Next Article in Journal
Reactive Hypoglycemia: A Trigger for Nutrient-Induced Endocrine and Metabolic Responses in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding Post-Esophagectomy Complications and Their Management: The Early Complications
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Clinical Trajectories of Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis with Systolic Dysfunction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Left-Sided Thoracoscopic Approach to Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula and Post-Fistula Tracheal Diverticula

1
Clinical Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland
2
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, AÜ Tıp Fakültesi Hst. No: 6, Ankara 06620, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7251; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237251
Submission received: 4 September 2023 / Revised: 31 October 2023 / Accepted: 14 November 2023 / Published: 23 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery)

Abstract

:
Background: Recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (RTEF) is usually a consequence of leakage or other complications after esophageal atresia repair performed through right-sided access. This results in extensive intrapleural adhesions, and open redo surgery poses a challenge. Alternatively, endoscopic endotracheal fistula obliteration usually requires repetitive procedures, and its success rate varies significantly between centers. We present a novel approach to recurrent fistulas. The innovation is in reaching the fistula through the virgin field via left-sided three-port thoracoscopy instead of classical right-sided thoracotomy. Methods: This is a presentation of a new operative technique based on a retrospective case series of patients operated on at our department between 2016 and 2023. Results: Eight patients after esophageal atresia repair (six with RTEF and two with post-fistula tracheal diverticula) were successfully treated with left-sided thoracoscopy. There were no conversions. One patient required rethoracoscopy for chylothorax. Another one, after RTEF closure, underwent multiple endoscopic obliterations of subsequent tracheal diverticulum. No other major complications nor re-recurrences were noted. Conclusions: Left-sided thoracoscopy in redo esophageal atresia has the advantage of a “virgin” operative field and grants feasible access to the RTEF or tracheal diverticulum. We believe that this approach is worth further exploration because it combines minimal invasiveness with high effectiveness without all the consequences of a thoracotomy.

1. Introduction

One of the most common reasons for reoperation after esophageal atresia repair is undiagnosed upper tracheoesophageal fistula or recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas (RTEF), occurring in 1.9–16% of cases [1,2,3,4,5]. Although RTEF is rare, it is also one of the most complex and serious late complications of esophageal atresia surgery. Not only fistulas but also tracheal diverticula (TD) as a remnant of the closed fistula may be seen. RTEF is usually a consequence of complications, mainly leakage, after primary right-sided repair of esophageal atresia [2,3,4]. It results in extensive adhesions and scarring developing in the surrounding tissues and pleural cavity. Any reoperation through the right side is therefore challenging.
Current treatment is endoscopic obliteration of the fistula or open right-sided surgical removal of the fistula or diverticulum. The reoperation is either open or endoscopic, the recanalization rate is still over 20%, and the mortality is up to 10% [2,3,4,6,7,8,9].
We found that in all our cases, the RTEF/diverticulum was located to the left of the esophagus and was accessible through the left side. This study aims to present a novel left-sided thoracoscopic approach for RTEF and TD as a complication of EA surgery.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the Bioethical Committee of Wroclaw Medical University (KB–18/2020). The research has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and informed consent for retrospective review was obtained from all participants’ legal guardians.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with RTEF or TD who underwent left-sided thoracoscopic repair since the introduction of the method in 2016. We also analyzed the operation video recordings and completed the data from the outpatient clinic and telephone consultations. We define major complications as grade IIIa and higher according to the Clavien–Dindo classification [10].

Thoracoscopic Treatment and Patient Management

The first author, who operated on all the cases, has the experience of more than 350 thoracoscopic procedures for EA/TEF pathology. The fistula or TD position was precisely defined using a computed tomography (CT) scan to the corresponding vertebra. The operative technique was similar in all cases. All procedures started with rigid bronchoscopy to confirm the diagnosis, rule out other airway pathologies, and in later cases, to place a guide wire through the fistula to help its identification during thoracoscopy. Then, left-sided three-port thoracoscopy was performed in a prone position (in the first two cases, left side was slightly elevated). First, the optical 5 mm trocar was inserted in the next intercostal space below the tip of the scapula at the posterior axillary line (A in Figure 1). Pneumothorax with CO2 at 6 mmHg was obtained (flow 1–3 L/min). Then, the remaining two 3 mm working trocars were placed under direct view around the scapula above and below the optical port (B and C in Figure 1). The mediastinal pleura was opened according to preoperative fistula localization, based on the CT scan and tracheoscopy, usually between Th4 and Th6 (Figure 2). The aorta was bluntly dissected above and posteriorly to the arch, and its segmental arteries to the vertebrae were spared. The plane of the dissection went deep here, leading to identification of the trachea and the esophagus (Figure 3). The fistula was localized and dissected (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The method of fistula closure depended on intraoperative findings and the anatomy. Both ends of the fistula were either closed with ligation (Vicryl 3-0), transfixing (Vicryl 3-0), or titanium 5 mm clips (B. Braun Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) (Figure 6). In some cases, all these methods were combined. For the clip applier, one of the 3 mm trocars was replaced by a 5 mm trocar. If feasible, the fistula was transected (Figure 7). For the tracheal stump, the technique was the same except that the esophageal end did not need closure. A chest drain was placed through the lowest trocar wound in all cases (as seen at Figure 1).

3. Results

Although patients were diagnosed at different ages, they all had common symptoms: recurrent respiratory infections. Three of four patients diagnosed before two years of age had also been choking during feeding. Diagnosis was based on symptoms and radiological examination, including esophagography or CT, and was always confirmed with bronchoscopy before qualifying for operative treatment. Three patients with RTEF had undergone unsuccessful attempts of endoscopic treatment with trichloroacetic acid (one, two, and four procedures accordingly) before surgery.
In the study period, we have had six cases of recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas (one of them was probably a missed upper TEF on the primary surgery) and two symptomatic tracheal diverticula (chronic respiratory infections and cough). Six of them were referred patients primarily operated on in other centers, while two patients with TD were our cases. Patient’s general data are in Table 1.
All patients except one had unfavorable courses after the primary esophageal atresia repair with complications such as anastomotic leakage or pneumothorax. Patient No. 1, who started the series and pushed us to try the new technique, had monthly anastomotic leakage and a history of several right chest tube insertions. As a result, RTEF was found during reoperation. Patient No. 5 underwent reoperation twice in the neonatal period because of anastomosis dehiscence. Seven out of eight patients required dilations for esophageal stenosis before diagnosis.
All patients were treated according to the operative technique described in the Methods section (left-sided thoracoscopy). There were no conversions to open surgery. The mean operative time was 177 min (130–255 min).
In two cases, we left the fistulas transfixed and ligated or clipped because they were too short for transection. In another case, after closing the tracheal end of the fistula, it was easier to transect it first and then suture at the esophageal end.
In three cases, we had difficulties identifying the fistula. Using intraoperative esophagoscopy or bronchoscopy, the fistula was located and illuminated with the light of the endoscope, which allowed us to confirm the fistula position from a thoracoscopic view (Figure 8). Therefore, if feasible in subsequent cases, we placed a guide wire through the TEF during preoperative bronchoscopy and pulled it out from the esophagus with an endoscope, so the wire created a loop with both ends outside.

Postop

The mean hospital stay postoperatively was 10 days (3–15 days). It is worth noting that last two patients went home 3 days after surgery. The complications rate was 2/8 (25%).
One patient (No. 5) developed significant chylothorax (up to 1100 mL/24 h). Conservative treatment (i.e., no enteral feeding, total parenteral nutrition, octreotide, drainage) was completely ineffective, so the patient was reoperated on six days after the TEF closure via left-sided thoracoscopy through the same wounds. As there was no identifiable source of chyle leakage, the previously opened mediastinal pleura was sutured, and the thoracic duct was ligated near the vertebrae. After the reoperation, the chylothorax diminished and resolved after four days.
Another patient (No. 6) had a persistent cough after the RTEF closure, and a postoperative endoscopy revealed a tracheal diverticulum, probably a result of insufficient dissection in difficult anatomical conditions. Therefore, over the next months, he underwent eight bronchoscopies with trichloroacetic acid obliteration of the TD. The TD diminished significantly, and symptoms resolved. The mean follow-up was four years (2 months–6 years), and there was still no recurrence. The first three patients underwent a postoperative endoscopy for recurrent respiratory infections, but no re-recurrence was found. Patients No. 4, 5, and 7 remained asymptomatic. In patients operated on for tracheal diverticulum, significant symptoms relief was achieved. The first patient who had the RTEF only transfixed and ligated without transection is currently over 3 years after the procedure and does not have any symptoms of re-recurrence of the RTEF. The second case without RTEF transection (only titanium clips) is the newest patient and remains under careful surveillance.

4. Discussion

According to the literature, the risk of RTEF is higher in children who have anastomotic leakage after primary surgery [8]. All but one of our patients had complications after initial esophageal atresia repair; thus our results support this idea.
The idea of left-sided thoracoscopy arose when we faced a 7-month-old girl with an RTEF after almost one month of anastomotic leakage, and a CT and esophagogram not only confirmed the diagnosis but also showed extensive inflammatory changes, suggesting severe adhesions in the right pleural cavity with the fistula located to the left of the esophagus. As RTEF is usually a result of post-anastomotic leakage, which causes massive inflammation and adhesions in a pleural cavity, reoperation is technically challenging. Access to the diverticulum or RTEF through the left pleura seems to be easier because of the lack of postoperative adhesions and more direct visualization of the pathological structure, as the RTEF and diverticula in our experience appear to be mainly located on the left side of the esophagus.
The most challenging aspect of the operation is the identification and dissection of the fistula. In three cases in our series, we used intraoperative esophagoscopy and/or fiber tracheoscopy to illuminate the site of the TEF. Another solution is preoperative cannulation of the fistula with guide wire, as was performed in the last cases. We have already been utilizing it in a few cases of congenital H-type TEF, and it greatly facilitates intraoperative localization [11].
The proximity of the left thoracic duct passing near the aorta and the fact that it is not always identifiable poses an actual risk of injury of the duct, which justifies leaving the drain after surgery. Chylothorax is a potential complication of the left-sided approach as happened in one case, but it is manageable.
Thoracoscopy is becoming the gold standard for esophageal atresia and TEF in many centers [11,12,13,14], but RTEF surgery is still performed open [2,3,4,7,8,15]. The “classical” right-sided MIS approach for RTEF was mentioned only once in the literature by Rothenberg [16]. Left-sided thoracoscopy has already been used for primary repair in patients with EA and right aortic arch [17]. The left-sided thoracoscopic approach is innovative for recurrent TEF or tracheal diverticulum, although it has recently been described by Svetanoff et al. for the Foker procedure, mainly in LGEA, but also as a part of salvage strategy after failed primary anastomosis [18].
Alternatives are open or endoscopic treatment. The disadvantages of thoracotomy are already widely described when discussing esophageal atresia, and they include longer time to extubation and first oral feeding, longer postoperative stay, and higher risk of chest deformities [13,19,20]. Authors of the biggest series of open RTEF repair do not provide operative times or postoperative hospital stays [2,3,4,7,8]. Nevertheless, our last two patients went home 3 days after surgery which can be considered a fast recovery given the complexity of the reoperation and a scarred surgical field through the right chest. For the same reason, we cannot compare our operative times, but our mean 177 min for such a major surgery seems to be acceptable.
In a systematic review from 2013, Aworanti and Awadalla presented 108 patients treated with open surgery. The refistulation rate was 21%. In the recent literature, the re-recurrence rate is still 8–17%, with mortality up to 10% [2,7,9]. The complication rate in our series (25%) is comparable with these outcomes and comes with the advantage of minimal invasiveness.
When compared with endoscopic fistula obliteration, open surgery provides a higher success rate, requires fewer procedures, and gives fewer recanalizations [1,4]. On the other hand, endoscopic treatment is the least invasive. For endoscopy, the success rates vary significantly between studies from 37% to 100% in small series [1,21,22,23]. Although there are publications with encouraging results, in our presented cases, the endoscopic attempts failed. Compared to tracheal endoscopy, thoracoscopy seems to be more invasive, but nevertheless, also more precise. In our experience, thoracoscopic treatment is more successful. It can also be regarded as the potential second line of treatment in failed endoscopic closures or in patients who primarily do not qualify for endoscopic treatment because of the fistula size (too wide for obliteration) or accompanying diverticulum.
In the present study, the main outcomes were favorable: we had a low reoperation rate (one re-thoracoscopy for chylothorax and one case of endoscopic obliterations of subsequent TD), no fatal complications, and good follow-up, without re-recurrence of TEF.
The main limitation of the study is the small sample size. Although we are a referral center, we can only present this short series of eight cases as RTEF is very rare in our hands. These preliminary findings need to be confirmed in a larger group of patients to obtain more convincing results. Nevertheless, this is the only report of this technique thus far.
The technique itself is demanding and requires experience in thoracoscopy but combines all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and a high success rate typical for open surgery.

5. Conclusions

Left-sided thoracoscopy in redo esophageal atresia has the advantage of a “virgin” operative field and grants feasible access to the RTEF or tracheal diverticulum. This approach is worth further exploration because it combines minimal invasiveness with high effectiveness without all the consequences of a thoracotomy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.P. and E.E.; Methodology, K.T. and E.E.; Formal analysis, K.T. and E.E.; Investigation, D.P., K.T. and E.E.; Resources, D.P. and K.T.; Data curation, K.T. and E.E.; Writing—original draft, K.T. and E.E.; Writing—review & editing, D.P.; Supervision, D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Wroclaw Medical University (protocol code KB-18/2020, date of approval 16.01.2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Dariusz Patkowski, Krystian Toczewski, and Ergun Ergun have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Abbreviations

RTEFrecurrent tracheoesophageal fistula
TDtracheal diverticula
CTcomputed tomography

References

  1. Daniel, S.J.; Smith, M.M. Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Open versus Endoscopic Repair. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016, 24, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Koivusalo, A.I.; Pakarinen, M.P.; Lindahl, H.G.; Rintala, R.J. Revisional Surgery for Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula and Anastomotic Complications after Repair of Esophageal Atresia in 258 Infants. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2015, 50, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smithers, C.J.; Hamilton, T.E.; Manfredi, M.A.; Rhein, L.; Ngo, P.; Gallagher, D.; Foker, J.E.; Jennings, R.W. Categorization and Repair of Recurrent and Acquired Tracheoesophageal Fistulae Occurring after Esophageal Atresia Repair. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2017, 52, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aworanti, O.; Awadalla, S. Management of Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistulas: A Systematic Review. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2014, 24, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lal, D.R.; Gadepalli, S.K.; Downard, C.D.; Ostlie, D.J.; Minneci, P.C.; Swedler, R.M.; Chelius, T.; Cassidy, L.; Rapp, C.T.; Deans, K.J.; et al. Perioperative Management and Outcomes of Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2017, 52, 1245–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gutierrez, R.S.; Guelfand, M.; Balbontin, P.V. Congenital and Acquired Tracheoesophageal Fistulas in Children. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2021, 30, 151060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Coran, A.G. Redo Esophageal Surgery: The Diagnosis and Management of Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2013, 29, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bruch, S.W.; Hirschl, R.B.; Coran, A.G. The Diagnosis and Management of Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistulas. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2010, 45, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhu, H.; Shen, C.; Xiao, X.; Dong, K.; Zheng, S. Reoperation for Anastomotic Complications of Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2015, 50, 2012–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dindo, D.; Demartines, N.; Clavien, P.A. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004, 240, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Toczewski, K.; Rygl, M.; Dzielendziak, A.; Frybova, B.; Patkowski, D. Thoracoscopic Repair of Congenital Isolated H-Type Tracheoesophageal Fistula. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2021, 56, 1386–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Holcomb, G.W. Thoracoscopic Surgery for Esophageal Atresia. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2017, 33, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, Y.-F.; Dong, R.; Zheng, C.; Jin, Z.; Chen, G.; Huang, Y.-L.; Zheng, S. Outcomes of Thoracoscopy versus Thoracotomy for Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair. Medicine 2016, 95, e4428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Way, C.; Wayne, C.; Grandpierre, V.; Harrison, B.J.; Travis, N.; Nasr, A. Thoracoscopy vs. Thoracotomy for the Repair of Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2019, 35, 1167–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Pan, W.; Wu, W.; Yan, W.; Cai, W. Management of Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula after Esophageal Atresia and Follow-Up. Dis. Esophagus 2017, 30, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rothenberg, S.S. Experience with Thoracoscopic Tracheal Surgery in Infants and Children. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 2009, 19, 671–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aguilera-Pujabet, M.; Gahete, J.A.M.; Guillén, G.; López-Fernández, S.; Martin-Giménez, M.P.; Lloret, J.; López, M. Management of Neonates with Right-Sided Aortic Arch and Esophageal Atresia: International Survey on IPEG AND ESPES Members’ Experience. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 53, 1923–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Svetanoff, W.J.; Zendejas, B.; Ngo, P.D.; Manfredi, M.; Hamilton, T.E.; Jennings, R.W.; Smithers, C.J. The left-sided repair: An alternative approach for difficult esophageal atresia repair. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2021, 56, 938–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Elhattab, A.; Ali, L.; Rousseau, V.; Clermidi, P.; Michelet, D.; Farnoux, C.; Lapillonne, A.; Aly, K.A.-E.; Sarnacki, S.; Bonnard, A.; et al. Thoracoscopy Versus Thoracotomy in the Repair of Esophageal Atresia with Distal Tracheoesophageal Fistula. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 2020, 30, 1289–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rozeik, A.E.; Elbarbary, M.M.; Saleh, A.M.; Khodary, A.R.; Al-Ekrashy, M.A. Thoracoscopic versus Conventional Open Repair of Tracheoesophageal Fistula in Neonates: A Short-Term Comparative Study. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2020, 55, 1854–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nazir, Z.; Khan, M.A.M.; Qamar, J. Recurrent and Acquired Tracheoesophageal Fistulae (TEF)-Minimally Invasive Management. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2017, 52, 1688–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lal, D.; Oldham, K. Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013, 23, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lelonge, Y.; Varlet, F.; Varela, P.; Saitúa, F.; Fourcade, L.; Gutierrez, R.; Vermesch, S.; Prades, J.-M.; Lopez, M. Chemocauterization with Trichloroacetic Acid in Congenital and Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula: A Minimally Invasive Treatment. Surg. Endosc. 2016, 30, 1662–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Trocar placement. A—5 mm optical trocar, B and C—3 mm working ports. This is picture of one of the first cases; now the position is prone.
Figure 1. Trocar placement. A—5 mm optical trocar, B and C—3 mm working ports. This is picture of one of the first cases; now the position is prone.
Jcm 12 07251 g001
Figure 2. Massive inflammatory changes and suspected adhesions to the right from the esophagus. The arrow shows the RTEF with a diverticulum. Please notice its left position to the trachea and esophagus.
Figure 2. Massive inflammatory changes and suspected adhesions to the right from the esophagus. The arrow shows the RTEF with a diverticulum. Please notice its left position to the trachea and esophagus.
Jcm 12 07251 g002
Figure 3. The mediastinal pleura opened; the thoracic duct dissected (arrowhead). E—esophagus, T—trachea.
Figure 3. The mediastinal pleura opened; the thoracic duct dissected (arrowhead). E—esophagus, T—trachea.
Jcm 12 07251 g003
Figure 4. Deep dissection plane with spared aortal segmental vessels. V—vertebra, A—aorta, S—segmental vessels, F—fistula.
Figure 4. Deep dissection plane with spared aortal segmental vessels. V—vertebra, A—aorta, S—segmental vessels, F—fistula.
Jcm 12 07251 g004
Figure 5. Dissected fistula on blue loop. V—vertebra, A—aorta, S—segmental vessels, F—fistula.
Figure 5. Dissected fistula on blue loop. V—vertebra, A—aorta, S—segmental vessels, F—fistula.
Jcm 12 07251 g005
Figure 6. An example of fistula clipped on both sides.
Figure 6. An example of fistula clipped on both sides.
Jcm 12 07251 g006
Figure 7. Transection of the fistula.
Figure 7. Transection of the fistula.
Jcm 12 07251 g007
Figure 8. The endoscope light (arrowhead) close to the fistula (F) is visible.
Figure 8. The endoscope light (arrowhead) close to the fistula (F) is visible.
Jcm 12 07251 g008
Table 1. General data of the patients.
Table 1. General data of the patients.
Patient No.SexEA TypePrimary repairReferredDiagnosisAge at RTEF DiagnosisDiagnostic TestsOther Congenital Defects
1fdistal TEFthoracoscopic+RTEF7 mcontrast, bronchohypothyroidism, vertebral anomalies
2mdistal TEFthoracoscopicTD5 yCT, bronchoPFO, PDA, pulmonary hypertension, laryngeal cleft
3fdistal TEFthoracoscopicTD23 mbronchoPDA, ASD II, tracheomalacia
4fdistal TEFopen+RTEF5 mCT, bronchoPDA
5mproximal and distal TEFopen+RTEF5 yCT, bronchoVUR
6mdistal TEFopen+RTEF23 mCT, bronchoARM
7mproximal and distal TEFthoracoscopic+missed upper TEF3 ycontrast, bronchoVACTERL
8m distal TEFthoracoscopic+RTEF8 yCT, bronchonone
TEF—tracheoesophageal fistula, RTEF—recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula, contrast—esophagography, CT—computed tomography, broncho—bronchoscopy, PFO—persistent foramen ovale, PDA—persistent ductus arteriosus, ASD—atrial septum defect, VUR—vesicoureteral reflux, ARM—anorectal malformation, VACTERL—VACTERL association.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patkowski, D.; Toczewski, K.; Ergun, E. Novel Left-Sided Thoracoscopic Approach to Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula and Post-Fistula Tracheal Diverticula. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 7251. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237251

AMA Style

Patkowski D, Toczewski K, Ergun E. Novel Left-Sided Thoracoscopic Approach to Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula and Post-Fistula Tracheal Diverticula. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(23):7251. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237251

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patkowski, Dariusz, Krystian Toczewski, and Ergun Ergun. 2023. "Novel Left-Sided Thoracoscopic Approach to Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula and Post-Fistula Tracheal Diverticula" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 23: 7251. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237251

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop