RETRACTED: Validation of the CHA2DS2-VA Score (Excluding Female Sex) in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
by
,
Sun Young Choi
1,2,
Moo Hyun Kim
1,*,
Hyo Bin Kim
1,
Sa Yul Kang
1,
Kwang Min Lee
1,
Kyung-Yae Hyun
3 and
Sung-Cheol Yun
4 1
Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan 49201, Korea
2
Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Daegu Health College, Daegu 41453, Korea
3
Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Dong-Eui University, Busan 47340, Korea
4
Asan Medical Center, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(7), 1823; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071823
Submission received: 22 January 2022
/
Revised: 21 February 2022
/
Accepted: 22 March 2022
/
Published: 25 March 2022
/
Retracted: 26 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myths and Realities of Current Cardiovascular Diseases and Therapy)
Abstract
:Sex (i.e., female sex) confers one point for the CHA2DS2-VASc score. For this reason, females with atrial fibrillation (AF) always have a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 1. To compare the CHA2DS2-VA (excluding female sex) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores in Korean AF patients using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we analyzed the risk of ischemic stroke in nonvalvular AF patients between 2013 and 2017. The predictive values of the CHA2DS2-VA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for ischemic stroke were evaluated using the C-statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI). The primary outcome was the occurrence of ischemic stroke. A total of 185,637 patients with AF (49.7% women) were included in this study. The mean ages were 66.5 years for females and 64.9 years for males. The incidence of ischemic stroke in male patients was similar to females (3.63%/year vs. 3.72%/year, p = 0.273, respectively). In addition, no sex difference was apparent for stroke risk in AF patients stratified by risk factor component and age group. In the C-statistic analysis, the predictive ability of the CHA2DS2-VA score for ischemic stroke was similar to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Additionally, CHA2DS2-VA performed better for predicting ischemic stroke in AF patients with risk scores of ≥2 (AUC 0.701 vs. 0.689, z = 4.596, p < 0.001) or those aged ≥75 years (AUC 0.715 vs. 0.701, z = 4.957, p < 0.001). In Korean AF patients, female sex is not a specific risk factor that contributes to the development of ischemic stroke. The CHA2DS2-VA score, which excludes female sex, may be a more suitable risk score for guiding anticoagulation decisions in Korean AF patients.
1. Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia disorder and confers a five-fold increased risk of stroke [1]. Stroke risk stratification is recommended for AF patients when assessing the risk of stroke and guiding oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy decisions. Most major international guidelines recommend the CHA2DS2-VASc score for stroke risk stratification [2,3,4,5], which includes female sex as a risk component [6].
There are gender differences in the incidence and prevalence of AF. While the incidence of AF is lower in females, the prevalence of AF in males and females ≥75 years of age is greater for females due to their increased longevity, so the absolute numbers of males and females with AF are roughly equal based on population [7,8]. A higher risk of stroke in females than in males with AF has been evident in several studies [9,10,11,12,13]. However, the inclusion of female sex as an independent risk factor has been the subject of recent examination and remains controversial [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The latest Canadian, Australian, and Japanese guidelines do not use female sex as a risk factor [22,23,24]. There is an exception to the use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in the European and American guidelines, whereby female patients aged <65 years without other risk factors (CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1) do not require anticoagulation therapy [2,5]. In addition, the European guidelines recommend (or at least consider) OAC therapy in males with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥1 and females with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2. Although a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 indicates an extremely low risk of stroke, a female would be allocated 1 point in this scoring system from birth. It is therefore apparent that the CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system has limitations. The aim of this study was to compare the CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VA scores (sex-independent risk score) in Korean AF patients.
2. Materials and Methods
This study used the national health claims database established by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) of Korea. The NHIS is a mandatory universal health insurance service that provides comprehensive medical care coverage for up to 97% of the Korean population. The database contains each patient’s sociodemographic information, diagnoses, procedures, prescription records in inpatient and outpatient services, and mortality data. Diagnoses are recorded using the International Classification of Disease-10th Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. The database is open to researchers whose study protocols are approved by the official review committee. Approval for this study was obtained from the Ethical Review Board Ethical Review Board of Dong-A University Hospital (15–130), and the requirement for informed consent was waived.
2.1. Study Population
From January 2013 to December 2017, 185,637 nonvalvular AF patients aged ≥20 years out of a total of 363,188 patients were selected from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database as the study population. Prevalent nonvalvular AF was identified using International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes (I48) and the baseline absence of mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves (ICD-10 codes I05 or Z952–Z954). We excluded patients who had a history of thromboembolic events or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and only included those with newly diagnosed AF. Patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OAC) (warfarin or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC)), aspirin, or other antiplatelet agents at the baseline were also excluded.
2.2. Risk Stratification Schemes for Ischemic Stroke
The CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for ages between 65 and 74 years; a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, or vascular disease (myocardial infarction or peripheral artery disease); and female sex and 2 points each for a history of stroke or transient ischemic stroke or ages ≥75 years [6]. The risk score excluding female sex from the CHA2DS2-VASc score was defined as the CHA2DS2-VA score (Table 1).
2.3. Clinical Endpoint
The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of ischemic stroke (ICD-10 code I63 or I64). Patients were followed until an endpoint occurred and censored at the outcome event or at the end of the study period.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were expressed as mean values with standard deviations, and categorical variables were presented as frequencies (percentages). For the clinical endpoints, we calculated incidence rates per 100 person/years and estimated confidence intervals (CI) for the incidence rates assuming that the number of cases followed a Poisson distribution. The prognostic utility of the risk models for ischemic stroke was assessed by an analysis of their C-statistic, while calibration of the models was achieved using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistical analysis. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) represents the average weighted improvement in discrimination. The impact of the reclassification procedure using the superior score was assessed using the NRI approach. Positive values for NRI indicated a predominance for correct reclassification, while negative values indicated a predominance for incorrect reclassification. All reported p-values were two sided, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data manipulation and statistical analyses were conducted using SAS® Version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of the 185,637 AF patients included in the analysis: 93,395 (50.3%) were male. The mean male age was 64.9 ± 11.5 years, and the mean female age was 66.5 ± 12.1 years. At the time of the AF diagnoses, hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity in 65.5% of the total patients (male, 64.4% and female, 66.6%). With the exception of dyslipidemia, the remaining comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and vascular disease) were higher in females than in males. Nineteen point two percent of the study patients were classified as having a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 or 1, and 26.5% of the patients were classified as having a CHA2DS2-VA score of 0 or 1. The median follow-up duration was 2.0 years (interquartile range (IQR): 1.1–2.7) for males and 2.2 years (1.2–2.6) for females.
3.2. Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Male and Female Patients Stratified by Risk Score Components and Age
During follow-up, the male subpopulation accrued 3111 cases of ischemic stroke, while 3140 ischemic events were reported in females. The incidence of ischemic stroke was 3.63 per 100 person/year and 3.72 per 100 person/year for all males and females, respectively. However, no sex difference was found (HR = 1.11 for females to males, 95% CI 0.93–1.29, p = 0.273) (Figure 1). Even when the male and female patients were divided into two groups according to the number of risk score components (0 or 1 and ≥2 risk factors) and into three subgroups for age (<65, 65–74, and ≥75 years), there were no sex differences in the incidence of ischemic stroke in the subgroups.
3.3. Risk of Ischemic Stroke in AF Patients Stratified by Risk Scores
The incidence of ischemic stroke for AF patients stratified by the CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VA scores is shown in Table 3. There was a significant increase in the risk of ischemic stroke with the increasing CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VA scores. For risk scores of 0 or 1, ischemic stroke rates using CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VA were not significantly different (0.65%/year vs. 0.72%/year, p = 0.498 and 1.01%/year vs. 1.09%/year, p = 0.414, respectively). For risk scores of ≥2, the incidence rate of ischemic stroke was significantly higher with the CHA2DS2-VA score.
3.4. Comparison of Risk Scores
The predictive value of the CHA2DS2-VA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for ischemic stroke was compared by the C-statistic and NRI in AF patients stratified by risk scores and age groups (Table 4). Across the total number of patients, the C-statistic for the CHA2DS2-VA score was similar to the CHA2DS2-VASc score (0.671 and 0.668, respectively). For low-risk AF patients (risk scores of 0 or 1), the discriminant ability of the CHA2DS2-VA (C-statistic 0.628) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (C-statistic 0.626) was not significantly different (C-statistic difference 0.002, Z = 1.099, p = 0.272; NRI 0.019, 95% CI 0.001–0.032, p = 0.321). However, among the AF patients with risk scores of ≥2, the C-statistic values for the CHA2DS2-VA score were higher than for the CHA2DS2-VASc score (0.701 vs. 0.689, C-statistic difference 0.012, Z = 4.596, p < 0.001; NRI 0.126, 95% CI 0.081–0.172, p = 0.005). The predictive abilities of the CHA2DS2-VA (C-statistic 0.642 and 0.668, respectively) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (C-statistic 0.639 and 0.663, respectively) were very similar for AF patients aged <65 years (C-statistic difference 0.003, Z = 0.879, p = 0.379; NRI 0.021, 95% CI 0.009–0.042, p = 0.309) and 65–74 years (C-statistic difference 0.005, Z = 1.193, p = 0.233; NRI 0.034, 95% CI 0.016–0.059, p = 0.227). However, in AF patients aged ≥75 years, the CHA2DS2-VA score was significantly superior compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in the C-statistic (0.715 vs. 0.701, C-statistic difference 0.014, Z = 4.957, p < 0.001) and NRI (0.159, 95% CI 0.119–0.196, p = 0.001). The cumulative incidences of ischemic stroke in males and females are shown in Figure 2. The incidence rates of ischemic stroke were not significantly different between male and female patients, regardless of the number of risk score components and age groups.
4. Discussion
The present study aimed to identify whether sex is a prognostic factor for ischemic stroke in AF patients. We sought to validate the CHA2DS2-VA score, a risk score excluding female sex from the CHA2DS2-VASc score, in a large cohort of Korean AF patients. We found that there was no sex difference for the risk of ischemic stroke in AF patients between risk groups (low- and high-risk) and age groups (aged < 65 years, 65–74 years, and ≥75 years). The CHA2DS2-VA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores demonstrated similar predictive abilities with respect to ischemic stroke in all AF patients, but the C-statistic values for the CHA2DS2-VA scores were higher than for the CHA2DS2-VASc scores in high-risk (risk scores of ≥2) or elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) AF patients. These findings indicate that female sex did not have a consistent impact on the CHA2DS2-VA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and the CHA2DS2-VA score may be more suitable for risk stratification for ischemic stroke in Korean AF patients, especially in high-risk or elderly patients.
Stroke prevention is the principal management priority in AF patients, so appropriate risk stratification is needed to balance the benefits of intervention against the risk of bleeding [25]. The CHA2DS2-VASc score, which includes female sex as a risk component [6], is formally recommended for stroke risk stratification in most major international guidelines [2,3,4,5]. However, recent scientific focus has shifted toward the sex category criterion as an independent risk factor for thromboprophylaxis, and the inclusion of female sex as a risk factor remains controversial [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The CHA2DS2-VASc risk score overestimates the risk conferred by female sex at the low end of the scale. These results support the European and American AF guidelines giving equal recommendations to both males and females without a sex risk factor [2,5]. In addition, the latest Canadian, Australian, and Japanese guidelines do not use the female sex criterion as a risk factor [22,23,24]. A number of studies have demonstrated that sex is not a significant ischemic event risk factor [14,15,16,17,18]. Additionally, recent large Japanese and Danish cohort studies have led to the implementation of the CHA2DS2-VA score (excluding the sex category criterion) as the preferred stroke risk score for guiding anticoagulation decisions in AF patients [19,20].
While females have a lower incidence of AF, the prevalence of AF in males and females ≥75 years of age is greater in women due to their increased longevity, so the absolute numbers of males and females with AF are roughly equal based on a population [7,8]. In addition, the risk of ischemic stroke is higher in females compared to males, but this association appears to be the result of confounding by age [10,11,12].
In this study, we evaluated the risk of ischemic stroke in male and female Korean AF patients, and no sex difference was found in patients when stratified by risk factor components and age groups. We also validated the CHA2DS2-VA score (excluding the sex category criterion) for ischemic stroke in Korean AF patients, and the predictive ability of CHA2DS2-VA score was similar to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. In addition, the CHA2DS2-VA score showed greater predictive accuracy for ischemic stroke than the CHA2DS2-VASc score, especially in identifying high-risk (risk score ≥ 2) or elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) Korean AF patients.
Study Limitations
This study was based on a nationwide cohort study using Korean NHIS data and might be limited by errors of coding, missing data, and laboratory measurements. Furthermore, because the AF diagnosis and the estimation of the clinical outcomes were based on diagnostic codes registered by physicians, the diagnosis of AF and events could be inaccurate. Second, the registry data also failed to provide any details regarding drug changes over time, as well as some unmeasurable confounding factors such as physicians’ decisions. For this reason, in the main analysis, we sought to adjust for several lists of potential confounders by including confounders in the Cox model; this made the problem of confounding by indication less of an issue, although it could not be ruled out completely. Third, our study may be subject to selection bias (prevalence incidence bias) and information bias (follow-up bias). The relatively short period of occurrence for new risk factors among patients initially having a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 (males) or 1 (females) could have resulted from an incomplete diagnostic assessment at the baseline. Fourth, we were not able to clearly confirm the cause of ischemic stroke, which could, in some cases, have been due to AF-related thromboembolism or atherosclerosis and thrombosis of the cerebral artery. Fifth, we inadvertently excluded pathologies where the sex factor has the most interactions with the long-term outcomes.
5. Conclusions
In Korean AF patients, the female sex criterion is not a specific risk factor that contributes to the development of ischemic stroke. The CHA2DS2-VA score excluding female sex may be a more appropriate risk score for guiding anticoagulation decisions in Korean AF patients. Further discussion is warranted to apply these results to Korean patients with AF.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.Y.C. and M.H.K.; methodology, K.M.L. and S.-C.Y.; software, K.M.L.; validation, S.Y.C. and M.H.K.; formal analysis, H.B.K., S.Y.K. and K.-Y.H.; investigation, K.M.L., H.B.K., S.Y.K. and K.-Y.H.; resources, S.Y.C. and M.H.K.; data curation, K.M.L. and S.-C.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Y.C.; writing—review and editing, S.Y.C. and M.H.K.; visualization, S.Y.C.; supervision, M.H.K.; project administration, M.H.K.; and funding acquisition, S.Y.C. and M.H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2018R1D1A1A09083902) to MHK and also received support from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2017R1D1A3B03035713) to S.Y.C.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Dong-A University Hospital (15–130, 2017).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data are the property of the authors and can become available by contacting the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Wolf, P.A.; Abbott, R.D.; Kannel, W.B. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: The Framingham Study. Stroke 1991, 22, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kirchhof, P.; Benussi, S.; Kotecha, D.; Ahlsson, A.; Atar, D.; Casadei, B.; Castella, M.; Diener, H.C.; Heidbuchel, H.; Hendriks, J.; et al. ESC scientific document group. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 2893–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiang, C.E.; Okumura, K.; Zhang, S.; Chao, T.F.; Siu, C.W.; Wei Lim, T.; Saxena, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Siong Teo, W. Consensus of the Asia Pacific heart rhythm society on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J. Arrhythm. 2017, 33, 345–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lip, G.Y.H.; Banerjee, A.; Boriani, G.; Chiang, C.E.; Fargo, R.; Freedman, B.; Lane, D.A.; Ruff, C.T.; Turakhia, M.; Werring, D.; et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2018, 154, 1121–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- January, C.T.; Wann, L.S.; Calkins, H.; Chen, L.Y.; Cigarroa, J.E.; Cleveland, J.C., Jr.; Ellinor, P.T.; Ezekowitz, M.D.; Field, M.E.; Furie, K.L.; et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patientswith atrialfibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 104–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lip, G.Y.; Nieuwlaat, R.; Pisters, R.; Lane, D.A.; Crijns, H.J. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: The Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. Chest 2010, 137, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphries, K.H.; Kerr, C.R.; Connolly, S.J.; Klein, G.; Boone, J.A.; Green, M.; Sheldon, R.; Talajic, M.; Dorian, P.; Newman, D. New-onset atrial fibrillation: Sex differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome. Circulation 2001, 103, 2365–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnabel, R.B.; Yin, X.; Gona, P.; Larson, M.G.; Beiser, A.S.; McManus, D.D.; Newton-Cheh, C.; Lubitz, S.A.; Magnani, J.W.; Ellinor, P.T.; et al. 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: A cohort study. Lancet 2015, 386, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch. Intern. Med. 1994, 154, 1449–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsadok, M.A.; Jackevicius, C.A.; Rahme, E.; Humphries, K.H.; Behlouli, H.; Pilote, L. Sex differences in stroke risk among older patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation. JAMA 2012, 307, 1952–1958. [Google Scholar]
- Friberg, L.; Benson, L.; Rosenqvist, M.; Lip, G.Y. Assessment of female sex as a risk factor in atrial fibrillation in Sweden: Nationwide retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2012, 344, e3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mikkelsen, A.P.; Lindhardsen, J.; Lip, G.; Gislason, G.H.; Torp-Pedersen, C.; Olesen, J.B. Female sex as a risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2012, 10, 1745–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wagstaff, A.J.; Overvad, T.; Lip, G.Y.; Lane, D.A. Is female sex a risk factor for stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM 2014, 107, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, L.Y.; Lee, C.H.; Yu, C.C.; Tsai, C.T.; Lai, L.P.; Hwang, J.J.; Chen, P.C.; Lin, J.L. Risk factors and incidence of ischemic stroke in Taiwanese with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A nationwide database analysis. Atherosclerosis 2011, 217, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, Y.; Apostolakis, S.; Blann, A.D.; Wang, H.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Ma, J.; Wang, Y.; Lip, G.Y. Validation of contemporary stroke and bleeding risk stratification scores in non-anticoagulated Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 904–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siu, C.W.; Lip, G.Y.; Lam, K.F.; Tse, H.F. Risk of stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in 9727 Chinese with atrial fibrillation in Hong Kong. Heart Rhythm. 2014, 11, 1401–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inoue, H.; Atarashi, H.; Okumura, K.; Yamashita, T.; Origasa, H.; Kumagai, N.; Sakurai, M.; Kawamura, Y.; Kubota, I.; Matsumoto, K.; et al. Impact of gender on the prognosis of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 2014, 113, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overvad, T.F.; Rasmussen, L.H.; Skjoth, F.; Overvad, K.; Albertsen, I.E.; Lane, D.A.; Lip, G.Y.; Larsen, T.B. Female sex as a risk factor for thromboembolism and death in patients with incident atrial fibrillation: The prospective Danish Diet, Cancer and Health study. Thromb. Haemost. 2014, 112, 789–795. [Google Scholar]
- Tomita, H.; Okumura, K.; Inoue, H.; Atarashi, H.; Yamashita, T.; Origasa, H.; Tsushima, E.; J-RHYTHM Registry Investigators. Validation of risk scoring system excluding female sex from CHA2DS2-VASc in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation—Subanalysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry. Circ. J. 2015, 79, 1719–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, P.B.; Skjøth, F.; Overvad, T.F.; Larsen, T.B.; Lip, G.Y.H. Female sex is a risk modifier rather than a risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation: Should we use a CHA2DS2-VA score rather than CHA2DS2-VASc? Circulation 2018, 137, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, P.B.; Overvad, T.F. Female sex as a risk modifier for stroke risk in atrial fibrillation: Using CHA2DS2-VASc versus CHA2DS2-VA for stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation: A note of caution. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 120, 894–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verma, A.; Cairns, J.; Mitchell, L.B.; Macle, L.; Stiell, I.G.; Gladstone, D.; McMurtry, M.S.; Connolly, S.; Cox, J.L.; Dorian, P.; et al. 2014 focused update of the Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Can. J. Cardiol. 2014, 30, 1114–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brieger, D.; Amerena, J.; Attia, J.; Bajorek, B.; Chan, K.H.; Connell, C.; Freedman, B.; Ferguson, C.; Hall, T.; Haqqani, H.M.; et al. National Heart foundation of Australia and the cardiac society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation 2018. Heart Lung. Circ. 2018, 27, 1209–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- JCS Joint Working Group. Guidelines for pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (JCS 2013): Digest version. Circ. J. 2014, 78, 1997–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Proietti, M.; Mujovic, N.; Potpara, T.S. Optimizing stroke and bleeding risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation: A balance of evidence, practicality and precision. Thromb. Haemost. 2018, 118, 2014–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
The risk of ischemic stroke for male and female patients stratified by risk factor components (A) and age groups (B). Hazard ratio of female to male patients in the incidence of ischemic stroke. CI, confidence intervals; HR, hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate (events divided by 100 person/year, %/year).
Figure 1.
The risk of ischemic stroke for male and female patients stratified by risk factor components (A) and age groups (B). Hazard ratio of female to male patients in the incidence of ischemic stroke. CI, confidence intervals; HR, hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate (events divided by 100 person/year, %/year).
Figure 2.
Cumulative incidence curves for ischemic stroke in male and female patients stratified by risk factor components and age groups.
Figure 2.
Cumulative incidence curves for ischemic stroke in male and female patients stratified by risk factor components and age groups.
Table 1.
Risk factors included in the CHA2DS2-VASc score and CHA2DS-VA score.
| Risk Factor | CHA2DS2-VASc Score | CHA2DS2-VA Score |
|---|---|---|
| Congestive heart failure/LV dysfunction | 1 | 1 |
| Hypertension | 1 | 1 |
| Age ≥75 | 2 | 2 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1 | 1 |
| Stroke/TIA/thromboembolism | 2 | 2 |
| Vascular disease | 1 | 1 |
| Age 65–74 | 1 | 1 |
| Sex category (i.e., female sex) | 1 | 0 |
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics.
| Variables | Total (Total = 185,637) | Male Patients (n = 93,395) | Female Patients (n = 92,242) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 65.7 ± 12.3 | 64.9 ± 11.5 | 66.5 ± 12.1 |
| <55 years, n (%) | 38,639 (20.8) | 21,574 (23.1) | 17,065 (18.5) |
| 55–64 years, n (%) | 41,327 (22.3) | 22,602 (24.2) | 18,725 (20.3) |
| 65–74 years, n (%) | 52,320 (28.2) | 23,909 (25.6) | 28,411 (30.8) |
| ≥75 years, n (%) | 53,352 (28.7) | 25,310 (27.1) | 28,042 (30.4) |
| Clinical history, n (%) | |||
| Hypertension | 121,580 (65.5) | 60,146 (64.4) | 61,433 (66.6) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 41,200 (22.2) | 19,800 (21.2) | 21,400 (23.2) |
| Heart failure | 60,232 (32.4) | 29,700 (31.8) | 30,532 (33.1) |
| Dyslipidemia | 67,306 (36.3) | 34,836 (37.3) | 32,469 (35.2) |
| Vascular disease | 44,441 (23.9) | 20,827 (22.3) | 23,614 (25.6) |
| Prior myocardial infarction | 7981 (4.3) | 3923 (4.2) | 4059 (4.4) |
| Prior peripheral artery disease | 36,738 (19.8) | 16,998 (18.2) | 19,740 (21.4) |
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | |||
| Score = 0 | 8996 (4.8) | 8996 (9.6) | 0 (0.0) |
| Score = 1 | 26,757 (14.4) | 21,312 (22.8) | 5445 (5.9) |
| Score = 2 | 43,344 (23.3) | 29,955 (32.1) | 13,389 (14.5) |
| Score ≥ 3 | 106,540 (57.4) | 33,132 (35.5) | 73,408 (79.6) |
| CHA2DS2-VA score | |||
| Score = 0 | 14,441 (7.8) | 8996 (9.6) | 5445 (5.9) |
| Score = 1 | 34,701 (18.7) | 21,312 (22.8) | 13,389 (14.5) |
| Score = 2 | 57,093 (30.8) | 29,955 (32.1) | 27,138 (29.4) |
| Score ≥ 3 | 79,402 (42.8) | 33,132 (35.5) | 46,270 (50.2) |
| Medication | |||
| No therapy | 17,207 (9.3) | 8395 (9.0) | 8812 (9.6) |
| Aspirin | 42,163 (22.7) | 20,386 (21.8) | 21,777 (23.6) |
| Warfarin | 61,128 (32.9) | 29,981 (32.1) | 31,147 (33.8) |
| NOAC | 65,139 (35.1) | 34,633 (37.1) | 30,506 (33.1) |
| Rivaroxaban | 27,970 (15.1) | 14,599 (15.6) | 13,371 (14.5) |
| Dabigatran | 16,837 (9.1) | 9285 (9.9) | 7552 (8.2) |
| Apixaban | 15,608 (8.4) | 8574 (9.2) | 7034 (7.6) |
| Edoxaban | 4724 (2.5) | 2175 (2.3) | 2549 (2.8) |
| Follow up, years (IQR) | 2.1 (1.4–2.6) | 2.0 (1.1–2.7) | 2.2 (1.2–2.6) |
Values are n (%), mean ± SD (standard deviation), or median IQR (interquartile range). NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant.
Table 3.
Risk of ischemic stroke in AF patients stratified by the CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VA scores.
Table 3.
Risk of ischemic stroke in AF patients stratified by the CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VA scores.
| No. of Events | IR (95% CI) | p-Value | HR (95% CI) | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHA2DS2-VASc of 0 | 157/8996 | 0.65 (0.60–0.70) | 0.498 | Reference | 0.498 |
| CHA2DS2-VA of 0 | 260/14,441 | 0.72 (0.68–0.76) | 1.12 (0.95–1.29) | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc of 1 | 517/26,757 | 1.01 (0.97–1.05) | 0.483 | Reference | 0.414 |
| CHA2DS2-VA of 1 | 690/34,701 | 1.09 (1.06–1.12) | 1.16 (0.99–1.33) | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc of 2 | 1501/43,344 | 2.12 (2.07–2.17) | 0.004 | Reference | < 0.001 |
| CHA2DS2-VA of 2 | 1619/57,093 | 2.44 (2.39–2.49) | 1.33 (1.17–1.49) | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc of ≥3 | 4076/106,540 | 5.18 (5.10–5.26) | <0.001 | Reference | < 0.001 |
| CHA2DS2-VA of ≥3 | 3682/79,402 | 5.46 (5.41–5.51) | 1.49 (1.34–1.64) |
CI, confidence intervals; HR, hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate (events divided by 100 person/year, %/year).
Table 4.
Comparison of the scores for ischemic stroke predictions in AF patients stratified by risk scores and age groups.
Table 4.
Comparison of the scores for ischemic stroke predictions in AF patients stratified by risk scores and age groups.
| All Patients | C-Statistic | SE | 95% CI | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHA2DS2-VA score | 0.671 | 0.005 | 0.663–0.679 | <0.001 | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 0.668 | 0.004 | 0.661–0.675 | <0.001 | ||
| Score difference | C-Statistic Analysis | NRI Analysis | ||||
| C-Statistic Difference | Z | p-Value | NRI | 95% CI | p-Value | |
| 0.003 (0.000–0.003) | 0.998 | 0.318 | 0.031 | 0.002–0.037 | 0.118 | |
| Risk score of 0 or 1 | C-Statistic | SE | 95% CI | p-Value | ||
| CHA2DS2-VA score | 0.628 | 0.005 | 0.619–0.637 | <0.001 | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 0.626 | 0.005 | 0.618–0.634 | <0.001 | ||
| Score difference | C-Statistic Analysis | NRI Analysis | ||||
| C-Statistic Difference | Z | p-Value | NRI | 95% CI | p-Value | |
| 0.002 (0.000–0.004) | 1.099 | 0.272 | 0.019 | 0.001–0.032 | 0.321 | |
| Risk score of≥2 | C-Statistic | SE | 95% CI | p-Value | ||
| CHA2DS2-VA score | 0.701 | 0.003 | 0.692–0.713 | <0.001 | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 0.689 | 0.003 | 0.675–0.703 | <0.001 | ||
| Score difference | C-Statistic Analysis | NRI Analysis | ||||
| C-Statistic Difference | Z | p-Value | NRI | 95% CI | p-Value | |
| 0.012 (0.009–0.021) | 4.596 | < 0.001 | 0.126 | 0.081–0.172 | 0.005 | |
| Aged < 65 years | C-Statistic | SE | 95% CI | p-Value | ||
| CHA2DS2-VA score | 0.642 | 0.006 | 0.630–0.654 | <0.001 | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 0.639 | 0.005 | 0.629–0.649 | <0.001 | ||
| Score difference | C-Statistic Analysis | NRI Analysis | ||||
| C-Statistic Difference | Z | p-Value | NRI | 95% CI | p-Value | |
| 0.003 (0.002–0.006) | 0.879 | 0.379 | 0.021 | 0.009–0.042 | 0.309 | |
| Aged 65–74 years | C-Statistic | SE | 95% CI | p-Value | ||
| CHA2DS2-VA score | 0.668 | 0.005 | 0.658–0.678 | <0.001 | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 0.663 | 0.004 | 0.655–0.671 | <0.001 | ||
| Score difference | C-Statistic Analysis | NRI Analysis | ||||
| C-Statistic Difference | Z | p-Value | NRI | 95% CI | p-Value | |
| 0.005 (0.003–0.008) | 1.193 | 0.233 | 0.034 | 0.016–0.059 | 0.227 | |
| Aged ≥ 75 years | C-Statistic | SE | 95% CI | p-Value | ||
| CHA2DS2-VA score | 0.715 | 0.004 | 0.707–0.723 | <0.001 | ||
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 0.701 | 0.005 | 0.691–0.711 | <0.001 | ||
| Score difference | C-Statistis Analysis | NRI Analysis | ||||
| C-Statistic Difference | Z | p-Value | NRI | 95% CI | p-Value | |
| 0.014 (0.011–0.022) | 4.957 | <0.001 | 0.159 | 0.119–0.196 | 0.001 | |
CI, confidence intervals; HR, hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate (events divided by 100 person/year, %/year); NRI, net reclassification; SE, standard error.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Choi, S.Y.; Kim, M.H.; Kim, H.B.; Kang, S.Y.; Lee, K.M.; Hyun, K.-Y.; Yun, S.-C. RETRACTED: Validation of the CHA2DS2-VA Score (Excluding Female Sex) in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071823
AMA Style
Choi SY, Kim MH, Kim HB, Kang SY, Lee KM, Hyun K-Y, Yun S-C. RETRACTED: Validation of the CHA2DS2-VA Score (Excluding Female Sex) in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(7):1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071823
Chicago/Turabian StyleChoi, Sun Young, Moo Hyun Kim, Hyo Bin Kim, Sa Yul Kang, Kwang Min Lee, Kyung-Yae Hyun, and Sung-Cheol Yun. 2022. "RETRACTED: Validation of the CHA2DS2-VA Score (Excluding Female Sex) in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 7: 1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071823
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
