Next Article in Journal
Personalized Therapeutic Strategies in the Management of Osteoporosis in Patients with Autoantibody-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Sleeping as a Protector against Malocclusion in the Primary Dentition: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/jcm11092339
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra Contributed to Lumbar Spine Degeneration: An MR Study of Clinical Patients

by
Linxiang Cheng
,
Chao Jiang
,
Jiawei Huang
,
Jiale Jin
,
Ming Guan
* and
Yue Wang
*
Spine Lab, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(9), 2339; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092339
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 26 March 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 22 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Orthopaedic Diseases and Innovative Intervention Strategies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We aimed to comprehensively characterize degenerative findings associated with various types of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) on magnetic resonance images. Three hundred and fifty patients with LSTV (52.3 ± 10.9 years), including 182 Castellvi type I, 107 type II, 43 type III, and 18 type IV, and 179 controls without LSTV (50.6 ± 13.1 years), were studied. Discs, endplates, and posterior vertebral structures were assessed and compared to those of controls for the most caudal three discs on MRIs. There were no differences in degenerative findings between patients with type I LSTV and controls. For types III and IV, the transitional discs had smaller sizes, lower Pfirrmann scores, and lower rates of disc bulging (2.3% and 5.6% vs. 39.1%), osteophytes (2.3% vs. 15.1%), disc herniation (2.3% and 5.6% vs. 31.8%), and Modic changes (2.3% and 5.6% vs. 16.8%) than controls. However, the cranial discs had more severe Pfirrmann scores, disc narrowing and spinal canal narrowing, and greater rates of disc herniation (41.9% and 50.0% vs. 25.7%), endplate defects (27.9% and 33.3% vs. 14.4%) and spondylolisthesis (18.6% vs. 7.3%) than controls. Type II LSTV was associated with degenerative findings in the cranial segments but to a lesser degree, as compared with type III/IV LSTV. Thus, Castellvi type III/IV LSTV predisposed the adjacent spinal components to degeneration and protected the transitional discs. Type II LSTV had significant effects in promoting transitional and adjacent disc degeneration. Type I LSTV was not related to spinal degeneration.

1. Introduction

Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) is a common anatomical variation at the lumbosacral junction of the spine [1,2], with an occurrence rate of 15.8–35.6% in general populations [3,4,5,6]. Although the etiology of LSTV remains unclear [7], it is generally accepted that LSTV is a congenital anomaly. There is a trend of family aggregation of LSTV [8], and the key genes in axial skeletal segmentation during embryogenesis, Hox-10 and Hox-11, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of LSTV [9,10]. In the presence of LSTV, the lumbar vertebral transverse processes may connect with the ala of sacrum to form a pseudoarticulation or bony fusion. On anteroposterior radiographs, Castellvi categorized LSTV into four subtypes: type I (transverse process > 19 mm), type II (pseudoarticulation between the lumbar vertebral transverse process and sacrum), type III (bony fusion between the transverse process and sacrum), and type IV (pseudoarticulation at one side and bony fusion at another). For types I–III, LSTV can be further classified as unilateral (a) or bilateral (b) [11].
LSTV may have important implications in spine practice. Other than vertebra numbering in radiological diagnosis and surgical planning, LSTV may have concomitant anatomical variations of the iliac artery [12]. More importantly, LSTV may be associated with back pain. As early as 1917, Bertolotti reported that back pain was more common in patients with LSTV than in those without [13]. While some population-based studies confirmed that LSTV was associated with the occurrence and severity of back pain and buttock pain [4,5], many others did not observe such associations [8,14,15]. Whether LSTV is a pathology related to back pain thus deserves further investigation.
Moreover, evidence suggests that LSTV may play a role in the development of degenerative lumbar disorders. While the disc cranial to the transitional segment may have more degeneration on magnetic resonance images (MRI) than other discs, the disc at the transitional segment tends to be mechanically protected and have fewer degenerative changes [16]. Another study reported that disc degeneration and facet degeneration in young men were most common in LSTV type I but less severe as compared with other types of LSTV [17]. It seems that LSTV may impact the proximal spinal segments, and such effects vary in degree among different types of LSTV. Yet, MR image features of LSTV have not been specifically depicted in detail.
Using clinical patients, the purpose of the current study is to characterize degenerative findings in the disc, endplate, spinal canal, and facet joints for various types of LSTV to understand the associations of LSTV with lumbar spine degeneration on MRIs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

This is a cross-sectional study of clinical images. On the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) at the author’s hospital, a general search was performed to identify patients who had consecutive computerized tomography (CT) and MR images of the lumbar spine between January 2016 and January 2018. The subject was excluded, if he or she had: (1) a previous history of lumbar spine surgery; (2) degenerative scoliosis or non-degenerative pathologies in the lumbar spine which could interrupt the evaluation of lumbar spine degeneration, including spinal tumors, infections, and traumatic fractures; (3) images with poor quality. Lumbar spine CT and MR images were then evaluated for included subjects.

2.2. Image Evaluation

MR imaging of the lumbar spine was performed with a 1.5 T scanner (GE, Boston, MA, USA), including sagittal T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and axial T2W sequences. CT was performed using a LightSpeed scanner (GE, Boston, MA, USA). Sagittal CT slices were then reconstructed, with a slice thickness of 3 mm.
General image evaluation was performed on a computer station using the PACS system. The degree of disc degeneration was evaluated for the most caudal three intervertebral discs on T2W sagittal MRIs. In the presence of LSTV, it is sometimes difficult to number a lumbar vertebra, as there may be four or six lumbar vertebrae due to the lumbosacral anomalies. As such, we defined the disc at the transitional segment as the transitional disc, which is the most caudal and well-formed disc, the disc immediately cranial to the transitional segment as the cranial disc, and the disc proximately neighboring the cranial disc as the neighboring disc (Figure 1). Spinal-level-specific measurements of the transitional, cranial, and neighboring discs were compared to L5/S1, L4/5, and L3/4 in controls without LSTV, respectively.

2.3. LSTV Evaluation

Using Castellvi classification, two orthopedic surgeons (LC and MG, who had 4 years of expertise with spine MRIs) independently evaluated the presence or absence of LSTV on the reconstructed CT images, which is the gold standard for the evaluation of LSTV [6,18]. If present, LSTV was classified as type I-IV, and then further marked as “a” if unilateral, or “b” if bilateral [11]. Kappa statistics were used to examine the interobserver agreement for LSTV. When there was a disagreement between two evaluators, the case was resolved by discussion.

2.4. Disc Degeneration

On T2W sagittal MRIs, disc degeneration was evaluated using the Pfirrmann scale [19]. Individual phenotypes of disc degeneration were further assessed. Disc bulging, defined as the disc tissues exceeding the posterior edges of the vertebral bodies, was rated as absent or present [20,21]. Similarly, the absence or presence of osteophytes was assessed [22]. Disc narrowing was assessed as none, mild, moderate, or severe [23]. Using ImageJ (Version 1.80, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), the anterior, middle, and posterior disc heights were quantitatively measured and averaged for each disc [24]. In addition, the absence or presence of disc herniation, defined as the displacement of disc material beyond the normal margins of the disc space, was assessed [25].
Moreover, cerebrospinal-fluid (CSF)-adjusted disc signal intensity was measured on the mid-sagittal T2W MRIs using ImageJ [24]. In brief, the mean signal of the disc was acquired, and the signal of the CSF region behind the disc was obtained as a reference to adjust the signal of the corresponding disc [26]. Using Spine Explorer (Yitian), the sagittal area and anteroposterior diameter of the disc were automatically obtained on sagittal MRIs. The reliability and validity of this program in measuring MRIs have been reported elsewhere [24].

2.5. Endplate Degeneration

Modic changes and signal variations on the vertebral endplate and marrow were assessed on T1W and T2W sagittal MRIs. If present, Modic changes were further classified as type I, II, or III [27]. Endplate defects were defined as the loss or disruption of the smooth appearance of the endplate [28]. If present, endplate defects were further classified as focal, corner, or erosive defects, as previously reported.

2.6. Canal Stenosis, Ligamentum Flavum Thickening, and Facet Joint Degeneration

On T2W axial MRIs, spinal canal narrowing was assessed and further classified as normal, mild to moderate, or severe, as previously defined [29]. The thickness of ligamentum flavum was measured using ImageJ, and was rated as present if ≥4 mm on either side [25]. Using Weishaupt’s approach, facet joint degeneration was rated as none, normal, mild to moderate, or severe [30]. In addition, spondylolisthesis was evaluated as absent or present [25].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to depict MR findings for various types of LSTV and controls. Measurements of the transitional disc, cranial disc, and neighboring disc in LSTV patients were compared to those of L5/S1, L4/5, and L3/4 discs in controls, respectively. Differences in MR findings among LSTV subtypes and controls were compared. A t-test was used for age and quantitative variables. Chi-square tests were used for measurements of disc bulging, osteophytes, disc herniation, Modic changes, endplate defects, and spondylolisthesis. Mann-Whitney U tests were used for ordinal variables, including Pfirrmann score, disc narrowing, spinal canal stenosis, ligamentum flavum thickening, and facet joint degeneration. The associations of age with Pfirrmann score, disc height, disc signal, and age were determined using linear regression. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata (Version 13.1, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Subject Characteristics

During the defined period, a total of 635 patients with consecutive CT and MR images of the lumbar spine were identified. Among them, 106 patients were excluded (25 had a history of spine surgery, 29 had lumbar vertebral fractures, 15 had spinal infections, 9 had scoliosis, 12 had lumbar tumors, and 16 had images of poor quality). As a result, 529 patients (238 men and 291 women, age 51.7 ± 11.7 years) were studied. Among them, 350 (66.2%) patients had LSTV, including 182 (34.4%) type I, 107 (20.2%) type II, 43 (8.1%) type III, and 18 (3.4%) type IV. The other 179 patients without LSTV were included as controls.
There was no statistical difference in age between LSTV patients and controls (p = 0.12). The prevalence of LSTV was higher in men than in women (70.5% vs. 51.0%, p < 0.001). However, the prevalence rate of each LSTV subtype was not different between men and women (p > 0.05 for all). No statistical difference in degenerative findings were observed between men and women (p > 0.05 for all). For LSTV evaluation, the interobserver Kappa was 0.83 and was considered excellent.

3.2. Differences in MRI Findings between Unilateral and Bilateral LSTV

For LSTV types I, II, and III, we compared unilateral (a) and bilateral (b) MR findings, and no statistical differences in degenerative findings were observed between unilateral and bilateral LSTV (p > 0.05 for all). As such, data of unilateral and bilateral LSTV were merged for further analysis.

3.3. MRI Findings for Type I LSTV

Between patients with type I LSTV and controls, there were no statistically significant differences in any degenerative findings for the most caudal three lumbar discs (p > 0.05 for all, Table 1 and Figure 2).

3.4. MRI Findings for Type II LSTV

(1)
The Transitional Disc
Compared with the L5/S1 discs in controls, the transitional discs in type II LSTV had significantly greater rates of disc bulging (51.4% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.043), osteophytes (28.0% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.008), and endplate defects (22.4% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.034), and greater Pfirrmann scores and disc narrowing (Table 1 and Figure 2). Greater age was associated with higher Pfirrmann scores, lower disc heights, and lower disc signals of the transitional discs in type II LSTV, similar to the L5/S1 discs in controls, as well (p < 0.05, Table 2).
(2)
The cranial disc
The cranial discs in type II LSTV patients had significantly higher rates of disc bulging (87.9% vs. 53.6%, p < 0.001), osteophytes (39.3% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.003), disc herniation (40.2% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.010), Modic changes (22.4% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.034), endplate defects (35.5% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001), and spondylolisthesis (15.0% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.037), and had greater Pfirrmann scores, disc narrowing, facet joint degeneration, ligamentum flavum thickening, and spinal canal narrowing, as compared with the L4/5 discs in controls (Table 1 and Figure 2).
(3)
The neighboring disc
The neighboring discs in type II LSTV patients had higher rates of disc bulging (54.2% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001), osteophytes (39.3% vs. 27.4%, p = 0.037), disc herniation (13.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.008), endplate defects (20.6% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.003), and greater Pfirrmann scores, ligamentum flavum thickening, and spinal canal narrowing, as compared with the L3/4 discs in controls (Table 1 and Figure 2).

3.5. MRI Findings for Type III LSTV

(1)
The Transitional Disc
The transitional discs in type III LSTV had significantly less anteroposterior diameters, lower disc heights, less area, and higher disc signals on the mid-sagittal MRI than the control L5/S1 discs (p < 0.05 for all, data not presented). Age was not associated with Pfirrmann score, disc height, or disc signal measurement of the transitional discs (p > 0.05, Table 3).
The transitional discs in type III LSTV had significantly lower rates of disc bulging (2.3% vs. 39.1%, p < 0.001), osteophytes (2.3% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.021), disc herniation (2.3% vs. 31.8%, p < 0.001), Modic changes (2.3% vs 16.8%, p = 0.013), and had lower Pfirrmann scores and ligamentum flavum thickening, but more severe disc narrowing and facet joint degeneration than the L5/S1 discs in controls (Table 1 and Figure 2). When compared to those in type II LSTV, the transitional discs in type III LSTV also had fewer degenerative findings in the discs, endplates, and facet joints (p < 0.05 for all, Table 1 and Figure 2).
(2)
The cranial disc
The cranial discs in type III LSTV had significantly higher rates of disc herniation (41.9% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.036), endplate defects (27.9% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.028) and spondylolisthesis (18.6% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.022), and had greater Pfirrmann scores, disc narrowing, and spinal canal narrowing than the L4/5 discs in the controls (Table 1 and Figure 2).
(3)
The neighboring disc
The neighboring discs in type III LSTV had higher rates of disc bulging (51.2% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001) and spondylolisthesis (9.3% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.014), and higher Pfirrmann scores, more severe disc narrowing, and greater spinal canal narrowing than the L3/4 discs in controls (Table 1 and Figure 2).

3.6. MRI Findings for Type IV LSTV

Similar to type III LSTV, in type IV LSTV, degenerative findings were barely observed in the transitional disc but rather common in the cranial disc (Table 1 and Figure 2). For the most caudal three discs, no significant differences in degenerative findings were observed between type IV and type III LSTV (p > 0.05 for all). In addition, the neighboring discs in type IV LSTV had higher rates of disc bulging (50.0 % vs. 24.0%, p = 0.017), endplate defects (33.3% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.001), and spondylolisthesis (11.1% vs. 1.1 %, p = 0.042) than the L3/4 discs in controls.

4. Discussion

In this study, MRI features of each LSTV type were characterized to understand their associations with lumbar spine degeneration. MR findings in type I LSTV spines were not different from those of age-matched controls, suggesting that type I LSTV did not have specific degenerative effects on the lower lumbar spine. Similarly, type III and IV LSTV were comparable in the context of lumbar spine degeneration. Compared with the L5/S1 discs in controls, the transitional discs in type III and type IV LSTV were smaller in size and degenerative findings were rare. On the contrary, the disc cranial to the transitional segment had serious degenerative changes in the disc and endplate, suggesting that type III and IV LSTV were associated with adjacent disc and endplate degeneration. On the other hand, type II LSTV was also related to cranial disc degeneration.
LSTV has important clinical implications in spine-related practice. Reportedly, over 30% of adults in general population have lumbosacral transition, and LSTV has long been suspected as a cause of common back pain [13]. On the other hand, it is sometimes challenging to number a lumbar vertebra in the presence of LSTV [31], resulting in accidental confusion in clinical communication and surgery. A less studied area of LSTV, however, is that LSTV may play an important role in lumbar spine degeneration and related disorders.
Recently, spinal sagittal balance and spinopelvic alignment have become important evaluations in the research and clinical practice of degenerative lumbar spinal disorders [32,33,34]. Although the Roussouly classification of sagittal spinal profile is widely used, its association with various subtypes of LSTV remains understudied [35,36]. Since LSTV has significant influence on pelvic morphology and spinopelvic parameters, reliable identification of LSTV and proper selection of measurement points are of great clinical relevance. For example, Henryk reported that LSTV was associated with changes in fixed spinopelvic parameters, including pelvic radius, pelvic incidence, and sacral table angle [37]. Nevertheless, the associations of LSTV with sagittal alignment and lumbar spinal degenerative findings deserve further study.
In type III and IV transitions, the discs at the transitional segments had much smaller sizes but higher signals than other lumbar discs and the control L5/S1 discs. The absence of associations between age and Pfirrmann score and disc signal of the transitional discs in type III/IV LSTV suggest that the transitional discs were small in size at birth and further escaped from age-related degeneration. Such phenomena may be attributable to the mechanical shielding effect of osseous fusion in the transitional segment. Further, degenerative findings were common in the cranial segment in both type III and IV LSTV. Together, findings suggest that type III/IV LSTV may have profound effects of promoting degeneration on the cranial segment. Related mechanisms may involve abnormal torque moments [11], altered mechanical stress [38], transferred mobility on the cranial segment [39], and weak iliolumbar ligament at the adjacent segment [40]. Notably, in this study, 41.9% of type III and 50% of type IV LSTV at the cranial discs had radiological disc herniation (Table 2), suggesting that type III/IV may be an important risk factor for lumbar disc herniation. In fact, cranial disc degeneration in type III/IV LSTV is similar to the adjacent segment disease following spinal instrumentation and fusion [41,42].
In this study, type II LSTV, with one or two enlarged L5 vertebral processes articulating with the sacrum, were associated with disc degeneration at both the cranial and transitional segments. Contrary to a previous study which reported that type II LSTV protected the transitional discs from degeneration [16], we observed a greater degree of degeneration at the transitional discs in type II LSTV than in the controls. Although some studies suggested that LSTV are genetically formed [43,44], we noticed that age was associated with disc degeneration in the transitional segment. It is possible that type II LSTV is an acquired lumbosacral anomaly formed as a result of progressive disc height decrease in aging. Further evidence is needed to support this new hypothesis.
Although it is traditionally counted as type I LSTV when the transverse processes of L5 vertebra are relatively large (>19 mm), such morphological enlargement was not related to lumbar spine degeneration [11]. Consistent with many studies [11,45], no differences in degeneration measurements were observed between type I LSTV and controls in this study. In addition, there was no anatomical connection between the vertebral transverse process and sacrum. Our findings suggested that Castellvi type I may not be a true lumbosacral anomaly and could be excluded from LSTV [40,45,46].
This was merely a retrospective image study of clinical patients. Detailed protocols were used to characterize various degenerative findings of multiple spinal components in the lower lumbar spine for each type of LSTV. Furthermore, LSTV was classified on CT images, which was more accurate than the traditional anteroposterior radiograph [18]. While the study samples were selected based on consecutive patients, most were with back or leg pain. Using highly selected clinical patients, this image study focused on MR findings of LSTV, and epidemiological parameters derived for LSTV should not be directly compared to those from general populations. In addition, the associations of LSTV with clinical symptoms were not studied, which was an obvious limitation.
In summary, types II-IV LSTV, particularly types III and IV, were closely associated with lumbar spinal degeneration. Type I may not be a true lumbosacral anomaly.

5. Conclusions

Castellvi types III and IV LSTV predisposed the adjacent spinal components to degeneration and protected the transitional discs from age-related degeneration. Type II LSTV had significant effects in promoting transitional and adjacent disc degeneration. Type I LSTV was not related to lumbar spine degeneration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C. and Y.W.; Methodology, L.C.; Software, J.H. and Y.W.; Validation, L.C.; Investigation, L.C., C.J., J.H. and M.G.; Data Curation, L.C. and C.J.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, L.C., J.J. and M.G.; Writing—Review and Editing, Y.W.; Visualization, L.C. and C.J.; Supervision, M.G. and Y.W.; Funding Acquisition, M.G. and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772382), Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2020C03042), and Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (2021KY153).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University for studies involving humans (IRB number: 2022-195).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived as this was a retrospective analysis of existing data.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mahato, N.K. Complete sacralization of L5 vertebrae: Traits, dimensions, and load bearing in the involved sacra. Spine J. 2010, 10, 610–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mahato, N.K. Morphological traits in sacra associated with complete and partial lumbarization of first sacral segment. Spine J. 2010, 10, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Apazidis, A.; Ricart, P.A.; Diefenbach, C.M.; Spivak, J.M. The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine. Spine J. 2011, 11, 858–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nardo, L.; Alizai, H.; Virayavanich, W.; Liu, F.; Hernandez, A.; Lynch, J.A.; Nevitt, M.C.; McCulloch, C.E.; Lane, N.E.; Link, T.M. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Association with Low Back Pain. Radiology 2012, 265, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tang, M.; Yang, X.-F.; Yang, S.-W.; Han, P.; Ma, Y.-M.; Yu, H.; Zhu, B. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in a population-based study of 5860 individuals: Prevalence and relationship to low back pain. Eur. J. Radiol. 2014, 83, 1679–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hanhivaara, J.; Määttä, J.H.; Niinimäki, J.; Nevalainen, M.T. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae are associated with lumbar degeneration: Retrospective evaluation of 3855 consecutive abdominal CT scans. Eur. Radiol. 2020, 30, 3409–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lian, J.; Levine, N.; Cho, W. A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration. Eur. Spine J. 2018, 27, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tini, P.G.; Wieser, C.; Zinn, W.M. The Transitional Vertebra of the Lumbosacral Spine: Its Radiological Classification, Incidence, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance. Rheumatology 1977, 16, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wellik, D.M.; Capecchi, M.R. Hox10 and Hox11 Genes Are Required to Globally Pattern the Mammalian Skeleton. Science 2003, 301, 363–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Carapuço, M.; Nóvoa, A.; Bobola, N.; Mallo, M. Hox genes specify vertebral types in the presomitic mesoderm. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 2116–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Castellvi, A.E.; Goldstein, L.A.; Chan, D.P. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae and Their Relationship with Lumbar Extradural Defects. Spine 1984, 9, 493–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carrino, J.A.; Campbell, P.D.; Lin, D.C.; Morrison, W.B.; Schweitzer, M.E.; Flanders, A.E.; Eng, J.; Vaccaro, A.R. Effect of Spinal Segment Variants on Numbering Vertebral Levels at Lumbar MR Imaging. Radiology 2011, 259, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Elster, A.D. Bertolotti’s syndrome revisited. Transitional vertebrae of the lumbar spine. Spine 1989, 14, 1373–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Luoma, K.; Vehmas, T.; Raininko, R.; Luukkonen, R.; Riihimäki, H. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra: Relation to disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine 2004, 29, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nakagawa, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Tsubakino, T.; Hoshikawa, T.; Inawashiro, T.; Tanaka, Y. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Cause Spinal Level Misconception in Surgeries for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorders. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2017, 242, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Farshad-Amacker, N.; Herzog, R.J.; Hughes, A.P.; Aichmair, A.; Farshad, M. Associations between lumbosacral transitional anatomy types and degeneration at the transitional and adjacent segments. Spine J. 2015, 15, 1210–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Apaydin, M.; Uluc, M.E.; Sezgin, G. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in the young men population with low back pain: Anatomical considerations and degenerations (transitional vertebra types in the young men population with low back pain). La Radiol. Med. 2018, 124, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hou, L.; Bai, X.; Li, H.; Gao, T.; Li, W.; Wen, T.; He, Q.; Ruan, D.; Shi, L.; Bing, W. Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pfirrmann, C.; Metzdorf, A.; Zanetti, M.; Hodler, J.; Boos, N. Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Spine 2001, 26, 1873–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deyo, R.A.; Mirza, S.K. Clinical Practice. Herniated Lumbar Intervertebral Disk. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 1763–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wei, W.; Hu, S.; Wang, Y. Type II Modic Changes May not Always Represent Fat Degeneration: A Study Using MR Fat Suppression Sequence. Spine 2016, 41, E987–E994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Bender, Y.Y.-N.; Diederichs, G.; Walter, T.C.; Wagner, M.; Liebig, T.; Rickert, M.; Hermann, K.-G.; Hamm, B.; Makowski, M.R. Differentiation of Osteophytes and Disc Herniations in Spinal Radiculopathy Using Susceptibility-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Investig. Radiol. 2017, 52, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pye, S.R.; Reid, D.M.; Lunt, M.; Adams, J.E.; Silman, A.J.; O’Neill, T.W. Lumbar disc degeneration: Association between osteophytes, end-plate sclerosis and disc space narrowing. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007, 66, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Huang, J.; Shen, H.; Wu, J.; Hu, X.; Zhu, Z.; Lv, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. Spine Explorer: A deep learning based fully automated program for efficient and reliable quantifications of the vertebrae and discs on sagittal lumbar spine MR images. Spine J. 2020, 20, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Suthar, P.; Patel, R.; Mehta, C.; Patel, N. MRI evaluation of lumbar disc degenerative disease. J Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015, 9, Tc04-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Y.; Videman, T.; Niemeläinen, R.; Battié, M.C. Quantitative measures of modic changes in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: Intra- and inter-rater reliability. Spine 2011, 36, 1236–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Modic, M.T.; Steinberg, P.M.; Ross, J.S.; Masaryk, T.J.; Carter, J.R. Degenerative disk disease: Assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988, 166, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Feng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yang, G.; Battié, M.C.; Wang, Y. Lumbar vertebral endplate defects on magnetic resonance images: Classification, distribution patterns, and associations with Modic changes and disc degeneration. Spine 2018, 43, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, G.Y.; Lee, J.W.; Choi, H.S.; Oh, K.-J.; Kang, H.S. Erratum to: A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: An easy and reliable method. Skelet. Radiol. 2011, 40, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Weishaupt, D.; Zanetti, M.; Boos, N.; Hodler, J. MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints. Skelet. Radiol. 1999, 28, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peckham, M.; Hutchins, T.; Stilwill, S.; Mills, M.; Morrissey, B.; Joiner, E.; Sanders, R.; Stoddard, G.; Shah, L. Localizing the L5 Vertebra Using Nerve Morphology on MRI: An Accurate and Reliable Technique. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2017, 38, 2008–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Legaye, J.; Duval-Beaupère, C.; Hecquet, J.; Marty, C. Pelvic incidence: A fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur. Spine J. 1998, 7, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Boulay, C.; Tardieu, C.; Hecquet, J.; Benaim, C.; Mouilleseaux, B.; Marty, C.; Prat-Pradal, D.; Legaye, J.; Duval-Beaupère, G.; Pélissier, J. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: Standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur. Spine J. 2006, 15, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Lafage, V.; Schwab, F.; Patel, A.; Hawkinson, N.; Farcy, J.P. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: Two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine 2009, 34, E599–E606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roussouly, P.; Gollogly, S.; Berthonnaud, E.; Dimnet, J. Classification of the Normal Variation in the Sagittal Alignment of the Human Lumbar Spine and Pelvis in the Standing Position. Spine 2005, 30, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Laouissat, F.; Sebaaly, A.; Gehrchen, M.; Roussouly, P. Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: Refounding the Roussouly classification. Eur. Spine J. 2018, 27, 2002–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Haffer, H.; Becker, L.; Putzier, M.; Wiethölter, M.; Ziegeler, K.; Diekhoff, T.; Pumberger, M.; Hardt, S. Changes of Fixed Anatomical Spinopelvic Parameter in Patients with Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: A Matched Pair Analysis. Diagnosis 2021, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Golubovsky, J.L.; Colbrunn, R.W.; Klatte, R.S.; Nagle, T.F.; Briskin, I.N.; Chakravarthy, V.B.; Gillespie, C.M.; Reith, J.D.; Jasty, N.; Benzel, E.C.; et al. Development of a novel in vitro cadaveric model for analysis of biomechanics and surgical treatment of Bertolotti syndrome. Spine J. 2020, 20, 638–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vergauwen, S.; Parizel, P.M.; Van Breusegem, L.; Van Goethem, J.W.; Nackaerts, Y.; Hauwe, L.V.D.; De Schepper, A.M. Distribution and incidence of degenerative spine changes in patients with a lumbo-sacral transitional vertebra. Eur. Spine J. 1997, 6, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Aihara, T.; Takahashi, K.; Ogasawara, A.; Itadera, E.; Ono, Y.; Moriya, H. Intervertebral disc degeneration associated with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: A clinical and anatomical study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2005, 87, 687–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Park, P.; Garton, H.J.; Gala, V.C.; Hoff, J.T.; McGillicuddy, J.E. Adjacent Segment Disease after Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: Review of the Literature. Spine 2004, 29, 1938–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hilibrand, A.S.; Robbins, M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: The consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004, 4, S190–S194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sekharappa, V.; Amritanand, R.; Krishnan, V.; David, K.S. Lumbosacral Transition Vertebra: Prevalence and Its Significance. Asian Spine J. 2014, 8, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Paik, N.C.; Lim, C.S.; Jang, H.S. Numeric and Morphological Verification of Lumbosacral Segments in 8280 Consecutive Patients. Spine 2013, 38, E573–E578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wigh, R.E.; Anthony, H.F. Transitional Lumbosacral Discs. Spine 1981, 6, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Farshad-Amacker, N.A.; Lurie, B.; Herzog, R.J.; Farshad, M. Interreader and intermodality reliability of standard anteroposterior radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging in detection and classification of lumbosacral transitional vertebra. Spine J. 2014, 14, 1470–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 11 02339 g001 550
Figure 1. The most caudal three intervertebral discs were evaluated on T2W sagittal MR images. In the presence of LSTV, they were defined as the transitional disc, the cranial disc, and the neighboring disc (a), which corresponded to L5/S1, L4/5, and L3/4 in controls without LSTV, respectively (b). Spinal level-specific comparisons were performed for various measurements between LSTV patients and controls.
Figure 1. The most caudal three intervertebral discs were evaluated on T2W sagittal MR images. In the presence of LSTV, they were defined as the transitional disc, the cranial disc, and the neighboring disc (a), which corresponded to L5/S1, L4/5, and L3/4 in controls without LSTV, respectively (b). Spinal level-specific comparisons were performed for various measurements between LSTV patients and controls.
Jcm 11 02339 g001
Jcm 11 02339 g002 550
Figure 2. Pfirrmann scores, disc narrowing, facet joint degeneration, ligamentum flavum thickening, and spinal canal narrowing among patients with LSTV type I (N = 182), type II (N = 107), type III (N = 43), type IV (N = 18), and controls (N = 179). *: p < 0.05; measurements of the controls were the references. #: p < 0.05; measurements of type II were the references.
Figure 2. Pfirrmann scores, disc narrowing, facet joint degeneration, ligamentum flavum thickening, and spinal canal narrowing among patients with LSTV type I (N = 182), type II (N = 107), type III (N = 43), type IV (N = 18), and controls (N = 179). *: p < 0.05; measurements of the controls were the references. #: p < 0.05; measurements of type II were the references.
Jcm 11 02339 g002
Table
Table 1. Degenerative findings on lumbar MRIs for patients with LSTV and controls.
Table 1. Degenerative findings on lumbar MRIs for patients with LSTV and controls.
Controls
(N = 179)		Type I
(N = 182)		Type II
(N = 107)		Type III
(N = 43)		Type IV
(N = 18)
Disc bulging
Neighboring disc43 (24.0%)59 (32.4%)58 (54.2%) *22 (51.2%) *9 (50.0%) *
Cranial disc96 (53.6%)111 (61.0%)94 (87.9%) *24 (55.8%) #12 (66.7%)
Transitional disc70 (39.1%)78 (42.9%)55 (51.4%) *1 (2.3%) *#1 (5.6%) *
Osteophytes
Neighboring disc49 (27.4%)36 (19.8%)42 (39.3%) *10 (23.3%)5 (27.8%)
Cranial disc41 (22.9%)36 (19.8%)42 (39.3%) *15 (34.9%)9 (50.0%) *
Transitional disc27 (15.1%)22 (12.1%)30 (28.0%) *1 (2.3%) *#1 (5.6%)
Disc herniation
Neighboring disc8 (4.5%)11 (6.0%)14 (13.1%) *5 (11.6%)2 (11.1%)
Cranial disc46 (25.7%)46 (25.3%)43 (40.2%) *18 (41.9%) *9 (50.0%) *
Transitional disc57 (31.8%)42 (23.1%)27 (25.2%)1 (2.3%) *#1 (5.6%) *
Modic changes
Neighboring disc13 (7.3%)15 (8.2%)12 (11.2%)2 (4.7%)2 (11.1%)
Cranial disc23 (12.8%)29 (15.9%)24 (22.4%) *8 (18.6%)5 (27.8%)
Transitional disc30 (16.8%)35 (19.2%)20 (18.7%)1 (2.3%) *#1 (5.6%)
Endplate defects
Neighboring disc27 (7.5%)12 (6.6%)22 (20.6%) *6 (14.0%)6 (33.3%) *
Cranial disc52 (14.4%)27 (14.8%)38 (35.5%) *12 (27.9%) *6 (33.3%) *
Transitional disc44 (12.2%)21 (11.5%)24 (22.4%) *2 (4.7%) #1 (5.6%)
Spondylolisthesis
Neighboring disc2 (1.1%)3 (1.6%)4 (3.7%)4 (9.3%) *2 (11.1%) *
Cranial disc13 (7.3%)12 (6.6%)16 (15.0%) *8 (18.6%) *1 (5.6%)
Transitional disc7 (3.9%)3 (1.6%)2 (1.9%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
*: p < 0.05; measurements of the controls were the references. #: p < 0.05; measurements of type II were the references. Data with statistical differences were displayed in bold.
Table
Table 2. Linear regression analysis of various parameters of transitional discs with age in type II LSTV.
Table 2. Linear regression analysis of various parameters of transitional discs with age in type II LSTV.
Coefficient95% CIp Value
Pfirrmann score0.027(0.001, 0.054)0.044 *
Disc height−0.108(−0.186, −0.030)0.007 *
Disc signal−0.003(−0.004, −0.001)0.007 *
*: p < 0.05; measurements of the controls were the references. CI: Confidence interval. Data with statistical differences were displayed in bold.
Table
Table 3. Linear regression analysis of various parameters of transitional discs with age in type III LSTV.
Table 3. Linear regression analysis of various parameters of transitional discs with age in type III LSTV.
Coefficient95% CIp Value
Pfirrmann score0.002(−0.003, 0.007)0.436
Disc height0.009(−0.035, −0.055)0.666
Disc signal0.001(−0.003, 0.004)0.788
Measurements of the controls were the references. CI: Confidence interval. Data with statistical differences were displayed in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, L.; Jiang, C.; Huang, J.; Jin, J.; Guan, M.; Wang, Y. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra Contributed to Lumbar Spine Degeneration: An MR Study of Clinical Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092339

AMA Style

Cheng L, Jiang C, Huang J, Jin J, Guan M, Wang Y. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra Contributed to Lumbar Spine Degeneration: An MR Study of Clinical Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(9):2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Linxiang, Chao Jiang, Jiawei Huang, Jiale Jin, Ming Guan, and Yue Wang. 2022. "Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra Contributed to Lumbar Spine Degeneration: An MR Study of Clinical Patients" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 9: 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop