Next Article in Journal
Structural and Magnetic Properties of Co0.5Ni0.5Ga0.01Gd0.01Fe1.98O4/ZnFe2O4 Spinel Ferrite Nanocomposites: Comparative Study between Sol-Gel and Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquid Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Angstrom-Scale Active Width Control of Nano Slits for Variable Plasmonic Cavity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/nano11092464
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Tribological Properties of Vulcanized Natural Rubber Composites by Applications of Carbon Nanotube: A Molecular Dynamics Study

by
Fei Teng
1,
Jian Wu
1,2,*,
Benlong Su
1 and
Youshan Wang
1,2
1
Center for Rubber Composite Materials and Structures, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China
2
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(9), 2464; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092464
Submission received: 27 August 2021 / Revised: 18 September 2021 / Accepted: 19 September 2021 / Published: 21 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances and Applications of Carbon Nanotubes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tribological properties of tread rubber is a key problem for the safety and durability of large aircraft tires. So, new molecular models of carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforced vulcanized natural rubber (VNR) composites have been developed to study the enhanced tribological properties and reveal the reinforced mechanism. Firstly, the dynamic process of the CNT agglomeration is discussed from the perspectives of fractional free volume (FFV) and binding energy. Then, a combined explanation of mechanical and interfacial properties is given to reveal the CNT-reinforced mechanism of the coefficient of friction (COF). Results indicate that the bulk, shear and Young’s modulus increase with the increasement of CNT, which are increasement of 19.13%, 21.11% and 26.89% in 15 wt.% CNT/VNR composite compared to VNR; the predicted results are consistent with the existing experimental conclusions, which can be used to reveal the CNT-reinforced mechanism of the rubber materials at atomic scale. It can also guide the design of rubber material prescription for aircraft tire. The molecular dynamics study provides a theoretical basis for the design and preparation of high wear resistance of tread rubber materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Natural rubber is widely used in industrial products due to its excellent elasticity and mechanical properties, such as tires and seals. However, higher requirements are being placed on the natural rubber due to the harsh working condition of aircraft tire. Carbon-based fillers such as graphene (GE) and carbon nanotube (CNT) have been widely applicated in rubber nanocomposites due to the unique structural characteristics, excellent thermodynamic and electromagnetic properties. It has been proved that carbon-based nanofillers can effectively improve the performance of composites, which are suitable for more industrial environments, such as electrical shielding and heating equipment, medical equipment and aircraft tires [1,2].
The properties and potential applications of nanocomposites can be greatly enhanced and expanded by carbon-based nanofillers [3,4,5,6]. Well dispersed epoxidized natural rubber/carbon black (ENR/CB) composite with CNT contained was prepared for high-performance flexible sensors [7]. Bokobza et al. [8,9,10,11,12,13] comprehensively studied the reinforcing effect of CNT on styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) in mechanical, thermal and electrical properties. The enhancement effect of aminosilane-functionalized carbon nanotube on NR and ENR has been discussed by Shanmugharaj et al. [14,15]. CNT was also used as a model filler for SBR to prepare tightly bound rubber material [16]. The excellent polymer-filler interaction of functionalized CNT was confirmed that it can greatly improve the overall performance including mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of the NR/CNT and ENR/CNT nanocomposites [17,18]. These fillers are regarded as ideal materials in aircraft tire applications to improve the strength [19], modulus [20] and wear resistance [21] of natural rubber materials. Atieh et al. [22] found that the Young’s modulus of the SBR/CNT composite containing 10 wt.% CNT was six times higher than that of the pure SBR due to the excellent strength and interfacial effects of CNT. Compared with other fillers, carbon-based fillers can achieve better reinforcement effects with a smaller dosage, thereby reducing pollution and further improving material performance [23]. Kumar and Lee [24] studied the influence of CB and CNT on the Young’s modulus of filled silicone rubbers (SRs). Results showed that the Young’s modulus of CNT-filled SR also increased from 272% to 706% when CNT was added from 2 phr to 8 phr, which is much larger than 125% with 10phr CB-filled SR. In addition, the different content of carbon-based fillers also has different reinforcement effects on the rubber matrix. Many research works [7,25,26,27,28,29,30] have proved that excessive CNT can cause agglomeration of fillers, which leads uneven dispersion and affecting the properties of composite materials.
It is confirmed that cross-linking vulcanization is one of the most important reasons for the excellent elasticity and deformation recovery of rubber materials [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The degree of crosslinking and cross-linking bond type greatly affect the overall properties of vulcanized rubber. The accelerator is often used to increase the degree of crosslinking of vulcanized rubber, thereby reducing pollution and improving material properties [39]. Sainumsai et al. [40] and Fan et al. [41] both tested vulcanized natural rubbers (VNRs) made by conventional vulcanization (CV), semi-effective vulcanization (SEV) and effective vulcanization (EV) methods. The crosslinking density and the content of monosulfidic, disulfidic and polysulfidic crosslinks were obtained. It was indicated that the distributions of sulfur crosslink types effect the strain-induced crystallization and dynamic mechanical properties of vulcanized rubber.
The enhancing mechanism of rubber composites by CNT, GE and other common reinforcing fillers were explained via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [42,43,44,45]. In particular, it can reveal the micro-reinforcement mechanism of carbon-based fillers and their functionalized products on the polymer matrix [46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. The interface interaction between CNT and polymer matrix was studied by molecular simulation [53,54,55]. It was found that the pull-out force of CNT and the elastic modulus of the matrix are both affected by the diameter of nanotube, however, the shear strength of the interface is mainly affected by the length. In addition, the cross-linked structure of polymers can be developed by MD models, such as epoxy resin and vulcanized rubber [56,57]. Zhang et al. [58] developed a vulcanized SBR molecular model to compare the tribological properties of vulcanized SBR and SBR. It was verified that vulcanization can improve the tribological and interfacial properties of rubber materials at the atomic scale.
In summary, the performance of rubber materials is influenced by the vulcanized cross-linked structure and carbon-based filler. The reinforcement is also affected by crosslinking degree, distribution of crosslinking bond types and dosage of carbon-based fillers. The enhancement mechanism has been studied from the perspective of vulcanization and nanofillers at the atomic level [59,60]; however, it mainly focusses on the oligomers and resin materials rather than rubber materials. In addition, the crosslinking degree, distribution of vulcanization bond types and CNT dosage have not been specific described in the existing studies at atomic scale.
A series of VNR atomic models reinforced by different content CNT were developed to reveal the mechanism of CNT-reinforced VNR. A new VNR model was developed with considering the distribution of sulfur bonds and crosslinking degree. As the main component of road surface, SiO2 can be regarded as the direct contact material with tires. As results, the interfacial interaction between SiO2 and VNR plays a significant guiding role in aircraft tire rubber materials design and evaluation. Here, the reinforced CNT/NR models and the CNT/NR-SiO2 interface models were developed to study the CNT reinforce mechanism on the vulcanized NR and the atomic behaviors of the composites on the friction interface.

2. Molecular Dynamics Model

MD models were developed by Materials Studio Software (MS). Firstly, the NR molecular chain, sulfides for the synthesis of crosslinking bonds, CNT and 45 Å3 empty periodic cell box were obtained. Then, different numbers of CNT were placed at the center of multiple cell boxes to represent different CNT dosage. The Amorphous Cell Calculation of MS was used to pack 10 NR molecular chains built with 70 repeat units into the periodic cell box by Monte Carlo method. In addition, a variety of sulfides used to generate vulcanized crosslinks were also added to the periodic box in certain proportions and quantities according to the existing experimental measurement results to obtain uncross-linked CNT/VNR models. Next, all the sulfides were used to generate cross-linked bonds by the cross-linking script, then, the cross-linked CNT/VNR composite models were developed. Finally, the silica (quartz glass) model in MS database was imported to build supercell as friction layer. The Cleave surface and the Super cell commands were used for 45 Å × 45 Å × 10.8 Å SiO2 supercell and interfacial interaction models were constructed by the cross-linked CNT/NR composite and obtained SiO2 slab for further calculation and analysis.
The degree of polymerization represents the number of repeating units in a single molecular chain in MD simulation. Longer chain can improve the simulation accuracy but reduce the speed. Therefore, the solubility parameters of single molecular chains with different numbers of repeating units were calculated for proper NR chain length. As shown in Figure 1, the solubility parameter of NR chain begins to stabilize while the number of repeat unit larger than 35, which means the number of repeat units should larger than 35. Moreover, the solubility parameter of NR stabilizes at 16.25 (J/cm3)1/2, which is consistent with the experimentally measured value of 16.2~17 (J/cm3)1/2. Here, we built NR chain containing 70 repeat units.
The modelling of uncross-linked CNT/VNR is shown in Figure 2. Hydrogen atoms were added at both ends for saturated CNT to eliminate the end-side effects. The size and the corresponding positions of the CNT in different CNT content periodic cells are shown in Figure 2g. The crosslink density is defined by:
ρ = v / N 0
where v is the number of crosslinked repeat units and N 0 is the total number of repeat units.
There is one crosslinked repeat unit in every 50~100 units for conventionally vulcanized rubber materials, which the ρ is about 1~2%. Here, considering the possibility of self-crossing, the number of cross-linking points is determined to be 10 in the model. The ρ of the obtained model is about 2.5%. Experiment results also indicate that the ratio of monosulfidic, disulfidic and polysulfidic crosslinks in the vulcanized natural rubber was about 5:3:2 [40]. Accelerators that promote the cleavage of polysulfide bonds were blended with rubber materials in actual production by EV method, which makes it difficult to form long polysulfide bonds in vulcanized natural rubber. Therefore, vulcanization bonds containing three sulfur atoms were used in this model to characterize polysulfidic crosslinks. Different types of sulfides with the ratio of 5:3:2 and 10 NR molecular chains were introduced to the periodic boxes by the Amorphous Cell Calculation module, which is used to obtain uncross-linked CNT/VNR models with a predefined density of 0.93 g/cm3.
Uncross-linked CNT/VNR models were further used to generate crosslinked structure by crosslinking Perl script at temperature of 450 K. The flow chart of the programing of vulcanization process was shown in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 2b, potential cross-linking points were set in every five repeating units to avoid two cross-linking points being too close. The carbon atoms on the NR chains and sulfur atoms on the sulfides were used to form carbon–sulfur (C-S) bonds when there was sulfide molecular in the range of 1.5~5.5 Å between two potential cross-linking points and excess hydrogen atoms were removed. The geometric center of the formed bond was located at the center between the two cross-linking points. All sulfides were consumed for the generation of cross-linking bonds at both ends in the cross-linking process. The schematic diagram and chemical formula of the cross-linking principle were shown in Figure 4. Crosslink can be divided into self-crosslinking and crosslinking, which was distinguished by setting each molecular chain as an independent color. Here, the CNT contents of the four models were about 0 wt.%, 5 wt.%, 10 wt.% and 15 wt.%.
The geometry optimization was applied to crosslinked CNT/VNR model by conjugate gradient method with the energy and force convergence tolerance of 1 × 10−5 kcal/mol and 5 × 10−4 kcal/mol/Å [61]. Then, a 100ps 5-cycle annealing process was conducted constant volume and temperature (NVT ensemble) from 200 K to 400 K to relax the internal stress of the structure. Finally, a 250 ps dynamic relaxation under constant pressure and temperature (NPT ensemble) of 101kpa and 298 K was performed to obtain the final energy equilibrium model with reasonable vulcanization bond distances and angles.
Double layer and three-layer models were developed to study the interfacial properties and tribological performance. These models were constituted of CNT/VNR model and 45 × 45 × 10.8 Å3 SiO2 model. The adsorption properties between rubber matrix and SiO2 can be analyzed by the double layer structure as shown in Figure 5. The interfacial energy can be obtained by dynamics calculation for 150 ps under 298 K NVT ensemble with fixed bottom SiO2 layer. The interface interaction energy E i n t e r and the interface van der Waals force energy E i n t e r − v d W can be calculated by Equations (2) and (3), respectively.
E i n t e r = E T o t a l − ( E L a y e r 1 + E L a y e r 2 )
                                        E i n t e r − v d W = E T o t a l − v d W − ( E L a y e r 1 − v d W + E L a y e r 2 − v d W )
where and are the potential energy and van der Waals energy of the entire double-layer model, respectively. and are the potential energy and van der Waals energy of the lower silicon dioxide fixed layer. and are the potential energy and van der Waals energy of the upper EUG/NR composite movable layer.
Additionally, all atoms of SiO2 layer needs to be unfixed before the calculation.
The frictional simulation was carried out by the confined shear calculation in Forcite module in MS based on the confined nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) theory. The SiO2 slabs were initially fixed during relaxation process which including geometry optimization, annealing from 200 K to 400 K and 100 ps dynamic calculation under 298 K NVT ensemble tasks to obtain stable layer structure. After that, the bottom and top SiO2 slabs were unfixed and moved in the opposite direction along the X axis with a speed of 0.2 Å/ps for 250ps. All the friction force, layer pressure and temperature data during friction process were recorded into the trajectory files.
More details have been presented to reproduce the simulation processes. Firstly, the condensed-phase optimized molecular potentials for atomistic simulation studies (COMPASS) force field [62] was used for entire simulation work. The system is considered stable when the energy and density values of the model fluctuate less than 5% during the relaxation process. Secondly, periodic boundary conditions in x and y directions were adopted in the double layer and three-layer models to simulate properties of bulk system. Thirdly, all simulations were conducted with the time step of 1fs, the temperature and pressure controlling methods were Anderson [63] and Berendsen [64] methods, respectively. Finally, the summation methods of energy calculation were Ewald for electrostatic and Atom based for van der Waals interaction. The accuracy and buffer width of Ewald method were 1 × 10−5 kcal/mol and 0.5 Å. The cutoff distance, spline width and buffer width of van der Waals interaction calculations were 18.5 Å, 1 Å and 0.5 Å [61].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microscopic Inherent Properties Analysis

The fractional free volume (FFV) and mean square displacement (MSD) are calculated in this part to explain and predict the enhancement of CNT on the rubber matrix.

3.1.1. Fractional Free Volume

The total volume ( V T ) of solid matrix can be considered as the sum of occupied volume ( V O ) and free volume ( V F ) based on the free volume theory [65]. The empty space represents the potential area for atoms and chains to move, therefore influencing the mechanical and thermal properties when deformation is applied to material [66]. After the relaxation process, different degrees of distortion occur in different models and it is inaccurate to discuss free volume directly. Therefore, the percentage of fractional free volume is calculated to characterize. The Connolly surface method is adopted for FFVs calculation based on Equation (4). The Connolly radius and Grid interval are 0.1 nm and 0.015 nm, respectively.
F F V = V F V T × 100 % = V T − V O V T × 100 %
where V T , V F and V O represent the total, free and occupied volume of the models, respectively.
The results of the FFVs of pure VNR and CNT/VNR with different CNT contents are shown in Figure 6. The occupied and free volume are colored by grey and blue, respectively. It is illustrated that the addition of CNT increases the FFV of the composites. Thus, it can be inferred that CNT has an attractive effect on surrounding atoms, which leads to the agglomeration of inside atoms and formation of outside free volume. The pattern of free volume evolution with increasing CNT content can be concluded as generation-growing-convergence. During the increase of CNT content, some small free areas are generated at beginning. Then, those new formed areas become larger due to higher attractive effect from inside CNT. Finally, the grown free areas converge to form larger free volume. The molecular chains inside the concentrated rubber matrix with CNT addition show low tendency of movement, which results in less chance of internal destruction under dynamic stress. This free volume expansion at atom level is in accordance with the experimental results [26].

3.1.2. Mean Square Displacement

The diffusion and movement trend of the molecular chains inside the particles can be characterized by the mean square displacement [66,67]. It indicates the statistical square of particle displacement in the system compared to the initial state, which is defined as:
M S D = 1 3 N ∑ i = 0 N − 1 ( | R i ( t ) − R i ( 0 ) | 2 )
where R i ( t ) and R i ( 0 ) are the displacement vector of atom i at time t and initial time, N is the total number of atoms.
The MSD evolutions of pure VNR and CNT/VNR system during relaxation process are shown in Figure 7. It can be illustrated that the MSD first decrease and then increase with the addition of CNT. It can be conjectured that small amount of CNT is conductive to the aggregation of the matrix and enhancement of the composite strength due to the excellent hardness of CNT. However, agglomeration is caused by excessive nanotubes in the matrix. According to the deformation law of the hard filler-reinforced soft material, the deformation degree of the soft matrix is greater than that of overall material. Similarly, the VNR matrix surrounded by those agglomerated nanotubes shows large deformation and stress concentration, which performs higher tend of molecular movement. As a result, the CNT content should not be too high in order to avoid the agglomeration, which is consistent with related research at different scales [28].

3.2. Mechanical Properties Analysis

The elastic mechanical properties of the systems are analyzed by the constant strain method. Relative mechanical properties of the material including Young’s, bulk and shear modulus can be obtained by solving the stiffness matrix [68]. In MS, the stiffness matrix can be calculated by applying a series of 0.03% small tensile strains along three axes to the obtained stable models. The stable models used in this section are five independent configurations obtained in last 20 ps of relaxation process. The results are averaged and the error bars are used to express maximum and minimum among these configurations. The elements in the stiffness matrix are expressed by the following equation:
C i j = ∂ 2 U V ∂ ε i ∂ ε j
where U, V and ε represent the second derivative of the deformation, unit volume and strain. For isotropic materials like rubber, the stress-strain relations are completely described by two lame constants λ and μ, which can be expressed by the elements in the stiffness matrix as [51]:
λ = 1 3 ( C 11 + C 22 + C 33 ) − 2 3 ( C 44 + C 55 + C 66 )
μ = 1 3 ( C 44 + C 55 + C 66 )
The Young’s modulus (E), bulk modulus (K) and shear modulus (G) of the systems can be further calculated based on the λ and μ results following equations below [69]:
E = μ ( 3 λ + 2 μ ) λ + μ
K = λ + 2 3 μ
G = μ
The calculation results of Young’s modulus are separated in three directions. Considering rubber as isotropic material, the modulo is calculated by Equation (12) for quantitative comparison.
| E | = E X 2 + E Y 2 + E Z 2
where |E| is the modulo of Young’s modulus; E X , E Y , E Z are the Young’s modulus in X, Y and Z directions, respectively.
The details of bulk, shear modulus and Young’s modulo calculation results are recorded in Table 1. The results are given in the form like: minimum value~maximum value (averaged value). In addition, the increase percentage is calculated according to the averaged value. It can be concluded that the modulus increase with the increase of CNT. The bulk, shear modulus and Young’s modulo of CNT/VNR composites with 15 wt.% CNT content are 2.74, 1.09 and 5.19 GPa, which are 19.13%, 21.11% and 26.89% higher than 2.30, 0.90 and 4.09 GPa of pure VNR. This result indicates that the CNT can enhance comprehensive mechanical properties of the rubber matrix, which increases the hardness of the matrix, the resistance to shear deformation [70] and volume change [71]. The addition of CNT also allows the obtained composites to endure larger stress and suit for wider circumstance like aircraft tire production. Moreover, the increasing trend of mechanical properties of CNT/VNR composites at atom level is also conformity with experimental studies [27,28,29]. The continuous increase of CNT/VNR composites modulus can be explained by the high hardness and modulus of carbon nanotubes.

3.3. Interfacial Properties Analysis

The interfacial interactions of CNT/VNR composite mainly includes internal interaction of CNT- matrix and external interaction of composite-SiO2. Adhesion phenomenon between tire and road occurs in friction process. Hence, the double layer structure (seen in Figure 5) was developed to reveal the interface contact mechanism of the adhesion phenomenon. A clear adsorption process between composites and fixed SiO2 was also observed during dynamic equilibrium. The interfacial energy and atom density between CNT reinforced rubber materials and SiO2 are calculated in Section 3.3.1. Before dynamical friction happens, a comparatively large friction force occurs in the state of static friction due to the static adsorption. As a result, relatively large deformation occurs in this state, which brings the possibility of material damage. For nanocomposites, the dispersion condition and bonding strength of the filler inside the matrix greatly determine the damage resistance of composites during deformation [25]. In order to characterize the enhancement mechanism of CNT effects on the vulcanized natural rubber, the CNT-matrix binding energy and atom relative concentration inside nanocomposites are discussed in Section 3.3.2.
The system is considered stable when the energy fluctuation is less than 5%. All the results in this section are the average of five independent configurations in the last 20 ps after stabilization. The maximum and minimum values among the calculation results are given in the form of error bars.

3.3.1. Composite-SiO2 Interface

The interfacial energy calculation of composite-SiO2 interface is based on the Equations (1) and (2). The interfacial energy and van der Waals energy results of pure VNR and different CNT contents CNT/VNR composites are shown in Figure 8. It can be illustrated that the interfacial energy evolution shows nonlinear trend with the addition of CNT. The largest interfacial energy is obtained in 10 wt.% CNT/VNR composite, which means higher energy barrier needs to be break during the relative movement. This process may lead to higher temperature rise, severer atoms contact and larger static friction force. In addition, the interfacial interaction is mainly caused by the van der Waals interaction according to the contribution of van der Waals energy.
The atom relative concentrations along Z direction are shown in Figure 9. It is found that the peaks of atom concentration occur in the range of 12~14 Å along Z direction. These peaks represent the aggregation degree of the atoms at the contact interface between the SiO2 and rubber matrix, which reflex the severity of relative motion between layers. More concentrated atoms can cause more intense friction process, which is not expected in both micro and macro applications. In the range of 50~60 Å, the relative concentration of the matrix drops rapidly, which can be explained by adsorption effect of SiO2 slab to the rubber matrix. It can be observed that the concentration value of 10 wt.% CNT/VNR composite in the range of 14~50 Å is higher than that of 0.5 and 15 wt.%. This phenomenon may reflect the superimposition of CNT binding and the binding weakening of excessive nanotubes. The result of interface atom concentration is consistent with the interfacial energy, which indicates that high interfacial energy can attract more internal atoms moving outward to form a high-density shell. This may be a new idea for soft materials coating preparation.

3.3.2. CNT-Matrix Interface

The interfacial interactions between CNT and rubber matrix are discussed by using the models as same as Section 3.2. The binding energy calculations follow similar pattern of interfacial energy calculations, which is expressed by Equations (13) and (14).
E b = − ( E T − E r − E C N T )
E b − v d W = − ( E T − v d W − E r − v d W − E C N T − v d W )
where E b , E T , E r , E C N T and E b − v d W , E T − v d W , E r − v d W , E C N T − v d W   represent the potential and van der Waals energy of binding, total system, rubber and CNT, respectively.
The results of total binding energy and binding energy per CNT are shown in Figure 10. It can be indicated that the binding energy between rubber matrix and CNT increases with the increase of CNT. It is easily to understand that more nanotubes have more contact area with rubber matrix and the superimposition effect of nanotubes binding mentioned before causes greater total binding energy of higher CNT content. However, the binding energy per CNT no longer shows linear growth but decrease when excessive nanotubes exist in the rubber matrix. This binding weakening phenomenon may be caused by the agglomeration of nanotubes. These agglomerated nanotubes begin to compete for atoms located around their geometric center when the superposition effect of CNT exceeded its maximum, which decreases the binding energy per CNT. Macroscopically, it is reflected by the decrease of mechanical properties like tensile strength, elongation at break and so on [7,28,29]. In addition, it can be observed that the van der Waals binding energy constitutes most part of the total binding energy, which proves the van der Waals interaction is the main factor of binding between CNT and rubber matrix.
The density distributions of rubber matrix inside the composite are also obtained as shown in Figure 11. Obvious peaks can be observed at the CNT-rubber matrix interface, which indicates the attractive effect of CNT on surrounding atoms. This is consistent with the conclusions obtained in Section 3.1 and Section 3.2, which explains the strengthening mechanism of CNT on the rubber matrix. In addition, higher atomic densities are observed between two different nanotubes than that on both sides, which also indicates that the attraction of CNT has a superimposed effect. The relatively low atom density in the 15 wt.%CNT/VNR reflects the compete relationship between excessive nanotubes. This attraction-superposition-competition dynamic changing process caused by the increase of CNT content may be one of the main reasons for the changes of mechanical and tribological properties in actual applications.
In conclusion, both the internal binding and external interaction are influenced by CNT. The dynamic process of attraction-superposition-competition is inferred by molecular simulations. The friction performance is preliminarily predicted based on the interfacial calculation results. In order to verify the rationality of predictions, the tribological properties are discussed below.

3.4. Tribological Properties and Mechanism

The COF is computed in this section for evaluating the tribological properties of the different CNT contents CNT/VNR composites. The details of calculated COF are given in the form like: minimum value~maximum value (averaged value) and listed in the Table 2.
Results indicate that the COF keep rising with the addition of CNT. However, the growth rate drops significantly when CNT content changes from 10 wt.% to 15 wt.%. The discrepancy of COF caused by the surface roughness can be ignored at atomic level in our simulations. The fiction performance of the composite can no longer be simply judged by the interfacial energy but a combined result of mechanical and interfacial properties. On one hand, the increasing mechanical modulus prevent large shear deformation of the composite, which makes the composite become more stable during the friction process. The atoms around the friction surface tend to show lower activity in this stable composite, which achieves better equilibrium adsorption between the composite and the SiO2 slab. That’s the reason why the COF increase with the addition of CNT. On the other hand, the friction performance also effected by the interfacial energy. Although the CNT/VNR composites with lower CNT content are harder to achieve well equilibrium adsorption state during friction process, they still have larger interfacial energy (especially the 10 wt.% CNT/VNR) to offset the inadequate surface interaction caused by insufficient mechanical properties. Thus, the COF of composites are not show a linear trend of increasing like the modulus, but increasing trend of slowing down.
The slip phenomenon is observed during friction process and relative atom concentration along Z direction are further discussed for the tribological properties. During the friction process, the shear deformation of the composite is observed in the beginning. Then, the deformation of the composite reaches its maximum state and the slip phenomenon can be observed afterward. The slip mechanism may be caused by the relative movement, which breaks the energy barrier formed by interfacial interaction. Therefore, the state of the composite and the time of slip phenomenon occurs can be used to reveal the mechanism of the COF evolution. The relative concentration reflects the severity of the friction. More concentrated atoms cause more intense friction process. The state of different CNT/VNR composites and the time when slip phenomenon occurs are shown in Figure 12. The relative atom concentration along Z direction is shown in Figure 13. It can be observed that CNT/VNR composites with higher CNT content have lower shear deformation and the slip phenomenon occurred earlier. This enhanced property prevents the damage of composite during friction and allows the composite to reach stable dynamic friction sooner. The relative concentration indicates that the atoms appear to gather on the rubber matrix rather than friction interface due to the enhanced binding properties of CNT, which can reduce the intensity of friction. The maximum decrease of the atom concentration is observed in the 5 wt.% CNT/VNR composite, which are 14.3% and 13.8% lower than that of pure VNR on different friction interfaces. However, this enhancement can be attenuated by excessive nanotubes, which may be caused by the weakened binding properties. As a result, this impact needs to be noticed in actual prescription design of CNT reinforced rubber materials.

4. Conclusions

MD simulations were performed to reveal the influence of CNT content on the CNT/VNR composites and the enhanced mechanism. The results are consistent with the present research, which can be used to reveal the enhanced mechanism of CNT. The following conclusions are highlighted from the results.
(1)
Molecular models for the CNT/VNR composites with different CNT content were developed with considering the distribution of different sulfur bonds. The FFV and MSD were discussed preliminarily. The FFV evolution with CNT addition is summarized as three stages, which are generation, growing and convergence.
(2)
The bulk, shear and Young’s modulus were calculated by constant strain method to evaluate the mechanical properties of the composites. Approximately linear increase trends were observed in all modulus. The largest bulk, shear and Young’s modulus occurred in the 15 wt.% CNT/VNR composite, which were 19.13%, 21.11% and 26.89% higher than that of pure VNR, respectively. The mechanism of these improved mechanical properties can be explained by the high strength of CNT.
(3)
The binding energy of CNT-matrix interface and the interfacial energy of composite-SiO2 interface were obtained, respectively. The largest interfacial energy was obtained in 10 wt.% CNT/VNR composite. Thus, a dynamic attraction-superposition-competition process is concluded to reveal the reinforced mechanism of CNT on the rubber matrix. Both the binding and interfacial interactions are mainly produced by the van der Waals interaction.
(4)
The COF and relative concentration at the friction interface were calculated to discuss the tribological properties of CNT reinforced VNR composite. The COF shows a nonlinear trend of increasing. Based on the mechanical and interfacial results, the friction performance is inferred to be a combined consequence of mechanical and interfacial properties. Although the enhanced COF is expected in the production of aircraft tires, the addition of CNT can cause more intense friction process according to the relative concentration results. Therefore, this impact needs to be noticed in the actual design of prescription.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W.; methodology, F.T.; software, F.T.; formal analysis, F.T.; investigation, J.W. and F.T.; data curation, F.T.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W. and F.T.; writing—review and editing, J.W. and B.S.; visualization, F.T.; supervision, J.W. and Y.W.; project administration, J.W. and Y.W.; funding acquisition, J.W. and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (52075119), Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51790502) and Shandong Provincial Key R & D Program (2019GGX102051).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (52075119), Major Pro-gram of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51790502) and Shandong Provincial Key R & D Program (2019GGX102051).

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Bokobza, L. Multiwall carbon nanotube elastomeric composites: A review. Polymer 2007, 48, 4907–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Fletcher, A.; Gupta, M.C.; Dudley, K.L.; Vedeler, E. Elastomer foam nanocomposites for electromagnetic dissipation and shielding applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 953–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Basheer, B.V.; George, J.J.; Siengchin, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J. Polymer grafted carbon nanotubes—Synthesis, properties, and applications: A review. Nano Struct. Nano Objects 2020, 22, 100429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, J.; Jin, X.; Li, C.; Wang, W.; Wu, H.; Guo, S. Graphene and graphene derivatives toughening polymers: Toward high toughness and strength. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 370, 831–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tarawneh, M.A.; Ahmad, S.H.; Noum, S.Y.E.; Lau, K.T. Sonication effect on the mechanical properties of MWCNTs reinforced natural rubber. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 47, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Song, S.; Zhang, Y. Carbon nanotube/reduced graphene oxide hybrid for simultaneously enhancing the thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of styrene -butadiene rubber. Carbon 2017, 123, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tarawneh, M.A.; Ahmad, S.H.J.; Rasid, R.; Yahya, S.Y.; Shamsul, B.A.R.; Ehnoum, S.; Ka, K.Z.; Seng, L.Y. Mechanical properties of thermoplastic natural rubber (TPNR) reinforced with different types of carbon nanotube. Sains Malays. 2011, 40, 725–728. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bokobza, L.; Bruneel, J.-L.; Couzi, M. Raman spectra of carbon-based materials (from graphite to carbon black) and of some silicone composites. C J. Carbon Res. 2015, 1, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bokobza, L. Mechanical and electrical properties of elastomer nanocomposites based on different carbon nanomaterials. J. Carbon Res. 2017, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bokobza, L.; Rapoport, O. Reinforcement of natural rubber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 85, 2301–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liliane, B.; Mostafa, R. Blends of carbon blacks and multiwall carbon nanotubes as reinforcing fillers for hydrocarbon rubbers. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2008, 46, 1939–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bokobza, L.; Bruneel, J.L.; Couzi, M. Raman spectroscopic investigation of carbon-based materials and their composites. Comparison between carbon nanotubes and carbon black. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 590, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bokobza, L.; Paris, T.; André, L.; Dorothea, K.; Philippe, S. Thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of composites based on multiwall carbon nanotubes and styrene-butadiene rubber. KGK-Kaut Gummi Kunst.. 2014, 67, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shanmugharaj, A.M.; Bae, J.H.; Lee, K.Y.; Noh, W.H.; Lee, S.H.; Ryu, S.H. Physical and chemical characteristics of multiwalled carbon nanotubes functionalized with aminosilane and its influence on the properties of natural rubber composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 1813–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shanmugharaj, A.M.; Ryu, S.H. Influence of aminosilane-functionalized carbon nanotubes on the rheometric, mechanical, electrical and thermal degradation properties of epoxidized natural rubber nanocomposites. Polym. Int. 2013, 62, 1433–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hoshikawa, Y.; Kawaguchi, R.; Nomura, K.; Akahane, H.; Ishii, T.; Ando, M.; Hoshino, N.; Akutagawa, T.; Yamada, H.; Kyotani, T. Quantitative analysis of the formation mechanism of tightly bound rubber by using carbon-coated alumina nanoparticles as a model filler. Carbon 2021, 173, 870–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peng, Z.; Feng, C.; Luo, Y.; Li, Y.; Kong, L.X. Self-assembled natural rubber/multi-walled carbon nanotube composites using latex compounding techniques. Carbon 2010, 48, 4497–4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhattacharyya, S.; Sinturel, C.; Bahloul, O.; Saboungi, M.L.; Thomas, S.; Salvetat, J.P. Improving reinforcement of natural rubber by networking of activated carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2008, 46, 1037–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hernández, M.; Bernal, M.; Verdejo, R.; Ezquerra, T.A.; López-Manchado, M.A. Overall performance of natural rubber/graphene nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 73, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Frasca, D.; Schulze, D.; Wachtendorf, V.; Morys, M.; Schartel, B. Multilayer graphene/chlorine-isobutene-isoprene rubber nanocomposites: The effect of dispersion. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 872–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Y.; Chen, L.; Qin, S.; Li, J.; Zhou, H.; Chen, J. Functionalized graphene-reinforced rubber composite: Mechanical and tribological behavior study. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Atieh, M.A. Effect of functionalized carbon nanotubes with carboxylic functional group on the mechanical and thermal properties of styrene butadiene rubber. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostructures 2011, 19, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xing, W.; Tang, M.; Wu, J.; Huang, G.; Li, H.; Lei, Z.; Fu, X.; Li, H. Multifunctional properties of graphene/rubber nanocomposites fabricated by a modified latex compounding method. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 99, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, V.; Lee, D.J. Studies of nanocomposites based on carbon nanomaterials and RTV silicone rubber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, J.; Sharma, J.; Monaghan, K.W.; Meyer, H.M.; Cullen, D.A.; Rossy, A.M.; Keum, J.K.; Wood, D.L.; Polizos, G. Styrene-based elastomer composites with functionalized graphene oxide and silica nanofiber fillers: Mechanical and thermal conductivity properties. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ponnamma, D.; Ramachandran, R.; Hussain, S.; Rajaraman, R.; Amarendra, G.; Varughese, K.T.; Thomas, S. Free-volume correlation with mechanical and dielectric properties of natural rubber/multi walled carbon nanotubes composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 77, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anand, K.A.; Jose, T.S.; Alex, R.; Joseph, R. Natural rubber-carbon nanotube composites through latex compounding. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2010, 59, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Matchawet, S.; Kaesaman, A.; Bomlai, P.; Nakason, C. Effects of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and conductive carbon black on electrical, dielectric, and mechanical properties of epoxidized natural rubber composites. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kueseng, P.; Sae-Oui, P.; Rattanasom, N. Mechanical and electrical properties of natural rubber and nitrile rubber blends filled with multi-wall carbon nanotube: Effect of preparation methods. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, D.; Kong, Q.Q.; Jia, H.; Xie, L.J.; Chen, J.; Tao, Z.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, D.; Chen, C.-M. Dual-functional 3D multi-wall carbon nanotubes/graphene/silicone rubber elastomer: Thermal management and electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 2021, 183, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Studebaker, M.L.; Nabors, L.G. Sulfur group analyses in natural rubber vulcanizates. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1959, 32, 941–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chan, B.L.; Elliott, D.J.; Holley, M.; Smith, J.F. The influence of curing systems on the properties of natural rubber. J. Polym. Sci. Symp. 1974, 48, 61–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sombatsompop, N. Analysis of cure characteristics on cross-link density and type, and viscoelastic properties of natural rubber. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 1998, 37, 333–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cunneen, J.; Russell, R. Occurrence and prevention of changes in the chemical structure of natural rubber tire tread vulcanizates during service. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1970, 43, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Flory, P.J.; Rabjohn, N.; Shaffer, M.C. Dependence of elastic properties of vulcanized rubber on the degree of cross-linking. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1950, 23, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mullins, L. Determination of degree of crosslinking in natural rubber vulcanizates. Part I. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1957, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Loo, C.T. High temperature vulcanization of elastomers: 2. Network structures in conventional sulphenamide-sulphur natural rubber vulcanizates. Polymer 1974, 15, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mukhopadhyay, R.; De, S.K. Effect of vulcanization temperature and vulcanization systems on the structure and properties of natural rubber vulcanizates. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1979, 52, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saito, T.; Yamano, M.; Nakayama, K.; Kawahara, S. Quantitative analysis of crosslinking junctions of vulcanized natural rubber through rubber-state NMR spectroscopy. Polym. Test. 2021, 96, 107130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sainumsai, W.; Suchiva, K.; Toki, S. Influence of sulphur crosslink type on the strain-induced crystallization of natural rubber vulcanizates during uniaxial stretching by in situ WAXD using a synchrotron radiation. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 17, 1539–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Sun, K. Effect of crosslink structures on dynamic mechanical properties of natural rubber vulcanizates under different aging conditions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 81, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, X.; Zhao, N.; He, C. The superior mechanical and physical properties of nanocarbon reinforced bulk composites achieved by architecture design—A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 113, 100672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, S. A review on enhancement of mechanical and tribological properties of polymer composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes and graphene sheet: Molecular dynamics simulations. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 160, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Degrange, J.M.; Thomine, M.; Kapsa, P.; Pelletier, J.M.; Chazeau, L.; Vigier, G.; Dudragne, G.; Guerbé, L. Influence of viscoelasticity on the tribological behaviour of carbon black filled nitrile rubber (NBR) for lip seal application. Wear 2005, 259, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Arash, B.; Wang, Q. A study on tribology of nitrile-butadiene rubber composites by incorporation of carbon nanotubes: Molecular dynamics simulations. Carbon 2016, 100, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jin, Y.; Duan, F.; Mu, X. Functionalization enhancement on interfacial shear strength between graphene and polyethylene. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 387, 1100–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, P.; Qiao, G.; Hou, D.; Jin, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Sun, G. Functionalization enhancement interfacial bonding strength between graphene sheets and calcium silicate hydrate: Insights from molecular dynamics simulation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 261, 120500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, F.; Hu, N.; Zhang, J.; Atobe, S.; Weng, S.; Ning, H.; Liu, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Mo, F.; et al. The interfacial mechanical properties of functionalized graphene-polymer nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 66658–66664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, B.; Fu, S.; Wu, Z.; Bai, H.; Ning, N.; Fu, Q. Molecular dynamics simulations of orientation induced interfacial enhancement between single walled carbon nanotube and aromatic polymers chains. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 73, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cui, J.; Zhao, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y. Effects of carbon nanotubes functionalization on mechanical and tribological properties of nitrile rubber nanocomposites: Molecular dynamics simulations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2021, 196, 110556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Duan, Q.; Xie, J.; Xia, G.; Xiao, C.; Yang, X.; Xie, Q.; Huang, Z. Molecular dynamics simulation for the effect of fluorinated graphene oxide layer spacing on the thermal and mechanical properties of fluorinated epoxy resin. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ji, W.M.; Zhang, L.W.; Liew, K.M. Understanding interfacial interaction characteristics of carbon nitride reinforced epoxy composites from atomistic insights. Carbon 2021, 171, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Peng, X.; Yan, C.; Liu, S.; Hu, N. Pull-out simulations on interfacial properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2011, 50, 1854–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Coto, B.; Antia, I.; Barriga, J.; Blanco, M.; Sarasua, J.R. Influence of the geometrical properties of the carbon nanotubes on the interfacial behavior of epoxy/CNT composites: A molecular modelling approach. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 79, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, S.; Yu, S.; Kyoung, W.; Han, D.S.; Cho, M. Multiscale modeling of size-dependent elastic properties of carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites with interfacial imperfections. Polymer 2012, 53, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nakao, T.; Kohjiya, S. Computer simulation of network formation in natural rubber (NR). In Chemistry, Manufacture and Applications of Natural Rubber; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2014; ISBN 009780857096838. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ma, J.; Nie, Y.; Wang, B. Simulation study on the relationship between the crosslinking degree and structure, hydrophobic behavior for poly (styrene-co-divinylbenzene) copolymer. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1173, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, T.; Huang, H.; Li, W.; Chang, X.; Cao, J.; Hua, L. Vulcanization modeling and mechanism for improved tribological performance of styrene-butadiene rubber at the atomic scale. Tribol. Lett. 2020, 68, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Park, C.; Yun, G.J. Characterization of interfacial properties of graphene-reinforced polymer nanocomposites by molecular dynamics-shear deformation model. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME 2018, 85, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Park, C.; Kim, G.; Jung, J.; Krishnakumar, B.; Rana, S.; Yun, G.J. Enhanced self-healing performance of graphene oxide/vitrimer nanocomposites: A molecular dynamics simulations study. Polymer 2020, 206, 122862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, X.; Zhou, X.; Kuang, F.; Zuo, H.; Huang, J. Mechanical and tribological properties of nitrile rubber reinforced by nano-SiO2: Molecular dynamics simulation. Tribol. Lett. 2021, 69, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rigby, D.; Sun, H.; Eichinger, B.E. Computer simulations of poly(ethylene oxide): Force field, PVT diagram and cyclization behaviour. Polym. Int. 1999, 44, 311–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Toxvaerd, S. Molecular dynamics at constant temperature and pressure. Phys. Rev. E 1993, 47, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Berendsen, H.J.C.; Postma, J.P.M.; Van Gunsteren, W.F.; Dinola, A.; Haak, J.R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Fox, T.G.; Flory, P.J. Second-order transition temperatures and related properties of polystyrene. I. Influence of molecular weight. J. Appl. Phys. 1950, 21, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhu, L.; Chen, X.; Shi, R.; Zhang, H.; Han, R.; Cheng, X.; Zhou, C. Tetraphenylphenyl-modified damping additives for silicone rubber: Experimental and molecular simulation investigation. Mater. Des. 2021, 202, 109551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, K.; Li, Y.; Lian, Q.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, J. Influence of cross-linking density on the structure and properties of the interphase within supported ultrathin epoxy films. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 9019–9030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhao, Z.; Zhao, X. Electronic, optical, and mechanical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 with four crystal structures. J. Semicond. 2015, 36, 083004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Theodorou, D.N.; Suter, U.W. Atomistic modeling of mechanical properties of polymeric glasses. Macromolecules 1986, 19, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhan, Y.; Pang, M.; Wang, H.; Du, Y. The structural, electronic, elastic and optical properties of AlCu(Se1-xTex) 2 compounds from first-principle calculations. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2012, 12, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pugh, S.F. XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1954, 45, 823–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g001 550
Figure 1. Solubility parameters NR with different degree of polymerization.
Figure 1. Solubility parameters NR with different degree of polymerization.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g001
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g002 550
Figure 2. Establishment of un-crosslinked CNT/VNR molecular models. (a) NR molecular chain. (b) Five repeating units with one potential cross-linking point. (c) Monosulfide. (d) Disulfide. (e) Polysulfide. (f) Different CNT contents un-crosslinked CNT/VNR molecular models. (g) Size and corresponding positions of the nanotubes.
Figure 2. Establishment of un-crosslinked CNT/VNR molecular models. (a) NR molecular chain. (b) Five repeating units with one potential cross-linking point. (c) Monosulfide. (d) Disulfide. (e) Polysulfide. (f) Different CNT contents un-crosslinked CNT/VNR molecular models. (g) Size and corresponding positions of the nanotubes.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g002
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g003 550
Figure 3. Flow chart of the programing of vulcanization process.
Figure 3. Flow chart of the programing of vulcanization process.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g003
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g004 550
Figure 4. 10 wt.% CNT/VNR molecular model crosslinking process and containing crosslinking bonds. (a) Colored by atom types as same as Figure 2. (b) Colored by molecular chains.
Figure 4. 10 wt.% CNT/VNR molecular model crosslinking process and containing crosslinking bonds. (a) Colored by atom types as same as Figure 2. (b) Colored by molecular chains.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g004
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g005 550
Figure 5. Adsorption double layer structure model of 10 wt.% CNT/VNR composite (Periodic boundary conditions are shown as black lines). (a) Initial state. (b) Equilibrium state.
Figure 5. Adsorption double layer structure model of 10 wt.% CNT/VNR composite (Periodic boundary conditions are shown as black lines). (a) Initial state. (b) Equilibrium state.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g005
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g006 550
Figure 6. The FFVs and free volume distribution of different CNT contents CNT/VNR composites.
Figure 6. The FFVs and free volume distribution of different CNT contents CNT/VNR composites.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g006
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g007 550
Figure 7. The comparatively MSD of pure VNR and CNT/VNR composites.
Figure 7. The comparatively MSD of pure VNR and CNT/VNR composites.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g007
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g008 550
Figure 8. The energy of composite-SiO2 interface.
Figure 8. The energy of composite-SiO2 interface.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g008
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g009 550
Figure 9. The atom relative concentration of different systems along Z direction.
Figure 9. The atom relative concentration of different systems along Z direction.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g009
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g010 550
Figure 10. The binding energy of CNT/VNR composites with different CNT contents.
Figure 10. The binding energy of CNT/VNR composites with different CNT contents.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g010
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g011 550
Figure 11. Axial density distribution of CNT/VNR composites with different CNT contents. (a) Pure VNR. (b) 5 wt.%CNT/VNR. (c) 10 wt.%CNT/VNR. (d) 15 wt.%CNT/VNR.
Figure 11. Axial density distribution of CNT/VNR composites with different CNT contents. (a) Pure VNR. (b) 5 wt.%CNT/VNR. (c) 10 wt.%CNT/VNR. (d) 15 wt.%CNT/VNR.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g011
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g012 550
Figure 12. Deformation state of different CNT/VNR composites and time at the beginning of slipping. (a) Pure VNR. (b) 5 wt.%CNT/VNR composite. (c) 10 wt.%CNT/VNR composite. (d) 15 wt.%CNT/VNR composite.
Figure 12. Deformation state of different CNT/VNR composites and time at the beginning of slipping. (a) Pure VNR. (b) 5 wt.%CNT/VNR composite. (c) 10 wt.%CNT/VNR composite. (d) 15 wt.%CNT/VNR composite.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g012
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g013 550
Figure 13. Relative atom concentration of different CNT/VNR composites.
Figure 13. Relative atom concentration of different CNT/VNR composites.
Nanomaterials 11 02464 g013
Table
Table 1. Bulk, Shear modulus and Young’s modulo results and increase percentage compared to pure VNR.
Table 1. Bulk, Shear modulus and Young’s modulo results and increase percentage compared to pure VNR.
CNT Content
(wt.%)		Bulk
Modulus (GPa)		Increase (%)Shear
Modulus
(GPa)		Increase (%)Young’s
Modulo
(GPa)		Increase (%)
02.22~2.34
(2.30)		00.88~0.94
(0.90)		04.01~4.15 (4.09)0
52.35~2.51
(2.42)		5.220.94~1.00
(0.96)		6.674.23~4.59
(4.42)		8.07
102.50~2.77
(2.61)		13.481.01~1.06
(1.03)		14.444.70~4.94
(4.83)		18.09
152.65~2.85
(2.74)		19.131.05~1.12
(1.09)		21.114.99~5.31
(5.19)		26.89
Table
Table 2. COF details of different CNT contents CNT/VNR composites.
Table 2. COF details of different CNT contents CNT/VNR composites.
CNT Content (wt.%)COFIncreased Percentage (%)
01.017~1.049 (1.033)0
51.037~1.118 (1.078)4.36
101.097~1.192 (1.144)10.75
151.104~1.207 (1.155)11.81
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teng, F.; Wu, J.; Su, B.; Wang, Y. Enhanced Tribological Properties of Vulcanized Natural Rubber Composites by Applications of Carbon Nanotube: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092464

AMA Style

Teng F, Wu J, Su B, Wang Y. Enhanced Tribological Properties of Vulcanized Natural Rubber Composites by Applications of Carbon Nanotube: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(9):2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092464

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teng, Fei, Jian Wu, Benlong Su, and Youshan Wang. 2021. "Enhanced Tribological Properties of Vulcanized Natural Rubber Composites by Applications of Carbon Nanotube: A Molecular Dynamics Study" Nanomaterials 11, no. 9: 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092464

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop