Next Article in Journal
Impact of Helium Ion Implantation Dose and Annealing on Dense Near-Surface Layers of NV Centers
Previous Article in Journal
Improving the Insulating Capacity of Polyurethane Foams through Polyurethane Aerogel Inclusion: From Insulation to Superinsulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reset First Resistive Switching in Ni1−xO Thin Films as Charge Transfer Insulator Deposited by Reactive RF Magnetron Sputtering

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
2
Lam Research, Daesan-ro 288, Icheon-si 17336, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(13), 2231; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132231
Submission received: 4 June 2022 / Revised: 25 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nanoelectronics, Nanosensors and Devices)

Abstract

:
Reset-first resistive random access memory (RRAM) devices were demonstrated for off-stoichiometric Ni1−xO thin films deposited using reactive sputtering with a high oxygen partial pressure. The Ni1−xO based RRAM devices exhibited both unipolar and bipolar resistive switching characteristics without an electroforming step. Auger electron spectroscopy showed nickel deficiency in the Ni1−xO films, and X-ray photoemission spectroscopy showed that the Ni3+ valence state in the Ni1−xO films increased with increasing oxygen partial pressure. Conductive atomic force microscopy showed that the conductivity of the Ni1−xO films increased with increasing oxygen partial pressure during deposition, possibly contributing to the reset-first switching of the Ni1−xO films.

1. Introduction

Resistive random access memory (RRAM) [1] has been widely studied as a candidate for next-generation non-volatile memory to overcome the limitations of conventional memories, such as flash memory and dynamic random access memory (DRAM). RRAM has a relatively low operation voltage with excellent program and erase speed [2]. In addition, the device could be fabricated in a simple metal–insulator–metal (MIM) [3] structure, enabling the high-density cell structure of a cross-bar array with 4F2 [4,5]. It was reported that numerous transition metal oxides, including Al2O3 [6,7], HfO2 [8,9,10], NiOx [11,12,13,14], TiOx [15,16], TaOx [17,18], Nb2O5 [19,20], and Pr1−xCaxMnO3 [21,22,23] show resistive switching (RS) characteristics. Moreover, various deposition techniques, such as sputtering [24,25,26,27,28], atomic layer deposition (ALD) [29] and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [30] were used for the formation of such oxides. Notably, nickel oxide (NiO) film is one of the most widely studied oxides and is reported to have low operation power, a high on/off resistance ratio and is compatible with the CMOS fabrication process [31,32]. NiO has a rock salt structure composed of Ni2+ and O2− and is a member of the strongly correlated 3d transition metal oxides that exhibit charge-transfer insulator behavior [33,34]. It is an insulating oxide with a wide bandgap (Eg ≈ 4.3 eV) due to the charge transfer gap caused by “Hubbard U” between the 2p and 3d states [34,35]. Therefore, the pristine state of NiO is typically the insulating state in RRAM [36,37]. The RS phenomenon in NiO has been mainly described as the formation and rupture of conductive filaments. This reversible resistance transition between the high-resistance state (HRS) and low-resistance state (LRS) is caused by applying electrical stress after an “electroforming” step [38]. It was suggested that oxygen atoms are migrated by the electric field, leaving oxygen vacancies (Vo2+) at the vacated sites during the electroforming step; the adjacent Ni2+ atoms are changed to Ni0 to compensate for the charge state, resulting in a Ni filament [39,40,41]. The electroforming process degrades the chemical and physical properties of devices of MIM structure, affecting their reliability. The characteristics of RS uniformity also deteriorate because of non-uniform filament formation among MIM devices [42]. Moreover, electroforming requires additional high-voltage circuits, significantly reducing the device density. Therefore, research on devices that can be operated without an electroforming step is essential for realizing RS memories [43,44,45].
This study investigated the RS characteristics of off-stoichiometric Ni1−xO films for unipolar and bipolar RSs (URS and BRS, respectively). Particularly, it was demonstrated that nickel-deficient Ni1−xO films deposited under excessive oxygen partial pressure exhibit a reset-first RS without an electroforming step. An RRAM device with a reset-first RS could be an alternative to overcome the limitations of RRAM requiring an electro-forming step.

2. Experimental

MIM devices with Pt/NiO/Pt and Pt/NiO/TiN stacks were fabricated for electrical characterization. First, Ti/TiN adhesive layers with thicknesses of 10–50 nm were deposited onto SiO2 on a Si substrate using DC magnetron sputtering. Pt or TiN films were then deposited as bottom electrodes (BE). BE with various areas of 0.18~4.0 µm2 were formed to investigate the area-dependence of the electrical characteristics. After BE formation, off-stoichiometric Ni1−xO films with a thickness of 10 nm were deposited via reactive RF magnetron sputtering using a Ni target under various O2 partial pressures. During sputtering, the base and working pressures were less than 3 × 10−3 and 3 mTorr, respectively. During deposition, the RF power and temperature of the substrate were main-tained at 100 W and 400 °C, respectively. The fraction of the O2 partial pressure in the mixture of Ar and O2 varied from 10% to 50% for deposition. Finally, Pt top electrodes (TEs) with a thickness of 100 nm were formed using DC magnetron sputtering and a lift-off process. The electrical characteristics of the device were characterized using a Keysight B1500A analyzer at 21~23 °C. RS under DC bias was measured with a com-pliance current of 10 mA to avoid hard breakdown of the Ni1-xO films. The spatial distribution of conductivity in the pristine state was investigated using conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) (Park Systems, XE-100) with a measurement bias of 3 V [46,47]. Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD, Rigaku SmartLab), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES, PHI-700, ULVAC-PHI), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-alpha, Thermo U. K.) analyses were conducted to investigate the crystallinity, composition, and valence states of Ni in the Ni1−xO films, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

XRD analysis was conducted to investigate the crystallinity of Ni1−xO films. The XRD patterns of Ni1−xO films deposited under various O2 fractions are illustrated in Figure 1a. The peaks of NiO (111), NiO (200), NiO (220), and NiO (311) imply a polycrystalline structure [48]. NiO films, deposited with an O2 partial pressure fraction of 50% showed lower intensity with a more comprehensive full-width half maximum (FWHM), implying poorer crystallinity of NiO films. The XRD peak of the (111) plane shifted to lower diffraction with increasing O2 partial pressure, indicating an increase in the lattice constant with increasing O2 partial pressure, as shown in Figure 1b. The increase in the lattice constant could be ascribed to the increased strain effect as Ni vacancies increase with excessive O2 partial pressure [48,49,50]. Figure 1c shows the composition of Ni and O, estimated from AES analysis of the Ni1−xO films with various O2 partial pressures during deposition. The volume of Ni is gradually reduced with increasing O2 partial pressure, resulting in a Ni-deficient Ni1−xO film. The compositions of nickel oxide at 10% and 50% O2 partial pressures were estimated to be Ni0.89O and Ni0.86O, respectively.
Figure 2a shows the typical behavior of Pt/Ni1−xO/Pt stacks. The pristine Ni1−xO films deposited under an O2 partial pressure fraction of 10% offered an initial high resistivity [51] at an applied voltage of 1.77 V (1.4 MV/cm) on the TE. The film resistance changed from HRS to LRS during the forming step. The resistance state was changed back to HRS at 0.64 V (0.5 MV/cm) during the subsequent bias application, exhibiting reversible switching for the positive bias on TE. The difference between the forming voltage (Vform) and set voltage (Vset) was approximately 0.57 V. In contrast, pristine Ni1−xO films deposited under the 30% or 50% O2 ratio showed low resistance in the pristine state without the electroforming step and reset-first RS behavior, where the initial LRS state was changed to the HRS state, as shown in Figure 2b,c. While Vset is similar to that of Ni1−xO films for the O2 partial pressure fraction of 10%, the IHRS/ILRS ratio decreased because of the overall high current level in the HRS state. In particular, the IHRS between these oxygen partial pressure fractions showed that the 50% O2 ratio was 10 times higher than that of 30% O2. The I-V curves of TiN/Ni1−xO/Pt stacks are plotted in Figure 2d–f. The Ni1−xO film deposited under a 10% O2 partial pressure fraction show BRS [52] characteristics, as shown in Figure 2d. The pristine Ni1−xO film showed high resistivity, and the resistance state changed to LRS after the electroforming step with a negative bias on TE. The difference between Vform (−4.0 V) and Vset (−0.7 V) was approximately 3.3 V. On the contrary, the Ni1−xO film deposited under the 30% or 50% O2 partial pressure fraction showed reset-first BRS behavior for a positive voltage on the TE, as shown in Figure 2e,f.
Figure 3 shows the electric currents at 0.64 V of the Pt/Ni1−xO/TiN stacks in the LRS and HRS states, where Ni1−xO films were deposited at various O2 partial pressures. The mean values of IHRS and ILRS (red line) increased with the O2 ratio, suggesting that the Ni1−xO film conductivity depends on the O2 partial pressure, as shown in Figure 3a. The Ni1−xO films with a 10% O2 fraction required electroforming for resistive switching, but the Ni1−xO films with a 30% O2 fraction or higher showed reset-first RS behavior without electroforming. Figure 3b shows the electrical currents at 0.64 V in the LRS states, which has a similar tendency to the IHRS with O2 partial pressure, but the slope was lower than that of the IHRS state. The IHRS and ILRS showed the highest values for Ni1−xO films deposited under the 50% O2 partial pressure fraction.
To understand the nature of resistance switching, HRS and LRS resistances were measured from devices with BE of 0.18, 0.38, 2.00, and 3.69 μm2 at a bias of ±0.48 V. Figure 4a shows the area dependent resistance for BRS device with Ni1−xO films deposited by 10% O2 partial pressure fraction. The resistance of the HRS remained almost constant with decreasing geometric device area, while that of the LRS is almost independent of the device area. These area-independent characteristics imply that resistance switching through the device occurs in local regions, such as filament paths, rather than homogeneously distributed switching paths [53,54,55,56,57]. Meanwhile, the resistances of reset-first RS devices with Ni1−xO films deposited at 50% O2 partial pressure showed increased dependence on the device area, as shown in Figure 4b. Because the area dependence of the LRS for Ni1−xO films with 50% O2 partial pressure is close to that of Ni1−xO films with 10% O2 partial pressure, the nature of the RS is filamentary in the local area. The significant dependence of HRS on the Ni1−xO films with 50% O2 partial pressure is attributed to the reduced resistance of the Ni1−xO films, as shown in Figure 4b.
The DC, and AC endurance characteristics of the Ni1−xO device are shown in Figure S1. DC endurance in Figure S1a was measured at a read voltage (Vread) of ±0.25 V under a compliance current of 10 mA. The measured IHRS/ILRS ratio is higher than 101 even after 103 cycles. Figure S1b shows the AC endurance under pulse, which is measured with a set pulse of −0.95 V with 180 ns, a reset pulse of 1.2 V with 180 ns, and a Vread of 0.3 V conditions. The device has a uniform IHRS/ILRS ratio even after 105 cycles, which results in a stable RS property.
C-AFM measurements investigated the two-dimensional (2D) variation of the Ni1−xO film conductivity. Figure 5a illustrates the scheme of the C-AFM measurement. NiO/Pt and NiO/SiO2/Pt stacks were simultaneously formed on a sample to compare the differences during the current image mapping. Cross-sectional TEM images of the Ni1−xO films for C-AFM measurements are shown in Figure 5b. The sample-to-sample variation in the Ni1−xO thickness on the SiO2/Pt stacks was estimated to be within 15%. Therefore, we ignore the difference in conductivity due to thickness variation. Figure 5c–e show the current mapping images at a bias of 3 V from Ni1−xO films deposited under various O2 partial pressures. The left region of each mapping image represents the reference of the insulating SiO2 between the BEs and Ni1−xO films. The regions on the right represent the Ni1−xO films on the Pt BEs in their pristine state. Similar to the I-V characteristics of MIM devices, C-AFM showed an increased current through the Ni1−xO films with increasing O2 partial pressure. The conductive regions in the Ni1−xO film regions increased with increasing O2 partial pressure fraction, as shown in Figure 5d,e. In particular, the current distribution is relatively uniform in Ni1−xO film with a 50% O2 fraction. In contrast, films deposited under 10% O2 partial pressure fraction showed improved resistivity, as shown in Figure 5c.
The effect of the O2 partial pressure on the chemical bonding states in the Ni1−xO films is investigated through XPS analysis. Figure 6a–c show the Ni 2p3/2 peaks of Ni1−xO films deposited with various O2 partial pressures. Ni0, Ni2+ and Ni3+ states with binding energies of 852.5, 853.7, and 855.5 eV, respectively, are used for deconvolution of Ni 2p3/2 peaks [58,59].
The proportion of the Ni3+ state was estimated from the ratio of the Ni3+ peak area to the Ni2+ peak area. The Ni3+ valence state increased while the fraction of Ni2+ ions decreased with increasing O2 partial pressure (Figure 6a–c). The Ni3+ ratio in the film grown under 10% and 50% O2 partial pressure was estimated at 14.0% and 23.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, the Ni0 state at the 852.5 eV peak was not observed in our Ni 2p2/3 peak analysis, although it was considered a conductive path in previous studies [39,40,41]. Conventionally, Ni vacancies form in Ni-deficient NiO films with relatively excessive oxygen. It was reported that nickel deficiency could promote the further oxidation of Ni2+ ions, which can be expressed with Kröger–Vink notation, as follows [48,49]:
2 N i N i x + 1 2 O 2 ( g )     2 N i N i + O o x + V N i ,
where N i N i x , N i N i , O o x , V N i represent Ni2+, Ni3+, O2−, and ionized Ni vacancies, respectively. Ni2+ ions react with oxygen to generate ionized nickel vacancies and two Ni3+ ions, which affect the conductivity of the nickel oxide films. Therefore, it is shown that the increase in Ni3+ in Ni1−xO films is related to the increase in the current in the HRS state of MIM devices and C-AFM. It is expected that Ni deficiency in Ni1−xO films grown under high O2 partial pressure causes a high Ni3+ concentration, leading to a highly conductive state and possibly the reset-first RS behavior with reinforced localized conductive paths [39,60,61]. Further investigation is required to understand how excess Ni3+ ions produce the reset-first resistive switching behavior in Ni1−xO films.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the reset-first RS characteristics of off-stoichiometric Ni1−xO films were investigated. The RS behavior without the electroforming step was observed in the unipolar and bipolar off-stoichiometric Ni1−xO films. Ni3+ distribution contributes significantly to the conductivity of the pristine Ni1−xO films. The conductivity and Ni deficiency of pristine Ni1−xO films increased as the O2 partial pressure increased during a deposition as revealed by the C-AFM and AES results. Moreover, Ni2+ was further oxidized to Ni3+ as the O2 partial pressure increased, as revealed by the XPS results.
The Ni2O3 bonding by Ni3+ ions is related to the reset-first RS behavior without the electroforming step. This is advantageous in terms of device scale-down, making Ni1−xO films promising candidates for memory applications by overcoming the limitations of the electroforming step in RRAM.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12132231/s1, Figure S1: Endurance characteristics of Ni1-xO bipolar RS device.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.-w.K.; methodology, J.-y.K.; validation, D.-w.K., T.-h.K. and J.-y.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.-w.K.; writing—review and editing, H.-c.S.; supervision, H.-c.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea under the Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program (Grant no. 100680075).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zahoor, F.; Zulkifli, T.Z.A.; Khanday, F.A. Resistive Random access Memory (RRAM): An Overview of Materials, Switching Mechanism, Performance, Multilevel Cell (mlc) Storage, Modeling, and Applications. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, H.; Yan, X. Overview of Resistive Random access Memory (RRAM): Materials, Filament Mechanisms, Performance Optimization, and Prospects. Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Res. Lett. 2019, 13, 1900073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, L.; Yang, C.; Wen, J.; Gai, S. Emerging Nonvolatile Memories to Go Beyond Scaling Limits of Conventional CMOS Nanodevices. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 927696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pan, F.; Gao, S.; Chen, C.; Song, C.; Zeng, F. Recent progress in resistive random access memories: Materials, switching mechanisms, and performance. Mater. Sci. Eng.: R: Rep. 2014, 83, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wong, H.S.P.; Lee, H.-Y.; Yu, S.; Chen, Y.-S.; Wu, Y.; Chen, P.-S.; Lee, B.; Chen, F.T.; Tsai, M.-J. Metal–Oxide RRAM. Proc. IEEE 2012, 100, 1951–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Quan, X.-T.; Zhu, H.-C.; Cai, H.-T.; Zhang, J.-Q.; Wang, X.-J. Resistive Switching Behavior in Amorphous Aluminum Oxide Film Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2014, 31, 078101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rodrigues, A.; Santos, Y.; Rodrigues, C.; Macêdo, M. Al2O3 thin film multilayer structure for application in RRAM devices. Solid-State Electron. 2018, 149, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, Y.S.; Zeng, F.; Tang, S.G.; Liu, H.Y.; Chen, C.; Gao, S.; Wang, Y.G.; Pan, F. Resistive switching mechanisms relating to oxygen vacancies migration in both interfaces in Ti/HfOx/Pt memory devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 064510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Raghavan, N.; Fantini, A.; Degraeve, R.; Roussel, P.; Goux, L.; Govoreanu, B.; Wouters, D.; Groeseneken, G.; Jurczak, M. Statistical insight into controlled forming and forming free stacks for HfOx RRAM. Microelectron. Eng. 2013, 109, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ku, B.; Abbas, Y.; Sokolov, A.S.; Choi, C. Interface engineering of ALD HfO2-based RRAM with Ar plasma treatment for reliable and uniform switching behaviors. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 735, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seo, S.; Lee, M.-J.; Seo, D.H.; Jeoung, E.J.; Suh, D.-S.; Joung, Y.S.; Yoo, I.K.; Hwang, I.R.; Kim, S.H.; Byun, I.S.; et al. Reproducible resistance switching in polycrystalline NiO films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 5655–5657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yoshida, C.; Kinoshita, K.; Yamasaki, T.; Sugiyama, Y. Direct observation of oxygen movement during resistance switching in NiO/Pt film. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 042106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, C.-Y.; Ho, J.-Y.; Huang, J.-J.; Wang, H.-Y. Transient Current of Resistive Switching of a NiO$_{x}$ Resistive Memory. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 51, 041101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alagoz, H.S.; Tan, L.; Jung, J.; Chow, K.H. Switching characteristics of NiOx crossbar arrays driven by low-temperature electroforming. Appl. Phys. A 2021, 127, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, J.J.; Inoue, I.H.; Mikolajick, T.; Hwang, C.S. Metal oxide memories based on thermochemical and valence change mechanisms. MRS Bull. 2012, 37, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Trapatseli, M.; Khiat, A.; Cortese, S.; Serb, A.; Carta, D.; Prodromakis, T. Engineering the switching dynamics of TiOx-based RRAM with Al doping. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 120, 025108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, C.; Song, C.; Yang, J.; Zeng, F.; Pan, F. Oxygen migration induced resistive switching effect and its thermal stability in W/TaOx/Pt structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 253509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, Y.; Tan, C.C.; Li, M.H.; Fang, Z.; Weng, B.B.; He, W.; Zhuo, V.Y.-Q. Forming-Free TaOxBased RRAM Device with Low Operating Voltage and High On/Off Characteristics. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2015, 4, N137–N140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hanzig, F.; Mähne, H.; Veselý, J.; Wylezich, H.; Slesazeck, S.; Leuteritz, A.; Zschornak, M.; Motylenko, M.; Klemm, V.; Mikolajick, T.; et al. Effect of the stoichiometry of niobium oxide on the resistive switching of Nb 2 O 5 based metal–insulator–metal stacks. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2015, 202, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kundozerova, T.V.; Grishin, A.M.; Stefanovich, G.B.; Velichko, A.A. Anodic Nb2O5 Nonvolatile RRAM. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 1144–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Asamitsu, A.; Tomioka, Y.; Kuwahara, H.; Tokura, Y. Current switching of resistive states in magnetoresistive manganites. Nature 1997, 388, 50–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lashkare, S.; Chouhan, S.; Chavan, T.; Bhat, A.; Kumbhare, P.; Ganguly, U. PCMO RRAM for Integrate-and-Fire Neuron in Spiking Neural Networks. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2018, 39, 484–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Panwar, N.; Ganguly, U. Variability assessment and mitigation by predictive programming in Pr 0.7 Ca 0.3 MnO 3 based RRAM. In Proceedings of the 2015 73rd Annual Device Research Conference (DRC), Columbus, OH, USA, 21–24 June 2015; pp. 141–142. [Google Scholar]
  24. Depla, D.; Mahieu, S. Reactive Sputter Deposition; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stognij, A.; Sharko, S.; Serokurova, A.; Trukhanov, S.; Panina, L.; Ketsko, V.; Dyakonov, V.; Szymczak, H.; Vinnik, D.; Gudkova, S. Preparation and investigation of the magnetoelectric properties in layered cermet structures. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 13030–13036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sharko, S.A.; Serokurova, A.I.; Novitskii, N.N.; Ketsko, V.A.; Smirnova, M.N.; Almuqrin, A.H.; Sayyed, M.I.; Trukhanov, S.V.; Trukhanov, A.V. A New Approach to the Formation of Nanosized Gold and Beryllium Films by Ion-Beam Sputtering Deposition. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zubar, T.; Fedosyuk, V.; Tishkevich, D.; Kanafyev, O.; Astapovich, K.; Kozlovskiy, A.; Zdorovets, M.; Vinnik, D.; Gudkova, S.; Kaniukov, E.; et al. The Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 2D Nanostructured Au/NiFe System. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zubar, T.I.; Fedosyuk, V.M.; Trukhanov, S.V.; Tishkevich, D.I.; Michels, D.; Lyakhov, D.; Trukhanov, A.V. Method of surface energy investigation by lateral AFM: Application to control growth mechanism of nanostructured NiFe films. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. George, S.M. Atomic Layer Deposition: An Overview. Chem. Rev. 2009, 110, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Greer, J.A. History and current status of commercial pulsed laser deposition equipment. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2013, 47, 34005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Trukhanov, S.V.; Vasil’Ev, A.N.; Maignan, A.; Szymczak, H. Critical behavior of La0.825Sr0.175MnO2.912 anion-deficient manganite in the magnetic phase transition region. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 2007, 85, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Trukhanov, A.; Kostishyn, V.; Panina, L.; Korovushkin, V.; Turchenko, V.; Vinnik, D.; Yakovenko, E.; Zagorodnii, V.; Launetz, V.; Oliynyk, V.; et al. Correlation of the atomic structure, magnetic properties and microwave characteristics in substituted hexagonal ferrites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 462, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hüfner, S. Electronic structure of NiO and related 3d-transition-metal compounds. Adv. Phys. 1994, 43, 183–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ferreira, L.G.; Marques, L.K.T. Band structure of NiO revisited. Mater. Sci. (Cond.-Mat. Mtrl.-Sci.) 2009. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Band-structure-of-NiO-revisited-Ferreira-Teles/0d15b06260c2aff5df1c9531066bdac6f50f9145 (accessed on 26 June 2022).
  35. Janod, E.; Tranchant, J.; Corraze, B.; Querré, M.; Stoliar, P.; Rozenberg, M.; Cren, T.; Roditchev, D.; Phuoc, V.T.; Besland, M.-P.; et al. Resistive Switching in Mott Insulators and Correlated Systems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 6287–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karolak, M.; Ulm, G.; Wehling, T.; Mazurenko, V.; Poteryaev, A.; Lichtenstein, A. Double counting in LDA+DMFT—The example of NiO. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2010, 181, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Xue, K.-H.; de Araujo, C.A.P.; Celinska, J.; McWilliams, C. A non-filamentary model for unipolar switching transition metal oxide resistance random access memories. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 091602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, N.; Liu, L.; Sun, X.; Liu, X.; Han, D.; Wang, Y.; Han, R.; Kang, J.; Yu, B. Characteristics and mechanism of conduction/set process in TiN∕ZnO∕Pt resistance switching random-access memories. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 232112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chien, F.S.-S.; Wu, Y.T.; Lai, G.L.; Lai, Y.H. Disproportionation and comproportionation reactions of resistive switching in polycrystalline NiOx films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 153513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Russo, U.; Ielmini, D.; Cagli, C.; Lacaita, A.L. Filament Conduction and Reset Mechanism in NiO-Based Resistive-Switching Memory (RRAM) Devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2009, 56, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.S.; Kang, J.F.; Chen, B.; Gao, B.; Liu, L.F.; Liu, X.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wu, L.; Yu, H.Y.; Wang, J.Y.; et al. Microscopic mechanism for unipolar resistive switching behaviour of nickel oxides. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 65303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Grossi, A.; Nowak, E.; Zambelli, C.; Pellissier, C.; Bernasconi, S.; Cibrario, G.; el Hajjam, K.; Crochemore, R.; Nodin, J.; Olivo, P. Fundamental variability limits of filament-based RRAM. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 3–7 December 2016; pp. 4.7.1–4.7.4. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fang, Z.; Yu, H.Y.; Li, X.; Singh, N.; Lo, G.Q.; Kwong, D.L. HfOx/TiOx/HfOx/TiOx Multilayer-Based Forming-Free RRAM Devices With Excellent Uniformity. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2011, 32, 566–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Luo, Q.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Y.; Gong, T.; Xu, X.; Yuan, P.; Ma, H.; Dong, D.; Lv, H.; Long, S.; et al. Self-Rectifying and Forming-Free Resistive-Switching Device for Embedded Memory Application. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2018, 39, 664–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aglieri, V.; Lullo, G.; Mosca, M.; Macaluso, R.; Zaffora, A.; DI Franco, F.; Santamaria, M.; Cicero, U.L.; Razzari, L. Forming-Free and Self-Rectifying Resistive Switching Effect in Anodic Titanium Dioxide-Based Memristors. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 4th International Forum on Research and Technology for Society and Industry (RTSI), Palermo, Italy, 10–13 September 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Wolf, P.; Snauwaert, J.; Clarysse, T.; Vandervorst, W.; Hellemans, L. Characterization of a point-contact on silicon using force microscopy-supported resistance measurements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1995, 66, 1530–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alexeev, A.; Loos, J.; Koetse, M. Nanoscale electrical characterization of semiconducting polymer blends by conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM). Ultramicroscopy 2006, 106, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kim, D.S.; Lee, H.C. Nickel vacancy behavior in the electrical conductance of nonstoichiometric nickel oxide film. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 034504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, T.; Wang, A.; Shang, B.; Wu, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y. Property modulation of NiO films grown by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 643, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jang, W.-L.; Lu, Y.-M.; Hwang, W.-S.; Hsiung, T.-L.; Wang, H.P. Point defects in sputtered NiO films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 062103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lombardo, S.; Stathis, J.H.; Linder, B.P.; Pey, K.L.; Palumbo, F.; Tung, C.H. Dielectric breakdown mechanisms in gate oxides. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 121301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Akinaga, H.; Shima, H. Resistive Random Access Memory (ReRAM) Based on Metal Oxides. Proc. IEEE 2010, 98, 2237–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, L.; Hou, Y.; Chen, B.; Gao, B.; Kang, J. Improved unipolar resistive switching characteristics of mixed-NiOx/NiOy-film-based resistive switching memory devices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 094201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Das, N.C.; Kim, M.; Rani, J.R.; Hong, S.-M.; Jang, J.-H. Electroforming-Free Bipolar Resistive Switching Memory Based on Magnesium Fluoride. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Das, N.C.; Oh, S.-I.; Rani, J.R.; Hong, S.-M.; Jang, J.-H. Multilevel Bipolar Electroforming-Free Resistive Switching Memory Based on Silicon Oxynitride. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Y.-T.; Long, S.-B.; Lü, H.-B.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Lian, W.-T.; Liu, S.; Liu, M. Investigation of resistive switching behaviours in WO3-based RRAM devices. Chin. Phys. B 2011, 20, 017305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, J.; Park, J.; Jung, S.; Hwang, H. Scaling effect of device area and film thickness on electrical and reliability characteristics of RRAM. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference, Dresden, Germany, 8–12 May 2011; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  58. Park, C.; Kim, J.; Lee, K.; Oh, S.K.; Kang, H.J.; Park, N.S. Electronic, Optical and Electrical Properties of Nickel Oxide Thin Films Grown by RF Magnetron Sputtering. Appl. Sci. Converg. Technol. 2015, 24, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Grosvenor, A.P.; Biesinger, M.C.; Smart, R.S.C.; McIntyre, N.S. New interpretations of XPS spectra of nickel metal and oxides. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 1771–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. McWilliams, C.R.; Celinska, J.; de Araujo, C.A.P.; Xue, K.-H. Device characterization of correlated electron random access memories. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 091608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kwon, D.-H.; Lee, S.R.; Choi, Y.S.; Son, S.-B.; Oh, K.H.; Char, K.; Kim, M. Observation of the Ni2 O3 phase in a NiO thin-film resistive switching system. Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Res. Lett. 2017, 11, 1700048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of Ni1−xO films deposited with various oxygen partial pressures. (b) Lattice constant of Ni1−xO, estimated from (111) peak position, as a function of oxygen partial pressures. (c) Nickel and oxygen composition in Ni1−xO by AES.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of Ni1−xO films deposited with various oxygen partial pressures. (b) Lattice constant of Ni1−xO, estimated from (111) peak position, as a function of oxygen partial pressures. (c) Nickel and oxygen composition in Ni1−xO by AES.
Nanomaterials 12 02231 g001
Figure 2. I−V characteristics of Ni1−xO devices with a bottom electrode of 2 × 2 μm2. URS characteristics of Ni1−xO films deposited with partial oxygen pressure of (a) 10%, (b) 30% and (c) 50%. BRS characteristics of Ni1−xO films deposited with oxygen partial pressure fraction of (d) 10%, (e) 30% and (f) 50%.
Figure 2. I−V characteristics of Ni1−xO devices with a bottom electrode of 2 × 2 μm2. URS characteristics of Ni1−xO films deposited with partial oxygen pressure of (a) 10%, (b) 30% and (c) 50%. BRS characteristics of Ni1−xO films deposited with oxygen partial pressure fraction of (d) 10%, (e) 30% and (f) 50%.
Nanomaterials 12 02231 g002
Figure 3. Influence of oxygen partial pressure on (a) IHRS of Ni1−xO films and (b) ILRS of Ni1−xO films.
Figure 3. Influence of oxygen partial pressure on (a) IHRS of Ni1−xO films and (b) ILRS of Ni1−xO films.
Nanomaterials 12 02231 g003
Figure 4. Area dependence of HRS and LRS resistances for Pt/Ni1−xO/TiN stacks (a) with Ni1−xO films, deposited with oxygen partial pressure fraction of 10%, with electroforming (b) with Ni1−xO films that are deposited with oxygen partial pressure fraction of 50%, with reset-first BRS without electroforming.
Figure 4. Area dependence of HRS and LRS resistances for Pt/Ni1−xO/TiN stacks (a) with Ni1−xO films, deposited with oxygen partial pressure fraction of 10%, with electroforming (b) with Ni1−xO films that are deposited with oxygen partial pressure fraction of 50%, with reset-first BRS without electroforming.
Nanomaterials 12 02231 g004
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of the C-AFM measurement. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of Ni1−xO films deposited at various oxygen partial pressure. C-AFM current mapping images of the pristine Ni1−xO films under oxygen partial pressure fraction of (c) 10%, (d) 30%, and (e) 50%.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of the C-AFM measurement. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of Ni1−xO films deposited at various oxygen partial pressure. C-AFM current mapping images of the pristine Ni1−xO films under oxygen partial pressure fraction of (c) 10%, (d) 30%, and (e) 50%.
Nanomaterials 12 02231 g005
Figure 6. XPS peaks of Ni 2p3/2 of Ni1−xO films with oxygen partial pressure fraction of (a) 10% (b) 30% (c) 50%.
Figure 6. XPS peaks of Ni 2p3/2 of Ni1−xO films with oxygen partial pressure fraction of (a) 10% (b) 30% (c) 50%.
Nanomaterials 12 02231 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, D.-w.; Kim, T.-h.; Kim, J.-y.; Sohn, H.-c. Reset First Resistive Switching in Ni1−xO Thin Films as Charge Transfer Insulator Deposited by Reactive RF Magnetron Sputtering. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132231

AMA Style

Kim D-w, Kim T-h, Kim J-y, Sohn H-c. Reset First Resistive Switching in Ni1−xO Thin Films as Charge Transfer Insulator Deposited by Reactive RF Magnetron Sputtering. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(13):2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132231

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Dae-woo, Tae-ho Kim, Jae-yeon Kim, and Hyun-chul Sohn. 2022. "Reset First Resistive Switching in Ni1−xO Thin Films as Charge Transfer Insulator Deposited by Reactive RF Magnetron Sputtering" Nanomaterials 12, no. 13: 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132231

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop