Next Article in Journal
Selective Mid-IR Metamaterial-Based Gas Sensor System: Proof of Concept and Performances Tests
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Time Persisting Superhydrophilicity on Sapphire Surface via Femtosecond Laser Processing with the Varnish of TiO2
Previous Article in Journal
Interface Formation during the Growth of Phase Change Material Heterostructures Based on Ge-Rich Ge-Sb-Te Alloys
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles Using Bio-Inspired Systems and Electrically Conductive Pattern Fabrication through Laser-Direct Writing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of the Micro-Nanostructuring of Titanium Dioxide Films on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Formic Acid under UV Illumination

by
Nicolas Crespo-Monteiro
1,*,
Marwa Hamandi
2,
Maria Alejandra Usuga Higuita
1,
Chantal Guillard
2,
Frederic Dappozze
2,
Damien Jamon
1,
Francis Vocanson
1 and
Yves Jourlin
1
1
Laboratoire Hubert Curien, Université de Lyon, UMR CNRS 5516, 42000 Saint-Etienne, France
2
University Lyon, University Claude Bernard, CNRS, IRCELYON, UMR5256, 69626 Villeurbanne, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(6), 1008; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12061008
Submission received: 21 February 2022 / Revised: 8 March 2022 / Accepted: 15 March 2022 / Published: 18 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser Fabrication of Functional Micro/Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
Surface micro-nanostructuring can provide new functionalities and properties to coatings. For example, it can improve the absorption efficiency, hydrophobicity and/or tribology properties. In this context, we studied the influence of micro-nanostructuring on the photocatalytic efficiency of sol-gel TiO2 coatings during formic acid degradation under UV illumination. The micro-nanostructuring was performed using the UV illumination of microspheres deposited on a photopatternable sol-gel layer, leading to a hexagonal arrangement of micropillars after development. The structures and coatings were characterized using Raman spectroscopy, ellipsometry, atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. When the sol-gel TiO2 films were unstructured and untreated at 500 °C, their effect on formic acid’s degradation under UV light was negligible. However, when the films were annealed at 500 °C, they crystallized in the anatase phase and affected the degradation of formic acid under UV light, also depending on the thickness of the layer. Finally, we demonstrated that surface micro-nanostructuring in the form of nanopillars can significantly increase the photocatalytic efficiency of a coating during the degradation of formic acid under UV light.

1. Introduction

The development and improvement of surface coatings is a major challenge in industry today because materials are used in many strategic sectors, including health, transport, housing, energy, and the production of luxury goods [1,2,3,4]. Metal oxides are an important class of materials that can meet this need thanks to their chemical, mechanical, and thermal stability, and thanks to their physical and chemical properties (e.g., SiO2, ZnO, TiO2) [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is the best known and most widely used of these oxides to date. Its main advantages are its optical properties (a high refractive index, and transparency in the visible and NIR range) and its mechanical, physical and chemical properties (photocatalytic properties). The advantages of depositing TiO2 coatings in the form of thin films have been demonstrated in many fields, including energy [11], photocatalysis [12,13,14,15,16,17], electronics [18,19], health [20], and optics [21,22,23]. Additionally, the coatings can be micro-nanostructured, thereby giving them new functionalities and properties, e.g., improved absorption efficiency [24], hydrophobicity and enhanced tribological properties [25].
Many studies have consequently been devoted to the development of new techniques to transform flat surfaces into two- or three-dimensional surfaces at the micro-nanometric scale. These techniques are based on two types of approach: bottom-up and top-down. In the bottom-up approach, micro-nanostructures are constructed by additive building processes controlled by the laws of chemistry and physical chemistry [26,27]. These allow the creation of micro-nanostructures with few constraints on scale or resolution, but these approaches are generally limited to simple designs and small surface areas. In the top-down approach, nanostructures are constructed from bulk materials that are selectively patterned to remove some of the bulk, as in optical lithography [21,28,29]. The great majority of industrial nanofabrication techniques fall into this category.
Among the top-down approaches, microsphere photolithography or colloidal lithography (CL) is an inexpensive and promising way to produce regular and homogeneous arrays of micro-nanostructures of different sizes on a planar or cylindrical substrate [29,30,31]. This technique uses microspheres deposited on the surface of the films (usually using a Langmuir–Blodgett method) as micro-lenses to create photonic nanojets under the microspheres. Depending on the material involved, the photonic nanojets then create nano-pillars or nano-holes under the microspheres. The periodic microstructure is thus determined by the quasi hexagonal arrangement of the monolayer of the microspheres deposited on the layer. As we showed in previous studies, this technique can be applied directly to micro-nanostructured titanium oxide coatings [28,29,30].
In the present study, we used colloidal lithography to investigate the influence of patterning on the photocatalytic efficiency of sol-gel TiO2 films. The sol-gel approach is a so-called “soft chemistry” technology, which allows the realization of glassy material such as TiO2 without having to resort to high temperatures for its processing [21,29,32]. The material is directly fabricated from a viscous solution that can be easily deposited (e.g., by dip-coating or spin-coating) on small or large planar or non-planar substrates [21,29,32], which makes this method very adjustable. Moreover, the sol-gel approach is interesting because the coatings can be photosensitive to UV radiation, which allows direct structuring without having to resort to etching steps [21,29,32], which is one of its main interests. Micro-nanostructured and unstructured coatings were characterized using Raman spectroscopy, ellipsometry, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Their photocatalytic efficiency was evaluated based on the degradation of formic acid under UV illumination. We demonstrated that surface micro-nanostructuring in the form of nanopillars can significantly increase the photocatalytic efficiency of a coating during the degradation of formic acid under UV light due to both light absorption and the specific area thanks to a direct micro-nanostructuring sol-gel layer with colloïdal lithography.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

The thin films used in this study were manufactured from a sol-gel at room temperature using the procedure previously described in [21,32]. Briefly, the sol-gel was composed of a mixture of two sols with different reactivities. The first sol was prepared by reacting titanium tetra iso-propoxide (TIPT from Sigma-Adrich, St. Quentin Fallavier, France), deionized water, hydrochloric acid (HCl from Carl Roth, Lauterbourg, France) and butanol (BuOH from Acros Organics, Fischer scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) with a TIPT/H2O/HCl/BuOH molar composition of 1/0.13/0.82/23.9. The second sol was prepared from TIPT, methanol (MeOH from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and benzoylacetone (BzAc from Sigma-Aldrich) with a TIPT/MeOH/BzAc molar composition of 1/0.75/20.4 moles. The TiO2 sol-gel was obtained by mixing the two sols with a TIPT-BzAc at a molar ratio of 0.6.

2.2. Elaboration of the Photocatalyst Thin Films

2.2.1. Unstructured TiO2 Films

The sol-gel layers were deposited on a flat silica substrate (with a diameter of 2 inches, NEYCO Vacuum & materials, Vanves, France) by spin-coating at 3000 rpm, and were then heated in an oven at 500 °C for 3 h. In order to investigate the influence of the thickness of the layer in the photocatalysis study, the process was repeated several times, resulting in multilayers of different thicknesses.

2.2.2. Micro-Nanostructured TiO2 Films

The complex TIPT-BzAc used in the sol-gel solution renders the solution stable and determines its photosensitive behavior under UV light. Under UVA, the complex is partially degraded into insoluble species such as carbonates and/or carboxylates. The non-illuminated areas can then be removed by washing in ethanol and water, while the illuminated zones are insoluble in ethanol and are thus stable. As we already reported in previous studies, this sol can be combined with colloidal photolithography to produce nanopillars [29]. In the present study, we reproduced and used this method on micro-nanostructured TiO2 films. A schematic diagram of the micro-nanostructuring process is reported in the Scheme 1.
The sol-gel film was deposited by spin coating at 3000 rpm for 1 min, and was heated at 110 °C for 90 min. This thermal treatment was performed to obtain an amorphous photosensitive xerogel film. In order to preserve the photo-patternable xerogel film of water, a protective layer made of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was deposited on top of the film by spin coating at 5000 rpm for 1 min [29]. Next, a monolayer of silica microspheres (diameter 1 μm) suspended in ethanol (96% v/v) (Micromod) was deposited using the Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) technique (KSV NIMA LB from Biolin Scientific). The monolayer was deposited with a barrier speed of 2 mm min−1, a surface pressure of 35 mN·m−1, and a withdrawal speed of 1 mm·min−1. The sample was then exposed to homogenous UV illumination at a wavelength of 365 nm for 10 min. Each microsphere of the monolayer behaves like micro-lens by focusing UV light, creating a photonic nanojet in form of concentrated light underneath the microspheres, the size (length and width) of which depends on the spheres’ diameter and exposure wavelength. These nanojets degrade the TIPT-BzAc complex and render the illuminated areas insoluble in ethanol [29]. After the exposure of the microspheres to the UV light, the sample was processed using a three-step procedure based on successive washings in chloroform, ethanol, and deionized water, for 1 min each. Chloroform dissolves PMMA and the untreated xerogel layer, ethanol washes the sample, and water stabilizes the illuminated areas. The entire protocol produced periodic nanopillars arranged in a 2D, hexagonal, periodic pattern [29]. Finally, the sample with the xerogel nanopillars was heated in an oven at 500 °C for 3 h in order to obtain TiO2 anatase nanopillars.

2.3. Characterization

Both films were characterized before and after annealing at 500 °C. Spectroscopic ellipsometry measurements (UVISEL from Horiba Jobin Yvon Kyoto, Japan, associated with DeltaPsi2 software Jobin Yvon) were taken in order to determine the thickness, refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) of the TiO2 thin films. The ellipsometry measurements were performed at an angle of incidence of 60°, in the 0.99 to 4.4 eV spectral range, with a 0.02 eV step. The optical model consists of two layers on a semi-infinite glass substrate. The first layer is made of the material under study (TiO2). The second layer is considered to be a roughness layer, with a 50–50% mixed dielectric function between the void and the dielectric function of the first layer. We used the double Tauc Lorentz dispersion formula described in the reference [33] because we had interband aborption in the TiO2 thin film. In order to complete the characterization of the film, the thicknesses were also measured with a profilometer (Bruker Dektak XT from Bruker company, Billerica, MA, USA).
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Dimension Icon from Bruker) and scanning electron microscopy (NovananoSEM200 FEI with a HELIX detector) were used to characterize the profile of the micro-nanostructured films. The amount of TiO2 in the coatings was determined by inductively coupled plasma- optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) using an Activa (Jobin Yvon) instrument. The samples were dissolved by acid attack (H2SO4 (1 mL) + HNO3 (4 mL) + HF (0.5 mL) in 25 mL water) and heated at 150 °C for 12 h.

2.4. Photocatalytic Experiments

The supported titania samples were placed on a four quarter-moon shaped glass holder about 1 cm from the bottom of a cylindrical Pyrex photoreactor equipped with a bottom optical window (diameter ca. 5.5 cm) which was open to the air (Figure 1). A radiation flux of 6 mW.cm−2 provided by an 18 W PLL lamp with a maximum wavelength of 365 nm was used for all of the photocatalytic tests. The radiation flux was measured with a VLX-3W radiometer and a CX-365 detector (UV-A).
The light absorbed by the TiO2 deposit was assessed by measuring the irradiance transmitted through the glass support impregnated with different TiO2, coatings, and then subtracting the irradiance transmitted through the support alone.
Aliquots (120 mL) of an aqueous solution containing 50 ppm (1086 μmol/L) formic acid (FA), used as a model pollutant, were continuously stirred on a mechanical stirrer (Mixel TT, 500 tr min−1, from Mixel, Dardilly, France). Before irradiation, the stirred solution was kept in the dark for 30 min to reach the adsorption equilibrium, after which the solution was irradiated, and 0.5 mL samples were collected at regular intervals and analyzed by HPLC.
The formic acid HPLC analyses were performed using a VARIAN system (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France) equipped with a UV-Vis detector and a 300 mm × 7.8 mm carbohydrate analysis column (COREGEL-87H3 from Interchim, Montluçon, France). The mobile phase was a H2SO4 solution (5 × 10−3 mol L−1) and the flow rate was set at 0.7 mL min−1. The detection wavelength was set at 210 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Coated Surfaces

Before annealing at 500 °C, the unstructured film was homogenous and transparent in the visible range. Based on profilometry and ellipsometry, the film was estimated to be to be 300 nm thick. The Raman spectrum (Figure 2a) showed multiple peaks but none for crystallized TiO2. Following Oda et al. [34], the peaks at 1600 and 1000 cm−1 were attributed to the 8b and 12 vibration modes of the phenyl group of BzAc, and the peaks at 1297 and 1315 cm−1 were attributed to the symmetric vibrations of the C=C=C bond of the BzAc molecules of the TIPT-BzAc chelated ring. The refractive index (n) of the layer before annealing (Figure 2b) was 1.8 in the visible–NIR range, and the extinction coefficient (k) was close to 0 in this wavelength range, confirming low light absorption (Figure 2b), but below 350 nm the extinction coefficient (k) increased to reach 0.44 at 280 nm. This behavior indicates the absorption of the incident wavelength of the film, which is all the higher as the wavelength decreases below 350 nm. After annealing at 500 °C, four dominant peaks were indeed observed at 142, 396, 516 and 637 cm−1 on the Raman spectrum that did not exist before annealing. These peaks were assigned to Raman active modes of anatase TiO2 (Figure 2a), as illustrated in the references [35,36]. A small Raman signal was also detected near 800–850 nm and below 400 nm, which could mean that some organic compounds are always present. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM—Jeol 2010F TEM, equipped with a field-emission gun from JEOL Europe SAS, Croissy sur Seine, France) also confirmed the presence of anatase TiO2 nanocrystallites in the film, as illustrated in Figure 2c.
The profilometer and the ellipsometry measurement indicated the densification of the film, the thickness of which decreased to around 50 nm. The phase change of the film and its densification led to an increase in the refractive index to around 2.1 in the visible–NIR range, and the extinction coefficient remained nearly zero in this range (Figure 2b). However, the film began to absorb at 360 nm, and reached an extinction coefficient of 0.95 at 280 nm, highlighting the better absorption of the films at these wavelengths after annealing. For the present study, the thickness of the unstructured film was adjusted by making multilayer deposits.

3.2. Photocatalytic Performance for Formic Acid Degradation

3.2.1. Effect of Annealing

Table 1 shows the photocatalytic degradation of FA in the presence of TiO2 films prepared by annealing at 500 °C and without annealing. In the non-annealed TiO2 film, the disappearance rate of the formic acid was negligible, in agreement with the Raman analysis showing the presence of peaks characteristic of organic compounds, especially BzAc, and no anatase phase. However, the small disappearance rate observed in the absence of annealing suggests that a very small proportion of TiO2 anatase existed but was not detected by Raman analysis.
After annealing at 500 °C, TiO2 crystallized well to the anatase phase with good activity, fulfilling the requirement for a well-crystalized TiO2 phase. Actually, the crystallization of TiO2 to the anatase phase is one of the more important parameters in photocatalysis [37,38].

3.2.2. Effect of the Film Thickness and Light Absorption on the Photocatalytic Activity

Increasing the thickness of the TiO2 film increased the degradation rate of FA (Figure 3), as was already reported in the literature in the case of other pollutants [38,39,40]. This correlation is explained by the absorption of light that increases linearly to the TiO2 thickness in this range of thickness (Figure 3b). Actually, by increasing the absorption light, more (e−, h+) are generated, thereby favoring the degradation of formic acid. From this result, the quantum yield can be estimated as the ratio of the photocatalytic degradation rate to the absorbed light.
By drawing the disappearance rate as a function of light absorption (Figure 4), a quantum yield of 3.3% was obtained, considering the slope of the curve. However, it is important to note that the number of absorbed photons is difficult to estimate experimentally, owing to reflection; as such, the value is probably underestimated.

3.2.3. Effect of Micro-Nanostructuring on the Films

For micro-nanostructuring, the colloidal photolithography of the thin films was performed on an unstructured anatase TiO2 film with a thickness of 140 nm (Scheme 1). For this purpose, a sol-gel photosensitive film was deposited on top of the unstructured film of TiO2 anatase. After the deposition of the silica spheres (diameter 1 μm) using the Langmuir–Blodgett technique, UV light at a 365 nm wavelength illuminated the sample to create photonic nanojets under the silica nanospheres. These nanojets degraded the TIPT-BzAc complex and rendered the illuminated areas insoluble in ethanol. After development and annealing at 500 °C for 3 h, anatase nanopillars were obtained on the surface of the film (Figure 5a,c,d).
The optical photograph (Figure 5b) shows visible light over the entire sample, confirming that the structuring of the whole surface of the sample has indeed occurred. The SEM top view image and AFM profile (Figure 5b,d,e) indicate a homogeneous micro-nanostructure of nano-pillars with diameters of around 460 nm and a height of around 130 nm. The nano-pillars are organized in a hexagonal structure of which the period is 1 μm. A 10 × 10 μm2 area contains around 100 nano-pillars. The contact surface between the TiO2 and the formic acid is estimated as being equivalent to the surface of the sample (10 μm × 10 μm) to which the sides of the nano-pillars ((2 × π × nano-pillar radius × nano-pillar height) × number of nano-pillars) are added. This calculation showed that, in the micro-nanostructured film, the contact surface increased by 118.8 μm2. When we compared this surface with the contact surface generated by an unstructured film of the same thickness, we found that adding an unstructured film of this thickness increased the contact surface by 105.2 μm2 (10 μm × 10 μm + 4 × 10 μm × film thickness). For the sake of comparison, we found that the micro-nanostructured film increased the contact area by about 11% compared to an unstructured film.
As the estimation of the light absorption by micro-nanostructured film is complicated and is impossible to compare to the thickness of film, in order to evaluate the photocatalytic efficiency of the micro-nanostructured film, first we checked for proportionality between the thickness and the amount of TiO2. Figure 6 confirms that the amount of Ti increases proportionally with the thickness, as we already found in a previous study [38].
Thus, as the degradation rate is proportional to the thickness, the rate can be considered to be proportional to the amount of Ti, and the photocatalytic efficiency of micro-nanostructured and unstructured films can be compared by calculating the disappearance rate of FA per μg of Ti (Table 2, Figure 7).
We clearly demonstrated that micro-nanostructured film is about 46% more efficient than unstructured film, whereas the amount of Ti only increased by about 10%. However, this improvement may be due to different phenomena, in particular the increase in the contact surface area of Ti with the pollutant, or the improved light absorption. As suggested in another work, the improvement of the light absorption can increase the mean photochemical efficiency [41]. A 20 nm thick anatase layer conformally deposited onto a wavelength-scale two-dimensional periodic photonic lattice allowed the increase of the photochemical efficiency by a factor of up to 5.7 compared to the flat references [41].

4. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that, compared to flat TiO2 films, the surface micro-nanostructuring of a TiO2 film significantly improved the photocatalytic efficiency of the films in formic acid degradation under UV light.
When sol-gel TiO2 films are unstructured and not annealed at 500 °C, their effect on the formic acid degradation under the UV light is negligible, whereas when the films are annealed at 500 °C, which leads to crystallization of anatase phase, they increase the degradation of formic acid. Likewise, increasing the thickness of the TiO2 film increases the rate of FA degradation. This phenomenon is explained by light absorption, which increases linearly with the thickness of TiO2 in this thickness range. Indeed, by increasing the light absorption, more (e−, h+) are generated, thereby enhancing FA degradation. From this result, we estimated the quantum yield to be 3.3%, but due to measurement difficulties, this ratio was probably underestimated.
Colloidal photolithography was performed to obtain the micro-nanostructuring of an unstructured anatase TiO2 film with a thickness of 140 nm. The resulting nano-pillars were homogeneous, and were organized in a hexagonal structure with a 1 μm period. The diameters of the pillars are around 460 nm, and their height is around 130 nm. The photocatalytic efficiencies of micro-nanostructured and unstructured films were compared by calculating the rate of FA disappearance per μg of Ti. The results indicated a photocatalytic efficiency of 180 × 1013 molecules/s/mg Ti for the unstructured film and 263 × 1013 molecules/s/mg Ti for the micro-nanostructured film. It is clear that the micro-nanostructured film is more efficient than the unstructured film, whereas the amount of Ti increased only slightly. It is worth noting that the 46% improvement in the overall rate of FA can not only be explained by the increase in the surface area available for exchange due to TiO2 nanopillars (estimated at roughly 11%) but also by the improved light absorption owing to the micro-nanostructured film in the range of the wavelength. Thus, both phenomena must be addressed.
The further development of the micro-nanostructuring of TiO2 anatase thin films requires an increase in both light absorption (photon confinement) and in specific surfaces with an optimized micro-nanostructured pattern. Such developments will depend on rigorous optical modeling and topographically (geometrically) based approaches for the surface.

Author Contributions

N.C.-M. conducted the study; M.A.U.H. and F.V. synthesized and deposited the films; M.A.U.H. and N.C.-M. performed the micro-nanostructuring. The different characterizations were performed as follows: N.C.-M. and M.A.U.H. performed the Raman spectroscopy, M.A.U.H. performed the SEM and AFM, D.J. performed the ellipsometry. The photocatalytic experiments were performed by M.H., F.D. and C.G.; Y.J. offered suggestions and commented on the data analyses. The paper was written by N.C.-M. and C.G. with contributions from F.V. and Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) for the financial support in the framework of the PEPS project NOTAIR.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Li, X.; Sun, X. Interface Design and Development of Coating Materials in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1801323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hołyńska, M.; Tighe, A.; Semprimoschnig, C. Coatings and Thin Films for Spacecraft Thermo-Optical and Related Functional Applications. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1701644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, X.; Marks, T.J.; Facchetti, A. Metal Oxides for Optoelectronic Applications. Nat. Mater 2016, 15, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chung, S.; Cho, K.; Lee, T. Recent Progress in Inkjet-Printed Thin-Film Transistors. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1801445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kim, Y.-H.; Heo, J.-S.; Kim, T.-H.; Park, S.; Yoon, M.-H.; Kim, J.; Oh, M.S.; Yi, G.-R.; Noh, Y.-Y.; Park, S.K. Flexible Metal-Oxide Devices Made by Room-Temperature Photochemical Activation of Sol-Gel Films. Nature 2012, 489, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ogale, S.B.; Venkatesan, T.; Blamire, M.G. Functional Metal Oxides: New Science and Novel Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-3-527-65486-4. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dyshlyuk, L.; Babich, O.; Ivanova, S.; Vasilchenco, N.; Atuchin, V.; Korolkov, I.; Russakov, D.; Prosekov, A. Antimicrobial Potential of ZnO, TiO2 and SiO2 Nanoparticles in Protecting Building Materials from Biodegradation. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 146, 104821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramana, C.V.; Mudavakkat, V.H.; Bharathi, K.K.; Atuchin, V.V.; Pokrovsky, L.D.; Kruchinin, V.N. Enhanced Optical Constants of Nanocrystalline Yttrium Oxide Thin Films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 031905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ramana, C.V.; Vemuri, R.S.; Kaichev, V.V.; Kochubey, V.A.; Saraev, A.A.; Atuchin, V.V. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Depth Profiling of La2O3/Si Thin Films Deposited by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4370–4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garg, V.; Sengar, B.S.; Awasthi, V.; Kumar, A.; Singh, R.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, C.; Atuchin, V.V.; Mukherjee, S. Investigation of Dual-Ion Beam Sputter-Instigated Plasmon Generation in TCOs: A Case Study of GZO. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 5464–5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, W.; Tian, Y.; He, H.; Xu, L.; Li, W.; Zhao, D. Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Hierarchically Mesoporous TiO2 Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 1702–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lu, Y.; Guan, S.; Hao, L.; Yoshida, H. Review on the Photocatalyst Coatings of TiO2: Fabrication by Mechanical Coating Technique and Its Application. Coatings 2015, 5, 425–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Purcar, V.; Rădiţoiu, V.; Rădiţoiu, A.; Raduly, F.M.; Manea, R.; Frone, A.; Anastasescu, M.; Ispas, G.C.; Căprărescu, S. Bilayer Coatings Based on Silica Materials and Iron (III) Phthalocyanine—Sensitized TiO2 Photocatalyst. Mater. Res. Bull. 2021, 138, 111222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zarubica, A.; Vasić, M.; Antonijevic, M.; Ranđelović, M.; Momčilović, M.; Krstić, J.; Nedeljković, J. Design and Photocatalytic Ability of Ordered Mesoporous TiO2 Thin Films. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014, 57, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. You, H.; Yanyin, Z. Synthesis, Characterization and Visible Photocatalytic Performance of Iron (III) Tetracarboxyphthalocyanine-Sensitized TiO2 Photocatalyst. J. Phys. Chem. Biophys. 2016, 6, 1000199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Rădiţoiu, V.; Purcar, V.; Raditoiu, A.; Raduly, M.; Frone, A.; Anastasescu, M.; Stoica, M.; Alexandrescu, E.; Șomoghi, R.; Manea, R.; et al. Sol–Gel Hybrid Films Based on Organosilanes with Long Alkyl Chains. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2020, 17, 1389–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raditoiu, V.; Raditoiu, A.; Raduly, M.F.; Amariutei, V.; Gifu, I.C.; Anastasescu, M. Photocatalytic Behavior of Water-Based Styrene-Acrylic Coatings Containing TiO2 Sensitized with Metal-Phthalocyanine Tetracarboxylic Acids. Coatings 2017, 7, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yu, S.-Y.; Schrodj, G.; Mougin, K.; Dentzer, J.; Malval, J.-P.; Zan, H.-W.; Soppera, O.; Spangenberg, A. Direct Laser Writing of Crystallized TiO2 and TiO2/Carbon Microstructures with Tunable Conductive Properties. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1805093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, K.; Yu, H.; Xie, M.; Liu, S.; Wu, F. Effects of Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Grafted Graphene on the Electrical Properties of Poly(Lactic Acid) Nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 10599–10605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Verma, R.; Gangwar, J.; Srivastava, A.K. Multiphase TiO2 Nanostructures: A Review of Efficient Synthesis, Growth Mechanism, Probing Capabilities, and Applications in Bio-Safety and Health. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 44199–44224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Higuita, M.A.U.; Bruhier, H.; Hochedel, M.; Kampfe, T.; Vocanson, F.; Valour, A.; Jamon, D.; Langlet, M.; Crespo-Monteiro, N.; Jourlin, Y. Resonant Waveguide Grating Fabrication on Planar and Cylindrical Substrates Using a Photosensitive TiO2 Sol-Gel Approach. Opt. Mater. Express 2021, 11, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kruchinin, V.N.; Perevalov, T.V.; Atuchin, V.V.; Gritsenko, V.A.; Komonov, A.I.; Korolkov, I.V.; Pokrovsky, L.D.; Shih, C.W.; Chin, A. Optical Properties of TiO2 Films Deposited by Reactive Electron Beam Sputtering. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 6089–6095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. DohĿeviĿ-MitroviĿ, Z.; StojadinoviĿ, S.; Lozzi, L.; AškrabiĿ, S.; RosiĿ, M.; TomiĿ, N.; PaunoviĿ, N.; LazoviĿ, S.; NikoliĿ, M.G.; Santucci, S. WO3/TiO2 Composite Coatings: Structural, Optical and Photocatalytic Properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 83, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Crespo-Monteiro, N.; Cazier, A.; Vocanson, F.; Lefkir, Y.; Reynaud, S.; Michalon, J.-Y.; Kämpfe, T.; Destouches, N.; Jourlin, Y. Microstructuring of Mesoporous Titania Films Loaded with Silver Salts to Enhance the Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Blue under Visible Light. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Skarmoutsou, A.; Charitidis, C.A.; Gnanappa, A.K.; Tserepi, A.; Gogolides, E. Nanomechanical and Nanotribological Properties of Plasma Nanotextured Superhydrophilic and Superhydrophobic Polymeric Surfaces. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 505711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Patil, U.M.; Kulkarni, S.B.; Deshmukh, P.R.; Salunkhe, R.R.; Lokhande, C.D. Photosensitive Nanostructured TiO2 Grown at Room Temperature by Novel “Bottom-up” Approached CBD Method. J. Alloy. Compd. 2011, 509, 6196–6199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Atuchin, V.V.; Galashov, E.N.; Kozhukhov, A.S.; Pokrovsky, L.D.; Shlegel, V.N. Epitaxial Growth of ZnO Nanocrystals at ZnWO4(010) Cleaved Surface. J. Cryst. Growth 2011, 318, 1147–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Valour, A.; Usuga Higuita, M.A.; Crespo-Monteiro, N.; Reynaud, S.; Hochedel, M.; Jamon, D.; Donnet, C.; Jourlin, Y. Micro–Nanostructured TiN Thin Film: Synthesis from a Photo-Patternable TiO2 Sol–Gel Coating and Rapid Thermal Nitridation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 25480–25488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shavdina, O.; Berthod, L.; Kämpfe, T.; Reynaud, S.; Veillas, C.; Verrier, I.; Langlet, M.; Vocanson, F.; Fugier, P.; Jourlin, Y.; et al. Large Area Fabrication of Periodic TiO2 Nanopillars Using Microsphere Photolithography on a Photopatternable Sol–Gel Film. Langmuir 2015, 31, 7877–7884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Berthod, L.; Shavdina, O.; Vocanson, F.; Langlet, M.; Dellea, O.; Veillas, C.; Reynaud, S.; Verrier, I.; Jourlin, Y. Colloidal Photolithography Applied to Functional Microstructure on Cylinder Based on Photopatternable TiO2 Sol-Gel. Microelectron. Eng. 2017, 177, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hochedel, M.; Bichotte, M.; Arnould, F.; Celle, F.; Veillas, C.; Pouit, T.; Dubost, L.; Kämpfe, T.; Dellea, O.; Crespo-Monteiro, N.; et al. Microstructuring Technology for Large and Cylindrical Receivers for Concentrated Solar Plants (CSP). Microelectron. Eng. 2021, 248, 111616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gâté, V.; Jourlin, Y.; Vocanson, F.; Dellea, O.; Vercasson, G.; Reynaud, S.; Riassetto, D.; Langlet, M. Sub-Micrometric Patterns Written Using a DIL Method Coupled to a TiO2 Photo-Resist. Opt. Mater. 2013, 35, 1706–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Von Blanckenhagen, B.; Tonova, D.; Ullmann, J. Application of the Tauc-Lorentz Formulation to the Interband Absorption of Optical Coating Materials. Appl. Opt. AO 2002, 41, 3137–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oda, S.; Uchiyama, H.; Kozuka, H. Thermoplasticity of Sol–Gel-Derived Titanoxanes Chemically Modified with Benzoylacetone. J. Sol-Gel. Sci. Technol. 2014, 70, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ma, H.L.; Yang, J.Y.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, Y.B.; Lu, B.; Ma, G.H. Raman Study of Phase Transformation of TiO2 Rutile Single Crystal Irradiated by Infrared Femtosecond Laser. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 7497–7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arsov, L.D.; Kormann, C.; Plieth, W. Electrochemical Synthesis and in Situ Raman Spectroscopy of Thin Films of Titanium Dioxide. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1991, 22, 573–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Herrmann, J.-M. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Applications to the Removal of Various Types of Aqueous Pollutants. Catal. Today 1999, 53, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guillard, C.; Beaugiraud, B.; Dutriez, C.; Herrmann, J.-M.; Jaffrezic, H.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Lacroix, M. Physicochemical Properties and Photocatalytic Activities of TiO2-Films Prepared by Sol–Gel Methods. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 39, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Langlet, M.; Kim, A.; Audier, M.; Guillard, C.; Herrmann, J.M. Transparent Photocatalytic Films Deposited on Polymer Substrates from Sol-Gel Processed Titania Sols. Thin Solid Film. 2003, 1, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fallet, M.; Permpoon, S.; Deschanvres, J.L.; Langlet, M. Influence of Physico-Structural Properties on the Photocatalytic Activity of Sol-Gel Derived TiO2 Thin Films. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 2915–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Capitolis, J.; Hamandi, M.; Hochedel, M.; El-Jallal, S.; Drouard, E.; Chevalier, C.; Leclercq, J.-L.; Penuelas, J.; Dursap, T.; Brottet, S.; et al. Two-Dimensional Photonic Metasurfaces for Slow Light-Controlled Photocatalysis. Nano Sel. 2022, 3, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the micro-nanostructuring process.
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the micro-nanostructuring process.
Nanomaterials 12 01008 sch001
Figure 1. Sketch of the set-up used for the photocatalytic tests.
Figure 1. Sketch of the set-up used for the photocatalytic tests.
Nanomaterials 12 01008 g001
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra. (b) Refractive index and extinction coefficient of the film before and after annealing at 500 °C. (c) HRTEM micrograph of an anatase TiO2 nanocrystallite (inset: the corresponding FFT showing the (−1, −1, 0) and (0, −1, 3) directions of the anatase TiO2 tetragonal structure).
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra. (b) Refractive index and extinction coefficient of the film before and after annealing at 500 °C. (c) HRTEM micrograph of an anatase TiO2 nanocrystallite (inset: the corresponding FFT showing the (−1, −1, 0) and (0, −1, 3) directions of the anatase TiO2 tetragonal structure).
Nanomaterials 12 01008 g002
Figure 3. (a) FA disappearance rate as a function of the thickness of the unstructured TiO2 film. (b) Photons absorbed as a function of the TiO2 thickness.
Figure 3. (a) FA disappearance rate as a function of the thickness of the unstructured TiO2 film. (b) Photons absorbed as a function of the TiO2 thickness.
Nanomaterials 12 01008 g003
Figure 4. Disappearance rate of FA as a function of the photons absorbed.
Figure 4. Disappearance rate of FA as a function of the photons absorbed.
Nanomaterials 12 01008 g004
Figure 5. (a) SEM top view image. (b) Optical photograph of the micro- nanostructured sample. (c) AFM images. (d) Profile of the nanopillars.
Figure 5. (a) SEM top view image. (b) Optical photograph of the micro- nanostructured sample. (c) AFM images. (d) Profile of the nanopillars.
Nanomaterials 12 01008 g005
Figure 6. Amount of Ti present in an unstructured TiO2 film as a function of its thickness.
Figure 6. Amount of Ti present in an unstructured TiO2 film as a function of its thickness.
Nanomaterials 12 01008 g006
Figure 7. Disappearance rate of FA per μg of Ti obtained for micro-nanostructured and unstructured TiO2 films.
Figure 7. Disappearance rate of FA per μg of Ti obtained for micro-nanostructured and unstructured TiO2 films.
Nanomaterials 12 01008 g007
Table 1. Disappearance rate of formic acid obtained in the presence of an unstructured TiO2 film before and after annealing at 500 °C.
Table 1. Disappearance rate of formic acid obtained in the presence of an unstructured TiO2 film before and after annealing at 500 °C.
TiO2 Filmr (Molecules/s.cm2)
Before annealing(1.6 ± 0.5) 1013
After annealing(7.4 ± 0.5) 1013
Table 2. Comparison of micro-nanostructured and unstructured films.
Table 2. Comparison of micro-nanostructured and unstructured films.
TiO2 FilmTi (μg) for 2 Inches (20.27 cm2)Molecules/s/cm2Molecules/s/mg Ti
Unstructured521 ± 10(4.63 ± 0.5) 1013(180 ± 10) 1013
Structured571 ± 10(7.42 ± 0.5) 1013(263 ± 10) 1013
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Crespo-Monteiro, N.; Hamandi, M.; Usuga Higuita, M.A.; Guillard, C.; Dappozze, F.; Jamon, D.; Vocanson, F.; Jourlin, Y. Influence of the Micro-Nanostructuring of Titanium Dioxide Films on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Formic Acid under UV Illumination. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12061008

AMA Style

Crespo-Monteiro N, Hamandi M, Usuga Higuita MA, Guillard C, Dappozze F, Jamon D, Vocanson F, Jourlin Y. Influence of the Micro-Nanostructuring of Titanium Dioxide Films on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Formic Acid under UV Illumination. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(6):1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12061008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Crespo-Monteiro, Nicolas, Marwa Hamandi, Maria Alejandra Usuga Higuita, Chantal Guillard, Frederic Dappozze, Damien Jamon, Francis Vocanson, and Yves Jourlin. 2022. "Influence of the Micro-Nanostructuring of Titanium Dioxide Films on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Formic Acid under UV Illumination" Nanomaterials 12, no. 6: 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12061008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop