Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “Chronic HCV Infection: Clinical Advances and Eradication Perspectives”
Next Article in Special Issue
Goal Attainment in an Individually Tailored and Home-Based Intervention in the Chronic Phase after Traumatic Brain Injury
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Early Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
In the Aftermath of Acute Hospitalization for Traumatic Brain Injury: Factors Associated with the Direct Pathway into Specialized Rehabilitation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Refined Analysis of Chronic White Matter Changes after Traumatic Brain Injury and Repeated Sports-Related Concussions: Of Use in Targeted Rehabilitative Approaches?

1
Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
2
Section of Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
3
Rehabilitation and Pain Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
4
PET Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
5
Medical Physics, Uppsala University Hospital, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
6
Division of Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden
7
Affidea CDRC Centre de Diagnostic Radiologique de Carouge SA, Clos de la Fonderie, 1227 Geneva, Switzerland
8
Section of Anesthesiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
9
Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
10
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
11
Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 22184 Lund, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(2), 358; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020358
Submission received: 1 December 2021 / Revised: 3 January 2022 / Accepted: 8 January 2022 / Published: 12 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives in Rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury)

Abstract

:
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) or repeated sport-related concussions (rSRC) may lead to long-term memory impairment. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is helpful to reveal global white matter damage but may underestimate focal abnormalities. We investigated the distribution of post-injury regional white matter changes after TBI and rSRC. Six patients with moderate/severe TBI, and 12 athletes with rSRC were included ≥6 months post-injury, and 10 (age-matched) healthy controls (HC) were analyzed. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status was performed at the time of DTI. Major white matter pathways were tracked using q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction and analyzed for global and regional changes with a controlled false discovery rate. TBI patients displayed multiple classic white matter injuries compared with HC (p < 0.01). At the regional white matter analysis, the left frontal aslant tract, anterior thalamic radiation, and the genu of the corpus callosum displayed focal changes in both groups compared with HC but with different trends. Both TBI and rSRC displayed worse memory performance compared with HC (p < 0.05). While global analysis of DTI-based parameters did not reveal common abnormalities in TBI and rSRC, abnormalities to the fronto-thalamic network were observed in both groups using regional analysis of the white matter pathways. These results may be valuable to tailor individualized rehabilitative approaches for post-injury cognitive impairment in both TBI and rSRC patients.

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects more than 27 million people worldwide every year, often resulting in cognitive and functional deficits, the impairment of daily life functioning, and reduced quality of life [1,2,3,4,5].
Sport-related concussion (SRC), defined as a mild TBI, affects millions of athletes each year [6,7]. While most SRC-induced symptoms resolve within 2–3 weeks, headache, dizziness, confusion, and nausea may be long-lasting. Athletes with persisting symptoms beyond the first three months post-injury are often called the “miserable minority” reflecting a discrepancy into the debate concerning the psychological vs. organic origins of symptoms [8]. In fact, the treatment of these persisting cognitive deficits is challenging, in part since gross structural abnormalities on routine neuroimaging [e.g., structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT)] are rare in repeated SRC (rSRC) compared with moderate and severe TBI [2,3,5,8]. Some of these athletes without traumatic damages visible at the routine morphological MRI sequences are not systematically considered for rehabilitation programs, and the possible long-term consequences of the brain injury are often neglected without a structural visible injury [9,10]. For these athletes, a diagnosis of a mild or major neurocognitive disorder caused by brain injury is commonly used [11], mostly based on the impaired cognitive function only [11,12]. Memory impairment has also often been linked to microstructural damage in the brain, and it affects patients both acutely and chronically after TBI [2,8,13,14].
The use of advanced MRI techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), can, in higher detail, reveal the presence of white matter injury that may cause injury-induced symptoms following TBI and SRC [8,15,16,17]. DTI can both qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrate pathology not detected by other modalities and is, therefore, an important tool not only in the research setting but in the clinical setting as well [18]. Altered DTI-based parameters in the subacute post-injury stage suggests different levels of white matter damage [19,20]. Robust evidence has shown a vulnerability of white matter bundles near the midline, such as the fornix and cingulum, to TBI-induced shearing forces [21,22,23]. Investigations of DTI-based parameters for specific regions such as the corpus callosum (CC), internal capsule (IC), and corona radiata (CR), indicates that baseline fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were associated with executive function and reaction time, respectively [24,25,26]. Other cognitive domains, including memory, may also depend on regional white matter integrity rather than generalized white matter injury [2,4,8,13,18,27,28,29,30]. Since there may be different subtypes of SRC, requiring specific rehabilitative therapies, refined white matter analysis is needed to understand the anatomical basis of the persisting symptoms [31].
Inter-subject differences in the mechanism of injury, as well as other biomechanical factors such as head and body composition, make it highly probable that, despite some commonalities, many areas of injury will differ among both patients and athletes [18,32]. The general interpretation of DTI-based-parameter alteration may therefore suffer these differences at group level, especially if the mean values of FA or MD are analyzed [18]. The further application of individualized assessments of regional brain injury are needed to realize the full potential of DTI as a research and clinical tool. These reasons may explain why, despite the general evidence, DTI is still not integrated in the clinical care of patients with TBI or SRC [9].
This work has two aims: first, to assess whether fiber tract analysis (local/regional) reveals alterations in DTI-based parameters not seen on whole tract analysis (global) nor morphological MRI in patients with TBI or rSRC athletes; second, to assess possible connections between local white matter alterations and long-term cognitive status in both groups.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Cohorts

Six patients were enrolled after a moderate (defined as Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score 9–13, loss of consciousness ≥ 5 min, and/or focal neurologic deficits [33]) to severe (GCS score ≤ 8) TBI and treated at the neuro-critical care unit ≥6 months at the department of neuro-surgery, Uppsala University hospital. Athletes of both sexes with rSRC and ≥6 months duration of post-concussion symptoms, according to the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, were recruited [34,35]. Ten age-matched HCs with no previous TBI, neurological condition, or current or previous active participation in any contact sport were recruited as a control group. The Regional Research Ethics Committee in Uppsala granted permission for the study (Dnr 2015/012). Written informed consent was obtained from all included patients/athletes and HCs. All research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards given in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

2.2. Image Acquisition and Data Processing

High-resolution 3D-T1-weighted- (T1w), 3D-T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR), and susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN) images were acquired for morphological evaluation.
DTI was acquired with a single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence using the following imaging parameters: repetition time = 14,384 ms, echo-time = 78.6 ms, voxel size = 2 × 2 × 2 mm3, 73 slices, b-value = 1000 s/mm2 with 32-directions on a 3.0 Tesla PET/MR-system (Signa PET/MR, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Waukesha, WI, USA). Motion and eddy current correction of acquired DTI data was performed in eddy, FSL (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki; last accessed 11 October 2021) [36]. The diffusion data were reconstructed in MNI space using q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction (QSDR) in DSI studio with a diffusion sampling length ratio of 1.25. The output resolution was 2 mm. Briefly, QSDR is a white-matter-based nonlinear registration approach that directly reconstructs diffusion information in MNI space. As such, parametric images of FA, AD, and RD were calculated in MNI space. Detail information on QSDR can be found in Yeh et al. [37]. The QSDR function also provides a R2-value between subject and MNI diffusion data. A value greater than 0.6 suggests a good registration result. A value greater than 0.6 was reported for all subjects. Major projection, commissural, and association white matter pathways (37 tracts in total) have previously been reconstructed within the HCP-1021 template following the anatomical criteria used for the Brain-Grid DTT reference atlas [38], which were applied to each subject.
Along-tract mapping was performed in DSI Studio. All included white matter pathways were stretched to correspond to straight lines. FA, AD, and RD were sampled along these lines and regressed using a kernel density estimator with default regression bandwidth at 1.0. Each point of these lines corresponds to one coordinate in the tract file generating indices for a given pathway. These were arranged from start to end with a corresponding DTI-based parameter for each given index for each subject.

2.3. Neuropsychology

The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) [39], an objective test to measure neuro-cognitive functions including attention, verbal functions, visuospatial, immediate, and delayed memory, was performed by a trained neuropsychologist at the time of MRI investigation. Here, RBANS was used to estimate the neuro-cognitive burden in TBI and rSRC.

2.4. Data and Statistical Analysis

2.4.1. General White Matter Changes/Damages

The Shapiro–Wilks test was performed on the underlaying data for each analysis to test for normality; parametric or non-parametric statistical methods were chosen accordingly. A Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test to correct for multiple comparisons was used to test whole white matter pathway DTI-bases parameter differences between TBI, rSRC, and HCs for all white matter pathways, respectively. Furthermore, the median and interquartile range was calculated for TBI, rSRC, and HC and for all white matter pathways and DTI-based parameters, respectively. General changes were defined as a whole white matter pathway with significantly decreased total average FA and significantly increased total average AD or RD [19,20]. For all performed statistical analysis, derived p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis and graphic plots were created using GraphPad Prism 9 (v 9.3.1., GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

2.4.2. Focal White Matter Changes/Damages

Focal along-tract analysis was performed using multiple unpaired t-tests comparing each white matter pathway index in TBI vs. HC and rSRC vs. HC for all DTI-based parameters and white matter pathways, respectively. The false discovery rate (FDR) was controlled using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure with Q = 10%. In this regard, the number of false positives is kept below 10% of the number of significant indices. We chose a group of ten sequential significant indices to indicate a significant difference compared to HCs.

2.4.3. Neuropsychological Test

For descriptive analysis, the average and standard deviation (SD) of each subpart of the RBANS index was calculated. A group comparison on each subpart between TBI vs. HCs and rSRC vs. HCs were performed using an unpaired t-test for independent samples for comparison between groups.

3. Results

3.1. Participants

Six TBI patients (four males, two females, mean age 27 ± 7), 12 rSRC athletes (6 males, 6 females, mean age 26 ± 7) and 10 HCs (five males, five females, mean age 26 ± 5) were enrolled. No TBI patient had any known psychiatric or psychological disorder prior to the injury. Four TBI patients had cerebral contusions, and 2 had multiple cerebral microbleeds (CMB) suggesting diffuse axonal injury. Of the TBI patients, four had a good clinical recovery on the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS 5) and two a moderate disability (GOS 4). rSRC athletes had attained a median of 6 sports-related concussions (range 3–10). Concussion symptoms were assessed by the sport concussion assessment tool (SCAT)-3 [40], displaying high symptom severity. Non-specific white matter lesions were found in 2 rSRC athletes. Clinical and radiological data are summarized in Table 1.

3.2. General White Matter Changes/Injuries

Differences in DTI-based parameters were observed in 29 white matter pathways in TBI patients compared to HCs (see Table 2). No rSRC athlete displayed significantly increased AD or RD or significantly decreased FA for any of the included white matter pathways (Table 2). On the other hand, six white matter pathways displayed significant difference in DTI parameters in rSRC compared with HC. The six structures displayed a completely different trend in DTI parameters with a higher FA and lower AD and RD compared with HC (Table 2). The median and interquartile range for all white matter pathways and DTI-based parameters are presented in electronic Supplementary Material Table S1 (ESM1).

3.3. Focal White Matter Changes/Injuries

Three white matter structures displayed regional differences in DTI-based parameters in both groups compared to HCs. The left frontal aslant tract (FAT) displayed lower FA and higher RD in the fronto-opercular region in TBI patients. The same pathway displayed higher FA and lower RD in the supplementary motor area region in rSRC patients. The right anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) displayed lower FA and higher AD and RD in TBI patients localized mostly at the thalamic level. The rSRC group displayed higher FA and lower AD and RD mostly at the thalamic level. The genu of the corpus callosum (CC) showed lower FA, higher AD and RD in the TBI group close to the midline. In the rSRC group, the focal analysis showed higher AD and lower RD close to the midline (Figure 1).

3.4. Neuropsychology

Both TBI patients and rSRC athletes were impaired on the RBANS global outcome analysis compared with HC (TBI: 75 ± 24; rSRC: 80 ± 17; HC: 105.5 ± 2; TBI to HC: p = 0.03 rSRC to HC: p = 0.006). RBANS Memory scores were lower in both TBI, and SRC when compared to HC (p = 0.048 and p = 0.04; respectively). The RBANS Verbal scores were lower in rSRC athletes compared to HC (p = 0.048) although not in TBI (p = 0.07). No significative difference was detected among the groups for the other RBANS functional domains (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

The most important finding in our study was that focal regional differences in white matter pathways were observed at the chronic stage post-injury in both TBI patients and rSRC athletes who had a similar impairment on memory testing in comparison to healthy, age-matched controls (HC). For the development of novel treatments, and for precision rehabilitation, an enhanced understanding of the structural basis of persistent symptoms is crucial [41].
White matter changes, demonstrated by differences in DTI-based parameters, have been previously identified in TBI patients [19,21,25,28,30]. Furthermore, differences in DTI-based parameters are also seen in patients with only minor cognitive impairment and in patients with normal conventional MRI, supporting the role of DTI in detecting subtle injuries missed by other modalities [8,20,25,30,42]. In our study, TBI patients displayed significant changes in DTI-based parameters compared with HC in 29 of the 37 analyzed white matter structures in the global white matter analysis. Using the same analysis interpreting the mean values for each single white matter in rSRC athletes, no white matter pathways displayed global axonal or myelin abnormalities compared with HC. However, a different trend in DTI parameters compared with HC was observed in six white matter pathways compared with HC. It is suggested that different injury mechanisms and levels of energy produced by trauma to cortical and subcortical structures may be explaining factors [15,26,28,30]. This variability leads to a lack of consensus on the interpretation of chronic DTI-based parameters after TBI or rSRC [16,21,23]. In fact, DTI has been demonstrated to be sensitive to a wide range of group differences, although no specific trends have been consistently identified [29,43]. For this reason, we performed post-hoc analyses to investigate specific and focal injuries to white matter pathways. A similar method was previously used to analyze regional white matter changes after radiation therapy in DTI-based parameters [44] and to investigate white matter anomalies in a patient with visual snow syndrome [45]. We found a different level of regional differences in the same white matter networks only partially revealed by the global analysis. Several white matter pathways displayed regionally decreased AD and RD in their midline segments in rSRC, in agreement with previous reports in chronic rSRC [16,46,47,48]. On the other hand, there are conflicting results showing increased AD and RD indicative of damage to axonal fibers or myelin, respectively [43,49]. Plausibly, focal and/or incomplete damage to myelin or axonal fibers may not affect the entire pathway in terms of DTI-based metrics at the chronic stage. Incomplete damage to both myelin and axons in rSRC may induce a myelin repair process with a change in the dominant cell type contributing to the signal, with axonal bundles being replaced by astrocytes and/or microglia [15]. Hence, significantly higher AD and RD and, potentially, lower FA in rSRC patients could be expected at the chronic stage [16,21,42,50]. Animal models showed that neuronal shrinkage can occur in the absence of cell death or perisomatic axotomy [16,51]. Decreased AD and RD post injury may be related to such shrinkage, leading to less surface area along axons for parallel diffusion [16,51].
These data suggest that the time course of physiological recovery extends longer than initially thought in rSRC athletes [17]. In addition, previous inconsistent results matching cognitive outcome and DTI may depend on the different DTI analysis methods used [22,23,24,43,51,52]. Changes in DTI-based parameters may be subtle and difficult to detect due to technical factors (such as the number of DTI directions, the algorithm used for the analysis, normalization process, the technique of tractography, the choice of global or focal indices’ analysis among others) [52,53,54,55]. When the structural injury is focal and/or partially repaired, analysis of regional DTI-based metrics changes should be investigated to identify anatomical and possible links to functional information/dysfunction.
Both TBI patients and rSRC athletes performed significantly worse in the memory domain. This result agrees with other studies demonstrating impaired neuropsychological outcome in TBI patients and rSRC athletes during the subacute/chronic stage [2,4,5,7,20,23,39,56]. In patients with evidence of structural and functional abnormalities after TBI, effective cognitive rehabilitation interventions initiated post TBI enhance the recovery process and minimize the functional disability [57]. In rSRC patients, the persistence of symptoms long beyond the generally accepted time frame for recovery may reflect the development of post-concussion syndrome (PCS) [58,59]. There is, however, no consensus regarding the clinical neuroradiological criteria for PCS and, increasingly, the term persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) is used [60]. Despite persisting symptoms, many of these athletes have normal MRI investigations [59]. The possible evidence of white matter alterations may represent an important factor to consider to plan early education [61], cognitive behavioral therapy [62], and/or aerobic exercise therapy [63], which have been shown to be effective in certain patients with post-concussion syndrome [59]. Moreover, since memory seems the common most affected domain in our two populations, the specific use of external memory aids and computer-assisted strategies may be indicated, since they have also been shown to improve attention, memory, and executive skills after TBI and therefore may be of help in SRC patients with memory impairment [10,64,65,66].
The indication for tailored cognitive rehabilitation based on the affected white matter networks and functional impairment would therefore be necessary to either restore or compensate for memory deficits or other functional impairments commonly debilitating to rSRC patients, as well as for TBI patients [67,68].

4.1. Functional Correlates of Regional White Matter Injuries

We found FAT, ATR, and CC to be among the abnormal white matter pathways due to significant variations in DTI-based parameters, at the regional analysis in both TBI and rSRC athletes. The two groups displayed similar functional outcome and a similar mid-line location for the DTI-based parameters changes at the regional analyses for the ATR and CC. FAT is a key component of a cortico-basal ganglia- thalamic-cerebellar circuit involved in action control [69,70]. In both hemispheres, the FAT plays a role in selecting among competing representations for actions that require the same motor resources (mainly the articulatory apparatus on the left hemisphere and the oculomotor and manual/limb action systems on the right hemisphere) [69,71,72]. Its damage has been related to impairment in speech and language functions, as well as executive functions, visual–motor activities, inhibitory control, working memory, and attention [69,71]. The damage/changes to segments of ATR can also be observed in the midline fluid percussion brain injury, a rodent model of diffuse TBI wherein memory deficits are observed [73]. Electrophysiological evidence suggests a crucial role for ATR connectivity in human memory formation, connecting the anterior and midline thalamic nuclear groups to the frontal lobe [74,75,76,77,78,79]. Commissural white matter pathways such as the genu and splenium of the CC are more vulnerable in their segment close to the midline due to a close relationship with fibrotic structures such as the falx cerebri [28,80,81]. Lesions or regional changes of the CC are known to disable the interhemispheric communication of multiple memory systems and disturb memory function [82,83,84], in particular in long-term verbal memory performance [85,86].
Taken together, these findings suggest that regional differences in the frontal and fronto-thalamic networks (FAT, ATR) may be key contributors to the poor memory performance observed in our study. The additional involvement of the genu of CC, may have resulted in a lack of interhemispheric modulation and resilience leading to a less compensable functional impairment [82,83,84,85,86,87]. Knowledge of the presence of such white matter changes is of importance to individualize treatment strategies [41].

4.2. Limitations

Our study has some limitations. The sample size of the three groups is small, especially the TBI group. Although the groups are thoroughly characterized and matched (age and gender) the injury mechanisms resulting in the TBI or rSRC were heterogeneous. Hence, our results should, therefore, be interpreted with caution. The limited sample size influenced our analysis and some of the variables such as age, gender, and hospitalization time were not included as confounding factors in this article. Since the TBI group is too small and other studies from our group did not identify significant differences among subgroups of rSRC athletes [88], we did not include the other variables in our analysis, which was beyond the aim of this article. We aimed to investigate differences in white matter changes with two different methods and to match the neuropsychological outcome with diffusion changes in the two groups. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to clarify the role of the confounding factors in TBI and rSRC subjects at the chronic phase. We also believe that only longitudinal studies with repeated investigations would minimize the risk of hidden differences between the groups displaying trends for possible recovery. Another limitation is that we cannot exclude that possible comorbidities, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which has been described in TBI patients, might have contributed to the worse performance on memory domain by the TBI group [89]. On the other hand, the similar performance in rSRC athlete, the different background of the TBI patients included in this study and the absence of similar white matter alterations as previously reported may indicate a different reason for the results presented in this article.
To our knowledge, this is the first study applying focal injury analysis to white matter pathways in both TBI patients and rSRC athletes. Hence, another limitation may be linked to our methods with the creation of several small indices for each DTI-based parameter together with the intrinsic sensitivity to noise. We defined regional differences as a minimum of 10 consecutive indices reaching the pre-determined significant levels in comparison to controls at group level in both direction (increased or decreased when compared with healthy controls). We believe the FDR analysis may represent a reliable and solid way to discriminate the effects of confounds through the analysis of voxel’s spatial neighborhood. Another limitation is the possible role of cerebral contusions and CMB on our DTI results. Post-traumatic lesions such as contusions and CMB can be associated with lasting changes in perilesional white matter properties, even remotely from the lesion, and midsagittal CMB have been associated with cognitive decline after TBI [90,91,92]. Since we did not anatomically normalize CMB, an effect on the DTI results cannot be excluded. However, at the time of DTI, neither acquisition nor an expansive effect of the contusions was present, nor was a significant deformation of anatomical structures detected. The quality of the normalization process was carefully assessed before the analysis. In view of the differences in acquisition period and the different trend in AD and RD between TBI and rSRC, a major role for CMB is unlikely. Further studies with more advanced models of white matter investigations are necessary to minimize the effects of confounds and to, in detail, assess network vulnerability in TBI and rSRC.

5. Conclusions

In our study, TBI patients and rSRC athletes displayed different morphological images and different DTI abnormalities at the first level analysis of white matter but shared a similarly impaired memory performance at the chronic stage after injury. DTI analysis detected white matter pathway changes especially in TBI patients but underestimated focal or incomplete abnormalities when the white matter pathway was considered as one entity. At the regional analysis, similar regions of the left FAT, the genu of the CC, and the right ATR displayed different focal changes in both rSRC and TBI patients, reflecting possible differences in trauma and recovery mechanisms. The concomitant presence of white matter findings and the functional impairment observed in both TBI patients and rSRC athletes may suggest a long-term chronic impairment in some subgroups of patients despite the normal standard MRI images. This information seems crucial to better interpret the functional outcome of athletes with rSRC and to tailor individualized rehabilitative plans.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11020358/s1, Table S1: Median with interquartile range for all white matter pathways and DTI-based parametric values.

Author Contributions

Author contributions included conception and study design, F.L., M.F. and N.M.; data collection or acquisition, F.V., S.S., E.-M.L., M.L., Y.T., J.J., A.W., G.A. and N.M.; statistical analysis, M.F.; interpretation of results, F.L., M.F., E.-M.L., S.H. and N.M.; drafting the manuscript work, F.L., M.F. and N.M.; and approval of the final version to be published and agreement to be accountable for the integrity and accuracy of all aspects of the work, All authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Swedish Brain Foundation FO2020-0147, FO2019-0190, FO2018-0166, Swedish Research Council (SRC) 2018-02500_VR, SRC under the framework of EU-ERA-NET NEURON CnsAFlame, Swedish Research Council for Sport Science P2019-0133, P2020-0116, P2021-0105, Bissen Brain Walk and Selander Foundation—all to N.M.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional ethics review board (2015/210/2).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

N.M. and Y.T. are scientific advisors for PolarCool Inc. The other authors have no competing/conflict of interests to declare.

References

  1. GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury, 1990–2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019, 18, 56–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Dikmen, S.S.; Corrigan, J.D.; Levin, H.S.; Machamer, J.; Stiers, W.; Weisskopf, M.G. Cognitive Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009, 24, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sariaslan, A.; Sharp, D.J.; D’Onofrio, B.M.; Larsson, H.; Fazel, S. Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury in Childhood and Adolescence: A Nationwide Swedish Cohort Study of a Wide Range of Medical and Social Outcomes. PLoS Med. 2016, 13, e1002103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Filley, C.M.; Kelly, J.P. White Matter and Cognition in Traumatic Brain Injury. JAD 2018, 65, 345–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marklund, N.; Bellander, B.-M.; Godbolt, A.K.; Levin, H.; McCrory, P.; Thelin, E.P. Treatments and Rehabilitation in the Acute and Chronic State of Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Intern. Med. 2019, 285, 608–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Langlois, J.A.; Rutland-Brown, W.; Wald, M.M. The Epidemiology and Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Brief Overview. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006, 21, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. McKeithan, L.; Hibshman, N.; Yengo-Kahn, A.M.; Solomon, G.S.; Zuckerman, S.L. Sport-Related Concussion: Evaluation, Treatment, and Future Directions. Med. Sci. 2019, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kraus, M.F.; Susmaras, T.; Caughlin, B.P.; Walker, C.J.; Sweeney, J.A.; Little, D.M. White Matter Integrity and Cognition in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study. Brain 2007, 130, 2508–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pavlovic, D.; Pekic, S.; Stojanovic, M.; Popovic, V. Traumatic Brain Injury: Neuropathological, Neurocognitive and Neurobehavioral Sequelae. Pituitary 2019, 22, 270–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Knight, S.; Takagi, M.; Fisher, E.; Anderson, V.; Lannin, N.A.; Tavender, E.; Scheinberg, A. A Systematic Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Children With Moderate or Severe Acquired Brain Injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2019, 100, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wortzel, H.S.; Arciniegas, D.B. The DSM-5 Approach to the Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Neuropsychiatric Sequelae. NeuroRehabilitation 2014, 34, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dwyer, B.; Katz, D.I. Postconcussion Syndrome. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2018, 158, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arenth, P.M.; Russell, K.C.; Scanlon, J.M.; Kessler, L.J.; Ricker, J.H. Corpus Callosum Integrity and Neuropsychological Performance after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014, 29, E1–E10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Raskin, S.A.; Williams, J.; Aiken, E.M. A Review of Prospective Memory in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2018, 32, 891–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Newcombe, V.; Chatfield, D.; Outtrim, J.; Vowler, S.; Manktelow, A.; Cross, J.; Scoffings, D.; Coleman, M.; Hutchinson, P.; Coles, J.; et al. Mapping Traumatic Axonal Injury Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Correlations with Functional Outcome. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lancaster, M.A.; Meier, T.B.; Olson, D.V.; McCrea, M.A.; Nelson, L.D.; Muftuler, L.T. Chronic Differences in White Matter Integrity Following Sport-Related Concussion as Measured by Diffusion MRI: 6-Month Follow-Up. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018, 39, 4276–4289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mohammadian, M.; Roine, T.; Hirvonen, J.; Kurki, T.; Posti, J.P.; Katila, A.J.; Takala, R.S.K.; Tallus, J.; Maanpää, H.-R.; Frantzén, J.; et al. Alterations in Microstructure and Local Fiber Orientation of White Matter Are Associated with Outcome after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2020, 37, 2616–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hulkower, M.B.; Poliak, D.B.; Rosenbaum, S.B.; Zimmerman, M.E.; Lipton, M.L. A Decade of DTI in Traumatic Brain Injury: 10 Years and 100 Articles Later. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2013, 34, 2064–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Shenton, M.E.; Hamoda, H.M.; Schneiderman, J.S.; Bouix, S.; Pasternak, O.; Rathi, Y.; Vu, M.-A.; Purohit, M.P.; Helmer, K.; Koerte, I.; et al. A Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Findings in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012, 6, 137–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Veeramuthu, V.; Narayanan, V.; Kuo, T.L.; Delano-Wood, L.; Chinna, K.; Bondi, M.W.; Waran, V.; Ganesan, D.; Ramli, N. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Correlation with Early Neuropsychological Impairment: A Longitudinal Study. J. Neurotrauma 2015, 32, 1497–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aoki, Y.; Inokuchi, R.; Gunshin, M.; Yahagi, N.; Suwa, H. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2012, 83, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, J.; Wei, R.-L.; Peng, G.-P.; Zhou, J.-J.; Wu, M.; He, F.-P.; Pan, G.; Gao, J.; Luo, B.-Y. Correlations between Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Levels of Consciousness in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, J.; Tian, L.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, R.; Wei, R.; He, F.; Li, J.; Luo, B.; Ye, X. Relationship between White Matter Integrity and Post-Traumatic Cognitive Deficits: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2019, 90, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. de la Plata, C.D.M.; Yang, F.G.; Wang, J.Y.; Krishnan, K.; Bakhadirov, K.; Paliotta, C.; Aslan, S.; Devous, M.D.; Moore, C.; Harper, C.; et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Biomarkers for Traumatic Axonal Injury: Analysis of Three Analytic Methods. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2011, 17, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Moen, K.G.; Vik, A.; Olsen, A.; Skandsen, T.; Håberg, A.K.; Evensen, K.A.I.; Eikenes, L. Traumatic Axonal Injury: Relationships between Lesions in the Early Phase and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in the Chronic Phase of Traumatic Brain Injury: Traumatic Axonal Injury Lesions in Chronic TBI. J. Neurosci. Res. 2016, 94, 623–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hashim, E.; Caverzasi, E.; Papinutto, N.; Lewis, C.E.; Jing, R.; Charles, O.; Zhang, S.; Lin, A.; Graham, S.J.; Schweizer, T.A.; et al. Investigating Microstructural Abnormalities and Neurocognition in Sub-Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Normal-Appearing White Matter: A Preliminary Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Maller, J.J.; Thomson, R.H.S.; Lewis, P.M.; Rose, S.E.; Pannek, K.; Fitzgerald, P.B. Traumatic Brain Injury, Major Depression, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Making Connections. Brain Res. Rev. 2010, 64, 213–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Zappalà, G.; de Schotten, M.T.; Eslinger, P.J. Traumatic Brain Injury and the Frontal Lobes: What Can We Gain with Diffusion Tensor Imaging? Cortex 2012, 48, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Asken, B.M.; DeKosky, S.T.; Clugston, J.R.; Jaffee, M.S.; Bauer, R.M. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Findings in Adult Civilian, Military, and Sport-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI): A Systematic Critical Review. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018, 12, 585–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Castaño Leon, A.M.; Cicuendez, M.; Navarro, B.; Munarriz, P.M.; Cepeda, S.; Paredes, I.; Hilario, A.; Ramos, A.; Gómez, P.A.; Lagares, A. What Can Be Learned from Diffusion Tensor Imaging from a Large Traumatic Brain Injury Cohort?: White Matter Integrity and Its Relationship with Outcome. J. Neurotrauma 2018, 35, 2365–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Makdissi, M.; Schneider, K.J.; Feddermann-Demont, N.; Guskiewicz, K.M.; Hinds, S.; Leddy, J.J.; McCrea, M.; Turner, M.; Johnston, K.M. Approach to Investigation and Treatment of Persistent Symptoms Following Sport-Related Concussion: A Systematic Review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2017, 51, 958–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ware, J.B.; Hart, T.; Whyte, J.; Rabinowitz, A.; Detre, J.A.; Kim, J. Inter-Subject Variability of Axonal Injury in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2017, 34, 2243–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ingebrigtsen, T.; Romner, B.; Kock-Jensen, C. Scandinavian Guidelines for Initial Management of Minimal, Mild, and Moderate Head Injuries. The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee. J. Trauma 2000, 48, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Guze, S.B. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed. (DSM-IV). AJP 1995, 152, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. McIntyre, M.; Amiri, M.; Kumbhare, D. Postconcussion Syndrome: A Diagnosis of Past Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2021, 100, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Andersson, J.L.R.; Sotiropoulos, S.N. An Integrated Approach to Correction for Off-Resonance Effects and Subject Movement in Diffusion MR Imaging. Neuroimage 2016, 125, 1063–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yeh, F.-C.; Tseng, W.-Y.I. NTU-90: A High Angular Resolution Brain Atlas Constructed by q-Space Diffeomorphic Reconstruction. Neuroimage 2011, 58, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Latini, F.; Fahlström, M.; Berntsson, S.G.; Larsson, E.-M.; Smits, A.; Ryttlefors, M. A Novel Radiological Classification System for Cerebral Gliomas: The Brain-Grid. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. McKay, C.; Casey, J.E.; Wertheimer, J.; Fichtenberg, N.L. Reliability and Validity of the RBANS in a Traumatic Brain Injured Sample. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2007, 22, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Yengo-Kahn, A.M.; Hale, A.T.; Zalneraitis, B.H.; Zuckerman, S.L.; Sills, A.K.; Solomon, G.S. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool: A Systematic Review. Neurosurg. Focus 2016, 40, E6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Iverson, G.L. Network Analysis and Precision Rehabilitation for the Post-Concussion Syndrome. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bazarian, J.J.; Zhong, J.; Blyth, B.; Zhu, T.; Kavcic, V.; Peterson, D. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Detects Clinically Important Axonal Damage after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study. J. Neurotrauma 2007, 24, 1447–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Winklewski, P.J.; Sabisz, A.; Naumczyk, P.; Jodzio, K.; Szurowska, E.; Szarmach, A. Understanding the Physiopathology Behind Axial and Radial Diffusivity Changes—What Do We Know? Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Houri, J.; Karunamuni, R.; Connor, M.; Pettersson, N.; McDonald, C.; Farid, N.; White, N.; Dale, A.; Hattangadi-Gluth, J.A.; Moiseenko, V. Analyses of Regional Radiosensitivity of White Matter Structures along Tract Axes Using Novel White Matter Segmentation and Diffusion Imaging Biomarkers. Phys. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2018, 6, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Latini, F.; Fahlström, M.; Marklund, N.; Feresiadou, A. White Matter Abnormalities in a Patient with Visual Snow Syndrome: New Evidence from a Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 2789–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chamard, E.; Lefebvre, G.; Lassonde, M.; Theoret, H. Long-Term Abnormalities in the Corpus Callosum of Female Concussed Athletes. J. Neurotrauma 2016, 33, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Henry, L.C.; Tremblay, J.; Tremblay, S.; Lee, A.; Brun, C.; Lepore, N.; Theoret, H.; Ellemberg, D.; Lassonde, M. Acute and Chronic Changes in Diffusivity Measures after Sports Concussion. J. Neurotrauma 2011, 28, 2049–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Meier, T.B.; Bergamino, M.; Bellgowan, P.S.F.; Teague, T.K.; Ling, J.M.; Jeromin, A.; Mayer, A.R. Longitudinal Assessment of White Matter Abnormalities Following Sports-Related Concussion. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016, 37, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wheeler-Kingshott, C.A.M.; Cercignani, M. About “Axial” and “Radial” Diffusivities. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009, 61, 1255–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Song, S.-K.; Yoshino, J.; Le, T.Q.; Lin, S.-J.; Sun, S.-W.; Cross, A.H.; Armstrong, R.C. Demyelination Increases Radial Diffusivity in Corpus Callosum of Mouse Brain. Neuroimage 2005, 26, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Singleton, R.H.; Zhu, J.; Stone, J.R.; Povlishock, J.T. Traumatically Induced Axotomy Adjacent to the Soma Does Not Result in Acute Neuronal Death. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 791–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Farquharson, S.; Tournier, J.-D.; Calamante, F.; Fabinyi, G.; Schneider-Kolsky, M.; Jackson, G.D.; Connelly, A. White Matter Fiber Tractography: Why We Need to Move beyond DTI. J. Neurosurg. 2013, 118, 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Vos, S.B.; Jones, D.K.; Viergever, M.A.; Leemans, A. Partial Volume Effect as a Hidden Covariate in DTI Analyses. Neuroimage 2011, 55, 1566–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gardner, A.; Kay-Lambkin, F.; Stanwell, P.; Donnelly, J.; Williams, W.H.; Hiles, A.; Schofield, P.; Levi, C.; Jones, D.K. A Systematic Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Findings in Sports-Related Concussion. J. Neurotrauma 2012, 29, 2521–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Feigl, G.C.; Hiergeist, W.; Fellner, C.; Schebesch, K.-M.M.; Doenitz, C.; Finkenzeller, T.; Brawanski, A.; Schlaier, J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diffusion Tensor Tractography: Evaluation of Anatomic Accuracy of Different Fiber Tracking Software Packages. World Neurosurg. 2014, 81, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Manley, G.; Gardner, A.J.; Schneider, K.J.; Guskiewicz, K.M.; Bailes, J.; Cantu, R.C.; Castellani, R.J.; Turner, M.; Jordan, B.D.; Randolph, C.; et al. A Systematic Review of Potential Long-Term Effects of Sport-Related Concussion. Br. J. Sports Med. 2017, 51, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rees, L.; Marshall, S.; Hartridge, C.; Mackie, D.; Weiser, M. Erabi Group Cognitive Interventions Post Acquired Brain Injury. Brain Inj. 2007, 21, 161–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Willer, B.; Leddy, J.J. Management of Concussion and Post-Concussion Syndrome. Curr. Treat Options Neurol. 2006, 8, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Leddy, J.J.; Sandhu, H.; Sodhi, V.; Baker, J.G.; Willer, B. Rehabilitation of Concussion and Post-Concussion Syndrome. Sports Health 2012, 4, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Rickards, T.A.; Cranston, C.C.; McWhorter, J. Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms: A Model of Predisposing, Precipitating, and Perpetuating Factors. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mittenberg, W.; Canyock, E.M.; Condit, D.; Patton, C. Treatment of Post-Concussion Syndrome Following Mild Head Injury. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2001, 23, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Al Sayegh, A.; Sandford, D.; Carson, A.J. Psychological Approaches to Treatment of Postconcussion Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2010, 81, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Leddy, J.J.; Kozlowski, K.; Donnelly, J.P.; Pendergast, D.R.; Epstein, L.H.; Willer, B. A Preliminary Study of Subsymptom Threshold Exercise Training for Refractory Post-Concussion Syndrome. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2010, 20, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Bergquist, T.; Gehl, C.; Mandrekar, J.; Lepore, S.; Hanna, S.; Osten, A.; Beaulieu, W. The Effect of Internet-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation in Persons with Memory Impairments after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Inj. 2009, 23, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, S.H.; Thomas, J.D.; Glueckauf, R.L.; Bracy, O.L. The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Cognitive Rehabilitation for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Inj. 1997, 11, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tam, S.-F.; Man, W.-K. Evaluating Computer-Assisted Memory Retraining Programmes for People with Post-Head Injury Amnesia. Brain Inj. 2004, 18, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Iaccarino, M.A.; Bhatnagar, S.; Zafonte, R. Rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2015, 127, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Barman, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Bhide, R. Cognitive Impairment and Rehabilitation Strategies After Traumatic Brain Injury. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 2016, 38, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Dick, A.S.; Garic, D.; Graziano, P.; Tremblay, P. The Frontal Aslant Tract (FAT) and Its Role in Speech, Language and Executive Function. Cortex 2019, 111, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vergani, F.; Lacerda, L.; Martino, J.; Attems, J.; Morris, C.; Mitchell, P.; de Schotten, M.T.; Dell’Acqua, F. White Matter Connections of the Supplementary Motor Area in Humans. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2014, 85, 1377–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. La Corte, E.; Eldahaby, D.; Greco, E.; Aquino, D.; Bertolini, G.; Levi, V.; Ottenhausen, M.; Demichelis, G.; Romito, L.M.; Acerbi, F.; et al. The Frontal Aslant Tract: A Systematic Review for Neurosurgical Applications. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Baker, C.M.; Burks, J.D.; Briggs, R.G.; Smitherman, A.D.; Glenn, C.A.; Conner, A.K.; Wu, D.H.; Sughrue, M.E. The Crossed Frontal Aslant Tract: A Possible Pathway Involved in the Recovery of Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome. Brain Behav. 2018, 8, e00926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lifshitz, J.; Rowe, R.K.; Griffiths, D.R.; Evilsizor, M.N.; Thomas, T.C.; Adelson, P.D.; McIntosh, T.K. Clinical Relevance of Midline Fluid Percussion Brain Injury: Acute Deficits, Chronic Morbidities, and the Utility of Biomarkers. Brain Inj. 2016, 30, 1293–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Aggleton, J.P.; Brown, M.W. Episodic Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal-Anterior Thalamic Axis. Behav. Brain Sci. 1999, 22, 425–444; discussion 444–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sweeney-Reed, C.M.; Zaehle, T.; Voges, J.; Schmitt, F.C.; Buentjen, L.; Kopitzki, K.; Esslinger, C.; Hinrichs, H.; Heinze, H.-J.; Knight, R.T.; et al. Corticothalamic Phase Synchrony and Cross-Frequency Coupling Predict Human Memory Formation. Elife 2014, 3, e05352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sweeney-Reed, C.M.; Zaehle, T.; Voges, J.; Schmitt, F.C.; Buentjen, L.; Kopitzki, K.; Hinrichs, H.; Heinze, H.-J.; Rugg, M.D.; Knight, R.T.; et al. Thalamic Theta Phase Alignment Predicts Human Memory Formation and Anterior Thalamic Cross-Frequency Coupling. Elife 2015, 4, e07578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. de Bourbon-Teles, J.; Bentley, P.; Koshino, S.; Shah, K.; Dutta, A.; Malhotra, P.; Egner, T.; Husain, M.; Soto, D. Thalamic Control of Human Attention Driven by Memory and Learning. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 993–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Carrera, E.; Bogousslavsky, J. The Thalamus and Behavior: Effects of Anatomically Distinct Strokes. Neurology 2006, 66, 1817–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Nishio, Y.; Hashimoto, M.; Ishii, K.; Ito, D.; Mugikura, S.; Takahashi, S.; Mori, E. Multiple Thalamo-Cortical Disconnections in Anterior Thalamic Infarction: Implications for Thalamic Mechanisms of Memory and Language. Neuropsychologia 2014, 53, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bigler, E.D. The Lesion(s) in Traumatic Brain Injury: Implications for Clinical Neuropsychology. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2001, 16, 95–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Ok, B.S.; Lyong, K.O.; Ho, K.S.; Soo, K.M.; Min, S.S.; Woo, C.Y.; Mok, B.W.; Ho, J.S. Relation between Cingulum Injury and Cognition in Chronic Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury; Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study. NeuroRehabilitation 2013, 33, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gazzaniga, M.S. Cerebral Specialization and Interhemispheric CommunicationDoes the Corpus Callosum Enable the Human Condition? Brain 2000, 123, 1293–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Glickstein, M.; Berlucchi, G. Classical Disconnection Studies of the Corpus Callosum. Cortex 2008, 44, 914–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Schulte, T.; Müller-Oehring, E.M. Contribution of Callosal Connections to the Interhemispheric Integration of Visuomotor and Cognitive Processes. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2010, 20, 174–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Yaldizli, Ö.; Penner, I.-K.; Frontzek, K.; Naegelin, Y.; Amann, M.; Papadopoulou, A.; Sprenger, T.; Kuhle, J.; Calabrese, P.; Radü, E.W.; et al. The Relationship between Total and Regional Corpus Callosum Atrophy, Cognitive Impairment and Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Mult. Scler. 2014, 20, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. McDonald, S.; Rushby, J.A.; Dalton, K.I.; Allen, S.K.; Parks, N. The Role of Abnormalities in the Corpus Callosum in Social Cognition Deficits after Traumatic Brain Injury. Soc. Neurosci. 2018, 13, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. van der Knaap, L.J.; van der Ham, I.J.M. How Does the Corpus Callosum Mediate Interhemispheric Transfer? A Review. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 223, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Marklund, N.; Vedung, F.; Lubberink, M.; Tegner, Y.; Johansson, J.; Blennow, K.; Zetterberg, H.; Fahlström, M.; Haller, S.; Stenson, S.; et al. Tau Aggregation and Increased Neuroinflammation in Athletes after Sports-Related Concussions and in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients—A PET/MR Study. Neuroimage Clin. 2021, 30, 102665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mohamed, A.Z.; Cumming, P.; Nasrallah, F.A. White Matter Alterations Are Associated With Cognitive Dysfunction Decades After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and/or Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 2021, 6, 1100–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Andreasen, S.; Andersen, K.; Conde, V.; Dyrby, T.; Puonti, O.; Kammersgaard, L.; Madsen, C.; Madsen, K.; Poulsen, I.; Siebner, H. Limited Colocalization of Microbleeds and Microstructural Changes After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31588844/?from_single_result=limited+colocalization%2C+Andreasen+S&expanded_search_query=limited+colocalization%2C+Andreasen+S (accessed on 23 May 2020).
  91. Haller, S.; Vernooij, M.W.; Kuijer, J.P.A.; Larsson, E.-M.; Jäger, H.R.; Barkhof, F. Cerebral Microbleeds: Imaging and Clinical Significance. Radiology 2018, 287, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Rostowsky, K.A.; Maher, A.S.; Irimia, A. Macroscale White Matter Alterations Due to Traumatic Cerebral Microhemorrhages Are Revealed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Focal analysis of three white matter pathways with white matter changes identified in both TBI patients and in rSRC patients compared with HC. False discovery rate (FDR) analysis was performed, as such significant differences are displayed as continuous lines on the x axis of each DTI-based parameter for each white matter pathway. The left frontal aslant tract (FAT) displayed lower FA and higher RD in the fronto-opercular region in TBI patients, while a higher FA and lower RD in the supplementary motor area region were found in the rSRC group. The right anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) displayed lower FA and higher AD and RD in the TBI group localized mostly at the thalamic level, while the rSRC group displayed higher FA and lower AD and RD mostly at the thalamic level. The genu of the corpus callosum (CC) showed lower FA and higher AD and RD in the TBI group close to the midline, while the rSRC group displayed a higher AD and lower RD close to the midline. TBI: traumatic brain injuries; rSRC: repeated sport related concussions; HC: healthy controls; AD: axial diffusivity; RD: radial diffusivity; FAT: frontal aslant tract; ATR: anterior thalamic radiation; CC: corpus callosum.
Figure 1. Focal analysis of three white matter pathways with white matter changes identified in both TBI patients and in rSRC patients compared with HC. False discovery rate (FDR) analysis was performed, as such significant differences are displayed as continuous lines on the x axis of each DTI-based parameter for each white matter pathway. The left frontal aslant tract (FAT) displayed lower FA and higher RD in the fronto-opercular region in TBI patients, while a higher FA and lower RD in the supplementary motor area region were found in the rSRC group. The right anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) displayed lower FA and higher AD and RD in the TBI group localized mostly at the thalamic level, while the rSRC group displayed higher FA and lower AD and RD mostly at the thalamic level. The genu of the corpus callosum (CC) showed lower FA and higher AD and RD in the TBI group close to the midline, while the rSRC group displayed a higher AD and lower RD close to the midline. TBI: traumatic brain injuries; rSRC: repeated sport related concussions; HC: healthy controls; AD: axial diffusivity; RD: radial diffusivity; FAT: frontal aslant tract; ATR: anterior thalamic radiation; CC: corpus callosum.
Jcm 11 00358 g001
Figure 2. Each domain of RBANS is shown for TBI, rSRC, and HC. Significant differences in RBANS Memory score were detected between HC and TBI patients, as well as rSRC athletes. For the other domains of the RBANS, there were no significant differences among the groups. TBI: traumatic brain injuries; rSRC: repeated sport-related concussions; HC: healthy controls; RBANS: repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. * Statistical significance with p value < 0.05.
Figure 2. Each domain of RBANS is shown for TBI, rSRC, and HC. Significant differences in RBANS Memory score were detected between HC and TBI patients, as well as rSRC athletes. For the other domains of the RBANS, there were no significant differences among the groups. TBI: traumatic brain injuries; rSRC: repeated sport-related concussions; HC: healthy controls; RBANS: repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. * Statistical significance with p value < 0.05.
Jcm 11 00358 g002
Table 1. Summary of the clinical and radiological data of the three groups.
Table 1. Summary of the clinical and radiological data of the three groups.
Clinical/Radiological FactorsGroups
TBISRCHC
Number of patients61210
Age-mean (SD)27 (7)26 (7)26 (5)
Gender-M/F4/26/65/5
Concussions-no (range)-6 (3–10)-
Contusions-no4--
DAI-no2--
Time since last TBI or SRC (months)19 (8)23 (6–132)-
Length of Hospital stay (days)17 (9)--
Injury Mechanisms
Fall3--
Motor vehicle accident3--
Sports-related-12-
Neurologic status
GCS at admission (range)12 (5–14)--
GCS at discharge (range)14 (8–15)--
GOS at the time of MRI (n of pts)5 (4), 4(2)--
Symptoms (SCAT)
SSS (range)-48.5 (3–91)-
NOS (range)-18 (2–22)-
In athletes, concussion symptoms were assessed by the sport concussion assessment tool (SCAT). The symptom evaluation score lists 22 symptoms with a severity range of 0–6, and the symptom severity score (SSS) is the sum of all symptom scorings (range 0–132). The number of symptoms (NOS) is the sum of each symptom with a severity score between 1 and 6 (range 0–22). TBI: Traumatic brain injury, SRC: Sport-related concussions, and HI: healthy controls. DAI = diffuse axonal injury; GCS = Glasgow coma scale SCAT = sports concussion assessment tool; SSS = symptom severity score; NOS = number of symptoms; GOS: Glasgow outcome scale; non-parametric data (number of SRCs, time since last SRC, SSS, NOS, GCS) is presented as medians and range, and parametric data (age, time since TBI and length of hospital stay) is presented as means ± standard deviations (SD).
Table 2. Analysis of global white matter damage.
Table 2. Analysis of global white matter damage.
White Matter StructureADFARDInjured
TBI vs. HCSRC vs. HCTBI vs. HCSRC vs. HCTBI vs. HCSRC vs. HCTBISRC
AC<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001YN
AF L<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.4062<0.0001NN
AF R0.0006>0.99990.06030.68010.00020.3323YN
Internal capsule
Anterior L
<0.00010.8410<0.00010.0226<0.00010.5070YN
Internal capsule
Anterior R
<0.00010.23870.0416<0.0001<0.0001>0.9999YN
FAT L0.0007>0.99990.0125>0.9999<0.0001>0.9999YN
FAT R0.0178>0.99990.01490.62670.00060.2962YN
ATR L<0.00010.1121<0.00010.0588<0.00010.5310YN
ATR R<0.0001>0.9999<0.00010.6583<0.00010.2591YN
Ci L0.17090.0003<0.00010.2943<0.00010.0295NN
Ci R<0.0001<0.00010.00060.0026<0.00010.0017YN
CS L<0.00010.14220.0006>0.9999<0.0001>0.9999YN
CS R<0.0001>0.99990.03220.8871<0.0001>0.9999YN
External capsule L<0.00010.84490.03740.0980<0.00010.5370YN
External capsule R<0.0001>0.99990.0410>0.9999<0.00010.6081YN
FM <0.00010.47710.00060.0028<0.0001<0.0001YN
Fo L<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.0011<0.00010.0001YN
Fo R<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001YN
Genu CC0.0019>0.9999<0.00010.3754<0.00010.0060YN
hSLF L<0.00010.57330.00020.8185<0.00010.8285YN
hSLF R<0.0001>0.99990.00050.7111<0.0001>0.9999YN
IFOF L<0.00010.30860.00360.0009<0.00010.1810YN
IFOF R<0.0001>0.99990.2301>0.9999<0.00010.7752YN
ILF L0.01160.33160.0157>0.9999<0.0001>0.9999YN
ILF R<0.0001>0.99990.0140>0.9999<0.00010.6816YN
MLF L0.18900.02260.28410.0774<0.00010.3796NN
MLF R0.5220>0.99990.00110.0105<0.0001<0.0001NN
OR L<0.00010.64110.02070.5038<0.0001>0.9999YN
OR R<0.0001>0.9999>0.9999>0.9999<0.00010.8799NN
Internal capsule
posterior L
<0.00010.0622<0.0001>0.9999<0.0001>0.9999YN
Internal capsule
posterior R
<0.0001>0.99990.01440.8507<0.0001>0.9999YN
UF L<0.00010.33530.10330.0110<0.00010.0007YN
UF R0.12620.41690.07290.72280.00220.0070NN
VO L0.5318>0.99990.0022>0.9999<0.0001>0.9999NN
VO R0.41490.16430.12070.01060.02400.3355NN
vSLF L0.00270.00810.2355>0.99990.0249>0.9999YN
vSLF R<0.00010.01050.00120.5643<0.00010.5110YN
Adjusted p-values are presented for each comparison between traumatic brain injury (TBI), healthy controls (HC), and repeated sport-related concussions (rSRC) and HC including, all DTI-based metrics and white matter pathways. Values in red emphasize results wherein the axial diffusivity (AD) or radial diffusivity (RD) values are increased in comparison to HC, defining the criteria for white matter pathway injury. Values in green emphasize results wherein AD or RD decreases, which is contradictory to the theory presented. Y: yes (injured), N: not injured, L: left, R: right; AC: anterior commissure; AF: arcuate fasciculus; FAT: frontal aslant tract; ATR: anterior thalamic radiation; Ci: cingulum; CS: cortico-spinal tract; FM: forceps major; Fo: fornix; CC: corpus callosum; hSLF: horizontal component of superior longitudinal fasciculus; IFOF: inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ILF: inferior longitudinal fasciculus; MLF: middle longitudinal fasciculus; OR: optic radiation; UF: uncinate fasciculus; VO: vertical occipital fasciculus; vSLF: vertical component of superior longitudinal fasciculus.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Latini, F.; Fahlström, M.; Vedung, F.; Stensson, S.; Larsson, E.-M.; Lubberink, M.; Tegner, Y.; Haller, S.; Johansson, J.; Wall, A.; et al. Refined Analysis of Chronic White Matter Changes after Traumatic Brain Injury and Repeated Sports-Related Concussions: Of Use in Targeted Rehabilitative Approaches? J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020358

AMA Style

Latini F, Fahlström M, Vedung F, Stensson S, Larsson E-M, Lubberink M, Tegner Y, Haller S, Johansson J, Wall A, et al. Refined Analysis of Chronic White Matter Changes after Traumatic Brain Injury and Repeated Sports-Related Concussions: Of Use in Targeted Rehabilitative Approaches? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(2):358. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Latini, Francesco, Markus Fahlström, Fredrik Vedung, Staffan Stensson, Elna-Marie Larsson, Mark Lubberink, Yelverton Tegner, Sven Haller, Jakob Johansson, Anders Wall, and et al. 2022. "Refined Analysis of Chronic White Matter Changes after Traumatic Brain Injury and Repeated Sports-Related Concussions: Of Use in Targeted Rehabilitative Approaches?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 2: 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020358

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop