Assessment of the Efficacy of Lowering LDL Cholesterol with Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Four Korean Statin Benefit Groups as per ACC/AHA Guidelines (NewStaR4G)
by
, and
Kyung-Jin Kim
1, 
Junghan Yoon
2,
Kyung Heon Won
3,
Sang-Wook Lim
4,
In-Ho Chae
5,
Sung Yun Lee
6,
Sang-Wook Kim
7 and
Hyo-Soo Kim
8,* 1
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul 07985, Korea
2
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju 26426, Korea
3
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul 02053, Korea
4
Bundang Cha Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Seongnam 13496, Korea
5
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University School of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea
6
Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital Cardiology, Goyang 10380, Korea
7
Heart Research Institute Chung-ang University Hospital, Seoul 06973, Korea
8
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(4), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040916
Submission received: 16 March 2020
/
Revised: 24 March 2020
/
Accepted: 25 March 2020
/
Published: 27 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current and Emerging Uses of Statins in Clinical Therapeutics)
Abstract
:The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines identified four statin benefit groups on the basis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction and proposed statin therapy by evidence-based intensity. Although these guidelines used randomized controlled trials with hard outcomes as exclusive evidence for its recommendations, a limited number of studies conducted in Asian countries makes its application of treatment strategy, intensity, and statin doses uncertain in these population. This prospective, multicenter study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rosuvastatin 10 mg in the four statin benefit groups requiring high- or moderate-intensity statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA guidelines in the Korean population. The primary endpoint was percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Secondary endpoints were percentage reduction in other lipids and achievement of ≥50% reduction in LDL cholesterol. Rosuvastatin 10 mg lowered LDL cholesterol by 61.4 mg/dL, a 44.9% decrease from baseline after eight weeks. Reduction of LDL cholesterol ≥50% was achieved in 46.3% of patients. Rosuvastatin 10 mg was generally well tolerated. In the Korean population, rosuvastatin 10 mg was favorable and tolerant in lowering LDL cholesterol in the four statin benefit groups requiring high- or moderate-intensity statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA guidelines.
1. Introduction
The reduction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels is one of the cornerstones in the prevention of cardiovascular events [1,2]. Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme reductase inhibitors, are the most effective class of drugs for lowering serum LDL cholesterol levels, and they are the first-line medication to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk [3,4]. Among the various statins, rosuvastatin, a high-potency third-generation statin [5], has been known to be more effective in lowering LDL cholesterol than simvastatin, atorvastatin, or pravastatin [6,7,8,9,10], and it also induces regression of coronary atherosclerosis [11,12].
The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines [3] led to a paradigm shift in cholesterol management by identifying four statin benefit groups on the basis of ASCVD risk reduction and proposing statin therapy using evidence-based intensity without targets [3,13]. These guidelines are also different from previous guidelines in that it used only randomized controlled trials with hard outcomes as exclusive evidence for its recommendations. However, applying these guidelines to an Asian population requires prudence because of the limited number of randomized controlled trials conducted in Asian countries, which results in limited applicability of treatment strategy, intensity, and statin doses [13]. Therefore, further studies using diverse doses of statins in Asian countries are essential.
This study aimed to evaluate the potency of rosuvastatin 10 mg in subjects categorized into the four statin benefit groups requiring high- or moderate-intensity statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA guidelines in South Korea.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design
This prospective, multicenter, 8-week study was conducted in 7 centers in South Korea (clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT03903029). All study participants provided written informed consent and the study protocol was approved by institutional review boards at each participating center. We screened subjects who were older than 21 years and who met the criteria of at least one of the four statin benefit groups requiring high- or moderate-intensity statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA guidelines [3]. The four statin benefit groups were as follows: 1) subjects with prior history of clinical ASCVD; 2) subjects with primary elevation of LDL cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL; 3) subjects with diabetes, age 40 to 75 years, and LDL cholesterol 70 to 189 mg/dL; 4) subjects without diabetes, age 40 to 75 years, LDL cholesterol 70 to 189 mg/dL, and with estimated 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%. The main exclusion criteria were: 1) history of significant statin-induced rhabdomyolysis or myopathy; 2) history of a significant hypersensitivity reaction to rosuvastatin; 3) uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c >9%); 4) uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >190 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg); 5) current active liver disease (alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase >2 times the upper limit of normal); 6) chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine clearance <30 mL/min); 7) creatine kinase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal; 8) use of prohibited concomitant therapies; 9) history of malignancy within the last 5 years; 10) women who were pregnant, breast-feeding or of childbearing potential without contraception; and 11) subjects who would take any medication for purposes other than this trial within 30 days after taking this study’s medication. Participating subjects were given rosuvastatin 10 mg daily for 8 weeks after a 4-week wash out period.
2.2. Efficacy, Safety, and Stability Assessments
The primary efficacy outcome was the percent reduction in LDL cholesterol from baseline to 8 weeks. Secondary efficacy outcomes were the percent changes from baseline to 8 weeks in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglyceride (TG), non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A1, and achievement of ≥50% reduction in LDL cholesterol with use of rosuvastatin 10 mg. The percent changes in LDL cholesterol and other lipids from baseline to 8 weeks in the pre-specified four statin benefit groups and in subgroups with diabetes mellitus (DM) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) were also analyzed. The definition of DM was HbA1c ≥6.5%, or a fasting serum glucose level ≥126 mg/dL [14], or self-reported use of an antihyperglycemic drug with a history of DM. The definition of MetS was at least 3 of the following 5 factors: 1) elevated waist circumference (waist circumference ≥90 cm in men, ≥80 cm in women); 2) elevated TG (≥150 mg/dL) or drug treatment for elevated TG; 3) reduced HDL cholesterol (<40 mg/dL in men, <50 mg/dL in women) or drug treatment for reduced HDL cholesterol; 4) elevated fasting glucose ( ≥100 mg/dL) or drug treatment for elevated glucose; 5) elevated blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg) or antihypertensive drug treatment with a history of hypertension [15]. Comparison between patients achieved LDL cholesterol reduction ≥50% or not and was additionally performed after excluding patients with low compliance (<75%).
Safety was evaluated by various laboratory tests, patient-reported adverse symptoms/signs, and the investigators’ observations. In the individual centers, the investigators rated the adverse event (AE) in terms of their intensity (mild, moderate, or severe), seriousness (death or life-threatening events, prolonged hospitalization, and/or disability/incapacitation), and relationship (definitely, probably, possibly, and probably not related) to study medication.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The differences in the baseline characteristics were assessed using Student’s t-test between two groups and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) between the four statin benefit groups for continuous variables, and the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. The differences in changes in lipid profile were compared using Student’s t-test between two groups and using ANOVA between the four statin benefit groups. For all analyses, a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 22.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Graphs were drawn with GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
Of the 315 screened subjects, after excluding 15 subjects who withdrew consent (n = 5) or violated the inclusion and exclusion criteria (n = 10), 300 subjects were initially assigned the study medication. After an additional exclusion of 58 subjects who withdrew consent (n = 18), violated the inclusion or exclusion criteria (n = 5), loss of follow up (n = 34), and loss of treatment (n = 1), 242 subjects were finally analyzed.
The mean age was 66.3 ± 8.2 years and 58.3% of subjects were men. A total of 158 (65.3%) patients had hypertension, 94 (38.8%) patients had DM, 79 (32.6%) patients had MetS, and 95 (39.3%) patients had a history of coronary artery disease (Table 1). Most patients (n = 212, 87.6%) were included by clinical ASCVD history and although subjects with clinical ASCVD history had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and past history of coronary artery disease than other groups, baseline lipid profiles were not different (Table 1, Table S1).
3.2. Efficacy
Rosuvastatin 10 mg reduced LDL cholesterol by 61.4 mg/dL, a 44.9% decrease from baseline at week 8 (Table 2, Table S2, Figure 1 and Figure 2). In terms of the other lipids, rosuvastatin 10 mg reduced total cholesterol by 63.5 mg/dL (29.6%), triglyceride by 19.4 mg/dL (10.0%), non-HDL cholesterol by 65.9 mg/dL (40.7%), apolipoprotein B by 44.7 mg/dL (38.8%), and increased HDL cholesterol by 2.4 mg/dL (6.0%) and apolipoprotein A1 by 5.1 mg/dL (4.7%) (Table 2, Table S2, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Reduction rate was not significantly different by the pre-specified four statin benefit groups (Table 2, Table S2, Figure 4, Figure S1).
Achievement of ≥50% reduction in LDL cholesterol by rosuvastatin 10 mg was 46.3% (112/242) in all patients. A comparison of subjects who reached 50% LDL cholesterol reduction versus others was performed (Table 3) in patients whose compliance was greater than 75%. The prevalence of comorbidities and rates of inclusion criteria were not significantly different between groups, except history of dyslipidemia. The subjects who achieved LDL reduction ≥50% (109/237, 46.0%) had higher baseline lipid values, except triglyceride (Table 3), and showed higher reduction in total cholesterol, triglyceride, non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (Table 4). Meanwhile, the subjects who achieved LDL reduction ≥50% showed a lower increase in apolipoprotein A1 and lower but not significant increase in HDL cholesterol (Table 4).
3.3. Safety
The adherence of all patients at 8 weeks was 94.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) of 92.6 to 96.7). No event of consecutive elevation ≥3 times the upper normal limits in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase occurred (Table 7). Two patients (0.7%) were reported to have elevations ≥5 times the upper limit of normal of creatine kinase. Both patients reported performing heavy muscular activities the day before the visit and normalized without treatment. Except the increased creatine kinase level, the reported drug-related AEs were limited to generalized itching, urticaria, and dry mouth and the symptoms improved without treatment. Other serious AEs were cerebral infarction in two patients, although these were not considered drug-related AEs.
4. Discussion
This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 10 mg in the treatment of the four statin benefit groups requiring high- or moderate-intensity statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA guidelines in the Korean population.
In this study, we confirmed rosuvastatin 10 mg was favorable and tolerant in the four statin benefit groups for managing LDL cholesterol and other lipids including total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and apolipoprotein A1 in the Korean population. Moreover, rosuvastatin 10 mg was acceptable in terms of achieving LDL cholesterol reduction ≥50%.
Since the first guideline recommending treatments for lowering cholesterol was released by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) in 1998 [16], the idea that lowering LDL cholesterol levels is one of the cornerstones in the prevention of cardiovascular events has been accepted in all future recommendations. This first guideline, the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) I, defined target values for LCL cholesterol less than 130 mg/dL to 160mg/dL according to estimated coronary risk [16] and following this, ATP II [17] and ATP III [2] set a new goal of <100mg/dL for the highest risk groups.
In 2013, there was a paradigm shift by new guidelines on the management of blood cholesterol released by ACC/AHA [3]. These guidelines were differentiated from previous guidelines by using only randomized controlled trials with hard outcomes as evidence, proposing statin therapy using evidence-based intensity without targets, and identifying four statin benefit groups on the basis of ASCVD risk reduction. Even though these guidelines were updated in 2018 [18], the mainstream ideas that emphasizing attention on the reduction of ASCVD risk, focusing on the intensity of the drug rather than the target value, and identifying patient groups in whom statin therapy is recommended based on the four statin benefit groups, was maintained. Therefore, consideration of this new perspective in clinical fields is worth applying.
Although there has been previous studies which evaluated the efficacy and safety of statins in the Asian population, due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials with hard outcomes conducted in Asian countries which used exclusive evidence for these guidelines, and moreover, limited studies conducted within patients categorized into the four statin benefit groups, the suitability of applying this guideline to Asian populations was uncertain.
In this study, the percent reduction rate of LDL cholesterol was 44.9% and the target LDL achievement rate (≥50% reduction in LDL cholesterol) by rosuvastatin 10 mg was 46.3%. In previous reports, LDL cholesterol reduction rate by rosuvastatin 10 mg was 44.6% to 47.5% [10,19,20]. However, the study populations of these studies were subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia or those who qualified for lipid-lowering therapy, not the four statin benefit groups identified by the ACC/AHA guidelines, which limits the direct comparison. One previous study reported a ≥50% rate of reduction in LDL cholesterol in the ASCVD group as defined by the ACC/AHA guidelines as 57% and 71% with rosuvastatin 20 mg and 40 mg, respectively [21]. The 46.3% achievement rate of our study was lower than this report. However, considering the lower dose of our study protocol, achieving ≥50% reduction in LDL cholesterol in almost half of the study subjects might be considered acceptable. Moreover, it should be considered that increasing the dose of the statin contributes a limited additional reduction rate and may result in a higher rate of side effects [22,23,24].
Meanwhile, these previous studies were mostly conducted in Western countries, and few clinical trials carried out in Asia demonstrated the efficacy and safety of statins [25]. A few clinical studies were conducted in Japan, and the reduction rates of LDL cholesterol with rosuvastatin 10 mg were 49.2% [26] and 49.7% [27], which were similar to our study. In Korea, our group recently reported the LDL reduction rate with rosuvastatin 10 mg of 52% [24]. However, the study population of these studies were subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia [26] or hyper LDL cholesterolemia [27], not subjects within the four statin benefit groups as defined by the ACC/AHA guideline. Besides these studies, there were several reports that the plasma concentration of rosuvastatin and metabolites were higher in Asian subjects than Caucasian subjects, and body weight differences contributed to the pharmacokinetic differences (less than 10%) [25,28], but data from Asian populations are still limited.
We expect that our study may give additional evidence of the efficacy of rosuvastatin 10 mg in the four statin benefit groups defined by the ACC/AHA guidelines, especially in Asian populations.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, this study supports the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 10 mg in the four statin benefit groups focused on ASCVD risk reduction as identified by the ACC/AHA guidelines in the Korean population. Moreover, in the Korean population, rosuvastatin 10 mg is acceptable to achieve a 50% reduction in LDL cholesterol.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/4/916/s1, Figure S1: Changes in LDL cholesterol per ACC/AHA 4 statin benefit groups, (A) Changes from baseline. (B) Percent changes from baseline. LDL, low density lipoprotein, Table S1: Baseline characteristics per ACC/AHA guidelines 4 statin benefit groups, Table S2: Changes in lipid profiles per ACC/AHA guidelines 4 statin benefit groups.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.-J.K. and H.-S.K.; Methodology, K.-J.K. and H.-S.K.; Validation, K.-J.K.; Formal Analysis, K.-J.K.; Investigation, K.-J.K.; Resources, H.-S.K.; Data Curation, K.-J.K.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, K.-J.K.; Writing-Review & Editing, All authors; Supervision, H.-S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
The contributions of the NewStaR4G study investigators and Samjin Cooperation are gratefully acknowledged.
Conflicts of Interest
The all authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- Grundy, S.M.; Cleeman, J.I.; Merz, C.N.; Brewer, H.B., Jr.; Clark, L.T.; Hunninghake, D.B.; Pasternak, R.C.; Smith, S.C., Jr.; Stone, N.J.; National Heart, L.; et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation 2004, 110, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002, 106, 3143–3421. [CrossRef]
- Stone, N.J.; Robinson, J.G.; Lichtenstein, A.H.; Bairey Merz, C.N.; Blum, C.B.; Eckel, R.H.; Goldberg, A.C.; Gordon, D.; Levy, D.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014, 129, S1–S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baigent, C.; Blackwell, L.; Emberson, J.; Holland, L.; Reith, C.; Bhala, N.; Peto, R.; Barnes, E.; Keech, A.; Simes, J. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010, 376, 1670–1681. [Google Scholar]
- Kapur, N.K.; Musunuru, K. Clinical efficacy and safety of statins in managing cardiovascular risk. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2008, 4, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davidson, M.H.; McGarry, T.; Bettis, R.; Melani, L.; Lipka, L.J.; LeBeaut, A.P.; Suresh, R.; Sun, S.; Veltri, E.P. Ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 40, 2125–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Olsson, A.G.; Istad, H.; Luurila, O.; Ose, L.; Stender, S.; Tuomilehto, J.; Wiklund, O.; Southworth, H.; Pears, J.; Wilpshaar, J.W.; et al. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin compared over 52 weeks of treatment in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am. Heart J. 2002, 144, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, W.V.; Bays, H.E.; Hassman, D.R.; McKenney, J.; Chitra, R.; Hutchinson, H.; Miller, E.; Rosuvastatin Study, G. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin compared with pravastatin and simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A randomized, double-blind, 52-week trial. Am. Heart J. 2002, 144, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paoletti, R.; Fahmy, M.; Mahla, G.; Mizan, J.; Southworth, H. Rosuvastatin demonstrates greater reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with pravastatin and simvastatin in hypercholesterolaemic patients: A randomized, double-blind study. J. Cardiovasc. Risk 2001, 8, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, P.H.; Davidson, M.H.; Stein, E.A.; Bays, H.E.; McKenney, J.M.; Miller, E.; Cain, V.A.; Blasetto, J.W.; Group, S.S. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* Trial). Am. J. Cardiol. 2003, 92, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nissen, S.E.; Nicholls, S.J.; Sipahi, I.; Libby, P.; Raichlen, J.S.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Davignon, J.; Erbel, R.; Fruchart, J.C.; Tardif, J.C.; et al. Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: The ASTEROID trial. JAMA 2006, 295, 1556–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.W.; Kang, S.J.; Ahn, J.M.; Song, H.G.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, W.J.; Park, D.W.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, S.W.; et al. Comparison of effects of atorvastatin (20 mg) versus rosuvastatin (10 mg) therapy on mild coronary atherosclerotic plaques (from the ARTMAP trial). Am. J. Cardiol. 2012, 109, 1700–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, S.C.; Grundy, S.M. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline recommends fixed-dose strategies instead of targeted goals to lower blood cholesterol. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- American Diabetes, A. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care 2014, 37 (Suppl. 1), S14–S80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alberti, K.; Eckel, R.H.; Grundy, S.M.; Zimmet, P.Z.; Cleeman, J.I.; Donato, K.A.; Fruchart, J.-C.; James, W.P.T.; Loria, C.M.; Smith, S.C. Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome A Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009, 120, 1640–1645. [Google Scholar]
- Goodman, D.S.; Hulley, S.B.; Clark, L.T.; Davis, C.; Fuster, V.; LaRosa, J.C.; Oberman, A.; Schaefer, E.J.; Steinberg, D.; Brown, W.V. Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. Arch. Intern. Med. 1988, 148, 36–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Cholesterol Education Program. Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). Circulation 1994, 89, 1333–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grundy, S.M.; Stone, N.J.; Bailey, A.L.; Beam, C.; Birtcher, K.K.; Blumenthal, R.S.; Braun, L.T.; de Ferranti, S.; Faiella-Tommasino, J.; Forman, D.E. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, e285–e350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuster, H.; Barter, P.J.; Stender, S.; Cheung, R.C.; Bonnet, J.; Morrell, J.M.; Watkins, C.; Kallend, D.; Raza, A.; Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin Therapy I Study Group. Effects of switching statins on achievement of lipid goals: Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin Therapy (MERCURY I) study. Am. Heart J. 2004, 147, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clearfield, M.B.; Amerena, J.; Bassand, J.P.; Hernandez Garcia, H.R.; Miller, S.S.; Sosef, F.F.; Palmer, M.K.; Bryzinski, B.S. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 20 mg in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia--Prospective study to evaluate the Use of Low doses of the Statins Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin (PULSAR). Trials 2006, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karlson, B.W.; Palmer, M.K.; Nicholls, S.J.; Lundman, P.; Barter, P.J. To what extent do high-intensity statins reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in each of the four statin benefit groups identified by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines? A VOYAGER meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2015, 241, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armitage, J. The safety of statins in clinical practice. Lancet 2007, 370, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton-Craig, I.; Kostner, K.; Colquhoun, D.; Woodhouse, S. Combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2010, 6, 1023–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, K.J.; Kim, S.H.; Yoon, Y.W.; Rha, S.W.; Hong, S.J.; Kwak, C.H.; Kim, W.; Nam, C.W.; Rhee, M.Y.; Park, T.H.; et al. Effect of fixed-dose combinations of ezetimibe plus rosuvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: MRS-ROZE (Multicenter Randomized Study of ROsuvastatin and eZEtimibe). Cardiovasc. Ther. 2016, 34, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, J.K. Safety and efficacy of statins in Asians. Am. J. Cardiol. 2007, 99, 410–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mabuchi, H.; Nohara, A.; Higashikata, T.; Ueda, K.; Bujo, H.; Matsushima, T.; Ikeda, Y.; Nii, M. Clinical efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2004, 11, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saito, Y.; Goto, Y.; Dane, A.; Strutt, K.; Raza, A. Randomized dose-response study of rosuvastatin in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2003, 10, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, E.; Ryan, S.; Birmingham, B.; Zalikowski, J.; March, R.; Ambrose, H.; Moore, R.; Lee, C.; Chen, Y.; Schneck, D. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics in white and Asian subjects residing in the same environment. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 78, 330–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Change in LDL cholesterol in 8 weeks. LDL: low-density lipoprotein.
Figure 2.
Changes in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in 8 weeks. (A) Changes from baseline. (B) Percent changes from baseline. HDL: high-density lipoprotein.
Figure 2.
Changes in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in 8 weeks. (A) Changes from baseline. (B) Percent changes from baseline. HDL: high-density lipoprotein.
Figure 3.
Changes in triglyceride, HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 in 8 weeks. (A) Changes from baseline. (B) Percent changes from baseline.
Figure 3.
Changes in triglyceride, HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 in 8 weeks. (A) Changes from baseline. (B) Percent changes from baseline.
Figure 4.
Changes in LDL cholesterol as per the ACC/AHA four statin benefit groups by clinical ASCVD. (A) Changes from baseline. (B) Percent changes from baseline. ASCVD: clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Figure 4.
Changes in LDL cholesterol as per the ACC/AHA four statin benefit groups by clinical ASCVD. (A) Changes from baseline. (B) Percent changes from baseline. ASCVD: clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics as per The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines of the four statin benefit groups, by clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics as per The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines of the four statin benefit groups, by clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
| Total (n = 242) | Clinical ASCVD (n = 212) | Composite of Groups 2, 3 and 4 of the Four Statin Benefit Groups (n = 30) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic | ||||
| Age, years | 66.3 ± 8.2 | 66.3 ± 8.3 | 66.0 ± 7.5 | 0.848 |
| Male, n (%) | 141 (58.3) | 128 (60.4) | 13 (43.3) | 0.076 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.4 ± 4.2 | 25.2 ± 4.1 | 26.5 ± 4.7 | 0.129 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 33 (13.6) | 29 (13.7) | 4 (13.3) | >0.999 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 158 (65.3) | 136 (64.2) | 22 (73.3) | 0.323 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 94 (38.8) | 72 (82.3) | 22 (73.3) | <0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 148 (61.2) | 127 (59.9) | 21 (70.0) | 0.288 |
| Metabolic syndrome, n (%) | 79 (32.6) | 71 (69.2) | 8 (26.7) | 0.456 |
| Past history of CAD, n (%) | 95 (39.3) | 94 (44.3) | 1 (3.3) | <0.001 |
| Congestive heart failure | 4 (1.7) | 4 (1.9) | 0 | >0.999 |
| Stroke | 8 (3.3) | 8 (3.8) | 0 | 0.601 |
| Peripheral artery occlusive disease | 9 (3.7) | 9 (4.2) | 0 | 0.606 |
| Washout information, n (%) | ||||
| Atorvastatin | 9 (3.7) | 7 (3.3) | 2 (6.7) | 0.309 |
| Pitavastatin | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.5) | 0 | >0.999 |
| Simvastatin | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | |
| Pravastatin | 2 (0.8) | 2 (0.9) | 0 | >0.999 |
| Rosuvastatin | 6 (2.5) | 6 (2.8) | 0 | >0.999 |
| Baseline lipid profile | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 128.9 ± 26.5 | 128.0 ± 37.1 | 135.3 ± 32.1 | 0.304 |
| Total cholesterol mg/dL | 203.0 ± 41.7 | 202.1 ± 42.1 | 209.0 ± 38.1 | 0.397 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 130.9 ± 54.9 | 129.9 ± 53.8 | 137.8 ± 62.4 | 0.460 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 50.1 ± 12.7 | 50.0 ± 13.0 | 51.3 ± 10.4 | 0.602 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 152.8 ± 38.7 | 152.1 ± 39.1 | 157.8 ± 36.2 | 0.459 |
| Apolipoprotein B, mg/dL | 113.0 ± 22.3 | 113.2 ± 22.5 | 111.9 ± 21.4 | 0.773 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, mg/dL | 132.4 ± 22.1 | 131.8 ± 22.4 | 136.0 ± 20.1 | 0.331 |
Variables are presented as mean (SD) or n (%). SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; CAD, coronary artery disease; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.
Table 2.
Changes in lipid profiles as per ACC/AHA guidelines for the four statin benefit groups, by clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
Table 2.
Changes in lipid profiles as per ACC/AHA guidelines for the four statin benefit groups, by clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
| Total (n = 242) | Clinical ASCVD (n = 212) | Composite of Groups 2, 3 and 4 of the Four Statin Benefit Groups (n = 30) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute change | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −61.4 ± 2.1 | −60.7 ± 2.3 | −66.4 ± 4.7 | 0.382 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | −63.5 ± 2.4 | −63.0 ± 2.6 | −67.3 ± 5.8 | 0.550 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | −19.4 ± 3.6 | −17.7 ± 3.9 | −31.3 ± 9.3 | 0.219 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 4.2 ± 1.8 | 0.237 |
| Non−HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −65.9 ± 2.4 | −65.1 ± 2.6 | −71.4 ± 5.2 | 0.374 |
| Apolipoprotein B, mg/dL | −44.7 ± 1.3 | −44.8 ± 1.4 | −44.0 ± 3.5 | 0.822 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, mg/dL | 5.1 ± 1.2 | 5.3 ± 1.3 | 3.5 ± 3.6 | 0.632 |
| Percent change | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, % | −44.9 ± 1.4 | −44.5 ± 1.5 | −48.3 ± 2.4 | 0.357 |
| Total cholesterol, % | −29.6 ± 1.0 | −29.3 ± 1.1 | −31.2 ± 2.2 | 0.541 |
| Triglycerides, % | −10.0 ± 2.4 | −9.1 ± 2.6 | −16.3 ± 5.5 | 0.318 |
| HDL cholesterol, % | 6.0 ± 1.1 | 5.5 ± 1.2 | 9.6 ± 3.5 | 0.234 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, % | −40.7 ± 1.3 | −40.2 ± 1.5 | −44.3 ± 2.4 | 0.299 |
| Apolipoprotein B, % | −38.8 ± 0.9 | −38.8 ± 1.0 | −38.5 ± 2.5 | 0.921 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, % | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 4.9 ± 1.0 | 3.8 ± 2.6 | 0.698 |
Variables are presented as the means ± SE. SE, standard error.
Table 3.
Comparison of subjects who reached 50% LDL cholesterol reduction versus others.
| Total (n = 237) | LDL-C Reduction <50% (n = 128) | LDL-C Reduction ≥50% (n = 109) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic | ||||
| Age, years | 66.2 ± 8.2 | 67.1 ± 7.2 | 65.1 ± 9.2 | 0.060 |
| Male, n (%) | 138 (58.2) | 77 (60.2) | 61 (56.0) | 0.514 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.4 ± 4.2 | 25.6 ± 4.2 | 25.2 ± 4.2 | 0.556 |
| Inclusion criteria | 0.273 | |||
| Group 1 (ASCVD) | 208 (87.8) | 112 (87.5) | 96 (88.0) | |
| Group 2 (LDL ≥190) | 3 (1.2) | 0 | 3 (2.8) | |
| Group 3 (DM) | 19 (8.0) | 12 (9.4) | 7 (6.4) | |
| Group 4 (10yr risk ≥7.5%) | 7 (3.0) | 4 (3.1) | 3 (2.8) | |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 33 (13.9) | 18 (14.1) | 15 (13.8) | 0.947 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 156 (65.8) | 81 (63.3) | 75 (68.8) | 0.371 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 93 (39.2) | 50 (39.1) | 43 (39.4) | 0.952 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 146 (61.6) | 62 (48.4) | 84 (77.1) | <0.001 |
| Metabolic syndrome, n (%) | 79 (33.3) | 43 (33.6) | 36 (33.0) | 0.927 |
| Past history of CAD, n (%) | 92 (38.8) | 43 (33.6) | 49 (45.0) | 0.074 |
| Congestive heart failure | 4 (1.7) | 2 (1.6) | 2 (1.8) | >0.999 |
| Stroke | 7 (3.0) | 3 (2.3) | 4 (3.7) | 0.706 |
| Peripheral artery occlusive disease | 9 (3.8) | 6 (4.7) | 3 (2.8) | 0.512 |
| Washout information, n (%) | ||||
| Atorvastatin | 9 (3.8) | 7 (5.5) | 2 (1.8) | 0.184 |
| Pitavastatin | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.8) | 0 | >0.999 |
| Simvastatin | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Pravastatin | 2 (0.8) | 0 | 2 (1.8) | 0.210 |
| Rosuvastatin | 6 (2.5) | 5 (3.9) | 1 (0.9) | 0.222 |
| Baseline lipid profile | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 129.4 ± 36.6 | 119.0 ± 35.5 | 141.7 ± 34.1 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol mg/dL | 203.6 ± 41.8 | 192.0 ± 40.7 | 217.3 ± 39.0 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 131.5 ± 55.1 | 131.1 ± 58.0 | 132.0 ± 51.8 | 0.904 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 50.1 ± 12.8 | 48.4 ± 12.3 | 52.1 ± 13.1 | 0.026 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 153.5 ± 38.7 | 143.6 ± 38.0 | 165.2 ± 36.4 | <0.001 |
| Apolipoprotein B, mg/dL | 113.3 ± 22.3 | 109.8 ± 20.0 | 117.5 ± 24.2 | 0.008 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, mg/dL | 132.0 ± 22.1 | 129.3 ± 20.7 | 135.2 ± 23.4 | 0.043 |
Variables are presented as mean (SD) or n (%).
Table 4.
Changes in lipid profiles of subjects who reached 50% LDL cholesterol reduction versus others.
Table 4.
Changes in lipid profiles of subjects who reached 50% LDL cholesterol reduction versus others.
| Total (n = 237) | LDL-C Reduction <50% (n = 128) | LDL-C Reduction ≥50% (n = 109) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute change | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −61.5 ± 2.2 | −41.4 ± 2.4 | −85.0 ± 2.2 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | −63.5 ± 2.4 | −42.1 ± 2.7 | −88.7 ± 2.5 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | −19.1 ± 3.7 | −9.3 ± 5.6 | −30.7 ± 4.4 | 0.004 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.9 | 0.218 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −65.9 ± 2.4 | −45.1 ± 2.8 | −90.3 ± 2.5 | <0.001 |
| Apolipoprotein B, mg/dL | −44.7 ± 1.3 | −35.5 ± 1.7 | −55.5 ± 1.6 | <0.001 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, mg/dL | 5.2 ± 1.3 | 7.8 ± 1.9 | 2.2 ± 1.5 | 0.027 |
| Percent change | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, % | −44.7 ± 1.4 | −31.7 ± 1.9 | −59.9 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, % | −29.4 ± 1.0 | −20.3 ± 1.3 | −40.2 ± 0.7 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, % | −9.7 ± 2.4 | −2.4 ± 3.8 | −18.2 ± 2.8 | 0.001 |
| HDL cholesterol, % | 6.0 ± 1.1 | 7.3 ± 1.5 | 4.5 ± 1.8 | 0.233 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, % | −40.4 ± 1.3 | −28.7 ± 1.9 | −54.2 ± 0.7 | <0.001 |
| Apolipoprotein B, % | −38.6 ± 0.9 | −31.6 ± 1.3 | −46.8 ± 0.7 | <0.001 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, % | 4.8 ± 1.0 | 7.2 ± 1.5 | 2.1 ± 1.1 | 0.007 |
Variables are presented as the means ± SE.
Table 5.
Percentage changes in lipid profiles by diabetes mellitus.
| Total (n = 242) | Non-Diabetic (n = 148) | Diabetic (n = 94) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute change | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −61.4 ± 2.1 | −61.3 ± 2.8 | −61.6 ± 3.2 | 0.944 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | −63.5 ± 2.4 | −63.9 ± 3.2 | −62.8 ± 3.4 | 0.809 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | −19.4 ± 3.6 | −15.4 ± 5.2 | −25.7 ± 4.4 | 0.166 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 0.9 | 0.327 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −65.9 ± 2.4 | −65.9 ± 3.2 | −65.8 ± 3.4 | 0.996 |
| Apolipoprotein B, mg/dL | −44.7 ± 1.3 | −44.5 ± 1.8 | −45.2 ± 1.8 | 0.792 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, mg/dL | 5.1 ± 1.2 | 4.4 ± 1.7 | 6.1 ± 1.8 | 0.505 |
| Percent change | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, % | −44.9 ± 1.4 | −44.6 ± 1.8 | −45.4 ± 2.1 | 0.780 |
| Total cholesterol, % | −29.6 ± 1.0 | −29.3 ± 1.3 | −30.0 ± 1.4 | 0.712 |
| Triglycerides, % | −10.0 ± 2.4 | −7.3 ± 2.1 | −14.3 ± 3.7 | 0.153 |
| HDL cholesterol, % | 6.0 ± 1.1 | 5.0 ± 1.5 | 7.6 ± 1.7 | 0.271 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, % | −40.7 ± 1.3 | −40.0 ± 1.8 | −41.7 ± 1.8 | 0.537 |
| Apolipoprotein B, % | −38.8 ± 0.9 | −37.9 ± 1.3 | −40.1 ± 1.2 | 0.264 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, % | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 1.4 | 0.408 |
Variables are presented as the means ± SE.
Table 6.
Percentage changes in lipid profiles by metabolic syndrome.
| Total (n = 242) | Non-MetS (n = 163) | MetS (n = 79) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute change | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −61.4 ± 2.1 | −63.6 ± 2.4 | −57.8 ± 4.2 | 0.270 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | −63.5 ± 2.4 | −63.6 ± 2.6 | −63.3 ± 4.9 | 0.950 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | −19.4 ± 3.6 | −13.2 ± 3.1 | −32.2 ± 9.0 | 0.047 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 0.8 | 0.099 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −65.9 ± 2.4 | −65.4 ± 2.6 | −66.8 ± 5.0 | 0.796 |
| Apolipoprotein B, mg/dL | −44.7 ± 1.3 | −43.8 ± 1.6 | −48.8 ± 2.2 | 0.028 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, mg/dL | 5.1 ± 1.2 | 3.7 ± 1.7 | 8.1 ± 1.6 | 0.094 |
| Percent change | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, % | −44.9 ± 1.4 | −46.5 ± 1.5 | −41.7 ± 2.8 | 0.133 |
| Total cholesterol, % | −29.6 ± 1.0 | −29.9 ± 1.0 | −28.8 ± 2.1 | 0.650 |
| Triglycerides, % | −10.0 ± 2.4 | −8.3 ± 2.5 | −13.6 ± 5.0 | 0.290 |
| HDL cholesterol, % | 6.0 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 1.4 | 9.5 ± 1.9 | 0.030 |
| Non-HDL cholesterol, % | −40.7 ± 1.3 | −42.0 ± 1.4 | −38.0 ± 2.8 | 0.212 |
| Apolipoprotein B, % | −38.8 ± 0.9 | −38.0 ± 1.2 | −40.3 ± 1.3 | 0.181 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, % | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 3.5 ± 1.3 | 7.2 ± 1.3 | 0.071 |
Variables are presented as the means ± SE.
Table 7.
Safety endpoints: adverse events.
| Adverse experience | (n = 300) |
|---|---|
| All adverse events, n (%)a | 32 (10.7) |
| Drug-related, n (%)a | 6 (2.0) |
| Definitely, n (%) | 0 |
| Probably, n (%) | 1 (0.3) |
| Possibly, n (%) | 4 (1.3) |
| Probably not related, n (%) | 4 (1.3) |
| Serious, n (%) | 2 (0.7) |
| Death or life-threatening, n (%) | 0 |
| Prolonged hospitalization, n (%) | 0 |
| Disability/incapacitation, n (%) | 0 |
| Liver function tests ≥ 3 × ULN | |
| Alanine aminotransferase, n (%) | 0 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase, n (%) | 0 |
| Creatine kinase ≥ 5 × ULN, n (%) | 2 (0.7) |
AE, adverse event; ULN, upper limit of normal, a Considered by the investigator to be related to the study drug.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kim, K.-J.; Yoon, J.; Won, K.H.; Lim, S.-W.; Chae, I.-H.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, S.-W.; Kim, H.-S. Assessment of the Efficacy of Lowering LDL Cholesterol with Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Four Korean Statin Benefit Groups as per ACC/AHA Guidelines (NewStaR4G). J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040916
AMA Style
Kim K-J, Yoon J, Won KH, Lim S-W, Chae I-H, Lee SY, Kim S-W, Kim H-S. Assessment of the Efficacy of Lowering LDL Cholesterol with Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Four Korean Statin Benefit Groups as per ACC/AHA Guidelines (NewStaR4G). Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(4):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040916
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Kyung-Jin, Junghan Yoon, Kyung Heon Won, Sang-Wook Lim, In-Ho Chae, Sung Yun Lee, Sang-Wook Kim, and Hyo-Soo Kim. 2020. "Assessment of the Efficacy of Lowering LDL Cholesterol with Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Four Korean Statin Benefit Groups as per ACC/AHA Guidelines (NewStaR4G)" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 4: 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040916
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
