Next Article in Journal
Research Progress of Bifunctional Oxygen Reactive Electrocatalysts for Zinc–Air Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of ZnO/Au Nanocomposite for Antibacterial Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Piezoresistive Sensor with High Sensitivity and Flexibility Based on Porous Sponge

1
Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
2
School of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Jilin Engineering Normal University, Changchun 130052, China
3
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(21), 3833; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213833
Submission received: 20 September 2022 / Revised: 25 October 2022 / Accepted: 27 October 2022 / Published: 30 October 2022

Abstract

:
Chemical plating has recently been employed for the preparation of flexible piezoresistive sensors; however, plating solutions and processes that affect the sensitivity still need further exploration. In the study, a sponge-based flexible sensor with copper as its conductive material is prepared using electroless plating. The variation in sponge resistance and sensitivity changes with different plating times are studied. It is found that, with the increasing plating time, the conductivity increases and the resistance of sample will decrease. Moreover, the range of resistance difference will decrease under compression, thus the sensitivity decreases. Furthermore, the sensor’s applications were assessed, verifying the practicability of the developed preparation method. This study may bring ideas for the new development of flexible pressure sensors.

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the development of wearable gadgets used in health monitoring, research on sensors has greatly deepened and expanded, with aims of high quality, flexibility, sensitivity, and response speed [1,2,3,4,5]. Flexible sensors can easily attach to individuals’ skin, solving the mismatch between rigid planar sensors and human body curves. Based on their working mechanism, flexible sensors are divided into capacitive, piezoelectric, and piezoresistive sensors used for monitoring pressure, temperature, humidity, and so on [6,7,8,9,10,11].
Flexible piezoresistive sensors have attracted significant attention and are widely used in electronic skin, soft robotics, health monitoring, and so on [12,13]. There were many attempts in the applied magnetism and engineering to create flexible pressure sensors of different types. Melzer fabricated [Co/Cu] multilayers revealing a giant magnetoresistance (GMR) effect on free-standing elastic poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) membranes [14]. A series of multilayer thin-film structures based on Fe20Ni80 and Fe11Ni89 with Cu or Ta spacers were designed, prepared, and investigated [15]. Flexible magnetoimpedance (MI) sensors fabricated using a NiFe/Cu/NiFe tri-layer on Kapton substrate have been studied by Li [16]. Many methods have been developed for preparing high-performance flexible piezoresistive sensors [17,18,19]. Conductive nanomaterials, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, and metal nanomaterials, with elastomeric material, such as PDMS, PU, SBS, and Ecoflex, are integrated to form composites [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]; however, for the sensors to perform well, conductive fillers and elastomeric materials must be controlled. For example, the composite conductive thin film was prepared with a spraying method by shadow masks [29]. This preparation method is simple and low-cost, but the electrical property is largely affected by material deformation and the sliding between conductive nanomaterials. To solve the problems, the sensor structure is designed with regard to the wave structure, effectively decreasing the influence of material deformation [30,31]. Other sensor structures, such as spring and net-shaped, have been developed [32,33,34]. Although the preparation methods, such as template and electrospinning, coupled with the designed sensor structures have further applications [35,36], the requirements of material stretchability and stability are still difficult to meet, along with mass production challenges [37].
In recent years, materials with three-dimensional (3D) network structures have been widely used in every field thanks to their simple and economical production along with excellent stretchability and stability [38,39,40]. Graphene with 3D networks has been extensively studied for its great electrical conductivity and mechanical performance. Nevertheless, some preparation methods, such as CVD and hydrothermal reduction, are complicated [41,42,43,44]. For instance, three-dimensional porous polymer composites with graphene networks prepared by CVD and PEDOT/PSS coating showed high conductivity [38]. However, their complicated and costly preparation methods make mass production and wide application difficult. In a recent report, 3D graphene sponge flexible sensors with great performance are prepared by the electrodeposition method, but the derived microcracks significantly influence the resistance variations when stretched [45]. In further research, the chemical plating method is applied in the preparation of 3D graphene sponge flexible sensors; compared with the electrode position method, there are no microcracks in the preparation process, making it suitable for good conductivity and uniform coating. Although chemical plating is appropriate for preparing flexible piezoresistive sensors, plating solutions and other experimental processes affect the sensitivity [46], requiring further exploration.
In this paper, the chemical plating method is applied for preparing high-sensitivity and flexible piezoresistive sensors based on the porous sponge, the experiment cost is low, and finite element analysis is employed to demonstrate the flexible piezoresistive sensors’ mechanism. The sensitivity is raised to 98.5% and the application of wearable gadgets is verified by flexible circuit.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Materials: Sponge (polyurethane, 5 mm thickness) was produced by Nanjing Saneduo Sponge (Nanjing, China); CuSO4 5H2O (99 wt%) and HCl (37.5 wt%) were purchased from Beijing Chemical Works (Beijing, China); NaKC4H4O6 (99 wt%), Na3PO4·12H2O (98 wt%), SDBS (90 wt%), and Na2CO3 (99.8 wt%) were from Tianjin Guangfu Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China); NaOH (96 wt%) was from Tianjin Beichen Founder Reagent Factory (Tianjin, China; NiCl2·6H2O (98 wt%) and SnCl2·2H2O (98 wt%) were from Tianjin Yongsheng Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China); HCHO (36 wt%) was from Liaoning Quan Rui Reagent Co., Ltd. (Liaoning, China); Op-10 emulsifier (99 wt%) was from Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China); and PdCl2 (99.9 wt%) was from Tianjin Chemical Reagent Third Factory (Tianjin, China).

2.2. Preparation Methods

A 5 mm thick low-density sponge was cut to 70 mm × 50 mm. There are no special requirements for the type and size of sponges. The types of sponges are common in the market. Other types of sponges are also operable. Sponge size is also important for the purpose of uniform specifications, and different sizes of sponges also have this feature. An electroless copper plating sponge composite mainly includes six steps: cleaning, sensitization, activation, reduction, plating, and post-treatment, as shown in Figure 1.
Cleaning
The purpose of the substrate and, consequently, the sponge cleaning is to ensure obtaining the ideal catalytic activity, mainly including alkaline and ultrasonic cleaning.
A. Alkaline cleaning. Ingredients of alkaline cleaning solution: 20–40 g/L NaOH, 20–30 g/L Na2CO3, 5–10 g/L Na3PO4·12H2O, and 1–3 g/L OP-10 emulsifier. Alkaline cleaning process: 10 min at 70 °C.
B. Ultrasonic cleaning. After alkaline cleaning, the sample is immersed in CH3COCH3 solution, followed by ultrasonic cleaning for 2 min with an ultrasonic instrument, and then immersed in deionized water for 1 min.
Sensitization
The purpose of the sensitization is to adsorb a layer of easily oxidized material inside and on the sponge’s surface as a reducing agent for catalytic metal ions during the subsequent activation treatment. The sensitizing solution comprises 20 g/L SnCl2·2H2O and 40 mL/L HCl. The sensitization process is carried out at room temperature for 6 min. During the sensitization process, the sponge must be pressed to ensure the sensitization liquid is fully in contact with the inner space support of the sponge. Finally, it is cleaned with a deionized water press for 30 s.
Activation
The purpose of activation is to generate a catalytic metal layer inside and outside of the sponge as a catalyst for the REDOX reaction during the following electroless plating. The activation solution comprises 1 g/L PdCl2 and 10 mL/L HCl. The activation process takes 6 min at room temperature and requires the sponge to be pressed to ensure that the activation fluid can make full contact with the inner space of the sponge. Finally, it is cleaned with a deionized water press for 30 s.
Reduction
The purpose of reduction is to improve the catalytic activity of the substrate’s surface, accelerate the deposition rate of the electroless copper plating solution, and prevent contamination of the electroless copper plating solution. The reducing solution comprises 10% HCHO. The reduction process involves stirring at room temperature for 3 min. During the reduction process, the sponge must be pressed to ensure the sensitization liquid is fully in contact with the inner space support of the sponge.
Plating
The purpose of plating is to reduce the metal ions in the electroless plating solution to their metal state and deposit them on the surface of the plated parts to form a copper film. The plating solution consists of 10 g/L CuSO4·5H2O, 40 g/L NaKC4H4O6, 8 g/L NaOH, 2 g/L Na2CO3, 1 g/L NiCl2·6H2O, 20 mL/L HCHO(36%), and 0.5 g/L SDBS. The plating process takes 30 s of being pressured in a 40 °C water bath box.
Post-processing
The purpose of post-treatment is to remove the residual liquid and means processing in a drying oven at 50 °C for 30 min after thoroughly cleaning with deionized water.

2.3. Testing Methods

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU3500, HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to observe the samples’ morphologies. The accelerating voltage of the SEM microscope was 15 kV, measuring the distance at 58 mm, and the magnification was 50.
An energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS, 550i, IXRF, Austin, TX, USA) was used to determine the samples’ elemental composition. The EDS’s accelerating voltage was 15 kV, with a take-off angle of 35.0°.
A universal testing machine (ZQ-990B, Dongguan Zhigu Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., Dongguan, Guangdong, China) and a digital multimeter (KEYSIGHT-34465A, KEYSIGHT Technologies, Springs, CO, USA) (as shown in Figure 2) were used to analyze the performance of the attained sensor. During the measurement, two pieces of copper foil were placed on the upper and lower surfaces of the sensor to act as conductors and the measuring surface (as shown in the inset of Figure 2). As the indenter moves up and down, it can better fit the surface of the sample, which is more accurate than the point measurement. Here, 0–100 N force was dynamically applied, with the pressure speed set as 1 mm/min. The press exerts a force of 0 N–100 N on the sponge during the compression process, gradually compressing and deforming the sponge and thinning the pores. When the loading force reaches 100 N, the compression process stops. Under the deformation state of the 100 N force applied by the press, it gradually decreases, and the sponge’s pores recover during the recovery process. When the pressing force on the sponge measures at zero N, the sponge recovers partial deformation before the cyclic compression. The press repeatedly applies a force of 0–100 N, taking 20 cycles as an example.

2.4. Finite Element Analysis

Finite element analysis was employed to analyze the performance improvement mechanism of the attained flexible sensor. The finite element software ANSYS (Version 2021, ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA, USA) was used to simulate the feasibility of the material as a flexible sensor. The sponge compression process was simplified as only one porous material and the press was simplified as an applied displacement. In the static analysis, the density of the sponge is 40 kg/m3, Poisson’s ratio is 0.38, and the modulus of elasticity is 0.9 Gpa; the material was assumed as a flexible body owing to its deformation under pressure. The porous material is meshed using 36,073 tetrahedral elements, determined through a convergence analysis by gradually increasing the mesh density until the deviations in the estimated stress reach <5%. In order to control the sponge’s deformation accurately, displacement was applied at the top of the material and fixed constraints were applied at the bottom. The finite element analysis was divided into two steps. At first, the flexible material was not deformed, followed by 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% deformations. Secondly, a 12 V voltage to the top of the undeformed and deformed material and a 0 V voltage at the bottom were applied, obtaining the resistance variation trends by averaging the current density at the bottom of the material.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Structural Analysis

In this study, electroless plating was used for the first time to attach the copper to the sponge’s surface and to its pores to functionalize the material. Many studies ignored the high possibility of nanoparticles separating from the matrix material and causing severe health problems to users when used as a wearable gadget for motion detection; therefore, this study used harmless copper as the conductive filler material of the sponge.
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of sponges with different plating times. Figure 3a shows the SEM images of sponges without copper plating. As can be seen from the sample cross section, the sponge has a network structure inside without any attachments. Figure 3b–g show samples with different plating times ranging from 1 to 10 min. It can be deduced that the sample’s surface changes and the sponge is covered with a layer of dense copper with folds evenly distributed. The copper film uniformly covers the surface and the sponge’s pores and forms a network. The sponge’s pores fill up with the increasing plating time and the copper film of the sample thickens, demonstrating that copper is successfully deposited on the sponge’s surface. The reduced copper is coated on the sponge during preparation and penetrates the interconnecting holes. The SEM images show the microstructure of the copper-coated sponge and the interconnecting pores covered by the copper.

3.2. Elemental Analysis

Based on the electroless plating method, the copper mass fraction in the sponge’s pores is controlled by the plating time in the study. Figure 4 shows the energy spectrum of sponge samples before and after plating. As shown, the elements in the sample without plating are mainly carbon and oxygen, with the carbon content being the largest. After plating, a tiny amount of palladium, tin, and a large amount of copper appeared, while the proportion of copper increased significantly to about 95%.

3.3. Mechanical Property Analysis

Sponge is a kind of material with a porous structure; it is insulated, soft, elastic, and does not easily undergo plastic deformation. Based on the above characteristics, the sponge is analyzed after copper plating. Figure 5 shows the deformation of the sponge-based sensor subjected to cyclic compression load, divided into two phases of compression and recovery. Figure 5a,b show the load and sponge’s deformation during the first hour of testing. The load is cycled with the test time changes. When the maximum peak value force (100 N) is applied, the deformation of the sponge is the largest, and it is the least when applying the minimum peak value (0 N). Increasing the test time brings the sponge deformation closer to stability at the tenth cycle (at minute 15). Figure 5c shows the stress–strain curve, demonstrating that the sponge can still be nearly restored to its initial state under many load cycles, thus indicating that the compressibility of a sponge-based material is a feasible flexible sensor.

3.4. Finite Element Analysis

As shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7, in the finite element model, the variation law of resistance can be obtained by measuring the current/current density at the same voltage. The voltage of the upper surface of the sample is set to 12 V, the voltage of the lower surface is set to 0 V, and the meshes are unchanged. The average current density is obtained by solving the model. The average current density of the undeformed sponge is 142,260 mA/mm2, the average current density of 5% deformation is 176,070 mA/mm2, the average current density of 10% deformation is 192,460 mA/mm2, the average current density of 15% deformation is 208,800 mA/mm2, the average current density of 20% deformation is 223,320 mA/mm2, and the average current density of 25% deformation is 230,590 mA/mm2. It can be seen that increasing the deformation increases the current density and decreases the resistance against a constant voltage. Among the prepared materials, the copper-coated sponge has relatively high conductivity. This is because of the fact that a large amount of deformation under compression will directly increase the effective cross-section area and decrease the length of the sponge pore unit, thus decreasing the electrical resistance, leading to the resistance variations according to different deformations. In addition, the deposition thickness of copper increases with the increasing plating time within the study (as shown in Figure 3), indicating the copper content deposited in sponge pore is improved. Under this condition, the electrical resistivity will decrease, and it can be inferred the copper-coated sponge has better conductivity. However, in this study, when the reaction time is too long, the prepared plating solution will be out of work at the temperature of the water bath, so this effect is not observed with a long plating time. Therefore, the copper-coated sponge has advantages to be selected as a flexible piezoresistive sensor material.

3.5. Sensor Performance Analysis

The process used in this study can produce sensors with different sensitivities. Therefore, it is necessary to characterize and compare their sensitivities by various methods to determine their performance, benefits, and potential applications. Through the electroless plating of copper on the surface of the sponge, it can conduct electricity. The copper-plated sponge is equivalent to a flexible sensor and shows good electrical conductivity. ∆R/R0 represents the sensitivity, where ∆R = Rn − R0, Rn represents the sensor’s resistance against a particular stimulus, and R0 represents its initial resistance.
Figure 8 shows the resistance distribution fitting curve of the sample sponge under one cyclic loading pressure. As demonstrated by the figure, the left half section of the horizontal axis is force unloading while the right half is force loading. It can be deduced from the results that the maximum value of the resistance fitting curve is when the pressure is equal to 0 N and the sponge porosity is at a maximum. The sponge’s minimum volume is achieved, the pressure is 100 N, and the sponge’s pores are completely closed, equivalent to a conductor with a constant resistance value. Under cyclic loading pressure, the resistance presents a periodic distribution.
As shown in Figure 9, within the plating time range of 1 to 10 min, the sensor’s conductivity increases with the increasing plating time. The sensor’s conductivity with a 10 min duration is the highest, with its resistance measured at 0.128 Ω under 0 N and 0.015 Ω under 100 N, respectively. In comparison, it is the lowest with a one-minute duration, with its resistance measured at 355,828 Ω at 0 N and 4369 Ω at 100 N. This difference is due to the increase in plating time, the actual coverage of the copper on the unit area of the sensor, and the decrease in the sensor’s equivalent resistance. If the plating time is infinite, theoretically, the copper will completely cover the sponge and fill every pore.
The piezoresistive sensitivities of sponges with different plating times were compared to determine the sensor with the best performance parameters. The results are shown in Figure 10. In this study, the sensor prepared within one minute of plating time shows the highest sensitivity, at around 99%, while the one prepared with 10 min of plating time has the lowest sensitivity, measured at around 88%. This is due to the porous sponge’s pores being filled with more conductive materials and becoming smaller with the increasing plating time. Therefore, the conductivity is enhanced and the sponge’s resistance to pressure is reduced. It is proven that the sensor’s sensitivity prepared by this process is tunable and has a potential application.
To evaluate the sensor’s performance further, they were compared to the same types of sensors developed in previous literature [47] (as shown in Table 1).
The comparison shows that the sensor developed in this study has higher sensitivity, more stability, and compression recovery properties, and the preparation process is more straightforward and with lower costs compared with others.

3.6. Sensor’s Application Analysis

Biocompatibility has to be considered when developing sensors that are usually attached to individuals’ skin and can cause health issues. In this study, copper is attached to the sponge’s pores’ walls. When used for human motion detection, the manufacturing process developed in the study would avoid the possibility that nanoparticles separate from the surface of the elastomer as a result of repeated circulation. It is safe for the user and suitable for commercial human motion detection products. In this study, copper was embedded into the sponge’s pores to significantly reduce the possibility of tearing during use. This advantage makes the sensors developed in this study suitable for wearing.
In order to visually characterize the sensor’s performance, LED lamps and a power supply were connected to form a series circuit. As shown in Figure 11, the LED lamp is lit when the switch is off, indicating the sensor’s good conductivity. The LED lamp’s brightness is significantly enhanced when pressure is applied to the sensor. Similarly, as shown in Figure 12, by increasing the bending angle, the fitting surface of different shapes is simulated and the LED lamp’s brightness is significantly enhanced. The sensor’s resistance gradually reducing with the compression load can explain this.
The sponge, with its porous structure prepared by electroless plating, has potential applications for monitoring a wide range of pressure stimuli in wearable, flexible electronic gadgets and other related fields.

4. Conclusions

Flexible pressure sensors constitute an important part of the applications of flexible electronic sensing systems and have been widely used in biomedical engineering, robotics, and other fields. In the study, a sponge-based flexible sensor with copper as its conductive material is prepared using electroless plating. The sponge’s resistance and sensitivity changes with different plating times are studied. We found that increasing the plating time decreases the resistance value, and sensitivity gradually decreases while the conductivity increases. In this study, the sensor prepared within one minute of plating time shows the highest sensitivity, at around 99%, while the one prepared with 10 min of plating time has the lowest sensitivity, measured at around 88%. Furthermore, the sensor’s applications were assessed, verifying the practicability of the developed preparation method for flexible sensors. This study brings forth new ideas, simplifies the preparation process, and reduces production expenses for flexible pressure sensors.
There are still limitations to this paper, which could be further investigated in future studies: (1) more materials with better conductivity should be considered as sensors’ conductive materials; (2) further improvement in the preparation method and process of the sensors is necessary to advance their overall performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Y. and Z.Q.; methodology, H.Y.; software, Y.L.; validation, H.Y., Z.Q., L.R. (Lei Ren) and L.R. (Luquan Ren); formal analysis, Z.Q.; investigation, H.Y.; resources, Z.Q.; data curation, H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Y.; writing—review and editing, H.Y.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, L.R. (Lei Ren); project administration, Z.Q.; funding acquisition, Z.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52175270, Zhihui Qian) and the Project of Scientific and Technological Development Plan of Jilin Province (No.20220508130RC, Zhihui Qian).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trung, T.-Q.; Lee, N.-E. Flexible and Stretchable Physical Sensor Integrated Platforms for Wearable Human-Activity Monitoring and Personal Healthcare. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4338–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mukundan, A.; Feng, S.-W.; Weng, Y.-H.; Tsao, Y.-M.; Artemkina, S.-B.; Fedorov, V.-E.; Lin, Y.-S.; Huang, Y.-C.; Wang, H.-C. Optical and Material Characteristics of MoS2/Cu2O Sensor for Detection of Lung Cancer Cell Types in Hydroplegia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hua, Q.-L.; Sun, J.-L.; Liu, H.-T.; Bao, R.-R.; Yu, R.-M.; Zhai, J.-Y.; Pan, C.-F.; Wang, Z.-L. Skin-inspired Highly Stretchable and Conformable Matrix Networks for Multifunctional Sensing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Laskowska, M.; Nowak, A.; Dulski, M.; Weigl, P.; Blochowicz, T.; Laskowski, L. Spherical Silica Functionalized by 2-Naphthalene Methanol Luminophores as a Phosphorescence Sensor. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Munteanu, I.-G.; Apetrei, C. Electrochemical Determination of Chlorogenic Acid in Nutraceuticals Using Voltammetric Sensors Based on Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode Modified with Graphene and Gold Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mannsfeld, S.; Tee, B.; Stoltenberg, R.; Chen, C.; Barman, S.; Muir, B.; Sokolov, A.; Reese, C.; Bao, Z.-N. Highly Sensitive Flexible Pressure Sensors with Microstructured Rubber Dielectric Layers. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Konishi, S.; Hirata, A. Flexible Temperature Sensor Integrated with Soft Pneumatic Microactuators for Functional Microfingers. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jeon, J.; Lee, H.-B.; Bao, Z. Flexible Wireless Temperature Sensors Based on Ni Microparticle-Filled Binary Polymer Composites. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 850–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Han, Z.-W.; Liu, L.-P.; Zhang, J.-Q.; Han, Q.-G.; Wang, K.-J.; Song, H.-L.; Wang, Z.; Jiao, Z.-B.; Niu, S.-C.; Ren, L.-Q. High-performance Flexible Strain Sensor with Bio-inspired Crack Arrays. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 15178–15186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, H.-Y.; Lan, C.-Y.; Zhou, Z.-F.; Sun, P.; Wei, D.; Li, C. Transparent, Flexible, and Stretchable WS2 Based Humidity Sensors for Electronic Skin. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 6246–6253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, L.; Wu, R.; Patil, A.; Zhu, S.; Meng, Z.; Meng, H.; Hou, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Yu, R.; et al. Full-Textile Wireless Flexible Humidity Sensor for Human Physiological Monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, Y.; Fan, X.-Y.; Chen, S.-C.; Zhao, N. Emerging Technologies of Flexible Pressure Sensors: Materials, Modeling, Devices, and Manufacturing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1808509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nela, L.; Tang, J.-S.; Cao, Q.; Tulevski, G.; Han, S.-J. Large-Area High-Performance Flexible Pressure Sensor with Carbon Nanotube Active Matrix for Electronic Skin. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 2054–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Melzer, M.; Makarov, D.; Calvimontes, A.; Karnaushenko, D.; Baunack, S.; Kaltofen, R.; Mei, Y.; Schmidt, O. Stretchable Magnetoelectronics. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2522–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chlenova, A.; Lepalovsky, V.; Vas’kovskiy, V.; Svalov, A.; Kurlyandskaya, G. Magnetoimpedance effect in multilayered permalloy structure with different magnetostriction: Small-pressure sensor. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1886, 020005. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, B.; Kavaldzhiev, M.; Kosel, J. Flexible Magnetoimpedance Sensor. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 378, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yao, S.; Zhu, Y. Nanomaterial-Enabled Stretchable Conductors: Strategies, Materials and Devices. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1480–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, S.-F.; Li, J.-H.; Cao, D.-X.; Zhang, G.-P.; Li, J.; Li, K.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Jin, Y.-F.; Sun, R.; et al. Recent Advancements in Flexible and Stretchable Electrodes for Electromechanical Sensors: Strategies, Materials, and Features. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12147–12164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Langley, D.; Giusti, G.; Mayousse, C.; Celle, C.; Bellet, D.; Simonato, J.-P. Flexible Transparent Conductive Materials Based on Silver Nanowire Networks: A Review. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 452001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Geim, A.-K. Graphene: Status and prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kim, K.S.; Zhao, Y.; Jang, H.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, K.S.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, P.; Choi, J.-Y.; Hong, B.H. Large-Scale Pattern Growth of Graphene Films for Stretchable Transparent Electrodes. Nature 2009, 457, 706–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sekitani, T.; Nakajima, H.; Maeda, H.; Fukushima, T.; Aida, T.; Hata, K.; Someya, T. Stretchable Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display Using Printable Elastic Conductors. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sekitani, T.; Noguchi, Y.; Hata, K.; Fukushima, T.; Aida, T.; Someya, T. A Rubberlike Stretchable Active Matrix Using Elastic Conductors. Science 2008, 321, 1468–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Han, T.; Wang, G. Peroxidase-like Activity of Acetylcholine-Based Colorimetric Detection of Acetylcholinesterase Activity and an Organophosphorus Inhibitor. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 2613–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, W.-P.; Li, J.-H.; Zhao, S.-F.; Han, F.; Zhang, G.-P.; Sun, R.; Wong, C.-P. Highly Electrically Conductive and Stretchable Copper Nanowires-Based Composite for Flexible and Printable Electronics. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 146, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, F.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y.-T.; Zhu, Y. Wavy Ribbons of Carbon Nanotubes for Stretchable Conductors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 1279–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, W.-L.; Wang, R.-R.; Lu, Y.-F.; Pei, Q.-B. An Elastomeric Transparent Composite Electrode Based on Copper Nanowires and Polyurethane. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 1298–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, P.; Ham, J.; Lee, J.; Hong, S.; Han, S.; Suh, Y.D.; Lee, S.E.; Yeo, J.; Lee, S.S.; Lee, D.; et al. Highly Stretchable or Transparent Conductor Fabrication by a Hierarchical Multiscale Hybrid Nanocomposite. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 5671–5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, L.-B.; Wei, Y.; Brochu, P.; Gruner, G.; Pei, Q.-B. Highly Stretchable, Conductive, and Transparent Nanotube Thin Films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 161108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, Y.; Xu, F. Buckling of Aligned Carbon Nanotubes as Stretchable Conductors: A New Manufacturing Strategy. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1073–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bowden, N.; Brittain, S.; Evans, A.-G.; Hutchinson, J.W.; Whitesides, G.-M. Spontaneous Formation of Ordered Structures in Thin Films of Metals Supported on an Elastomeric Polymer. Nature 1998, 393, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shang, Y.-Y.; He, X.-D.; Li, Y.-B.; Zhang, L.-H.; Li, Z.; Ji, C.-Y.; Shi, E.-Z.; Li, P.-X.; Zhu, K.; Peng, Q.-Y.; et al. Super-Stretchable Spring-Like Carbon Nanotube Ropes. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2896–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liang, H.-W.; Guan, Q.-F.; Zhu, Z.; Song, L.-T.; Yao, H.-B.; Lei, X.; Yu, S.-Y. Highly Conductive and Stretchable Conductors Fabricated from Bacterial Cellulose. NPG Asia. Mater. 2012, 4, e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Chen, Z.-P.; Ren, W.-C.; Gao, L.-B.; Liu, B.-L.; Pei, S.-F.; Cheng, H.-M. Three-Dimensional Flexible and Conductive Interconnected Graphene Networks Grown by Chemical Vapour Deposition. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yu, C.-J.; Masampu, C.; Rong, J.; Wei, B.-Q.; Jiang, H. Stretchable Supercapacitors Based on Buckled Single-Walled Carbon-Nanotube Macrofilms. Adv. Mater. 2010, 21, 4793–4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wu, C.; Fang, L.-J.; Huang, X.-Y.; Jiang, P.-K. Three-Dimensional Highly Conductive Graphene–Silver Nanowire Hybrid Foams for Flexible and Stretchable Conductors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014, 6, 21026–21034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wu, H.; Hu, L.; Rowell, M.W.; Kong, D.; Cha, J.J.; McDonough, J.R.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Y.; McGehee, M.D.; Cui, Y. Electrospun Metal Nanofiber Webs as High-Performance Transparent Electrode. Nano. Lett. 2010, 10, 4242–4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, Y.; Sheehan, C.-J.; Zhai, J.; Zou, G.; Luo, H.; Xiong, J.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, Q. Polymer-Embedded Carbon Nanotube Ribbons for Stretchable Conductors. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3027–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, C. Three-Dimensional Porous Stretchable and Conductive Polymer Composites Based on Graphene Network Grown by Chemical Vapour Deposition and PEDOT: PSS Coating. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3169–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, Y.; Zeng, J.-F.; Chen, C.-J.; Xie, Z.; Guo, R.-S.; Liu, Z.-L.; Zhou, X.-C.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, Z.-J. Composite Materials: Three-Dimensional Compressible and Stretchable Conductive Composites. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Park, J.; Wang, S.; Li, M.; Ahn, C.-G.; Hyun, J.-K.; Dong, S.-K.; Kim, D.-K.; Rogers, J.-A.; Huang, Y.-G.; Jeon, S.-K. Three-Dimensional Nanonetworks for Giant Stretchability in Dielectrics and Conductors. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Chen, M.-T.; Zhang, L.; Duan, S.-S.; Jing, S.-L.; Jiang, H.; Li, C.-Z. Highly Stretchable Conductors Integrated with a Conductive Carbon Nanotube/Graphene Network and 3D Porous Poly(dimethylsiloxane). Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 24, 7548–7556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wei, W.; Yang, S.; Zhou, H.; Lieberwirth, I.; Feng, X.-L.; Müllen, K. 3D Graphene Foams Cross-Linked with Pre-Encapsulated Fe3O4 Nanospheres for Enhanced Lithium Storage. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2909–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, Y.-X.; Sheng, K.-X.; Li, C.; Shi, G.-Q. Self-Assembled Graphene Hydrogel via a One-Step Hydrothermal Process. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4324–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fei, H.; Li, J.-H.; Zhao, S.-F.; Yuan, Z.; Huang, W.-P.; Zhang, G.-P.; Rong, S.; Wong, C.-P. A Crack-based Nickel@Graphene Wrapped Polyurethane Sponge Ternary Hybrid Obtained by Electrodeposition for Highly Sensitive Wearable Strain Sensors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 10167–10175. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fei, H.; Su, X.-Y.; Huang, M.-Q.; Li, J.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Liu, F.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, G.; et al. Fabrication of a Flexible and Stretchable Three-Dimensional Conductor Based on Au–Ni@Graphene Coated Polyurethane Sponge by Electroless Plating. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 8135–8143. [Google Scholar]
  47. Herren, B.; Webster, V.; Davidson, E.; Saha, M.-C.; Altan, M.-C.; Liu, Y. PDMS Sponges with Embedded Carbon Nanotubes as Piezoresistive Sensors for Human Motion Detection. Nano Mater. 2021, 11, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the flexible piezoresistive sensor preparation process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the flexible piezoresistive sensor preparation process.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g001
Figure 2. Sensor performance test system ((left): press, (right): multimeter, (inset): resistance measuring point).
Figure 2. Sensor performance test system ((left): press, (right): multimeter, (inset): resistance measuring point).
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy images of samples with different plating times: (a) unplated, (b) 1 min, (c) 1.5 min, (d) 2 min, (e) 4 min, (f) 8 min, and (g) 10 min.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy images of samples with different plating times: (a) unplated, (b) 1 min, (c) 1.5 min, (d) 2 min, (e) 4 min, (f) 8 min, and (g) 10 min.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g003
Figure 4. (a) The SEM and (b) energy spectrum of the sample before copper plating; (c) the SEM and (d) energy spectrum of the sample after copper plating.
Figure 4. (a) The SEM and (b) energy spectrum of the sample before copper plating; (c) the SEM and (d) energy spectrum of the sample after copper plating.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g004
Figure 5. (a) Cyclic force curve applied by the press, (b) cyclic compression deformation curve of the sample, and (c) the stress–strain curve of the sample.
Figure 5. (a) Cyclic force curve applied by the press, (b) cyclic compression deformation curve of the sample, and (c) the stress–strain curve of the sample.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g005
Figure 6. Deformation of sponge with different displacement constraints: (a) no deformation, (b) 5%, (c) 10%, (d) 15%, (e) 20%, and (f) 25%.
Figure 6. Deformation of sponge with different displacement constraints: (a) no deformation, (b) 5%, (c) 10%, (d) 15%, (e) 20%, and (f) 25%.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g006
Figure 7. Current density of sponges with different deformations: (a) no deformation, (b) 5%, (c) 10%, (d) 15%, (e) 20%, and (f) 25%.
Figure 7. Current density of sponges with different deformations: (a) no deformation, (b) 5%, (c) 10%, (d) 15%, (e) 20%, and (f) 25%.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g007
Figure 8. Resistance distribution fitting curve of the sample sponge under one cyclic loading pressure.
Figure 8. Resistance distribution fitting curve of the sample sponge under one cyclic loading pressure.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g008
Figure 9. The resistance of sponge with different plating times: (a) before compression and (b) after compression.
Figure 9. The resistance of sponge with different plating times: (a) before compression and (b) after compression.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g009
Figure 10. Sponge sensitivity at different plating times.
Figure 10. Sponge sensitivity at different plating times.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g010
Figure 11. Flexible switch applications: (a) unpressed, (b) partly pressed, and (c) completely pressed.
Figure 11. Flexible switch applications: (a) unpressed, (b) partly pressed, and (c) completely pressed.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g011
Figure 12. Flexible switch applications: (a) 180°, (b) 150°, (c) 120°, and (d) 90°.
Figure 12. Flexible switch applications: (a) 180°, (b) 150°, (c) 120°, and (d) 90°.
Nanomaterials 12 03833 g012
Table 1. Comparisons of the sensors’ performance.
Table 1. Comparisons of the sensors’ performance.
Materials Maximum Compression DeformationCarbon Nano Tube (CNT) CapacityCarbohydrate ContentMax ∆R/R0 (%)
Sponge50.0%1.5–3.0%70.0%<90.0%
Sponge50.0%3.0%70.0–85.0%<90.0%
Sponge (this paper)85.0%0%0%98.8%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, H.; Li, Y.; Qian, Z.; Ren, L.; Ren, L. A Piezoresistive Sensor with High Sensitivity and Flexibility Based on Porous Sponge. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3833. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213833

AMA Style

Yuan H, Li Y, Qian Z, Ren L, Ren L. A Piezoresistive Sensor with High Sensitivity and Flexibility Based on Porous Sponge. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(21):3833. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213833

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Hengyi, Yi Li, Zhihui Qian, Lei Ren, and Luquan Ren. 2022. "A Piezoresistive Sensor with High Sensitivity and Flexibility Based on Porous Sponge" Nanomaterials 12, no. 21: 3833. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213833

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop