Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Size and Shape of Ho, Tm:KLu(WO4)2 Nanoparticles on Their Self-Assessed Photothermal Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Tunable Split-Disk Metamaterial Absorber for Sensing Application
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic Profiling Unveils the Impact of Non-Doped and Heteroatom-Doped Carbon Nanodots on Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasmonic Gold Nanohole Arrays for Surface-Enhanced Sum Frequency Generation Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Efficient Light Absorption of Monolayer Graphene by Quasi-Bound State in the Continuum

1
Department of Photoelectric Information Science and Engineering, School of Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(2), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020484
Submission received: 20 January 2021 / Revised: 5 February 2021 / Accepted: 8 February 2021 / Published: 14 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plasmonic Nanostructures and Their Applications)

Abstract

:
Graphene is an ideal ultrathin material for various optoelectronic devices, but poor light–graphene interaction limits its further applications particularly in the visible (Vis) to near-infrared (NIR) region. Despite tremendous efforts to improve light absorption in graphene, achieving highly efficient light absorption of monolayer graphene within a comparatively simple architecture is still urgently needed. Here, we demonstrate the interesting attribute of bound state in the continuum (BIC) for highly efficient light absorption of graphene by using a simple Si-based photonic crystal slab (PCS) with a slit. Near-perfect absorption of monolayer graphene can be realized due to high confinement of light and near-field enhancement in the Si-based PCS, where BIC turns into quasi-BIC due to the symmetry-breaking of the structure. Theoretical analysis based on the coupled mode theory (CMT) is proposed to evaluate the absorption performances of monolayer graphene integrated with the symmetry-broken PCS, which indicates that high absorption of graphene is feasible at critical coupling based on the destructive interference of transmission light. Moreover, the absorption spectra of the monolayer graphene are stable to the variations of the structural parameters, and the angular tolerances of classical incidence can be effectively improved via full conical incidence. By using the full conical incidence, the angular bandwidths for the peak absorptivity and for the central wavelength of graphene absorption can be enhanced more than five times and 2.92 times, respectively. When the Si-based PCS with graphene is used in refractive index sensors, excellent sensing performances with sensitivity of 604 nm/RIU and figure of merit (FoM) of 151 can be achieved.

1. Introduction

Graphene has attracted a high level of research interest due to its exceptional optical, electronical, chemical, and mechanical properties, combined with its unique electronic band structure [1,2]. For example, graphene has the linear dispersion of two-dimensional (2D) Dirac fermions, the full spectrum response from the ultraviolet to terahertz band, and the ultrahigh carrier mobility, revealing great potential for advancing modern optoelectronic devices [3,4]. In mid-infrared to terahertz (THz) spectral range, the absorption and confinement of light in graphene can be remarkably enhanced due to the excitation of graphene surface plasmon polaritons (GSPPs) [5]. However, in the visible (Vis) to near-infrared (NIR) wavelength region, graphene behaves mostly like an absorptive dielectric and cannot sustain GSPPs. It has been shown that the optical absorption of a suspended monolayer graphene only reaches a value of 2.3% under normal incidence in the Vis and NIR regions [6]. The poor light–graphene interaction constitutes a major limitation for its substantial applications in optoelectronic devices. Therefore, one of the challenges concerning this ultrathin material is to enhance its optical absorption efficiency.
To enhance the light absorption of graphene in Vis–NIR region, several mechanisms such as guided-mode resonance [7,8,9], coherent absorption [10], cavity resonance [11,12], plasmonic resonance [13,14], and prism coupling [15,16] have been proposed to enhance the light–graphene interaction. Unfortunately, the peak values of light absorption in monolayer graphene are confined in the range of 30–60% in most cases [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. To significantly improve the light absorption of graphene, an effective approach is to integrate the graphene with the metasurfaces supported by the metallic mirror [17,18,19,20,21] or metallic structured substrate [22,23]. However, due to the inherent ohmic loss of metal materials, the use of the metallic mirror or structured substrate will inevitably result in suppression of light absorption in graphene. On the other hand, dielectric Bragg mirror does not have the issue of ohmic loss, and it has been reported that the monolayer graphene integrated with the all-dielectric Bragg mirror can achieve perfect or near-perfect light absorption [24,25,26,27,28,29]. In addition, the absorption of graphene can be efficiently improved by integrating graphene with a metal thin film and dielectric Bragg mirror via Tamm plasmon polaritons [30,31]. However, the use of the dielectric Bragg mirror increases the physical footprint of the device and makes the configuration more complicated, since Bragg multilayers consisting of high/low index materials require high-precision fabrication techniques.
In recent years, bound states in the continuum (BIC) have been demonstrated as an effective approach to enhance the interaction between light and matter, examples of present-day uses include directional lasing [32], magneto-optical phenomena [33], second-order nonlinear effects [34], giant enhancement of the Goos–Hänchen shift [35], ultrahigh–Q guided resonances [36] and much more. BIC also bring exciting opportunities to enhance light absorption of graphene due to the associated strong field enhancement. Zhang et al. [37] showed that optical absorption in graphene can be enhanced based on BIC using a sphere–graphene–slab structure, and ultrasensitive absorption of graphene can be obtained via the excitation of GSPPs. Later, Wang et al. [38] showed that light absorption in graphene can be controlled by asymmetric parameter of suspended silicon nanodisk, and maximum absorption of 50% can be realized at critical coupling through quasi-BIC in the two-port system composed of graphene. However, achieving highly efficient light absorption of monolayer graphene within a comparatively simple architecture is still rare, and a theoretical model based on critical coupling for perfect or near-perfect light absorption of graphene in the two-port system needs to be developed.
In this work, near-perfect absorption of the monolayer graphene is realized in the communication band by using the BIC based on the photonic crystal slab (PCS) of Si. The high confinement of light and near-field enhancement in the Si-based PCS with a slit contributes to the unexpected improvement of graphene absorption, where BIC turns into quasi-BIC due to the symmetry-breaking of the structure. Theoretical formulas based on the coupled mode theory (CMT) are derived that can well evaluate the absorption performances of graphene integrated with the symmetry-broken PCS. The absorption properties of the monolayer graphene are robust to the variation of the structural parameters. By using the full conical incidence, the angular bandwidths for peak absorptivity and the central wavelength of graphene absorption can be effectively improved. In addition, excellent sensing performances can be realized when the Si-based PCS with graphene is used in refractive index sensors.

2. Basic Principles and CMT for Absorption Enhancement of Graphene

The schematic image of the Si-based PCS with monolayer graphene is shown in Figure 1, where a monolayer graphene is sandwiched between a one-dimensional (1D) periodic Si PCS and a SiO2 substrate. The PCS consists of a grating layer and a sublayer, and the structural symmetry of the PCS is broken due to the narrow slit in the sublayer. The refractive index of Si is 3.48, the refractive index of SiO2 is 1.47, and the background is air. In practice, the Si-based PCS with monolayer graphene can be fabricated by combing the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) with nanolithography processes. Firstly, the monolayer graphene is directly deposited on the bare SiO2 substrate using the copper-vapor-assisted CVD technique [39]. Next, the Si layer is deposited on the top of the monolayer graphene by plasma-enhanced CVD [40]. Finally, the periodic Si PCS can be achieved by UV holographic lithography, reactive-ion etching with a CHF3 + SF6 gas mixture, and O2ashing for residual photoresist mask removal [41].
In the Vis–NIR region, graphene can be modeled as an ultrathin dielectric film with thickness of tg = 0.34 nm, and its relative permittivity can be written as εg = 1 + g/ωε0tg, where σg represents the graphene surface conductivity, ω indicates the angular frequency, and ε0 is the vacuum permittivity. According to the Kubo formula, the graphene surface conductivity σg can be written as the sum of the intraband σintra and interband conductivity σinter [42]:
σ i n t r a ( ω ) = j e 2 k B T π 2 ( ω 2 j Γ ) [ μ c k B T + 2 ln ( e μ c k B T + 1 ) ]
σ i n t e r ( ω ) = j e 2 4 π ln [ 2 | μ c | ( ω j 2 Γ ) 2 | μ c | + ( ω j 2 Γ ) ]
where ħ and e are reduced Planck’s constant and the elementary charge, respectively. μc is the chemical potential, kB is the Boltzmann constant, τ is the momentum relaxation time, and Γ = 1/2τ is the phenomenological scattering rate. The physical parameters of the graphene are set as μc = 0.15 eV, T = 300 K, and τ= 0.5 ps.
Figure 2 shows the spectral response of the Si-based PCS under the illumination of TM wave (magnetic field vector lies along the y-axis) at normal incidence (θ = 0°). Rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) [43] is used to calculate the spectral responses as well as other properties of the Si-based PCS. The frequency-dependent absorption of graphene is calculated as A = 1 – R− T, where R and T represent reflection and transmission, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 2a, the Si-based PCS with graphene shows broadband reflection with high reflectivity due to high index contrast of the grating [44]. In addition, the absorption response does not show spectral selectivity because of the wavelength-independent absorption of graphene in the NIR region. However, as can be seen in Figure 2b, a narrow slit in the sublayer with s = 10 nm will significantly alter the spectral responses due to the symmetry-breaking of the structure. In particular, the reflection spectrum is varied abruptly—with the occurrence of two resonant reflection dips, two narrow absorption peaks of graphene are formed at the locations of the two resonances as well. Obviously, the narrow slit in the sublayer is crucial for the selective absorption enhancement of the monolayer graphene.
To corroborate the correlation of the location between the resonant reflection dips and the absorption peaks of the monolayer graphene, spectral responses of the Si-based PCS without graphene and with graphene are investigated. As can be seen in Figure 3a, for the Si-based PCS without graphene, the spectrum shows mirror effect as s = 0, while it varies abruptly and two Fano resonances are appeared as s is slightly altered (s = 10 nm). In both cases, the reflection responses are similar as in Figure 2, except for higher reflectivity because there is no absorption from graphene. In Figure 3b, transmission responses are in the logarithmic scale so as to clearly see the resonant locations of Si-based PCS without graphene. As can be seen in Figure 3b, there are two leaky mode resonances (LMRs) in the wavelength region of interest as s = 0; the LMRs arise from the coupling between the diffracted orders and the waveguide modes, and the overlapping of the two LMRs will result in broadband reflection with high reflectivity [45]. However, two additional high-Q Fano resonances occurred as s = 10 nm, where BIC turns into quasi-BIC due to the symmetry-breaking of the structure [46,47]. At normal incidence, the BIC mode can be completely decoupled from the radiation continuum due to its different symmetry, while it can be leaky by breaking the symmetry of the structure [48,49]. As can be seen in Figure 3c, the locations of the absorption peaks of the graphene are coincided with those of the quasi-BICs as there is no graphene in the structure, confirming that it is the quasi-BICs instead of the LMRs that are responsible for the absorption enhancement of the monolayer graphene.
To gain further insight into the physical basis for the absorption enhancement of the monolayer graphene, distributions of the tangential components (Hy and Ex) of electromagnetic fields associated with the LMRs and quasi-BICs of the Si-based PCS without graphene are shown in Figure 4. As can be seen in Figure 4a,b, the electromagnetic fields associated with the LMR#1 are slightly enhanced with the symmetrical mode (even mode) profiles to the yz plane. The magnetic field of the LMR#1 is mainly confined in the grating layer and the sublayer, and the moderate enhancement of the magnetic field with the maximum amplitude of 6.17 is responsible for large rejection bandwidth and low Q resonance of the Si-based PCS. In Figure 4c,d, it can be seen that the field distributions of the LMR#2 have similar properties as those of LMR#1. However, as can be seen in Figure 4e–h, in the case of the quasi-BIC modes, significant field enhancement can be realized with the anti-symmetrical mode (odd mode) profiles with respect to the yz plane, and the field distributions show the typical radiation patterns of electric dipole aligned with the x-axis. Leakage radiation to the surface normal direction is permitted due to the symmetry-breaking of the structure, which permits the overlap between the incident plane wave and the supported mode and consequently allows coupling between the fields [48]. Note the fields of the quasi-BIC#1 are mainly localized in the sublayer, while the fields of the quasi-BIC#2 are enhanced not only in the sublayer but also in the grating layer due to its high-order leaky mode features. In both cases of the quasi-BIC modes, although the intrinsic attenuation of graphene remains unchanged, the significant near-field enhancement and confinement of light in the Si-based PCS contributes to high Q Fano resonances as well as the unexpected improvement of graphene absorption.
Figure 5a shows absorption response of the Si-based PCS with graphene as a function of the slit width s. As can be seen in Figure 5a, the absorption of graphene associated with the quasi-BIC modes can be flexibly controlled by merely varying the slit width, and the locations of the two absorption channels of graphene are blue-shifted as s is increased due to the decrease in the effective refractive index of the structure. In particular, the location and the peak absorptivity of the absorption channel of the quasi-BIC#1 (longer wavelength) can be effectively tuned by the slit width because its nearfields are mainly localized in the sublayer. By properly selecting the slit width as s = 74 nm with other structural parameters kept the same, near-perfect absorption of the monolayer graphene (97.8%) can be obtained at the wavelength of λr = 1.55 μm with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Δλ = 4.0 nm, as indicated by the theoretical RCWA result in Figure 5b. Compared with the previous graphene absorbers whose absorption efficiency is not high in the two-port system composed of graphene [8,9,10], and those metal mirror [17,18,19,20,21] or multilayer Bragg mirror [24,25,26,27,28,29] structuresthat are required to realize high absorption of graphene at critical coupling, the proposed absorber exhibits the advantage of achieving high absorption efficiency of graphene within a comparatively simple two-port system.
To further the quantitative understanding of highly efficient light absorption of the monolayer graphene in the Si-based PCS, theoretical formulas based the CMT are derived here. According to the CMT, the amplitude reflection (ρ) and transmission (ξ) coefficients of the grating-based 1D PCS can be written as [50,51]:
ρ = r ( ω ω 0 ) + i ( δ γ ) ( ω ω 0 ) + i ( δ + γ )
ξ = t ( ω ω 0 ) + i γ ( ω ω 0 ) + i ( δ + γ )
where ω0 is the resonant frequency; r and t are the Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients of off-resonance, as no resonance is taking place in the structure. γ is the external leakage rate of the Si-based PCS, and δ is intrinsic loss rate due to the embedded monolayer graphene. The corresponding intensity of reflection (R) and transmission (T) can be expressed as:
R = ρ ρ * = r 2 [ ( ω ω 0 ) 2 + ( γ δ ) 2 ] ( ω ω 0 ) 2 + ( γ + δ ) 2
T = ξ ξ * = t 2 [ ( ω ω 0 ) 2 + γ 2 ] ( ω ω 0 ) 2 + ( γ + δ ) 2
Note for the Si-based PCS without graphene, the intrinsic loss rate δ=0 and r2 + t2 = 1 due to the subwavelength periodicity. In this case, R + T = 1 according to Equations (5) and (6). For the Si-based PCS with graphene, the absorption A = 1–R−T can be written as:
A = ( 1 r 2 t 2 ) [ ( ω ω 0 ) 2 + γ 2 ] + 2 ( 1 + r 2 ) γ δ + ( 1 r 2 ) δ 2 ( ω ω 0 ) 2 + ( γ + δ ) 2
It can be inferred from Equation (7) that the absorption can be simplified as A = 1 r 2 [ ( ω ω 0 ) 2 + ( γ δ ) 2 ] ( ω ω 0 ) 2 + ( γ + δ ) 2 = 1 R if there is no transmission (t2 = 0). In addition, the absorption responses are in the form of the Lorentzian lineshape as A = ( 1 r 2 t 2 ) γ 2 + 2 ( 1 + r 2 ) γ δ + ( 1 r 2 ) δ 2 ( γ + δ ) 2 at the resonant frequency (ω = ω0). In particular, perfect absorption with A = 100% is realizable at critical coupling with γ = δ if t2 = 0, thus it is feasible to achieve highly efficient light absorption of graphene at critical coupling based on the destructive interference of transmission light within a comparatively simple structure composed of graphene. The absorption responses of the Si-based PCS with graphene are dependent on the off-resonance reflection (r) and transmission (t) coefficients, the external leakage rate (γ), and the loss rate (δ). Therefore, it is possible to achieve high absorption of graphene in the Si-based PCS by tuning the structural parameters.
To verify the validation of the theoretical model based on the CMT, the absorption response using the CMT is also shown in Figure 5b. In simulation, we extracted the total quality factor Qtot of the Si-based PCS with graphene as Qtot = ω0ω = ω0/2(γ + δ), where Δω is the FWHM at the resonant frequency ω0, thus we got γ + δ =1.57 × 1012 Hz as Qtot = 387.5. The external leakage rate γ associated with the quasi-BIC mode can be obtained by using the Fano lineshape equation [52]:
T Fano = | a 1 + j a 2 + b ω ω 0 + j γ | 2
to fit the transmission intensity spectra of the Si-based PCS without graphene, where a1, a2, and b are real number. The external leakage rate can be fitted as γ = 8.07×1011 Hz, and thus δ = 7.63 × 1011 Hz. As shown in Figure 5b, the absorption response of the CMT based on Equation (7) is in good agreement with that of the RCWA, validating that the proposed model could provide a general strategy to evaluate the absorption performance of graphene integrated with all-dielectric metasurface.

3. Performance Analysis and Sensing Application

To evaluate the robustness of graphene absorption associated with the quasi-BIC, we firstly investigate the structural parameters (Δs, p, d1, d2) on the absorption performances of the Si-based PCS with graphene. As can be seen in Figure 6a, as the slit is laterally shifted from the edge (Δs = 0) to the center of the unit cell with s fixed as 74 nm, the location of the absorption peak is blue-shifted, and the peak absorptivity is reduced as well due to the reduced symmetry of the structure. In particular, as the slit approaches the center of the unit cell with Δs = (ps)/2 = 308 nm, the Si-based PCS becomes the symmetrical structure, and the absorption peak of graphene is vanished due to the symmetry incompatibility between the BIC mode and the external radiation. In Figure 6b, it can be seen that the location of the absorption peaks can be dynamically tuned with high absorptivity maintained by varying the grating period. In Figure 6c,d, it can be seen that high absorption enhancement of graphene can be achieved even the thickness of the grating layer and sublayer are significantly altered. The grating layer is related to the coupling strength between the diffracted order and the incident wave [45], thus the variation of d1 mainly changes the absorption bandwidth of the graphene. However, the variation of d2 mainly results in the shift of absorption peak of graphene because the mode profiles of the quasi-BIC#1 are mainly confined in the sublayer. Key parameters of the absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene are listed in Table 1, where λr, Apeak, and FWHM denote the absorption wavelength, the peak absorptivity, and the absorption bandwidth, respectively. Note the graphene absorption associated with the quasi-BIC mode is relatively stable to the variations of the structural parameters of Δs, p, d1, and d2, which facilitates the robust control of absorption enhancement of graphene integrated with the Si-based PCS.
We further characterized the incident angle and polarization angle dependence of the Si-based PCS with graphene. Figure 7a shows absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene at classical incidence, i.e., the incident angle (θxz) is varied in the xz plane. As can be seen in Figure 7a, deviation from normal incidence will broaden the absorption bandwidth with the absorption peaks blue-shifted, and the peak absorptivity of graphene is reduced as well. The peak absorptivity of graphene is reduced to ~40.0% as θxz = ±4°. Note because the Si-based PCS with a slit is anti-symmetric with respect to its mirror-symmetry plane (yz plane), the absorption spectra of graphene for the ±θxz are slightly different. Figure 7b shows absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene at fully conical incidence, i.e., the incident angle (θyz) is varied in the yz plane. It can be seen that the angular tolerance of graphene absorption can be effectively improved compared with that of the classical incidence, and the peak absorptivity of 47.0% can be achieved even at θyz = ±20°. In this case, the absorption spectra for the ±θyz are exactly the same because the incident angle is varied within the mirror-symmetry plane of the structure. Therefore, the angular tolerance for peak absorptivity of graphene at classical incidence can be enhanced more than five times by using the fully conical incidence. In general, the leaky modes of the grating-based metasurface are essentially related to the diffraction orders, and the angular variations of the mth-order diffracted wave vector for classic (|Δkdiff|classic) and full conic (|Δkdiff|fully conic) incidences can be written as [53]:
| Δ k diff | classic = k 0 sin θ
| Δ k diff | fully conic = ( k 0 sin θ ) 2 + ( 2 m π / p ) 2 2 m π / p
where k0 is the wave vector of the incident light, θ is the incident angle. In the subwavelength regime, (p < λ0), and | p sin θ m λ 0 | < 1 , thus Equation (10) can be rewritten in terms of |Δkdiff|classic via Taylor series expansion as:
| Δ k diff | full   conic = 2 m π p { ( p sin θ m λ 0 ) 2 + 1 1 } p sin θ 2 m λ 0 | Δ k diff | classic
According to Equation (11), |Δkdiff|fully conic is always smaller than |Δkdiff|classic, thus the absorption spectra at fully conical incidence is more robust than that at classical incidence as the incident angle is varied.
Figure 7c shows the angular response for the central wavelength of 1.55 μm in both classical (θxz) and fully conical (θyz) incidences, and the structural parameters are the same in both two cases. As shown in Figure 7c, the angular bandwidth of absorption at classical incidence is 5.1°, while it can be further enhanced 2.92 times to 14.9° by using the fully conical incidence, and the results are in line with the prediction of Equation (11). Notably, perfect absorption of graphene can be achieved as θxz is slightly deviated from normal incidence due to the decreased symmetry of the structure. Compared with the previous Si-based graphene absorbers that can achieve high absorption at 1.55 μm only at oblique incidence within a small angle range of ±1.5° [54,55], the proposed absorber can achieve high absorption at normal incidence due to the symmetry-breaking of the structure, and its angular tolerance can be significantly larger by using the fully conical incidence. Figure 7d shows absorption spectra of graphene as a function of the polarization angle, where ϕ = 0° and ϕ = 90° correspond to the TM and TE polarizations (electric field vector lies along the y-axis), respectively. As can be seen in Figure 7d, as the polarization angle is varied from 0° to 90°, the peak absorptivity of graphene at the central wavelength of 1.55 μm can be dynamically tuned in the range between 97.8% and 1.2% with the low sideband level kept almost the same, which may be used to fashion the functions of notch filters and intensity-resolved sensors based on thin-film gratings or photonic crystals.
Finally, we showed that the Si-based PCS can function as a high sensitivity refractive index sensor due to the robust absorption of the monolayer graphene. Here, we evaluate the refractive sensing capabilities of the Si-based PCS with sensitivity S = Δλpeaknc and figure of merit (FoM) = Sλ, where Δλpeak is the peak wavelength change with the refractive index change Δnc. and Δλ is the half-width of the absorption band. As can be seen in Figure 8a, the reflection spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene are very sensitive to the variation of the background refractive index nc. The reflection dip of Si-based PCS with graphene is red-shifted with the increase in nc, but the reflectivity of the reflection dip is slightly increased due to deviation from the critical coupling for perfect light absorption of graphene. In Figure 8b, the slope of the curve via linear fitting shows that the sensitivity of Si-based PCS with graphene reaches 604 nm/RIU, and its FoM can be obtained as 151. In the NIR wavelength region, the sensitivity and FoM of the Si-based PCS with graphene are larger than many nanostructured absorbers such as Si bar-ring resonator [56], Si nanoblocks [57], plasmonic nanoslit-microcavity [58], and guided-mode resonance grating [59]. Additionally, the sensing performances of the Si-based PCS with graphene are comparable with the plasmonic gold mushroom, whose FoM is comparable to the theoretical upper limit for standard propagating surface plasmon resonance sensors [60]. Therefore, the Si-based PCS with graphene may be suitable for sensing applications due to the relatively simple architecture and excellent performances.

4. Summary

We provide a novel approach to achieve highly efficient light absorption of monolayer graphene via quasi-BIC by employing a compact Si-based PCS with a slit. Near-perfect absorption of the monolayer graphene can be realized due to the high confinement of light and near-field enhancement in the Si-based PCS, where BIC turns into quasi-BIC due to the symmetry-breaking of the structure. The derived formulas based on the CMT can well evaluate the absorption performances of graphene integrated with the symmetry-broken PCS, indicating that high absorption efficiency of graphene is feasible at critical coupling based on the destructive interference of transmission light within a comparatively simple two-port system. The excitation of the quasi-BIC of the Si-based PCS is robust to the variation of the structural parameters such as the lateral shift of the slit, the period, the thickness of the grating layer and the sublayer, and high absorption of graphene can be maintained even the structural parameters are significantly altered. Moreover, the angular tolerance of graphene absorption for the classical incidence can be effectively enhanced by using the full conical incidence, the angular bandwidths for the peak absorptivity and for the central wavelength of 1.55 μm can be enhanced more than five times and 2.92 times, respectively. When the Si-based PCS with graphene is used in refractive index sensors, excellent sensing performances with sensitivity of 604 nm/RIU and FoM of 151 can be realized. The proposed architecture together with its design principle reveals the potential implementation of BIC for extraordinary absorption enhancement of monolayer graphene, which may provide a guide to design graphene and other 2D material-based optoelectronics devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.S. and K.A.; data curation, T.S.; formal analysis, T.S. and S.A.D.; resources, S.A.D., W.H., and I.T.; methodology, T.S.; software, S.A.D., W.H., and I.T.; writing—original draft preparation, T.S.; writing—review and editing, T.S. and K.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

K.A. acknowledges support from the Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Program (ONR-YIP) Award (N00014-17-1-2425). T.S. acknowledges funding from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61975153, 61975155), and China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201906795009).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Fal’ko, V.I.; Colombo, L.; Gellert, P.R.; Schwab, M.G.; Kim, K. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 2012, 490, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Papageorgiou, D.G.; Kinloch, I.A.; Young, R.J. Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 90, 75–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, N.; Chortos, A.; Lei, T.; Jin, L.; Kim, T.R.; Bae, W.-G.; Zhu, C.; Wang, S.; Pfattner, R.; Chen, X.; et al. Ultratransparent and stretchable graphene electrodes. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cao, Y.; Fatemi, V.; Fang, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kaxiras, E.; Jarillo-Herrero, P. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 2018, 556, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grigorenko, A.N.; Polini, M.; Novoselov, K.S. Graphene plasmonics. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nair, R.R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A.N.; Novoselov, K.S.; Booth, T.J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N.M.R.; Geim, A.K. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 2008, 320, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sahoo, P.K.; Pae, J.Y.; Murukeshan, V.M. Enhanced absorption in a graphene embedded 1D guided-mode-resonance structure without back-reflector and interferometrically written gratings. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 3661–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, G.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.; Liu, Y. Enhanced absorption of graphene monolayer with a single-layer resonant grating at the Brewster angle in the visible range. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 2274–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, R.; Sang, T.; Wang, L.; Gao, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Enhanced absorption of a monolayer graphene using encapsulated cascaded gratings. Optik 2018, 157, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, X.; Cheng, Z.-Q.; Zhai, X.; Liu, Z.-M.; Li, S.-Q.; Liu, J.-P.; Wang, L.-L.; Lin, Q.; Zhou, Y.-H. A tunable dual-band and polarization-insensitive coherent perfect absorber based on double-layers graphene hybrid waveguide. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Furchi, M.; Urich, A.; Pospischil, A.; Lilley, G.; Unterrainer, K.; Detz, H.; Klang, P.; Andrews, A.M.; Schrenk, W.; Strasser, G.; et al. Microcavity-integrated graphene photodetector. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2773–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, J.-T.; Liu, N.-H.; Liu, J.; Li, X.J.; Huang, J.-H. Enhanced absorption of graphene with one-dimensional photonic crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 052104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cai, Y.; Zhu, J.; Liu, Q.H. Tunable enhanced optical absorption of graphene using plasmonic perfect absorbers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 043105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lu, H.; Cumming, B.P.; Gu, M. Highly efficient plasmonic enhancement of graphene absorption at telecommunication wavelengths. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 3647–3650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Heo, H.; Lee, S.; Kim, S. Broadband absorption enhancement of monolayer graphene by prism coupling in the visible range. Carbon 2019, 154, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pirruccio, G.; Moreno, L.M.; Lozano, G.; Rivas, J.G. Coherent and broadband enhanced optical absorption in graphene. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4810–4817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Guo, C.-C.; Zhu, Z.-H.; Yuan, X.-D.; Ye, W.-M.; Liu, K.; Zhang, J.-F.; Xu, W.; Qin, S.-Q. Experimental demonstration of total absorption over 99% in the near infrared for monolayer-graphene-based subwavelength structures. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016, 4, 1955–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, H.; Sturmberg, B.C.P.; Lin, K.-T.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Chong, T.K.; de Sterke, C.M.; Jia, B. 90-nm-thick graphene metamaterial for strong and extremely broadband absorption of unpolarized light. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, S.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Q. Graphene-based dynamically tunable absorbers through guided mode resonance. Superlattice. Microst. 2020, 144, 106550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cen, C.; Chen, Z.; Xu, D.; Jiang, L.; Chen, X.; Yi, Z.; Wu, P.; Li, G.; Yi, Y. High quality factor, high sensitivity metamaterial graphene-perfect absorber based on critical coupling theory and impedance matching. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Piper, J.R.; Fan, S. Total absorption in a graphene monolayer in the optical regime by critical coupling with a photonic crystal guided resonance. ACS Photonics 2014, 1, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sang, T.; Gao, J.; Yin, X.; Qi, H.; Wang, L.; Jiao, H. Angle-insensitive broadband absorption enhancement of graphene using a multi-grooved metasurface. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lin, K.-T.; Lin, H.; Yang, T.; Jia, B. Structured graphene metamaterial selective absorbers for high efficiency and omnidirectional solar thermal energy conversion. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Xiang, Y.; Dai, X.; Guo, J.; Zhang, H.; Wen, S.; Tang, D. Critical coupling with graphene-based hyperbolic metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Long, Y.; Shen, L.; Xu, H.; Deng, H.; Li, Y. Achieving ultranarrow graphene perfect absorbers by exciting guided-mode resonance of one-dimensional photonic crystals. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, X.; Wang, T.; Xiao, S.; Yan, X.; Cheng, L. Tunable ultra-high-efficiency light absorption of monolayer graphene using critical coupling with guided resonance. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 27028–27036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Zheng, G.; Zhang, H.; Bu, L. Narrow-band enhanced absorption of monolayer graphene at near-infrared (NIR) sandwiched by dual gratings. Plasmonics 2017, 12, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qing, Y.M.; Ma, H.F.; Ren, Y.Z.; Yu, S.; Cui, T.J. Near-infrared absorption-induced switching effect via guided mode resonances in a graphene-based metamaterial. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 5253–5263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hu, J.; Qing, Y.; Yang, S.; Ren, Y.; Wu, X.; Gao, W.; Wu, C. Tailoring total absorption in a graphene monolayer covered subwavelength multilayer dielectric grating structure at near-infrared frequencies. J. Opt. Sci. Am. B 2017, 34, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, H.; Gan, X.; Jia, B.; Mao, D.; Zhao, J. Tunable high-efficiency light absorption of monolayer graphene via Tamm plasmon polaritons. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 4743–4746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, K.; Lu, L.; Song, J.; Li, B.; Cheng, Q. Ultra-narrow-band and highly efficient near-infrared absorption of a graphene-based Tamm plasmon polaritons structure. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 123102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ha, S.T.; Fu, Y.H.; Emani, N.K.; Pan, Z.; Bakker, R.M.; Paniagua-Domínguez, R.; Kuznetsov, A.I. Directional lasing in resonant semiconductor nanoantenna arrays. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 1042–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, G.Y.; Zhang, W.X.; Zhang, X.D. Strong terahertz magneto-optical phenomena based on quasi-bound states in the continuum and Fano resonances. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 16449–16460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Minkov, M.; Gerace, D.; Fan, S. Doubly resonant χ(2) nonlinear photonic crystal cavity based on a bound state in the continuum. Optica 2019, 6, 1039–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wu, F.; Wu, J.; Guo, Z.; Jiang, H.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Ren, J.; Chen, H. Giant enhancement of the Goos-Hänchen shift assisted by quasibound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 12, 014028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jin, J.; Yin, X.; Ni, L.; Soljačić, M.; Zhen, B.; Peng, C. Topologically enabled ultrahigh-Q guided resonances robust to out-of-plane scattering. Nature 2019, 574, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, M.; Zhang, X. Ultrasensitive optical absorption ingraphene based on bound states in the continuum. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, X.; Duan, J.; Chen, W.; Zhou, C.; Liu, T.; Xiao, S. Controlling light absorption of graphene at critical coupling through magnetic dipole quasi-bound states in the continuum resonance. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 102, 155432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, H.; Song, I.; Park, C.; Son, M.; Hong, M.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J.S.; Shin, H.-J.; Baik, J.; Choi, H.C. Copper-vapor-assisted chemical vapor deposition for high-quality and metal-free single-layer graphene on amorphous SiO2 substrate. ACS Nano 2013, 6575–6582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mateus, C.F.R.; Huang, M.C.Y.; Chen, L.; Chang-Hasnain, C.J.; Suzuki, Y. Broad-band mirror (1.12–1.62 μm) using a subwavelength grating. IEEE Photon. Lett. 2004, 16, 1676–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Niraula, M.; Yoon, J.W.; Magnusson, R. Single-layer optical bandpass filter technology. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 5062–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hanson, G.W. Dyadic Green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 064302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Moharam, M.G.; Grann, E.B.; Pommet, D.A.; Gaylord, T.K. Formulation for stable and efficient implementation of the rigorous coupled-wave analysis of binary gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1995, 12, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Magnusson, R. Wideband reflectors with zero-contrast gratings. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 4337–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sang, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, X.; Cai, S. Resonant enhancement transmission in a Ge subwavelength periodic membrane. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 071107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yoon, J.W.; Song, S.H.; Magnusson, R. Critical field enhancement of asymptotic optical bound states in the continuum. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sang, T.; Yin, X.; Qi, H.; Gao, J.; Niu, X.; Jiao, H. Resonant excitation analysis on asymmetrical lateral leakage of light in finite zero-contrast grating mirror. IEEE Photon. J. 2020, 12, 4500111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Foley, J.M.; Phillips, J.D. Normal incidence narrowband transmission filtering capabilities using symmetry-protected modes of a subwavelength, dielectric grating. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 2637–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yin, X.; Jin, J.; Soljačić, M.; Peng, C.; Zhen, B. Observation of topologically enabled unidirectional guided resonances. Nature 2020, 580, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rosenblatt, D.; Sharon, A.; Friesem, A.A. Resonant grating waveguide structure. IEEE J. Quantum. Elect. 1997, 33, 2038–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, Q.; Zhai, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Liu, G.; Xia, S. Combined theoretical analysis for plasmon-induced transparency in integrated graphene waveguides with direct and indirect couplings. EPL 2015, 111, 34004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cong, L.; Singh, R. Symmetry-protected dual bound states in the continuum in metamaterials. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ko, Y.H.; Niraula, M.; Magnusson, R. Divergence-tolerant resonant bandpass filters. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 3305–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sang, T.; Wang, R.; Li, J.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y. Approaching total absorption of graphene strips using a c-Si subwavelength periodic membrane. Opt. Commun. 2018, 413, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hu, J.-H.; Huang, Y.-Q.; Duan, X.-F.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Ren, X.-M. Enhanced absorption of graphene strips with a multilayer subwavelength grating structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 221113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, Y.; Kravchenko, I.I.; Briggs, D.P.; Valentine, J. All-dielectric metasurface analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hu, J.; Lang, T.; Shi, G.-H. Simultaneous measurement of refractive index and temperature based on all-dielectric metasurface. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 15241–15251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, T. Nanoslit-microcavity-based narrow band absorber for sensing applications. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 20715–20720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qian, L.; Wang, K.; Bykov, D.A.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Yan, C. Improving the sensitivity of guided-mode resonance sensors under oblique incidence condition. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 30563–30575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shen, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liu, T.; Tao, Y.; Jiang, R.; Liu, M.; Xiao, G.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, Z.-K.; Wang, X.; et al. Plasmonic gold mushroom arrays with refractive index sensing figures of merit approaching the theoretical limit. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a subwavelength Si-based photonic crystal slab (PCS) with a monolayer graphene at the incident angle of θ. The monolayer graphene is sandwiched between the Si PCS and the SiO2 substrate, the structural symmetry of the PCS is broken due to the slit in the sublayer. d1 and d2 stand for the thickness of the grating layer and the sublayer, respectively. The width of the grating layer is w, and the width of the slit in the sublayer is s; the period is p.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a subwavelength Si-based photonic crystal slab (PCS) with a monolayer graphene at the incident angle of θ. The monolayer graphene is sandwiched between the Si PCS and the SiO2 substrate, the structural symmetry of the PCS is broken due to the slit in the sublayer. d1 and d2 stand for the thickness of the grating layer and the sublayer, respectively. The width of the grating layer is w, and the width of the slit in the sublayer is s; the period is p.
Nanomaterials 11 00484 g001
Figure 2. Spectral responses of the Si-based PCS under the TM-polarized normal incident wave. The parameters are: p = 690 nm, d1 = 438 nm, d2 = 249 nm, w = 345 nm. (a) s = 0. (b) s = 10 nm.
Figure 2. Spectral responses of the Si-based PCS under the TM-polarized normal incident wave. The parameters are: p = 690 nm, d1 = 438 nm, d2 = 249 nm, w = 345 nm. (a) s = 0. (b) s = 10 nm.
Nanomaterials 11 00484 g002
Figure 3. Spectral responses of the Si-based PCS without graphene (w/o GR) and with graphene (w/ GR). Other parameters are the same as those in Figure 2. (a) Reflection responses with s = 0 and s = 10 nm. (b) Transmission responses with s = 0 and s = 10 nm. (c) Absorption and transmission responses with s = 10 nm.
Figure 3. Spectral responses of the Si-based PCS without graphene (w/o GR) and with graphene (w/ GR). Other parameters are the same as those in Figure 2. (a) Reflection responses with s = 0 and s = 10 nm. (b) Transmission responses with s = 0 and s = 10 nm. (c) Absorption and transmission responses with s = 10 nm.
Nanomaterials 11 00484 g003
Figure 4. Distributions of electromagnetic fields associated with the leaky mode resonances (LMRs) and quasi-bound states in the continuum (BICs) of the Si-based PCS without graphene as s = 10 nm. Other parameters are the same as those in Figure 2. Hy and Ex denote the tangential components of the magnetic and electric field amplitudes, respectively, the values are normalized by incident field amplitudes. (a) Hy and (b) Ex of the LMR#1. (c) Hy and (d) Ex of the LMR#2. (e) Hy and (f) Ex of the quasi-BIC#1. (g) Hy and (h) Ex of the quasi-BIC#2.
Figure 4. Distributions of electromagnetic fields associated with the leaky mode resonances (LMRs) and quasi-bound states in the continuum (BICs) of the Si-based PCS without graphene as s = 10 nm. Other parameters are the same as those in Figure 2. Hy and Ex denote the tangential components of the magnetic and electric field amplitudes, respectively, the values are normalized by incident field amplitudes. (a) Hy and (b) Ex of the LMR#1. (c) Hy and (d) Ex of the LMR#2. (e) Hy and (f) Ex of the quasi-BIC#1. (g) Hy and (h) Ex of the quasi-BIC#2.
Nanomaterials 11 00484 g004
Figure 5. Absorption response of the Si-based PCS with graphene, other parameters are the same as Figure 2. (a) Absorption response as a function of the slit width s. (b) Rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) result and coupled mode theory (CMT) result of absorption response with s = 74 nm.
Figure 5. Absorption response of the Si-based PCS with graphene, other parameters are the same as Figure 2. (a) Absorption response as a function of the slit width s. (b) Rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) result and coupled mode theory (CMT) result of absorption response with s = 74 nm.
Nanomaterials 11 00484 g005
Figure 6. Absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene under the variations of structural parameters with s = 74 nm, other parameters are the same as Figure 2. (a) The lateral shift of the slit Δs where Δs is indicated in the figure inset. (b) The period p. (c) The thickness of the grating layer d1. (d) The thickness of the sublayer d2.
Figure 6. Absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene under the variations of structural parameters with s = 74 nm, other parameters are the same as Figure 2. (a) The lateral shift of the slit Δs where Δs is indicated in the figure inset. (b) The period p. (c) The thickness of the grating layer d1. (d) The thickness of the sublayer d2.
Nanomaterials 11 00484 g006
Figure 7. Absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene under the variations of incident angle θ and polarization angle ϕ with s = 74 nm, other parameters are the same as Figure 2. (a) Absorption spectra as a function of the incident angle in the xz plane. (b) Absorption spectra as a function of the incident angle in the yz plane. (c) Angular response for the central wavelength of 1.55 μm in both the xz and yz planes. (d) Absorption spectra as a function of the polarization angle.
Figure 7. Absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene under the variations of incident angle θ and polarization angle ϕ with s = 74 nm, other parameters are the same as Figure 2. (a) Absorption spectra as a function of the incident angle in the xz plane. (b) Absorption spectra as a function of the incident angle in the yz plane. (c) Angular response for the central wavelength of 1.55 μm in both the xz and yz planes. (d) Absorption spectra as a function of the polarization angle.
Nanomaterials 11 00484 g007
Figure 8. Sensing properties of the Si-based PCS with graphene, other parameters are the same as Figure 2 except s = 74 nm. (a) Reflection spectra as a function of the refractive index of the background. (b) Locations of the reflection dip as a function of the refractive index of the background.
Figure 8. Sensing properties of the Si-based PCS with graphene, other parameters are the same as Figure 2 except s = 74 nm. (a) Reflection spectra as a function of the refractive index of the background. (b) Locations of the reflection dip as a function of the refractive index of the background.
Nanomaterials 11 00484 g008
Table 1. Key parameters of the absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene shown in Figure 6.
Table 1. Key parameters of the absorption spectra of the Si-based PCS with graphene shown in Figure 6.
ParametersΔs (nm)p (nm)d1 (nm)d2 (nm)
04080670690710420440460230250270
λr(nm)155015381526151815501582154915501551151215501592
Apeak97.8%88.9%58.1%95.5%97.8%96.3%88.3%97.5%66.0%78.8%97.7%77.6%
FWHM (nm)4.06.16.23.74.04.24.93.93.43.34.06.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sang, T.; Dereshgi, S.A.; Hadibrata, W.; Tanriover, I.; Aydin, K. Highly Efficient Light Absorption of Monolayer Graphene by Quasi-Bound State in the Continuum. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020484

AMA Style

Sang T, Dereshgi SA, Hadibrata W, Tanriover I, Aydin K. Highly Efficient Light Absorption of Monolayer Graphene by Quasi-Bound State in the Continuum. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(2):484. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sang, Tian, Sina Abedini Dereshgi, Wisnu Hadibrata, Ibrahim Tanriover, and Koray Aydin. 2021. "Highly Efficient Light Absorption of Monolayer Graphene by Quasi-Bound State in the Continuum" Nanomaterials 11, no. 2: 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop