Next Article in Journal
Formation of Nano- and Micro-Scale Surface Features Induced by Long-Range Femtosecond Filament Laser Ablation
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Progress in Flexible Pressure Sensor Arrays
Previous Article in Special Issue
PLGA Nanoparticles Grafted with Hyaluronic Acid to Improve Site-Specificity and Drug Dose Delivery in Osteoarthritis Nanotherapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Advanced Nanomaterials for Bioimaging”

Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Taegu 41566, Korea
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(14), 2496; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142496
Submission received: 13 July 2022 / Accepted: 19 July 2022 / Published: 20 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomaterials for Bioimaging)
Bioimaging currently plays a critical role in medical diagnosis [1,2,3]. Various imaging modalities are available for this purpose, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray computed tomography (CT), ultrasound imaging, fluorescence imaging (FI), positron emission tomography (PET), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Molecular imaging agents are a requisite for FI [4,5], PET [6], and SPECT [6], but they are also commonly used for MRI [7] and CT [8] in order to improve imaging sensitivity and resolution. Currently, most commercial imaging agents are molecular agents [6,7,8]. However, nanomaterials such as nanoparticles, nanorods, core-shell nanoparticles, and hybrid nanoparticles have been extensively investigated as imaging agents owing to their unique and advanced properties [9,10], which are highly advantageous for disease diagnosis and treatment [11,12].
This Special Issue focuses on various nanomaterials that are useful for imaging, drug delivery, and therapy. Nanoparticles possess several advantages over small molecules: they have advanced imaging properties, easy surface functionalization for tumor-targeted drug delivery, and longer blood circulation times. Nanoparticles also have higher metal ion concentrations than small molecules at the same number density, a property that makes them highly favorable CT contrast agents [13,14,15,16]. Gadolinium-containing nanoparticles exhibit higher longitudinal water proton spin relaxivities (r1) than Gd(III)-chelates do, and hence are useful high-performance T1 MRI contrast agents [10,11,13,14]. Fatima et al. reviewed recent advances in gadolinium-based contrast agents for bioimaging [17]. Gadolinium-based nanoparticles are useful as T1 MRI contrast agents because of the high and pure spin of Gd3+ (s = 7/2) and the high density of Gd3+ per nanoparticle; these lead to high r1 values, as well as r2/r1 ratios close to 1 (where r2 is the transverse water proton spin relaxivity). In addition, owing to the strong X-ray attenuation property of gadolinium, these nanoparticles are useful as CT contrast agents [13,14,15]. Dual T1 MRI-FI is also possible, by doping fluorescent europium or terbium metal ions into or conjugating dyes with gadolinium-based nanoparticles [17]. Holmium- and terbium-containing nanoparticles can be used as T2 MRI contrast agents owing to their appreciable magnetic moments at room temperature, a behavior that arises from the 4f-electron spin-orbital motions of these elements. Liu et al. prepared polyethylenimine (Mn = 1200 amu)-coated ultrasmall holmium oxide nanoparticles (average particle diameter: 2.05 nm) and measured their cytotoxicity and water proton spin relaxivities [18]. Notably, the nanoparticles exhibited an r2 value of 13.1 s−1 mM−1 with a negligible r1 value of 0.1 s−1 mM−1, which results in very large r2/r1 ratios and makes them efficient T2 MRI contrast agents. These nanoparticles exclusively induce T2 relaxations, with negligible induction of T1 relaxations, and can thus act as efficient T2 MRI contrast agents. Shanti et al. proved this phenomenon in vivo by successfully administering polyacrylic acid-coated terbium(III) and holmium(III) oxide nanoparticles to mice in 3.0 and 9.4 T MR fields [19]. They observed appreciable T2 contrasts in the livers and kidneys of the mice after injection, with enhanced T2 contrasts at 9.4 T.
FI is a highly sensitive bioimaging modality that is useful for cell imaging and skin-deep in vivo imaging due to its low penetration depth (<1 cm) [2,3]. Compared with organic dyes and quantum dots [4,5], terbium- and europium-containing nanomaterials possess larger Stokes shifts and show less background noise in biological samples; thus, they are extremely useful for disease detection at very low concentrations. Gómez-Morales and coworkers synthesized luminescent citrate-functionalized terbium-substituted carbonated apatite nanomaterials and applied them to cellular uptake imaging [20]. The luminescence properties of these nanoparticles allowed visualization of their intracellular cytoplasmic uptake after 12 h of treatment through flow cytometry and fluorescence confocal microscopy (green fluorescence was observed) when incubated with A375 cells.
Nanomaterials that combine imaging and therapy can be utilized in cancer theranostics. Such nanomaterials can be prepared by using nanoparticles with both imaging and therapeutic properties (such as gadolinium-containing nanomaterials [21]), or by synthesizing hybrid nanomaterials. Tian et al. prepared multifunctional magnetoplasmonic Au-MnO hybrid nanocomposites for cancer theranostics. MnO exhibited promising contrast enhancement in T1 MR imaging with good relaxivity (r1 = 1.2 mM−1 s−1), and Au produced sufficient heat (62 °C at 200 µg/mL) to ablate cancerous cells upon 808 nm laser irradiation (photothermal therapy), inducing cell toxicity and apoptosis [22].
Soft polymer nanomaterials are ideal drug delivery vehicles. They can also carry imaging materials to diagnose diseases. Zerrillo et al. synthesized poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles and grafted them with hyaluronic acid (HA), which can bind to specific receptors in various cells, in order to improve site specificity and drug dose delivery in osteoarthritis nanotherapy [23]. They further encapsulated the nanoparticles with a near-infrared (NIR) dye and gold (20 nm). With the NIR dye and gold acting as contrast agents, the encapsulated HA-PLGA nanoparticles were successfully visualized on micro-CT by optical imaging in vivo in mouse knees and ex vivo in human cartilage explants.
This Special Issue covers a broad spectrum of nanomaterials that can be used for bioimaging. Surface modification of nanomaterials with hydrophilic ligands is essential for bioimaging applications, while further functionalization of surface-modified nanomaterials with drugs and cancer-targeting ligands will make them invaluable cancer-targeting theranostic agents.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (No. 2016R1D1A3B01007622) and the Korean government (Ministry of Science, and Information and Communications Technology: MSIT) (No. 2021R1A4A1029433).

Data Availability Statement

Data might be available from the authors of the cited papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weissleder, R.; Mahmood, U. Molecular imaging. Radiology 2001, 219, 316–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Massoud, T.F.; Gambhir, S.S. Molecular imaging in living subjects: Seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 545–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Paeng, J.C.; Lee, D.S. Multimodal molecular imaging in vivo. Open Nucl. Med. J. 2010, 2, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kovar, J.L.; Simpson, M.A.; Schutz–Geschwender, A.; Olive, D.M. A systematic approach to the development of fluorescent contrast agents for optical imaging of mouse cancer models. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 367, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Michalet, X.; Pinaud, F.F.; Bentolila, L.A.; Tsay, J.M.; Doose, S.; Li, J.J.; Sundaresan, G.; Wu, A.M.; Gambhir, S.S.; Weiss, S. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 2005, 307, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Wadas, T.J.; Wong, E.H.; Weisman, G.R.; Anderson, C.J. Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2858–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wahsner, J.; Gale, E.M.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A.; Caravan, P. Chemistry of MRI contrast agents: Current challenges and new frontiers. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 957–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, S.-B.; Watson, A.D. Metal-based X-ray contrast media. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2353–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thakor, A.S.; Jokerst, J.V.; Ghanouni, P.; Campbell, J.L.; Mittra, E.; Gambhir, S.S. Clinically approved nanoparticle imaging agents. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 1833–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Xu, W.; Kattel, K.; Park, J.Y.; Chang, Y.; Kim, T.J.; Lee, G.H. Paramagnetic nanoparticle T1 and T2 MRI contrast agents. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 12687–12700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahmad, M.Y.; Yue, H.; Tegafaw, T.; Liu, S.; Ho, S.L.; Lee, G.H.; Nam, S.-W.; Chang, Y. Functionalized lanthanide oxide nanoparticles for tumor targeting, medical imaging, and therapy. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Das, S.; Mitra, S.; Paul Khurana, S.M.; Debnath, N. Nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Front. Life Sci. 2013, 7, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahmad, M.W.; Xu, W.; Kim, S.J.; Baeck, J.S.; Chang, Y.; Bae, J.E.; Chae, K.S.; Park, J.A.; Kim, T.J.; Lee, G.H. Potential dual imaging nanoparticle: Gd2O3 nanoparticle. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lee, E.J.; Heo, W.C.; Park, J.W.; Chang, Y.; Bae, J.-E.; Chae, K.S.; Kim, T.J.; Park, J.A.; Lee, G.H. D-Glucuronic Acid Coated Gd(IO3)3·2H2O Nanomaterial as a Potential T1 MRI-CT Dual Contrast Agent. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 2013, 2858–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghazanfari, A.; Marasini, S.; Miao, X.; Park, J.A.; Jung, K.-H.; Ahmad, M.Y.; Yue, H.; Ho, S.L.; Liu, S.; Jang, Y.J.; et al. Synthesis, characterization, and X-ray attenuation properties of polyacrylic acid-coated ultrasmall heavy metal oxide (Bi2O3, Yb2O3, NaTaO3, Dy2O3, and Gd2O3) nanoparticles as potential CT contrast agents. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 576, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hainfeld, J.F.; Slatkin, D.N.; Focella, T.M.; Smilowitz, H.M. Gold nanoparticles: A new X-ray contrast agent. Br. J. Radiol. 2006, 79, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fatima, A.; Ahmad, M.W.; Saidi, A.K.A.A.; Choudhury, A.; Chang, Y.; Lee, G.H. Recent advanced in gadolinium-based contrast agents for bioimaging applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, S.; Yue, H.; Ho, S.L.; Kim, S.; Park, J.A.; Tegafaw, T.; Ahmad, M.Y.; Kim, S.; Saidi, A.K.A.A.; Zhao, D.; et al. Polyethylenimine-coated ultrasmall holmium oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, cytotoxicities, and water proton spin relaxivities. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marasini, S.; Yue, H.; Ho, S.L.; Park, J.A.; Kim, S.; Jung, K.-H.; Cha, H.; Liu, S.; Tegafaw, T.; Ahmad, M.Y.; et al. Synthesis, characterizations, and 9.4 tesla T2 MR images of polyacrylic acid-coated terbium(III) and holmium(III) oxide nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gómez-Morales, J.; Fernández-Penas, R.; Acebedo-Martínez, F.J.; Romero-Castillo, I.; Verdugo-Escamilla, C.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Esposti, L.D.; Jiménez-Martínez, Y.; Fernández-Sánchez, J.F.; Iafisco, M.; et al. Luminescent citrate-functionalized terbium-substituted carbonated apatite nanomaterials: Structural aspects, sensitized luminescence, cytocompatibility, and cell uptake imaging. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ho, S.L.; Yue, H.; Tegafaw, T.; Ahmad, M.Y.; Liu, S.; Nam, S.-W.; Chang, Y.; Lee, G.H. Gadolinium neutron capture therapy (GdNCT) agents from molecular to nano: Current status and perspectives. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 2533–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tian, C.; Tang, Z.; Hou, Y.; Mushtaq, A.; Naz, S.; Yu, Z.; Farheen, J.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Kong, X. Facile synthesis of multifunctional magnetoplasmonic Au-MnO hybrid nanocomposites for cancer theranostics. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zerrillo, L.; Gigliobianco, M.R.; D’Atri, D.; Garcia, J.P.; Baldazzi, F.; Ridwan, Y.; Fuentes, G.; Chan, A.; Creemers, L.B.; Censi, R.; et al. PLGA nanoparticles grafted with hyaluronic acid to improve site-specificity and drug dose delivery in osteoarthritis nanotherapy. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, G.H. Special Issue “Advanced Nanomaterials for Bioimaging”. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142496

AMA Style

Lee GH. Special Issue “Advanced Nanomaterials for Bioimaging”. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(14):2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142496

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Gang Ho. 2022. "Special Issue “Advanced Nanomaterials for Bioimaging”" Nanomaterials 12, no. 14: 2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142496

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop