Next Article in Journal
Sequential Synthesis Methodology Yielding Well-Defined Porous 75%SrTiO3/25%NiFe2O4 Nanocomposite
Next Article in Special Issue
Defect-Induced π-Magnetism into Non-Benzenoid Nanographenes
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrothermal Synthesis of Ag Thin Films and Their SERS Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Band Structure and Energy Level Alignment of Chiral Graphene Nanoribbons on Silver Surfaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

On-Surface Synthesis of sp-Carbon Nanostructures

Interdisciplinary Materials Research Center, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(1), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010137
Submission received: 1 December 2021 / Revised: 26 December 2021 / Accepted: 28 December 2021 / Published: 31 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue On-Surface Synthesis of Low-Dimensional Organic Nanostructures)

Abstract

:
The on-surface synthesis of carbon nanostructures has attracted tremendous attention owing to their unique properties and numerous applications in various fields. With the extensive development of scanning tunneling microscope (STM) and noncontact atomic force microscope (nc-AFM), the on-surface fabricated nanostructures so far can be characterized on atomic and even single-bond level. Therefore, various novel low-dimensional carbon nanostructures, challenging to traditional solution chemistry, have been widely studied on surfaces, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, graphene nanoribbons, nanoporous graphene, and graphyne/graphdiyne-like nanostructures. In particular, nanostructures containing sp-hybridized carbons are of great advantage for their structural linearity and small steric demands as well as intriguing electronic and mechanical properties. Herein, the recent developments of low-dimensional sp-carbon nanostructures fabricated on surfaces will be summarized and discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Over the centuries, carbon allotropes have been playing a significant role in material science and engineering due to their outstanding electric, magnetic, optical, and mechanical properties. Compared to traditional carbon materials such as diamond and graphite, carbon nanomaterials consist of carbons with different hybridization types, namely linear (sp), planar (sp2), or tetrahedral (sp3) bond configurations, or even a combination of several types [1]. The investigation of novel carbon nanomaterials has attracted more attention since the first successful separation of monolayer graphene by Geim and Novoselov in 2004 [2]. In view of the remarkable semimetallic property, graphene can be modified to open a bandgap by heterogeneous element doping [3,4] and multifunctional nanoporous graphene [5,6]. Over the past decades, many breakthroughs for the fabrication of novel nanostructures have been achieved [7], which enriched the structural complexity of nanocarbons and provided various materials applications.
Owning to the development of STM (scanning tunneling microscope) [8,9] and nc-AFM (noncontact atomic force microscope) [10], a wide variety of low-dimensional carbon nanostructures have been synthesized and characterized at the atomic scale on surfaces, such as linear polymers comprising of hydrocarbons [11,12], graphene nanoribbons [13,14,15,16,17,18], porous graphene [19], and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [20,21]. In addition to the all-benzene family with different dimensionality and sizes, novel topological nanostructures with nonbenzenoid rings, including four-/eight-membered rings [22,23] and five-/seven-membered rings [24], have sparked considerable attention owing to extraordinary electronic properties. Compared to traditional wet chemistry, on-surface synthesis is carried out under ultra-high vacuum, which prohibits the contaminants from the surroundings and promotes the formation of atomically precise nanostructures. Insoluble molecules, while are less reactive in solution, can act as precursors on surfaces to synthesize various conjugated low-dimensional nanostructures that are hardly prepared by conventional solution chemistry. Furthermore, metal surfaces could reduce the mobility of molecular precursors to some certain degrees due to their confinement effect, which facilitates the fabrication of unexpected nanostructures. Besides the real-space images obtained from STM and nc-AFM, solid evidence can be characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), which could provide more information about element content and valence. In addition, density functional theory (DFT) is another supplementary tool to support the structural analysis from STM and nc-AFM. The exploration of theoretical investigation could provide possible directions to experimental design, synthetic routes to precursors, and predict the performance and potential applications of novel nanostructures [25].
In contrast to sp2-hybridization, sp-hybridization is of great structural advantages for the linearity and small steric effect of the carbon-carbon bond [26]. The sp-hybridized structures, such as cyclo[n]carbons and linear carbons, can be cumulenic or polyynic [27]. As sketched in Scheme 1, both types of structures have two possible configurations [28,29]. The polyynic form consists of alternating single and triple bonds with different lengths, while the cumulenic form is built from consecutive double bonds. Moreover, linear carbons have been predicted to behave with high tensile strength and superconductivity at room temperature, suggesting potential mechanical and electronic applications [30]. Recently, the properties of carbon atomic wires calculated in carbon nanotubes have been reported, aiming to unravel fascinating behaviors of 1inear carbons such as molecular electronics [31,32]. In particular, graphyne, which contains both sp- and sp2-carbons, is predicted to own an intrinsic bandgap that differentiates from zero-bandgap graphene [33]. As illustrated in Scheme 1, 0D cyclo[18]carbon, 1D linear carbon, and 2D graphyne have appealed enthusiasm for their unique theoretical performance in electronic devices and excellent mechanical properties. Experimentally, various novel carbon structures containing sp-carbon have been fabricated recently via on-surface synthesis strategy, challenging to traditional methods in solution [34], which can be used to obtain a plethora of pre-designed nanostructures. A lot of theoretical investigations have been employed on carbon clusters to speculate their structures, stabilities, and properties. It is found that odd-numbered carbon clusters have linear structures while most of the even-numbered ones prefer being cyclic forms [35]. Energetically, odd carbon species have lower energies than even ones but even species show greater electron affinity [36]. What is more, atomically precise nanostructures fabricated on the surface could provide possibilities to verify their fascinating theoretical properties. Herein, we will summarize recent works regarding the on-surface synthesis of low-dimensional sp-hybridized carbon nanostructures, including cyclo[n]carbons, metallic carbynes, and graphdiyne-like structures.

2. 0D sp-Carbon Nanostructures

0D sp-carbon nanostructures were hard to isolate and characterize due to their instability in condensed phases. A large number of experimental and theoretical studies on carbon clusters have been applied to their molecular structures and electronic properties [37]. Most importantly, a fundamental and controversial question is still open: the configuration of cyclocarbons is polyynic (alternating single and triple bonds of different lengths) or cumulenic (consecutive double bonds) [29,38]. Initial laser desorption mass spectrometry has been reported to obtain evidence for the size-selective growth of fullerenes through the coalescence of cyclo[n]carbons, the molecular carbon allotropes consisting of monocyclic rings with a certain number (n) of carbon atoms [39]. Three carbon oxides Cn(CO)n/3 (Figure 1a–c) with n = 18, 24, and 30 were prepared as precursors to the cyclocarbons cyclo-C18, C24, and C30 (Figure 1d), respectively. Mass spectroscopy pointed out that the coalescence of cyclo-C30 was accompanied by the formation of predominantly buckminsterfullerene (C60), while the smaller C24O6 and C32O8 preferentially produced fullerene C70 instead. This work provides not only new insights into the mechanism of fullerene formation but also a protocol to obtain cyclocarbons. However, the structure of cyclocarbon, whether it is cumulene or polyyne, was not explained. Recently, cyclo[18]carbon (C18) was synthesized with atomic precision via atom manipulation and characterized for the first time. By using low-temperature STM-AFM, carbon monoxide was eliminated from the precursor (Figure 1e), a cyclocarbon oxide molecule C24O6, on a bilayer sodium chloride (NaCl) on Cu(111) at 5 K [40] resulting in the formation of a single C18 molecule. The nc-AFM image of the intact precursor was shown in Figure 1f and characterization of C18 by high-resolution AFM revealed a polyynic structure of C18 with defined positions of alternating triple and single bonds, which was observed as bright lobes under nc-AFM contrast shown in Figure 1g. The AFM contrast evidenced the structure of C18 on NaCl with the defined positions of C≡C triple bonds, which is supported by the simulated image in Figure 1h. This work provides the first example of a real-space characterization of cyclo[18]carbon, which shows a polyynic form rather than a cumulenic structure using a combination of experimental and theoretical tools.
Innovative carbon clusters with manifold architectures involving sp-carbon can be prepared by using rationally designed halogenated hydrocarbons. For example, a nanostructure involving diyne moieties was fabricated via on-surface assisted homocoupling reaction starting from 1,3-bis(2-bromoethynyl)benzene (shortened as BBEB, Figure 1i) on Au(111) [41]. The submolecular resolution observations confirmed the formation of the organometallic intermediates (Figure 1j) and graphdiyne-like macrocycles after demetallization (Figure 1k). It can be concluded that on-surface synthesis has strong advantages in the preparation of 0D carbon structures. Therefore, more attention should be devoted to the on-surface synthesis and its mechanism for the discovery of novel 0D carbon nanostructures comprising of sp-carbons.

3. 1D sp-Carbon Nanostructures

One-dimensional carbon nanostructures involving sp-carbon were less investigated due to the high chemical activity compared to graphene that only consists of sp2-carbon. Over the recent years, graphdiyne nanowires were gradually developed. Generally, graphdiyne nanowires are termed as m-n graphdiyne nanowires, where m refers to the number of phenyl rings and n stands for the number of alkyne moieties in a repeating unit of the backbone [42]. Surface-assisted covalent synthesis, depending on the catalysis [43] and confinement of metal substrates [44], has nowadays been a powerful method to fabricate carbon nanostructures involving sp-carbons. For example, Glaser coupling, one of the most popular methods to construct diyne motif, has been widely used in both solution and surface chemistry. However, on-surface dehydrogenation of alkynes always leads to chain branching [45]. Thus, it is very important to fabricate structural motifs involving sp-carbon more efficiently. To avoid the side reactions, Zhang et al. chose Ag (877) vicinal surface as the template and fabricated 3,2-graphdiyne nanowires with length up to 30 nm via Glaser homocoupling along the step-edges [46], which is demonstrated in Figure 2a. Moreover, Sun et al. developed a novel path to prepare another motif involving sp-carbons, namely cumulene, via dehalogenative homocoupling (Figure 2b). The real-space evidence for the formation of the cumulene motifs indicated by the red arrow in Figure 2e,f was obtained by the nc-AFM [47], which is consistent with the relaxed DFT model in Figure 2c,d, respectively.
In addition to the thermal treatment, Pavliče et al. performed atomic manipulation to trigger programmed dehydrogenation of the precursor on NaCl surface at 5 K [48]. Subsequently, a reductive rearrangement of 1,1-dibromo alkene to polyynes occurred, resulting in the formation of a linear structure with three –C≡C– bonds, as illustrated in Figure 2g. With the help of high-resolution nc-AFM, the authors confirmed the structures of reactant (Figure 2h), intermediate (Figure 2i), and final product (Figure 2j). Aside from the atomic manipulation, Sánchez-Grande et al. reported an on-surface synthesis protocol to produce ethynylene-bridged anthracene polymers on Au(111) (Figure 2k) [49]. First, the deposition of the precursor (11,11,12,12-tetrabromoanthraquinodimethane), a quinoid moiety functionalized with =CBr2 (abbreviated as TBAn), on Au (111) giving rise to a close-packed assembly. Further annealing to 400 K enabled debromination as well as efficient diffusion of resulting carbene until the complete coupling and aromatization. With the functional side groups modified in the nanowires, cumulene was transferred into the alkyne (Figure 2i–p), which differs from the previously mentioned cumulene bridges formed via dehalogenative homocoupling of alkenyl gem-dibromides in Sun’s work. Eventually, molecular wires based on ethynylene bridges with a bandgap of 1.5 eV were investigated. The relation between resonant form and topological quantum phase of π-conjugated polymers with increasing size of the acene monomers was further investigated in the following work, which shows an increasing cumulene (=C=C=) character of the bridge in both pentacene and bisanthracene polymers [50]. These works demonstrated the formation of sp-carbon moieties through dehalogenation of the functional group of =CBr2, and the utilization of sp2-hybridized units to construct nanoarchitectures consisting of sp-carbons.
As previously mentioned, the step-edges of the surfaces can improve the reaction selectivity of terminal alkynes during Glaser coupling. This strategy, however, is restricted due to the accompanied side reactions. To solve the problem, terminal alkynyl bromide groups were introduced on surfaces. Experimentally, dehalogenative C−C coupling reactions were demonstrated to be an effective strategy for introduction of carbon-carbon triple bonds with high efficiency and selectivity. Figure 3a schematically shows the formation of –C–Au–C– organic metallic intermediates (Figure 3b) and diyne products (Figure 3c) [51]. The gold atoms could be released from the organometallic molecular wires at elevated temperatures. Finally, C–C coupled graphdiyne nanowires were synthesized on Au(111). It is conclusive to say that dehalogenative homocoupling of terminal alkynyl bromide groups should be an alternative efficient way for incorporating the acetylenic scaffolding into low-dimensional surface nanostructures. What is more, another strategy was developed to in-situ form C≡C triple bonds on the surface. In Sun’s work, on-surface dehalogenative homocouplings of tribromomethyl-substituted arenes were achieved, directly forming nanowires involving carbon-carbon triple bonds (Figure 3d–f) [52]. In this process, conversion of sp3-hybridized carbon atoms into sp-hybridized ones was successfully realized. Other than the debromination homocoupling, cross-coupling reactions, for example, Sonogashira coupling could be resorted to fabricating nanostructures as well. According to the previous study, Sonogashira coupling has a higher reaction barrier than that of Glaser coupling or trimerization of alkynyl [53]. Therefore, optimization of the reaction conditions appears to be particularly important. Wang et al. reported that the synergy of high temperature, low molecular coverage, and low molecular evaporation rate could reach high selectivity up to 70% for Sonogashira coupling to synthesize graphyne nanowires (Figure 3g). This work not only reports the first construction example of graphyne nanowire via on-surface Sonogashira coupling but also offers deep insight into the underlying mechanism which might be applied to other on-surface cross-coupling reaction systems. Given the successful formation of C≡C triple bonds from sp3-hybridized carbon, a stepwise reaction tactic was put forward [54]. Further functionalized precursor (1-bromo-4-(tribromomethyl)benzene, shortened as BTBMB) with both the tribromomethyl and aryl bromide groups is shown in Figure 3h, which aims at introducing two types of dehalogenative homocoupling reactions (i.e., C(sp3)–Br and C(sp2)–Br). As a result, the graphyne nanowires were synthesized through stepwise debromination followed by homocouplings (Figure 3i,j). Despite the notable mechanical and electrical properties, the application of graphyne/graphdiyne nanowires is still limited because of the difficulty in transferring such structures from metallic substrates to other surfaces.
There exists a linear carbon structure comprising of sp-carbon configuration with alternating single and triple bonds of different lengths and non-alternating structures, which are defined as polyyne –C≡C– and cumulene =C=C=C=, respectively. Linear carbon is predicted to possess notable physical properties such as extremely high tensile strength and Young’s modulus, rendering them potential candidates for mechanical applications. What is more, the extraordinary predicted properties such as room temperature superconductivity inspired researchers to explore the synthesis of linear carbon. However, the development of carbyne was restricted by the synthesis of well-defined structures due to its extreme instability. Sun et al. have fabricated the metalated carbyne by on-surface synthesis strategy and characterized by the interplay of the high-resolution STM, nc-AFM, and XPS assisted by DFT calculations [55]. Ethyne was chosen as a precursor molecule, and the experimental conditions were optimized by substrate temperature regulation to avoid undesired side reactions and facilitate the dehydrogenative coupling reaction. Finally, they fabricated the Cu metalated carbyne (with −C≡C−Cu− unit) after deposition of ethyne on the surface held at 450 K (Figure 4a–d). The XPS analysis confirmed the formation of Cu metalated carbyne. The minor peak at 284.3 eV (marked as C1) is attributed to unsaturated carbon atoms on surfaces, and the major peak at 283.2 eV (marked as C2) is the characteristic of carbon atoms bound to copper. Moreover, the semiconducting organometallic polyyne with −C≡C−C≡C−Au− unit has also been fabricated by such a precursor Br2C=C=C=CBr2 on Au(111) [56]. The skeleton rearrangement from the cumulene moiety to the diyne one (1,4-dibromo-1,3-butadiyne, Br−C≡C−C≡C−Br, shortened as C4Br2) was confirmed by breaking two C–Br bonds of C4Br4 via atomic manipulation (Figure 4f). Compared with the traditional solution methods to obtain short carbyne-like structures requiring harsh reaction conditions [57], on-surface synthesis strategy is of great advantage in the formation of long linear carbon structures.

4. 2D sp-Carbon Nanostructures

A plethora of novel two-dimensional carbon nanostructures are flourishing, such as nanoporous graphene, nonbenzenoid carbon allotropes, etc., especially the nanostructures involving sp-hybridized carbons. The C–C triple bond is of great advantage for avoidance of fluctuation arising from cis-trans isomerization which is different from olefinic bond [58,59]. What is more, the graphyne comprising of sp- and sp2-carbon atoms has been predicted to have a crystalline state, which was also predicted to be one of the most stable carbon phases containing acetylenic groups as a major structural component. Additionally, graphyne was calculated to be a semiconductor with a bandgap of 1.2 eV [60], which demonstrated their possible applications in electronic devices. However, the atomic precise fabrication of graphyne is limited by its high chemical reactivity. Zhang et al. developed a method to grow extended 2D graphdiyne-like networks using terminal alkynes on Ag(111) via homocoupling reaction, as demonstrated in Figure 5a–c [61]. The STM image in Figure 5b revealed a closer inspection of irregular, open-porous networks. The inset showed a magnified image of the associated honeycomb unit, and a corresponding model. The formation of covalent bonds was substantiated by complementary XPS measurements. The absence of the low energy shoulder peak at 283.7 eV (a typical binding energy for methylacetylide) revealed a resulting covalent structure, which is contradictory to that proposed by the organometallic binding mechanism when compared with the simulated XPS spectrum of the organometallic dimer. Other impressive efforts have also been devoted to synthesizing graphyne-like nanostructures. Similarly, Zhang et al. have synthesized highly regular single-layer alkynyl-silver organometallic networks at the micrometer scale via gas-mediated surface reaction (Figure 5d) [62]. Different from the previous strategy through thermal induction combined with catalyzation via substrate, terminal alkyne radicals were obtained via oxygen gas mediated deprotonation on Ag(111), and the activation procedure was confirmed by XPS spectroscopy. The peak at 283.6 eV evidenced the strong interaction between the alkynyl groups and the substrates. There was an absence of the O 1s signature in the XPS spectrum after dosing O2, ruling out adsorbed oxygen species and other intermediates containing oxygen. The results indicated that both gas species and substrate play crucial roles in the particular activation process. This work provides a versatile fabrication procedure featuring high chemoselectivity without poisoning the surface. Aside from dehydrogenation, debromination of sp- and sp3-carbon was explored, which greatly avoids the byproducts generated at elevated temperatures. As demonstrated in Figure 5e–g, Xu group applied the on-surface synthesis protocol by introducing dehalogenative homocouplings of alkynyl bromides on Au(111), which results in the formation of an organometallic intermediate and subsequent release of gold atoms at elevated temperature [51]. Furthermore, they synthesized C≡C triple-bonded structural motif by dehalogenative homocouplings of tribromomethyl-substituted arenes, as illustrated in Figure 5h [52]. Notably, the organometallic intermediates were not formed in this process. This work provides a new protocol to convert sp3-carbon atoms to sp-hybridized ones through pre-designated molecular precursor. Moreover, Figure 5i,j demonstrate two potential precursors that could be considered to synthesize graphdiyne and graphyne, respectively.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we have reviewed a series of recently reported sp-carbon nanostructures through on-surface synthesis: cyclo[18]carbon, metalated carbynes, graphyne/graphdiyne nanowires and graphdiyne-like networks. Moreover, different fabrication procedures to prepare carbon-carbon triple bonds were also discussed in this review: (1) dehydrogenation homocoupling, (2) gas-mediated dehydrogenation organometallic coupling, (3) dehalogenation organometallic coupling, and (4) Sonagashira coupling. Meanwhile, it is still of great necessity to explore new protocols for building up acetylenic scaffolds with high efficiency and selectivity. STM and nc-AFM could be developed to be combined with more advanced in-situ characterization techniques to explore reaction pathways systematically, such as tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) and infrared spectroscopy (IR). More novel pre-designed nanostructures could be synthesized on surfaces assisted by DFT. Though various carbon nanostructures could be fabricated by on-surface synthesis strategy, there are still many difficulties in transferring well-defined structures from metal substrates to other surfaces towards molecular devices. Therefore, it is of scientific importance to quest practical use and transfer the carbon nanostructures from the surface in high efficiency.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22125203, 21790351).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, Q.; Zhang, R.; Qiu, J.; Liu, R.; Xu, W. On-Surface Synthesis of Carbon Nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1705630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cai, J.; Pignedoli, C.A.; Talirz, L.; Ruffieux, P.; Sode, H.; Liang, L.; Meunier, V.; Berger, R.; Li, R.; Feng, X.; et al. Graphene Nanoribbon Heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 896–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Pawlak, R.; Liu, X.; Ninova, S.; D’Astolfo, P.; Drechsel, C.; Sangtarash, S.; Häner, R.; Decurtins, S.; Sadeghi, H.; Lambert, C.J.; et al. Bottom-Up Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Porous Graphene Nanoribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 12568–12573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moreno, C.; Vilas-Varela, M.; Kretz, B.; Garcia-Lekue, A.; Costache, M.V.; Paradinas, M.; Panighel, M.; Ceballos, G.; Valenzuela, S.O.; Peña, D.; et al. Bottom-Up Synthesis of Multifunctional Nanoporous Graphene. Science 2018, 360, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Fan, Q.; Wang, C.; Liu, L.; Han, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, J.; Kuttner, J.; Hilt, G.; Gottfried, J.M. Covalent, Organometallic, and Halogen-bonded Nanomeshes from Tetrabromo-Terphenyl by Surface-Assisted Synthesis on Cu(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 13018–13025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sobola, D.; Ramazanov, S.; Konecny, M.; Orudzhev, F.; Kaspar, P.; Papez, N.; Knapek, A.; Potocek, M. Complementary SEM-AFM of Swelling Bi-Fe-O Film on HOPG Substrate. Materials 2020, 13, 2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Binning, G.; Rohrer, H.; Gerber, C.; Weibel, E. Surface Studies by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Binnig, G.; Rohrer, H. Scanning Tunneling Microscopy—From Birth to Adolescence. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1987, 59, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gross, L.; Mohn, F.; Moll, N.; Liljeroth, P.; Meyer, G. The Chemical Structure of a Molecule Resolved by Atomic Force Microscopy. Science 2009, 325, 1110–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cai, L.; Yu, X.; Liu, M.; Sun, Q.; Bao, M.; Zha, Z.; Pan, J.; Ma, H.; Ju, H.; Hu, S.; et al. Direct Formation of C–C Double-Bonded Structural Motifs by On-Surface Dehalogenative Homocoupling of Gem-Dibromomethyl Molecules. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 7959–7966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, S.; Sun, Q.; Groning, O.; Widmer, R.; Pignedoli, C.A.; Cai, L.; Yu, X.; Yuan, B.; Li, C.; Ju, H.; et al. On-Surface Synthesis and Characterization of Individual Polyacetylene Chains. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 924–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cai, J.; Ruffieux, P.; Jaafar, R.; Bieri, M.; Braun, T.; Blankenburg, S.; Muoth, M.; Seitsonen, A.P.; Saleh, M.; Feng, X.; et al. Atomically Precise Bottom-Up Fabrication of Graphene Nanoribbons. Nature 2010, 466, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ruffieux, P.; Wang, S.; Yang, B.; Sanchez-Sanchez, C.; Liu, J.; Dienel, T.; Talirz, L.; Shinde, P.; Pignedoli, C.A.; Passerone, D.; et al. On-Surface Synthesis of Graphene Nanoribbons with Zigzag Edge Topology. Nature 2016, 531, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. de Oteyza, D.G.; García-Lekue, A.; Vilas-Varela, M.; Merino-Díez, N.; Carbonell-Sanromà, E.; Corso, M.; Vasseur, G.; Rogero, C.; Guitian, E.; Pascual, J.I.; et al. Substrate-Independent Growth of Atomically Precise Chiral Graphene Nanoribbons. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 9000–9008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gröning, O.; Wang, S.; Yao, X.; Pignedoli, C.A.; Borin Barin, G.; Daniels, C.; Cupo, A.; Meunier, V.; Feng, X.; Narita, A.; et al. Engineering of Robust Topological Quantum Phases in Graphene Nanoribbons. Nature 2018, 560, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, Y.C.; de Oteyza, D.G.; Pedramrazi, Z.; Chen, C.; Fischer, F.R.; Crommie, M.F. Tuning the band Gap of Graphene Nanoribbons Synthesized from Molecular Precursors. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6123–6128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rizzo, D.J.; Veber, G.; Cao, T.; Bronner, C.; Chen, T.; Zhao, F.; Rodriguez, H.; Louie, S.G.; Crommie, M.F.; Fischer, F.R. Topological Band Engineering of Graphene Nanoribbons. Nature 2018, 560, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bieri, M.; Nguyen, M.T.; Gröning, O.; Cai, J.; Treier, M.; Aїt-Mansour, K.; Ruffieux, P.; Pignedoli, C.A.; Passerone, D.; Kastler, M.; et al. Two-Dimensional Polymer Formation on Surfaces: Insight into the Roles of Precursor Mobility and Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16669–16676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Di Giovannantonio, M.; Yao, X.; Eimre, K.; Urgel, J.I.; Ruffieux, P.; Pignedoli, C.A.; Müllen, K.; Fasel, R.; Narita, A. Large-Cavity Coronoids with Different Inner and Outer Rdge Structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 12046–12050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fan, Q.; Martin-Jimenez, D.; Werner, S.; Ebeling, D.; Koehler, T.; Vollgraff, T.; Sundermeyer, J.; Hieringer, W.; Schirmeisen, A.; Gottfried, J.M. On-Surface Synthesis and Characterization of a Cycloarene: C108 Graphene Ring. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 894–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, M.; Liu, M.; She, L.; Zha, Z.; Pan, J.; Li, S.; Li, T.; He, Y.; Cai, Z.; Wang, J.; et al. Graphene-Like Nanoribbons Periodically Embedded with Four- and Eight-Membered Rings. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Fan, Q.; Yan, L.; Tripp, M.W.; Krejci, O.; Dimosthenous, S.; Kachel, S.R.; Chen, M.; Foster, A.S.; Koert, U.; Liljeroth, P.; et al. Biphenylene Network: A Nonbenzenoid Carbon Allotrope. Science 2021, 372, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fan, Q.; Martin-Jimenez, D.; Ebeling, D.; Krug, C.K.; Brechmann, L.; Kohlmeyer, C.; Hilt, G.; Hieringer, W.; Schirmeisen, A.; Gottfried, J.M. Nanoribbons with Nonalternant Topology from Fusion of Polyazulene: Carbon Allotropes Beyond Graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17713–17720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, Z.; Liu, J.; Hou, S.; Wang, Y. Manipulation of Molecular Spin State on Surfaces Studied by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, G.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Guo, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, D. Architecture of Graphdiyne Nanoscale Films. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3256–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hoffmann, R. Extended Hückel Theory—v: Cumulenes, Polyenes, Polyacetylenes and Cn. Tetrahedron 1966, 22, 521–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Diederich, F.; Rubin, Y.; Knobler Carolyn, B.; Whetten Robert, L.; Schriver Kenneth, E.; Houk Kendall, N.; Li, Y. All-Carbon Molecules: Evidence for the Generation of Cyclo[18]carbon from a Stable Organic Precursor. Science 1989, 245, 1088–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parasuk, V.; Almlof, J.; Feyereisen, M.W. The [18] All-Carbon Molecule: Cumulene or Polyacetylene? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1049–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, M.J.; Artyukhov, V.I.; Lee, H.; Xu, F.B.; Yakobson, B.I. Carbyne from First Principles: Chain of C Atoms, a Nanorod or a Nanorope. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 10075–10082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. da Silva, C.A.B.; Nisioka, K.R.; Moura-Moreira, M.; Macedo, R.F.; Del Nero, J. Tunneling Rules for Electronic Transport in 1-D Systems. Mol. Phys. 2021, 119, e1976427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ramberger, B.; Kresse, G. New Insights into the 1D Carbon Chain through the RPA. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 5254–5260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bunz, U.H.F.; Rubin, Y.; Tobe, Y. Polyethynylated Cyclic π-Systems: Scaffoldings for Novel Two and Three-Dimensional Carbon Networks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, Q.; Cai, L.; Ding, Y.; Xie, L.; Zhang, C.; Tan, Q.; Xu, W. Dehydrogenative Homocoupling of Terminal Alkenes on Copper Surfaces: A Route to Dienes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 4549–4552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Raghavachari, K.; Binkley, J.S. Structure, Stability, and Fragmentation of Small Carbon Clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 2191–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pitzer, K.S.; Clementi, E. Large Molecules in Carbon Vapor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 4477–4485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Torelli, T.; Mitas, L. Electron Correlation in C4N+2 Carbon Rings: Aromatic Versus Dimerized Structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 1702–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Neiss, C.; Trushin, E.; Gorling, A. The Nature of One-Dimensional Carbon: Polyynic Versus Cumulenic. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2497–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McElvany, S.W.; Ross, M.M.; Goroff, N.S.; Diederich, F. Cyclocarbon Coalescence: Mechanisms for Tailor-Made Fullerene Formation. Science 1993, 259, 1594–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Kaiser, K.; Scriven, L.M.; Schulz, F.; Gawel, P.; Gross, L.; Anderson, H.L. An sp-Hybridized Molecular Carbon Allotrope, Cyclo[18]carbon. Science 2019, 365, 1299–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, M.; Li, S.; Zhou, J.; Zha, Z.; Pan, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Qiu, X. High-Yield Formation of Graphdiyne Macrocycles through On-Surface Assembling and Coupling Reaction. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 12612–12618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Chi, L. On-Surface Synthesis of Graphyne-Based Nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1804087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, Q.; Cai, L.; Ding, Y.; Ma, H.; Yuan, C.; Xu, W. Single-Molecule Insight into Wurtz Reactions on Metal Surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 2730–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kang, F.; Gao, W.; Cai, L.; Li, C.; Yuan, C.; Xu, W. Selective On-Surface Reactions of the Alkenyl Gem-Dibromide Group Directed by Substrate Lattices. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 23840–23847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gao, H.Y.; Wagner, H.; Zhong, D.; Franke, J.H.; Studer, A.; Fuchs, H. Glaser Coupling at Metal Surfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4024–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cirera, B.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Bjork, J.; Klyatskaya, S.; Chen, Z.; Ruben, M.; Barth, J.V.; Klappenberger, F. Synthesis of Extended Graphdiyne Wires by Vicinal Surface Templating. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1891–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sun, Q.; Tran, B.V.; Cai, L.; Ma, H.; Yu, X.; Yuan, C.; Stohr, M.; Xu, W. On-Surface Formation of Cumulene by Dehalogenative Homocoupling of Alkenyl Gem-Dibromides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12165–12169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Pavlicek, N.; Gawel, P.; Kohn, D.R.; Majzik, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Meyer, G.; Anderson, H.L.; Gross, L. Polyyne Formation via Skeletal Rearrangement Induced by Atomic Manipulation. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sanchez-Grande, A.; de la Torre, B.; Santos, J.; Cirera, B.; Lauwaet, K.; Chutora, T.; Edalatmanesh, S.; Mutombo, P.; Rosen, J.; Zboril, R.; et al. On-Surface Synthesis of Ethynylene-Bridged Anthracene Polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 6559–6563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Cirera, B.; Sanchez-Grande, A.; de la Torre, B.; Santos, J.; Edalatmanesh, S.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, E.; Lauwaet, K.; Mallada, B.; Zboril, R.; Miranda, R.; et al. Tailoring Topological Order and π-Conjugation to Engineer Quasi-Metallic Polymers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, Q.; Cai, L.; Ma, H.; Yuan, C.; Xu, W. Dehalogenative Homocoupling of Terminal Alkynyl Bromides on Au(111): Incorporation of Acetylenic Scaffolding into Surface Nanostructures. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7023–7030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, Q.; Yu, X.; Bao, M.; Liu, M.; Pan, J.; Zha, Z.; Cai, L.; Ma, H.; Yuan, C.; Qiu, X.; et al. Direct Formation of C–C Triple-Bonded Structural Motifs by On-Surface Dehalogenative Homocouplings of Tribromomethyl-Substituted Arenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4035–4038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, T.; Huang, J.; Lv, H.; Fan, Q.; Feng, L.; Tao, Z.; Ju, H.; Wu, X.; Tait, S.L.; Zhu, J. Kinetic Strategies for the Formation of Graphyne Nanowires via Sonogashira Coupling on Ag(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13421–13428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yu, X.; Cai, L.; Bao, M.; Sun, Q.; Ma, H.; Yuan, C.; Xu, W. On-Surface Synthesis of Graphyne Nanowires through Stepwise Reactions. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 1685–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sun, Q.; Cai, L.; Wang, S.; Widmer, R.; Ju, H.; Zhu, J.; Li, L.; He, Y.; Ruffieux, P.; Fasel, R.; et al. Bottom-Up Synthesis of Metalated Carbyne. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1106–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yu, X.; Li, X.; Lin, H.; Liu, M.; Cai, L.; Qiu, X.; Yang, D.; Fan, X.; Qiu, X.; Xu, W. Bond-Scission-Induced Structural Transformation from Cumulene to Diyne Moiety and Formation of Semiconducting Organometallic Polyyne. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 8085–8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hayatsu, R.; Scott, R.G.; Studier, M.H. Carbynes in meteorites: Detection, Low-Temperature Origin, and Implications for Interstellar Molecules. Science 1980, 209, 1515–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sun, Q.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Hu, A.; Tan, Q.; Xu, W. Surface-Assisted cis-trans Isomerization of an Alkene Molecule on Cu(110). Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1728–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sun, Q.; Cai, L.; Ma, H.; Yuan, C.; Xu, W. The Stereoselective Synthesis of Dienes through Dehalogenative Homocoupling of Terminal Alkenyl Bromides on Cu(110). Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 6009–6012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Baughman, R.H.; Eckhardt, H.; Kertesz, M. Structure-Property Predictions for New Planar Forms of Carbon: Layered Phases Containing sp2 and sp Atoms. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 6687–6699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Y.Q.; Kepcija, N.; Kleinschrodt, M.; Diller, K.; Fischer, S.; Papageorgiou, A.C.; Allegretti, F.; Bjork, J.; Klyatskaya, S.; Klappenberger, F.; et al. Homo-Coupling of Terminal Alkynes on a Noble Metal Surface. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, Y.Q.; Paintner, T.; Hellwig, R.; Haag, F.; Allegretti, F.; Feulner, P.; Klyatskaya, S.; Ruben, M.; Seitsonen, A.P.; Barth, J.V.; et al. Synthesizing Highly Regular Single-Layer Alkynyl-Silver Networks at the Micrometer Scale via Gas-Mediated Surface Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5087–5091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Novel carbon allotrope nanostructures containing sp-hybridized carbon atoms.
Scheme 1. Novel carbon allotrope nanostructures containing sp-hybridized carbon atoms.
Nanomaterials 12 00137 sch001
Figure 1. (ac) Precursors to the (d) cyclo[n]carbon (n = 1, 2, 3), respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 1993, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (e) Reaction scheme for the on-surface formation of C18. (f,g) Nc-AFM images of C24O6 and C18 recorded with a CO-functionalized tip on the NaCl surface. (h) Simulated AFM image based on gas-phase DFT-calculated geometries, corresponding to the difference in probe height in Figure 1g. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [40]. Copyright 2019, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (i) Structural model of 1,3-bis(2-bromoethynyl) benzene (BBEB). (j) Nc-AFM image of an organometallic intermediate attributed to (d-BBEB-Au)6 and (k) graphdiyne-like macrocycles using a CO-functionalized tip. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Figure 1. (ac) Precursors to the (d) cyclo[n]carbon (n = 1, 2, 3), respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 1993, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (e) Reaction scheme for the on-surface formation of C18. (f,g) Nc-AFM images of C24O6 and C18 recorded with a CO-functionalized tip on the NaCl surface. (h) Simulated AFM image based on gas-phase DFT-calculated geometries, corresponding to the difference in probe height in Figure 1g. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [40]. Copyright 2019, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (i) Structural model of 1,3-bis(2-bromoethynyl) benzene (BBEB). (j) Nc-AFM image of an organometallic intermediate attributed to (d-BBEB-Au)6 and (k) graphdiyne-like macrocycles using a CO-functionalized tip. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 12 00137 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of graphdiyne wires obtained by covalent homocoupling reaction of the 4,4″-diethynyl-1,1′:4′,1″terphenyl on Ag(877). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (b) Illustration of the formation of cis- and trans-cumulene products through dehalogenative C–C homocoupling reactions of the 1,1′-biphenyl, 4-(2,2-dibromoethenyl) molecular precursor (BPDBE). (c,d) High-resolution STM images of the cis- and trans-cumulene structures together with the equally scaled DFT relaxed models overlaid on top. (e,f) Corresponding frequency shift nc-AFM images of the two dimer structures. The red arrows are pointing to the cumulene groups. Scale bars: 5 Å. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [47]. Copyright 2017, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (g) The rearrangement reaction of the formation of product 5 from 5(Br2) and one radical intermediate caused by the sequential loss of the two Br atoms. (hj) Laplace-filtered AFM images with structural ball-and-stick models overlaid as a visual aid. Grey, red and white balls represent C, Br, and H, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2018, Nature Publishing Group. (k) Reaction sequence of the TBAn (11,11,12,12-tetrabromoanthraquinodimethane) precursor after deposition on Au(111) and subsequent annealing. (l) Chemical structure of an ethynylene-bridged anthracene moiety. (m) Constant-height STM, (n) nc-AFM and (o) nc-AFM simulation image. (p) Constant-height nc-AFM image of a linear ethynylene-linked anthracene polymer after annealing to 500 K. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of graphdiyne wires obtained by covalent homocoupling reaction of the 4,4″-diethynyl-1,1′:4′,1″terphenyl on Ag(877). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (b) Illustration of the formation of cis- and trans-cumulene products through dehalogenative C–C homocoupling reactions of the 1,1′-biphenyl, 4-(2,2-dibromoethenyl) molecular precursor (BPDBE). (c,d) High-resolution STM images of the cis- and trans-cumulene structures together with the equally scaled DFT relaxed models overlaid on top. (e,f) Corresponding frequency shift nc-AFM images of the two dimer structures. The red arrows are pointing to the cumulene groups. Scale bars: 5 Å. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [47]. Copyright 2017, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (g) The rearrangement reaction of the formation of product 5 from 5(Br2) and one radical intermediate caused by the sequential loss of the two Br atoms. (hj) Laplace-filtered AFM images with structural ball-and-stick models overlaid as a visual aid. Grey, red and white balls represent C, Br, and H, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2018, Nature Publishing Group. (k) Reaction sequence of the TBAn (11,11,12,12-tetrabromoanthraquinodimethane) precursor after deposition on Au(111) and subsequent annealing. (l) Chemical structure of an ethynylene-bridged anthracene moiety. (m) Constant-height STM, (n) nc-AFM and (o) nc-AFM simulation image. (p) Constant-height nc-AFM image of a linear ethynylene-linked anthracene polymer after annealing to 500 K. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Nanomaterials 12 00137 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustration of dehalogenative homocouplings of 1,1′-biphenyl, 4,4′-bis(2-bromoethynyl) (BPBBE). (b) Close-up STM image showing the formation of the C–Au–C organometallic chains after deposition of BPBBE molecules on Au(111) at RT and slight anneal to 320 K. (c) STM image of C–C coupled molecular chains with acetylenic scaffoldings after the sample is annealed to ~425 K, with the scaled model of a molecular chain overlaid on the corresponding STM topography. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (d) Large-scale and (e) close-up STM images showing the formation of molecular chains (graphyne wires) after deposition of 1,4-bis(tribromomethyl)benzene (bTBP) molecules on Au(111) held at RT followed by annealing to ~430 K. The equally scaled DFT-relaxed model is superimposed on the STM topography. (f) Schematic illustration of dehalogenative homocouplings of bTBP. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (g) The formation of graphyne nanowires via Sonogashira coupling on Ag(111). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (h) The schematic illustration of the stepwise dehalogenative homocoupling reactions, resulting in the formation of a graphyne nanowire. (i) Large-scale and (j) close-up STM images showing the formation of graphyne nanowires after annealing the sample to 530 K. The equally scaled DFT model is overlaid on the corresponding STM topography. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [54], Copyright 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustration of dehalogenative homocouplings of 1,1′-biphenyl, 4,4′-bis(2-bromoethynyl) (BPBBE). (b) Close-up STM image showing the formation of the C–Au–C organometallic chains after deposition of BPBBE molecules on Au(111) at RT and slight anneal to 320 K. (c) STM image of C–C coupled molecular chains with acetylenic scaffoldings after the sample is annealed to ~425 K, with the scaled model of a molecular chain overlaid on the corresponding STM topography. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (d) Large-scale and (e) close-up STM images showing the formation of molecular chains (graphyne wires) after deposition of 1,4-bis(tribromomethyl)benzene (bTBP) molecules on Au(111) held at RT followed by annealing to ~430 K. The equally scaled DFT-relaxed model is superimposed on the STM topography. (f) Schematic illustration of dehalogenative homocouplings of bTBP. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (g) The formation of graphyne nanowires via Sonogashira coupling on Ag(111). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (h) The schematic illustration of the stepwise dehalogenative homocoupling reactions, resulting in the formation of a graphyne nanowire. (i) Large-scale and (j) close-up STM images showing the formation of graphyne nanowires after annealing the sample to 530 K. The equally scaled DFT model is overlaid on the corresponding STM topography. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [54], Copyright 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Nanomaterials 12 00137 g003
Figure 4. (ad) On-surface synthesis of organometallic carbon chains by dehydrogenative coupling of ethyne molecules on a Cu(110) surface. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. (e) C 1s core-level XP spectrum showing the major peak C2 located at a binding energy of 283.2 eV (cyan curve). Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (f) On-surface synthesis of organometallic carbon chains by entire debromination of C4Br4 molecules followed by homocoupling on Au(111) surface and the transformation from cumulene to diyne moiety via partial debromination induced by STM tip. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. (ad) On-surface synthesis of organometallic carbon chains by dehydrogenative coupling of ethyne molecules on a Cu(110) surface. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. (e) C 1s core-level XP spectrum showing the major peak C2 located at a binding energy of 283.2 eV (cyan curve). Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (f) On-surface synthesis of organometallic carbon chains by entire debromination of C4Br4 molecules followed by homocoupling on Au(111) surface and the transformation from cumulene to diyne moiety via partial debromination induced by STM tip. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 12 00137 g004
Figure 5. (a) Scheme of surface-assisted Glaser homocoupling reaction. (b) Chemical structure of 1,3,5-tris-(4-ethynyl phenyl)benzene (TEPB). (c) An open reticular structure from the merged ethynyl moieties prevails. The inset shows a single honeycomb nanopore superimposed with a calculated model. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2012, Macmillan Publisher Limited. (d) Reaction scheme and STM image of single-layer alkynyl−silver networks at the micrometer scale via gas-mediated surface reaction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [62]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (e) Schematic illustration of dehalogenative homocoupling of 1,3,5-tris(2-bromoethynyl)benzene (tBEP). (f,g) STM images of the (f) C–Au–C organometallic network and the (g) C–C coupled network. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (h) Scheme of dehalogenative homocoupling of 1,3,5-tris(tribromomethyl)benzene (tTBP) molecule. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (i,j) Two potential precursors to synthesize graphdiyne and graphyne structures.
Figure 5. (a) Scheme of surface-assisted Glaser homocoupling reaction. (b) Chemical structure of 1,3,5-tris-(4-ethynyl phenyl)benzene (TEPB). (c) An open reticular structure from the merged ethynyl moieties prevails. The inset shows a single honeycomb nanopore superimposed with a calculated model. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2012, Macmillan Publisher Limited. (d) Reaction scheme and STM image of single-layer alkynyl−silver networks at the micrometer scale via gas-mediated surface reaction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [62]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (e) Schematic illustration of dehalogenative homocoupling of 1,3,5-tris(2-bromoethynyl)benzene (tBEP). (f,g) STM images of the (f) C–Au–C organometallic network and the (g) C–C coupled network. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (h) Scheme of dehalogenative homocoupling of 1,3,5-tris(tribromomethyl)benzene (tTBP) molecule. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (i,j) Two potential precursors to synthesize graphdiyne and graphyne structures.
Nanomaterials 12 00137 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shang, L.; Kang, F.; Gao, W.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, W. On-Surface Synthesis of sp-Carbon Nanostructures. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010137

AMA Style

Shang L, Kang F, Gao W, Zhou Z, Xu W. On-Surface Synthesis of sp-Carbon Nanostructures. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(1):137. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shang, Lina, Faming Kang, Wenze Gao, Zheng Zhou, and Wei Xu. 2022. "On-Surface Synthesis of sp-Carbon Nanostructures" Nanomaterials 12, no. 1: 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010137

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop