Next Article in Journal
Development of Quantum Dot (QD) Based Color Converters for Multicolor Display
Next Article in Special Issue
Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macro/Mesoporous Nb2O5/Nb4N5 Heterostructure as Sulfur Host for High-Performance Lithium/Sulfur Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Asymmetric Lipid Transfer between Zwitterionic Vesicles by Nanoviscosity Measurements
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Electrochemical Behavior of Peanut-Shell Activated Carbon/Molybdenum Oxide/Molybdenum Carbide Ternary Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing the Capacity and Stability by CoFe2O4 Modified g-C3N4 Composite for Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2
Department of Materials of Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Hefei 230026, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(5), 1088; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051088
Submission received: 18 March 2021 / Revised: 9 April 2021 / Accepted: 19 April 2021 / Published: 22 April 2021

Abstract

:
As society progresses, the task of developing new green energy brooks no delay. Li-O2 batteries have high theoretical capacity, but are difficult to put into practical use due to problems such as high overvoltage, low charge-discharge efficiency, poor rate, and cycle performance. The development of high-efficiency catalysts to effectively solve the shortcomings of Li-O2 batteries is of great significance to finding a solution for energy problems. Herein, we design CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites, and combine the advantages of the g-C3N4 material with the spinel-type metal oxide material. The flaky structure of g-C3N4 accelerates the transportation of oxygen and lithium ions and inhibits the accumulation of CoFe2O4 particles. The CoFe2O4 materials accelerate the decomposition of Li2O2 and reduce electrode polarization in the charge–discharge reaction. When CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composites are used as catalysts in Li-O2 batteries, the battery has a better discharge specific capacity of 9550 mA h g−1 (catalyst mass), and the cycle stability of the battery has been improved, which is stable for 85 cycles.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the face of huge pressure from energy conservation and emission reduction advocates, it is necessary to replace traditional fuel vehicles with electric vehicles possessing high energy capacity and long range [1,2]. The theoretical energy density of Li-O2 batteries is 3500 Wh kg−1, much higher than other batteries. Li-O2 batteries are expected to be used in electric vehicles and in large-scale productions [3,4,5]. However, so far, the actual specific energy of Li-O2 batteries reported in literature is less than half the theoretical value. This is because during the charging and discharging processes, Li-O2 batteries generate large polarization phenomena and high activation energy, leading to high energy loss [6]. One of the solutions to reduce energy loss for the Li-O2 batteries is to develop new electrocatalysts with high activity. Metallic materials, such as platinum and iridium, or their alloys, have been shown to be the best electrode materials for oxygen reduction reaction. However, the high price of metallic materials hinders their commercial application [7,8]. Hence, more and more attention has been paid to the development of electrocatalysts prepared by some non-precious metals and non-metals [9].
Recently, spinel materials (such as Co3O4) with adjustable structure and stable chemical properties have attracted the attention of researchers [10,11]. However, compared with noble-metal-based catalysts, the catalytic performance of spinel material has a big gap. Studies have found that the structural stability and performance of the spinel material can be improved by replacing Co in Co3O4 with secondary metals such as Ni, Cu and Mn [12]. Unfortunately, when choosing this material as a catalyst, as the reaction begins, particles continue to aggregate, the number of active sites decreases, and cycle performance decreases. Choosing a suitable supporting substrate to form a stable structure can effectively reduce particle agglomeration and improve catalyst activity.
Graphite carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has a graphite-like planar phase, of which the nitrogen atoms have both three-fold coordination atoms and two-fold coordination atoms. They each also contain six nitrogen lone pairs of electrons [13,14,15]. This enables the g-C3N4-based catalyst to change the electronic structure and provides an ideal position for recombination [16,17]. Therefore, when employed as an ameliorative support for the nanoparticle surface, g-C3N4 plays a significant role in the catalysis process. It can not only restrain the migration of nanoparticles, but also acts as the second active-site supplier that imparts activity to the integral catalyst [18,19]. In addition, we know that rate capability, round-trip efficiency, and cycle life in Li-O2 batteries are equally governed by parasitic reactions, which are now recognized to be caused by formation of the highly reactive singlet oxygen. Selected homogeneous catalyst approach to limit singlet oxygen release is a way to improve performance [20,21,22]. The uniformly dispersed particles supported on substrate are also beneficial to performance improvement due to more sufficient contact between the active constitutes and Li2O2 particles.
Taking these issues into account, we herein rationally design a scalable facile strategy for fabricating a CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite with the CoFe2O4 particles supported on the flaky g-C3N4. Thereinto, g-C3N4 not only provides rich catalytic sites, but also acts as a support for loading CoFe2O4 nanoparticles to restrain their aggregation. g-C3N4 and CoFe2O4 synergistically enhance the catalytic performance. The resultant CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite exhibits enhanced electrochemical performance of Li-O2 batteries with respect to discharge capacity, voltage polarization, and cycling performance when compared with single CoFe2O4. This strategy may provide an efficient and versatile approach for designing spinel-based materials as efficient Li-O2 batteries cathodes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis

Preparation of g-C3N4: First, 4 g melamine was placed in a crucible with a cover. The crucible was annealed at 550 °C for 4 h in a muffle furnace, and the obtained product was grinded to obtain block C3N4. Next, 1 g C3N4 was dissolved in 35 mL hydrochloric acid and stirred for 30 min. The solution was then placed in a Teflon hydrothermal kettle at 110 °C for 300 min. Finally, the mixture was centrifuged, washed, and dried at 70 °C for 10 h.
Preparation of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4: First, 0.4 g g-C3N4 was dissolved in 30 mL ethylene glycol, then 0.0496 g cobalt nitrate and 0.138 g iron nitrate (nCo:nFe = 1:2) were added and stirred vigorously for 30 min to achieve thorough mixing. The concentrated ammonia solution was added dropwise to the mixed solution to sustain the pH at 8, which was stirred for another 30 min. Next, the mixture was put in a 50 mL Teflon-lined autoclave and kept at the temperature of 160 °C for 20 h. The products were centrifuged, washed, and dried at 70 °C for 600 min. After grinding and annealing at 350 °C for 3 h, CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite was obtained.
Preparation of CoFe2O4: The procedure for the preparation of pure CoFe2O4 was the same as the preparation of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4, but without g-C3N4.

2.2. Material Characterization

The phase prepared in this experiment was tested with a D/MAX2500V X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The scan range was set to 10–90°, and the scan speed was 10° min−1. For the observation and research of the microscopic morphology of the sample, the SU8020 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) produced by Japan’s JOEL company was used. The surface microstructure and preliminary quantitative analysis of the sample was tested and analyzed by the JEM-2100F field emission transmission electron microscope (TEM) and energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS). A TriStar Ⅱ 3020 V1.03 specific surface area tester was employed and the specific surface area was calculated by the BET method from the adsorption isotherm of the sample with nitrogen gas. The component elements of the sample and the analysis of element valence were performed by ESCALAB250 X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS).

2.3. Electrochemical Performance Test

2.3.1. ORR/OER Performance Test

The ORR/OER electrocatalytic performance test was carried out by an ATA-1B rotating disc electrode (RDE). Preparation of working electrode: A mixture of 10 mg CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 and 2 mg Vulcan XC-72 were added to 40 μL Nafion solution, and 2 mL isopropanol water with the given fraction (Visopropanol:VDeionized water = 1:5) was added into the solution. The ultrasonic treatment was then used to disperse the solution, then 5 μL was pipetted and mixed suspension added to the polished glassy carbon electrode surface. Finally, the electrode was dried by natural volatilization or low-temperature drying. Once the electrode was completely dried, it proceeded to the testing process. In the measurements, glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was used as the working electrode. Saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as the reference electrode. Graphite electrode was used as the auxiliary electrode.
For ORR/OER polarization curve testing, the scanning speed was set to 10 mV s−1 and the rotation speed was 400~2000 rpm. The electrolyte was 0.1 M oxygen-saturated KOH solution. The ORR potential scanning interval was set between 0 and −0.6 V. The electrode rotation speed tested in OER was 1600 rpm, and the potential scanning interval was 0~1 V.

2.3.2. Battery Performance Test

Preparation of oxygen electrode: First, 15 mg catalyst and 30 mg KB were grinded and mixed for 1 h. Next, 83.3 mg PVDF (6 wt%) and 10 drops of NMP were added to the grinded powder to form a uniform slurry without obvious particles, which was then coated on carbon paper and dried at 90 °C for 10 h.
The electrochemical performance of batteries was tested by using 2032-type coin cell. Each cell was composed of a lithium metal anode, a glass fiber separator (Whatman grade GF/D), an electrolyte containing 1 M LiCF3SO3 in TEGDME, an oxygen cathode, and two pieces of nickel foam (1 mm thick) as the filler and the current collector. This was assembled in an argon-filled glove box (M. Braun). The oxygen cathodes were prepared by coating catalyst ink onto carbon paper homogenously. The catalyst mass loading of the oxygen cathode is about 0.5 ± 0.1 mg cm−2.
For the evaluation of the battery discharge–charge performance and overvoltage performance test, voltage range was 2.2–4.5 V (vs. Li+/Li). The current density was 100 mA g−1.
The voltage range for the battery cycle performance test was 2.0–4.5 V (vs. Li+/Li). The current density was 500 mA g−1 and limited the capacity to 1000 mA h g−1.

3. Results and Discussions

As shown in Scheme 1, the synthesis of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 starts with a facile hydrothermal treatment of the solution containing cobalt nitrate, iron nitrate, and the prepared g-C3N4. The phase is studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD). In Figure 1a, g-C3N4 exhibits two characteristic diffraction peaks: A peak at 27.4° is formed by the stack of g-C3N4 rings, which is the (002) crystal plane [23]; another with relatively weak intensity is at 13.0°, which is a characteristic diffraction peak of Melamine substances and mainly refers to the in-plane nitrogen pores formed by the 3-s-triazine structure [24]. By comparing the two XRD patterns, before and after alkali treatment, the peak of the material does not change, which implies that the crystal structure of g-C3N4 remains unchanged. This confirms that carbon nitride possesses good chemical stability. For the XRD patterns of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite, the peaks at 18.3°, 30.7°, 35.7°, 43.3°, 57.4°, and 63.2° are CoFe2O4 diffraction peaks. The peak at 2θ position of 27.7° correspond to the typical peak of g-C3N4, implying that the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 material has been successfully synthesized.
The surface and internal morphology of materials are observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Bulk g-C3N4 is composed of many layered nanosheets, which are stacked on each other (Figure S1). After alkali treatment, the g-C3N4 is stripped into flakes (Figure S2), which is conducive to the loading of spherical particles. Without g-C3N4, pure CoFe2O4 shows the particle morphology in Figure S3, while CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 exhibits stacked granular morphology connected with particles as shown in Figure 1b. TEM images indicate that CoFe2O4 nanoparticles are supported on the flaky g-C3N4 where the clear lattice fringes of 0.25 nm correspond well to the (311) plane of CoFe2O4, suggesting that these particles are CoFe2O4 (Figure 1c,d). Moreover, the element distribution C, N, O, Co, and Fe of the material is observed by energy-dispersive spectroscopic (EDS) (Figure 1e), indicating successfully prepared material of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite and uniformly distributed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles on the flat g-C3N4. The specific surface area and pore volume of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 are determined to be 244.1 m2 g−1 and 0.423 cm3 g−1 by Braunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis (Figure S4), which is much larger than those of g-C3N4. Such a big increase for specific surface area and pore volume indicates that CoFe2O4 particles supported on the flaky g-C3N4 are effective for preventing g-C3N4 from stacking on each other. The increase in specific surface area and pore size can expose more active sites, increasing the ion migration rate during charging and discharging.
The elemental composition and chemical state of synthetic materials are analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The full-spectrum scan result shows that the material contains C, N, O, Fe, and Co, which proves that the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 material was successfully synthesized (Figure 2a). In the spectrum of C 1s (Figure 2b), two strong peaks are shown at 288.1 and 284.7 eV, which respectively belong to the sp2 hybridized bounded carbon (C=N) and graphitic carbon (C-C) [25,26]. Figure 2c is the N 1s spectrum, which confirms that the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite has three kinds of nitrogen. The 398.3 eV is the sp2 hybrid nitrogen (N1), the 399.2 eV is the tertiary nitrogen (N2), and the 400.9 eV is the amino functional group (N3), respectively [27,28]. The high-resolution Co 2p3/2 spectrum presents the signals of Co2+, Co3+, and satellite (Figure 2d), where the presence of Co3+, Co2+, and vibration satellite are respectively exhibited by the brown main peak (780.5 eV), the blue green peak at 782.2 eV, and the peak at 786.8 eV [29,30,31]. The Fe 2p3/2 spectrum of the catalyst also exhibits Fe2+, Fe3+, and satellite peaks, which respectively appear at 710.7 eV, 712.2 eV, and 714.1 eV [31,32,33]. The above results indicate that two-electron pairs of Fe3+/Fe2+ and Co3+/Co2+ exist in the structure of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 material. In addition, the O1s XPS peak at 530.2 eV is the intrinsic lattice, while another peak at 531.8 eV may be the adsorbed water [34,35].
The electrochemical catalytic activity of the sample was evaluated in 0.1M KOH solution by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). In Figure 3a, the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 displays an onset potential (Eonset) of 0.90 V and a half-wave potential (E1/2) of 0.76 V, which are more positive than those of CoFe2O4 (0.67 V) and g-C3N4 (0.65 V) catalysts (Figure 3b), signifying the higher activity for ORR. Moreover, the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 exhibits a larger diffusion-limited current, suggesting the material has strong mass transfer ability and fast electron transfer speed. The reaction kinetics of the material are calculated and analyzed by the LSV curve at different speeds, as shown in Figure 3c. The activity of all materials at different speeds is linearly related, and the calculated number of transferred electrons show Pt/C, CoFe2O4/g-C3N4, CoFe2O4, and g-C3N4 is 4.0, 3.8, 3.4, and 1.67, respectively. The ORR reaction of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite is nearly a 4e- process, which indicates a better ORR catalytic performance and is close to commercial Pt/C. Furthermore, the OER curves of various catalysts show the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 catalyst has the limiting current density of 49.3 mA cm−2, higher than CoFe2O4 (~18.8 mA cm−2), g-C3N4 (~1.93 mA cm−2), and Pt/C (~9.87 mA cm−2) (Figure 3d), indicating the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 material has the best OER performance. This may be due to the synergies of g-C3N4 and CoFe2O4 which boost the performance.
The electrochemical catalytic ability of the material was evaluated by assembling 2032 button batteries. In Figure 4a, the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite exhibits a discharge specific capacity of 9550 mA h g−1, significantly higher than CoFe2O4 and XC-72. The overpotential of the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite as exhibited in Figure 4b is 1.21 V, which is lower than the catalysts of CoFe2O4 (1.33 V) and XC-72 (1.87 V). These results indicate that when CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite is used as catalyst for Li-O2 batteries, the degree of polarization during the discharge–charge process is relatively lower than pure CoFe2O4. Figure 4c,d show the cycle performance of CoFe2O4 and CoFe2O4/g-C3N4. The CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite can stably cycle 85 times, which is significantly higher than pure CoFe2O4 cathodes (16 times). In the battery cycle reaction, the flake structure of g-C3N4 can supply sufficient space to store discharge product Li2O2 and accelerate the transportation of O2 and Li+; also, its larger specific surface area and rich N content provide more reactive sites for the discharge–charge reaction. In addition, g-C3N4 provides a stable support for restraining aggregation of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles due to its high chemical stability, which leads to an increase in the stability of the composite catalyst. Therefore, from the discussion, the synergistic effect between g-C3N4 and CoFe2O4 can effectively improve the electrocatalytic activity and stability of the catalyst in Li-O2 batteries, which is much better than pure CoFe2O4 cathode. The capacity retention rate tests of Li-O2 batteries of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 material were carried out at four current densities (Figure 4e). Compared with the first discharge capacity, the corresponding capacity retention rates of the four current densities are 67.7%, 61.3%, 48.4%, and 42.3%, respectively (Figure 4f). All results prove that CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite can promote ORR/OER dynamics, thus improving the rate performance of the battery. Even at a high current, the battery keeps a good capacity retention rate.
To investigate the composition and morphology changes of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 electrodes at different stages after the discharge–charge process, Figure 5a displays XRD spectrum of batteries at different states. Compared with the catalyst in the initial state, after discharging, the surface of carbon sheet clearly exhibits characteristic peaks of Li2O2 at 33°, 35°, and 58°, and neither Li2O nor LiOH is detected. After charging, no diffraction peak of Li2O2 is observed, which indicates that the battery has a good reversibility. Figure 5b–d are the SEM images of the battery after different processes. From Figure 5c, the morphology of the Li2O2 after the battery being deeply discharged is clearly observed. The lithium peroxide is mainly distributed uniformly on the carbon sheet in the form of filaments. After the charging process (Figure 5d), Li2O2 disappeared completely, which is similar with the initial state (Figure 5b) and consistent with XRD results, indicating that the battery has good reversibility.

4. Conclusions

In short, the g-C3N4/CoFe2O4 material is synthesized by simple methods. The flake structure of the CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 catalyst accelerates the transportation of O2 and Li+ and provides sufficient space to store the discharge product of Li2O2. Both g-C3N4 and CoFe2O4 can offer catalytic sites. In addition, g-C3N4 supplies a stable support for restraining the aggregation of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. Therefore, the Li-O2 batteries with such CoFe2O4 modified g-C3N4 composites as air cathodes deliver a discharge specific capacity of 9550 mA h g−1, and the cycle stability has been enhanced more than pure CoFe2O4 cathodes. This strategy opens opportunities for rationally exploring different modified strategies on nanostructured electrocatalysts for diverse devices.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11051088/s1, Figure S1: SEM image of bulk g-C3N4, Figure S2: SEM image of flake C3N4, Figure S3: SEM image of CoFe2O4, Figure S4: (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (b) specific surface area and pore volume of g-C3N4 and CoFe2O4/g-C3N4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Z., Y.Y.; methodology, L.D.; software, Z.L.; formal analysis, Q.G.; data curation, X.L., D.W.; writing original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, grant number 172731 and National College Students’ Innovative Entrepreneurship Training Scheme, grant number 201910359038.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be available upon request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X.G.; Xie, Z.; Zhou, Z. Enzyme-Inspired Room-Temperature Lithium–Oxygen Chemistry via Reversible Cleavage and Formation of Dioxygen Bonds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 17856–17863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Z. Towards practical lithium-metal anodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3040–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qiao, Y.; He, Y.; Wu, S.; Jiang, K.; Li, X.; Guo, S.; He, P.; Zhou, H. MOF-Based Separator in an Li–O2 Battery: An Effective Strategy to Restrain the Shuttling of Dual Redox Mediators. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mu, X.; Wen, Q.; Ou, G.; Du, Y.; He, P.; Zhong, M.; Zhu, H.; Wu, H.; Yang, S.; Liu, Y.; et al. A current collector covering nanostructured villous oxygen-deficient NiO fabricated by rapid laser-scan for Li-O2 batteries. Nano Energy 2018, 51, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akhtar, N.; Akhtar, W. Prospects, challenges, and latest developments in lithium-air batteries. Int. J. Energy Res. 2014, 39, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ganesan, P.; Prabu, M.; Sanetuntikul, J.; Shanmugam, S. Cobalt sulfide nanoparticles grown on nitrogen and sulfur codo-ped graphene oxide: An efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3625–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, W.; Wang, J.; Yin, R.; Li, B.; Huang, X.; Zhao, L.; Qian, L. Single-atom Pt supported on holey ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets as efficient catalyst for Li-O2 batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 564, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, F.; Zhao, Q.; Han, X.; Chen, J. Recycling application of Li-MnO2 batteries as rechargeable lithi-um–air batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 4338–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ionescu, M.I.; Laforgue, A. Synthesis of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes directly on metallic foams as cathode material with high mass load for lithium-air batteries. Thin Solid Films 2020, 709, 138211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, H.; Jiang, W.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, S.; Tang, T.; Huang, L.-B.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Wei, Z.; Hu, J.-S. Self-terminated activation for high-yield production of N,P-codoped nanoporous carbon as an efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for Zn-air battery. Carbon 2018, 128, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, S.; Hao, X.; Abudula, A.; Guan, G. Nanostructured Co-based bifunctional electrocatalysts for energy conversion and storage: Current status and perspectives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 18674–18707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Budnikova, Y.H. Recent advances in metal–organic frameworks for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution and overall water splitting reactions. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 12483–12502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Luo, H.; Jiang, W.J.; Niu, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, L.P.; He, C.X.; Hu, J.S. Self-Catalyzed Growth of Co-N-C Nano-brushes for Efficient Rechargeable Zn-Air Batteries. Small 2020, 16, 2001171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Duan, J.; Chen, S.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Porous C3N4Nanolayers@N-Graphene Films as Catalyst Electrodes for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dai, L.; Xue, Y.; Qu, L.; Choi, H.-J.; Baek, J.-B. Metal-Free Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 4823–4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Luo, X.; Xie, Y.; Xin, S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.W.; Goodenough, J.B. α-MnO2 nanorods supported on porous graphitic carbon nitride as efficient electrocatalysts for lithium-air batteries. J. Power Sources 2018, 392, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fu, J.; Yu, J.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, B. g-C3N4-Based Heterostructured Photocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Xin, S.; He, X.; Zhang, D.; Shui, J. Electrocatalytic performances of g-C3N4-LaNiO3 composite as bi-functional catalysts for lithium-oxygen batteries. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Thomas, A.; Fu, X.; Antonietti, M. Metal-containing carbon nitride compounds: A new functional or-ganic-metal hybrid material. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1609–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Samojlov, A.; Schuster, D.; Kahr, J.; Freunberger, S.A. Surface and catalyst driven singlet oxygen formation in Li-O2 cells. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 362, 137175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, J.; Sun, B.; Zhao, Y.; Tkacheva, A.; Liu, Z.; Yan, K.; Guo, X.; McDonagh, A.M.; Shanmukaraj, D.; Wang, C.; et al. A versatile functionalized ionic liquid to boost the solution-mediated performances of lithium-oxygen batteries. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qian, Z.; Li, X.; Sun, B.; Du, L.; Wang, Y.; Zuo, P.; Yin, G.; Zhang, J.; Sun, B.; Wang, G. Unraveling the Promotion Effects of a Soluble Cobaltocene Catalyst with Respect to Li–O2 Battery Discharge. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 7028–7034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sano, T.; Tsutsui, S.; Koike, K.; Hirakawa, T.; Teramoto, Y.; Negishi, N.; Takeuchi, K. Activation of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) by alkaline hydrothermal treatment for photocatalytic NO oxidation in gas phase. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 6489–6496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nie, H.; Ou, M.; Zhong, Q.; Zhang, S.; Yu, L. Efficient visible-light photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous NO with graphitic carbon nitride (g–C3N4) activated by the alkaline hydrothermal treatment and mechanism analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 300, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cai, B.; Zhao, M.; Ma, Y.; Ye, Z.; Huang, J. Bioinspired Formation of 3D Hierarchical CoFe2O4 Porous Microspheres for Magnetic-Controlled Drug Release. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, J.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Fan, H.; Su, D.; Wang, G. MOF-derived porous N–Co3O4@N–C nanododecahedra wrapped with reduced graphene oxide as a high capacity cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 2797–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kong, H.J.; Won, D.H.; Kim, J.; Woo, S.I. Sulfur-Doped g-C3N4/BiVO4 Composite Photocatalyst for Water Oxidation under Visible Light. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 1318–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.-L.; Chen, Z.; Li, H.; Xiong, B.-Q.; Zhang, P.-L.; Tang, K.-W. Visible-light photoredox-catalyzed dual C–C bond cleavage: Synthesis of 2-cyanoalkylsulfonylated 3,4-dihydronaphthalenes through the insertion of sulfur dioxide. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 3011–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, D.; Dong, C.-L.; Zou, Y.; Su, D.; Huang, Y.-C.; Tao, L.; Dou, S.; Shen, S.; Wang, S. In situ evolution of highly dispersed amorphous CoOx clusters for oxygen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 11969–11975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Feng, L.; Li, Y.; Sun, L.; Mi, H.; Ren, X.; Zhang, P. Heterostructured CoO-Co3O4 nanoparticles anchored on nitrogen-doped hollow carbon spheres as cathode catalysts for Li-O2 batteries. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 14769–14776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Lau, L.W.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Han, Q.; Wang, B.; Gao, J.; Cheng, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Qu, L. Atomically Thin Mesoporous Nanomesh of Graphitic C3N4 for High-Efficiency Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 2745–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, X.; Liang, C.; Qu, X.; Ren, Y.; Yin, J.; Wang, W.; Yang, M.S.; Huang, W.; Dong, X. Sandwich-Structured Fe-Ni2P/MoSx/NF Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 1901926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, Y.J.; Kim, D.H.; Kang, T.-G.; Ko, Y.; Kang, K.; Lee, Y.J. Bifunctional MnO2-Coated Co3O4 Hetero-structured Catalysts for Reversible Li-O2 Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 10542–10550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, J.; Gao, R.; Zhou, D.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Z.; Schumacher, G.; Hu, Z.; Liu, X. Boosting the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co3O4 Nanosheets for a Li-O2 Battery through Modulating Inner Oxygen Vacancy and Exterior Co3+/Co2+ Ratio. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 6533–6541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite.
Nanomaterials 11 01088 sch001
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of bulk g-C3N4, g-C3N4, CoFe2O4, and CoFe2O4/g-C3N4; images of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 material: (b) SEM, (c) TEM, (d) HRTEM, and (e) EDS elemental mapping.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of bulk g-C3N4, g-C3N4, CoFe2O4, and CoFe2O4/g-C3N4; images of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 material: (b) SEM, (c) TEM, (d) HRTEM, and (e) EDS elemental mapping.
Nanomaterials 11 01088 g001
Figure 2. XPS survey spectra of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4: (a) full-spectrum scan, (b) C 1s, (c) N 1s, (d) Co 2p3/2, (e) Fe 2p3/2, and (f) O 1s.
Figure 2. XPS survey spectra of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4: (a) full-spectrum scan, (b) C 1s, (c) N 1s, (d) Co 2p3/2, (e) Fe 2p3/2, and (f) O 1s.
Nanomaterials 11 01088 g002
Figure 3. (a) ORR polarization curves; (b) the results summary of E1/2 and E0; (c) Koutecky-Levich plots; (d) OER curves of g-C3N4, CoFe2O4, CoFe2O4/g-C3N4, and Pt/C catalysts.
Figure 3. (a) ORR polarization curves; (b) the results summary of E1/2 and E0; (c) Koutecky-Levich plots; (d) OER curves of g-C3N4, CoFe2O4, CoFe2O4/g-C3N4, and Pt/C catalysts.
Nanomaterials 11 01088 g003
Figure 4. (a) First discharge–charge curves and (b) the overpotential curves of XC-72, CoFe2O4, and CoFe2O4/g-C3N4; cycle ability of (c) CoFe2O4 and (d) CoFe2O4/g-C3N4; (e) first discharge–charge plots at different current densities (200, 400, 600, and 800 mA g−1) and (f) capacity retention plots of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4.
Figure 4. (a) First discharge–charge curves and (b) the overpotential curves of XC-72, CoFe2O4, and CoFe2O4/g-C3N4; cycle ability of (c) CoFe2O4 and (d) CoFe2O4/g-C3N4; (e) first discharge–charge plots at different current densities (200, 400, 600, and 800 mA g−1) and (f) capacity retention plots of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4.
Nanomaterials 11 01088 g004
Figure 5. (a) XRD patterns of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 electrode in different states; SEM images of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 electrode in (b) pristine state, (c) 1st discharged state, and (d) 1st charged states.
Figure 5. (a) XRD patterns of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 electrode in different states; SEM images of CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 electrode in (b) pristine state, (c) 1st discharged state, and (d) 1st charged states.
Nanomaterials 11 01088 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Zhao, Y.; Ding, L.; Wang, D.; Guo, Q.; Li, Z.; Luo, H.; Zhang, D.; Yu, Y. Enhancing the Capacity and Stability by CoFe2O4 Modified g-C3N4 Composite for Lithium-Oxygen Batteries. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051088

AMA Style

Li X, Zhao Y, Ding L, Wang D, Guo Q, Li Z, Luo H, Zhang D, Yu Y. Enhancing the Capacity and Stability by CoFe2O4 Modified g-C3N4 Composite for Lithium-Oxygen Batteries. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(5):1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiaoya, Yajun Zhao, Lei Ding, Deqiang Wang, Qi Guo, Zhiwei Li, Hao Luo, Dawei Zhang, and Yan Yu. 2021. "Enhancing the Capacity and Stability by CoFe2O4 Modified g-C3N4 Composite for Lithium-Oxygen Batteries" Nanomaterials 11, no. 5: 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop