,-Tetracyano-9,10-Anthraquinodimethane. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1199–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. He, J.; Xu, B.; Chen, F.; Xia, H.; Li, K.; Ye, L.; Tian, W. Aggregation-Induced Emission in the Crystals of 9,10-Distyrylanthracene Derivatives: The Essential Role of Restricted Intramolecular Torsion. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 9892–9899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Krebs, F.C.; Spanggaard, H. An Exceptional Red Shift of Emission Maxima upon Fluorine Substitution. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7185–7192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Choudhury, S.D.; Mohanty, J.; Pal, H.; Bhasikuttan, A.C. Cooperative Metal Ion Binding to a Cucurbit[7]Uril−Thioflavin T Complex: Demonstration of a Stimulus-Responsive Fluorescent Supramolecular Capsule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1395–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Solís, R.R.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Belver, C.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Bedia, J. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) for the Solar Photocatalytic Degradation of Aqueous Emerging Pollutants in Batch and Continuous Tests. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vandenbroucke, A.M.; Morent, R.; De Geyter, N.; Leys, C. Non-Thermal Plasmas for Non-Catalytic and Catalytic VOC Abatement. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 195, 30–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guieysse, B.; Hort, C.; Platel, V.; Munoz, R.; Ondarts, M.; Revah, S. Biological Treatment of Indoor Air for VOC Removal: Potential and Challenges. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Manos, M.J.; Malliakas, C.D.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Heavy-Metal-Ion Capture, Ion-Exchange, and Exceptional Acid Stability of the Open-Framework Chalcogenide (NH4)4In12Se20. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moody, D.E. The Effect of Tetrahydrofuran on Biological Systems: Does a Hepatotoxic Potential Exist. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 1991, 14, 319–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Draper, A.J.; Madan, A.; Parkinson, A. Inhibition of Coumarin 7-Hydroxylase Activity in Human Liver Microsomes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1997, 341, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fan, H.; Tu, T.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Q.; Liu, G.; Zhang, T.; Bao, Y.; Lu, Y.; Dong, Z.; Dong, J.; et al. Sinomenine Attenuates Alcohol-Induced Acute Liver Injury via Inhibiting Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Apoptosis in Mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 159, 112759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Biancalana, M.; Koide, S. Molecular Mechanism of Thioflavin-T Binding to Amyloid Fibrils. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA) Proteins Proteom. 2010, 1804, 1405–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Harel, M.; Sonoda, L.K.; Silman, I.; Sussman, J.L.; Rosenberry, T.L. Crystal Structure of Thioflavin T Bound to the Peripheral Site of Torpedo Californica Acetylcholinesterase Reveals How Thioflavin T Acts as a Sensitive Fluorescent Reporter of Ligand Binding to the Acylation Site. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7856–7861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Takashima, Y.; Martínez, V.M.; Furukawa, S.; Kondo, M.; Shimomura, S.; Uehara, H.; Nakahama, M.; Sugimoto, K.; Kitagawa, S. Molecular Decoding Using Luminescence from an Entangled Porous Framework. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fang, M.-M.; Yang, J.; Li, Z. Recent Advances in Purely Organic Room Temperature Phosphorescence Polymer. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2019, 37, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Tian, Y.; Fang, M.; Liao, Q.; Wang, L.; Hu, W.; Tang, B.Z.; Li, Z. Persistent Organic Room Temperature Phosphorescence: What Is the Role of Molecular Dimers? Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xie, Y.; Li, Z. The Development of Mechanoluminescence from Organic Compounds: Breakthrough and Deep Insight. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, Y.; Xiao, X.; Ran, Y.; Bin, Z.; You, J. Molecular Design of Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescent Emitters for Narrowband Orange–Red OLEDs Boosted by a Cyano-Functionalization Strategy. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 9408–9412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chakraborty, S.; Bhattacharjee, D.; Hussain, S.A. Formation of Nanoscale Aggregates of a Coumarin Derivative in Langmuir-Blodgett Film. Appl. Phys. A 2013, 111, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, J.; Huang, J.; Li, Q.; Li, Z. Blue AIEgens: Approaches to Control the Intramolecular Conjugation and the Optimized Performance of OLED Devices. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 2663–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PXRD patterns of (a) NH2-MIL-125, FGFL-A1–5, and (b) MIL-125, FGFL-B1–5 (Thioflavin T, 8-hydroxyquinoline, dansyl chloride, pyrene-1 amine, and umbelliferone were referred to as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).
Figure 1. PXRD patterns of (a) NH2-MIL-125, FGFL-A1–5, and (b) MIL-125, FGFL-B1–5 (Thioflavin T, 8-hydroxyquinoline, dansyl chloride, pyrene-1 amine, and umbelliferone were referred to as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).
Nanomaterials 13 02732 g001
Figure 2. (af) SEM images of MIL-125, FGFL-B1, FGFL-B2, FGFL-B3, FGFL-B4, and FGFL-B5, respectively.
Figure 2. (af) SEM images of MIL-125, FGFL-B1, FGFL-B2, FGFL-B3, FGFL-B4, and FGFL-B5, respectively.
Nanomaterials 13 02732 g002
Figure 3. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of (a) NH2-MIL-125, FGFL-A1–5, (b) MIL-125, FGFL-B1–5.
Figure 3. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of (a) NH2-MIL-125, FGFL-A1–5, (b) MIL-125, FGFL-B1–5.
Nanomaterials 13 02732 g003
Figure 4. (a) Fluorescence spectra of MIL-125 and FGFL-B1–5, (b) Fluorescence spectra of FGFL-A1 and FGFL-B1.
Figure 4. (a) Fluorescence spectra of MIL-125 and FGFL-B1–5, (b) Fluorescence spectra of FGFL-A1 and FGFL-B1.
Nanomaterials 13 02732 g004
Figure 5. (a) IR spectra of ThT, NH2-MIL-125, and FGFL-A1, (b) IR spectra of ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1.
Figure 5. (a) IR spectra of ThT, NH2-MIL-125, and FGFL-A1, (b) IR spectra of ThT, MIL-125, and FGFL-B1.
Nanomaterials 13 02732 g005
Figure 6. A general survey of the fluorescence spectra of (a) FGFL-A1 and (b) FGFL-B1 loaded with the six selected VOCs. Relative fluorescence intensities of (c) FGFL-A1 and (d) FGFL-B1 in response to the six selected VOCs. (e) Photos under UV (365 nm) of FGFL-B1 and FGFL-B1 loaded with six selected VOCs. (f) Photos under UV (365 nm) of FGFL-B1 (left) and FGFL-B1 loaded with CCl4 (right).
Figure 6. A general survey of the fluorescence spectra of (a) FGFL-A1 and (b) FGFL-B1 loaded with the six selected VOCs. Relative fluorescence intensities of (c) FGFL-A1 and (d) FGFL-B1 in response to the six selected VOCs. (e) Photos under UV (365 nm) of FGFL-B1 and FGFL-B1 loaded with six selected VOCs. (f) Photos under UV (365 nm) of FGFL-B1 (left) and FGFL-B1 loaded with CCl4 (right).
Nanomaterials 13 02732 g006
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of FGFL-B1 adsorption detection of VOCs.
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of FGFL-B1 adsorption detection of VOCs.
Nanomaterials 13 02732 g007
Figure 8. The titrated fluorescence spectra of FGFL-B1 loaded (a) THF and (b) CCl4. Adsorption profile of the loading of (c) THF and (d) CCl4 in FGFL-B1 upon increasing the adsorption time. Change in the fluorescence intensity of FGFL-B1 by loading (e) THF and (f) CCl4 upon increasing the adsorption time. Plot of ΔI versus the amount of (g) THF and (h) CCl4 adsorbed by solid FGFL-B1.
Figure 8. The titrated fluorescence spectra of FGFL-B1 loaded (a) THF and (b) CCl4. Adsorption profile of the loading of (c) THF and (d) CCl4 in FGFL-B1 upon increasing the adsorption time. Change in the fluorescence intensity of FGFL-B1 by loading (e) THF and (f) CCl4 upon increasing the adsorption time. Plot of ΔI versus the amount of (g) THF and (h) CCl4 adsorbed by solid FGFL-B1.
Nanomaterials 13 02732 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Q.; Tian, F.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Lei, B. Specific Recognition and Adsorption of Volatile Organic Compounds by Using MIL-125-Based Porous Fluorescence Probe Material. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2732. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192732

AMA Style

Wu Q, Tian F, Chen W, Wang J, Lei B. Specific Recognition and Adsorption of Volatile Organic Compounds by Using MIL-125-Based Porous Fluorescence Probe Material. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(19):2732. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192732

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Qiuyu, Feiyang Tian, Wenqian Chen, Jianying Wang, and Bo Lei. 2023. "Specific Recognition and Adsorption of Volatile Organic Compounds by Using MIL-125-Based Porous Fluorescence Probe Material" Nanomaterials 13, no. 19: 2732. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192732

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop