Next Article in Journal
Topological Anderson Insulator in Cation-Disordered Cu2ZnSnS4
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue “Micro/Nano Emulsions: Smart Colloids for Multiple Applications”
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Micro- and Nanocellulose-Based Delivery Systems for Liposoluble Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phase Inversion and Interfacial Layer Microstructure in Emulsions Stabilized by Glycosurfactant Mixtures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Chymosin on Physicochemical and Hydrolysis Characteristics of Casein Micelles and Individual Caseins

1
Department of Biological Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, China
2
Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, China
3
Department of Food Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan
4
National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei City 112, Taiwan
5
Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung City 804, Taiwan
6
Ph.D. Program in Nutrition & Food Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the work.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(10), 2594; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102594
Submission received: 25 August 2021 / Revised: 24 September 2021 / Accepted: 27 September 2021 / Published: 1 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micro/Nano Emulsions: Smart Colloids for Multiple Applications)

Abstract

:
The effects of chymosin on the physicochemical and hydrolysis characteristics of casein micelles and individual caseins were investigated. Adding 0.03 units of chymosin/mL led to the casein micelles in skim milk coagulating after a 3 h incubation period at 30 °C. SDS–PAGE investigation showed that β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and a portion of β-lactoglobulin (β-LG) in the milk supernatant fraction (MSF) were precipitated into the milk pellet fraction (MPF). The mean particle size of the MSF with chymosin decreased from 254.4 nm to 179.2 nm after a 3 h incubation period. Mass spectrometry and SDS–PAGE analysis suggested that chymosin hydrolyzed individual β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN, but not β-LG. Chymosin hydrolysis led to a decrease in the molecular weights of the hydrolyzed β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN. Particle size analysis indicated that there was no difference in the particle size distribution of hydrolyzed β-CN and αs-CN. Moreover, our outcomes demonstrated that the hydrolysis of κ-CN by chymosin occurs before that of β-CN and αs-CN.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Milk is a complex mammalian liquid secretion of lipids, carbohydrates, lactose, and trace elements. The average composition of bovine milk is 4.5% lactose, 4.8% fat, 2.8% proteins, 87.2% water, and 0.7% ash [1]. The protein in milk consists of two protein collections: whey proteins (20%) and caseins (80%). The casein family, which is an intricate combination of several normal caseins, contains β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN at an individual ratio of 4:1:5 [2,3]. The molecular weights of β-CN, κ-CN, αs1-casein, and αs2-casein were 24.0, 19.0, 23.6, and 25.2 kDa, respectively [4]. The other type of milk protein, whey protein, consists of bovine serum albumin, β-LG, α-lactalbumin, and other constituents [5,6,7]. It is also a heterogeneous and polymorphic group of proteins, composed of 10% bovine serum albumin, 20% α-lactalbumin, 50% β-LG, 10% immunoglobulins, and <10% proteose peptones [8]. The molecular weights of β-LG, bovine serum albumin, and α-lactalbumin were 18.3, 66.3, and 14.2 kDa, respectively [9].
Milk is not only an important source of nutrition, but it is also important for industrial and commercial reasons. For example, milk is used in dairy-based products and other processed foods, such as cheese [10]. Cheese is a nutritious food and a significant wellspring of proteins, fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals [11]. Milk coagulation is an important stage in cheddar making, and its success is a significant boundary for obtaining high-quality cheese [12]. Various coagulants are utilized in cheese-making, but the most commonly used coagulant is chymosin [13]. In the process of making cheese, chymosin coagulates milk proteins enzymatically, and casein micelles are enzymatically destabilized during this process. Milk coagulation is a cycle in which liquid milk is turned into a viscoelastic semi-strong coagulum by an explicit chemical called chymosin [14,15].
Traditionally, chymosin (EC 3.4.23.4) is the main enzyme responsible for milk protein coagulation. Chymosin is a protease found in rennet that can precipitate milk proteins and promote the formation of curds during cheese making [16]. The enzyme works on milk κ-CN, somewhat separating these particles. This process causes an adjustment of micelle surface charge, increases their hydrophobicity, and encourages their conglomeration [17]. Furthermore, the natural substrate of chymosin is separated at the peptide connection between amino corrosive deposits as phenylalanine (105) and methionine (106). The chymosin induces the hydrolysis of κ-CN, which causes destabilization and aggregation of casein micelles [18]. In the process of making cheese from milk, when the cheese is aged, the hydrolysis of caseins prompts changes. Proteolysis is frequently considered to be the main biochemical pathway affecting the surface and flavor development [19].
In their 2012 study, Hsieh and Pan (2012) discussed the utilization of proteomic innovation to research the impacts of milk protein coagulation with chymosin [20]. The sample confirmed that the coagulation change of κ-CN is faster than the coagulation change of different caseins, such as β-CN, αs-CN, and a portion of whey protein. However, information about the relative susceptibility and coagulation of β-CN and αs-CN with chymosin treatment, apart from κ-CN, is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of chymosin on the physicochemical and hydrolysis characteristics of casein micelles and individual β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Skim Milk, Individual Caseins, and Chymosin

Raw milk was collected from healthy Holstein cows on a dairy farm in Taipei. Skim milk (29.9 mg/mL) was prepared by separating fat from raw milk by centrifugation (5000× g, 20 min), collected, and stored at 4 °C. Individual milk proteins, including β-CN (C6905), κ-CN (C0406), αs-CN (C6780), β-LG (L3908), and chymosin (R4877, 20 units/mg), were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Chymosin was dissolved in a phosphate buffer (pH 6.8, 0.02 mM) prior to use. One unit of coagulation activity was defined as the amount of chymosin that coagulated 10 mL of milk per min at 30 °C.

2.2. Preparation of Skim Milk and Individual Casein Samples with/without Chymosin

Skim milk samples with/without chymosin (0.03 units/mL) were incubated at 30 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h. Samples were then fractionated into the milk pellet fraction (MPF) and the milk supernatant fraction (MSF) by centrifugation at 5000× g for 20 min after incubation. One milliliter of each MSF sample was collected, and each MPF sample was redissolved in an equal volume (1 mL) of lysis solution containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, and 4% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate prior to use. To examine the effects of chymosin on the hydrolysis of individual β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG, 2 mg of each individual casein was dissolved in 0.02 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). Each casein sample with 0.03 units of chymosin/mL was incubated at 30 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h.

2.3. SDS-PAGE Analysis

After incubation, skim milk and individual caseins (including β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG) with/without chymosin were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. In this study, samples were shown by using stacking gel (5%) and separating gel (12.5%). Then, 0.1 mL of each sample was mixed with 0.3 mL sample buffer (pH 6.8, containing SDS (2%), glycerol (10%), β-mercaptoethanol (5%), Tris-HCl (70 mM), and bromophenol blue (0.02%)). Each sample was heated at 95 °C for 5 min. The gel electrophoresis was run at 50 V for 30 min and then at 120 V for 2–3 h at constant current. After electrophoresis, Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 solution was used to stain the gels, which were imaged by an EPSON perfection V39 image scanner and then analyzed by Gel-Pro Analyzer software (version 4.0, Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). SDS-PAGE profiles were used to evaluate the effect of chymosin on the hydrolysis of casein micelles and individual caseins.

2.4. Mass Spectrometry Analysis

To examine the effects of chymosin on the hydrolysis characteristics of individual caseins, individual β-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG samples with 0.03 units of chymosin/mL were hatched at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) was used to determine the molecular weights of the individual β-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG samples, which were analyzed on a Bruker Autoflex Speed MALDI-TOF-MS (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) by measuring the mass-to-charge proportion (m/z) of the ionized analyte and recording the number of ions at each m/z value. The spectrum was acquired in linear positive mode at a laser frequency of 200 Hz. A method optimized for the mass range was established using the following parameters: acquisition range: 5000 to 35,000 Da.

2.5. Particle Size Analysis

To investigate the effects of chymosin on the physicochemical characteristics of casein micelles and individual caseins, skim milk, β-CN, and αs-CN with 0.03 units of chymosin/mL were hatched at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h. The particle size analysis was measured using a nanoparticle analyzer (SZ-100Z, HORIBA Instruments, Inc.). The particle size distribution spectra for the nanoparticles were recorded as diameter (nm) versus frequency (%), using the dynamic light scattering technique at a scattering angle of 90° and a temperature of 25 °C. The experiments on the sample were performed in triplicate.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed using SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and the data are displayed as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was used to calculate significant differences between treatments. Each treatment was measured 3 times, and the statistical significance level was set to p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SDS-PAGE Analysis of Chymosin’s Effect on the Coagulation of Milk Proteins

Skim milk samples with/without chymosin (0.03 units/mL) were incubated at 30 °C for 3 h, and the resulting MPF and MSF samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1). The analysis results revealed that β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG were the major milk proteins in skim milk. As shown in Figure 1A, the protein bands of β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and a part of β-LG in chymosin-containing MSF disappeared after incubation for 3 h. However, these milk proteins were observed in the chymosin-containing MPF (Figure 1B). Furthermore, there were no significant changes in the protein bands of β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG in the MSF and MPF without chymosin after the 3 h incubation period. These results indicate that some whey proteins and casein micelles were coagulated by chymosin into the MPF from the MSF. Horne (2006) reported that β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN in milk are consolidated into large colloidal structures called casein micelles [21]. These β-CN and αs-CN are connected with colloidal calcium phosphate, and κ-CN are assembled at the surface. Zhao and Corredig (2020) also reported that chymosin can precipitate casein micelles and promote the formation of curds during the cheese-making process [16]. Chymosin can cleave to κ-CN, resulting in a decrease in steric repulsion and net negative charge. It rapidly and specifically hydrolyzes κ-CN’s Phe105-Met106 bond, resulting in instability of casein micelles [22,23]. Hsieh and Pan (2012) suggested that these unstable casein micelles (β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN) and a part of whey protein such as β-LG are thought to be trapped in cheese curds [20]. Therefore, the above results demonstrate that chymosin induces the hydrolysis of κ-CN, which causes aggregation and destabilization of casein micelles. This result corresponded with that of Corredig and Salvatore [24].

3.2. SDS-PAGE Analysis of Chymosin’s Effect on the Hydrolysis of Individual Milk Proteins

Individual β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG samples with 0.03 units of chymosin/mL were incubated at 30 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h, and the resulting samples were also analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2A, some αs-CN disappeared after a 1 h incubation period, while some hydrolyzed αs-CN was found by SDS-PAGE. The total intensities of αs-CN after 1, 2, and 3 h of incubation with chymosin decreased to 83.86 ± 5.59, 82.25 ± 5.06, and 72.84 ± 3.44%, respectively (Figure 3). These results indicated that chymosin hydrolyzed some αs-CN after 1 h incubation. Similar results were observed on chymosin-containing β-CN and κ-CN samples, and hydrolyzed β-CN (Figure 2B) and κ-CN (Figure 2C) were also found by SDS-PAGE after a 1 h incubation period. The total intensities of β-CN after 1, 2, and 3 h of incubation with chymosin significantly decreased to 49.54 ± 0.05, 1.72 ± 2.72, and 0.0 ± 0.0%, respectively (p < 0.05). The total intensities of κ-CN after 1, 2, and 3 h of incubation with chymosin decreased to 0.69 ± 0.17, 0.0 ± 0.0, and 0.0 ± 0.0%, respectively (Figure 3). Cooper et al. (2010) reported that chymosin is responsible for the specific cleavage of κ-CN [25]. Furthermore, chymosin also easily hydrolyzes peptide bonds in β-CN and αs-CN [26]. Therefore, these results also demonstrated that β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN were substrates for chymosin. However, we noticed no significant changes in the chymosin-containing β-LG sample after a 3 h incubation period (Figure 2D). The total intensities of β-LG after 1, 2, and 3 h of incubation with chymosin decreased to 99.02 ± 0.48, 96.93 ± 1.18, and 91.45 ± 2.09%, respectively (Figure 3). Therefore, β-LG is considered to be a poor substrate for chymosin.

3.3. MALDI-TOF-MS Analysis of Chymosin’s Effect on the Hydrolysis of Individual Milk Proteins

κ-CN is known to be a good substrate for chymosin, and κ-CN is hydrolyzed by chymosin to frame two peptide-like response items, which were the result of the specific cleavage of the Phe105-Met106 bond of κ-CN [27]. According to the results above, chymosin also hydrolyzed β-CN and αs-CN. Horneffer et al. (2007) indicated that MALDI-TOF-MS can be used to determine the molecular weights of proteins and is suitable for food research [28]. Therefore, individual β-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG samples with 0.03 units of chymosin/mL were incubated at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h, and the molecular weights of the resulting samples were analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS. As shown in Figure 4A,C,E, the molecular weights of β-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG were 23858.5751 Da, 23497.3545 Da, and 18265.4257 Da, respectively. Haginaka (2000) reported that the molecular weights of β-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG were 24.0 kDa, 23.6 kDa, and 18.3 kDa, respectively [29]. However, the molecular weights of hydrolyzed β-CN and αs-CN induced by chymosin after 3 h incubation were decreased to 21998.9416 Da and 20751.5721 Da, respectively (Figure 4B,D). Kim et al. (2004) reported that chymosin hydrolyzed the Leu192-Tyr193 and Phe23-Phe24 bonds in β-CN and αs-CN, respectively [26]. These processes resulted in a decrease in the molecular weights of the hydrolyzed β-CN and αs-CN. However, there were no significant changes in the molecular weights of β-LG (18258.5634 Da) after a 3 h incubation with chymosin (Figure 4F). This result demonstrated that β-LG was not hydrolyzed by chymosin after 3 h of incubation.

3.4. Particle Size Analysis of Milk Proteins and Individual Milk Proteins Treated with Chymosin

Skim milk and individual milk protein samples with 0.03 units of chymosin/mL were incubated at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h, respectively. The resulting MSF and individual milk protein samples were analyzed by a nanoparticle analyzer (Figure 5). The particle size of MSF with chymosin was 180–460 nm after 0 h incubation, while the mean particle size of MSF with chymosin was 254.4 nm after 0 h of incubation (Figure 5A). De Kruif and Holt (2003) reported that the normal particle size of casein micelles is approximately 50–600 nm, and the mean particle size is approximately 200 nm [30]. Huppertz et al. (2018) reported that casein micelles consisting of β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN are highly hydrated particles. κ-CN exists on the surface of casein micelles, and β-CN and αs-CN are predominantly found in the interior [4]. In solution, the milk protein spreads to form a polyelectrolyte layer, such as a hairy layer, which brings sterics and charges repulsion between protein particles, providing stability. When the casein micelles are linked with chymosin, the polyelectrolyte layer of the casein micelles is hydrolyzed while causing the casein micelles to become unstable and precipitate out of solution. The particle size of the MSF with chymosin was 92–316 nm after 3 h of incubation, while the mean particle size of the MSF with chymosin was 179.2 nm after a 3 h incubation period (Figure 5B). This is because only whey proteins such as β-LG and some casein micelles remained in the MSF, and it decreased the mean particle size of the MSF. The outcome revealed that β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and some β-LG were trapped in the curds, and the MSF mostly consisted of whey protein and some casein micelles.
The effects of chymosin (0.03 units/mL) on the hydrolysis of individual β-CN and αs-CN samples at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h were also investigated, however, no significant changes were observed in either. The particle sizes of αs-CN with chymosin were 4.2–17.8 nm and 7.0–14.9 nm after 0 h and 3 h incubation, respectively (Figure 5C,D). The particle sizes of β-CN with chymosin were 8.8–18.2 nm and 11.1–28.4 nm after 0 h and 3 h incubation, respectively (Figure 5E,F). We observed that the molecular weights of β-CN and αs-CN decreased after chymosin hydrolysis; however, there was no difference in particle size distribution. These results suggest that chymosin induced the hydrolysis of β-CN and αs-CN, but it did not cause aggregation of β-CN and αs-CN.

3.5. Hydrolysis Reaction Scheme on Casein Micelles and Individual Caseins Induced by Chymosin

Chymosin hydrolyzes the specific peptide bond of κ-CN, leading to destabilization and aggregation of casein micelles. It has a specific function during the bioactive reaction in cheese-making. According to our results, a hydrolysis reaction scheme on the casein micelles and individual caseins induced by chymosin in the cheese-making process is shown in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6A, the coagulation reaction on casein micelles induced by chymosin consists of two steps. κ-CN was surrounded by the external area of casein micelles. First, chymosin hydrolyzes κ-CN to form caseinomacropeptide and para-κ-CN in the external area of casein micelles [18]. The Phe105-Met106 bond of κ-CN was hydrolyzed by chymosin, resulting in the instability of the casein micelles. Then, the aggregation of unstable casein micelles was induced by chymosin. Hydrophobic interactions are an important impetus for coagulation and are indirectly enhanced by calcium ions in milk. These unstable casein micelles and a part of whey protein, such as β-LG, are then thought to be trapped to form cheese curds after 3 h of incubation. During the coagulation process, the mean particle size of MSF with chymosin decreased from 254.4 nm to 179.2 nm. The hydrolysis reaction scheme on the individual caseins induced by chymosin in the cheese-making process is shown in Figure 6B. The peptide bonds in β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN were hydrolyzed by chymosin, and this protease hydrolyzed the Leu192-Tyr193, Phe105-Met106, and Phe23-Phe24 bonds in αs-CN and β-CN, respectively [26]. Chymosin hydrolyzed most κ-CN after 1 h of incubation, while some β-CN and αs-CN were hydrolyzed by chymosin after 1 h of incubation. However, β-LG was not hydrolyzed by chymosin after 3 h of incubation. These hydrolyzed β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and β-LG were entrapped into the cheese curd.

4. Conclusions

We analyzed the effect of chymosin on the physicochemical and hydrolysis characteristics of casein micelles and individual caseins. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that milk proteins, including β-CN, κ-CN, αs-CN, and some β-LG, were coagulated by chymosin. In the catalysis process, chymosin hydrolyzed β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN but not β-LG. The hydrolysis of κ-CN by rennet occurred earlier than the hydrolysis of β-CN and αs-CN. MALDI-TOF-MS analysis indicated a decrease in the molecular weights of the hydrolyzed β-CN and αs-CN. Particle size analysis suggested that there was no difference in particle size distribution between β-CN and αs-CN after hydrolysis. Moreover, β-LG and hydrolyzed β-CN, κ-CN, and αs-CN were entrapped in the cheese curd.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-F.H.; data curation, C.-J.C.; formal analysis, C.-C.C. and L.-Y.C.; funding acquisition, J.-F.H.; investigation, W.-T.L. and K.-L.C.; methodology, J.-F.H.; supervision, J.-F.H.; validation, M.-I.K.; writing—original draft, C.-C.C.; writing—review and editing, J.-F.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan for grant support (MOST 109-2221-E-030-003-MY2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The works are supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan for grant support (MOST 106-2221-E-030-014 -MY3).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.

References

  1. Getaneh, G.; Mebrat, A.; Wubie, A.; Kendie, H. Review on goat milk composition and its nutritive value. J. Nutr. Health Sci. 2016, 3, 401. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dalgleish, D.G. On the structural models of bovine casein micelles-review and possible improvements. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 2265–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jensen, H.B.; Poulsen, N.A.; Andersen, K.K.; Hammershøj, M.; Poulsen, H.D.; Larsen, L.B. Distinct composition of bovine milk from Jersey and Holstein-Friesian cows with good, poor, or noncoagulation properties as reflected in protein genetic variants and isoforms. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 6905–6917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huppertz, T.; Fox, P.F.; Kelly, A.L. The Caseins: Structure, Stability, and Functionality. In Proteins in Food Processing; Yada, R.Y., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; pp. 49–92. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fox, P.F.; Guinee, T.P.; Cogan, T.M.; McSweeney, P.L.H. Enzymatic Coagulation of Milk. In Fundamentals of Cheese Science; Fox, P.F., Guinee, T.P., Cogan, T.M., McSweeney, P.L.H., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 185–229. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gamlath, C.J.; Leong, T.S.H.; Ashokkumar, M.; Martin, G.J.O. The inhibitory roles of native whey protein on the rennet gelation of bovine milk. Food Chem. 2018, 244, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. McDermott, A.; Visentin, G.; De Marchi, M.; Berry, D.P.; Fenelon, M.A.; O’Connor, P.M.; Kenny, O.A.; McParland, S. Prediction of individual milk proteins including free amino acids in bovine milk using mid-infrared spectroscopy and their correlations with milk processing characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 3171–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Aimutis, W.R. Bioactive properties of milk proteins with particular focus on anticariogenesis. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 989S–995S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Chen, Y.C.; Chen, C.C.; Hsieh, J.F. Propylene glycol alginate-induced coacervation of milk proteins: A proteomics approach. Food Hydrocolloid. 2016, 53, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, C.C.; Chen, S.T.; Hsieh, J.F. Proteomic analysis of polysaccharide-milk protein interactions induced by chitosan. Molecules 2015, 20, 7737–7749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mureşan, C.C.; Marc, R.A.V.; Anamaria Semeniuc, C.; Ancuţs Socaci, S.; Fărcaş, A.; Fracisc, D.; Rodica Pop, C.; Rotar, A.; Dodan, A.; Mureşan, V.; et al. Changes in physicochemical and microbiological properties, fatty acid and volatile compound profiles of Apuseni cheese during ripening. Foods 2021, 10, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fox, P.F.; McSweeney, P.L.H.; Cogan, T.M.; Guinee, T.P. General Aspects. In Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology; Fox, P.F., McSweeney, P.L.H., Cogan, T.M., Guinee, T.P., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 1, pp. 1–617. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rayanatou, I.A.; Mahamadou, E.G.; Garric, G.; Harel-Oger, M.; Leduc, A.; Jardin, J.; Briard-Bion, V.; Cauty, C.; Adakal, H.; Grongnet, J.F.; et al. Physico-chemical characterization of dairy gel obtained by a proteolytic extract from Calotropis procera-A comparison with chymosin. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Budelli, E.; Bernal, M.; Lema, P.; Fink, M.; Negreira, C.; Tanter, M.; Gennisson, J.L. Use of shear wave elastography for monitoring enzymatic milk coagulation. J. Food Eng. 2014, 136, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Freitas, C.D.T.; Silva, M.Z.R.; Oliveira, J.P.B.; Silva, A.F.B.; Ramos, M.V.; de Sousa, J.S. Study of milk coagulation induced by chymosin using atomic force microscopy. Food Biosci. 2019, 29, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, Z.; Corredig, M. Effects of pH-modification on the rennet coagulation of concentrated casein micelles suspensions. Food Chem. 2020, 316, 126199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Koc, A.B.; Ozer, B. Nondestructive monitoring of renetted whole milk during cheese manufacturing. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nilsson, K.; Abdelghani, A.; Burleigh, S.; Johansen, L.B.; Lindmark-Månsson, H.; Paulsson, M.; Glantz, M. An investigation of the enzymatic cleavage of κ-casein in non-coagulating milk. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 109, 104754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Soltani, M.; Sahingil, D.; Gokce, Y.; Hayaloglu, A.A. Effect of blends of camel chymosin and microbial rennet (Rhizomucor miehei) on chemical composition, proteolysis and residual coagulant activity in Iranian Ultrafiltered White cheese. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hsieh, J.F.; Pan, P.H. Proteomic profiling of the coagulation of milk proteins induced by chymosin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 2039–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Horne, D.S. Casein micelle structure: Models and muddles. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 11, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bijl, E.; van Valenberg, H.; Sikkes, S.; Jumelet, S.; Sala, G.; Olieman, K.; Hooijdonk, T.V.; Huppertz, T. Chymosin-induced hydrolysis of caseins: Influence of degree of phosphorylation of alpha-s1-casein and genetic variants of beta-casein. Int. Dairy J. 2014, 39, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ulusu, Y.; Şentürk, S.B.; Kuduğ, H.; Gökçe, İ. Expression, purification, and characterization of bovine chymosin enzyme using an inducible pTOLT system. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 46, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Corredig, M.; Salvatore, E. Enzymatic Coagulation of Milk. In Advanced Dairy Chemistry; McSweeney, P.L.H., O’Mahony, J.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 287–307. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cooper, C.; Corredig, M.; Alexander, M. Investigation of the colloidal interactions at play in combined acidification and rennet of different heat-treated milks. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 4915–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, S.Y.; Gunasekaran, S.; Olson, N.F. Combined use of chymosin and protease from Cryphonectria parasitica for control of meltability and firmness of cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fox, P.F.; Uniacke-Lowe, T.; McSweeney, P.L.H.; O’Mahony, J.A. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Cheese. In Dairy Chemistry and Biochemistry; Fox, P.F., Uniacke-Lowe, T., McSweeney, P.L.H., O’Mahony, J.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 499–546. [Google Scholar]
  28. Horneffer, V.; Linz, N.; Vogel, A. Principles of laser-induced separation and transport of living cells. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12, 054016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Haginaka, J. Enantiomer separation of drugs by capillary electrophoresis using proteins as chiral selectors. J. Chromatogr. A. 2000, 875, 235–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. De Kruif, C.G.; Holt, C. Casein Micelle Structure, Functions and Interactions. In Advanced Dairy Chemistry-1 Proteins; Fox, P.F., McSweeney, P.L.H., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 233–276. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of skim milk incubated with/without chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h. (A) Milk supernatant fraction (MSF); (B) milk pellet fraction (MPF). M = protein marker.
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of skim milk incubated with/without chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h. (A) Milk supernatant fraction (MSF); (B) milk pellet fraction (MPF). M = protein marker.
Nanomaterials 11 02594 g001
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis of αs-CN, β-CN, κ-CN, and β-LG treated with chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h. (A) αs-CN; (B) β-CN; (C) κ-CN; (D) β-LG. M = protein marker.
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis of αs-CN, β-CN, κ-CN, and β-LG treated with chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h. (A) αs-CN; (B) β-CN; (C) κ-CN; (D) β-LG. M = protein marker.
Nanomaterials 11 02594 g002
Figure 3. Densitogram corresponding to SDS-PAGE analysis of αs-CN, β-CN, κ-CN, and β-LG treated with chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h.
Figure 3. Densitogram corresponding to SDS-PAGE analysis of αs-CN, β-CN, κ-CN, and β-LG treated with chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h.
Nanomaterials 11 02594 g003
Figure 4. Mass spectrometry analysis of αs-CN, β-CN, and β-LG treated with chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h. (A) αs-CN for 0 h; (B) αs-CN for 3 h; (C) β-CN for 0 h; (D) β-CN for 3 h; (E) β-LG for 0 h; (F) β-LG for 3 h.
Figure 4. Mass spectrometry analysis of αs-CN, β-CN, and β-LG treated with chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h. (A) αs-CN for 0 h; (B) αs-CN for 3 h; (C) β-CN for 0 h; (D) β-CN for 3 h; (E) β-LG for 0 h; (F) β-LG for 3 h.
Nanomaterials 11 02594 g004
Figure 5. Particle size analysis of MSF, αs-CN and β-CN treated with chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h. (A) MSF for 0 h; (B) MSF for 3 h; (C) αs-CN for 0 h; (D) αs-CN for 3 h; (E) β-CN for 0 h; (F) β-CN for 3 h.
Figure 5. Particle size analysis of MSF, αs-CN and β-CN treated with chymosin (0.03 units/mL) at 30 °C for 0 and 3 h. (A) MSF for 0 h; (B) MSF for 3 h; (C) αs-CN for 0 h; (D) αs-CN for 3 h; (E) β-CN for 0 h; (F) β-CN for 3 h.
Nanomaterials 11 02594 g005
Figure 6. Hydrolysis reaction scheme on the casein micelles and individual caseins induced by chymosin. (A) casein micelles; (B) individual caseins.
Figure 6. Hydrolysis reaction scheme on the casein micelles and individual caseins induced by chymosin. (A) casein micelles; (B) individual caseins.
Nanomaterials 11 02594 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.-C.; Chen, L.-Y.; Li, W.-T.; Chang, K.-L.; Kuo, M.-I.; Chen, C.-J.; Hsieh, J.-F. Influence of Chymosin on Physicochemical and Hydrolysis Characteristics of Casein Micelles and Individual Caseins. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2594. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102594

AMA Style

Chen C-C, Chen L-Y, Li W-T, Chang K-L, Kuo M-I, Chen C-J, Hsieh J-F. Influence of Chymosin on Physicochemical and Hydrolysis Characteristics of Casein Micelles and Individual Caseins. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(10):2594. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chun-Chi, Liang-Yu Chen, Wen-Tai Li, Ken-Lin Chang, Meng-I Kuo, Chao-Jung Chen, and Jung-Feng Hsieh. 2021. "Influence of Chymosin on Physicochemical and Hydrolysis Characteristics of Casein Micelles and Individual Caseins" Nanomaterials 11, no. 10: 2594. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102594

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop