Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes following COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy
, Raanan Meyer 1,2, Abraham Tsur 1,2 and Yoav Yinon 1,2,*Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This is a well constructed review of the retrospective cohort in a well controlled population and health system.
Author Response
Thank you for your review!
Reviewer 2 Report
- Over all a very reasonable paper and well done.
- It would be helpful if the results of the paper were described in a more positive manner instead of the several “no associations” between vaccination status descriptions provided etc.
- The authors correctly addressed the important possible limitation of statistical power for their study.
- Line 19, add the word “different” following significantly.
- Line 45, move the word “each” to in front of the word “published”.
- Line 63, change “does” to “dose”.
- Line 67, change “variables” to variable” (or change the sentence to allow for the plural variables).
- Line 99, correct spelling of “included”
- Line 189, the earlier gestational age of delivery among the vaccinated women in this study is not significant, and therefore I do not believe it is worth mentioning at in this explanation. Doing so may confuse the reader.
Author Response
Response to Reviewer 2 Comments
We would like to thank you for the opportunity to submit the revised manuscript entitled "Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes following COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy". We found all the reviewers’ comments to be very constructive and have changed the manuscript accordingly. Our point by-point reply appears below.
Point 1: Over all a very reasonable paper and well done.
Response 1: Thank you for your feedback.
Point 2: It would be helpful if the results of the paper were described in a more positive manner instead of the several “no associations” between vaccination status descriptions provided etc.
Response 2: Results description was adjusted.
Point 3: The authors correctly addressed the important possible limitation of statistical power for their study.
Response 3: Thank you for your feedback.
Point 4: Line 19, add the word “different” following significantly.
Response 4: Corrected.
Point 5: Line 45, move the word “each” to in front of the word “published”.
Response 5: Corrected.
Point 6: Line 63, change “does” to “dose”.
Response 6: Corrected.
Point 7: Line 67, change “variables” to variable” (or change the sentence to allow for the plural variables).
Response 7: Corrected.
Point 8: Line 99, correct spelling of “included”
Response 8: Corrected.
Point 9: Line 189, the earlier gestational age of delivery among the vaccinated women in this study is not significant, and therefore I do not believe it is worth mentioning at in this explanation. Doing so may confuse the reader.
Response 9: The discussion paragraph was rephrased accordingly.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
